20130843 Ver 1_401 Application_20130813

SAIC.
August 7, 2013
20130843
Accession # 6818 20130529 001
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality VUG
�� Raleigh Regional Office j� 1628 Mail Service Center U Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 �� 2013
Attention: Ms. Cherri Smith , wwa
Reference: PCN Submittal for Bank Stabilization
1305 Highway 70 West, Garner, Wake County, NC
Texaco #0322 —1305 Highway 70 West
Chevron Facility No. 211977
Dear Ms. Smith:
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is pleased to provide you with the
enclosed Pre - Construction Notification for proposed bank stabilization activities for the
referenced site on behalf of Chevron Environmental Management Company (Chevron).
Please feel free to contact me at 770 - 452 -5836 or okeeferasaic.com with any questions
or comments; technical questions can be directed to Monica Stillman of SAIC at 802-
366 -9130 or stillmanm @saic.com.
Sincerely,
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
... ......
Richard O'Keefe, P.G. AUG - 9 2013
Project Manager
cc: Martin Ocampo, Chevron
Rakesh Kumar
Jim Barnwell, Huffman Oil
211977 Project File
Science Applications International Corporation
35 Vanden Dr., Suite F, Aiken, SC 29803 - (803) 643 -2901- Fax: [phone]

Chevron EMC
Proposed Bank Stabilization
1305 US Highway 70, Garner, NC
&M&IIED
O'n 11
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Submittal to North Carolina Division of Water Quality
This submittal is to fulfill the requirements of the Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) for activities
regulated by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). The proposed project will include a discharge of fill material into waters of the U.S. regulated
under Section 404 (USACE) and Section 401 (DWQ) of the Clean Water Act. The proposed project will
also require Buffer Authorization from DWQ for construction activities in state - regulated riparian buffers
in the Neuse River Basin (15A NCAC 02B. 0233).
The proposed project consists of restoring functional channel conditions to an erosional scour hole that
has developed at the discharge location of the existing culvert that directs flow in Echo Branch from
under US Highway 70. The project will restore the pre- existing channel configuration and stabilize the
channel and banks appropriately to prevent recurrence of erosion. As described in this submittal, the
work meets the criteria for USACE Nationwide Permit (NWP) 13 for bank stabilization activities and does
not require submittal of the PCN to USACE because:
• No fill will be placed in wetlands;
• Fill will constitute no more than an average of 1 cubic yard of fill per linear foot of project;
• The project length is no more than 500 linear feet; and
• Riprap to be placed in the stream bed will be placed to restore the pre- existing stream bed
elevation and no higher (in accordance with USACE's regional conditions on NWP 13).
The project site is located at 1305 US Highway 70, Garner, North Carolina. Jurisdictional areas to be
affected by the project consist of the intermittent stream channel named Echo Branch. Pursuant to
USACE and NC DWQ site inspections in 2008, Echo Branch is regulated under Section 404 to the ordinary
high water (OHW) elevation; there are no wetlands on site. This was confirmed with a written
Approved Determination from USACE in 2008 following a site inspection by USACE staff (dated
8/29/2008, copy attached). Echo Branch is also subject to the Neuse River Basin buffer requirements
because it appears on the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil survey. This was
confirmed by DWQ staff in 2008 (documentation attached).
Because the federal and state jurisdictional determinations for the site are five years old, site conditions
were re- evaluated with a site inspection conducted by Science Applications International Corporation
(SAIC) on May 22, 2013. Findings indicate that while it is likely that the limits of OHW have changed
some since 2008 due to channel erosion, general site conditions are the same as they were in 2008 in
terms of channel location. No wetlands or riffle and pool complexes were observed on the property
during the May 22, 2013, site inspection. Following the site inspection, a survey was conducted to
provide detailed topography in the areas affected by erosion, delineate the current OHW elevation, and
map the Zone 1 and Zone 2 regulated buffers.
FPD---j@[§ObE
AUG - 9 2013

The OHW elevation in the project area was determined during a June, 2013, site survey based on the
algae line on a collapsed piece of concrete swale at the end of the remaining concrete sluice section and
further downstream in the channel by evidence of active channel sediment transport processes
(indicated by sand and pebble channel deposits and by silt deposits on the vegetation along the base of
the bank).
The project design meets the requirements specified in the NWP conditions and the Neuse River Basin
Buffer Regulations including the following:
• There are no practical alternatives to correct the existing channel erosion and prevent
downstream impacts from sedimentation and turbidity;
• Filter cloth is incorporated to prevent scour behind /under riprap;
• Material has been sized and configured correctly to withstand expected high flows;
• The design consists of the minimum material needed to resolve erosion at the site and protect
habitat conditions and water quality downstream;
• The design includes a construction water handling plan and best management practices (BMPs)
that will prevent adverse impacts downstream from sedimentation and erosion during
construction; and
• The proposed buffer restoration plan will restore and maintain existing buffer functions
including providing stable channel banks, protecting the channel from non -point source
pollutants, moderating stream temperature, and providing habitat.
The following Attachments are included as part of the PCN submittal:
PCN Form
Attachment A. Supplemental Information for PCN Form
Attachment B. Copies of 2008 USACE and DWQJD /Site Visit Information
Attachment C. Engineering Drawings of the Proposed Project
Attachment D. Site Photographs

`O�ot 10ATF,\\
>Gar
C � T
Office Use Only-
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
© Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
© Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
© 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express Q Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
© Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes Q No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes © No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Bank Stabilization 1305 U.S. Highway 70 West, Garner, NC
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Gamer, NC
2d. Subdivision name:
Not applicable.
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
Not applicable.
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
J &S Petro, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Deed 13019, Page No. 2050
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Rakesh Kumar
3d. Street address:
3802 Cumberland Pond Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
3f. Telephone no.:
918 -833 -7714
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Chevron EMC
4b. Name:
Martin Ocampo
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Chevron EMC
4d. Street address:
4800 Foumace Place
4e. City, state, zip:
Bellaire, TX 77401
4f. Telephone no.:
713 -432 -3228
4g. Fax no.:
N/A
4h. Email address:
OcampoM @Chevron.com
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Richard O'Keefe
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
SAIC
5c. Street address:
35 Varden Drive, Suite F
5d. City, state, zip:
Aiken, SC 29803
5e. Telephone no.:
803-643 -2901
5f. Fax no.:
803 -644 -8144
5g. Email address:
okeefer @saic.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN 1701 -67 -5103
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.720002 Longitude: -78.641188
1c. Property size:
1.06 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Swift Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C (Aquatic Life, Secondary Recreation); NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin, Swift Creek Subbasin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site consists of densely developed land bordering U.S. Highway 70. The site consists primarily of pavement, buildings, and mowed grass.
There is a narrow strip of hardwood forested land (15 to 35 ft wide) along the south/southeastern property boundary; this extends approx. 200 ft south
to dense residential development along Vesta Drive. U.S. Highway 70 and 401 corridors in the vicinity have dense commerciaUndustrial development
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 60
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To restore pre - existing channel conditions by filling/stabilizing a scour hole and eroding banks at the culvert discharge location.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See Attachment A; Kam B(3e).
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary Q Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Crystal Amschler
Agency /Consultant Company: USACE
Other: Lia Gilleski, DWQ
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE 8/29/2008 Approved Determination (Attachment B) and DWQ site inspection 6/30/2008; documentation attached. Site inspection conducted
on May 22, 2013, by SAIC and Town of Gamer stormwater engineer indicates no change in conditions with respect to the 2008 wetland determination.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries © Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
Echo Branch
INT
DWQ
5
65
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
F
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
65
3i. Comments:
Project area stream width varies considerably due to scour hole; from approx. 1.75 ft to 12 feet wide. Average width over project length is 5 ft. Area of
impact below OHW is 210 square feet Permanent impacts to 210 s.f. of channel to fill scour hole to pre - existing conditions and provide a stable
channel to convey storm flows Will require placement of 27 c.y., or an average of 0.415 cy fill per linear foot, below current OHW level in the channel.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 P
Stabilization
Echo Branch
No
1,310
0
B2 T
Construction Disturbance
Echo Branch
No
2,610
300
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
3,920
300
6i. Comments: See Attachment A, Item C(61)
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Attachment A, Item D(1 a)
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Attachment A, Item D(1 b)
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes © No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Not applicable; see 6h for rationale.
Buffer mitigation is not required for bank stabilization per Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B. 0233) Bank
6h. Comments: stabilization is Allowable (without mitigation) in Zone 1 (30 -foot buffer), and grading and revegetation are Exempt (no agency review
required and no mitigation required) in Zone 2 (30- to 50 -foot buffer) provided diffuse flow and health of existing vegetation are
maintained and disturbed areas are stabilized. Attachment A, Item D(1 b) provides post- construction buffer restoration measures
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The project will not after stormwater contributions to Echo Branch and /or the buffer, including point
There be in
❑ Yes © No
sources and non -point sources of stormwater runoff. will no change stormwater contributions
to the existing culvert, and no changes to the existing diffuse flow provided through the buffer to Echo
Branch.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes © No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The project is not a development project because it will not increase the amount of built -upon area or decrease the infiltration of precipitation into the
soil (per Definition (6) "Development", at 15A NCAC 02H .1002).
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Not applicable
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Not applicable.
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Gamer
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
[]Session Law 2006 -246
[]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes © No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes Q No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes © No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not applicable; no change in upland development and site use.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes Q No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
U.S. Fish and Wildlife listed species list for Wake County at httpJ/ www. tws. gov/ raleigh /speciestcntylisthvake.htmi. See Attachment A, item 5(5d) Table
1 listing Wake County protected species, habitat preferences, and determination regarding potential occurrence at the project site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project Is in an intermittent stream channel and will not be located at or near coastal/tidal waters or a perennial freshwater stream.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes © No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office website, http:// www .hpo.ncder.gov/NR- PDFs.html#W. See Attachment A, Item 7(7b) for a table of
National Register sites located in the vicinity of the project site and a determination of effects
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping program at http:/twww.ncfloodmaps.com. Figure provided in Attachment A, Item 8.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Attachment A. Supplemental Information for PCN Form
Bank Stabilization 1305 U.S. Highway 70 West, Garner, NC
This attachment provides additional information for the referenced PCN form items. The project
location is shown on Figure 1, from the USGS Quadrangle, with the property boundary and streams
indicated. A general view of site conditions is provided in Figure 2, which shows the property
boundaries, topography in the project area from a June 2013 survey, Zone 1 and Zone 2 buffers, and the
100 -year floodplain.
Figure 1. USGS Quadrangle with site location.
MOM
A jm,A"
MIN'
PIMP
1111
I
AW
NO.
' -- -
y\
Cjlry
= I
t 1.11"
Raleigh
FOR P—L
Y , I
ArVi
Detailed
►i�';�
View
r s
Nom/
i
_�;C
�1��� _
\ �� '
/� /
a
�fUV rw� ����\l 111
�Y�-Ri"
�`I
%M�� '�%
L'e(l lL4Ta7 // �IB
�Rtt
,.
OLM
YJ
jai � �•. -, " -ft
..�
r
%`
INA
#4
� ��`,!� Ip�/I►r1.
";I
` ���
iii
►1� �. , ��
►,`�� ��
J, MON..
�►i
i E
l2 I
1305 US HWY 70 W"I, Gamer. NC
'
Figure 1. USGS Quadrangle with site location.

TI
as
c
(D
N
G
(D
C
(D
N
I�
W
>
T
O
AA
$S vvtS
°>
g
'$--
ppag
�J>
y
'HAW
I'M
IPA
eeFF��
I
A \
1; '1
t
C
. R
r _
r[ T
^1 ` • r I
0 x
`yy
CjS
h �9
m
a
C
S # m a oz'��
44 An��4 -_ •�..It2R r
R n
�: ;'r
a MME MID
u
-yT
S
-qi
n
m
! J.
�40
0
,T
any L_± 14
� � 6
o�
Yr;
�j
l�
am �>
9 {-
.g;m
Lpi CAl bjp� ��
5
A
0
4
_K
�4
.� 4i
a►.
y 1
,
4 r \
Nl
'Al,j i /
i $?
x,� • _ 3
w 4
w
gDm
' MIN
Y [ cmi • Zv
4b�
x eo' �i
^
m x� fi
e,fivfr ViX(I'.NYrbh ivM+E +Mm»xom
4 R# STREAM SURVEY TAYLOR WISEMAN & TAYLOR
= #�' SCIENCE APPLICATIONS
� ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS 1 SCIENTISTS
CHEVRON #211977 INTERNATIONAL CORP.
SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERS 1107 -8 CWRMONT ROAD. NE
a p g 1305 US H WY 70 WEST 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY, SUITE 260, CARY. NC 27518 ATLANTA, GA 10329
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] 16781539.2659
ST. MARYS' TWP -WAKE COUNTY - GARNER, NC NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NUMBER: F -0362
y
I'M
X
�gp
CjS
h �9
m
a
C
S # m a oz'��
44 An��4 -_ •�..It2R r
R n
�: ;'r
a MME MID
u
-yT
S
-qi
n
m
! J.
�40
0
,T
any L_± 14
� � 6
o�
Yr;
�j
l�
am �>
9 {-
.g;m
Lpi CAl bjp� ��
5
A
0
4
_K
�4
.� 4i
a►.
y 1
,
4 r \
Nl
'Al,j i /
i $?
x,� • _ 3
w 4
w
gDm
' MIN
Y [ cmi • Zv
4b�
x eo' �i
^
m x� fi
e,fivfr ViX(I'.NYrbh ivM+E +Mm»xom
4 R# STREAM SURVEY TAYLOR WISEMAN & TAYLOR
= #�' SCIENCE APPLICATIONS
� ENGINEERS 1 SURVEYORS 1 SCIENTISTS
CHEVRON #211977 INTERNATIONAL CORP.
SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERS 1107 -8 CWRMONT ROAD. NE
a p g 1305 US H WY 70 WEST 3500 REGENCY PARKWAY, SUITE 260, CARY. NC 27518 ATLANTA, GA 10329
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] 16781539.2659
ST. MARYS' TWP -WAKE COUNTY - GARNER, NC NORTH CAROLINA LICENSE NUMBER: F -0362

The following sections provide information requested in the indicated section of the PCN form.
A(1c). Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes. A project description was sent by
e -mail to David Shaeffer of the USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office on May 15, 2013; he replied on
May 21, 2013, confirming use of NWP 13 provided the project met the appropriate limitations (i.e., no
more than 500 feet in length, no more than 1 cy discharge per linear foot, and no discharge in special
aquatic sites).
13(3e). Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project
consists of restoring the channel of Echo Branch downstream of the discharge culvert location to pre-
existing conditions to eliminate a scour hole formed by erosion during high flows. The discharge culvert
has a concrete sluiceway and vertical concrete block retaining wall that became undermined and
collapsed, leaving an approximately 8 foot drop from the remaining section of sluiceway to a scour hole.
The scour hole is approximately 30 feet by 40 feet and ends at a narrow section of channel downstream.
The concrete sluiceway and scour hole will be reconfigured with an engineered channel that will
adequately convey high flows from the 42 -inch RCP. This will require regrading the bottom and side
slopes of the channel and placement of rock riprap to dissipate the flow velocity and mitigate further
scouring within the channel.
Construction access to Echo Branch will be through an existing asphalt paved access road to the east of
the creek. This area was selected because it provides easy access to the creek, is expected to result in
minimal disturbance to existing vegetation, and provides a large paved area for equipment staging and
material stockpile to support construction activities. Steep slopes on the western bank and tree cover
will make it difficult to operate construction equipment without extensive site disturbance. Therefore
construction equipment will be operated from the top of the eastern bank. Construction equipment
will include a backhoe /excavator with a long arm to regrade the channel bottom and side slopes to the
required lines and grades specified in the plan drawings, and also for the placement of rock riprap.
Construction drawings for the project are provided in Attachment C, Figures C -1 through C -3. The total
disturbed area and cut /fill estimates are provided in Figure C -1. Cross - sections showing existing and
proposed grades including rock riprap thickness are provided in Figure C -2. Figure C -3 presents the
erosion and sediment control details.
Best management practices (BMPs) will be implemented during the implementation of this project to
minimize impact to the creek. BMPs will include installation of temporary silt fencing in the construction
areas and stockpile /staging areas as shown in Figure C -1 to control runoff. Construction will be
scheduled to occur when the creek is dry and no rain event is anticipated. However, as a contingency
measure, a pump around practice as shown in Figure C -1 and C -3 will be available on site to divert any
water away from the work areas to ensure the construction activities are completed on schedule
without impacts to the work area and downstream. As shown in Figure C -1, any water removed from
within the construction area will pass through a filter bag to minimize sediment impacts at the
downstream discharge location. Any wet soil removed from the work area will be staged in the

