20130227 Ver 1_401 Application_20130313

Strickland, Bev
From: Dennison, Laurie
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 9:53 AM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: FW: New Express 401 Project
Attachments: PCN app- T of Farmville Johnson Field Pump Station.pdf; 404 info. -T of Farmville Johnson
Field Pump Station.pdf; Narrative - T of Farmville Johnson Field Pump Station.pdf
I'll let you know the number
From: Hardison, Lyn
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 8:04 AM
To: Dennison, Laurie
Subject: New Express 401 Project
Hi Laurie,
Please find attached a new 401 application that we received into express review today. We will mail you a hard copy for
your files. Let me know what the BIMS number, for our files.
Also, I have a special request for Karen H. Please keep her in your prayers. The Doctors found a mass behind her right
ear (just like the one found behind her left ear late last year). The mass is between the lining of the brain and her skull.
She is at Duke for radiation treatments and other tests. This young lady is a wonderful person and been battling
incidents like this for the past 2 years when cancer came back in her spine a couple years ago.
Thanks again,
Lyn
Lyn Hardison Iyn.hardison @ncdenr.ov
Environmental Assistance Coordinator
NCDENR Division of Environmental Assistance & Outreach (DEAD)
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Phone: 252 - 948 -3842
Fax: 252 - 975 -3716
ncenvironmentalassistance.or
��
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Environmental and Soil
Service, Inc.
March 6, 2013
NC DWQ, WBSCP Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
P.O. Box 82
Pinetops, N.C. 27864
Ph (252) 531 -3471
Fax [phone]
ESS
MAR 0 7 2013
Subject: Request for 401 Certification, Johnson Field Pump Station Project located off Hwy 264 Alt, Pitt County,
North Carolina. (Tax Parcel # 31732)
To Whom It May Concern,
A 401 Certification is being requested by the Town of Farmville for the proposed project.
The site consists of +/- 0.37 acres and lies south of Hwy 264 Alt east of Fannville, North Carolina. The existing Johnson
Field Pump Station, which is part of the Town of Farmville sewer network, adjoins the project site to the east. It is
understood an existing sewer line runs through the project area and connects to the existing pump station. The project
includes a renovation of the existing pump station and the addition of bar screen. A new 24" sewer line and man holes
will be needed to reroute wastewater from the existing sewer line to the bar screen. The total length of the new sewer
line including the bar screen unit will be +/ -237'. A portion of the new sewer line will run through what has been
determined to be jurisdictional 404 wetlands by the US army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The total area of 404
wetlands in the project area is 0.3 acres and the impact area is 0.06 acres. A NW12 permit has been obtained from the
USACE. Some mechanized land clearing will be required in a small wooded area in a portion of the wetland.
Please find enclosed in the following order:
1. A site plan that includes proposed improvements and the wetland delineation line.
2. A Letter of Authorization from the Town of Farmville
3. A State Environmental Clearing House approval letter
4. A Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
5. A Pitt County OPIS riparian buffer map
6. A U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service list of endangered species in Pitt County
7. A 404 Wetland report that has been submitted and approved by the USACE. The report includes a narrative, an
USACE approved wetland delineation map that shows wetlands and the impact area, a Jurisdictional
Determination Form, A USGS Topographic Map, a Pitt County Soil Survey Map, an aerial view of the project
area, Wetland Data Form, Upland Data Form, and a Pre - Construction Notification Form
8. A copy of the NW12 Permit obtained from the USACE.
If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at 252 - 531 -3471.
Respectfully Submitted,
Scott Stone
Licensed Soil Scientist
Enclosures

TOWN OF FARMVILLE
OFFICE OF MAYOR AND TOWN MANAGER
POST OFFICE Box 86/3672 NORTH MAIN
FAR�4VILL1,,, NORTH CAROLINA 27828 -0086
www.fai-inville-nc.com
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAx: [phone]
January 29, 2013
Mr. William Wescott
US Corp of Engineers
2407 West 5' Street
Washington, NC 27889
Subject: Johnsonfield Pump Station
Town of Farmville
Dear Mr. Wescott:
Mr. Scott Stone is authorized as the agent that has permission to submit the information necessary
to obtain the NW 12 permit for the above subject.
If you have any questions please contact me.
Sincerely,
Town of Farmville
David Hodgkins
Town Manager
CAJ /bbr
cc: Charles A. Joyner, Jr., P.E.

