20060952 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20130212

06
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Report — MY05
Orange and Durham Counties, NC
Basin 03030002 — Contract # D050011 -2
r.
�E o3
DENR -_WA' 8 C�UALlTY
eta Aranct
Submitted to:
Fo�l
Ecosystem
RECIV
D
%1. /12
ENHANu X CC)S.`STEAR
MENT PROGRAM
PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: November 2006
Data Collection: 2011
Submitted: December 2011

Monitoring and Design Firm
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.spiller(d),kci.com
KCI Project No: 12054252
Brown Farnn Wetland Restoration KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .,.....~~...~..-.....~~..~~~~.~.~~.~~.~~~~~....~.' D
1 Project Objectives ---. ' ......... . . ..... .... ...... . -'. '. ' '-' l
1-2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach -_. . -' - --' .l
13 Location and Setting ......... ....... -' - ......... . ...... .. .................. l
14 Project History and Background . ---_ ..... '.'... --- . .'.. . l
2.0 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS .......................... 6
2.1 Vegetation Assessment '--' ....... ... . - ' -. - --- . ...... ...... .... .6
LIST OF TABLES
Table l Project Restoration Components . --.--- .. --- ........ . .- J
Table Project Activity and Reporting EGotory.-.. ....... ... ..... ..... -. . '..-3
Table 3. Project Contact Table - ................. --.--' .- ........................ ...... 3
Table Project Background Table ' . ....... . .-' - .-. ... --- .. -. ......... .-3
Table Hydrologic Monitoring 0eaubs--- ..- ... .. ...... ... .-.- . ...'''6
Table 6 Hydroperiod History. ...--.. ----..--.-.... -- .- . --- M
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map -' .......... ...... .. ' .............. ... . -----. - -'. ..'2
Figure Site Map -. -' '-- -- .. . -- . '- ..... ... --' -- . '' ..'4
Figure 3. Monitoring Plan View - . . ...... .... . -- ---. - ...... . ... .....'5
APPENDIX A- VEGETATION DATA
APPENDIX B- HYDROLOGIC MONITORING AND HYDROPERDOD
APPENDIX C-PHOTO LOG
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration «o Associates offorth Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Brown Farm Wetland Restoration Project restored 24 6 acres and enhanced 3 3 acres of
nparian wetland New Hope Creek, which runs adjacent to the site, has a contributing drainage
area of 33 3 square miles (21,331 acres) at the downstream limits of the site and is located within
USGS 8 -digit HUC 03030002 and NCDWQ Sub -basin 03 -06 -05 of the Cape Fear River Basin
The 46 1 -acre project site is located on an active floodplain of New Hope Creek along the
Orange - Durham County line The restoration was completed to achieve the following objectives
• Restore aquatic /terrestrial habitat
• Improve water quality
• Increase groundwater recharge
• Enhance nutrient cycling
• Restore a native bottomland hardwood community
Project construction occurred in November 2006. Construction involved plugging and filling
ditches, installing level spreaders, and creating microtopography The site was planted with native
trees and shrubs common to Piedmont Bottomland Hardwood communities Following
construction and planting, baseline data collection occurred in February 2007 This report
describes the fifth year of monitoring that took place in 2011
Vegetation was planted at densities of approximately 436 and 100 -200 stems per acre in the
restored and enhanced wetlands, respectively Twenty vegetation plots are monitored to assess
planted vegetation survivability, growth, and vigor The fifth year of monitoring counted an
average of 310 planted stems /acre, with the site averaging 2,284 total stems /acre, which includes
woody volunteers in the monitoring plots excluding red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum
(Llguidambar styraciflua) Supplemental planting with large stock bare root trees was conducted
at the site in the winter of 2009/2010 An assessment of the site's vegetation found Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora) on the outskirts of the site with sparsely scattered Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza
cuneata) and thistle (Cirsium sp ) observed in the site Fifth -year monitonng found the vegetation
component of the project to be on track to meeting the success criteria
The hydrology success criterion states that groundwater must be within 12 inches of the soil
surface in excess of 12 consecutive days (5% of the growing season) at each well During 2011,
wetland hydrology was achieved at all seven wells in the restoration area, with all having
hydroperiods longer than 12 5% of the growing season
The daily rainfall data depicted on the gauge data graphs were obtained from the on -site
precipitation gauge The precipitation gauge was installed in 2006 prior to project
implementation Daily rainfall data were obtained from the State Climate Office of North
Carolina for Durham, North Carolina to confine on -site precipitation data The combined
precipitation data show that the site experienced normal precipitation during the 2011 growing
season
Site photographs were taken from permanent photo points established throughout the site Photo
documentation facilitates the qualitative evaluation of wetland conditions The photo point
locations were selected in order to document representative site conditions
The results of the fifth year of monitoring of the Brown Farm Wetland Restoration Project
indicate that the site has met the project's success criteria
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Project Objectives
• Restore aquatic /terrestrial wildlife habitat
• Improve water quality
• Increase groundwater recharge
• Enhance nutrient cycling
• Restore a native bottomland hardwood community
1.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type, and Approach
Before restoration, the land use was primarily agricultural for at least the past 50 years The wetland was
restored by plugging and filling drainage ditches throughout the site, removing ditch spoil from wooded
areas to restore natural drainage patterns, placing water diversion features to redistribute the surface
hydrology, recreating microtopography across the site to enhance surface water retention and storage, and
planting the site with Piedmont Bottomland Hardwood Forest species.
1.3 Location and Setting
The Brown Farm Wetland Restoration Site is located within the 03030002 (Upper Cape Fear 02)
Watershed Cataloging Unit (8 -digit HUC) and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Sub -
basin 03 -06 -05 (Figure 1) New Hope Creek, which runs adjacent to the site, has a contributing drainage
area of 33 3 square miles (21,331 acres) at the downstream limits of the project Jordan Lake is
approximately 11 miles downstream of the site The project watershed is located within the Piedmont
physiographic province and is part of the Triassic Basins Level IV Ecoregion
1.4 Project History and Background
Table 1. Protect Restoration Components
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
0
0
Z.
OD 2
b0
Segment / Reach iD
w
F
Q
Q
g
g
Brown Farm
246
R
-
246
1 1 0
1 246
Brown Farm
33
E
-
33
1 05
1 7
Mitigation Unit Summations
Riparian
Nonripanan
Total
Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
Buffer
Stream (If)
(Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
(Ac)
Comment
263
R = Restoration E = Enhancement
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KC/Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 1 2011 - MY05

6
I . 4 , -
ORANGE D F
COUNTY O
•
•
r
■ `
We
1
211,W600A
•
64 b
�i
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Project Location Major Roads
Major Streams and Rivers Other Roads KCI
w�
Lakes and Reservoirs
s . ASSOCIATES OF NC
Municipalities 1:63,360
K C I 1 inch equals 1 miles
Counties 1 0.5 0 1
TECHNOLOGIES 111Ics ENVIRONMEMAL TECHNOLOGIES
AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Protect Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
May 06
Jun 06
Construction
N/A
Nov 06
Mitigation Plan
Feb 07
Mar 07
Year 1 Monitoring
Sep 07
Nov 07
Herbicide Sprayed for Invasive Species Control
N/A
Jun 08
Year 2 Monitoring
Sep 08
Dec 08
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 09
Dec 09
Supplemental Planting
Feb 10
Feb 10
Year 4 Monitoring
Oct 10
Dec 10
Year 5 Monitoring
Aug 11
Dec 11
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Design, Monitoring, and
KCI Associates of NC
Maintenance Firm
Landmark Center 11, Suite 220
17%
4601 Six Forks Rd
Piedmont
Raleigh, NC 27609
Triassic Basin
Contact Mr Adam Spiller
Wehadkee
Phone [phone]
03030002
Fax [phone]
Construction Contractor
KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction, Inc
65%
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Nursery
Cill Ide Native Plant Nursery
621 Starburst Lane
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact Mr George T Swearingen
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Project County
Durham and Orange Counties
Project Area
46 1 Acres
Draina a im ervious cover
17%
Phystographic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Triassic Basin
Dominant soil types
Wehadkee
USGS HUC for project and reference
03030002
NCDWQ Sub -basin for project and reference
03 -06 -05
of project easement fenced
65%
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates offorth Carolina
Basin 03030002 3 2011 - MY05

.LLB If., 1(, \I I
1
i
gas
o �
cl
°
N o
aim
IFyn
8
v
Z
R =
6 BROWN FARM —NEW HOPE CREEK
; � WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECT
ORANGE I DURHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
E wcno•R� sxs•ccaa'is
.sum eons oo. wrr'.I.s
,,[[,�YN CClll
�dlllil'f'IIIEIlf
°'°
REVWN5

2.0 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
The site is immediately adjacent to well - developed wetlands within the New Hope Creek floodplam with
extensive wetland vegetation These surrounding areas have helped seed the site, contributing to a large
number of volunteers in the monitoring plots There was an increase in the site average of planted
stems /acre during the fifth monitoring year This reflects the addition of planted trees during the 2010
monitoring year as well as trees that had been counted as dead resprouting The mortality of the planted
stems is primanly related to deer browse and competition from dense herbaceous vegetation The volunteer
plants that were counted during the 2011 monitoring include green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica),
buttonbush (Cephalanthus occldentahs), willow oak (Quercus phellos), cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda),
overcup oak (Quercus lyrata), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), American elm (Ulmus
americana), sycamore (Platanus occidentahs), eastern baccharis ( Baccharis hahmifoha), and slippery elm
(Ulmus rubra) Red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum (Liquidambar sdyraciflua) were also counted, but
since they are common successional species, they were not included in the density calculations for this
report The fifth year of monitoring found an average of 310 planted stems /acre and 2,284 total stems /acre
for the site based on the monitored vegetation plots Even though there has been some mortality of the
planted stems, the site is on track to meeting the vegetation success criterion
The qualitative vegetation assessment of the site found that there were many woody stems throughout the
site and that there is a healthy mix of wetland herbaceous vegetation covering the site as well For
additional data on the counted stems, volunteer stems, and photos of the vegetation plots, see Appendix A
2.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment Tables
Table 5. Hydrologic Monitoring Results
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Well #
H dro eriod
Dates Meeting Success
<5%
5%-8%
8%-12.5%
>12.5%
Max. No. of
Consecutive Days
1
13%
13%
15%
X
40
3/24/11 - 5/3/11
2
24%
35%
44%
X
126
3/24/11 - 7/28/11
3
7%
32%
43%
X
60
3/24/11 - 5/22/11
4
5%
15%
18%
X
37
3/24/11-4/29/11
5
12%
1 34%
45%
X
92
3/24/11 - 6/24/11
6
8%
30%
26%
X
64
3/24/11 - 5/26/11
7
9%
30%
1
29%
X
79
3/24/11- 6/10/11
Ref, Wetland
6%
20%
16%
16%
3
Gauge Malfunction
Table 6. Hydroperiod History
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Well #
Pre - Restoration
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
1
<5%
13%
13%
15%
6%
18%
2
<5%
24%
35%
44%
19%
56%
3
<5%
7%
32%
43%
21%
27%
4
<5%
5%
15%
18%
9%
16%
5
1 <5%
12%
1 34%
45%
19%
41%
6
<5%
8%
30%
26%
14%
28%
7
<5%
9%
30%
1
29%
16%
35%
Ref. Well
6%
20%
16%
16%
* Gauge Malfunction
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KC/Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 6 2011 - MY05

The wetland wells used to monitor site hydrology were installed in early 2007 The maximum number of
consecutive days that the groundwater was within 12 inches of the surface was determined for each
groundwater gauge This number was converted into a percentage of the 223 -day growing season Wetland
hydrology was achieved at all of the gauges on the site in 2011 (Table 5) Based on these data, the site has
exceeded the minimum duration of 12 consecutive days with the water table within 12 inches of the soil
surface for the 2011 growing season (Appendix B) In addition, all of the gauges exceeded 12 5%
saturation Table 5 presents the hydrological monitoring results for 2011 Climatic data for the 2011
growing season were analyzed in comparison to histoncal data to determine whether 2011 was a normal
year in terms of climatic conditions as a precursor to validating the results of the wetland monitoring The
histoncal data were collected from the NRCS, Water and Climate Center, "Climate Analysis for Wetlands
by County" website This evaluation concluded that 2011 was a normal year for rainfall during the growing
season Rainfall was within the 30'' to 70`h percentiles for the months of February, March, April, June, July,
August, October, and November Rainfall was less than the 306' percentile threshold in January and was
greater than the 70th percentile threshold in May and September (Appendix B)
To illustrate that the site is a nverine system, a stream gauge was installed on New Hope Creek to
document overbank flooding This gauge was installed in February 2008 Since installation, the gauge has
recorded 40 overbank flooding events (over 253 8' elevation) These events typically flood approximately
75% or more of the site
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KC1 Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 7 2011 - MY05

Appendix A
Vegetation Data
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KC! Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

Appendix A - Vegetation Data Tables
Table Al. Planted stem counts for each species arranged by plot
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Species
Plots
Initial Totals
Year 5 Totals
Survival %+
1-1
2
1 3
1 4+
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 8
9
10
Trees
iospyros virginiana
1
1
1
1
6
1
2
3
1
1
100%
raxinus penmylvanica
6
3
5
4
1
3
1
23
23
100%
iriodendron tulip fera
6
0
0%
Quercus laurfolia
1
1
1
2
7
4
57%
Quercus lyrata
1
4
1 2
2
2
1
1
4
1 9
12
133%
Quercus michauxii
1
5
1 3
1
1
4
2
1
1
23
15
65%
Quercus pagoda
1
1
3
3
2
1
2
1
2
2
23
17
74%
Quercus phellos
2
6
1
2
9
5
1 56%
Un nown
44
0
1 0%
*Plot 1 was moved in MY02 +Additional trees from February'10 supplemental planting
Table Al cont. Planted stem counts for each species arranged by plot
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Species
Plots
Initial Totals
Year 5 Totals
Survival %
11
12
13
14
15
16+
17
18
19+
20
Trees
raxinus pennsylvanica
1
2
1
1
6
1
2
3
25
17
68%
iriodendron tulipifera
5
0
0%
yssa sylvatica
1
0
0%
Quercus laur folia
1
1
7
2
29%
Quercus lyrata
6
3
4
3
4
1
4
4
28
29
104%
Quercus michauxii
1
1
2
2
1
1
8
8
100%
Quercus pagoda
3
5
3
1
3
1
22
16
73%
Quercus phellos
6
8
6
75%
Unknown
30
0
0%
Additional trees from February '10 supplemental planting
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCt Associates ojNorth Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

Table A2. Planted Stem Density By Plot
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Date : 8/4/11 to 8/9/11
Crew: T Seelmger, A Helms
R
Q
v
a
Q
a+
d
tq 01
61 0i
0!
C
Plot #
a a
u �`
F .,
3 �'
.� a
>
o 01
Ch o
u a
3 a
F
o
1
6
1
1
1
9
360
2
1
3
4
5
1
14
560
3
2
3
3
2
10
400
4
2
1
3
6
240
5
5
2
2
9
360
6
4
1
1
6
240
7
1
1
1
4
2
1
10
400
8
0
0
9
3
1
2
6
240
10
1
2
2
2
7
280
11
1
1
6
1
3
12
480
12
2
3
5
200
13
1
4
1
5
11
440
14
3
3
120
15
4
4
160
16
1
2
3
6
12
480
17
6
1
7
280
18
1
2
1
4
160
19
2
1
4
1
3
11
440
20
3
4
1
1
9
360
Total Average Densityl
310
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KC/ Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

Table A3. Vegetation History: Stems /Acre Planted and Total with Volunteers
Project Name: Brown Farm Wetland Restoration
Plot #
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
planted
planted
planted
planted
total
planted
I total
planted
total
1
640
560
360
360
400
360
360
360
600
2
760
720
600
600
800
600
640
560
1,760
3
680
560
520
440
1,040
400
960
400
2,040
4
520
240
240
120
1,120
240
1,720
240
5,400
5
640
520
360
360
560
360
560
360
1,880
6
400
320
160
160
800
240
880
240
3,800
7
680
680
480
400
960
400
920
400
1,840
8
560
280
80
0
840
0
640
0
3,480
9
440
360
280
240
840
240
920
240
1,360
10
480
480
320
320
520
320
1,680
280
3,440
11
640
520
480
480
680
480
1,040
480
4,280
12
520
240
200
200
240
200
480
200
920
13
640
560
480
480
1,200
440
1,280
440
1,560
14
720
480
400
160
720
120
1,280
120
3,080
15
320
320
200
160
360
160
1,080
160
2,120
16
480
440
320
320
480
480
880
480
920
17
600
560
520
520
1,760
280
1,920
280
1,680
18
320
280
160
160
2,000
160
1,520
160
2,120
19
480
480
260
240
320
280
360
440
640
20
640
600
520
440
1,920
440
1,920
360
2,760
Site Average
558
460
347
308
878
310
1,052
310
2,284
Notes -Plot I was moved in monitoring year 02
-Total stems includes all volunteer woody stems except for red maple (Acer rubrum )
and sweetgum (Ltgutdambar styraciva )
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 1 Date: 8/5/2011
Plot Map
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
•9
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
8
4
2
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytvanica)
•
7
3
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytivanica )
073
•
•4
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu)
1 03
4
•6
5
Cherry bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 58
4
•3
Green Ash Fraxmus perinsytivanica )
062
•5
Browsed
2
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytyanica
089
4
Browsed
8
Green Ash Fraxinus nns Ivanica
060
4
Browsed
9
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytvanica)
045
3
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
246
4
2
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytvanica)
164
4
3
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytivanica )
073
4
4
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu)
1 03
4
Top died back
5
Cherry bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 58
4
6
Green Ash Fraxmus perinsytivanica )
062
4
Browsed
7
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytyanica
089
4
Browsed
8
Green Ash Fraxinus nns Ivanica
060
4
Browsed
9
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsytvanica)
045
3
`Plot was moveo in myuz vigor 4= excenent, 3=g000 z- 0leaK, t= unuKery to survive yeas

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
66.7%
Overcu Oak Quercus) rata
11.1%
Southern Red Oak Quercus falcata
11.1%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
11.1%
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
2
1
Eastern Baccharis Baccharis halimifolia
1
Density:
Total Number of 9
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 360 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 15 0.025 acres = 600
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 9 x 100 = 100
Planted Stems 9 trees
stems / acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>1502m_
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
1
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
2
1
Eastern Baccharis Baccharis halimifolia
1
Eastern Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua)
1
Total
1 4
1 2
1
1 1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 2 Date 8/5/2011
Plot Map
• 4
• 5
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
• 6
• 11
3
•3
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu)
205
4
• 16
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
208
• 12
4
Overcup Oak (Quercus l rata )
X10
4
•2
X7
129
4
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxa)
1 12
4
15 17
7
• 8
•9
18
•
8
Green Ash Fraxinus nns Ivamca
053
4
X
• 1
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxa
4 00'
• 13
14 19
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Green Ash Fraxinus nns Ivamca
065
3
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu)
205
4
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
208
4
4
Overcup Oak (Quercus l rata )
164
4
5
Overcup Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
129
4
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxa)
1 12
4
7
Swam Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
Dead
8
Green Ash Fraxinus nns Ivamca
053
4
9
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxa
4 00'
4
10
Unknown
Dead
11
lGreen Ash (Frawnus nnsylvamca)
028
3
Top died, browsed
12
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
1 32
4
13
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
1 93
4
14
Unknown
Dead
15
Green Ash Fraxmus nns Ivamca )
Missing
16
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
204
4
17
Persimmon (Djospyros wrginiana)
229
4
18
Overcup Oak (Quercus 1 rata )
1 32
4
19
Unknown
Dead
"= estimated Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
21.4%
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
28.6%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
35.7%
Persimmon (Diospyros vir iniana
7.1%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
7.1%
4
1
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
1
2
Density:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 14 0.025 acres = 560 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 44 0.025 acres = 1760
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 14 x 100 = 74
Planted Stems 19 trees
stems / acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
8
4
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica)
9
4
1
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
1
2
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
2
Total
21
10
1 1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 3 Date 8/5/2011
Photo
Point
Plot Map
5
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
188
014
X4
Unknown
I
0 15
3
X6
1 33
4
4
Unknown
13
Dead
• 3
Willow Oak (Querous phellos)
069
16
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxo
12
Dead
7
e 7
048
X11
X2
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxu)
Missing
9
Unknown
010
� 17
e 1
Overcu Oak Querous lyrata
1 35
4
11
• 8
Dead
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
188
4
2
Unknown
I
Dead
3
Overcu Oak Querous lyrata
1 33
4
4
Unknown
Dead
5
Willow Oak (Querous phellos)
069
3
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxo
Dead
7
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
048
1
8
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxu)
Missing
9
Unknown
Dead
10
Overcu Oak Querous lyrata
1 35
4
11
Unknown
Dead
12
Willow Oak Querous hellos
241
4
13
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxu)
jDead
14
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxu)
1 35
4
15
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxn)
070
4
16
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxii)
1 03
4
17
lCherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
1 32
4
Vigor 4= excellent 3 =good 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
20.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
30.0%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
30.0%
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
20.0%
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
3
6
2
Slippery Elm (Ulmus rubra)
5
6
Density:
Total Number of 10
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 4.00 stems I acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 51 0.025 acres = 2040 stems / acre
• This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 10 17 trees x 100 = 59 % survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis)
4
14
1
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
3
6
2
Slippery Elm (Ulmus rubra)
5
6
weetgum iqul am ar s yracl ua
1
Total
12
27
3

