WQ0019755_NOV-2021-PC-0324_20210622

I.OY COOPER.
Governor
JOHN NICHOLSON
Interim Secretory
S. DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
June 22, 2021
Certified Mail No. 7018 1130 0000 1612 5198
Return Receipt Requested
Phillip Cooke, Manager
JPC Utilities LLC
P.O. Box 345
Oak Ridge, North Carolina 27310
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation (NOV-2021-PC-0324)
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Oak Ridge Commons
Reclaimed Water System and Wastewater Irrigation
Permit No. WQ0019755
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Cooke:
On June 1, 2021 Division of Water Resources staff person Caitlin Caudle performed a
routine, scheduled compliance inspection and on June 16, 2021 completed a follow up
inspection to review immediate action items discovered during the initial inspection. Doug
Smith, Back Up ORC, and Travis Correll were present during both inspections. A review
of irrigation zones, reclaimed and upset treatment systems, and records was completed.
This review reflected noncompliance with the subject permit.
The following violations were noted:
I. During the follow up inspection, Mr. Smith clarified the flow path of effluent and
daily operations. Mr. Smith stated that a pipe had been installed that connects the
mud well at the reclaimed system to the septic tank of the upset system. This new
pipe was connected to an existing pipe that carries effluent from the mud well to
the equalization basin on the package plant. An outlet had also been installed on
the existing pipe that empties into a sludge basin. Valves are present to direct the
flow of effluent from the mud well. Under normal operations, most effluent from the
mud well is sent to the upset system and is treated by that system. Mr. Smith stated
that best professional judgement is used to determine where effluent from the mud
well goes during daily operations and while personnel are on site. When personnel
are off site and the transfer of effluent from the mud well is controlled by floats, all
effluent removed from the mud well goes to the upset system.
NORTH
D E
D.p$rtmem of Envimnmomni au.i`
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

Mr. Smith stated that a pipe was installed from the splitter box for the tertiary filters
to the chlorine contact chamber, bypassing the tertiary filters and clearwell. An
overflow pipe is present at the splitter box for the tertiary filter that empties into the
clearwell. During normal operations, this pipe is above the effluent level in the
splitter box and is only needed in emergency situations when the tertiary filters and
the mud well are full. The chlorine contact chamber has needed to be pumped
once in both 2019 and 2020 because this bypass line was used and filled the
chamber with solids.
The filter media in the tertiary filters has been altered from what was originally
designed, which was a layer of anthracite above a layer of sand. Mr. Smith stated
that the anthracite was replaced with a silica sand some time ago.
Permit Condition 11.10 states "there shall be no direct cross -connections
between the reclaimed water and potable water systems unless such
connection has been approved by the Department" and Permit Condition
111.14 stated "the Permittee shall not divert or bypass untreated or partially
treated reclaimed water from the subject facilities." The pipe to the upset
system, outlet to the sludge basin, bypass of the tertiary filters and clearwell,
and silica sand were installed without notification or prior approval from the
Division and are bypassing the designed treatment flow.
Within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Notice a permit modification detailing
the changes to the treatment system, with engineer designs, specifications,
and certifications, must be submitted on Division approved forms OR a
timeline for acquiring engineer designs, specifications, and certifications to
submit a permit modification application. If the modifications that were
installed do not meet minimum design criteria for the treatment system they
must be corrected or disconnected from the system.
II. Permit Condition IV.10 states that "an annual representative soil analysis ... shall
be conducted on each wastewater irrigation site listed in Attachment B." A soil
analysis was not completed for the 2020 calendar year.
This is a violation of the permit. Moving forward please be sure to collect
annual soil samples according to Permit Condition IV.10.
The following deficiencies were noted:
1. The freeboard markers in both ponds are contained in the wet wells used for
irrigation. According to Mr. Smith the effluent levels in the wet wells are the same
as the effluent level in the storage ponds and a transect was used to determine the
elevation of the berm on the freeboard markers. Freeboard is measured from the
"high berm" mark down. Permit Condition 111.16 references 15A NCAC 2T .0507(f)
and 15A NCAC 2U .0801(f), which state "water level gauges shall be provided for
all open atmosphere treatment lagoons and ponds..."
D_E
NORTH CARCLINA
fewlheeat al �vemmanM Oum
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

As the gauges are currently installed, they may not accurately represent the
water level in the storage ponds. The gauges are not readily accessible for
review by this Office in the event of emergency situations. The gauges are
also not marked appropriately with elevations for maximum liquid level at
the top of temporary liquid storage, minimum liquid level at the bottom of the
temporary liquid storage volume, and the lowest point on the dam. A
freeboard marker must be installed in both storage ponds within ninety (90)
days of receipt of this Notice.
The following items of concern was noted:
A. At the time of inspection, the sand filters were actively being repaired and cleared
of vegetation. Mr. Smith and Mr. Correll stated that this was routine monthly
maintenance. The sand filter had a large amount of vegetation and solids built up
on the surface of the filter media. In a discussion during the follow up inspection
Mr. Smith stated that the pumps in the sand filter dose tank are being raised
eighteen inches from their current position to prevent the pumps from spraying
solids collected on the bottom of the tank on the sand filter. Please continue to
closely monitor the sand filter and continue to take measures to prevent
solids from building up on the sand filter.
B. At the time of inspection, a few sprinkler heads needed repair in the irrigation zones
that were viewed. Specifically, a mini -wobble head sprinkler in RC-08 directly
above the creek. A ball valve was cracked directly below the riser. There was no
evidence that effluent was flowing downslope and entering the creek at the time of
inspection. Mr. Smith stated the sprinkler head was repaired by the time of the
follow up inspection. Please continue to inspect the zones during irrigation
and make timely repairs.
C. A Residuals Management Plan was not available on site. Permit Condition 111.13
references 15A NCAC 02T .0508 and 15A NCAC 2U .0802 in regards to residuals
management, and lists the information that must be included in a Residuals
Management Plan. Please develop a Residuals Management Plan and submit
it to this Office for within sixty (60) days of receipt of this Notice.
D. The highwater audible and visual alarm for the wet well at the upset system was
not working at the time of the follow up inspection. Please repair the alarm and
ensure that the audible and visual components are working.
Your immediate attention to the violations, deficiencies, and concerns noted above are
greatly appreciated. A permit modification or timeline, as referenced in Item I, must be
submitted within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Notice. Failure to do so will result in
further enforcement action from this Office. Please be mindful of other deadlines included
in this Notice.
Please refer to the enclosed compliance inspection report for additional observations and
comments. If you have any questions regarding this Notice, please contact Caitlin Caudle
DE
NORTH CAROLINA
fewlheeat al �vemmanM Oum
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