stockpile area and allowed to dewater to a low point and the drained water will be discharged to the
downstream portion of the creek away from the work area.
The total volume of fill to be placed below OHW is approximately 27 cubic yards (cy). Based on a total
project length of 65 linear feet, this corresponds to placement of an average of approximately 0.415
cy/linear foot (If) for the project, which is below the NWP threshold of 1 cy /If.
C(6i): Comments on Buffer Impacts, including permanent and temporary impacts to 30 -ft and 50 -ft
buffers: Impacts to the Zone 1 buffer (0 to 30 feet from top of bank) include permanent impacts for
bank stabilization (existing eroding banks will be replaced with riprap) , and temporary impacts from
grading around the fill areas and for construction access (east side of channel only).
Permanent impacts to the Zone 1 buffer on the west side of the channel consist of 730 square feet of
riprap. Permanent impacts to the Zone 1 buffer on the east side of the channel consist of 580 square
feet of riprap. Total permanent fill in Zone 1 buffer consists of 1,310 square feet. Temporary
construction impacts in the Zone 1 buffer consist of clearing vegetation to provide construction access
and facilitate grading and placement of riprap; this temporary impact area is 2,610 square feet. These
impacts are all located in vegetated portions of the Zone 1 buffer.
Impacts to the Zone 2 buffer (30 to 50 feet from the top of bank) will be limited to the east side of the
channel and will include temporary disturbances associated with the temporary stockpile area to
support construction (see Attachment C, Figure C -1). Only a portion of the stockpile area, approximately
300 square feet, is located in Zone 2, and will be located in a portion of the Zone 2 buffer that is
currently unvegetated. The remainder of the stockpiling (100 square feet) and staging areas (400 square
feet) are located outside the Zone 2 buffer in areas that have been cleared.
All buffer areas temporarily disturbed by construction activities will be restored upon completion of
construction.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
D(1a): Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the
project.
The proposed construction activities are required to improve the stream conditions by minimizing scour
and erosion. Any site disturbance will be limited to the minimum required to stabilize bank and will
minimize buffer disturbance. Buffer functions will be restored by replanting temporarily disturbed buffer
areas.
D(ib): Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques.

Construction access will be from east side of the channel to limit buffer disturbance. Construction work
will be conducted in dry conditions to avoid potential for turbidity impacts downstream. As a
contingency measure, pump around practice will be available onsite to divert water away from the work
areas to minimize impacts. Details of the pump around practice are presented in Attachment C, Figure
C -1 and C -3.
Upon completion of the channel and bank stabilization work, portions of the Zone 1 and Zone 2 buffers
that were temporarily disturbed during construction will be restored to ensure the pre- existing buffer
functions are maintained. This includes stabilizing the soil to prevent erosion, and providing a diverse
mix of native vegetation to provide wildlife habitat and shading for the channel. Species guidance is
from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration (NCDENR 2004; accessed at http: / /www.nceep .net /news /reports /buffers.pdf). The
following buffer restoration measures will be included in the construction design:
1) Disturbed soils will be seeded with an upland conservation seed mix and stabilized with erosion
control matting or mulch; suitable grasses include warm season grasses for erosion control such as
redtop (Agrostis alba), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and brown top (Pennisetum glaucum).
2) All Zone 1 buffer areas that are disturbed by clearing (z6" diameter at breast height) trees will be
replanted with shrubs at a density of 1,200 shrubs /acre (approximately 2 — 3' spacing) with native
species such as alder (Alnus serrulata), chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), dogwood (Corpus spp.), and
arrowwood (Viburnum dentotum). Based on the temporary impact area in the Zone 1 buffer, 2,610
square feet or 0.06 acre, approximately 72 shrubs will be planted.
3) No invasive species will be used for plantings.
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (Required by DWQ)
2. Stormwater Management Plan
All development projects that disturb z1 acre require a local- or state - approved Erosion and
Sedimentation Control (E &SC) Plan (http: / /Portal.ncdenr.org /web /wq /ws /su /construction). The project
will automatically be covered by an NPDES Stormwater General Permit NCGO10000 for construction -
related activities, provided that the ground stabilization and basin design requirements in that permit
are included in the E &SC Plan.
The disturbed area for the proposed project will be 0.095 acres or 4,130 square feet (0.095 acre) which
is below the 1 acre threshold for preparation of an E &SC Plan. Therefore, a separate erosion and
sediment control plan is not required for this project. Erosion and sedimentation controls to be used
during construction are indicated in the engineering drawings provided in attachment C.
The proposed construction will occur under dry conditions. As a contingency measure, pump around
practice involving the installation of sandbag barriers and pumping the water away from the work areas
and dewatering the soil /sediment in the creek channel will be used to handle water during construction
activities.

BMPs will include installation of temporary silt fencing around work areas and stockpile /staging areas
and use of filter bags to minimize downstream sediment impacts. BMPs will be installed and properly
maintained for the duration of construction and until disturbed areas are stabilized.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5d. Wake County federally protected species
Federally protected species known to occur in Wake County are listed in Table 1 with habitat
requirements and a determination of the potential for the species to occur at the site. Determinations
about habitat conditions at the site were made during a site inspection conducted on May 22, 2013.
Table 1. Wake County federally protected species and determination on potential to occur at the
project site.
Common Name'
Scientific name'
Federal Statusi
Habitat
Potential
Requirements
Occurrence at Site
Vertebrate:
American eel
Anguilla rostrata
FSC
Aquatic
No; would not
occur in an
intermittent
stream with flashy
stormwater
discharge.
Bachman's
Aimophila
FSC
Occurs in pine or
No; unsuitable
sparrow
aestivalis
other
habitat.
woodslands with
grassy
understory.'
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus
BGPA
Nests near
Possible but not
leucocephalus
rivers, lakes and
likely; potential to
marshes; feeds
occur in the
primarily on
vicinity on a
fish.'
transient basis
only, no perching
or foraging
attraction at the
project site.
Carolina darter
Etheostoma collis
FSC
Aquatic species in
No; would not
(fish)
lepidinion
the Yadkin,
occur in an
PeeDee and
intermittent
Catawba
stream with flashy
drainages2
stormwater
discharge.
Carolina madtom
Noturus furiosus
FSC
Aquatic species
No; would not
(fish)
I
I that occurs in the
I occur in an

I
Common
Pinewoods shiner
(fish)
Red- cockaded
woodpecker
Roanoke bass
Southeastern
myotis (bat)
Scientific
Lythrurus
matutinus
Federal
FSC
Picoides borealis I E
Ambloplites
cavifrons
Myotis
austroriparius
FSC
FSC
Southern hognose Heterodon simus FSC
snake
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe Fusconaia masoni FSC
(mussel)
Diana fritillary I Speyeria diana I FSC
(butterfly)
Habitat
Neuse River
drainage; spawns
in moderate to
slow flow areas.3
Aquatic species.
Uses old growth
(60 -120 years old)
pines for cavity
Potential
Occurrence at Site
intermittent
stream with flashy
stormwater
discharge.
No; would not
occur in an
intermittent
stream with flashy
stormwater
discharge.
No; no suitable
nesting or foraging
habitat on site.
nesting and
forages in younger
(30 years) pine
stands.'
Aquatic species
No; would not
that inhabits
occur in an
larger creeks,
intermittent
streams, and small
stream with flashy
rivers.°
stormwater
discharge.
Uses hollow trees,
No; no suitable
mines and caves
habitat on site.
for roosting and
over - wintering;
always near a
permanent body
of water.'
Prefers pine
No; no suitable
flatwoods and
habitat on site.
sandy substrate e
Occurs in PeeDee
River and Goose
Creek; prefers
coarse sand and
gravel at
downstream edge
of riffles.'
Piedmont forest
species; feeds on
violets, milkweed,
buttonbush,
No; would not
occur in an
intermittent
stream with flashy
stormwater
discharge.
No; no suitable
habitat on site.

