20110767 Ver 2_401 Application_20130313

WITHERS & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 1o1
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
(910) 256 -9277
FAX [phone]
TO: NC Division of Water Quality — 4o1 Wetlands Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street; 9"' Floor
Raleigh, NC 276o4
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of Letter
11- 10 -1 UIU2 --
LETTER OF T° ° NSN lei QL
DATE 3/19/13
JOB NO. 02061 .02
ATTENTION Ms. Karen Higgins
PHONES i -80 -6 6
RE' Mankro Creek Interceptor Replacement Project
Submittal of NWP 12 PCN for Re-Permitting
DWQ Project #11 -0 6
NWP 12 PCN
1
3/19/13
02o6i345.o3
® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Prints
❑ Change order
❑ Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Diskette ❑
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
o3/i8/i3
02o61 .02
NWP 12 PCN
1
3/19/13
02o6i345.o3
Check for $24o Application Fee
1
3/19/13
02o61345-03
CD of PCN Submittal Packet
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
❑ Resubmit
❑ Submit
❑ Return
_ copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
REMARKS:
COPYTO: File
SIGNED: Troy Beasley
lfenclosuies ate not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

WITHERS RAVEN EL
March 18, 2013
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Dave Shaeffer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
NC- Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
1650 Mail Service Center.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Mango Creek Interceptor Sewer Replacement— NWP 12 PCN Submittal for Re- Permitting
Corps AID# SAW- 2o11 -o1690
DWQ Project #11 -0767
W &R Project #02o61345.02
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of the City of Raleigh, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP 12 for
0.52 acres of temporary wetland impacts and 161 if of temporary stream impacts for replacement of
a section of the Mango Creek Interceptor sewer line, and oo1 acres of permanent wetland conversion
impacts for the permanent maintenance corridor. We are also requesting a 401 WQC for the impacts
listed above, as well as 526 sq of permanent buffer impacts, 11,491 sq ft of temporary buffer
impacts.
The proposed project consists of the replacement of approximately 6,500 if of sewer line which runs
along Mango Creek and the Neuse River. The proposed sewer replacement begins at the Neuse
River Siphon on the east side of the Neuse River (Lat: 35.768561 °N; Long: - 78.539964 °W) to Hodge
Road (Lat: 35.777728 °N; Long: - 78.525922 °W) in Knightdale, Wake County. The proposed alignment
contains portions of Mango Creek and unnamed tributaries to Mango Creek, which is located in the
Neuse River Basin. The Water Quality Classification for Mango Creek is: "C- NSW ", the Stream Index
number is: 27 -32, and the cataloging unit for the project is: 03020201.
Project Purpose
The overall purpose of this project is to replace an aging and undersized sewer line currently running
parallel to Mango Creek and the Neuse River. The proposed line is approximately 6,500 linear feet
Of 36 -inch diameter pipe. The line must tie to the existing sewer system on both sides of Mango
Creek at Hodges Road and with the siphon under the Neuse River on an NCDOT mitigation parcel
near US 264.
Project History
The Mango Creek Interceptor Sewer Replacement project was previously issued a Corps NWP 12 and
DWQ 401 WQC & Buffer Authorization in 2011. Copies of the previous authorizations have been
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravene[.com I License No. C -0832

WITHERS II RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYOR5
provided as Appendices. These authorizations expired on March 18, 2012, but were granted an
automatic 1 -year extension. Construction was never initiated due to difficulty securing easements
for the project, and the previous authorizations have expired. The easements for the project have
been secured and the City of Raleigh is ready to move forward with the project as was previously
designed and permitted.
Proposed Impacts
Type
Permanent
Impacts
Temporary
Impacts
Total
Impacts
Wetland (ac)
0.01
0.52
0.53
Stream (to
0
161
161
Riparian
Buffer (sq ft)
Zone 1
310
5,353
5663
Zone 2
216
6,138
6,354
Avoidance and Minimization
The alignment avoids un- impacted wetlands and streams by following the existing sewer easement
for most of the alignment. Forested wetland impacts will primarily be temporary in nature as the
permanently cleared maintenance corridorwill be located within the current cleared easement. The
only exception to this is a small (o.o1 acre) maintenance corridor adjacent to Hodges Road at Mango
Creek (Site 7).
Stream crossings will be installed using open cut construction techniques. Open cut construction
will be used at the two Mango Creek stream crossings, one of which is on the NCDOT mitigation
parcel. Directional drilling or boring was evaluated but deemed not practical. This crossing will be
constructed to eliminate the existing 18 -inch pre- stressed concrete cylinder pipe aerial crossing just
upstream of the 1 -264 Neuse River Bridge. The downstream terminus of this project is a recently
constructed siphon box that crosses the Neuse River and discharges to the City of Raleigh
interceptor on the west bank of the Neuse River. The siphon elevation is fixed and to some extent
dictates the vertical alignment of the proposed 36 -inch gravity sewer. The proposed vertical
alignment of the sewer line through the mitigation parcel is 0.15 percent. At this grade, the top of
the 36 -inch sewer line would be approximately one foot below the creek bed at the crossing.
Due to the shallow depth of both Mango Creek crossings, they will require an open cut installation.
A relatively shallow bore would not allow for sufficient cover or depth under the creek to successfully
install a casing pipe. These crossings would require a 54 -inch casing pipe that would protrude
above the bottom of the creek bed. Based on geotechnical investigation, there is a sloping rock face
in the immediate vicinity of the proposed stream crossings. There is roughly 1 foot of partially
weathered rock 13 feet below grade over laying a layer of hard granite. The sloping face makes it
virtually impossible to successfully bore through rock on a consistent grade due to the tendency of
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 2 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