EXPrjr.z)*
'41
MAR 0 7 2013
NCDENR Nor Carolina
Department of A&Anistration
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
August:24,, 2009
Mr. R-ichard.Moore
T6w.-'. p of Fam-W I I e
c/o McDavid AssoclaiesInc.
P.0, Drawer 49
Fannvflle; NG-27.828
P L I Igo% -L,
Witt Gobb,:Seoretary
Rts ST File .#I -94'QOQAQ,025- SQOPING;. Proposal to rvplacei appro x. .909 feet of eiWiak
24 itio'hes sanitary -OW6t 611elc&u filfle.
Dear Mr. Moore:
flip -gjdve teferen aed enviponwex�tai impapt,'informatio has b h i 0 S e us
a 48 con 3v X11. il1q, tax C10044gho e
under the P.rovislons of the NAtional ErxvIrbjiinental'P64Y. Act; A tk ' ' d W b
Ardm '- to Sv 1:13A"10j.-- be -a
sLa rpquiredip prapare an.-environmental docurnentunder the-provisions of federal law, the
of :844tel'nvironmental PQlkcY Act. Attached to this
elivirdn"thental doou*m6AtMdets tbe.-PrOvolons, �. the
letter for your consideration are -tho'ciorm'
if any further eiiviromnental revie*ddcuraentv-are pre--pared-16r tliis pro*t"Ahe
Y should: be -f&warded -t6
this office for intergovernmental review.
ShoulO -you have any questions, please do -riot lv-dsltqxe to e41I4
Sincerely,
Irep - r
$t-aje t-jiVironmenial Review Ciearinghbu$6
Attachments
ce., Region Q
USDA R-unal.Development
OF
1301 moil•se"ice-Cotter
F . ax (919)733M . 7f
Raielgh. NC 27699-1301 pktq.Cqt!ri4 05) -01 -00.
1:9cadon-Addrm,
116 w6goop'"Street
r,
,I,gh, Nonh Carolina

i
t
p Z $
N x
W
Z
0
N
W
°gym
W
y =m
O
E o v o E
° d
=CO 0°0
o
Us.0
OmrIL
H
�s
9rpco
Z
qq.°
U
I-
o
�n
W
v
r-�
K
6 8
. °
W "
o. m i
LO
Z
0
°
oEoOD
Z
W
�^
p
'v 1' 9
p�� �LL
Q
CL
(�
4
o m
�— O G m
Co
•i'
C
T
W CV F °A
y
j i 7 LL
�
L++
j
< u
Qr oar
LLI
0
Z
tt
kk
WLLL
J o
ii.
Za`
8 v
S8
t�+Q
n
Q
V
_p
--
u2ra 8
W IS E
vi
e
®—
¢_
b�WLLO
E
O.
N
O O
O O
a O
—
v
O
—
C L°p Y F
N« c i; £
Earn
p Z $
N x
W
Z
0
N

_ ƒ %^ �\
- <. ®/� \
_� � ? ©��
z >� �� <
.� .�� \ \��y
�2�� <
�2�:���2 \�
�� ~� \��
�� � \
� � � � � /,�
�� <?«dd»
� \.:
}�\
� � � �
� -
� d�
y ads �
§� �
\� � � � : �
��������/
S��
�»y<3�y:
�-��
� } \.
{� � / w ><
w* ��:�

Pitt County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate 5... Page i of L
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern,
and Candidate Species,
Pitt County, North Carolina
Updated: 12 -26 -2012
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
American eel
Anguilla rostrata
FSC
Current
Atlantic sturgeon
Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus
E
Current
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Carolina madtom
Noturus furiosus
FSC
Current
Eastern Henslow's sparrow
Ammodramus henslowii susurrans
FSC
Current
Pinewoods shiner
Lythrurus matutinus
FSC
Obscure
Red - cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Historic
Roanoke bass
Ambloplites cavifrons
FSC
Current
Southern hognose snake
Heterodon simus
FSC
Obscure
West Indian manatee
Trichechus manatus
E
Current
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni
FSC
Current
Green floater
Lasmigona subviridis
FSC
Current
Tar River spinymussel
Elliptio steinstansana
E
Historic
Yellow lampmussel
Lampsilis cariosa
FSC
Current
Vascular Plant:
Grassleaf arrowhead
Sagittaria weatherbiana
FSC
Historic
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh /species /cntylist/pitt.html 1/18/2013

Pitt County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate 5... Page 2 of 2
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "Cl" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC = federal species of concern. A species under consideration for listing, for which there is insufficient
information to support listing at this time. These species may or may not be listed in the future, and many of
these species were formerly recognized as "C2" candidate species.
T(S /A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S /A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT ",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346- 37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668 -668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb ". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http:/ /www .fws.gov /migratorybirds/baldea lg e.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A)):
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822 - 55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S /A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S /A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The T
(S /A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S /A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and /or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental /migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable /potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh /species /cntylist/pitt.html 1/18/2013

404 WETLAND DELINEATION
�PI Town of Farmville
MAR n 7 2013 +/- 0.37 Acre Tract (Tax Parcel #31732)
a r
Johnson Field Pump Station Project
Pitt County, North Carolina
PREPARED FOR:
Town of Farmville
Farmville, NC 27828
PREPARED BY:
E. Scott Stone
Environmental & Soil Service, Inc.
Pinetops, NC 27864
�.P soiL sc�F�
703€,
MIA

Environmental and Soil
Service, Inc.
January 15, 2013
Town of Farmville
P.O. Box 86
Farmville, NC 27828
c/o Mr. Charles Joyner
McDavid Associates, Inc.
P.O. Drawer 49
Farmville, NC 27828
P.O. Box 82
Pinetops, N.C. 27864
Ph (252) 531 -3471
Fax [phone]
ESS
Subject: Wetland report for proposed Johnson Field Pump Station Project, off Hwy 264 Alt, Pitt
County, North Carolina. (Tax Parcel # 31732)
Dear Charles,
Due to continued and accelerated degradation of the Nation's waters, the United States Congress
enacted the Clean Water Act. The Act is to maintain and restore the waters of the United States.
Section 404 of the Act gives authorization to the Secretary Of the Army, acting through the Chief of
Engineers to issue permits for the discharge of dredge or fill material into waters of the United States,
which includes wetlands. Before any land disturbing activity can begin on a site which has 404
wetlands, those wetlands must be delineated and determined to be jurisdictional or non jurisdictional.
However no matter what the wetland is determined to be all wetlands are still regulated. Wetland
determinations are made by the technique of delineating. The process first starts with an inspection of
the wetland. Using hydrophytic vegetation, hydrology and hydric soil indicators, the wetland boundary
is identified. All three of these criteria must be present for an area to be classified as a wetland. The
wetland boundary is identified by being flagged. The boundary is then surveyed either by a
professional surveyor or using highly accurate survey grade GPS equipment. While onsite, vegetation,
hydrology and hydric soil indicators are identified to complete Wetland Determination Data Forms.
Jurisdictional Determination (JD) forms are filled out to determine if the wetland is under the jurisdiction
of the US Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE). A meeting on site with the USACE or DWQ is typically
required to ensure that the wetland boundary has been accurately identified.
General and Background Information
As requested ESS has completed an investigation of the referenced tract to determine if areas were
present that meet the requirements to be classified 404 wetlands. The 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Supplement were used as
references when determining wetland areas.
The site consists of +/- 0.37 acres and lies south of Hwy 264 Alt east of Farmville, North Carolina. The
existing Johnson Field Pump Station, which is part of the Town of Farmville sewer network, adjoins the
project site to the east. It is understood an existing sewer line runs through the project area and
connects to the existing pump station. The project includes a renovation of the existing pump station
and the addition of bar screen. A new 24" sewer line and man holes will be needed to reroute
wastewater from the existing sewer line to the bar screen. The total length of the new sewer line
including the bar screen unit will be +/ -237'. A portion of the new sewer line will run through what has
been preliminarily been determined to be 404 wetlands. Some mechanized land clearing will be
required in a small wooded area in a portion of the wetland.