� Common
Dwarf
wedgemussel
(mussel)
Green floater
(mussel)
Yellow lance
(mussel)
Scientific nai
Alasmidonto
heterodon
Lasmigona
subviridis
Federal
E
FSC
Elliptio lonceolata I FSC
Habitat
coneflower in
understory.8
Inhabits small to
large streams, a
variety of
substrates, in
hydrologically
stable areas.'
Occurs in stream
and small rivers
with slow pools
and eddies;
cannot tolerate
flooding or
droughts.9
Occurs in Neuse
River basin and
Swift Creek
subbasin; found in
small streams,
prefers coarse to
medium -sized
sand substrate.lo
Potential
Occurrence at Site
No; would not
occur in an
intermittent
stream with flashy
stormwater
discharge.
No; would not
occur in an
intermittent
stream with flashy
stormwater
discharge.
Possible but not
likely; not likely to
occur in project
area due to
unstable substrate
conditions and
routine
disturbance by
high stormwater
discharge from
culvert.
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush
Lindera
FSC
Occurs in
No; occurs in
subcoriacea
permanently moist
wetlands.
to wet, shrub -
dominated
seepage
wetlands."
Grassleaf
Sagittaria
FSC
Occurs in swamps,
No; occurs in
arrowhead
weatherbiana
muddy banks or
wetlands.
occasionally in wet
sand."
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
Small deciduous
No; occurs in
shrub that grows
clearings (requires
in open oak-
full sun).
hickory stands and
old clearings;
requires full sun.''
13
Sweet pinesap
Monotropsis
FSC
Occurs in pine-
No; occurs in pine-

Common Name'
Scientific name'
Federal Status'
Habitat
Requirements
Potential
Occurrence at Site
odorata
dominated forest
dominated forests
and oak heaths;
and oak heaths.
relies on leaf
litter. 14
Virginia least
Trillium pusillum
FSC
A wetland species
No; occurs in
trillium
var. virginianum
(FACW in Region
wetlands.
2).15
Sources:
1. Species list for Wake County, and species information for bald eagle, red - cockaded woodpecker, dwarf wedgemussel, Michaux's Sumac, and
Bachman's sparrow: htta• /Iwww.fws.gov /raleigh /species /cntylist /wake html: FSC= federal species of concern: BGPA = Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act: E = endangered.
2. Carolina darter: httr): / /www.dnr.sc.gov /cwcs /odfhigh /Piedmont.odf
3. Carolina madtom: htto: / /ncpedia.org/wddlife /carolina- madtom
4. Roanoke bass: htto: / /www.dgif.virginia.gov /wildlife /fish /details.asp?fish=010174
5. Southeastern myotis: htto: / /www dgif virginia.gov /wildlife /information / ?s= 050131
6. Southern hognose snake: htto: / /srelhery.uga.edu /snakes /hetsim.htm
7. Atlantic pigtoe: http: / /www.dnr.sc.gov /cwcs /odf /AtlanticPigtoe.r)df
8. Diana fritillary: htto: / /www dnr.sc .gov /cwcs /pdf /DianaFntdlarv.pdf
9. Green floater: htto: / /nas.er.usgs gov /queries /factsheet.aspx ?SDeaeslD =146
10. Yellow lance: htta:/ /www.wakegov.com /planning/mar)s/ Documents /Swift %2OCreek /swiftcreek environ.odf
11. Bog spicebush: http: / /www.fs.fed.us /wildflowers /plant -of- the - week /lindera subconaceae.shtml
12. Grassleaf arrowhead: htto: / /www. wildflower .org /plants /result.r)hp ?id plant =SAGR
13. Michaux's sumac: htto: / /www.fws.govlraleigh /species /cntvlist /wake.html and
htto://wwwfws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/odf/endsg)ecies/fact sheets /michuax %20sumac.pdf
14. Sweet pinesap: htto:// www. goldendelighthoney .com /tes /MOOD2 /mood text.htm
15. Virginia least trillium: htta: / /Plants.usda .gov /iava /profile ?svmbol =TRPUV
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7b. Data sources used to determine whether the project would impact historic or prehistoric resources.
North Carolina listings in the national register of historic places as of May 15, 2013 found on North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office website:
http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/NR-PDFs.html#W
Searching for results by county indicates a total of 216 National Register listings for Wake County.
Displaying the map of these listings shows that the closest National Register - listed property to the
Chevron site is the Downtown Garner Historic District (WA1194;1989), which is approximately 2 miles
from the Chevron site to the east and immediately north of U.S. Highway 70 (Figure 3a).
There are also several sites on the Study List for the National Register that have been determined
eligible, and several sites that have been surveyed, within approximately a mile of the project site. Sites
are shown in Figures 3a and 3b, and described in Table 2. Based on the distance from the project site
to each of these properties (at least one mile), the developed nature of the land surrounding the project
site along the U.S. Highway 70 corridor, and the small scope of the work to be conducted for this
project, no adverse impacts on any listed or potentially eligible National Register properties will occur
from the project. This includes direct impacts from construction activities and indirect impacts from

changes in the view in the vicinity of the site, traffic, construction noise, and other temporary and
permanent disturbances at /near the project site.
Table 2. National Register Listed and Eligible Sites in the vicinity of the project site in Garner, NC.
Site
NC SHPO Site
National Register
Direction and Distance from
Identification
Status
Project Site
Number
Downtown Garner
WA1194
Listed
2 miles east, to north of U.S.
Historic District
Highway 70
Garner High School
WA039
Study List;
1.75 miles east, to north of
(former)
Determined Eligible
U.S. Highway 70
Governor Morehead
WA 2461
Study List;
1.5 miles north
School for the Blind
Determined Eligible
Carolina Pines Hotel
WA2467
Study List;
1.5 miles northwest
Determined Eligible
Myatt Church and
WA4810
Surveyed only
1 mile southwest
Parsonage
Multiple buildings on
WA7428-
Surveyed only
1+ mile east of site, to north
Yeargan Road and West
WA7427
of U.S. Highway 70
Garner Road (six houses,
church, commercial
building)
Source: http : / /www.hpo.ncdcr.gov /nrlist.htm

Figure 3a. National Register Listed and Eligible Sites in the vicinity of the project site in Garner, NC. [source: http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb/]

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. and 8b. The FEMA 100 -year flood zone is located off site to the south as shown in Figure 4. The
project will not directly impact the flood zone and will not decrease flood storage in the project area
located immediately up- gradient of the 100 -year flood zone. Reconfiguring the channel banks to a more
gradual slope in the project area will enhance the floodplain within the project limits.
Fxna�» Orrw Fbotlptlm.mtl
Figure 4. FEMA 100 -year floodplain in the vicinity of the site. (Source: North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program at http: / /www.ncfloodmaps.com)

Attachment B. Copies of 2008 USACE and DWQ JD /Site Visit Information

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 South New Hope Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
919 -212 -1760 / Facsimile 919 - 212 -1707
www.environmentabervicesinc.com
mmilam @esinc.cc, cjohnston @esinc.cc
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mr. Anthony Lester
FROM:
Todd Milam, Charlie Johnston
DATE:
August 26, 2008
RE:
Gamer Tract
Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI) conducted an on -site meeting with Crystal Amschler of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on August 26, 2008 to review the jurisdictional
delineation for the Garner Tract in Wake County, NC.
Ms. Amschler verified the delineation of streams STA and SCA. An additional stream channel
(STB) located along the southern boundary of the property identified by PIN# 1701667637 was
deemed to be jurisdictional. Stream STB is not depicted on the USGS topographic map or the
NRCS soil survey map and will not subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules per the
N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ). However, the three features are subject to USACE
Section 404 jurisdiction. If impacts to these features are proposed, Ms. Amschler indicated that
the USACE would approve a 1:1 mitigation ratio due to the low quality of these features. Ms.
Amschler also indicated that the existing preliminary site plan submitted would need to be
altered to demonstrate that all practicable efforts to minimize unavoidable impacts to the features
were taken prior to authorizing a NWP. As discussed in the report, we recommend that the
proposed parking area be redesigned such that it merely crosses the stream and buffer to satisfy
the USACE permitting and the DWQ Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rule requirements.
I have attached an aerial map with the approximate extent and location of these jurisdictional
streams. Please call Charlie Johnston or me if you have any questions or need any additional
information.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
524 S. NEW HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27610
919- 212 -1760 • FAX 919 - 212 -1707
www.environmenulwvi=inc.com
July 1, 2008
Mr. Anthony Lester
Evans Engineering, Inc.
4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro, NC 27407
Re: Garner Tract ESI Project # ER09*89.00
Jurisdictional Evaluation
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lester.
Environmental Services, Inc, (ESI) has completed the jurisdictional wetland and surface water
delineation and the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) review for the approximately 3.4 -acre
Garner Tract in Wake County, North Carolina. The project study area consists of Wake County
PIN# 1701667637 and a portion of PIN# 1701665922. The project study area is located adjacent
to the south side of U.S. 70 and to the west side of Timber Drive (SR 2812) and is within the
Neuse River Basin. The Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina identifies three (3) soil
mapping units as potentially occurring on the site. None of the identified soil mapping units are
considered to be hydric soils.
Wetlands and Streams
The project study area was reviewed on 20 June 2008 to document the presence or absence of
jurisdictional wetland areas subject to federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act. The area was assessed using the three- parameter approach (hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation, and evidence of jurisdictional hydrology) as outlined by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE) 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual. No wetlands were documented as
occurring within the project study area.
The project site was also reviewed for the presence of jurisdictional stream channels using
additional criteria provided by the COE and the DWQ. Two (2) jurisdictional stream channels
were delineated within the project study area. Stream SCA is located on the property identified
by PIN# 1701665922. Stream STA is located along the northwest boundary of the property
identified by PIN# 1701667637. Figure 1 depicts the approximate extent and location of these
jurisdictional streams and can be used by your surveyor when locating the flags. It is our
understanding that the jurisdictional delineation will be located by traditional survey. The
streams were delineated with sequentially numbered blue & orange flagging.
The ,jurisdictional delineation effort should be reviewed by the USACE prior to impacting any
jurisdictional areas. Unavoidable impacts to Section 404 jurisdictional areas will require Section
404 and Section 401 permitting. ESI is currently scheduled to review the project study area with
COE on July 10.
FLORIDA • GEORGIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • OHIO

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
Neuse River Riparian Buffers
The Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules (Buffer Rules) place a restriction on certain development
within SO feet of stream channels and surface waters that are depicted on the most recent version
of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5- minute quadrangle map or on the Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) county soils map (i.e. Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina). The riparian buffer consists of two distinct zones. Zone I comprises a 30 -foot wide
area adjacem to the surface wato that cannot be disturbed owept for dose specific activitfes that
are allowed by the Neuse River Riparian Baft Rules. Zone 2 comprises a 2O4xA vride area
adjacent to Zone I that is to be left undisturbed except for those specific activities allowed by the
Buffer Runs. Grading and r9e- we� Zone 2 is allowed provided that the condition of Zone I
is not compromised.
ES] met with Lia Gilleski of DWQ on 30 June 2008 to review onsite stream origins and to assess
applicability of the Buffer Rules for the two mapped features. Stream STA is depicted on both
the USGS topographic map and NRCS soil survey map and will be subject to the Buffer Rules
per DWQ. Stream SCA is depicted on the NRCS soil survey map and will also be subject to the
Buffer Rules per DWQ. DWQ flags were tied at the origin points for the two streams.
Most impacts to Neuse River Riparian Buffers require prior approval from DWQ; however,
impacts to Zone l for a proposed parking lot are prohibited according the Buffer Rules. Based
upon the preliminary site plan that you provided, a Major Variance granted by the Environmental
Management Commission (EMC) would be required for the proposed Zone 1 buffer impacts. A
Major Variance is a costly and time consuming endeavor and we typically encourage our clients
to avoid the procedure if at all possible. We recommend that the proposed parking area be
redesigned such that it merely crosses the stream and buffer. Road crossings that impact equal to
40 linear feet or less of riparian buffer are exempt from the Buffer Rules and road crossings that
impact equal to or less than 150 linear feet or less or one-third of an acre of riparian buffer are
allowable with written authorization from DWQ. If the parking area can not be redesigned due to
factors that we are not aware of; then we can discuss the Major Variance option and identify in
greater detail the regulatory hurdles that will undoubtedly be encountered.
Thank you for allowing ESI to be of service to Evans Engineering, Inc. Please call either of us if
you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONM ANTAL SERVICES, INC.
Charles ignston Todd Milam
Senior Scientist Project Scientist
Attachments: General Jurisdictional Layout

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Figure 1.
Approximate Jurisdictional Layout
Garner Tract
f
4� 5 i A
SCA •
a a A

i
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILWNGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200802272 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: Lake Wheeler, NC
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner /Agent: Kotis Properties,
Address: Attn: William 115. Kotis III �7 d5 D
PO Box 9296
Greensboro, NC 27429 AUG 2 `= 2008
Telephone No.:
Property description:
Size (acres) 5_2 Nearest Town Garner
Neared Waterway Swift Creek River Basin Neuse River
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates N 35.7187188 W - 78.640473
Location description The US 70 Hwy W Garner Tract is located south of US 70 Hwv W approximately 350 fat crest
of the intersection of US 70 Hwy W and Timber Drive in Garner Wake County North Carolina
Indicate Which of the Following Ayt)ly:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary detetmination is not an appealable'action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the
Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
_ The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above descriibed' roperty which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at (252) 946 -6481 to determine
their requirements.
Page 1 of 2

Action ID: 2008 -02272
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact at
C. Basis For Determination
Streatns were identified utilizing ordinary high water mark as identified in the field.
D. Remarks
E. Appeals Information (This Information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated
S. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process ( NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Jean Manacle, Field Office Chief,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 33 1.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 1026/2008.
"It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.** ,,
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date 0072008 Expiration Date 0=7/2013
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at hp• //regalatory usacesurvev con/ to
complete the survey online.
Copy famished:
Environmental Services, Inc.
Attn: Todd Milani
524 S. New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Page 2 of 2

Environmental Sendces, Inc.
3661 Ahtmsnee Road
&r&*w... WC 27215
(336) 570 - 301x2. t336) 37"%6 fax
www. viemetenJlseryittsin:.ram
ACCESS AGREEMENT
and
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
i
/i/ fv/.J / /i. representing e9'1s % V- e,f,13 t,ptK.wu.r�
hereb3 authorize representsihms of the U.S. Amy Corps of Engineers andlor K C Division of
Water Quality to access the subject propem.:isted oe:oN, for the purp-se ofperrormnnga
3urisdictionrl wetland, stream, or buffer demrmrnallon utrrronmsnto/ Senkes, he (ESI) is
acting as ou Aulwrized A3ent for this proect and must accompany agency persannei when
visiting this sre
Project NAMC: Gamer Tract (PIN °S 1701667637. 1701665922)
ESI Project t: 08- 089.00
Stgnattuc. '0 =a
Date:

IiN1ITIAL INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
WITHIN THE 401 OVERSITE/EXPRESS PERMITTING UNIT
June 20, 2008
Version S
Applicant Name: Mr. Anthonv Uster. Evans Ensinscring, Inc.
Applicant Address: 4409 Dundas Drive Greensboro NC 27407
Applicant's phone number: 336 -854 -8877 Fax number: ( ) --
Applicant's email address: adloevans- egg,com
Consultant Name (if applicable): Environmental Services. Inc Todd Mil am
Consultant address (if applicable): 524 S, New H2M&ad RaleigJ
Consultant's phone number. 919.212.1760 Fax number: 919 -212 -1707
Consultant's email address: mmilam .esinc.cc
Ty a of action requested under the Express Review Program (check all that apply):
�] 401 Water Quality Certification ® Stream Origin Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Permit 2# of Determinations Requested
❑ Riparian Buffer Approval ❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Riparian Buffer Minor Variance # of Determinations Requested
❑ Coastal General "Major" Variance ❑ Non -404 Wetland Determination
# of Wetlands
Stormwater Management Plan (this fee is not additive when approval is combined with 401 Cert.)
# of Drainage Areas/Project Site
Name of Project: Garner Tract County: Wake
Site Location (DM.MM) - Latitude: 35 719030 Longitude: 78.640417
Total project acreage: 4 (acres) Total built out impervious area: Q2. (acres)
Nearest Named stream + River Basin (from USGS topo map). Swift Creek. Neuse River Basin
Please provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
The current site conditions consist of andeveloW forested areas maintained/disturbed Areas, and a paved area
(agg=imately 0 2 ac) with an abandoned building pad iust north of a pugw station on the west side of the parcel The_
Ramp station and residential areas are located south of the T/9rcel The final site plans are not completed at this time
Please attach a map of site location using USGS 1:24,000 topographic map and County soil survey.
Location of project site - please include reference to the county, nearest named town and street name or highway number:
The pMiect site is located in Garner. NC apRmimateLy 0,6 miles southeast from the intersection of NC 70 and SR 2538
(Loop Rd.) on the south side of NC 70 just west of SR 1443 (Timber Dr.)

