20100099 Ver 1_Baseline As Built Report_20130520

Strickland, Bev
From: Kulz, Eric
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 9:19 AM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: FW: As -Built Walkthrough @ Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Attachments: F9D4AODO -D2F3- 4105- BFE1- 5DA505917AA5[7].png; Pancho_BaselineDoc_5_3_13.pdf
LEE
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties
From: Tara Allden [ ma i Ito: ta I Iden (a) restorationsystems.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:05 AM
To: Kulz, Eric; Cox, David R.; John EIIis(a)fws.gov; Emily JerniganCa)fws.gov; Kathryn Matthews(a)fws.gov;
bowers.toddCa)epa.gov
Cc: Worth Creech; Tracey Wheeler; Grant Lewis
Subject: Re: As -Built Walkthrough @ Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Good morning.
Please find attached the As -Built document for Restoration System's Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank in the Neuse
01 Service Area. The post- construction site visit is tomorrow at 10 a.m. If you can make it. I have heard from several of you
who could not. If your plans have changed, please join us.
Take care.
Ta ra
Tara Disy AlIdr ri
Rector atiori Systc =, [ ..0
110 il a,�.>ries Street, Suite X 11
Raleigh, NC 27604
[phone] - direct
[phone] - mobile
talldennrestorationsystems.com

From: Tara Allden < tallden @restorationsystems.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:50 AM
To: Eric Kulz <eric.kulz @ncdenr.gov >, "david.cox @ncwildlife.org" <david .cox @ncwildlife.org >, "John Ellis @fws.gov"
<John Ellis @fws.gov >, "Emily Jernigan @fws.gov" < Emily Jernigan @fws.gov >, "Kathryn Matthews @fws.gov"
< Kathryn Matthews @fws.gov >, "bowers.todd @epa.gov" <bowers.todd @epa.gov>
Cc: Worth Creech <worth @restorationsystems.com >, Tracey Wheeler < tracer .l.wheeler @usace.army.mil>
Subject: As -Built Walkthrough @ Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
Dear IRT Members,
Restoration Systems has finished construction and planting of the Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank. We would like
to invite you to attend a site visit on Thursday May 16, 2013 at 10 a.m. The as -built document will be ready and sent to each
of you before the walkthrough. Please let me know if you will be able to attend.
Thank you.
Ta ra
lZestor atiori Systc r , L.L.C,
110 iI a,�.>ries Street, Suite X 11
lZaleigh, INC, 27604
[phone] — direct
[phone] — mobile
talldennrestorationsystems.com

MONITORING BASELINE DOCUMENT
AND
ASBUILT REPORT
PANCHO MITIGATION BANK
Developed Through
RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND PRESERVATION
OF KENNEDY MILL BRANCH,
UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES, AND
RIVERINE WETLANDS
Wayne County, North Carolina
PREPARED BY:
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET, SUITE 211
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
AND
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
MAY 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC established a stream and wetland mitigation bank at the Pancho
Mitigation Site (hereafter the Bank) located approximately 13 miles west of Goldsboro in western
Wayne County; north of U.S. Highway 13 near the intersection of State Road 1008 (Stevens Mill
Road) and State Road 1105 (Dobbersville Road). The Bank is located within the Neuse River
Basin in 14 -digit United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit and Targeted Local
Watershed 03020201150050 of the South Atlantic /Gulf Region (North Carolina Division of
Water Quality [NCDWQ] Subbasin Number 03- 04 -04). The Bank is expected to offset
unavoidable impacts associated with projects located within 8 -digit Cataloging Unit 03020201.
The Bank encompasses 65.62 acres of agricultural land utilized for livestock grazing, row crop
production, and forest. Kennedy Mill Branch and unnamed tributaries to Kennedy Mill Branch,
as well as 31.0 acres of hydric soil and existing wetlands were restored or enhanced within the
Bank.
Kennedy Mill Branch and its tributaries are not listed on the NCDWQ final 2012 303(4) list;
however, the Neuse River (Stream Index Number 27- (49.5a) less than 1.5 miles downstream of
the Bank is listed in the final 2012 303(4) list for a standard violation reducing aquatic life integrity
as the result of turbidity levels (NCDWQ 2012). This project is expected to improve turbidity and
aquatic habitat within the watershed and downstream receiving waters.
The primary goals of this stream and wetland project focused on improving water quality,
enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat to Kennedy Mill Branch
and its tributaries, wetlands, and floodplains. Sediment from eroding banks is deleterious to
benthic macroinvertebrate habitat and can be expected to reduce fisheries populations in the
existing and downstream reaches. As constructed, mitigation activities will create wildlife and
fish habitat, shade /cool surface waters (thereby increasing dissolved oxygen levels), filter
nutrients, reduce sedimentation, reduce downstream flooding, and increase bed morphology
(habitat) through maintenance of perpendicular flow vectors.
The primary goals were accomplished through the following measures.
Improving Water Quality
• Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural activities including a)
removal of livestock from streams, stream banks, wetlands, and floodplains; b) eliminating
the application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and adjacent to
streams and wetlands; and c) establishing a vegetative buffer adjacent to streams and
wetlands to treat surface runoff, which may contain pollutants such as sediment and /or
agricultural pollutants from the adjacent landscape.
• Reducing sedimentation onsite and downstream by a) reducing bank erosion associated
with hoof shear and vegetation maintenance and b) planting a diverse woody vegetative
buffer adjacent to Kennedy Mill Branch and associated unnamed tributaries to Kennedy
Mill Branch.
• Providing shallow wetland marsh treatment areas to intercept surface waters draining
through agricultural areas prior to discharging into Bank streams and wetlands.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Executive Summary
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Enhancing Flood Attenuation
• Promoting floodwater attenuation by a) reconnecting bankfull stream flows to the
abandoned floodplain terrace, b) restoring secondary, entrenched tributaries thereby
reducing floodwater velocities within smaller catchment basins, c) restoring depressional
floodplain wetlands, resulting in increased storage capacity for floodwaters within the
Bank, and d) revegetating the Bank's floodplains to increase frictional resistance on
floodwaters crossing the Bank.
Restoring Aquatic Resources and Riparian Habitat
• Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and sediment
loads by restoring stable dimension, pattern, and profile supported by natural in- stream
habitat and grade /bank stabilization structures.
• Improving aquatic habitat by promoting stable stream banks, shading open waters, and
providing in- stream structures within the Bank.
• Providing wildlife habitat corridors within fragmented parcels in the Neuse River
watershed.
Project construction and planting was completed between December 2012 and April 2013. The
Bank's plan included 1) construction of a stable, riffle -pool stream channel, 2) restoration of
braided stream systems, 3) restoration /enhancement of historic wetland functions, 4) enhancement
of water quality functions (reduced nonpoint source sedimentation and nutrient inputs), 5)
restoration of a native woody riparian buffer (at least 50' wide) along Bank streams, 6) restoration
of wildlife habitat associated with a riparian corridor /stable stream, and 7) establishment of a
permanent conservation easement which will encompass all restoration activities.
The implemented mitigation is as follows.
After completion of construction, the Bank offers 8419 Stream Mitigation Units and 29.9
Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Executive Summary
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Quantity
Mitigation Units (Credits)
Mitigation Activity
Riparian Nonriparian
Stream
Riparian
Nonriparian
Streams
Wetlands Wetlands
Units
Wetland
Wetland
(linear feet)
(acres) (acres)
(SMUs)
Units
Units
Stream Restoration
6596
1�,�� i 1,iy \l'i1�} ;s ail
'£�,� fit, ?,ttir�z ` ( � � r,ilt ����A, �
6596
�y tZ�. fit, 1,£�ti���, �t£��
N,
Stream Enhancement LevelI
( )
803
�� �t�,��, ,r;
�{£a`��`�'4� �i£s � i s i�, r \� i ta,r1
535
v',t���', rat+' r,»�
r{,;�� �4tus�s
\ti'';',jx�y�t�i�, {,,�,frt�a
., ,,,
�� is �ti, Sri,
tt�1}£
Stream Enhancement (Level II)
3221
� i
�����, ��,r k,:
1288
� S
�,
I££�,S �``
r �,.y, >>
Wetland Restoration
S£, ,
t� ` �£Ii��- i ` Sr, ,
29
s� , S� ,y�� 1 ,�r l`"`?, i�w
'1
29
�r h��,,,t�``„
a ,,k
Wetland Enhancement
1.5
0.75
. \
( �ShV; , \11 }c , s 1, .
}ij
t
,tl
; r ,
Preservation
�
0.5
o.lWetland
zr,r1t
st£
TOTALS
8419
29.9
"{
After completion of construction, the Bank offers 8419 Stream Mitigation Units and 29.9
Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Executive Summary
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES ........................... ..............................1
1.1
Location and Setting ....................................................................................... ..............................1
1.2
Project Goals and Objectives .......................................................................... ..............................1
1.3
Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach ........................................ ..............................2
1.3.1
Project Structure ...................................................................................... ..............................2
1.3.2
Restoration Type and Approach ............................................................. ..............................2
2.0
SUCCESS CRITERIA ........................................................................................ ..............................4
2.1
Streams ............................................................................................................ ..............................4
2.2
Vegetation ....................................................................................................... ..............................6
2.3
Wetland Hydrology ......................................................................................... ..............................7
3.0
MONITORING PLAN ...................................................................................... ...............................
8
3.1
Streams ............................................................................................................ ..............................8
3.2
Vegetation ....................................................................................................... ..............................9
3.3
Wetland Hydrology ......................................................................................... ..............................9
3.4
Biotic Community Changes ........................................................................... .............................10
4.0
MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY ....................................................... .............................11
5.0
REFERENCES .................................................................................................. .............................12
APPENDICES
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Figure 1. The Bank Location
Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View
Appendix B. Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Tables 5A -5D. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 6A -6E. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross - section Plots
Fixed Station Photo Points
Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 7. Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 8a -8c. Linear Mature Vegetation Mortality Plots
Table 9a -9c. Linear Plot and Privet Occurrence
Baseline Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Appendix D. As -built Plan Sheets
Appendix E. Preconstruction Benthic Data
Figure El. Preconstruction Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sites
Preconstruction Benthic Sample Results
Habitat Assessment Field Datasheets
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Table of Contents page i
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
Restoration Systems, LLC established a stream and wetland mitigation bank at the Pancho
Mitigation Site (hereafter the Bank) located approximately 13 miles west of Goldsboro in western
Wayne County; north of U.S. Highway 13 near the intersection of State Road 1008 (Stevens Mill
Road) and State Road 1105 (Dobbersville Road) (Figure 1, Appendix A). The Bank is located
within the Neuse River Basin in 14 -digit United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit
and Targeted Local Watershed 03020201150050 of the South Atlantic /Gulf Region (North
Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Subbasin Number 03- 04 -04). The Bank is expected
to offset unavoidable impacts associated with projects located within 8 -digit Cataloging Unit
03020201.
Directions to the Bank:
➢ From the City of Raleigh travel east on U.S. Highway 70
➢ Travel — 37 miles on U.S. Highway 70 to the intersection with Martin Livestock Road
➢ Turn right at Martin Livestock Road (0.7 mile)
➢ Turn right at Progressive Church Road (4 miles)
➢ Turn left at Brogden Road (0.5 mile)
➢ Turn right at Richardson Bridge Road (5.3 miles)
➢ Turn left at T- intersection onto Harper House Road, which turns into Stevens Mill Road (1.3
miles)
➢ The Bank is located where Kennedy Mill Branch crosses Stevens Mill Road
o Latitude: 35.3337550 N, Longitude: 78.1926990 W
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The primary goals of this stream and wetland project focused on improving water quality, enhancing
flood attenuation, and restoring aquatic and riparian habitat to Kennedy Mill Branch and its
tributaries, wetlands, and floodplains. Sediment from eroding banks is deleterious to benthic
macroinvertebrate habitat and can be expected to reduce fisheries populations in the existing and
downstream reaches. As construction, mitigation activities will create wildlife and fish habitat,
shade /cool surface waters (thereby increasing dissolved oxygen levels), filter nutrients, reduce
sedimentation, reduce downstream flooding, and increase bed morphology (habitat) through
maintenance of perpendicular flow vectors.
The primary goals were accomplished through the following measures.
Improving Water Quality
• Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural activities including a)
removal of livestock from streams, stream banks, wetlands, and floodplains; b) eliminating
the application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and adjacent to
streams and wetlands; and c) establishing a vegetative buffer adjacent to streams and
wetlands to treat surface runoff, which may contain pollutants such as sediment and /or
agricultural pollutants from the adjacent landscape.
• Reducing sedimentation onsite and downstream by a) reducing bank erosion associated with
hoof shear and vegetation maintenance and b) planting a diverse woody vegetative buffer
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 1
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