or me at the letterhead address or phone number, or by email at
caitlin.caudle(c�ncdenr.gov or lon.snider a(�ncdern.gov.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
�OD2D3CE3F1B7456..
Lon T. Snider, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ-WSRO
enc: Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Guilford County Health Department([e-mail])
Doug Smith, ORC ([e-mail])
WSRO Electronic Files
DWR Laserfiche File WQ0019755
LD_E
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental quaky
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality j Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0019755 Effective: 12/01/20
SOC: Effective:
County: Guilford
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Philip M Cooke
Expiration: 05/31/27
Expiration:
Title:
Owner : JPC Utilities LLC
Facility: Oak Ridge Commons WWTP
2200 NC 68
Oak Ridge NC 27310
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
From Winston-Salem, take 1-40 East to Route 68 North. Proceed to the intersection of Route 68 and Route 150. The facility is
situated in the northwrst corner of the crossroads.
System Classifications: WW2, SI,
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021
Primary Inspector: Caitlin Caudle
Secondary Inspector(s):
Entry Time 02:07PM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Reclaimed Water
Facility Status: E Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement -Water
Use Records
▪ Record Keeping
▪ End Use -Irrigation
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement
(See attachment summary)
Certification:
Exit Time: 04:33PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent
▪ Treatment
▪ Treatment Lagoons
▪ Treatment Clarifiers
▪ Storage
▪ Miscellaneous Questions
▪ Treatment Barscreen
▪ Treatment Sludge Storage/Treatment
▪ Treatment Disinfection
▪ Standby Power
Page 1 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On June 1, 2021 Division of Water Resources staff person Caitlin Caudle performed a routine, scheduled compliance
inspection and on June 16, 2021 completed a follow up inspection to review immediate action items discovered during the
initial inspection. Doug Smith, Back Up ORC, and Travis Correll were present during both inspections. A review of irrigation
zones, reclaimed and upset treatment systems, and records was completed. This review reflected noncompliance with the
subject permit.
The following violations were noted:
I. During the follow up inspection, Mr. Smith clarified the flow path of effluent and daily operations. Mr. Smith stated that a
pipe had been installed that connects the mud well at the reclaimed system to the septic tank of the upset system. This
new pipe was connected to an existing pipe that carries effluent from the mud well to the equalization basin on the package
plant. An outlet had also been installed on the existing pipe that empties into a sludge basin. Valves are present to direct
the flow of effluent from the mud well. Under normal operations, most effluent from the mud well is sent to the upset system
and is treated by that system. Mr. Smith stated that best professional judgement is used to determine where effluent from
the mud well goes during daily operations and while personnel are on site. When personnel are off site and the transfer of
effluent from the mud well is controlled by floats, all effluent removed from the mud well goes to the upset system.
Mr. Smith stated that a pipe was installed from the splitter box for the tertiary filters to the chlorine contact chamber,
bypassing the tertiary filters and clearwell. An overflow pipe is present at the splitter box for the tertiary filter that empties
into the clearwell. During normal operations, this pipe is above the effluent level in the splitter box and is only needed in
emergency situations when the tertiary filters and the mud well are full. The chlorine contact chamber has needed to be
pumped once in both 2019 and 2020 because this bypass line was used and filled the chamber with solids.
The filter media in the tertiary filters has been altered from what was originally designed, which was a layer of anthracite
above a layer of sand. Mr. Smith stated that the anthracite was replaced with a silica sand some time ago.
Permit Condition 11.10 states "there shall be no direct cross -connections between the reclaimed water and potable water
systems unless such connection has been approved by the Department" and Permit Condition 111.14 stated "the Permittee
shall not divert or bypass untreated or partially treated reclaimed water from the subject facilities." The pipe to the upset
system, outlet to the sludge basin, bypass of the tertiary filters and clearwell, and silica sand were installed without
notification or prior approval from the Division and are bypassing the designed treatment flow.
Within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Notice a permit modification detailing the changes to the treatment system, with
engineer designs, specifications, and certifications, must be submitted on Division approved forms OR a timeline for
acquiring engineer designs, specifications, and certifications to submit a permit modification application. If the modifications
that were installed do not meet minimum design criteria for the treatment system they must be corrected or disconnected
from the system.
II. Permit Condition IV.10 states that "an annual representative soil analysis ... shall be conducted on each wastewater
irrigation site listed in Attachment B." A soil analysis was not completed for the 2020 calendar year.
This is a violation of the permit. Moving forward please be sure to collect annual soil samples according to Permit Condition
IV.10.
The following deficiencies were noted:
1. The freeboard markers in both ponds are contained in the wet wells used for irrigation. According to Mr. Smith the
effluent levels in the wet wells are the same as the effluent level in the storage ponds and a transect was used to determine
the elevation of the berm on the freeboard markers. Freeboard is measured from the "high berm" mark down. Permit
Condition 111.16 references 15A NCAC 2T .0507(f) and 15A NCAC 2U .0801(f), which state "water level gauges shall be
Page 2 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
provided for all open atmosphere treatment lagoons and ponds..."
As the gauges are currently installed, they may not accurately represent the water level in the storage ponds. The gauges
are not readily accessible for review by this Office in the event of emergency situations. The gauges are also not marked
appropriately with elevations for maximum liquid level at the top of temporary liquid storage, minimum liquid level at the
bottom of the temporary liquid storage volume, and the lowest point on the dam. A freeboard marker must be installed in
both storage ponds within ninety (90) days of receipt of this Notice.
The following items of concern was noted:
A. At the time of inspection, the sand filters were actively being repaired and cleared of vegetation. Mr. Smith and Mr.
Correll stated that this was routine monthly maintenance. The sand filter had a large amount of vegetation and solids built up
on the surface of the filter media. In a discussion during the follow up inspection Mr. Smith stated that the pumps in the
sand filter dose tank are being raised eighteen inches from their current position to prevent the pumps from spraying solids
collected on the bottom of the tank on the sand filter. Please continue to closely monitor the sand filter and continue to take
measures to prevent solids from building up on the sand filter.
B. At the time of inspection, a few sprinkler heads needed repair in the irrigation zones that were viewed. Specifically, a
mini -wobble head sprinkler in RC-08 directly above the creek. A ball valve was cracked directly below the riser. There was no
evidence that effluent was flowing downslope and entering the creek at the time of inspection. Mr. Smith stated the sprinkler
head was repaired by the time of the follow up inspection. Please continue to inspect the zones during irrigation and make
timely repairs.
C. A Residuals Management Plan was not available on site. Permit Condition 111.13 references 15A NCAC 02T .0508 and
15A NCAC 2U .0802 in regards to residuals management, and lists the information that must be included in a Residuals
Management Plan. Please develop a Residuals Management Plan and submit it to this Office for within sixty (60) days of
receipt of this Notice.
D. The highwater audible and visual alarm for the wet well at the upset system was not working at the time of the follow up
inspection. Please repair the alarm and ensure that the audible and visual components are working.
Other observations:
• Based on a review of the 2019 soil report, there are no concerns for soil condition in the upset zones.
• The flows reported on PP102 are representative of the effluent from the mud well that is treated by the upset system. The
reclaimed system is used as the main treatment train at all times.
• The sand filter was being repaired by the follow up inspection as there was an issue with their tractor. Sludge from the
sand filter is being stored on a tarp until a dumpster arrives, which Mr. Smith stated would be by the end of the week. The
sludge will be transported to the McLeansville Osbourne plant.
• Ms. Caudle's understanding is that the back wash pumps are turned off while personnel are on site. The pumps are
turned off to allow solids to settle. Liquid is then sent to the upset system, or a valve is turned to send liquid back to the
head of the plant. Solids are then removed from the mud well and sent to the sludge basin. The mud well pumps are turned
back on when personnel leave.
• The tertiary filter back wash is activated by a float in the filter cells. The mud well pumps are also activated by floats.
The original design of the package plant is to send all effluent in the mud well back to the equalization basin.
• An inline flow meter was recently installed to measure the flow that is being irrigated from the upset system.
• An ISCO flow meter is installed after the splitter box that splits flow between the sand filter dose tank and the chlorine
contact chamber. The meter records all flow that passes through the chlorine contact chamber.
• The chlorine contact chamber for the upset system had tablets present in the tubes and appeared to be in good shape.
• The splitter box at the upset system splitting flow between the sand filter dosing tank and chlorine contact chamber had
a significant amount of moss growing in it. Mr. Smith stated that the splitter box is cleaned once per month.
• There are high water alarms on all parts of the package plant, mudwell, and wet well. An auto -dialer is connected to all
