Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0086649_Inspection_20040603Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality June 3, 2004 Wayne A Hollowell City of Clinton. PO Box 199 Clinton NC 28328 SUBJECT: June 3, 2004 Compliance Evaluation Inspection City of Clinton Well Field East WTP Permit No: NC0086649 Sampson County Dear Mr. Hollowell: Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection conducted on June 3, 2004. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Michael Lawyer of the Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit NC0086649. Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you, or your staff, have any questions, please call me at (910) 486-1541, ext. 724. Sincerely, Michael Lawyer Environmental Technician cc: Travis Gerald Anderson, ORC Central Files Fayetteville Files it NCOENR NCDENR Division of Water Quality 225 Green Street -Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-50431 (910)486-1541 Telephone (910)486-0707 Fax Customer Service 1 877 623-7748 United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA . Washington, D.C. 20460 Water Compliance Inspection Report Form Approved. OMB No. 2040-0057 Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/molday Inspection 1 U 2 LI 31 NC0086649 I11 121 04/06/03 117 Type Inspector Fac Type 18LI 19ISI 2011 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 166 Remarks 211 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA------------------Reserved- ------ 67 I 3 .0 1 69 70 LI 71 U 72 LI 731 1 174 751 1 I- 1 I I I 180 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include POTW name and NPDES permit Number) Well Field East WTP Clive Jacobs Road Clinton NC 28329 Entry Time/Date 01:12 PM 04/06/03 Permit Effective Date 02/01/01 Exit Time/Date 02:15 PM 04/06/03 Permit Expiration Date 06/10/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Travis Gerald Anderson/ORC/910-592-1961/ /// Other Facility Data Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Wayne A Hollowell, PO Box 199 Clinton NC 28328/ / 910-592-1961/910592P84octed Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated). Permit 1 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance l Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program 1 Sludge Handling Disposal 1 Facility Site Review 1 Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Mike Lawyer FRO WQ//91048615411726/910-486-0707 //(314(1( signature of nag ment Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date /7 EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. NPDES yrlmo/day Inspection Type 31 N00086649 111 121 04/06/03 117 18 1,,1 1 Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Facility should obtain a copy of the current NPDES permit to keep on -site. Discharge Monitoring Reports and lab reports from January 2004 through April 2004 were reviewed and no NPDES permit violations were found. Facility discharges once per month and was not discharging at the time of inspection. Therefore, a visual evaluation of the effluent could not be performed. Permit: NC0086649 Owner - Facility: City of Clinton - Well Field East WTP Inspection Date: 06/03/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation. Permit (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? Is the facility as described in the permit? Are there any special conditions for the permit? Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? Comment: Onerations & Maintenance Does the plant have general safety structures in place such as rails around or covers over tanks, pits, or wells? Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? Comment: J ahoratnry Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? Is the facility using a contract lab? Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)? Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? Comment: Record Keepina Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? Is all required information readily available, complete and current? Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? Are sampling and analysis data adequate and include: Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Plant records are adequate, available and include O&M Manual As built Engineering drawings Schedules and dates of equipment maintenance and repairs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users? (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? Is thebackup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? Is the facility description verified as contained in the NPDES permit? Yes No NA NF ❑ ❑•■ O • 000 0.00 • 000 • 000 Yes No NA NF • 000 1.0 ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NF • 000 ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ • ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 000 ❑ ❑ ❑• O 0.0 ❑ ❑ • ❑ Yes No NA NF • ❑ ❑ ❑ 11000 • 000 ■ O O O • 000 • ❑ ❑ O ■ 0 0 • 000 O O ■ ❑ O O ■ O • 000 111000 • 000 O ■ ❑ ❑ • 000 Permit: NC0086649 Owner - Facility: City of Clinton - Well Field East WTP Inspection Date: 06/03/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Record Keeping Yes No NA NF Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for example: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, DO, Sludge ❑ ❑ M ❑ Judge, pH, and others that are applicable? Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ M ❑ Comment:At the time of inspection, facility did not have a copy of the current NPDES permit. It was stated that a copy of the current NPDES permit may have been sent to the public works director and not forwarded on to the facility. The facility should obtain a copy of the current permit. Uostream / Downstream Sampling, Yes No NA NF Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? •❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Fffluent Pipe Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? Are receiving water free of solids and floatable wastewater materials? Are the receiving waters free of solids / debris? Are the receiving waters free of foam other than a trace? _ Are the receiving waters free of sludge worms? If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? Comment:Facility was not discharging at the time of inspection, therefore the effluent pipe was not evaluated. Ye No NA NF O ❑ ❑ ■ O DOM DOOM DOOM O DOM DOOM