adjacent to Kennedy Mill Branch and associated unnamed tributaries to Kennedy Mill
Branch.
• Providing shallow wetland marsh treatment areas to intercept surface waters draining
through agricultural areas prior to discharging into Bank streams and wetlands.
Enhancing Flood Attenuation
• Promoting floodwater attenuation by a) reconnecting bankfull stream flows to the abandoned
floodplain terrace, b) restoring secondary, entrenched tributaries thereby reducing
floodwater velocities within smaller catchment basins, c) restoring depressional floodplain
wetlands, resulting in increased storage capacity for floodwaters within the Bank, and d)
revegetating the Bank's floodplains to increase frictional resistance on floodwaters crossing
the Bank.
Restoring Aquatic Resources and Riparian Habitat
• Reestablishing stream stability and the capacity to transport watershed flows and sediment
loads by restoring stable dimension, pattern, and profile supported by natural in- stream
habitat and grade /bank stabilization structures.
• Improving aquatic habitat by promoting stable stream banks, shading open waters, and
providing in- stream structures within the Bank.
• Providing wildlife habitat corridors within fragmented parcels in the Neuse River watershed.
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
1.3.1 Project Structure
Prior to construction, the Bank was cleared of native forest vegetation; streams were relocated,
ditched, and straightened; and groundwater hydrology was lowered due to agricultural ditching and
entrenchment of Bank streams. Land use practices resulted in degraded water quality, unstable
channel characteristics (stream entrenchment, erosion, and bank collapse), and reduced storage
capacity.
1.3.2 Restoration Type and Approach
As constructed, Bank restoration activities resulted in the following.
• Providing 8419 stream mitigation units by the following.
• Restoring approximately 5311 linear feet of stream channel through priority I
construction of stable channels, thereby reestablishing stable dimension, pattern, and
profile.
• Restoring approximately 1285 linear feet of braided stream channel by redirecting
stream flows into a braided, backwater slough.
• Enhancing (Level I) approximately 803 linear feet of stream channel by removing
invasive species, protecting desirable hardwood trees greater than 4 inches in diameter
at breast height to the maximum extent possible, restoring overbank
flooding /hydrodynamics by raising the bed elevation, sloping channel banks, altering
channel slopes to reduce bank erosion, modifying woody debris in channels to promote
habitat, and supplementally planting where necessary.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 2
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

o Enhancing (Level 11) approximately 3221 linear feet of stream channel by improving
floodplain access, providing bank stabilization in highly eroded portions of the channel,
and removing invasive species adjacent to the channel.
Providing 29.9 wetland mitigation units by the following.
• Restoring approximately 29.0 acres of riparian wetlands by reconstructing stream
channels within the historic floodplain, filling agricultural ditches, removing livestock
and row crop production, rehydrating floodplain soils, and planting with native woody
vegetation.
• Enhancing approximately 1.5 acres of riparian wetlands by 1) supplementally planting
areas high - graded for lumber production or 2) removing livestock and planting with
native forest vegetation.
• Preserving approximately 0.5 acres of existing forested riparian wetlands.
Planting a native woody riparian buffer adjacent to restored /enhanced streams and wetlands
within the Bank.
• Protecting the Bank in perpetuity with a conservation easement.
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and project
attributes are summarized in Tables 1 -4 (Appendix A).
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 3
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

2.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
2.1 Streams
Priority I Restoration Kennedy
Kennedy Mill Branch, Main Tributary, UTs 5 -6
Performance standards for channels where work includes construction of pattern, dimension, and /or
profile (e.g., Priority I Restoration) shall be in accordance with the Stream Mitigation Guidelines,
dated April 2003, listed below. These stream systems, which include Kennedy Mill Branch, the
Main Tributary, and UTs 5 -6 on the Monitoring Plan View (Figure 2, Appendix A), are subject to
the performance standards listed below.
1. Photo reference sites should show no substantial aggradation, degradation, or bank
erosion.
2. Channel stability (monitored using cross - sections, longitudinal profiles, and
photographic documentation of substrate) should demonstrate no more than minimal
evidence of instability (down- cutting, deposition, bank erosion, or increase in sands
or finer substrate material).
Braided Stream Restoration (UT7) and
Single- threaded Stream Restoration within Wetland Complex (UTs 1 -2)
Stream channels associated with the project that do not involve construction of pattern, dimension,
and /or profile were generally designed in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) guidance document Information Regarding Stream Restoration with Emphasis on the
Coastal Plain, Version 2, dated April 4, 2007. Development of streams in these systems will be
achieved through the reestablishment of braided stream morphology through passive measures,
including ditch filling, and natural progression of the stream through historic sloughs, braids and
channels (UT7 on the Monitoring Plan View [Figure 2, Appendix A]) or the construction of single -
threaded channels consisting of shallow (0.2 -foot in depth) depressions that will promote the
development of stream features in a Juncus dominated wetland area (UTs 1 -2 on the Monitoring
Plan View [Figure 2, Appendix A]). These stream systems are subject to the performance standards
listed below.
1. Under normal climatic conditions, continuous surface water flow within the valley or
crenulation must be documented to occur every year for at least 30 consecutive days within
each monitoring year during the prescribed monitoring period (7 years). Additional
monitoring and /or analysis may be necessary in the event of abnormal climatic conditions.
Documentation of flow shall be accomplished using flow meters and photographic evidence
of observed flow taken from fixed photo stations located along the path of flow.
2. Evidence of channel formation within the valley or crenulation must be documented through
the identification of field indicators on an annual basis in accordance with the following
schedule:
a. During monitoring years 1 through 4, the preponderance of documented field
indicators must demonstrate the accumulation of flow within the topographic
low -point of the valley or crenulation. Documented indicators may include any
of the following indicators or any of the indicators listed in Part b:
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 4
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

i. Presence of litter and debris (wracking) indicating surface water flow;
ii. Leaf litter disturbed or washed away;
iii. Matted, bent, or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or otherwise) indicative
of surface flow;
iv. Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment transport by flowing
water;
v. Water staining due to continual presence of water.
b. During monitoring years 5 through 7, the preponderance of documented field
indicators must demonstrate the accumulation of flow within the topographic
low -point of the valley or crenulation (documented by field indicators listed in
Part a) and the development of a primary path of flow, stream channel, or
ordinary high water mark. Documented indicators may include any of the
following:
i. Formation of channel bed and banks;
ii. Sediment sorting indicated by grain -size distribution within the primary path
of flow;
iii. Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks;
iv. Change in plant community (absence or destruction of terrestrial vegetation
and /or transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long duration,
including hydrophytes)
v. Development of channel pattern (meander bends and /or channel braiding) at
natural topographic breaks, woody debris piles, or plant root systems;
vi. Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of flow;
vii. Changes in soil characteristics (when compared to the soils abutting the
primary path of flow).
Enhancement (Level I) Reaches
Kennedy Mill Branch, Main Tributary (upper reaches)
Performance standards for Enhancement (Level I) reaches shall be similar to Restoration
performance standards; however, these channels would be expected to aggrade over time as
sediment moves into, and through the reach. These stream systems, including the upper, forested
reaches of Kennedy Mill Branch and the Main Tributary immediately upstream of Priority 1
restoration areas (Figure 2, Appendix A), are subject to the performance standards listed below.
1. Photo reference sites should show no substantial bank erosion.
2. Channel stability (monitored using cross - sections and photographic documentation)
should demonstrate no more than minimal evidence of instability (down- cutting and
bank erosion).
3. Linear transects within the adjacent buffer will be used to determine if enhancement
efforts result in mortality of existing, forested vegetation.
4. Crest gauge should show connection of the channel with the floodplain for the
downstream portions of the enhancement (level I) channels.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 5
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Enhancement (Level II) Reaches
Kennedy Mill Branch, Main Tributary
Performance standards for enhancement (level II) reaches shall be commiserate with the proposed
functional uplift. Similar to enhancement (level I) reaches, these channels would be expected to
aggrade over time as sediment moves into, and through the reach. Enhancement (level II) reaches,
including the upper, forested reaches of Kennedy Mill Branch and the Main Tributary immediately
upstream of Enhancement (level I) areas (Figure 2, Appendix A), are subject to the performance
standards listed below.
1. Photo reference sites should show no substantial bank erosion.
2. Channel stability (monitored using cross - sections and photographic documentation)
should demonstrate evidence of improved stability over existing conditions.
3. Crest gauge should show limited connection of the channel with the floodplain for
the downstream portions of the enhancement (level II) channels. These channels will
remain incised and are expected to show limited connection with the adjacent
floodplain.
Bankfull Events
Documentation of at least two bankfull events within the monitoring period must occur, in separate
years; in the event that only one bankfull event occurs or if bankfull events occur in the same
monitoring year, release of remaining credit for bankfull events will be subject to Interagency
Review Team (IRT) approval.
Stream Substrate
Stream substrate is not expected to coarsen over time; therefore, pebble counts are not proposed as
part of the stream success criteria.
Visual Assessments of Structures
Visual assessment of in- stream structures will be conducted to determine if failure has occurred.
Failure of a structure may be indicated by collapse of the structure, undermining of the structure,
abandonment of the channel around the structure, and /or stream flow beneath the structure.
2.2 Vegetation
Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports community
elements necessary for forest development. Success of vegetation criteria at the Bank indicates
successful restoration of riparian habitat within and adjacent to aquatic stream and wetland resources
as well as improvement of overall water quality resulting from the treatment of surface water and a
reduction of sedimentation.
Success criteria are dependent upon the density and growth of characteristic forest species
throughout planted areas of the Bank including the Mesic -Mixed Hardwood Forest and Coastal Plain
Bottomland Hardwoods (brownwater subtype) communities. An average density of 320 living,
planted stems per acre must be surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 260
living, planted stems per acre in year 5, and 210 living, planted stems per acre in year 7.
No single volunteer species (most notably red maple, loblolly pine, and sweet gum) will comprise
more than 20 percent of the total composition. If this occurs, remedial procedures /protocols outlined
in the contingency plan will be implemented. If, within the first 3 years, any species exhibits greater
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 6
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

than 50 percent mortality, the species will either be replanted or an acceptable replacement species
will be planted in its place as specified in the contingency plan.
2.3 Wetland Hydrology
According to the Soil Survey of Wayne County, the growing season for Wayne County in Goldsboro
is from March 17- November 14 (USDA 1974). However, for purposes of this project gauge
hydrologic success will be determined using data from February 1- November 14 to more accurately
represent the period of biological activity. Success of hydrology criteria at the Bank indicates
successful restoration of aquatic riparian wetland resources and enhanced floodwater attenuation as
well as improvement of overall water quality resulting from the removal of livestock.
Target hydrological characteristics include saturation or inundation for a minimum of 9 percent of
the monitoring period (February 1- November 14), during average climatic conditions. During years
with atypical climatic conditions, data from a groundwater gauge(s) in a reference wetland will be
available for use by the USACE and the IRT to evaluate hydrology success. Based on groundwater
modeling, consecutive groundwater hydrology within an early successional restoration site is
typically approximately 75 percent of that in a mature, forested reference site. These areas are
expected to support hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils; a jurisdictional determination may be
performed to provide this additional information to the USACE and the IRT.
In addition, "vernal pool" features resulting from small pockets of open channel remaining after
plugging and filling existing channels should account for less than 10 percent of the overall wetland
area.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 7
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

