WI0700012_Staff Report_20070914

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
Date: September 14, 2007
To: ❑ Landon Davidson, ARO-APS
❑ Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS
❑ Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: Peter Pozzd , Groundwater Protection Unit
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: peter.pozzo(a,ncmail.net
Z David May, WaRO-APS
❑ Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS
❑ Sherri Knight, WSRO-APS
Fax: [phone]
A. Permit Number: WI0700012
B. Owner: PCS Phosphate
C. Facility/Operation: PCS Phosphate
❑ Proposed ® Existing
❑ Facility ❑ Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ❑ Animal ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle El FE Lagoon ❑ GW Remediation (ND)
❑ UIC - (5Z) other (specify)
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M - ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 ❑ 503 Exempt ❑ Animal
2. Project Type: El New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. Z Renewal El Renewal w/ Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ® I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days, please take the following actions:
Z Return a Completed Form APSSRR.
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet. .
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO*.
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits, reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer: Date:
FORM: APSARR 02/06 Page 1 of 1

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
September 13, 2007
RICHARD ATWOOD
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY
1530 NC HWY 306 SOUTH
AURORA, NC 27806
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No. WI0700012
PCS Phosphate Company
Injection Other Wells (5Z)
Beaufort County
Dear MR ATWOOD:
The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (the Division) acknowledges receipt of
your permit application and supporting materials on September 7, 2007. This application package has
been assigned the number listed above and will be reviewed by Peter Pozzo.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if
necessary. To ensure the maximum efficiency in processing permit applications, the Division requests
your assistance in providing a timely and complete response to any additional information requests.
Please be aware that the Division's Regional Office, copied below, must provide recommendations prior
to final action by the Division. Please also note at this time, processing permit applications can take as
long as 60 - 90 days after receipt of a complete application.
If you have any questions, please contact Peter Pozzo by phone at [phone] or by email at
[e-mail]. If the reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message, and they will respond
promptly. Also note that the Division has reorganized. To review our new organizational chart, go to
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/documents/dwcl orgchart.pdf.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES
ON THIS PROJECT.
Sincerel
For Debra J. Watts
Supervisor
cc: Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Permit Application File WI0700012
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www,ncwaterqualitv.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
No Carolina
Xtura!!y
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone].
Customer Service: [phone]

AQUIFER PROTECTION S;ECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: October 8, 2007
To: Aquifer Protection Section Central Office
Central Office Reviewer: Peter Pozzo
Regional Login No:
County: Beaufort
Permittee: PCS Phosphate
Project Name: PCS Phosphate
Application No.: WI0700012
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): ❑ New ® Renewal
0 Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification
❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals
❑ Distribution of Residuals
❑ Attachment B included
❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt
❑ Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation ® Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Date of site visit: October 4, 2007
Person contacted and contact information: Mr. D. Daniel Winstead, III
Site visit conducted by: Peter Pozzo, Allen Clark, and Will Hart
Inspection Report Attached: ❑ Yes or ® No.
RECEIVED / DENR / DWQ
AQUIFER PRfTFCTION SECTION
OCT 11 200i
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
® Yes or ❑ No. If no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude:
e. Regulated Activities / Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For Disposal and Iniection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site, or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s):
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude:
IV. INJECTION WELL PERMIT APPLICATIONS (Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat
pump injection wells.)
FORM: WI0700012.str 1

AQUIFER PROTECTION StECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Description Of Well(S) And Facilities — New, Renewal, And Modification
1. Type of injection system:
❑ Heating/cooling water return flow (5A7)
❑ Closed -loop heat pump system (5QM/5QW)
❑ In situ remediation (5I)
❑ Closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5L/"Non-Discharge")
Z Other (Specify: 5Z - Groundwater Remediation)
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes Z No
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ❑ Yes Z No
What is/are the pollution source(s)? . What is the distance of the infection well(s) from the pollution
source(s)? ft.
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? ft.
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good Z Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ® Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ® Yes ❑ No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes or ❑ No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution.
sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
Injection Well Permit Renewal And Modification Only:
1. For heat pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation (e.g. turbid water,
failure to assimilate injected fluid, poor heating/cooling)?
D Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain: N/A
2. For closed -loop heat pump systems, has system lost pressure or required make-up fluid since permit issuance
or last inspection? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain: N/A
3. For renewal or modification of groundwater remediation permits (of any type), will
continued/additional/modified infections have an adverse impact on migration of the plume or management of
the contamination incident? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, explain:
4. Drilling contractor: Name: N/A
Address:
Certification number:
FORM: WI0700012.str 2

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
5. Complete and attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
V. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.:
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet - if needed information is available
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item
Reason
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition
Reason
6. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition
Reason
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information;
Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons:
8. Signature of report preparer(s):it
Signature of APS regional supervisor:
Date: / O __
115
FORM: WI0700012.str 3

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Application is for renewal without modification. Potential impact to off -site property is highly unlikely, due to
system's location within a large mining operation. A slurry containment wall has been constructed to prevent
discharge to a barge slip on the Pamlico River.
FORM: WI0700012.str 4

Shrestha, Shristi R
From: Watts, Debra
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 4:49 PM
To: Hart, William
Cc: Shrestha, Shristi R; Watts, Debra; May, David
Subject: RE: WI070012 - PCS Tank Farm
Hi Will
Thanks for getting back with me. In some of the review summaries from CO staff, the terms treated groundwater and
groundwater were intermixed, which was a bit confusing. I saw where the water was going through a sand filter and
UV and wasn't sure if this was some kind of treatment for the contaminated groundwater, but if it's fresh water, it's
probably being treated for the bacteria, etc. if I'm reading between the lines correctly.
Hopefully this answers our questions so we can issue. Thanks for your quick response. Debra
Debra Watts
Supervisor, Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Protection Branch
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6338 office
d e b ra. watts (a), n cd e n r. q ov
512 N. Salisbury Street
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Nothing Compares......
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties,
From: Hart, William
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 4:12 PM
To: Watts, Debra <[e-mail]>
Cc: May, David <[e-mail]>
Subject: WI070012 - PCS Tank Farm
Debra, David asked me to touch base with you regarding the permit referenced above. The Tank Farm remedial
action plan operates utilizing injection of untreated groundwater (from a confined sandy layer OR Castle Hayne
DePressurization Water-DPW),disinfected by UV, into the Croatan Aquifer at the south end of the tank farm.
Extraction wells in the Croatan Formation remove impacted groundwater at the north end of the tank farm and send
the impacted groundwater back through the plant processes to recover phosphorus. There is also a slurry wall north of
the extraction wells to prevent migration of contamination to the barge slip and the Pamlico River. In short, the
injected groundwater receives no additives and the extracted groundwater is not re -injected after treatment. The most
recent permit renewal package contains an Interim Project Evaluation that helps to explain the process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me if there are any further questions.
Will Hart
Hydrogeologist '
Division of Water Resources

Department of Environmental Quality
252 948 3968 office
wi l l i a m. h a rttQ n cd e n r. a ov
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
+:Nothing Compares —
Email correspondence to and from this address issubject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties.

WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
Date: October 9, 2017
To: David May — Robert Tankard
From: Shristi Shrestha, WQROS — Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Protection Branch
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail]
Permit Number: WI0700012
• A. Applicant: PCS Phosphate Company Inc.
B. Facility Name: PCS Phosphate Company Inc.
C. Application:
Permit Type: In -situ Groundwater Remediation Well
Project Type: Renewal
E. Comments/Other Information:
I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days, please return a completed WOROS Staff
Report.
When you receive this request form, please write'your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy of
this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office Groundwater Protection Branch contact person
listed above.
RO-WOROS Reviewer:
COMMENTS:
Date:
NOTES:
FORM: WQROS-ARR ver. 092614
Page 1 of 1

WQROS REGIONAL STAFF REPORT FOR
UIC Program Support
Date: November 1, 2017
To: Shristi Shrestha
Permit No. WI0700012
County: Beaufort
Permittee/Applicant: PCS Phosphate Company Inc.
Facility Name: PCS Phosphate Company Inc.
L GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): 0 New ® Renewal
0 Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification
a. Date of Inspection: N/A
b. Person contacted and contact information:
c. Site visit conducted by:
d. Inspection Report Printed from BIMS attached: ❑ Yes ❑ No.
e. Physical Address of Site including zip code:
f. Driving Directions if rural site and/or no physical address:
g. Latitude: Longitude:
Source of Lat/Long & accuracy (i.e., Google Earth, GPS, etc.):
IL DESCRIPTION OF INJECTION WELL(S) AND FACILITY
1. Type of injection system:
❑ Geothermal Heating/Cooling Water Return
® In situ Groundwater Remediation
❑ Non -Discharge Groundwater Remediation
❑ Other (Specify:_
2. For Geothermal Water Return Wells) only
a. For existing geothermal system:
Were samples collected from Influent/Effluent sampling ports? 0 Yes ❑ No.
Provide well construction information from well tag:
b. Does existing or proposed system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If No, please provide source/supply well construction info (i.e., depth, date drilled, well contractor,
etc.) and attached map and sketch location of supply well in relation to injection well and any other
features in Section IV of this Staff Report.
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? 0 Yes ® No
What is/are the pollution source(s)?
What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution source(s)?
RECEIVEDINCDEQ OWR.
NOV 0 8 2017
Water Quality Regional
Operations Section
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary?
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good ® Adequate 0 Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ❑ Low ® Moderate 0 High
Rev. 6/1/2015 Page 1