Proposed impacts: 1NIA Acres of 404/401 wetlands
N_/A Acres of non -004 wetlands
Linear feet of streams
N/A Linear feet of isolated streams
NIA Square feet of protected stream buffers
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ- sponsored training sessions in the past two years? If so, please list which
ones. Yes Perennial and Intermittent Stream Identification Aquatic Insect Collection Protocols. Express pcmlit Training.
Has any DWQ staff visited the site? Unknown if yes, please provide DWQ staff name, and
date of visit:
Which other environmental permits from other agencies will be needed for this project? Please list the permits and issuing
agencies below:
Unknown at this time
Is there local government implementation of a State - mandated stormwater control program on your site ?_yLs
(If yes, please state local government and implemented program (ex. Town of Wake Forest, NPDES Phase 2):
WS -II1 NSW Protected Are& Neuse River Buffer Rules
Does this project require approval under the SEPA or NEPA? 11` o
Is this project an After -the -fact application or has this project received a previous Notice of Violation from DWQ? No
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management Commission? No
Are you aware of any local controversy concerning this project? If so, please describe the controversy and any measures
that have been taken with respect to public involvement.
This form must be submitted via email (c/o 401exoress ftcmail net) faxed (919- 733 - 6893), or hand- delivered to:
Parkview Building, 2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604. Applicants who are selected to participate in the
Express Review Program will be notified via email or fax. Successful applicants will then be instructed regarding detailed
procedures for full application (Note: Submittals of the review packages on Friday after 12:00 pm will be stamped as
received on the next business day).
Please contact Lia Myott or Joseph Gyamfi at 919- 733 -1786 if you have any questions regarding this form.

OF W A�F9
\4G
Vr
'y, .Yes✓, r
August 21, 2008
Evans Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Mr. Anthony Lester
4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro, NC 27407
Subject Property: Garner Tract (PIN: 1701665922)
Michael F. Easley. Governor
William G. Roar h . Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Colm H. Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ EX" 08 -1032
Wake County
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0233) - EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Lester:
On June 30, 2008, at the request of Todd Milani of Environmental Services, Inc., Lia Myott Gilleski conducted an
on -site determination to review two stream features located on the subject property for applicability to the Neuse
Buffer Rules (I SA NCAC 2B .0233). The features are labeled as "A" and "B", on the attached maps initialed by
Lia M. Gilleski on August 21, 2008. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the following:
• Feature "A" is subject to the Nurse Buffer Rule at the flag labeled, "A l" (Intermittent Stream begins).
• Feature "B" is subject to the Neese Buffer Rule at the flag labeled, "BI " (Intermittent Stream begins) at
the Hwy 70 culvert outlet.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties
that dispute a determination made by the DWQ that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule
may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the
Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd.,
Raleigh, NC 276042260. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream
and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers.
Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have
any questions, please contact Lia Myott Gilleski at 919.733.9502.
,iT,YQ&
Coleen H. Sullins
CHSIc lik/ling
Attachments: Wake County Soil Survey Map, USGS Topographic Map
401 Oversight / Fxpress Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mad Service Center. Raleigh. North Carolina 27699 -1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard. Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Phone [phone]/ FAX 919 - 733-6893 / Inlemet hqp / 20 nr at n n wtx ands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50°/* Recycle&101% Post Consumer Paper
P4�"�idtCaroltina
,N,atut�ls`t,/

Gamer Tract
Page 2 of 2
August 21, 2008
cc: Todd Milam, ESI, 524 S. New Hope Rd., Raleigh, NC 27610
Lauren Witherspoon, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files

I JiL
, t
12Dn
T,-�zrft TV

Wt
Z7— r
-4t —lot
)* 16
01,
ry
4 %
Ilk
ar
cm IL Tie f r f o
` � = I c. �l . ``_sue• - �',,;��� � '.. _,. .' �' . �_'�� '' '
30
14
fill
Greei
lam:
Of wabor QLM*
7-1
R41

Attachment C. Engineering Drawings of the Proposed Project

A
TRAFFIC
SIGNAL BOX
19.1
Ito]
C
1
/
/
i
/
/
/
/
/
-- - - - - --
LS
2
3
0
m
ILI --------- - - - - -- 4� -------------- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - --
-------------- ----------------------------
STORM INLET STORM INLET
RIM = 330.18 RIM = 328.19
INV IN NW= 320.20 INV IN= 315.75
INV IN NE= 320.20 INV OUT= 315.69
60
i
i
,
,
- -- LANDSCAPING Fw In
.�N , PUMP° _PUMP, °ryQe
:. MW -1
PUMP PUMP
MW -5 •
• �: ranlixiv��
• -
MW 4 -
4• 0 DPE -1 BAS •
. • : E.i.
MW -2 •
MW -10 •DPE -2
_ DPE -5•
:H£b':.TO:BUILDINCT '
• V3
1 -STORY
---
y\
BLOCK
/
BUILDING
FFE= 330.90
I
L,
of
,319.4
I
,318.50
z
Z
,
,
318.07
I ;"'rte- _•:.�k. ®.��'•'r
11
i
O
v
2�3
REMEDIATION -
SYSTEM ELEC. 329.73;......
SUPPLY PANEL % 3za. W -9 ,<
_
0
316.44p...
315-
319.4
31 a n
102' g{/C
- INS 312.
0
,314.26 \ \
I \
• AS-4
,113.570 0 .314,5=