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot. 4 Date- 8/4/2011
Plot Mag
ck�
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
X 6
X7
Vigor
Comment
1
4
8>4
Dead
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
Xg
3
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
1 59
10 •
4
• 3
13
•
5
• 14
Dead
X1
X2
15
11
12 •
7
Tulip Po lar Linodendron tub Gera
•
Dead
ck�
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Unknown
Dead
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
Dead
3
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
1 59
4
4
Unknown
Dead
5
Unknown
Dead
6
jUnknown
Dead
7
Tulip Po lar Linodendron tub Gera
Dead
8
Unknown
Dead
9
Unknown
Dead
10
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxrr)
1 72
4
11
Unknown
Dead
12
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
192
4
Browsed
13
lCherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
1 35
4
14
Overcu Oak Quercus I eta
078
4
Browsed
15
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 05
4
Vigor a= exceuent 3 =goon, 2 =WeaK, i= unliKeiy to survive yeai

Species
Percent of Total
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
50.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
16.7%
Overcu Oak (Quercus 1 rata )
33.3%
24
1
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
7
9
4
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
1
4
Density:
Total Number of s
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 240 stems / acre
Total Number of
Desirablestems' 135 / 0.025 acres = 5400 stems I acre
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 6 / 15 trees x 100 = 40 % survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
22
54
24
1
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
7
9
4
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
1
4
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1
Red Maple Acer rubrum
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
Total
30
1 69
1 31
1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 5 Date 8/5/2011
Plot Map
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
• 13
• 12
1
W6
• 15
Dead
2
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
x11
3
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
051
• 14
4
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica
•g
4
Browsed
5
X8
073
4
•7
Unknown
Dead
7
Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata)
117
5 •
8
Unknown
4 •
9
1x
1 31
4
.3
10
Unknown
2
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Unknown
Dead
2
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
Dead
3
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
051
4
4
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica
078
4
Browsed
5
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica
073
4
6
Unknown
Dead
7
Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata)
117
4
8
Unknown
Dead
9
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
1 31
4
10
Unknown
Dead
11
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
IDead
12
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 75
4
13
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
069
4
14
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsytyanica
082
4
Browsed
15
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
166
4
16
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to surwve year

Species
Percent of Total
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
22.2%
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica)
55.6%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
22.2%
3
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
1
Total
8
27
Density:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 9 0.025 acres = 360 stems / acre
Total Number of —
DesirableStems* 47 0.025 acres — 188O
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 9 x 100 = 56
Planted Stems 16 trees
stems / acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus penn s Ivanica
8
26
3
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
1
Total
8
27
3

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 6 Date
Plot Map
8/5/2011
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
X4
Height (m)
Vigor
0
1
3
076
3
2
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
•5
4
.9
3
Tulip Poplar (Linodendron tulipifera)
2
• •6
•8
4
•1
X
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
076
3
2
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 09
4
3
Tulip Poplar (Linodendron tulipifera)
Dead
4
Unknown
Dead
5
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
1 38
1 4
6
Green Ash Fraxinus enns vanica)
120
4
7
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxn)
Dead
8
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsytvanica)
085
4
Top died, browsed
9
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxii)
079
4
10
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent 3 =good, 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash (Fraxinus eons Ivanica)
66.7%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii)
16.7%
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
16.7%
15
6
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubs
5
6
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
Density:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 6 / 0.025 acres = 240
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 95 / 0.025 acres = 3800
• This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Ater rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
stems / acre
stems I acre
/ 10 trees x 100 = 60 % survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
12
41
15
6
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubs
5
6
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
1
Eastern Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
1
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
1
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
1
Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
1
Total
19
1 50
1 17
1 6

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 7 Date 8/9/2011
Plot Map
• 6
X 7
8
Vigor
17
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
1 77
e 9
Y16
2
X5
� 10
Dead
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
076
4
•
15
4
3
�L 2
217
e 14
5
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
13
6
� 1
2 05
All
7
lWillow Oak Quercus hellos
12 x
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
1 77
4
2
Wilow Oak (Quercus hellos)
Dead
3
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
076
4
4
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfoha)
217
4
5
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
Dead
6
ISwarrip Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
2 05
4
7
lWillow Oak Quercus hellos
Dead
8
Laurel Oak Quercus launfoha
Dead
9
Willow Oak Quercus phellos
1 98
4
10
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
1 75
4
11
Unknown
Dead
12
Green Ash (Fraxinus nnsylvamca)
Dead
13
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii)
1 38
4
14
lCherrybark Oak Quercus oda
1 28
4
15
Cherry bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
137
4
16
Unknown
Dead
17
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica)
141
4
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =g000I z =weaK, i = unlarery to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
10.0%
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
10.0%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
20.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
40.0%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
10.0%
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
10.0%
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
1
Density:
Total Number of 10
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 400 stems f acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems* 46 0.025 acres = 1840
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 10 X 100 = 59
Planted Stems 17 trees
stems I acre
%survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
5
2
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica)
5
19
3
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
1
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
1
Total
5
25
5
1

Site Brown
1d
Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Plot 8 Date 8/5/2011
Plot Map
10
X12
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Unknown
X14
X9
x 11
1%
Dead
3
Unknown
X6
Dead
X8
X
X5
Dead
5
Unknown
Dead
X1
)(2
Dead
7
Unknown
X4
Dead
8
Unknown
3
Dead
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Unknown
Dead
2
Unknown
Dead
3
Unknown
Dead
4
Unknown
Dead
5
Unknown
Dead
6
Unknown
Dead
7
Unknown
Dead
8
Unknown
Dead
9
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfolia)
Dead
10
Unknown
Dead
11
Unknown
Dead
12
jUnknown
Dead
13
Unknown
Dead
14
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauwi
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, t=weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Density:
Total Number of Q
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 0 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 87 0.025 acres = 3480 stems / acre
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum), and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciNua )
Survivability:
Total Number of Q
Planted Stems
14 trees X 100 = Q % survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
13
12
Eastern Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
1
Slippery Elm (Ulmus rubra)
23
7
4
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
6
13
6
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii)
1
Sweet um (Liquidambarstyraciflua)
1
Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
2
1
Total
33
34
24

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot
s
Plot Map
Date 8/4/2011
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
X10
•
g
Vigor
8
11
Green Ash Fraxinus nns lvanica
076
4
Browsed
2
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
Dead
3
Unknown
6
7
4
5
Dead
5
Green Ash (Fraxmus pennsylvanica )
X4
4
Browsed, top died
�1
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1 03
4
2X
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Green Ash Fraxinus nns lvanica
076
4
Browsed
2
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
Dead
3
Unknown
Dead
4
Unknown
Dead
5
Green Ash (Fraxmus pennsylvanica )
058
4
Browsed, top died
6
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1 03
4
7
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsytyanica
1 54
4
8
Unknown
Dead
9
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfolia)
1 50
4
10
Unknown
Dead
11
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1 26
4
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash (Fraxinus enns Ivanica )
50.0%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
16.7%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
33.3%
4
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis)
3
American Elm Ulmus americans
1
1
Density:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 240 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems" 34 0.025 acres = 1 360 stems / acre
" This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraci/lua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 6
Planted Stems
11 trees X 100 = 55 % survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
7
12
4
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis)
3
American Elm Ulmus americans
1
1
Red Maple Acerrubrum
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
2
4
Total
9
r 18
8

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site- Brown Plot 10 Date-
Plot Map
di-, -
PVC
Marker
8/9/2011
• 10
11 •
Height (m)
Vigor
12
1
X9
090
• 8
2
Unknown
7
Dead
3
•6
1[5
• 4
3.
4
Willow Oak (Quervus hellos)
165
x2
•1
Unknown
Dead
Photo
Point
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Laurel Oak Quercus lawrfoha
090
4
2
Unknown
Dead
3
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1 89
4
4
Willow Oak (Quervus hellos)
165
4
5
Unknown
Dead
6
Willow Oak Quercus phellos)
208
4
7
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
063
4
8
Green Ash Fraxinus nns Ivanica)
074
3
Res rout
9
Willow Oak Quercus phellos)
Dead
10
Laurel Oak Quercus launfoha)
144
4
11
lGreen Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
Missing
12
Unknown
jDead
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2--weak, 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
28.6%
Green Ash (Fraxinus penns Ivanica )
14.3%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
28.6%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
28.6%
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
7
4
2
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1
Density:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 7 0.025 acres = 280 stems / acre
Total Number of 86 0.025 acres = 3440 stems / acre
DesirableStems'
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 7 ,
Planted Stems
12 trees x 100 = 58 % survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica)
23
31
8
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
7
4
2
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1
Eastern Sycamore Platanus occidentalis)
1
2
Red Maple Acerrubrum
1
1
Chinese Privet Li ustrum sinense
2
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1 2
1
1 1
Total
32
1 43
1 10
1 1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 11 Date 8/9/2011
Plot Map
go
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
• 16
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
C herrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1 49
4
X15
2
• 13
14
4
• 12
x 11
2 90'
4
4
Overcu Oak (Quercus lyrata)
•7 X
4
•5
5
lCherrybark Oak (Quercus agoda)
6
4
6
•9
Dead
7
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
010
4
• 8
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
215
4
9
Green Ash (Fraxrnus pennsylvamca)
063
4
•4
10
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfola)
• 1
4
3
11
Unknown
•2
•
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
C herrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1 49
4
2
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxa)
124
4
3
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
2 90'
4
4
Overcu Oak (Quercus lyrata)
253
4
5
lCherrybark Oak (Quercus agoda)
142
4
6
Unknown
Dead
7
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
204
4
8
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
215
4
9
Green Ash (Fraxrnus pennsylvamca)
063
4
Top died
10
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfola)
161
4
11
Unknown
Dead
12
10vercup Oak (Quercus I rata)
168
4
13
10vercup Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
1 32
4
14
Unknown
Dead
15
Unknown
Dead
16
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata)
128
4
-=estlmatea Vigor 4= excellent 3 =good t=weak 1= unlikely to surnve year

Species
Percent of Total
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
50.0%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica )
8.3%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
8.3%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
25.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
8.3%
1
Greem Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
29
27
Density:
Total Number of ,� 2
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 480 stems / acre
Total Number of 107 0.025 acres = 4280 stems / acre
DesirableStems•
" This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 12 16 trees X 100
ti
75 %survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
1.09
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
5
5
9
3
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
1
Greem Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
29
27
6
75 %survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
5
5
9
3
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
1
Greem Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
29
27
6
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
10
Red Maple Acer rubrum
7
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
1
Total
51
1 33
17
1 3

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot- 12 Date 8/5/2011
Photo
Point
Plot Mao
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
•13
12
Tulip Poplar Lmodendron tuh rfera
-
Dead
2
11 •
Dead
3
Unknown
10
X9
4
Unknown
•6
Dead
5
Unknown
•7
6 •
6
5x
097
4
7
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
1 95
4
8
Overcu Oak Quereus 1 rata
X2
4
9
Unknown
3
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Tulip Poplar Lmodendron tuh rfera
-
Dead
2
Unknown
Dead
3
Unknown
Dead
4
Unknown
Dead
5
Unknown
Dead
6
Green Ash Frdxrnus pennsylvanica
097
4
7
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
1 95
4
8
Overcu Oak Quereus 1 rata
211
4
9
Unknown
Dead
10
Unknown
Dead
11
Overcu Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
210
4
12
Unknown
Dead
13
Green Ash Fraxrnus pennsytyanica
083
3
Browsed
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good, tweak, 1= unlikey to survive year

Green Ash
Density:
Total Number of 5
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 200 stems / acre
Total Number of 23 0.025 acres = 920
DesirableStems•
• This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 5
Planted Stems
13 trees x 100 = 38
stems / acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
3
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
2
2
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata)
2
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
1
4
Black Willow Salix ni ra
1
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfolia)
2
Total
5
1 11
1 2

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot: 13 Date 8/5/2011
Plot Man
13 •
Species
Height (m)
I5x
16
1
Overcu Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
14 4
4
2
12 •
3 80'
4
3
• 8
3 70'
10
4
Unknown
•
Dead
5
Tulip Poplar (Linodendron tul pifera)
11 g
Dead
6
Unknown
6X
Dead
7
•2
239
X 5
8
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu
3
4
9
Overcu Oak (Quercus lyrata )
•
4
1 •
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica
065
1
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
252
4
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
3 80'
4
3
Overcup Oak (Quercus 1 rata)
3 70'
4
4
Unknown
Dead
5
Tulip Poplar (Linodendron tul pifera)
Dead
6
Unknown
Dead
7
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda
239
4
8
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu
298
4
9
Overcu Oak (Quercus lyrata )
3 00'
4
10
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica
065
1
11
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
1 91
4
12
1 C herrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
213
4
13
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
Missing
14
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
3 20'
4
15
Unknown
Dead
16
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
3 00'
4
estimated Vigor 4= excellent 3 =good, t=weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
9.1%
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
36.4%
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
45.5%
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )
9.1%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3
4
3
3
Eastern Sycamore Platanusoccidentalis)
Density:
Total Number of 11
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 440 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 39 0.025 acres = 15560 stems / acre
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 11 16 trees x 100 = 69 %survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Eastern Baccharis Bacchans halimifolia
2
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3
4
3
3
Eastern Sycamore Platanusoccidentalis)
1
6
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1
Slippery Elm (Ulmus rubra)
2
3
Total
1 5
1 7
1 4
1 12

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site. Brown Plot: 14 Date
Ck--, ..
PVC
Marker
Plot Mao
8/5/2011
Photo
Point
North
10
Species
16
Vigor
17
18 X
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
=
Dead
15 •
13
12X
11 •
Dead
14
Unknown
10
4
X 7
X
6
Y
8 X
9 •
Dead
5 a
Overcup Oak Querous 1 rata
4X
4
Rodent Damage
X1
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
2 V
3
Photo
Point
North
10
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
=
Dead
2
Unknown
; +' ,'
Dead
3
Unknown
Dead
4
Overcup Oak Querous lyrata
r
- - '"
Dead
5
Overcup Oak Querous 1 rata
238
4
Rodent Damage
6
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
Dead Rodent
7
Che bark Oak Querous a oda
Dead Rodent
8
Overcup Oak Querous / rata)
Dead Rodent
9
Overcup Oak (Querous / rata)
Missing
10
Unknown
Dead
11
Overcup Oak (Querous 1 rata)
206
4
12
Unknown
Dead
13
Unknown
d «
Dead
14
Unknown
Dead
15
Overcup Oak Quercus l rata
071
4
Browsed
16
Overcup Oak Querous lyrata
"'
f,? w _v
Dead Rodent
17
Overcup Oak (Querous 1 rata )
Dead (Rodent)
18
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
;
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2 -weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Density:
Total Number of 3
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 120 stems / acre
Total Number of 77 0.025 acres = 3,080 stems / acre
DesirableStems`
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 3
Planted Stems
18 trees x 100 = 17 %survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Eastern Baccharis Baccharis halimifolia
2
4
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
5
29
8
Eastern Sycamore Platanus occidentalis)
6
4
7
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
4
4
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambarstyracitiva)
1
Total
9
40
15
1 11

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot. 15 Date-
C�- -
Photo PVC
Pint Man
8/5/2011
Point Marker
North
ID
8x
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
7X
6•
•5
Unknown
4
Dead
3
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
3 0
4
,1
2x
Dead
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
236
4
2
Unknown
Dead
3
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
151
4
4
Laurel Oak (Quercus launfolia)
Dead
5
Overcu Oak (Quercus lyrata)
217
4
6
Overcu Oak (Quercus lyrata)
226
4
7
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
Dead
8
Unknown
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent 3 =good, 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Density:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 4 1 0.025 acres = 160 stems I acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 53 0.025 acres = 2120
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 4 x 100 = 50
Planted Stems 8 trees
stems / acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
6
29
9
1
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
1
Slippery Elm (Ulmus rubra)
2
1
Total
9
30
9
1

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site- Brown Plot 16 Date: 8/4/2011
Plot Man
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
• 11
Comment
1
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
148
4
•12
• g
• 10
223
4
3
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
14
4
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
103
4
•
8
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus mrchauxu)
089
7
6
•6
6
7
Unknown
Dead
•4
Unknown
Dead
9
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
3
4
10
Willow Oak Quercus phellos)
1 43
4
13
11
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
124
4
•
__L_L
•1
088
•2
___j
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
148
4
2
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
223
4
3
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
Dead
4
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
103
4
5
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus mrchauxu)
089
4
6
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
Missing
7
Unknown
Dead
8
Unknown
Dead
9
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
113
4
10
Willow Oak Quercus phellos)
1 43
4
11
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
124
4
12
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
088
4
13 jSwarnp
Chestnut Oak (Quercus mrchauxu)
116
4
14
Che bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
091
4
15
Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda)
1 09
4
16
Willow Oak Quercus hellos)
064
4
New
Vigor 4= excellent, 3=good t=weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
50.0%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
8.3%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
16.7%
Cher bark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
25.0%
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
1
5
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
Density:
Total Number of 12
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 480
Total Number of
23 0.025 acres = 920
DesirableStems'
• This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 12 X 100 = 75
Planted Stems 16 trees
stems I acre
stems I acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100-150cn
>150 cm
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
1
2
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
1
5
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
1
1
Red Maple Acer rubrum
1
1
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
3
2
Total
1 7
1 11

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot. 17 Date: 8/4/2011
Photo
Point
Plot Map
w
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
1s
1
12 W
13 •
14 •
2
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
1 97
4
X
• 11
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
10
4
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
Dead
5
Laurel Oak (Quercus /aunfolia)
9•
Dead
6
7X
g •
Missing
7
Unknown
Dead
•6
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
081
4
•1
2•
1 04
4
3
w
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
098
4
2
Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata)
1 97
4
3
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
Dead
4
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
Dead
5
Laurel Oak (Quercus /aunfolia)
Dead
6
Laurel Oak (Quercus /aunthba)
Missing
7
Unknown
Dead
8
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
081
4
9
Green Ash (Fraxinus ennsylvanica)
1 04
4
10
Laurel Oak (Quercus /aunfolia)
Dead
11
Green Ash (Fraxinus ennsylvanica)
046
3
1 top died
12
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
Dead
13
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
099
4
14
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
204
4
15
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanrca)
Dead
Vigor 4= excellent 3=good 2--weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species Percent of Total
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 85.7%
Overcup Oak (Quercus l rata) 14.3%
Density:
Total Number of 7 I
Planted Stems 0.025 acres
280 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems" 42 0.025 acres = 1,680
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Survivability:
Total Number of 7 x 100 = 47
Planted Stems 15 trees
stems I acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash (Fraxinus pens Ivanica)
8
12
13
Eastern Sycamore (P/atanus occidentalis)
1
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra)
1
Red Maple Acerrubrum
4
5
2
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1
Total
2
1 13
17
15

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 18 Date 8/4/2011
Photo
Point
Plot Mao
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
s
7 •
8,
2
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
241
4
3
Unknown
4X
3
•1
2.
Dead
PVC
Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
1 30
4
2
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
241
4
3
Unknown
Dead
4
Tulip Poplar (Linodendron tulpdera)
Dead
5
Green Ash (Fraxinus pens Ivamca)
Dead
6
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxu)
Dead
7
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
142
4
8
Green Ash Fraxinus perinsylvanica
067
3
Top died
Vigor 4= excellent, 3=good t=weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25.0%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
50.0%
Cher bark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
25.0%
1
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
4
14
5
20
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis)
1
Density:
Total Number of 4
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 160 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 53 0.025 acres = 2120
' This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum), and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styracitlua )
Survivability:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 4 s trees x 100 = 50
stems / acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
1
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
4
14
5
20
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis)
1
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
1
Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra
1
2
Red Maple Acerrubrum
1
1 6
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
1 1 1
3
1 3
Total
7
1 24
1 9
1 23

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site Brown Plot 19 Date
PVC
Marker
Plot Mai)
8/4/2011
Photo
Point
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
•12
1
•11
-
Dead
2
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
17
•
3
3
Unknown
X10
X5
• 9 15 8•
6 • 0 1 •16
Willow Oak Querous phellos)
Dead
5
Willow Oak (Querous phellos)
13
6
ICherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
279
OK
3
Green Ash Fraxinus perinsylvanica
Dead
14
X1
211
•2
9
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Willow Oak Quercus hellos
-
Dead
2
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
1 26
3
3
Unknown
_
Dead
4
Willow Oak Querous phellos)
Dead
5
Willow Oak (Querous phellos)
Dead
6
ICherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
279
4
7
Green Ash Fraxinus perinsylvanica
Dead
8
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
211
4
9
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
077
1
10
Water Tupelo N ssa aquabca)
Dead
11
Cherrybark Oak Querous pagoda)
338
4
12
Laurel Oak ( Quercus launfoha)
224
4
13
1 Cherrybark Oak Quercus pagoda
076
4
14
10vercup Oak Quercus I rata
083
4
New
15
Overcu Oak Quercus /rata
069
4
New
16
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Querous michauxii)
088
4
New
17
Overcup Oak (Querous lyrate)
079
4
New
Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =good t=weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
18.2%
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
9.1%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
27.3%
Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia
9.1%
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
36.4%
1
Loblolly Pine Pinus taeda
Density:
Total Number of 11
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 440 stems / acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems" 16 0.025 acres = 640 stems / acre
• This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum), and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraci/lua)
Survivability:
Total Number of
Planted Stems 1 1 17 trees X 100 = 65 % survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
50 -100 cm
100 -150 cm
>150 cm
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
1
2
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis)
1
Loblolly Pine Pinus taeda
1
weetgum (Liquidambarstyraci ua)
5 %'
15 %'
Total
2
2
>20
>20
'= cover % estimated

Vegetation Monitoring Worksheet
Site: Brown Plot 20 Date-
Plot Mai)
8/4/2011
•16
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
15 •
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxtt
1 90
4
13
2
Tulip Poplar Lmodendron tulpifera)
r ` -
• 14
Dead
3
10 •
L
• 11
12 •
9 X
Cherrybark Oak (Querous pagoda)
107
4
8 •
Green Ash (Fraxmus pennsylvanica )
•
=
5X
6
•
6
�° .'
Missing
1 •
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
k2
13X
1 4 •
Photo PVC
Point Marker
North
ID
Species
Height (m)
Vigor
Comment
1
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxtt
1 90
4
2
Tulip Poplar Lmodendron tulpifera)
r ` -
pc r <
Dead
3
Tulip Poplar Linodendron tuliptera)
L
14- 'K
Dead
4
Cherrybark Oak (Querous pagoda)
107
4
5
Green Ash (Fraxmus pennsylvanica )
°
=
Dead
6
j Green Ash (Fraxmus pens Ivamca
�° .'
Missing
7
Overcu Oak Quercus l rata
3 00'
4
8
Green Ash Fraxmus pennsylvanica
083
4
9
Unknown
Dead
10
Green Ash Fraxmus nns Ivamca)
P " :
Missing
11
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvamca)
072
3
12
Overcu Oak (Quercus lyrata)
034
3
Beaver
13 iCherrybark
Oak (Querous pagoda)
n r-
Dead
14
Overcu Oak Quercus "fa
210
4
15
Overcu Oak Quercus 1 rata
226
4
16
Green Ash (Fraxmus pennsylvanica )
167
4
-=estlmatea Vigor 4= excellent, 3 =goon, t=weak 1= unlikely to survive year

Species
Percent of Total
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
11.1%
Cher bark Oak Quercus pagoda)
11.1%
Green Ash Fraxinus enns Ivanica
33.3%
Overcu Oak Quercus I rata
44.4%
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
8
1 32
16
Total
8
Density:
Total Number of 9
Planted Stems
0.025 acres = 360 stems I acre
Total Number of
DesirableStems' 69 0.025 acres = 2760
This includes all volunteers listed below except Red Maple (Acer rubrum), and Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua )
Survivability:
Total Number of 9
Planted Stems
16 trees x 100 = 56
stems I acre
% survivability
4th Year
Monitoring
Volunteers:
5th Year
Monitoring
Species
10 -50 cm
1 50 -100 cm
100 -150 Cm-t
>150 cm
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
4
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
8
1 32
16
Total
8
1 36
16

Appendix B
Hydrologic Monitoring and Hydroperiod
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

256
255
254
253
w
e
0
w 252
v
L
251
R
3
c
0 250
L
V
249
248
Brown Farm Gauge 1 Hydrograph
1 /1 /11 to 12/9/11
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/24/2011 11/1/2011
Ground Surface
12" Below Surface 40 Days 17 Day
Sensor Deplh
247
N
W
-_7
N �]
O
O
O
O
O
P
a
'O
D
b
00
r
O
r
O
00
O
.Z
o
v
Z
�]
Z rn
Date
Rainfall —WS Elevation Sensor Depth Ground Surface --- Ground Surface -12
3.0
2.5
2.0
m
1.5 5'
iv
7
1.0
0.5
0.0

256
255
254
253
c
0
c�a
252
d
w
L
251
CQ
3
e
0 250
L
W"
249
248
247
Brown Farm Gauge 2 Hydrograph
1/1/11 to 12/9/11
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/24/2011 11/1/2011
Ground Surface
12" Below Surface 126 Days
Sensor Depth
- - N - u- ' O O N `j N N N D - - N - � O N 00 N 00 N --j N J
Y D d a rn Z Z
n O O o 0
77 w . a n e w w w > > ? — ro c c D < o o
Date
Rainfall WS Elevation Sensor Depth Ground Surface — -- Ground Surface -12
3.0
2.5
2.0
7�
m
1.5
iv
7�
1.0
0.5
0.0

256
255
254
c
253
0
R
252
L
a
3 251
c
0
0
L
V 250
249
248
247
Brown Farm Gauge 3 Hydrograph
1/1/11 to 12/9/11
Begin Growing Season
3/24/2011 End Growing Season
11/1/2011
Ground Surface
AL
12" Below Surface 60 Days
Sensor Dep� I I I
I I I I
I I
I I I
+
7
c` c` c D D C O o Z Z
d m a w m w > > > — to
Date
Rainfall —WS Elevation Sensor Depth Ground Surface -- Ground Surface -12
3.0
2.5
2.0
7�
a�
0
1.5
0
1.0
0.5
0.0

256
255
254
253
252
C
O
i
> 251
d
fs7
L
d
250
3
E
,°. 249
V
248
247
N W N N N N N W N W N W �O N 00 N 00 N J N J
3 y o z b
`• ` `• n n D Y w 3 3 3 _ c` c` c` c` c` c Y D
u° ao oco ° v f Day — < o 0
q
Date
Brown Farm Gauge 4 Hydrograph
1 /1 /11 to 12/9/11
Rainfall WS Elevation Sensor Depth — Ground Surface Ground Surface -12
3.0
2.5
2.0
a�
o'
1.5 v
1.0
0.5
0.0

256
255
254
253
e
0
w
d 252
W
d
3 251
c
0
0
L
C7 250
249
248
247
-
n p. w d a D a ` ` ` ` ` — ` — ` — 00 v�o v�o v e rn v N c
o 0 0
^ Date ^ ^
Brown Farm Gauge 5 Hydrograph
1/1/11 to 12/9/11
Rainfall WS Elevation Sensor Depth Ground Surface Ground Surface -12
3.0
2.5
2.0
a�
1.5
0
1.0
0.5
0.0

256
255
254
253
252
C
O
ar
251
L
250
3
�v
C
7
L 249
I
248
247
Brown Farm Gauge 6 Hydrograph
1 /1 /11 to 12/9/11
N W N N N N N W N W N W 'O N OG N 0o N J N J
—• •�• � O O �, N N � i i y � �• � .^_. OO O O O � �O �O � 00 00 O 00 00 ,z J J 'v
a L L �11 ITI > 3 b a s w c` c` e` C c c a=o c c o c�'o coo O O o c c
Date
Rainfall WS Elevation Sensor Depth — Ground Surface Ground Surface -12
,.0
2.5
2.0
d
o'
1.5 E
1.0
0.5
0.0
7

256
255
254
253
w
c
c
252
y
251
c
3
250
L
1
249
248
247
Brown Farm Gauge 7 Hydrograph
1/1/11 to 12/9/11
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
3/24/2011 11/1/2011
Ground Surface
79 Days
12" Below Surface
Sensor Depth I (
I
N
� N w N 00 00 N J N J
A O D � 00 Oo O Oo 00 z J �l
— e _ - — — — — — — — oa w —
Date
Rainfall —WS Elevation Sensor Depth Ground Surface Ground Surface -12
3.0
2.5
2.0
a�
o'
I.5 a
1.0
0.5
0.0
0

251
250
249
248
w
c
247
�a
L 246
d
w
�a
3
245
0
V
244
243
Brown Farm Reference Gauge Hydrograph
1 /1 /11 to 12/9/11
242
F
T
r�
=+�
��+�
-
��
—�
��r�=
-
- ��
- �+
-� •
" F
F�
�=
=--F
N
W
N
W
O
N
00
N
00
N
J
N J
a
v
D
D
w
c`
y
c`
c`
y
c`
y
c`
_
c
y
c
D
vo
D
trco
n
a
O
=
O
y
o
<
z
o
Z co
o
Date
Rainfall WS Elevation Sensor Depth Ground Surface -- Ground Surface -12
3.0
2.5
2.0
a�
5'
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0

0
O
CC
a � N
'b L
�U o
as
L �
wz
a
3
0
Rainfall (m)
o v, o vi o
M M N N
r- I'D kn 'IT M
N N N N N kn ell
(1J) ao1lenalg aalumpano aD
7 -Dec -I 1
27- Nov -11
17- Nov -11
7- Nov -11
28- Oct - I 1
18- Oct - I 1
8- Oct -11
28- Sep -11
18 -Sep -11
8- Sep -11
29- Aug -11
19- Aug -11
9 -Aug -11
30 -Jul -11
20 -Jul -11
10- Jul -11
30 -Jun -11
20- Jun -11
10 -Jun -11 G
31- May -11
21 -May -I l
I I - May - I 1
1 -May- I 1
21- Apr -11
11- Apr -11
1- Apr -11
22- Mar -11
12- Mar -11
2- Mar -11
20- Feb -11
10- Feb -11
31- Jan -11
21 -Jan-11
I 1 -Jan-11
I- Jan -11
N ^
N N
w
1
t
o
o,
w
w
0
0
0
w
r- I'D kn 'IT M
N N N N N kn ell
(1J) ao1lenalg aalumpano aD
7 -Dec -I 1
27- Nov -11
17- Nov -11
7- Nov -11
28- Oct - I 1
18- Oct - I 1
8- Oct -11
28- Sep -11
18 -Sep -11
8- Sep -11
29- Aug -11
19- Aug -11
9 -Aug -11
30 -Jul -11
20 -Jul -11
10- Jul -11
30 -Jun -11
20- Jun -11
10 -Jun -11 G
31- May -11
21 -May -I l
I I - May - I 1
1 -May- I 1
21- Apr -11
11- Apr -11
1- Apr -11
22- Mar -11
12- Mar -11
2- Mar -11
20- Feb -11
10- Feb -11
31- Jan -11
21 -Jan-11
I 1 -Jan-11
I- Jan -11
N ^
N N
w
1

7
5
4
c
w
c
3
CZ
2
0
Brown Farm 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2010 -2011
Durham, NC Monthly Rainfall
C) cC a) ro Q- cC O 7 N U O
V o z
Date
02010 Rainfall 02011 Rainfall —301h Percentile —W -70th Percentile

Appendix C
Photo Log
Brown Farm Wetland Restoration KCI Associates of North Carolina
Basin 03030002 2011 - MY05

--w "
I �' *14,
Ar ,
INN

Photo Point 2: View looking north toward vegetation plot # 3. 8/5/11 — MY -05
Photo Point 3: View looking north with vegetation plot 410 on left. 8/5/11— MY -05

_ a '
t•
:i
r
w
f. ,

i 1 ,
AL
_ . � �.r •fir