WQROS REGIONAL STAFF REPORT FOR
UIC Program Support
7. For Groundwater Remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ® Yes ❑ No. If No,
attach map of existing monitoring well network if applicable and recommend any changes to the groundwater -
monitoring program.
8. Does the map included in the Application reasonably represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface
drainage)? ® Yes ❑ No. If No, or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries,
buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
9. For Non -Discharge groundwater remediation systems only:
a. Are the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? D Yes ❑ No ® N/A.
If no, please explain:
b. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with what was reported by
the soil scientist and/or Professional Engineer? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
III. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ►1 No. If yes, explain.
2. Recommendation
❑ Deny. If Deny, please state reasons:
❑ Hold pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
3. Signature of report preparer(s):
itict
Signature of WQROS Regional Supervisor:
Date: I/- k- (1
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS/ATTACHMENTS (If Needed)
The system operates as part of a Remedial Action Plan to remediate an historic leak from a phosphoric acid
tank. The leak was discovered during tank replacement activities. The source has ben removed/discontinued
Rev. 6/1/2015 Page 2

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION - GROUNDWATER PROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: November 26, 2012 Permittee(s): PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Permit No.: WI0700012
To: APS Central Office County: Beaufort
Central Office Reviewer: Michael Rogers, PG Project Name: Tank Farm
Regional Login No:
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): ❑ SFR Waste Irrigation System ® UIC Well(s)
0 New 0 Renewal
❑ Minor Modification 0 Major Modification
❑ Surface Irrigation 0 Reuse 0 Recycle 0 High Rate Infiltration 0 Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals
❑ Distribution of Residuals
❑ Attachment B included
❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt
❑ Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation ® Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ❑ Yes or /5 No.
a. Date of site visit:
b. Person contacted and contact information:
c. Site visit conducted by:
d. Inspection Report Attached: ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
Yes or ❑ No. If no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For SFR Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude: Method Used (GPS, GoogleTM, etc.);
e. Regulated Activities / Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For UIC Injection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site, or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s):
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude: Method Used (GPS, GoogleTM, etc.);
RECEIVEDIDENRIDWQ
NOV 30 2012
Aquifer Protection Section
APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page I of 5 Pages

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION - GROUNDWATER PROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
H. RENEWAL AND MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS (use previous section for new or major modification
systems)
Description of Waste System and Facilities
1. Are there appropriately certified ORCs for the facilities? ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
Operator in Charge: N/A Certificate #:
Backup- Operator in Charge: Certificate #:
2. Is the design, maintenance and operation (e.g. adequate aeration, sludge wasting, sludge storage, effluent
storage, etc) of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or ❑ No.
If no, please explain:
3. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect permit (drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? If yes, please explain: No
5. Is the residuals management plan for the facility adequate and/or acceptable to the Division?
❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain: N/A
6. Are the existing application rates (hydraulic or nutrient) still acceptable? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please
explain: N/A
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring
parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well network if
applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program: Modification of the groundwater monitoring plan will be duscussed later in
the Staff Report.
8. Will seasonal or other restrictions be required for added sites? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification B?)
9. Are there any buffer conflicts (treatment facilities or disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or ® No. If yes, please attach a
map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be incorporated
into the permit:
10. Is the description of the facilities, type and/or volume of waste(s) as written in the existing permit correct? FEI
Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain:
11. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes or ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (GW, NDMR, and NDAR as applicable)? ® Yes or
❑ No ❑ N/A. Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Review of self -monitoring data
does not indicate any issues with the continued operation of the system
APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 2 of 5 Pages

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION - GROUNDWATER PROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
13. Check all that apply: ® No compliance issues; ❑ Notice(s) of violation within the last permit cycle; ❑
Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under SOC; ❑ Currently under JOC; ❑ Currently under
moratorium. If any items checked, please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify
answer/comments (such as NOV, NOD etc):
14. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit, (SOC, JOC, etc.) been complied with? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ Not Determined ® N/A.. If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? ❑
Yes or ® No ❑ N/A. If yes, please explain:
III. INJECTION WELL PERMIT APPLICATIONS (Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat
pump injection wells.)
Description of Well(s) and Facilities — New, Renewal, and Modification
1. Type of injection system:
❑ Heating/cooling water return flow (5A7)
❑ Closed -loop heat pump system (5QM/5QW)
❑ In situ remediation (51)
❑ Closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5L/"Non-Discharge")
Z Other (Specify: Former Type 5Z)
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes /1/ No
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ❑ Yes ® No
What is/are the pollution source(s)? . What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution
source(s)? ft.
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? ft.
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good Z Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ❑ Low Z Moderate ❑ High
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ® No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program: The Washington Regional Office would like to recommend modification of
the groundwater monitoring schedule for Total Coliform Organisms to semi-annual, to coincide with other
parameter monitoring, or be removed altogether. Historical monitoring data does not indicate that Coliform
Organisms are an issues at the site. Likewise, cadmium and chromium have not proven to be issues at the site
and could be removed from the monitoring program.
APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 3 of 5 Pages

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION - GROUNDWATER PROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? Z Yes or ❑ No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution
sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
Injection Well Permit Renewal and Modification Only:
1. For heat pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation (e.g. turbid water,
failure to assimilate injected fluid, poor heating/cooling)?
❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain: N/A
2. For closed -loop heat pump systems, has system lost pressure or required make-up fluid since permit issuance
or last inspection? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain: N/A
3. For renewal or modification of groundwater remediation permits (of any type) will
continued/additional/modified infections have an adverse impact on migration of the plume or management of
the contamination incident? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, explain:
4. Drilling Contractor: Name:
Address:
NC Certification number:
5. Complete and attach NEW Injection Facility Inspection Report, if applicable
V. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the Application: This system operates as part of a
Remedial Action Plan formulated to remediate a phosphorus leak/spill in the Tank Farm area of the mine
facility.
2. Attach new Injection Facility Inspection Form, if applicable
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, please explain
briefly. .
4. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information;
Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons:
APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 4 of 5 Pages

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION - GROUNDWATER PROTECTION UNIT
REGIONAL TAFF REPORT
5. Signature of report Preparer(s):
Signature of APS regional supervisor:
Date: t — L -aid
APS-GPU Regional Staff Report (Sept 09) Page 5 of 5 Pages

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
March 18, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Will Hardison
Groundwater Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Evan Kane, Underground Injection Control Program Manager /i
RE: Amendment of injection well permit
Permit number WI0700012, previously issued to PCS Phosphate on December 19, 2002, has been
amended to correct a mistake in the monitoring schedule. Specifically, the monitoring schedule in
Part V, Section B, paragraph 1, has been changed to require sampling for several parameters from
CIW7 and MWTF-1CR in April and October, rather than January and October. The quarterly
sampling schedule for total coliform organisms is unchanged.
A copy of the amended permit is enclosed for your files. If you have any questions regarding this
permit or the UIC Program, please call me at [phone].
cc: UIC-CO files
Enclosures

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
December 19, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Will Hardison
Groundwater Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: ,_Evan Kane, Underground Injection Control Program Manager
RE: Issuance of injection well permit
Permit number WI0700012 has been re -issued to PCS Phosphate for the injection of potable water
to control migration of contaminated groundwater at the Tank Farm area at PCS Phosphate's plant
in Aurora, NC. A copy of this permit is enclosed for your files. The UIC Program appreciates
Michelle Volosin's assistance with the review of this permit. If you have any questions regarding
this permit or the UIC Program, please call me at [phone].
cc: UIC-CO files
Enclosures

MEMORANDUM
TO: Evan Kane, UIC Group
FROM: Michelle Volosin, WaRO
DATE: December 28, 2001
SUBJECT: PCS Phosphate Information; WI0100012
Evan- Please find attached WaRO's duplicate copy of the Design Report (July 31, 1990) and a
copy of the Supplemental Remedial Action Plan (October 31, 1989), both excluding drawings and
fold out figures. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 252.946.6481 or via
email.
ry

MEMORANDUM
TO:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
December 17, 2001
Evan Kane
UIC Group
Central Office
FROM: Michelle Volosin, Hydrogeolgist
Washington Regional Office
SUBJECT: PCS Phosphate
Beaufort County
Permit No: WI0700012
Evan- Please find attached the requested information on the referenced permit that is available in
this office. As noted via email, the November 1989 Supplemental Remedial Action Plan,
December 1989 response from the GWS to the Supplemental Remedial Action Plan, March 6,
1990 report from Ardaman & Associates, Subject: "Response to deficiencies noted by DEM...",
. and the July 31, 1990 Design Report and Specifications have not been located in our incident,
permit, or archive files. Please call if I can be of further assistance.
+ sue+ I c$i 1 ZT-Es NIOV5 kc-C;
rrl
2

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
May 4, 2001
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mark Pritzl
Underground Injection Control Group
Central Office
THROUGH: Willi Iardison, Groundwater Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Michelle Volosin, Hydrogeolgist
Washington Regional Office
SUBJECT: PCS Phosphate Injection Permit Renewal
Beaufort County
Permit No: WI0700012
This office has reviewed the above referenced application. Based on this review and a
site investigation (5/7/01) the following comments are submitted for your consideration:
1. Drainage at the site is "adequate" to "good".
2. Containments are constructed around potential contamination sources (phosphate tanks).
3. All wells are properly constructed.