I
:I 1
I •
IPt' --
A I' l
7
it
j 1 !
I l i 1
i 1 i i
• ail
0
/r •r f
11 ,
f
Ll j 1
I.
,
B
9.73
WEST SIDE 730
SQ FT OF RIP
3280 AP:
R
e /
/.
.327.61
I
- --
_.L41,
j
314.41 R I;
Y \ I
IV i i I
\ ✓/ ,314;54
I11
U *f'
,314.34 QZZ I I
m l I` FIL
D , I
_� I
W j
1 1
j,314.36 I
i6:) ECHO BRANCH DETAIL
\E-V NOT TO SCALE
1
2
I
I � BU FR
l I i� 1 •,, r/
i r ,318.07 i
(� JO, ,317.72
\1 ;
sr y,,
Re 317.7
1 , : AM 6 IF
M
FER
I
/ D
C5 I' 1
I i I
I�
�I. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
4130 SQUARE FEET
' ,317.68
I` I 1317.61
I q
' P
I 1 i I
I
I ORDINARY HIGH W TER (CHIN)
17 AREA IMPACTED 210 SO FT.
I
,318.55
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
,317.85 j
I
I
1
1 i 317
,317.38
I
I
11
I
1 II
,317.22
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
.2C?
I
I
I
ly
11
I
I
11
I
I
33 `� SO FT'OF RIPS RAP
317.47
i' t, I 317.60
c
ONSTRUCTIC114
r I
j ;j: ENTRANCE
1 �
A
O m
1317.50
co
Ay
31 7
PLACE SILT FENCE AROUND
STOCKPILE AND STAGING
AREAS 990 SID FT. SEE
DETAILS 1, 2 & 3, SHT C -3
,317.44
PHASE I DISCHARGE HOSE
SEE DETAII, 4 SHEET C -3 316.66
TER. BAG
1
1317.19
l
316.66 --
I
\ 316'55 N
,313.52 1
1313.09
In
I ;
1 i
I �
I
II
3
P05T
STAPLE STAPLE
STEP 1
/ TWIST POST TOGETHER
STAPLE ~
/STEP 2 STAPLE
rr
i
STEP 3
STAPLE STAPLE
STAPLE STAPLE
FINAL CONFIGURATION
JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT
FENCE SECTIONS (TOP VIEW)
1 DETAIL
C -1 NOT TO SCALE
36' MIN. FENCE POST LENGTH— F-1
WOVEN SLIT FILM
UNDISTURBED GI
EXISTING GRADE
FLOW
MIN.
SECTION
SILT FENCE DETAIL
C -1 NOT TO SCALE
4
6' -0' MAX. CENTER
ELEVATION
2� SILT FENCE DETAIL
C -1 NOT TO SCALE
APPROVED
DEWATERING DEVICE DISCHARGE HOSES
PUMPS SHALL DISCHARGE
5 6
STREAM
DIVERSION PUMPS
INTAKE HOSE
ONTO A STABLE VELOCITY DEWATERING PUMP
DISSIPATOR MADE OF RIP ' P
RAP OR SANDBAGS
AL A
\ -/ FLT INTAKE HOSE F
SEDIMENT DIKE CLEAN WATER DIKE
SUMP —HOLE OR
POOL (12- TO
WORK AREA N 18" DEEP 2' DIA)
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
PLAN VIEW
SANDBAG DIKE
IMPERVIOUS SHEETING
VBASE FLOW BASE FLOW + 1 FOOT
WORK AREA (2 FOOT MINIMUM)
Ed - -I ! 7 777=7 IF
SECTION A -A
(4� PUMP - AROUND PRACTICE DETAIL
C -1 NOT TO SCALE
PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE
PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE MULCH, LEAF /WOOD COMPOST,
WOODCHIPS, SAND, OR STRAW BALES
STRAP
FLOW SLOPE
t-
5% MAX.
FILTER BAG
ELEVATION
5 � FILTER BAG DETAIL
C -1 NOT TO SCALE
4 5
5. USE NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE WITH DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS USING HIGH
STRENGTH THREAD. SIZE SLEEVE TO ACCOMMODATE A MAXIMUM 4 INCH
DIAMETER PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE. THE BAG MUST BE MANUFACTURED FRO
A NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS MINIMUM AVERAGE ROL
VALUES (MARV) FOR THE FOLLOWING:
GRAB TENSILE 250 LB ASTM D -4632
PUNCTURE 150 LB ASTM D -4833
FLOW RATE 70 GAL/MIN/FT' ASTM D -4491
PERMITTIVITY (SEC -') 1.2 SEC` ASTM D -4491
W RESISTANCE 70% O 500 HOURS ASTM D -4355
OPENING SIZE 0.15 -0.18 MM ASTM D -4751
SEAM STRENGTH 9D% ASTM D -4632
6. REPLACE FILTER BAG IF BAG CLOGS OR HAS RIPS, TEARS, OR PUNCTURES.
DURING OPERATION KEEP CONNECTION BETWEEN PUMP HOSE AND FILTER B
BAG WATER TIGHT. REPLACE BEDDING IF IT BECOMES DISPLACED.
1
REV. I DATE DESCRIPTIONS APPROVE BY
5A1 151 T DRIVE
RIDGE,
OAK RIDGE, TN N 37830
Engineering of North Carolina ,nc. (865) 482 -9031
CHEVRON FACILITY NO. 211977
1305 US HWY 70 WEST
GARNER, NEC 27529 C-3
EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL DETAILS
A BOND
JUNE 28" 2013 SCALE AS SNOMN ''P°�F0 81 SNFiT NUMBER
(J DIN'. 1]011 W
GENERAL NOTES:
SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION
/SPECIFI(CATIO)NS:
INIMUM
1 SOUND Q�TO�S'T�DWOOD.I A�AN USE STANDARD
36' MIN. FENCE
ALTERNATIVE WOODENPOSST
i" OR "U" SECTION STEEL POSTS WEIGHING NOT LESS THAN 1 POUND PER
POST LENEAR
DRIVEN MINN N. 16
FOOT.
2. USE 36 INCH MINIMUM POSTS DRIVEN 16 INCH MINIMUM INTO GROUND NO MORE
IN. INTO GROUND
THAN 6 FEET APART.
3. USE WOVEN SUT FILM GEOTEXTILE AND FASTEN GEOTEXTILE SECURELY TO
UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES AT TOP AND
EILE NU MD1_DE1L -01
R OkEEFE
MID - SECTION.
4. WHERE TWO SECTIONS OF GEOTEXTILE ADJOIN: OVERLAP, TWIST, AND STAPLE TO
6
POST M ACCORDANCE WITH THIS DETAL
5. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATION TO THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF
16" MIN. HEIGHT
THE INSPECTION ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY SHOWING THAT THE GEOTEXTILE USED
OF WOVEN SLR
MEETS THE REQ IREMENTS IN SECTION H -1 MATERIALS (MDE- 2011).
6. MINIMUM
FILM GEOTEXTILE
UUPS OPE AATH45NDEGREES TOSTHE MAINE FENCE ALIGNMENT NPR VEVENT RUNOFF
A
FROM GOING AROUND THE ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE
7. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS WHEN BULGES DEVELOP IN SILT
FENCE OR WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 25% OF FENCE HEIGHT. REPLACE
GEOTEXTILE IF TORN. IF UNDERMINING OCCURS, REINSTALL FENCE.
FILTER BAG:
8' MIN.
1. TIGHTLY SEAL SLEEVE AROUND THE PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE WITH A STRAP
DEPTH INTO
OR SIMILAR DEVICE.
GROUND
2. PLACE FILTER BAG ON SUITABLE BASE (E.G., MULCH, LEAF /WOOD COMPOST,
WOODCHIPS, SAND, OR STRAW BALES) LOCATED ON A LEVEL OR 5%
MAXIMUM SLOPING SURFACE. DISCHARGE TO A STABILIZED AREA. EXTEND
BASE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM EDGES OF BAG.
3. CONTROL PUMPING RATE TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE PRESSURE WITHIN THE
FILTER BAG IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.
AS THE BAG FILLS WITH SEDIMENT, REDUCE PUMPING RATE.
4. REMOVE AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF FILTER BAG UPON COMPLETION OF
PUMPING OPERATIONS OR AFTER BAG HAS REACHED CAPACITY, WHICHEVER
OCCURS FIRST. SPREAD THE DEWATERED SEDIMENT FROM THE BAG IN AN
STREAM
DIVERSION PUMPS
INTAKE HOSE
ONTO A STABLE VELOCITY DEWATERING PUMP
DISSIPATOR MADE OF RIP ' P
RAP OR SANDBAGS
AL A
\ -/ FLT INTAKE HOSE F
SEDIMENT DIKE CLEAN WATER DIKE
SUMP —HOLE OR
POOL (12- TO
WORK AREA N 18" DEEP 2' DIA)
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
PLAN VIEW
SANDBAG DIKE
IMPERVIOUS SHEETING
VBASE FLOW BASE FLOW + 1 FOOT
WORK AREA (2 FOOT MINIMUM)
Ed - -I ! 7 777=7 IF
SECTION A -A
(4� PUMP - AROUND PRACTICE DETAIL
C -1 NOT TO SCALE
PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE
PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE MULCH, LEAF /WOOD COMPOST,
WOODCHIPS, SAND, OR STRAW BALES
STRAP
FLOW SLOPE
t-
5% MAX.
FILTER BAG
ELEVATION
5 � FILTER BAG DETAIL
C -1 NOT TO SCALE
4 5
5. USE NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE WITH DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS USING HIGH
STRENGTH THREAD. SIZE SLEEVE TO ACCOMMODATE A MAXIMUM 4 INCH
DIAMETER PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE. THE BAG MUST BE MANUFACTURED FRO
A NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS MINIMUM AVERAGE ROL
VALUES (MARV) FOR THE FOLLOWING:
GRAB TENSILE 250 LB ASTM D -4632
PUNCTURE 150 LB ASTM D -4833
FLOW RATE 70 GAL/MIN/FT' ASTM D -4491
PERMITTIVITY (SEC -') 1.2 SEC` ASTM D -4491
W RESISTANCE 70% O 500 HOURS ASTM D -4355
OPENING SIZE 0.15 -0.18 MM ASTM D -4751
SEAM STRENGTH 9D% ASTM D -4632
6. REPLACE FILTER BAG IF BAG CLOGS OR HAS RIPS, TEARS, OR PUNCTURES.
DURING OPERATION KEEP CONNECTION BETWEEN PUMP HOSE AND FILTER B
BAG WATER TIGHT. REPLACE BEDDING IF IT BECOMES DISPLACED.
1
REV. I DATE DESCRIPTIONS APPROVE BY
5A1 151 T DRIVE
RIDGE,
OAK RIDGE, TN N 37830
Engineering of North Carolina ,nc. (865) 482 -9031
CHEVRON FACILITY NO. 211977
1305 US HWY 70 WEST
GARNER, NEC 27529 C-3
EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL DETAILS
A BOND
JUNE 28" 2013 SCALE AS SNOMN ''P°�F0 81 SNFiT NUMBER
(J DIN'. 1]011 W
C
EILE NU MD1_DE1L -01
R OkEEFE
6
C