high water alarms that calls the ORC, Back Up ORC, and Mr. Correll in that order.
• A rain sensor for the reclaimed system is on top of the pump house for the reclaimed system.
Page 3 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
• The irrigation pumps for the upset system are in the wet well for the upset system.
• A rain sensor for the upset system is on top of the overhang with the control panels. Mr. Smith stated that this rain
sensor was replaced about three weeks ago.
• The facility is currently in the process of removing solids from the upset lagoon. The lagoon will be completely drained
and the liner as repaired as needed in September.
• The upset zones are now fenced, and mostly surrounded by the reclaimed zones. The reclaimed zones have signs in
both Spanish and English.
• Metering equipment was calibrated on April 1, 2021. All metering equipment was calibrated at the same time yearly, as
well as the irrigation system.
• The embankment of the reclaimed lagoon was mowed and in good condition. Two pieces of trash were present in the
lagoon.
• The embankment of the upset lagoon was also mowed and in good condition.
• The flow meter for the reclaimed system is a magnometer contained in a below ground concrete chamber outside of the
reclaimed pump house.
• One lift station is at the church, another at the Bojangles, and the last next to a gas station.
• Residuals are pumped quarterly by Overby's and taken to the McLeansville wastewater treatment plant The lift stations
are just wet wells with floats that transfer effluent to the reclaimed system. The Bojangles and gas station lift stations have
grease traps that are checked monthly.
• When turbidity in the reclaimed water is > 10 NTUs a valve is automatically switched and effluent is sent to the upset
lagoon.
• The sludge basins were not being aerated at the time of the initial inspection. Aeration was turned off to allow solids to
settle and effluent was being decanted. Mr. Smith stated that the solids would be pumped soon. At the time of the follow up
inspection, one sludge basin had been pumped out and was being aerated, the other was still being decanted.
• The scum trough in the clarifier was full of a foamy appearing sludge during the initial inspection. Mr. Smith stated that a
pump truck was coming the next day to empty the sludge basin. Some sludge was floating on the surface of the clarifier. At
the follow up inspection, the scum trough had been pumped out and there was small amount of solids on each side.
• Irrigation zones RC4A, RC4B, RC6, RC8, and UP7 were viewed in operation.
• The zones are irrigated four times a day, with even zones being irrigated one day and the odd zones being irrigated the
next. Each zone is irrigated for approximately 20 minutes, with 40 minutes between each irrigation cycle.
• Some bare areas and areas with sparce vegetation were present in the irrigation zones. These areas are cause by
standing water or chronic wet areas.
• At the time of the initial inspection, the influent was a cloudy green color.
• Based on discussions during the follow up inspection, it appears that the ORC and other personnel are cutting off
pumps and turning valves on a regular basis while on site.
Page 4 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type Yes No NA NE
Reuse (Quality) ❑
Single Family Spray, LR ❑
Infiltration System ❑
Activated Sludge Spray, HR ❑
Activated Sludge Spray, LR ❑
Recycle/Reuse ❑
Activated Sludge Drip, LR ❑
Single Family Drip ❑
Lagoon Spray, LR •
Treatment Yes No NA NE
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? ❑ • ❑ ❑
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.) • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Several new pipes have been installed in the reclaimed treatment plant, and one between the
upset and reclaimed treatment plant.
Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flowmeter operating properly? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter monitor continuously? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter record flow? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Use Records
Is water use metered?
Are the daily average values properly calculated?
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent
Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
Is flowmeter operating properly?
Does flowmeter monitor continuously?
Does flowmeter record flow?
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
Comment:
Standby Power
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Page 5 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is generator tested weekly by interrupting primary power source?
Is generator operable?
Does generator have adequate fuel?
Comment:
Treatment Barscreen
Is it free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screenings in compliance?
Are the bars spaced properly?
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment:
Treatment Clarifiers
Are the weirs level?
Are the weirs free of solids and algae?
Is the scum removal system operational?
Is the scum removal system accessible?
Is the sludge blanket at an acceptable level?
Is the effluent from the clarifier free of excessive solids?
Comment:
Treatment Sludge Storage/Treatment
Is the aeration operational?
Is the aeration pattern even?
If required, are Sanitary "Ts" present in tankage?
Comment:
Treatment Disinfection
Is the system working?
Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
Is there adequate detention time (>=30 minutes)?
Is the system properly maintained?
If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe?
Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable?
Is the chlorinator accessible?
If tablets, are tablets present?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth?
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑•
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
•
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑•❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 6 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
If UV, are extra UV bulbs available?
If UV, is the UV intensity adequate?
# Is it a dual feed system?
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000-
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Record Keeping
Is a copy of current permit available?
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR?
NDAR?
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
Are application rates adhered to?
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)?
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters?
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW?
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards?
Are annual soil reports available?
# Are PAN records required?
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime?
If so, has it been applied?
Are operational logs present?
Are lab sheets available for review?
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR?
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
Comment: A 2020 soil report was not available.
Piping has been installed that bypasses part of the treatment system.
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑•❑ ❑
Page 7 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
End Use -Irrigation
Are buffers adequate?
Is the cover crop type specified in permit?
Is the crop cover acceptable?
Is the site condition adequate?
Is the site free of runoff / ponding?
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
Is the application equipment present?
Is the application equipment operational?
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes?
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use?
Are any supply wells within the CB?
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
How close is the closest water supply well?
Is municipal water available in the area?
# Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells?
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB?
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval?
Are monitoring wells damaged?
Comment: Some ponding was evident from lack of vegetation.
UPSET POND -
Storage
Storage Type?
Storage amount?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
5-day detention
pond
2184040
Gallons
# At what point is side -stream wastewater returned to treatment?
Is there a Spill Control Plan? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Aerated or Mixed? NONE
If aeration is present, is it adequate? ❑ ❑ • ❑
If present, are diffusers cleaned regularly? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Is influent structure acceptable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are banks/berms free of seepage and erosion? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are banks/berms free of excessive vegetation? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is pond lined? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Liner Type Full, synthetic
Is liner acceptable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 8 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Are baffles/curtains acceptable? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Does the pond have a freeboard marker? ❑ • ❑ ❑
Required freeboard? 2
Feet
Actual freeboard? 4.6
Feet
Is there suitable grassed vegetation? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the vegetation maintained? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the area free of excessive weeds and/or woody species? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the area free from signs of overflow? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is color acceptable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are floating mats acceptable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
No excessive buildup of solids? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are aerators/mixers acceptable? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Is effluent structure acceptable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
If present, is pond cover acceptable? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Comment: No freeboard marker is present.
REUSE STORAGE -
Storage
Storage Type?
Storage amount?
# At what point is side -stream wastewater returned to treatment?
Is there a Spill Control Plan?
Aerated or Mixed?
If aeration is present, is it adequate?
If present, are diffusers cleaned regularly?
Is influent structure acceptable?
Are banks/berms free of seepage and erosion?
Are banks/berms free of excessive vegetation?
Is pond lined?
Liner Type
Is liner acceptable?
Are baffles/curtains acceptable?
Does the pond have a freeboard marker?
Required freeboard?
Yes No NA NE
Lagoon
3751026
Gallons
El El El El
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Full, synthetic
2
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Page 9 of 10