r'
North Caro Department of Environment and I :__ .ral Resources
Division of Water Quality - Groundwater Section
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT - FORM B
INJECTION WELL PERMIT NO. WI 070 00 I a DATE E7t1/4.)
NAME OF OWNER PPS �P"ha 5phai
ADDRESS OF OWNER "PO 1-I S / I530 i-1 Wy sO G 30N A,
/Iu2oR4, n►C a7ta� I
d l kJ-)
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision, county, town)
LOCATION OF INJECTION WELL (and source well(s), if applicable)( ', addeecsj
• appeotc IsA' lrt/es4 of agfre £u:/dtnj
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision , county, town, if different than owner's address, plus description of location on site)
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Minimum distance of well from property boundary 7 J 0?Y'
Quality of drainage at site C. Flooding potential of site LU t'N
(good,adequate,poor) 0° (high,moderate,low)
GPS Data:
Latitude: ° a9,/ 97 .L411
Longitude: 760 d Eke' & i. (0 Or
DRAW SKETCH OF SITE (Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and
north arrow.) On , a.. 4 ^, _ t
DESCRIBE INJECTION SYSTEM (vertical closed loop, uncased borehole or cased water well; separate source well and
injection well; combination source and injection well; or other description cis applicable)
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT -FORM B (CONTINUED)
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Date construc62'_ .5730/q(
Drilling contractor: Name BAtlaine-t-V 0.4nis< &din/ '-b fill
Address J
Certification number I'l7S
Total depth of well 5-Y Total depth of source well
(if applicable)
Inspection point Measurement Meets minimum standards Comments
Yes No
Casing
Depth
Diameter
Height (A.L.S.)
Grout
Depth
Screens
Depth(s)
Length(s)
I.D. Plate
Static water level
Well yield
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
(concrete)
Sampling port
(labeled)
X
X
x
X
K
X
Water tight pipe entry J�
Well enclosure entry
Vent
Functioning of heat pump system (Determine from the owner if heat pump functions properly)
INSPECTOR
GW/UIC-2
z3(c&? j/'d/O5(; 4 Office Wa po
March 28, 2001

r
WITNESS Address
WITNESS Address
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

4/
North Carob—_ Department of Environment and Resources
Division of Water Quality - Groundwater Section
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT - FORM B
INJECTION WELL PERMIT NO. WI 6.7000 t'a, DATE 5714/0
NAME OF OWNER PeS �P"haSphok 1 I elw-a
ADDRESS OF OWNER ?O & �I8 / 1530 } 1 W1t' 30 (p oc 41,
,t2oR*, Al C. d 7t0L 1
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision, county, town)
LOCATION OF INJECTION WELL (and source well(s), if applicable)( 1Ve addRej-c,
• beittiten l' 9 "ant and office
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision , county, town, if different than owner's address, plus description of location on site)
Potential pollution source?dL1 Distance from well - 100'
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Potential pollution source Distance from well .
Minimum distance of well from property boundary 7/CSKI0'
Quality of drainage at site ar(r°f'lta Flooding potential of site La (/(/
(good,adequate,pooi) t L (high,moderate,low)
GPS Data: // I
Latitude: 55° � 2' 1Z 7. yy" Vv Longitude: 76' °Via 33. 37'/ 1/
DRAW SKETCH OF SITE (Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and
north arrow.) `pp a
DESCRIBE INJECTION SYSTEM (vertical closed loop, uncased borehole or cased water well; separate source well and
injection well; combination source and injection well; or other description as applicable)
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

t I�YO c essa- c i
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT -FORM B (CONTINUED)
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Date constructed 6/3 — (a�c jc I
Drilling contractor: Name {�, Liten 4 ' l fhv- r &ckfvtj °p- fill Ylq �a
Address V
Certification number t .a75 '
Total depth of well 60 • Se Total depth of source well
(if applicable)
Inspection point Measurement Meets minimum standards Comments
Yes No
Casing
Depth
Diameter
Height (A.L.S.) )r
Grout
Depth
Screens
Depth(s)
Length(s)
I.D. Plate
Static water level X
Well yield
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
(concrete)
Sampling port
(labeled)
Water tight pipe entry
Well enclosure entry
Vent
Functioning of heat pump system (Determine from the owner if heat pump functions properly.)
INSPECTOR
GW/UIC-2
(T/C&? (/A/osa Office VValC o
March 28, 2001

J.
WITNESS Address
WITNESS Address
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

North Carol.___ Department of Environment and N .. ral Resources
Division of Water Quality - Groundwater Section
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT - FORM B
INJECTION WELL PERMIT NO. WI 07000
( a
DATE 5711/0
NAME OF OWNER Pes �a"hu 5�h0
f,Y/w,�Q
ADDRESS OF OWNER ePO qg / 1530 wv. SO(p 30U411
AuEoR Nc a7a4,
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision, county, town)
LOCATION OF INJECTION WELL (and source.well(s), if applicable)(k1im, adders-0
• b elm/ten fPOv JWsLt A4uC t11t4e Ie9e/ grim Ma/ nt
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision , county, town, if different than owner's address, plus description of location on site)
Potential pollution sourceSant Distance from well as
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Minimum distance of well from property boundary
Quality of drainage at site Mao, Sao, Flooding potential of site LabV
(good,adequate,poor) V L (high,moderate,low)
GPS Data:
Latitude: 35 o??'`1//
7 as1'jJ Longitude: I 4&'32.3? "W
DRAW SKETCH OF SITE (Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and
north arrow.)
J%e Qatc%med.
DESCRIBE INJECTION SYSTEM (vertical closed loop, uncased borehole or cased water well; separate source well and
injection well; combination source and injection well; or other description as applicable)
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

roe_ at- 1 n` )3
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT -FORM B (CONTINUED)
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Date constructed (p75 /q( II II /�
Drilling contractor: Name {�,wane-14 &Aircat-t- ni 4 i I i Ylq �a
Address J U
Certification number a75
Total depth of well `�(J Total depth of source well
(if applicable)
Inspection point Measurement Meets minimum standards Comments
Yes No
Casing
Depth
Diameter Sc'
Height (A.L.S.)
Grout
Depth
Screens
Depth(s)
Length(s)
I.D. Plate
Static water level
k
Well yield__
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
(concrete)
Sampling portALA
(labeled)
Water tight pipe entry
Well enclosure entry Nip;
Vent
Functioning of heat pump system (Determine from the owner if heat pump functions properly.)
INSPECTOR
GW/UIC-2
'6(C e j7d/OSi t4 Office Wa ?Q
March 28, 2001

WITNESS Address
WITNESS Address
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

North Caro Department of Environment and T.-....rai Resources
Division of Water Quality - Groundwater Section
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT - FORM B
INJECTION WELL PERMIT NO. W1 Q 7600 ( a
DATE 574.1/0
NAME OF OWNER 77e8 �P"ha 5phak
t�
ADDRESS OF OWNER ?O &Y q 8 / 1530 vvy 30 (p �oU7h
fjuroR.4, nit aTao/
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision, county, town)
LOCATION OF INJECTION WELL (and source well(s), if applicable)(c 'n7e &&&cj-c)
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision , county, town, if different than owner's address, plus description of location on site)
Potential pollution source
Potential pollution source
Distance from well
Distance from well
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Minimum distance of well from property boundary 715LO
Quality of drainage at site
(good,adequate,poor) U G (high,moderate,low)
GPS Data:
Latitude: "VV .t< !r/V Longitude: 76/ 1& 5/-[6-
Flooding potential of site (,(/ W
DRAW SKETCH OF SITE (Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and
aii-etch
arrow.)
DESCRIBE INJECTION SYSTEM (vertical closed loop, ttncased borehole or cased water well; separate source well and
injection well; combination source and injection well; or other description as applicable
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

rt522vrr Lwt( 'IJ /njre,an
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT -FORM B (CONTINUED)
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Date constructed (p/t!/ql—(o/S/g
Drilling contractor: Name U'CRNIVA-C&C.41715 ^p D-V i i Yl �a
Address
Certification number I^L75
Total depth of well tj q S' Total depth of source well
(f applicable)
Inspection point Measurement Meets minimum standards Comments
Yes No
Casing
Depth y�
Diameter
Height (A.L.S.) >c
Grout
Depth _
Screens
Depth(s)
Length(s)
I.D. Plate
Static water level _ c�
Well yield —
Enclosure
Enclosure floor j_l/_
(concrete) T
Sampling portAZA
(labeled)
Water tight pipe entry x
Well enclosure entry jB//(►
Vent NIA -
Functioning of heat pump system (Determine from the owner if heat pump functions properly.)
INSPECTOR
GW/UIC-2
/($J? 0/0S%>J Office VVa ? Q
March 28, 2001

`WITNESS
WITNESS
Address
Address
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