-EXIST] NO 6ADE
. ........
..........
EXISTING
GRAD�
I
. . .. . .......
RIPRAP PLACEMENT NOTES:
1. ENSURE SUBGRADE FOR THE FILTER AND RIPRAP FOLLOWS
REQUIRED LINES AND GRADES SHOWN IN THE PLAN.
3201 L PROPOSED GRADE 1:1 320
5-0"
1+5 315
.... . ..... .... .. .. .................... ...... ........ ,---CONCRETE SLAB
24 " 1
RIP-RAP LINED DITCH
TILE
R BELOW RIIP-RAP
3101 1 1 310
t
11k1 �CONCRETE BLOCK WA
305 STATION 305
S(
ISTING-GR,
GRADE
320 XISTING OR DE 320
P p FR OS
__PROPOSED GRADE 1:1
IPROPOSED GRADE 1-1
3201
\-CONC�R E SLAB
. ..... . .. - ... ...... .
...... . ..... . .. . . ........ . ...........
1 2
4" RIP-RAP LINED DITCH 307.65'ORDINARY HIGH WATER (OHW)
(TNON -WOVEN GEOTEXTIL
A ER BELOW RIP-RAP
31 O� I 1 1
BLOCK WALL
305
STATION 1 +83.55
SCALE: 1"�-�10'H, 1 =5
3201 T DE
......... - ­­­- - . . ...... .. .. ... EXISTING 0 4- -
320
315
310
3 0.5
320
2. RIPRAP MUST CONFIRM TO SPECIFIED GRADING LIMITS
SHOWN IN THE PLAN.
3. FILTER CLOTH MUST MEET DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND BE
PROPERLY PROTECTED FROM PUNCHING OR TEARING
DURING INSTALLATION. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE BY REMOVING
THE RIPRAP AND PLACING ANOTHER PIECE OF FILTER
CLOTH OVER THE DAMAGED AREA. ALLL CONNECTING
OVERLAP SO THE TOP LAYER IS ABOVE THE
DOWNSTREAM LAYER A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT. IF DAMAGE
IS EXTENSIVE REMOVE THE ENTIRE FILTER CLOTH.
4. RIPRAP MAY BE PLACED BY EQUIPMENT, BUT TAKE CARE
TO AVOID DAMAGING THE FILTER.
5. BASED ON ESTIMATED FLOW, d50 OF RIPRAP SHALL BE 1
FOOT AND dMAX SHALL BE 1.5 FEET.
6. MINIMUM THICKNESS OF RIPRAP SHALL BE 2 FEET.
7. RIPRAP MAY BE FIELD STONE OR ROUGH QUARRY STONE.
IT SHOULD BE HARD ANGULAR, HIGHLY WEATHER
RESISTANT, WELL GRADED, AND SHALL MEET NCDOT
SPECIFICATIONS.
8. IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION, STABILIZE ALL
DISTURBED AREAS WITH VEGETATION.
315, CONCRETE SLAB 315
24" RIP-RAP LINED 'DITCH
_XTI L
W NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE k
k
FI(TER BELOW RIP-RAP /--307.65' ORDINARY HIGH WATER (OHW)
310 . ... ... 310
,,,-CONCRETE BLOCK WALL
3051 305
STATION 1 +68.55
SCALE: 1 -=10 H, 1 -=5 —V
E XI TI
3 G GRADE
T- EXISTING GRADE
ROPOSED GRADE I
\\,,-'ROPOSED Mut 1: 1
320 1320
I
315
3140
3915
STATION 1+93.55
SCALE: 1 =10 'H, 1 =5 V
320
-PROPOSED GRADE 1:1
PROPOSED
CONCRETE SLAB
24" RIP RAP LINED DITCH
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 30 7.65'ORDINARY HIGH WATER (OHW)
wl TI
FILTER BELOW RIP-RAP
CONCRETE BLOC < WALL
.. . .... ... . .... ....... .......... ....
-T
EXISTING GRADE
PR POSED GR� DE 1:1
315
310
305
320
315 B
5' -0"
310 . ; /�307.65ORD WATER (OHW)
4 , ............
DITCH Q
24" RIP RAP LINED DITCH
IH ,,-CONCRET BLOCK WALL
XT L
W(TNON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FI ER Ap
305, BLOW RIP-R�p
1
STATION 1+73.55
1-=10'H, 1-=5—V
315
310
305
315 ----------------- - - - -­ . . ..................
24" RIP -RAP LINED U11UH
W/NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE_---
L
31 01 FILTER BELOW RIP-RAP-
- - - ------
30 5�
STATION 1+98.55
SCALE:
\\-CONC,, ETE SLAB 315
CONCRETE
5-- 310
A—-
I CONCRETE BLOCK WALL
E
......... .......... . 305
11 1
144 . ..... l.:
—.,SCALE:
325
-- - -
CB RIM 328.19
INV IN 3
INV OUT
- - - -
5 75
5.69
- - - - -
- - -
- ---
- - - - 7
- - - - -
EXISTING -
325
KEY MAP
SCALE: 1 = 40'-0"
320
315
...... . . ................ . ......
T
-CONCRETE
SLAB
320
. . ....
---------
-------- -
315
REV.
DATE
DESCRIFnONS
APPROVED BY
42"0 RCP
-5. -- --------
-----
-----------------
42"0 RCP
INV OUT 314.10
---------- -----------------
-----------------
PROPOSED GRADE 11
"umm
Engir
151 IAFAYETTE DRIVE
OAK RIDGE, TN 37830
[phone]
QjDff.
310
.........
......... . ..
ONCR E BLOCK WAL�
24- RIP-RAP LINED DITCH
W -WOVE OTEXTILE
Fl- BELOW RP -RAP
A
G —
�o 190__2
- -
- - --
.... .- -- .......
- - - - - -
305
PROJEM
CHEVRON FACILITY NO. 211977
1305 US HWY 70 WEST
GARNER NC 27529
CROSS - SECTIONS
P sma
300_._0
10 O
20 0+30
0
0
50 0+60
O�70
0+80
0
1
00
1+-1
1
20 1
+30 1
+60
1
1300
A. SELVAW
.2
C
PROFILE ALONG CENTER LINE
SCALE: 1-=10'H, 1-=5'V
1 DATE: XW 2C 2013 1
R. OlwT
SHEU N.GER
i,�Ea­ 13011 1

Attachment D. Site Photographs
a. View of site looking south from Highway 70. The culvert discharge location is in the forested area
behind the fence and power lines poles at the left side of the photograph.
abutting property

c. View of scour hole with collapsed concrete sluice and retaining wall sections; looking down into scour
hole from east bank.

e. Channel and bank erosion downstream from scour hole; view is looking north toward scour hole.
f. Another view of channel downstream from scour hole; view is looking north toward scour hole.

g. Channel downstream from scour hole; view is looking south toward southern property boundary.