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Actual freeboard?
Is there suitable grassed vegetation?
Is the vegetation maintained?
Is the area free of excessive weeds and/or woody species?
Is the area free from signs of overflow?
Is color acceptable?
Are floating mats acceptable?
No excessive buildup of solids?
Are aerators/mixers acceptable?
Is effluent structure acceptable?
If present, is pond cover acceptable?
Comment: A freeboard marker is not present.
Feet
4
Feet
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Page 10 of 10

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0019755 Effective: 12/01/20 Expiration: 05/31/27 Owner : JPC Utilities LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Oak Ridge Commons WWTP
County: Guilford 2200 NC 68
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Philip M Cooke
Oak Ridge NC 27310
Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
From Winston-Salem, take 1-40 East to Route 68 North. Proceed to the intersection of Route 68 and Route 150. The facility is
situated in the northwrst corner of the crossroads.
System Classifications: WW2, SI,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/16/2021
Primary Inspector: Caitlin Caudle
Secondary Inspector(s):
Entry Time 09:09AM Exit Time: 11:24AM
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up
Permit Inspection Type: Reclaimed Water
Facility Status: E Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions
(See attachment summary)
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Reconnaissance
Page 1 of 3

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/16/2021 Inspection Type : Reconnaissance
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
A follow up inspection was completed to review immediate repairs that were taking place in the sand filter, and to review the
removal of solids from the clarifier scum trough and sludge basins.
In this follow up it was discovered that a pipe was installed from the reclaimed mudwell to the septic tank in the upset
system. A pip was installed off the mudwell return that emptied into a sludge basin. And a line was installed that bypassed
the tertiary filters and clear well, and emptied directly into the chlorine contact chamber. Compliance issues will be listed in
the compliance inspection report.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: WQ0019755 Owner - Facility:JPC Utilities LLC
Inspection Date: 06/16/2021 Inspection Type : Reconnaissance
Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Page 3 of 3