North Caro_ Department of Environment and P:..t..ral Resources
Division of Water Quality - Groundwater Section
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT - FORM B
INJECTION WELL PERMIT NO. WI 0 70 O 0 1 a DATE SAVO I
NAME OF OWNER peS Pha5phak G W-5
ADDRESS OF OWNER'pQ f rl w y g / 1530 }-k wy So Co 30UA
,{uEoR4, N c a 78o6
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision, county, town)
LOCATION OF INJECTION WELL (and source well(s), if applicable)( im, addn
' to !si Pdy lantAn And tW/ oiML(l C/aS*,e at"
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision, county, town, ifdifferent than owner's address, plus description of location on site)
Potential pollution source tby Agit Distance from well N go -
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Minimum distance of well from property boundary ?/6-DLY
Quality of drainage at site
(good, adequate, poor)
GPS Data:
Latitude: 35'17aa' `-Rd4' lt%
de QM_ Flooding potential of site /aW
(high,moderate,low)
Longitude: / &a-`i IP O i,02 k)
DRAW SKETCH OF SITE (Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and
north arrow.)
(gee 464f e l nmtot1
DESCRIBE INJECTION SYSTEM (vertical closed loop, uncased borehole or cased water well; separate source well and
injection well; combination source and injection well; or other description as applicable[
GW/�IC-2 March 28, 2001

tea;, w k Slane v ejetwern
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT -FORM B (CONTINUED)
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Date constructed Cp/6/9/ ' I (� T
Drilling contractor: Name -Bug e.4-i l(jA G.c-11- lQ '� i3 V i i nq Ca
Address J
Certification number 1 a75
Total depth of well 5t?' Total depth of source well
(if applicable)
Inspection point Measurement Meets minimum standards Comments
Yes No
Casing
Depth
Diameter
Height (A.L.S.)
Grout
Depth L
Screens
Depth(s)
Length(s)
I.D. Plate
Static water level lc
Well yield
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
(concrete)
Sampling port
(labeled)
Water tight pipe entry
Well enclosure entry
Vent
1
K
Functioning of heat pump system (Determine from the owner if heat pump functions properly)
INSPECTOR
GW/UIC-2
de V11os 4 Office Wet (C Q
March 28, 2001

ill..
WITNESS Address
WITNESS Address
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

4
North Caro, • . Department of Environment and P ___raI Resources
Division of Water Quality - Groundwater Section
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT - FORM B
INJECTION WELL PERMIT NO. WI 07000 ( a DATE 571-1/0
NAME OF OWNER Pes Pha Sphaig.
ADDRESS OF OWNER 'PO Baq g / 1530 gm: 30(a 30t441,
4u2oR4, AJC a7t64,
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision, county, town)
LOCATION OF INJEC ION WELL (and source well(s), if applicable)(' ir? atdp s)
be i4y Anil I/ 4/s
(Street/road or lot and subdivision , county, town, if different than owner's address, plus description of location on site)
Potential pollution source Par htt14/c/
Potential pollution source pay iaakt la /5
Distance from well 0
Distance from well "- 0'
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Minimum distance of well from property boundary 7 /Svc
Quality of drainage at site 4deg //Ole Flooding potential of site La (q/
(good,adequate,poor) (/ (high,moderate,low)
GPS Data: tt ll !� /� r/ ' /
Latitude: 566,22t 4(0. 06 e lv Longitude: 7%d"lV 0y /d" // kZ
DRAW SKETCH OF SITE (Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and
north arrow)
Lite 11,Alachmeet(
DESCRIBE INJECTION SYSTEM (vertical closed loop, uncased borehole or cased water well; separate source well and
injection well; combination source and injection well; or other description as applicable)
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

•
�LGwn 5 iU'2'P wtl/ v
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT -FORM B (CONTINUED)
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Date constructed W10/4 (
Drilling contractor: Name -- tA'Rtn-C.4 T I:ISVIiac-611 ^WY p i 1 I in aAddress J �l
Certification number 1 0"175
Total depth of well Total depth of source well
(f applicable)
Inspection point Measurement Meets minimum standards Comments
Yes No
Casing
Depth k
Diameter
Height (A.L.S.)
Grout
Depth
Screens
Depth(s)
Length(s) > .
I.D. Plate A
Static water level
Well yield AFA—
Enclosure
Enclosure floor 1[/_
(concrete) TT
Sampling port
(labeled)
Water tight pipe entry J�
Well enclosure entry
Vent t_
Functioning of heat pump system (Determine from the owner if heat pump functions properly)
INSPECTOR
GW/UIC-2
teLdie idios1' J Office wf 0
March 28, 2001

WITNESS Address
WITNESS Address
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

North Caro Department of Environment and 1.—_lral Resources
Division of Water Quality - Groundwater Section
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT - FORM B
INJECTION WELL PERMIT NO. WI 0 7000 Ira DATE 57t1/o
NAME OF OWNER RS P"ho5phak 1 I &W -7
ADDRESS OF OWNER 'PO 8/w Li g / 15�30 1-ktIvv. so Co rSOUdin
AURORA Nc a7zoe,
(Street/ road or lot and subdivision, county, town)
LOCATION OF INJECTION WELL (and source well(s), if applicable)(J2tf e addefr
• 5mtlh a- Poy t is
(Sweet/road or lot and subdivision , county, town, if different than owner's address, plus description of location on site)
Potential pollution source
Potential pollution source
Distance from well 9/Q
Distance from well
Potential pollution source Distance from well
Minimum distance of well from property boundary 7 /2)(i
Quality of drainage at site k 4 /t ak Flooding potential of site LOW
(good,adequate,poor) G (high,moderate,low)
GPS Data:2✓�o2r1 /,
Latitude: ✓2��16? %
Longitude: 1l0 LAI'2 as /r
DRAW SKETCH OF SITE (Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and
north arrow.) a4 /.. G% ew1
DESCRIBE INJECTION SYSTEM (vertical closed loop, uncased borehole or cased water well; separate source well and
injection well; combination source and injection well; or other description as applicable)
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

4r
INJECTION FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT -FORM B (CONTINUED)
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Date constructed
Drilling contractor: Name -{ j(A(Z.fley4 @-&co.C-ftij Ylj
Address U
Certification number t?75
Total depth of well ( Total depth of source well
(if applicable)
Inspection point Measurement Meets minimum standards Comments
Yes No
Casing
Depth
Diameter
Height (A.L.S.)
Grout
Depth
Screens
Depth(s)
Length(s)
I.D. Plate
Static water level
Well yield
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
(concrete)
Sampling port
(labeled)
Water tight pipe entry
Well enclosure entry
Vent
Functioning of heat pump system (Determine from the owner if heat pump functions properly.)
INSPECTOR
GW/UIC-2
((*die 0/0564 Office Wa I Q
March 28, 2001

WITNESS Address
WITNESS Address
GW/UIC-2 March 28, 2001

MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
April 11, 2001
Willie Hardison, Groundwater Supervisor
Groundwater Section
Washington Regional Office
Mark Pritzl iW [e-mail]
Hydrogeological Technician II
Underground Injection Control (UIC) Group
Central Office (CO)
Re: Request for review of an injection well application, type 5X25 experimental technology
well, submitted by PCS Phosphate for a tank farm remedial action system at 1539
Highway 306 South in Aurora, North Carolina.
1. Please review the application and submit any comments to CO-UIC group. Retain the
application for your UIC file.
2. Please inspect the injection well site to verify that the location and construction plans
submitted in the application are accurate and that the NCAC Title 15A 2C.0200 standards
are being complied with, using the enclosed Injection Facility Inspection Report (fora: B)
as appropriate.
3. You are requested to return The Review Continents and the completed Injection Facility
Inspection Report (form B) to the CO-UIC by May 15, 2001. If the inspection and
review can not be accomplished by this date, please inform the CO-UIC.
The UIC group greatly appreciates your assistance with this review. If you have any
questions regarding this review or the UIC program, please contact me at [phone]
or Meliktu Fanuel at [phone].
cc: CO-UIC Files (Type 5X25 Injection Well)
Enclosures

4
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
GROUNDWATER SECTION
September 24, 1997
Jeff Welti
Groundwater Section
Washington Regional Office
Marcus Geist M
UIC Group
Groundwater Section
Raleigh Central Office
Re: Revision of an injection well permit.
Permit No. WI0700012 to use a well for the injection of freshwater, for the purpose remediating
groundwater has been reissued to PCS Phosphate; a copy of the permit is enclosed for your files.
The revisions are in accordance with the suggestions made by you and Leon Montgomery of PCS
Phosphate. If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
C:\WPDOCS\SHELLS\PERNIMSNDPERMM. WPD
cc: UIC Files
WARO Files
Enclosures

Author: "Jeff Welti" <[e-mail]> at Internet
Date: 9/17/97 11:56 AM
Priority: Normal
Receipt Requested
TO: Marcus Geist at NRGWSO1P
CC:"NROAR01/TS19U40"@waro.ehnr.state.nc.us at Internet
Subject: PCS Phosphate, Inc. (WI0700012)
Message Contents
September 17, 1997
Marcus,
Can you assist us\PCS with changes in the WI -Permit? Before Mark
left we discussed errors in the permit which needed changing. These
errors were pointed out by PCS back in November, 1996. I received a
call from Leon Montgomery, Environmental Engineer, at PCS wanting to
follow-up on corrections to the permit.
Specifically the errors\ corrections
1." Page 7 of 7" (well construction
unnecessary and was included in the
Authorization To Construct (ATC), is
which PCS identified are:
diagram) is actually page 8. This is
rtevefl,.A64
the wrong system.
2." Page 7 of 7" (Permit) with number listed as" ??. " It is PMoil()
requested that this page be omitted.
3. "Page 6 of 7" - Part VIII-Special Conditions, (3) " ...regulatory
limits established in Specific Condition 2." Should this
reference Specific Condition 1? Aid
Please review and advise. Leon Montgomery can be reached at (919)
322-8193. Thankyou for your help with this situation.
Jeff Welti [phone] ext. 225
W4 o
,a/11 (?s
rot f \m a b
'1123/117
lU e sty ueJ-J G C,6.-3es rnclvd:, dele-h;
®G Cot' ens, e
rkt cif(' 'typo c)
fio 01101A,
d__N p2„0
f-cf,/".-\ CA -Se
Ge ►5Y
1— ea, l toil4yo
f
vT pro ✓L910 -\
n1,VA13 t
(as HP g7/4Z -

