HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0086649_Inspection_20040603Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 3, 2004
Wayne A Hollowell
City of Clinton.
PO Box 199
Clinton NC 28328
SUBJECT: June 3, 2004 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
City of Clinton
Well Field East WTP
Permit No: NC0086649
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Hollowell:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection conducted
on June 3, 2004. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Michael Lawyer of the
Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit NC0086649.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you, or your
staff, have any questions, please call me at (910) 486-1541, ext. 724.
Sincerely,
Michael Lawyer
Environmental Technician
cc: Travis Gerald Anderson, ORC
Central Files
Fayetteville Files
it
NCOENR
NCDENR Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street -Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-50431 (910)486-1541 Telephone
(910)486-0707 Fax
Customer Service 1 877 623-7748
United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA . Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/molday Inspection
1 U 2 LI 31 NC0086649 I11 121 04/06/03 117
Type Inspector Fac Type
18LI 19ISI 2011
I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 166
Remarks
211 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA------------------Reserved- ------
67 I 3 .0 1 69 70 LI 71 U 72 LI 731 1 174 751 1 I- 1 I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Well Field East WTP
Clive Jacobs Road
Clinton NC 28329
Entry Time/Date
01:12 PM 04/06/03
Permit Effective Date
02/01/01
Exit Time/Date
02:15 PM 04/06/03
Permit Expiration Date
06/10/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Travis Gerald Anderson/ORC/910-592-1961/
///
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Wayne A Hollowell, PO Box 199 Clinton NC 28328/ / 910-592-1961/910592P84octed
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated).
Permit 1 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance l Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 1 Sludge Handling Disposal 1 Facility Site Review 1 Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Mike Lawyer FRO WQ//91048615411726/910-486-0707
//(314(1(
signature of nag ment Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
/7
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
NPDES yrlmo/day Inspection Type
31 N00086649 111 121 04/06/03 117 18 1,,1
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Facility should obtain a copy of the current NPDES permit to keep on -site.
Discharge Monitoring Reports and lab reports from January 2004 through April 2004 were reviewed and no NPDES
permit violations were found.
Facility discharges once per month and was not discharging at the time of inspection. Therefore, a visual
evaluation of the effluent could not be performed.
Permit: NC0086649 Owner - Facility: City of Clinton - Well Field East WTP
Inspection Date: 06/03/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation.
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment:
Onerations & Maintenance
Does the plant have general safety structures in place such as rails around or covers over tanks, pits, or wells?
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Comment:
J ahoratnry
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
Is the facility using a contract lab?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
Comment:
Record Keepina
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Are sampling and analysis data adequate and include:
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Plant records are adequate, available and include
O&M Manual
As built Engineering drawings
Schedules and dates of equipment maintenance and repairs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is thebackup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Is the facility description verified as contained in the NPDES permit?
Yes No NA NF
❑ ❑•■ O
• 000
0.00
• 000
• 000
Yes No NA NF
• 000
1.0 ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NF
• 000
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
■ 000
❑ ❑ ❑•
O 0.0
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NF
• ❑ ❑ ❑
11000
• 000
■ O O O
• 000
•
❑ ❑ O ■
0
0
• 000
O O ■ ❑
O O ■ O
• 000
111000
• 000
O ■ ❑ ❑
• 000
Permit: NC0086649
Owner - Facility: City of Clinton - Well Field East WTP
Inspection Date: 06/03/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NF
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for example: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, DO, Sludge ❑ ❑ M ❑
Judge, pH, and others that are applicable?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment:At the time of inspection, facility did not have a copy of the current NPDES permit. It was stated that a copy of
the current NPDES permit may have been sent to the public works director and not forwarded on to the facility. The
facility should obtain a copy of the current permit.
Uostream / Downstream Sampling, Yes No NA NF
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? •❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Fffluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are receiving water free of solids and floatable wastewater materials?
Are the receiving waters free of solids / debris?
Are the receiving waters free of foam other than a trace?
_ Are the receiving waters free of sludge worms?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:Facility was not discharging at the time of inspection, therefore the effluent pipe was not evaluated.
Ye No NA NF
O ❑ ❑ ■
O DOM
DOOM
DOOM
O DOM
DOOM