IiNtk r is bo- n,_) rival (reilA/ ed ►n Seoi)A ba;1, ��(l(`V
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Section
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION
General Information
Facility Name: Oak Ridge Commons VVVVTP
Permit No.: WQ0019755
9wner: Philip Cooke 336-643-7445
RC Name Doug Smith/ (Aka( i;*
Backup OI
Other Contact: -1 r & tJ is Co (yt(
Location (address, gps or directions): 2205NC 68, Oak Ridge, NC 27310
County: Guilford
Issuance Date:
Expiration Date:
Telephone No.: 336-215-0949p_,
Telephone No.:
Telephone No.:
son for Ins s ection
' OUTINE ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ COMPLAINT ❑ PERMITTING ❑ Other:
omments (attach additional pages as necessary)
-Review zones 1, 2, 3 for ponding and runoff
,Lagoon embankments? (2018, brush and groundhogs) jjjM,Cd (c, S q0
- Stormwater issues in reclaimed irrigation
lift stations? l t(t '(%Vl &A-f1gi)\i.OW IAA)
fNlagnometer. WV) t rf
a 1\ U(ks o� AC1
40NYY\S �
Av u i vt OM 11T .v
\WS aM Men 4 5ka kqed ,Vin i s YY\O f n Mi
*Irrigating in the rain during September. Are zones checked before irrigation? What is the usual practice
there?
%'day upset flow meter? (by March 2, 2021) IN 11Ae.,(RbW �er-/
;Rain sensor? O A kv u h - f ftafAiyntcl.✓
ublic ac ess restricted for upset zone . vIGd rY10`(�
�'Qco�wI' t tfrct �3
an b1
- staff guages?r&1� ^ C�GIyytt L (A 061,&((Y ,1000C.tfd-'( \Cx( IDS lwet (V
�neterin equipment tested and calibrated Ii li t at(tvt tali broad
� 9 ment annually? q p Y•�CSf3aent,41: ate
-sand filters?
Ls a follow-up inspection nece.sary es U No
(X(-( aura k; UI eAr se a vidiQcc�ha!
Secondary Inspector:
Entry Time: Z, 0 Exit Time:
46utu,00,sy,k'k,6\64_ � �n ��"l� �� �S �ces � sc,+�d`(-k-r-
Primary Inspector:
Date of Inspection:
3

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Record Keeping and Reporting Information
Is current permit available upon request?
Has the facility been free of public complaints for the last 12 months?
Are maintenance and inspection logs present (date & time of inspections, visual observations,
any maintenance (adjustments, cleanings, equip changes) or repairs taken)?
Are weekly freeboard records present?
Are irrigation tracking records present (date, weather, volume, length time, field #,
Hydraulic loading, nutrient loading, other)?
Las irrigation equipment been calibrated (once/permit cycle) & records present4/SJZ1
&re records present for residuals removal (date, volume, Residual Hauler iVame,
iVame/permit of the receiving party or letter from Municipality)?Pl.&i l If1Q
Is an Operation & Maintenance Plan, and Spill Plan present?
Are appropriate grade ORC & Backup ORC designated? Up to date on CE?
Effluent Monitoring:
Were effluent monitoring reports present? ® NDMR ® NDAR ❑ NDMLR
Are flow rates less than permitted flow? Permitted Flow: 30,000 and 6,000
Are application rates adhered to? Permitted Rate: 0.30 in/yr and 0.25 in/yr
Are lab sheets available for review and support monitoring reports?
Are samples analyzed for the required parameters (See permit)?
Effluent concentrations do NOT exceed permit limits or 2L GW standards?
If required, are PAN records present and complete?
wa er on
Is groundwater monitoring required? •
Were GW-59's and lab results present?
Were samples analyzed for the required parameters (See permit)?
Observed records indicate no 2L GW quality violations? ,/
Soil Analysis: P4 1(\(k dp SO4.5 1 60 f �/ g6lb.ed, as wt0\
Were annual soil analyses results present for each i igation field?
If lime was called for on the Agronomist report, was lime applied? U
Copper and Zinc indices:` < 2,000 ❑ 2,000 — 3,000 ❑ >3,000
Was Sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm3 ?
Was Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) -ss than 15% ?
Influent Pump Station(s) 3 Description: / i G ' V Lc i Y
All pumps present, operational
Floats/Controls operable ❑
A^udio & Visual Alarms Operational ❑
Free of bypass lines or structures ❑
General housekeeping good ❑
Back-up power available, routinely tested & fueled?
Treatment Bar Screen Description:
Are bars spaced properly & free of excess debris?
Are screenings disposed of properly?
Is unit in good condition (excess corrosion)?
❑
II
N
NA
❑ ❑
O El
❑ ❑
❑ E
E ❑
❑ LI
O
C
CU❑❑UU❑
111
NA
C
NE
n
NE
NA NE
❑
Equalization Basin Description: Y N NA NE
Is aeration present? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are pumps present and operational? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is unit in good general condition? ❑ ❑ ❑
s WCA,15 Qukr & quoi-ed\\( IN o\1�P692�g 1 Nl (;V.eccnsvi ge,cANtetV
age f 4
Os- I5 \'1A -- ?1()\/ r1,iv` y M5G1-f o nv5 Cr" \LC s\(s WW , sell -)- Au ftpsel- bi
� 1 G-- a oti n °O - - S Q nci -)-v 'v---) b n \ 6 Yvviik o (— PoY1 c\-

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Treatment Activated Sludge Description:
Aeration mechanism operable & accessible? Q ettat,{vi-}ott,�P�t''
Aeration basin thoroughly mixed?
Settleometer & dissolved oxygen results acceptable?
Is sludge an acceptable color?
Residual Storage/Treatment
❑ Lagoon ® Basin
❑ Septic Tank Capacity (gallons):
Y N NA
o
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑
Y N NA NE
3,751,026 gal and 2,184,040 gal
If Septic Tank, is a sanitary T or filter present?
How often are residuals pumped? fk.a.{-itielV
Treatment Filter(s) Description: Z' N
Is unit accessible for review (i.e. inspection port or not subsurface)? n
Is the filter media present, correct size & type? ❑
Is mud well free of excess solids and filter media? X ❑
Is media free of ponding, algae or excess vegetation? ��. U
Is clear well free of excess solids and filter media? 2n
Does backwashing/air scour frequency appear adequate? ZI ❑
reatment Clarifiers Description: Y
Heirs level, free of excessive solids & algae? ii
*1
Scum removal system operational and accessible? Sludge level: :/
Sludge blanket at acceptable level? (generally 25% or less of the sidewall) I0 _
Clarifier effluent free of excessive solids? j*
Treatment Disinfection Description:
Type: ® Tablets ❑ Gas ❑ Liquid ❑ UV
Is the system properly maintained and working?
Fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
Adequate detention time (> 30 minutes)?
If tablets, proper size & type?
Present in Cylinder(s)?
If UV bulbs, are replacement bulbs on hand?
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids and growth?
❑ ❑
N
P1
n
NA NE
n
u
C
n
u
n
NA NE
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ n
NA NE
n ❑
n n
❑ n
Z ❑
1' 1
Flow Measurement
Flowmeter location: ❑ Influent Effluent Y N NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually (design flow > 0,000 gpd)? / ❑ ❑ P1
Is flowmeter operating properly? Calibration records present (w/in 10%)? ►r1 ❑ n
Does flowmeter record flow? ilP1 E ❑ P
rX
If no flowmeter (<10,000 gpd), are water -use records available (water meter)?
Are the daily average values properly calculated?
Treatment
Are treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in permit?
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? If no, note below.
List any items/units):
,,tk\ of Solt tu6 S0\(5 + C� is (OYV1i `Al
Page 3 of 4
NA
NE
11
p & Wl p 0 u w- 1'rs