State of North Carolina11111
Dement of Environment,
Pri
Health and Natural Resources
AutDiviion fomT '[e-mail]> a • •
Date: 9/17/a977 11:56
I•I•am•••M••••I•I I•i.is0s:I I
RecWr'LdJr., Governor
TO: Yeas evitt,tS e, ©E H NI F�
CC: A;I ®jVOIst v�? rtirSr Eeh eve.nc.us at Inter
Subject: PCS Phosphate,Inc. (WI0700012)
Message Contents
September 17, 1997
Marcus,
Can you assist us\PCS with changes in the WI -Permit? Before Mark
left we discussed errors in the permit which needed changing. These
errors were pointed out by PCS back in November, 1996. I received a
call from Leon Montgomery, Environmental Engineer, at PCS wanting to
follow-up on corrections to the permit.
Specifically the errors\ corrections which PCS identified are:
1." Page 7 of 7" (well construction diagram) is actually page 8. This is
unnecessary and was included in the
Authorization To Construct (ATC), is the wrong system.
2." Page 7 of 7" (Permit) with number listed as" ??. " It is
requested that this page be omitted.
3. "Page 6 of 7" - Part VIII-Special Conditions, (3) " ...regulatory
limits established in Specific Condition 2." Should this
reference Specific Condition 1?
Please review and advise. Leon Montgomery can be reached at (919)
322-8193. Thankyou for your help with this situation.
Jeff Welti [phone] ext. 225
Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 29578, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0578
2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Voice 919/733-3221 FAX 919l715-0588
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
GROUNDWATER SECTION
October 7, 1996
Willie Hardison
Groundwater Section
Washington Regional Office
Mark Milligan 1,/`^-
UIC Group
Groundwater Section
Raleigh Central Office
Re: Permit No. WI0700012 issued to PCS Phosphate for an injection well system.
A renewal permit for continued operation of an injection facility at the Tank Farm area at
PCS Phosphate Inc., Aurora, NC has been approved by RCO-UIC. A copy of the permit is
enclosed for your UIC files.
Guy Pearce reviewed the original application, a copy of which should already be contained in your
UIC file. Since sampling reports are submitted quarterly and central office staff visited the site in
March, 1996 neither an inspection nor sampling are being requested.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 715-6165.
cc: UIC Files
mrm-c:\office\wpdocs\permits\perm_cop.pcs

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
July 31, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mark Milligan, UIC Group
Central Office Groundwater Section
THROUGH: Willie Hardison, Regional Groundwater Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Guy Pei',Hydrogeologist
Washington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Permit Renewal Request for
Injection Well Permit No. WI0700012
PCS Phosphate (formerly Texasgulf)
Beaufort County
up
CN
C7
UP
cn
iv
N
The Washington Regional Office has reviewed the subject
application for continued operation of injection wells to
facilitate groundwater remediation at the PCS Tank Farm site. The
injection wells are used to inject UNCONTAMINATED groundwater from
the Castle Hayne Aquifer into the surficial aquifer in the Tank
Farm area. The injected groundwater then flushes the surficial
aquifer, which contains excessive total dissolved solids, towards
downgradient recovery wells. The recovered groundwater is then
incorporated into process water at the plant. Based on our review,
we have no objections to permit renewal and submit the following
comments are for your consideration:
1. We do not object to discontinuing the use of well FERT-1, and
the construction of a new supply well.
2. We do not object to the use of steam condensate to dilute the
concentration of total dissolved solids in the water supplied to
the injection wells provided that the temperature of the water is
not raised over 30° F above background groundwater temperatures.
If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter
further, please contact me at any time.
cc: WaRO Files

MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
GROUNDWATER SECTION
July 23, 1996
Willie Hardison
Guy Pearce
Groundwater Section
Washington Regional Office
Mark Milligan tviik-
UIC Group
Groundwater Section
Raleigh Central Office
Re: Renewal of Permit No. WI0700012 issued to PCS Phosphate
PCS Phosphate's permit renewal application dated May 8, 1996 indicates that a copy was
sent directly to Willie Hardison of the WaRO.
• Please review the application and submit any comments to RCO-UIC by August 7, 1996
(within 2 weeks). Retain the application for your UIC file.
Since sampling reports are submitted quarterly and central office staff visited the site in March,
1996 neither an inspection nor sampling are being requested.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 715-6165.
cc: UIC Files
WaRO Files
mrm-c:\ office \wpdocs\permits \asknvsam.pcs

MWIF-3
CLUSTER
Zj
SPZ
SPZ-/ O
cPz-1 OI
SWW-1
CW W-1
CUT—OFF WALL
CPZ-2 0 ASPHALT ROAD cwws
CWw-S
SWWJ CWWJ
SPZ-S
Q ` t 0SPZ-S SPZ•T
`� J
3 NA��
CWW.] �1 -Y.:.
v F_. 11 *r fir_
'gam
SWW-3
SPZ-
SWW-a
CwW-a
MWTF-a
CLUSTER
DRADIADE DITCH
003
CPW
WTMONAWAL WEIL
FLOW TOTALIZERS
AND CONTROL VALVES
O CPZ-3
JSPZ-H
005
SPW COW-S
SWW4
Q
srz S
SWAT CWW-T
PIPERACK SPILL CONTAINMENT PAD
c0-1
S.P.A
PLANT
L__T
0
O
0
008 1 1 009
fJ
S.P.A
I PLANT
WATER LEVEL
CONTROL TANK
MWTF-1
CLUSTER
CO4
c,W-I
OFFICE
CIW.CIW.S
1 � e
cl .11:1 I \ A'L?
•
016
044
clW-S
•
H
r
SPZ•10
1
LEGEND
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
O NUMMETER
• MONITOR WELL
• CONFINED SAND LAYER WITHDRAWAL WELL
• CROATAN FORMATION WIIHORAWM. WELL
• CROATAN FORMATION INJECTION WELL
• NJECTION WELL HEADER PIPE CLEVLOHT
® INJECTION WELL SYSTEM V EVE!
CONTROL TANK
LOCATION PLAN FOR TANK FARM
AREA REMEDIAL ACTION SYSTEM
WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS

W/o oo012_
R042614A.STS
Ten«squ1/ - Phosphwle Op•
el* — I
PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble
42 ] 4A". COR
Recs
Navigation, Ltd, 1991, 1994. All rights
Mean
Latitude 188 35022'48.29816"N
Longitude 188 76046'33.30096"W
Altitude 188-25.98153
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Start GPS Week #798
End GPS Week #798
Std Dev
Minimum
reserved
Statistics Version 3.3
3.94383 35022'48.14087"N
1.90667 76046'33.37805"W
3.31050 -31.70504
on 04/26/95 at 14:18:58
on 04/26/95 at 14:23:45
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance Units
Velocity Units
WGS-84
Latitude/Longitude
Height Above Ellipsoid
Meters
Meters/Second
Maximum
35022'48.72444"N
76046'33.07014"W
-15.35749
Page 1

R042614B.STS
Ttie4.55'�
PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble Navigation, Ltd, 1991, 1994. All rights reserved
Latitude
Longitude
Altitude
Recs
Mean
186 35m22'47.99983"N
186 76046'31.98265"W
Std Dev
7.34550
3.45623
186-21.35827 19.01155
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Start GPS Week #798
End GPS Week #798
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance
Velocity Units
on 04/26/95 at 14:24:35
on 04/26/95 at 14:29:16
Statistics Version 3.3
Minimum
35022'47.20195"N
76046' 32 . 21243"W
: WGS-84
: Latitude/Longitude
: Height Above Ellipsoid
Units : Meters
: Meters/Second
-71.03187
Maximum
35022'48.42240"N
76046'31.57156"W
38.18873
Page 1

R042615B.STS
Aexasgu/P
C1w-3
PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble Navigation, Ltd, 1991, 1994. All rights reserved
+$ 5S. COR
Latitude
Longitude
Recs
Mean Std Dev
193 35022'47.88976"N
193 76046'31.21923"W
Altitude 193
-27.40251
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Start GPS Week #798
End GPS Week #798
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance
Velocity Units
Statistics Version 3.3
Minimum
1.42314 35022'47.74344"N
2.05108 76046'31.51004"W
7.59084 -45.87782
on 04/26/95 at 15:12:14
on 04/26/95 at 15:16:46
Units :
WGS-84
Latitude/Longitude
Height Above Ellipsoid
Meters
Meters/Second
Maximum
35022'48.01591"N
76046'31.05958"W
-16.71901
Page 1

R042614F.STS
Ae at yd..
PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble Navigation, Ltd, 1991,
42614W COR
Recs
Latitude 187
Longitude 187
Altitude 187
Mean
35022'47.54608"N
76046'29.73845"W
Std Dev
5.72057
11.79940'
-18.11203 25.31640
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Start GPS Week #798
End GPS Week #798
on 04/26/95 at 14:56:55
on 04/26/95 at 15:03:02
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance Units
Velocity Units
1994. All
Minimum
35022'46.87595"N
76046'31.48089"W
WGS-84
Latitude/Longitude
Height Above Ellipsoid
Meters
Meters/Second
-106.66168
rights reserved
Statistics Version 3.3
Maximum
35022'48.45451"N
76046'28.75889"W
37.48796
Page 1