WITHERS II RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYOR5
the bore to follow the angle of the rock face. The geotechnical report also indicates that a
directional drill with these conditions will be extremely difficult. Several contractors have also been
consulted with regard to this crossing. The consensus is the creek cannot be bored successfully and
therefore open cut methods will be used.
Riparian buffer impacts have also been minimized by limiting the construction corridor to the
existing sewer easement as much as practical. Stream crossings are perpendicular to limit both
buffer and stream impacts. A minor amount of Zone 2 clearing will be required at Site 2 where the
alignment is constrained by the fill slope and bridge abutment of US -264.
Mitigation
Wetlands & Streams
Wetland and stream impacts for replacement of the sewer line are temporary and do not require
mitigation. Permanent wetland impacts from permanent conversion of forested wetlands to
herbaceous wetlands for a permanent maintenance corridor are less than o.10 acres and do not
require wetland mitigation.
Buffers
The proposed buffer impacts for sewer crossings are Allowable, and therefore, buffer mitigation is
not required.
The current request is for 0.52 acres of temporary wetland impacts, 161 if of temporary stream
impacts, 526 sq of permanent buffer impacts, 11,491 sq ft of temporary buffer impacts and o.o1
acres of permanent wetland conversion impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to call ifyou have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Quad Map & Wake County Soil Survey
• Previous 404 & 401 Permits
• Impact Exhibits
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 3 of 3
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

