WI0400571_Permit (Issuance)_20210722

NC Department of Environmental Quality — Division of Water Resources (DWR)
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT (NOI) TO CONSTRUCT OR OPERATE INJECTION WELLS
The following are "permitted by rule" and do not require an individual permit when constructed in accordance
with the rules of ::f_ 1:' X w: ,:;.%v.' (NOTE: This form must be received at least 14 DAYS prior to iniectionl
AQUIFER TEST WELLS (15A i4CAC 02C .:,22:
These wells are used to inject uncontaminated fluid into an aquifer to determine aquifer hydraulic characteristics.
IN SITU REMEDIATION (I5A NCAC 02C .0225) or TRACER WELLS (
1) Passive. Infection Systems - In -well delivery systems to diffuse injectants into the subsurface. Examples include
ORC socks, iSOC systems, and other gas infusion methods (Note: Injection Event Records (IER) do not need to be
submitted for replacement of each sock used in ORC systems).
2) Small -Scale Injection Operations — Injection wells located within a land surface area not to exceed 10,000
square feet for the purpose of soil or groundwater remediation or tracer tests. An individual permit shall be required
for test or treatment areas exceeding 10,000 square feet.
3) Pilot Tests - Preliminary studies conducted for the purpose of evaluating the technical feasibility of a
remediation strategy in order to develop a full scale remediation plan for future implementation, and where the
surface area of the injection zone wells is located within an area that does not exceed five percent of the land surface
above the known extent of groundwater contamination. An individual permit shall be required to conduct more
than one pilot test on any separate groundwater contaminant plume.
4) Air Injection Wells - Used to inject ambient air to enhance in -situ treatment of soil or groundwater.
5) In -Situ Thermal Wells (IST 3 — Used to `heat' contaminated groundwater to enhance remediation.
Print Clearly or Type Information. Illegible. Submittals Will Be Returned as Incomplete.
DATE: June 25 , 2021
PERMIT NO. W 10400571 (to be filled in by DWR)
NOTE- If this NOI is being submitted as notification of a modification of a previously issued NOI for this site (e.g.,
different injection wells, plume, additives, etc.) and still meets the deemed permitted by rule criteria, provide the
previously assigned permit tracking number and any needed relevant information to assess and approve injection:
A.
B.
Permit No. WI Issued Date:
WELL TYPE TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR OPERATED
(1) Air Injection Well
(2) Aquifer Test Well
(3) Passive Injection System
(4) X Small -Scale Injection Operation
(5) Pilot Test
(6) Tracer Injection Well
(7) In -Situ Thermal (IST) Well
STATUS OF WELL OWNER: Business/Organization
Complete sections B through F, J, M
Complete sections B through F, J, M
Complete sections B through F, H-M
Complete sections B through M
Complete sections B through M
Complete sections B
Complete sections B through 2421
actioR
tad oi*
Deemed Permitted GW Remediation NOI Rev. 2-17-2020
Page 1

C. WELL OWNERS) — State name of Business/Agency, and Name and Title of person delegated authority to
sign on behalf of the business or agency:
Name(s): Burns Blackwell, Bruce Terminix Company
Mailing Address: 1703 Wendover Ave. E.
City: Greensboro State: NC Zip Code: 27405 County: Guilford
Day Tele No.: [phone] Cell No.:
EMAIL Address: [e-mail] Fax No.:
D. PROPERTY OWNER(S) (if different than well owner/applicant)
Name and Title: The Estate of William H. Whiteheart and Yadkin Valley Investments, LLC
Company Name Yadkin Valley Investments,_LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 40
City: Lewisville State: NC_ Zip Code: 27023 County: Forsyth
Day Tele No.: Cell No.:
EMAIL Address: Fax No.:
E. PROJECT CONTACT (Typically Environmental Consulting/Engineering Finn)
Name and Title: Chris Hay. Regional Operations Manager
Company Name EnviroTrac Ltd.
Mailing Address: 7343 West Friendly Avenue. Suite J
City: Greensboro
State: NC Zip Code: 27410 County: Guilford
Day Tele No.: [phone] Ce11 No.: [phone]
EMAIL Address: [e-mail]
Fax No.:
F. PHYSICAL LOCATION OF WELL SITE Former Bruce Terminix
(1) Facility Name & Address: 3495 Leo Street
City: Winston-Salem County: Forsyth Zip Code: 27105
(2) Geographic Coordinates: Latitude**: 0" or 36 °.13421979301867
Longitude**: 0" or -80 °.23946197377443
Reference Datum: Accuracy:
Method of Collection: Google Earth
**FOR AIR INJECTION AND AQUIFER TEST WELLS ONLY: A FACILITY SITE MAP WITH PROPERTY
BOUNDARIES MAY BE SUBMITTED IN LIEU OF GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES.
G. TREATMENT AREA
Land surface area of contaminant plume: 40,000 square feet
Land surface area of inj. well network: 765 square feet (< 10,000 ft2 for small-scale injections)
Percent of contaminant plume area to be treated: 2% (must be < 5% of plume for pilot test injections)
Deemed Permitted GW Remediation NOI Rev. 2-17-2020 Page 2

H. INJECTION ZONE MAPS — Attach the following to the notification.
(1) Contaminant plume map(s) with isoconcentration lines that show the horizontal extent of the
contaminant plume in soil and groundwater, existing and proposed monitoring wells, and existing and
proposed injection wells; and
(2) Cross-section(s) to the known or projected depth of contamination that show the horizontal and vertical
extent of the contaminant plume in soil and groundwater, changes in lithology, existing and proposed
monitoring wells, and existing and proposed injection wells.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s) indicating the rate and direction of groundwater movement, plus existing
and proposed wells.
I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED INJECTION ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE — Provide a brief narrative
regarding the cause of the contamination, and purpose, scope, goals of the proposed injection activity:
A treatability study has been approved by the IHSB for powdered activated carbon treatment of pesticide
impacted soil. The objective of the study is to verify the efficacy of the proposed soil treatment at the site. The
objective of the initial abatement is to prevent leaching of pesticides from impacted soil to the groundwater. The
proposed soil treatment strategy will have the additional benefit of reducing pesticide levels in the shallow
groundwater at the site. The attached Initial Abatement Workplan was approved by the IHSB and describes
the history of the incident, purpose. scope. and objectives as well as the drawings requested as part of this
submittal.
J. WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
(1) No. of injection wells: Proposed 6 Existing (provide NC Well
Construction Record (GW-1) for each well)
(2) Appx. injection depths (BLS):_0 -17
(3) For Proposed wells or Existing wells not having GW-ls, provide well construction details for each
injection well in a diagram or table format. A single diagram or line in a table can be used for
multiple wells with the same construction details. Well construction details shall include the
following (indicate if construction is proposed or as -built):
(a) Well type as permanent, Geoprobe/DPT, or subsurface distribution infiltration gallery
(b) Depth below land surface of casing, each grout type and depth, screen, and sand pack
(c) Well contractor name and certification number
K. INJECTION SUMMARY
NOTE: Only injectants approved by the epidemiology section of the NC Division of Public Health, Department
of Health and Human Services can be infected. Approved injectants can be found online at
http://deg .nc.Qov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/,round-water
protection/around-water-approved-injectants. All other substances must be reviewed by the DHHS prior to use.
Contact the UIC Program for more info if you wish to get approval for a different additive. However please
note it may take 3 months or longer. If no injectants are to be used use N/A.
Injectant:powdered activated carbon Total Amt. to be injected (gal)/event:2.780
Injectant: Total Amt. to be injected (gal)/event:
Injectant: Total Amt. to be injected (gal)/event:
Deemed Permitted GW Remediation NOI Rev. 2-17-2020 Page 3

Injectant: Total Amt. to be injected (gal)/event:
Injectant: Total Amt. to be injected (gal)/event:
Total Amt. to be injected (gal/event):
No. of separate injection events:1 Total Amt to be injected (gal): 2.780
Source of Water (if applicable): City of Winston-Salem public water supple
L. MONITORING PLAN — Describe below or in separate attachment a monitoring plan to be used to determine
if violations of groundwater quality standards specified in Subchapter 02L result from the injection activity.
Groundwater will be sampled from observation wells before and after the treatabilitv study.
Groundwater samples from existinz~ monitoring wells at the property are to be sampled following the study.
M. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER
Well Owner/Applicant: "I hereby cert, under penalty of law, that I am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments thereto and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, 1 believe that the information is true, accurate and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties, including the possibility of f nes and imprisonment,
for submitting false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the
injection well and all related appurtenances in accordance with the 15A NCAC 02C 0200 Rules."
Signature of Applicant
12` 1 rt C1c1/CI
Print or Type Full Name and Title
Property Owner (if the property is not owned by the Well Owner/Applicant):
"As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(ISA NCAC 02C .0200)."
"Owner" means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed. A well
is real property and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the
absence of contrary agreement in writing.
See attached Consent Order
Signature* of Property Owner (if different from applicant) Print or Type Full Name and Title
*An access agreement between the applicant and property owner may be submitted in lieu of a signature on this form.
Please send 1 (one) hard color copy of this NOI along with a copy on an attached CD or Flash Drive at least
two (2) weeks prior to injection to:
DWR — UIC Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone: [phone]
Deemed Permitted GW Remediation NOI Rev. 2-17-2020 Page 4

Ei?i5IFrc
Environmental Services
Revised May 5, 2021
Mr. Thomas C. Clark
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
Reference: Initial Abatement Work Plan — Activated Carbon Injection
Bruce Terminix
3495 Leo Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
IHSB Site ID No. NONCD0002238
Dear Mr. Clark:
EnviroTrac Ltd. has prepared this Initial Abatement Work Plan on behalf of Bruce Terminix for the
referenced site. Based on results of the previous groundwater and soil sampling, EnviroTrac
recommends securing the site with fencing and signage, installing silt fence upgradient of the stream,
and installing injection wells to treat soil with a powdered activated carbon solution. Additionally, a site
specific treatability study has been included, as requested. Soil treatment progress will be evaluated
through groundwater monitoring.
Should you have questions or require additional information regarding this submittal, please do not
hesitate to contact the undersigned.
ENVIROTRAC LTD.
CjklA
Christopher W. Hay, E.I., RSM
Environmental Program Manager
Enclosure
Cc: Mr. Burns Blackwell, Terminix, w/enc.
Mr. Joseph Ponzi, Brooks Pierce, w/enc.
7343 West Friendly Avenue, Suite J, Greensboro, NC 27410 1 [phone] 1 Fax: [phone]
www.envirotrac.com
Offices in NY, NJ, NH, OH, CT, FL, MA, PA, GA, NC, WV, VA

INITIAL ABATEMENT WORKPLAN
ACTIVATED CARBON INJECTION
Site:
BRUCE TERMINIX
3495 LEO STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
IHSB ID NUMBER NONCD0002238
Submitted To:
MR. THOMAS C. CLARK
INACTIVE HAZARDOUS SITES BRANCH
450 WEST HANES MILL ROAD, SUITE 300
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27105
Prepared By:
ENVIROTRAC LTD.
7343 WEST FRIENDLY AVENUE, SUITE J
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27410
[phone]
A Full Service Environmental Consulting
and Contracting Firm

Environmental Services
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION RESULTS 1
3.0 INITIAL ABATEMENT OBJECTIVE 2
4.0 PROPOSED INITIAL ABATEMENT 3
4.1 Site Access Control 3
4.2 Sedimentation Control 3
4.3 Activated Carbon Treatability Study 3
4.4 Activated Carbon Soil Treatment 5
4.5 Evaluation of Soil Treatment Progress 6
5.0 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE 7
6.0 ESTIMATED COST 7
7.0 SCHEDULE 8
TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3a
Figure 3b
Figure 4a
Figure 4b
Figure 5a
Figure 5b
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
APPENDICES
A
B
Monitoring Well Construction Details
Soil Sample Analytical Summary
Groundwater Sample Analytical Summary
Creek Sediment Sample Analytical Summary
Surface Water Sample Analytical Summary
Sample Location Map
Groundwater Elevation Contour Map
Soil Sample Analytical Results (VOCs)
Soil Sample Analytical Results (Organochlorine Pesticides)
Groundwater Sample Analytical Results (VOCs)
Groundwater Sample Analytical Results (Organochlorine Pesticides)
Creek Sediment Sample Analytical Results (VOCs)
Creek Sediment Sample Analytical Results (Organochlorine Pesticides)
Surface Water Sample Analytical Results (VOCs)
Surface Water Sample Analytical Results (Organochlorine Pesticides)
Cross Section Locations
Cross Section A -A'
Cross Section B-B'
Injection Well Layout
Injection System Diagram
Activated Carbon Treatability Study Details
General Carbon Powdered Activated Carbon Specification Sheet
Initial Abatement Design Calculations
11.990146.00 Page i Revised May 5, 2021
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.

E'wto
Environmental Services
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Bruce Terminix site is located at 3495 Leo Street in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North
Carolina (Latitude 36° 08' 05.52" N, Longitude 80° 14' 22.30" W) (Figure 1). As discussed in the
Remedial Investigation (RI) Work Plan (EnviroTrac, May 2019), the site is presently undeveloped
and is covered with gravel, grass, brambles, small, and mature trees; however, the site was
formerly developed with a Terminix Pest Control business. The site is located within a mixed -use
area with Leo Street and a shopping center west of the site; US Highway 52 and residential housing
developments east of the site; and undeveloped Tots to the north and south. The area surrounding
the site west of Hwy 52 has historically been developed with commercial/industrial properties.
2.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION RESULTS
The remedial investigation at the site has resulted in 66 soil borings, surface water samples,
sediment samples and the installation of seven monitoring wells.
In 1987 soil samples were collected around the perimeter of the Terminix Pest Control building.
Analytical results indicated the presence of pesticides exceeding the Preliminary Industrial Soil
Remediation Goal (SRG) in the soil to a depth of four feet below ground surface (bgs). An action
plan for remediation was submitted to DEQ and approved. After that action was complete, a No
Further Action letter was issued by DEQ.
In April 2012, samples were collected of soil, groundwater, stream sediment, and surface water
from Bowen Branch. Four soil samples were collected to identify the depth of the pesticides within
the soil. Pesticides were detected above the Preliminary Industrial SRG to a depth of 11 feet bgs.
Three monitoring wells were installed and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE)
were detected over the North Carolina 2L Standard (2L Standard) in the three monitoring wells.
Monitoring well MW-1 also detected cis-1,2-dichloroethene, and MW-2 detected dieldrin above the
2L Standard. Both TCE and pesticides were detected above the 2B Standard for surface water,
and the Protection of Groundwater SRG for sediment.
In July 2019, remedial investigation occurred to determine the extent of the contamination within the
soil, groundwater, stream sediment, and surface water of Bowen Branch. Four monitoring wells
were installed (two shallow and two deep) to identify the vertical extent of the contamination.
11.990146.00
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.
Page 1 of 8 Revised May 5, 2021

T
Enviror : al Services
Monitoring well construction details are summarized in Table 1. Forty-two soil borings were drilled.
The monitoring well and soil boring locations are shown on Figure 1. Soil sample analytical results
are summarized in Table 2. A groundwater potentiometric map is provided on Figure 2. Figures 3a
and 3b provide graphic representations of the soil sample results for VOCs and pesticides,
respectively. PCE was detected above the 2L Standard in each of the monitoring wells. TCE was
detected above the 2L Standard in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-4 and MW-7D. Additionally,
benzene was detected in MW-4 above the 2L Standard. Pesticides were detected above the 2L
Standard in MW-3, MW-5 and MW-7D. Laboratory results for the sediment samples indicated PCE
and pesticides concentrations were above the Protection of Groundwater S RG. Table 3 provides a
summary of groundwater samples collected from the site. Figures 4a and 4b provide graphic
representations of the groundwater sample results for VOCs and pesticides, respectively. Stream
sediment sample analytical results are summarized in Table 4. Figures 5a and 5b provide graphic
representations of the stream sediment sample results for VOCs and pesticides, respectively.
Surface water samples indicated levels of PCE and pesticides above the 2B Standard. Surface
water sample analytical results are summarized in Table 5. Figures 6a and 6b provide graphic
representations of the surface water sample results for VOCs and pesticides, respectively.
To further delineate the horizontal extent of impacted soil, 17 soil borings were drilled in January
2020, and an additional seven soil borings were drilled in July 2020. The extent of impacted soil
was delineated horizontally and vertically. Figure 7 shows the locations of cross sections prepared
for the site. The vertical extent of impacted soil is shown on Figures 8 and 9.
3.0 INITIAL ABATEMENT OBJECTIVE
The objective of the initial abatement proposed in this workplan is to prevent leaching of pesticides
from impacted soil to the groundwater. The proposed soil treatment strategy will have the additional
benefit of reducing pesticide levels in the shallow groundwater at the site. A feasibility study is
proposed, as requested, to verify the efficacy of the proposed soil treatment at the site. Further,
fencing is proposed to control access to the site, and silt fence is proposed to prevent runoff from
carrying impacted soil to the stream.
11.990146.00
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.
Page 2 of 8 Revised May 5, 2021

Environmental Services
4.0 PROPOSED INITIAL ABATEMENT
4.1 Site Access Control
Access to the site and stream will be controlled through the installation of a six foot tall chain link
fence installed to the north, west, and south. The fence will meet an existing chain link fence along
the eastern property boundary. A locked gate will be installed for vehicular access at the existing
entrance to the property along Leo Street. The fence will include "No Trespassing" signage and
encompass impacted areas of the site identified in the Remedial Investigation and the stream. The
location of the proposed fencing and gate is shown on Figure 10.
4.2 Sedimentation Control
Silt fence including 36 inch geotextile fabric on 48 inch posts will be installed downgradient of
impacted soil delineated in the Remedial Investigation to prevent runoff from carrying impacted
surface soil to the stream. The bottom of the silt fence will be buried a minimum of six inches below
grade. The approximate location of the proposed silt fence is shown on Figure 10.
4.3 Activated Carbon Treatability Study
A treatability study will be performed, as requested, to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed soil
treatment strategy at the site. Slug tests will be conducted in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 to
estimate an average hydraulic conductivity at the site. Treatability studies will be performed in two
areas at the site.
10 Foot Treatment Spacing
One treatability study will be conducted in the vicinity of soil boring SS-8, which exhibited the
highest aldrin concentration (4.12 mg/kg) identified during the Remedial Investigation as well as
concentrations of chlordane (14.10 mg/kg) and dieldrin (12.40 mg/kg). Soil logged within SS-8 was
representative of soil types and textures found across the site. Nested temporary observation wells
will be installed at the location of SS-8. The one inch diameter observation wells will be screened at
depths of 1-2 feet, 2-5 feet, 5-10 feet, and 12-17 feet below ground surface. The observation wells
will have a two foot section of solid PVC below the screen to collect treatment water. Following
installation of the observation wells, a groundwater sample will be collected for laboratory analysis
of pesticides by EPA Method 8081 B. Results of the laboratory analysis will be compared to
11.990146.00 Page 3 of 8 Revised May 5, 2021
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.

Erw ■ il■- ate.
Environmental Services
groundwater results following treatment with activated carbon.
Three temporary injection wells will be installed at a radius of 10 feet from the observation wells.
The temporary injection wells will be constructed of 2 inch diameter PVC well screen and riser with
sand pack and bentonite surface seal. The temporary injection wells will be screened from 2 to 17
feet below ground surface. Following installation of the injection wells, they will be connected to 300
gallon totes. A 5 percent solution of powdered activated carbon and water (125 pounds of powdered
activated carbon in 300 gallons of water) will be mixed in each tote and the solution will be allowed
to drain into the injection wells. The powdered activated carbon will be mixed and kept in solution by
placing a small pump inside the tote to constantly circulate the solution. A fourth tote will be used to
mix a 10 percent solution of powdered activated carbon and water to apply to the ground surface.
Following treatment of all the injection wells, the ground surface and shallow subsurface will be
treated with a 10 percent solution of powdered activated carbon and water. The time required to
drain the contents of each activated carbon solution vessel will be recorded to estimate an average
infiltration rate for the soil column. The groundwater elevation will be measured prior to the start of
the treatability study. After the totes have drained and equilibrium is reached of the groundwater
level in each injection well, the observation wells will be checked. The time required to drain the free
pore space and the volume recovered in each temporary observation well will be recorded to verify
treatment of the entire soil column.
Powdered activated carbon used for the treatability studies will be supplied by General Carbon
Corporation. The specifications of their powdered activated carbon product are included on the
sheet provided in Appendix A. The particle sizes listed on General Carbon's spec. sheet only
include US sieve mesh sizes 100, 200, and 325 which correlates to 149, 74, and 44 microns. The
spec. sheet indicates 90% of the product is Tess than 44 microns; however, no analysis of the finer
portion is provided. EnviroTrac has a sample of the product and plans to have particle size analysis
completed. Depending on the particle size distribution of the sample of typical product, EnviroTrac
may request additional milling of the product, if necessary. The parameters (product selection,
solution concentration, solution volume) recommended for the treatability study and initial
abatement soil treatment have been found to be effective in our experience to distribute activated
carbon at similar sites throughout the Piedmont Region of North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Georgia in loamy soils derived from weathering of igneous and metamorphic bedrock. We have not
experienced issues with clogging pore spaces at other sites under these conditions possibly due to
the availability of larger pore spaces in loamy textured soil or simply the vast availability of pores
11.990146.00 Page 4 of 8 Revised May 5, 2021
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.

TF!rwac
Environmental Services
versus the dilute concentration of the solution. The selection of powdered activated carbon supplied
by General Carbon was because it has a superior particle size to other commercially available
carbon products and General Carbon indicated they could provide additional milling of the product,
if requested.
If treatment solution is not evident in some or all of the observation wells, an additional application
of treatment solution will be completed as described above prior to sampling the observation wells.
If treatment solution is evident in the observation wells, water samples will be collected from the 2,
5, 10, and 17 foot observation wells at the location of SS-8. The water samples will be delivered to a
North Carolina certified laboratory for analysis of pesticides by EPA Method 8081 B and total organic
carbon. The efficacy of the treatment strategy and activated carbon solution concentration will be
assessed through comparison of the initial groundwater sample prior to treatment with laboratory
results from the water samples collected from the observation wells following treatment.
15 Foot Treatment Spacing
A second treatability study will be conducted in the vicinity of soil boring SS-25 which exhibited the
highest chlordane concentration (45.70 mg/kg), the highest heptachlor concentration (0.584 mg/kg),
and dieldrin (2.810 mg/kg). Soil logged within SS-25 was representative of soil types and textures
found across the site with primarily silt and silty clay in the lower portion of the boring. The 15 foot
treatability study will be completed as described above for the 10 foot study with two exceptions: 1)
The three temporary injection wells will be installed at a radius of 15 feet from the observation wells;
and 2) The initial treatment volume applied to the injection wells will be 600 gallons each.
4.4 Activated Carbon Soil Treatment
Based on favorable results from the treatability studies, initial abatement will be achieved through
the implementation of an activated carbon soil treatment strategy encompassing soil identified
during the Remedial Investigation at levels exceeding the Protection of Groundwater Preliminary
Soil Remediation Goals (PSRG). Figure 3b provides graphic representation of the areas identified
to be impacted by pesticides in excess of the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs. For the purpose of
providing details of the initial abatement strategy, the following section includes a 10 foot injection
well spacing and treatment volumes as described in the 10 foot treatability study. The final soil
treatment spacing and volumes will be based on results of the treatability studies.
11.990146.00
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.
Page 5 of 8 Revised May 5, 2021

Mtro—litac
Environmental Services
Figure 10 shows the distribution of 65 injection wells, each with a 10 foot radius of influence
covering the area to be treated during the Initial Abatement phase. Prior to the installation of
injection wells at the site, a Non -Discharge Groundwater Remediation Permit Application Form will
be submitted to the Division of Water Resources Underground Injection Control Program. The
injection wells will be placed at the site on a surveyed grid in accordance with the approved layout.
The injection wells will be constructed of 2 inch diameter PVC well screen and riser with sand pack
and bentonite surface seal. Forty of the injection wells will be screened from 2 to 12 feet below
ground surface. Twenty-five of the injection wells will be screened from 2 to 17 feet below ground
surface. Following installation of the injection wells, they will be connected to 300 gallon totes. A 5
percent solution of powdered activated carbon and water will be mixed in each tote and the solution
will be allowed to drain into the injection wells under the pressure provided by the head of the
injection system (2.5 to 7.5 psi). Ten injection wells will be treated at one time starting at the
upgradient (north) portion of the treatment area. When the totes have drained, they will be moved to
injection wells downgradient until all the injection wells have been treated. The initial abatement soil
treatment strategy will include the application of 8,640 pounds of powdered activated carbon. The
forty 12 foot injection wells will receive 200 gallons of 5 percent carbon solution. The twenty-five 17
foot injection wells will receive 300 gallons of 5 percent carbon solution. The surface treatment will
include 2,600 gallons of 10 percent carbon solution. The water supply for the initial abatement soil
treatment will be the public water hydrant adjacent to the entrance to the site. A Fire Hydrant
Connection Water Use Permit and meter will be obtained from the City of Winston-Salem.
4.5 Evaluation of Soil Treatment Progress
Progress of the soil treatment will be evaluated by sampling five monitoring wells to be installed
within the treatment area (monitoring wells MW-8 through MW-12). The wells will be screened
across the water table and are anticipated to have terminal depths of 20 to 25 feet. The proposed
locations of the five monitoring wells are shown on Figure 10. The monitoring wells will be installed,
developed, and sampled prior to beginning the soil treatment. The groundwater samples will be
delivered to a North Carolina certified laboratory for analysis of pesticides by EPA Method 8081 B.
Laboratory results of the initial sampling event will be compared to quarterly groundwater sample
results following completion of the Initial Abatement soil treatment strategy.
It is important to note that the proposed Initial Abatement will address both the pesticides and
chlorinated compounds, capture known contaminants on -site, reduce groundwater concentrations
11.990146.00
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.
Page 6 of 8 Revised May 5, 2021

EFFAINTArac
Environmental Services
overtime, and prevent further impacts to the stream immediately upon installation. The chlorinated
compounds are the most significant pollutant to Bowen Branch and Terminix has no responsibility
for these contaminants in either groundwater or the stream.
5.0 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE
Investigation derived waste generated during the Initial Abatement will include uncontaminated
consumables and PPE. PPE and other solid waste (packaging of materials brought to the site) will
be disposed of in appropriate waste disposal receptacles. Soil cuttings, development and purge
water from the monitoring wells, and water used for decontamination of the drilling equipment will
be discharged within the soil treatment area to be treated.
6.0 ESTIMATED COST
A summary of the cost to date of the project was provided by Terminix's accountants on December
8, 2020. From 2009 through November of 2020 Terminix has paid $518,811.46 toward addressing
this incident. EnviroTrac's estimated cost to complete the scope of work described herein is
$242,850.50. The estimated total cost includes installation of the proposed Initial Abatement and
one quarterly groundwater monitoring event to be summarized in a progress report. A breakdown
of the estimated cost is provided below
INITIAL ABATEMENT
SITE ACCESS CONTROL AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
Clearing $2,980.00
Fencing and Signage $15,345.00
Silt Fence and Installation $1,490.00
ACTIVATED CARBON TREATABILITY STUDY
Drilling (2 nested observation wells and 6 injection wells) $10,700.00
Powdered Activated Carbon, 1,425 pounds @ $5.30 per pound $7,552.50
Mobilization, Shipping, Equipment, PPE, Labor, $8,070.00
EPA Method 8081B, TCLP Pesticides, TOC $964.00
Analysis/Documentation/Results $2,500.00
ACTIVATED CARBON SOIL TREATMENT
Injection Well Permit $2,000.00
Drilling $49,260.00
11.990146.00
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.
Page 7 of 8 Revised May 5, 2021

ErivirvT`c
Environmental Services
Activated Carbon, 8,640 pounds @ $5.30 per pound $45,792.00
Mobilization, Shipping, Equipment, Staging $10,417.00
Injection, Equipment, Labor (two weeks) $36,785.00
Surface Soil Treatment, Equipment, Labor (one week) $32,810.00
Consulting, documentation, reporting $5,000.00
INITIAL AND ONE QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING EVENT
Labor, Equipment, Sampling Supplies, PPE $7,475.00
EPA Method 8081B, $1,210.00
Analyze Sample Results, Provide Recommendations on Remedial Design, Report $2,500.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL S242,850.50
7.0 SCHEDULE
EnviroTrac is prepared to begin working on the project upon receipt of written authorization. Utilities
will be cleared and marked, clearing will be completed to accommodate fencing, silt fence, and
injection well installation. A drilling firm scheduled, and activated carbon will be ordered and shipped
to the site. EnviroTrac anticipates the treatability study will take one week with laboratory results
following within two weeks. Results will be analyzed and shared. The injection well permit will be
prepared and submitted. Drilling monitoring wells and injection wells will be initiated (two weeks
budgeted). Activated carbon will be ordered and shipped. The five new monitoring wells will be
sampled. Injection equipment will be mobilized to the site. Injection through the wells is anticipated
to require two weeks. The surface soil application is anticipated to require one week. An Initial
Abatement Report will be completed following the work. The report is anticipated to be complete
and submitted to DEQ within 30 days of completion of the work at the site.
Groundwater monitoring will be scheduled 3 months following completion of the initial abatement.
Laboratory results are typically available within two weeks of groundwater sampling. A report will
be completed summarizing results of the monitoring event.
11.990146.00 Page 8 of 8 Revised May 5, 2021
© 2021 EnviroTrac Ltd.

TABLES

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
GROUNDWATER
ELEVATION
(feet MSL)
CM
r
o
N ao
ti
O)
r,
O)
,
943.74
949.02
938.24
948.28
944.82
TOP OF
CASING
ELEVATION
(feet MSL)
co
o
N
oo
963.54
O)
00
O
CO
CO
O)
964.57
943.99
963.62
LC)
N
in
O)
DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
(feet TOC)
15.59
Not Located
5.62
co
co
•-
5.75
NI -
co
r
12.43
SCREENED
INTERVAL
(feet bgs)
J 20-30
4.5-14.5
Cn
C[)
co
N
M
co
Ch
38-45
16.5-23.5
TOTAL
DEPTH
(feet bgs)
30.0
(0
O
6
23.0
13.0
45.0
Cn
M
N
DATE
CONSTRUCTED
N
r
1-
Q
<
M
N
T
L
is
<
4
4-Apr-12
co
r
=
'-
0)
r
'-
co
T
-5
(NJ
2-J u I-19
MONITORING
WELL
Date
r
1
C
G
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
1
2
CD
1
S
MW-7D

AL SUMMARY
Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B
0
a
CC
03
o
In
o
co
a
m
0
m
BRL
0
CO
CO
0
m
CO
CO
CD.�
BRL
BRL
BRL
CO
CO
m
m—
CO
CO
CO
CO
BRL
03
W
❑
d
Or
o
N
0.47
coCCK
rn
J
0
J
CO
J
CC
CO
J
K
CO
J
Cr
m
BRL
J
K
m
J
d'
0
J
Cr
m
BRL
BRL 1
J
Et
m
yy
O
—
8.8
O
m
co
N
ICJ
N
CO
st
CO
N
1
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
re
m
J
a'
0
BRL
J
a'
0
J
a'
0
Methoxychlor
m
m
820
Lindane
0.57
0.0035
N
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL I
IX
m
0
m
Cr
m
BRL
BRL
a
40
BRL
0
m
BRL
0
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
CC
m
K
CO
BRL
C
m
BRL
BRL
K
m
CC
m
L Heptachlor
0.14
m
dCC
0.63
J
J
CCmm
BRL
BRL
J
cc
J
c c
J
cc
J
cc
J
ccmmmmm
BRL
BRL
J
cc maw
p
W
A
0
r
0
—
J
03co'03al030303=
m
—
.d
N
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
BRL
J
c
m
IBRL
C
N
Ii
p
'p
W
W
Z
W
Z
W
Z
O
J
a.
CO
J
03
m
J
Ce 03
m
BRL
BRL
I BRL
J
a.
m
BRL
BRL
J
CC
m
03
J
CC
03
m
J
03
m
903
J
m
03
in
'
J
a.
m
BRL
N
n
J
03
m
J
03
m
J
C.
03
BRL I
J
0:
m
J
0.
m
J
0
m
J
Ce 03
m
J
0
m
BRL
'Np0
C
W
T
m
'
c
m
N
01
O
n
m
m
m
N
W
N
o-
210
BRL
a'
CO
BRL
N
m
co
a'
CO
CO M
Q1
CC COa'
IL
CO
BRL
a
N
1.4 J
BRL
a'
m
W
CO
m
CO
O
v
BRL I
J
co
J
co
J
co
J
N
'1'
J
m
J
m
W •
m
N
`-
J
cocd
O
CO
a
8.5
W
w
W
m
CO
0
N
g
J
m
J
m
J
CO
J
m
1.3
J
m
BRL
J
m
Chlordane* Dieldrin
1.7 0.034
o
O
O
BRL
J
m
co
J
m
co
J
m
(0
T
Co
m
'
J
2'
m
m
m
'
492
W
O
N
'
•
J
Q_
m
J
m
03
.ap
—
124
BRL
J
m
03
BRL
J
K
m
BRL
J
0
03
BRL
BRL
J
m
%
n
N
0
n
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Aldrin
0.039
W
W
m
co
co
m
co
co
co
co
co
m
m
J
m
A
pp
P!
J
m
J
m
J
m
Y
QI
O1
J
m
J
m
BRL
J
carom
J
J
J
m
V•
J
ce
m
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
1,2,4-
Trimethyl-
benzene
a
0
M
Q
Z
VN
NA 1
NA
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
2
NA
NA
NA
NA
LVN
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
NA !
NA
NA
<
Z
VN
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
VN
VN
cis-1,2- Tetrachloro-
Acetone Dichloro- ethylene
ethylene (PCE)
12,000 48 17
25 2.50 0.0063
140,000 210 82
NA
Z
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
Z
Z
NA
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
Z
NA
Z
NA
Z
NA
Z
NA
Z
Z
NA
Z
NA
Z
Z
VN
NA
VN
Z
NA
C NA
NA
NA
Z
Z
NA
VN
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA 1
NA
NA
Z
NA
Z
Z
NA
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
VN
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<
Z
VN
NA
NA
NA
NA
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soil Remediation
Goal (SRG)
Protection of Groundwater SRG
Preliminary Industrial Soil Goal SRG
m
m
o
o
N
0
0
n
CO
0
o
1...-
CO
0
0
n
CO
0
0
n
CO
0
0
n
CO
0
0
n
CO
0
0
n
CO
o
0
0-
CO
0
0
0
n
onW
m
0
0
0-
0
0
n
CO
m
0
0
0-
OD
0
0
1..--
CO
0
0
n
CO
0
0
0
0-
CO
o
0)
0
1.--
CO
0
0)
0
n
COW
o
0)
0
0-
m
o
0
I--
03
m
o
0
n
CO
o
0)
0
0-
CO
0
0)
0
I--
CO
o
0)
0
I--
COW
co
0
0
0-
io
0
0
O6/03/87
n
CO
m'
0
0
0.❑
CO
0
O
0
CO
°o
M
co
Collection
Depth
(feet bast
0
0
0
0
o
W
o
0.5
o
'-
o
0.5
0
0.5
O
N
O
0N
4.0
a
0.5
O
3.0
4.0
o
0.5
0
W
0
0
ao
O
m
m
E
ao
N
a
F
Q
A -Bottom
B-Top
` p
4
mN
C-Top
C-Bottom
D-Top
D-Bottom
E-Top
E-Bottom
F-Top
F-Bottom I
a
17
0=
G-Bottom I
0
0
0
H-Top
o
"al2
2
2
a
F
—
rI -Bottom
a
I
-
J-Bottom I
no
Y
c
YI

Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B
0
❑
O
o
0
6.4
L1,0
BRL
J
10
m
BRL I
J
Et
m
J
re�'•
m
a
J
10
m
J
10
m
J
2
m
•
J
O¢
m
10
m
J
a'
m
J
K
CO
BRL
J
10
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
K
m
CO
m
M
m
10
m
10
m
Oa
m
W
❑
d
0
2.0
0.47
M
m
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
COCC
m
J
CO
1.0
N
N
7.8
r
J
K
m
J
COX
CO
J
CO
J
K
m
J
0_'
m
J
0_'
m
J
d'
CO
BRL
K
m
J
K
CO
J
X
al
J
Ir
m
J
CO
m
J
K
m
J
O_
m
`o
t
m
O
V
N
O
i
I
I
BRL
CO
CO
m
m
BRL
CO
m
CC
m
cc
0
BRL
BRL
0
IBRL
10
CO
BRL
Lindane
0.57
c
0
o
0
O
0
fV
J
CC
m
J
K
m
J
10
CO
J
IC
m
J
0:•
m
^
J
1
m
BRL
BRL
J
K
m
0:
m
BRL
BRL
J
K
m
BRL 1
BRL
BRL
J
10
CO
J
K
CO
J
K
m
J
10
m
J
10
m
J
0_
m
J
10
m
J
EL
CO
Heptachlor]
0.14
0.013
0.63
J
m
J
m
m
BRL
m
BRL
M
r
N
J
m
J
ce m
BRL
J
m
J
m
J
CO
m
^'
�.j
CI
BRL, 0.010
o
O
N
O
O
BRL
BRL
m
BRL
J
m
m
m
m
W
o
a
c
W
Z
NE
NE
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
J
X
m
J
K
m
BRL
J
K
m
J
K
CO
J
0
m
J
m
0
BRL
BRL
J
m
BRL
J
O'
m
BRL
J
COX
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
K
m
J
CC
CO
Endosulfan I
rn
O
O
J
m
J
m
BRL
s'
''
a
A
N
r
m
N
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
BRL
J
CO
J
m
J
m
J
m
Endrin"
O
0)
COW
V
BRL
J
m
J
m
K
m
K
m
fO
a
—
BRL I
BRL
J
m
J
K
m
J
IX
m
BRL
BRL
1.5, 0.56
BRL
0.013, 0.016
BRL
7.0024, 0.0016.
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
J
2
m
J
K
m
BRL
J
K
m
0.034
Oa
O
O
m
BRL
m
BRL I
m
r(�]i
N
N
8
M
r"
a'
m
d'
m
7,
O
o
O
N
00
0
N
CO
00
O
a
0
0
0
CO
O
O
N
O
0
CO
O
d
O
O
ea
l+Of
a09,
�Oy
N
O
M
G
a
O
0.032, 0.023
0.027, 0.018
O
O
O
m
0.1020
m
BRL
-a
L
n
N
C
r
rCO
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
10
K
m
0_0392, 0.0454
o
o
N
i
0.834, 0.838
0.952, 0.91'
0.076, 0.0388
N
O
O
0
0
0.4730
CC
m
CC
m
O
CO
Oo
CC
co
co
D
Q
O
O
CO
O
O
10
o
K
m
10
m
10
m
ix
CO
ixO•
CO
BRL J
N
BRL
BRL
J
10
CO
J
cc
CO
J
10
m
J
10
m
2.7, 0.8
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
10
m
J
re10
CO
J
CO
BRL
J
10
m
J
ix
m
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
1,2,4-
Trimethyl-
benzene
0
CAI
370
NA
Z
NA 1
Z
NA
Z
Z
NA
Z
Z
J
m
0
J
J
m
J
J
m
BRL
J
m
0
J
0
m
J
m
0
J
0
CO
J
m
0
J
K
m
BRL
BRL
J
K
m
J
0
m
J
CC
0
m
Tetrachloro-
ethylene
(PCE)
0.0063
VN
Z
VN
Z
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
Z
co
O
O
O
O
OK
p
O
0.0100 1
COm
BRL
BRL
m
COm
m
CO
CO
BRL
CO
CO
CO
m
O m
h ra L
U'p v
a
,Ni
N
NA
NA
Z
Z
NA
Z
Z
NA
NA
NA I
m
m
CO
o
o
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
CO
m
m
CO
m
m
BRL
Acetone
12,000
N
140,000 I
Z
Z
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
n
o
O
BRL
o
0
m
0.025 J
m
BRL
m
m
m
CO
CO
CO
BRL
BRL
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soil Remediation
Goal (SRG)
Protection of Groundwater SRG
Preliminary Industrial Soil Goal SRG
Collection Date
r
CO
O
m
0
r
CO
O
O
0
r
CO
O
O
0
r
CO
O
CO
0
r
O
01
CO
0
r
CO
G
O
0
r
CO
G
O
0
r
CO
O
0)
0
r
CO
O
m
0
r
CO
0
O)
0
N
0
R
AT
N
0
AT
v
4/4/2012
N
0
V
v
N
0
V
v
N
0
V
v
N
0
V
v
N
0
0
v
N
0
0
v
m
0
N
is
CO
N
(�
r
m
N
(�
r
a)
N
N
r
0
N
N
r
a)
N
(�
r
m L a
— n y
U0g.
2.0
t�
4.0 I
O
0.5 I
O
y
G
O
OV
O
M
O
a
N
`_o
7
c
*'
i
h
N
m
m
y
cq
0
iIl
<0
N
p
y
0)
In
'
m
C
m
y
Y
Y
Y
6
Fa-
J
L-Bottom 1
6
F
0.
IP-Bottom
O.
O.
0.
r.
y
0
y
co
N
y
0
N
co
f0
0
y
0
l!
y
0
4
y
y
Y
co
0
W
co0
•-
10
In
y
N
co
0
N
10
0
N
co
CO

Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B
P,P-DDD
4
l"J
O
r
O
rn
J
R
m
BRL
BRL
BRL 1
J
K
m
BRL 1
J
d'
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
cc
CO
J
cc
m
J
K
CO
J
cc
m
BRL J
J
CC
CO
J
CCd'
CO
J
m
J
CO
J
m
J
CO
BRL BRL
J
CC
CO
J
0_
m
J
K
CO
J
0_
CO
BRL I BRL
J
K
CO
BRL BRL _!
J
CC
m
J
CC
CO
J
CC
CO
J
0_
m
W
Ci
a
0
O
N
0.47 1
of
J
CC
m
BRL
J
0_
CO
J
CC
m
J
CC
CO
J
m
J
0'
CO
J
K
m
J
0_
CO
J
0'
CO
J
CC
CO
J
m
J
CO
J
CO
J
0'
m
BRL
BRL
J
X0_
m
J
m
BRL I.
J
K
m
Methoxychlor
CO
v
N
W
BRL
D:
m
0:
m
0:
m
BRL
'
CO
BRL
J
K
CO
J
0'
CO
BRL I
J
IX
m
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
K
m
J
X
m
J
0:
m
J
K
m
BRL I
BRL
J
X
m
J
X
m
BRL
J
0:
m
BRL I
BRL
J
K
CO
J
CC
CO
BRL
Lindane
0.57
0
0
O
O
CV
N
J
0_
m
BRL
J
0C
m
J
0_
CO
J
CO
CO
BRL I
J
0_
m
J
CO
CO
J
D'
m
J
0c
m
J
0:
m
J
c0
BRL
J
0:
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
0e
m
J
0:
m
J
0:
m
BRL
J
0:
m
J
0:
m
BRL
J
0:
m
J
CO
CO
BRL
BRL
J
0
m
Heptachlor
O
0.013
(0
t0
O
J
0'
m
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
J
0
m
J
0_
m
BRL
_J
0'
m
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
J
M
m
J
0_
CO
BRL
J
D;
m
BRL
J
0'
m
J
K
m
J
K
m
J
0'
m
BRL I
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
BRL
J
0
m
BRL
J
0_
CO
J
0_
m
J
M
CO
J
0_
CO
w
V
C
W
m
m
BRL I
m
m
BRL
BRL
m
CO
BRL
m
m
m
m
m
CO
m
BRL I
m
m
m
CO
m
CO
BRL
IX
CO
CC
m
IX
m
CC
CO
C
o
a
111
94
O
<
O
BRL I
J
0_
m
J
0_
CO
BRL
BRL
J
CC
CO
J
CC
m
J
CC
CO
J
0_
m
J
0'
in
J
0!
m
BRL
0!
m
0!
m
0
m
BRL
0
m
0
m
BRL
BRL
0
m
0!
m
BRL
J
CC
m
J
0:
m
M
m
J
CC
m
J
0!
m
BRL
Endrin" 1
CO
of
O
<
O
c
J
CC
m
BRL
J
CC
m
J
It
m
J
K
m
J
0_
CO
J
CC
m
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
BRL
J
0_
m
BRL
J
M
m
J
0:
m
J
0:
m
J
M
m
J
0_
m
J
0'
m
J
M
m
J
0_
in
J
CC
in
J
M
m
J
0:
m
BRL
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
BRL
J
0'
m
0.034
O
O
a
O
O
d
41
g
G
2.440
°)
N_
o
o
(O
o
0.0064
J
m
0.0612
0.0175
J
m
0
M
O
0.0515
N
N
o
o
NO
o
O
D:
m
CC
m
CC
m
D:
m
Ce
m
0:
m
O
o
O
2'
m
0.0048
X
m
IX
m
0:
m
Chlordane*
<
0.27
r
CO
uj
-
<
0'
m
O
o
O
X m
BRL
0_
m
BRL
BRL
0.0292
0:
m
0.0263
BRL
X
m
BRL
BRL
X m
BRL 1
BRL
0.0428
BRL
1 0.0134
0:
m
BRL
BRL
v
O
O
O
CO
(p
0
O
CO
<
O
J
0_
m
J
0'
m
J
CC
m
BRL
J
[C
m
J
CC
m
J
m
J
X
m
J
0_
m
J
X
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
0_
CO
BRL
CC
m
0_
m
X
m
0_
CO
0_
m
BRL
CC
m
BRL
0_
m
0_
m
BRL
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
ctiy N
FE g n
m
-
tp
-
370
NA
z
NA
Q
z
Q
z
Q
z
NA
NA
Q
z
Q
z
NA
Q
Z
NA
CC
m
0_
m
BRL
0_
m
0_
m
CC
m
BRL
m
O
o
o
J
0_
m
0_
CO
Tetrachloro-
ethylene
(PCE)
O.
m
NA
NA
NA
NA
z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA I
NA
z
z
NA
I BRL
m
BRL
BRL
CC
m
X
m
BRL
X
m
BRL
BRL
m
m
a
U L
0 3
48
'°
tV
210 I
NA
NA
NA
VN
NA
z
z
VN
NA
z
NA I
NA
NA I
NA
z
BRL
m
m
BRL
X
m
X
CO
BRL
CC
m
BRL I
m
Acetone
n
N
140,000
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BRL
BRL
BRL
m
BRL
0_
m
0_
m
0_
m
0_
m
0_
m
0_
m
0_
m
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soil Remediation
Goal (SRG)
Protection of Groundwater SRG
Preliminary Industrial Soil Goal SRG
Collection Date
o
NOQN0
N
n
o)
N
N
r
o)
N
r
07/02/19
O
N
r
O
N
n
o)
N0NQNNN
N
r
7/2/2019
o)
N
r
O)
N
o)
=
r
o
N
r
7/2/2019
O
N
r
O
=
r
0))
iv-
r
rn
QN
N
r
CD
Q
N
r
0)
N
r
7/2/2019
7/2/2019
7/2/2019
0)
O
Nr
0
rn
NNNNNN
r
0)
r
CD
r
m
r
rn
r
0)
r
Collection
Depth
(feet bgs)
N
O]
m
c
N
<
O)
00
N
<
a
N
<
O
O)
N
0
m
N
<
a
04
<
N
0
m
CO
m
N
0
O
14-15
N
0
O
a,
In
<
<
p)
m
a
co
<
m
co
r 12-14
1-
SS-5 1
Dupllceb SS4
I Dupllceb 58.9
0
3

Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B
Q
d
0
0.38
a
O
O
'?
D7
BRL BRL
1
BRL I BRL
J
m
J
C
m
J
C
m
J
0:
m
J
0:
m
J
Ce
m
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
J
C
m
J
Cr
CO
J
CC
m
BRL
BRL
J
C
m
J
C
m
IBRL
J
0_
m
J
C
m
J
C
03
1 BRL I
m
` BRL
P,P'-DDE
O
N
n
a
O
J
CO
J
CO
J
C
m
BRL
BRL
J
C
CO
J
CCCC
00
BRL
BRL
J
CO
J
CC
CO
J
CC
CO
J
C
m
BRL J
J
C
00
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
BRL
BRL
J
C
03
BRL
J
C
CO
IBRL
J
C
CO
Methoxychlor
m
co
m
C
CO
C
CO
C
m
C
CO
C
m
C
m
CC
m
m
CC
m
CC
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
IX
03
00
CC
m
BRL
C
00
C
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
CC
03
C
CO
BRL
m
al
C
1p
C
J
0.57
0.0035
O
m
[V
J
m
J
00
J
00
J
C
CO
BRL
d'
07
L BRL
00
J
m
J
C
m
J
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
00
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
0]
BRL
J
00
BRL
J
C
00
C
CO
Heptachlor
0.14
m
p
d
m
t0
O
BRL
BRL
J
C
CO
J
C
00
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
J
C
00
J
C
CO
BRL
J
C
0]
BRL
J
C
CO
BRL
BRL
J
C
m
J
X
CO
J
C
03
J
C
m
J
C
CO
BRL
BRL
J
C
0]
BRL
BRL
J
C
CO
BRL
BRL
W
W
Z
Z
Z
BRL
J
CC
m
J
07
J
C
m
J
C
m
J
CC
m
J
m
J
CC
m
BRL
m
J
C
m
J
X m
BRL
BRL
J
C
CO
BRL
J
IX
CO
J
IX
CO
J
IX
m
m
J
CC
00
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
J
CC
CO
J
CC00_
00
00
IBRL
9
W
94
O
•V
—
O
-
J
C
01
BRL
BRL
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
J
C
0]
J
C
00
J
C
0]
J
C
(0
J
C
m
J
C
00
BRL
J
C
07
J
C
07
J
C
CO
J
C
m
J
C
00
J
C
m
J
C
m
L BRL
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
J
C
m
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
J
C
[0
W
0
m
O
BRL 1
BRL
BRL
BRL
C
m
C
co
C
0]
C
0]
C
m
C
m
C
m
BRL
C
0]
C
m
C
m
0.0034
BRL
C
co
BRL
C
00
C
00
C
0
C
m
C
m
BRL
C
m
O
C
—y
'p
T
O
0.0016
0.14
.-
CO
O
O
O
J
C
ma
m
O
CO
O
O
BRL
J
C
0]
ry
N
O
O
J
C
m
coC
m
0.0922
J
m
n
O
O
O
0.0102
0.0041
O
m
O
d
0.0059
J
C
f0
r
0.0418
J
C
0]
O
as
0.1320
C
1.53
N
'
t0+1
O
N
a
Z
U
0.27
7.7
O
0
J
m
0.0126
0.1940
.,-
O
0
BRL
a
O
co
O
O
J
m
O
~
0
J
m
BRL
CO
o
0
J
m
m
0
BRL
BRL
'
J
CO
BRL
0
A
•
m
COv
O
O
O
aO
O
{h
O
O
O
C
T
d
(00
0
O
O
J
C
00
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
J
C
00
J
C
m
J
C
f0
O
O
N
O
C
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
0
J
C
00
J
C
CO
J
C
al
J
C
CO
J
C
m
BRL
BRL
1'
BRL
f BRL
J
C
00
J
WCLCC
03
J
03
J
CO
IBRL
CO
„�LG `. Jv" J^'•' " ^„^` • •,v^` vv,•,.. Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
1,2,4-
Trimethyl-
benzene
COO
N
370
J
C
co
J
C
00
J
CC
CO
J
CC
CO
J
CC
m
J
C
CO
J
C
03
J
CCZ
CO
BRL
Z
I NA J
Z
Z
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
Z
Z
J
00
J
C
00
J
C
m
NA
1 NA
NA
L d W
t
Ta� .
m m
0.
0.0063
8
COm
BRL
BRL
C
C
m
O
O
BRL
C
m
0.0218
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
Q
Z
NA
NA
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
CO
BRL
m
VN
Q
Z
Q
Z
N O
_
U r
U Q m
a
O Lo
NZ.,-,
O
J
0
J
0]
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
00
J
0]
BRL
a,m
O1
O
O
Q
Z
NA
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
NA
NA
Q
Z
Q
Z
1 NA
NA
Z
BRL
J
m
J
m
NA
1 NA
Z
Acetone
12,000 I
N
140,000 I
C
CO
C
CO
BRL
BRL
C
CO
C
CO
C
CO
C
O]
m
NA
NA
NA
NA
Z
NA
NA
Z
Z
Z
NA
NA
C
[0
rBRL
C
m
Z
Z
NA
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soil Remediation
Goal (SRG)
Protection of Groundwater SRG
Preliminary Industrial Sal Goal SRG
Collection Date
m
O
N
n
m
O
N
n
.
o
N
n
m
0
CO
n
0>
0--
CO
n
CO0
0
o
0
N
n
W
0
CO
n
0)
0
N
n
r
CO
0
CO
n
CO
0
CO
n
CO
0
Q
n
0)
0
Q
N
n
0)
0
Q
N
n
7/2/2019
T
O
Q
n
CO
O
Q
n
0
O
Q
n
7/1/2019
7/1/2019
O)
o
n
7/1/2019
CO
O
N
n
0)
O
N
n
m
O
N
n
O
O
N
n
0)
O
N
Collection
Depth
!feel host
m
O N
0I
ab
N
W
co
cc,
(V
O
ej
7
N
r
m
m
m
N
`
m
N
N
W
aD
a.'
ap
0)
c
' Q
I
6
E
N
N
N
N
N
tlJ
N
N
N
N
m
N
N
m
N
W
m
N
W
O
W
N
Q
N
N
O
N
M
a7
N
M
a7
h
h
N
H
N
O
N
N
O
N
N
t0
N
M
ISS-17 1
n
0
N
n
CON
aO
W
N
a0
N
CO
of
co
N
0)
fA
CO
al
co
N
en
N
CO
O
N
CO
O
W
N
O
co
co

Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081E
P,P-DDD
CO m
0
0.47
4.9
J
K
03
J
0'
CO
J
0_
03
J
0_
01
BRL 1
J
0_
03
J
CZ
CO
J
0_
00
J
K
CO
J
d'
3
BRL
BRL it
J
K
00
J
0_
03
J
d'
CO
J
K
00
J
0_
CO
J
K
CO
J
K
00
J
0:
CO
J
d'
03
J
K
03
J
0_
CO
J
d'
CO
J
0_
CO
-J
K
0]
BRL J
J
K
CO
J
0_
CO
P,P'-DDE
N
n
Q
d
m
O)
J
Z
0]
BRL
J
K
CO
J
0C
CO
BRL
J
0C
0]
BRL
_J
0!
0]
J
0_
CO
J
0_
03
J
0_
00
J
0_
CO
_J
0_
00
J
0_
CO
_J
0_'
03
J
0_'
03
J
K
CO
J
0_
03
J
0_
03
J
0_
00
J
0_
03
J
d'
03
J
0'
CO
J
0_
CO
J
0_
03
J
0_
CO
J
0_
CO
J
0_'
CO
J
0_
00
Methoxychlor
m
(0
43
O
N
0
J
0'
03
BRL
BRL
J
0_'
03
J
0:
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
IX
CO
BRL
J
0_
CO
J
0_
CO
J
0_
CO
J
0_
CO
J
0_
CO
2'
m
J
0'
CO
J
CO
R�
CO
0'
CO
BRL
CL
CO
BRL
J
0'
0]
CC0'
CO
03
0'
CO
J
CC0'
CO
J
03
Lindane
0.57
0.0035
o
an
N
BRL
J
CC
01
J
03
CO
J
CC
0
J
0C
03
J
0C
CO
J
CZ
CO
J
0'
03
BRL
_J
03
CO
J
CC
CO
_J
0C
0]
J
0C
0
J
0_
CO
J
0_
03
BRL
J
CC
CO
BRL 1
J
0:
CO
BRL
J
0:
CO
J
CC
CO
J
03
00
BRL 1
J
0:
03
BRL 1
J
03
03
J
Q:
00
BRL
Heptachlor
0.14
0.013
0.63
K
m
BRL
0_
0]
Or
0]
BRL
0:
0]
0_
0]
BRL
D:
0]
BRL
BRL
N
O
BRL
BRL
0:
0]
BRL
0_
03
CC
m
CC
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
0_
01
BRL
Z
m
0_
03
BRL
BRL
Endosulfan II
NE
NE
W
Z
J
m
J
0'
m
J
0'
m
J
m
J
0_
0]
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
J
m
J
m
J
CO
J
03
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
BRL 1
J
CC
m
J
Z
m
J
Z
03
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
J
0:
03
J
IX
m
J
CC
m
J
Z
03
J
CC
CO
C
O
17
C
W
V
O
O
—
0
J
CC
m
J
0Z
m
J
0C
O]
J
03
O]
J
CC
0]
J
0C
0]
J
CC
0]
J
0C
m
BRL
J
0C
03
J
CC
03
J
CC
03
BRL
BRL
J
03
01
J
0,
0]
BRL
BRL
J
0:
0]
J
CC
03
J
0_
m
J
Cr
O]
J
Q:
0]
J
CC
m
BRL
J
CC
0]
BRL
J
0:
03
BRL
Endrin**
3.8
m
Cr,
V
BRL
J
03
J
CC
0]
J
0:
03
BRL
BRL
BRL
0.0064
BRL
BRL
J
CC
CO
O
V
03
.
O
BRL
J
CC
CO
BRL
J
0C
03
BRL
BRL
J
0!
0]
BRL 1
J
0C
03
BRL
J
CC
03
BRL
J
0!
m
J
00
00
J
0C
0]
J
CC
01
J
LC
0]
0.034
(0
0
O
O
0.2010
to
VOan
O
m
O
'0
O
G
QQ
O
O
O
O
0.1020
0
ell
O
O
0.1390
0
coO
O
O
T
O
O
O
O
NO
A
at
O
0.0138 1
0
eiOQm
O
0
O
0 0058
0
J
0.0316
10.0732
J
0]
0
O
O••
O$
•CZ
N
J
0]
0.0230
Oa-is-
0
C
Chlordane"
,`.
N
o
r
K
CO
0.0475
(O
N
0
0.1080
V
rn
0
0.5050
0.2090
0.0287
O
0
O
0'
0]
K
03
45.70
03
O
0.1230
0.5930
0.0479
BRL
O
Q
N
m
m
0.0808
BRL
m
m
O
to
y
03
m
2.070
0.054
v
Z
01
0
o
0.0066
lD
0
o
J
(0 m
BRL
J
00
co
J
Z
ca
BRL
BRL
J
0_
m
BRL
J
0!
m
J
0'
co
J
0_
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
0_
00
J
0_
00
J
0_'
03
3.050 1
JJV
0_
0]CO
0_
BRL
0_'
a]
BRL
BRL
BRL
0 _'
CO
0
0
J
CC
01
J
CC
03
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
1,2,4-
Trimethyl-
benzene
63
co
0
(7
NA
NA 1
NA
¢
Z
NA
NA
<<
Z
Z
a
Z
<
Z
NA
a<
Z
Z
a
Z
NA
a<
Z
Z
a
Z
a
Z
NA
NA
a
Z
NA
VN
a
Z
NA
NA
a
Z
NA
Tetrachloro-
ethylene
(PCE)
0
M
p
o
d
N
00
VN
a
z
NA
NA
a
z
NA
NA
a
z
<
z
<
Z
<
Z
NA
<
z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
a
Z
NA
NA
NA
a
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
<
Z
<
Z
cis-1,2-
Acetone Dichloro-
ethylene
c0
<
Po
N
210 1
NA
a
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
<
Z
<
Z
VN
NA I
a
Z
a
Z
NA
NA
NA
a
z
<
z
NA 1
<
z
NA
NA
NA
<
Z
NA
a
Z
Q
Z
VN
NA 1
NA
O
o
o
N
N
140,000
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Z
Z
Z
NA 1
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Z
NA
NA
Z
NA
Z
NA
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soil Remediation
Goal (SRG)
Protection of Groundwater SRG
'Preliminary Industrial Soil Goal SRG
Collection Date
rn
0
CO
F.:
0)
0
N
n
0)
0
N
n
0
0
N
II.,o
0)
0
N
rn
0
N
0)
E.
0)
o
N
0)
0
N
N
m
0
N
co
n
0)
0
N
N
r
0)
0
N
N
is
0
0
N
CO
n
0)
0
N
N
n
rn
0
N
N
n
m
0
N
CON
n
0)
0
N
R.
0)
o
N
.-
n
0]
O
CO
.-
n
0)
o
N
.-
n
0)
0
N
.-
n
W
0
N
.-
n
O)
o
N
.-
O)
O
N
N
n
T
O
N
N
n
0)
o
N
N
n
0
0
N
N
0)
0
N
n
O)
0
N
Collection
Depth
(feet bgs)
N
0
0
V
(7
0)
N
O)
0
(7
N
0)
0
s-
(�)
M
N
8-9
,-
N
N
N
0)
0
-
N
N
A
0
O
V
(�)
O)
0
1-3 1
Cr,
0
r
Cr)
0
,-
(1)
N
c0
0
0)
(0
0
o
EO1
V7
0
N
N
N
(0
fO
N
CO
tl)
SS-22
N
N
03
CO
an
N
03
01
CO
N
fA
(O
0)
N
CO
CO
Q
N
CO
M
Q
N
CO
0
Q
N
CA
03
1 SS-25
anan(O
N
CO0)
CO
N
CO
N
CO
03
CO
N
(0
03
r SS-26
SS-27
A
N
(0
(0
SS-27
m
N
0)
0)
m
N
CA
CO
an
N
0)
CO
en
N
O1
N
en
(V
CO
CO
0
(+)
CO
N
0
()
V]
CO
(+)
CO
N
.I?m
CO
CO

Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B
P,P'-DDE I P,P-DDD
CO
m
O
A
a
o
CD
4
J
K
m
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
BRL
J
Z
m
J
K
m
J
0:
m
J
K
m
J
re
m
J
Z
CO
J
0:
CO
J
0:
m
Z
CO
0:
CO
BRL
J
0:
CO
J
0_
m
0_
m
m
m
K
m
0
m
Cr
m
0:
m
O'
m
0_
m
0_
m
0_
CO
0:
m
BRL
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
cc
m
BRL
J
m
BRL
J
CC
m
BRL
O'
m
J
Z0_
CO
I
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
0_
m
J
0_
m
BRL •
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
o
m
J
0'
CO
J
m
m
J
K
m
J
K
m
J
K
m
J
O_
m
o
N
A
v
o
alix
m
J
ix
m
J
0_'
m
J
0'
m
J
m
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
0_
m
BRL
BRL
J
0_
m
J
re
m
J
cc0'
CO
J
m
J
0:
m
J
0_'
m
J
0-'
m
BRL
BRL
J
0-'
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
'J
CO
CO
Methoxychlor
m
v
N
CO
BRL 1
J
re
CO
J
re
CO
BRL
BRL
J
re
CO
Z
CO
0
m
BRL
0
m
F
m
BRL
J
CC
m
J
et
m
BRL
BRL
J
CC
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
m
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
m
m
J
Z
m
J
O_
m
Heptachlor Lindens
0.57
0.0035
O
m
CV
172
CO
BRL
J
CO
J
CC
m
CL
JCC
CO
BRL
J
m
J
CC
m
JCL
CC
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
m
JCr CL
m
BRL
BRL
Jce
m
BRL
J
m
J
CC
m
CC
JCC
m
BRL
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
m
0.14
0.013
L 0.63 1
BRL
BRL
J
CC
CO
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
0C
m
J
0
m
BRL
J
CC
CO
BRL
J
0:
m
BRL
J
0:
m
J
D:
m
J
re
m
BRL
J
D!
m
J I
w
CO
J
0!
m
Jm
0!
CO
BRL
Cr'
CO
BRL
J
CO
J
m
m
J
0
m
J
CC
m
C
w
G
c
c
W
1.11
Z
LO
Z
Ill
Z
J
m
m
BRL
J
0_
m
J
Z
m
J
0_
m
J
0'
m
J
CCre
m
BRL
_J
CO
J
0_
m
J
0_'
m
BRL
J
m
CO
BRL
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
a'
CO
BRL
J
0_
m
J
m
m
J
0'
m
BRL
J
0_
m
BRL
J
K
m
BRL
J
K
m
BRL
c
O
C
G
W
94 J
O
1,400
CC
m
0
m
0
m
J
CL
m
J
D!
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
CL
m
BRL
J
Q:
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
m
m
J
0
m
J
cc
m
BRL
J
m
m
J
CC
m
J
m
Cr,
0
J
O_
m
0.0172 1
J
CY
m
J
CC
CO
J
0
m
Endrin**
m
N
o
t-
49
BRL
J CC
m
DI
O
0.0033
N
a
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
O
?
O
J
m
J
m
A
o
o
m
m
0.0040
1 0.0087
-I
m
m
DEE
n
OO
0.0185
0.0821
m
CO
I 0.0656
1 0.0318
tD
o
G
C
G0
;�
TO
p
0.034
O
o
O
O
0_
m
BRL
0.0577
CCn
m
co
00
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
0:
m
BRL
BRL
0:
m
0.0564
0.0154
0.
m
0:
m
0.0401
0_
CO
0.1830
O
0
o0
0.1480
0_
CO
0.1350
BRL
BRL
0.14
C
m
O
L
U
'-
N
O
7.7
J
m
BRL
0.0054
J
m
0.0034
J
m
J
m
I
J
m
BRL
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
BRL
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
a
M
o
O
(op
0
o•
co
0•
NA
<
Z
<
Z
<
2
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
a
Z
NA
<
Z
11 NA
<
Z
<
2
NA I
NA
NA
r VN _I
NA
NA
NA
NA
r NA
NA
NA
<
Z
<
Z
NA
NA
1 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA26 Method 8 0
1,2,4-
Trimethyl-
benzene
M
m
N
0
CD
LVN
NA
NA
NA
z
z
NA
NA
NA
z
NA
z
NA
NA
Z
NA
NA
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Tetrachloro-
ethylene
(POE)
17
0.0063
CO
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
NA 1
NA
NA
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
2
Q
2
Q
Z
NA
NA
Q
Z
NA
NA
Q
Z
NA
NA
Q
Z
Q
Z
O m
J, t t
p m
co
a
2.50
210 1
NA
NA
NA
Q
Z
NA
NA
Q
Z
Q
Z
<
Z
NA
<
Z
NA
<
Z
<
Z
NA
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
NA
NA
<
Z
NA
NA
NA
NA
<
Z
Acetone
12,000
4)
N
140,000
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soll Re -mediation
Goal (SRG)
Protection of Groundwater SRG
'Preliminary Industrial Soll Goal SRG
El0
O
m
O
0
m
0
N
A
O)
0
N
AA
0)
0
N
A
CA
0
N
A
m
0
N
'A
0)
-
O
0
7/1/2019
CA
0
N
A
7/1/2019
0
0
N
A
CD
O
CZ!
A
Oi
O
A
O+
O
N
A
Of
O
�V
A
Of
0
�V
A
W
0
Q
A
rn
0
Q
A
Cn
0
Q
N
A
CD
0
QI
N
A
Cn
0
Q
N
A
03
0
�1
A
CD
0
^Q
A
CA
0
N
A
7/1/2019
rn
0
N
A
m
0
N
A
0
0
N
A
Cn
0
N
A
Collection
Depth
(feet has)
d1
( N
C.'
co
<O
O
`-
'
Pl
O`
D
t?
O'
1
''
r
CD
`?
co
O'
co
'-
N
m
CO
`-
m
N
1
m
Cb
N
`-
L[f
A
t0
csi
1
N
W
W
`-
{
V
co
N
CG
YS
r
co
CI
m
TXCO
m
N
cm
0
N
Vl
W
ul
0
up
co
up
N
co
0
N
O
CO
up
ye -se
O
CO
N
0)
M
N
N
CO
up
N
CD
up
m
CO
up
0
CA
N
O
CO
to
A
CO
m
A
CO
Cal
A
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
IO
SS-39
CA
tll
CO
0
N
CO3
0
CO
CO
0
CO
CO
CO
CO3
N
fO
CO
CO

Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081B
0
❑O
a
0
0.38
7
0
v
BRL
BRL
J
CC
m
J
IX
CO
J
0:
m
J
IX
CO
J
0:
CO
J
IX
CO
IC
m
J
m
J
0:
CO
J
0:
CO
J
LC
CO
J
m
BRL
J
0:
CO
J
W
CO
0:
CO
0_'
m
w'
m
0_'
CO
0:
m
0'
m
J
0'
m
J
0:
CO
J
0:
m
J
K
CO
W
❑
d
CI:
0
V
o
m
O)
2'
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
d'
07
J
0:
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
0'
m
0_'
CO
0:
CO
..
a'
CO
W'
01
CC
m
BRL
J
0'_
CO
J
0:
m
BRL
J
0_'
m
J
0:
CO
J
IX
0
BRL
BRL
0:
0
BRL
BRL
Methoxychlor
m
43
820
J
CC
m
J
0:
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
0:
CO
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
J
CL
m
J
Cr
m
J
0:
m
J
0:
CO
J
Q:
m
J
CC
m
BRL
J
Cr
m
J
0:
m
J
CC
m
J
Cr
m
J
0'
m
J
Cr
m
J
Q!
m
BRL
J
CC
m
J
0'
m
J
0'
m
J
0:
m
Lindane
co
0.0035
2.50
m
CO
m
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
0
BRL
m
m
BRL
BRL
m
m
01
BRL
m
BRL
m
m
BRL
BRL
IX
m
O
0
m
S
0.14
m
p
o
N)
m
o
BRL
J
0:
m
J
0_
m
BRL
J
0
m
J
ce
m
J
0'
m
BRL
J
0'
m
J
0
m
J
0'
m
N
0o
J
0
m
BRL
J
0:
m
BRL
J
0
m
J
0'
m
J
0_
m
J
0'
CO
J
0_
m
J
W
m
J
Q!
m
BRL
BRL
J
0_'
m
J
0'
m
C
m
m0
O
G
W
Z
0)
O
r
Z
CC
m
J
0
m
BRL
BRL
J
0
m
0
m
J
0
m
BRL
BRL
J
0
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
0
m
J
0:
m
J
m
0
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL 1
BRL
BRL
J
0
m
BRL
J
0
m
J
cC
m
C
n
CIm
C
W
BRL
J
CC
m
J
0:
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
0'
m
J
X
m
J
0
m
J
CO
CO
BRL
J
0_
m
J
0)
CO
J
0)
m
J
m 0!
J
0:
m
J
0:
m
0 m
BRL
CO
CO
0r
m
0 m
CO
CO
BRL
0 m
0!
CO
0:
m
C
"a
w
co
m
so
�-
0
BRL
BRL
J
cc
m
J
0:
m
J
0
m
J
0'
m
J
Cr0_
m
J
m
BRL
J
0:
0
J
0
m
J
m
J
m
J
CC
m
J
CC0:
m
J
m
J
0'
m
J
Cr
m
BRL J
J
0_
m
BRL
J
0'
m
J
0_
m
0_
m
J
CC
m
BRL
0
m
C
U
v
❑
0.034
O
O
O
O
0.14
J
m
BRL
J
0:
m
J
Q:
m
J
Cr
m
J
0
in
J
Cr
0
0.0038
CO
O
O
O
J
0.
m
W
O
$
O
•O
O
N
4�)
O
N
01
O
O
J
Q'
m
m
O
O
O
0.004
g
s-
O
O
BRL
J
0
m
J
0'
m
BRL
0.0278
CO
O
O
O
O
O
m
l0
`O
P
V
n
0.27
^
0-
m
BRL
m
BRL
m
BRL
BRL
O
m
m
IX
m
N
,
G
m
O
d
IC
m
,a
0
BRL
6
J
m
J
m
BRL
J
m
J
m
I(1
,0
O
J
m
Ni-
O
m
U
QO
0.039
m
0
m
J
0
CO
BRL
BRL
J
0
CO
BRL
J
CC
m
J
m
CO0
BRL
J
CO
BRL
J
Le
CO
J
m
0
BRL J
BRL
J
0
CO
BRL
BRL
J
0
m
J
0!
CO
BRL
0
m
BRL
BRL
0.008
0!
CO
BRL
0.112
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
1,2,4-
Trimethyl-
benzene
)`)
CO
BRL
BRL
Z
Z
Z
Z
m
BRL
CO
BRL ll
BRL
CO
BRL
0:
CO
CC
CO
CC
m
CC0:
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
m
BRL
0:
m
0_'
m
BRL
BRL
O C
u m W
S d
r
-
co
0
p
N
m
0'
m
Cr
CO
0'
m
NA
NA
Q
z
Q
z
0_'
m
m
0
0'
m
BRL
0'
m
0!
m
0:
m
0:
m
C
m
BRL
0_
m
BRL
0:
m
BRL
0_
m
BRL
0_
m
BRL
0:
CO
m
X
cis-1,2-
Dichloro-
ethylene
48
2.50
210
J
CC0
CO
J
m
BRL
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
NA
BRL
BRL
J
0:
m
BRL
BRL
J
0:
m
J
0:
m
J
0:
m
BRL
J
m
0
BRL
BRL
J
IX
CO
J
0'
CO
J
X
CO
BRL 1
J
0:
m
BRL
J
0'
m
J
COCC
m
Acetone
12,000
N
N
O
gj
V
0_
m
0'
CO
0 m
NA
NA
NA
J
0 m
J
0'
m
0_
m
BRL
BRL
J
0'
CO
J
CC0'
m
BRL
BRL
J
m
BRL
J
0 m
J
0:
m
J
0:
m
J
0_
m
J
0:
COm
J
0:
J
Q'
m
J
0:
m
J
m
X
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soil Remediation
Goal (SRG)
1Rrotection of Groundwater SRG 1
CD
Q:
CO
A
O
N
b
0
2.
m
0
Collection Date
7/212019
0)
O
N
a
0)
O
N
s
m
O
N
0)
O
N
a
m
O
N
0)
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
0
N
O
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
0
N
O
N
a
1/2/2020
1/2/2020
CO ^
I.
mt
O G) 9
0 ❑
'
G
O)
v.
r
v
ri
m
m
SO
m
'
Or
OD
7
'
O0
0,
-
m
'
O
co
'
O{
'
OO
'
O
0)
8-10
c
0
OD
'
m
n
Q
m
Z.0)
m
N
SS-42
N
0)
SS-42
Y
3
2
N
2
r MW-6D
OF
g
SS-03
0)
y
(0
co
N
f0
V
CO
N
V
N
CO
V
0
CO
r SS-45
N
N
CO
CO
0
0)
)O
N
CO
)-
N
CO
Is
N
CO
CO
co
CO
CO
co
0)
0)
W
CO
O)
CO
0)
0
W
CO
0
0
CO
ISS-51 1
SS-51

Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081E
O
a
a
0:
d
0.47
m
J
C
m
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
0
J
C
0
J
C
CO
C
CO
BRL
J
C
0
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
m
J
C
0
J
C
0
J
C
0
J
C
0
BRL
BRL
C
CO
C
CO
C
0
C
0
BRL
BRL
J
C
0
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
w
C
CI
d
CI:
O
a.
J
CC
CO
J
CC
m
J
CC
0
J
C
a0
J
C
m
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
CO
J
CC
m
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
m
J
CC
m
BRL
J
IX
CO
J
cc
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
CC
in
J
CC
m
BRL
BRL
J
CO
J
C
CO
BRL
Methoxychlor
63
CI
a
0
J
0
J
0
BRL I
J
CO
J
m
J
CO
J
0
J
O
J
CO
BRL
J
C
J
m
J
CO
J
CO
BRL
J
m
J
in
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
CO
J
m
J
m
m
0
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
Lindane
0.57
0.0035
i0
N
J
C
in
J
C
0
J
C
0
J
C
m
J
C
m
J
C
m
BRL I
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
J
C
00
J
C
00
BRL
BRL
J
C
m
J
C
01
BRL
BRL
` BRL
J
0:
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
O
0
0
2
.1.
O
0.013
O
BRL 1
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
CO
CO
CO
CO
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
m
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
CO
' BRL
J
C
m
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
0
m
J
0
m
J
0
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
Endosulfan II
Z
Z
Z
C
CO
DO
m
CCC
CO
m
R
m
CC
m
CC
in
CC
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
CC
CO
J
CC
CO
J
m
J
CC
m
BRL
J
CO
J
C
CO
BRL
CC
CO
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
BRL I
BRL
J
m
CC
CO
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
CO
luepnsopu3
11.0
1,400
0_
0
C
m
C
CO
C
m
C
m
C
m
C
m
C
m
C
m
BRL
BRL I
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
in
J
C
0
BRL
J
C
m
BRL
BRL
J
0
BRL
IBRL I
BRL
J
m
J
0
BRL
J
m
Chlordane* Dieldrin Endrin"`
1.7 0.034 3.8
m
co
co
co
0
0
C
m
0
CO
CC
m
Cr
m
CC
m
CC
m
0
m
BRL
C
0
J
CC
0
BRL
TBRL 1
J
0
0
J
0
m
J
0:
CO
J
CC
0
J
C
0
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
CCCC
1
J
m
J
CC
m
J
C
m
J
M
0
J
CC
CO
J
0
CO
J
0
CO
m
O
p
O
0.0391
CJ
Oo
Il
m
p
p
J
C
m
J
0'
03
J
IX
m
0:
m
BRL
BRL
J
m
BRL
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
El
.0.
p
O
J
CC
03
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
J
CC
CO
J
CC
m
BRL
BRL
J
-I
01
J
CC
m
J
IC
m
J
IXCCC
m
J
m
J
m
J
0
m
0.27
r
0.0626
cc
m
J
C
CO
J
C
m
J
C
m
BRL
J
C
CO
O
v
o
J
0_'
CO
J
C
CO
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
a
co
o
J
C
m
J
C
m
J
C
m
0
m
J
0:
m
J
C
m
J
0_'
m
J
C
m
-1
C
CO
K
m
0
m
m
BRL
BRL
v
G
0.039
(m0
O
O
O
00
O
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
m
m
J
C
m
J
C
f0
BRL
J
C
m
J
C
01
J
K
m
m
J
C
01
J
D:
03
J
0:
CO
J
C
03
J
C
m
J
C
m
BRL
J
03
C
CO
J
C
03
BRL
J
C
03
J
C
m
J
C
CO
BRL
BRL
m
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
1,2,4-
Trimethyl-
benzene
63
r
th
CC
03
CC
01
K
01
K
01
CC
01
CC
01
CC
CO
K
m
K
00
K
01
CL
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
m
M
CO
M
03
K
0
CC
C
M
CO
BRL 1
K
0]
K
CO
I
mCO
BRL
BRL �I
I NA
NA
cis-1,2- Tetrachloro-
Dichloro- ethylene
ethylene (PCE)
48 17
CO
o
N
m
BRL
C
0]
C
M
C
m
C
m
C
0
C
m
BRL
C
1
J
C
01
C
01
C
0]
C
0]
C
0
C
CO
BRL
NJ
O r+I
O
CC
m
0.0313
I 0.0603
0.0254
CrOL
CO
COO
BRL
BRL
I BRL
NA
NA
NA
O
N
210 I
BRL
J
m
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
CO
J
CO
BRL
J
m
J
CO
BRL 1
J
CO
J
cc
m
J
ccCC
m
BRL
J
03
0.0112
0.0341
J
m
J
CC
m
J
C
CO
J
CC
CO
BRL
J BRL
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
COMPARISON CRITERIA Acetone
Preliminary Residential Soil Remediation 12,000
Goal (SRG)
25
140,000
J
C
m
J
C
0
BRL I
J
C
m
J
C
CO
C
m
C
m
BRL
J
C
m
J
C
m
J
C
CO
J
C
CO
J
C
m
BRL 1
BRL
J
C
0
BRL
J
C
m
J
C
m
BRL 1
J
C
m
J
C
CO
BRL
BRL
J
C
m
BRL
NA
NA
Q
Z
Protection of Groundwater SRG
Preliminary Industrial Soil Goal SRG
01
Q
U
O
N
O
N
1/2/2020
1/2/2020
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
0
N
a
1/2/2020 1
O
N
0
N
O
N
0
N
O
N
0
N
a
1/2/2020
O
N
O
N
a
O
N
O
N
a
O
N
O
N
a
co
N
O
N
a
O
N
O
Q
N
1/2/2020
1/2/2020
p
N
0
QUQN
N
p
N
0
N
O
N
0
N
O
N
0
N
N
r
N
N
�..
13-15 7/15/2020
N
�
dL am
884•
7
(
Om
1
C
•
co
Cci
O
10
NO
I
m
O
cc
O
8-10
C
D
CA
r
OO
mm
0
0Cn
Z.
m
SS-52
SS-52
N
N
co
CO
0
tlI
CO
0
'
Vl
CO
at
'
Vl
CO
V
'
0
CO
-a
0I
N
CO
N
0I
W
CO
010
N
co
CO
N
0)
C0
10
N
co
CO
SS-56
I SS-56
r
m
N
CO
r-
N
co
CO
r-
09
0/
CO
00
N
N
CO
SS-58
SS-58
0
N
t0
CO
0I
/
co
CO
01
N
0
CO
y
8
-
y
i
og
y
o
0
CD
C9
N
0
00
N
CO
p
10
to
CO
0

AL SUMMARY
Organochlodne Pesticides by EPA Method 8081E
0
O
O
d
0
W
O
EL
CC
CO
m
O
O
N
N.
v
C
O
O
Q'.
V
m
o
m
J
a
m
J
m
J
a
m
J
CC
m
J
K
m
J
CC
m
BRL 1
J
K
m
J
CC
m
J
IX
m
J
K
m
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
m
m
J
0
m
J
CC
m
J
o
CO
J
CC
m
J
CC
m
Methoxychlor
63
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
CO
J
m
BRL 1
J
m
J
m
N
C
J
0.57
Les
co
O
O
O
o
o
(V
d'
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
K
m
K
m
K
m
K
m
K
m
K
m
Heptachlor
0.14
ro
C
m
m
O
m
BRL
BRL
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
J
m
BRL
BRL
JCC
p
a
W
NE
NE
NE
J
CC
CO
J
Cr
m
J
Cr
m
BRL
J
m
BRL
BRL
J
m
J
m
J
CD
wC
O
a
c
W
94
,
1,400
BRL
BRL
BRL
m
CD
m
CC
m
CC
m
CC
m
IX
m
BRL
C
a
C
W
l 3.8
CD
O
J
m
BRL
m
BRL
J
m
BRL
J
m
J
m
J
m
J
m
i
N
o
0.034
m
OS
O
N
d
'
d
n
0.0373
0.0079
m
7 BRL
0.0027
a'
m
0,0054
ix
m
a'
m
a'
m
G
C
2`
0
-
o
o
o
0.0399
K
CD
CC
m
BRL
CC
CO
_
m
0
O
X
CO
CCO
CD-
BRL
`p
0.039
m
Om
0
coJ
o
d'
m
BRL
BRL
J
d'
m
BRL
BRL
J
d'
m
BRL 1
J
m
m
J
CD
m
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
1,2,4-
Trimethyl-
benzene
63
Ol
370
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Q
c o^
m t a
0.I- 15
o
o
Z
NA
NA
NA j
Z
NA
NA
NA I
NA
Z
N Q C
O m
N V L
U z ,
m
a
2.50
210
Q
Z
NA
VN
<
Z
<
z
NA
NA
NA
Q
z
Q
z
Acetone
12,000
25
140,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
Z
Z
Z
NA
Z
NA
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soil Remediation
Goal (SRG)
(Protection of Groundwater SRG
Preliminary Industrial Soil Goal SRG
Collection Date
N
000000
N
o
r
N
N
N
r
N
N
o
r
N
N
N
r
N
N
10
r
N
N
r
7/15/2020
7/15/2020
7/15/2020
7/15/2020
o ^rn
ota
m o m
m
8-10
13-15
m
o
m
m
m
m
m
ce
m
- m
E
cn
W''?
W
N
'4
W
H
W
N
'4
W
W
N
'4
2N
W
2
'4
2
Results presented in milligrams per kilogram
SRG = Soil Remediation Goal (Ref. Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals Table - Feb 2018)
feet bgs = feet below ground surface
Bold denotes concentration is greater than the Preliminary Residential Health -Based SRG
Gray = Denotes concentration is greater than the Protection of Groundwater SRG
Red = Denotes concentration is greater than the Preliminary Industrial Soil Gola SRG
BRL = Not detected at or above adjusted reporting limit
J = Estimated concentration below the reporting limit
NA = Not Analyzed
1 micrograms per liter.
Equipment blank sample "Equip-1" did not contain detectable concentrations of pesticides. Acetone was estimated at a concentration of
• = Results listed for chlordane are the sum of cis -chlordane, chlordane, and trans -chlordane
= Results listed for Endrn, total (includes endrin, endrin aldehyde, and endrinketone

Organochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 8081 B
Heptachlor
0.008
J J
m m
m m
J J
m m
m m
J J
m m
m m
J
m
m
0.010
J
m
CO
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
Endrin (total)
0
m
m
m
m
0.33, 0.32
0.37, 0.32
m
m
o
N
BRL
n
0
BRL
0
BRL
m
m
m
m
m
CO
m
m
Dieldrin
0.002
a.
on
Q.
m
r
_
r
r
r
r
P9
r
Q.
m
M
Q.
m
m
r
m
BRL
m
m
m
m
m
CO
Chlordane*
m CO
BRL
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
m
BRL
m
m
BRL
BRL
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B
trans-1,2- Trichloro-
Dichloro- ethene
ethene
100 3.0
I
N O
N W
cl
e>
V
r
M
r7.
.7
N
N
m
8.7
BRL
BRL
5.6
J
CO
r
•
M
O
o
' -3
st VI
o o
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
BRL
J
m
m
J
m
m
BRL
J
m
cis-1,2- Tetrachloro-
Dichloro- Naphthalene ethylene
ethene (PCE)
70 6.0 0.7
m M
.0 VIm
0
4
r
48.7
188
53.7
60.8
173
J
m
BRL
326
J
m
m
48.7
m m
m CO
C
0.65 J
BRL
m
m
BRL
BRL
BRL
m
COm
BRL
BRL
BRL
BRL
n M
M 0)m
vj
P
N
N
26.0
N-
r
59.7
J
m
J
m
CO
N
co
M
26.0
N
Chloroform
O
r
Nm
J
CO
r cD
J
m
CO
_J
m
CO
_I
m
CO,
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
BRL
Benzene
< J
m
o m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
a
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
CO
BRL
J
m
m
J
M
m
`'
J
m
m
1,2-Dichloro-
benzene
O
0.49 J
J
m
m
J
m
m
_1
m
m
J
m
CO
J
m
CO
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
BRL
J
m
m
_J
m
CO
Acetone
6,000
J
m
m
J
m
CO
J J
m m
m m
J J
m m
m m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
CO
-,
o
,.,
J
m
m
J
m
m
J
m
m
COMPARISON CRITERIA
2L Standard
Collection Date
04/05/12
07/08/19
N N
to N
0 0
0 0
N W
le) COCO
0 0
0 0
W
0
0
T
COCO
0
0
O)
0
0
O)
CO
0
0
04/05/12 1
N
0
o
O)
N
n
O)
W
0
0
O)
N
p-
d
E
co
c.
3
2
N N
I3
02
M
3
2
MW-4
MW-5
MW-6D
MW-7D
I. Equip-2 1
TRIP BLANK
A
0
I MS
MSD
Results presented in micrograms per liter
Bold denotes concentration is greater than the NCAC 2L Standard
2L Standard = NC Administrative Code Title 15 A 2L .0202, effective 4/1/2013
MS = Matrix Spike
MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate
*= Results listed for chlordane are the sum of cis -chlordane, chlordane, and trans -chlordane
Endrin (total) = (includes endrin, endrin aldehyde, and endrinketone

Organochlodne Pesticides by EPA Method 808113
❑
d
0
g
o
v
o
e
K
m
K
COm
-
cc cc
m
cc
CO
ix
m
cc cc
m m
cc
m CO
K
CO
W
0
❑
a
0
m
O1
03
m
03
m
,
c¢
m CO
s
m
c
m
CO¢¢¢
CO m
CO m
CO
CO
1
ic
m
d
m
q
N
a7
C
o
N
d
m m
J
¢
m
a
m
K K
m m
3- C
m m
K
m
O
co
o
$
R'
g
�'
m
p;p
p
n
R' g
m m
K
m
R'
m
K d'
m m
2' d'
m m
d'
m
9
x
O
m
m El K K
C d
K d
K
-
cN
w
^
o
m
m
K
m
C
m m m m
m m
m m
m
1
w
z
z
z
c9
¢
m
¢
m
¢ m m
m m m m
m m
m m
g¢¢
m m
m
1
N
'
gg
si
w
m
g C g g
m m m m
g C
m m
K K
m m
g
m
m
m
w m
m o
o m
m m
m
1
n
I
A
-
1
S
o
a
o
0 956 048
BRL BRL
0.073 0.47
BRL 0.16
0119 0.30
BRL BRL
BRL 0.022
BRL BRL
BRL BRL
Do`
U
;
o
o
o
o
o
K
m
K
m
N
0 K K K
m m m m
K A
m m
0 53
m m
¢
m
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
m
o
mm
o
N
1
1
1
0.0017 J BRL
BRL BRL
0,002 J BRL
BRL BRL
K
m m
m,
o
m
F- u
o
Co
2
81
v
K
o m
K K
m m
o
b
p C
— atW
o
r
o
m
,
N dN
O co o mK
0
W
oy
K d
SS
1
1
BRL BRL
BRL BRL
BRL BRL
BRL BRL
0.013 0.0049 J
0.0082 BRL
BRL BRL
BRL BRL
0.0021 : BRL 1
crs-1,2 I Methyl ethyl
eUlenea ketone
etha
O
N
O
N
O
Q
G O
m
COMPARISON CRITERIA
Preliminary Residential Soli Remediation
Goal (SRG)
'Protection of Groundwater SRG
3
b
2,g
vs
Collection Date
-
o
a
o
m
a
8 0 $ o
04/10/12
07/03/19 J
a
a 2
o
••
or
V -
1
-E.-
E
E
to
c m
E E_>
9
NNN
2 d
p 0
O g
'- m
o
N 2 W
a
2$
w
GLL
N
e, <� E
N aN ❑
U Each
V
:,1,.
V
ej
N
V
G
N
-
f
m
W
2
Results presented in milligrams per kilogram
nary Soil Remediation Goals Table - Feb 2018)
SRG = Soil Remediation Goal (Ref. Inactive Hazardous Sites Bran
sidential Health -Based SRG
BRL = Not detected at or above adjusted reporting limit
12
•
5
2
8
E
3
2
8
8
2
111
Wn
11
'N
W �
R
g
8