R042615A.STS
PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble Navigation, Ltd, 1991, 1994. All rights reserved
14 COR
Latitude
Longitude
Recs
Mean
195 35022'47.30634"N
195 76046'28.74301"W
Altitude 195-33.27137
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Start GPS Week #798
End GPS Week #798
Std Dev
3.82679
2.97578
7.02694
on 04/26/95 at 15:03:59
on 04/26/95 at 15:09:01
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance Units
Velocity Units
Statistics Version
Minimum
35022'46.40106"N
76046'28.85884"W
WGS-84
Latitude/Longitude
Height Above Ellipsoid
Meters
Meters/Second
COO- 5
-80.28357
Maximum
3.3
35022'47.48104"N
76046'28.27855"W
-14.85752
Page 1

R042614D.STS
PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble Navigation, Ltd, 1991, 1994. All rights reserved
RO42 ii4D.COR
Latitude
Longitude
Recs Mean Std Dev
191 35022'46.65074"N
191 76046'27.93805"W
Altitude 191-29.87740
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Statistics Version 3.3
Minimum
4.63586 35022'46.38680"N
3.45943 76046'28.36258"W
3.78997 -50.41996
Start GPS Week #798 on 04/26/95 at 14:45:01
End GPS Week #798 on 04/26/95 at 14:49:42
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance
Velocity Units
Units .
WGS-84
Latitude/Longitude
Height Above Ellipsoid
Meters
Meters/Second
Maximum
35022'47.08372"N
76046'27.74444"W
-25.41654
Page 1

PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble
COR
Recs
R042614E.STS
Navigation, Ltd, 1991, 1994. All rights reserved
Statistics Version 3.3
Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum
Latitude 186 35022'46.18016"N
Longitude 186 76046'27.00732"W
Altitude 186-28.56382
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Start GPS Week #798
End GPS Week #798
1.84221
1.91410
6.70148
on 04/26/95 at 14:50:24
on 04/26/95 at 14:54:47
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance Units
Velocity Units
35022'46.07235"N
76046'27.13140"W
WGS-84
Latitude/Longitude
Height Above Ellipsoid
Meters
Meters/Second
-44.07835
caw-7) cow • 11) (.p..LSJ
35022'46.31991"N
76046'26.74951"W
-18.38687
Page 1

R042615C.STS
PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble Navigation, Ltd, 1991, 1994. All rights reserved
'615 `'. COR
Latitude
Longitude
Recs
Mean
198 35022'42.37778"N
198 76046'24.17712"W
Altitude 198
Std Dev
Minimum
T�x4s9uiP
(From &silo Layne)
Statistics Version 3.3
Maximum
0.75659 35022'42.32444"N 35022'42.44749"N
0.70192 76046124.26892"W 76046'24.10618"W
-40.75972 3.44994
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Start GPS Week #798
End GPS Week #798
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance
Velocity Units
on 04/26/95 at 15:21:19
on 04/26/95 at 15:25:53
Units
WGS-84
Latitude/Longitude
Height Above Ellipsoid
Meters
Meters/Second
-50.50445
-24.76743
Page 1

R042614C.STS
sJcr lho
M JTF lC
PFSTAT Ver 3.3
Copyright (c) Trimble Navigation, Ltd, 1991,
F4t4.' COR
Recs Mean Std Dev
1994. All
rights reserved
Minimum
Latitude 189 35022'47.19944"N 9.09380 35022'46.66043"N
Longitude 189 76046'29.39175"W 7.81700 76046'29.96679"W
Altitude 189-0.08184 32.00495
No velocity records in file.
No DOP records in file.
Start GPS Week #798 on 04/26/95 at 14:33:10
End GPS Week #798 on 04/26/95 at 14:40:58
Datum
Coordinate System
Altitude Mode
Altitude/Distance
Velocity Units
Units .
WGS-84
Latitude/Longitude
Height Above Ellipsoid
Meters
Meters/Second
-42.50050
civs
1 Il�wi�tU►�
Statistics Version 3.3
Maximum
35022'47.94084"N
76046'28.42281"W
87.63299
Page 1

77
35 37 3D
A
B
Continue on Page 65
C
D
35'07'30
77'07'30'
1
.ash
Continue on Page 46
�dr
• L o.ry ZOGB .,Whkhn.d
9
-Neu6e River
— et ►�,
66
3
PLYMOUTH /
4
co PVC. AO
d canon rmah
r,rwlna
y NEW BERN/
Continue on Page 78
Blounts
Boy
2
♦ I
12
Li.e Trail K��� Iwrir
autos Point
KILOMETERS 1 0
MILES 1
0
Ki- fb
Island''`
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2
3
4
5
6

I r
E;
t

x8
Bogus Pt -
L.
DURHAM
)O FEET i 3
MN
9°
160 MILS
GN
1'03'
19 MILS
UTM GRID AND 1993 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
50'
Garrison Pt
335 (AURORA)
5654 IV SE
SCALE 1 24 000
0
337 47'30'
1 MILE
1000
0
1000
2000
3000 4000
5000 6000 7000 FEET
.5
0
1 KILOMETER
Hti 1--f 1-4 f --1_ I-1 I
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
338
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
Revisions shown in purple compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey
COMPLIES WITH U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STANDARDS FOR SPATIAL ACCURACY - CLASS 2 from aerial photographs taken 1988 and other sources
FOR SALE BY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DENVER, COLORADO 80225, OR RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092 This information not field checked. Map edited 1993
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
339 INTERIOR—G E O LOG I C A L
Primary highway,
hard surface .......-........
Secondary highway,
hard surface.......... Unimproved road._...
Gum Point
r. v
1" (1946
�i
�1I
RVEY. RESTON. VIRGINIA-1994
340000R-E.
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Light -duty road, hard or
improved surface
25'
3920
3919
3918
3917°°°" N.
TT-35'22'30"
76*45'
0 Interstate Route
U. S. Route
State Route
BATH, N. C.
35076-D7-TF-024
1951
REVISED 1993
mmn FRF6 IV CCD/CC VAd0

I%
III
II
II
11
II
II
11
11
' 11
, _ 11
11
II
II
II
11
II
stab
i
•
—
-
50'
L tED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
7.74
47'30'
9
AURORA QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA-BEAUFORT CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
76°45'
MICKCov 001N? 3.9 141, > 2 670 000 FEET 35°22'30'
—pro Llewellyn
i ••••• /eot ea 5
Andy (C) ��� Holland ' Atli
%� Amos APt • `ee
t
5
7
//
// Pi
// Je
(c)// P
//
Silverthor /i/
Pt //
1/ /
e
7
590 000
FEET
AURORA, N. C.
N3515—W7645/7.5
1950

➢EPARI T OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COI.,,,.1ITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Well location
WELL AND PUMP INSPECTION REPORT
�Q,•1.r, 4,�� ` Co.A .cu rvL
(To, Comm., Subdivision and Lot No.)
Owner
P • a . -"))aX 4,nl C. 27V1(8
Address
jf WELL CONSTRUCTION
Drilling Contractor j �, -�'C� C,ttcamt:nc, 4- br+�,i.tk'Yd Cr .
Name J
Meets Min. Standards
Measure Yes No
No
Permit ✓
Location
Distance from
Pollution source
Other location standards
Total Depth 50.E t
L.4.L..ag
Depth `,\¢Q;:7
4 ✓ auc-
Diameter
Weight/thickness _ 1 PVC �d'0
Height v
Drive shoe J
Exception approved by owner V/
Grout: J
Type ✓ At es ct.4.,rt f.✓t�1'
Thickness v
Depth v
/ '-,
Screens v/
Development V
I. D. Plate
Abandonment (temporary/permanent) ylle-i1 i •fit ke, IA K..4e. `'wig,
Water level (..5.8
We11 test.
4
Chlorination /
Cuttings I.
Reports v
Water sample (appearance)
Date �iisi9l
Area 4fYa IrN��+1e.
County p(r.,s..ttA_
Road/Street
Quad No.
Serial No.
Lat .0 } 7..ong . E 0- 14 (a3
127(
Address Reg. #
Remarks
O (.Q - 00 -7 / - - C 238
GROU
r•

WELL HEAD COMPLETION
Pump ir:stalic:r
Name
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
Casing height
Access port
Valved f low
Water tight pipe entry
Well entry
Vent
Hose bib
Tee (iet)
Suction line
Chlorination
Temporary Aband.
Measure
Address Reg. #
Meets Min. Standards
Yes No / Remarks
Date Well Constructed AL3b - c� (AiNe_7 1 cif I
Date Pump Installed
Witness
Signature
Name Address Type
Name Address Type

Well location
Owner
Address
DEPART:r of NATURAL RESOURCES AND
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
WELL AND PUMP INSPECTION
COSInVTTY DEVELOPMENT
MANAGEMENT
&LauAIDS Pb'7L
Date 8115191
REPORT
Te..vasr 1/4.1 - TaAV Fa.rt�n.
(Towpi, Conm., Subdivision and Lot No.)
1 e 'lg4,00\ukt
9 n . Rmi MMM aurort nI.c , 27soG
tjr� /� W LL CONSTRUCTION
Drilling Contractor �trrnciIi, la�rJrrw - q QrtIt.lvtq Ct,
Name J J Address
Meets Min. Standards
cIw-2 In\ NAldli'2
Permit
Location
Distance from
Pollution source
Other location standards
Total Depth 50.Et
Casing
Depth riD.rir
Diameter
Weight/thickness'
Height
Drive shoe
Exception approved by owner
Grout:
Type
Thickness
Depth
Screens
Development
I. D. Plate
Abandonment (temporary/permanent)
Water level (litiL
Well test
Chlorination
Cuttings
Reports
Water sample (appearance)
Measure Yes r
4ll
Area 1e Xaa ul LLW�.vw
County Re.a,.� et+
Road/Street
Quad No.
Serial No.,
`l" Lat. j'pLong. east"
iv15
Reg. #
No Remarks
p(o-OD/ l -kir-o2.M8
INr.- 6tkAO
. Alea)CeilYtrn7
t/
t/ 1
In�r ll kid' loe iuttt� soma