o�oF w a rF9o�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Mango Creek Interceptor Sewer Replacement
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Knightdale
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
N/A — Linear Project
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A — Linear Project
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: City of Raleigh
4b.
Name:
Aaron Brower — Construction Project Administrator
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
4d.
Street address:
PO Box 590
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27602
4f.
Telephone no.:
919 - 996 -3469
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
Aaron. Brower @raleighnc.gov
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e.
Telephone no.:
910 - 256 -9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910 - 256 -2584
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley @withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
N/A — Linear Project
South: Lat: 35.768561'N Long: - 78.539964 °W
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
North: Lat: 35.777728 °N Long: - 78.525922 °W
1 c. Property size:
N/A — Linear Project
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Mango Creek (Stream Index # 27 -32)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse - 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project corridor is primarily an existing sewer easement. It passes through a forested NCDOT mitigation parcel, then
runs adjacent to a rail corridor and residential development before crossing Mango Creek adjacent to Hodges Road.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.53 acres of wetlands within the proposed project corridor.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
161 If of stream within the proposed project corridor.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project purpose is to replace the existing sewer interceptor that is undersized and aging with a larger gravity sewer
line. this new gravity sewer line will enable the City of Raleigh to continue to provide sewer service to the Town of
Knightdale.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed sewer interceptor will be constructed adjacent to the existing line with minor deviations to minimize
impacts. The existing sewer easement will be used for construction and additional easement will be required due to the
sewer size and depth. The new easement will be 40 feet wide and will be retained by the City. All easements not to be
retained will be allowed to reforest. Standard construction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes F1 No F1 Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Carolina Ecosystems, LLC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Corps issued a Preliminary JD for the wetlands and streams within the project corridor in conjunction with the
previously issued NWP 12. A copy of the NWP 12 has been provided as an Appendix.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A NWP 29 (AID # 2011 - 01690) was issued on September 14, 2011. A
A 401 WQC and Buffer Authorization (DWQ Project # 11 -0767) was issued on October 14, 2011.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
This is the first planned phase of the replacement of the Mango Creek interceptor. Future phases are not currently
funded or designed.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
Impact Site 3
El P ®T
Excavation
Headwater
El Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.03 ac
Impact Site 4
El P ®T
Clearing /Excavation
Headwater
® Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.27 ac
Impact Site 5
El P ®T
Clearing /Excavation
Headwater
® Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.12 ac
Impact Site 6
El P ®T
Clearing /Excavation
Bottomland
® Yes
El
® Corps
® DWQ
0.03 ac
Impact Site 7
® P El T
Clearing /Excavation
Bottomland
® Yes
El
® Corps
® DWQ
0.01 ac
Impact Site 7
El El
Clearing /Excavation
Bottomland
® Yes
El No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.07 ac
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.53 ac
2h. Comments: Permanently cleared maintenance corridor will be limited to areas without current forested wetland with the
exception of Site 7. Remaining areas will be allowed to reforest or where already cleared for existing sewer line or other
activity.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact Site 1
❑P ®T
Excavate /Backfill
UT to Neuse River
❑ PER
®INT
® Corps
®DWQ
3'
47 If
Impact Site 2
❑P ®T
Excavate /Backfill
Mango Creek
® PER
❑INT
® Corps
®DWQ
20'
62 If
Impact Site 3
❑P ®T
Excavate /Backfill
Mango Creek
® PER
❑INT
® Corps
®DWQ
20'
52 If
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
161 If
3i. Comments: Both Mango Creek crossings and the UT are already disturbed by existing sewers or the inlets of culverts
under Hodge Road.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P)
or Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary (T)
impact
required?
Impact Site 1
❑P ®T
Clearing
UT to Neuse River
❑ Yes
®No
2125 sq ft
1208 sq ft
Impact Site 2
❑P ®T
Clearing
Mango Creek
❑ Yes
®No
1878 sq ft
3396 sq ft
Impact Site 7
❑P ®T
Clearing
Mango Creek
❑ Yes
®No
1350 sq ft
1534 sq ft
Impact Site 7
®P ❑T
Clearing
Mango Creek
❑ Yes
®No
310 sq ft
216 sq ft
6h. Total buffer impacts
5663 sq ft
6354 sq ft
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts based on forested buffer outside of existing maintained sewer corridor (already cleared).
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached cover letter for complete description. Sewer line replacement was chosen to reduce permanent impacts as
compared to a parallel line. The alignment minimizes uplands forest on the NCDOT mitigation parcel, riparian buffer, stream
and wetland impacts by avoiding undisturbed areas as much as possible.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction will be limited to areas shown through the use of orange tree protection and silt fencing at the limits of
disturbance. Stream crossings will be constructed using Portadams or similar technologies or in the dry in order to limit
downstream turbidity.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 8of11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes No
Comments: No discharge of stormwater will be created by the project.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The
proposed project will not result in
impervious surface that requires stormwater management.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The purpose of this project is to replace an existing sewer. While the sewer is being replaced to provide additional
capacity, the upstream sewer segments are not being upsized at this time and the area adjacent to this project is either
under development or preserved as part of ad NCDOT mitigation parcel.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This is part of the City of Raleigh sanitary sewer collection system and will ultimately discharge to the Neuse River
Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Existing NCNHP database search, site reference visit on Barwell Road and field reviews for Michaux's Sumac along
existing sewer corridor and roadsides. No occurrences of Michaux's Sumac were found within the project area. The
issuance of the previous permits document that the proposed project will not result in impacts to endangered species or
critical habitat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters in Wake County classified as EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places. Also, the entire project area has been disturbed previously by construction of roads
or sewers.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No change in contours is proposed as part of the project. Therefore, no impacts to flood plains will occur.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — W &R
Authorized Agent
3/18/13
Applicant /Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION

WITHERS & RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned municipality City of Raleigh, Public Utility Department_ (Client) does hereby
appoint Troy Beasley / Withers & Ravenel, Inc. _as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of
petitioning the appropriate local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army
Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands,
streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and /or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental
permit applications /requests for the Replacement of Mango Creek Interceptor Sewer.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests /applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
Troy Beasley / Withers & Ravenel. Inc.
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
Wilmington, NC 28403
Tel [phone]
Date:
Signature of Client:
Aaron Brower. Construction Proiect Administrator
(Name - Print (Title)
(Signature)
P.O. Box 590
Mailing Address
Raleigh North Carolina 27602
City State Zip
Phone: _ 919 996 73469
Email: Aaron. Browerc§raleighnc.gov
1 1 1 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511 i tel,: 919.469.3340 1 fax: [phone] www.withersrovenel.com I License
No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive i Suite 101 1 Wilmington, NC 28403 i tel: 910.256,9277 i fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G i Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

USGS QUAD MAP
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY

J,
GRAPHIC SCALE � 1 I
0 500 1000
r,,.
/�
/ �'w,.,r_ °•
~' f
ter=
1 inch = 1000 ft
�N.- ♦ •'
0
of
x ,3Q
.-
•
P iR
rk
.-`� ' ,'� .
:
EANGO CREEK INTERCEPTOR REPLACEMENT
DALE WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD MAP - RALEIGH EAST
WITHERS RAVENEL
EN•INEEEf 1 PLANNERS I lNEVEYOEf