3.0 MONITORING PLAN
Monitoring of the Bank will conform to guidelines established in Information Regarding Stream
Restoration with Emphasis on the Coastal Plain —Draft (USACE et al. 2007) and Stream Mitigation
Guidelines (USACE et al. 2003). Monitoring data collected at the Bank should include reference
photos, plant survival analysis, hydrology analysis, channel stability analysis, documentation of
bankfull events, and biological data. Prior to the installation of all monitoring gauges and sampling
plots, proposed numbers and locations were submitted to the USACE for approval.
Wetland hydrology, the stream channel, and vegetation are proposed to be monitored for a period
of seven years (years 1 -7). If monitoring demonstrates the Bank is successful by year 5 and no
concerns have been identified, Restoration Systems, LLC may propose to terminate monitoring at
the Bank and forego monitoring requirements for years 6 and 7. This provision is only applicable
if the Bank has consistently met all performance standards, and at year 5 met the year 5 vegetation
density standards (260 plants /acre) and the year 7 average height requirement of 10 feet. Early
closure will only be provided through written approval from the USACE in consultation with the
IRT.
Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports of the data
collected will be submitted to the IRT no later than December 31 of each monitoring year.
3.1 Streams
Priority I Restoration Reaches
Kennedy Mill Branch, Main Tributary, UTs 5 -6
Annual monitoring will include development of channel cross - sections on riffles and pools, and a
water surface profile of the channel in priority I stream restoration reaches. The data will be
presented in graphic and tabular format. Data to be presented will include 1) cross - sectional area,
2) bankfull width, 3) average depth, 4) maximum depth, 5) width -to -depth ratio, and 6) water surface
slope. A photographic record of preconstruction and post - construction pictures will also be
compiled.
Braided Stream Restoration (UT7) and
Single- threaded Stream Restoration within Wetland Complex (UTs 1 -2)
Annual fall monitoring will include documentation of channel surface flow (a minimum of 30
consecutive days) and fixed photograph locations in the braided stream restoration reach (UT7) and
single- threaded stream restoration within wetland complexes (UTs 1 -2). Evidence of channel
formation within the valley will be documented annually in monitoring years 1 -4. Field indicators
such as wracking, disturbance of leaf litter, matted or absent vegetation, sediment deposition and /or
scour, and water staining due to the continual presence of water will be noted and photographed. In
monitoring years 5 -7 documented field indicators of channel formation must demonstrate the
accumulation of flow in the topographic low -point of the valley with development of a primary path
of flow, stream channel, or ordinary high water marks.
Enhancement (Level I) Reaches
Kennedy Mill Branch and Main Tributary
Annual monitoring will include development of channel cross - sections on riffles and pools in
enhancement (level I) stream reaches. The data will be presented in graphic and tabular format.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 8
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Data to be presented will include 1) cross - sectional area, 2) bankfull width, 3) average depth, 4)
maximum depth, and 5) width -to -depth ratio. A photographic record of preconstruction and post -
construction pictures will also be compiled.
In addition, linear transects will be monitored adjacent to the stream enhancement (level I) reach to
access any existing mature tree mortality due to changes in hydrology. This information will be
reported in the annual monitoring report but will not be tied to performance standards.
Enhancement (Level II) Reaches
Kennedy Mill Branch and Main Tributary
Annual monitoring will include development of channel cross - sections on riffles and pools in
enhancement (level II) stream reaches. The data will be presented in graphic and tabular format.
Data to be presented will include 1) cross - sectional area, 2) bankfull width, 3) average depth, 4)
maximum depth, and 5) width -to -depth ratio. A photographic record of preconstruction and post -
construction pictures will also be compiled.
Bankfull Events
Bankfull events will be documented throughout the monitoring period.
3.2 Vegetation
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation are designed in accordance with U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) guidelines enumerated in Mitigation Site Type (MIST)
documentation (USEPA 1990), Compensatory Hardwood Mitigation Guidelines (DOA 1993),
Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE 2003), and CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
Level 1 -2 Plot Sampling Only (Version 4.0) (Lee et al. 2006). A general discussion of the restoration
monitoring program is provided. A photographic record of plant growth should be included in each
annual monitoring report.
After planting was completed in early spring, an initial evaluation was performed to verify planting
methods and to determine initial species composition and density. Supplemental planting and
additional Bank modifications were determined to not be necessary.
During the first year, vegetation will receive a cursory, visual evaluation on a periodic basis to
ascertain the degree of overtopping of planted elements by nuisance species with quantitative
sampling occurring between September 1 and September 30. Subsequently, quantitative sampling
of vegetation will be performed between June 1 and September 30 for each growing season until the
vegetation success criteria are achieved.
During quantitative vegetation sampling in early fall of the first year 10 sample plots (10 meters by
10 meters) were randomly placed within the Bank. Best professional judgment may be necessary
to establish vegetative monitoring plots upon completion of construction activities. In each sample
plot, vegetation parameters to be monitored include species composition and species density.
3.3 Wetland Hydrology
After construction, 21 groundwater monitoring gauges and 3 surface water gauges were installed to
measure hydrological modifications performed at the Bank. Hydrological sampling will continue
throughout the growing season at intervals necessary to satisfy jurisdictional hydrology success
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 9
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

criteria within each wetland restoration area (USEPA 1990). According to the Soil Survey of Wayne
County, the growing season for Wayne County in Goldsboro is from March 17- November 14
(USDA 1974). However, for purposes of this project gauge hydrologic success will be determined
using data from February 1- November 14 to more accurately represent the period of biological
activity. Soil temperatures will be collected in late January /early February of each monitoring year,
and will be reported in the annual monitoring report.
3.4 Biotic Community Changes
Changes in the biotic community are anticipated from a shift in habitat opportunities as tributaries
are restored. In- stream, biological monitoring is proposed to track changes during the monitoring
period. The benthic macroinvertebrate community will be sampled using NCDWQ protocols found
in the Standard Operating Procedures forBenthic Macro invertebrates (NCDWQ 2006) and Benthic
Macro invertebrate Protocols for Compensatory Stream Restoration Projects (NCDWQ 2001).
Biological sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates will be used to compare preconstruction baseline
data with postconstruction restored conditions.
Three benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring locations will be established within restoration reaches
(two established within restoration reaches and one monitoring location established within an
upstream enhancement reach of Kennedy Mill Branch [Figure El. Appendix E]). Postrestoration
collections will occur in the approximate location of the prerestoration sampling. Benthic
macroinvertebrate samples will be collected from individual reaches using the Qual -4 collection
method. Sampling techniques of the Qual -4 collection method consist of kick nets, sweep nets, leaf
packs, and visual searches. Preproject biological sampling occurred on June 1, 2010; postproject
monitoring will occur in June of each monitoring year.
Identification of collected organisms will be performed by personnel with NCDWQ or by a
NCDWQ certified laboratory. Other data collected will include D50 values/NCDWQ habitat
assessment forms.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 10
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

4.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY
In the event that success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be implemented.
Stream
In the event that stream success criteria are not fulfilled, a mechanism for contingency will be
implemented. Stream contingency may include, but may not be limited to 1) structure repair and /or
installation; 2) repair of dimension, pattern, and /or profile variables; and 3) bank stabilization. The
method of contingency is expected to be dependent upon stream variables that are not in compliance
with success criteria. Primary concerns, which may jeopardize stream success include 1) structure
failure, 2) headcut migration through the Bank, and /or 3) bank erosion.
Structure Failure: In the event that a structure is compromised and no longer maintains grade control
function, the affected structure will be repaired, maintained, or replaced. Once the structure is
repaired or replaced, it must function to stabilize adjacent stream banks and /or maintain grade
control within the channel. Structures which remain intact, but exhibit flow around, beneath, or
through the header /footer will be repaired by excavating a trench on the upstream side of the
structure and reinstalling filter fabric in front of the pilings. Structures which have been
compromised, resulting in shifting or collapse of header /footer, will be removed and replaced with
a structure suitable for Bank flows.
Headcut Migration Through the Bank: In the event that a headcut occurs within the Bank (identified
visually and /or through mapping and measurements, provisions for impeding headcut migration and
repairing damage caused by the headcut will be implemented. Headcut migration may be impeded
through the installation of in- stream grade control structures (rip -rap sill and /or log cross -vane weir)
and /or restoring stream geometry variables until channel stability is achieved. Channel repairs to
stream geometry may include channel backfill with coarse material and stabilizing the material with
erosion control matting, vegetative transplants, and /or willow stakes.
Bank Erosion: In the event that severe bank erosion occurs within the Bank, resulting in elevated
width -to -depth ratios, contingency measures to reduce bank erosion and width -to -depth ratio will
be implemented. Bank erosion contingency measures may include the installation of log -vane weirs
and /or other bank stabilization measures. If the resultant bank erosion induces shoot cutoffs or
channel abandonment, a channel may be excavated which will reduce shear stress to stable values.
Vegetation
If vegetation success criteria are not achieved based on average density calculations from combined
plots over the entire restoration area, supplemental planting will be performed with tree species
approved by regulatory agencies. Supplemental planting will be performed as needed until
achievement of vegetation success criteria.
Hydrology
Hydrological contingency will require consultation with hydrologists and regulatory agencies if
wetland hydrology enhancement is not achieved. Floodplain surface modifications, including
construction of ephemeral pools, represent a likely mechanism to increase the floodplain area in
support of jurisdictional wetlands. Recommendations for contingency to establish wetland
hydrology will be implemented and monitored until Hydrology Success Criteria are achieved.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 11
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

5.0 REFERENCES
Department of the Army (DOA). 1993 (unpublished). Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.
Compensatory Hardwood Mitigation Guidelines (12/8/93).
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.0. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2001. Benthic Macroinvertebrate
Monitoring Protocols for Compensatory Mitigation. 401 /Wetlands Unit, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2006. Standard Operating Procedures for
Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Biological Assessment Unit, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2012. Final North Carolina Water Quality
Assessment and Impaired Waters List (NC 2012 Integrated Report Category 5, 303(4) List
Approved August 24, 2012) (online). Available:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/ document_ library /get file ?uuid= 9d45b3b4 -4066- 4619 -82e6-
ea8ea0e01930 &groupId= 38364. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(USACE et al.). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
United States Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (USACE et
al.). 2007. Information Regarding Stream Restoration with Emphasis on the Coastal Plain,
Version 2.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1974. Soil Survey of Wayne County, North
Carolina. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture.
United States Environmental Protection Agency ( USEPA). 1990. Mitigation Site Type
Classification (MIST). USEPA Workshop, August 13 -15, 1989. EPA Region IV and
Hardwood Research Cooperative, NCSU, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Page 12
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Appendix A.
General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Figure 1. The Bank Location
Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendix
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

i■
U
O
bA
ii
y
ii
ii
O
O
U
V
.p
S■
rl
ii
�ry.CC�
F+�I
O
CC
V
ii
x
CL
Q
Q
O
Q
N Y
N
7 m
N O
N
C .0
C
N '6
7 �
U >�
N -6
C C
N
N E
M
CO N
O)�
C
O O
t
� U
cO
G IL
x
x
x
x
CL
I
o
o
o
v
o O
v>
m
m
o �
o �
E o
o
Y
Y
CL
2,
v
o
v
o
v
0
N
N
'O
CL
0
W
�
O eC
P'o
oo
00
r
M
n
o0
X
S� U
N
oc
h
oc
oc
N
vM1
gyp+
U
CC
O
a W
�
U
rte+
�
a �
'�
eC
N
60
a bA
CC
OA
M
M
OA
�l1
_
IC
N
O U
N
U1
oc
00
h
OA
N
U1
M
oc
oo
N
Ic
N
H
O
W
N�
W
o
O
S
+
oc
v+
N
N
N
oc
u
_
IC
Ic
p
�'
N
FBI
�
� V]
x
CL
Q
Q
O
Q
N Y
N
7 m
N O
N
C .0
C
N '6
7 �
U >�
N -6
C C
N
N E
M
CO N
O)�
C
O O
t
� U
cO
G IL

i.
V
ii
O
bA
O
O
U
V
O
I�
ii
ii
O
V
CC
ii
ryCC�
F+�I
ii
O
CC
O
V
^^CC�
I�
x
C
Q
Q
Q
O
Q
N Y
7 m
N O
� N
C
N 'O
E c
7 N
U >�
N -6
C C
(6
N E
(6
CO N
0)
o O
s
� U
O
d
an
U
I�
CC
`I
•�
O
•�
o
O
z
•S..i
N
i
i
,-i
p
M
�
CC
p
�
N
O
U
O
w
�
�
CC
S.i
H
NC
'
w
Q
F+I
W
W
x
C
Q
Q
Q
O
Q
N Y
7 m
N O
� N
C
N 'O
E c
7 N
U >�
N -6
C C
(6
N E
(6
CO N
0)
o O
s
� U
O
d