Metals by EAP Method 6010
!
,
,a#
11,,,,1.,,
E
!/9
,__
,,,,,,,,,,
Orgenochlorine Pesticides by EPA Method 80816
)
!
.__
■§§§!§§§§§
DieIdrin I Enddn (total)
,66
�|§!�§■mmm
)
2
"
'
■§■■mm««§«
m ■ IA
BRL BRL
BRL BRL
s !
BRL, 0.033 J BRL, 0.022J
BRL BRL
!
;
;
;
.... .... ...
Valetas Organic Compounds by EPA Method B260B1
Toluene I TricNoro-
ethane
NE 1 2.5
$°°:
,,,
=1,222;225,
22|=
,,,
;=;;==5§«■
'''
]/]±
§!§m£§E01
COMPARISON CRITERIA
.
. §
]B)§
:
�;;
,
2|22\§%kk§
;;§§lG22l2
:
!
-
}
!
,
ij ij
k § 2 2
§
§
,§
for Surface Water, Class WS (I-V) Water Suply, effective 6/1012019
and Trans -chlordane

FIGURES

O
a
M/a
34th ST. -
N
- N N
• y • .. • •^1 • 7
s: , N 1
•
N- ail I y
y�'y
W
>•
•N • •.N fA t/J N
• •—�� I� • •
- `0•rh •� fA
-. yI y y y •y N
•
•d, •�' •�.Y_� rh
• yam. —y y A 1 •
V1
y r W •
-L ,., •� •J, y
h 4 y
HSr j8
•
ce
mia
0
0
ry •
PROJECT NO: 11.990146.00
co
}
X
z
0
7
CC
03
CC
0
0
00
2
cc
cn
VI
m
z
•
a.pgy ca.n04 02a2\sa.nadWasaapsaAut rvp•.+aa Id\q - L ar-'a ar9Yiafi6'[I‘ai2ara.1dvA

m/a
34th ST.
M/8
ci 0 ''4
0<•
0
0
0
0
6
2
N
(n�
a�0
)Z JOU=
OFm-, 0
ce a
o. C 0W Ncn
arev —O
Oa
•
N h •
•
a
• o
BRASH
•
2i
7
X
2
NOTE: BASE DRAWING WAS PROVIDED FROM BRUCE
2
27
5,2
i
YQ
Wo
3= o
�GW
aw
O Q
¢0
K
0
SCALE: AS SHOW
O
0
1. y�
Soo
;C cL c9
•
c
Byerliv j 0 \sa.ngruq}nansanul Inp•+azi II asWd\+9uN+a1 00'961066'I1\51.3ar0ddVA

ƒ
{
IN
G/' zcer
/ « wenko
aa
zx
ma
ww
\`
PROJECT NO: 11.990146.00
rS
Sall Boring Depth(ft) Analyte(mg/kg)
S-19 1-2 Chlordane: 9.9.HI
Dleldrin: 3.23Q
8-9 Chlordone: 0.3330
DIeldrin: 0.132
13-14 Chlordane: • :9
SS-20 1-2 Chlordane1,..v.d..n: : L9fl
Diddrin: 1.53.
8-9 Chlordane. 3.30.
DIeldrin: L4Z
13-14 _Chlordane: 0.0201
Ie :D2910.
SS-21 1-2 DIeldChlodane: 0.0
8-9 Chlordone: 0.0475
Dhlord : 0.0.08
13-14 Chlordane: 0.0598
�I9ldrin: 9 .
4 -T —i,h!ardone: t.In90
Mel _An: 01790_
B-9 DIe131n: 0.008.5.
12
SS-25 2-3 Cmadane:
DIeldrin: 2.510.
Heptachlor: 0354
8-9 Chlordane: 0.30.
DIeldrin: 0 0427
12-13 Chlordane: 0.1230
DIeldrin: .Ci3
- -a ,Of one:
Dleldrin: n 5971.
8-7 Chlordane: 0.0479
DIeldrin: 0.030Z
10-11 DIeldrin:
Frd..0
Chlordane: 12.431
DIddrin: 9.350.
8-9 NON 0E1ECT
.13-14 Olddrin:
SS-28 1-3 Chlodane 0
Dlderin: 0.0732.
8-9 NON DE1EC1
3-14 O1Mdrin' C.JR•99
SS-29 8-9 DIeldrin: L3i3D.
11-12 Chlordane: g.53D.
olpldrin: ' :0
&
55-34 1-3 NON DF'T9CT
8-10 NON DE*OCT
12-13 NON PE'IECT
- 55-35 1-3 NON DETECT
8-10 NON DETECT
13-15 NON DETECT
9-10
EJ
ECT
l
NON DETECT
14-15 NON DETECT
{\!//.
es
II,;t•
agg�a
SS-30 2-3 NOn 9ES9`.
7-8 Aldrin: 0.004.
_ Oleldrin: 5312
SS. 31 5-5 Chlordane:
Dleldrin: 1.511
10-11 Chlordane: 0.
uwero. sGi
)QQ\d
%4
Garrey . 4-020a‘_a___.__.___.©16 1(}6611 21.2i1-0.1dVA

( ƒ
)
7/WOW
ae/ae@
Nkg#K«
a
Sell Boring Depth(tt) Anatyle(mg/kg)
SS-19 1-2 Chlordane: 6.930
DIeldrin: 3.732
8-9 Chlordane.: 11.1.310
DIeldrin: 0132
13-14 _IT,,lane; !W —
/
g~!9`t
!d»
1"2"
2,
ƒ
5
/
55-22 2-3 i`11oraane: 5W.
DIeldrIn: 0 C915
8-9 Chlordane: C 0024
DIeldrIn: _
SS-23 2-3 Chlordane: '
Dieldrin: 47770
8-9 Chlordane:
0.10 0.3090
Walden: 0.10.00
13-15 Chlordhlord ane: 0.0287
DIeldrin1
\k
Q
22�
®.
8/
;
/)
Dhlo da: : 3 4
IWO
6-7 Chlordane: e: D.0479
DIeldrIn: 0.03D0.
_ ._.. 10-1L_0ieldrip: 0. 'S0
.i%
\za±.C\}
:d3
; !%
q3
q9k
,
»
,
SS-31 5-6 Chlordane
Dlelarin: 1.812.
10-11 Chlordane: 9.0336
DIedrin:gala_
SS-32 2-3 1
a-9 NDN DEW_
SS-33 5-8 Alarin: 0.0054
Chlordane: 0.0577
DIeldrIn: D.0749
9-10 Dieldrin: 0.0033
13-14 AldrIn: 0.0034
Chlordane: 0.0536
DIeldrin: A.024
`
Qb
5
.
"!
SS-35 1-3 NON DE EC?
6-10 NON DETECT
13-15 NON DETECT
55— W 5 3-6.3 Diaidln: ch,2342
9-10 NON DETECT
14-15 NON DETECT
__saa______.____1.441.141 ra9b/066•INsi.aaraJdwk

O
0
U
z
M/a
34th ST.
M/a
1
N
%\�ab1�\\
\\\\ 1.-.3 0 \ --` �°'c�
\ \ \ . - L]_ �� m
afa a aaaauhaa. 7J{ r
e�iiw \^. \ \ y :�
tiv �� .Y -`\ \ J} • J CZ co
\
S
U
3
o z
o
a ae
n
Z
=re
a
ce 0
m Z
Q 0
0 VI
4
NOTE: BASE DRAWING WAS
Ca
o�
%
away sa.ngL'ama\sa.aAuaalAissaaut pmpauaa aswa\NuwaL +2M+e sv9r106,61t\S}WirOJaVA

Eapgy sa.ngj p \5.1151ruq}11q}3.U/ [[ +S94d\WIW,+31 a311-19 0796I06611 SI.MarOJdVA

ging
ghintig
.0.....4
Rhig
WWI! g
' gs
A g#
W¢ .
f
gl
II1III
z "
w
M/a
34th ST
M/a
Ce
0o
0<
0
0
0
8
i
c6
Hsfl21
8
•
•
8
RIPRAP
•
W
•
•
•
8
8
3
u>
6 ETD
0
-
a 0
K Q
0
m
W0
w
X
6
LEJ
0 L
U
6
cc
0
w
0
0
a_
a
En
3
07
2
N G
0
8
0
ad�
at
0- C
'
O
00
0
ay,
ar.
4
sway saaIgj-0 ‘sa.n8gruomathsanu[ IaO+auaa II asaid\q+Waal aa+ig 0191,t06611\ o roJdVA

Eapgy sa,nOu oma sauAs\ugyaflgsanu[ laloauag [[ asold\4uNua1 ao^4g oo5Yio66'[[\sy3ajoudvA

ob
oz
ding
0 SRO • .
3
■0.a®:B4
111II�
w I11 I
M/a
34th ST.
o+p'gV 9a,,,C14-0202\sa..01Sku.10514sawl aswd\muN-++1 oasma6611\•i.+Paced\

g•
m/a
34th ST.
M/a
0
•
•
y
S
S
JZU —7" `� SC,
Li 7 O
0
M
0
0
0
3 a
0
oZ
LOC-
O
Y M
M
• M
- zz
}
= w>
z
Y
0
� N
0
m
0
0,
X
Z
w
m
O
u_
W
0
0
K
re
cn
N
0
0
ro
0
Z
3
y 0
it 3%
rr co
oo
a
a•1 E saa^q! Oi02\sa.ngruq}oE10 UI 1a11.auaa II ...Al 00'961066M slz.C..y\A

a
z
9D
CO
m/a
34th ST.
M/a
T
0
0
0
3
ce
S
2
ms—
•
2
O PT ..++a4-oaoa\ aruasaas••OI fw+f++a a asnydvelupa.tai =rye 065f10664h.sW4eNn

a
0
0
O1
,Ground Surface
0
0
01
3
0
u1 o 1 0
u1 Ln v v
01 01 01 01
u1 0 ur1
rn m N
01 co co
0
N
CO
Ln
00
.01 ,5 ,0
31VDS 1t3I1113A
s -
HORIZONTAL SCALE
CL/ML- Silty Clay/Silty Clay
S>S
3
PROJECT NO: 11.990146.00
thway saxau 0202\sa.nAlWgioCimsa^u4 loiauab [( asWd\Tuvaa1 azeme W5Y1066-mstnaroJd\N

W
al
Ground Surface
Approximate Groundwater
N M M N
Ol Ql Ol 01 CO CO
,0T ,S ,0
immmmTTTTT
31VJS 1VD11213A
O O O O
C c c C
c c c c
o o 0 0
..7.,
c c G.1c �c
Q5 OO 0O =O
CL - Sandy CLAY
ET:
HORIZONTAL SCALE
O
u1
C
0
Y
f0
d CC
H E
0 O ,u
Z CI, wC
Q CO 0 0
V1 V1 0_ 0
CL/ML- Silty Clay/Clayey Silty
SM - Silty SAND
SC/SM - Silty Clayey SAND
Z
0.
ce c
w Z Le)
ce O
Vr U O
LL Q
Q m
m
w
w
w
o±
Q
Z
x
Z
yerj ce cd
NO
Z
D0
Lri
[L J W
w
2 ,
z
0 0
O
Z
SCALE: AS SHOWN
PROJECT NO: 11.990146.00
co
co
0
W
0
C
a
Q
co
O
Q .N�i
mm
Z O
3W
0 0
Q
ti
may
00
W
W
5 1-
cc ci
E
E
CI; 1;'
W
Ugly saun6u OZOZ\saun6ld\uoI o6n.sanui palpamab II asnyd\xlulmJal a7n.lg 00'94I0661I\s}7a(ro.ad\,/q

array sa 14 O202\sa.n014\uq}n0I}sanut InPadaL 11 asnyd\9Wa-+a1 20n4 O091,106611 51. ar°JdVA

VENT PIPE
FIGURE 11
ACTIVATED CARBON INJECTION SYSTEM DIAGRAM
(TYPICAL)
2 IN DIAMETER PVC
12-17ft.
VALVE
ACTIVATED
CARBON
SOLUTION
•
2 FT Bentonite Surface Seal
TOP OF SCREEN
10 -15 FT SCREEN (PVC 0.101 SLOT)
SAND FILTER PACK
BOTTOM OF WELL
300 GALLON POLY TOTE

J
1-
uJ
0
>-
>-
H
J
N
a
LLJ I—
D/ LU
V
LL
z
0
0
0
Lu
a
0
AJ—
S0
a)
Y
P
0
Ed
1:1 0
C
W
Bentonite Seal
O oui
O -
9- r�
— 0 0 — iD
C Ta C
Ns- NT
EN U U
u) In T (n r
Ii,,,pIl„l
,11u1nun11y1u�
n 111111111111M
s _iInu U•
Borehole Diameter
T
Nesting Observation
No. 2 Filter Sand
.0
0
O_
(/)
C
a)
0 0
o L()
IO N
Lo
laml^^
V/
Nesting Observatio
Bentonite Seal
No. 2 Filter Sand
6Mp av sa.an61 f 0202\sa,Jn6Id\uoI .o61}sanuI lnlpawaa II asnyd\0049tI0661t\s}oaro.)d\�M

APPENDIX A
General Carbon Powdered Activated Carbon Specification Sheet

"CLEANING THE WORLD WITH ACTIVATED CARBON"
GC POWDERED
powdered activated carbon
GC Powdered Activated Carbon is a virgin carbon. Derived from selected
grades of bituminous coal its high activity and surface area make it ideal for
many purification applications including the treatment of potable water and
the removal of taste, odor and organic contaminants. It meets the
requirements of AWWA B600-90.
Specifications
Mesh Size, (US Sieve):
- 100 mesh, %: 99 (min)
- 200 mesh, %: 95 (min)
- 325 mesh, %: 90 (min)
Iodine Number, mg/g: 800 (min)
Surface Area, m2/g: 900 (min)
Moisture, % (as packaged): 5 (max)
Typical Density, lbs./cu.ft.: 29-33
g/cc: 0.48-0.52
*Standard packaging is in 55 Ib. vinyl bags. Other packaging is available upon
request.
Caution!
Wet activated carbon removes oxygen from air causing a severe hazard to workers inside
carbon vessels. Confined space/low oxygen procedures should be put in place before any
entry is made. Such procedures should comply with all applicable Local, State and Federal
guidelines.
33 Paterson Street, Paterson, New Jersey 07501 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.generalcarbon.com [e-mail]

