SW3210702_Supplement-EZ Form_20210910

SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE
FORMS LOADED
PROJECT INFORMATION
1
Project Name
PROVISION CHRUCH
2
Project Area ac
9.562
3
F4
Coastal Wetland Area ac
NA
Surface Water Area ac
0.2
5
Is this project High or Low Density?
Low
6
Does this project use an off -site SCM?
No
COMPLIANCE WITH 02H .1003(4)
7
Width of vegetated setbacks provided feet
30
8
Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated?
Yes
9
If BUA is proposed in the setback, does it meet NCAC 02H.1003 4 c-d ?
N/A
10
Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project?
No
NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMS:
11
Infiltration System
12
Bioretention Cell
13
Wet Pond
14
Stormwater Wetland
15
Permeable Pavement
16
Sand Filter
17
Rainwater Harvesting RWH
18
Green Roof
19
Level Spreader -Filter Strip LS-FS
20
Disconnected Impervious Surface DIS
21
Treatment Swale
22
1 Dry Pond
23
StormFilter
24
Silva Cell
25
Bayfilter
26
Filterra
FORMS LOADED
DESIGNER CERTIFICATION
27
Name and Title:
NEAL SMITH, PE
28
Organization:
NEAL SMITH ENGINEERING, INC.
29
Street address:
139 PINEHURST AVE. STE C
30
City, State, Zip:
SOUTHERN PINES, NC 28387
31
Phone numbers :
910-695-8825
32
Email:
[e-mail]
Certification Statement:
I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-F7 form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision; that the
information provided in the form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete; and that the engineering plans,
specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here.
N CA
j SEAL
19311 ;
SM116611
R����.��``
1VV —
Signa re of Designer
Date

DRAINAGE AREAS
1
Is this a high densi!y project?
No
2
If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs
0-Jan
3
Does this ro ect have low density areas?
Yes
4
If so, number of low density drainage areas
1
5
Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule
versions?
Yes
FORMS LOADED
DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION
Entire Site
LD 7
4
Type of SCM
N/A
5
Total BUA from project (sq ft)
63598 sf
6
1995 rules
SL 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
7
New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to
permitting) (sq ft)
N/A
1995 rules
SL 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
8
New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to
permitting) (sf)
63598 sf
1995 rules
SL 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
9
Offsite - total area (sq ft)
sf
1995 rules
SL 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
10
Offsite BUA (sq ft)
sf
1995 rules
SL 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
11
Design storm (inches)
N/A
1995 rules
SL 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
12
Breakdown of new BUA:
- Parking (sq ft
44744 sf
- Sidewalk (sq ft
2714 sf
- Roof (sg ft
16140 sf
- Roadway s n
- Future (sq ft
- Other, please specify in the comment box
below (sq ft
13
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
Isubdivided lots (sq ft
14
New infiltrating permeable pavement not on
subdivided lots (sq ft
15permitting)
Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to
s ft
16
Existing BUA that is already permitted (sq ft
17
Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft
18
Percent BUA
15%
19
1 Desi n volume of SCM cu ft
20
1 Calculation method for design volume
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
121
Please use this space to provide any additional
information about the drainage area(s):

LOW DENSITY
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECrS FROM 02H .1003
1
Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule?
Yes
2
Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow?
Yes
3
Has the use of piping been minimized per.1003(2)(c)?
Yes
4
Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances (H:V)
3:1
5
Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm?
6
Are curb outlet swales proposed?
Yes
7
Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (%)
5%
8
Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet)
3 ft
9
Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s) (H:V)
3:1
10
Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet)
100 ft
11
Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales?
No
12
is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow?
Yes
13
Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion?
Yes
14
Are variations to rule .1003 proposed?
No
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
15 1 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project:
©��
r r•
r®"
®
rr
��
r r
r •
r .r
�
r .•
�
rr
�®