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Pancho Mitigation Bank
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Deliver
Restoration Plan
--
March 2012
Construction Plans
--
June 2012
Addendum to Restoration Plan
--
February 2013
Planting and Construction Completion
--
April 2013
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Pancho Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Provider
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer 919 - 755 -9490
Designer
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Construction Plans and Sediment and
Florence & Hutcheson
Erosion Control Plans
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Kevin Williams, PE 919 - 851 -6066
Construction and Planting Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919 - 639 -6132
As -built Surveyor
K2 Design Group
5688 US Highway 70 East
Goldsboro, NC 27534
John Rudolph 919 - 751 -0075
Baseline Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Pancho Mitigation Bank
Project County
Wayne County, North Carolina
Physiographic Region
Southeastern Plains
Ecoregion
Southeastern Flood plains and Low Terraces
Project River Basin
Neuse
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
03020201150050
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
03 -04 -04
WRC Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
% of project easement fenced or demarcated
100
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
Yes
Kennedy
Mill
Main
Trib
UT 1/2
UT 5/6
UT 7
Drainage Area (sq mi)
2.9
1.1
0.01
0.05
0.08
Stream Order (USGS to o)
3rd
2nd
NA
NA
1st
Restored Length (feet)
2488
987
1121
715
1285
Perennial (P) or Intermittent (I)
P
P
I
I
P
Watershed Type
Rural
Watershed impervious cover
<5%
NCDWQ AU/Index number
27-52-(1)
NCDWQ Classification
C, NSW
303d listed?
No
Upstream of a 303d listed
Yes
Reasons for 303d listed segment
aquatic life / turbidity
Total acreage of easement
65.62
Total existing vegetated acreage of easement
13.9
Total planted restoration acreage
52.9
Rosgen Classification of preexisting
Gc5
Ge5
Ge5
Ge5
Ce5
Rosgen Classification of As -built
Cc 5/6
Cc 5/6
De 5/6
Ec 5/6
D 5/6
Valley type
VIIl
VIIl
VIIl
VIIl
VIIl
Valley slope
0.0032
0.0051
0.026
0.0337
0.0049
Cowardin classification of proposed
R31JB4
R31JB4
R4SB4 /5
R4SB4 /5
R21JB4/5
Trout waters designation
NA
Species of concern, endangered etc.
NA
Dominant Soil Series
Bibb Bibb Bibb Bibb Johnston
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

�
roa
-
7 ! "§
Legend
Surveyed Easement Boundary
llk
�.I
47
Roads
County Boundaries
Wayne County`
Municipal Boundaries
Goldsboro
Jed t f m u
,y "M
K �.
�f f -.wf�
ire
a�
yen
Ilia
! ..
wed 5 d'
rr
ci
,gyp'
Pancho
1k
Mitigation
ti Bank
�u
Directions to the Site from Raleigh, NC:
-> Travel east on U.S. Highway 70 d
-> Travel 37 miles on U.S. Highway 70 to the intersection
"�
with Martin Livestock Road
kj�t ° -> Turn right at Martin Livestock Road (0.7 mile)
Turn right at Progressive Church Road (4 miles)
Turn left at Brogden Road (0.5 mile)
Turn right at Richardson Bridge Road (5.3 miles)
-> Turn left at T- intersection onto Harper House Road,
0 0.5 1 2 3
4 which becomes Stevens Mill Road (1.3 miles)
Miles -> The Bank is located where Kennedy Mill Branch crosses
Stevens Mill Road
Scale 1:120,000
ug -> Latitude: 35.333755° N, Longitude: 78.192699° W
P.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NCZ76o3
THE BANK LOCATION
PANCHO MITIGATION BANK
Dwn. By:
CLF
Date:
April 2013
FIGURE
919- 215 -1693
Wayne County, North Carolina
Project:
Axiom :nvimnmen.'al, Inc.
1 0 -01 0

Appendix B
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Tables 5A -5D. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 6A -6E. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross - section Plots
Fixed Station Photo Points
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Y
U
ii
Y
ii
O
W
O
O
h
� U
ii
M�
W
O
a
o
•� o
d
v) o
H p,
"O
N
N
N
O
N
(h
O
N
N
II
II
N
O
O
N
00
N
O
N
II
II
O
pj
N
)
(D
O)
(O
(f)
OR
O)
II
II
Q
O
p
N
O
(p
(h
I.()
I�
II
II
O)
N
p
II
0)
U
O
00
r
V
O)
r-
00
V
N
(D
°
00
(r)
II
u
II
u
O
00
O
—
.--
II
II
d
N
O
LI)
N
N
O)
('j
II
II
II
II
(fl
(Y)
O
N
II
II
0000
II
II
II
II
II
II
O
II
II
N
II
(q
II
II
II
O
.A �
II
II
°
II
�
O N
III
d)
III
III
N
O )
N
II
°
II
III I
III I
,N
I
I
I
II
O
II
II
II
II
II
O
II
U
Cw'
N
N
II
II
O)
N
00
II
II
II
II
00
N
(n
II
II
°
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
(y
II
O
O)
(p
N
�
II
II
(`-
II
II
O
R
O
l!i
O
(fl
O)
II
II
II
II
(D
N
II
II
°
II
II
II
II
II
II
Z
00
�
II
II
II
II
II
II
y
U
O
Cw �
y
II
II
II
II
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
II
II
°
II
II
II
II
II
II
w
II
II
II
II
I�
(
II
II
N
a
z
II
II
(V
II
II
II
N
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
w
O
O
•'
III
III
((j
II
II
II
00
II
°
0
III I
III I
III I
r.+
d
T
I
I
0
()
II
II
II
II
a
O
d
N
O
N
00
N
0
II
N
III
III
4
r,:
1-
O
—
Op
N
II
II
II
O
N
I
II
I
II
O)
III
III
(r)
-7
(`)
II
II
II
00
(D
N
II
-.R
N
II
II
II
II
II
N °
II
,
I
I
7
N
W
I
(Y)
LL
Fw
O
d
(n
II
II
II
II
00
—7
N
II
II
II
II
0
II
O
III I
III I
O
O
,
I I
I I
O
N
N
N
O
N
00
II
I I
II
I I
u!
N
O j
u!
N
O j
II
I I
II
I I
pp
N
II
II
w
w
II
II
O
O
O
°
ON
00
i N
O
N
i O
III I
III I
III I
III I
N
IIII I I
Q
2
= Q 0)
O
N
I I
00
II I I
II I I
a
0--o
)
p
=
p N
00
O
N
I I
I I
Z
N
Z
N
I I
I I
CC
y
'O c�
U
CC
CC
bD ,� N
C•i
Uj
Uj cd
o
o
U
a
�
w

Y
U
ii
Y
ii
O
W
O
O
h
� A
� U
C.
�i
O
a
o
CQ
v� o
H p,
"O
O
Lo
p
N Lo
00
'IT
LO
(O
Ln
O
r
O)
N
N
V
V
N
II
II
II
II
O
.}.
'O
W
O
N
N
(p
N
II
II
N
0)
YE
00.
V
I) L
Ln
V
N
V
N
LO
V
LO
O
(O
II
II
II
II
Q
p
U
N
N
N
N
O
I I
I I
LO
N
(gyp
0)
0
O
"O
d
(fl
O
Ln
N
00
II
II
II
II
N
N
O
V
N
II
II
II
II
(fl
II
II
II
II
II
II
O)
II
Ln
II
LO
II
II
O
II
II
II
II
N
II
II
II)
U
N
p
LO
N
II
(O
N
(fl
LIT)
(D
II
(O
(p
III I
II
III I
II
A
LO
O
O
Cw'
O)
N
II
II
N
II
II
II
II
N
(O
II
II
°
II
II
N
II
II
II
II
p
O
R
"O
O
Ln
O
(fl
O)
II
II
II
II
N
II
II
°
II
II
II
II
II
II
Z
W
�
II
II
(D
II
II
II
II
y
U
O
Cw �
y
II
II
N
II
°
II
�
II
II
w
II
II
(° D
II
II
N
a
z
II
II
(V
II
II
II
N
N
II
II
"T
II
II
II
II
�
II
w
O
O
>•.'
II
II
II
II
�
N
�
(fl
L(j
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
00
(C)
LO
II
II
°
00
II
II
�
II
II
II
II
r.+
d
�p
�
�
II
II
O
�
�
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
a
O
LO
O
N
00
N
O
11
N
III
III
4t 4t
�
r,:
Ln
O
—
OO
N
III I
III I
III I
O
I
N
I
II
I
II
U
'�
Cl
O)
II
III
II
III
�rj
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
00
N
II
N °
III I
III I
III I
III I
III I
N °
III I
,
I
I
N
II
LL
�.
Fw
N
O
d
LO
II
II
II
II
00
-7
Ln
II
II
II
II
II
II
V
II
II
0
II
II
O
II
II
II
II
(Ci
I I
I I
O
—
r-
(p
O
pp
y
z
00
(—C)
�
�
II
II
II
II
u!
0 j
u!
0 j
II
II
II
II
O
O
O
°
R
Ln
0)
i O
O
O
II
II
LO
N
IIII I I
L(O n �
' O
�O
Q
O
Q 0)
II
II
O
i.'
N
II
O)
N
II
II
II
II
a
0 N 2
O 2
N
II
O
N
II
II
Z
Z
II
II
CC
y
'O c�
U
CC
CC
bD ,� N
C+i
Uj
Uj cd
rCL
m
J
J
Q
Q
U
a
�
w

