WQ0018153_Staff Report_20210811

DocuSign Envelope ID: 30F26F22-6C56-4C52-9FB2-D85DD1C52F94
,ATIQ
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
August 11, 2021
To: DWR Central Office — WQ, Non -Discharge Unit
Attn: Chloe Lloyd
Application No.: WQ0018153
Facility name: Cox SFR Wastewater Irrigation System
From: Patrick Mitchell
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ❑ Yes or ® No
a. Date of most recent site visit: March 6, 2018
b. Site visit conducted by: J. Henderson
c. Driving directions: See file.
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes ❑ No
Note: See Section IV. of this report.
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
Note: See Section IV. of this report.
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or n No
Note: See Section IV. of this report.
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
Note: See Section IV. of this report.
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
Note: See Section IV. of this report.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? n Yes n No ® N/A
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted? n Yes n No ® N/A
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues n Current enforcement action(s) n Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 30F26F22-6C56-4C52-9FB2-D85DD1C52F94
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
nYes ®NonN/A
III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
5. Recommendation:
❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
�DocuSigned by:
6. Signature of report preparer:
paiv'irt
Signature of regional supervisor 5546B6CO265C47A...
Date: August 11, 2021
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
nocliSignad i,y.
Ljt
-Oti 'T. Smittr
145B49E225C94EA._.
No site visit was made for this permit renewal review. The most recent inspection was completed by Justin Henderson
of the WSRO. Minor compliance issues were noted but follow up was conducted to ensure those issues were properly
addressed by Mr. Henderson. System components onsite noted by Mr. Henderson match the system description in
permit. Most answers to questions in this staff report are based upon the previous inspection and the follow-up notes
in file by Mr. Henderson. A site map showing the location of the system is attached.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 2