WELL HEAD COMPLETION
Pump irista;ier
Name
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
Casing height
Access port
Valved flow
Water tight pipe entry
Well entry
Vent
Hose bib
Tee (jet)
Suction line
Chlorination
Temporary Abend.
Measure
Address
Meets Min. Standards
Yes• No
V
Date Well Constructed IV\py 30-51eAt/ oggl
Date Pump Installed
Witness
Reg. #
Remarks
Signature
Name Address Type
Name Address Type

.-i
DEPAR&.T OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WELL AND PUMP INSPECTION REPORT "� Alt P IjL
Date 1 4
Well location IZNClCio 4 'Aullc. P•i uWl
(Town), Conn., Subdivision and Lot No.)
Owner
Address Q.D. )SOX " A tR Yiurni7k- r.1 t.- 2iRoLo
Drilling Contractor
Area
County
Road/Street
Quad No.
Serial Noy..
T.:CONSTRUCTIO/Nt Lat.a�9 %ong• E %T.:WM
. 11Arim:VC envAi n• 12
Name . ) J. Address Reg. #
CIW-3 ‘,jec im.Vica
Permit
Location
Distance from
Pollution source
Other location standards ar—lL,_
1
Total Depth �•O
Casinga kcpp���3 ���_ 3i
Depth q'l•'L41WEAW
Diameter 41/
Weight/thickness ' V`, 4e14 4in PW
Height, J
Drive shoe /
Exceptionapproved by owner ✓
Grout: A
I
Type iRAI Ctinej f
Thickness J/
Depth /J
ScreensJ/ -
Development V
I. D. Plate
Abandonment (temporary/permanent)
Meets Min. Standards
Measure
Yes No Remarks
l� 06-OM1—W'r-02.38
Water level Iln
Well test
Chlorination
Cuttings
Reports
Water gamine (appearance)
J
/
th$11 is t' loe. IN p5e• 4DA

WELL HEAD COMPLETION.
Pump installer
Name
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
Casing height
Access port
Valved flow
Water tight pipe entry
Well entry
Vent
Hose bib
Tee net)
Suction line
Chlorination
Temporary Aband..
Date Well Constructed
Date Pump Installed
Witness
Address Reg. It
Meets Min. Standards
Measure Yes'
J
Nlay3D-Jin7.f4I
Remarks
Signature
N ame
Address Typo
Name
Address Type

DEPARY_ P OF NATURAL
DIVISION OF
WELL AND PUMP INSPECTION REPORT
Well location le vext c err' lava 1nr✓N
(Town Comm., Subdivision and Lot No.)
Owner \1 VA5OLd
P.a. P14 4* At. rr.ra.t1$b*n
Address
WELL CONSTRUCTION
t e fV
Drilling Contractor buane1 le. enw+rac�„1� 'l� N- ttrAci lh.
Name J J Address
•
Meets
C rW-4 Tvc eul Well *4
Permit
Measure
Location
Distance from
Pollution source
Other location standards
i
Total Depth 4q.5
Casin
oktz43
Depth 47.
Diameter
Weight/thickness
Height
Drive shoe
Exception approved by owner
Grout:
Type
Thickness
Depth
Screens
Development
I. D. Plate
Abandonment (temporary/permanent)
Water level
Well test
Chlorination
Cuttines
Reports
Waters sample (appearance)
1l.05
Min. Standards
Yes No Remarks
No— Q411—b'JI-0232
1
RESOURCES AND COM:UNIIY DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Area IP��l/osa A�wW.
County R2nittor+
Road/Street
Quad No.
Serial No.
Lat./N3Oliong. E 13atb3
1271
Reg. 4
Pvc 6c.t 40
Ctuylc.ak
V1i.1i boat k iN JSC SLSnA

WELL HEAD COMPLETION
Pump installer
Name
Enclosu re
Enclosure floor
Casing height
Access port
Valved flow
Water tight pipe entry
Well entry
Vent
Hose bib
Tee (iet)
Sucticn line
Chlorination
Temporary Aband.
Measure
Address Reg. /k
Meets Min. Standards
Yes` No/ Remarks
Date Well Constructed N1aNi!-Suv1P_%\9�
Date Pump Installed
Witness
Signature
Name
Address Type
Name
Address • Type

WELL AND PUMP INSPECTION REPORT
Well location TP YG ,.I - 7.O Akie f'4 rvw.
(Tot, Comm., Subdivision and Lot No.)
Owner \P>1QTigLdV
Address P_0 . &x 48 4,i fhrO n1.0 , 2i SQ(n
1 WELL CONSTRUCTION
Drilling Contractor jMM.rAelte. emiAp rneli tilq ,1tal.;:v\c��, 12.
75-
Name . J Address Reg. 0
DEPART<l OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF EXVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Q>Ans Alp: P 17 L
Date
Area
County
Road/Street
Lat.pI%34 song.
Quad No.
Serial No.
E 000
5
cDA'-in, Yk,well*
Permit
Location
Distance from
Pollution source
Other location standards
Total Depth
Casing
Depth 41.20 ka4433
4"
Diameter
Weight/thickness'
Height
Drive shoe
Exception approved by owner
Grout:
Type
Thickness
Depth
Screens
Development
I. D. Plate
Abandonment (temporary/permanent)
Water level %•
Well test
Chlorination
Cuttings
Reports
Warnr sample (appearance)
Meets Min. Standards
Measure Yes No
0 to '32 9b
Remarks
rWo-nnil• Wit 023R
4c,i4 40 CW
t-U b.Alt IAe. je i19.. SMS1

WELL HEAD COMPLETION
Pump ir.s cal icr
Name
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
Casing height
Access port
Valved flow
Water tight pipe entry
Well entry
Vent
Hose bib
Tee (iet)
Suction line
Chlorination
Temporary Aband.
Measure
Address Reg. #
Meets Min. Standards
Yes No Remarks
1
Date Well Constructed PRO... T rr )txu\r'.-1 9�
Date Pump Installed
Witness
Signature
Name Address Type
Name Address Type

c l W -(c,- 1v1, `CC:I'louk W e,ll io
Permit
DEPART.
T OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Qd, AID: P r71-
WELL AND PUMP
INSPECTION REPORT
Well location t{,11A5 1At eLiAL rtitiot
((To , Conn., Subdivision and Lot No
Q 1\/j Owner C(C+i�l Address p.D.?to>t 4A AuAfnrq. 1\1•C, 137QDin
.)
I (WELL jCONSTRUCTION
_
Drilling Contractor Bt�(r1i�F( Co(Ai'ra.eltivl4t) 4-DrtLL
Name Address
Meets Min. Standards
Measure Yes - No
Location
Distance from
Pollution source
Other location standards
Total Depth
Casin
Depth
Diameter
Weight/thickness
Height
Drive shoe
Exception approved by owner
Grout:
Type
Thickness
Depth
Screens
Development
I. D. Plate
Abandonment (temporary/permanent)
Water level
Well test
Chlorination
Cuttings
Reports
Watpr sample (appearance)
411
Date n
Area -re �,.c .
County la2GLk. or'�
Road/Street
Quad No.
Serial No..
Lat.j'fl' Long VN3244l4
216.
Reg. #
Remarks
&,,-001l— WI-0238
5c h, 4o PVC.
4Ltnuc l h A V A
;kW SttA

WELL HEAD COMPLETION
Pump installer
Name Address Reg. #
Meets Min. Standards
Enclosure
Enclosure floor
Casing height
Access port
Valved flow
Water tight pipe entry
Well entry
Vent
Hose bib
Tee (jet)
Suction line
Chlorination
Temporary Aband.
Date Well Constructed
Measure Yes
V /
1
L &i— -aunt-1 fit
Date Pump Installed
Witness
No
Remarks
Signature
Name
Address Type
Name
Address Type

_,1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Well location
DEPART OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND
➢IVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
WELL AND PUMP INSPECTION REPORT
l?hlag,q \a. & �osa
(Towh, Come., Subdivision and Lot No.)
Owner \.&N O. zjqsS
Address 9•U. P,hy 4R Autt-nr1 AtC, 'LURO(D
Drilling Contractor
Ct W -1 ' Zv\.�Letiov.
Permit
Location
Distance from
Pollution source V
Other location standards
Total Depth
Casin
Depth
Diameter /
Weight/thickness 1
Height
Drive shoe v/
Exception approved by owner 1�
Grout:
Type _
Thickness
Depth
Screens
Development
I. D. Plate
Abandonment (temporary/permanent)
Water level
Well test
Chlorination
.Cuttings
Reports
Water sample (appearance)
WELLCONSTRUCTION
&urv\eirVe. Cnvt\rmc1 tvuq bratv\q
Name Address
Meets Min. Standards
Measure Yes No
MANAGEMENT
Date 8�16.0i ,A
Area —CC YQA
County I�e_auCo L
Road/Street
Quad No.
Serial No.
Lat .1( `d24(D .ong..133+ 29
{27'
Reg. #
Remarks
nr "' LY5ZI-- wr-023S
5dA 4o PVC
A GGLr Cemf.ni
\Ate ti W tll hr !N u't icon

