NC0025445_Randleman Pretreatment Audit Report_20210602

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Ms. Lisa Osthues
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Randleman
168 Nathan Dudley Road
Clinton, North Carolina 28328
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 2, 2021
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Audit Inspection (PAI)
City of Randleman
NPDES# NC0025445
Randolph County
Dear Ms. Osthues:
On May 13, 2021 a Pretreatment Audit Inspection (PAI) was performed by Jim Gonsiewski of the
Winston-Salem Regional office. Ms. Lisa Osthues, pretreatment coordinator for the City of
Randleman, was present. The purpose of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the
pretreatment program, which included: a detailed file review, review of the POTW plant
performance, sampling, and compliance judgement program, and adherence to the enforcement
response plan (ERP). Additionally, an inspection of the Deep River Dyeing facility was conducted
in conjunction with an inspection by the City of Randleman.
Background
This is a 1.745 MGD permitted facility. The City has one (1) Significant Industrial User (SIU)
which is non -categorical. The publicly owned treatment works (POTW) was non -compliant for
BOD in April 2020 due to a tertiary filter failure. The repairs were made and the POTW returned
to compliance.
Pretreatment Program Element Review
The Headworks Analysis (HWA) was submitted on May 19, 2017. The HWA was approved on
August 16, 2017. The next HWA is due on June 1, 2022.
The Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was submitted on March 2, 2018. The IWS was approved on
May 25, 2018. The next IWS is due on February 28, 2023.
The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on February 4, 2013.
TM D_EQ�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road. Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was approved on August 11, 2020.
LTMP File Review
The Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) was approved on October 10, 2011 and is being
conducted at the proper locations and frequencies.
Industrial User Permit (IUP) File Review
A review of the file for Deep River Dyeing (#0004) revealed that the monitoring data was well
organized and compliant.
The slug control plan for Deep River Dyeing 00004) was in good order.
Action Items
No other action items were noted.
The pretreatment program is considered satisfactory. Ms. Osthues maintains an excellent program.
If you have any questions please contact Jim Gonsiewski or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
E—OP. yDocu8llgn.d b`y: t�JMItr
146649E226C94EA...
Lon T. Snider
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ — WSRO
Enclosure: PAI Report
cc: PERCS Unit — Mike Montebello (Electronic Copy)
Michael Glass — City of Randleman (Electronic Copy)
WSRO Electronic Files
Laserfiche Files
GQE
Os40M1ntlM 01 YvrwMOUI w.0
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

NC• NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL DUALITY
Background Information [Complete prior to audit; review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Randleman
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Lisa Osthues and Michael Glass
3. Title(s): Contracting Pretreatment Consultant / ORC
4. Address of POTW:
Mailing 204 South Main Street
City Randleman, NC Zip Code 27317
Phone Number [phone] Fax Number E-Mail wwtracitvofrandleman.com, lisaopretreatAgmail.com
5. Audit Date 05/ 13 /2021
6. Last Inspection Date: 12/ 17 / 2019 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ® Yes ❑ No
If Yes, Explain. Non -compliant for BOD in April 2020 due to a tertiary filter failure. Repairs made and returned to
compliance.
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
ICIS Coding
Main Program Permit Number
INICIOI0I2 15 14 14 15 1
10. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
11. Number of SIUs with No IUP; or with an Expired IUP?
12. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
13. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
MM/DD/YY
05 11'i 121 1
14. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
15. Number of SIUs in SNC for Reporting During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
16. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule?
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
17. Number of SIUs on Schedules?
0
18. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
19. Number of CIUs in SNC?
0
NA
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Page 1

20. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of each Program Element
in their File, complete with all supporting documents and PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
06/01/2022
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
05/19/2017
Yes ❑ No
08/16/2017
►1 Yes ❑ No
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
03/02/2018
/1 Yes ❑ No
05/25/2018
/1 Yes ❑ No
02/28/2023
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
01/03/2013
►1 Yes ❑ No
02/04/2013
/1 Yes ❑ No
NA
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
05/15/2020
/1 Yes ❑ No
08/11/2020
►1 Yes ❑ No
NA
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
09/16/2011
// Yes ❑ No
10/10/2011
/1 Yes ❑ No
NA
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
21. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas.
22, If yes to #21, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
23. If yes to #21, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
If yes, Explain.
24. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 02/05/2013
25. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
26. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ® Yes ❑ No Emailed updated copy to industry 5/11/2021
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
27. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
['Yes ® No If yes, Explain. Note to discuss hard copy 'wet signature' issue
28. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
NA
Resources
29. Please Rate the Following: S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unsatisfacto
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
IS ❑M ❑U
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
Emergencies
/1S ❑M ❑U
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
POTW has portable sampler and Industry has its own.
►1S ❑M ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
►1S ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
S ❑M ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
►1S ❑M ❑U
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
►1S ❑M ❑U
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016
Page 2

30. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain Yes or No. Excel spreadsheets and other Microsoft form products.
31. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
BOD and COD surcharges for overages.
Public Perception/ Participation
32. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
33. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, how would the request be addressed? Make appointment and allow to copy public records.
34. Has any industry ever requested that certain information remain confidential from the public? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain
procedure for determining whether information qualified for confidential status, as well as procedure for keeping files confidential
from public. If no how would the request be addressed? See Section 7 of SUO on Confidential Information. Would need to
comply with requirements in ordinance if private entity.
35. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? ® Yes ❑ No
ORC stops by occasionally to check on discharge and during sampling twice a year, and Industry and Consultant speak on the
phone or communicate by email.
36. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes ❑ No
Would be included as an agenda item for Board meeting and also included in minutes.
37. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ❑ Yes ❑ No
NA — none in SNC
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey-IWS)
38. How does the POTW become aware of new or changed Users?
• City Hall
• Prior year Industrial Waste Surveys
• The North Carolina Manufacturers Register
• The Randleman Chamber of Commerce (http://randlemanchamber.com/list/)
• The ORC is in close contact with the Water Production Supervisor and the Collection Systems Supervisor.
Potential impacts are relayed as found.
• The ORC conducts grease trap inspections. Inspections are not limited to existing traps/filters, but also include
new and expanding or changing businesses/industries.
• The Better Business Bureau
39. Once the POTW becomes aware of new or changed Users, how does the POTW determine which industries have the
reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and therefore require a new permit or a permit revision? (Who is an
SIU?)
• Water/sewer records — review flow volumes
• Make contact with business and request to complete IWS short form as needed
• Determine POCs
• Test as needed — pollutant scan
• Review process
• Follow with long form as needed
40. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
❑Yes No If Yes, How many are there?
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable.
41. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) ❑ Truck ['Dedicated Pipe ® NA
42. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) NA
43. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ❑ Categorical Limits ['Other
Explain Other:
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Pace 3

44. Review POTW's copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, what parameters are over allocated? There is a theoretical overallocation for silver due to the use of the
chronic silver stream standard by the state.
45. If yes to #44, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term IUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
NCDEQ has not required programs to update LTMP plans but has begun enforcing the chronic standard for
HWA. There are no silver dischargers to this plant. Silver has been added to LTMP informally to collect data. City
has requested that their contract lab test to at least 0.002 mg/L for future analyses. City is participating the NCPC
silver workgroup to discuss this issue with NCDEQ as this is a statewide issue for many programs/plants. City has
completed the silver survey for the NCPC. City will monitor its single industry for silver in second half of 2021.
46. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, what percentage of each parameter Actually not necessary at this time, but will do this and determine as needed
47. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
48. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (for example: were only those pollutants
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
POCs for NPDES; pollutant scans; IWS Long form; type of industry also considered; categorical determined; changes to
process for IUP renewals
49. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits? Explain.
POTW still conducts 2 times annually to address POCs for plant. Frequency for industry is based on numerous factors
including, but not limited to, volume of discharge, typical load of discharge, types of pollutants (e.g. primary or additional),
potential to impact POTW, available loading at POTW.
Permit Compliance
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Compliance judgement spreadsheet is used for all pollutant
judgement. Postmarks for reports are now used for reporting timeframe compliance. Annual inspections are used to
determine compliance with other permit conditions.
52. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all Division data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
53. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug/spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
54. What criteria are used to determine if a slug/spill control plan is needed?
In general, we require all SIUs to have a slug/spill plan.
55. What criteria does the POTW use to determine if a submitted slug/spill control plan is adequate?
Must have chemical/product control, contact information to alert emergency personnel and POTW, training requirements,
post spill procedures.
56. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Current SIU sampling point already in place. Future points would be determined by attempting to obtain representative
samples, free from side streams, post all pretreatment, accessible safely.
57. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: correct location; proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
POTW: ® Yes ❑ No SIU: ® Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. SIUs samples are collected by a certified contract
laboratory using the industry's approved sampler. POTW samples are collected by City personnel only following required
sampling procedures and submitted to a contract laboratory using chains of custody and proper preservation.
58. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for
Metals Meritech
Conventional Parameters Meritech
Organics Meritech
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Page 4

59. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
Meritech chain of custody forms are used for both POTW and industry sampling. POTW conducted testing is recorded on
POTW form.
Long/Short Term Monitoring Plan (L/STMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA)
60a. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
60b. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
NOTE: When POTW changed to new lab, some issues with TSS detection levels. These have been addressed with the lab. If other
detection levels are not met, request lab repeat testing where possible or determine if it is matrix interference. Note that this
LTMP plan is older an lists an incorrect detection level for TSS. The lowest detection level possible for TSS per the NC lab branch
is 2.5 mg/L. Older LTMP plans have it listed at 2.
60c. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ❑ YES ❑ NO
60d. All LTMP/STMP effluent data on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)? ® YES ❑ NO Division Inspector, verify yourself!
60e. If NO to any above, list violations
60f. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ® YES ❑ NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added: Silver
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, who completes your HWA? Phone ( ) --
62. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, what is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply) ❑Increased average flow
❑NPDES limits change
®More LTMP data available ❑Resolve over allocation ❑5 year expiration ®Other
Explain. Will have silver data available soon. Also, one industry has left the City. The City also applied for its NPDES
permit renewal and once received, the POTW has 180 days to update the Headworks analysis.
63. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA? ❑Inhibition ® Pass Through ❑Sludge Quality
64. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Explain. This is not necessary at this time with only one SIU.
Summary
65. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
None planned.
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Page 5

INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS AND 1 IU IN
66. User Name
1. Deep River Dyeing
2. NA
3. NA
67. IUP Number
0004
68. Does File Contain Current Permit?
// Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
69. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/21
70. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
NA
71. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date? Completed 7/20/2016; permit renewed January
1, 2017.
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
72. Does File Contain Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
Inspected 12/10/2020
/1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
73. a. Does File Contain Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. r Yes ■ No
b. ■Yes •No
a. ■ Yes ■ No
b. ■Yes •No
a. ■ Yes ■ No
b. •Yes ■No
74. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
75. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►1Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ■Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. •Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
76. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
►1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
77. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
78. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
79. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports on
time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
80a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
80b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
81. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
❑ Yes ❑ No
None
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
82. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
83. a. Was POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW within 30 Days?
c. If applicable, did POTW resample and obtain results within 30 days of
becoming aware of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of SIU?
a.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
84. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes
/1 No
❑
Yes ❑ No
❑
Yes ❑ No
85. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken as
Specified in POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑Yes❑No:N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
86. Does File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
87. Does File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoCAN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
88. a. Does File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
89. Did POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any Requested
Information For You?
❑ Yes // No
II Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Well organized files. All requested information was easily accessible.
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: December 2016
Page 6

INDUSTRY INSPECTION ICIS CODING:
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
INICI0101 1 1 1 1 I 1051131211
1. Industry Inspected: Deep River Dyeing
2. Industry Address: 225 Poplar Street. Randleman, NC 27317
3. Type of Industry/Product: Textile dyeing
4. Industry Contact: Jake Marsh Title: Owner Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes ❑ No
D. Sampling Review ® Yes ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
Met with the plant manager, Nate Marsh. Deep River Dyeing begane operations at the facility in 1973. Currently the plant has
three shifts a day and operates four days a week. 55 people work at the facility at this time. The facility dyes fabrics for various
uses. There are 19 dyeing machines at the facility of which two are obsolete and no longer used. The pretreatment process
consists of lint screens, flow equalization with bubble defusers, and ozone treatment for BOD, COD, and color removal. The
facility was very well run amd maintained.
Audit SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Audit Comments: A very well run program.
Requirements: None
Recommendations: None
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: El Yes ® No
QNCR: El Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory
Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory El
Audit COMPLETED BY: Jim Gonsiewski DATE: 05/28/2021
Michael Montebello - PERCS and Winston-Salem Regional Office
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form
Revised: December 2016 Page 7

United States Environmental Protection Agency
E PA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code
1 I� I 2[
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac
I 3 I NC0025445 111 121 21/05/13 117 18 n 191 S I 201
Type
211111
1 1 1
I
I
III
I II I I I II
I I
I I I 1 1
I I I 1 III
III
I II l i
166
Inspection Work Days
671 I
Facility Self -Monitoring
701LJ
�
Evaluation Rating
I 71
B1
I tyI
72
QA
12,j
731 I
I I
Reserved
174 71
I
I
I
1 1 I 1
_180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Randleman WWTP
3475 Applewood Rd
Randleman NC 27317
Entry Time/Date
10:OOAM 21/05/13
Permit Effective Date
17/08/01
Exit Time/Date
12:45PM 21/05/13
Permit Expiration Date
21/08/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Garry Michael Glass/ORC/336-498-2254/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/tle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Nick Holcomb,204 S Main St Randleman NC 27317181411336-495-7500/
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Records/Reports Pretreatment
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s)
Jim J Gonsiewski
of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Docuaronedby: DWR/Division of Water Quality/336 776 9704/ 5/28/2021
po.. C- C t e.Aki
c Et97689F179D46F...
Signature of Managemento
a Revinedewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
L..o# 'C. SMlcr 6/2/2021
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NC0025445 111 121 21 /05/13 117 18 LG.]
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
The Pretreatment Audit Inspection (PAI) was conducted on May 13, 2021. As part of the inspection,
the SIU Deep River Dyeing was also inspected. The POTW was found to be in compliance with a
very well run pretreatment program.
Page# 2

Permit: NC0025445
Inspection Date: 05/13/2021
Owner - Facility: Randleman VWVTP
Inspection Type: Pretreatment Audit
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ ❑III
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? •❑ ❑ ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ❑ E ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? •❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page# 3