NCG060133_Cargill Feed Letter and Report_20210824

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELVABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRIAN WRENN
Director
Cargill Incorporated
Attention: Gavin Atkinson
15407 McGinty Road West
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 24, 2021
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Cargill Feed and Nutrition Barber
NPDES Certificate of Coverage — NCG060133
Rowan County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Atkinson,
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report
for the inspection we conducted at the Cargill Feed and Nutrition Barber on August
17, 2021. Please note that in the stormwater inspection report summary we ask that
you repair and stabilize eroded areas on site.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or by E-mail at
[e-mail].
Enclosure
c: Laserfiche
Sincerely,
CJX�c�tv�
es Moore
Assistant Regional Engineer
mm.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue. Suite 301 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704.663.1699

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060133 Effective: 07/01/21 Expiration: 06/30/26 Owner: Cargill Incorporated
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Cargill Feed & Nutrition Barber
County: Rowan 9150 Statesville Blvd
Region: Mooresville
Cleveland NC 27013
Contact Person: Sherrie Suttles Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 08/17/2021 Entry Time 11:20AM Exit Time: 01:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Jesse M McDonnell Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Lily C Kay
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: FoodlTobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG060133 Owner - Facility: Cargill Incorporated
Inspection Date: 08/17/2021 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The Stormwater Polution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and related documents were complete. Overall, the facility is well
maintained. Minor erosion within the basin and within the channel drainging towards Highway 70 needs to be repaired and
stabilzied. Contact our office if you have any questions.
Page 2 of 3

permit: NCG060133 Owner - Facility: Cargill Incorporated
Inspection Date: 08/17/2021 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑❑❑
❑❑❑■
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑❑❑■
■❑❑❑
❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
• ❑ ❑❑
■❑❑❑
Comment: The stormwater polution prevention plan (SWPPP) and related documents were complete.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Qualitative monitoring records were avaliable and complete.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Analytical monitoring records were avaliable and complete.
Permit and Outfalls . Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ M ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Overall, the facility is well operated and maintained. Minor erosion was observed within the
channel draining towards Highway 70 and within the basin. These areas need to repaired.
Page 3 of 3