APPENDIX B
Initial Abatement Design Calculations

APPENDIX B
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Initial Abatement Work Plan — Powdered Activated Carbon Soil Treatment
Bruce Terminix
3495 Leo Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
IHSB Site ID No. NONCD0002238
Assumptions
Concentrations of treatment solutions are based on reported activated carbon adsorption
capacities of various commercial pesticides (2016, Adsorption of emerging pollutants on activated
carbon). Reported maximum adsorption capacities range from 25 milligrams per gram (mg/g) to
720 mg/g; however, for most commercial pesticides especially those with similar constituents to
the contaminants found at the site, maximum adsorption capacities range from 100 to 200 mg/g
and the mean of the reported maximum adsorption capacities was 100 mg/g.
A normal distribution of particle size was assumed for the milled powdered activated carbon
product supplied from General Carbon (2018, The Hydrogen Adsorption Behavior of Mechano-
Chemically Activated Carbon). Therefore, we estimate 15 to 20 percent of the product is of a
particle size (less than 15 microns) which may be transported the proposed radius of influence
(10 feet). In the calculations below, we use 17.5 percent content less than 15 microns.
The average chemical concentration of subsurface soil from a depth of 2 feet to a depth of 15 feet
of 5 mg/kg was used as a very conservative estimate.
The average chemical concentration of near surface soil from ground surface to a depth of 2 feet
of 10 mg/kg was used as a very conservative estimate.
Estimate of the total contaminant load within the cylindrical radius of influence (10 feet) of
an injection well to a depth of 15 feet:
Volume of cylindrical radius of influence = 3.14(10 ft)2 x 15 ft = 4,712 ft3/ 27 ft3/yds3 = 175 yds3
Mass of cylindrical volume of soil = 175 yds3x 1.3 tons/yds3= 227 tons x 907 kg/ton = 205,792 kg
Mass of contaminant = 205,792 kg x 5 mg/kg = 1 kg

Estimate of the mass of powdered activated carbon product required for treatment of 17
foot injection well:
Mass of activated carbon required to adsorb 1 kg of contaminant = 1 g of carbon/100 mg of
contaminant/ x 1 kg of contaminant = 10 kg x 2.2 Ibs/kg = 22 Ibs of carbon
Mass of activated carbon required for appropriate treatment particle size = 22 Ibs / 0.175 = 125 Ibs
Estimate of the total contaminant load within the cylindrical radius of influence (10 feet) to
a depth of 2 feet:
Volume of cylindrical radius of influence = 3.14(10 ft)2 x 2 ft = 628 ft3 / 27 ft3/yds3 = 23 yds3
Mass of cylindrical volume of soil = 23 yds3 x 1.3 tons/yds3 = 30 tons x 907 kg/ton = 27,425 kg
Mass of contaminant = 27,425 kg x 10 mg/kg = 0.27 kg
Estimate of the mass of powdered activated carbon required for surface application of one
well radius (10 feet):
Mass of activated carbon required to adsorb 0.27 kg of contaminant = 1 g of carbon/100 mg of
contaminant/ x 0.27 kg of contaminant = 2.7 kg x 2.2 Ibs/kg = 6 Ibs of carbon
Mass of activated carbon required for appropriate treatment particle size = 6 Ibs / 0.175 = 33 Ibs
Limiting factor for surface application of powdered activated carbon and water solution:
Available water capacity (AWC) of upper two feet = Published AWC rate (2021, Soils — Part 2:
Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Water) for sandy loam 0.12 in water / in of soil x 24 in of soil
= 2.88 in of water (not a limiting factor)
Infiltration rate = range of Published infiltration rates (2021, Minnesota Stormwater Manual) for
silt loam to sandy loam = 0.3-0.8 in/hr; at an application rate of 1 gal/min = 1 gal/min x 1 ft3/7.48
x 60 min/hr = 8 ft3/hr over an area of 3.14 x 102 = 314 ft2. 8 ft3/hr / 314 ft2 x 12 in/ft = 0.3 in/hr
(limiting factor)
In order to not flood soil or cause runoff of applied solution 0.2 inches of water will be applied over
the radius of influence of each well (314 ft2) at an application rate of 0.5 gal/min. 0.2 in x 1 ft/12 in
x 314 ft2 x 7.48 gal/ft3 = 39 gal. Therefore, the estimated surface treatment volume is 40 gal x 65
injection wells = 2,600 gal.
Volume of water for injection wells (10 foot radius of influence):
Using the same logic for the surface application, if we apply 20 gal/ft over the radius of influence
of each well over the screened interval (10 or 15 feet) = 20 gal/ft x 10 ft = 200 gal or 20 gal/ft x

15 ft = 300 gal. Subsurface application will have the additional influence of 2.6 psi from the
elevation head of water in the full tote at a depth of 2 feet (top of the well screen) to 9.1 psi at a
depth of 17 feet (bottom of the well screen).
Volume of water for injection wells (15 foot radius of influence):
0.5 gal/min. 0.2 in x 1 ft/12 in x 3.14(15 ft)2 x 7.48 gal/ft3 = 44 gal. 44 gal/ft over the radius of
influence of the screened interval (15 feet) = 44 gal/ft x 15 ft = 660 gal. To keep it simple, use 600
gal (two totes).
Concentration of powdered activated carbon solution for injection wells:
125 Ibs powdered activated carbon per 300 gallon tote = 125 Ibs / (300 gal x 8.34 Ibs/gal) = 0.05
or 5 % solution of powdered activated carbon and water.
Concentration of powdered activated carbon solution for surface application:
33 Ibs powdered activated carbon per 40 gallons of water = 33 Ibs / (40 gal x 8.34 Ibs/gal) = 0.1
or 10 % solution of powdered activated carbon and water.
References:
The Hydrogen Adsorption Behavior of Mechano-Chemically Activated Carbon from Indonesian
Low -rank Coal: Coupled Langmuir and Dubinin-Astakhov Isotherm Model Analysis, October 2018,
International lournal of Technology 9(5):993.
Adsorption of emerging pollutants on activated carbon, 2016, Rev Chem Eng, Zahra Jeirani,
Catherine Hui Niu and Jafar Soltan, downloaded from New York University Bobst Library
Technical Services.
Soils — Part 2: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Water, The Plant and Soil Sciences e-Library
2021, maintained by the University of Nebraska -Lincoln, Dept. of Agronomy and Horticulture,
University of Nebraska — Lincoln, NE 68583-0915, access:
https://passe12.unl.edu/view/lesson/Ocff7943f577/10.
Minnesota Stormwater Manual, Design infiltration rates, 2021 by Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency, access: https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Design_infiltration_rates.

NORTH CAROLINA
FORSYTH COUNTY
1N THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
• SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
16 CvS 3652
BRUCE-TERMINIX COMPANY, )
ELISABETH MURRAY, CARtLINE )
HUGHES, JANE BROWN and ANNE )d
ELLIS,
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. )
)
THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM H. )
WHITEHEART and YADKIN VALLEY )
INVESTMENTS, LLC, )
)
Defendants. )
CONSENT ORDER
This cause was scheduled to come for trial before the undersigned presiding during a
regularly scheduled session of Forsyth County Superior Court commencing on September 24,
2018. Based upon a review of the record and statements of counsel in open court, the Court
finds and concludes that the Parties have reached an agreement to fully and finally resolve this
action upon the terms and conditions set forth below:
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERD, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:
1. The Estate of William H. Whiteheart (the "Estate") shall deliver or cause to be delivered
to Bruce-Terminix Company ("Bruce-Terminix") payment in the total amount of
$250,000 (the "Settlement Funds"), to be received by counsel for Plaintiffs within 30
days hereof.
2. Upon delivery of the Settlement Funds, Plaintiffs shall file a voluntary dismissal with
prejudice, dismissing all claims asserted against Defendants in this action.
3. Bruce-Terminix shall be responsible for relnediation of pesticide contamination (the
"Pesticide Remediation") on, at or emanating from the property located at 3495 Leo
1
4814-8576-6517.v1

Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (the "Property") and the two adjoining properties
to the north and south (the "Adjoining Properties") owned by Defendant Yadkin Valley
Investments, LLC ("Yadkin Valley"), to the extent such pesticide contamination migrated
from the Property or was otherwise caused by the historic activities of Bruce-Terminix.
In general, the parties believe that Bowen Branch represents a divide on the southern
Adjoining Property and there shall be a presumption that any further soil contamination
on the southern Adjoining Property is the result of an independent release. The Pesticide
Remediation may include, but is not necessarily limited to, site assessment, cleanup,
containment, and natural attenuation.
4. The Parties anticipate that the cost of the Pesticide Remediation will be substantial. In
addition, the Plaintiff has already incurred substantial costs associated with
environmental issues at the Property, including environmental consultant fees and
attorneys' fees.
5. Bruce-Terminix shall undertake the Pesticide Remediation in coordination with DEQ
and/or under the Registered Environmental Consultant Program, and shall work in good
faith to obtain a No Further Action ("NFA") letter from DEQ related to pesticide
contamination at the Property within two (2) years of the entry of this Consent Order.
6. The Settlement Funds shall be held in a segregated account and shall be used by Bruce-
Terminix for the Pesticide Remediation, and the parties agree that Plaintiff will account
for the expenditure of Settlement Funds as such expenditures become necessary.
7. Other than the Pesticide Remediation, Plaintiffs shall not be liable for remediation of any
contaminants, pollutants, or hazardous or toxic substances (collectively "Pollutants") at
the Property or Adjoining Properties (including in the soil, groundwater, or surface
2
4814-8576-6517.v1

water), or of Pollutants that have migrated to or from the Property or Adjoining
Properties.
8. Other than the Pesticide Remediation, if it is determined that pollutants are found and
additional remediation is required, which Defendants specifically deny, Yadkin Valley
shall be responsible for remediation of those Pollutants at the Property or their Adjoining
Properties (including in the soil, groundwater, or surface water).
9. Bruce-Terminix and Yadkin Valley shall enter a site access agreement sufficient to allow
Bruce-Terminix to undertake the Pesticide Remediation. The site access agreement shall
not affect or modify the terms of this Consent Order.
10. Plaintiffs Elisabeth Murray, Caroline Hughes, Jane Brown, and Anne Ellis represent and
warrant that they are the sole known heirs or assigns of John Detgen entitled to enforce
the Purchase and Sale Contract dated March 28, 2000 between John and Marianne
Detgen, on the one hand, and William H. Whiteheart, on the other, for the sale of the
Property (the "Contract"). Plaintiffs agree to hold harmless and indemnify the Estate for
liability, costs, and expenses incurred in connection with any claim asserted against the
Estate by any third party seeking to enforce Addendum B, ¶ 2 of the Contract as an heir
or assign of John Detgen.
11. The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees related to this action.
This the 21 day of January, 2019
3
The Honorable Edwin G. Wilson
Superior Court Judge Presiding
4814-8576-6517.v1

To the foregoing, WE CONSENT:
George W. House
N.C. State Bar No. 7426
Joseph A. Ponzi
N.C. State Bar No. 36999
BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON
HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
Post Office Box 26000
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420-6000
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRUCE-TERMINIX COMPANY
By: Burns Blackwell, President
Elisabeth Murray
Caroline Hughes
Jane Brown
Anne Ellis
Steven D. Smith
Matthew L. Spencer
Smith Law Group, PLLC
500 Olive Street
Winston Salem, NC 27103
Attorneys for Defendants
4
ES' OF WILL WHITE
ltr
04
BS
Bryan C. Ti
mpson, Estate Administrator
LEY INVESTMENTS, LLC
B * Tki—ak SL
Its:
tlioNG
4814-8576-6517.v1

To the foregoing, WE CONSENT:
eorge w . use
N.C. S Bar No. 7426
Joseph A. Ponzi
N.C. State Bar No. 36999
BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON •
HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
Post Office Box 26000
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420-6000
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRUCE-TERMINIX COMPANY
By: Burns Blackwell, President
Elisabeth Murray
Caroline Hughes
Jane Brown
Anne Ellis
Steven D. Smith
Matthew L. Spencer
Smith Law Group, PLLC
500 Olive Street
Winston Salem, NC 27103
Attorneys for Defendants
ESTATE OF WILLIAM H. WHITEHEART
By: Bryan C. Thompson, Estate Administrator
YADKIN VALLEY INVESTMENTS, LLC
By:
Its:
4
4814-8576-6517.v1

To the foregoing, WE CONSENT:
George W.'House
N.C. State Bar No. 7426
Joseph A. Ponzi
N.C. State Bar No. 36999
BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON
HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
Post Office Box 26000
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420-6000
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRUCE-TERMINIX COMPANY
By: Burns Blackwell, President
Elisabeth Murray ---
Steven D. Smith
Matthew L. Spencer
Smith Law Group, PLLC
500 Olive Street
Winston Salem, NC 27103
Attorneys for Defendants
ESTATE OF WILLIAM H. WH1TEHEART
By: Bryan C. Thompson, Estate Administrator
YADKIN VALLEY INVESTMENTS, LLC
#71MIART
By:
Its:
Caroline Hughes
Jane Brown
Anne Ellis
4
4814-8576-6517 vl

To the foregoing, WE CONSENT.
George W. House
N.C. State Bar No. 7426
Joseph A. Ponzi
N.C. State Bar No. 36999
BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON
HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
Post Office Box 26000
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420-6000
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRUCE-TERMINIX COMPANY
By: Burns Blackwell, President
Elisabeth Murray
°U 1/(1/ ittit
Caroline Hughes
Jane Brown
Anne Ellis
Steven D. Smith
Matthew L. Spencer
Smith Law Group, PLLC
500 Olive Street
Winston Salem, NC 27103
Attorneys for Defendants
ESTA 1F OF WILLIAM H. WHITEHEART
By: Bryan C. Thompson, Estate Administrator
YADKIN VALLEY INVESTMENTS, LLC
By:
Its:
4
4814-8576-6517.v1

To the foregoing, WE CONSENT:
-George W. House
N.C. State Bar No. 7426
Joseph A. Ponzi
N.C. State Bar No. 36999
BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON
HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
Post Office Box 26000
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420-6000
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRUCE-TERMINIX COMPANY
By: Burns Blackwell, President
Elisabeth Murray
Caroline Hughes
Anne Ellis
4814-8576-6517.v1
Steven D. Smith
Matthew L. Spencer
Smith Law Group, PLLC
500 Olive Street
Winston Salem, NC 27103
Attorneys for Defendants
ESTA'I'h OF WILLIAM H. WHITEHEART
By: Bryan C. Thompson, Estate Administrator
YADKIN VALLEY INVESTMENTS, LLC
4
By:
Its:

To the foregoing, WE CONSENT:
George W. House
N.C. State Bar No. 7426
Joseph A. Ponzi
N.C. State Bar No. 36999
BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON
HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P.
Post Office Box 26000
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420-6000
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRUCE-TERMINIX COMPANY
By: Burns Blackwell, President
Elisabeth Murray
Caroline Hughes
Jane Brown
4814-8576-6517.v1
Steven D. Smith
Matthew L. Spencer
Smith Law Group, PLLC
500 Olive Street
Winston Salem, NC 27103
Attorneys for Defendants
ESTATE OF WILLIAM H. WHITEHEART
By: Bryan C. Thompson, Estate Administrator
YADKIN VALLEY INVESTMENTS, LLC
By:
Its:
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on this date, I served a copy of the CONSENT
ORDER by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Steven D. Smith
Matthew L. Spencer
Smith Law Group, PLLC
500 Olive Street
Winston Salem, NC 27103
This the 24Lh day of January, 2019.