t,
U
� [H
O
a
o
•� o
U
v� o
H p,
"O
O
00
N
0
00
N
II
II
00
O
V
(2
O
N
N
00
N
00
(O
N
N
(O
O
N
p
V
I I
I I
N
00
0)
N
000
II
O
N
0)
00
O
(h
1.()
1.()
N
00
O
p
N
N
O
l!)
(`")
1 j
°
O
N
00
E
II
II
II
II
(y
o
U
d
N
00
O
N
(h
O
O
N
V
N
O
p
N
II
II
II
II
O
O )
—
0
O
—
V
( 2
11
11
N
N
00
N
00
(D
N
II I I
II
O
II I I
II
O
II I I
II
II I I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
°
O
II
II
II
N
U
N
II
11
O
N
(D
�j
N
II
II
11
II
II
11
O
V
N
N
O
—
N
(`")
II
II
II
°
N
II
II
11
(fl
II
II
11
II
II
11
AN
p
N
II
00
O
N
II
II
N
V
()
II
°
W
11
I
N
11
II
11
II
O
R
O
—7
(q
II
II
III
(
II
11
N
III I
III I
00
1-
I
—
II
II
U
Cw �
y
0)
II
II
II
II
N
00
17
II
II
II
II
II
II
�
1-
I-
N
II
II
°
II
II
II
II
II
II
w
II
II
II
II
I�
o ('D
II
II
N
a �
z
�
II
II
�
�
(V
II
II
II
N
N
I—
(,)
II
�
II
�
II
II
II
II
'7
II
w
O
O
>•.'
II
II
II
II
N
(fl
((j
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
00
dd
II
II
°
00
II
II
N
II
II
II
II
r.+
d
p
II
II
O
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
a
O
O
N
0
N
—
O
O)
0
II
N
III
III
4t
ILO
1.()
I-
O
DD
N
O
11
N
I
II
I
II
O)
III
III
�N rj
III
III
III
N
N
II
N °
II
II
II
II
II
°
N
III I
W
I
I
I
I
I
II
Fw
00
O
d
(O
00
� p
II
II
II
II
0
II
O
III I
III I
O
O
I I
I I
I I
O
d
y
N
N
—
N
�
00
(f)
u!
u!
t!
III I
III I
pp
Z
c6 c
0)
1-
U
U
3
i 3
O
O
°
O
00
(O
i O O
c
i O
III I
III I
III I
III I
IIII I I
' O
�O
Q
O 0)
-O t
O
N
N
II
I I
00
(fl
II
I I
II
I I
II
I I
II
I I
a
0 C =�
N N
O =ff
N N
(O
I I
O
V
m
I I
I I
Z
N
Z
N
I I
I I
CC
y
'O c�
U
C
C
to N
C7
b4 On
C•i
Uj
Uj cd
a
81
J
J
Q
Q
r-+
N
N
O
N
cd
N
N
V]
O
O
ti
to
U
a
�
w
:al
.o

t,
U
•iii Cw'
W �
a'
o
•� o
A
A
v� o
H p,
d
0)
0
I-
V
I-
N
V
N
O
(!)
N
I-
m
0
0
O)
N
V
O
00
-
N
N
O
00
O
II
II
II
II
O
o
O)
I-
V
I-
(D
N
I
N
0
N
N
N
l!)
N-
II
(h
O
O
V
(j
II
II
(fl
1'
-
II
W
N
�"
O)
I-
V
0
I-
0
O)
(fl
N
N
V
V
O
N
(O
00
(fl
N
(D
(O
O
0
N
00
O
II
II
O
O
II
II
N
N
(`")
�
V
0
0
00
II
II
II
II
00
('4
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
°
II
O
II
II
(n
II
II
_
(n
II
°
O)
II
N
II
II
d
O
II
II
II
II
O
N
II
II
II
II
N
(`")
II
II
II
II
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
U
A
00
N
Cw'
0� 0
N
II
II
V
O
N
N
II
II
N
(D
00
N
II
(
W
III I
O
III I
III I
N
^p
V
O
)
O
((01
N
II
°
II
0
III I
III I
II
II
II
II
II
II
U
O
Cw �
y
0
N
II
°
II
II
II
w
II
II
o
II
N
a
z
II
II
(V
II
II
II
N
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
w
O
O
>•.'
II
II
II
II
0
N
(fl
((j
II
II
II
II
II
II
N
00
L
II
II
°
0
II
II
ON
II
II
II
II
r.+
d
p
II
II
O
II
II
II
(`C)
II
II
II
II
a
O
"al
(n
N
Dp
N
O
N
r-
0
III
N
III
III
4
1
1-0-
00
N
O
I
I I
N
I
I I
I
I I
0)
P)
(`�
-7
(N
N
II
°
N
III I
III I
III I
III I
III I
N
N °
II
J
1
Fw
00
O
d
(n
II
II
II
II
O0
-7
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
V
II
II
0
II
II
O
II
II
II
II
(6
I I
I I
O
(p
O
"al
I I
I I
u!
w O j
u!
w O j
I I
I I
pp
V
0
0
r-
U
U
3
i 3
W Cw
(D
(
O
0p
O
N
(O
N
O
O
i O
O
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
0
°�
II
II
II
II
II
II
O
-O t
O
CL
Q -O t
II
II
V
I I
I I
I I
II
I I
II
I I
O .O
Z N N
O c .O
Z(U N
CC
y
'O c�
bA
YE
O N V
to
C•i
Uj
Uj cd
N
O
N
cd
^p
'O
i.
N
N
V]
O
O
ti
o
o
to
U
a
�
w
:al
.o

e
�_
+� R
C CG
O
R
�� �D
R Z
9 � R
x =a
9 � �
_ a. v
R � �
C 9 C
O R C
aE�1
o a°i
b O 'fl
„ s =
RR �I
H a W
ionn�n
iann�n
l�l�l��l
io�m�n
10�0�00���00�0��llll
ionn�n
inn
l0sOS0'��o0�0�illll
��l�l��l
I��I�Ii
iann�n
i�nm
00�0�00�
�o0�0�i
iann�n
i�nm
iann�n
i�nm
�0�0�00���'��'�illll
Illlillll�Ilillllll

bA
C
O �
♦+ R
C �
O =
O
U �
'= bA
R
i
x�
'6
� U
o�u
o �
o �
a E
`o aRi
i
.r
C
x
w,
9
C
x
�
a
;
�
�
G
a
�
RO
a
z
o
C
v
�
a
O
�
a
e
o
i
�
O
I�
�v
M
a
O
O
G
a
N
O
R
a
z
o
�
a
o
vii
O
�
U
p
o

;
|
))
/j
\)
ƒ)
/\
\k
2$
\\
{\\
(\k
\\
)\
\)
§
\\
2)
}
(
}®
®
}
/(
$
}\
2)
\�
{]
\
\\
)_
}&mz:eez«
:
-..,.:
%r
;
��
:
(
22...
)}
)_
{}
,
2:
}]
\
\)
),
\
§]
\\
Q(
)_
\\
(
{)
©
-
}�

t,
R
7
bD
C
O R
C 0.
O
R
R
'O
x�
s�
s° R
a E
o aRi
C+ L
lilllillillll
i�I1111111111�������IIII
111111111111
i����
I�IIIIIIIIIII������IIIII
iilllllllllll
�����1
i�lllllllllll�������llll
111111111111
�����
I�IIIIIIIIIII������IIIII
onnnnnn�������llll
I�Illllllllll��i���lllll
iilllllllllll
�����1
�II�II�III�II�IIII�I��III

C�
CG
G
7
bA
G
O �
R
O =
O �
i R
W � i
o � W
a E �
i
W
R
0
a.
O
�
�
G
�
0
z
o
�
a
a
�
�c
o
a
w
�x
L
�
�y
5
F
5R
,D
O
M
i1i
O
HIT
N
9
qC
W
O
Hill
H
C
O
N
:;
w
a

0
Qo 0
y�N
3 � a �
dada
i
o
+
s
�
m
�3
3
� �
.2
0 ',.
d�
�
�_
� ',.
L
� ',..
S
�
G
n
0.
Q
Q
�
�
�
b
�3
'D
�
d
x
.5 �
sad
',,.
S
�
R
W
dw
',,.
��
b
�' 3
',,.
.5
� .�
',.
d
',,.
dw
',,.
',.
��
b
3
�
"�
�
� �
S � _ �
wawa
9
z
�
(,Cie.q�q�e
-aaa� uogenalg
� � a
�

Z 3
N�g
®m
e�
� �° ���
E
6 m
Y � Q
.H a a a a ao ao ao ao ao ao ao ao
®o Y �S,�asl!9� -7�J) uOganal3
',,.
6 0 0
3 � d �
cacti
3
�
�
a
go
m
y
�3
c ',,
�
_
3
.5 �
',,.
�m
}
tiW
p. ',,..
e
.� ',,.
a
d
a
R
\
y �
��
�
a a
m
�
w
�3
3
',,
a
c
y
.5 �
� E �
d ',.
s ',,.
® m"
�
R ',..
p,
Z 3
N�g
®m
e�
� �° ���
E
6 m
Y � Q
.H a a a a ao ao ao ao ao ao ao ao
®o Y �S,�asl!9� -7�J) uOganal3

0
Qo 0
dada
0
�3
3
a
y a
R
y
c
q
ag 7uauca
ue�g
gasa,d
a:Qsdfj _.
w
W
I
b
g
E a
�Iwwv
9
z
y 4
(,Cia,q�gaa-
aaa�uoganalg
4 a

o 0
b S0N 6
3"aN
¢�¢w
b
�3
2
� � w
d�
�3
5
ry 9
v Pl
�3
5
� z
d�
d
uaucaaue
g �Sagn
uy u�ey�
uOlTmOl
ad �Sa lu
uy =W
+
s
3
a
y,
L
I
� v
H
S
R
W
(I —Ilgm -p�.d u.q. -Ig w w

dada
\
a
3
�
3
L
e
3
L
I
A s
e
'O
W
P.
dw
b
b
a9
wawa
z
� °,y � �
g
(,Cie.q�q�e-
aaa�uogenal3
aawAs

i
Qo o
3 a
� �
dada
\
+
s
a
§
.�
m
�3
�
�
3
'2 a
o ',.
��
L
� ',..
6
�
� ,
��
a
H
q a
9
_
m
�' 3
.o
E
c ',,.
w
"s��
S
w
��
',,..
m
�' 3
.5
� .�
',.
d
',,.
dw
',,.
_
',,.
b
3
"�
_
� �
�
',,..
a9
��
��aes
wawa
z
yy
�
(,Cie.q�q�e-
aaa�uogenal3
rC r��a�

u yF "aii�ti Y
O
1
O
1
1 ( T
7)r
ri
1
l "'iSq
1
S��t }{ ��U)� •: - U
C
1
N
O
1
sy5 { tft _
A
1
�l
ea
CQ
i
C
1
1
M V1 D`
OC O oo
0o N
CC
1
bA
1
1
O
v
1
1
1
C
1
1
CC
�
1
1
1
1
�
1
1
.N M o0 r— O M O O
N O
r r
r
r
r
r
r
d
d
z~
OO
NO

F
_ o }'
�
1
A
1
i
1
ti
O
:y
1
00
00 00
00
j +
1
1
�
1
1
v
C
1
CC
�
1
1
1
1
y
1
1
1
1
�
1
W
Ca
`JS
-14
A
d
W
X7
q
Gr....
1
ax'>CN�a
l—
C,
GO
C,
t`
N
o0
M
'D
V
M
N
o0
M
'o
00
O
CD
00
O
q+
.?.' 00
�. 00
00
00
00
00
r
00
r
00
x
00
10
00
10
00
10
00
10
00
10
00
10
00
r
00
r
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
W
ji

.o o0
x 4 vi
00 ,-, ,-,
o,
c�
�a
^�
q
D
A
CEO
al
W CJ Y�'
i
h

0
f
� �
O
s s
1
r"'
1
It
„s
CC
1
1
�
1
d.A
1
S".
1
1
1
v
C
1
CC
py
1
1
1
1
' � e
A
a° c c
Ol
G i+. N ,--i — V1 ,--i l{J 00 V1 V1 V1 - ,--i
M M
O O O Ol Ol 00 00 00 00 00 D` O
D` D` D` 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 D` D`
O O
D`
N
y .ai
W
j�.I
L lf.:'i

N
�a
^�
q
D
A
CEO
al
W CJ Y�'
i
h

n �
n!
CC
r n
Ftk4i �
Sw i s'J i (tai �i akb
�
�
C
1
CC
iQ
1
1
O
:y
1
CC
1
�
1
1
p
1
1
C
1
1
CC
iyl
1
1
1
�
1
d d
O
mO C ^�"
Ol °
c
`p. - - M - - — N — O O O M n
—
M
-
-
-
-
cr
W
�
ji
1O
l�

r
B
1
s 4(
(
1
(
1
4
"s
a
8
1
-zt
00
O
�
8
1
1
1
N O M
M
O
8
1
8
1
p
�
8
8
(
1
1
1
�
8
8
1
1
�
�
8
1
8
1
8
y
8
/
i
bi)
Chi
W U 'r'
O
4
•�
A..�
�
�
8
1
a
S7
CA
o0
-zt
l—
C)
C,
O
O
N'D
O
,�
N
W

4�
^�
q
D
al
Zo
W CJ Y�'

-zt � M " NO — 0 6 0 0 03 -zt n -zt
o" 1 1 ,7,z�ll 'Orl1 "O� I .r1 iid 'Orl1 l,",ld 'Cid --i 1 '(71
O
go
4.
�
yo
th
-zt � M " NO — 0 6 0 0 03 -zt n -zt
o" 1 1 ,7,z�ll 'Orl1 "O� I .r1 iid 'Orl1 l,",ld 'Cid --i 1 '(71
O
TI
CC
O
1
CC
-zt � M " NO — 0 6 0 0 03 -zt n -zt
o" 1 1 ,7,z�ll 'Orl1 "O� I .r1 iid 'Orl1 l,",ld 'Cid --i 1 '(71

N
�a
^�
q
D
A
CEO
al
W CJ Y�'
i
h

O N 00
N
M
l-
4�
^�
q
D
CEO
al
W CJ Y�'
i
h

V� jy
��11t
U
a
�O
s.
1
1
1
N
r
7
t st
1�t t
1
1
e
t itt t
1
�
U
1
fi S . t'tt t
1
1
�j
++
1
Q
1
�I
1
ro
1
C
�
1
1
O
�
1
bA
�+
1
1
1
S".
1
1
1
v
C
1
CC
1
1
�
�
1
c
W
�
ji

4�
^�
q
D
CEO
al
W CJ Y�'
i
h

W
t}�••li, h�s��i �3t t�u�' 1
1
4
4 1vFki% psi
U
(
1
8
1
1
�
8
8
1
1
�
8
1
�
8
8
1
1
8
1
�
(
1
U
(
1
�
�
8
1
8
8
1
c
•y
�
�
8
8
1
1
14
8
1
bA
yd
a�J
�
t.+
3.,
d
a7
C# �..
•aa
Ol
Ol
Ol Ol
c
�
ji

Ifi I
O �
v
I 1
T
I)
��+�tk 1
R� psl`a ye :-.?,
a1
NJ! ao� yet
r
C
MM�
I�
CC
V
CC
QI
4�
c

8
1
1
b
b��
±,
8
1
�
8
1
�
�
8
8
1
1
�
/
8
6
1
1
U
�
8
1
CC
^
/
/
fl
�
W
°
I
PA m ;q
c
D,
D,
—
D,
00
D,
D,
W
ji
N
Ol

i 1{ dpi ro..t
i'
k
1
0
tl{
L
�� r •
'�y t� tiS
#
W
-
� s
•It
�
C
CC
CC
biA
�y
O
V
C
CC
CD
Ol Ol
Ol Ol Ol
Ol
Ol
c
D,
O
—
t`
-
M
—
—
-
D,
O
o0
N
-
cr
ty Ol
Ol
Ol
Ol
D`
D`
D`
D`
D`
Ol
Ol
Ol
Ol
Ol
W
�
JA

rr 1 P'30
s �
i
YN7} Ql`rg iS b� � � tfi�1,
1
�i
ryl
R
1
�tl
a
1
C
�
1
�
1
1
00
N
r.
1
�
1
1
O
1
�
1
1
1
V
C
1
H4�5
14
1
8
0
own
R
qj
4o
1
8
on
3 o
R„4
�A��'
"
Ol Ol Ol M N
O o Ol
c�l
i
c
lO
Ol
Ol
n
W
y
Si
ji
O
N
l�
oc
O
N
n
�
O
N
M
N
N
N
N

c Moc
0
0
0
0
0
00 N
^�
q
D
A
CEO
al
W CJ Y�'
i
h

R �;y 4• t
� M
a
�
k
1
k
O
1
1
ro
CC
1
1
�
1
n oo
r—
C
1
oc M
O
O
CC
d.A
1
1
S".
1
1
1
v
C
1
CC
1
py
1
1
1
1
�
�
1
d
d
fl
A
th
x
�
x
�
�
�
H vi
o
r,
�
(Iaa�� uopenaj�
c
—
—
N
O
-
M
N
N
-
O,
—
—
O
O,
'y, 00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
W
G3
"
z~'
O
M
�,77�
�
4
4
O,
M
�,:�
n
00
O,
O
,Gy7
7
� ��A•1
� 1uA
'A

Pancho Mitigation Bank
Baseline Fixed Station Photographs
Taken March 2013
Photo Point 2
Photo Point 4
Photo Point 5
Photo Point 6
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Pancho Mitigation Bank
Baseline Fixed Station Photographs (Continued)
Taken March 2013
Photo Point 7
Photo Point 12
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Appendix C.
Vegetation Data
Table 7. Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 8a to 8c. Linear Mature Vegetation Mortality Plots
Table 9a to 9c. Linear Plot and Privet Occurrence
Baseline Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

2� \}

Table 8a. Linear Mature Vegetation Mortality Plots
Strip Plot 1 (300ft by 20 ft)
Compass Bearing 210 degrees
Distance Along
Transect
Species
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
3
Betula nigra
18
Betula nigra
26
Ulmus americana
33
Ulmus americana
42
Ulmus americana
42
Ulmus americana
67
Liquidambar styraciflua
101
Ulmus americana
108
Liquidambar styraciflua
245
B etula nigra
258
Betula nigra
264
Liriodendron tulipifera
256
B etula nigra
267
B etula nigra
273
Liquidambar styraciflua
275
Liquidambar styraciflua
279
Liquidambar styraciflua
294
Liquidambar styraciflua
293
Liquidambar styraciflua
295
Liquidambar styraciflua
Table 8b. Linear Mature Vegetation Mortality Plots
Strip Plot 2 (300ft by 20 ft)
Compass Bearing 208 degrees
Distance Along
Transect
Species
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
0
nex opaca
2
Liriodendron tuplipifera
5
Liriodendron tuplipifera
16
Quercus michauxii
21
Quercus michauxii
66
Liriodendron tuplipifera
69
Carpinus caroliniana
71
Persea palustris
73
Quercus alba
78
nex opaca
73
Carpinus caroliniana
73
Carpinus caroliniana
136
Acer rubrum
161
Perseapalustris*
166
Perseapalustris*
194
Liquidambar styraciflua
204
Carpinus caroliniana
204
Quercus alba
207
Liquidambar styraciflua
205
Prunus serotina
205
Liquidambar styraciflua
221
Liquidambar styraciflua
231
Liquidambar styraciflua
262
Quercus lyrata
264
Liquidambar styraciflua
* Indicates that the vigor of this plant is low (Vigor 2).
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Table 8c. Linear Mature Vegetation Mortality Plots
Strip Plot 3 (300ft by 20 ft)
Compass Bearing 139 degrees
Distance Along
Transect
Species
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
Year 1 (2013)
Survival
0
Quercus michauxii
4
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Lirodendron tutipifera
31
Lirodendron tutipifera
58
Lirodendron tutipifera
64
Ilex opaca
65
Ilex opaca
78
Celtis laevigata
98
Lirodendron tutipifera
104
Quercus michauxii
111
Quercus michauxii
145
Liquidambar styraciflua
240
Lirodendron tutipifera
225
Liquidambar styraciflua
261
Liquidambar styraciflua
272
Lirodendron tutipifera
287
Acer rubrum
287
Ilex opaca
293
Acer rubrum
298
Ilex opaca
Table 9a. Linear Plot and Privet Occurrence
Strip Plot 1 (300ft by 20 ft)
Coin ass Bearing 210 degrees
Distance Along
Transect
Number of
Privet Year 0
2013
Number of
Privet Year 1
2013
Number of
Privet Year 2
2014
Number of
Privet Year 3
2015
Number of
Privet Year 4
2016
Number of
Privet Year 5
2017
0 -20
3
20-40
8
40-60
1
60-80
14
80-100
13
100-120
42
120-140
11
140-160
7
160-180
0
180-200
0
200-220
0
220-240
19
240-260
0
260-280
19
280-300
30
Total
167
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Table 9b. Linear Plot and Privet Occurrence
Strip Plot 2 (300ft by 20 ft)
Coln ass Bearing 208 degrees
Distance Along
Transect
Number of
Privet Year 0
2013
Number of
Privet Year 1
2013
Number of
Privet Year 2
2014
Number of
Privet Year 3
2015
Number of
Privet Year 4
2016
Number of
Privet Year 5
2017
0 -20
8
20-40
0
40-60
0
60-80
33
80-100
9
100-120
0
120-140
5
140-160
0
160-180
1
180-200
5
200 —220
20
220-240
11
240-260
8
260-280
1 14
280-300
1 0
Total
1 114
Table 9c. Linear Plot and Privet Occurrence
Strip Plot 3 (300ft by 20 ft)
Compass Bearing 139 degrees
Distance Along
Transect
Number of
Privet Year 0
(2013)
Number of
Privet Year 1
(2013)
Number of
Privet Year 2
(2014)
Number of
Privet Year 3
(2015)
Number of
Privet Year 4
(2016)
Number of
Privet Year 5
(2017)
0 -20
0
20-40
0
40-60
0
60-80
0
80-100
1
100-120
0
120-140
0
140-160
0
160-180
0
180-200
0
200-220
0
220-240
0
240-260
1 0
260-280
0
280-300
0
Total
1
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Pancho Mitigation Bank
Baseline Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken April 2013
Plot 5
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Pancho Mitigation Bank
Baseline Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken April 2013
(continued)
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

Appendix D.
As -built Plan Sheets
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

a €38 "g 83� aa3�°_ m m
a3� R a" i8- 'c3
0 MIS $s °agg` =c ease Sig "g m§ =m � a
s °a$s p 8 a adu°9i P .z; "z nlm�° , in, m! 4��s n W�
s. »,� �oµ� ��So ? h
;a3 R *'gaps 3;e ll 110 eJ a88`< ize a'= .A° �K "°
a � �gy AVE sm:
nil '11
1i+ m'°.y S=o�� c�9 9� ::j 8m!
_ g.gaeag
Clio � e � � �ar� �3 d11 ���R �
Pin a °�B r $ aag m x =_ R G a s 3 S 8 gNi q� =8^
.gym€
Aga ^ ^ jai
pp3
$ U 7�il if!
.$
aa�o���2e�
Q'jsmmg _
" ^" as�sss3 Nsa a "d� s�p'Sg a.. o
$m
MT
1 owl 1 40
4� �°°,�
ISAM G n �l�.l�"�'m -
_
o�u M
x s' m "OR m o;
p (] o
a
s i
® © o© o ©® ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8$�• g'$4^'0 �0 Hop
3n
ni
2
n;
ap
7p
a0
a�
2
n;
2°
if;
w�
ai
pi
pi
ai
Ba
mN9£e
9��
m9�°
n °9�p
£p
�
°nn
�� &a
m
a
3n
ni
2
n;
ap
7p
a0
a�
2
n;
2°
if;
w�
ai
pi
pi
ai
Ba
A�
°nn
w�
A�
°nn

Ilill _
2 g.as 3 a�az g�w1W �„ $ _;' -;
°a�an
ay�,��sa$.�s as =
g P
s�
7
� n
� � m
Am � r E• 2n,��a, 8 �
/ � x
� E
a
�§
m
ro
ro
r�
z
�
o
z
�
2
§d 8 A :\
Heo a ®n a4 fax °s .��g q "Y
Ra
A�0,
mm
r � �� -z� a �m S�• °_
Am A— z
S � ' •f ea`'yix gns
_qz
s9
a IQ N�
L.z; olm e wa sa
A=

eoo
a�
ma
aRwS
a'
3
"co
Tm
iii~
Z9
' S®
.10
24
m4
Uq
°�€�•ms
m
S
A & z
b
y
ur-
?SRS °3
€33
0
§e
-

Appendix E.
Preconstruction Benthic Data
Figure E1. Preconstruction Benthic Macroinvertebrates Sites
Preconstruction Benthic Sample Results
Habitat Assessment Field Datasheets
Monitoring Baseline Document and Asbuilt Report Appendices
Pancho Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank

BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES, AXIOM, WAYNE CO.NC, 6/1/10.
SPECIES T.V. F.F.G. Reference Site 1
Site 2
ARTHROPODA
Crustacea
Amphipoda
CG
Crangonyctidae
Crangonyx sp.
7.9
CG
1
Insecta
Ephemeroptera
Heptageniidae
SC
Maccaffertium (Stenonema) sp.
SC
5
Odonata
Aeshnidae
P
Boyeria vinosa
5.9
P
1
1
1
Calopterygidae
P
Calopteryx maculata
7.8
P
1
5
Cordulegastridae
P
Cordulegaster maculata
5.7
1
Trichoptera
Hydropsychidae
FC
Cheumatopsyche sp.
6.2
FC
14
3
1
Limnephilidae
Pycnopsyche sp.
2.5
SH
1
Psychomyiidae
CG
Lype diversa
4.1
SC
1
Coleoptera
Dryopidae
Helichus sp.
4.6
SC
3
1
3
Elmidae
CG
Ancyronyx variegata
6.5
SC
1
Macronychus glabratus
4.6
SH
1
Gyrinidae
P
Dineutus sp.
5.5
P
3
3
Hydrophilidae
P
Sperchopsis tesselatus
6.1
CG
3
1
Tropisternus sp.
9.7
P
1
Diptera
Chironomidae
Chironomini
1
Conchapelopia sp.
8.4
P
2
1
Orthocladiinae
1
Polypedilum flavum (convictum)
4.9
SH
2
1
3
Polypedilum fallax
6.4
SH
1
1
Tanytarsus sp.
6.8
FC
3
Tipulidae
SH
Tipula sp.
7.3
SH
1
TOTAL NO. OF ORGANISMS
36
19
18
TOTAL NO. OF TAXA
12
12
10
EPT TAXA
3
2
1
BIOTIC INDEX
5.83
6.09
6.19
Pennington and Associates, Inc. Page 1 of 1 axiomwayneconc610cl.xls 4/24/2013

3/06 Revisiori 7
13jolugical Asses;mi
Direaions fov use,
upstream direction,
struarri coo idifions. '
de-qcriptinn which b�
select an intermedia
0/ 1
Latitude �&
Water Quality;
Physical Charact
you oh5urve drivi
Visible Land Use-,
1/1,17allow Fil
WaterOied land i
Width: (mmTs) �
Bank Height (fto
flow canditions'.
Channel Flow St;
UnH "
A. Water
13, Water
C. Water
D- Ro ot i
,E. Very t
Turbidity: OCI
Good potential
Details Oi-,-Ct-
H-abit2t Assessment Field Data Sheet r) [
Coastal Plain Streams 'S te—, I
[f OTA-T, SCO-RE2'-I-
I Unit, DWQ
tt observer is to survey a nalnimum a f 100 meters NY ith 200 ineters preferred of strc=6 preferably in an
irting? above the bridge pool and the road, right-of-way. The segment which is a4w%sednhould represent average
perforrn -a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the strew. To complete tha.tbrrrt, &qlect the
f& the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between hvo deseyiptil Dn%,
score. A final habitat score is detemuried by adding the results from the different metrics.
)County
(Road Na= ---- . 9-11 XDL
cc# JA202�3 Basin �Kl � vs P-, Su'bbasin 03- M-Qq-
,,-, Type of Study: ❑ Fish �13cnthos El Basinwide Mpc6al Study (Describe)
&ont'
gitiid' 12bfl."'Fcoregion, 0 CA El 0 Sandbills 0 03
."C! DO _ Tnp)l Conductivity (corrj _— __.,,Akre PH —
ratiom Visible land, use refers to irnmediate area that you can see fi-orn sampling loentlort, Check off what
thru the watershed, in wate"hed [and ase.
0/00rest —1-0/oResideutial 60 '/DActivc Pasture Active Crops
%'Cornm ere ial %ITtdu ',5tn al
%Other - Describe:
'Al"Orest OjAgriculture OUrban .Animal operations upstream
cam
... hannel (at top ofbank- Strea m Dep tb; (m) Avsz 0 TMax 0,
Widthyariabic [)Braided, channel El argue river >25m wide
deepest part of charuiel to top of bank): (m) L 1 _,S
Migh O,lqrmal ❑Low
ially under abrionnal or low flow conditions,
dies base ofbQth bardcs, minima[ channel substrate exposed
t >75% of 4tvai I able channel, or <25% of channd substrato is exposed ...
; 25-75% of availab Le- channel., manylogVsTia
I -out of Water- .... ....................... ------ —".— ............. ...........
water in Qhannel, mostly present as standing pools ------- -- ............................... .......... El
Slightly TLubid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic OMijky 13Colored (from dyes) MQTcu tinge
Vetlamuls Ratoration Project?? AYES 13 No
Cl
Whanne fized dire
eply incis ed-s cup, s ttuight banks
Okeeent overban Iyton 'deposits
ElExces'6ve perip growth
Ma de Stabqm' [ion, py" C
4
RS* k
Weathl2r COn.d itjC1 lq�od-k..
Remarks;
❑B oath banks undercia at bend ❑Channel filled: in with sediment
Mar duvuloprntnt, 13'sewagesmell
Ell-leavy filamentous algae growth
c ojm-nt, gabions, ❑ Seditent/grade- control structure OBeTnvlcvcc
') Photos: N OY OlDigital 035mm
M
9M

ViF. Eltiipsar°imi Veotative Z011i Widtl I
Definition; breakJin the riparian zone is any area which, allows sedirancnt to enter tine stream. breaks ru r to the mar - stream portion
of the riparian zone Oanks n places whore pollutants cats directly enter the stream-
Lft, Bank,
lit,. Barak
V. Bank StAility aid Vegetation
curg Score
A- Banks stialst or no iaank€s, ust RD plain
A. i iparian zoAi; intact (no breaks)
1. tittle or :ti evidence of errrsion or batik failure, little potential for erosion ---------
10
1
B. Erasion are is p res+ant
2- zoo width. 12-18 rrlct+ rs.,. .. . . ......... --- ....... .......:. . .f., , ... .....................,,...
4
1, divuse I recs, slu bs, mss; pl ants healthy with good root systems..,.,.,:
9
9
2, few trees or small trees and shralbs; vegetation appears geueTally healthy
7
7
3. pla-ot types and conditions suggest p Gorey stall bIndiri,g ,..,.— ..„
4
4
4. mostly lrassts, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure poteavtrial at high flow
1, bye iks rate
S. little or no bank vel;ctation, rnass eros:ion and bank failure evident— ......... .... ........ . .. .A
G
4
4
b, zcnu width I2- 1.8 'rneters- .......,. ..., .... :. . ....... . ......,......... ........ 3
Trital �
Rerrra rks
2
2
I. Light l eraa to ati�n (Canopy is defined gas tree dr vegeeative Go v€:r diYectly above the stzearn's ,uTface . C y - Yvould block out
sunnlagbt writes the stun is directly overhead),
1
2, bre iks cxirnmon
Scure'
A— Stream A goon canopy with .some breaks for light penetration .t,.,,, :- , - ....,, ................
FO-
B. . trearn ith full canopy - breaks for tight penetration absent,— ....,;,.. .............. ..:.. ..........
2
S
C. Stwayn ith partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equatl, .,..,...E .. ...... ..... a,.,
7
D, trcam iith minimal canopy - f"tiil sun asi all but a few areas
d., zone width < 6 riveters...., ..... ......... »F..........................
E. No cars lay and no sb4Aing. ........... ,.,.,... ...,..... .,.,., ,_, ,
' "
C
Total '
Remrks
otal
S ubt
Rar.rs
enn
R_
Page Tioital u
ViF. Eltiipsar°imi Veotative Z011i Widtl I
Definition; breakJin the riparian zone is any area which, allows sedirancnt to enter tine stream. breaks ru r to the mar - stream portion
of the riparian zone Oanks n places whore pollutants cats directly enter the stream-
Lft, Bank,
lit,. Barak
Score
Scare
A. i iparian zoAi; intact (no breaks)
LzuIak width > t8 meters „ .... ......... .:... ..».,,.,. ,,, ............... .,.,.,F , , .......,,..,.,
5
S
2- zoo width. 12-18 rrlct+ rs.,. .. . . ......... --- ....... .......:. . .f., , ... .....................,,...
4
Izone width. 6 -12 rneters� ..... ......... ...I...., ...,.,.;, , ..,...,-1---.--.
3
4. zone width < 6 meters. . ... ......... ......... .................. ...........
2
B- Riparim?o c not irttaet(breaks)
1, bye iks rate
a. zone width > 19 me s,. ............... . .......... ....... . d »...........................
4
4
b, zcnu width I2- 1.8 'rneters- .......,. ..., .... :. . ....... . ......,......... ........ 3
3
e. zone width 6 -12 rrlctcrs:,.,F w ,.» ., . ,.:.., .................. ..... .......... --
2
2
d. zone width < 6 renters ...... ......... ... -.— -, - - -- --- ......... ,,,.,:,,, ..,..
1
1
2, bre iks cxirnmon
3
3
b. zone width, 12 -18 meters ................ ......... .. ­­­­­1 ............ ,.;.,..,,_....
2
c, zone width 6 -12. meterrs....
L
ro
l
d., zone width < 6 riveters...., ..... ......... »F..........................
qO
Total '
Remrks
R_
Page Tioital u
4
TQTA,L SCORE
37

