Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820067_Inspection_20210706de,rno %CM/? Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ..S Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Farm Name: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Arrival Time: 7.' 6 Departure Time: o ftw Coun Owner Email: Region: Fie6 VI—F j Phone: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Title: r1 Latitude: Integrator: Phone: 77D? Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current, Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish 37 3 Farrow to Wean .2000 Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish gco Gilts Boars Other Other Layer Non -Layer Design Current ty Pop. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other esign Currey Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes�"No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes „E`No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 2/4/2015 Continued 12. CropType(s): • .-� �`�� i(). Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Structure 1 Structure 2 9 Structure 3 Structure 4 ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE Structure 5 Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Arc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload n Frozen Ground ❑ Yes d'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE or environmental threat, notify DWR ❑ Yes =❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes „❑--No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE n Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN n PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. n Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil n Outside of Acceptable Crop Window n Evidence of Wind Drift n Application Outside of Approved Area / 13. Soil Type(s): %%`r a'r rr fk; 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. n WUP ❑ Checklists n Design ❑ Maps n Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Waste Application n Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis n Rainfall ❑ Stocking n Crop Yield ,.t120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Page 2 of 3 n Yes DNo 0 NA 0 NE n Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑•°No ❑ NA ❑ NE n Yes JJ, No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Other: 0-Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ Ycs : ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2/4/2015 Continued (Facility Number: v. 7 Date of Inspection: 7/ / 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ❑ Yes ,ai\io ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes _❑,,No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Jf No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? 0 Yes 'No ❑ NA 0 NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ja1lo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes psNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes . 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE s of facili r any additional recommendations or any o `uiise additional pages as necessary Reviewer/Inspector Name: e /.SdhJ •ELM I e F6h1flOt Phone: %%0 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 s<%�✓.vh--- 1 �L�i.�I.K �� i Date: '7 h., 7.?/ 2/4/2015 FACILITY #: 67 FARM NAME: FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT (#19) DUE EVERY 5 YEARS �/�3��I9 EXPERIATION DATE ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL OIC CARDOR NO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20) SOIL TYPES 6/L� � CROP TYPEST.2cu�- THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOUL AVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST ES R NO Irrigation Plan Maps WASTE REPORT (#21) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER PGtP r �/ �I� DATE yJ/�U% I NITROGEN LEVEL �� / SOIL REPORT (#21) EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE f%> ?-/Ig"°/ P-I (NO MORE THEN 400) PH (Note if 4 or Tess) (5; 4 /5`' 3 Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) ;2-o6 NUMBER OF ANIMALS Fe.. -3 F-e- ,taZc j ap j MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS IRR2 (#21) ZONE ACRES PAN CROP TYPE ee 61,4 c5-2.a4 • __ee eft. FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) 120 Min inspection initialed Weather Codes Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter CALBRIATION (#24) - EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED - DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS d`' �� /, l `1_ - FLOW RATES RAIN FALL (#21) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED -LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2 FORM SLUDGE (#21 8,25) -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM 7 CROP YEILDS MORTALITY VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE