820249_Routine_20210827

Divisi__ _
Division of Soil<andA
Other Agency ;x
Type of Visit: 'Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 4:+ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
LQ9t- char,ice PI'g Fc&rrn
Owner Name: d Q V t 4 ; . C'* WCJ ra �I
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: Garripsor4 Region: FrCo
c u rti .c, B' tui (GK.
Onsite Representative: SDI I T J e
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: TPC h (or
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
fthfjeld
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
r checK berrnvd� from LaS1-- NQa-f-- INgp Note
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes\❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes sailo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 'e No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes !Nilo ❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

(Facility Number: Pic.2 - "1-1fp
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
Spillway?: WO
Designed Freeboard (in): 19
Date of Inspection: p 0-1
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑NA ❑NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Observed Freeboard (in): a 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes SIQTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes bkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ISNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)`'
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of4WindinJDriftri❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): COQ 9tt !J� I I nucicu �rl I �G
13. Soil Type(s): (
vine, V\I61 ribm
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes ' o ❑NA
❑ Ye:-...173`No ❑ NA
❑ Yeso ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
El Yes ratio ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes "RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes"No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes �No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ['Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes "IS.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes tl,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: - ilr�
Date of Inspection: '?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Yes " Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yeso to NA 0 NE
❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ItStlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ticliTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommend
Usedrawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Keep ivo1-1:1Ng ON b-einnuda Slap 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
LNo
ISINNo
Itt‘No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
ions or any other comme
Phone:: g 'RCP 17 / 6
(`t
Date: 3.
5/12/2020