3104 Revision 7 Q�' —
Habitat Assessment Field D'Ita Sheet 'J
Coastal Plain Streams �TOTAL
41ological Assessment Unit, DWQ
Dir"tionsfor use; 41w obscrver is to survey Tninimum of 100 t in an
� 11 neters with 200 ureters rs preferred of stman-4 prdorably t
upstrearn direction tart ng dboY6 die, bridge pool and the road Tight-of-way. The scgrnent which, is assessed should reprcsont average,
strearn conditions. To perfon-n. a 'proper habitat cvaluation, the obsenrer needs to get into the strearn. To complete the fbnTi, select arc
deseription which blt!i t fits the observed habitat& and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in hehYQFn hvo dc-,cripfions,
select an interniedia.e score. A final Nbitat score is detem, -uneij, by adding file L results from the different Imtrilos,
'JM Vf�" f
Stre _(Ro
ad Name COUnty
" I �
Date cc#0'6021Y�Di Basin �'P'I 1, 9,' subbasin n'-09-oq-
Obsmer(s) hk� 0f Type of Study- 0 Fish oBenthris D Basinwide ElSpecia.], Study (Describe)
F -' Longitude a re R
iom El CA 11 SHIP 11 Sandhills 0 CB
Water Quality, T'Junpera'111re—Ic Do Mail Conductivity (corr.) —Vsklh PH
Physical Chararte fizatlow Visible land use refers to i'mmPdIate area that you can see from sampling location. Check of iyhat
you observe d rivi ng thru the w4tershed in watershed Land use..
'Visible I-and Use: —0/ororerst, I-t , %Rcsidcntial IDD 9/mActive Pa5wre %0 LAC C'Ve Crops
--,%Faltow Fields 'Xa'Commercial %Industdal —%Cdier -'DescTibc�
Watershed land use l$ l2orest KAgriculttire DUrban A Animal operations Upstream
Width: (moters) Smarn Channel (at top of bank) x-15- Strearn Depth: (m) Avg_2�--I Max.
Width �rible D-Braided channel 0 Large river >25,m ivide
Barok Height (frog ri deepest part of channel to top of bank): (m)
Flow cons itioiu:',Migh *6rmal ElLow
Channel Flow sta.�u
Usehl espccially under -'abnorntal or low flow conditions.
XA. Watev aches base of both banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ....... ..........
13- Water fills >75% ❑f � vailable channel, or <2 5% of chwulel, svbstratt is exposed...., .... ...... 0
C. waw ills 25-75% of al,,,ailabIQ r-hannel, many, logslsnags, exposed ....... ................... 11
D- Root Ils out of Water ... .......... ... . ............. ....... . ............. ... ..... ..... --- -------- '0
E. Very little avatar in channel, mostly present as standing poobi-. ....................... ...... .............
13
Turbidity. 130ca� )*Slightly Tuibi d ❑Tnrbid CITannic Cl MI lky ElColored ( ftoirn dyes) DGreen tinge
Good potential for Wetlands Restara Hon Project?? YES �' NO
Details---i
TKfChannelized ditr I h
I I
r 'JgDeTly incasedd7s ' icep, straigbt
El Recent overbauld, deposits
ClExcessive p PTipl ytou growth
EJ B otb banks i4ndoTcut at bend ElChannel filled in with sediment
Mar davelopment Usewage sn-MIl
EM--avy filamentous algae growth
g
Marm,kade Stdbilization:X�N EM DRip-rap, cornvot, gabiq!4 0 Sedimentigrade-control stmeture Me levee
6mr-1-% photos. DY 0Dig!Wl 035rnm
Weather Condit.14 'A�
DIAGRAM ON BACK
35

D
V. Bank Stability and Vegetatioi i
Score.
A. Banks stabl or nob n"-, just 1100 d plain
1, litfle or np evidence of erosion or bank failure, little potential for erosim ......... 110 10
B. Erosion areas present !
1, diverse trees, stu-ubs, grass; plants healthy with good root .................... 9 9
2, few trees or small trees and shrubs; vcg;tation appears generally healthy.,. -- ., - - . .... .. - - 7 7
3, sparse ytgetafloii; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ......... 4 4
4, mostly sses, few if any trees and shrubs, hiol erosion and failure potential at high flow
5, little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank fiailum evident.....,., .. 0 0
I
Total
Remarks
V1. Light Penetrati i on (Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above The Mean "5 surface- Canopy wGulti block ont
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead).
Score
A. Stream With good canopy with some breaks for light penetration .............. 10
B, Stream �i`th 'itb full Canopy - breaks for light penetration absent.....— . -- .......... ................ ....... 8
C Stream partial canopy - sLmliglyt and shading are essentially equal .............. ...... . ........ -- 7
D, Stream � ith minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas,
L4 No cartOpy and no shi dn-V .......... ........ ......... --- -1.--'-- 4
Subtotal
Reinarks
VII, Riparian Vq
Definition; A break,
of tho riparian Zane
A. Riparian
4.
3- Riparian
1,
0
ReTnarics
Iative Zoni Width
i the ripariaii one is any area %-WO allows sictlirnentio, enter the sti-earn. Breaks refer to tho rear strearnportioll
wanks) ; places where pollutants can directly tinter the strearn.
11
Lft. Bank,
RT., Barik
Score
scare
Intact (no breaks)
width> 19 imeters ............. ........ --.1-111-1.1— ...... ............. .............
5
5
width, 12-1 g motors.. ........ - ... ................ ---- ........ ........
4
4
width6-12 ..................... ....... ........ ...............
3
3
width< ................. ........... ..................
2
2
not intact l breaks)
CS tare
a, zone width > 18 ................ -- ......................
4
4
b. zone, wMth L 248 mr-Wrs-.... ........... ............... .......... -- ...............
3
3
e, zone wi=4rh 6-12 meters— ............................... ............... ..... -4---
2
2
d. zone width < 6 -- ---- - . . ..............
I.
I
3
3
a. zone Width > I a meters,,;, . ................... ­­--Ar ..............
b. zone width 12- 18 meters, ..........
2
2
C. zoMl Width, 6-12 m aem ........ ................ ......... ....... ..........
1
1
d. zone width < 6 rnot'ers
Total
Page Total
TOTALSCORE.
11

3106 Revision 7
flabitat Assessment Field,D atuSheet
Coastal Plain Streams
o—TA:L SCo1
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ
Directions for wc: The observer is to survey a mirtimuln of 1011 meters with 200 motors preferred raf stream, prcferably in an
upstrearn directinn - �tarting above the bridge pool and the road right of way. '- a segruent Ulrich as wessed should represent av enge
stroarn conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream, Tu cumpicte; the four4 select the
drseription which h st fits the ob�crvt l habitats and dien circle the score. If the obsmed habitat falls in behv en two descriptions.,
select an intermedia a sure, A final habitat. score is ddcrrfin Ld by Adding, the results from the diff°e nt Metrics<
Strean -4 ,Y ,tc ri xi,. (Road Name )County
at I CPT -�• 11�so�� i
ONiurver(s Y � Y Typc of Study. 0 FFish I - crotbos 0 13asiowide ElSpecial Study (Describe) .
_. .
Latitude 91 Longitude �a. "� i p Ecoregio n ❑ CA El SWP , Sandbills 0 CB
E
Water T roper lige "C DO gn Conduc:tivity(corr.) _ µSIoni pal:
hysizal Chnraete izadon: Visible lanai use refers to, immediate area that you can see from sampling loe:Mimi. Check, riff what
you observe driving thru the watershed in watershed laud use.
Visible Land V se fi CI_) `/.Forest �'i'oResidential °/.Active Pastes °! Active Crops
' Fallow FielIs Cominorem a/,1TAustTial %Other _ Describe.,
land resAgriculture ❑Urban . akna operatioars upstream
+idth (meters) a,�t ®ry i Charurel (at trip of bank) � tre�rn [i�ptly: (rri} Aug; � � Max
Width variable Mraided channel ❑L,arge river' >25ni wide
Bank Height (lTO deepest part of chamiel to top of bank): (nv) L
Flow conditions CHigh drrual Mow
Ch -annel Flow Sta us
Usefid especially under Anormal or love flow conditi oos-
A, Water a'�cs basso oil both banks, �,4n„mal channel stabs tt exposed,.......,.,.. ... . ,.................
B. Water a16 75% of avrailable rh el or % of channel substrate is exposed .......... .....,.,...
C. Water fills 25 -75% of arvailablo channel, many logshrmgs exposed,:.,.. .. ........ ......... ........ ..
D. Hoot i is out of Wata r. . ,., ........ ..,, f ,. .. { -- ........ ,,, ......... —.,...............
E; 'fiery little water in ehonnel, mostly present s standing Poo Is ........... .................. ...
Turbidity: tMea rI Slightly gl�tiy Turbid Murbid 1�1T'annic Milky ❑ Colored ( rn dyes) p reen time
Good potential fug i etlands Res#oratino Project?? 12 YES
tl hsamielized disc
❑Deeply incised -s, ep, straight
El Recent averban I deposits
❑Excessive ped, i yton gro tb.
Masuuudc
Weather
Remarks,
:
T 1PiCAl
❑ Botli hanks unr tacut at lend EI hanna1 filk -d in Mth sediment
013ar developn7wat El sewage smell
b Heavy fitarnentous algae growth
cernent, gabigo§ [2 ediment/grade -co trol structure 1313err0evc
'"''t photos; ON ❑ Y ElDigital 035mrn
35
r �

A. Riparian.
Ld
2-:
3,
4�.
P. Riparian
1.
Remarks
intact (no breaks)
width> IS inetors.
widthl 2- 18, tneters ........
width 6-12 incters. ............................. ...... — ....... ...................
width < 6 rr Qters ............. ........ ............................ ........
not intact (larc;4ks)
3 rare
a. zone width > 18 met m ---- ......... ..............
b. �onr width 1.2-19 n ter5 ......... ........ .......
C_ zone width 6-12 meters -... ...... ...... ....... . .................
d. zone width < 6 mcters—_ ............. .... __ ........... .....................
Z9 COPITOOn ,
a, zone width> 13 maters...._.. • ........... ......................
b, zono width 12-18 =tern.. ...................... ....... — ............
c. one wiAffi 6-12 meters.... . ............... ............. ......
d. zono width < 6 meters.—II.—......., ......
i
M
U-1/1
4
3
2
1 'N
(5-0
4
3
2
3
2
1
0
Total 0
Page Total
TOTAL SCORE Gf I
F I L 0 V) I'Q
V. Ban It Stability aid Vegetation
Score _C_Iorm
A. Banks stable or, no hanks, just flood plain
1. little or no evidence -of erosion ix- bank failure, little potential fbzerosion
ID
B, Krostori areas present
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems....,.
�P
2,, few treci or small treas and shrubs; vegetation appears Zenexally healthy........... ......
7 7
3. sparse V getation; plant types anti conditions suggest poorer soil binding.,
4 4
4, rmstly grasses, few il" any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at 1� igli flow
2, 2
,5. little or o bank vegetation, tnass erosion and ......... _—A
0
Total q9
Ru=ks
VL Light PerzEtrati I on (Canopy 19 defined as true or vegetative cover directly above the streard.9 surface, Canopy would block our
sunlight when J e sun is direc dy ci;verhead).
A.Strcarn th good canopy with some breaks for light Penetration ---- - -.r .— ......... ..............
Sri3ru
(IT
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks fbr light penetra lion absent.. ............................................
...... 8
C. Stream Tith partial canopy - sunlight and sb, ding are essentially equal ......... _ ................ 7
1). Stream with "nimai!canopy - full sun in all but a fi!sv .......... ____ . .......
2
& ?Na canopy and min, shading.— ................... ................. ... ...... ............... 0
ub
Stotal
Rernarlo
V11. Riparian VeqetafiveZon�wldth
Definition-, A break in the ripaziao zone is any area which allows sudiment to enter the stream. Breaks
refer to the near-strearn portion
of the ripanian zonc 'banks), places where po Iltitants can directly enter the streani.
Lft- Bank, Ril. Bank
core. Scow
A. Riparian.
Ld
2-:
3,
4�.
P. Riparian
1.
Remarks
intact (no breaks)
width> IS inetors.
widthl 2- 18, tneters ........
width 6-12 incters. ............................. ...... — ....... ...................
width < 6 rr Qters ............. ........ ............................ ........
not intact (larc;4ks)
3 rare
a. zone width > 18 met m ---- ......... ..............
b. �onr width 1.2-19 n ter5 ......... ........ .......
C_ zone width 6-12 meters -... ...... ...... ....... . .................
d. zone width < 6 mcters—_ ............. .... __ ........... .....................
Z9 COPITOOn ,
a, zone width> 13 maters...._.. • ........... ......................
b, zono width 12-18 =tern.. ...................... ....... — ............
c. one wiAffi 6-12 meters.... . ............... ............. ......
d. zono width < 6 meters.—II.—......., ......
i
M
U-1/1
4
3
2
1 'N
(5-0
4
3
2
3
2
1
0
Total 0
Page Total
TOTAL SCORE Gf I