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Effluent Storage
®Lagoon(s) ❑ Above ground tank(s) ❑ Underground tank(s) ['Other:
Amount of Storage (days, months, gallons, etc.): 3,751,026 gal and 2,184,040 gal •••_,30 dS
Effluent Storage Lagoon(s) ❑ Primary ❑ Secondary C
Influent structure(s) free of obstructions?
No signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion on embankments?
Proper vegetation type w/ no excessive vegetation present on embankments?
Liner (if visible, is it intact)?
Baffles/curtains in good condition?
Freeboard is >2 feet from overtopping? Measurement at time of inspection:
›figtaff gauge is clearly marked?
No evidence of overflow (vegetation discolored or laying down/broken)?
No unusual color (very black, textile colors)?
No Foam present? Are antifoam agents used? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No floating mats (sludge, plants, inorganics)?
No signs of excessive solids buildup (from bottom)?
Aerators/mixers operational (if present)?
Effluent structure is free of obstructions and easily accessible?
Effluent Pump station Description:
All pumps present, operational
Floats/Controls operable
Audio & Visual Alarms Operational
Free of bypass lines or structures
If required, is a rain sensor present and operational
General housekeeping good
Back-up power
•
Jzr
•
End Use -Irrigation Number of Fields: 1/11?Are cover crops the \
Are buffers adequate? �(' i m' v t . l,ch -1 Pr►'� �I IZ , iYI
No signs of runoff, ponding, or drift?6ora Sv045 ryT) M `O (ki fl4
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
Is the application equipment present, operational, and in good condition?
No limiting slopes present in irrigation fields?
Is site access restricted and/or signs posted in accordance with permit?
No water supply wells within the CB?
No water supply wells within 250' of the CB?
Is permit being followed?
N
❑
❑
N
N
NA
u
u
NA
n
NA
e is Y NA
Does the permit require monitoring wells? If so, answer the following.
Are the monitoring wells properly installed according to the permit?
re the monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB & CB?
Are the wells properly identified & free of damage?
1 �a` 114 ` P` Y1 n- rv�;� ;& !Pe C S
1 VNikts 6a is s eau -op\u Zv v v
t -3 3 --t7 0 A i'1 1 3 -7 -
NE
U
NE
II
❑ a
❑ ❑ ❑
D ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
6 NoVN, 66 bfb\ ►A fDye- Paoff ¢/ o F lM q o
NE
n
NE

A ; -aRa ,o,(A-or. �c;i4,g ,1,'mkt/A{1 sang fi14-N rejairs
(pN1o,1la bu
SUk W\
c Caw a.2 CG l�.%-eFpa vv\ ,YvUWt aP.+ru ors q01ivl
+5 (D 6/ire- kf+nrtiA- i 5 ca-iedAa sao ,1
FLOW THROUGH SYSTEM:
• Does the ertiary filter wash actually go to thesandfilter? y� L �\
ialle,d \9e itt� �QAC(X- a��%e VA,l+reAQ//wdoesitgetthere?
es the mud well empty onto sand filter or go to the head of the plant? DO1 YT 1 vickc5 `' is s�-1�� kb u'{ - s*
p/ 2015 staff report says the only connection between the two systems is the pipe after q"-"f lud�e- bo-st n � G (7Gts t4
av'nck 190Inlb,(inaltd
turbidity meter that kicks effluent over to the upset system.
• Is valve actually flipped on the weekend to go directly to upset? �fc, 1 tiun f A, • V j ROWS
S are (O „ 1 PIM 0Z b�
Flow values reported for reclaimed on weekends, not jus C�� ,1 j ( (ii J C
-•—trthere is liOftow going through reclaimed on Sat and Sun, need to report a_rt f Of/ C 6-c- net,EAa.(� 6t,t, -i_ (-j.6
€Gold be-swampir+g-the-septietank-onvpset-and-causing-sand-fifter-to-get— V
� egged -with -solids--
UPSET S EM (ori finally permitted for 13,000 GPD in 2001)
V`WOV IV IS Ac k a(l�rr i fi v <I� � t `mil Q�
here is the rain sensor for upset system? 0 f1 ti ej U} (Ot -`� c1 Qa (,g P ic11 Aill �k s 0.�a 7
here are the upset irrigation pumps? -� b(klind (p)(skYb\ ctt. lfl we, - jel( , . f
ifs nline flow meter on upset measures what goes in the lagoon or what is irrigated?-x7 14Y1 A0-1 S (JVl QAtCd✓
jumping out liquids or solids from the upset pond? les 1
jumping
marker? Is top of wet well at the same elevation as the top of the lagoon? 'D d 1N �Q -€ a p 6 bi/) m 15 Q� s 1 G1
. �n lorine contact cha ber for the upset? What does it look like on the inside?() id -AV, ode dY CQ>,Ank5 d( �r ,A ed, -caw sly+ 1„D
`o1 ICY � \Io MO5 SP,e\a0l.�ks S�reikw(NS `9rk,moans sta.�tytt e k�
RECLAI� SYSTEM (constructed 2005 2006) �� _d
Is top of wet well same elevation as the top of the lagoon? GI l(Uf,(,d S a rule Qs (Acc;.
.--What is being pumped from the chlorine contact chamber? (3/17/2019, 12/7/2020)`^
o Why does the chlorine contact chamber being pumped? )�' YX,t' Pa3e,
here is the sludge being removed from the sand filter being dumped? -� Ve1 n qa S red Oi Ai w.( m hi f will `' e
(nnsl'excc k, a dumrkr a,a A-cuAn vl(,l.eavis4mt osb6u.rvyC v • n+
IRRIGATION ZONES d 0-1 `,1, , -
•�P1, UP2, UP3, UP4, UPS fenced?
Riser in RC8 fixed? Cited WA day
TO DO
Sludge judge clarifier
Ask for daily records (clip boards) to be sent to me
Review lift stations
at is the makeup of the lift stations? Tanks? Pumps? 1 cOI,veYan ,'fVl�t�s , j & 4- ps(pe ~` i��
Do lift stations need to be included in the permit? fff
Vtk " \A ta'K. 9 ,&rqs ivr . bok vv r rvrv\.e d irtAt h Nod of plan.-1-
dk1. ail v ( -xr� r cyckir: mdvin pua Sin dose %�V1+e-IA9 -1, 6" e4 P,'I4-(�S O'r 6c
U /61e70T6S\
ts`�Wka'l �� .bu mel,Wu*"\t'w1"PaNeArd-sued 1 de�`n9
olids sa�d
Sail ,a b c,,- w.In i , i d S g 1-,• c av-( 1i- , V-Se5 g P 3 }-„ s hd w �i rir
�p (1���
(Apse \i- 5e Q (� 'n 1ik-1 0A-s iY (M a ae, W V Ci 1-VV3 a re e kti t I , ; In 4--, rn 1
'Nfmt vKvt5 d v\-,N, buc - C Gc -VD 5tc ►a0,r<k, coca--stiA muorweitkob,,�� rieId
c'&% e Qtun5, usk tnsAGV las-4-yea,(
* rektAMAls b lung e, ba,s vi'V Mikhail (S a iso 11,t'iw ( r'14+ i vt 'P (6nS

ie v e 5 'N✓D nn 1uf,'i a G� 10 - btt ' 1-k�rs
Q q � �i Lim s� l ill-c�' �� d-� -�i-t� , �
c bacl cd tA.pp, efalg. n 00es J,rirec,-Hy b c,hl ovi a -I csr t-voo t , We, vt 4urb
Date
Location
Volume (gallons)
10/18/2018
Sludge basins
14,300
1/29/2019
Skimmed septic tank
Cleaned pump tank at
reclaimed pond
6,000
3/17/2019hlorinatortank
Skimmed EQ
3,600
3/21/2019
Upset septic tank
Trays at treatment
plant
15,500
1/13/2020
Skimmed small tank
3,500
a f -;'(
Skimmed lti :< tank (/t
1/23/2020
Pumped septic tank in
Ili
13,000
' . �S{1
liil 1,1 t i I-1, E
. Slue
3,500
b&siyi.
8/12/2020
Pumped sewer
3,500
12/7/2020
' Chlorinator at
treatment plant
1,800
12/8/2020
Treatment Plant
3,500
12/9/2020
Grease trap (Oak
Ridge Diner)
12/9/2020
Grease Trap (Bistro)
12/9/2020
Grease Trap (Noma
Teresa Eatery)
1/6/2021
Pumped Septic Tank
Cleaned filter
Cleaned pump tank
Pumped #2 tank at
treatment plant
17,500
3/3/2021
Grease Trap (Oak
Ridge Diner)
3/3/2021
Grease Trap (Bistro)
3/3/2021
Grease Trap (Noma
Teresa Eatery)
3/18/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
4/2/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
4/8/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
4/14/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
4/22/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
4/23/2021
Grease Trap (Market
Place Drive)
1,250
4/2/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
5/6/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
5/14/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
5/20/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
5/25/2021
Upset Pond
2 loads (7,000)
{ Commented [CO]: Where are these?
• Commented [CC2]: Upset septic tank? Tank Is only
14,000 gallons
{Commented [CC3]: is thls right? Digestor 2? Sewer?
Commented [CC4]: What are these locations?

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY20-SL000840
Philip Cooke
Page 2 of 4
More
Information
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meg/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
Hi!!i% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% S-1 Mri-I Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.36 1.16 5.9 71 1.7 5.5 55 55 49 18 29 542 342 94 94 53 0.3 5
More
Information
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-0 Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.32 1.02 8.0 78 1.8 5.5 15 91 49 22 32 309 202 62 62 34 0.4 5
More
Information
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meg/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-A0 Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.32 1.10 7.8 77 1.8 5.5 18 85 52 20 28 446 285 68 68 38 0.3 4
More
Information
Note: 11
Test Results [units - WN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dn3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-Al Cu-1 Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.32 1.12 6.2 64 2.2 4.9 25 64 41 19 27 418 74 74 37 0.2 3
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.8 120-200 20 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lame Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.8 120-200 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.8 120-200 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tonslacre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Hardwood, M 0.8 80-120 30 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
Sample ID: RC04
Lime History:
Sample ID: RC05
Lime History:
Sample ID: RC06
Lime History:
Sample ID: RC07
Lime History:

FY20-SL000840
O
2
O
c.
www.ncagr.govlagronomi!
[phone]
0
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
4-
0
CO
a)
CL
O
Information
0 0
f.
O 0
E
0
Recommendations:
O
O
co
co. O
0 0
Sample ID: RC08
Lime History:
z
O
z
U)
N
� O
U • `)
� N
s rn
N
Mn-AII Mn-Al2
s 0.4
N-
U) N

NCDA&.CS Agronom c Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronorni/ Report No. FY20-SL000840
Philip Cooke
Page 4 of 4
Eco
o
• • a
0 a = _
o e / c 2 2
2 / § / 0 u m
co
\ / \ E / -
±�E 5\ )% o j
u a n x e x e -
\ \ f \ q E g ) \ - : • / _ \ 7 0 j
0 . E c _o » _ _ — & 7 7 » - _ : E o =
= 3 B f % G� ]/ m e— e®cr)° Q x»> a
m
\ G o x c\/ E S S G\\ g/ /\\/ f± 3% 2
0
§ c j w / \ Q { \ £ % # o) \ " \ \ \ / 2 k k / / 2 \ x
%
t g e 0= E t e 3 3 0@= m? c c e a e& E o o£ 2 7 c.) a)
>
§ 2$$ S o)\ E E a E E// E{ 7 S§% G£ k 2 S$\\
/
\
<
_
— E
2aO-a.a 0 \3-
W
\mind§/1.I.11 J///}2/\\\/jU)/\\\
CO
c
_
_
crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendatiob
nix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil
its is not possible, apply no more than 1 to '
You can apply the rest in similar increment'
is needed, use dolomitric lime.
r large areas are listed separately for each
Imendations for N (and sometimes for B) are
sults. K-I and P-I values are based on test r
ns given. If Mg is needed and no lime is rec
alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually sati
lem samples.
>hould pay special attention to micronuiriel
&Vote: Secondary Nutrients and Microrrutrients
§
)
0
7
0
6.
0
f
E
2
§
co
0
0
0
c
2
0.
2
0
62.
\
m
5
c
c
/
/
0
c
M

2 § .
J \ To
D
a / 3
.o o ® 2
e = E •0
® § § \
$ = a 7
\ \ § \
�e 2y
0 0 \ •)
e 2 \ .§
/H �E
. o
E0 • ?
0
} # /
' e c / L.
/ co %
WE )\
\
/ 0
m
\\ /
( co \
E k »
§ 2 0
E ® 2
/ \
k
0
2 \
± 7
4co
/
E
e
/
ct

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomc Report No. FY20-SL000839
Philip Cooke Page 2 of 3
More
Information
Note: 11
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-0 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-0 Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.32 1.02 6.7 78 1.5 5.7 47 57 55 19 26 113 89 89 53 0.2 3
More
Information
Note: 11
Test Results [units -INN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meg/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-0 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.27 1.16 6.6 78 1.4 5.6 90 49 57 17 26 83 69 69 65 0.2 3
More
Information
Note: 11
Test Results [units -INN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N On mg/dm3j: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-0 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-0 Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.32 1.07 7.0 80 1.4 5.6 49 70 53 22 34 182 104 104 48 0.2 3
More
Information
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in glcm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-O Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-Al1 Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AO Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.32 1.11 7.4 82 1.4 5.8 39 77 54 22 28 308 202 73 73 37 0.2 3
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Pine, M 0.0 100-150 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.4 120-200 50 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
Sample ID: UP04
Lime History:
Sample ID: UP05
Lome History:
Sample ID: UP06
Lime History:
Sample ID: UP07
Lime History:

FY20-SL000839
NCDA&CS Agrono
0
ns and waits
N
c
O
Report Abbrev
Recommendations
0)
C
0
0
0
ro
>
Q
a
a)
Q
0
0
0
0
U
W
0
U
a)
Q
O 0
a3
(on E
a) .0
c0
O)
C
(6 N
X a)
a) a
X
0
.0
E
3
0)
0)
(o
0
O.
0)
O
U
Q
N
N
0
E
N
o. Q
o O
U U U1
L L u)
0 0 (a
U
O a)
C c a)
.O 0
a) 0 co a) O
m m (La
cy) m ( c a)
co c c co C_
E E E
ac) E
O) O .a) C C
o (a m m o 0 4
C UO) C O U 0. O. U7)
� N �
4)
(a (q N s C C C (a O— In s7.
<{ Q7 co U U U LSJ g �! �! c O n (n (n �S Ks N
co")
x
N
c (0 =
� U O_ 'C
_ O i O
O a) 'al
0) 0O (0 a
0 -. .0 .0 .0
soluble salt index
a)
E
J
c
a)
E
a
CO
C
0 a)
a
C
a)
`) EE
o N
`)
E
E
O
.(0
— 0 �z 4 �{ 0
2 2
coco 0
O @
a1 N a)
L.
N (I)•u
E c
f9 E N ,O
o
03
© a) 0 a
O
CO o
0 U 0
a)
o
t5 a) C N
e o
(A a) O
c _c c c
a 0) — O
C a) a =
a) C O O
E cE U _
O 2 _cC
0
N L 6.
(o
N 6
N �
O V)
O
-0-
0-
CD O
E LU
O
2
.N >,
a) (0
E
O �
C
C a
VO C
a)
N
0
(0 Uj
C
L E
O
a) w
O E
co a)
N Q
O
U
(0 Q
O O
Q
O
Lc)
N C
O 0
10 C
O
U O.
L O
c o
O C
XU O
a) >,
(o O
4)
C N
C
C O
c (0 O
U Ea,
C O0 :
> .0 CD
a
.fi O
0 N
O
O : S
O
C
7
a
a)
17)
U N
(c-
c ' O
(0
L
obi o
cc
> 2
o E
® O
-c
O
a
O) (0
co a)_a
E
E co
Q
Z O E
(0 a)
4. a
R® 2 a)
o
O o
O t
U
(0 O
N 5,
E
E c)a
O a) A
E
Test Results
co
.0 O
L
� O
((00 �o
Oo
z.
•
4) i
(.O
N C
(A's
a W
C
CO (0
Z
0
co
a)
co ro
0 —^
0 U
Q. u
•0
N
CO
U
Q N
mQ
W
U Q

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomi! Report No. FY20-SL000839
Philip Cooke
Page 3 of 3
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
u)
o
— .••
aS C
U E
U U
'( U w 0
co 0 N E
E
_7
a)
a)0
O)
co
— N
0
2 2
U U U)
0)
O O co
:6 .0 0 0
Q
N 0 — N
o
m a�i aai 0 t x
a) .0 •0 c 0 U -0
as u)
'Q (o
c a Q.) (/)) aa) c _
.-, c .c N co = c c
7 7 (0 x C
'C
C U
(
-_ U Q O—
' '
NO O U =
O •6 N
0 0) Q) OL •O •O Qxj Wu) ca
0
O 0 x C .0
O ul 0
O O N u) O 'a u)
U U 0. C �
C
C C C 0.43 (6
Lo. -�
•a00
(o
.€ o w w o Q. c0) N N w c (6 N a, N O� 7 f6 c ot. m (c6 x
U U '— -co L 0 co C_ "O L O O O .� 0 -13
0 0
N
i
a) O o o 0 O x 0 =cr>
o 0
0 'E E 2 2 E F •E N C O 0 0. O. u) 0)) tV
0 Q o o 0 0 0 Q Q. O. o
U
.0
C
0
a
't''
N
r N
0
w
U (n ia ow O(gE_O a)- C c C cQ (a0W2To—In C C
Q O m U U U w= X X EEEMEMEZZZO Q. a 0. (n cn > N N
Recommendations
Lime
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or lb/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at one
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-I and P-I values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS -I levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of lb/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncaaroov/agronomi/oboar14.17trnfdsfind information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer
Test Results
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, WN, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
remaining 16 [P-I, K-1, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-AI1, Mn-Al2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinely
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncagr.gov/agronomy/uvrst.hbn