WELL HEAD COMPLETION
Pump installer - -
Name Address Reg. #
Meets Min. Standards
Measure Yes. No Remarks
Enclosure
Enclosure floor / v
Casing height ✓ /
Access port ✓ /
Valved flow
Water tight pipe entry Well entry /
Vent /
Hose bib v/
Tee (jet), k '
Suction line // v/
Chlorination ✓
Temporary Abend. v
Date Well Constructed
Ano_.3D- '7`4t
Date Pump Installed
Witness
Signature
Name Address Type
Name- Address Type

- I—.t 1H I
2'
__1__ __
ABANDONED
OW
WATER LINE
INV. 4.0'
u SUMP
�'J •" 14 CMP
IFLASH TANKS _ INV. 6.10'
MWTF-1
CCHCPETE CONTNNM
VERIFY OLD 18' CMP
NORTH OF C.B.
WAS REMOVED
'IN FIELD x
PIPE RACY. COLUMNS
(LYP.)-
- c.2.
11.0'
INV. 6.8'
I � ,,.6.11TF-110
PIPE
/ � \ LOGTION
IN FIELD
RA
nRyN —�I �� PIPE RACK (REF.)
6' C.I.P.
II \\
--INV. 5.al
CONcRE)E
.:. =.'j21.:}c.... Ire
18`CMP
INV 5.SS'
--\
CATCH BASIN
INV. 5.4' IIII
`_.Q� \\
Q
B' AW2-71713 --04
FUEL OIL DAY TA
E%IST eui

DIVISION OF ENVIRONEMNTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rob Turner
THROUGH: Willie Hardison
FROM: Mark Purser /AP
April 2, 1991
S��
G
SUBJECT: Texasgulf Injection Well Permit Applicati-`Si.s•
'
In response to your questions regarding the Texasgulf Injection Well Permit
Application, we will try to answer as best we can. The well (FERT-1) which
will be providing fresh water to the injection wells does have some
problems with total dissolved solids and chlorides. The total dissolved
solids range from 760 to 950 ppm (the maximum allowable concentration being
500 mg/1). The chlorides range between 290-308 mg/1 and the groundwater
standard is 250 mg/1. However, it should be noted that this water will
pass through a reverse osmosis treatment before injection to the
subsurface. Texasgulf also provided us with the projected ion
concentrations after the reverse osmosis treatment and all are below the
maximum allowable concentrations. In addition, Texasgulf provided us with
temperature data to illustrate that the temperature of the injected fluid
is compatible with the temperature of the formation fluids. Finally, the
injection fluid will be of a much higher quality water than the waters
being impacted from the injection process, and it is our opinion that the
injection system will in fact enhance, with time, the groundwater system of
the Croatan formation.
The contamination is within the boundaries of the tank farm area with a
concentration around the phosphoric acid tanks. This location is also
within the proposed injection/withdrawal system.
For your information, Texasgulf hopes to begin installing the Remedial
Action System in late April. Therefore, anything you could do to expedite
the permitting process, I am sure will be appreciated.
cc: Bob Cheek

sa..zaaall
Table 2-10
tat Dim Mkt Wait KA Ma It
GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN CASTLE HAYNE AQUIFER AT UTILITY WELL FERT-1
Parameter
Sampling Date
1/89 4/89 7/89 10/89 1/90 4/90
• HELD DATA
Specific Conductance (p.mhos/cm)
at Field Temperature 1320 1380 1500 1400 1400 1425
Corrected to 25°C 1452 1518 1500 1526 -
7.0 7.2 7.4 7.0 1540
7.1 6.9
Water Temperature (°C) 20 20 25 20.5 20 20
Water Level, feet (MSL) x x x x x x
Gallons Purged Before Sampling • * * * 15.0 *
O ITHYSICAL APPEARANCE
• Odor none none none none none none
Apparent Color clear clear clear clear clear clear
• LABORATORY DATA
Lab pH 7.1 7.3 7.6 7.3 7.7 7.5
Total Phosphorus, P (mg/1) 0.030 0.100 0.043 0.160 0.094 0.012
Fluoride, F (mg/1) 0.66 0.59 0.63 0.61 0.60 0.671
Chloride, CI (mg/I) 290 290 303 299 297 308
Sulfate, SO4 (mg/1) 9 10 5 8 6 10
• Total Dissolved Solids, TDS (mg/1) 888 796 760 848 950 844
Total Organictarbon, TOC (mg/1) 5 5 5 5 5 4
pH'
*Pump on well was running at time of sampling.

Texasgulf Inc.
File Number 88-089
Texasgulf Project AFE-N-763
Table 1
Application for Permit to Construction Injection
Attachment
February 28, 1991
Page 5 of 5
SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY IN WATER SUPPLY WELL FERT-1 AND
CROATAN FORMATION MONITOR WELL M FF-3C, AND EXPECTED QUALITY OF INJECTION FLUID
Parameter
Specific Conductance (µmhos/cm)
pH
Calcium, Ca (mg/1)
Magnesium, Mg (mg/1)
Sodium, Na (mg/1)
Potassium, K (mg/I)
Iron, Fe (mg/1)
Chloride, CI (mg/I)
Fluoride, F (mg/1)
Sulfate, SO4 (mg/I)
Bicarbonate, HCO3 as CaCO3 (mg/1)
Nitrate, NO3 as N (mg/I)
Total Phosphorus, P (mg/I)
Total Hardness as CaCO3 (mg/1)
Total Dissolved Solids, TDS (mg/1)
Coliform Bacteria (counts/100 ml)
Source:
Castle Hayne Aquifer
Utility Well PERT-1
Reported Value
Existing Croatan Formation Monitor
Well MWTF-3C
Source
1406±50
7.1 ±0.2
87
34
212
20
0.15
299±6
0.64±0.04
8±2
371
<0.5
0.06±0.05
356
853±54
Not Detected
Reported Value
795±26
6.9±0.2
140
7
33
3
6.4
55±2
0.44±0.18
66±7
397
<0.02
0.26±0.16
378
560±59
Source
Expected
Injection Fluid
Concentration
6.5-7.0
<40
<15
<90
<10
<0.2
<130
<0.6
<5
<180
<0.5
<0.06
<165
<475
(1) Mean ±1 standard deviation based on nine quarterly sampling events between January 1989 and January 1991.
(2) Water analysis by Culligan on sample obtained August 1, 1990.
(3) Calculated as 2.5(Ca) + 4.1(Mg).
(4) Based upon coliform bacteria not being detected in four quarterly samples obtained on January 10, April 11, July 17 and October 10, 1990.
(5) Based on analysis of sample obtained on January 10, 1991.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
April 30, 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mark Purser
FROM: Rob Turner X J
SUBJECT: UIC Program Permit Issuance for Texasgulf
The central office has completed its review of the
Texasgulf application for an Underground Injection Control
(UIC) program permit to construct an injection well system
at their phosphate operations tank farm in Aurora, North
Carolina. Attached you will find a copy of the draft permit
and transmittal letter for this facility.
The proposed system consists of seven injection wells
that will be used to drive phosphoric acid -contaminated
groundwater in the Croatan formation to a series of
withdrawal wells. Uncontaminated groundwater from the
Castle Hayne aquifer will be used for the injected fluid.
Based on my review of the submitted application, the
remedial., action plan and on conversations with staff of the
Washington' Regional Office, I believe that this system will
meet all regulatory requirements. Nevertheless, we should
not issue the injection well operation permit until after we
have inspected the constructed, system. Accordingly, please
issue the construction permit at your convenience, inform
Texasgulf as to how we want to issue the operation permit,
and make arrangements to visit the site after construction
is finished. When - you have arranged a site visit date,
please inform me so that I can accompanyyouu during the
inspection. At that time I wrll-forward-to you the draft
permit to operate -the -proposed injection well system. -
Please keep in mind that you will have to obtain the
Regional Supervisor's signature, date the transmittal
letter, and fill in the expiration date and facility number
of the'"tbnstruction permit before forwarding them to the
applicant. Additionally, please remember to make copies of
the completed documents and send them to me for my files.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Attachments
cc: Bob Cheek

r'
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
November 14, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Mulligan
THROUGH: Willie Hardison
FROM: Richard Powers PR
SUBJECT: Review of Texasgulf Incorporated Remedial Action
Plan for the Tank Farm Area -r 1_g0(91
The staff review of the above mentioned remedial action plan
has been completed by the Groundwater Section. Three points
of concern are noted.
1. The injection of fresh water into the confined sand layer
and the Croatan Aquifer at the south end of the tank farm
area will require a injection well construction and
operation permit. Discussions with Rob Turner, of our
Central Office Underground Injection Control (UIC) staff
indicates that permits of this type are allowed .even
though previous policy prohibited all but heat pump
effluent disposal wells. The key to obtaining the UIC
permit is to have the concurrence of the necessity of the
system from the Regional Office and a complete
application package.
2. The construction of the bentonite slurry cut-off wall is
a technique that is new to us. Great pains have been
taken in the documentation of the specifications for the
wall, but we may wish to have a qualified third party
review the specifications. The Land Quality Central
Office staff possesses expertise in slurry wall
construction due to use in dam construction practices.
We may want to run this through Floyd Williams.
3. The water withdrawn from the north end of the tank farm
area is to be sent to the cooling ponds for disposal. It
will be approximately 6 gallons per minute, or 259,200
gallons per month. This water may need to be taken into
account as part of the flow of the zero discharge recycle
lake system and Water Use Permit. As such, the overall
water balance and permitted withdrawal rates may be
affected.
This office is to make a response back to Texasgulf directly,
as this is not a permit issue. Please let me know of any
comments you may have so I can prepare a response to
Texasgulf for Jim's signature.