GRAPHIC SCALE
0
500 1000
1 inch
= 1000 ft.
A B,.
}
LoD
Cm'
-
Anf�? if
j
AG,I:�
kaB
ApC
� ApD
Lo C
AP B
D
.aQ
ApC
APB u
: t'
X Apb :..
m,
a d
LaC�
r AoB
AA
f WgA
ApB2
QuC WgA
_ t� l
ApC Cm W �,
.Q , 'C.- i
Zak ,a . .. A D } .: Ly 1 �,
g } p m7 Ap(,2
w APC2 WaB
V
Ap
l WaA
' \-AP 2 }
v x ApC]
Lou s WaB
�1 ? ADA # INr7 r IF
1 W AaC2
Will"
�4�� D u �
B
ApC p Lo�
` G APB ( Woli A C''
P� fill
A' b f{ ,�
n
,► i Wo ! pL > W
o,,
Ir
APC2 ApD
A' r _ApD
A ApB2
. A ,,L,oc WkC Ap!
` ApC2 ApC2
APC2
A 7D LoD.
`' I CeC2 p -
L WkE
• ; APC2 LoD DUB ApP
LaD ArA`' i`., I LoD
,.� Apr Aft
Me
ApB2 WkE
ro ApB2
A €A ----
LoC • . Api7 Loo i.
w
Xm
MANGO CREEK INTERCEPTOR REPLACEMENT WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY -SHEET 60 WITHERS RAVENEL
ENYINEEEf 1 PLANNERS I lNEVEVOEf
KNIGHTDALE WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

PREVIOUS 404 NWP 12

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW- 2011 -01690 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- RALEIGH
EAST
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: City of Raleigh Agent: Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Aaron Brower Phil May
Address: One ExchanLye Plaza Suite 620 Address: 3040 NC 42 West
Raleigh, NC, 27602 Clayton, NC, 27520
919 - 857 -4540 919.606.1065
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc.): Existing sewer easement from the Neuse River
Siphon on the east side of the Neuse River at the powerline easement south of US 64/264 Bypass, to Hodge Road, at Mango
Creek, southwest of Knightdale, NC.. Latitude 35.773 Longitude - 78.532
Description of projects area and activity: Impact 0.53 acre of wetlands and 161 If of stream for sewerline installation.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 12 Utility Line Activities.
SEE ATTACHED NATIONWIDE AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated 8/5/2011. Any violation of the attached conditions
or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and /or
appropriate legal action.
Special Permit Condition: If riprap stabilization is needed, it should be placed only on the stream banks, or, if it is necessary
to be placed in the stream bed, the finished top elevation of the riprap should not exceed that of the original stream bed.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. Al] of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2012. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to carmnence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revolted, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terins and conditions of this nationwide permit.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management,
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Eric Alsmeyer t 919-5 -4§� ext. 23.
Corps Regulatory Official Date: 9/14/2011 Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2012
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http:// pert. nwp.usace.army.mil /survey.htnll to complete the survey
online.
Copy Furnished:

-0/1 7
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ® Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area (see att.). This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal
Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US and /or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation /determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation /determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the to al office he Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work,
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date 9/14/2011 . Expiration Date 9/14/2016.

Action ID Number: SAW - 2011 - 01690 County: wake
Permittee: City of Raleigh
Date Permit Issued:
Project Manager: Eric Alsmeyer
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADD ESS OF PERSON REESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Phil May CA�4F(0" C. lWe �
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
3040 NO 42 West
Clayton NO 27520
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME AND NUMBER: 'S,4"1J
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mango
Creek Sewer Interceptor Replacement - SITE 7 adjacent to Hodge Road
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:NC County /parish /borough: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/iong in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.7772 °
N, Long. - 78.5250 ° E.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Mango Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 100 linear feet: 15 width (ft) and /or 0.2 acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Perennial
Wetlands: 0.1 acres.
Cowardin Class: Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non - Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY): /
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: g/!
® Field Determination. Date(s): 5/12/2011
hy
�ecdalf���q�5s

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable, (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be "waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:lmpact maps with permit application.
Z Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
Z U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Raleigh East.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation :Wake County Soil Survey.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:Raleigh East.
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):Wake County 2008.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
� 4 k.
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

I// �� //
Estimated
amount of
Class of
Site
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
aquatic
aquatic
number
Class
resource in
resource
review area
1
35.7708
- 78.5361
R4
47 linear feet
non - section 10
— non - wetland
2
35.7732
- 78.5350
R2
62 linear feet
non - section 10
— non - wetland
3
35.7746
- 78.5341
PEM
0.03 acre
non - section 10
— wetland
4
35.7765
- 78.5285
PEM
0.27 acre
non - section 10
— wetland
5
35.7772
- 78.5272
PEM
0.12 acre
non - section 10
— wetland
6
35.7784
- 78.5255
PEM
0.03 acre
non - section 10
— wetland
7
35.7772
- 78.5250
PFO1 and
0.08 acre and
non - section 10
R2
52 linear feet
— wetland and
non- wetland
I// �� //

PREVIOUS 401 WQC &
BUFFER AUTHORIZATION

A2 V,
ILTIFWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 14, 2011
DWQ Project # 11 -0767
Wake County
Aaron Brower
City of Raleigh
One Exchange Plaza, Suite 620
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject Property: Mango Creek Interceptor Sewer Replacement
Mango Creek [030402, 27 -32, C; NSW]
UT to Neuse River [030402, 27- (22.5), C; NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Brower:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to fill or otherwise
impact 0.52 acre of wetland (temporary impact), 0.01 acre of wetland (permanent impact), 49 linear feet of
intermittent stream channel (temporary impact), 114 linear feet of perennial stream channel (temporary impacts),
4,632 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer (temporary impacts), 675 square feet of
Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer (permanent impact), 5,781 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse River
basin protected riparian buffer (temporary impact), 569 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse basin protected riparian
buffer (permanent impact) to replace an existing sewer interceptor that is undersized and aging with a larger sewer
line, as described in your application dated August 5, 2011 and received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
on August 9, 2011 and additional information dated September 13, 2011, October 11, 2011, and October 13,
2011. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number(s) 3819 (GC3819). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW 12
when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved
Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you
should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with
your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non - discharge regulations. Also,
this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your
application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. if you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of
stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval
requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed
below.
one
NhCarolina
Natura!!J
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper

Page 2
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions of
this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are approved including incidental
impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved Units
Plan Location or Reference
Wetland 404
0.52 acre) temporary impact
9-13-2011 PCN paore 5 of l 1
Wetland (404)
0.01 (acre) permanent impact
9 -13 -201 1 PCN page 5 of 1 1
Stream - intermittent
49 linear feet) temporary impact
10 -13 -2011 PCN page 5 of 11
Stream - perennial
114 (linear feet) temporary impact
10 -13 -2011 PCN vaae 5 of 1 1
Buffers Zone 1
4,632 (square feet temporary impact
10 -13 -2011 PCN page 7 of I 1
Buffers Zone 1
675 (square feet) permanent impact
10 -13 -2011 PCN page 7 of 1 1
Buffers Zone 2
5,781 (square feet ) temporary impact
10 -13 -2011 PCN page 7 of 11
Buffers Zone 2
569 s uare feet permanent impact
10 -13 -2011 PCN page 7 of 11
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All construction activities,
including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper
design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect
surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures
must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all
construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased
borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and /or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters without prior approval
from the Division. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, design and placement of temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in dis- equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream
and down stream of the above structures. All sediment and erosion control devices shall be removed and

Page 3
the natural grade restored within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Land Resources or locally
delegated program has released the project;
5. Diffuse Flow
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non - erosive velocities through the protected stream
buffers and will not re- concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 213
.0233(5)
6. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing (or
similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer,
wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15 NCAC 2H, Section
.0500.
7. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules,
and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to
the Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater, Compliance and Permitting Unit (WeBSCaPe), North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to
waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the
404 or CAMA Permit.
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the
petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is
considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The
Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and
5:00pm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed - provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -6714
Telephone: (919) -431 -3000, Facsimile: (919) -431 -3100
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Page 4
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
Unless such a petition is filed, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and
the Neuse River basin riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any
questions, please telephone Lauren Witherspoon, at 919 - 791 -4251
Sincer y, }
AY
Danny Si z
Surface Protection Section Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
Enclosures: GC 3819
Certificate of Completion
cc: Jamie Shern — USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Central Office — WeBSCaPe — 1650 Mail Service Center
RRO File Copy
DLR RRO
Phil May, Carolina Ecosystems, Inc., 3040 NC 42 West, Clayton, NC 27520
Filename: 11-0767—Mango Creek Intercptor Sewer Replacement_40l_NBR_Approval

IMPACT EXHIBITS

PROJECT SUMMARY
WETLANDS:
TEMPORARY 22,600 SF (0.519 AC)
WETLANDS IMPACTS
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
ZONE 1 5,663 SF (0.130 AC)
ZONE 2 6,354 SF (0.146 AC)
IN
. N,
X11 �� `�`- ^•. � /� � `..
♦ � 1�1
r/
1
1
I1
1
%-qw, I
SITE 1
rf j 1
1
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
L.F. 161 LF
AREA 3,153 SF (0.073 AC)
l — :fir• SITE 3 ♦ ` _ — — _
\ \`♦ 1� ::::::. ` —� — NS RAILROAD — —
SITE 2
ho
0
�mm p P pj-- pq
r� C► �� ,
1
SITE 4
a! Q
\ ► LL, s e
r II II 9'Pfc
r°
SITE 6
J.
Iffl
�i`tom ��•''•�•r;.
ti. t
.t -q• K.
• ,�; ws •?"� •�• •�•.• �:� ;:•'•'',',777777""""��•••.
SITE 7
\ \ 1 � Il'i r 1`\ . t` ♦ � i I
1
\ ♦ r
/
/
/
GRAPHIC SCALE
300 0 150 300 600
1 inch = 300 ft.
"°. Re's'°° Date I by 111 °e='g °e' I s-, Ill MANGO CREEK WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
W &R AS SHOWN SheetNO.
o,aw�B, o�e WITHERS RAVENEL
D,.,d� PAP ,obNO -29 -10 INTERCEPTOR SEWER REPLACEMENT ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS WE -1
W &R 020513as.03 Ralei h Wake count North Carolina OVERALL ALIGNMENT AND INDEX 111 M.- -Drive CZ North-ol -27511 [,1919- 469 -3340 lay: 91 4467 -6008. wthers,—e�om

\`. PROPOSED 36 —INCH SEWER / � N
!y7/
"'#
L ZONE 2 NRB
co /.�i :� W E
s
ZONE 1 NRB
Magnetic
ZONE 1 NRB POSED
40' EASEMENT
(30' EXISTING + 10' NEW)
ZONE 2 NRB
LIMITS OF STREAM
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA: "M
47 L.F.
/= ZONE 1
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA:
2,125 SQ. FT.
\ EX. WETLAND AREA —
ZONE 2 �
i
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA: I i
/ 1,208 SQ. FT.
/ PROPOSED 20' TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
EXISTING SEWER LINE AND
EASEMENT TO BE ABANDON
,
.. \
LEGEND
WETLANDS: TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY NONE L.F. 47 L.F.
WETLANDS IMPACTS
AREA 0 118 SF (0.003 AC)
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
ZONE 1 2,125 SF (0.049 AC)
ZONE 2 1,208 SF (0.028 AC)
EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON) GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS
EX. TOP OF BANK —
1 inch = 50 ft.
MANGO CREEK INTERCEPTOR WITHERS & R"ENEL
SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 1 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
City of Raleigh Wake County North Carolina

W E
►1
Magnetic
ZONE 1
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA:
5::,�oo 1,878 SO. FT. '
i
PROPOSED 10' TF�PORKRY
_ CONSZRUCTJW- EASEMENT
ZONE 2 NRBv i
/
/
I I
000
i
i
' S
i 5
i PROPOSED 36 -INCH SEWER
i
LIMITS OF STREAM
/ TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA:
995 SQ. FT.
n
ZONE 1 NRB
Kxx
i
ZONE 1 RB /
ZONE 2 NRB
(U$,264 w o
NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
1& 2
- -
-O TEMPOARY
�. CO CT .,
i11 1 *114
301-fl,
D.200
i� N
n
ZONE 2
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA:
3,396 SO. FT.
EXISTING SEWER LINE AND
iI EASEMENT TO BE ABANDON
LEGEND
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
ZONE 1 1,878 SF (0.043 AC)
ZONE 2 3,396 SF (0.078 AC)
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
L.F. 62 L.F.
AREA 0 995 SF (0.023 AC)
EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON) GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS
EX. TOP OF BANK -
1 inch = 50 ft.
MANGO CREEK INTERCEPTOR WITHERS & R"ENEL
SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 2 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
City of Raleigh Wake County North Carolina

N \
W E
s /CjS /
i
i
magnetic
CC-
PROPOSED 36 —INCH SEWER
/ i ol
PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
` \ ` ` / \ i ' SSA ism
PROPOSED � TEMPORARY / , � 5/�
CONSTRNC N\EASEMENT i SS/ o ,��\
i
,
N
PROPOStl5' 40' EASEME /
000 i A S6 - - \- (31�'EXISTING + 10
L
"o, \ -�i �� - LIMITS OF WETLANDS ONE
If QN�/ -
TEMPORARY IMPACTED AREA:.
1 86 S FT.
rte
� � H
/ EXISTING SEWER LINE AND /O pNE
pNE I� I EASEMENT TO BE ABANDON
i
oo
v
LEGEND
WETLANDS: TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY 1,386 SF (0.032 AC) L.F. NONE
WETLANDS IMPACTS
AREA 0 NONE
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
ZONE 1 NONE
ZONE 2 NONE
EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON) GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS
EX. TOP OF BANK 1 inch = 50 ft.
MANGO CREEK INTERCEPTOR WITHERS & R"ENEL
SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 3 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
City of Raleigh Wake County North Carolina

—OHE— —OHE— —OHE— 0
•
DHE OHf •/ ��
OHE � �i E
— — — — — — PROPOSED 20' TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
------------------- - - - - -- III -- — — — — — — — —
—OHE— I '6E— —OHE— —
—OHE— —OHE— — —OHE—
/ —OHE-
- - - -- — OHS- -7 ::: E_ _ j/ /f HE
OHE-
- — _ —OHE— —
RE
I I
— - - - -I-- ---- - - - - --
PROPOSED 36 —INCH SEWER
loo
L_ OWN
,rl,_
EXISTING SEWER LINE AND
EASEMENT TO BE ABANDON
i /
i
i
le
i
i
Lvn)I /
N �t� ' OHE— OHE
—OHE— ��E— •
• I I c
- —1 • •bHE� —OHE ,ogee -rOHE
I I .
+—�• �— HE— s— —,OHE— —OHE
HE— I• P
V) I•
�� � f� �� j�V� f�tt�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�t �t �ft ftftftffffffffffftfffffffffftfftf ►�f�f' '����t���'►'
. t��f�f�f�f�t�f�f�ftf�f�1� 'fMf�fflfff/ftAt,f� � ff�f•t �t��t��'
LIMITS OF WETLANDS
TEMPORARY IMPACTED AREA:
11,612 SO. FT.
LEGEND
WETLANDS:
TEMPORARY 11,612 SF (0.267 AC)
WETLANDS IMPACTS
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
ZONE 1 NONE
ZONE 2 NONE
PROPOSED 40' EASEMENT
(30' EXISTING + 10' NEW)
PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
L. F. NONE
AREA NONE
EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON) SS
NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
EX. TOP OF BANK //
1 inch = 50 ft.
"°. Re's'°° Date I by 111 oe=Igne s-, IIII MANGO CREEK Na
Drawn By CNH daze AS SHOWN Sheet
INTERCEPTOR SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 4 WITHERS R"ENEL
CNH JUNE 2011 4
checked By i0b N0. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
ML /PM 1 2061345.02 C of Ralei h Wake County North Carolina 111 Mx — ,Drive Cary, North C— l-27511 tel [phone]a:: 914467£008 www wlth -1 enelcnm
i
�
I
i
Lvn)I /
N �t� ' OHE— OHE
—OHE— ��E— •
• I I c
- —1 • •bHE� —OHE ,ogee -rOHE
I I .
+—�• �— HE— s— —,OHE— —OHE
HE— I• P
V) I•
�� � f� �� j�V� f�tt�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�f�t �t �ft ftftftffffffffffftfffffffffftfftf ►�f�f' '����t���'►'
. t��f�f�f�f�t�f�f�ftf�f�1� 'fMf�fflfff/ftAt,f� � ff�f•t �t��t��'
LIMITS OF WETLANDS
TEMPORARY IMPACTED AREA:
11,612 SO. FT.
LEGEND
WETLANDS:
TEMPORARY 11,612 SF (0.267 AC)
WETLANDS IMPACTS
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
ZONE 1 NONE
ZONE 2 NONE
PROPOSED 40' EASEMENT
(30' EXISTING + 10' NEW)
PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
L. F. NONE
AREA NONE
EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON) SS
NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
EX. TOP OF BANK //
1 inch = 50 ft.
"°. Re's'°° Date I by 111 oe=Igne s-, IIII MANGO CREEK Na
Drawn By CNH daze AS SHOWN Sheet
INTERCEPTOR SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 4 WITHERS R"ENEL
CNH JUNE 2011 4
checked By i0b N0. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
ML /PM 1 2061345.02 C of Ralei h Wake County North Carolina 111 Mx — ,Drive Cary, North C— l-27511 tel [phone]a:: 914467£008 www wlth -1 enelcnm

EXISTING SEWER LINE AND
EASEMENT TO BE ABANDON
(30' EXISTING + 10' NEW)
L LIMITS OF WETLANDS
TEMPORARY IMPACTED AREA:
5,008 SO. FT.
r Y-YY1 Y Y Y—�
c
LEGEND
WETLANDS: TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY 5,008 SF (0.115 AC) L.F. NONE
WETLANDS IMPACTS
AREA 0 NONE
EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON) -SS
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER: NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS
ZONE 1 NONE EX. TOP OF BANK //
ZONE 2 NONE GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
MANGO CREEK INTERCEPTOR WITHERS & R"ENEL
SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 5 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
City of Raleigh Wake County North Carolina
-OHE _
—OH1:—
-0 I 1
•
014E-
-OHE-
OVE
OHE-
'' - rOHE -�
,�-
•
PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
-
I 0
•
-OHE-
r
,
HE -,
-OHE-
,yes
• SEE
SITE 4
,
'
' • .
,
�-_J
•
PROPOSED
36 —INCH SEWER
'PROP
ED 20'
TEMPORARY
'
CODS RUCTION
EASEMENT
'
SS
SS
SS
SS
S—
—SS—
—
SS— — —SS—
— —
SS --®—
—SS
EXISTING SEWER LINE AND
EASEMENT TO BE ABANDON
(30' EXISTING + 10' NEW)
L LIMITS OF WETLANDS
TEMPORARY IMPACTED AREA:
5,008 SO. FT.
r Y-YY1 Y Y Y—�
c
LEGEND
WETLANDS: TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY 5,008 SF (0.115 AC) L.F. NONE
WETLANDS IMPACTS
AREA 0 NONE
EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON) -SS
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER: NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS
ZONE 1 NONE EX. TOP OF BANK //
ZONE 2 NONE GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
MANGO CREEK INTERCEPTOR WITHERS & R"ENEL
SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 5 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
City of Raleigh Wake County North Carolina

m �t � —OHE— — —OHE— —OHE —
—OHE— F
HE—
I I I �� s
� OHE— _ —OHE-
- -OH
w OHE-
OH _g_ —OHE—
1= I I PROPOSE 10' TEMPORAR6 _ —OHE— —OHE-
-0
0 E— E— COMTRUCfld� EASEMENT, TYP.
LIMITS OF WETLANDS
— _ TEMPORARY IMPACTED AREA: �_S�_ —SS-
1,216 SQ. FT. /
PROPOSED 36 —INCH SEWER J
ri
III
/ PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR
/ LIMITS OF WETLANDS •
T / / PERMANENT IMPACTED AREA: `
500 SQ. FT.
I
S
PROPOSED 40' EASE NT �..
LL� to - - -- - -- - -- -
�{ I �fEXISTING SEWER LINE AND
1�
–EASEMENT TO BE ABANDON
Ln
i t I i l r1
LEGEND
WETLANDS: TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY 1,714 SF (0.039 AC) L.F. NONE
WETLANDS IMPACTS
AREA 0 NONE
EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON) -SS
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER: NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS
ZONE 1 NONE EX. TOP OF BANK //
ZONE 2 NONE GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
MANGO CREEK INTERCEPTOR WITHERS & R"ENEL
SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 6 ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
City of Raleigh Wake County North Carolina

SEE SITE 6
I
� ` I
` � s ss♦
\v
I � 1
i ZONE 1
LIMITS OF STREAM
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA: / MPORARY IMPACT AREA:
1 1,660 SQ. FT. �\t040 SQ. FT. PERMANENT MAINTENANCE CORRIDOR L.F.
ZONE 2 ! I I NE 1
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA:
1,750 SQ. FT. 20NF , TpNF' .' PROPOSED 18 —INCH SEWER
t S SS
:v w
co
—0� I p ! i _ — —�— �— 7,w — — — — — —
_— —_— s.
CA
PROPOSED EASEMENT
� ` �. � � � 11 r � HODGE ROAD ` \
(VARYING WIDTH) �y0\
S �L S 1 — --'r — — —
-- fi�— `� S_ — — - - - -- -- —
SS Ste— �— —
I �— `LIMITS OF WETLANDS — — — —
1 OHE � ° 0 TEMPORARY IMPACTED AREA: — — —OHE— -
H 2,880 SO. FT.
I
LEGEND
WETLANDS:
TEMPORARY 2,880 SF (0.066 AC)
WETLANDS IMPACTS
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
L. F. 52 L.F.
AREA 2,040 SF (0.047 AC)
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
,,,,,,,,,, EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON)
ZONE 1 ,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�, 1,660 SF (0.038 AC)
\\ NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS
GRAPHIC SCALE
ZONE 2 1,750 SF (0.040 AC) 50 0 25 50 100
EX. TOP OF BANK //
1 inch = 50 ft.
"°. Re's'°° Date I by 111 oe=Igne s`a'e MANGO CREEK
Drawn a7 CNH daze AS SHOWN Sheet Na
INTERCEPTOR SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 7 WITHERS RAVENEL
CNH JUNE 2011 7
checked By i0b N0. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
ML /PM 1 2061345.02 C of Ralei h Wake County North Carolina 111 Mx — ,Drive Cary, North C— l-27511 tel [phone]a:: 914467£008 www wlth -1 enelcnm
YN"\ X
,
'
I
I
EXISTING
SEWER LINE AND
EASEMENT
TO BE ABANDON
i
I
Ln
LEGEND
WETLANDS:
TEMPORARY 2,880 SF (0.066 AC)
WETLANDS IMPACTS
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS:
L. F. 52 L.F.
AREA 2,040 SF (0.047 AC)
TEMPORARY NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER:
,,,,,,,,,, EXISTING SEWER (TO BE ABANDON)
ZONE 1 ,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�, 1,660 SF (0.038 AC)
\\ NEW SEWER ALIGNMENT SS
GRAPHIC SCALE
ZONE 2 1,750 SF (0.040 AC) 50 0 25 50 100
EX. TOP OF BANK //
1 inch = 50 ft.
"°. Re's'°° Date I by 111 oe=Igne s`a'e MANGO CREEK
Drawn a7 CNH daze AS SHOWN Sheet Na
INTERCEPTOR SEWER REPLACEMENT IMPACT SITE 7 WITHERS RAVENEL
CNH JUNE 2011 7
checked By i0b N0. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
ML /PM 1 2061345.02 C of Ralei h Wake County North Carolina 111 Mx — ,Drive Cary, North C— l-27511 tel [phone]a:: 914467£008 www wlth -1 enelcnm