Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130412 Ver 1_Staff Comments_20130522 (2)Strickland, Bev From: Kulz, Eric Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:13 PM To: Matthews, Monte; and rew .e.wiIIiams2 @usace. army. miI Cc: Homewood, Sue; Strickland, Bev Subject: DWQ Comments on Proposed Hoosier Dam Mitigation Bank - Chatham County ( #13 -0412) Monte: Please see our comments below: DWQ Comments — Hoosier Dam Mitigation Bank Due to the presence of critical habitat upstream and downstream for T &E species, the location appears favorable for a mitigation bank. The potential for improvement of aquatic function is likely. However, monitoring needs to be designed to demonstrate uplift, such as • Recolonization by Cape Fear Shiner and /or other species using same habitat could be demonstrated by performing pre and post removal fish surveys. • Improvement of water quality /303d issues could be demonstrated by conducting pre and post - removal Chlorophyll a sampling, macrobenthos sampling and biotic index /bioclassification calculation. • Restoration of natural flow regime (lentic to lotic system) could be demonstrated through pre and post - removal macrobenthos, mussel and fish surveys. DWQ acknowledges the fact that some riparian buffers will be placed within conservation easements, and we feel that this enhances the viability of this project as a mitigation bank. We have a particular interest in establishing and protecting riparian buffers along the tributaries, as the buffers have a greater positive effect on water quality than on the main stem due to the ability to create a closed canopy, which provides shading /temperature moderation, organic matter, and large woody debris. • The tributaries are a concern. Intermittent vs perennial determinations should be performed. Uplift in tributaries needs to be demonstrated (see above). There is the possibility of downcutting based on observations along the former Carbonton Dam impounded reach. Crediting — generation of credit should be tied to demonstration of project goals and objectives (improvement of aquatic function), examples of which were provided above. Of particular concern is crediting on the tributaries, which may not show the amount of uplift expected in the main stem. Crediting should also reflect the amount of protected buffer along the main stem and tributaries, particularly in light of the potential for the repeal of the Jordan Lake Buffer Rule. • Sediment — While the watershed upstream of the Hoosier Dam appears to be mostly undeveloped, sediment quantity and quality is a concern. Assessment of sediment is recommended (at least Tier 1). A sediment management plan will likely be necessary to protect critical habitat downstream. Service area —The requested service area includes the HUC in which the proposed bank is located (03030003), plus the next downstream HUC (03030004). In the past the IRT has approved multiple HUCs for several banks (Stone Farm, Barra Farm, Hoffmann). However, given recent legislation requiring the use of banks before accessing EEP, adding a second eight -digit HUC could confuse the hierarchy requirements (e.g. for an impact in 03030004, does the bank, located within 03030003 with a service area including 03030004 get precedence over an EEP site in 03030004 ?). DWQ does acknowledge the location of the proposed mitigation site near the downstream end of 03030003. If it is decided that the service area can include both 03030003 and 03030004, DWQ recommends the following exceptions be considered for discussion: 1. The Randleman portion of 03030003 be excluded from the service area. 2. The Coastal Plain portion of 03030004 be excluded (mitigation in Piedmont ecoregion only). DWQ reserves the right to provide additional comments on the final prospectus, mitigation plan, and /or 401 WQC application. Eric W. Kulz Environmental Senior Specialist N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater - Compliance & Permitting Unit 1650 MSC Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650 Phone: (919) 807 -6476 E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties