20130251 Ver 1_401 Application_20130313

Strickland, Bev
From: Rick Atkinson [ratkinson @wegnet.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:35 PM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: RE: DWQ# 13 -0251 Elizabeth City Winfall
I just placed the file into the "Winfall" folder. Let me know if you have any questions or problems with the file.
Thanks,
Rick Atkinson
Senior Regulatory Specialist
From: Strickland, Bev [ mai Ito: bev.stricklandCa)ncdenr.aovI
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:07 PM
To: Rick Atkinson
Subject: RE: DWQ# 13 -0251 Elizabeth City Winfall
Yes it would get to get a CD with an application and thanks for the offer. You will be getting an invitation to join
dropbox. It is free and you can upload the file there.
Beverly Strickland, Administrative Officer
Division of Water Quality - Stormwater & Wetlands Branch
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mail Service Center 1650, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Phone# 919 - 807 -6350
Fax# 919 - 807 -6488
Email Address: Bev. Strickland(dncdelingov
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Rick Atkinson [mai Ito: ratkinsonCa)wegnet.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:39 PM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: RE: DWQ# 13 -0251 Elizabeth City Winfall
Beverly,
Would you mind setting up a folder where I can drop the file in? Please contact me with any questions. Also, would it be
tasier in the future if we provide a Cr along with the hard copy of - application?
Thanks,

Rick Atkinson
Senior Regulatory Specialist
From: Strickland, Bev [ mai Ito: bev.stricklandCa)ncdenr.aovI
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:39 AM
To: Rick Atkinson
Subject: DWQ# 13 -0251 Elizabeth City Winfall
Importance: High
Mr. Atkinson,
Could you please provide an electronic copy of your application for the above project. We need to distribute it to our
Regional office for their review.
It can be provided through email or ftp site in the format of TIF Group 4 or as a PDF.
Also, if you need a place to drop the files because of size, I can set up a folder in drop box to assist you.
Thanks
Bev
Beverly Stric1dand, Administrative Officer
DMsion of Water Quality- - Program Development
N.C. Department of Ens- ironment and Natural Resources
Mail Sery ice Center 1650, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Phone# 919 - 807 -6350
Email Address: Bev.Stric1danda.ncdenr.gov
Phone # [phone]
E -mail correspondence to and from this address niavhe suhjectto the Vorth Carolina Puhlic Records Larrand niavhe disclosed to third parties.

PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO.
START: 36 018'50.67 "N, 76 013'34.50 "W
TERMINUS. 36 013121.46 "N, 76 027140.50 11W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of an existing transmission line approximately
15.20 miles long in Elizabeth City and Pasquotank and Perquimans Counties, North Carolina.
Please Print:
Property Owner: Mr. John Bailey — Dominion Virginia Power
The undersigned, registered property owner of the above noted property does authorize
Rick Atkinson , of Williamsburg, Environmental Group, Inc.
(Contractor /Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all the actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance
of a preliminary jurisdictional determination on the property described above.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
701 East Cary Street, 12th Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219
Telephone: [phone]
I hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of ur knowledge.
Authorized Signatu
Date: 6 0 2

WILLIAMSBURG ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC,
Environmental Consultants
March 8, 2013
Mr. Dan Bacon
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Re: Nationwide Permit #12 & Section 10 Verification
Elizabeth City to Winfall 230 kV Transmission Line
Pasquotank and Perquimans Counties, North Carolina
Applicant: Virginia Electric and Power Company
WEG Project #4689
Dear Mr. Bacon:
On behalf of Virginia Electric and Power Company, Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) is
pleased to submit the attached Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) for the Elizabeth City to Winfall
Ttansmission Line project. The project area consists of approximately 242.72 acres of existing utility
right -of -way (ROW) beginning at the Elizabeth City Substation located north of North Hughes Boulevard
(Route 17) and east of Parsonage Street.(Route 1321). The transmission line generally runs southwest
where it terminates at the Winfall Substation. The Winfall Substation is located cast of Two Mile Desert
Road (Route 1218) and north of Bembury Road (Route 1219). The area of investigation is located within
the - Perquimans River, Little River, Mill Creek, Sutton Creek, and Knobbs Creek drainage basins in
Pasquotank and Perquimans Counties, North Carolina (Figure 1 & 2, Appendix B).
Proiect Description
As part of Virginia Electric and Power Company's effort to maintain reliable service across the region,
they are upgrading and replacing existing wooden tower structures and wire associated with Line 2020, an
existing 230 kV line, extending from the Elizabeth City Substation to the Winfall Substation. The
existing wooden, H -frame tower structures will be replaced with new H -framc steel structures as shown
on the enclosed Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map and Tower Structure Detail (Appendix Q. It is
anticipated that wooden structures in the wetlands will be cut off at the base. Removal of the existing
wooden tower structures and construction of the steel replacement tower structures is scheduled to begin
in August 2013. A portion of the project between structures 2020/124 and 2020/129 will begin in April
2013 as part of construction of a substation being completed by others. The required line clearance is
based on existing road elevations at the time the transmission line was originally constructed.
The replacement tower structures will consist of two pole steel structures as shown on the enclosed tower
structure details (Appendix Q. Foundations for all structures and poles within wetlands (14) will utilize a
pipe pile foundation which consists of an open metal sleeve being driven directly into the ground. The
pole is then placed inside of the sleeve and secured, typically through the use of anchor bolts or concrete.
In some cases, some material is removed fiom the interior of the sleeve to provide the final necessary
elevations for setting the structures. The overall function of the foundation is equivalent to that of a
1011 Boulder Springs Drive, Suite 225 a Richmond, VA 23225 e Tel [phone] • Fax [phone]

Mr, Dan Bacon
March 8, 2013
Page 2 of 4
driven pile, and therefore does not constitute fill within a wetland. All work will be conducted within the
limits of the existing right of way. As the area is currently cleared and maintained, no additional clearing
or grading will be requited outside the existing ROW.
Construction Access
Existing structures and construction of the new tower structures will be accessed through the existing
ROW. All access areas will include timber mats and will be restored to preconstruction contours upon
completion of the project. As such no permanent impacts to wetlands are anticipated as a result of
temporary access in the existing ROW. A construction entrance (CE) is proposed near tower 2020/133
from West Main Street. For access purposes, a new 36' long, 18" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culvert
is proposed for the CE as shown on the Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map Cutsheet Impact PRl provided
in Appendix C. The culvert is sized and designed to support an access. road and equipment to complete
the proposed tower structure replacements. As a result of the proposed upgrade, 0.003 -acre of palustrine
scrub -shrub (PSS) wetlands will be permanently impacted.
Aerial Crossings
The Elizabeth City to Winfall 230 kV Line rebuild will require three aerial crossings associated with Mill
Creek, Little River, and Knobbs Creek. The drainage area of each is greater than five 'square miles and
the now line is proposed in the same location as the existing aerial crossings over these channels. The
drainage area for the overhead utility line crossing at Mill Creek, Little River, and Knobbs Creek
(Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map) is 11.49 - square - miles, 52.06 square - miles, and 9.5 square - miles,
respectively. A plan and profile showing the height of the utility line above ordinary high water (011W)
for each crossing is provided in Appendix C. The proposed aerial line clearances at tower structures '12-
13, 65 -66, and 129 -130 will be 50 feet, 38 feet, and 48 feet above OHW, respectively, as listed in Table 1
below. The lengths of each of the crossings, measured from- OHW to OHW, are also included in Table 1.
The existing and proposed line clearances meet the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 33 (Navigation and
Navigable Waters), Part 322 (Permits for Structures or Work in or Affecting Navigable Waters of The
United States) for clearances over navigable waters.
Table 1. Minimum height and width of aerial crossings over waters with drainage areas greater than five
souare miles.
Clearing and Maintenance
The entire width of the existing transmission corridor is currently cleared and maintained for existing
transmission facility operation. Maintenance activity within the ROW may be necessary in some
locations. Prior to construction, the existing ROW must be cleared to allow construction activities and
safe operation of the new transmission line. Existing low growing vegetation. outside of construction
activities will be left in place. Trees that are required to be cut will be cut no more than three (3) inches
above ground level. Any additional clearing will be accomplished by hand cutting in wetland areas and
Crossing Length
Minimum Vertical Clearance
Crossing
Location
(OHW-OHW)
(feet)
(feet)
Mill Creek
Towers 12.13
250
50
Little River
Towers 65 -66
145
38
Knobbs Creels
Towers 129 -130
200
48
Clearing and Maintenance
The entire width of the existing transmission corridor is currently cleared and maintained for existing
transmission facility operation. Maintenance activity within the ROW may be necessary in some
locations. Prior to construction, the existing ROW must be cleared to allow construction activities and
safe operation of the new transmission line. Existing low growing vegetation. outside of construction
activities will be left in place. Trees that are required to be cut will be cut no more than three (3) inches
above ground level. Any additional clearing will be accomplished by hand cutting in wetland areas and

Mr. Dan Bacon
March 8, 2013
Page 3 of 4
within 100 -feet of streams. Erosion control devices will be used on an ongoing basis during all clearing
activities and temporary stabilization for all soil disturbing activities will be used until the ROW has been
restored.
Wetland Delineation.Information
The limits of waters of the U.S. (WOUS), including wetlands, were delineated by WEG during May and
June 2012. Approximately 33.42 acres of wetlands, 2.34 acres of open water, and 251 LF (0.01_ acre) of
stream channel were delineated within the 242.72 acre portion of existing ROW. In addition, 21,874 LF
(2.37 acres) of jurisdictional ditches and 15,552 LF (0.83 acre) of non jurisdictional were identified
within the existing ROW. A request for a preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) was submitted
to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the PJD was issued on January 15, 2013. The
datasheets and delineation map are provided in Appendix D.
Threatened and Endangered Species Information
WEG conducted searches of existing database resources associated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) — North Carolina Division and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Programs to
determine the known presence of any state or federally protected species within the vicinity of the
proposed project. According to the results of the USFWS county search (Appendix E), the Atlantic
sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) was listed in both counties as federally endangered species.
Additionally, the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was listed within both Pasquotank and
Perquimans Counties and is protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA). The
Shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), a fedcrally- listed endangered species, was listed in
Pasquotank County only.
A request for a list of all federally- listed endangered or threatened species' or designated critical habitat
that may be affected by this activity was submitted to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program and
the results are attached (Appendix E). Those results revealed the presence of Shortnose sturgeon
(Acipenser brevirostrum) occurring in the Albemarle 'Sound of North Carolina, including the lower
Pasquotank River, Batchelor Bay, and Salmon Creek. The USFWS Information, Planning, and
Conservation System (IPaQ also listed the Shortnose sturgeon as an Endangered Species Act species that
may be affected by the proposed project. Based on the scope and location of the proposed work, no
adverse effects to the above - listed species are anticipated.' Lastly, the project area does not include any
essential fish habitat.
Cultural Resources Information
As stated in the= general conditions of the nationwide permits, coordination is required involving historic
or pre - historic cultural resources. A search of the North Carolina State .Historic Preservation Office
online database revealed that no known cultural or historic resources are located in the vicinity of the
project area, except for the Elizabeth City Water Plant (Appendix-F). The Elizabeth City Water Plant is
located adjacent to the Elizabeth City Substation. The historical resources report for this resource . is
attached (Appendix F). Impacts to this resource or other cultural or historic resources are not anticipated
as a result of the proposed project.
100 -Year Floodpiain Information
According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels 7940, 7951, 7960, 7980, 7982, 8903,
8913, 8914, for the Town of Hertford, Perquirnans County, Town of Winfall, Pasquotank County,

Mr. Dan Bacon
March 8, 2013
Page 4 of 4
Elizabeth City and Camden County, parts of the project are within the 100 -year floodplain (Appendix G),
As the project will not alter surface elevations or the hydrologic characteristics of the site, no adverse
effects to the floodplain are expected.
SUM=ry
The attached PCN and supplemental information is being submitted for review and verification under the
Corps Nationwide Permit #12 for permanent impacts to 0.003 acre of PSS wetlands. In addition, the
applicant is requesting authorization under a Section 10 permit for the proposed overhead line clearances.
This project is exempt from Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit requirements based on
coordination with John Cece of the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management.
Please contact me Qatkinson(cr�,we ern t.com or 804 - 267.3474) at your earliest convenience if you have any
questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Rick Atkinson
Senior Regulatory Specialist
tjl .
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Amy Adams, NC DWQ Washington Regional Office
Mr. Stefan Brooks, Virginia Electric and Power Company

APPENDIX A
PCN Form

wA
� r
fl Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: Number 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
N No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Elizabeth City to Winfall 230 kV Transmission Line
2b.
County:
Perquimans and Pasquotank
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Elizabeth City and Winfall
2d.
Subdivision name:
n/a
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Virginia Electric and Power Company
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Virginia Electric and Power Company Attn: Stefan Brooks
3d.
Street address:
701 East Cary Street, 12th Floor
3e.
City, state, zip:
Richmond, VA, 23219
3f.
Telephone no.:
804 - 771 -6430
3g.
Fax no.:
804 - 771 -6303
3h.
Email address:
stefan.r.brooks @dom.com
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Rick Atkinson
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
1011 Boulder Springs Drive, Suite 225
5d.
City, state, zip:
Richmond, VA, 23225
5e.
Telephone no.:
804 - 267 -3474
5f.
Fax no.:
804 - 267 -3470
5g.
Email address:
ratkinson @wegnet.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Various
Latitude: 37.437411 Longitude: - 77.158481
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
242.72 acres, 15.20 miles
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Knobbs Creek, Little River, Mill Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C, Sw
2c. River basin:
Pasquotank River, Perquimans River, Little River, Mill
Creek, Sutton Creek, and Knobbs Creek
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site currently includes cleared, maintained right -of -way with an existing overhead transmission line on H -frame
structures. The surrounding area is primarily agricultural land and open farm fields
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
33.42 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
251 LF of stream channel, 2.34 acre of open water, 21,874 LF of jurisdictional ditches, 15,552 LF of non - juris. ditches
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to replace existing H -frame structures with new H -frame steel structures and wires.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Line 2020, an existing 230 kV transmission line in existing right -of -way (ROW), is proposed for upgrade to include the
replacement of existing wooden H -frame tower structures with new H -frame steel tower structures and new line.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
January 15, 2013, see Appendix D
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ® P ❑ T
fill / structure
PSS
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0.003
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.003
2h. Comments: Impact is a result of 18" RCP culvert pipe installation for a construction entrance
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ I NT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ I NT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ I NT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ I NT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ I NT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ I NT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary (T)
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project will not require any additional clearing and will be constructed entirely within the existing right -of -way.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Timber mats will be utilized for access in ROW. Structures in wetlands will be constructed with pipe pile foundations.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan is not designed at this time.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Not Required
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project involves an upgrade to an existing overhead utility line and is not expected to generate wastewater.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS County Species List & NC Natural Heritage Online Database, USFWS IPaC
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Project is replacement of existing structures within existing ROW; no new impact areas
8. Flood zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project involves replacement of tower structures for an
overhead utility line. The new poles will not impede the flow of water and no changes to existing contours are required for
the work.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps
:2-le
ApplicantlAgenfs Printed Name
Date
ApplicantlAgent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Is rovlded.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

APPENDIX B
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Project Location Map

X.-
..=?�
c1 _ 1. ilMiVl ,
1
re
l �niiNiFQi i
r
..'H
Im a
7
6 MILES 3 0 MILES 6 MILES
SCALE: 1 INCH = 6 MILES
SOURCE: NORTH CAROLINA ATLAS AND GAZETTEER,
DeLORME MAPPING CO.. 2012.
J - i(
t
WILLIAM[S]BURG
ENVIRONMENTAL
GROU]P,INC.
FIGURE 1
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL
230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
CAMDEN, PASQUOTANK, AND
PERQUIMANS CO., CITY OF FEBRUARY 2013
ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF
WINFALL, NORTH CAROLINA

E A T� D 1 S MI A L S A M P
v
7
`7
. ... ......
j! .........
'w . ..... ......
...... . ...
------ -- --- ---
N
—4—
—7
-4
-7
T
77
WINFALL ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL
SUBSTATION 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
j
WILLIAMSBURG
ENVIRONMENTAL
6,000' 3,000' ol 0,0001 GRO U Ps I NC.
1 INCH 6,000 FEET
SCALE: a
_j
FIGURE 2
START TERMINUS
LATITUDE: 36o1 8'15.12"N LATITUDE: 36o 13'20.67" N PROJECT LOCATION MAP
LONGITUDE: 76o 13'36.32" W LONGITUDE: 76o 27142.6511 W
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL
SOURCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE SERIES TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
START: ELIZABETH CITY, NO QUADRANGLE, 1982 CAMDEN, PASQUOTANK,
AND
PERQUIMANS CO., CITY OF
TERMINUS: HERTFORD, NO QUADRANGLE, 1982 ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF MARCH 2013
WINFALL, NORTH CAROLINA
ELIZABETH CITY
SUBSTATION
=� r�
Rim-

"PENDIX C
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Aerial Crossing Profiles
Tower Structure Details

PERMANENT IMPACTS
TABLE:
PSS T
TOTAL
PR1 0
0.003 0
0.003
TOTAL 0
0.003 0
0.003
L.F. ±)
NON - JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES 0.83 ACRES ± (15,552 L.F. ±)
JURISDICTIONAL AREA IMPACTS:
WETLANDS 0.003 ACRES ±
PERMANENT IMPACTS
TABLE:
PSS T
TOTAL
PR1 0
0.003 0
0.003
TOTAL 0
0.003 0
0.003
NQ ft R
i Jr :4
LEVEL OF IMPACTS:
P = PERMANENT
TYPES OF IMPACTS: , �, `• {`�
R = ROAD
e.
J1
1 ,
I � ` rSI• �% 1 err- I �- \� � �\F i 1 � � � y • ^ J{� ( l I -1 • ll
�� b' ^ice+ _ _ � . / � ?� v � • � • - Y rk
��� �'� ` EE
f i �`f �„� •� r � .� �.
NOTE: THE LIMITS OF WETLANDS AND STREAM CHANNELS /OPEN . /jr ,cam <fi ^;t f "f +r •- 4' �; ,� �d ` ��.` �'�'r' ' r"
WATERS SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN FIELD
LOCATED BY MEANS OF SUB METER GPS TECHNOLOGY
AND ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. �T
F
IN
3 1�
S STATI O t, H FT
yr ►i' r� i�.'
SHEET 16 '� air ax 4000 o s000 4000
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
� 80 EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
80 PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
� TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
IMPACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
SITE DATA:
PROJECT LENGTH 15.20 MILES
PROJECT AREA 242.72 ACRES ±
JURISDICTIONAL AREAS:
WETLANDS 33.42 ACRES ±
OPEN WATER 2.34 ACRES ±
STREAM CHANNELS 0.01 ACRES ±(251 L.F. ±)
JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES 2.37 ACRES ± (21,874
co
a.
aax
CQ
L
V
a J
� J W �a
q— �Z
r Z Z Q m Q
�pY�o
Q LL z -x
QO�No�o
Z T nQz
OwvNQ��
H W Zao�
V =� �oZz
0 N W HyQLL
N �m >F?o
J
ZJMOwp
7 _ W NUa�
O JOB# 4689
DRAIN BY CHECKED BY
MAC ETA
DATE
MARCH . 2013
SHEET 1

S�
t
tl
SHEET 1
.a.. -. . - - - .
020/1
020/1
r
�
2020/135
i
2020/134
PR1 —
WETLANDS 0.003 ACRE±
PROPOSED 18" RCP
36' LENGTH
it. . - -- - - . ._Aky.
20/1
•� 4
.i
3
2020/143
r 2020/142
2020/141
.fir • � f • �-
Ze ¢
020/145.
s ` 2020/146 ,
1 -
x
� c '
R"f t f gAll s
' A
t CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET 19
400' 0' 200' 400'
6
� » W
oV
NN
°ERN mEN
N3 o o 4o
P4
Q
aa®
Ca
L
V
a J
Jw a
q— <Z °9
W Z ZamQ
Q �0z�=
J 0 cl)
co �
_ LL 0
Z T- � Qo
D 0 co CIL co
LL
V ¢0z
NW 3
D�HW�
m LL
N W >p —o
W -'kzQz
=J0�oc3
7 N W NUa0
1 1 I-E BA6E Al PROVIDED BY
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
SCALE
FEET
SHEET 2
JOB# 4689
LEGEND:
4
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
®
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
80
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
❑ 80
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
S�
t
tl
SHEET 1
.a.. -. . - - - .
020/1
020/1
r
�
2020/135
i
2020/134
PR1 —
WETLANDS 0.003 ACRE±
PROPOSED 18" RCP
36' LENGTH
it. . - -- - - . ._Aky.
20/1
•� 4
.i
3
2020/143
r 2020/142
2020/141
.fir • � f • �-
Ze ¢
020/145.
s ` 2020/146 ,
1 -
x
� c '
R"f t f gAll s
' A
t CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET 19
400' 0' 200' 400'
6
� » W
oV
NN
°ERN mEN
N3 o o 4o
P4
Q
aa®
Ca
L
V
a J
Jw a
q— <Z °9
W Z ZamQ
Q �0z�=
J 0 cl)
co �
_ LL 0
Z T- � Qo
D 0 co CIL co
LL
V ¢0z
NW 3
D�HW�
m LL
N W >p —o
W -'kzQz
=J0�oc3
7 N W NUa0
1 1 I-E BA6E Al PROVIDED BY
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
SCALE
FEET
SHEET 2
JOB# 4689

NEW CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
2020/131
I I
I I
I I
I I
II
I I
I I
II
4b
27+, { .• r
w - Ap•• r
i, f
IL
-. L I
off.
woNO
y
MATCH To I �SF EET THREE
MATCH TO SHEET FOB
•• • •• •• I
oV
o NN
6
°"
cl ms`
>m my C
»
11 W
EN 0EN
°�I °nom o
"L 0 � 6
aa®
i
Q
V
a J
q— <Z U9
W Z Z z m a
�0
Q Z_2
0 cl) �
Q ~NoLLo
Z r �n0z
DO =ZQaVa
V oCoZz
MW 3
�Hm ~Wma
co) W �F -0
Wlg�z�z
=Jcoo�3
7 ui W NUa�
I-E BASE MAP PROVIDED BY
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY-)
DATE
MARCH 1 1011
SCALE
1 INCH - 400 FEET
SHEET: 3
JNB# 4689
LEGEND:
4
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
®
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
80
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
❑ 80
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
2020/131
I I
I I
I I
I I
II
I I
I I
II
4b
27+, { .• r
w - Ap•• r
i, f
IL
-. L I
off.
woNO
y
MATCH To I �SF EET THREE
MATCH TO SHEET FOB
•• • •• •• I
oV
o NN
6
°"
cl ms`
>m my C
»
11 W
EN 0EN
°�I °nom o
"L 0 � 6
aa®
i
Q
V
a J
q— <Z U9
W Z Z z m a
�0
Q Z_2
0 cl) �
Q ~NoLLo
Z r �n0z
DO =ZQaVa
V oCoZz
MW 3
�Hm ~Wma
co) W �F -0
Wlg�z�z
=Jcoo�3
7 ui W NUa�
I-E BASE MAP PROVIDED BY
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY-)
DATE
MARCH 1 1011
SCALE
1 INCH - 400 FEET
SHEET: 3
JNB# 4689

1
11
1
��� 2020/115
' r
2020/1
2020/116
1
1 s
0/118
POTENTIAL {
LAYDOWN YARDr- r
i
2020/123
320 122 '
21
1� CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
400' 0' 200' 400'
I
cl ms`
>m my C
� » W
E- o mE� �'m-
N3o
P4
aa®
Ca
L
V
a�
-IW a
q- <Z U9
W Z Z z m a
a �0—g
J 0N.� WI
N_
Z
LL 0
r �n0z
DCIL ULL
0 <
V L oC0Zz
L U LL
—0
Q m
a0
I-E BA6E MAP PROVIDED BY
DRAWN BY 'HEIKAD BY-)
MA. RTA
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
SCALE
1 NCH - 400 FEET
SHEET: 4
JOB# 4689
LEGEND:
4
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
®
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
80
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
❑ 80
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
FiCONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
1
11
1
��� 2020/115
' r
2020/1
2020/116
1
1 s
0/118
POTENTIAL {
LAYDOWN YARDr- r
i
2020/123
320 122 '
21
1� CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
400' 0' 200' 400'
I
cl ms`
>m my C
� » W
E- o mE� �'m-
N3o
P4
aa®
Ca
L
V
a�
-IW a
q- <Z U9
W Z Z z m a
a �0—g
J 0N.� WI
N_
Z
LL 0
r �n0z
DCIL ULL
0 <
V L oC0Zz
L U LL
—0
Q m
a0
I-E BA6E MAP PROVIDED BY
DRAWN BY 'HEIKAD BY-)
MA. RTA
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
SCALE
1 NCH - 400 FEET
SHEET: 4
JOB# 4689

6
� » W
Eo mo >
�oo
o3C - o
a C�
V �R v �)
a
CQ
G
H
V
IL
a J
Jw a
Q— <Z 69
Q Z ZamQ
a �0
J 0N�w¢
N_
z
DO =Za6a
9Ozz
�W 3
D �m>LU LL
co) W � -0
W��z5z
=:j 0na
7 N W NUaP
BRAIN BY CHECKED BY
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 5

LEGEND: ho we I-M
i 2020/9;
i
i
020/96
A,
`)
Co j�
j
0/101
'�` A .41
me
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
4
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
400'
7m7mmr7
400' 0' 200'
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
®
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
80
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
❑ 80
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
i 2020/9;
i
i
020/96
A,
`)
Co j�
j
0/101
'�` A .41
me
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
400'
7m7mmr7
400' 0' 200'
/ 8\
6
�» w
�Eo mo
o3o
LRaa®
/
CQ
L
co
V
a J
q— <Z °9
W Z Z Q m a
a �0—g
J 0 cl)
co �
_ LL 0
Zr�Q0Z
DO ZaULL
=
V ¢OZ?
W
��m ~Lu LL
N_ W Q � F — 0
WIV�ZoZ
= J 0nm3
7NWcm0
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
MA. ETA
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 6

6
Ym
>m clm C
� » W
�Eo mE� �'�-
N.3C °1,m
a CE
aa®
IL
CQ
G
H
V
a J
Jw a
Q— <Z °9
Q Z ZamQ
a 0O -z
J 0N�w¢
co
Zr�QQz
DO = _ ZaVa
Oz
w 9 z
�` 3
� Hm>LU LL
co) W � -o
W��z5z
=J0�oc3
7NWNUIL
DRIINBY CHECKED BY
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 7

ism
020/7
•
, r
.p AM
J I r� 4 1� ■ ��J7� �-
Ico O
ow
�i
r4
Z = •1 ..
t_
020/81
f
n
1p—wJ `•• /" .
�rsla
WWI-4
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
7m7mmr7 19
400' 0' 200' 400'
oV
NN
6
Im
cl ms`
>m my C
W
EN
mE� Im
NoI ° o oo 4o
P4
aa®
Ca
L
V
a J
J Wa
q— <Z °9
W Z ZamQ
a �0
J 0 co n
co _
Z
LL 0
r�Q0Z cl) co
DO =z C6 z
90
LLOD >LU LL
> � �ZoZ
0NUa0
I-E BA6E MAP PROVIDED BY
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY—)
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
ET FEET
SHE Q
JOB# 4689
LEGEND:
4
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
®
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
80
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
❑ 80
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
ism
020/7
•
, r
.p AM
J I r� 4 1� ■ ��J7� �-
Ico O
ow
�i
r4
Z = •1 ..
t_
020/81
f
n
1p—wJ `•• /" .
�rsla
WWI-4
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
7m7mmr7 19
400' 0' 200' 400'
oV
NN
6
Im
cl ms`
>m my C
W
EN
mE� Im
NoI ° o oo 4o
P4
aa®
Ca
L
V
a J
J Wa
q— <Z °9
W Z ZamQ
a �0
J 0 co n
co _
Z
LL 0
r�Q0Z cl) co
DO =z C6 z
90
LLOD >LU LL
> � �ZoZ
0NUa0
I-E BA6E MAP PROVIDED BY
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY—)
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
ET FEET
SHE Q
JOB# 4689

LEGEND:
i
—1
6:p F,' r
0/70
_ — 2020/68'
f a.
`r 2020/67
2020/72
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
7m7mmr7
400' 0' 200' 400'
/ 8\
oV
on
6
Ym
>m
cl my C
� >� W
EN
mE� � - Im
NoI ° o oo 4o
P4
aa®
a
V
a J
Jw a
q— <Z UK
W Z Z z m a
a J 0�NO
Z�N
w�M
Z T_ Q co co
DZO =4 =
S—)
�W 3
�Hm ~W�a
N W �-0
w lzz
=J0�oc3
7NWNU(L
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
MA. ETA
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 9
4
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
®
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
80
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
❑ 80
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
i
—1
6:p F,' r
0/70
_ — 2020/68'
f a.
`r 2020/67
2020/72
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
7m7mmr7
400' 0' 200' 400'
/ 8\
oV
on
6
Ym
>m
cl my C
� >� W
EN
mE� � - Im
NoI ° o oo 4o
P4
aa®
a
V
a J
Jw a
q— <Z UK
W Z Z z m a
a J 0�NO
Z�N
w�M
Z T_ Q co co
DZO =4 =
S—)
�W 3
�Hm ~W�a
N W �-0
w lzz
=J0�oc3
7NWNU(L
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
MA. ETA
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 9

LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION ACCESS
2020/55
020/6
� 020/58
V
6
Ym
>m
cl m C
Im » W
mEo mE� �>
N.31 °1, °
P4
aa®
Ca
L
V
a J
Jw a
Q— <Z °9
Q ZZzW
a �O—z�=
Q n0No�o
Z _ n 0 z
T
0OVN a
a
H Z
= a�LL
V V -- 0z
W 3
co) HmHw LL
W >� -0
W��zQz
7 = J 0�oC3
Cl)
W NUa0
O
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
MA. ETA
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 10
JOB# 4689

LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON — JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
,y
AJ
% % -- - 2020/47
II J,f
10•'
f
J I -
/
rf
� .F��. • _' � � i .rte_ - -- _ -
1 d\
020/48 -
AW
k
I' tl
.'
020/53
2020/52
•� CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
7m7mmr7
=� A -
- N 400' 0' 300' 400'
6
Ym
>m
cl m C
Im » W
mEo mE� �'m-
N.31 °1, °
P4
tiffj
Ca
L
V
a�
J Lu
Q— <Z 0K
Ili Z ZamQ
a �O -Z�=
Q n0NoLLo
Z n0z
r
-OVNaa
H Za LL
V r LL LL N Z
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
SCALE
1 INCH -400 FEET
SHEET: 1 1
JOB# 4689
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
,y
AJ
% % -- - 2020/47
II J,f
10•'
f
J I -
/
rf
� .F��. • _' � � i .rte_ - -- _ -
1 d\
020/48 -
AW
k
I' tl
.'
020/53
2020/52
•� CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
7m7mmr7
=� A -
- N 400' 0' 300' 400'
6
Ym
>m
cl m C
Im » W
mEo mE� �'m-
N.31 °1, °
P4
tiffj
Ca
L
V
a�
J Lu
Q— <Z 0K
Ili Z ZamQ
a �O -Z�=
Q n0NoLLo
Z n0z
r
-OVNaa
H Za LL
V r LL LL N Z
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
SCALE
1 INCH -400 FEET
SHEET: 1 1
JOB# 4689

6
Ym
>m clm C
� » W
�Eo mE� �'�-
N.3C °1,m
a CE
aa®
IL
CQ
G
H
V
a J
Jw a
Q— <Z °9
Q Z ZamQ
a 0O -Z�=
Q n0
Cl) oLLo
Z _ n0z
T
0OVNaa
H =Za�LL
C.4 3:
O
DRIINBY CHECKED BY
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 12
JOB# 4689

/ 8\
6
Ym
>m cl m 1, IF C
W
E' o
o
N. I mo o
a C�
aa®
IL
CQ
G
H
V
a J
J Wa
Q— <Z °9
Q Z ZamQ
a 0O -Z�=
Q n�
Cl) oLUo
Z _ n0z
T
0OVNaa
H =Zqa�LL
V r�¢OZZ
W 3
HmHw�
co) LL
W >� —o
WIg�ZoZ
I :i 0
7NWcm0
BRAIN BY CHECKED BY
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 13
JOB# 4689

LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
POTENTIAL
LAYDOWN YARD
c
,,.
...............�
020/2
020/23
-
//
• �� y� m
yyyyyyyyy "� � y y Y yryyy • y Y r \ \�/ .
yyyyyy yid r� 4
A
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
400'
ElCONSTRUCTION
ACCESS
POTENTIAL
LAYDOWN YARD
c
,,.
...............�
020/2
020/23
-
//
• �� y� m
yyyyyyyyy "� � y y Y yryyy • y Y r \ \�/ .
yyyyyy yid r� 4
A
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
7m7mmr7
400' 0' 200'
400'
/ 8\
6
Ym
>m clm C
Im> W
E o m E ' �'m Im
N. I ° o
P4
aa®
Ca
L
V
a J
J Lu
Q— <Z °9
11� Z - < Lu
a �0—e
Q n0NoLLo
Z _
n 0 z
T
0 0 ()
H =Za�LL
V oZz
NW 3
HmHw�LL
W >� -0
w lz z
=J0n
7 co) W NUa�
FIVCIONA
KATE
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
MA. ETA
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 14
JOB# 4689

APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION ACCESS
i
II _ "adi !
�^ 2020/1
,1 +II 1
�\\–_ — �o -- – 2020/14 \
� �
MAYBEY BRIDGE REQUIRED
D _ _ FOR CROSSING
2020/6
)20/5
—01
44i CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
19
400' 0' 200' 400'
oV
6
� » W
0Eo mEN �'�-
N3 o oo
�
Ca
L
V
a J
J Wa
Q— <Z °9
11� Z ZamQ
a 0O —Z I
Q n�NoLLo
Z _ n0z
T
0OVNa a
H =Za�LL
V ��-goZz
NW 3
H M Lu LL
W >F -o
Wg "ezQz
=J0
7 co) W NUa0
O
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
MA. ETA
DATE
MARCH 8 2013
FEET
SHEET 15
JOB# 4689

LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL
LIMITS
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL
I M PACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION ACCESS
rr
AI 9 P.
S
T7 'Aw-mograft-
2—O,'
(( •. 2020/5
I
2020/3
116 A
-
��.
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2FEET
T41A)l 400' 0' 200' 40 0'
6
m E N m E N
�3I ° ° —
P4
�
Ca
L
V
a�
-1 w a
Q—
LL 0�
W Z ZamQ
Q Z_2
Q n�NoLLo
Z LL T _ N noz
�OVa�a
H
0O HL
V T- 0Z z
W¢ 3
NHmHLu LL
W > 0
W Z o Z
=J0nm
7 N W NUa�
FIVCIONC
FRTE
W!
DR NBY CHECKED BY
MARCH 1 2013
SCALE
SHEET FEET 16

LEGEND:
y.� APPROXIMATE WETLAND
LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS
® APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
�® EXISTING TOWER LOCATION
D® PROPOSED NEW OR REPLACEMENT
TOWER LOCATION
�® PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
FPERMANENT STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS
PROJECT LIMITS
ElCONSTRUCTION ACCESS
WETLANDS 0.003
2020133 /
\
;ED 18" RCP ❑
36' LENGTH
ILI \ j
.1 1
/
` ❑ \/ /
/
i
L.�7 0
100' 0' 50' 100'
}8
U
N-
�� w
EN oEa a
w
T
LL
a
(L 0
CID
L
F W
Lu
� N J W �
_TLLZ o f
QMZ -Ja 0
WW (L Z Lu
D: F30Yr�o
JV00.5
Q Q N IS ao
ZDQz
0? —NN ns
Ua
F F Z 0a
LLI LL c6 z
F_ (1) �=m<LL
NyQ�Foo
C9 om
1Uwccm0LOU°
SHEET: 17

PLS -CADD DRAWIN
SPAN
RULING SPAN (FT)
CONDUCTOR
TENSION(LBS)
J(hOJ >11_ L0
JAN
1�0
��1�
_jr1_0J 11_ 0
JO�J
>11_ L0
JO�J >�00�
J00(OJ
>11_ 0
J0000J >1�
J
L0 _j >L0 L0 L0 L0
JNjJ
>
001�� >�(0 0(`)N
0110 >�I�
01�rn� >�(0
DO0I- >I�(01��
0�0� >�I�
0(`)N� >�
0
>1�1�00�
DO�� >
200
W1�1�� 111�?(p
W�ao
111�?(o
WN1--U) 1.1. Lq
��1�U)
Waco
LWr--W 110(o(0O
0_00u)
1.U0(D
Wrn00U) LU0
W
.��
�� W�?1�1��
0-000)
LU
200
2020/2 -
550.0
DNO -848
60T INITIAL
1586
Q +W
Q +W
��
Q +W
��
Q +W
��
M +W ����
�IT_
Q +W
��
Q +W
0
+W ����
Q +W
2020/13
FIBER
MAXIMUM
4408
2020/2-
550.0
2 -636
60 °F INITIAL
2802
0OJ �N oIT J
(0 LU 1_ "W
�N
0OJ �N
1-- 0W
0OJ �N
(0`OW
J ��N�
0(OJ �N
1�OW
0NJ
1��W
�I
J ��N�
W
000J
0000W
III
I,QO
—II
I,QO
—II
I,QO
—II
I,QO
pOW
II
0<0
—II
1�Q0
III
1�Q0
p
No
II
O
—II
r,Qp
2020/13
ACSR
24/7)
MAXIMUM
6800
LO
LO
LO
LO
NCO
0 0
0 0
N
O
0 O
°F
1412
L? () LO
�? (A o
L? (A Sri
L? (A Sri
(A O
L? (A o
L? (A Sri
o
L? (A Lo
2020/13 -
620
DNO -848
60 INITIAL
MAXIMUM
4408
N O N
N
N O
N
N
O
N O
2020/16
.8
FIBER
180
2
r` 2
180
2020/13 -
2 -636
60 °F INITIAL
2763
T_ T_
2
2
2
2
2
620.8
MAXIMUM
6800
2020/16
(24/7)
2020/16-
DNO -8482
60 °F INITIAL
1364
2020/22
648.4
FIBER
MAXIMUM
4408
160
160
2020/16-
2020/22
648.4
2 -636
8
60 °F INITIAL
2789
(24/7)
MAXIMUM
6800
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
140
140
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
120
120
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
100
12
SID
100
60 °F INITIAL
8S
9SD
666.87
882.36
4S
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
9 SD
9SD
4S
60 °F INITIAL
80
9SD
607.16
579.22
9SD
628.
0
80
MAXIMUM
6 SD 348.28 4S
9SD 517.29
4S
551.48
9 SD
4S
4S
4S
0
DEG
BARE
AI\
60
�
60
60 DEG F
All
-
- - - - --
40
40
'X' - S = NUMBER OF STATIC DAMPERS
- - --
302
DEG
F MOT
- - --
- - - - --
��
X- C = NUMBER OF CONDUCTOR DAMPERS
'X'-
SD = NUMBER OF SPACER - DAMPERS
36.9
I
I
�50
ft.
20
I
(
20
OHW
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION NOTES:
1. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPANY'S GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROVISIONS
0
co
00
-
0
AND GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN.
0
2. EROSION & SEDIMENTATION MEASURES TAKEN AT EACH STRUCTURE
0
O
o
o
N
SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE PROJECT COORDINATOR AND IMPLEMENTED
O
O W
O
W
O
fb
o
O
o
O
O
O
O
�
PRIOR TO EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
3. AT A MINIMUM, AREAS MARKED ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING
O
W
O
BY SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST EROSION WHEN ANY
+
+
+
+
W
+
-20
O
O
O
Crossing of Mill Creek measures
O
O
-2Q
EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OCCUR UPSTREAM OF THESE AREAS .
approximately 250 LF from
Mill Creek
OHW. Clearance to lowest line
is approximately 50 feet.
°°
x
M
M
OO
o � �
O
l0 .
I` .
M
12
> 0
0
11 �
11
13
_ o
o
p
o
t ap
o
W
10
t�
-
9
Lo
LO
+o
N
0 0)
o
a o
d p
14
I
0
N
x �
0
200.0 FT.
0
^�
r7�
HORIZ. SCALE
N
A
20.0 FT.
�n�
i VERT. SCALE
O
.ry
Z
15
W
J_
LL
((
N
O -
O
-
o
0
+ M
�
O +
O
+
00 0
O+ 0)
0
o
_
O �' _
O
160
W 0
17
0 W
0
230 KV TRANSMISSION LINE2020
m
Z
Q
N
Q
>
+ �
WINFALL — ELIZABETH CITY
W
I-
W
Y
a
0
rn 't
o
W
a
(
~ o
0
U
0_
Q
W
D
E
NAME DATE SCALE SHEET NO.
DRAVVN RAS 1/15/13
ORT. 0 2 OF 1
0
CHECKED VE 1" =20
Z
va
INSPECTED
DRAWING NO.
U
69
REVISIONS
(N.E.S.C.)
2007 EDITION
LOADING
N. E.S.C. CLEARANCES
RULING SPAN
INSTALLED
SIZE
STRINGING
TENSION 60 °F
MAXIMUM
TENSION
INSTALLED
SIZE
STRINGING
TENSION 60 °F
MAXIMUM
TENSION
ELECTRONIC
W
0
Z
W
�_
APPROVED
RMC
- 2020 -� —256
DESIGN
ICE
WIND
OF
WATER
GROUND
ROAD
RAILROAD
SEE TABLE
CONDUCTOR
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
SEE
TABLE
SHIELD
WIRE
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
PLS CADD
PROJECT NO
W.O. NO.
B/M NO.
Q
O
SPECIFICATION
DATA
60,
1/2,,
4 LBS.
00
22.5 FT
22.5 FT
22.5 FT
30.5 FT
99 -2329
1
1 2351
1 CAD No202001 .BAK

PLS -CADD DRAWIN
SPAN
RULING SPAN (FT)
CONDUCTOR
TENSION (LBS)
JOI�J >OOO
(011_
JlnlnJ >I�ln
(`')I- I1_
J NJ
>OOO
I- I1_ 00
JOp�J >I�ln
O
JOI�J
>I�O
JI­�J
NI-
>I�ln
�L0 I`
J��J
>I­
_j 1100
ISO
�L0 I1_
JInOpJ
>
2020/64
DNO
60 °F INITIAL
1305
0�00� >I1_
01-- >L0
0(`)I--
>I1_
0(0(`')I- >L0
04,E >Lo
0
Q�(11)I- >�
0q
0(`)NI- >
200
0- co ()
LU (01 (01
0- N(`')()
LU (o
W(oN(
LULq (o
WaoNU) LU (o
WL0
NU)
LU (C)
W�MU)
LU0(D
0- NNU)
W`0 T
0-0m
LULq(o
W
200
-
692.8
-848
�+ II
OL<7W
���
<+ II
��
^+ II
���
^ +W ��
al<7J
^
a�J
+W
��
^ +W
a(OJ
��
^ +W
aNJ
^ +W
<+
��
^ +W
<+
2020/66
FIBER
MAXIMUM
4408
2020/64 -
2 -636
60 °F INITIAL
2728
I J N
O
0 LU
J N
-M
00)W
O J
m
N
00-j
- M W
O N
-M W
N
-M W
0
-M W
O J
-M W
N J
W
MAXIMUM
6800
(� W
N II
W
I� II
W
- II
1` II O
1` II O
1` II O
1` II O
1` II O
1` II O
2020/66
692.8
ACSR
24/7
o O
NCO
O
��O
O
o
��0
��O
o<
O
�a
`�
�a
�a
o
�a
60 °F INITIAL
1531
(
00�O
U)
C (
U) I­
U) I­
<<
2020/66-
570.4
DNO -848
MAXIMUM
4408
'q(/JO
C
C?
N(A�
N(A�
N(A(0
2020/75
FIBER
180
II
II
II
II
�
II
II
II
� II
kN II
180
2020/66-
570.4
2 -636
ACSR
60 °F INITIAL
2792
T_
_
T
o=
2
2
2
2
2
MAXIMUM
6800
2020/75
(24/7)
60 °F INITIAL
N
MAXIMUM
O
60 °F INITIAL
O
160
160
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
140
140
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
120
120
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
100
100
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
80
9SD
9SD
9 SID
80
MAXIMUM
12 SD 773.58
612.34
9
SD 571.77
615.34
4S
607.93 SD
9SD
4S
4S
4
4 S
564.57
9
SD
576.73
472.91
4S
S
0 DEG
BARE
60
60
�
r
'
F
�6ODEG
40
- - - - --
40
X— S = NUMBER OF STATIC DAMPERS
X— C = NUMBER OF CONDUCTOR DAMPERS
\ —_ - --
___
__ --
- --
-
'X'- SD = NUMBER OF SPACER - DAMPERS
�41 ft.
--
--
302 DEG F MOT
20
41.5
37.9
20
OHW
28.3
I
I
I
1
I
1
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION NOTES:
Erl
1. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN
T
® 1P
ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPANY'S GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROVISIONS
0
0
AND GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN.
-
2. EROSION & SEDIMENTATION MEASURES TAKEN AT EACH STRUCTURE
N
p
c0
SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE PROJECT COORDINATOR AND IMPLEMENTED
O
N
O
O
O
O
b
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
PRIOR TO EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
00
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
p
3. AT A MINIMUM, AREAS MARKED ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING
O
O
O
O
BY '< SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST EROSION WHEN ANY
-20
00
O
O
O -
W
O
W
W
O
W
-20
EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OCCUR UPSTREAM OF THESE AREAS.
Crossing of Little River measures
Little River
approximately 145 LF from OHW. Clearance
to lowest line is approximately 41 ft.
N
OW O O
M
(+� P O
64
m
0
o
Q (V ^O , ❑
M
El 66 ®ONL /V
0)
,o
p
P
LO 00
LO
❑ ❑
00
67
�
O
O
O
MM
lrj
�
�`',
tlJ
(00
M �,M
68
N
Q, o
o
�
0
C)
,
0
N
N
O O
O
O
69
200.0 FT. HORIZ. SCALE
N
Q\
O
O
o
^•
Ory
20.0 FT.
(0 ;
Y.
VERT. SCAL
O
�
Z
00
O
Q
W
Q� p
J_
LL
SJ�Q
O
SG
7
Y_
O
4)
Diu
Y.
0
O
Y_
O
230 KV TRANSMISSION LINE2020
m
Z
Q
o
C)
O
Q
W
a
Q� 0
72
WINFALL — ELIZABETH CITY
,
oW0-
0
0-
U
Q
Q
NAME DATE SCALE NO.
QSHEET
RAS 1/15/13 OF 18
0
CHEC ED VEORT. 1" =200 �J
Z
cfl
INSPECTED
DRAWING NO.
U
69
REVISIONS
(N.E.S.C.)
2007 EDITION
LOADING
N. E.S.C. CLEARANCES
RULING SPAN
INSTALLED
SIZE
STRINGING
TENSION 60 °F
MAXIMUM
TENSION
INSTALLED
SIZE
STRINGING
TENSION 60 °F
MAXIMUM
TENSION
ELECTRONIC
W
0_
Z
W
APPROVED
RMC
- 2020 - —263
DESIGN
ICE
WIND
°F
WATER
GROUND
ROAD
RAILROAD
SEE TABLE
CONDUCTOR
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
SHIELDWIRE
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
PLS CADD
PROJECT NO
W.O. NO.
B/M NO.
0
}
SPECIFICATION
DATA
0
1�2"
4 LBS.
0°
22.5 FT
22.5 FT
22.5 FT
30.5 FT
99 -2329
2351
CAD No 202001 .BAK

PLS -CADD DRAWIN
SPAN
RULING SPAN (FT)
CONDUCTOR
TENSION (LBS)
J�ij(¢�
0(`�if�
J000
DOI��
1�
�L0
JO�O 00
DOI�(`') �L0
J�O(0 1�0
0N�L0 �L01
J000
0�1�I
X00
�I�(01�
JO(00
00000
1�0
�L0 00
J�(00
0L0 L0 -
1�0
�L0 I�
J�(`')O
ONOO
1�0
�L01
J001�0
0000'
1�0
�L0 I
200
Wa 2�
Wrn 'N
W-
0_(� 'N W-
0_p ,(' LULq
0�0' N
WL?(p(p
W�(v0o
LULq
W00�('?
WL?(p
W(o�m
W�?(p
W�oN
u1�?(o
200
2020/124 -
603.0
DNO -848
60°FINITIAL
1444
J+ II
Q
rn +W
0 +W
^ +W ��
O�J
^+ II
<+
IT
���
^+ II
O�
��
^ +W
0NJ
^
O�J
+W
��
^
OT"
+W
2020/129
FIBER
MAXIMUM
4408
2020/124-
603.0
2 -636
ACSR
60°FINITIAL
2771
90 J
U)
�(`)J
NW
�OJ
II­
�N
IIMW
��N
(o'T W
J �N
000 ,1W
�N
1�0W
�N
1 0LU
J �N
1�oW
MAXIMUM
6800
_j
I � o M
NI it oo
o IQI oo
—I­
11- II O
-1 II
I` II
111II O
—1­ O
—1­ p
2020/129
24/7
Y�0 ��
NFL
N�0
��0
0 06
LO �0
��0
��0
�QO
48
60 °F INITIAL
1328
0 00 U>
0)
0(A I`
0
N(AI`
IU)
N()0
N(A1`
N(A1`
N(A�
2020/130
683.5
FIBER
MAXIMUM
4408
180
011 II
11
N
�
II
� II
�
�
�
180
2020/129-
683.5
2 -636
ACSR
6o °F INITIAL
2732
2
_
T_
=
LW _
(,) _
(,) _
Lo
(,) _
(,) =
MAXIMUM
6800
U) N
1
2020/130
(24/7)
Q 00 N
X0
N
2020/130 -
5687
DNO -848
60 °F INITIAL
1545
MAXIMUM
4408
N 0
N
2020/132
.
FIBER
160
N
�
�
160
2020/130-
568.7
ACSR
6o °F INITIAL
2796
MAXIMUM
6800
2020/132
(24/7)
2020/132-
497.6
DNO -8482
60 °F INITIAL
1780
MAXIMUM
4408
2020/137
FIBER
2020/132-
2 -636
ACSR
60 °F INITIAL
2853
MAXIMUM
6800
2020/137
497.6
(24/7)
140
140
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
120
120
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
100
100
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
MAXIMUM
60 °F INITIAL
0
MAXIMUM
80
O
80
741.74
683.91
586.99
477.45
603.86
526.34
0 DEG BARE
48771
415.62
473.73
60
60
0 DEG F
40
_ _
-
- - - --
40
X- S = NUMBER OF STATIC DAMPERS
- --
-
'X' NUMBER OF CONDUCTOR DAMPERS
3
- _.-
X- SD = NUMBER OF SPACER - DAMPERS
20
20
36.8
EROSION & SEDIMENTATION NOTES:
�48
ft. OHW
47�
1. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMPANY'S GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROVISIONS
0
0
AND GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN.
2. EROSION & SEDIMENTATION MEASURES TAKEN AT EACH STRUCTURE
O
SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE PROJECT COORDINATOR AND IMPLEMENTED
(0
O
O
0
O
00
nN
0
0
O
-
N
O
7
O
7
00
°
N
(` )
O
PRIOR TO EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.
3. AT A MINIMUM, AREAS MARKED ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING
ao
O
M
00
p
O
°
(,)
0
0
0 p
BY '< SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST EROSION WHEN ANY
O
+
+
+
+
+
-20
p
O
O�
—
O
N
p
O
O 7
-20
EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OCCUR UPSTREAM OF THESE AREAS.
Crossing of Knobbs Creek measures approximately
200 LF from OHW. Clearance
to lowest
line is
approximately 48 ft.
0
Knobbs Creek
0
Lq
N
O
O'
00
+ c
Uj
00
LO _
O Q
• • '
11,
O+
LID
gg
��q
O
0 N N �•
Q`1 ° ��
o
C0
p
N
EEO
^�
N
2
133
a p
a.o
5
136
77
°
• •
•
• N
•
129
0
132
rn
O
134
mAlEn ,ws.
W umwmm4 0 * ^u^
mn ., � „ ,, ,,:"„ N
00
137
0
• •
(6
N
•
N
N
T" N
!
200.0 FT.
N
1. (o
r
�
HORIZ. SCALE
1
o0
a°
�0
r
20.0 FT.
S�
VERT. SCALE
O
Z
W
r'
J
LL
rn.
0
k� 60
°CA
f
O' C9
230 KV TRANSMISSION LINE2020
m
Z
0
°
o
a
WINFALL - ELIZABETH CITY
o1a
U
0
°
Q
NAME DATE SCALE SHEET NO.
DRAVVN RAS 1/15/13
ORT. 0 17oF 1
0
CHECKED VE 1" =20
Z
cfl
INSPECTED
DRAWING NO.
U
cfi
REVISIONS
(N.E.S.C.)
2007 EDITION
LOADING
N. E.S.C. CLEARANCES
RULING SPAN
INSTALLED
SIZE
STRINGING
TENSION 60 °F
MAXIMUM
TENSION
INSTALLED
SIZE
STRINGING
TENSION 60 °F
MAXIMUM
TENSION
ELECTRONIC
W
0_
Z
W
APPROVED
RMC
1 — 2020 -1 -271
DESIGN
ICE
WIND
OF
WATER
GROUND
ROAD
RAILROAD
SEE TABLE
CONDUCTOR
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
SEE TABLE
SHIELDWIRE
SEE
TABLE
SEE TABLE
SEE
TABLE
PLS CADD
PROJECT NO
W.O. NO.
B/M NO.
0
}
SPECIFICATION
DATA
Q
60,
69
1/2,,
4 LBS.
00
22.5 FT
22.5 FT
22.5 FT
30.5 FT
99 -2329
2351
CAD N0202001 .BAK

U
W
Z
0
0
ATTACHMENT II.A.3.i.
32 FEET
EXISTING
R/W
50 FEET
EXISTING
230KV CIRCUIT
(LINE 82020)
125 FEET
57 FEET
EXISTING
R/W
75 FEET
EXISTING CONFIGURATION
TYPICAL RIGHT OF WAY LOOKING TOWARD ELIZABETH CITY SUBSTATION
TYPE OF STRUCTURE:
FOUNDATION :
APPROXIMATE AVERAGE HEIGHT:
WIDTH AT CROSSARM:
WIDTH AT BASE:
APPROX.AVERAGE SPAN LENGTH:
CONDUCTOR TYPE:
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH:
APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF LINE :
EXISTING
230 KV CIRCUIT
(LINE 82020)
WOOD H -FRAME
DIRECT BURIED
70 FEET
36 FEET
18 FEET
554 FEET
1109 ACAR
150 FEET
15.26 MILES

PROPOSED
230KV CIRCUIT
(LINE 82020)
29 FEET
EXISTING
R/W
50 FEET
125 FEET
54 FEET
75 FEET
PROPOSED CONFIGURATION
EXISTING
R/W
TYPICAL RIGHT OF WAY LOOKING TOWARD ELIZABETH CITY SUBSTATION
TYPE OF STRUCTURE:
FOUNDATION :
APPROXIMATE AVERAGE HEIGHT:
WIDTH AT CROSSARM:
WIDTH AT BASE:
APPROX.AVERAGE SPAN LENGTH:
CONDUCTOR TYPE:
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH:
APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF LINE
PROPOSED
230KV CIRCUIT
(LINE 82020)
STEEL H -FRAME
STICK -UP PIPE PILE
75 FEET
42 FEET
18 FEET
554 FEET
2 -636 ACSR
125 FEET
15.28 MILES

Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Datasheets
Delineation Map

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 15 Jan 2013
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Mr. John B. Bailey
Dominion Virginia Power
701 East Cary Street, 12t" Floor
Richmond, Virginia 23219
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District, Washington Field Office
Dominion Virginia Power
Elizabeth City to Winfall 230 kV Transmission Line
SAW - 2012 -01899
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Preliminary
jurisdictional determination was completed along the utility corridor from Elizabeth City,
North Carolina to Winfall, North Carolina. There are 223 aquatic resources located on
the utility corridor.
(IF NECESSARY, USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE
WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
1. State: NC County: Pasquotank City: Elizabeth City
2. Center coordinates of site (latliong in degree decimal format):
Lat. 36.2472561 Long. - 76.342881
3. Name of nearest waterbody: little River
4. Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
a. Non - wetland waters: linear feet: 25042.19 and/or acres.
i) Cowardin Class(es): R -4
ii) Stream Flow: NIA
b. Wetlands: 36.759 acres.
i) Cowardin Class(es): PSSIPEM
7. Name of onsite water bodies identified as Section 10 waters: None

❑ Tidal
❑ Non -Tidal
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination / Date:
® Field Determination 1 Date(s): 18 October 2012
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States
on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person
who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD
in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general
permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to
comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in
reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water
bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United
States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and
(7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and
all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional
issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be " waters of the United States on the subject project
site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity,
based on the following information:
F. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply -
checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested,
appropriately reference sources below):
3

Z Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant /consultant :Williamsburg Environmental Group (WEG)
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 inch = 5000feet. Elizabeth
City, Pasquotank, Nixonton, and Hertford NC Quadrangle, 1952.
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMAIFIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date): Received from WEG October 31, 2012
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
ve�ra ed by the Corns4md should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinati
INMEWE l�
I date "Signature and D
ject Manager Person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)
0

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: lA
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
r l Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Scction/Township/Range: NIA
City/County: PASQUOTANK, PERQU1MA.NS, ELIZABLTii CITY, TOWN W_ _I_N_ _F_AL_L Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Eh'1'IRO,4,W,N'rAt. Irivestiga[ar(s): K. PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N / 76°27'40,50 "W
GROUP, INC.
Date: 5!2512012 Soil Map Unit Name: BERTIE FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND NEAR FLAG D -4.
IND
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NNVI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):.
Local Relief: CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within 9 Wetland: X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %: 0 -2
Hvdraloev Parameter:
Dominant Species
Prima Indicators:
IND
Secondar y Indicators:
Warns americana
Shrub
FACW
_- Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (AI)
—High
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
)PAC
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
OBL
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
X Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B 15)
OBL
~Moss Trint Lines (B16)
_Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C])
OBL
—Dry-Season Wnter Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)'
~Oxidized Rhizospberes on Living Roots (0)
5Y 312
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
B2
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_Iron Deposits (115)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
30
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible on AerialImagery(B7)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
IOYR416
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
M
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Maier Depths (Itches),
Remarks: IIYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
_ Surface Water:
"
Water Table:
Saturated soil: 0
_Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Warns americana
Shrub
FACW
2
Acer rabrmu
Shrub
)PAC
2
' Typlraangastrfolia
Herbaceous
OBL
25
Sauntras cenwris
Herbaceous
OBL
25
Carei bafida
Herbaceous
OBL
20
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Sagillarialatfolia
Herbaceous
OBL
10
Hydroeoq,le antbellala
Herbaceous
OBL
1
Cicala mac :data
Herbaceous
OBL
3
Jancas canadenris
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Camv albalrrlescens
Herbaceous
FACW
10
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 1001/. Prevalence hides: 1.2
NOTT?:( +I- is tltc 111r11MMrs ore na1 rued nr vegetnlion rnfcrdeliorrs j Cirkukted ming n11 spxFesprer¢at.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER AIET.
Dominance Tesi >50 %: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Alatrix
Redox Features
Depth incites
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color (Moist)
%
Type
Lae
Texture
0 -3
A
10YR 3/2
100
SILT LOAM
3 -8
B1
5Y 312
97
5Y 414
3
C
M
SILT LOAM
8 -20
B2
loY 511
60
2.5Y 514
30
C
M
SILT LOAM
IOYR416
10
C
M
Hydric Soil hsdicators:
_Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Lrdiceaors for Problenralic Hydric Soils
Histic Fpipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black 1listic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
Icm Muck (A9)
—_
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) .
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (F10)
2em Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
Shipped Matrix (96)
— Depleted Ochric (F11)
Reduced Venic (Fl 8)
Organic Bodies (A6)
—Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12)
Piedmont Ploodplain Soils (F19)
-
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (Fl3)
- Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ocluic (Fl 7)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F t)
Reduced Vertic (1718)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A]
l) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Picdntont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Residdire Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 113
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND NEAR FLAG D -4,
secondary Indicators:
%
I lydrophytio Vegetation is Present:
�j
NWI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
Project:
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV T1L4NSM1SS10N LINE
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landfonn:
(rj
I
Applicant:
DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
Sectionfl'onnship/Range:
NIA
)
Cily /County:
PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
WILIJAh1SBURG
State:
NORTH CAROLINA
Site Start:
36 °18'50.67 "N / 76 °13`34.50 "W
EM118O\ MNrA4
Investigator(s):
K. PRESGRAVES
Site'1'ermiuus:
36 °1321.46 "N / 76°27'40.50 "W
GROUP, INC
Date:
512512012
Soil Map Unit Name;
B>:R'1'1L FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND NEAR FLAG D -4,
secondary Indicators:
%
I lydrophytio Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONVEX
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landfonn:
FLAT
Sampled Aren is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
u...r.•.,1.. ., b ". v arnr
_Drift Deposits (B 3)
~ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
raraurerer:
Dominant Species
1'rhnar y Indicators.
secondary Indicators:
%
Piruts laeda
Andropogon virginicus
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (118)
High Water Table (A2)
—_
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) -
_Moss Trinr Lines (B 16)
_Water Marks (Ill)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
— Oxidized Rhizosplteres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_Drift Deposits (B 3)
~ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
- _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Herbaceous
OBL
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
95
2.5Y 7/2
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Mater Depths (inches).;
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT AIET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
raraurerer:
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Piruts laeda
Andropogon virginicus
Sapling
Herbaceous
FAC-
FACU
40
40
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Quereas palastris
Sapling
FACW
10
Quercns nigra
Sapling
FAC
2
Lieliddambar•slyracifhra
Sapling
FAC+
3
N)rrsa V4vallea
Sapling
FAC
2
Querells plrellos
Sapling
FAC+
2
Eupolo illm eapillifolium
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Similar rolandifolia
Herbaceous
FAC
5
A4imrrlus ringens
Herbaceous
OBL
3
%Dominant species FAC or we(ter: 501% Prevalence Index; 3.3
NOTE:( + /- in die iudicaldrs are trot used hr regelation rvlerrlaidrrn) Cotcalated rising all species preseuG
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION 1'AIWIETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50 %: _
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF EUTHAMIA (3%a) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrovkvlic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox features
Depth inches
llorlzon
Color foist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0 -4
A
2.5Y4/2
100
LOAM
4 -10
BI
2.5Y 513
95
2.5Y 614
5
C
M
FINE SANDY LOAM
10 -20
B2
2.5Y 613
95
2.5Y 7/2
5
D
M
FINE SANDY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
-Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lem Muck (A9)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Marl (FIO)
— 2cm Muck (A10)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (171 J)
~_Iron•
Reduced Vertic (1718)
Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Mnngauese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Palyvahne Below Surface (SE)
Umbric Surface (F 13)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Oclnic (F17)
~Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
~Loamy
_ Reduced Ver€ic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) Gleyed Mntrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1520)
Resafictive Lc9ler (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 1C
Project: FL17ABFTH CITY TO WINF;ALL 236kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMTNTON VIRGINTA POWER SectiontrownshiplRange: NIA
CitylCounty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, FLT7..ABFTH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA); LRR T
WILUANiSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Star: 36 °18'50.67 "N 1 76°13'34.50 "W
3MROS11LE11TAL Investigator(s): S. KUPIEC Site Terminus: 36 °13'21A6 "N 176 °27'40.50 "W
GROUP, INC:
Date: 5/2412012 Soil Map Unit Name: PERQUIMANS SILT LOAM
Sururuniy of Findings; UPLAND IN AGRICULTURAI. FIELD NEAR FLAG C -7.
Ilydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): Local Relief, NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present. Problematic Parameters (see Remarks); _ Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland: Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: .0 -2
Iiydroltiev .Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators.
Secondary Indicators:
%
Glamv maritlnra
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (At)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (BI3)
Drainage Patterns (310)
_ Saturation (A3)
— [vlarl Deposits (1115)
— Moss Trim Lines (1316)
~ Water Marks (BI)
.-_.__ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C t)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Dritt Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Planes (01)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorpltic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
4 -8
BI
X FAC- Neutral'rest (D5)
85
2.5YR416
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
IFaier Depths (inches):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT DIET.
Surface Water:
132
2.5Y 611
60
Water Table:
40
C
M
Saturated soil; >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
I"
%
Glamv maritlnra
Herbaceous
OBL
5
%Dominant species FAC orwetter: 1001/.
NOTE:( +I- iu the indkwars are imt rued iu vegemio» calnd
Dominance Test >50 %uc X
Prevalence hndex is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation:
Prevalence Index: 1.0
cal -Wed using att spec!. present
VEGETATION PARAMETER MET,
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color foist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -4
A
IOYR 4/1
80
10YR 518
15
C
M
LOAM
10YR 416
5
C
PL
4 -8
BI
10YR411
85
2.5YR416
15
C
M
SANDY LOAM
8 -20
132
2.5Y 611
60
15Y 516
40
C
M
SANDYLOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicolois for Problematic Hydric Soils
_Mstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Icm Muck (A9)
~_
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
—
_ Marl (Fi0)
2cm Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (SG)
Ochric (I'll)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
-Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodpisin Soils (F19)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (1`13)
~Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material {TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Ail)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_AnomalOtnS Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resirielire Layer (IfObsened)
Remarks: SOIL PARAIITETER AIET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 1D
+ Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
+ f Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Section(fownship /Rauge: NIA
�3 1 City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUTMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
1V1LLIM,ISBURG Statc: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "IV
Firx o u llI, I Investigator(s): S. KUPIEC Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 1 76°27'40.50 "W -
CROl1l', INC •
Date: 5/2412012 Soil Map unit Name: CHAPANOKF SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings;
1'rinrar y Indicators:
WETLAND NEAR FLAG C-7.
Secondary LrtNcntors:
Y)phaangustifolia
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWl Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present;
X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
DRATNAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland;
X
Atypical Climatelllydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Qvdrolo2v Parameter.
Dominant Species _
1'rinrar y Indicators:
1ND
Secondary LrtNcntors:
Y)phaangustifolia
Herbaceous
0131,
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
OBL
� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
• High Water Table (A2)
— Aquatic Fauna (1313)
OBL
— Drainage Patterns (B 10)
• Saturation(A3)
Marl
IOD
Moss'frimLines(B16)
Water Marks (B 1)
~_
- Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rldzospheres on Living Roots (0)
1 OYR 511
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drill Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ Sauuntion Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent inn Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
—Other
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Mater Depths (Inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table: O
Saturated soil: O
Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species _
Stratum
1ND
%
Y)phaangustifolia
Herbaceous
0131,
80
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Sanninis carman
herbaceous
OBL
10
Leersiaoiyzoides
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Carer iwipinoidea
Herbaceous
OBL
5
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 1.0
NOTE,:( + / in Nre indimiorr ur a not aced ur regeiai ar rnicnlurims.J cal'alaied wh g ell yeeies yr.....
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER DIET.
Dominance'rest >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3A: X
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Dloist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -4
A
IOYR2l2
IOD
MUCK
4 -20
B
1 OYR 511
100
SIT T LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
(Al)
Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators forProblematic 11),dric Soils
_Histosol
_Histic Epipcdon (A2)
—Coast
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_Black Ilistic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
-Redox Depressions (FS)
_ tern Mack (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
_2cm Mack (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)_
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (FI 1}
Vertio (FI8)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Irou- Manganese Masses (FI2)
—
_Reduced
_Piedmont Ploodplain Soils (F] 9)
_Organic
_5eni Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
� Umbric Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
~ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_ Delta Ochric (Fl 7)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
—I cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_ Reduced Vertic (F 18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
-Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Lonmy Soils (F20)
Restrictive La),cr {Ifi)bsemed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 1E
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINI %ALL 230kV'I'l2ANSMISSI0N LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectio frownship/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN Olt WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N I76 °13'34.50 "W
FIM11ON21F\fAL Invesligator(s ): S.KUPiEC SiteTenninus: 36 °1321.46 "N /76°27'40.50 "1V
GROUP, INC
Date: 5/2412012 Soil Map Unit Name: WATER
Summary of Findings;
OPEN WATER AT FLAG N -10.
Matrix
.S'eeondar , Indicators:
Hydrophylic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: x
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland;
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
klydroloav Parameter:
%Dominant species FAC or welter:
ITT:(+ / -iu fire iudirnt rs are xat rrseAirr vex
Prevalence Index:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance'rest >50%: _
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WIT] IIN OPEN WATER AREA.
Morphological Adaptations;
Problematic Hvdroolnvtic Vegetation:
Primary Indicators:
Matrix
.S'eeondar , Indicators:
Depth (inches)
~ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
X Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Color Molst
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (A 13)
Texture
_ Drainage Patters (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B 15)
95
_Moss Trial Lines (1316)
Water Marks (BI)
~_Sediment
Hydrogen Sulfide Odur (Cl)
PI,
_Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Deposits (132)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres an Living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
~_
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plnnts (DI)
_Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (1)2)
_Inundation Visible oil Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other
_SliailorvAquitard(D3)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (DS)
Sphagnum Moss (118)
Water Deplhs(hnehes):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET,
Surface Water: >12"
WaterTable:
Saturated s4l:
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
%Dominant species FAC or welter:
ITT:(+ / -iu fire iudirnt rs are xat rrseAirr vex
Prevalence Index:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance'rest >50%: _
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WIT] IIN OPEN WATER AREA.
Morphological Adaptations;
Problematic Hvdroolnvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Color faist
%
Color Molst
%
., e
Loc
Texture
0 -20
A
2.5Y 5/2
95
7.5YR 518
5
C
PI,
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol(AI)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Itrdico tomfor Problematic H}vlricSoils
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
— Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
1cm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
--Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (FIO)
2cm Muck (AI0)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (Fil)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Iran- Manganese Masses (Fl 2)
—
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surfacer (S8)
Umbric Surface (Fl3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ I cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A]
1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (RI)
_Reduced
_Piednrort Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObserwd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: IF
1 i Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
j Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectionlTownship/Rauge: N/A
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
W1LLL"ISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: - 36 °18'50.67 "N /76 °13'3450 "W
E34V1RONAIENI'AL hrvestigator(s): K.PRESGRAVES Site'renninus: 36'1321.46"N/ 7627'40.50"W
GROUP, INC
Date: 5!25/2012 Soil Map Unit Natne: UllDRTHENTS LOAMY
Summary of findings;
UPLAND NEAR FLAG N -10,
d'econdar y Inelleators:
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks); _
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland !Hydrology is Presenl;
I
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):_
Landfono:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland;
Atypical Climatelllydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydroloev Parameter:
Dominant Species
Priarary Indicators:
d'econdar y Inelleators:
%
Baccliarls Jralinrifolia
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (M)
_!hater Stained Leaves (139)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
—I ligh Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Palma (B13)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
— Water Marks (B1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
— Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drill Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduccd Iron (C4)
_ Samratiou Visible oil Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction itr'ri[led Soils (C6)
~Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial lrnagery (137)
Other
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Herbaceous
FACU
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
SO
IOYR 5/6
Spliagrmm Moss (DS)
!Pater Deplks (Inches):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Wnter Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
1ND
%
Baccliarls Jralinrifolia
Shrub
FACW
2
Elipatorh nl senriservntanr
Herbaceous
FACW
30
Psitortan turdmn
Herbaceous
NI
25
Lespedeza repens
Herbaceous
UPL
25
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Jaucas canadensis
Herbaceous
OBL
20
Andropogon virginlcas
Herbaceous
FACU
15
iirigeron ran nus
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Airthatantlanrt odorallnrt
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Bon}clthan virginiarnrar
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Eripalor'ium capillifahum
Herbaceous
FACU
1
Dichanthaffisur cl atdesrinum
Herbaceous
FAC+
3
Ambrosia aNendsilfolia
Herbaceous
FACU
I
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 67% Prevalence index: 3.1
NOTE:( + / -hs f1mindirotarsnre tmlo-dh,n gemri­rn7rofnrim�sJ - Cnlcrdated nrirrg nllspeciesprasenr.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Daminance'rest >50 %: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ UNIDENTIFIED SPECIES OF LESPEDEZA PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroohvtic Veactation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color (Moist
%
Color (moist)
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0-10
A
2.5Y 512
75
IOYR 516
15
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
25Y 516
10
C
M
10 -20
B
25Y513
SO
IOYR 5/6
20
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (At)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problemalle Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedou (A2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (FS)
_ lcru Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Sandy Redox (SS)
_Marl (FI0)
_gem Muck (Alo)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Irou- Manganese Masses (1`12)
—Umbric
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19)
_ 5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS )
— Surface (1713)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (89)
—Delia Ochric (Ft?)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F])
_Reduced Vertic (Fl S)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A]
1) Loamy Gleyed. Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrlerire Lrryer (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type;
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
J City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY,'I'OWN OF WiNrALL
WUJJAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
FNT110N111'ATAL Invesiigator(s): K. PRESGRAVES
CROUP INC.
' Date: 5/25/2012
Sampling Point Number: IG
Section rownship/Range:
NJA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
Site Start:
36 °18'50,67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus:
36 °13'21.46 "N l 76°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name:
NIXONTON- YEOPIM COMPLEX
Summary of Findings;
UPLAND NEAR FLAG K -6.
Secondary Indicators:
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: i
N WI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
NONE
Welland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfarm:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
ttyaromLV raramerer:
Dominant Species
Prinrar y Lrdicalors:
Secondary Indicators:
%
Loliumperenme
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (119)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B 15)
_Moss Trim Lines (1116)
— Water Marks (BI)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2}
Sediment Deposits (B2)
~—Drift
_ Oxidized Rhizosphcres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Deposits (133)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
- Saturation Visible on Aerial hnngery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iran Redaction in Tilled Soils (C6)
- Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other
_SballowAquitard(133)
Herbaceous
FACU
_FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagmmn Moss (DS)
Wwcr Deplhs (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET,
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Loliumperenme
Herbaceous
FACU-
40
Solidagoallissima
Herbaceous
FACU-
40
Psilotum nudrmn
Herbaceous
NI
20
Non - Dominant Species
Sira(um
IND
%
E igeroeamunrs
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Antkaxaruhrun odoratran
herbaceous
FACU
10
Ambrosia arterfsifolia
Herbaceous
FACU
15
ox)polis r•Igidior
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Gleconra kederacea
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Ranunculus acris
Herbaceous
FAC+
5
CarGT frlbalo7Aes
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
EupaiorivarcapiRfalitarr
Herbaceous
FACU
5
% Dominant species PAC or wetter: O Prevalence Index: 3.6
NOTE:( +F in the brJi oeorsrae rut rased eo regetatiuo enlerrinfinwr.) G'nlcututed rasing ntt ciu present
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation. Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MGT.
Dominance Test >50%:_
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic. Vegeta(imn: -
A7atrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Soist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
hoc
Texture
0 -8
A
IOYR 3/2
100
SANDY LOAM
8 -20
B
2.5Y 5/4
100
LOAMY SAND
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators forProblematic Hydric Soils
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
~Depicted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black his[ic (A3)
Sandy Gleycd Matrix (S4)
.—Sandy
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Icm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Redox (S5)
(FIO)
2em Muck (AIO)
Stratified Layers (A5)
- Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Marl
_Depleted Ochric (Fl 1)
_Reduced Vertic (1318)
_Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ &on- Iron Masses (F 12)
—_
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ 5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (58)
—Thin
Umbric Surface (1313)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (120)
_ Muck Presence (A8)
Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochre (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1 em Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (P 1)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow bark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below DarkSmface (Al
1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont FloodplainSoiIs(F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Depicted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive La) er (If observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: lH
Project: FL17ABETH CITY TO WINFALL 23OkV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectiawTownship /Range: NIA
City/County: PASQUOTANK, PFRQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or M1.RA): LRR T
WILI.IANNIMAG Stater NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: WIS'50.67 "N / 76 °13'3450 "W
'WV OtO.V11r�V..L Investigator(s): S, KUPIEC Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176 27'40.50 "W
G.RO UP, I C:
Date: 5/24/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: NLYON'1'ON- YEOPIM COMPLEX
Summary of Findings:
lrriurar y Indicators:
WETLAND NEAR FLAG IG6.
Seeonda Indicators:
Acer rubranr
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWJ Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland.
X
Atypical Climatelhydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hvilroloey Parameter:
Dominant S ecies
lrriurar y Indicators:
IND
Seeonda Indicators:
Acer rubranr
Sapling
FAC
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
OBL
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
• High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
OBL
—Drainage Patterns (B IO)
• Saturation (A3)
—Marl Deposits (B15)
OBL
_ Moss Trim Lines (1116)
Water Marks (B1)
_hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
OBL
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (112)
~_
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
10YR 2I1
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (113)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
D
_ Saturation Visible ou Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (114)
_Recent Iron Reduction iu Tilled Soils (C6)
Shorted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_ Iron Deposits (115)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Neu €ral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
Maier Depths (inches): -
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAAIETERiIIF.T.
Surface Water:
Water Table: O
Saturated soil; O
_Coast Prairie Redox (A 16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant S ecies
Stratum
IND
%
Acer rubranr
Sapling
FAC
10
Leersiaa;7zoides
Herbaceous
OBL
35
Smtrra•us cenrnms
Herbaceous
OBL
IS
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
P,rlandwsgigantens
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Junens efflrsus
Herbaceous
FACW+
10
Adyriumfrlirfemkia
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Caret ralpinoldea
herbaceous
OBL
5
Poftoruon sagittarunn
Herbaceous
OBL
10
%Dominant species FAC or wetter; 100% Prevalence lndex: 1.5
MOTE:( + /- hr ibe indicators are oat used b- vegetation rnrcnfntiansJ Cnlcuteted rrsiog all species present
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50"/.: X
Prevalence index is < 3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation: -
illstrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color foist )
%
Color &IOist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
O -4
A
10YR 2/2
100
MUCK
4 -20
B
10YR 2I1
95
2.5Y 512
5
D
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A 16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Pmblawoiic Hydile Soils
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (91)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Redox Depressions (FS)
X lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (FIO)
gem Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
—Orgy
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (Fl 1)
_Reduced Verlic (Fig)
is Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (1712)
—Umbric
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_Sera Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SR)
Surface (1713)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1`20)
_Muck Presence (AS)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
—I cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mined (FI)
Reduced Ver€ic (Fig)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TP12)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
^ Other
_Thick Dark Surface (A 12)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
�Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resirictive Layer (IfObsenvd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER RIET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

WetIand Determination Data form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 2A
Project: ELILABET'11 CITY TO WHdF'ALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINF;
yf.t
Applicant: DOMMONVIRGINIAPOWER ScctimVTownsbip/Rangc: NIA
}! .� City /County: PASQUOTANK, PBRQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MI.RA): LRR T
NNILLiAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36118'50.67 "N 176°13'34.50 "W
FANNIFON\IEYIAL Investigator(s): K.PRESGRAVIS SiteTemunus: 36°13`21.46 "N176°27'40.50 "W
0 Ito UP, INC.
Date: 512512012 Soil Map Unit Name: SP.ABRGOK LOAMY SAND
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND ON EDGE OF AGRICULTURAL FIELD NEAR FLAG 0-6.
.S'ecou ai , Indicators.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances; X
NWI Classificatiam .
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland;
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
.S'ecou ai , Indicators.
%
Prrarrnsserotina
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
~_Sparsely
_Surface Water (Al)
-Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_high Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
~Water
Marl Deposits (B 15) -
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Marks (B1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (04)
~Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Shorted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
—Iron Deposits (B5)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geornorphic Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard(D3)
�Inundation
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
2.5Y516
Sphagnum Moss (178)
Water Depths (inches):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Watcr:
Water Table:
Satnratedsoil: >20
-
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Prrarrnsserotina
Sapling
FACU
3
!Aires copallumni
Shrub
NI
5
microstegirmr vilydneu nr
Herbaceous
FAC+
30
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Lolhunperenne
Herbaceous
FACU-
10
Solielago allissfnra
Herbaceous
FACU-
7
Rubrrs angirnrs
Herbaceous
FACU+
3
Parilienocissus gninguefolia
Herbaceous
FACU
3
%Dominant species FAC orwetter: 50% Prevalence fudex: 3.5
NOSE:( + /- kr rke indeiYrrnra nre riot used in regernrimr cnfcur rlauj C'ar"dw d using O Pcierpresenr.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50 %: _
Prevalence index is <3.0:
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Color (Moist)
%
Color Molst
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0.15
A
IOYR 313
100
SANDY LOAM
15 -20
B
2.5Y 514
60
IOYR 313
30
INCLUSION
M
LOAMY SAND
2.5Y516
10
C
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histasol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (1'6)
Indicalors far Pmblemalic Hydric Soils
—Sandy Sandy MuckyMineral(SI)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Icm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_
_ Mad (F10)
gem Muck (AIO)
Stratified Layers (A5)
^_Organic
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochrie (Fil)
Reduced Vertic (F 18)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (Fl 2)
Piedmont Floodpinin Soils (F19)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (98)
Umbric Surface (1713)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_ Delta Ochric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (FIS)
—
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
PiedmontFloodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resiricrive Laker (If Obsen -ed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point lumber: 2B
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 23OLV TRANSMISSION LINE
rr F
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionrrownship/Range: N/A
City /County; PASQUOTANK, PERQUiMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
TAXIROSRf1NITAL Tnvestigalor(s): K. PRESGRAVF.S Siie Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N / 7627'40.50 "W
CROUP, INC
Date: 5!2512012 Soil Map Unit Name: CHOWAN SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WKi'LANn NEAR FLAG U -3,
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
N%VI Classification:
PF06F
Ilydrio Soils are PresenC X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONVEX
Weiland Hydrology is Present: XJ
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfornt;
FLAT
Sampled Area Is within a Wetland: X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
PrLnar y Ltdieators:
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Acerrubrum
Sapling
FAC
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
~Water Stained Leaves (B9)
FAC
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Farma (B 13)
OBL
_ Drainage Patterns (B 10)
X Saturation (A3)
—Marl Deposits (BI5)
OBL
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
OBL
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
FAC
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
FAC
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Cru3t (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
FACU
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_iron Deposits (BS)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
FAC
_Geomorphic Position (132)
hnuidation Visible on Aerinl Imagery (137)
Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagmm Moss (D8)
lVaterDepths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water.
Water Table:
Saturated soil: O
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A1(i)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6),
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Acerrubrum
Sapling
FAC
20
Ligtslr•nnu sinense
Shrub
FAC
5
Saarltrus cerntats
Herbaceous
OBL
40
Leersia oryzoides
Herbaceous
OBL
30
T)phalaiifaha
Herbaceous
OBL
20
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Rahim argutus
Herbaceous
FACU+
15
Carerlurida
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Carex lttptdina
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Impatiens capencis
Herbaceous
FACW
15
Solidagaallissirna
Herbaceous
FACU-
10
Hills tntandifolia
Herbaceous
FAC
10
Canipsis radicam
herbaceous
FAC
5
hills labrusca
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Gelsenduat senipervirens
Herbaceous
FAC
5
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 1001/6 Prevalence Index: 2,1
NOTE;( +,' in the indantors are not used la regaarion ealealadens.) cabilm"I nsixg off syecies preselit.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation; _ Remarks: VEGET"ION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3A; X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Rlolst
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -20
A
10YK 2/1
100
SANDY MUCK LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A1(i)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6),
Indicators for Problematic Hydrie Soils
Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Histic
—Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Depressions (F8)
_ tern Muck (A9)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_Redox
_Marl (Flo)
gem Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
^_Organic
_ Stripped Matrix (56)
Depleted Ochric (FI I)
_Reduced Wrtic (FI8)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
~Polyvalue
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Below Surface (S8)
^—Thin
Umbric Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Lona y Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (Fl7)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F 18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
X Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (173)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resn•icrive Leger (If 0bsermd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form •- Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Sampling Point Number: ZC
j
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 23OkV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectionrFownship/Rauge: NIA
1 City /Conaty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILIJANISKMG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36°18'50.67'T1176 °13'34.50 "W
EN'VII10'111ENTAL lnvestigator(s): S. KUPIEC Site TernLnlls: 36 °1321.46 "N 17627'40.50 "W
CROUP, I1\C.
Date: 5125/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: 'fETOTUM FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND AT FLAG VB -11.
1ND
Secondar > Indicators:
llydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Nomial Circumstances: X
NWf Classification;
PUBHx
Hydric Sails are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks); _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE,
Wetland Hydrology is Present; X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landfom :
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
_
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks);
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators.
1ND
Secondar > Indicators:
Liquidombarstytaciflua
sluub
FAC+
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (139)
FAC
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
• High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
FACW+
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
• Saturation (A3)
~Marl Deposits (B l5)
FAC+
_Moss "Trim Lines (B16)
_Water Marks (131)
hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
FAC
_Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
~Drift
X Oxidized Rldzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
FAC%V+
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
FAC
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent Iran Reduction in'fiUed Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
~_
_Iron Deposits (135)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
5
Geomorphic Position (112)
Visible on Aerial imagery (B7)
6 -20
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
—Other
7.5YR 518
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Sphagturm Moss (D8)
Maier Depllrs (hiches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER AIET,
Surface Water:
Water Table: O
Saturated soil: O
_ Mstosol (AI)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
1ND
Redox Features
Liquidombarstytaciflua
sluub
FAC+
10
Acer rubrmu
Shrub
FAC
5
Jmncusefrsus
Herbaceous
FACW+
15
Alchondreliran cloadestinum
Herbaceous
FAC+
15
Seneclo paiperenhis
Herbaceous
FAC
15
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
WD
Redox Features
Lespedeza crrneala
Herbaceous
N1
5
Toxicodandroniadlcans
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Solidago alllssinna
Herbaceous
FACU-
5
Cmripslr radleans
Herbaceous
FAC
2
Rubus argrrnrs
Herbaceous
FACU+
10
Cares iribuloides
Herbaceous
FAC%V+
2
Agaltnis lenir folla
herbaceous
FAC
2
% Dominant species FAC or welter: 1001% Prevalence Index: 3.0
NOTE.:( + /- inllte indeartars ore ml irrediu regelnfion cnfcul rimr J - Cnlc rinred,�si„g nil sprcierprerenr.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAAIETF.R AfET.
Dominance'rest >50"/0: X
Prevalence Index is t 3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdraohvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color loist
%
Color Aloist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -4
A
IOYR 412
90
IOYR 516
10
C
M
SANDY LOAM
4 -6
B
2.5Y 512
85
7.5YR 518
10
- C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
7,5YR516
5
C
PL
6 -20
B2
2.5Y 612
85
7.5YR 518
15
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Mstosol (AI)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicator:s for Problelnoffc Hydric Soils
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Ilistic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Icnr Muck (A9)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Marl (F IO)
_ 2cm Muck (A I O)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (F11)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12)
__Umbrie
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalne Below Surface (S8)
Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Brigid Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delia Ochric (1`17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ I cm Muck (A9)-
_Loamy Mucky 141incml (FI)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dart; Surface (1]H 2)
—Depleted Belove Dark Surface (All)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_PiedniontTloodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (173)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Resirloive layer (IfObserved)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT hWf.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
i •� Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQ TANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
FM'ILLIAN[SBURC Slate: NORTH CAROLINA
En'1'II101111FNEAL lovesligator(s): S. KUPIEC
CROUP, INC.
Date: 5/25/2012
Sampling Point lumber: 2D
SectionYl'ownship/Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.5D "W
Site Terminus: 36 °1321!46 "N / 76°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: CHOWAN SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND NEAR FLAG AA -6,
IND
,S'ecomdar y Indicators.
Ilydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Shrub
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
PFO1C
Hydric Soils are Present: X
FACW+
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landfomr
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X
—Water Marks (131) -
Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter.
Dominant Species
11rhiraq Indicators, -
IND
,S'ecomdar y Indicators.
Acer rub)-run
Shrub
PAC
_Surface Suit Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) -
—Water Stained Leaves (B9)
FACW+
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
• High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
OBL
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
• Saluration (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
FACW+
_Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
—Water Marks (131) -
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
OBL
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—
I0YR2/2
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (B 3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—
D
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
B2
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
5
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
SANDY LOAM
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Other
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagrmm Moss (D8)
Maler Depths (inches ):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table: O
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Saturated sail: O
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Acer rub)-run
Shrub
PAC
10
Cares'tribuloldes
Herbaceous
FACW+
15
Sam•re•ris cernnevs
Herbaceous
OBL
10
Jnnerrsefrsus
Herbaceous
FACW+
10
Runrev verticillatur
Herbaceous
OBL
10
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 1001%
ITF,:( +F in fie indicrenorsarenorirsed irr vegawion rnfarlariwrr j
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Foatmes
Arruulirnariagiganlea
Herbaceous
FACW
5
E iandrus gfganfesn
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Carer rulpiuoidea
Herbaceous
OBI,
5
Rubus argulus•
Herbaceous
FACU+
5
Prevalence Index: 1.9
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER AIF,T.
Dominance Test >501/.: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON- DOMINANT SPECIES OF POLYGONUM (5%) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrovltvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Foatmes
Depth Inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Moist
%
Rue
Lac
Texture
0 -4
A
10YR 211
100
MUCK
4 -8
Bl
I0YR2/2
a0
2.SY5/2
20
D
M
SANDYLOAM
8 -20
B2
2.5Y 512
95
10YR 618
5
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ His €osol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (p•6)
brdicatons for Problematic Hydric Soils
HisticEpipedor(A2)
~_Black
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
Depleted Da&Surface(F7)
Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
1 c Muck (A9)
~_
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (85)
—Mart (1710)
2cm Muck (At0)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
Reduced Verde (1`18)
—Organic
Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (F13)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Oclrric (Fl 7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
X 1 em Muck (A9)
loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_PiedmontFloedplain Soils (F19)
_Other
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Lnyer {ljObsened)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER AIET.
Type:
Depth (inches);

Wetland Determination Data form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 2E
Project: FLIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSN USSION LINT;
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectiori7ownshipiRange: NIA
City /Cmmty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF W_ _IN_ FATA, Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILIJAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 113134.50 11W
FNVII10\1f !\rFAL Investigator(s): K. PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °1321,46 "N 176 °27'40.50 "W
GROUP, ITC.
Date: 5!2512012 Soil Map Unit Name: TETOTUM FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND NEAR FLAG AA -6.
Secondary Indicators:
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: x
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Lmrdform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetlmtd:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hvdroloi=_v Parameter:
Dominant Species
Prinrar , Indicators:
Secondary Indicators:
%
Cynarlandactylon
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
—Aquatic Faama (B13)
~Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (BI5)
_Moss Trim Lines (1116)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sedunent Deposits (B2)
— Oxidized Rhizosplieres on Living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (CS)
—Drift Deposits (B3)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal. Moor Crust (M)
_Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_ Iron Deposits Q35)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
~ m Geoorphic Position (D2)
— Inundation Visible on Aerint Imagery (B7)
_ Other
_ Shallow Aquilard (133)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
l Paler• Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY I'AItAllWfER NOT TUFT.
Surface Water.
- Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Cynarlandactylon
Herbaceous
FACU
50
Tararacunt ofcinale
Herbaceous
FACU-
20
Plonlago lanceolata
Herbaceous
UPL
20
%Dominant species FAC or welter: O
r'M( + / -h: rlre iredirntafs ure nor riser!in� efalion crt7adutiatwj
Non - Dominant species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Psilorrnn nudran
herbaceous
NI
3
Ox3polis rigidior
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Cirsirnn r:dgare
Herbaceous
FACU-
3
Pleridimn aquilimax
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Prevalence Index: 3.8
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VCGGTATION PARAMETER NOT I%Wr.
Dominance Test >50%:
Prevalence Index is ¢ 3.0: ~_
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic lUdroi)Imic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
horizon
Color joist
%
Color (Hoist)
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -10
A
2.5Y312
100
SANDY LOAM
10 -20
B
2.5Y 5/4
100
LOAMYSAND
Ilyrldc. Soil Indicators:
-
_ Histosol (At)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic H),dric Soils
_ Ilistic Epipedou (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed f4fatdx (S4)
_Redox Depressions (FS)
Icm Muck (A9)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Marl (Flo)
2cm Muck (A 10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ocluic (Fll)
_Reduced Veitic (F1S)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_Organic
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Iron-
Umbric Surface (1713)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1520)
Muck Presence (A8)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Oebric (F17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
�_ 1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F 1)
~_
_Reduced Vertic (1718)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Other
_Thick. Dark Surface (A 12)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (720)
Resn•ictive Lcq cr• (IfObsenvdJ
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT i41ET.
.type.
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 2F
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectiorvT'ownship/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF W]NFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
tl'1LLiAh[SBLIRG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: - 36 °18'50.67 "Nl 76'13'34.50 "W
FNVIRMWNTAL htvestigator(s): K,PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °13`21.46 "NI 76°27'40.50 "W
GROUP INC .
Date: 5!2512012 Soil Map Unit Name: DRAGSTON FINE SANDY LOAM
Susmnary, of Findings; UPLAND ON CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ADJACENT TO ROUTE 344.
I Iydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: x NNNl Classification; N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: CONVEX
Wetland Ilydrolotry is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landfoun: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Prinrar y Indicators:
Secondary Indicators:
%
viola Worimt
Plantago lonceolala
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface \[rater (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (B9)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High !Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B 15)
_Moss Trint Lines (1316)
— Water Marks (B1)_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Presence ofRedueed Iron (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
—Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagmuu Moss (D8)
!rater Depncs (itwhe ):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >0
Dominant Species
Stratum
1ND
%
viola Worimt
Plantago lonceolala
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
NI
UPL
20
- 15
Nan - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Oxypolis rigidior
Herbaceous
OBL
10
Connaeliva conutnods
Herbaceous
FAC-
5
Siellarlawedia
Herbaceous
UPI,
5
'I'rifolimu mpens
Herbaceous
FACU-
3
Gctttiauacaresbaei
herbaceous
OBL
2
1 aricodendrwt tudicans
Herbaceous
FAC
1
Chelan entlrberlii
Herbaceous
OBL
1
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: O Prevalence Index: 3.4
NOTE;:( + / -1tr fhe irrdicaturs are trot used irr regerntiwr crrlerrlrrrimax) G'nfcn7nr � wring u!! �cies preseuG
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50%:_
Prevalence Index is ¢ 3.0: _
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroahvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Soist
%
Color Moist
%
e
Lac
Texture
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (AI) .
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
( oldlcerforsforProblenralicHydric Soils
_Histic Epipcdon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histie (A3)
Sandy Gleycd Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lem Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
.Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
_2em Muck (Alo)
Stratified Layers (A5)
~Organic
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
Reduced Vertic (T18)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (87)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
_Sera Mucky Mineral (A7)
—Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Preseuce (A8)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochric (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
[__16.11clive
Type:
Depth (inches):
REFUSED AT 0" DUE TO COMPACTION AND GRAVEL.

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WIlIFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
jt1 Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
6• City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF W_ INF_A_ L_L
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
11iVIR0N%I11 rAL R 1,,,,igator(s): S. KUPIEC
GROUP, INC.
Date: 6/7/2012
Sampling Point ]Number: 3A
Scction/fownship/Range: NIA
Snbrcgion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13`34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N / 76°2740.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Namc: DRAGSTON FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of rindings:
WE'T'LAND NEAR FLAG AAT -23.
IND
Secondary Indicators;
Hydmphytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
N WI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
DRAINAGENVAY
Sampled Area is within a NVetland: X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
ITvdrelmnv Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
IND
Secondary Indicators;
Liquidambarslyraciva
Shrub
PAC+
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
FACW+
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
FAC+
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
—Marl. Deposits (B15)
100
—Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (BI)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sedimeni Deposits (B2)
-- Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
2.5Y5/1
_Crayfish Burrows (CS)
—Drift Deposits (B3)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B¢)
~_
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Suits (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI),
Iron Deposits (135)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
5
Geomorphic Position (D2)
inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other
8 -20
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
2.5Y 5/1
_
10YR 516
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
Sphagnum Moss (138)
Timer Depths {inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARANWEER KIEL
7.5YR 416
Surface Water:
C
PI,
Water Table:
Saturated soil: 0 -6
Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A 16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Liquidambarslyraciva
Shrub
PAC+
5
Jmrcris efjosus
Herbaceous
FACW+
25
DichaiNheliaur cltardestinum
Herbaceous
FAC+
20
%Doinhiaut species FAC or wetter: 100%
NOTE: f + / -ind,h indicntorr are not used hr regdredm m1mi
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Dion - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
C;peras501gosas
Hefceous
FACW
5
LurhrlgiapalashIs
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Eupatorium caplllijolitein
Herbaceous
FACU
2
Prevalence Index: 2.4
VEGETATION PARANIETERAIET.
Aiateli
Redox Features
Depth Inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color (Alois()
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0 -2
A
I0YR 2/t
100
SANDY LOAM
2 -8
B 1
2.5Y5/1
75
10YR 516
20
C
M
SANDY LOAM
7.5YR 518
5
C
M
8 -20
B2
2.5Y 5/1
80
10YR 516
15
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
7.5YR 416
5
C
PI,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A 16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators jor Problematic flydric Soils
— Histio Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
—Marl
_ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
— (1710)
2cm Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (01)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
—Organic
Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Floodplain Soils (FI9)
Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
— Umbric Surface (P13)
_Piedmont
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
—Muck Prescuee(AS)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
DeltaOehric(F[7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F 18)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At l) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
— Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive La}er (IjObsen ed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAIIIF.TF.R AIET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 3B
Project: ELIZAEETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
t1i'll Applicant: DOMINION VfRGIMA POWER SeetionfTownship/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUO'PANK, PERQUIMANS, EIJT.ABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR cr MLRA): LRR T
ISRLUAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50 -67 "N 176 °13'34 -50 "W
r� "" lRo """"1Y"AL investigator(s): S. KUPIF.0 Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176 °27'40 -50 "W
G.RPl1P,ICC,
Date: 6/7/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: DRAGSTON FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of 1findings:
UPLAiN D ABU V k: F LAU ANT-35,
Secondary Indicalors:
Redax Features
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
1lydrie Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONW -,X
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfortir
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrolo" Parameter:
Dominant Species
PrInuitybfdleators:
Secondary Indicalors:
Redax Features
Liquidamrbarso,i-actJlna
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
— Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
Salutation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (Bl)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Dry- Scason Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (6 3)
Presence of Rcdnccd Iron (C4)
—
_Saturation Visible an Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
~Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
—iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial lmagery (137)
_Other
_Shallow Aquitard(D3)
8 -20
132
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
70
1 OYR 616
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
lYnter Depths (inches):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Strntum
IND
Redax Features
Liquidamrbarso,i-actJlna
Shrub
FAC+
5
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IiND
Redax Features
rinthoxamlunn orloralum
Herbaceous
FACTS
10.
Trifoliean tepens
Herbaceous
FACU-
5
Ilmpaloriron capillifoliron -
Herbaceous
FACU
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 3,8
NOTE;( + /- nr d,e nrdicnmrs —not erred in ve dnlion eakatrtd m.) Catcx&M+ rung all species presn,f.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50 %: X
Prevalence Index is < 3.0:
-- - --- UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF FESCUE (90 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redax Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color foist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -2
A
10YR 2/2
100
LOAM
2 -8
B I
25Y 6/3
80
IOYR 616
20
C
M
SANDY LOAM
8 -20
132
2.5Y 512
70
1 OYR 616
3o
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators;
_Histosol(At)
Coast Prairie Redox(Al6)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
IndicalorsforP i-ohlematicHydricSoils
_ llistic Epipedon (A2)
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
lem Muck (A9)
__2em
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Rcdox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
Muck (A10)
Stralified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ocltric (Fl l)
_Reduced Vertic (1718)
^_Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (57)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Sails (P19)
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_Polyvatue Below Surface (S8)
_Umbric Surface (1713)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (F20)
—_Red
Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochric (F17)
Parent Material (17172)
1 can Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (FIB)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObsefved)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 3D
r Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectiowTownship/Rauge: NIA
'.. City/ County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUUVIANS ,ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN Or, WINFALL Subregion(LRRorMLRA): LRRT
1WI,UAMSBIIRG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36°18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
FEsTUR0N11Ir\TAL atar htvesti s 8, KUPLEC Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N / 76°27'40.50 "W
G.k10U1',INC, g ()�
Date: 6/7/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: BERI'IE FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND AREA "AQ ".
IND
Secojidary
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWT Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief.
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks ):
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X
_
Atypical ClimatelHydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Flydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicalonv.
IND
Secojidary
Juncos lenrds
Ludwigiapahairis
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FAC-
OBL
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface iVater (AI)
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Color h1olst
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_ High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Texture
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
X Saturation (A3)
—Mart Deposits (B15)-
75
_Moss Trial Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B 1)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
M
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
—oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
10YR 312
_Crayfish Burrows (Cg)
_ Drill Deposits (33)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Saturation Visible an Aerial htmgery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
_ Other
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Inundation
X FAC - Neutral Test (D5)
Spliagnum Moss (DS)
if ater Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER AIET,
Surface Water:
Water Table:.
Saturated soil: O
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (1`6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Juncos lenrds
Ludwigiapahairis
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FAC-
OBL
30
15
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Paspaluar laeve
Jarrcas efrsrts
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FAC+
FACW 1
10
10
% Dominant species FAC or wuffer: 1001/6 Prevalence Index: 2.4
NpTE;( +/- h, fie indicnfurs nrenot aced h, Cn1err1n1ed rrsi�rg nlf pecies present
Rapid Testfor Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAABiTER MET.
Dominance Test >50'1.: X
Prevalence Index is <3,0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIFS OF RANUNCULUS (5 9/6) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Alatrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color h1olst
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0.8
A
2.5Y 412
75
10YR 5/S
25
C
M
SANDY LOAM
8 -20
B
10YR 312
100
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (1`6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric .Sorts
_Ilistic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
—Sandy
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
— Gleyed Matrix (S4)_
Redox Depressions (F8)
—I cm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_Mart (F10)
_gem Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (AS)
_Stripped Matrix (S(i}
_Depleted Ochric (F1 1)
Reduced Vertic (F15)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Dark
Iron- Mangmtese Masses (Fl?)
—
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_Organic
_Sera Mucky M¢ieral (A7)
Below Surface (Sg)
Umbric Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
-1
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ocluic (F17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
em Muck (A9)
-
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
_Reduced Vertic (Fig)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TT12)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) —Loamy Gleyeii Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplaiu Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (173)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resirictim Layer (If Obsenvd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type: _
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 3C
Project: ELI7ABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230k-V TRANSMISSION LINE
�tqll Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectiowTownship/Range: NIA
CitylCounty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELI7.•ABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
W11.L1ANISIlU11C State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34,50 "W
M'VIRO\Nir fAL Investigator(s): J. TFSCHI.ER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46"N / 76°27'40.50 "W
GROUP, INC.
Date: 6/7/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: EERT[E FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND NEAR "AQ" LINE.
Secondar , Indicators:
%
Hydrophytie Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks ): _
Landform:
FLAT
- Sampled Area is within n Wetland:
Atypical Climatc/1lydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0-2
~Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B 3)
~ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
raeaurcrur:
Dominant Species
Pt mar y Indlealors:
Secondar , Indicators:
%
Lespedeza enneato
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A 1)
_ Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (615)
_Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
_ hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
~Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B 3)
~ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
—
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Slanted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_'Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
ShallowAquilard(D3)
I0 -I8
BI
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
80
10YR 518
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Maier Depths (inches),
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT AIET.
Surface Water;
B2
2.5Y 2.5/1
93
Water Table:
5
C
M
Saturated soil: >20
raeaurcrur:
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Lespedeza enneato
Herbaceous
NI
15
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
rindiaxanduan odorawnt
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Daricus cmnta
Herbaceous
UPL
7
Tara acuat officlnale
Herbaceous
FACU-
7
Ahnis incamr
Herbaceous
M
5
Lepidium virginicrma
Herbaceous
FACU-
2
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: O Prevalence hid": 4.3
NOTE:( + /- in the indiMers arc vot nsenl is rrgemfimr cal- I&Iions) calculated usbig all.peeler prawn!.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NO.1• AIET.
Dominance Test >50 %:
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _
UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF GRASS (20 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Q.;] n ".• ".,. " +ar.
Alatrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Saist
% -
Color Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -10
A
2.5Y513
93
2,5Y5/1
5
D
M
SANDY CLAYLOA14l
7,5YR516
2
C
M
I0 -I8
BI
2.5Y S/1
80
10YR 518
20
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
18 -20
B2
2.5Y 2.5/1
93
10YR 512
5
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
7.5YR314
2
Hydric Soil Indicators:
-
_Histosol (Al)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
Indicalom fm• Problematic flydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
-
_ Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lem Muck (A9)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (AA)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (Flo)
2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (711) -
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedniont rloodplain Soils (1`19)
5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (98)
Umbrie Surface (1713)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Muck Presence (A8)
Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (F17)
Red Parent Material (7T2)
_ 1 em Muck (A9)
_Thin
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FL)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Very Very Shallow Dark Surface CFF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplaiu Soils (F19)
_Other
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (0)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
ResL•iclive Layer (IfObse)•red)
Remarks: SOIL PARAAICTI;R AIET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 4A
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionfrownship/Range: NIA
til City /County; PASQUOTANK, PERQUTMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
IM'f €IO��IF1fAh
Investigator(s); ators P. METER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N176 °27'40.50 "W
CROUP, INC Date: 6/8/2012 Soil Map Unit Name; HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings: Vk:GLO ATED JURMWICTR1NAL DEL'Uti XT FLAG 0111 -6, -
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydrie Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): Londform: DRAFNAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X Atypical Climatchlydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
rwrriuuar4w
Dominant Species
Pidutar y Indicators:
IND
Secoirdar y Indicators:
Salir oigra
Sapting
OBL
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
— Water Stained Leaves (B9)
FACW+
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (1113)
OBL
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
`_Moss
X Saturation (A3)
—
_Marl Deposits (13 15)
100
Trim Lutes (BI 6)
Water Marks (B I)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (62)
_Oxidized R16zospheres on Living Roots (0)
2.5Y411
_Crayfish Barrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—
C
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (114)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils .(C6)
-
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
5
_ Geomorphic Position (02)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
—Other
10 -20
— Shallow Agtutard (D3)
25Y 6/1
75
TM 4/6
X FAC- Ncutral Test (DS)
~
-
M
SAND
Splmgnnm Moss (D8)
FYruel- Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
IOYR 5/8
Surface Water:
C
M
Winer Table: O
Saturated soil: O
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie RedoX (AI6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
rwrriuuar4w
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Salir oigra
Sapting
OBL
5
Jmrcirs effiqus
Herbaceous
FACW+
20
7)pha latifolla
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Non - Dominant Species.
Stratum
IND
%
Larhrlgla palaslr•is
Herbaceous
OBL
10
Galirau aparbre
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Runes crispus
Herbaceous
FACU
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 1001% Prevalence Index: 2 -0 -
NOTE:( +/- is the 80camrr arc uor used irr regewiox calculo bm) Calerr&W -bg nfl rpecies pruexl.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER AMT.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF GRASS (15 %) AND NON - DOMINANT RANUNCULUS (10 %) AND
Morphological Adaptations: _ SEDGE (5 %) PRESENT.
Problematic FIydrophytic Vegetation: -
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Harizon
Color Iolsl
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0-2
A
10YR 211
100
SILT LOAM
2 -10
131
2.5Y411
80
10YR5 18
15
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
-
10YR 516
5
C
PL
10 -20
B2
25Y 6/1
75
TM 4/6
15
C
M
SAND
IOYR 5/8
10
C
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie RedoX (AI6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problentaoc Hydric Soils
flistio Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
'
_Black Histic (A3)_
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
lcm Muck (A9)
__2cm
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (F31)
_Reduced Vertic (FI8)
_Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—
-Iran- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umbrio Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Della Ochric (F17)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Verlic (FI8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al l) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (A 12)
X Depleted Matrix (0)
_ Anoralous Bright Loanty Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (If obsenvd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 413
Summary of Findings: UPLAND IN ATHLETIC FIELD NEAR FLAG CH -6,
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: N/A
Ilydrie Soils are Present X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief, CONVEX
Wetlnnd Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Laudform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland: Atypical Clinnate/Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
-
Prbaar y Indicators:
SerandaiyAndicalors.,
%
Trifoliunlfeperts
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Project:
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
"r
I
�?
Applicant:
DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
Sectionrrownship/Range:
N/A
Water Marks (BI)
City/County:
PASQUOTANK, PL+RQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WTNFALL
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
117LLIAMSBURG
State:
NORTH CAROLINA
Site Start:
36 °18'50,67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
FANInONUENCAL
ftrvesti ator s
R METER
Site Temrinus:
36 °13'2lA6 "NI76 27'40.50 "W
CROUP, IN.0
Date:
602012
Soil Map Unit Dame:
HYDE MUCKY SlUr LOAM
Summary of Findings: UPLAND IN ATHLETIC FIELD NEAR FLAG CH -6,
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: N/A
Ilydrie Soils are Present X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief, CONVEX
Wetlnnd Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Laudform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland: Atypical Clinnate/Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
-
Prbaar y Indicators:
SerandaiyAndicalors.,
%
Trifoliunlfeperts
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (AI)
_ ~Water Stained Leaves (139)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauns (1313)
Patterns (B10)
— Saturation (A3)
—Mart Deposits (13 15)
_Drainage
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (BI)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ Iron Deposits (BS)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
7.5YR 416
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
lVaterDeplhs (Inches):
PL
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water.
Water Table;
Saturated sail: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Trifoliunlfeperts
Herbaceous
FACET-
25
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Sisyrinchiran allanticum
Ierbaceous
FACW
5
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: O Prevalence Index: 3,7
NOTE!( + / -in nine hedicatorc are rrut ascNiu regefulioa caiculofions -) Calcalnfed using all spederpr —w..
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VrGE.TAT'ION I'Al2ANIETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50%: _
Prevalence Indexis <3.0: UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF FESCUE (50 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroohvlic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color (Aloist )
Color 'foist
%
Type
Lne
Texture
0 -5
A
10YR2 /2
100
SILT LOAM
5 -20
B
2.5Y 5/1
80
IOYR 518
15
C
M
SILTY CLAY
7.5YR 416
5
C
PL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol(At)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicatorsfor Problematic Hydo-leSoils
_Hislic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (Fg)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (FIO)
2cm Muck (A10)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Strippcd Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ocluic (F) l)
—Iron-
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
—Dark
Dark Surface (S7)
Manganese Masses (1`12)
_Piedmont Fleodplain Soils (F19)
_
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Below Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (1513)
_ Anomalous Bright Lonmy Soils (F20)
— Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9}
_Delta Ochric (F17)
~ Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mhreml (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (153)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Lcgcr(IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET,
Type:
Depth inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LM
Applicant: DOMINTON VIRGINIA POWHR
City/County: PAS UOTANK, PER UIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFAL L
MILL1AA SBURG State: NOWril CAROLINA
Fil'N'MIX1,1101TAL Invesfigator(s): P. MITER
G l3 o U.P, I N C. Date: 6!8/2012
Sampling Point Number: ___ 4C
Serflauffownship/Range: NIA
Subregion (I RR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N l 7627'40,50"W
Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Sunimaty of Findings: JURISDICTIONAL DITCH NEAR FLAG CN -2.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): Local Relief, CONCAVE
Welland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform: DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area Is within a Welland: Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %T 0 -2
%Dominant species FAC or wetter:
TC( +/-irrrhe h0cutanare nor ased ire veKerafien ruledalion,
Lyon - Dominant Species Stratum IND
Prevalence Index:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >501.:
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdronhvtic Vegetation:
Prl+nar , bulleatars:
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
Depth inches
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (At)
—Water Staincd Leaves (B9)
Color (Alois()
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Texture
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (1115)
100
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
2.5Y 4/1
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (113)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (0)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Sttmted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
X Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
20
Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (117)
_ Other
Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ FAC-Nenlral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
!Pater Depths (inclies):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water: 6
_
Water fable:
Hydric Soil hidicators:
CHANNEL IS 5' WIDE, AND BANKS ARE 4'111011. OIILVM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil:
— Ilistosol (A l)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dad: Surface (F6)
%Dominant species FAC or wetter:
TC( +/-irrrhe h0cutanare nor ased ire veKerafien ruledalion,
Lyon - Dominant Species Stratum IND
Prevalence Index:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >501.:
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdronhvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color (Aioist )
%
Color (Alois()
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -2
A
10YR2/1
100
MUCK
2 -20
B
2.5Y 4/1
60
IOYR 513
20
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
7.5YR4 /6
20
C
M
Hydric Soil hidicators:
— Ilistosol (A l)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dad: Surface (F6)
Indicators forProblematic Ffjkiiic Soils
Histic Epipedma (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Hislic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Icm Muck (A9)
_ Iydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (1710)
_ 2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ocluic (FI I)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
_5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvaluc Below Surface (S8)
~ Umbric Surface (FI3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (1`17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
X 1 can Muck (A9)
L.uamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At
1) Loamy Gleycd Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
—Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depicted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER i1iET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
it
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applican €: . DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
UWCouuty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WfNFALL -
R7LLIAtrISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
VAIVIRO\SII,W\ 'Al. M
Investigator(s): P. ETER
GROUP, INC.
Date: 518/2012
Sampling Point Number: 4D
Section /formshiplRange: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36°18'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N / 76°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: CHAPANOKE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings: JURISDICTIONAL DITCH NEAR FLAG BR -13.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NR'I Classification: NIA
Hydrie Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform: DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area Is within a Wetland: Atypical Climatgffydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + / -ia the {rrdicurarr ere r+or «std in regelnrio+r cwlcd7rtians,) Cntc�dated nsi+rg oft syecies prrr-em.
Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >5V /.:
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvilropbviic Vegetation:
Primary Indicators.
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
Depth inches
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (AI)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
Color joist
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Texture
_ Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (1315)
100
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (BI)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
_Dry- Scason Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
2.5Y5/1
_Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Unagcry (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
10
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Otter
15 -20
_Sbnllow Aquitard (D3)
10YR 611
75
IOYR 5/8
_FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
Maier Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY ?A RAMETER b'IET.
Surface Water: 7
10
C
M
Water fable:
Ifydric Soil Indicators:
CHANNEL IS 2' WIDE, AND BANKS ARE 3' HIGH. OHWM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil:
Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + / -ia the {rrdicurarr ere r+or «std in regelnrio+r cwlcd7rtians,) Cntc�dated nsi+rg oft syecies prrr-em.
Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >5V /.:
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvilropbviic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color (Moist)
%
Color joist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0-4
A
IOYR 611
100
SILTY CLAY
4 -15
B 1
2.5Y5/1
75
2.5Y 516
15
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
10YR 518
10
C
M
15 -20
B2
10YR 611
75
IOYR 5/8
15
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
2.5Y 611
10
C
M
Ifydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicator.%for� Prohlemofic Hydric Soils
_— Hisiie Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Redox Depressions (178)
_ lcm Mack (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
_ 2em Muck (Alo)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (Fl 1)
_Reduced Vettic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12)
_Umbric
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
_Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (Sg)
— Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (AS)
_Thin Dark Surface (89)
Delta Ochrio (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Mack (A9)
—
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F 18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
Depicted Below Dark Surface (All) _Loamy Gleyei. Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
_Other
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Reswictivela}+er (IfObsciwd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER WILT.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 44E
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV 'TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIAPOWL'R Section/Township/Range: NIA
CitylCounty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH4 CITY, TO WN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG Slate: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °1850.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
'iVV11tON1fF�lYtL Investigator(s): P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36°13'21.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
GROUP.I�C:
Date: 61812012 Soil Map Unit Name: CHAPANOKF' SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings; UPLAND IN AGRICULTURAL YIELD AT FLAG BR -13.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: x NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: F Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief- NONE
Welland hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area is ivithin a'*Vetfand: Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Hvdroloev Parameter
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
Secondary Indicators:
%
Zephyrrauhes atmnasea
Solmmmm calnlinelne
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Water (A 1)
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
-_-_- Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_Surface
_High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
—Marl
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_Saturation (A3)
Deposits (BIS)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Drill
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Deposits (B3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
- Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent han Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
- Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial lrnagery (137)
Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
_ PAC- Neutral Test (D5)
10YR 416
Sphagtutm Moss (D8)
Maier Depths (Mches):
PL
Remarks: M DROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET,
Surface Water:
B2
2.SY 512
93
Water Table: 18
5
C
M
Saturated soil: 16
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Zephyrrauhes atmnasea
Solmmmm calnlinelne
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FACW
UPI,
20
15
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 50%
NOTF,:( +/- iii the irrdicatara nre iaot used in regr�nrimr cnlcrdnt7onsJ
Domimmee Test >50%: _
Prevalence Index is <3A _
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vepetation:
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Fcatures
Ambrosia arlemisiifolia
Rrmrex crispas
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FACU
FACU
5
2
Prevalence Index: 3.4
CnlerdnW n h,g nll speciaspre d.
VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
HNIDFNTIPILD DOMINANT SPECIES OF FESCUE (15 %) PRESENT.
Matrix
Redox Fcatures
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color (Moist)
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0 -10
A
I OYR 3/2
100
CLAY LOAM -
10 -14
BI
2.5Y 511
90
2.5Y 616
5
C
M
CLAY
10YR 416
5
C
PL
14 -20
B2
2.SY 512
93
25Y 516
5
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
10YR 4/6
2
C
PL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Hislosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S])
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Slack Ilislie (A3)
— Sandy Glcyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Icm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (Flo)
gem Muck (A10)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
^_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (FI1)
_Reduced Vertic (1718)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (Pl2)
^_Umbria
Piedmont Fleodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
Sena Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
—Thin
Surface (1`13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
— Dark Surface (S9)
_Della Ochric (F 17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
1e Muck (A9)
m
_LoamyMuc€y Mineral (Fl)
—Reduced Vertic(F18)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al l) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172}
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resh'Ictive Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 5A
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TOWINFALL230k-VTRANSMISSIONLINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Scction/Iownship/Range: N/A
City /Comity: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABL'fll CfEY, TOWN OF WIN_ FALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
ENVlltOi"iIT'PAL Investigator(s): S. KUPIEC / P. MEIER Site Tenninus: 36 °13121,46 "N I76 27140,50 "W
GROUP, INC
Date: 6II412012 Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
JURISDICTIONAL DI'T'CH IN AGRICULTURAL FIELD, NEAR FLAG AS -4.
Matrix
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wettand Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform;
DRAINAUMVAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical CliinatelHydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %
0 -2
r- r.,.t.•„r...,,, u,,. ono.
_Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen SldLdc Odor (C 1)
r ar+iwrerr:
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + / -itt IRc iudicrtrors are no! nserl in r•egelrtltaa rnlpdntions.) Calurlarad using all apacier prerertf.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50%: _
Prevalence Index is $ 3.0: _
NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroohvtic Vegetation:
Primary Indicators:
Matrix
Secaudar y Indleatorsr
Depth inches
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (A])
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
Color joist
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
— High Wafer Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Texture
+ Drainage Patterns (B 10)
Sntumlion (A3)
_Marl Deposits (1 315) -
100
— Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
_Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen SldLdc Odor (C 1)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
~Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
25Y 611
_ Crayfish Barrows (C8)
_Drill Deposits (133)
_Presence o£Reduced iron (C4)
C
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stmtted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_Iron Deposits (115)
_Thin Muck Surface (0)
2
Geomorphic Position (D2)
—
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
10 -15
Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—FAC-
2.SY 611
100
Neutral Test (D5)
SAND
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
lVarer Deplks (inches):
5Y7/2
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARA1 WEER MET.
Surface Water: 12
10
C
M
Water Table:
Hydric Soil Indicators:
-
CHANNEL 1S 5` WIDE, AND BANKS ARE 4' HIGH. OIIWM IS PRFSE.NT.
Saturated soil:
_Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
r ar+iwrerr:
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + / -itt IRc iudicrtrors are no! nserl in r•egelrtltaa rnlpdntions.) Calurlarad using all apacier prerertf.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50%: _
Prevalence Index is $ 3.0: _
NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroohvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Aloist
%
Color joist
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0-6
A
7.5YR2.5/1
100
CLAY LOAM
6 -10
B
25Y 611
93
2.5Y 516
5
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
10YR 516
2
C
M
10 -15
132
2.SY 611
100
SAND
15 -20
B3
5Y7/2
90
2.5Y 516
10
C
M
SAND
Hydric Soil Indicators:
-
-
_Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Ltdicarats far Problematic Flydric Satls
Hisdc Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
lem Muck (A9)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (SS)
— Marl (Flo)
2cm Muck (A 10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
- Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted Ochric (Flt)
_Reduced Vertic (Fig)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain. Soils (F 19)
^_Anomalous
_ 50m Mucky Mineral (A7)
-Dark
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (Sg)
_Umbric Surface (1`13)
Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
—Muck Presence (A8)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
— Delta Oebrie (F17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (1`18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TFI2)
_
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At
1) _ Loarny Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1'19)
Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Kesrrictive Layer (IfObse) ed)
Remarks; SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches);

Wetland Determination Data Form •- Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 5B
Project: FLIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWL'R SectionffownshiplRange: N/A
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, 'TOWN OP WHIMALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
1ALIdAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N l 76 °13'34.50 "W
FAIVIRON\ILLVrAL Investigator(s): P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
GgOup, INC Date: 6114/2012 Soil Map Uitit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings: UPLAND IN AGRICULTURAL FIELD NEAR FLAG AZ-3.
Hydrophytio Vegetation is Present: X Normal Circumstances; X N%V1 Classification: N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief.- NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland: I Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Dominant S ecies
Ar&nar y Indicators:
Secondar - Indicators:
%
Gland• marilima
— Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (118)
_High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Faima (1313)
—Marl
—Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_Saturation (A3)
— Deposits (1315)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (B1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Dry-Season. Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Sediment
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—
ftDeposits (B 3) _
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
~ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mal or Crust (114)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plains (DI)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Othcr
Shallow Aquitard (133)
10 -15
B2
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
70
IOYR 416
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Water Depths (inches).
M
Remarks: IrVDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
20
INCLUSION
M
Saturated soil: >20
15 -20
B3
2.5Y 511
Dominant S ecies
Stratum
IND
%
Gland• marilima
Herbaceous
OBL
60
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 1.0
NOTB:( +/ k rke M ficufurc are oue cued ire Culcnloted nsheg all specter pmrew
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color joist
/
Color Moist
%
e
Lee
Texture
0 -6
A
2.5YR2.5/1
100
CLAYLOAM
6 -10
B1
2.5Y 413
100
CLAY LOAM
10 -15
B2
10YR 512
70
IOYR 416
10
C
M
CLAY LOAM
2.5Y 511
20
INCLUSION
M
15 -20
B3
2.5Y 511
90
lOYR 416
10
C.
M
CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
—Coast Prairie Redox. (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
Indicators for Prnblentatk Hpdric Soils
_ Hislic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
— Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ ]em Muck (A9)
Ilydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (1`10)
2cm Muck (AI0)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (86)
—Depleted Ochric (FI1)
~Reduced Vertic (FIR)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Sails (1`19)
—Organic
_ Senn Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvaluc Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Muck Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochrie (F17)
_Red Parent Material (T172)
I cm Muck (A9)
—
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
l) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resoictiye Loyer (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain !legion
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WCNFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
City /Goumly: PASQUOTANK, PE.RQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
NVILLIAh1SBU1tG State: NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONNILYFAL Investigatar(s ): S. KUPIEC
GROUP. INC.
Date: 6114/2012
Sampling Point Number: 5C
Seelionfrownship /Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRRT
Site Start: 36 °18'50,67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY Slur LOAM
Summary of Findings:
JURTSDICTIONAL DITCH AT FLAG AY -5,
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
Hydrophytie Vegetation is Present;
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landforrn:
DRATNAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climatchlydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
—Water Marks (B 1)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
M
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
raramcrcr:
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + / -rat rite irrrfiaolan arc na1 cued in vegelrttioi, rnlcrrlalioaxJ Calcnla(ed nsiug oll species prerex7.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT AITT.
Dominance Test >50 %: _
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrouhvtic Vegctation:
Primary Indicators.
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
Depth inches
—Surface Sail Cracks (116)
X Surface Water (A])
—High
Water Stained Leaves (119)
Color Moist
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
�____. Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Famua (1113)
Texture
_ Drainage Patterns (B 10)
Saturation (A3)
—Marl Deposits (B15)
95
_Moss Trim Lines (3316)
—Water Marks (B 1)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
M
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
2.5Y 412
— Crayfish 11— s (C8)
_Drift Deposits (11
—Presence Presence of Reduced Iron (04)
C
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent iron Rednctionin'riRed Soils (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (BS)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
5
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible onAeriat Imagery (137)
_Other
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Mater Depths (inches);
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER AILT.
Surface Water: 12
'Water Table:
-
CHANNEL IS 6' WIDE, AND BANKS ARE THIGH, OHIUM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil:
_ Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
raramcrcr:
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + / -rat rite irrrfiaolan arc na1 cued in vegelrttioi, rnlcrrlalioaxJ Calcnla(ed nsiug oll species prerex7.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT AITT.
Dominance Test >50 %: _
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrouhvtic Vegctation:
Matrix
- RedoaFeatures
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Lee
Texture
0 -4
A
10YR 211
95
10YR 4/6
5
C
M
SILT LOAM
4 -20
B
2.5Y 412
80
10YR 518
15
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
7.5YR518
5
C
PL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
-
_ Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicatory for Problenrade Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Ilis6c (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed. Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ is n Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (F10)
2cm Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (PI3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (MO)
_Muck Presence (As)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ocluic (F17)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
~_
_ 1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Verde (1718)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (At l) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Fluodplam Soils (FI9)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restriefive I-tryer (IfObserved)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET,
_
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Paint Number: 5D
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSIONLTNE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINfAPOWER Section /fownshiplRange: NIA
� ? City /County: PASQUOTANK, PFRQU[MANS, ELIZABETH CrfY, TOWN OF WINFAT T, Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
R7LUAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
l%'VlR0\ IE\ CAL Tnvesti a €o s S. KUPIEC I P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36 °1321,46" N 176 °27'40.50 "W
Date: 6/14/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH AT FLAG CX -2.
Matrix
Secondary Indfcalors:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Sails are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): —
Laadfonn:
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Welland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
raramerer:
Non- Dondnnat Species Stratum WD
% Dominant species FAC or svelter: Prevalence Index:
NOTEe( +/- in trre inr11wi» s are not eered in vegererimr cnferrinlionxj Calndare'l ruing all species premnx
Rapid Test for llydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT AWT.
Dominance Test >50 °1:
Prevalence Index is X3.0: ~
— NO VEGETATION PRESENT 1VITiIIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problentadc Ilvdroohvlic Vegetation:
i'rinrar lrrdicators:
Matrix
Secondary Indfcalors:
Depth inches
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Texture
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
Saturation (A3)
~_Water
_Marl Deposits (1315)
100
— Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
Marks (B f)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sedhitent Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
2,5Y 511
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
C
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sails (C6)
—Slanted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ Iron Deposits (BS)
_Thor Muck Surface (0)
5
Geontorpbic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Other
— Shallow Aquiturd (133)
_FAC- Nentral Test (135)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
11'arerDepllis (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PAILOIETER ➢JET.
Surface Water, 5
Water Table:
Hydric Soil Indicators:
CHANNEL IS 2.5' WIDE, AND BANKS ARE 3' HIGH. OHWM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil:
Histosol (Al)
- Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
raramerer:
Non- Dondnnat Species Stratum WD
% Dominant species FAC or svelter: Prevalence Index:
NOTEe( +/- in trre inr11wi» s are not eered in vegererimr cnferrinlionxj Calndare'l ruing all species premnx
Rapid Test for llydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT AWT.
Dominance Test >50 °1:
Prevalence Index is X3.0: ~
— NO VEGETATION PRESENT 1VITiIIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problentadc Ilvdroohvlic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -2
A
10YR 212
100
SILT LOAM
2 -20
B
2,5Y 511
80
7.5YR 518
15
C
M
SILT LOAM
7.5YR 516
5
C
PL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
- Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicatars for Problematic Hydric Soils
_I1istic Epipedoa (A2)
-Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleycd Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (F10)
_ 2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted Ochric (1711)
—Reduced Vertic (Fl8)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (Fi2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_Organic
_Scut Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Umbric Surface (F 13)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
— Delta Ochric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
—
Reduced Vertic (1718)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TFI2)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al l) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Other
Thick Dark Surface (A 12)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Lager (If Observer!)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NWT.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 5E
/ Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFAIL 230LV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Section/Cowaship/Range: NIA
City/County: PAS UOTANK, PERQUEVIANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA); LRR T
19RI.1IAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
W1lRO��IN11TAI, htvestigator(s): S. KUPIEC Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
CROUP, INC
Date: 611412012 Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
Primary Lrrlicalors:
WETLAND NEAR FLAG EL-R.
Secondary Indicators:
Arenas canadensis
Twhrlglapalusiris
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (sec Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland:
X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %;
0.2
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_Ctaylish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
Vegetation Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Lrrlicalors:
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Arenas canadensis
Twhrlglapalusiris
herbaceous
Herbaceous
OBL
OBL
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surfacc Water (A l)
~high
_Water Staincd Leaves (139)
FACfV
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
— Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B 13}
FACU
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
FACU
_Moss Trim Lures (1316)
!Water Marks (B I)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_Ctaylish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Color Moist
~Geomorphic Position (D2)
Intmdalion Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
—Other
Type
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Texture
04
A
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
IOYR 2!1
100
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
I17wer Deplhs (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER DIET.
4 -8
Surface Water: 1
IOYR 211
70
Water Table:
30
INCLUSION
M
Saturated soil:
8.20
B2
Vegetation Parameter:
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Arenas canadensis
Twhrlglapalusiris
herbaceous
Herbaceous
OBL
OBL
20
15
Nan - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Calcnfaeed
Dorcas ejjrsus
herbaceous
FACW+
5
Haccharis haiimifolia
Herbaceous
FACfV
3
Tsnpam -hnn capillifoltant
Herbaceous
FACU
1
AnAuzrandminodoraturn
Ierbaceous
FACU
I
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100%
Prevalence index: 1.3
NOTE:(tG h, the indl -1— --t,—din regeklim ealra arimm)
Calcnfaeed
ping all pecies pr—m.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X
Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevatence Index is <3.0: X
UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF GRASS (]O%) AND RANUNCULUS (5%) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Soil Parameter:
rilntrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color (Moist)
%
Type
Lee
Texture
04
A
IOYR 2!1
100
SILT LOAM
4 -8
131
IOYR 211
70
10YR 413
30
INCLUSION
M
SILT LOAM
8.20
B2
25Y 411
85
IOYR 516
10
C
M
SILT LOAM
7.5YR4/6
5
C
PL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Ilistosol (Al)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicalorsfor Problematic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
~_Black
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Histic (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (FS)
—Marl
_ lcni Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
— (1710)
_tent Muck (AIO)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
— Stripped Matrix (56)
_Depleted Octric (Fl l)
—Reduced Veitic (F18)
Organic Bodics (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (F 13)
—Delta
_Anomalous Brigbt Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (AS)
_'Chin Dark Surface (S9)
Ochric (1717)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (1718)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
—Loamy Oleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmon]Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Brigbtl.oamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObseived)
Remarks: SOH. PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 5F
i � z
I Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMIMON VIRGINIA POWER Sectionrrownsbip /Range: N/A
City /County: PASQIIOTANK, PERQITIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
PA MI(ONUUNTAI' hrvestigator(s): S. KUPIEC Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N 176°27'90.50 "W
GROUP, INC.
Date: 6114/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summary of Find ings:
UPLAND NEAR FLAG EL-9.
secwrdar y Indlealors.
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present;
Normal Circumstances: X
NWr Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief-,
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland:
_
Atypical ClinmtelHydrotogy (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
hydrology Parameter: -
ra
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
secwrdar y Indlealors.
%
Pyridanlhera barbulata -
T1 ifollral! repens
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (AI)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
—Drainage Patterns (1110)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
_Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
—Water Marks (B 1)
_hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Crayfish Butrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (6
—Drift 3)
~ Prescuce of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
~Geomorphic
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
_Other
_Shallow Aquilard (173)
12 -20
B2
_PAC- Neutral Test (D5)
95
IOYR 516
Sphagnum Moss (138)
lFater Depths {inches):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET,
Surface Water.
Water Table:
Saturated soil: 16
ra
Dominant Species
Stratum
M
%
Pyridanlhera barbulata -
T1 ifollral! repens
Shrub
herbaceous
FACU-
FACU-
5
20
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
INll
%
'I'rnrcracuni ofchrale
Herbaceous
FACU-
5
Rnrnex Crispirs
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Eapatorhan capiRifolium
Herbaceous
FACU
2
Anthoxanthean adorahn o
Herbaceous
FACU
2
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: O Prevalence Index: 4.0
NOTE:( +I -iu ih. imlirnlars aremi s.redtuvegelalimrcardadwm) Calcnlulad« sing nll �ecirsprrsei�i.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT ATET.
Dominance Test >50'/a: _
Prevalence Index is ¢ 3.0: _ UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF GRASS (15 %) AND NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF CARER (5 %)
Morphological Adaptations: _ AND RANUNCULUS (5 %) PRESENT.
Problematic Hvdronhviie Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth Itches
Horizon
Color joist
%
Color Moist
%
'1 a
Lee
Texture
0 -8
A
IOYR 212
100
SILT LOAM
8 -12
B 1
10YR 413
80
1 OYR 212
20
INCI USION
M
SILT LOAM
12 -20
B2
lOYR 512
95
IOYR 516
5
C
M
SILT LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
— Histosol (At)
Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
~ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Pmblematic Hyrli•ic Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_— Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Icm h3uck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
_2cm Muck (A10)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (86)
_Depleted Ochric (F 11)
_Reduced Vertic (FIB)
_Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (37)
_Iron- Mauganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_Scm Mucky Mtnemt (A7)
_Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bdghrt Loamy Soils (1720)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Oclnic (T 17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (0)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Itesrriclive Layer (IfObselled)
Remarks: SOIL PARMNETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches);

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 5G
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 23OkV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionfrownshi [Ran e :
N/A
till City /County:
PASQUOTANK, PERQUTMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
537LLIAh1SBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °[3'34.50 "W
FANIRONMUNTAL Invesligator(s): P. MEIER Site Terrains: 36 °13'21.46 "N / 76°2740.50 "W
claollr, INC .
Date: 6/14/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
Prirnar y Indicators: -
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH NEAR FLAG ENI -20.
Secondary Indicators:
Hydrophyfic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X N1VI Classification:
MIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
X
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landfonn:
DRAINAGEIVAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
X
Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %:
0 -2
F7v 1Nnlnr..r Pn—,narn,•.
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
FACU
_Dry- Scason Water Table (C2)
Dominant Species
Prirnar y Indicators: -
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Bacchartsltalinlifolia
Junes efrsos
Shrub
Herbaceous
FACW
FACW+
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (Al)
—High
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
FACU
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Wat& Table (A2)
_Aquafie Fauna (613)
OBI,
_Drainage Patterns (BIO)
_ Saturation (A3)
Mart Deposits (1315)
—Mart
NI
_Moss Trim Lines (1116)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
FACU
_Dry- Scason Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) -
_ Oxidized Rhixospheres on Living Roots (0)
25Y 5/2
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (114)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
B2
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (65)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
10
Geomorphic Position (132)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Other
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
5YR416
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
PL
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
1Vnlei Depilis (h uches):
Remark: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET,
Surface Water: 2
Water Table:
Saturated soil:
Histosol (AI)
—Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Bacchartsltalinlifolia
Junes efrsos
Shrub
Herbaceous
FACW
FACW+
20
60
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Ludwigiapalusn•is
Herbaceous
OBL
10
Galium aparine
Herbaceous
FACU
5
H}elrocolj,le antericana
Herbaceous
OBI,
5 -
Lespedeza enueala
Herbaceous
NI
2
Andropogon virginicas
Herbaceous
FACU
2
% Dontinant species FAC or welter: t00% Prevalence Index: 2.0
NOTE:( + /- int!airrdirnmrs are rmr used irr rrgerurimr calcrrinrionaJ Cn&nfredrising nnspcd -pia w.
Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >500/.,. X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF CAREX (5%) AND SOLIDAGO (2%) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth incites
Horizon .
Color joist
%
Color Moist )
Type
I.oc
Texture
04
A
10YR 412
100
SILT LOAM
4 -10
B
25Y 5/2
90
7.5YR4/6
10
C
M
SILTY CLAY
10.20
B2
2.5Y 611
85
2.5Y 516
10
C
M
SILTY CLAY
5YR416
5
C
PL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (AI)
—Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Iadicraors far Problematic Hydric Soils
HisticEpipedon(A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (94)
_Redox Depressions (178)
_ lcm Muck (A4)
Hydrogen Sutride (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (Flo)
2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted
DepletedOchric(Fll)
—Reduced Vertic(F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
-5cm
Dark Surface (S7)
—Dark
Masses (1712)
_Piedmont Floodplaul Soils (F19)
- Mucky Mineral (A7)
Below Surface (Sa)
Umbric Surface (FI3)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (AS)
_Thin Dark Surface (89)
Delta Ochric (F17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
~_
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hestriclirc Layer (IjObsen'ed)
SOIL PARAMETER 11fF.T.
Type:
Depth (inches):
_re—k,.

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 6A
Project: ELIZABETI CITY'1.O WlNFALL 230kV 'TRANSMISSION LINE
I, Applicant: DOMINION VIRG1NiAPOWER Sectionfrowuship /Range: N!A
II'.. City/County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Suhregton (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBDRG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
I•r \�'11IQ \'\av \TAI. Investigator(s): S, KUPIEC Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N / 76°27'40.50 "W
fnzouP, INC,
Date: 6/14/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND NEAR FLAG EV -5.
IND
seemidrrr y Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
I RV1 Classification:
N/A
Hyd €ic Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfonn:
DRAiNAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Donlivant Species
Primary Irrdicalors:
IND
seemidrrr y Indicators:
hlyrica cerifera
Shrub
FAC
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
—Surface Water (Al)
X 1Vater Stained Leaves (B9)
OBL
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_ High Water Table (A2)
— Aquatic Fauna (B] 3)
FACW+
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (M)
—Marl Deposits (Bl5)
100
_Moss'friin Lines (B16)
— Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_My- Scason Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospberes on Living Roots (C3)
50Y 511
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Presence o£Reduced iron (C4)
C
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
_]ton Deposits (BS)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
5
Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Other
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
14'alerDepths(inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAAIETERAIET,
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: O
—Coast Prairie Redo., (AI6)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Donlivant Species
Stratum
IND
%
hlyrica cerifera
Shrub
FAC
10
salix nigra
Shrub
OBL
5
Jarrcusefcsss
herbaceous
FACW+
20
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Larltrigia palmiris•
Rubus argiefus
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
OBL
FACU+
5
2
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 2.1
N0TE:(k /- i. Am iudicnrors ire rut,,s d nr vegernt7on cnlcnrntion ..) Cn7crrinled usi»g off speries presexl.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytio Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAAJETF,R AIET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF CAREX (5 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Aloist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0.4
A
10YR 2/I
100
SANDY LOAM
4 -20
B
50Y 511
75
10YR 5/8
20
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
5YR5 /8
5
C
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
—Coast Prairie Redo., (AI6)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indreaiars for Problematic IT),dric Soils
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
~ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
BlackHistic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy
Redox Depressions (F8)
1cm Muck (A9)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Redox (S5)
Mnrl (FIO)
_gem Muck (AIo)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochdc (FI1)
_Reduced Vertic (1`18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron-Manganese
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12)
PiedmontFloodplain Soils (1719)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
—_Thin
Surface (1713)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
—1
Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ociuic(F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
em Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
_Reduced Vertic (FI8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
- Anomalous BrightLoamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer {If Obsen•ed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER AIET.
Type:
Depth (itches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 613
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
} i Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Section/Toivnship/Range: NIA
tl =� CitylCounty: PASQUOTANK, PEIiQU1MANS, EL_ I_ZABET_H CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
RRLLIAhlSBURC State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
ENVIRO!'11F CAL Investi tars P. WIER Site Terminus: 36 °13'21,46 N 176°27'40.50 "W
Gitoup, INC Date: 6/1412012 Soil Map Unit Name: HYDE MUCKY SILT LOAM
Summarq of Findings:
UPLAND ABOVE FLAG PV -5.
Secondary Indicators:
IA
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
NW1 Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
NOW
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Land£orm:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
nmi rology .Fa ra m erer:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators: -
Secondary Indicators:
IA
Salirlago allissinra
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) .
-Marl
Drainage Patterns (BID)
Saturation (A3)
- Deposits (B15)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Dry-
Water Marks (B J)
~_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Oxidized Rluzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8) -
-Drift Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geonnorphic Position (D2)
�ShallowAquitard(D3)
_inundation Visible on Aerial Imagety(B7)
Other
SILTY CLAY
FAC- Neutml'rest (DS)
IOYR 516
Sphagnum Moss (138)
Maier Depilis (Arches):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT DIET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
IA
Salirlago allissinra
Herbaceous
FACU-
40
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Par•ihenocissus quiuquefolia
Herbaceous
FACU
15
'I'oxicodendron radicans
Herbaceous
FAC
10
Rirbus arguirrs
herbaceous
. FACU+
5
Jmicusefrsrrs
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Diehandiellumscopariinn
Herbaceous
FACW
5
Solidago rugoso
Herbaceous
PAC
5
- %Dominant species FAC or wetter: O Prevalence hrdex: 3.6
NOTP:( +/- irr the uut'caars urc rml,eseAhr regemtiorr enlerrlafio„s) Calurlated rsing nil species praser<1.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PAIL"IETER NOT MET,
Dominance Test >50'/.: _
Prevalence Index is < 3,0: _ UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF FESCUE (20 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation: _
Afatrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Lot
Texture
0 »10
A
IOYR 312
100
SILT LOAM
10 -20
B
IOYR 41T
55
23Y 7/1
30
D
M
SILTY CLAY
IOYR 516
15
C
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (AI)
—Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
bidicalors for Problematic Hydric Soiis
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (91)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Black Hislic (A3)
Sandy Gloyed Matrix (S4)
—Redox Depressions (178)
_ 1 c Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (95)
Marl (F10)
_ 2cm Muck (AIO)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (I'll)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
_
_ Organic Bodies (A6)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Irnn- Manganese Masses (1712)
—
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (58)
_ Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (1`17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
_Reduced Veitic (F] S)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
Other
_Thick Dark Surface (AI2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
— Anomalous Bright Lonmy Soils (F20)
Restr•icrive Layer (IfObsemed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
City /County: PAS UOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
INULiANISBURG State: NORTII CAROLINA
k11'Y OON11EXIAL Investigator(s): S. KUPIEC
CROUP, IINC
Date: 6/15/2012
Sampling Point Number: 6C
Section/Township/Range: N/A
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 7" 334.50 "W
Site Terminus: 369321,46 "N / 76 °27'90.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH AT FLAG FE-3.
Matrix
Secondary Indicators.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Cirerunstauces: X
NWI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief;
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Londforrn:
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Weiland:
Atypical Clinrate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Elvdrolo2v Parameter:
%Dominant species FAC or wetter:
NOTE:( +A is dre irrrlirnPors arc nar rrserf Lr rq
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND
Prevalence Index:
Rapid Test for Iiydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET,
Dominance Test >5011,v.
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL
Morphological. Adaptations:
Problematic Ilydrophytic Vegetation:
Pritaar r hul(ealors:
Matrix
Secondary Indicators.
Depth inches
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (AI)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
Color joist
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
- Texture
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
—saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
NO
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sedunent Deposits (B2)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
10YR 4/1
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tillcd Sails (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (0)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7)
—Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (138)
WalerDepths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PAILO TER MET.
Surface Water: 5
-
Water Table:
llydric Soil Indicators:
CHANNEL IS Y WID1E, AND BANKS ARE 4' HIGH. OfRVM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil•
Histosol (Al)
__HisticEpipedmr(A2)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
%Dominant species FAC or wetter:
NOTE:( +A is dre irrrlirnPors arc nar rrserf Lr rq
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND
Prevalence Index:
Rapid Test for Iiydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET,
Dominance Test >5011,v.
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL
Morphological. Adaptations:
Problematic Ilydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Ilorixon
Color Moist
%
Color joist
%
Type
Lac
- Texture
0 -4
A
10YR3/1
NO
SILT LOAM -
4 -20
B
10YR 4/1
85
10YR 618
15
C
M
CLAY
llydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
__HisticEpipedmr(A2)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sails
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Black Hislic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ 1 cm Mack (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
—Marl (1710)
2cm Muck (AlO)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ocluic (I'll)
_Reduced Vertic (FIS)
—Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7) .
_Iran- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Untbric Surface (F13)
-Delta
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
—Red
_Much Presence (AS)
_'Thin Dark Surface (S9)
- Ochric (F17)
Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
~_Depleted
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Below Dark Surface (All)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
—Anomalous Bright Loatny Soils (F20)
Resiriclive Layer (IfObsenvd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Farm - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 6D
Project: ELIZABi3'f11 CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMQdION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionfl'ownship/Range: N!A
lI' City/County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR orMLRA): LRR T
NVIIIJAWISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site stmt: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
EW110NUEN'Thl, juvesg8ritor(s): P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
GROUP, INN
Date: .6115/2012 Soil Map Unit Name; GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings; UPLAND ALONG SURISDICTTONAL DITCH NEAR FLAGS Fr-3 AND FF -2.
Hydrephytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWt Classification: N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):_ Local Relief: NONE
Welland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):_ Landfomt: FIAT
Sampled Area is within a 1Vetiand: Atypical Clinrate/Ilydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Prima , Indicators:
Vecandar y Indicators:
%
Lolimrr pe enne
7ephyramhesalamosca
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al)
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Aquatic Fauna (B13)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (B 15)
_ Moss'frhn Lines (B16)
— Water Marks (B1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Thin
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D I)
_Iron Deposits (B5)
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
_ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
10YR 316
Sphagm,un Mass (D8)
TFater Depths (hrehes):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARA11i1ETF,R NOT MET.
Surface Water:
B2
l OYR 412
98
Water Table:
2
C
M
Saturated sail: 15
Dominant Species
Stratum
1ND
%
Lolimrr pe enne
7ephyramhesalamosca
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FACU-
FACW
40
20
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Gathrm palustre -
Herbaceous
OBL
10
Solantan carohnense
Herbaceous
UPI,
5
Achilleandllefoliom
Herbaceous
FACU
5
% Dominant species FAC orwetter: 50% Prevalence index: . 3,2
NOTE:( +/ -iii r! a iudicntors nre riot «s d in vegaarlva w1virlarioa.) Calmkmf «sing nit species present.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50'1.t _
Prevalence Index is < 3.0; UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOT -TDAGO (20 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations;
I'roblematicHvdronhvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color (Moist)
%
Color 'Moist
%
Type
Lae
Texture _
0 -10
A
IOYR4/2
100
SILT LOAM
10 -15
B
P)YR 312
75
25Y 611
15
D
M
SILT LOAM
10YR 316
10
C
M
15 -20
B2
l OYR 412
98
2.5Y516
2
C
M
SILTY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histasal (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
Indicator: for Problematic Hydric Soils
_HistieEpipedon(A2)
Sandy MuckyMineral(SI)
—Sandy
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histic (A3)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
lcm Muck (A9)
—2cm
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
—mart (Flo)
Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
~_Organic
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fl 1)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
�Polyvalue
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ 5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
Below Surface (S8)
—_Thin
_Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
—Muck Presence (A8)
Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (F17)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TFl2)
_Depleted BclowDark Surface (At
1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (M)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 6E
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND N EAR FLAT; EZ-5.
Secondary Indieators.
Redox Foatures
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
IIydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
tlll��
Project:
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfornt:
TOE OF SLOPE
Ap plicant:
DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
Seclien/1'owrtship/Rarige:
NIA
.x
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG
State:
NORTH CAROLINA
Site Start:
3VIS'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
CAt,
I"
Tnvcstigator(s }:
P. NEJF.R
Site'rern inns:
36 °13'21.46 "N 1 76°27'x40.50 "W
C Ito , INC
GItOIIP.I.
Date:
6/15/2012
Soil Map Unit Name:
GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND N EAR FLAT; EZ-5.
Secondary Indieators.
Redox Foatures
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
IIydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfornt:
TOE OF SLOPE
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/1Tydrology (see Remarks);
Slope %:
0-2
Ilvdroloev Parameter:
Dominant Species
Prinwr y Indicators:
Secondary Indieators.
Redox Foatures
Daccharis halinrifoila
Lespedeza caneata
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A Q
_ Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3)
—Marl Deposits (B 15)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (Bl)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C f)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3)
—Drift
_ Presence orReduced Iron (C4)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
— Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
~ Geomorphic Position (132)
_Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Ncutral Test (D5)
IOYR 5/6
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
!Tarter Depths (inclres):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET,
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: T6
Dominant Species
Stratum
TNT
Redox Foatures
Daccharis halinrifoila
Lespedeza caneata
Shrub
Herbaceous
FACW
NI
5
40
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Foatures
Amens effrrsas
Andropogonvirginicas
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FACW+
FACU
5
5
% Dominant species P'AC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 2.7
NOTE:( + /- h, the brdicnrarr --t awd in regemliwr crsicul eliontJ Cnlcrrinred using nit pecies preserra
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Daminance Test >50°ln: X
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOLIDAGO (30 %) AND NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF FESCUE
Morphological Adaptations: (10%) PRESENT.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Foatures
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color foist
%
Type
Loe
Texture
0 -12
A
10YR 3/1
95
10YR 416
5
C
M
SILT LOAM
12 -20
B
10YR512
65
RYR4 11
30
INCLUSION
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
IOYR 5/6
5
C
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
____- Histosol(Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A 16)
_Redox. Dark Surface (F6)
Indicalorsforl 'roblemntieHydricSoils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Depleted
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Depressions (FS)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Sandy Redox (85)
Marl (F10)
2em Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
~_Dark
_Depleted Ocluic (Fl l)
_Reduced Vertic (F 19)
_
Organic Bodies (A6)
—Organic
Surface (S7)
lion- Manganese Masses (1`12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
—Umbria Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1520)
_Muck Presence (AS)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Delia Ochrie (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TlJ'2)
1 em Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_Loamy Oleycii Matrix (172)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F] 9)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
HesI iefive Lager (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Sampling Point Number. 6F
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
u
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionrrownship/Range: N/A
�J I City /County: PASQUOTANIC, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CI'T'Y, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T'
117LI.IANf8R 1RG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
FIN V tit O \INII -YrAL Inyestiga €ax(s): P. METER Sitc Tcnninus: 3"321.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
GROiIPx_ INC.
Date: 6115/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: GERT[E SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND WITHIN 1VETLANDIUPLAND IMOSAIC SOUTIIWF.ST OF "HN" LINE.
IND
Hydrophytio Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X
NW1 Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
I
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter.
rnrn—uter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators.
IND
Second" r, Indicators:
Uquidauibm•sly),acitra
Tree
FAC+
— Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (AI)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
FAC»
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
— Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC+
_Drainage Pattcros (1310)
X Satmarfion.(A3)
—Mart Deposits (B 15)
FACW+
_Moss Trim Lines (BIG)
_ Water Marks (131)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
FACW
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
X Oxidized Rhizosplreres on Living Roots (0)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
-
Drift Deposits (B3)
—Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
C
- Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Cmst (B4)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sails (C6)
B
_Slanted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
10
_Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial lmagery(I37)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
10YR 618
X FAC - Neutral Tas1(D5)
C
M
Sphagnum Moss (138)
[Valor Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
7.5YR416
Surface Water:
C
M
Water Table:
Saturated soil: 0 -5
_ Histosol (Al)
—Coast Prairie Redox (Alb)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
rnrn—uter:
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Uquidauibm•sly),acitra
Tree
FAC+
20
Minis Oeda
Tree
FAC»
20
Liquidmnbarsiyrxrciva
Sapling
FAC+
30
Juncus efrsus
Herbaceous
FACW+
40
DichandielAmrscoparirrm
Herbaceous
FACW
20
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100%
NOTF,:( +/- in 11rc h di-1— ore nut used in reg nftotr cnicu!
Rapid 'Pest for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _
Dominance Test >5D %: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Non- Duininant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Minus americana
Sapling
FACW
5
Eriandursgigameus
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Rubies atguurs
Herbaceous
FACU+
2
Prevalence Index: 2.5
VEGETATION PARAMETER IMET.
UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOLIDAGO (10 %) PRESENT.
' Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Iolst
%
Type
Lou
Texture
0 -5
A
IOYR 512
90
IOYR 4/6
5
C
M
SILT LOAM
IOYR 416
5
C
PL
5 -20
B
IOYR 5/1
78
10YR 611
10
D
M
SILTY CLAY
10YR 618
10
C
M
7.5YR416
2
C
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Coast Prairie Redox (Alb)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Prablernaric Hydrie Soils
_llistic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Ilistie (A3)
--Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (178)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (FIO)
— 2cm Muck (A 10)
StratiedLayers(A5)
f
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted Ochric(Fll)
—Reduced Vertic(FI8)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (57)
Iron- Manganese Masses (FI2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
_5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)_
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (F17)
~Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F 18)
—
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_Depleted Bclow Dark Surface (All)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1`20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObsenvd)
Remarks: SOIL, PARAMETER ISLET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: RLIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUEVIANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
tiiNS7lt0}'1a'VfAL Investigator(s): S. KUPIEC
C1t0UI',INC.
Date: 6/15/2012
Sampling Point Number: 6G
SectionCfowuship/Range:
NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
Site Start:
36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus:
36 °1321.46 "N 176°2740.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name;
GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND WI'TIHN WETLANDIi1PLAND MOSAIC SOUTHWEST OF DATA POINT 6F.
Secondary Iruficators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X
NW1 Classification:
N/A
Hydrie Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief,
NONE
Wettand Hydrology is Present;
_Moss'rrim Lines (1116)
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Laudfomr:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland:
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Atypical Clanate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
Secondary Iruficators:
%
Liquidambarstyraceflrra
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (B9)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Drainage, Patterns (B 10)
Saturation (A3)
~_
_Marl Deposits (B15)
_Moss'rrim Lines (1116)
Water Marks (B I)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (112)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (113)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (114) -
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_'thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
4 -10
BI
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
95
10YR 518
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
1paierDepths(Mehas):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PAR"IETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
B2
IOYR 611
75
Water Table:
20
C
M
Saturated soil; >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Liquidambarstyraceflrra
Shrub
FAC+
10
Baccharb lialimifolia
Shrub
FACW
15
Sotidago rxgosa
Herbaceous
FAC
50
Nan- DorrinantSrecies
Stratum
IND
%
Rubusargalifs
Shrub
FACU+
3
Etlualarhan eapillflolinni
Herbaceous
FACU
10
.Iuncus efrsas
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
%Dominant species PAC or wetter. 100% Prevalence tad= 2.9
KOTE:( +/- in the indi-,,m of- rrw used ip erg 1 lieu cnrcfdoliu+zc) C" Icnrw d wring rr11 species p­t
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks; VEGETATION PARAIULTER MET.
Dmninance Test >50%: X
Prevalenccludexis <3.0i X
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color (Moist)
%
Color foist
%
Type
Luc
Texture
0 -4
A
IOYR 412
85
]OYR 518
10
C
M
SILT LOAM
lOYR 518
5
C
PL
4 -10
BI
IOYR 411
95
10YR 518
5
C
M
SILT LOAM
10-20
B2
IOYR 611
75
tOYR 518
20
C
M
SILT LOAM
10YR416
5
C
M
I Iydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A]) -
—Coast Prairie Redox (A] 6)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) -
Ltd calms for Problematic H)dric Soils
_ lfistic Epipedon (A2)
_ Saudy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Redox Depressions (FS)
]cm Muck (A9)
�2cm
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (1710)
Muck (A 10)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
—Shipped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Oclnic (I'll)
_Reduced Vertic (1718)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Seat Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvaluc Below Surface (S8)
— Um bric Surface (F 13)
— Anomalous Brigbt loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Loamy
Delta Ochric (F17)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
—Very
1 cm Muck (A9)
Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (1718)
_ Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) _ Loamy Gleyed. Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont F'loodplainS oils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (If Observed)
Remarks: SOH, PARAMF,TER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 6H
Project: FLIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionrfownship/Rauge: NIA
City /CauutT PASQUOTANK, PFRQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFAL.L Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILUA61SBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
Mi�VIltO O:NfAL Invesagatar(s): K. PRESGRAVES Site'1'enninus: 36 °1321.46 "N / 7627'40.50"W
GROUP, INN
Date: 6/20/2012 Sail Map Unit Name: GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings;
I riM(rr' Indicators:
IYETLAND AREA "FX ".
Secondary Indicators:
Lignldmnbar slyrrrciflrra
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWIClassificatlow
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfonw
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Weiland:
X
Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
kiyarotogy raramerer:
r n,a,ucrc.:
- Dominant Species
I riM(rr' Indicators:
1ND
Secondary Indicators:
Lignldmnbar slyrrrciflrra
Shrub
FAC+
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (B9)
FACW
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (118)
_High Water Table (A2)
Fauna (B 13)
PAC
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Aquatic
~Marl Deposits (B15)
FACU-
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B 1)
_hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
FACW
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
FACW
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
OBI,
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
FACW+
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_
_'Thin Muck Surface (C7)
15
X Oeomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other
_Shallow Agaitard (D3)
75YR 518
X FAC- Neutral Test (1)5)
C
1rL
Sphapimm. Mass (DS)
11 aver neplln (Incim):
Remarks: JWDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
_ Histosol (At)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (P6)
r n,a,ucrc.:
- Dominant Species
Stratum
1ND
%
Lignldmnbar slyrrrciflrra
Shrub
FAC+
2
Dichanthelhim scoparirnn
Herbaceous
FACW
25
Campsis radicans
Herbaceous
PAC
20
Solklagoaltissima
Herbaceous
FACU-
IS
Nan - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Pestucarubru
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Ambrosia arlemislifolia
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Juncos leinds
Herbaceous
FAG
5
Junexs eauaderisis
Herbaceous
OBL
10
Clperers strigosus
Herbaceous
FACW
2
Cjperuspseudovegenrs
Herbaceous
FACW
5
Rleochar'ls obOrsa
Herbaceous
OBI,
10 '
Carer i77buloidcs
Her:aceous
FACW+
2
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 75% Prevalence Index: 2.7
NOn:( +/- in the in fimlurs a­ tun rrsed u, cni akfiOns.) enlcrrinred rrrl,rg nli species prererrt
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Tndex is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON-DOMINANT SPECIES OF PASPALUM (5°/) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrophytic Vegetatiom:
T1latrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color A7oist
%
Color Moist
%
e
Loc
Texture
0 -5
A
2.5Y4/1
95
10YR 516
5
C
M
SILT LOAM
5 -10
BI
IOYR 5/1
95
7.5YR 516
5
C
PL
SILT LOAM
10 -20
B2
2.5Y 5/1
80
7,5YR 518
15
C
M
SILT LOAM
75YR 518
S
C
1rL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (At)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (P6)
Indicators forl'roblenmtic HydiIc Soils
_'Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histio (A3)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions 0)
_ 1em Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Mad (FIO)
2emMuck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (FI1)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Tron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
~Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
Tbin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Oclrric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1 em A4uek (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Reduced Vertic (PI8)
—
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _Loamy, Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (AI2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number:- 6I
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
rig
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectionlTowusltiplRmtge: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQLHMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
VVILLIA?tl$BURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
F3VS'IRO \1 €FYTAL Iavestigator(s): K. PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °13'21,46 "N! 7627'40,50"W
GROUP, IIvC,
Date: 612 072 0 1 2 Sail Map Unit Name: GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings; UPLAND ADJACENT TO "FX" LINE.
Hydrephytic Vegetation is Present: X Nonnal Circwusta Ices: X NWi Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief NONE
Welland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):_ Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks ): Slope %: 0 -2
Hvdrolopv Parameter:
Dominant Species
Prhuary Indicators:
Secondary Indicators;
%
Acer nvrbrurn
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
~_
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (118)
_ I Iigh Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (D 13)
_ Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Mad Deposits (13I5)
Moss Trim Lines (BIG)
~ Water Marks (B 1)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (112)
Rhizospheres oil Living Roots (0)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drill Deposits (133)
_Oxidized
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
~Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (137)
_Other
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Herbaceous
FACU
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
7.5YR 516
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Male)- Depths (brches):
I'l,.
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Acer nvrbrurn
Sapling
FAC
2
Bacclmrishalimifolia
Shrub
FACW
2
Solidago altissima
Herbaceous
FACU-
90
Lonicera/aponica
Herbaceous
FAC-
50
Non - Dominant Species..
Stratum
IND
%
verbena hastala
Herbaceous
FACW+
15
Fesluca rabra
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Hrrpaloriam capillifolimrr
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Frrpatorilrm l�yssaptfollnnn
Herbaceous
UPL
10
Cmupsis radrearts
Herbaceous
FAC
10
Daacas canasta
Herbaceous
UPL
2
Tsrigeron annum
Herbaceous
FACU
2
Apocyannrr camrabinum
Herbaceous
FACU
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 75% Prevalence Index: 3.6
NOTE:( + / -urIf aindicarors are,mrrereJNt vegeradav calerdarioat) Caicr&Wusing altspedt prerenx
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAAIETFR ATET.
Dominance Test >50 %: X
Prevalence Index is <3,0: UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF BROMUS (3%) PRESENT,
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroohvtio Vclretatiow
Matrix
RedoxF'caf tires
Depth incites
Horizon
Color Molst
%
Color MOISt
%
Type
Lee
Texture
0 -8
A
10YR 512
98
1 OYR 516
2
C
M
SILT LOAM
8 -20
B
IOYR 51I
85
10YR 516
10
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
7.5YR 516
5
C
I'l,.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosal (A])
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Histie Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
—Sandy
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
— Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
1 cm Muck (A9)
~2cm
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (FIO)
Muck (A10)
—Stratified
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Shipped Matrix (S6)
— Depleted Ochric (F] 1)
_Reduced Verlic (F18)
Bodies (A6)
—Dark
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron -Manganese Musses (1`12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
`Anomalous
_ 5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
— Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (F13)
~ Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Muck Presence (AS)
_Thin Dark Surface (59)
_Delta Ociuic (F17)
_ Red Parent Material CrF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
ResiricliveLayer(IfObsened)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETERI1YL
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 7A
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 236kV'I'I2ANSMISSIONLINE
Applicant: DOMINION ViRGINLA.POWER Section/Township/Range:. NIA
tllj�
CitylCaunty: TASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZA13ETi3 CITY,'rOWN Or WINrALL Subregion (LRR or MI,RA): LRR T
WILLIANISBURG State: NORTH: CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
ENVi110'111E \'PAL Investigator(s): K.PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °132€.46 "N 176 °27'40.50 "W
GROUP, INC.
Date: 6/20/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: GERTTE SH.T LOAM
Summary of Findings;
UPLAND NEAIt "FK" LINE.
Secondary fKdicalors:
%
ilydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: x
NW1 Classification;
NIA
Hydric Soils arc Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %
0 -2
Hvdroloev Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Lrdicators:
Secondary fKdicalors:
%
Lespedeza crrneala
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A 1)
_Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_High
_ Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
—
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
_Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
— Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algnl Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_lion Deposits (115)
_ Tldn Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Lnagery (B7)
Other
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
2,5Y 611
Spltagtmnt Moss (D8)
Water Depths (inches):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET,
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
1ND
%
Lespedeza crrneala
Herbaceous
NI
30
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Diodia virginiana
Herbaceous
FACW
10
Viola solaria -
Herbaceous
FAC-
5
solanant carolirtense
Herbaceous
UPL
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: G Prevalence Index: 3.0
NOTF,;( +I -In 11whslirorws rrrermt rued n,, ernrion cnlcerinrionsJ CnlcrdnieR nahgnll.ryeciespresenx
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VFGF.TAUON PARAMETER NOT RIFT.
Dominance Test >50 %:
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF FESCUE (60 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adoptaiions:
Problematic Hvdroohvtic Veeetatiow
R'latrlx
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Ioist
%
Color 1110 €st
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0-B
A
2.5Y 4l1
80
10YR 516
20
C
M
CLAY LOAM
8 »20
B
25Y 411
75
IOYR 516
15
C
M -
CLAY LOAM
2,5Y 611
10
D
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (Ai6)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Inchmoo a for Problematic Hydric Soils
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black llistie (A3)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Ecm Muck (A9)
—Sandy SandyRedox(SS)
—Marl (Flo)
_2cmMuck(A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron-Manganese
Iran - Manganese Masses (F12)
—Piedmont Floodplaiu Soils (1`19)
—Organic
_ Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (Sa)
Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (FI7)
_ Red Parent Material (TP2)
_ I cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F])
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
^Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PAIW1FTER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
A'!A
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
Site Start:
36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Project7 ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFAI I.230kV TRANSMISSION LTNE
36 °13'21.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
GERTIE SILT LOAM
CitylConnty: PASQUO'1'ANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WTNFALL
WIt.LIMISBURG
State: NORTH CAROLINA
ELNUROV1IEWAL
Investigalor(s): J.'IT;SCBLER
GROUP, INC:
Date: 6119!2012
Sampling Point Number: 7B
Sectiow7ownshiplRange:
A'!A
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
Site Start:
36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Tennhms:
36 °13'21.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name:
GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
VEGETATED JURISDICTIONAL DITCH AT FLAG GA -7.
IND
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
formal Circumstances: X NW1 Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform:
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within n Wetland: X
Atypical ChmatelHydrology (see Remarks): Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
vegetation rarameter:
Primary Indicators.
IND
' Secasdar y firdicalorsr
ATjricACerlferA
Slmib
FAC
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
~_Sparsely
X Surface Water (Al)
_ Water Staincd Leaves (139)
OBL
Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water Table (A2)
~_Saturation
Aquatio Fauna (B13)
OBL
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
- (A3)
_Mart Deposits (BI5)
FACW -r
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
M
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Btnrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (CA)
~ Saturation Visible on Aerial huagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
—Recent Tron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Iron Deposits (135) -
~Inundation
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2) -
Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other -
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
_
X FAC- Neutral Test (135)
1.6
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
]Pater Dcpihs(inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARA METER MET.
SurfaeeWater• 3
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER ASST.
Water Table:
Prevalence index is <3.0: X
Saturated soil:
Histosol (AI)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
~ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
vegetation rarameter:
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
ATjricACerlferA
Slmib
FAC
5
SAl1X HLgF'A
Shrub
OBL
5
CArexLrrida
Herbaceous
OBL
IS
dime :rs e�rsrrs
Herbaceous
FACW -r
25
5
C
M
CLAY
1.6
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100%
Prevaleuce Index:
NOTE:( +6 iirrhe indi -1—d,9 n6hisedin wger dmt Mcfetntions.)
Cnfc,duted using°aspecierpresenr.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER ASST.
Dominance Test >50 %: X
Prevalence index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Histosol (AI)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
~ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
ATjricACerlferA
Slmib
FAC
5
SAl1X HLgF'A
Shrub
OBL
5
CArexLrrida
Herbaceous
OBL
IS
dime :rs e�rsrrs
Herbaceous
FACW -r
25
Non-Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Scitpas aL•ovirens
Herbaceous
OBL
7
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color AfolsE
%
Color foist
%
e
Loc
Texture
0 -20
A
7.5YR411
95
7.5YR4/6
5
C
M
CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
-
Histosol (AI)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
~ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
DepIcted Dark Surface (177)
Black Aistic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ I cm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (Flo)
_gem Muck (A10)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (36)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11)
Reduced Verlic (F18)
`_
_-___ Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
5em Mueiy Mineral (A7)
— Polyvahre Below Surface (SS)
Umbric Surface (F 13)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
—Muck Presence (AS)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_ Delta Ocluic (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ I em Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F19)
—
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_Other
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resirictive La),er (IfObseived}
Remarks: SOIL PAIL"IETER AIET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 7C
SummniT of findings:
UPLAND NEAR FLAG GB -25.
Secondary Indicators:
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: x
Project:
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFAI.L 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief-
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGMA POWER
SectionlTownshiplRnuge:
NIA
Landferm:
City /County: PASQUOTANK,
PERQUINIANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
WIL.IIAMSBURG
State:
NORTH CAROLINA
Site Start:
36°18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
EM11ItONMUNrAL
]avesligator(s }:
J.TESCHLER
Site'1'erminus:
36 °1321.46 "N /76 °27'40.50 "W
GROUP, INC
Date:
6/19/2012
Sail Map Unit Name:
GERTIE SILT LOAM
SummniT of findings:
UPLAND NEAR FLAG GB -25.
Secondary Indicators:
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: x
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief-
CONVEX
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landferm:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hl lrnlnvv Parnmeterc
_Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
raraurcicr:
Dominant Species
Prtrrrar >Inrlicnmrs:
Secondary Indicators:
%
Lespedleza cuneara
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A 1)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (118)
_~ Iligh Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Forma (B 13)
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_Saturation (A3) -
_Marl Deposits (1315)
_Moss Trun Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Cnrst (134)
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (B5)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Agnitard (D3)
_Inundation
_Other
_
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (DO)
11"wal Depths (inches);
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MGT,
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
raraurcicr:
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Lespedleza cuneara
Herbaceous
NI
30 -
Schpus poll ,phj,llris
Herbaceous
OBL
25
Lanicemjaponica
Vine
FAC-
5
% Dominant species FAC or wettei: 100%
(NOTE:( + /- lu the hrdicnlors are rro1 userJbr rrgMrsleorr ndcrn
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations: _
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Rubusmgraris
Herbaceous
FACU+
15
Anitropogon vlrginicris
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Cmnpsis radicrnrs
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Prevalence Index: 2.6
Cd—larrd asnrg orl specrespresent
VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOLIDA00 (20%) PRESENT.
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color foist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -20
A
IOYR 611
so
10YR 6/4
20
C
M
SILTY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (At 6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
~_
Indicalors for Probienrade H)Klric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
Depleted Dark Surface (0)
_Black Histic (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ ]cm Muck (A9)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4)
_ Sandy Redox (55)
—Marl (Flo)
2em Muck (Ato)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (Flt)
_Reduced Vertic (Fig)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (1`12)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19)
—5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
_Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (1`13)
-Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (F20)
_ Muck Presence (A8)
—Thinn Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (1`17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
—I em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
—Loamy
Reduced Vertic (Fig)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF l2)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) _ Oleyed Matrix (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
Thick Dark Surface (A 12)
X Deple €ed Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Reshletive Layer (IfObserved)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gnlf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 7D
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV 'TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Section /fowushiplRauge: N/A
Ci[ylCounty: PAS" TANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILIJ,"ISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
EIN1110h'11UFAL hrvesligator(s):.__. P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40.54 "W
GROUP, INC. —
Date: 611 912 0 12 Soil Map Unit Name: GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings;
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH AT FLAG GA -71.
Alatr €x
Secondary Iudieators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils arc Present; X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Weiland hydrology is Present: X
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
DRAINAGEWAY -
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrolwzy Parameter:
Non - Dominant Species Straturn' IND
% Dominanl species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE: ( + /- inth,i+ :rRrnrorr ore nor rrsediinegemtion culcrr7nLmuj Cnlrnlutcd using all peciespr�enx
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT AIET.
Dominance'fest >5D%: _
Prevalence Index is :5 3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:_
Problematic Hvdroohvfic Vegetation:
Primary Indicators:
Alatr €x
Secondary Iudieators:
Depth (inches)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (M)
_Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Color Alo €st
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Texture
Dminage Pattems (B 10)
_Saturatioa(A3) -
_Marl Deposits (Bl5)
85
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
~_
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
M
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (112)
_Oxidized Rhizosphcres on Living Roots (0)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drill Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
C
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B 4)
_Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
B 1
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
—Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
10
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
SILTY CLAY
15 -20
_Shallow Aquitard (133)
_laudation
—Other
10YR 516
FAC-Neatral Test (D5)
C
M
SILTY CLAY
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
IFater Depths (Inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water:
5
C
M
Water Table: 1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
CHANNEL IS V WIDE, AND BANKS ARE 2' HIGH. OHWM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil'
_ Histosol (AI)
—Coast Prairie Redax (A16)
Non - Dominant Species Straturn' IND
% Dominanl species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE: ( + /- inth,i+ :rRrnrorr ore nor rrsediinegemtion culcrr7nLmuj Cnlrnlutcd using all peciespr�enx
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT AIET.
Dominance'fest >5D%: _
Prevalence Index is :5 3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:_
Problematic Hvdroohvfic Vegetation:
Alatr €x
Redax Fcatm•es
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Color Aloist
%
Color Alo €st
%
Type
Lee
Texture
0 -5
A
1 OYR 511
85
IOYR 611
10
D
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
10YR416
5
C
M
5 -15
B 1
I OYR 511
90
IOYR 516
10
C
M
SILTY CLAY
15 -20
B2
l0Y 511
85
10YR 516
10
C
M
SILTY CLAY
IOYR 416
5
C
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (AI)
—Coast Prairie Redax (A16)
Redax Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
—.Black Histic (A3)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ 1cm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (FI O)
2cm Muck (Al0)
Stratified Layers (A5)
~_OrganicBodies(A6)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fl 1)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont FloodplainSoils(FI9)
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
~Polyvalue, Below Surface (S8)
_Umbrio Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Oclric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ I em Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Veriic (F18)
—
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) —Loamy GleyedMatdx(F2)
PiedmontFloodplainSoils(F19)
_Other
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Restrictive Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARANWfER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches ):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gull' Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
i.. Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
City /County; PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFAL L
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
ENIV1RON)MYrAL Imvesligntor(s); P. METER
CROUP, INC
Date: 6/19/2012
Sampling Point Number: 7E
Section,/Township/Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 76 °1334.50 "1V
Site Temrinus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map UnitNanic: GERTTF; SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings: JURISDICTIONAL. DITCH NEAR FLAG GDA 6.
Hydrophytie Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NW1 Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: CONCAVE
Wettand Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform: DXA1XAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetlnnd: Atypical Climate/Rydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
raramcrcr:
Dominant Species Stratum IND
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
% Dominant species FAC or welter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + / -!o due indiedors ote uol used In regrluriaii rnlculn7emrx) Cakul ed using all sprdapresent
Rapid'resi for Hydroplipic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAIIIETER NOT AIET.
Dominance Test >50 %: _
Prevalence hidex is <3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITIM CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrouhvtic Vegetation:
Primer + Grdicalors.
Matrix
Secondar = Indicators.
Depth inches
— Surface Soil Cracks (66)
X Surface Water (Al)
— Water Stained leaves (119)
Color 'Iohst
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Higb Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Texture
—Drainage Patterns (B IO)
_Saturation (A3)
_Mad Deposits (D 15)
100
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (112)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
I OYR 511
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Tron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
B2
- Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
—Troll Deposits (B5)
-Thin Muck Surface (C7)
20
_Geomorphic Position (1)2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
—Other
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_FAC- Noutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
Maier Depths (inches),
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARANIET'ER MET.
Surface Water, 1
Water Table:
Hydric Soil Indicators:
CHANNEL IS 4' WIDE;, AND BANKS ARE 0.5' HTGH. OHWAT IS PRESENT,
Saturated soil:
_ Iislosol (Al)
~Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
raramcrcr:
Dominant Species Stratum IND
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
% Dominant species FAC or welter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + / -!o due indiedors ote uol used In regrluriaii rnlculn7emrx) Cakul ed using all sprdapresent
Rapid'resi for Hydroplipic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAIIIETER NOT AIET.
Dominance Test >50 %: _
Prevalence hidex is <3.0: _ NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITIM CHANNEL.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrouhvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color iohst
%
Color 'Iohst
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0-4
A
2.5Y 511
100
SILTY CLAY LOAM
4 -15
BI
I OYR 511
70
10YR 5/6
30
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
15 -20
B2
N 611
80
10YR 516
20
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Iislosol (Al)
~Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipcdon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histie (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (F10}
2cm Muck (AIO)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
— Depleted Ochric (FII)
~ Reduccel Vertic (FIR)
Organic Bodies (A6)
—
_Dark Surface (37)
Iron- Manganese Masses (FI2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19)
5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
Potyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochric (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F])
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (At
l) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (0)
_ Anomalous Bright Loanry Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObserred) •
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
{ City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL_
WILLIAMSBURG State: NOWHI CAROLINA
1]NYIRONNIMICAL Investigatot(s): 7. TESCELER
GROUP, INC.
Date: 6/19/2012
Sampling Point Number: 7F
Section/Township/Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): I.RR T
Site Start: 36°18'50.67.7q 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Tenninus: 3( ?13'2I.4GTN 176°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: TOMOTLEY FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
IVETLAND WITHIN "Gill LINE.
-
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normat Circumstances: X
NWl Clasacation: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief: CONCAVE;
Welland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area 1s within a Wetland: X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope W 0 -2
T-T 1-1— P.--f-
_ Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
Dominant Species
Primar+Indicators,
-
Secondary Indicators.
Jrmcus canadensis
herbaceous
OBL
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al)
Stained Leaves (B9)
Color joist
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_Water
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Texture
_Drainage Patterns (1110)
_ Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
98
_Mass Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Minks (B1)
Hydrogen Sudfide Odor (C])
M
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
—Drift
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
7.5YR 5/1
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (113)
—Algal
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
—Iron Deposits (65)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Neutral Test (135)
X Sphagnum Moss (138)
Maier Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MUT.
Surface Water:
Water Table: 7
Saturated soil:
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A] 6)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Jrmcus canadensis
herbaceous
OBL
5o
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
JND
%
Scirpes arrovirens
Herbaceous
0131,
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 1001% Prevalence Index: 1.0
NOTE:( + /-in theindic ft nreriot rued In regd fiou cakaraliunc) CaladrrWusing dhpedi p,­ ,I.
Rapid Test for Ilydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETA.TiON PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Ilydrophytic Vegetation; _
Matrix
Redox Features
De ill ineltes
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color joist
%
Type
Luc
Texture
0 -2
A
25Y 4/2
98
IOYR 316
2
C
M
SANDY CLAY
2 -20
B
7.5YR 5/1
85
7.5YR 518
15
C
M
SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
— Histosol (A])
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A] 6)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Lidicaiors for Problematic flydi•ic Sails
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
—Marl
Icm Muck (A9)
_.2em
hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
— (F10)
Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ocluic (Fl l)
_Reduced Vertic (1`18)
—Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Fleodplain Soils (F19)
—
_ Scnr Mucky Mineral (A7)
Potyvalue Below Surface (S8)
— Unlhric Surface (1713)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
_ Muck Presence (AS)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (F17)
_Red Parent Material (fF2)
I cur Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Verlic (1`18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1119)
_Other
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive L69,cr (IfObsetved)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER N ET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 7G
Project: ELIZAEETH CITY TO W1Np'ALL230kV T'RAt1SMISSI0i1LWE
! Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWE,R Section /rownship/Range: NIA
i City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OP WRUALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36018'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
G ]t o U P, I'=YI'C hivesfigator(S): J. TESCHLER Site Terminus: 36°13'21.46 "N 1762T40,50 "W
cltoar, rnc:
Date: 6/19/2012 Soil Map Unit Nanre: TOMOTLF;Y FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings: VEGETATED JnR1SDICrIONAL DITCH NEAR FLAG GG -78.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present X Normal Circumstances: X NWf Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils arc Present: At] Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: CONCAVE
Wetland hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): Landform: DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a \Vetland: Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope W. 0 -2
r- r...lrnlnn., Vnrn.n ornr•
Pritnar Indreators;
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
Depth inches
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A 1)
_ Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Color LjoI59
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1113)
Texture
_Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B 15)
80
Moss Trim Lines (BI 6)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C i)
M
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
~_Presence
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (B3)
of Reduced Iron (C4)
D
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Drift
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
B I
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
15
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible an Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Other
12 -20
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
85
7.5YR 416
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Mater Depilts (incites):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER DIET.
Surface Water:
-
-
Water Table:
Saturated soil: O
_ I istosol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color joist
%
Color LjoI59
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -6
A
2.5Y 412
80
10YR 316
10
C
M
SANDY CLAY
2.5Y511
10
D
M
6-12
B I
7.5YR 511
85
7.5YR 4/6
15
C
M
SANDY CLAY
12 -20
B2'
7.5YR 511
85
7.5YR 416
15
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ I istosol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators Jorilroblemalic Hydric Soils
Histic E- pipedon (A2)
~_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gtcyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
lean Muck (A9)
__2cm
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (P10)
Muck (AI0)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
_Reduced Vertic (1718)
Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron - Manganese Masses (FI2)
Piedmont Fleodplain Soils (FI9)
~_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvaluc Below Surface (SS)
_Umbric Surface (1713)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (89)
Delta Ochric (F17)
Red Parent Material CfF2)
I em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F])
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A] 1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resfriefive Layer (IjObseiled)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches);

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Paint Number: 7H
VOII Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO W[NFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VLRGINIA POWER Scclionfrcnvnship/Range: NIA
J CitylCaunty: PASQUOTANK, PF.RQUTMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
%V11,11ANISBt1RG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: W18'50,67'N 176 °13'34.50 "W
MVIltONNiENTAL hrvestigntor(s): J. TESCHLER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 1 7627'40.50 "W
GROUP, INC :
Date: 611912012 Sail Map Unit Name: TOMOTLEY FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings: U
UPLAND NEST OF GG-78,
Hydrophytie Vegetation is Present: X N
Normal Circumstances: X N
NWI Classification: N
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X D
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ L
Local Relief: N
NONE;
Wetland Hydrology is Present: P
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ L
Landfor is F
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: A
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks): S
Slope %: 0
0 -2
r7...1.•..1 ".r.. b ".•..moony
Secondary 111rllcalors:
_Surface Soil Cracks (116)
—Surface Water (Al) _Water Stained Leaves (119) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Farina (B13) _Drainage Patterns (B10)
~_ Saturation (A3) Marl Deposits (B15) _Moss 'trim Lines (B 16)
_ [later Marks (131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) ~ Presence of Reduced ]ron (C4) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Shorted or Stressed Plants (DI)
Iron Deposits (B5) _'thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) -
~_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _Other Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Maler Deplhs (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT A7ET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
rarxrucecr:
Dominant Species Stratum IND %
Racchal•is hallmifolia Shrub FACW 20
Panicum dichotontiorant Herbaceous FACW- 20
11ilis roltmdifolla Vine FAC 15
T.onlceraJapoidea Vine FAC- 15
Campsis radicans Vine FAC 15
Nan - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
Rab«s arguhn Herbaceous FACU+ 10
Swilar bona -nox Vine FACU 10
%Dominant species FAC or welter: 1001A Prevalence Index: 2.8
NOTE:( + / -I1 flee a«limrors are ual rrrrJin vegeldio11 cnlrnMliaor.) Cel.vrlrr(ed rni«g ull syecies present.
Rapid 'Pest far Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAAiE:TER AIET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF MINT (15 %) AND NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF CARER (10 %)
Morphological Adaptations: _ PRESENT.
Problematic Hvdranhvtic VeRetatiom
Matrix Redox Features
Depth inches Eorizon Color rdoist n/ Color Moist % Type Loc Texture
0 -6 A 2.5Y 412 95 10YR 516 5 C M SANDY CLAY
6 -12 BI 2.5Y 6/2 90 2,5Y 516 10 C M FINE SANDY CLAY
12 -20 B2 10YR 6l1 85 2.5Y 516 15 C M SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _Redox Dark Surface (F6) Lrdicaroix far Problentalic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2) ~ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histic (A3) _ Sandy Crleyed Matrix (S4) _Redox Depressions (FS) _ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Mart (F10) 2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Depleted Ochric (F] 1) _Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6) Dark Surface (S7) —Depleted
Masses (F12) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1519)
5cnr Mucky Mineral (A7) _Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) Umbric Surface (F13) —Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (1720)
_ Muck Presence (AS) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) _Delta Octnic (F17) ~Red ParentMateriat (TF2)
_ I em Muck (A9) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) Reduced Vertic (F18) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Piedmont Floedplain Soils (FI9) _ Other
Thick Dark Surface (AI2) X Depleted Matrix (173) _Anomalous BdghtLoamy Soils (F20)
ReNrlefivc lAyer (IfObsenvd) Remarks: SOIL, PARAAIETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):
rarxrucecr:
Dominant Species Stratum IND %
Racchal•is hallmifolia Shrub FACW 20
Panicum dichotontiorant Herbaceous FACW- 20
11ilis roltmdifolla Vine FAC 15
T.onlceraJapoidea Vine FAC- 15
Campsis radicans Vine FAC 15
Nan - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
Rab«s arguhn Herbaceous FACU+ 10
Swilar bona -nox Vine FACU 10
%Dominant species FAC or welter: 1001A Prevalence Index: 2.8
NOTE:( + / -I1 flee a«limrors are ual rrrrJin vegeldio11 cnlrnMliaor.) Cel.vrlrr(ed rni«g ull syecies present.
Rapid 'Pest far Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAAiE:TER AIET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF MINT (15 %) AND NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF CARER (10 %)
Morphological Adaptations: _ PRESENT.
Problematic Hvdranhvtic VeRetatiom
Matrix Redox Features
Depth inches Eorizon Color rdoist n/ Color Moist % Type Loc Texture
0 -6 A 2.5Y 412 95 10YR 516 5 C M SANDY CLAY
6 -12 BI 2.5Y 6/2 90 2,5Y 516 10 C M FINE SANDY CLAY
12 -20 B2 10YR 6l1 85 2.5Y 516 15 C M SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _Redox Dark Surface (F6) Lrdicaroix far Problentalic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2) ~ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histic (A3) _ Sandy Crleyed Matrix (S4) _Redox Depressions (FS) _ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Mart (F10) 2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Depleted Ochric (F] 1) _Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6) Dark Surface (S7) —Depleted
Masses (F12) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1519)
5cnr Mucky Mineral (A7) _Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) Umbric Surface (F13) —Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (1720)
_ Muck Presence (AS) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) _Delta Octnic (F17) ~Red ParentMateriat (TF2)
_ I em Muck (A9) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) Reduced Vertic (F18) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Piedmont Floedplain Soils (FI9) _ Other
Thick Dark Surface (AI2) X Depleted Matrix (173) _Anomalous BdghtLoamy Soils (F20)
ReNrlefivc lAyer (IfObsenvd) Remarks: SOIL, PARAAIETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):
Nan - Dominant Species Stratum IND %
Rab«s arguhn Herbaceous FACU+ 10
Swilar bona -nox Vine FACU 10
%Dominant species FAC or welter: 1001A Prevalence Index: 2.8
NOTE:( + / -I1 flee a«limrors are ual rrrrJin vegeldio11 cnlrnMliaor.) Cel.vrlrr(ed rni«g ull syecies present.
Rapid 'Pest far Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAAiE:TER AIET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF MINT (15 %) AND NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF CARER (10 %)
Morphological Adaptations: _ PRESENT.
Problematic Hvdranhvtic VeRetatiom
Matrix Redox Features
Depth inches Eorizon Color rdoist n/ Color Moist % Type Loc Texture
0 -6 A 2.5Y 412 95 10YR 516 5 C M SANDY CLAY
6 -12 BI 2.5Y 6/2 90 2,5Y 516 10 C M FINE SANDY CLAY
12 -20 B2 10YR 6l1 85 2.5Y 516 15 C M SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _Redox Dark Surface (F6) Lrdicaroix far Problentalic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2) ~ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histic (A3) _ Sandy Crleyed Matrix (S4) _Redox Depressions (FS) _ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Mart (F10) 2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Depleted Ochric (F] 1) _Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6) Dark Surface (S7) —Depleted
Masses (F12) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1519)
5cnr Mucky Mineral (A7) _Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) Umbric Surface (F13) —Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (1720)
_ Muck Presence (AS) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) _Delta Octnic (F17) ~Red ParentMateriat (TF2)
_ I em Muck (A9) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) Reduced Vertic (F18) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Piedmont Floedplain Soils (FI9) _ Other
Thick Dark Surface (AI2) X Depleted Matrix (173) _Anomalous BdghtLoamy Soils (F20)
ReNrlefivc lAyer (IfObsenvd) Remarks: SOIL, PARAAIETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):
%Dominant species FAC or welter: 1001A Prevalence Index: 2.8
NOTE:( + / -I1 flee a«limrors are ual rrrrJin vegeldio11 cnlrnMliaor.) Cel.vrlrr(ed rni«g ull syecies present.
Rapid 'Pest far Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAAiE:TER AIET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF MINT (15 %) AND NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF CARER (10 %)
Morphological Adaptations: _ PRESENT.
Problematic Hvdranhvtic VeRetatiom
Matrix Redox Features
Depth inches Eorizon Color rdoist n/ Color Moist % Type Loc Texture
0 -6 A 2.5Y 412 95 10YR 516 5 C M SANDY CLAY
6 -12 BI 2.5Y 6/2 90 2,5Y 516 10 C M FINE SANDY CLAY
12 -20 B2 10YR 6l1 85 2.5Y 516 15 C M SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _Redox Dark Surface (F6) Lrdicaroix far Problentalic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2) ~ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histic (A3) _ Sandy Crleyed Matrix (S4) _Redox Depressions (FS) _ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Mart (F10) 2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Depleted Ochric (F] 1) _Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6) Dark Surface (S7) —Depleted
Masses (F12) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1519)
5cnr Mucky Mineral (A7) _Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) Umbric Surface (F13) —Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (1720)
_ Muck Presence (AS) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) _Delta Octnic (F17) ~Red ParentMateriat (TF2)
_ I em Muck (A9) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) Reduced Vertic (F18) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Piedmont Floedplain Soils (FI9) _ Other
Thick Dark Surface (AI2) X Depleted Matrix (173) _Anomalous BdghtLoamy Soils (F20)
ReNrlefivc lAyer (IfObsenvd) Remarks: SOIL, PARAAIETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 7I
I;
Project: ELI7ARETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionrrownship /Range: NIA
CitylCormty: PASQUOTANK, PF.RQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
R91,11AMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °1850,67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
EA'VO UP,EVrAL Investigator(s): J. TESCHLER Site Terminus: 36°13'21.46 "N176°27'40.50 "W
CROUP, INC.
Date: 6/19/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: TOMOTLEY FINE SANDY LOAM
Suntntary of Fludings:
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH AT FLAG Glt -8.
IND
Secondary Titdleatorsr
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
N%VIClassification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Welland Hydrology is Present: X
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfonn:
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical ClimatelHydrology (see Remarks ):
Slope %:
0 -2
tlydroloJ!y Parameter:
Dominant Species
11rhuar lirdieafors:
IND
Secondary Titdleatorsr
f eersia w3voides
Herbaceous
OBL
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (A 1)
—High
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
Color Moist
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
— Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Texture
—Drainage Patterns (13 ]0)
Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15) -
100
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
_ Iydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Dry- Seasoa Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rhizosplieres on Living Roots (0)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
~ Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
_Iron Deposits (B5) -
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2) -
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Other
X FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Sphognam Moss (DS)
Maier Depths (!nc)tes),
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER AIET.
Surface Water. 6
Water Table:
Hydric Soil Indicators:
CHANNEL IS 5' 1VIDE, AND BANKS ARE 5-6'111011, OHWM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil:
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
f eersia w3voides
Herbaceous
OBL
95
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 1001/. Prevalence Index: Lo
NOTE.:( + /- is rite hedtcotors ore not used in tegetafiau crtlettfafious.) Cnteidated ruing all speefes presew.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dontimnee Test >50 %: X
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0 -20
A
7.5YR 5/1
100
LOAMY SAND
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic FT)xiiic Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
~_Black
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Marl (Fl0)
~2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ocluic (FI1)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodptain Soils (F19)
—5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvaluo Below Surface (SS)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochric (F17)
— Red Parent Material (TF2) .
_ 1 em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
l) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (142)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1420)
Reslricffve Layer (IfObsetied)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Sampling Point Number: 7J
1
Projcct: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionfrownship/Range; NIA
CitylCounty: PASQUOTANK, PERQiTIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL, Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILIJANISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start; 36 °18'50.67 "N I76 °13'34.50 "W
EWIRO \'N1E.YrAL Investigator(s): P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36°13'21.46 "N / 76'27'40.50 "W
GROUP, INC:
Date: 611912012 Soil Map Unit Name; 'I'OM01'LEY FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND SWALE WEST OP LINE "GH ",
Secondary Iadicarars:
Redox Ecatures
Hyd €ophytic Vegetation isPresent: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWIClassification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remark): _
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within u Wetlnrd:
Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Iiydraloey Parameter:
Printar , Indicators:
Secondary Iadicarars:
Redox Ecatures
—Surface Sod Cracks (116)
Surface Water (At)
—high
_Water Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
— Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (BI 3)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
—Marl Deposits (B 15)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
— Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospberes on Living Roots (C3)
—
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
__
_Recent Iron Reduction itt Tilled Soils (C6)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (0)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Intmdaiion Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Other
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
12 -20
_
~ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
98
2.5Y 613
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
i!'aler Depths (lnehes):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Matrix
Redox Ecatures
Depth inches
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -4
A
10YR 3/2
99
10YR 314
1
C
M
SILT LOAM
4 -12
B 1
2.5Y 5/1
98
7.5YR 416
2
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
12 -20
B2
2.5Y 611
98
2.5Y 613
2
C
M
FINE SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (At)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicaors for Problematic Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
~Black
_ Sandy Mucky Mhreral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleycd Matrix (94)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
—I can Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (FI0)
2em Muck (AIO)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
-- Depleted Ochric (P 11)
_Reduced Vertic (FI8)
Organic Bodies (A6)
—Organic
_Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Brigbt Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
Tbin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (F17)
Red Parent Material (TF2) -
_ 1 em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mincral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Ftoodplain Sails (Fl 9)
_Outer
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resiriclire Layer (IfObsenvd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches);

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 7K
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionfi'ownslup/Range: NIA
lit_11�
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINPALL Suhregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
IkILL1AWBURG Slate: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N176 °13'34.50 "W
ENV1RO'0f11VFAL Investigator(s): J. TESCHLER Site Ternritim: 36 °13'21.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
GROUP, ISC.
Date: 6/19/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: GERTIE. SII:T LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND ABOVE FLAG GA -72.
Secondary Indicators:
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NIVI Classification:
NIA
- Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
_
Problematic Paramcters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydralogy (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hvdroloev Parameter:
Dominant species
Prbnar y Indicators;
Secondary Indicators:
%
Ambrosia arlemisiifoha
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al)
_ 1Vater Stained Leaves (B9).
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (118)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Aqualic Fauna (B13)
_Drainage Patterns (BID)
_Saturation (A3)
Deposits (B15)
_Moss Trim Lines (1116)
Water Marks (Rl)
_Marl
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rbizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drill Deposits (B3)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Redaction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
Other
_ Shallaw Aquitaid (D3)
_FAC- Neufral Test (D5)
Sphagntun Moss (DS)
ff oter Depths {inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET,
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant species
Stralum
IND
%
Ambrosia arlemisiifoha
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Campsis radicarrs
Vine
FAC
25
Lonicerajapoirica
Vine
FAC-
20
Dominant species FAC or wetter: 67%
T19;(+/-;" the irrdi_tr ore rmt used in regerntiwr crake
Non - Dominant Species
Straturrr
IND
%
Dancus carola
Truncas effirsus
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
UPI,
FAC1V+
5
2
Prevalence Index: 3.3
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER DIET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOLWAGO (15 9/6) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations; _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
1A
Color oist
%
e
Lee
Texture
0 -4
A
2.5Y4/2
98
10YR 518
2
C
M
SILTY CLAY
4 -20
B
2.5Y 411
95
JOYR 518
5
C
M
SILTY CLAY
Hydric Soil Iadicators:
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (Al(i)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
~_Depleted
Indicators forProblenralic Hydric Soils
_HisticEpipedon(A2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S J)
Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Ictem. Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
_2cm Muck (Al0)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ocluic (Flt)
Reduced Vertic (1718)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (87)
—
Tron- Manganese Masses (1712)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Umbric Surface (F 13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Mack
I cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Loamy Glcycd Matrix (172)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resi iclive Layer(IfObsened)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: SA
Seedordrownship/Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °19'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°2740,50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: TOMOTLEY FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings: JUIHSDIC]IONAL D11 CH NEAR FLAGS GR -21 U7' -4.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
llydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landfarm: DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Welland: Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Rcnnrks): Slope %u: 0.2
Hydrology Parameter:
Prbnar , Inrifeators.
Matrix
1
Depth inches
Project:
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
!r
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWF,R
Ed:
CitylCounty: PAS
UOTANK, PERQUiMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
IAULLUISBURG
State:
N0Xr11 CAROLINA
E1�'1'IIIO \�1Fa\ I'AL
Nvesdgator(s):
P. MEIER
GROUP, INC.
Dale:
612012012
Sampling Point Number: SA
Seedordrownship/Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °19'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°2740,50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: TOMOTLEY FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings: JUIHSDIC]IONAL D11 CH NEAR FLAGS GR -21 U7' -4.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
llydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landfarm: DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Welland: Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Rcnnrks): Slope %u: 0.2
Hydrology Parameter:
Prbnar , Inrifeators.
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
Depth inches
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (AI)
—Water Stained Leaves (89)
Color (Moist
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Texture
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
—Saturation (A3)
—Marl Deposits (1315)
100
Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
2.5Y411
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
-Presence o£Reduced Iron (C4)
C
_Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
B2
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (65)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
15
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
_ Other
—Shallow
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
(DS)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
1PaterDeprhs (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETERNIET.
Surface Water: 5
Water Table:
Hydric Soil Indicators:
CHANNEL IS T WIDE, AND BANKS ARE 2'111011. OIIWM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil:
Histosol (Al)
~_llisticEpipedon(A2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color (Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -4
A
IOYR 4/2
100
SANDY LOAM
9 -15
B1
2.5Y411
90
10YR4l6
10
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
15 -20
B2
2.5Y611
85
2.5Y516
15
C
M
SAND
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
~_llisticEpipedon(A2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators forProblemntic frydrlc Soils
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (94)
~Redox Depressions (178)
_ tern Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (FIO)
2crn Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (AS)
—stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted Ocluic(Fll)
—Reduced Verde (Fla)
_
_Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (97)
_Iron - Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F) 9)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
—Umbric Surface (FI3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_Tbiu Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictire Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (hrclres):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 8B
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionffownship/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PER UIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
N%gLUA11ISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
F'* L"FRO \',,f _'YrAL Investigator(s): P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°2740,50 "W
O.ki0U1', INC.
Date: 6120/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: TOMOTLEY FINE SANDY LOAM
Summa ry of Findings; UPLAND IN RECENTLY PLOWED 1 IIARVESTED AGRICULTURAL FIELD, NEAR FLAGS GR -2 / GT -4.
Primary Indicators:
Hydraphytic Vegetation is Present
Normal Circumstances: X
N`%VI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: Ii:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landforrn:
FLAT
Sampled Area is ivithin a Welland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0.2
AvA,•nlnnv Pn ra n,nknr• -
_ Oxidized Rhizosplieres on living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drill Deposits (B3)
r arnwcrcr•
Dominant Species Stratum IND %
Non - Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
Seconds rj - Indicaturs:
% -
Lolhem perenne
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_High Water Table (A2)
— Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
— Marl Deposits (B 15)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B])
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizosplieres on living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drill Deposits (B3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Saluration Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction ut Tilled Soils (C6)
_Started or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorpbic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Other
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (DS)
Sphagnum Moss (138)
Water Deplhs (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAi1LFTFR NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
r arnwcrcr•
Dominant Species Stratum IND %
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
% -
Lolhem perenne
Herbaceous
FACU-
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: Prevalence Index:
NOTE:( + /- inI!aindr'cmors arenot used is regewimr crrlcertarionsJ Calerd"Mdusing allspeci"PrP -s a
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50%: _
Prevalence Index is < 3,0: _ UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF FESCUE (5%) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations: _
ProblematicHydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color [heist
1
Color Molst
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0.5
A
lOYR 412
100
SANDY LOAM
5-20
B
2.5Y 611
85
2.5Y 618
15
C
M
SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (A])
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indfcatotsfor• Problemalfe Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
~ Depleted Dark Surface (147)
_Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Manx (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lens Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (FIO)
_20m Muck (AID)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (F 11)
_Reduced Vertic (1418)
_Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Maugauese Masses (FI2)
—
PiedmontFloodplain Soils (1719)
_ 5cm Mucky Material (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
_Umbric Surface (1713)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ocluic (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
I em Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
l) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
Other
Thick Dark Surface (AI2)
A Depleted Matrix (143)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Restrictive Layer (If Obsenvd)
_
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 8C
i
Project: ELIZABETH CITY '1'O WINFALL 2301,V TRANSMISSION LINE
�S Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectionuTownshiplRauge: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
K\'VIRON'llt•]\ rAL Investigator(s): P. MEIER Site'renninus: 36 °13'21.46 "N! 7627'40.50"W -
G1tOUP, INC.
Date: 6/20!2012 Soil Map Unit Name: BERT'Hi FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary ofFiudings:
UPLAND ABOVE "IC" LINE.
Seeottdat • Indicators:
%
Hydrophy€ic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: x
NWl Classification:
NIA
- llydrio Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONVEX
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Laudfonu:
FLAT
Sampled Area i3 within a Wetland;
_
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
u�a.•�r "at/ r ".• ",��.e "r•
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Dominant Species
Prinfar + Indicators:
Seeottdat • Indicators:
%
Alnusincana
Liquidannbarstyrrrciiffna
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Hight Water Table (A2)
—Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation(A3)
Marl Deposits (1315)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Dry- Season Water Table (432)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
— Iron Deposits (B5)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geornorpluc Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Other
_
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Mater Depths (huches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Alnusincana
Liquidannbarstyrrrciiffna
Shrub
Shrub
NI
FAC+
10
5
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: l00%
rMtV in the rrrdic.1— nre not used i o V—el fiun enlcul
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Diehantheliumscoparium
Herbaceous
FACW
15
Anthoranehtrrn odoratunr
herbaceous
FACU
15
Rubes argurns
Herbaceous
FACU+
10
Pardiermcissus gnrnryrefolia
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Prevalence Index: 3.3
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER AIET.
Dominance Test >501/.: X
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: _ UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOLIDAGO (4041.), MINT (201A), AND NON DOMINANT SPECIES
Morphological Adaptations:_ OF GRASS (15 %) PRESENT.
Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inclies
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color joist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -6
A
IOYR 3I4
100
SANDY LOAM
6-20
B
2.5Y 6/4
100
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
-
_ Histosol (Al)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Rcdox Dark Surface (F6)
Iralicarors for Pr ohlernarle Ifydric Soils
Histic 1pipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S I)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_~ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ loon Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
_ 2em Muck (A10)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Och is (Fll)
_Reduced Vertic (1'18)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F l9)
~ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvedne Beloit/ Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (F13)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1`20)
— Muck Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochr €c (1`17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
I cm Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _Loamy Gleyed Matdx (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Sampling Point Number: SD
j�Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
i Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIAPOWER Section/Township/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLI,"ISBURG State: - NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: WI 9'50.67"N 176 °13'34.50 "W
F1'STROh`ivlhYfAL Investi tor()" s J.TESCHLER Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46N/76 °27'40.50 "W
GItOUT,INC.
Date: 6/20/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: TOMOTLFY FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings;
Primary Indicators,
VEGETATED JURISDICTIONAL DITCH AT FLAG IC -4.
SeconLarl Indicators;
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform:
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
X
Atypical ChmalefHydrology (see Remarks): Slope %:
0.2
u.,a�•„t.,.... nA.•2.,,ara.•.
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
Dominant S ecies
Primary Indicators,
IND
SeconLarl Indicators;
llteruatrlheraphNoreroldes
Herbaceous
0331,
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
Color fMaistl
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Texture
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
~Water
_Marl Deposits (B 15)
100
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (112)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
~ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Drift
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Irmo Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
-
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iran Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (0)
_ Gcomurpldc Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
_Other
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC - Neutral •Pest (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
117alerDeplhs (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water: 3
Water Table:
Hydric Soil Indicators:
CHANNEL 1S 8' WIDE, AND BANKS ARE THIGH. OHWM IS PRESENT.
Saturated soil:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairia Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant S ecies
Stratum
IND
%
llteruatrlheraphNoreroldes
Herbaceous
0331,
90
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Leersianrpzoldes
Herbaceous
OBL
10
% Dominant species PAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 1.0
KOTE:( +/- in Ilse indic oors are Ira! asat In regwoe;arr ralcrrlalimm) calo'lalnl snag all species present
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dorninance'rest >50 " /0: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:_
ProblematicHvdrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color fMaistl
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -20
A
2.5Y5/1
100
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Coast Prairia Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators forProblematic Hydric Soils
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy
Redox Depressions (FS)
_ lean Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Redox (S5)
— Marl (F10)
2cm Muck (AIO)
`Reduced
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (1711)
Vertic (F18)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_fron- Manganese Masses (1`12)
_Piedmont Floodplaur Soils (F19)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
._._._ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (FI3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
— Muck Presence (A8)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (PI 7)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
I cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (FIR)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dar], Surface (A]
1) Loamy Gleyed. Matrix (172)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (AI2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (If Observed)
Remarks; SOIL PAIL"IETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
� � f
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WiNFALL 230IN TRANSMISSION LINE
t Applicant: DOM]NION VIRGINIA POWER
I 1
City/County; PASQLIOTANK, PERQTJIMANS, FLIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
ITANIHO\Mlr \I'AL Investigator(s ): J. TESCHLER
GXO11P, INC
Date: 6I20l2012
Sampling Point Dumber: SF
Seclion/Township /Range; NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA ): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 76013'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36°13'21.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: MUNDBN LOAMY FINE SAND
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND AT FLAG GX -9,
IN➢
Secondary Indicaors.
Hydrophytie Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landfoms:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within n Welland: X
Atypical Climatelllydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
FT'A. —I. P...n fn
vegeranon Yarameter:
PrImar y Indicalors.
IN➢
Secondary Indicaors.
LigtrtdrnttbarslfsrrciJ?rta
Shrub
FAC+
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
FACW
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FACW+
_Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (BI5)
OBL
_Moss'frim Lines (1116)
_ Water Marks (131)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
M
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
2,5Y312
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Tron (C4)
C
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
7X Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (E7)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
WaterDepilu (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAAFLTER MET.
Surface Water.
Ws ter Table:
SaturatedsoiL 4
Coast Prairie Redox (AM)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
vegeranon Yarameter:
Stratum
IN➢
Redox Features
LigtrtdrnttbarslfsrrciJ?rta
Shrub
FAC+
5
Arutrrlivaria gigarriea
herbaceous
FACW
25
7Yrel }pleris7lre! }pferoides
Herbaceous
FACW+
IS
Cnreeloprrltrrn
Herbaceous
OBL
5
5
C
M
SANDY CLAY
6 -20
B
2,5Y312
95
lOYR 516
5
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A])
Coast Prairie Redox (AM)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicalors for• ProblerrmricHy�lric Soils
% Dominant species FAC or welter: 100%
Prevalence Index; 1.9
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
NOI'S:(tI- 8,11 a Lrdle tors are not axed in regelarion rnlrrrloliau)
Calcutaled rcriug ull species preseaL
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >501/.- X
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Prevalence index is <3.0: X
—Marl (F10)
Morphological Adaptations:
Muck (A10)
Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation:
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Oclrric (1711)
—_
Dominant Species
Stratum
IN➢
Redox Features
LigtrtdrnttbarslfsrrciJ?rta
Shrub
FAC+
5
Arutrrlivaria gigarriea
herbaceous
FACW
25
7Yrel }pleris7lre! }pferoides
Herbaceous
FACW+
IS
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IlV➢
Redox Features
Jtrurrrs• effiistrs
Herbaceous
FAGW+
10
.4rundinariagigaatea
Herbaceous
FAC1V
7
Scirpas alrnrirens
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Cnreeloprrltrrn
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color Malst
%
Type
Luc
Texture
0 -6
A
IOYR 312
95
l0YR 314
5
C
M
SANDY CLAY
6 -20
B
2,5Y312
95
lOYR 516
5
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A])
Coast Prairie Redox (AM)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicalors for• ProblerrmricHy�lric Soils
_ Histic E'pipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
lem Muck (A9)
—_2em
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
—Marl (F10)
Muck (A10)
Stratified layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Oclrric (1711)
—_
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
trop- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_
Senn Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
Umbric Surface (F13)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
~Red
Muck Presence (A8)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_ Delta Ocluic (F17)
Parent Material (TF2)
—
I cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F])
Reduced Vertic (F 18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
_'Thick Dark Surface (A] 2)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Restrictive Lager (If Obsen =ed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: SF
Project: ELIZABETH CFI"YTO WINFALL230kV TRANSMISSIONLlNE
Applicant: DOMINION ViRGINJAPOWFR Section /lownship/Range: NIA
� City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subrcgion (LKR or MLRA): LRR T
WILUMISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N /76 °13'34.50 "W
131 ORt)1111IEYTAL Investigator(s): K. PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176 °27'40.50 "W
clw UP, INC Dale: 612012012 Soil Map Unit Name: MUNDEN LOAMY FINE SAND
Summary of Findings;
UPLAND NEAR FLAG GX -9.
Secondary Indicators.
I Iydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
N Wl Classification: N/A
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief: CONVEX
Welland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfomr: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %: 0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant S ecies
Primary Indicators:
Secondary Indicators.
%
-
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A])
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
~Moss Trim Lines (1316)
13
Water Marks (1)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
—Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CG)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_ fmn Deposits (115)
_ Thin Muck Surface (0)
_ Geomorphic Position (1)2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
~_FAC-
Neutral Test (D5)
Splragnunr Moss (DS)
Maier Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARA1 MTER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant S ecies
Stratum
IND
%
Llgaidambarslpracian
Sapling
FAC+
5
Quercuspalltshis
Sapling
FACW
5
Errpaloriunn capillifoltunr
Herbaceous
FACU
15
Rabnrs arguirls
Herbaceous
FACUi.
15
Andrapogoirrirghrlclis
Herbaceous
FACU
15
Solidago altissin a
Herbaceous
FACU-
15
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
YND
Redox Features
Pinus laeda
Sapling
FAC-
2
Dichanibelitmrscoparlam
Herbaceous
1`ACW
10
Solidago ragow
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Juncus alpiuus
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Ca)-ex lribuloides
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Packera lontenlosa
Herbaceous
FAC-
10
Dominant species FAC or wetter: 33% Prevalence Index: 3.3
NOTE:( + /- - in the indimlers are nonsedinn•gemlean m1crrlaions) Carndaied using all gwiupr crit
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET,
Dominance Test >50'1.-
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: _ UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF BONESET (20 %) AND NON - DOMINANT PACKERA (10 %)
Morphological Adaptations: PRESENT.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
M.
Depth inches
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color foist
%
Type
Luc
Texture
042
A
10YR 312
100
SANDY LOAM
12 -20
B
10YR 514
100
LOAMY SAND
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosul (Al)
_Coast Prairie Rcdox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Gtdicatas for Problematic Hydric Soils
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Sandy Mucky Mincral (Sl)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Black Histic (A3)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Redox Depressions (FS)
1 cm Muck (A9)
__2cm
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (F 10)
Muck (A10)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Depleted Oclnic (Fl 1)
_Reduced Vertic (1`18)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
tmn- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
--Umbric Surface (1`13)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1`20)
—Red
Muck Presence (A8)
Tluin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Oehric (1317)
Parent Material (TF2)
I em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F 1)
Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Below Dark Surface (Al
1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Depleted
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Brigbt Loamy-Soils (F20)
Resi active Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOH. PARAMF.TFR NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
�. Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
i Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
City /County: I?ASQUOTANK, PERQUTMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF _WINFALL
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
F,i\Mlt0Ntf111,11'AL Invcstigator(s): P. MEIER
elloup, INC.
Date: 6/20/2012
Sampling Point Number: 9A
Sectionfrownship/Range: N/A
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36°18'50.67 "N / 76°13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36°13'21.46 "N 176 °27'40.50 "W
Sail Map Unit Name: ALTAVISTA FINE. SANDY LOAM
Summa ry of Findings: UPLAND IN AGRICULTURAL FIELD ADJACENT TO "JAI" & "ID" LINES.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief, NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): Landfomt: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland: Atypical Climateglydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
nyarmogy rarameter:
Primary Indicators:
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
—
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
— Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (139)
Loc
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_Aqua €ic Fauna (1313)
10YR 413
Patterns (B 10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (1115)
_Drainage
_Moss
Trim Lines (1116)
_ Water Marks (Bl)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Dry-
Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
5
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
17.20
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
IOYR 316
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (0)
_Geomorphic
Position (D2)
_htmtdation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
_Shallow
Aquiinrd (D3)
_
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
WaterDeplhs (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAAIFTF.R NOT AIIZT.
Surface Water:
Hydric Soil Indicators;
Water Table:
Histosol (A I)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Saturated sail: X20
Inchcafors forPnnblemade Hydrie Sails
_— Histic Epipedont (A2)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches)
Horizon
Color Aloist %
Color Ioist % Type
Loc
Texture
0.5
A
10YR 413
100
SANDY LOAM
5 -17
Bl
lOYR 512
95
10YR 416
5
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
17.20
132
2.5Y 512
97
IOYR 316
3
C
M
SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators;
Histosol (A I)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (176)
Inchcafors forPnnblemade Hydrie Sails
_— Histic Epipedont (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gloycd Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
_2cm Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
S €rippedMatrix(S6)
—Dark
_Depleted Ochric (Fll)
_Reduced Vertic (1`18)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)
_ Surface (87)
—Iron-Manganese
Iron- Manganese Masses (1712)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (88)
Surface (1713)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_'thin Dark Surface (S9)
_ Delta Ochric (F17)
Parent Material (17172)
1 cm Muck (A9)
—
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Red.
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_PiedummFloodplain Soils (F19)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Other
'Restrictive Layer (If observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARANIETER A ET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CfrY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
- City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUtMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
WILLIM \18BURC State: NOR111 CAROLINA
UNIFRIONXIENCAL Investigator(s): d• TESClILER
c1IOI1.P,Ine:
Date: 6/20/2012
Sampling Point Number: 9B
Sectionfownship /Range:
NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
Site Start:
36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus:
36 °1321.46 "N 1 76°2740.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name:
ALTAVISTA FINE SANDY LOAM
Summury of Findings;
VEGETATED JURISDICTIONAL ]DITCH AT FLAG IM -9,
IND
Ilydrophytic Vegetation is Present:. X
Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landfomt:
DRATNAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X
Atypical CliruatelHydrology (see Remarks): Slope %:
0 -2
Hvdroloev Parameter:
rnrnrrrcwr:
Dominant Species
Printar y Irdlcatorsr
IND
Secmrdar y Indicators:
Yypha lidifolia
Herbaceous
OBI,
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (A l)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
Color foist
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Texture
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
X Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B 15)
98
_Moss Trim Lutes (1316)
—Water Marks (B 1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
M
_Dry- Scason Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B 2)
~_Drift
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (133)
_Presence of Reduced lron (C4)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_Iron Deposits (115)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
—Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagumn Moss (D8)
Maier Depths (lnehes):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table: 1
Hydric Soil Iudicators:
CHANNEL IS 4' WIDE, AND BANKS ARE 4' liiGH.
Snlurated soil: O
_ I istosol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
- Redox Dark Surface (176)
rnrnrrrcwr:
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Yypha lidifolia
Herbaceous
OBI,
25
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 1001/. Prevalence Index: 1.0
NOTE:(+ /-hs the iudi atorsarermtrrsedh, regetatina colrulnrlorrs} Calurlatednsinx o!lsprciespresenf.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PAIUMFfER MET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations;
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color toisl
%
Color foist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0-20
A
10YR 411
98
10YR 516
2
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Iudicators:
_ I istosol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
- Redox Dark Surface (176)
Lrdicarots far Problematic Hydric Soils
_MsticEpipedon(A2)
_Sandy MuckyMineml(SI)
-Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
~Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
lcm Muck (A9)
-2cm
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
—Mart (F10)
- Muck (AIO)
Stratified Layers (A5)
—Stripped Matr ix (S6)
—Depleted Ochric (Fl 1)
_Reduced Verde (FI8)
_
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplaia Soils (F19)
_Organic
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Umbric Surface (F13)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
—Muck Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
^_
—Delta Ochric (F17)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
I cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F] 8)
—
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
- -Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (P2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
'X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Armmalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObsemed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 10A
iProject: ELIZABETH CFFY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION V1RGINIA POWER Section/Township/Range: NIA
• City/County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
MILLIA1IISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
FA'�711(3 \RII_ \I'Al. Investigator(s): J. TESCHLER Site Terminus: 36113'2i.46 "N I76°27'40.50 "W
G.1tour, INC ,
Bate: 6121!2012 Soil Map Unit Name: ROANOKE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND FLATAT FLAG I(2-3-
Secondary Indicators:
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NW1 Classification:
NIA
Ilydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
local Relief,
CONVEX
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
. Dominant Species
Primary Lrdleators:
Secondary Indicators:
%
Rhos copallinaur
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (139)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_High Water Table (A2)
—Aquatic Fauua (B 13)
Drainage Patters (B 10)
Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (1315)
~Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_ Dry- Sanson Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Sat ..lien Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_iron Deposits (B5)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Gcomarphic Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
M
Shallow Aquitnrd (133)
_Inundation
_Other
X FAC- Neutral Test (DS)
85
10YR 316
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
S nterDepths (inches):
M
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT NW f.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
. Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Rhos copallinaur
Shrub
Ni
10
Dichanthellwu sceparh ni
Herbaceous
FACW
20
Loliumperenne
Herbaceous
FACU-
20
Leypedeza crareala
Herbaceous
NI
20
Pleocharis halophila
Herbaceous
OBI.
20
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 671A
NOTE :( + /- L, d e nndicnrors .,t not used la vegd don calm
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Rabns argatus
Herbaceous
FACUf
10
Prevalence Index: 2.6
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOLIDAGO (l0o/) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Alols1
%
Color Molst
%
Type
Luc
Texture
0 -18
A
7.5YR511
75
7.SYR7 /1
10
C
M
CLAY
10YR 518
15
C
M
18 -20
R
10YR 411
85
10YR 316
15
C
M
CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicator for• Problematic Hydric Soils
_ Bistic Epipedon (A2)
--Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_Black His€ic (A3)
Smrdy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ tern Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (F IO)
2em Muck (AIO)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted Ochric (1711)
_Reduced Veitic (F18)
^_Organic Bodies (A6)
Dnrk Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
~_Anomalous
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_— Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
_ Umbric Surface (F13)
Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_ Delta Ochric (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2) '
1 cm Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Vary Shallow Dark Surface ('FF12)
_
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
a Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils Q'20)
ResirictiveLayer(LfObserved)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 10B
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
I r Applicant: DOiv1IN10N VIRGINIA POWER Section/fownshiplRange: MIA
t City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
117JUD"ISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
NNVINO \hIINI'AL Investigaior(s); P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40"50 "W
GROUP,
Date: 612112012 Soil Map UnitNamc: ROANOKE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
VEGETATED JURISDICTIONAL DITCH NEAR FLAG IF -3.
IND
HydrophyticVegetafionisPresent; X
Normal Circumstances: X NWIClassification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): Local Relief,
CONCAVE
Welland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): Landform;
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Weiland: X
Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
rwr raurrari W
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
IND
Secondar y Indicatarw
Leersfaoryzoides
Herbaceous
OBL
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
FACW
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (1113)
OBL
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
OBL
Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
—Dry-
Water Marks (B 1) .
Itydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (112)
_Oxidized Rltizospheres on Living Roots (0)
2.5Y 511
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (113)
~Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
D
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (1)1)
_Iran Deposits (B5)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
5
_ Geontorpluc Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
15 -20
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
2.5Y4/1
95
2.5Y 4/4
X FAC- Neutral •Pest (D5)
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
€VaferDepflrs (inches):
Remarks" HYDROLOGY PARA51EXER MET.
Surface Water. 3
Water Table:
CHANNEL IS 8' WIDE,
AND BANKS ARE 34 HIGH.
Saturated soil:
_Histosol (Al)
~Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Dark Surface (F6)
rwr raurrari W
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Leersfaoryzoides
Herbaceous
OBL
20
Polygonumpersicalla
Herbaceous
FACW
15
7)pha Iafffolia
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Typha angrrsrifalfa
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
]I ND
Redox Features
Irabus argutus
Lespedezaeaneala
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FACU+
NI
10
10
%Dominant species FAC or welter: 100% Prevalence Index: 1.6
NOTE:(+ I - in rl a lndle fors ate not ­d irr vegelelimr crtrcrrfufiaas.J Caladafed ruing nrlspc[iespmra+d
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >501/o: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOUDAGO (15 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroahvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
De ih inches
Horizon
Color uist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0 -5
A
2.5Y 611
100
SILTY CLAY LOAM
5 -15
BI
2.5Y 511
85
2.5Y 611
10
D
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
2.5Y4/4
5
C
M
15 -20
B2
2.5Y4/1
95
2.5Y 4/4
5
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
~Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic H}dric Soils
_ Ilistic Epipedou (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Redox
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lem Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (1710)
_2crn Muck (AIO)
_ Stratifi ed Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
^ Depleted Ochric (F 11)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Iron - Manganeso Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fl 9)
_Organic
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Palyvalue Below Surface (58)
_ Umbric Surface (F13)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
— Delta Ochric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TM)
I cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (rl)
—Loamy
Reduced Verde (FI8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resrrfcrive Layer (IfOhseived)
Remarks: SOIL PAIL"IETER AIF.T.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 10C
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
)t Applicant: DOMTNION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionll'ownmbip/Range: NIA
+.. City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUTMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WBSFALL Subregiun (LRR or A4LRA): LRR T
WILIIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °1850,67 "N 176 °13'34.50'XV
&WIROS'ME1 fAl. Investigator(s): P. WFER Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N 176°27'40.5011W
G110UP, INN
Date: 6/2112012 Soil Map Unit Name: PERQUllvfANS SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
IVFTLAND NEAR FLAG IX -1.
IND
SecowWr , Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
N \VI Classification:
NIA
liydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Welland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landfonn:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X
_
Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Lrlla tVI:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
IND
SecowWr , Indicators:
Acer rabrum -
Tree
FAC
— Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
FAG+
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
—Iligh Water fable (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC
_Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (1115)
FAC+
—Moss Trim Lines (1116)
—Water Marks (B 1)
~ ^ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
FAC-
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
FACW+
Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drip Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
FACW
Saturation Visible an Aerial Imagery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134)
~_
_ Recent Iron Reduction hi Tilled Soils (C6)
OBL
Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
Iron Deposits (135)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
FAC
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Otter
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IOYR 518
X PAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
M
Spbagnum Moss (138)
Motor Depths (inches):
2.5Y 511
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARA117ET'E1Niff.
2.5Y 5/6'
Surface Water:
C
M
SILTY CLAY
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Histosol (Al)
_ CoastPrairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (176)
Lrlla tVI:
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Acer rabrum -
Tree
FAC
40
Liquidambarstyraciillaa
Tree
FAG+
20
Acerrabrnm
Sapling
FAC
20
Liquidambarsoracina
Sapling
FAC+
15
Punts faeda
Sapling
FAC-
15
Junctir effustrs
Herbaceous
FACW+
40
Dichandrelianrscaparium
Herbaceous
FACW
20
Cares lurida
Herbaceous
OBL
20
Smilav rotrarrhfblia
Ville
FAC
5
%Dominant species FAG or welter: 1001%
ATE:( + / -ix Nre indicator; ore not used i's rcgerurio�r cnlcnlnrinns)
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Pions taeda
Tree
FAC-
15
Abutssenrdata
Sapling
FACNV+
5
Asitrtina trilaba
Sapling
FACU+
10
Uhmts ainericana
Sapling
FACW
10
Qaeretis tnichaarii
Sapling
FACW
5
Galium apmine
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Prevalence Index: 2.6
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VFGF.TATION PARAMETER AILT.
Dominance Test >50%', X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF FESCUE (5 1%) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth Inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -2
A
IOYR 511
100
SILT LOAM
2 -8
B 1
2.5Y 411
75
IOYR 416
10
C
M
CLAY LOAM
15Y 611
10
D
M
IOYR 518
5
C
M
8 -20
B2
2.5Y 511
60
2.5Y 5/6'
40
C
M
SILTY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ CoastPrairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (176)
Indicators far Probleumtle Hydrle Soils
Ilistic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gloyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Icm Muck (A9)
Sulfide (A4)
— Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (Flo)
2ctn Muck (A 10)
~_Reduced
_Hydrogen
Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Oehric (F1I)
Wrtic (F18)
_Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dart Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
—Umbric
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ ^Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_Polyvalue Below Surface (89)
Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright loamy Soils (F20)
Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Oclarie (F17)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Muck
- 1 em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (FI8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_ Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Reso-iclive Layer (IfObsened)
Remarks: SOIL PARAAIETF.R ATFT.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Dumber: 10D
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionflownship /Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQIJIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA ): LRR T
N47LL1ANISBUl1G State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36°18'50.67 "N / 76°13'34,50 "W
l:NV1l1ONXIL \TAL ytvestigator(s): J.TESCHLER Site Terminus; 36'1321.46"N 17627'40.50"W
GROUP, INC.
Date: 6/2112 012 Soil Map Unit Name: ROANOKE SB,T LOAM
Summary of Findings; UPLAND FLAT NEAR "1X" LINE.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): Local Relief: NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landfonu: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks ): Slope %: 0 -2
Hvrlroloev Parameter:
Far Ur Vrc.;
Dominant Species
Printarrlrrdicators:
Secondary Indicators:
%
Sambucuscanadelrsis
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A 1)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
_Aquatic
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
Fauna (B13)
Drainage Patterns (B IO)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B 15)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B 1)
_hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Dry- Scason Watcr Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizosphcres on Living Roots (0)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sails (06)
_Shunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Deposits (135)
—'thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_Iron
Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
X FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Sphagmmi Moss (1)8)
mater Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PA.IWIETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Sntumted soil: >20
Far Ur Vrc.;
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Sambucuscanadelrsis
Shrub
FACW-
15
Bacchwishalirnfolly
Shrub
FACW
5
Rubes mgIdUs
Herbaceous
FACU+
10
Lonicera japonica
Vine
FAG
75
Cmnpsls radicans
Vine
FAC
25
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND
Dominant species FAC or welter: 80% Prevalence Index: 2.9
NOTP:( + / -nr rl eirrdirntors ere rmr ased is regefafiar rnladelior�s.J CrsTerrluied erring el! yeclr -eprr -rear.
Rapid'fest for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VFGLTATION PARAh1ETER AIET.
Dominance Test >50/6. X
Prevalence Index is <3A X UNIDENTIFIED DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOLIDAGO (5%) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Hnri7011
Color foist
%
Color Lloisq
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0 -12
A
10YR 3!2
98
10YR 416
2
C
M
SILTY CLAY
12 -20
B
25Y 5/1
95
2.5Y5/6
5
C
M
SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil hldicateFa:
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for ProblematicHpdric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
—Sandy
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Histic (A3)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (FS)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
_Black
Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
~Mar] (Flo)
_2em Muck (A10)
_Hydrogen
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (F1 1)
_Reduced Vertic (1`18)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
5crrt Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalae Below Surface (88)
Umbric Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (59)
~Delta Ochric (1717)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Muck
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (171)
-
_Reduced Vertic (1`18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
— _Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_PiedmontFloodplaitiSoil&(FI9)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Restriclive Layer (LfObscnvd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

WetIand Determination Data Forin - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 11A
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFAT.L 230kV TRANSM155ION LINE
yy Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Section/Township/Range: NIA
1.
City/County: PASQUOTANK, PERQHiMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLiAhISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N l 76°13'34.50 "W
EANitO \1tI:�TAI' InvoAigator(s): K. PRE SGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 1 76°27'40.50 "W
GROUP, I N C, Date: 6/21/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: ROANOKE SILT LOAM
SummarT of Findings: Wh J l,AN11 AKUA riL' Try _Kr;n "HU" AND •aA • i,UN".
Hydrophytic. Vegetation isPresent: X Normal Circumstances: X NWIClassification: N/A
Hydric Soils arc Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): Local Relief: CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): Landfunn: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland: X Atypical ClimatellIydrology (see Remarks): � Slope %: 0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Irrdlealors:
IND
Secondary Indlcators:
Acer rabrum
Sapling
FAC
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
FACW
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
— Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
FACW
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
—Moss
Salum(ian (A3)
_Marl Deposits (815)
FACW+
Trim Lures (B16)
Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
OBL
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (B2)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
FAC-
_Crayfish Burrows (0)
_
-Drift Deposits (B3)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
FACW+
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
FAC
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D t)
Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
FACU-
—Geonterphie Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial imagery (B7)
_Other
FAC
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Imindaiion
X FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
IPaler Deplrs (hnches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Strnium
IND
%
Acer rabrum
Sapling
FAC
5
Dichaiiihellatnscoparlion
Herbaceous
FACW
50
Anradinarlagfgantea
Herbaceous
FACW
30
juncris efrstis
Herbaceous
FACW+
20
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Kuban aigunn
Herbaceous
FAC1J+
10
Cares frankii
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Carex tribaloides
Herbaceous
FACW+
10
Rheria virghrica
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Lwhrlglapaltrstris
Herbaceous
OBL
10
Lonicera"onica
Herbaceous
FAC-
IS
Lwhi igia allernifolia
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Smilar rolondlfolla
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Solidagoallissinia
Herbaceous
FACU-
5
Solidago ragosa
Herbaceous
FAC
5
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 2,2
NOTE:(+ / *, Neeindiortors nre real used in regernrionc Ieatrstiotts.} Catcrrlatedming affspeciesprereat.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytie Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET,
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3,0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF RHYNCHOSPORA (2 1/6) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
l;edox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -6
A
l0YR 411
75
5YR 416
20
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
7.5YR5/8
5
C
PL
6 -20
B
10YR 411
80
7.5YR 516
20
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (A 1)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicatws for Problematic Hydric Soils
HisticEpipedon(A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted DarkSurface(F7)
Black Histic (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ ]cm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
^ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Marl (FIO)
_ 2cm Muck (A10)
Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
— Depleted Ochrie (1711)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplahr Soils (F 19)
5onr Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13)
_ Arromaleus Bright Loamy Soils (F24)
Presence (AS)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
^_Loamy
_Delta Ocluic (F17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Muck
I em Muck (A9)
Mucky Mineral (FI)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
Depleted Below DA- Surface(A11) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resirielite Layer (IfObsenvd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 11B
Project: ]ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DONIMON VIRGINIA POWER Section/Township/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQT IIMANS, ELIZABFTH CITY, TOWN OF WTNFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
ti11LUMJSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67"N 176 °13'34.50 "W
EIMR074`1IE111AL Inves(igator(s): K. PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36113121.46"N 176°27'40.50 "W
GROIIP, INN
Date: 6!2112072 Soil Map Unit Name: ROANOKE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings;
'kYFTLANI) WEST OF "BAY" LINE,
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Narmal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief
CONCAVE
Welland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetbind; X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0-2
HvdroIoEv Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Luilewors:
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Pious raeda
-
FAC-
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
X Water Stained Leaves (119)
PAC+
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
FACW
—Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B 15)
FACW+
—Moss Trim Lutes (B16)
Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
OBL
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
—
_~ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
OBL
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (33)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
FAC
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Thin
FACU
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (135)
Muck Surface (C7)
5
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_Inmrdadou Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Other
12 -20
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
I OYR 511
70
1oYR 518
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Mater Dep11u (Inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMF.TF.R AIET.
2.5Y 6/1
Surface Water:
D
M
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
_Histosol(Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Pious raeda
Sapling
FAC-
10
LigrddrmrbarslyraciJiva
Sapling
PAC+
5
Baccharfs balimffolla
Shrub
FACW
2
Juncus efrsns
Herbaceous
FACW+
40
rleacharis oblusa
Herbaceous
OBL
30
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: IOU%
NOTE :( +F nr tree h dirnrors are not need Lr regelmimr rnlerd
ikon - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Acer rubrraa
Sapling
FAC
2
Dichandrelhairscopailura
Herbaceous
FACW
15
Qrerns psendaregelus
Herbaceous
FACW
7
Eriandnis giganferes
herbaceous
FACW+
5
Andrapogonglomerairs
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Jrmcus canadensis
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Aster vindireus
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Anriropogon virginicus
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Prevalence Index: 2.0
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAIITETER MET.
Dominance Test >5V1.: X
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF RHYNCHOSPORA (5 0%) PRESENT,
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth Inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0-4
A
10YR 311
95
IOYR 516
5
C
PL
SILTY CLAY LOAM
4 -12
B
2.5Y 611
65
10YR 512
30
INCLUSION
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
IOYR 618
5
C
M
12 -20
B2
I OYR 511
70
1oYR 518
10
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
2.5Y 6/1
20
D
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol(Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
IndicatorsforProblemarlcHydrieSoils
_ Histic Epipcdon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S l)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Marl (F10)
2cm Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (F 11)
— Reduced Vertic (F1S)
Organic Bodics (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron•Manganese Masses (F72)
_Piedmont Fleodplain Soils (1419)
_
_ 50m Mucky Mineral (A7)
_— Polyvalue Below Surface (58)
_Umbric Surface (F13)
`Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
_Muck Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_ Delta Ochric (F17)
~ Red Parent Material (T172)
I cm Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (FI8)
—
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
l) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (142)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
Thick Dark Surface (AI2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20)
Resu•lclire Layer (IfObseived)
Remarks: SOH, PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 2301,V TRANSMISSION LING
PP A Meant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
t'• JJJ City/County: PASQUOTANK, PER UIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WtNFALL
%47LLIAAISBURG State: NOWfll CAROLINA
MT17IRO\N[EY17AL Investigator(s): K. PRESGRAVES
G.lt0UP, INC
Date: 6I2I 12012
Sampling Point Number: 12A
Section/Township/Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °18'50,67 "N! 76 °13'34,5D "W
Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N! 76°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Namc: CHOWAN SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WE'T'LAND AREA BE'I'%VEEN "JE" AND "JB" LINES.
IND
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils arc Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X
Atypical ClimatclHydrology (see Remarks): Slope %:
0 -2
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
(A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
Dominant Species
Primar, , Indicaors;
IND
Seconds , Litdleators;
Frrcrintrs pennsylvanica
Sapling
FACW
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
~_Sparsely
Water (AI)
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
OBL
Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_Surface
_High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
OBL
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
(A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
90
_Moss Trim Lines (BI6)
_Saturation
Water Marks (B 1)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
PL
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
~Sediment Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
~Presence
2,5Y4/1
Crayfish Barrows (C8)
Deposits (133)
_ of Reduced iron (C4)
-
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Drift
Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
~_Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Algal
_ Iran Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7) -
10
_Geomorphic Position (D2) -
Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
—Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
X FAC- Neutra Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
Mater Depths(inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAAIFTERMET,
Surface Water:
W Ater Table:
Saturated soit: 18
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Frrcrintrs pennsylvanica
Sapling
FACW
2
Lewsia oryzotdes
Herbaceous
OBL
70
Saaurants cernttris
Herbaceous
OBL
40
Non-Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Cang hirida
Galhun palustre
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
OBL
OBI,
10
5
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Litdex: 1.0
NOTE:( + /- hr tl a indimlots am not used nr v, gefwim adaelariwm) Cuk dared rising.11 ies p'er'm
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGE'1'ATIONPARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50 %: X
Prevalence index is <3.0: Ii
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
- - -- ---- - - - - -- -- -
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color 'Moist
%
e
Lae
Texture
0.6
A
I OYR 411
90
7.5YR 416
10
C
PL
SILTY CLAY LOAM
6-20
B
2,5Y4/1
85
IOYR4 /6
5
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
-
1 OYR 611
10
D
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_His(osol (Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Histic Fpipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S [}
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Redox Depressions (F8)
_ hem Muck (A9)
_Black
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (1`10)
— 2cm Muck (A10)
—
Stratified Layers (A5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (FI1)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Mron- Manganese Masses (fl?)
`Umbric
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
Sem Mucky Mineral (A7)
Potyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Smface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
-Delta Ochre (FI7)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (FI8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Below Dark Surface (Al
1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Other
_Depleted
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (72D)
kesrrictive Layer (IfObsen'ed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER I%IET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Farm - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 12B
Project: ELIZABFTH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Section/fownshiplRange: N/A
tui. City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLD"ISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Fiy17R0\ f[i \fR[' Investigator(s): J. TESCHLER Site Tetininus: 36°13'21.46'14176°27'40.50 "W
C1tOUP, INC.
Date: 6121/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: CHAPANOKE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND AT FLAG ICI -7,
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumslancr : X
N1VI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present- X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Weiland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landform:
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X
Atypical Climatchlydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Water Marks (111)
~_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
M
Dry- Senson Water Table (C2)
Dominant Species
Frimar y Indicators.
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Microsreglum rindflown
Leersiamysoldes
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FAC+
OBI,
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
Water Stained Leaves (119)
^—Aquatic.
OBL
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
• High Water Table (A2)
Fauna (1113)
OBI,
_ Drainage Patterns (B 10)
• Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (1315)
FACU-
_ Moss Trint Lines (1316)
Water Marks (111)
~_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
M
Dry- Senson Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
7.5YR 411
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (B3)
Presence of Rcdnced Iron (C4)
C
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Drift
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
—
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_'Ifvn Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC Neutral Test (D5)
�Sphagnnun
Moss (DS)
lYater Depths (hiches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER DIET._
Surface Water:
Water Table: 10
Saturated soil: 6
—CoastPrairicRedox(A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Microsreglum rindflown
Leersiamysoldes
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FAC+
OBI,
20
20
%Dominant species FAC or welter: 1001%
ITE :(t / -in Ih. indicoforr nre loot ase181 1-1x,1411.11 culcerinlionxJ
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Sa111vlr11s cerilmis
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Polygoman sagilla8arr
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Cwvx llrrida
Herbaceous
OBI,
7
Arando doirar
Herbaceous
FACU-
7
Prevalence Index: 1.7
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARADIETRR MET.
Dominance Test >50'/.: X
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON- DOMINANT SPECIES OF SOLIDAGO (6%) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Fealures
Depth inches
Horizon
Color lo4s1
%
Color Moist)
%
4pc
Luc
Texture
0 -6
A
I0YR 411
90
10YR 3/3
to
C
M
LOAM
6 -20
B
7.5YR 411
98
7,5YR 4!6
2
C
M
CLAY
Hydric Soil indicators:
_Histosel(A])
—CoastPrairicRedox(A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Lidical orsforl'robletrralicHydricSoils
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Hisde (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
— Icm Muck (A9)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Sandy Redox(S5)
_ Marl (F10)
2cmMuck(A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
— Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
—Reduced Vcrtic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
^_Polyvalue
—Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (59)
_ Deha Ochric (F17)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
-
—Reduced Vcrtic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER DIET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELiZABF.TH CTTY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMMON VIRGINIA POWER
City/County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
WILLL"1SBUIIG State: NORTH CAROLINA
WIRONMEN'TAL Investigalor(s): P. MEIER
CROUP, INC 6/21/2012
Sampling Point Number: 12C
Sectionlfownsbip/Rauge: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N 17627'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: CHAPANOKE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND ABOVE "KJ" LINE.
Secondary Indicators:
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Nomtal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Sails are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief,
CONVEX
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landfarm:
SLOPE
Sampled Area is within a'*Vctland.
Atypical Climate / Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
2 -5
IIvdroloev Pn rameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators;
Secondary Indicators:
%
Pinrts laeda
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
—Surface Water (Ai)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ lUgh Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B15)
Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
Water Marks (B 1)
_hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)_
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
— Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (173)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drill Deposits (B3)
~Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent Iron Reductiouin Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Sbmted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
_iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
huutdation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
ShallowAquitard(D3)
—
X FAC- NeturalTest(D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
iraterDepths(mches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOTNIET.
Surface Water.
Water Table:
Saturatedsoil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Pinrts laeda
Sapling
FAC-
10
Rcerrebrurn
Sapling
FAC
5
Dichanthelioanseopariumi
Herbaceous
FACW
40
Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100%
ITE :( +/- in r! a irrdirnroes are not rued irr 119efariatr - 1calnrionxJ
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Lencothoe recm•ta
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Lespedeza caneata
Herbaceous
NI
5
Camtpsis iadicans
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Parthenocissus quingnefolia
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Circaeaalpina
Herbaceous
FACW
5
Prevalence htdex: 2.6
Rapid Test for Ilydrophytie Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER 61ET,
Dominance Test >50 %: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNTDENT1FIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF RANUNCULUS (2%) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdiovi vtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color hoist
%
Color lolst
%
Type
Lae
Texture
0.10
A
10YR 7/1
98
10YR 516
2
C
M
SILT LOAM
10 -20
B
10YR 612
98
1 OYR 616
2
C
M
SILT LOAM 7
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (A])
—Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
_ Redux Dail, Suncce (F6)
Indicators for Problematic HjWrie Soils
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Glcyed Matrix (54)
_Redox Depressions (178)
_ hem Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (1710)
2cm Muck (AI O)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
- Depleted Ochric (Fll)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
_iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
PiedmontPloodplain Soils (1719)
_Organic
_5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Unibric Surface (F 13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (1717)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
—1 cm Muck (A9)
____� Loamy MuckyMineral(Fl)
—Reduced Vertic(F18)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Restrictive La}er (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 12D
Summary of Findings:
1VE7TLAND xvEs -r OF "JS" LINE.
IND
3econdar y Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
Project:
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TitANSNUSSION LINE
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
Section /i'ownship/Range:
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
NIA
LRR T
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUTMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL -
R7LLIAh1SBURG
State:
NORTH CAROLINA
Site Start:
36 °18'50.67 "N i 76 °13'34,50 "W
FA'I'tltil \.1IFX1'AL
Investigator(.):
P. MEIER
Site Terminus:
36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
GROUP, INC.
Date:
6122!2012
Sail Map Unit Name:
TOMOThEX FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings:
1VE7TLAND xvEs -r OF "JS" LINE.
IND
3econdar y Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks); _
Landfomt:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Welland: X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Wrruruxaaae
Dominant S ecies
PrLitar y Indicators:
IND
3econdar y Indicators:
Pinrtslaeda
Sapling
FAC-
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A])
— Water Stained Leaves (139)
FAC
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FACW-
_ Drainage Pnoterns (B10)
_High
(A3)
_Marl Deposits (1325)
FACW
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Saturation
_Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
FACU
_Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
FAC
X Crayfish Brurows (Cg)
_
Drift Deposits (B3)
~Algal
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
FACU+
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Motor Crust (134)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
FACU
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Deposits (135)_
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
FACW+
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iran
Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
FACW+
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
Herbaceous
FAC
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
C
M
SANDY CLAY
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
WaierDepihs(inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAi11ETF.RMET.
25Y 711
Surface Water:
D
M
WaterTable:
Saturated soil: >20
Histosol(At)
_CoastPrairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Wrruruxaaae
Dominant S ecies
Stratum
IND
%
Pinrtslaeda
Sapling
FAC-
8
Acerrtrhrran
Sapling
FAC
5
11exglabra
Shrub
FACW-
15
Dichoutheliant scoparirnn
Herbaceous
FACW
80
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Liguidantbarsoroc #hm
Sapling
FAC+
2
Baccharis halimifolia
Shrub
FACW
2
Dichmtthelium diehoronuart
Herbaceous
FAC _
10
Rhaxiavirginica
Herbaceous
OBL
2
Eupato itrm capillifoliuin
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Sallelago rugosa
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Rabus argarns
Herbaceous
FACU+
3
Ambrosia arternisiifolia
Herbaceous
FACU
1
Carexiribulaides
Herbaceous
FACW+
2
Trmeresef+.sns
Herbaceous
FACW+
2
P,uilwiniagranrirrifolia
Herbaceous
FAC
10
%Dominmd species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 2.4
NOTE:(+ /-in 11re ixdicarorc ­Of fired in reg,1.11a1 CrtiCUlrtfians.J Cakdw dosing nlfspeciespresent.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MF,T.
Dominance Test >50'1.: X
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED NON - DOMINANT SPECIES OF RIIYNCHOSPORA (10 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Ioist
%
Color joist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -4
A
IOYR 412
98
10YR 416
2
C
M
SILT LOAM
445
B1
25Y612
83
2.5Y416
15
C
M
SILTY CLAY
IOYR516
2
C
M
15 -20
B2
25Y 511
72
2,5Y 516
20
C
M
SANDY CLAY
25Y 711
5
D
M
Ilydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol(At)
_CoastPrairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
hrrlica lorsforProblemaricllyidrlcSoils
~Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Redox Depressions (F8)
_ ]cm Muck (A9)
_Black
Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (F10)
_2cam Muck (A10)
_Hydrogen
Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Irl1)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Stratified
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron-Manganese, Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
—Dark
Below Surface (SE)
—Umbric Surface (1713)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
_
Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
— Delta Ochric (1`17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Muck
Icm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
_ Reduced Vertic(F18)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (At
1) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F] 9)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Reswelft- elayer(IfObserred)
Remarks: SOH.PARAMETERMET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 13A
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINiFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LIFE
Applicant: DOMINION V7RGMA POWER Sec €ion /fownslup/Range: NIA
R' City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAhISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site start; 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
EWIROMIF1TAL Investigator(s): K. PRESGRAVES Site ferminus: 36°13'21.46 "N / 76°27'40.50 "W
GItOUP INC.
Date: 6/22/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: CHOWAN SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
WETLAND NEAR FLAG JG -7,
IND
,4econdar y ladicarors:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circrmrstances: X
NWL Classification:
PEM1Cd
Hydric Soils are Present; X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X
Atypical ChmatelHydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primar+lnrlicators:
IND
,4econdar y ladicarors:
Anutdbtariagigantea
Herbaceous
FACW
Surface Soil Cracks (116)
_Surface Water (A1)
~Water Stained Leaves (119)
OBI,
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Iligh Water Table (A2)
Fauna (1113)
OBI,
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
_Aquatic
_Marl Deposits (B15)
OBL
_Moss'1'dmLiues(BI6)
Wnter Marks (Bl)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
FACW
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (112)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
2.5Y412
_ Crayfish Burnews (C8)
Drift Deposits (113)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Rcccntiron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
~Thin
B2
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
—iron Deposits (B5)
_ Muck Surface (C7)
20
_ Creomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible oil Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
_ Shallow Agnitard(D3)
X FAC - Neutral Test (D5)
~
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Mawr Depiin (filches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table: 2
Saturated soil: O
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratmn
IND
%
Anutdbtariagigantea
Herbaceous
FACW
40
Leenvia or3zoides
Herbaceous
OBI,
40
IYaodwardia areolata
Herbaceous
OBI,
20
Sannairscenunts
Herbaceous
OBL
20
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Rubusmgntus
.Herbaceous
FACU+
15
T3pha lafolia
Herbaceous
OBI,
15
Louicera japonica
Herbaceous
FAC-
15
Apiosantertcmia
Herbaceous
FACW
15
lhel3pteristhelypieroides
Herbaceous
FACW
10
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100 ° /a Prevalence Index; 1.7
NOTE:(+A in the irrdirntars —cut used in vegetation cwiceialiam) Catcufafed rrsiug all species present
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VrGE'lA11ON PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50'1.: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphologipal Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroultvtic Vmetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
- Color 'Moist
%
Type
Luc
Texture
0-4
A
IOYR 312
100
SILT LOAM
4.8
Bl
2.5Y412
95
10YR416
5
C
PL
LOAMYSAND
8 -20
B2
10YR 5/2
80
1 OYR 518
20
C
M
LOAMY SAND
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Hislosol (AI)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
ludleators forproblematicHydile Soils
_His1icEpipedori(A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histie (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
lcm Muck (A9)
_2em
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
X Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (Fl0)
Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
~_Organic
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fl 1)
_Reduced Verlic (1`18)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
�Potyvalue
Iron- Manganese Masses (F 12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Sem Mucky Mineral (A7)
Below Surface (SS)
^—Thin
Umbric Surface (1713)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochric (1`17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral. (Fl)
—Reduced Vertic (F 18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _Loamy Oleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObsen ed)
Remarks: SOIL, PARAMETER MET.
-
Typc:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Sampling Point Number: 13B
Project: ELIZABL'FH CITY TO W[NFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: I)OMWION VIRGINIA POWER Section/Township/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANY PERQUIMANS, E1d7.,ABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): IRR. T
AWLLIMMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
MVIRO.MNIEVIAL Investigator(s): K. PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N / 762740.50 "W
GIIOUP, INC.
Date: 6122!2012 Soil Map Unit Namc: CONFIDE LOAMY SAND
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND BETWEEN "Jl:" AND "Jl" LINES.
Secarrdar > Indicators;
Redox Featu res
Ilydrophytie Vegetation is Prescat: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWl Classification:
PEM1Cd
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONVEX
Wetland Ilydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks)._
Landform:
TOP OF SLOPE
Sampled Area is within a \Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks);
Slope %:
2 -5
_Dry
_Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Deposits (B3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
~Saturation Visible on Aerial Imngery (C9)
Dominant Species
Friona p, Indicators:
Secarrdar > Indicators;
Redox Featu res
Cojya ronrentosa
Surface Soil Cracks (n6)
~_Sparsely
_Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
-Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
~Water
—Marl Deposits (B15)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Marks (BI)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_Dry
_Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Deposits (B3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
~Saturation Visible on Aerial Imngery (C9)
—Drift
—Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Shmted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
�Inundation Visible onAerial Imagery (I37)
_Other
—Shallow Aquitard(D3)
10-20
B2
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
100
Sphagnum Moss (138)
Water•Depths(inches),
Remarks: HYDROLOGYPARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Tahle:
Satarated sail: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Featu res
Cojya ronrentosa
Sapling
NI
10
Ltrlodeudron Irtlipifera
Sapling
FAC
5
Quer•cus rdgm
Sapling
FAC
5
Rims copalliunm
Shrub
NI
10
Afyt•ica cer(jera
Shrub
FAC
5
Gelsernium senrpeii,irens
Herbaceous
FAC
20
I'rrpatorlrnnpeffoliallan
Herbaceous
FACW
I0
% Dominant species FAC orwetter: 1001/0
]YE7TF. :( + / -iu fire iuAicnrors are no! rued Frnegelatiau rnlenl
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Dominance Test >5011.: X
Prevalence Index is 5 3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation;
Non - Dominant Species
Siratum
1ND
Redox Featu res
Liquidombarsf)raciva
Sapling
FAC+
2
Aver rrrbrran
Sapling
FAC
2
Dichanthethan scoparhan
Herbaceous
FACIV
7
Rr•lantbus gigauteus
Herbaceous
FACIV+
5
Grlgerou aninan
Herbaceous
FACU
3
Andropogon virginicus
Herbaceous
FACU
2
Pac'kery tonrentosa
Herbaceous
FAC-
5
Prevalence Index: 2.8
MET.
Matrix
Redox Featu res
Depth incites
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color (Moist)
%
e
Lac
Texture
0 -2
A
IOYR3 /3
100
SANDY LOAM
2 -10
B
2.5Y4/3
100
LOAMY SAND
7
10-20
B2
2.5Y 514
100
LOAMY SAND
Hydric Soil ludicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Lrdicators fa• Problematic Hydfie Solis
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
— Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_HisticEpipedon(A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
^ Redox Depressions (178)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)
__�_. 2cm Muck (A10)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Oebrie (Fll)
Reduced Vertic (1718)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
—
PiedmontFloodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
—Muck
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Presence (A8)
Thiu Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochric (FI7)
— Red Parent Material (TF2) .
�_ I cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Loamy (leyed. Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
_Other
_Depleted
_'fldek Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resfriciire Layer (IfObset•ved)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (incites):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELI7ABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV 'TRANSMISSION LINE
I Applicant: DOMINION VIRGIN [A POWER
City/County: PASQUOTANK, PFRQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
WILLIAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
FWV1R0.1IF5Y1'AL Investigator(s); K. PRESGRAVES
CROUP, iNC.
Date: 612212012
Sampling Point Number: 13C
ScctioivTownshiplRaage: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36°18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36°13`21,46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: CHOWAN SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
Primary Indicators:
WETLAND NEAR FLAG JM -6.
Secondary Indicators:
Tmodhanf1dstichrau
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
PE.M]Cd
Hydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief,
CONCAVE
Welland Hydrology is Present:
X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): ^
Landform;
TOE OF SLOPE
Sampled Area is within n Wetland:
X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
2.5
Hvdroloov Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Tmodhanf1dstichrau
Sapling
OBL
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)_
X Surface Water (Al)
X Water Stained Leaves (119)
OBL
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Farma (1313)
OBL
Drainage Patterns (B 10)
Saturation (A3)
—Wafer
_Mad Deposits (B 15)
OBL
—Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
Mark& (Bl)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sedirient Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
-
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_Drift Deposits (133)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Cnist (B4)
Recent Iron Reductiau in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Ixau Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
�Shallow
�Inundation Visible on Aerial lmagery (B7)
_Other
Aquitard(D3)
X FAC- Neotrat'I'est(DS)
Sphagnum Moss (138)
lYaterDepilis (ruches):
Remarks: IIYDROLOGY PARAMETERMET.
Surface Water. 12
Water Table:
Saturated soil:
— Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Tmodhanf1dstichrau
Sapling
OBL
5
Cephalaudrus occideutalls
Shrub
OBL
10
Altettsantlferaplrlloxeroides
Herbaceous
OBL
60
Nuphor luteant
Herbaceous
OBL
25
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Juncus efrsrts
Herbaceous
FACW+
15
Poftontan h}dropiperoides
Herbaceous
OBL
15
Leersia oiyzoides
herbaceous
OBL
5
Polyslichuat acrostichoides
Herbaccous
FACU-
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 1.2
NOTE:( + /- in flee Lrdirntafs are not used irr vegetation calcrdafiv —) Cakakred ruing all specferprereA
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >5011.: X
Prevalence Index is < 3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
ProblematicHvdronhvtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Fentures
Depth inches
IIorizon
Color foist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -2
A
10YR 312
100
SANDY LOAM
2 -20
B
2,5Y 512
95
15Y516
5
C
M
LOAMY SAND
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
— Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Mucky Mineral (51)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Black Histic (A3)
~_
_Sandy
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Redox Depressions (P8)
_ ]em Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
— Mad (F10)
_ 2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleled Ochric (Flt)
_Reduced Vettie (Fl8)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
PiedmontFloodplain Soils (FI9)
_Organic
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (58)
_Utnbric Surface (1`13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
— Delta Ocbric (1717)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
I cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
—
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TT-
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al ]) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
—Other
Thick Dark Surface (A) 2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (IfObseimed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
'type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 13D
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
! Applicant: DOMTNJON VIRGINIA POWER Section/Township/Range: NIA
CitylCounty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OT WINFALL Subregion (LRR orMLRA): LRR T
WILUANSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
kr\9111OV111"ITAL Ihrvestigator(s): K.PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36°1321,46 "N /76°27'40.50 "W
CROUP; INC.
Date: 6122!2012 Soil Map Unit Name: CONETOE LOAMY SAND
Summary of Findings; UPLAND NEAR "JM" LINE. -
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): Local Relief: CONVEX
Wetland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): Landform: TOP OF SLOPE
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: Atypical Climate /Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 2 -5
Hvdrolotav Parameter:
inane re ;
Dominant Species
Printar y Indicators.
Secondary Indicators:
%
Solidago altissima
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (A 1)
Water Stained Leaves (139)
__Aquatic
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
Water Table (A2)
Fauna (B13)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_High
_ Saturation (A3)
_Mart Deposits (1315) -
— Moss Trim Lines (B 16) -
_ Water Marks (B 1)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
—Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizosplteres on Living Roots (C3)
_Craytislr Burrows (CS)
~_ Drift Deposits (133)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B 4)
— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_iron Deposits (B5)
—'thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position ( ➢2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Tmagery (B7)
_ Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
UPI,
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
82
15Y 618
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
If'ater Depths (Inches):
M
Remarks: HY DROLOGY PARADIETER NOT DIET.
Surface Water:
Water Table;
Saturated soil: >20
inane re ;
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Solidago altissima
Herbaceous
FACU-
60
flranrlinaria gtgantea
Herbaceous
FACW
50
Ban),chinmrlrginiommi
Herbaceous
FACU
25
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 33%
iTE;( +/- in N e inAicamrs are im1 eanf in vegrlatian rnfculntionr j
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Lonicerrrjapoittca
Herbaceous
FAC-
20
Pltylolacca amerlcona
Herbaceous
FACU+
15
Rribris arguers
Herbaceous
FACU+
15
Dichanthelirent dichoformarr -
Herbaceous
FAC
to
Aspletrftnttplat} tetuou
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Verbeshtaalteniifolia
Herbaceous
FAC
10
Eupaloriunr crepiflifollum
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Ferbesina oceirlentalts
Herbaceous
UPI,
10
Prevalencelndex: 3.4
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50'1.:
Prevalence Index is < 3,0: _
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -4
A
IOYR 413
100
LOAMY SAND
4 -12
B
2,5Y516
100
SAND
12 -20
B2
2.5Y 614
82
15Y 618
18
C
M
SAND
Hydric Soil indicators:
_ Histosol (A])
— Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
hidicators for Problenatie Hydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (178)
_ tern Muck (A9)
Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (F10)
2cm Muck (A1O)
_Hydrogen
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Depleted Ochric CHI)
—Reduced Vertie (1713)
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Organic
_ 5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (88)
Umbric Surface (F 13)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Presence (AS)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
— Delta Ochric (1`17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Muck
em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
_Reduced Venic (1.18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
—I
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Depleted Matrix (173)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Restriclim Layer (If Obsen ed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 13E
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 23okV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGR41A POWF,R Seclionrrownship/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
LVILLIAAISBURG State: NORTII CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
FAWIKOa\;OKMa AL lnvestig
GROUP, INC ator(s ): K. PRIiSGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N 176 °2T40.50 "fir
.
Date: 6/22/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: AUGUSTA FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings: \VF,TLAND NEAR FLAG JO -2.
Hydrophylie Vegetation is Present: X Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Sails are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: BONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: X Atypical Cliuraw/flydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
o
Primary Indicalors:
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Pinaslacda
Sapling
FAC-
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
�_
_ Water Stained Leaves (B9)
FAC
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
.� Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
FACW
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3)
—Marl Deposits (1315)
UPI,
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (B 1)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
FACW+
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
—oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
FACU+
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (Gl)
OBL
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
FACW+
Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
FACW+
X Geomorphic Positieu (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Other
10-20
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
2.5Y6/2
60
30YR 618
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
~
-
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
TValer Depdrs {inches)i
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
7.5YR618
Surface Water:
C
M
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Histosol (AI)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Pinaslacda
Sapling
FAC-
20
Acerrubrum
Sapling
FAC
10
Dichnnlbelianr scoparinar
Herbaceous
FACW
60
Monm'daptinetala
Herbaceous
UPI,
30
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: 75%
L: die hdiratorc am eat rrred in v g j-dmr rniat
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Ligtddambar styracii lua
Sapling
FAC+
2
Solidago rugosa
lIerbaceous
FAG
20
Campsis radicanu
Herbaceous
FAC
IO
Andropogon vhginictts
Herbaceous
FACU-
10
Eriantlntsgigaruerts
Herbaceous
FACW+
15
Solidago nrdta!!ii
Herbaceous
FACU+
5
Rhexia virginica
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Andropogonglonretalus -
Herbaceous
FACW+
5 '
Erianthnsgiganleus
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Prevalence Index; 2.9
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARi"IETER AfET.
Dominance Test >50%: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth Qnc hes
horizon
Color Aioist
%
Color Joist
%
Type
Loe
Texture
0 -2
A
IOYR 313
100
SANDY LOAM
2 -10
BI
25Y 612
80
10YR 516
15
C
M
SILT LOAM
IOYR 518
5
C
PL
10-20
132
2.5Y6/2
60
30YR 618
25
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
7.5YR618
15
C
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (AI)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators jar Problematic H}fiic Soils
Histie Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
]cm Muck (A9)
_Black
Sulfide (A4)_
Sandy Redox (S5)
_Marl (F10)_
2cm Muck (A10)
_Hydrogen
Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ocluic (Fl l)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)
—Piedmont Floodplaut Soils (F19)
_
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
_
Polyvalue Below Surface (98)
Umbric Surface (F 13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Presence (Ag)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (F17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Muck
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (FIB)
—
—Very Shallow Dark Surface CrF12)
�Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_PiedmontFloodplamSoils(F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resn•icllve Layer (IfObserred)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER AIET,
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 13F
Project: ELI7ABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230LV TRANSMISSION LINT;
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWFR Section/Township/Range: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK PERQUIMANS, LLIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINI'ALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA); LRR T
ZS'ILI.IANJSBLIRG State: NORT11 CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
EIdVIROMMYPAL hrvestigator(s }:
CROUP, INC: K,PRI?SCRAVES Site Terminus; 36 9321.46 "N/76°27'40.50 "W
Date: 6/22/2012 Soii Map UnitName: AUGUSTA FINE SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings: UYUANrr NEAtc i+r.AU au -0.
Hydroplrytic Vegetation is Present: X Normal Circumstances: X MVI Classification: NIA
llydric Soils are Present: Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area Is within a Wetland: Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Hvrlrninuv Parameter:
e
Primary Lrdicalars:
Secondary Indicators:
Redox Features
Pings laeda
_ Surface Soil Crocks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Water Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_
High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (6 13)
— Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
— Marl Deposits (1115)
Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
Water Marks (B1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
-Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
—crayfish Burrows (CO)
—Sediment
Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Acrial Imagery (C9)
—Drift
Mal or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Snmted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Algal
Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorplio Position (132)
_Iron
Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7)
—Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
B2
2.5Y 613
FAC- Nemrat Test (D5)
10YR 516
30
Sphagnum. Moss (D8)
11raler•Depfhs(fnelres):
SILTY CLAY LOAM
Remarks: HYDROLOGY ]PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water.
Water Table:
Saturated soil; >20
Dantinant Species
Stralum
IND
Redox Features
Pings laeda
Sapling
FAC-
7
Acer nibrunr
Sapling
FAC
5
Liqufderinbarslyraciilna
Sapling
FAC+
5
Dfchanthelirrnr scoparhon
Herbaceous
FACW
60
Monardaptarclala
Herbaceous
Ul'L
30
Non - Dominant Species
Stratmn
IND
Redox Features
Yerbesinaalfernifolia
Herbaceous
FAC
25
dndropogon virginfeus
Herbaceous
FACU
15
Ilexglabra
Herbaceous
FACW-
5
Solidago rugasa
1erbaceous
FAC
5
Lriarrlhasgigarrleus
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Solidago nrafallff
Herbaceous
FACU+
5
Paspalarnselacelan
Herbaceous
FACU+
10
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 80% Prevalence index: 3.1
NOTE:(+ / -kr theindleders arerruim -d it, -ege! neon cdenraliotm) cakulafedming nllsyeciurpresent
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET
Dominance Test >5011.: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0:_
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophy6c, Vegetation:
]Matrix
Redox Features
Texture
De ib inches
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Loe
0 -4
A
2.5Y 4/3
90
2.5Y 6/6
10
C
M
SILT LOAM
4 -12
B I
2.5Y 614
75
2.5Y 612
25
D
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
12 -20
B2
2.5Y 613
70
10YR 516
30
C
M
SILTY CLAY LOAM
Hydrnc Soil Indicators:
(Al)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
- Redox Dark Surface (r6)
Intlieaiors forProblenralic Hydiic Solis
_Histosol
Fpipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
—Depleted Dark Stu4'ace (F7)
_Histic
Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (178)
_ Icm Muck (A9)
—Black
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (SS)
^_
_Marl (F10)
gem Muck (A10)
—
Layers (A5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
~Depleted Ochrio (Fl l)
_Reduced Vertic (FI S)
_Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron - Manganese Masses (F 12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_ Umbric Surface (FI3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
—
Muck Presence (AS)
—Thin
Thin Dark Surface (59)
—Delta Ocltric (Fi7)
Red Parent Material (T72)
�_ I cm Muck (A9)
Mucky Mineral (Fl)
Reduced Vertio (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Below Dark Surface (All) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Other
_Depleted
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Resrriclive Layer (IfObseived)
Rcmnrks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type;
Dep€li ( inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELI7ABETH C1TY'1'O WINFALL 239kV TRANSMISSION IMF Applicant: DOMINION VIRGTNfAPOWER
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQll11NANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
WILI.TAA{SBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
FIAIRONNIENTAL Investigator(s): .i.'fL''SCHLER
GR0U.P, INC,
Date: 6122/2012
Sampling Point Number: 14A
SectioniTownship /Range;
NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRR T
Site Start:
36 °18'50.67'W 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus:
W1321.46'W 176 27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name:
DRAGSTON LOAMY FINE SAND
Summary of Findings; VEGKFATED d UKISDIC'11ONAL D11 CH NEAR k'LAU N V -7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present- X Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landforn: DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within all Mand: X Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
I'rierar Indicators:
Matrix
Secondary Indicators.
Depth inches
Surface Soil Crncks (136)
X Surface Water (At)
_ Water Stained Leaves (139)
Color Moist )
_^ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Wafter Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Texture
_Drainage Patterns (B 10)
_High
_ Marl Deposits (B15)
95
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Saturation(A3)
Marks (B 1)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
M
—Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_Water
Sediment Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
~Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Drift
Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Deposits (115)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_Iron
Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
_ Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Water Dep hs (Inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER AIET.
Surface Water: 5
Water Table:
Saturated soil:
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color joist
%
Color Moist )
Ty e
Loc
Texture
0 -20
A
10YR 3I1
95
10YR 313
5
C
M
CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Ilistosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
^ Ilistic Epipedou (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (81)
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Ilistic (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Icm Muck (A9)
_Black
Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (F10)
— 2cm Muck (A10)
_Hydrogen
Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (96)
Depleted Ochric (Fl l}
Reduced Vertic (1`18)
—
_Stratified
Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron-Manganese
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Orgnnic
Sera Mucky Mineral (A7)
Palyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Surface (FI3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_
Presence (A8)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (1`17)
— Red PmentMaterial (TF2)
—Muck.
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (171)
_Reduced Vettic (F18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Below Dark Surface (All) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_Other
_Depleted
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Layer (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER ME E
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Nomber: 1.4B
�Sjll Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionfibtvnship/Rauge: NIA
City/County: PASQUOTANK PER UiIvIANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
11'ILUAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
EIMR011111_M rAi. Irtvestigator(s): P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.A6 "N 176 °27`40.50 "W
GROUP, INC , Date: 6/22/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: DRAGSTON LOAMY PINE SAND
Summary of bindings: UPLAND IN RECENTLY MOWEDIHARVESTED AGRICULTURAL FIELD NEAR "KV" LINE.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Relief: NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0 -2
Hvdroloev Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indleaters:
8eeondar y Indicators:
%
7)'ep0carpus aelinraae
—Surface Sail Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (119)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
I ligh Water Table (A2)
Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
—Mad Deposits (1315)
_Moss Trhn Lures (1116)
— Water Marls (B 1)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
_ Dry- Scason Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
-
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drill Deposits (133)
- Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Stinted or Stressed Plants (D I)
_ iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (0)
— Geornarphic Position (132)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_luundatiou
_FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
1Faler Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
7)'ep0carpus aelinraae
Herbaceous
UPL
80
Dominant species FAC or wetter: O
iiE:(+ /- isoreindiMers ate erorused aregeMriax- 1- kriaru.)
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND I %
Prevalence Index: 5.0
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMRPER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50 %:
Prevalence Index is < 3.0:
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color moist
%
Color joist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -16
A
10YR 412
90
JOYR 4l6
10
C
M
SANDY LOAM
16 -20
B
25Y 5/3
95
l OYR 416
5
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al) -
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indlealors fa• Prohlemalic Hydric Soils
Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Hisao
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleycd Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
—Marl
_ lent Muck (A9)
Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— (F10)
_ 2em Muck (A10)
_Hydrogen
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ocluic (FI1)
_Reduced Vefic (FIB)
~_ Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron- Manganese Masses (FI2)
Piedmont Floodplanr Soils (F19)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Pelyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (F17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy, Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F 18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (AI2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
ReslricliveLTer(IfObserved)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER AIET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 3E
� S
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO W]NFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectionffownshipQrInge: N/A
irll� City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Li111,1IAMSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
EA'VIKOM[F_•ITAt, Irrvestigator(s): J.TESCHLFR Site'remuu
us: 36 °1321.46 "NI76 °27'40.50 "W
Date: 6/7/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: SEABROOK LOAMY SAND
Summary of Findings: VEGETATED JURISDICTIONAL DITCH NEAR FLAG EB -3.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X Disturbed Parameters (sea Remarks); _ Local Relief: CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _ Landform: DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is Within a Wetland: X Atypical ClimatelHydrology (see Remarks); Slope %: 0 -2
r ar rrarerer:
Dominant Species
Prins q Indicators:
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Echinochloa rrrarfcata
Herbaceous
FAC
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (AI)
~_
_Water Stained Leaves (B9)
OBI.
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
I ligb Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
OBL
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (BI5)
90
_Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
—Water Marks (B 1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
M
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Crayfish Borrows (0)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible oil Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stated or Stressed Plants (D t)
~_Geomorphic
X Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Acriat buagery (117)
_Odrer
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Mater Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARANICTER MET,
Surface Water: -
Water Table:
Saturated soil: O
_Histosol(Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
r ar rrarerer:
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Echinochloa rrrarfcata
Herbaceous
FAC
5
7)VIlo lalifalla
Herbaceous
OBI.
2
Alisura sabrordahnn
Herbaceous
OBL
2
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 2.1
NOTE:( } / -in thr hidi -W are not ruedFrrvegeladon ml rdalimm) Cvlettlnled using off pecierFr IlR
Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >501/.-. X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdroulivtic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color telst
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -20
A
2,5Y 3/1
90
7.5YR 3/4
10
C
M
SANDY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol(Al)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
IndicalosjorProb lenrnticHydricSoils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (FS)
_ ]cm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (F10)
gem Much (A10)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
— Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
hnn- Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F 19)
5em Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
—Umbric Surface (F13)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (AS)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
—Delta Ochric (1717)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_ Reduced Vertic (FI S)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) _Loamy (ileyed Matrix (F2)
_-Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
—Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (1720)
Restrictive Layer (IfObsewed)
Remarks: SOTI. PARAMETER MET.
.Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
''- CitylCmmty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CrfY, TOWN OF WINFALL
NVIL11MISBURC State: NORTH CAROLINA
k.NVIKONIMIA'AL Nvestigatar(s): J. TESCHLER
GROUP' INC.
Bate: 6!712012
,Sampling Point Number: 3F
Sectionffownship/Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °1850,67 "N 176 °13'34J0 "W
Situ Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176 °27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: SEABROOK LOAMY SAND
Summary of Findings:
NYET'LAND AT FLAG 11C -11.
INll
Secondar fndleaters.
Hydr6phytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NNVI Classification:
PF06F
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks):
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Welland Hydrology is Present; X
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area is within a Welinnd: X
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hvdroloav Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Irrdicatarst
INll
Secondar fndleaters.
Tarodh nr dislichtun
Jonas of rsas
Sapling
Herbaceous
OBL
FACW+
Surface Soil Cracks (116)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (69)
FACW
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
• High WaterTable(A2)
_AquaticFauna(1313)
OBL
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
• Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B 15)
OBL
_Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
FACU+
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
25Y 5/2
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
-
Drift Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
- Saturation Visible on Aerial imngery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D f)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
5
_Geomorphic Position (132)
_Inundation Visible on Aeriallmagery(B7)
Other
—Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X FAC- Neutral'rest (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (138)
Water Deprlrs(inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water:
Water Table: 9
Saturated soil: O
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
INll
%
Tarodh nr dislichtun
Jonas of rsas
Sapling
Herbaceous
OBL
FACW+
20
20
Non- Dumhumt Species
Stratum
IND
%
Diclianthelima clandeslinwa
Herbaceous
FAC+
10
Onocleasensibilis
Herbaceous
FACW
5
Saw-111wscernaris
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Carex Iw1da
Herbaceous
OBL
5
Rubus argidus
Herbaceous
FACU+
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence Index: 1.9
NOTE-.( +l In feelndiwlar - reuotevedin regernriatt cnfc«7otiotr J Cu7ntlurcd ustag allrpeciesprereni
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50U X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED SPECIES OF DOMINANT SOLiDAGO (25 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
. Alatrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color (Moist)
%
Color (Moist)
°/a
Type
Lee
Texture
0-7
A
2.5Y 2.5/1
100
SANDY CLAY
7 -20
B
25Y 5/2
85
10YR 516
10
C
M
SANDY LOAM
JOYR4 12
5
D
M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
�__ . Histosol (A[)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problenialic Ilydric Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Black Histie (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ ]em Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (F10)
2cm Muck (A10)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
— Reduced Vettic (F 18)
Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (1712)
-
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
—Organic
_ 5cm Murky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Presence (AS)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (Fl 7)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
—Muck
I cat Muck (A9)_
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
—
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
~Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
—Depleted
l) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Dark Surface (Al 2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive Lal,er(IfObseived)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETERAlET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
' Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WTNFALL 23okV TRANSMISSION LINE Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUTMA.NS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
WILLIANISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
E%`VR20 \211 "�:I'AL Investigatur(s): J. TESCHLER
GROUP, INC
Date: 6/7/2012
Sampling Point Number: 3G
Section/Township/Range: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Name: SEABROOK LOAMY SAND
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND BERM NEAR "BC" LINE.
Secondary Indicators.
%
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NW1 Classification:
PF06F
Hydric Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief,
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a 1Vetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hvdroloev Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary Indicators:
Secondary Indicators.
%
Coreopsis tincroria
Carey Irihi doides
Surface Soil Cracks (116)
Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
~_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
—Drainage Patterns (1110)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (13 IS)
Moss Trim Lines (B 16)
_Water Marks (B])
____Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
—Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_Drill Deposits (B3)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
~ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (114)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
^ Strmted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
Iron Deposits (115)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_Other
_ Shallow Aquitard(D3) -
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Spbagnuri Moss (138)
Ilrater.lDepfhs (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT 111LU.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Coreopsis tincroria
Carey Irihi doides
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FAC-
FACW+
15
15
%Dominant species FAC orweMr: l00%
ITE:(+/- in rlie iadirnlors are riot rrceAin rrgeraliarr mlod
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Andropagon rirginicus
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Solaria glauca
Herbaceous
FAC
5
Solalnnn corohnense
herbaceous
UPL
5
Chasmauflydunr latifolium
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Prevalence Index: 311
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMETER MET.
Dominance Test >50 %: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ UNIDENTIFIED SPECIES OF DOMINANT SOLIDAGO (15 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color Moist
%
Type
Lee
Texture
0 -20
A
10YR4/3
100
FINE SAND
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Flislosol (AI)
_Coast Prairie Redox (Al6)
_Redox Dark Surface (176)
Indicalors for Problematic Ifydrlc Soils
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Black Histic (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lem Muck (A9)
—
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Redox (S5)
Marl (FIG)
2cm Muck (A10)
Layers (A5)
_Sandy
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Ochric (F 11)
— Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (1712)
—
Piedmont Fleodplain Soils (FI9)
—Organic
Mucky Mineral (A7)
_Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Umhric Surface (1`13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ocluic (1717)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Muck
em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
—Reduced Verb: (F18)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
—I
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _Loamy Glcycd Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Resrrictive Layer (IfObsenvd)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 3H
7 Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230k-V TRANSMISSION LINE
i. Applicant: DOMINION VIRCTRHA POWER Section/Township /Mange: NIA
- City /County: PASQUOTANK, PER UIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
il'ILU,"LSBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA . Site Start: 36°18'50.67 "N 176 °13'34.50 "W
(FN%rf"f),N'11F, \lAL investigator(s): J. TESCHLER Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176 27'40.50 "W
ChOUP,I_AC,
Date: 6/7/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: SEABROOK LOAMY SAND
Summary of Findings:
UPLAND NEAR LING "W ".
Secondary Indicators:
%
Hydraphytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: R
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydrie Soils are Present:
Disturbed Parameters (sec Remarks): _
Local Relief:
NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0 -2
Hydrology Parameter:
Dominant Species
Pdnrar , Indicalor .,
Secondary Indicators:
%
Chasmairlldant latifoliurn
Loliumperenue
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
—Water Stained Leaves (B9)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
—
—Mad Deposits (B 15)
_Moss Prim Lines (1116)
Water Mmks (BI)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Dry- Scason Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
~ Oxidized Rhizosplieres on Living Roots (C3)
_Crayfish Burrows (CS)
—Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent iron Redaction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
—Iron Deposits (D5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Gcomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (D7)
_Other
ShallowAquilard(D3)
_FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum. Moss (D8)
Maier Depths finches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PAIIAMETER NOT MET.
Surface Water;
Water Table:
-
Saturated soil: >20
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Chasmairlldant latifoliurn
Loliumperenue
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FACU
FACU-
25
30
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: O
,TE:( +/ -ire arc Ltdicnrors afc uar -M in iW,101on ea&
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
Wu
Redox Features
ErrpatoHian capilNfolrtan
Herbaceous
FACU
10
Soramurrcalnlhrense
Herbaceous
UPI,
5
Allmon canadense
Herbaceous
FACU
5
Prevalence Index: 4.1
Rapid Test for I lydrophytic Vegetation: _ Remarks: VEGETATION PARAINETER NOT MET.
Dominance Test >50%: _
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _ UNIDENTIFIED SPECIES OF DOMINANT SOIIDAGO (25 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic flydrophytic Vegetation:
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color (Moist)
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0 -6
A
l OYR 4/3
99
7.5YR 518
1
C
M
SANDY CLAY
6 -20
B
25Y 613
98
25Y 618
2
C
M
SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol(At)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indica lorsfor'ProblentalicHydricSoils
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_ lcm Mack (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (FIG)
_ 2cm Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
_Reduced Verlic (F18)
^_ Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
5cin Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvaiue Below Surface (S8)
— Umbric Surface (F13)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (F17)
—Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al l) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FI9)
Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restriclire Layer (If Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMrTER NOT MET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 4F
� Project•. ELIZABETH CITY TO WiNPALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER SectionfrownsiiplRange: NIA
City/County: PASQUOTANK, PER UIMANS, ELIZABE'flI CEFY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
WILLIAhISBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50.67 "N l 76'13'34.50"W
E,WIROlAIT�I'Ai. Investigator(s): J.TESCHLER - Site Terminus: 36°13`21.46 "NI 76°2740.50 "W
GROUP, I A C • Date: 617/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: CHAPANOKE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings:
Prinraq Indicators:
WETLAND AT FLAK IfK -J.
Secondary Indicators:
Juncusefisus
Hydmphytic Vegetation is Present:
X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
N/A
I Iydric Soils are Present:
X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present:
X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfonn:
DRAINAGEWAY
Sampled Area Is within a Wetland:
X
Atypical Chmate/Hydrology (sec Remarks):
Slope %:
2 -4
Ilvdrnlnvv Parnmeter! -
Dominant Species
Prinraq Indicators:
IND
Secondary Indicators:
Juncusefisus
Herbaceous
FACW+
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (AI)
—Water Stained Leaves (139)
OBL
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (1373)
OBI,
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
—Marl Deposits (B 15)
10YR 416
—Moss Tnnt Lines (1316)
Marks (B 1)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
SANDY CLAY
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
—Water
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
85
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133)
~Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
M
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
—Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Sails (C6)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (0)
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron
Visible on Aerial Imagery (117)
_ Other
Shallow Arluitard (D3)
_inundation
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnatn Moss (D8)
]Eater Deplks (Inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAAIF.TER A177.
Surface Water.
Hydric Soil htdicatars:
Water Table:
_IIis €osol (Al)
Saturated soil: 7
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
IndicalwaforPrvNenmticHydric Soils
Dominant Species
Strutum
IND
%
Juncusefisus
Herbaceous
FACW+
15
Jutrctrs canadensis
Herbaceous
OBL
20
Ladi,Wapaltrsffis
Herbaceous
OBI,
15
Non - Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Dicharrthelfnrtt clandesehrion
Carer frfbrdoides
Herbaceous
herbaceous
FAC+
FACW+
10
5
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 100% Prevalence index: 1.6
NOTE;( + /- in flee indreurors are not vreJin vegernliorr rnkrrlafioax) Cnte�d "led �ri� g �1! mks yresal.
Rapid 'rest for HydrophyticVegetation: X Remarks: VEGETATION PARAMi.'fER1%WY.
Dominance Test >50/6: X
Prevalence index is <3.0: X UNIDENTIFIED SPECIES OF NON - DOMINANT GALLIUM (5 %) PRESENT.
Morphological Adaptations:
ProblematicHydrophytic Vegetation:
Alatrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Aloist
%
Color loist
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0 -1
A
IOYR 212
98
10YR 416
2
C
M
SANDY CLAY
1 -20
B
10Y 51I
85
IOYR 416
15
C
M
SANDY CLAY
Hydric Soil htdicatars:
_IIis €osol (Al)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
IndicalwaforPrvNenmticHydric Soils
Epipedon (A2)
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Hisric
Histie (A3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Icm Muck (A9)
_Black
Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (F10)
2cm Muck (Alo)
_hydrogen
Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fll)
_Reduced Vertic (FIB)
_Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_Iron - Manganese Masses (F12)
Piedmont :Floodpla n Soils (1`19)
Mucky Mineral (A7)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (88)
Urnbric Surface (F13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Scm
Muck Presence (A8)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ocbric (F l7)
_Red Parent Material (TF2) -
_
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Ail) X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Restrictive T (0,rr (if Observed)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER MET.
. Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 2G
Project ELIZABETH CITY TO WINPALL 230kV TRANSMISSION LINE
1 Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectiontrownship/Range: NIA
CitylCaunty: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
FPILLIAMSBURC State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: WIS'50.67 "N17"3'34.50 "W
FA'Vlti0\ills\ 1'AL lnvesti ato s P. MEIER Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46'N / 76°27'40.50 "W
Ck0111',I1vC: g �)'
Date: 10118/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: WATER
Summaty of Findings:
OPEN WATER NEAR FLAG P -16.
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetnlion is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
N1VI Classification:
PUBHX
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks):_
Landform:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (sec Remarks):
Slope %:
0
Hydrology Parameter:
%Dominant species FAC or wetter:
17E;( +/- hr!!re irrdlc¢! rrs are not used h, vegelaliorr calcalrrrian.)
Rapid Testfor Hydrophytic Vegetation:_
Dominance Test >54%:
Prevalence Index is < 3.0:
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrovimic Veae €alion:
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND
Prevalence Index:
Cakrrlated asiug alf species pr.
VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MELT.
NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN OPYN WATER AREA.
Primary Irrdicatars:
Matrix
Secondary Indicators:
Depth inches
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
Color joist
_
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—
high Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Texture
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B 15)
97
— Moss'frimLines (1316)
— Water Marks (BI)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C])
M
_ Dry- Scason Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (112)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (6)
25Y 411
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
C
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
___....
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_lion Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (0)
20
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Other
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_-- _Inundation
_ FAC Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (DS)
fralerDepths�hrcbes):
Remarks: HYDIZOLOCY PARAMETER MET.
Surface Water: >12
Water Table:
Saturated soil: 10
Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
~_
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
%Dominant species FAC or wetter:
17E;( +/- hr!!re irrdlc¢! rrs are not used h, vegelaliorr calcalrrrian.)
Rapid Testfor Hydrophytic Vegetation:_
Dominance Test >54%:
Prevalence Index is < 3.0:
Morphological Adaptations:
Problematic Hvdrovimic Veae €alion:
Non - Dominant Species Stratum IND
Prevalence Index:
Cakrrlated asiug alf species pr.
VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MELT.
NO VEGETATION PRESENT WITHIN OPYN WATER AREA.
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Moist
%
Color joist
%
Type
Loc
Texture
0 -8
A
25Y 614
97
10YR 518
3
C
M
SAND
8 -20
B
25Y 411
60
IOYR 5/6
20
C
M
SANDY LOAM
2.5Y&I
20
D
M
Hydrie Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (Al)
Coast Prairie Redox (AI6)
~_
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Prohlenrade Hydric Sails
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Black Histic (A3)
_ Sandy Gleycd Matrix (54)
—Redox Depressions (178)
_ lent Muck (A9)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Marl (1710)
_2cm Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fll)
_Reduced Verde (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
_Dark Surface (S7)
_Trot - Manganese Masses (F12)
_PiedmontFloodplain Soils (1719)
Sem Mucky Material (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
Umbric Surface (1`13)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Suits (F20)
Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Delta Ochric (1717)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
_Muck
1 cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Loamy Gleycd Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplant Soils (P19)
Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (170)
Resiriclive Layer (IfObsciTed)
Remarks: SOIL PARA IETER biET.
Type:
Depth (arches):

Wetland Determination Data form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: 211
Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 234kV'1'RANSMISSION LINE
j. Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Sectionlfownship/Rangc: NIA
City /County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUIMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OFF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T
3I7LUMISBURC State: NORTH CAROLINA Site Start: 36°18'50.67 "N / 76 °13'34.50 "W
ENV1H(I P , N1'C Invesligntor(s)7 P. NMIER Site Terminus: 36°13`21.46 "N /.76 27'40.50 "IV
CROUP, IIvC.
Date: 10118/2012 Soil Map Unit Name: TT,,TOTUM FM SANDY LOAM
Summary of Findings: , UPLAND IN AGRICULTURAL FIELD ADJACENT TO "P" LINE.
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: Normal Circumstances: X NWI Classification: N/A
Hydric Soils are Present: Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _ Local Rclief: NONE
Wetland Hydrology is Present: Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): Landfomr: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland: Atypical Climate/hydrology (see Remarks): Slope %: 0
Hvd rolo2v Parameter:
Test
Dominant Species Stratum IND %
%Dominant species FAC or wetter.
NOTE:(+/- in Nee indlcurors are not coed iu rG
Dominance Test >501/o:
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _
Morphological Adaptations:_
Prevalence Ind=
VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
UNIDENTIFIED REMAINS OP HARVESTED CROP PRESENT (50 %)
Pritmar > Indicators:
Secoadar y Indicators:
Redox Features
_Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (119)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (B 15}
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
— Water Marks (B 1)
_hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
� Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sedinkent Deposits (B2)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
~ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Recent Iron Reductionin'rilled Soils (C6)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Other
— Aquitard (D3)
FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Sphagnum Moss (138)
MorerDeplhs (hrahes):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT AICT.
Surface Water;
Wnter'rable:
Saturated soil: >20
Test
Dominant Species Stratum IND %
%Dominant species FAC or wetter.
NOTE:(+/- in Nee indlcurors are not coed iu rG
Dominance Test >501/o:
Prevalence Index is <3.0: _
Morphological Adaptations:_
Prevalence Ind=
VEGETATION PARAMETER NOT MET.
UNIDENTIFIED REMAINS OP HARVESTED CROP PRESENT (50 %)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color Dist
% -
Color Moist
%
Type
Lac
Texture
0.10
A
2.5Y 413
100
SANDY LOAM
10 -20
B
2.5X514
98
2,5Y616
2
C
M
SANDYLOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators;
_Histosol (A I)
— Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for ProbleinalicHydric Soils
_HisticEpipedon(A2)
_-_._- Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
lent Muck (A9)
—_2cm
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Sandy Redox (85)
_Marl (Flo)
Muck (A10)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Depleted Ochric (Fl l)
Reduced Vertic (FI8)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
iron- Manganese Masses (1`12)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1519)
_
Scm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS)
_Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous BrightLoamy Soils (MO)
Muck Presence (A8)
.____.1
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (1`17)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
cm Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fl9)
_Other
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Depleted Matrix (153)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1520)
Restrictive Layer (If Observed)
Rentarks: SOTL PARAMETER NOT MET,
Type:
Depth (itches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampling Point Number: Q
Project: EL[7AHE'f11 CITY TO WINFALL 2301,V TRANSMISSION LINE
1� Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER Section/Township/Range: NIA
City/County: PASQUOTANK, PERQU MANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRRT
WILLIANISBURG State: NORTII CAROLINA Site Start: 36 °18'50,67 "N I76 °13'34.50 "W
4 rll+o a p,LI INC Iiivestigstor(s): P. MEIEWK. PRESGRAVES Site Terminus: 36 °1321.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
cROt1r, lnc,
Date: 10/1$120I2 Soil Map Unit Name: GERTIE SII,'1' LOAM
Summary of Findings;
WETLAND NEAR FLAG PD -1.
IND
Secondary Indlcators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present: X
Normal Circumstances: X
NWI Classification:
NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Remarks): _
Local Relief:
CONCAVE
Wetland Ilydrology is Present: X
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landfotm:
FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland; X
Atypical ClinmatelHydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %:
0
Hydrology. Parameter:
Dominant Species
Primary htdicalors:
IND
Secondary Indlcators:
Astersabulaltes
Herbaceous
OBL
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (A I)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
FAC+
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna(B13)
OBL
Drainage Patterns (13€0)
_Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (1115)
FACW+
Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B 1)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C])
FACW
_Moss
_ Dry- SeaSOII Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
—Drift
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
FAC1V+
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Deposits (113)
_Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
FACW+
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
PAC
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
OBI,
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible onAerial Imagery (117)
_Other
FACU-
_ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation
X FAC - Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Water Depths (inches):
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PAIL"10TER NIET.
Surface Water:
Water Table:
Saturated snit: >20
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
%
Astersabulaltes
Herbaceous
OBL
70
% Dominant species FAC or wetter: loop/.
NOTE: (+I -ire 1heindimturs arerrnr used in regernrinn cn� lnteo>rs
Rapid'rest for Hydrophytic Vegetation: X
Dominance Test >50'1.: X
Prevalence Index is <3.0: X
Morphological Adaptations: _
Non- Dumiemnt Species
Stratum
IND
%
Cyperos strfgosus
Herbaceous
FACW
10
Pmrierun Orgatum
Herbaceous
FAC+
10
Ladtrlgiapahrwris
herbaceous
OBL
10
Juncris ejfrsas
Herbaceous
FACW+
5
Polygoaarnpens),ltrnrictuti
Herbaceous
FACW
3
Perberra hastaw
Herbaceous
FAC1V+
3
Andropogonglomeralus
Herbaceous
FACW+
1
SGariaglaaca
Herbaceous
PAC
1
Rhema vbginica
Herbaceous
OBI,
1
Solidago alrissinra
Herbaceous
FACU-
1
VEGETATION
PrevalenceJndex: 1.4
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth inches
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color (Moist
%
Type
Lae
Texture
0 -8
A
2.5Y411
85
10YR 416
10
C
M
CLAY LOAM
IOYR 516
5
C
PL
8 -20
B
15Y0
85
lOYR 516
15
C
PL
CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A 1)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Lrdicatars for Problematic Hydric Soils
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)_
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_Black Histio (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Joni Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Sandy Redox (S5)
Marl (F10)
2cm Muck (A10)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
-Depleted Ochric (FI1)
Reduced Vertic (F18)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
—Iron- Manganese Masses (1712)
—Piedmont Floodplaum Soils (1`19)
_
_5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (U)
_ Umbric Surface (F13)
—Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (AS)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ochric (1`17)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
1 our Muck (A9)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F])
Reduced Vertic (Fl8)
—
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al l) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Sails (1719)
_ Other
Thick Dark Surface (A 12)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_Anomalous Bri ght Loamy Soils (1720)
Restrteiive layer (IfObsened)
Remarks: SOIL PAIUMETER NIET.
Type:
Depth (inches):

Wetland Determination Data Form - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
3 i Project: ELIZABETH CITY TO WIN FALL 230L-V TRANSMISSION LINE
[ Applicant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
City/County: PASQUOTANK, PERQUTMANS, ELIZABETH CITY, TOWN OF WINFALL
WILLiAN1SBURG State: NORTH CAROLINA
Fr`1'IRt1NM12I'AI, Investigators }: P. METER/K. PRESGRAVES
GROUP, INC.
Date: 10/18/2012
Sampling Point Number: 6K
Sectionll'ownsbip/Ranpe: NIA
Subregion (LRR or MLRA ): LRR T
Site Start: 36°18'50.67 "N 1 76°13'34.50 "W
Site Terminus: 36 °13'21.46 "N 176°27'40.50 "W
Soil Map Unit Namc: GERTIE SILT LOAM
Summary of Findings: '
UPLAND iVF.AR FLAG PD -1.
Secondary Indicators:
Hydrophytic Vegetation is Present:
Normal Circumstances: X
NWi. Classification; NIA
Hydric Soils are Present: X
Disturbed Parameters (see Reipaiks):
Local Relief: CONCAVE
Weiland Hydrology is Present:
I
_
Problematic Parameters (see Remarks): _
Landform: FLAT
Sampled Area is within a Wetland:
Atypical Climate/Hydrology (see Remarks):
Slope %: 0
Hydrology Parameter
Dominant Species
1'rhuar y Irdleators:
Secondary Indicators:
Redox Features
Cy odon dactyloa
Panicum vlrgalam
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
~_
_Surface Water (Al)
_Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic, Farma (B 13)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3)
_Marl Deposits (1315)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B 1)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres oil Living Roots (C3)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
~ Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Ron (C4)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
~
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D I)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7) -
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Visible an Aerial Imagery (137)
3
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Inundation
_Oilier
_FAC- Neutral Test (1)5)
Daricus carola
herbaceous
Sphagnum Moss (1)8)
Water Depths (inches):
Polygmrum persicaria
Remarks: HYDROLOGY PARAMETER NOT RIET,
Surface Water:
2
Water Tahle:
Saturated soil: >10
Dominant Species
Stratum
IND
Redox Features
Cy odon dactyloa
Panicum vlrgalam
Herbaceous
Herbaceous
FACU
FAC+
80
30
%Dominant species FAC or wetter: 50%
TE:(+/- in the indicators ore no use d ix r'W' MNwr wfrrrlaliosx)
Dominance Test >50 1/.:
Prevalence Index is <3.0:_
Morphological Adaptations: _
Problematic Hvdrophytic Vegetation:
Nan - Dominant Species
Stratum
]ND
Redox Features
Asler vindneus
Herbaceous
FAC
25
Astersirbrrlahrs
Herbaceous
0I11,
20
Lespedeza claneata
Herbaceous
NI
15
CoiWa canadensis
Herbaceous
UPL
5
Solidagoallissiana
I1eraaumus
FACU-
5
Verbena haslala
Herbaceous
FAC%V+
5
Selariaglarica
Herbaceous
FAC
3
Rtmtexcrispas
Herbaceous
NACU
2.
Daricus carola
herbaceous
UPL
2
Polygmrum persicaria
Herbaceous
FACW
2
Prevalence Index: 3.3
AIET.
Alatrix
Redox Features
Depth (inches)
Horizon
Color foist
%
Color foist
%
e
Lac
Texture
0 -4
A
2.5Y411
80
10YR516
20
C
PL
CLAYLOAM
4 -10
D
2,SY 411
95
J OYR 416
5
C
PL
CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histosol (AI)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Redox Dark Surface (176)
Indicators for Problealalic Hydric Soils
Histic Fpipedon (A2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1)
Depleted Dark Surface (137)
Black Histic (A3)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ lcm Muck (A9)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Sandy Redox (55)
—Marl (F10)
_2om Muck (A10)
Layers (A5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Depleted Oclide (Flt)
_Reduced Vertic (FI8)
_Stratified
—Organic
Organic Bodies (A6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_Iran - Manganese Masses (F12)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Mucky Mineral (A7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Unrbric Surface (1713)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_Muck Presence (A8)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9)
_Delta Ocbric (F17)
_Red Parent Material (TF2)
—I em Muck (A9)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (FI)
Reduced Vertic (FI8)
—Reduced
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al
1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Floodplain Soils (1719)
^ Other
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Depleted Matrix (173)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Restriclire Layer (IfObsened)
Remarks: SOIL PARAMETER AIET.
Type'
Depth (inches):
REFUSAL AT 10" DUE TO COMPACTION AND DEBRIS PRESENCE,

T
O
O
G
0
n
00
O
0
O
w
U
z
\V
O
±-f
U
N
w
O
E
n
00
O
Nt
U
rr
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE WETLAND LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM CHANNEL LIMITS
APPROXIMATE OPEN WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
DATA POINT LOCATION
5
FLAG NUMBER
PROJECT LIMITS
PHOTO STATION
5 LOCATION
ELIZABETH CITY TO WINFALL 230kV
SITE DATA:
PROJECT LENGTH 15.20 MILES ±
PROJECT AREA 242.72 ACRES ±
WETLANDS 33.42 ACRES ±
OPEN WATER 2.34 ACRES ±
STREAM CHANNELS 0.01 ACRES ±
(EXCLUDING WETLANDS) (251 L.F. +)
JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES 2.37 ACRES ± (21,874 L.F. ±)
NON - JURISDICTIONAL DITCHES 0.83 ACRES ± (15,552 L.F. ±)
t1
b
o �?
J � O °Ib I 0
e
4 a °
r 8 0 o °o
0 ° °
r � ° 0 ° o
�• °QS° u o
Jv't'��,
v
0 � °
s v o °
.• ' �.va e8oc
° • O °° ° ° e X30 �� o
0
LR1
o °
!II
441 e
°
o o
0 �1nj�
` o r a ; °e o°
° • }�
o � °
• ° O , 9 0
e
p / s if
o • e e 8 � UUU � ° . . ° � u
o ,
0
v e
O� o D _
4
0
o •9 O
o �e
i
��/p ---,� � � • ;y , `�- �'` , °�1 � it ���
1 � �• � � = . � �� - ��rl�- � . ��ti� �� • �•t �. O, A \ �� 1�- ��� .�� �.� i�i�a mil �r ;
\�OTE: THE LIMITS OF .� - � � w , +.. _ *� 1 ° ��� � - • � rim. �' '' �� / a ,� 1 �.1 + ° _ h �T 4'' �t /
WETLANDS ♦ - ♦
U.S. SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN FIELD LOCATED
-
BY MEANS OF SUB-METER GPS TECHNOLOGY AND ARE 'Ag
FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.
ON
La W3 ffio
I mw
SHEET
�� — �' i °7. ��- ��� ;`i., Off• .♦ ��� � , i� � .� � _
- __ ' � c�` � • � �"� ' ' ?%�'�� ".� ���� %���e� Ili �
\� SS
r '
_
� �� ��� �`` 'lie . r � _ ��_ ��ra+ =.� � � r�'71� � � F � /:��1 ' � � � ��� , • •
.•LEI
' r
J.
•k .
e+
M
1,
0
� P0�
a°
°
I*.
a
C
W e
to d
_.y. �� � � � . �/• -fir' � � „ � i
o .
rt�
3,000 0' 1,500 3,000 6,000 9,000
'°8 0
U
t�
3%
I�
OCA
W �
JW
QZ VZ
LL — J
J =0
ao3Z amp
a LL o
o 0 N ono
z W�Nc�n��
0 WvZ a�LL
W = =Q LL
Nm~ w�3
Z�a> �_o
Wp1�1p��3
0?WN �a�
Lo
N
N
T
O r^
�
5z
L
O
��
T
co
> Lo
N
N
0
o M
M c:
N
N
0
>
U
�
� ' �
�' -
���
U00
(D Lo
r- ��
��I
0
EO
m ��
oC m r-
0
=
—�
T � �
-0 O
O0
SON
LC)
C
O mUUO
T CE s
Nil
T U--
U
t�
3%
I�
OCA
W �
JW
QZ VZ
LL — J
J =0
ao3Z amp
a LL o
o 0 N ono
z W�Nc�n��
0 WvZ a�LL
W = =Q LL
Nm~ w�3
Z�a> �_o
Wp1�1p��3
0?WN �a�
O
5z
L
0
W
Q
0
U
cv
o
z
CV
O W
CV
O
�
Q
CV
0
—
a_
0
O
CE
I�
O
W
M
M
Q
LLJ
LU
m
(D
_
II
CE
Lu
0
=
Cw
U
w
z
0
O
m
m
m
m—
m
T
cis
U
Q
0
z
I.ii
co
z
J
C
c�
Q
w 0
U
0
1 0
C
Cn
Cn
i

T
I
6
I
6
0
0
00
0
n
0
W
U
z
\V
0
U
N
W
I
O
E
c)
I
00
O
Nt
U
rr
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL DATA POINT LOCATION
WETLAND LIMITS DITCH LIMITS)
Y
WATER
XIMMITE OPEN APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL FLAG NUMBER
LIEl DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM PROJECT LIMITS PHOTO STATION
CHANNEL LIMITS 5 LOCATION
0
FIGURE 1
F
'r.
tA
u.
A'
ill!
Aw
FIGURE 2
.w
� Y
\H-7
�G -10 N -18 N -1 J -13 F -5
♦ E -1 C -15 ..,, - � ♦i ...
-1 �� P -8 L -1 J- 1/E -15 s* H -2 ♦ p -6
/ r
F -1�
f '
+ s'^
T_ � _
'lo ZA
f
9
k!�T4
r
3 =,
• �> I
AE -1'6 A%
'-AG-'3'-
3 �-
r ,'
NEW CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
2H
' A4
qw.
V_ 2B
.2A
Aff 4
,q.
l�
f
.m
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
:..-
N 4
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
U
.b
3%
W
CID
LL
0
N
H
WQZ �z
NZ� �
a3 �
o Z� �
�
Oct) N ono
Z m0oz
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
WmH w�� LL
0
J � Z Z
OWN �a�
Lo
z
N
N
T
Oo
�
5z
L
o
��
r
> Lo
N
� N
N
�CY)
N
+
N
�
�
>
M
�
Sao
(1)j�l
Lo
O
co
m
Lo
U
U
E
Ef
O'
0
I
T
O
O0
C\j uJ
L
C
O mUUO
T Lr
N�1
T LL
U
.b
3%
W
CID
LL
0
N
H
WQZ �z
NZ� �
a3 �
o Z� �
�
Oct) N ono
Z m0oz
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
WmH w�� LL
0
J � Z Z
OWN �a�
z
0
5z
L
c)
M
�
c)
U
CV
C
w
c)
z
CV
O
W
>
Q
T
N
0
o
w
CE
Q
CV
—
V/
O
VJ
LL
W
CV
LLI
/'yW
m
CE
O
II
�
CE
W
'
Z
Lu
W
111
U
w
Z
Cu
Q
0
O
Z
m
m_
w
cis
T
U
Q
�
z
6i
�
z
J
C
c�
Q
w
U
0
0
0
m
0
0
>

T
I
O
O
0
0
00
O
N
n
O
W
U
z
O
U
N
W
O
E
n
0y1
W
6
O
O
U
rr
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL DATA POINT LOCATION
WETLAND LIMITS DITCH LIMITS)
Y
WATER
XIMMITE OPEN APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL FLAG NUMBER
LIEl DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM PROJECT LIMITS PHOTO STATION
CHANNEL LIMITS 5 LOCATION
FIN-11 /E
i 100*N
,t
r,
FIGURE 3
10
pil
FIGURE 4
3�.
�I
f
1
.t
t
L
v= .. —
RA -1 /RR -A
i
9
E-11
w� O
r aa
9�
i
r
z... ­ —
N �
Arf�
1 ~ '
a�
Pelt' ,
f�
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
s 1 MAw. -
mllk� Mi.
C.
x x
ST -(1 -4) 50-1/5N-4 . . ,.
BS- 6 /BS -7 BU -(1 -6) -r l ..rte . �� O
BL -1/ +`.BK- 1
.T
BP -(1 -6) '000000 0 B
BR-7/BS-9 RR- 9/RR -25 BO- 4 /BN -1�
1 r�
a :a I s 9` \
a
tl-10.00 ily�Y
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
U
.b
3%
P4
co
LL
0
M
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Z��
a3 ��
o �
SON c,l) <
ono
Zr.2 o °z
o VZ aka LL
H2Q LLyz
0 z
ZM H w<�
LL
> p 0
J � ZcyZ
LU 0 :)m�
OWN �a�
Lo
N
N
O
T
O(c)
�
O
��
r
> Lo
N
� N
N
�CY)
N
+
N
�
�
>
C/)
Sao
(1)j�l
Lo
O
co
m
Lo
(D L
U
U
—
c)
SON
u J
Lo
C
O mUU O
T CE s
N �1 Lo
T LL
U
.b
3%
P4
co
LL
0
M
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Z��
a3 ��
o �
SON c,l) <
ono
Zr.2 o °z
o VZ aka LL
H2Q LLyz
0 z
ZM H w<�
LL
> p 0
J � ZcyZ
LU 0 :)m�
OWN �a�
O
z_
c)
M
c)
c)
U
w
CV
c)
z
Q
CV
O
W
�
T
N
O
O
w
Q
CE
CV
O�
—
O
CE
CE
C�
O
�
W
CV
w
W
m
CEO
�
m
'
II
CE
W
T
co
U
w
z
0
O
m
m
w
m—
w
T
cis
U
Q
�
z
6i
�
z
J
C
c�
Q
w 0
U
0
OE
cf)
cf)
>

CV
T
6
O
0
0
00
O
0
0
O
W
U
z
O
_>1
U
a�
N
W
i
O
E
0
i
00
O
O
Nt
U
rr
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL DATA POINT LOCATION
WETLAND LIMITS DITCH LIMITS)
Y
WATER
XIMMITE OPEN APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL FLAG NUMBER
LIEl DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM PROJECT LIMITS PHOTO STATION
CHANNEL LIMITS 5 LOCATION
FIGURE 6
NEW CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
,, -f,00
` j $. a i-
SCALE- 1 " = 200'
k
U
.b
3%
I�
I�
p
CID
LL
0
LLI
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Z��
a3o ���
SON cl)
ono
Z�� o °�
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
0 z
WmH w�� LL
> �: 0
J � ZcyZ
Lu OWN �a�
LO
z
N
N
a
T
z
O(0
�
O
��
r
> Lo
N
� N
N
c\j
CO M
N
.�
+
N
�
�
� 'E
� >
> �
5 �
� �
ao
q) j �
a) LO
O
m N
LO
U
U
—
O0
SON
uJ
Lo
C
O mUU O
T Lr
N �1
T LL
U
.b
3%
I�
I�
p
CID
LL
0
LLI
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Z��
a3o ���
SON cl)
ono
Z�� o °�
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
0 z
WmH w�� LL
> �: 0
J � ZcyZ
Lu OWN �a�
z
O
z
n
M
Q
c)
c)
w
C
CV
c)
z
Q
CV
O
W
>
T
N
O
O
w
Q
CE
CV
O�
—
O
CE
C�
O
0
W
CV
LLI
W
m
CEO
�
M
'
II
CE
W
Z
Cw
U
w
Z
0
O
m
m
w
m—
w
T
ci)
U
Q
�
z
L]Ij
�
z
J
C
c�
Q
w 0
U
0
c)
of
cn
cn
>

CV
T
I
6
I
O
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
W
z
c�
C=
0
U
a�
N
W
I
0
E
n
I
00
6
O
COO
U
rr
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND LIMITS DITCH LIMITS
Y
WATER
XLMMITS OPEN DITCHOLIMIASE JURISDICTIONAL
APPROXIMATE STREAM PROJECT LIMITS
CHANNEL LIMITS
5 DATA POINT LOCATION
FLAG NUMBER
PHOTO STATION
5 LOCATION
I
- -.l
mop
kv
r. Ljy'
•sue � � �. _ a - �
,' ..
FIGURE 8
i
ow
8D
oz's -
�o
GX- 1 /GZ -1 S -1 /G -
GT -1 /GR -5
► 11� w M' lF IC- /�A-5 GiT / ��- GS
o-
s T
ww
♦ R 1
-1 y
w w W :„' c GN11/
k . -5 G
_ w w r`;
E 1p
w .
..
w ,
w
.. , Y'".;a r ��, w � � �, �'� , ► �«� � � �� 9m
♦ w w w . r
7",
w
10.
S
/ I
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
c�
U
.b
3%
I�
I�
I'� p
co
LL
0
to
LLI
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Zl�
a3o ���
SON cl) <.j
ono
Z�� o °�
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
WmH w�� LL
Z > J � Z�Z
OWN �a�
Lo
N
N
T
z
Oco
00 ��
O
r
> Lo
N
� N
N
0
c\j
o M
N
.�
N
2
> �
Q
X00
q) j�l
a) Lo
0
co
m
(D 00000
UN
U
O
—
N
LC
LU
0 U O
m
N �1
0
T LL
c�
U
.b
3%
I�
I�
I'� p
co
LL
0
to
LLI
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Zl�
a3o ���
SON cl) <.j
ono
Z�� o °�
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
WmH w�� LL
Z > J � Z�Z
OWN �a�
O
z
0
Q
c)
U
w
CV
c)
z
Q
CV
O
W
>
T
N
O
O
w
Q
CE
CV
O�
—
O
CE
r
CE
(3)
O
�
W
CV
LLI
W
m
CEO
�
M
'
II
CE
W
T
co
�
U
w
z
0
O
m
m
w
m—
w
T
cis
U
Q
�
z
6i
�
z
J
C
c�
Q
w 0
U
0
C)
of
cn
cn
>

CV
T
6
O
0
0
00
O
0
0
W
U
z
(10
q—
C=
O
U
N
W
0
E
O
c)
C)
(D
6
O
O
U
CE
APPROXIMATE
WETLAND LIMITS
(� APPROXIMATE OPEN
�J WATER LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM
CHANNEL LIMITS
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL
DITCH LIMITS
PROJECT LIMITS
5 DATA POINT LOCATION
FLAG NUMBER
PHOTO STATION
5 LOCATION
o
Q 0
OQ NEW CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
41 4 Y
7
s
� -rilpE
PC -4
PB -1
1 OB
1 OA
10C � PA -7 k \f\
28 \ o
OD
30 �
0
31 / 29
v
/ a
FIGURE 10
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
c�
U
.b
3%
I�
I�
p
CID
LL
0
t0
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Zl�
a3o ���
SON cl) < j
ono
Z�� o °�
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
WmH w�� LL
> p 0
J � Z Z
OWN �a�
Fc—
Lo
=7z
N
N
O
T
Oco
00 ��
O
r
> Lo
N
� N
N
c\j
o M
O
N
.�
+
N
�
�
� 'E
� >
> �
X00
q) j�l
a) Lo
0
co
m
(D 00000
UN
M
�
O
N
LC
0 L
O UU O
m
N �
0
T LL
c�
U
.b
3%
I�
I�
p
CID
LL
0
t0
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Zl�
a3o ���
SON cl) < j
ono
Z�� o °�
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
WmH w�� LL
> p 0
J � Z Z
OWN �a�
Fc—
=7z
)
O
z
O
c)
M
�
c)
U
w
CV
C
c)
z
Q
CV
O
W
T
N
O
O
w
Q
CE
CV
O�
—
O
CE
C�
O
0
W
CV
LLI
W
m
CEO
�
M
'
II
CE
W
T
co
U
w
Z
0
O
m
m
w
m—
w
T
ci)
D
U
Q
Lu
z
6i
�
z
J
CE
0
Q
w
0
o
0
m
0
M
0
0
>

CV
T
6
O
0
\v
0
00
O
C�
n
0
W
U
z
C=
O
U
a�
N
W
i
O
E
n
i
00
O
Nt
U
rr
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL DATA POINT LOCATION
WETLAND LIMITS DITCH LIMITS)
Y
WATER
XIMMITE OPEN APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL FLAG NUMBER
LIEl DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM PROJECT LIMITS PHOTO STATION
CHANNEL LIMITS 5 LOCATION
FIGURE 11
12B
FIGURE 12
r� f�•! 41111,��1 I t
r r
#1
d^
Y
r�•
7
At
w
32G,
J'b
El
r
,41
} y r
Ae
.Y,
4
`Z
SCALE- 111 = 200'
GYa Syr.
SCALE- 111 = 200'
k
U
.b
3%
I�
I�
p
r W
LL
0
LLI
n
WQz �z
N Z � Z1 0 �
a3 �
o �
Oct) N ono
z �m o °z
OVZ aka
H2Q LLyz LL
0 z
WmH w�� LL
J � Z�Z
OWN �a�
Lo
z
N
N
T
z
Oo
�
o
��
r
> Lo
N
� N
N
O
�CY)
N
+
N
�
�
� 'E
� >
>
C/)
Q
Sao
(1)j�l
Lo
O
co
m
Lo
U
U
U
—
O0
SON
uJ
Lo
C
O mUU O
T Lr
N �1
T LL
U
.b
3%
I�
I�
p
r W
LL
0
LLI
n
WQz �z
N Z � Z1 0 �
a3 �
o �
Oct) N ono
z �m o °z
OVZ aka
H2Q LLyz LL
0 z
WmH w�� LL
J � Z�Z
OWN �a�
z
O
z
O
n
M
Q
c)
U
C
CV
w
c)
z
C V
O
W
>
Li
T
N
O
O
w
CE
Q
CV
O
LL
CY)
C�
O
O
CE
0
W
CV
LLI
W
m
CEO
'It
�
CE
CE
M
Z
Lu
W
U
w
Z
co
Q
0
O
a
m
—
a_
cis
T
U
Q
�
z
Li
�
z
J
C
c�
Q
w
U
0
0
OC
cn
cn
>

CV
T
6
6
0
0
00
O
W
0
0
W
U
z
O
t-f
0
�f
a�
N
W
i
O
E
c)
00
O
Nt
0
rr
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE NON - JURISDICTIONAL DATA POINT LOCATION
WETLAND LIMITS DITCH LIMITS)
Y
WATER
XIMMITE OPEN APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL FLAG NUMBER
LIEl DITCH LIMITS
APPROXIMATE STREAM PROJECT LIMITS PHOTO STATION
CHANNEL LIMITS 5 LOCATION
w
ON 0.
pp-
.a v,
->u. - •ys..__�_ _' � -"r .__. _....� ���.a�_.__.��sr. =.,�E _ ��•��r. _- 1rH...� _`.•ro....:_,._w' -.S. _ .aufi�_ _ _ -.. _...esui� -�.' ..,�.:- ,.:.... - .._ ..��:. �...rr;.' � -
R -F
ri
Fall mummum
rr -.�jr -=• i
r Y•- _
van a
ej. , , *r :,• ♦
. . F�,4 ;; � r� ''= _ - -- - ♦ ♦ `♦ `♦ ♦ � J'� -6 ,� JN � 1 JP -6 JO -1 • r N -5 a s - `KL -2 m - 2JP -1 KM 1 KN war
.
FIGURE 73
1 E
FIGURE 14
N
.,
A
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
=,'i I
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
Lo
N
N
r
AN 7 r
i
z
O(c)
�
O
��
r
> Lo
N
� N
N
0
�CY)
N
+
N
�
�
>
C/)
Q
Sao
(1)j�l
Mumma mau'am
36
O
=now, Mummum
N
Wr 7/K
'Mumma mill
l Y.
EWRY
ROAD
.w
_ " s
PAM
O0
SON
uJ
Lo
C
O mUU O
00
T Lr
N �1
T LL
h
c)
z
Q
IMMUNE-
W
5;
A
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
=,'i I
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
U
.b
3%
I�
opb
I�
r W
LL
co 0
LLI
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Z��
a3o ���
Oct) N ono
Z 20oz
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
WmH w�� 2 LL
J � Z�Z
OWN �a0
Lo
N
N
T
z
O(c)
�
O
��
r
> Lo
N
� N
N
0
�CY)
N
+
N
�
�
>
C/)
Q
Sao
(1)j�l
Lo
O
co
m
Lo
U
U
U
—
O0
SON
uJ
Lo
C
O mUU O
00
T Lr
N �1
T LL
U
.b
3%
I�
opb
I�
r W
LL
co 0
LLI
H
WQZ �z
NZ� Z��
a3o ���
Oct) N ono
Z 20oz
0 cl) aka
H2Q LLyz LL
WmH w�� 2 LL
J � Z�Z
OWN �a0
0
z
0
c)
M
Q
c)
U
w
C
CV
c)
z
Q
CV
W
5;
T
CV
0
O
W
Q
CE
CV
O�
—
O
CE
0)
O
�CE
c/ J
W
CV
LLI
W
m
CE
O
�
M
'
II
CE
W
T
Cw
U
w
z
Q
0
0
00
w
m
—
w
T
cis
U
Q
�
z
I.ii
co
z
J
C
c�
Q
w 0
U
0
M
C)
of
cn
cn
>

APPENDIX E
Threatened and Endangered Species Information

2/18/13 Pasquotank County Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
Pasquotank County, North Carolina
Updated: 09 -22 -2010
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Scientific name
Federal Record Status
Status
American eel
Anguilla rostrata
FSC
Current
Atlantic sturgeon
Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus E
Current
Bald ea e
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Shortnose sturgeon
Acipenser brevirostrum
E
Current
Invertebrate:
Vascular Plant:
Grassleaf arrowhead
Sagittaria weatherbiana
FSC
Historic
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant
portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC = federal species of concern. A species under consideration for listing, for which there is insufficient
information to support listing at this time. These species may or may not be listed in the future, and many of these
species were formerly recognized as "C2" candidate species.
T(S /A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
vmw.f%As.gov/raleigh/species/cnyist/pasquotankhtml 1/2

2/18/13 Pasquotank County Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S /A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as 'PE" or 'PT ",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346 - 37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed
(de- listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August
8,2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668 -668d) becomes
the primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb ". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http: / /www.fws. omi rgorvbirds/baldea l
Threatened due to similatity similarity of appearance (T(S/A))-
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822 - 55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S /A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S /A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S /A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina., part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S /A), the U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed m the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed m the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and /or location of observation is uncertain
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable /potential - the species is considered likely to occur m this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both
vmw.f%As.gov/raleigh/species/cnyist/pasquotankhtml 2/2

2/18/13 Perqui mans County Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species,
Perquimans County, North Carolina
Updated: 09 -22 -2010
Common Name
Vertebrate:
American eel
Atlantic sturgeon
•
Bald ea e
Rafnesque's big -eared bat
Invertebrate:
Vascular Plant:
Raven's boxseed
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Scientific name
Federal Record Status
Status
Anguilla rostrata FSC Current
Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus E Current
Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA Current
Corynorhinus rafinesquii FSC Current
Ludwigia ravenii
FSC Historic
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant
portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC = federal species of concern. A species under consideration for listing, for which there is insufficient
information to support listing at this time. These species may or may not be listed in the future, and many of these
species were formerly recognized as "C2" candidate species.
T(S /A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
vmw.f%As.gov/raleigh/species/cnyist/perquimans.html 1/2

2/18/13 Perqui mans County Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S /A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as 'PE" or 'PT ",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346 - 37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed
(de- listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August
8,2007. After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668 -668d) becomes
the primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb ". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http: / /www.fws. omi rgorvbirds/baldea l
Threatened due to similatity similarity of appearance (T(S/A))-
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822 - 55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S /A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S /A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S /A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina., part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S /A), the U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed m the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed m the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and /or location of observation is uncertain
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable /potential - the species is considered likely to occur m this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both
vmw.f%As.gov/raleigh/species/cnyist/perquimans.html 2/2

STAT
SCI NAME
COM NAME
SURVEYDATE
LAST OBS
STAT
FESTAT
ACCURACY
EOSTATUS
TYPE
NAME CATGY
SURVEYSITE
DIRECTIONS
EO DATA
GEN DESC
HAB COM
Albemarle Sound: This occurrence consists of observations in the Albemarle
Vertebrate
brackish water of large rivers and
Acipenser brevirostrum
Shortnose Sturgeon
1998 -05-18
1998 -05-18
E
E
Very Low
Extant
Aquatic
Animal
ROA /Albemarle Sound
Sound of North Carolina, including the lower Pasquotank River, Batchelor Bay,
es t
estuaries; spawns in freshwater areas
and Salmon Creek.
Hogs Creek, Pasquotank
J.C. Rabb (1940) collected specimen in Hog's Creek,
CM: bogs, marshes, and wet powerline
Iris prismatica
Slender Blue Iris
1940 -OS -25
1940 -OS -25
SR -T
Very Low
Historical
Wetland
Vascular Plant
Hogs Creek Pasquotank County near edge of river (Rabb 1940).
Rabb collected a specimen 25 May 1940.
County, NC.
Pasquotank County, NC near river edge.
clearings
East of Elizabeth City, US-
East of Elizabeth City, US -158: "Marsh, east side of Pasquotank River on US
Present; specimen collected by Radford and Bozeman on 26 September 1967 (NCU herbarium
CS: clay -based Carolina bays, marshes,
Boltonia asteroides
White Doll's -daisy
1967 -09 -26
1967 -09 -26
SR -O
Low
Historical
Wetland
Vascular Plant
Marsh (Radford and Bozeman 1967).
158
158; east of Elizabeth City" (Radford and Bozeman 1967).
search April 2008).
savannas
ZONE 100 -300 METERS WIDE ALONG PASQUOTANK
RIVER. CANOPY OF NYSSA BIFLORA AND LIQUIDAMBAR,
SHIPYARD LANDING SITE. ON EAST SIDE OF PASQUOTANK RIVER, JUST NORTH
APPEARS INTACT ON 1998 DOQQ. MATURITY AND NATURAL CONDITION UNKNOWN. A
Tidal Swamp (Cypress - -Gum Subtype)
1989 -11 -21
1998
Low
Unranked
Wetland
Natural
Shipyard Landing Natural
OF ELIZABETH CITY. ACCESS BY WATER, OR FROM SHIPYARD LANDING ROAD
RELATIVELY NARROW FRINGE, TRANSITIONAL TO CUTOVER PEATLAND ATLANTIC WHITE
WITH SOME PINUS TAEDA, ACER RUBRUM, AND NYSSA
Community
Area
(SR 1205) WEST OF NC 343.
CEDAR FOREST AND NONRIVERINE SWAMP FOREST.
AQUATICA. UNDERSTORY INCLUDES FRAXINUS
CAROLINIANA, PERSEA PALUSTRIS, AND MAGNOLIA
VIRGINIANA. WELL DEVELOPED HERB AND
"DITCH, 1.1 MILE NORTH
Ranunculus ambigens
Water - plantain Spearwort
1958 -07
1958 -07
SC -H
Medium
Historical
Aquatic
Vascular Plant
OF CHAPANOKE, THEN
"DITCH, 1.1 MILE NORTH OF CHAPANOKE, THEN 0.2 MILE WEST" (AHLES 1958).
NO INFORMATION.
NO INFORMATION.
CP: open wet areas
0.2 MILE WEST" (AHLES
"MARSH, 0.7 MILE EAST
Ludwigia alata
Winged Seedbox
1958 -07
1958 -07
SR -P
Very Low
Historical
Wetland
Vascular Plant
OF ELIZABETH CITY ON
"MARSH, 0.7 MILE EAST OF ELIZABETH CITY ON U.S. 158" (AHLES 1958).
NO INFORMATION.
"MARSH" (AHLES 1958).
TC: interdune ponds, marshes
U.S. 158" (AHLES 1958).
SERIES OF THREE PATCHES IN THE INTERIOR OF THE
MUCKYSWAMPALONG THETIDAL PASQUOTANK RIVER.
Natural
Shipyard Landing Natural
SHIPYARD LANDING NATURALAREA: ON THE EASTSIDE OF THE PASQUOTANK
APPEARS INTACTON 1998 DOQQ. FORESTOBSERVED ONLY FROM THEAIR. THREE SEPARATE
CANOPY DOMINATED BYCHAMAECYPARISTHYOIDES
Peatland Atlantic White Cedar Forest
1997
1998
Extant
Wetland
RIVER,ABOUT I -2 MILES WEST OF NC 343 AND 24AIR MILES NORTH OF
AREAS, PLUS ADDITIONAL AREAS WITH 10 -30% WHITE CEDARAND SOMEYOUNG
Community
Area
DOWNTOWN ELIZABETH CITY.
REGENERATION IN RECENT CLEARCUTS.
(70% IN MOST, 50% IN ONE STAND). REST IS PINEAND
UNSPECIFIED HARDWOODS, PRESUMABLY PINUSTAEDA,
NYSSA BI FLORA AN D ACE
"ROADSIDE DITCH, 2.2
Ranunculus ambigens
Water - plantain Spearwort
1958 -06
1958 -06
SC -H
High
Historical
Aquatic
Vascular Plant
MILES SOUTH OF
"ROADSIDE DITCH, 2.2 MILES SOUTH OF CHAPANOKE" (AHLES 1958).
NO INFORMATION.
NO FURTHER INFORMATION.
CP: open wet areas
CHAPANOKE" (AHLES

United States Department of the Interior x� $R
� FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
d RALEIGH ECOLOGICAL SERVICES FIELD OFFICE
#" ,e 551 PYLON DRIVE, SUITE F
RALEIGH, NC 27606
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Consultation Tracking Number: 04EN2000- 2013 -SLI -0152 February 19, 2013
Project Name: Elizabeth City to Winfa11230 kV Transmission Line
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and /or may be affected by your proposed project.
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, and proposed species, designated critical habitat, and candidate species that may
occur within the boundary of your proposed project and /or may be affected by your proposed
project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of
the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can
be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS -IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS -IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed
list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally - listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally - protected species list, information on the

species & #39; life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment
or evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally - listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species & #39; presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the
proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on
federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless
an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete
record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified
personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related
articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 etseq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
( http: / /www. fws. gov / windenergy /eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http: / /www.fws.gov /windenergy /) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http: / /www. fws. gov /migrato @irds /CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards /towers /towers. htm;
http: / /www.towerkill.com; and
http: / /www.fws. og v /mi rg ato @irds /CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards /towers /comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National
Marine Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems
you should also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http: / /www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office [e-mail].

Attachment

QgQµ +Ula�rHf J United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Elizabeth City to Winfall 230 kV Transmission Line
Official Species List
Provided by:
RALEIGH ECOLOGICAL SERVICES FIELD OFFICE
POST OFFICE BOX 33726
RALEIGH, NC 27636
(919) 856 -4520
Consultation Tracking Number: 04EN2000- 2013 -SLI -0152
Project Type: Transmission Line
Project Description: Within the existing right -of -way corridor between Winfall Substation to the
Elizabeth City Substation, the H -frame structures will be replaced with new steel structures and
wires. The new structures will be approximately the same height as the existing structures.
http: / /ecos.fws.gov /ipac, 02/19/2013 01:25 PM
Page 1

QgQµ +Ula�rHf J United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Elizabeth City to Winfall 230 kV Transmission Line
Project Location Map:
Project Coordinates: MULTIPOLYGON (((- 76.4616124 36.2227644, - 76.4616198 36.2229848, -
76.4567411 36.2234172, - 76.4440063 36.2250877, - 76.4402082 36.2253735, - 76.4346718
36.2233309, - 76.4226233 36.2242223, - 76.4184819 36.2256331, - 76.40255 36.230774, -
76.3963592 36.2328594, - 76.3914562 36.2343565, - 76.3844147 36.2364436, - 76.3774127
36.2382849, - 76.366732 36.2410037, - 76.3617034 36.2421978, - 76.3565878 36.2435294, -
76.3459342 36.2460556, - 76.3418366 36.2483055, - 76.3256478 36.2516007, - 76.313684
36.2613698, - 76.3064966 36.2675522, - 76.2965823 36.2755211, -76.290681136.2785834, -
76.2799194 36.2844469, - 76.2766897 36.2860902, - 76.2680425 36.2908856, - 76.2639014
36.2930821, - 76.2629543 36.2936458, - 76.2594809 36.2948677, - 76.2501147 36.2980628, -
76.2460806 36.3031338, - 76.2437231 36.3034957, - 76.2433576 36.3063901, - 76.2429798
36.3067742, - 76.2384098 36.3120135, - 76.2280578 36.3154952, -76.226310136.3144855, -
76.2265107 36.314294, - 76.2280372 36.3152011, - 76.2381604 36.3118479, - 76.2427762
36.3065534, - 76.2430936 36.3063223, - 76.2434286 36.3032402, - 76.2458523 36.3028477, -
76.2498672 36.2978403, - 76.2530275 36.2968479, - 76.2593071 36.2947198, - 76.2625924
http: / /ecos.fws.gov /ipac, 02/19/2013 01:25 PM
Page 2

QgQµ +Ula�rHf J United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Elizabeth City to Winfall 230 kV Transmission Line
36.293528, - 76.2723338 36.288188, - 76.2827734 36.2826041, - 76.2910459 36.2779988, -
76.2961957 36.2754032, - 76.298492 36.273446, - 76.3024396 36.2702224, - 76.3046351
36.2686188, - 76.3067423 36.2667814, - 76.3124387 36.2619347, - 76.3253785 36.2513273, -
76.3384239 36.2487194, - 76.3418142 36.24801, - 76.3423517 36.2476552, - 76.3457923
36.2457786, - 76.3571393 36.2430616, - 76.3616205 36.2418309, - 76.3760827 36.2382755, -
76.383476 36.2363415, - 76.3922397 36.2338498, - 76.3974186 36.2322065, - 76.4024454
36.2305097, - 76.4225732 36.2240088, - 76.4346978 36.2230534, - 76.4376176 36.224134, -
76.4405847 36.2251502, - 76.4448899 36.2246992, - 76.4491669 36.2241155, - 76.4567602
36.2231389, - 76.4616124 36.2227644)))
Project Counties: Pasquotank, NC I Perquimans, NC
http: / /ecos.fws.gov /ipac, 02/19/2013 01:25 PM
Page 3

QgQµ +Ula�rHf J United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Elizabeth City to Winfall 230 kV Transmission Line
Endangered Species Act Species List
Species lists are not entirely based upon the current range of a species but may also take into consideration actions that
affect a species that exists in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a
project could affect downstream species. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.
Shortnose sturgeon Ocipenser brevirostrum)
Population: Entire
Listing Status: Endangered
http: / /ecos.fws.gov /ipac, 02/19/2013 01:25 PM
Page 4

title
Page 1 of 2
EFH Data Notice: Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the
fishery management plans developed by the regional Fishery Management Councils. In most cases
mapping data can not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report
should be used for general interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive
evaluation of EFH at this location. A location- specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes
must be performed by a regional expert. Please refer to the following links for the appropriate
regional resources.
NMFS Northeast Regional Office
NMFS Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Management Division
Query Results
Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = 36 017'52" N, Longitude = 77047'23" W
Decimal Degrees: Latitude = 36.30, Longitude = -76.21
The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and /or HAPCs for the following
species /management units.
** *WARN I N G * **
The list provided below is incomplete due to current data limitations. For a complete list of EFH
designated at this location you must go to the following links:
HAPCs
No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report
location.
EFH Areas Protected from Fishing
No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location.
Spatial data does not currently exist for all the managed species in this
area. The following is a list of species or management units for which
there is no spatial data.
* *For links to all EFH text descriptions see the complete data inventory:
open data inventory - ->
New England Council EFH,
Atlantic Salmon,
New England Council HAPCs,
Rivers in Maine for Atlantic Salmon,
Mid Atlantic Council EFH,
Atlantic Mackerel,
http: / /www. habitat. noaa. gov / protection /efh /ef imapper /index.html 2/19/2013

title
Atlantic Surfclam,
Black Sea Bass,
Bluefish (except Gulf of Mexico),
Butterfish (Atlantic),
Golden Tilefish (except South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico),
Ocean Quahog,
Scup,
Spiny Dogfish,
Squid - Illex,
Squid - Loligo,
Summer Flounder
Page 2 of 2
http: / /www. habitat.noaa.gov / protection /efh /efhmapper /index.html 2/19/2013

APPENDIX F
Cultural Resources Information

4689 - Dominion Elizabeth City
Map 1
'•J
a
Volf
��dC190• , easa.".t�� cr th : EP so pal -hurl {� }
Winfall Substation•i ^'..:.
V V. `' t
T% Q t IONINF.aLL0'6' vlI IS.,: I r Q3`Gan i13 &2
C.I�Ep. Etti i �=hnefsiChu"ci
I, PZIESE as ' ikon -
r • Al I
r _ q ans•Caunty Home •1
Thomas Nnn House ,1982
y s { `Zz_ L_�s'PQ004SHenrl,, U Paci oflerrCn4 - enantHouse
11C PC 1 -E fl erste,d Srtio0
PL�p:24ldajCr, L aei ., ill Nv' s - —
# a P1I1 TnomasTl:x n7 a se r.G-n
} DQC'? hAvA)old 5 a s
km 0 G ' iliowBfanch VI ifor
•1 '
- -
­1:: Francis ;:n Hc..sc 'r:_
Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Wed May 23 2012 01:46:33 PM.

4689 Dominion Elizabeth
Map 2
Far• IyFduse Gcne,�
�f3U283` 11 s 2'
Fund
' 017 a h cGcne; 1982
#mss titer � lPKE:71 �arr� udf�rr Heuse an. Sicre jR_'s'� _ r
• �' iia PKE744 0%is4 C H usc3
top 6 $ rat Hauser + A S00 r.
rC�1'Ge rGeL. �
PK. :fi..
9 s RGAS, ;r
^� i1 yw�rf
�'� 0 5 a d i ral a d p parry (Ga a
•� •0 B
• - I} I _
;t ' or PK0833B` I �� •'
r4.
� ke
a P001:L Lt,x- F C .'re
6P7..JFC C -E- EJii
�. kir• ,�• PQC 191 PVC Schccl
Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Wed May 23 2012 01:47:44 PM.

4689
Map 3
�• h
h ► �]U { i
- Dominion Elizabeth City
Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Wed May 23 2012 01:49:14 PM.

4689 - Dominion Elizabeth City
Map
r _ -
r�
Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Wed May 23 2012 01:52:20 PM.

NPS Form 10 -900 OMB No. 10024 -0018
(Oct. 1990)
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
,4ational Register o Historic Places
This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in Now to Complete the
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or
by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N /A" for "not applicable." For functions,
architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional
entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10- 900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items.
As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ® nomination
❑ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of
Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property
® meets ❑ does not meet the Nat' naI Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant
❑ ation ly ❑ statewid locally. (❑ See continuation sheet for additional comments.)
'
SO PC) z 1
Signature of certifying offici I/Title Date
State of Federal agency and bureau
In my opinion, the property ❑ meets ❑ does not meet the National Register criteria. (❑ See continuation sheet for additional
comments.)
Signature of certifying official/Title Date
State or Federal agency and bureau
4. National Park Service Certification
hereby certify that the property is:
❑ entered in the National Register.
❑ See continuation sheet.
❑ determined eligible for the
National Register
❑ See continuation sheet.
❑ determined not eligible for the
National Register.
❑ removed from the National
Register.
❑ other, (explain:)
Signature of the Keeper Date of Action

Fl i zab thj i't.v IAlatPr Plant
Name of Property
. Classification
Ownership of Property
(Check as many boxes as apply)
❑ private
R public-local
❑ public -State
❑ public - Federal
Pasquotank County, NC
County and State
Number of Resources within Property
(Do not include previously listed resources in the count.)
Contributing Noncontributing
5
buildings
sites
structures
objects
roof
other �aigl l -_,-concrPtP
Narrative Description
(Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.)

f=1;_7ahpth rit�ia r —Rlant Pasauotank Counti/
Name of Property County and State
E. Statement of Significance
Applicable National Register Criteria 'Areas of Significance
(Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions)
for National Register listing.) Architecture '
W-1 A Property is associated with events that have made ��mmi i r�r P1 ann� ng_and G)evP10; meg
a significant contribution to the broad patterns of - E�i.neer'
our history. -
❑ B Property is associated with the lives of persons
significant in our past.
C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics
of a type, period, or method of construction or
represents the work of a master, or possesses
high artistic values, or represents a significant and
distinguishable entity whose components lack
individual distinction.
❑ D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield,
information important in prehistory or history.
Criteria Considerations
(Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.)
Property 'is:
❑ A owned by a religious institution or used for
religious purposes.
❑ B removed from its original location.
❑ C a birthplace or grave.
❑ D a cemetery.
O E a reconstructed building, object, or structure.
❑ F a commemorative property.
❑ G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance
within the past 50 years.
Narrative Statement of Significance
(Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.)
Period of Significance
1928 -194"
Significant Dates
Significant Person
(Complete if Criterion B is marked above)
N/A
Cultural Affiliation
Architect /Builder
Olsen, William C
9. Major Bibliographical References
Bibilography
(Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on
one or more continuation sheets.)
Previous documentation on file (NPS):
Primary location of additional data:
❑ preliminary determination of individual listing (36
X1 State Historic Preservation Office
CFR 67) has been requested
❑ Other State agency
❑ previously listed in the .National Register
❑ Federal agency
❑ previously determined eligible by the National
V Local government
Register
❑ University
❑ designated a National Historic Landmark
❑ Other
❑ recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey
Name of repository:
❑ recorded by Historic American Engineering
—
Record #

Elizabeth City Water Plant Pasquotank County, NC
Name of Property County and State
1�. Geographical ®ata
Acreage of Property approximately 10
UTM References
(Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.)
1118 1 389.9 40 2 ,1012�40 3 11181 13 8994 141 0190210
Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing
2 LBI 13 9006_,01 1410111911710] 4 18 38986LO � _�Ol_4�0
KI See continuation sheet
Verbal Boundary Description
(Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.)
Boundary Justification
(Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.)
11. Form Prepared By
name /title
organization
street & number
Tom Butchko, Preservation Consultant
Post Office Box 206
date September 1, 1993
telephone [phone]
city or town Elizabeth City state NC zip code 27907 -0206
Additional Documentation
Submit the following items with the completed form:
Continuation Sheets
am
A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location.
A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources.
= ..
Representative black and white photographs of the property.
Additional items
(Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items)
Propertv Owner
street & number
city or town
Post Office Box 347 telephone [phone]
NC
Elizabeth City
state
zip code
27907 -0347
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate
properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain
a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.).
Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing
instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect
of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013 -7127; and the Office of
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024- 0018), Washington, DC 20503.

NPS Fani 10-900-a
(8-85)
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
OMIT ,i8 ia7 -wi8
National Register of Historic Places
s
Continuation Sheet Elizabeth City Water Plant
Pasquotank County, North Carolina
Section number 7 Page 2
7. Narrative Description
The Elizabeth City Water Plant contains five contributing and five
noncontributing resources situated on approximately six and seven -
tenths acres of land along the city's northwest boundary. The
contributing resources include the three buildings and structures that
dominate the site--the Elizabeth City Water Plant Building ( #1), the
Circular Finished Water Reservoir (#4), and the Raw Water Reservoir
( #5)- -while the noncontributing resources include smaller or less
noticeable resources that have been added since 1977 to modernize and
expand the city's purification capacity; the latter structures are
clearly secondary in visual importance to the three major contributing
buildings. The terrain is essentially level and, except for a single
pine tree, completely barren of trees. The property is entirely
enclosed by a chain link fence.
1. Elizabeth City Water Plant Building, 1926, Contributing building,
William C. Olsen, Consulting Engineer.
The focus of the Elizabeth City Water Plant complex is a large
impressive Spanish Colonial Revival style building designed by William C.
Olsen, Consulting Engineers, a firm in Raleigh that specialized in
municipal water plants. The broad sixteen -bay, 160- foot -long south facade
of the main building focuses on a projecting three -bay three -story central
pavilion that is flanked on each side by identical two -story blocks. Each
section of the building is sheltered by a broad hipped roof of medium
pitch covered by green clay tiles with ridgecaps. The roof extends with
deep eaves to shelter walls sheathed with common bond brick on the first
story and stucco on the upper floor. These two wall textures are divided
by a simple three- course corbeled band, the upper course of cream - colored
ceramic the and the lower two of brick. The third floor of the central
block is also stucco. The entire building rests on a rusticated concrete
foundation.
The facade.;s fenestration provides a rhythm that complements the
building. The central pavilion contains a double -leaf door (each leaf
with a single ,glazed opening) surmounted by a tripartite transom with
Smyrna cross muntins; this classical composition is contained within a
cream- colored ceramic tile surround with flat arch accentuated by enlarged
keystone and cornerblocks. The elongated fifteen -pane windows consist of
fixed panes held in metal mutiny with functional central panels containing
six -panes each; the upper floors contain tripartite window arrangements.

NO'S Faun 90-a OPo9G Na r ffi
(8-861
United States Department of the Interior
Nationai Park 2' i
National k
r. g e
of Historic
Places
{ d 2
a a � e.. Z 5 ,6,R. F y Elizabeth - Plant
Pasquotank County, North .•
Section number __Z__ Page 3
Cream - colored ceramic tile quoins on the first story and a handsome flight
of concrete steps enclosed by ramped cheek walls complete the central
pavilion. The two -story wings consists of large round - arched windows - -the
repetition of which recalls the style's Mediterranean origins - -on the
first floor and rectangular eighteen -pane windows on the second floor.
Each window, containing fixed panes with in metal mutiny and operable
eight -pane central panels, is framed by simple brick architraves, with
those on the second story being the more prominent because of the stucco
background; brick quoins further accent the stuccoed upper story. The
rear and side elevations continue the fenestration of the facade except
for the first story of the north end, which is blind. While more than
half of the rear and side openings have been closed or modified, the
architectural integrity of the facade remains uncompromised.
As would be expected in a municipal utility building, the interior
finish is simple and straightforward. The focus in the entrance hall is a
wide free - standing closed- stringer stair that rises from the center to an
intermediate landing, where it turns 180- degrees at each end of the
landing before continuing with short flights to the second story. It is
anchored by simple paneled metal newels, with delicate square -in- section
metal balusters carrying the rounded handrail. The west wing contains the
pump room, which occupies four bays of the wing, with a storage room in
the outer bay. The east wing contains the lower portion of five large
coagulating water filters; these are best seen on the second story,
consisting of five poured concrete basins measuring approximately eight -
by- twelve feet.
The second story of the building contains the center of operations for
the water plant. In addition to the main staircase and passages, the
center pavilion is occupied by a small office (modernized with luan
paneling ca. 1980) in the front and storage rooms in the rear. The second
story of the west wing contains the main office, laboratory and control
room, instrument room, storage, and bathroom, all of which were sided with
glazed ceramic tile during an extensive 1977 rehabilitation of the entire
facility. At the same time an acoustical the suspended ceiling was added
in the second story of both wings,.enclosing the previous exposed trusses.
The third story of the central pavilion is entirely occupied by the Lime
Storage Room, a utilitarian room with brick walls where lime is mixed with
water prior to adding to the treated water. It is accessible by a corner
stair rising in the south corner of the pavilion.
In 1977 -1978 a one -bay seventeen- foot -wide addition was erected on the
east side of the building, and a two-story four -bay wide annex was
constructed forty - eight feet. north. The annex, known as the Ozone
Building, is where ozone is manufactured to be added to water from the
Pasquotank River as an early step in the treatment process. Designed by

NRS Fawn 10.30() -a
18-851
United ;+ '-d States Department rj' ow the e. `
Historic National Park Service
National Register of Places
Continuation
Pasquotank
Section number
'City Water Plant
County, North Carolina
J. M. Pease, Engineers of Charlotte, the brick and stucco building
successfully repeats the form, finish, materials, and character of the
original design. Such an effort was made to match the two sections that,
when identical clay roof tiles could not be found for the annex, some of
the original tiles were removed from the back of the main building's roof
for the front of the annex, with the slightly off -color new tiles being
placed on the less conspicuous rear elevations. The Ozone Building is
connected to the main building by a second -story catwalk enclosed by
stuccoed panels. A concurrent. renovation of the main building resulted in
the closure of numerous windows on the rear and sides to facilitate better
control of heating and air conditioning. Eight "'of these removed windows,
four arched windows from the first floor and four rectangular windows from
the second floor, were utilized in the annex. This integration of old and
new is remarkable, resulting in a harmony of design that completely masks
the difference in age of fifty -one years.
2e Coagulation Basin, 1926, Contributing structure, William C. Olsen,.
Consulting Engineer.
A large cast concrete structure attached to the rear northeast of the
main Water Plant Building ( #1), the Coagulation Basin is nonetheless
counted as a separate resource because it is completely different in
appearance and function. Approximately twelve feet tall with concrete
sides and utilitarian metal railing around the top, it is original to the
1926 complex designed by William C. Olsen. It consists of a series of
uncovered holding tanks with access provided by a network of walkways
leading from the rear of the second story of the east wing of the main
building. The function of the Coagulation Basin is to provide a location
for mixing raw untreated water with the necessary chemicals - -the first
step in water treatment -- before pumping it into the main building ( #1) for
filtering. In 1977 -1977 J. M. Pease, Engineers of Charlotte, added a
contiguous brick and concrete building for chemical storage at the
northwest corner. It occupied the'site of a frame garage erected in the
1930s that was demolished at an unknown date.
3. Raw Water Pump Douse, ca. 1935, Contributing building.
This utilitarian 32 -foot by 18 -foot brick building was erected ca. 1935
to pump raw water from the newly constructed Raw Water Tank ( #5) to the
Coagulation Basin ( #2). The simple three -bay by two -bay structure has

NVS Form 16- -a
(8-86)
National
Continuation Sheet
Section number 7 Page 5
Order AmwmwAkk 9 g
Elizabeth City Water Plant
Pasquotank County, North Carolina
large fixed windows containing eighteen panes with metal mutins, operable
eight -pane sash, and modest brick soldier course lintels.
4. Circular Finished Water Reservoir, 1926, Contributing structure,
William C. Olsen, Consulting Engineer.
Second in physical presence on the site only to the main building, this
impressive 150- foot - diameter concrete reservoir was constructed in 1.926 as
the primary reservoir for finished (i.e.,treated) water in Elizabeth City.
Having concrete sides that rise five feet above the ground, the structure
extends approximately three below grade yielding an interior height of
eight feet from floor to overflow valve. The structure was unroofed prior
to World War II, at which time a low concrete dome of about eight feet in
height was constructed. This is the facility which newspaper editor W.
0. Saunders stated was to be the site during construction of "a big dance
It is 150 feet wide, and is big enough to hold everybody who
dances in this old town" (The Independent, April 22, 1927). It is still
used for finished water storage and has a capacity of 1.5 million gallons.
5. Raw Water Reservoir, ca. 1935, Contributing structure.
The Raw Water Reservoir is a massive 165 -foot by 140 -foot rectangular
concrete structure that rises from grade approximately sixteen feet and is
recessed into the ground approximately four feet. The uncovered structure
has utilitarian concrete walls punctuated with buttresses for added
support. The interior depth is eighteen feet from floor to overflow
valve, providing a capacity of three million gallons. It stores raw
(untreated) water as it is pumped from the intake valve in the Pasquotank
River at Whitehurst Street, approximately 1.2 miles north of the water
plant. From here, the water is pumped to the Coagulation Basin ( #2) to
begin treatment.
6. Pre - Chlorination Tank, 1977, Noncontributing structure, J. M. Pease,
Engineers of Charlotte.
This concrete -sided round tank, 95 feet in diameter and 20 feet tall,
was added during the 1977 -1978 rehabilitation of the water plant. In it
raw water from the Raw Water Reservoir (5) was mixed with chlorine prior
to being pumped to the Coagulation Basin ( #2). It is no longer used

NPS Fom 96 -904 -a
ie-86i
United Interior
National Park
0418 , IS
National Regi sS e r of Historic P l a cmgas
Continuation Sheet Elizabeth Plant Pasquotank County, North Carolina
number Section Page 6
because tests in the late 1980s showed that chlorination of the city's raw
water, necessary because of its high natural tannic acid content, produced
dangerous levels of Trihalomethames (THMs), a cancer- causing agent. A
different treatment process was then instituted to eliminate the
production of THMs.
7. New Finished Water Tank, 1977, Noncontributing structure, J. M. Pease,
Engineers of Charlotte.
The largest structure on site, this immense 360 -foot long and 150 -foot
wide rectangular tank was built in 1977 to increase the city's capacity to
store finished water. The concrete structure, rising approximately six
feet above grade and extending about three feet, below grade, has an
interior depth of eight, feet, from floor to overflow valve and a capacity
of three million_ gallons. It is covered by a slightly pitched flat, roof
of concrete.
8. Sludge Holding Tank, 1992, Noncontributing structure.
A circular metal tank approximately forty feet in diameter and twenty
feet, tall, the Sledge Holding Tank was erected in 1992 to hold 200,000
gallons of sludge, a waste- product of the treatment process. This sludge
is removed from the tank four times a year and spread over agricultural
lands as a low -level fertilizer.
9. Backwash Holding Tank, ca. 1983, Noncontributing structure.
This uncovered concrete tank consists of two separate ponds or basins,
each containing 160,000 gallons.
10. Coagulation Basin Annex, 1977 -1978, Noncontributing structure, J. M.
Pease, Engineers of Charlotte.
The Coagulation Basin Annex is a concrete structure rising
approximately twelve feet above grade. It is finished in a manner that is
nearly identical to the Coagulation Basin ( #2) to the south, and is
connected to it by a pair of horizontal metal pipes,approximately four
feet above grade.

NP5 Fofm 10-Mo-a
j8-86) O AppvmtNa 1024�MYB
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet Elizabeth City Water Plant
Pasquotank County, North Carolina
Section number ---I!— Page 2
8, Narrative Statement of Significance
Summary
The Elizabeth City Water Plant reflects the civic pride the growing
municipality possessed in the 1920s when it became necessary to modernize
and enlarge the local water supply and is thus eligible for listing under
Criterion A. It dates from a period during which the local residents not
only had unbridled ambition for the future, but increased concerns about a
clean and safe source of water, a concern that was shown in major cities
throughout the state. The Elizabeth City Water Plant is also eligible for
listing under Criterion C because its plans were rendered by William C.
Olsen, Consulting Engineers, a Raleigh engineering firm which designed,
water plants for cities throughout the state. It. is testament to Olsen's
design and engineering skills that the Elizabeth City facility is the only
one of more than a dozen Such facilities the firm designed and built
before 1943 that, is still in use, Olsen's use of the Spanish Colonial
Revival style, a style which is infrequently seen in North Carolina and is
even rarer in the Albemarle region, is particularly significant for it is
the largest municipal building erected to date within the region. The
Elizabeth City Water Plant, the style's finest example in eastern North
Carolina, is a regional landmark of ambitious municipal design.
The Elizabeth City Water Plant's period of significance, 1926 to 1943,
begins with the date of its construction and falls within the years
covered by the Elizabeth City Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF),
"Historic and Architectural Resources of Elizabeth City, North Carolina,
1793-1943," particularly historic context Twentieth Century Progress: 1900
to 1943. Within this context, the subsections that most directly cover
this property are those concerning physical development and expansion, and
industrial and commercial development. The building is discussed in the
MPDF under property type 3-Institutional Architecture, section C-Public
Buildings.
Historical Background
The development and modernization of Elizabeth City's water supply
lagged far behind the city's growth during the nineteenth century. During
the early and middle decades of the century, an abundance of unpolluted
surface water in the Pasquotank River and Poindexter, Tiber, and Knobbs
creeks, the relative ease at which shallow wells could be dug, and the
relative unimportance attached to hygienic water resources enabled city

NPS Fo 10 -900 -a
1")
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
Continuation Sheet
e
Section number 8 page 3
ffz .� ��
Elizabeth City Water Plant
Pasquotank County, North Carolina
residents to benefit from a seemingly limitless supply. However,
increasing industrialization and population growth during the thirty years
following the Civil War, plus a heightened awareness of the importance of
safe drinking water, necessitated that the city undertake a more modern
water system. The century's last decade began with the city having 3,251
residents, making it. one of the ten largest cities in the state. Yet, the
water supply consisted primarily of water drawn from surface wells, many
of which were quite shallow because the city's low altitude (about six
feet above sea level) and relatively high water table. Many private
residences also had individual cisterns to collect rainwater, although a
comprehensive study of these has not been done. According to the 1891
Sanborn map, the city had two municipal cisterns with a combined capacity
of 13,000 gallons, with seven more cisterns planned; however, these
apparently were primarily intended for fire- fighting (Cheney 1975, 1229;
Sanborn maps, 1891, 1896).
The development, of a residential water system in Elizabeth City began
in 1895 with the operation of a private "water works'' by Joseph Sanders
(The Economist., September 22, 1895). In 1900 the Elizabeth City Water
Company was organized by several of the leading men in town, including
industrialist Charles H. Robinson, attorneys Edwin F. Aydlett and Pat H.
Williams, and merchants John W. Sharber, Jerome B. Flora, W. J. Woodley,
and Louis Selig, and two years later the Sanborn map noted that
"arrangements are being made for water works for town" (Incorporation Book
1, p. 178; Sanborn map 1902; Butchko 1989, 167). A modern facility was
built in 1903 on Pennsylvania Avenue (now North Poindexter Street) by the
Elizabeth City Light, Power, and Water Company, a private corporation that
appears to have been an consolidation of the Elizabeth City Water Company
and the Elizabeth City Light and Power Company, the latter having been
incorporated in February 1903 primarily by Baltimore investors. The
company laid water and sewer lines throughout much of the city for both
domestic use and fire protection. ,The treatment and distribution plant
was constructed in close proximity to both the Pasquotank River and Knobbs
Creek, the latter being the source of the plant's raw water. This private
corporation remained the city's main source of water until February 1925
when its operations were turned over to the City of Elizabeth City, it
having been purchased by the city the previous year. Preparations were
immediately undertaken to build a larger and more modern plant., and the
last structures at the Pennsylvania Avenue water plant were demolished in
the 1960s (Sanborn map 1908, 1914, 1923, 1931; Incorporation Book 1, p.
284; Parker 1953, 64 -65).

NP5 Form 10 -906 -a 0MG Appmwm& YCN=WYB
16-861
United States Department of the Interior
National
Historic National Register of Places
Continuation t Sheet Plant
Pasquotank County, Carolini
l Page Section number ,w ��
On August 30 -31, 1926 the city began acquiring lots for construction of
the new Elizabeth City Water Plant, these lots were located to the west of
the municipal limits in the Skinner and Gregory area that was platted in
1902 (Exhibit B). Thirty -seven lots were purchased, with an additional
seven lots acquired by September 1928 (Deed Book 67, pp. 416 -421, 430,
439, 484, 544; Deed Book 68, pp. 131, 209, 210; Deed Book 69, p. 547; Deed
Book 70, P. 172; Deed Book 72,.p. 312; Deed Book 74, p. 41; Butchko 1989,
168). This site was convenient both to Knobbs Creek, from which raw water
would be taken, and to the lines of the Norfolk and Southern Railroad, by
which chemicals for treatment were delivered. Construction on the
facility, which was expected to cost $250,000, began in September of 1926.
The design, developed by the firm of William C. Olsen, Consulting
Engineers of Raleigh, and erected by Guion and Company of Gastonia, was,
in the words of the leading local newspaper, to be -built "in attractively
ornamental fashion, the main building to be of Spanish architecture,
flanked by huge concrete reservoirs and settling tanks . . . and fronted
by a small park . . . . [The plant] is so designed that it will take care
of the needs of the city, based on reasonable estimates of growth, for a
generation or more" (The Daily Advance, September 8, 1926).
W. 0. Saunders, the editor of a rival newspaper, The Independent, was
typically witty when he reported on construction progress seven months
later-
When completed, the building will be as attractive as a
modern school building. It sets in a four acre lot
which is to be laid out with walks, and beautiful with
ornamental shrubbery. And then, `down by the
water works," [it] will be a spooning place by night,
and a playground by day. . . . Mr. Ridgeway [the
Superintendent] plans to hold a big dance on the floor
of the reservoir next month. It is 150 feet wide, and
is big enough to hold everybody who dances in this old
town.
Saunders went on to enumerate the building materials required for the job,
including 1,000 tons cement, 4,000 tons crushed stone, 2,000 tons s
and, a
quarter - million brick, and 150 tons of steel reinforcement
Independent, April 22, 1927).
When the facility was finally put into service in October 1927,
Saunders was effusive with praise, declaring that the plant's daily
capacity of two million gallons was sufficient to take care of more than

NPS Fofm 10-900-a
(8-86) OMO Approvama 1024-MIS
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet Elizabeth City Water Plant
Pasquotank County, North Carolil
Section number Page 5
twice the city's inhabitants and that residents were assured that
"dangerous raw water" could not find its way into homes: the plant, would
take "red water as it comes from Knobbs Creek, purify it, extract all the
dye of the juniper roots, the salt and sediment, the filth and dirt from
the watershed, the carbon dioxide, the carbonic acid gas, the colon
bacilli, and all else objectionable and convert it in to clear, sparkling,
palatable, potable water as safe for human consumption as the raindrops
(The Independent, October 14, 1927).
William C. Olsen (1888-1962) was one of the leading designers of
municipal water plants in North Carolina during the early twentieth
century. He began the firm of William C. Olsen, Consulting Engineers in
1920, and within the next twenty years designed water plants for many of
the state's municipalities, among them Kinston, Rocky Mount, Raleigh,
Fayetteville, High Point, Lexington, and Thomasville. As far as is known,
the Elizabeth City facility is the only one of Olsen's water plants that
is still in service (Sigmon interview, 1985). This seemingly remarkable
feat of longevity is due primarily to the fact that, unlike the cities
named above, each of which has at least tripled in size during the past
sixty years, Elizabeth City's population has not even doubled. In 1920
the city had 8,412 residents and in 1940, near the end of the property's
period of significance, the population numbered 11,564, a rather healthy
increase of thirty-seven percent in twenty years. Yet, in the last fifty
years, from 1940 to 1990, the population has increased to 14,292, a
twenty-four percent increase since 1940 and a seventy percent increase
since 1920 (Cheney 1975, 1229; 1990 Census). If editor Saunders's claim
in 1927 that the water plant "is large enough to take care of more than
twice as many inhabitants as the city now has" was accurate, that point
has yet to be reached (The Independent, October 14, 1927).
During the early 1930s, a change was made in the source of raw water
for the water plant. In an unsuccessful attempt to halt the increase in
salt seepage into the water supply during the dry season (essentially the
late summer and autumn), a dam was erected across Knobbs Creek.
Consultations with the several state and federal agencies resulted in the
construction in 1934 of a well field to supply water to the plant, this
field, composed of seven wells about sixty feet deep, is located along
Well Field Road approximately 2.9 miles due west of the water plant in an
unincorporated section of rural Pasquotank County (Parker 1953, pp. 66-
71).
Advances in water treatment technology since 1943 have resulted in
several modernizations and expansions of the water treatment capacity of
the Elizabeth City Water Plant. The last major expansion was undertaken
in 1977-1978 by J. M. Pease, an engineering firm from Charlotte. This

NPS Form 10-900-a
(8-m OMO AOPv-wH- F024-MIS
- Y-OWIPM
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet Elizabeth City Water Plant
Pasquotank County, North Carolil
Section number Page 6
resulted in several changes and additions to the Water Plant: a
modernization of the interior of the main building (#I); the construction
of the Ozone House (annex to the main building); the addition of --I
chemical storage building to the Coagulation Basin (#2); the building of a
Coagulation Basin Annex (#10),- and the addition of the large Finished
Water Tank (#7).

NPS Fomr ru -saa -a
Ia-w
Section number 9 Page 1
• l .• .:
Oma & .9 a
City Water Plant
County, North Carolina
C . Thomas R. Q_ The S-ores Of h- '_ • The , *,:a h.x -. , 1.
Elizabeth City: The Museum of the Albemarle, 1989.
Cheney, John L., ed., North Carolina Government: 1685- 974. Raleigh: North
Carolina Department of the Secretary of State, 1975.
Interview by consultant of William H. Sigmon of Olsen and Associates,
Engineers of Raleigh, North Carolina, June 4, 1985.
Parker, J. C. "History of Elizabeth City Water Supply," Report on Wate
Sup,nly of Elizabeth Citv. North Carolina. 1953. Charlotte, North
Carolina: J. N. Pease and Company, Engineers, 1953.
Pasquotank County Incorporation Records, Register of Deeds Office,
Pasquotank County Courthouse, Elizabeth City.
Sanborn Insurance Map Company. Sanborn maps for 1885, 1891,1896, 1902,
1908, 1914, 1923, 1931, 1958.
The Dai1v Advance (Elizabeth City). "Will Begin Soon on Water Plant,"
September 8, 1926; "Sewer Lines To Cover Entire City Are Laid
Engineer Announces," September 20, 1926; "Miles of Water Pipes Laid
Here," September 28, 1926;
The Independent (Elizabeth City). "This Big Job Contains 4,000 Tons
Concrete," April 22, 1927: "Two Million Gallons of Pure Water A Day,"
October 14, 1927.

NPS Form 10-900 -a
(8-86)
OMB Approval N.. 1024-M70
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet
Section number — 10 Page I
389870 4019200
Zone Easting Northing
MMMUTIOXMI
The property of the Elizabeth City Water Plant consists of the
land contained within a chain link fence around the site. This
property is all of tract number 8914 (15) 74-3143 as shown by the
bold line on Pasquotank County Tax Map Number 121 (Exhibit C), and
consists of lots number 305-350 as shown on now superseded Tax Map
37B i.v G.
P.-Mwe
The boundary ♦ the Elizabeth City Water Plant was drawn to include
the facility and its support structures that are enclosed within a
chain link fence surrounding them. The boundary that encompasses
the original lots purchased between August 1926 and September 1928
for the plant and are outlined by the bold line on the accompanying
501 = 111 scale sketch map, Exhibit A.

NPS Form 10-900-a
�8-86)
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
I Z:
,Continuation Sheet
Section number 10 Page 2
OMB Approval No. 1024-0018
Elizabeth City Water Plant
Pasquotank County, North
Carolina
A photocopy of the USGS nap on which the nomination is plotted is
included. The original, on which several nominations are plotted,
has been submitted with the multiple documentations nomination,
Historic and Architectural Resources of Elizabeth City, North
Carolina, 1793-1943.

9 �i1l L 10V 6iFZ.
R,aW ` W7rF,,P pFS�RVOi1T
TRNNSFORMER
WIRE FENCE
7S 000 G,7ts
,SEC 0IV0,7Ry
7RERTMENT
81%s1N /1r�
W I R t � NCE I, L tl .// /
it
1 /OG
it
T/79NSF i / II O„
G'T 1i
It It
it II
u �I
I y • 0
�Z 4'11<41UN
�H<
OLD]
Gt1gsH v i ,
ii ��
E�Ey
II ��
11 t� qp Zo Q SCALE Jr� FT. i0 ONE INCH \ \\
II �0
5't'
= loo
' l
U\%

1 A nn th.- ghnrac of tho P-�icniintanl:
Elizabeth City neighborhood development during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries based on plats
filed in the Office of the Register of Deeds in the Pasquotank County Courthouse.
1. Conrow, Bush, and Lippencott, 1881
2. Improvement Company, 1892
3. M. N. Sawyer, 1892
4. Sawyer, Lynch, and Wright, 1892
5. A. L. Aydlett, 1893
6. M. N. Sawyer, 1895
7. Sawyer and Stevens, 1897
8. Stevens and Stevens, 1899
9. Euclid Heights, 1900
10. Dunstan and Jones, 1902
1-1. Riverside Land Company, 1902
12 Skinner and Gregory, 1902
13, West End, 1902
14, P. E. White, 1902
15. Perry, 1906
16. Brooks and Parker, 1907
17. Cobb, 1907
18. Commander, 1907
19. J. L. Etheridge, 1907
20. Spellman, 1907
21. Laurel Park, 1908
22. Highland Park, 1914 and 1923
23. Lavenstein, 1916
24. Washington Heights, 1916
25. West End Addition, 1923
26. Westover, 1924
27. Lambert, 1926
28. Moore Heights, 1926
29. Pine Grove, 1926
30. Roanoke Park, 1926
31. Elcinoca, 1927
32. Weeks and Weeks, 1928

3
138 2
I
I
M
i
l
I
1
3b1
360
359 1,
l 358;
^) — T
357
(2823
50'
50
50
50
100
N
N
N
h
N
N
O
679917749
8746
3
E�I�A��TN ��TY North Caroiina
Pasquotank County'
O I m to m V) ti
425

Ll
1� Z
The 6r
4020
qD
ci
Wc
00. Qispo
SDOVI
h 1�
34
LN'57
3.0
-0
17 P Q A 0 IC! 46
06
C) 3g'D 1� 0 fV6
401
k Am
ri

APPENDIX G
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map

JOINS PANEL 7941
76° 28' 30"
76° 28' 00"
368 000 M 2 747 500 FEET
2 750 000
76° 27' 30"
369
FEET
000 M
910 000 FEE
/�I11 Liles\
Z�lil l��II I��
GRID NORTH
Winfall Substation
SCALE 1 " = 500' (1 6,000)
'
0 500 1000
FEET
E X
-
GL _ r'
I
sT PER UI'MANS CJOTN TY ZONE
1DDLE,SCHOOL
4k ` _ ��
MPS
L #K�N�
a ZONE X'-
_
• m ' }'• a r�
o
#
i
4rL *
ZONE AE
f
15 DJ
* i j
■
y +
Will V.
m ,
. 1 1■ m "'IGGIVS
} 1I
4k
'
- F O LOWELL DR
643 y Q. I� • I
r
�-6 — m
907 500 FE
36° 13' 00"
PANEL 7940)
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 7940
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
HERTFORD,TOWN OF 370186 794D J
PEROUIMANS COUNTY 370315 794D J
WINFALL,TOWN OF 370345 794D J
13 111
• ZONE X
� � r
ZON
p�
���
'I
E A
Extl alte ritorial Jul 'sd'ctl'on
3 0345
_
amt
> € `
Z � HERTFORD GRAMMAR SCHOOL
LBE ARLES
j O•
• Z
Notice to User: The Nap Nunbar ho— bel°w sF,uld ha used
when placing map orders; the CannuNity Number shown
above should he u..d on insurance applications tcrthe subject
community.
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
OCTOBER 5, 2004 37207940001
-�"""� nmsw
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency
�
YgTES DR
SON
Y'ONE �E
ZONE X
<
F
37 Town of
Winfall
(
3703 5
ZONE X
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.fema.gov

1 000 M I
L
r
6' 14' 00 "
I
F79191?
iii
0 FEET
ems —
h
ODD M
a 13' 30"
0 FEET
2 750 000 FEET
w,
•i ~
1
4
■
r
�k
J 178
Y
r
!�
V,
W.
t A
LVIY Ht: iso
2 752 500 FEET 370 coo M
76 °27' 00" 76 °26' 30"
JOINS PANEL 7950
8
OD
Y g
ICI
GRID NORTH
SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
0 500 1000
FEET
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.fema.gov
m
PANEL 7951)
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 7951
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
PEROUIMANS COUNTY 370315 7951 J
WINFALLTOWN OF 370345 7951 J
Notice to Yea,: The Nap Nunbar shown below sF.uld be used
when placing map orders; the C•NNUNity Number shown
above should he used on insurance applications tcrthe subject
community.
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
OCTOBER 5,2004 37207951001
4bEn Y��E
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency
®
a
m
O
®
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.fema.gov

0-
T'8
U
lop-
JL;
c�a n 'm
76 °26' 30"
JOINS PANEL 7950
}
I
371 000 M
76 °26' 00"
j
Z'
M
�9 �g
- am
--
LVI�fE AE
9
a,- _
N
4
401 GRID NORTH
SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
0 500 1000
FEET
36° 1
401
36° 1
910 0 This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
372 000 M was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
76° 25' 30" 2 760 000 FEE or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.nnsc.fcma.gov
m
PANEL 7951)
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 7951
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
PEROUIMANS COUNTY 370315 7951 1
WINFALLTOWN OF 370345 7951 1
Notice to User: The Nap Nunbar shown below sF,uld be used
when placing map orders; the CannuNity Number shown
above should he u..d on insurance applications tcrthe subject
community.
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
OCTOBER 5,2004 37207951001
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency
g
®
m
O
PO
CID
910 0 This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
372 000 M was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
76° 25' 30" 2 760 000 FEE or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.nnsc.fcma.gov

JOINS
PANEL 7962 76'23'00" 376 000 M 2 775 000
FEET 76.22 00
378 00o M 2 780 OOD
FEET
t9
920 000 FE
aa9 0
364 a6o
•i•
+1
�cc
GRID NORTH
°�
•
SCALE 1 = 1000 (1 12,000)
063
- -
.... ..ZONE.
A ... ... .......
...
-
0 1000 2000
FEET
e 854
ZONE
- -- --
WON E AE
843
..
.. ..r
839
h
��•
000 M
PARKERS
4012
4/v
• JON A
OODING e - T=
F 0 ITT R1UER
! f •
827 Oj
•
•
FL00 ODIN r EFF CT8
820
.
F O LI TL IU.R
JONE 812
805 797
WEIGHT STATION
PANEL 7960)
3°3
ZONE
C O-SS
784
FIRM
RM1M,2afhWMP
F3WAII MIN D =TIDY ANr reLIN -AT D
J*
°
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
D 7-
E'PRE�SE'NT- =T EAM = TATIONING F'eOR
'_•
D TAI ED STUDY AND 03 RRPRE�ENTB �T A
NORTH CAROLINA
STATI e0 IN
FOR FiE�ELIN ATED STUDY.
®
PANEL 7960
° -
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
v
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
g
_
PERQUIMANS COUNTY 370315 7M. J
f
, J
13 111
a •
r- r •• �•
915 000 FE
�r �•isY
i ', , y r'-
LIMIT 0 =TIDY
6
- �' .'J .� 4 )t • i. -, ,-
`�
Notice to User: The Nap Nunbar showo bAcw sF,uld ha used
+`
, ,ay {, �'
• �'t
•
when placing map orders; the CannuNity Number shown
above should he usetl on insurance applications ter the subject
- tr'
4
,^``
L`v {
G r
' �'r'� '�_•
• • • • .
• •
community.
�s�F`��
r
ZONE AE
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
OCTOBER 5,2004 37207960001
®
�O� �� �
• • • • • e
jw��En Y��E.
• r '� G F
y
2�
State of North Carolina
y
�F
• • •
13 35o
Federal Emergency Management Agency
r`
344
''-
13
4010 000 M
�` •
1, it an's Cauln y
>\
: cation C e •
ROUNDT E'E NtCGS 1
331 1
1
-
r or to t rea's
-
336
041 035 � d'ti
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
7j PQ
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
-
030 �� ,
321
326 _ ^
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
J 315
ZO E
O
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fcma.gov
i

U) fit' •*f {, • NE X
� �• P 24 It � � #.
• F'0626 � f � � � �
6
_ leo 9
MUSEUM NCGS i
FX�2374 �"
• y :� y SG
.dp
192 y
'
196
4 / \
202
ZONE �
�rt
ZONE /
00" #, }
I 5
LLT
Jv
DRIU IN NCG'S
X27•
ZONE
a
r .
ti -� F
ZONE X `
w+
17
011
- !c
O
W 214
s
11�7 IIIH IN III
GRID NORTH
MAP SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
250 0 500 1000
6E 0
FEE
lt�0
F
�a
}
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.nnsc.fcma.gov
m
PANEL 8903)
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 8903
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
ELIZABETH CITY,CITY OF 370185 8903 1
PASOUOTANK COUNTY 370184 8903 1
Notice to User: The Nap Nunbar ho— below sF,uld be used
when placing map orders; the CalnlnuNity Number shown
e=— should he used on insurance applications tcrthe subject
community.
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
OCTOBER 5,2004 37208903001
4bEn Y��E
nn sw
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency
g
®
m
POO
®
®
�
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.nnsc.fcma.gov

LIMIT OF COMBINED
SURGE AND RIVERINE EFFECTS JOINS PANEL 8914
76. 15' 00" 76. 14' 30" ZONE X
2 810 000
FEET 388 000 M 389 000 M 76. 14'00"
940 000 FEET
GRID NORTH
�" ZONE X s�- '
� • • :r S � WEEKS
'ULSTER
abeth City,
• • • ST
�• • `� � �_� �
D'R, G�P� � _ ++
_
SCALE 1" 500' (1 6,000)
ritorial
• ZONE,X, / ZONE X Z ' ' _ • • • • • ~• • �Q
o soo i000
FEET
1CtlOil
a'
- - ONE AE ' ° ' ° • • ZONE• X • • o . • z
+ pEL 6) • 2 .CHALK ST • • • 6• ce
` •S
185
/. • • B ER �S
-` E ZAB- ETH BASE • • • �• 7J r '
4018 000 M
' 0623 • 4 . . . ..
•'"'��'
36. 18'00 „
R7 A .
ZONE X �� �. �.'`
f/` , •� . ... . ' . ' . ' . ' .
ELIZABETH SB RM 2;.�,��
FX1830 4 48..ECCS F... (: '.� "� ^ . • . • . • •ZONE X
PP ZONE •X• CP ERSON ST
ZONE . . . .'.'. . . . . . .
K COUNTY
ZONE X X • ,
/ ZONE • •
I
100 ST EXT • w
PANEL 8913)
_•
J'•` ZONE' x' * ' •
• • .. OUERMA`f� CIGL'E 9� ,y• f . . . . • . • . . . • . • .
• G oR FLI62BETH S BASE AZ MKS �'; .`. • . • r •
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
o
BETH CITY
ZONE X-'
ZONE X
oN ����>
r 5J �9 • ..,,:..., pE9R
4% ES RD ST
e +r•• - ' .
•
° by .. °9� °� �- . ' . ' . . ; -...
•
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 8913
CD
m
WESLEY DR
_ . •: • sING NCGS • • ,
2 FX�2�369
LASSITER ST
■ v r
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
�rI�C�
VS ' �• • n �'
•
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
�
O
ZONE X
ZONE AE ,t. y ° • z o
ZONE X A C S • • • • • •
Ft, ' ' ' ' GH
CAMDEN CDUNTY 3701142 8913 J
ELRA'ETH CITY, CITY OF 370185 11913 J
i , , , , R� n _ • • •
/ i ST
PASOUOTANK COUNTY 3ro184 &913 J
• • • • • • -. _
•• s ' Y WRIGHT
ZONE X
.
A A
> •.... .•.•. it j} L*
,.�.. w e ZO E X
Ph
�. .•. N�
�`•�oLi�FL •�. . . . . 09 ` • * y•q�•' m r G\�GV�
•` ' �F • • • ZONE. /�. • >� • L 8� ~ s S t���
'. D �Gjf'
1 Q - �Q
.f • • • • •
Notice to User: The Nap Nunbar shown below ar,uld be used
when placing map orders; the cannunity Number shown
above should he used on Insurance applications tcrthe subject
community.
EN
•
`4 �*
` „a , • , ^ f,+ y ,•� k *
ti y� " ti RPV
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
OCTOBER 5, 2004 37208913001
ZONE X
. l • ,
012
1 F
�• RUM QUARTER RD
ZONE X
r • • ' • ti * . • i i . �,
+ ~ '
•r' PTASSPORT NC•Cr5 ' +mod - r �+
y +� t `
• X2370 •�
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency
36° 0 0'�0"
4017
�
�� Pasquot�ank County f� 'k
• • Un in, corpo)ralted Areas '`
Cilty mf �• `� m
ZONE X
�
. 7184 ` 'r o� z
• ` - ast , mnc E�11Zabe h It '
' " Z "ONE X •Knobbs Creel rrtb lacy 37UJ185 � z �
cl
oza
019 ;:� + w j ' ' 4 , d •TONE X
PEE
-+, fir. k
is an cial copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
This off
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
�. _ t�
r� .
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
ZONE X"•'�
iZ
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.fema.gov

`•ER LN
•
• • • • • • • • • • • • •�
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
J D
rn p •ZONE E �o-
y iN w
GRID NORTH
, . • .... (EL s)
• F S? .
_
SCALE 1 " 500' (1 6,000)
w N
. .
0 500 1000
FEET
X.
o . . . . ...
. . . . •r '
' •
CWEN ST' ;
' Lu ' "• E�l�i
.ZONE. X.' w.'. .' ..E,,pAE� .....
•
¢ AUSTfN'LEE CIRCLE (EL�6)
Lu.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r
• 'LARK ST
. . . . . . ' � • • • • • • f ,. k � Fr � � � .
-
409 N E X-3
.
RY
. WINSLOW' ST . . . . . . . . •.. . ZONE AE '.
EL 6)
m PANEL 8914K
E
,'
. . ... ... ..:.:.:. ; 7� '� ^ • FAIR- ST.
,. ....... .... ...... .,ti .. ...
. . . - .'ZONE'X. ' -'
' '
., •'=`_
FIRM
00M
• - , • n
- '%, -gym
*
, . AE : : : : : : . . . . I. ...
• ,, • "�_ ' ZONE : � � o
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
CD
. • (EL fi) s o
FEET
, _ice -} r _ . ' r
' #� ..� .
PANEL 8914
m
81301,
?_
... ... J .
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS.
ZONE AE �� #
' '�EL'6) G�
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
®
13 C1
' G\ ` •
- 1 • • • • • • • ' • r ' ' J' L r
�� ''f — • •
' ' ' ' • ' ' O��
CA MDEN COUNTY 370042 8914 K
ELRABETH CITY, CITY OF 370185 8914 K
PASQUOTANK COUNTY 370184 8914 K
Qp�OJ '•����`/ .. ELIZABETH
• ti w,rts: °
J'
CD
Z • N E X � :el`.`�� Nr y
�.,
•� .
CD
40 E X ti 32 E C•C• -S V S�
g . • Q�
• �5
'J, •
Nance to Usar: The Nap Nunbar haven b Community umbe be used sr,uld
ity Number shown
when placing map ordars;n..
• • ZONE E — { _ �• FX0618
# G�P-
• EL 6)
nce pph
community he usetl on sure ce applications for the subject
community
•
"
. . . . . . . . :17 —
•
MAP REVISED MAP NUMBER
JULY 19, 2005 3720891400K
'
J • ' �J ,
¢� ERRIWOOD �•
. SAVE . . . . ' J • '.. . . . .
uaT
' s
. CEp, q•
'• :. T
ma
:17;
' r ZONE AE li •
State te of North Carolina
. . . . . . . . . . '
Federal Emergency Management Agency
. . . • • -'�[• .o'.
. . . . . - .. .. .- S .
' M24. . . .
' X FX0620
ZONE
. ' Z X• . _ 056■
'
• �• / PRITCHAR� ST w .�
. .'. •' .
ZO E X ZONE X y MQIN.s7a
wFE S
FEET
ST y ZONE X
, 1. ZON X
FEET 888 000 M 2 812 500 FEET 389 ooD M
76' 15' 00" 76' 14' 30" 76° 14' 00"
This is an off ci al copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
810 000
JOINS PANEL 8913
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.fema.gov

ZONE AE • } KNO$
BINED• . . . . . . .
..... ... :..., .:. ....... ... .... .... ONE AE
( 15)
• .�. LIMIT � F
{ ;Cll•y OOf E�,iy„�za,•.eti' C,��Y, ��. � � r FLeOODWA
• ••10WIN
••• • •••••••••••• Elizabeth City Substation
Extralt� to�ial; Jtxr�sdict�gn ; ; , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
37.0185::::::::: ......::::::: '
6
s
ao ,r;
. . . UWr O •OMB D
. . . . . . . ZONE' X E E 'X i URG AN VE APP CT5
: : :..... ..: ; : : : : : : : : : : :: N ' ' ' ; ' ' ••'. c`��Q�'.'.'..'��'.'. P Q�aTAN II H C1 I
ZONE AE o e= �,F. ELr SET- -
c�
m �L9 • c �•• -• ln,
. :. �' �, 90 ••••••••••'�' ZONE X ,., �, .•. ' : :
ZONE X . -# ?'• ,
.. ! Cl y oaf - .� • �. ' . ��• , �• ' N , . � � {.
100117-31 etyli Gi y ° , �. • . • ....... .... ' u9uJ .
GREENLEAF , •
(EL 6) .f r• 371O�1gS •.� •NCGS .•.•.•.. ;�' •.,
00 ' >' .fXA54. '1. .
F_ •••�••••• ..
�•..... •ON X ••••. •'•'• .'ZONE' X'.'�� .. '...
P.
' ' . • ,p , ` . . ' %ONE . • . . ' ' , *I' �y y✓ , ; ?' '} � t ,
¢ w•
4�. r. . . n ; X 35• EC-6s, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,FX0613
'
}�
+ . . , 8_RtJgD g
'Fq.{�.ST.'.'. •••••''•. r`.'. 4",
•••'•.•..ZONE X . �
'
..... ...... .... • • �• 1 \tVV.. J/ '/ ./. • f�R T, o , • •. • 4, rz' • J •. F r,; J Q J'• i, • r, te, , �`. � �� GJ -
•...• •....• •... ~ \
mi
'
'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•� �O E AE, . ..- %y�r -� b y #� 4 +• •gECLSr i..4•��v
. • . (E 61 ti 9p SAN t p,
rn "Y iJa2� is Ff._air` ' ,. C . 7r.. a=�-J •"
,��2 :+ r Z 2 E A W
' ,GX ELI•ZABfTH NB RM 3 PG�OP . , +
air �� � FX�2368 F f l�, IN ;� ',, • ,ly9`2�: GF;
R NX PT ' N
R *
VA 0, r Cie I , .� ' FFN 5 •� T
•'30.� �' ~�,',','1 ;mow guRGess sT'•'ZONE:X:•. "•- 5�
ff
x• yr. JT .'(�P , eft''. .�•y� F ��G
' 32 ECCS �J
S '
_ f
•� 5_ V
. • ' • ' • ' • ' R �F. >XOfi18 •�C�Pe . . . . . ' . ® "��`�,
. • ZONE• X• . ` . " . 38 ECCS,I F e P4 5�
. . . . . . _ ® E �•' • f �X05J3 L ERG F`�
• • • • • . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . L _ . . . . . . . �'� •,- • • .'t n-
4
GRID NORTH
SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
0 500 1000
FEET
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.fema.gc
m
PANEL 8914K
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 8914
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
CAMDEN COUNTY 370042 8914 K
ELIZABETH CITY,CITY OF 370185 8914 K
PASQUOTANK COUNTY 370184 8914 K
Notice to User: The Nap Number shown bAaw aFO d be used
when placing map orders; the CoNNUuity Number shown
soave should he used on insurance applications torthe subject
community
MAP REVISED MAP NUMBER
JULY 19, 2005 3720891400K
fay "�"t �F
x F
� ^.;.n' 4nm sw�
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management AP ncy
®
m
®
13 C1
CD
®
IET;
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc.fema.gc