• Page 2
Wetland Determination
January 15, 2013
Enclosed is a copy of the wetland delineation map that depicts wetlands flagged by ESS. The flag
locations were located by McDavid Associates, Inc. and placed on a plat created by McDavid
Associates, Inc. The wetland delineation map has been reviewed by ESS to ensure the wetland areas
shown on the map depict what was flagged by ESS. The total area of 404 wetlands was calculated to
be 0.3. The wetlands consist of a typical toeslope landscape position that abuts Middle Swamp which
based on observation would be classified as relatively permanent waters (RPW). Middle Swamp
carries water via natural drainage to Contentnea Creek.
The attached Jurisdictional determination (JD) form was used to determine that the wetland is under
the jurisdiction of the USACE. Also enclosed is the USGS topographic map of the area, a copy of the
Pitt County Soil Survey Map, an aerial view of site and copies of Wetland Determination Data Forms.
Based on the findings, all wetland depicted on the enclosed plat would be jurisdictional 404 wetlands.
Nationwide Permit 12
This project involves the proposed installation of a new sewer line. The sewer line that is part of the
existing Town of Farmville sewer collection and disposal system is also part of a renovation to the
existing Johnson Field Pump Station. It is my understanding the new sewer line is needed to reroute
wastewater from the existing sewer line to a new bar screen. A portion of the new sewer line is
proposed to be installed in what has preliminarily been identified as 404 wetlands. A Nationwide Permit
#12 is being requested for the installation of the sewer line. Since a portion of the sewer line installation
will be in a wooded area that is within the 404 wetland a Pre - Construction Notice is being required.
Enclosed is a copy of the PCN. The PCN and pertinent information has been forwarded to the Division
of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at 252 - 531 -3471.
Respectfully Submitted,
Scott Stone
Licensed Soil Scientist
Enclosures
Cc William Wescott, USACE

EXPRESS U.S. ARMS' CORPS OF ENGINEERS
MAR 0 7 2013 WILMINGTON DISIRICT eel .,.,,
NC NR Action Id. SAW 2013- 00357 County: Pitt U.S.G.S. Quad. Fat mville_-
a-
- GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Town of Farmville A ent: Environmental and Soil Service, Inc.
attn: David Hodgkins, Town Manager attn: Scott Stone
Address: Post Office Box 86 Address: Post Office Box 82
Farmville, North Carolina 27828 Pinetops, North Carolina 27864
252 -753 -5116 252 -531 -3471
Size and locution of property (water body, road narnelnurnber, town, etc.): The 0.37 acre tract adjoins the existing John
Field Pump Station which is part of the Town of Farmville sewer collection system. The project is located south of Farmville
adiacent to Middle Swamp. Latitude: 35.561848 N Longitude: - 77.588417 W
Description of projects area and activity: The proposed project will temporarily impact 0.06 acres of wetlands during the
installation of a new sewer fine at the John Field Pump Station.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
[1 Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: 12
SEE ATTACHED NATIONWIDE AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated 2 -5 -2013 . Any violation of the
attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration
order and /or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. 1f, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions reg ding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of 13ngineers regulatory
program, please contact Willianif Wescott at 910 -251 -4629.
Corps Regulatory Official Date: 2/21/2013
Expiration Date of Verification: 2/2112015
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit h1W:/ /per2 nwp usace.army.mil/survey.htnil ttnil to complete the survey
online.
Copy Furnished:

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on prel'uninary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 3' ) CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and /or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified tinder a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued _ Action ID _
Basis For Determination: Area exhibits the three parameters specified in the Regional Supplement of the 1987 USACE Wetland
Deilneotion Manual.
Remarks:
Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineationMeter-nination has been conducted to identify, the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. if you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 3' ) CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M1.5
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
hl order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days orthe date orthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 4/21 /2013.
* *It is not necessary to submit }l P RF f rm to tM Division Office iryou do not object to the determination in this correspondence.'
Corps Regulatory Official: i /� 4y On Vii.'`-' --
v
Date: 2/21/2013 Expiration Date: 212112018

Copy furnished:
Applicant: Town of Farniville File Number: SAW 2013 -00357 Date: 2/21/201
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
rER]PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
E; PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ; PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
peal of t)ie above'dectsion.
�ic( or ,
Corps rekulations at 33 CFR'Part 331.
A. INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the pen-nit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
APPF,Ai,: if you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. 'f'his form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMt'I' DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section It of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
S) CTTON II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or Q$JEGT[ONS TON (NiTIAI;. PRQkF>*RED I?ERMIT ,.
REASONS FOR APPEAL, OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POIN`1?OF CONTACT. FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal processyou may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: William Wescott CF.SAD -PDO
Washington Regulatory Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
2407 West 5 "' Street 60 Forsyth Street, Room I OM 15
Washington, North Carolina 27889 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3801
910- 251 -4629 Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: I Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: William Wescott, 2407 West 5 "' Street, Washington, North
Carolina 27889
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, boom 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]

Action ID Number: SAW 2013 -00357 County: Pitt
Permittee: Town of Farmville
Date Permit Issued: 2/21/2013
Project Manager: William Wescott
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: William Wescott
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2107 West 51" Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
MAR 0 7 2013 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Thi mpleted by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County /parish borough: Pitt City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.561749° N, Long. - 77.588435° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Middel Swamp
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Contentnea Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03020203
0 Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas islare available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
[i Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):'
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[) Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
0 Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
[] Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: linear feet: width (R) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.3 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
Q Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this fonn, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e ° tvnie.ally I rnnnths)

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section HLAA and Section III.D. L only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IRA.1 and 2
and Section II .D. L; otherwise, see Section HLB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Smmnarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section HIM. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section IHB.1 for
the tributary, Section IIl.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section RLB.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apps):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riflle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow. Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OFIWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
❑ sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous 0I-IWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack Tune
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines/clnanges in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm 1barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity _(Relationship ) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river mules fi-om TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if larownn:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findugs:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERAIINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and fifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section M.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section Ul.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
[] TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
tQ Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Middle Swamp holds surface water year round as evidenced by direct observation and aerial photo.
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111.13. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non- wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
JZ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year - round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: The wetland in the review area is connected hydraulicly to surface waters of Middle
Swamp that flows directly into and eventually becomes Contentnea Creek
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111.13 and rationale in Section 111.13.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.3 acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
is Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorw+dum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based sole l on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakestponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delmeation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000, Farmville, NC.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. CitationTitt County Soil Survey.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:US Fish and Wildlife Service.
[❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datuun of 1929)
�j Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):Google Earth, 2012.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

C
A
V7 C
C
in
77'34'30" 77'34'
1 26 1 4000 26150003 26 1 6 UOIJ
it
�7
14.
cs: 91.
J�
A j I WT,
Marlboro
J\
4
2X F
Chw
N
I IKI
RV$-
-7,
GMW.-
M PI ,
".4
QA `R
]z Site
rr #U
h
All k
4,
-jell
N AY
J
24
'g,
pftadi; Tower -,7
(VVUNKI corm(
--s
I pa"lloCh-
V
41
24
Y) '04
2 64 00 0 2 65 000
2&0W z 67 UUU
77'36'30" 77'30' 771570" 71-35, I I -.v# 'IV
1:24000 scale
Umvurral Tran5verw Mercator JUTIVII PMeCtion Zom M
North American Datum of 19133
(100 ""W UTMIUSSIG/mURS 04
OW Z(mie Deblvalkni. 183 1 !M al cane —fmv
100,000-m SquaresTE m Mom) 17 '011
Town of Farmville, Johnson Field Pump Station
uWWt
W
U�
W
9

;A! ULINA bllLL_I INUMULK -Ifs
425 Q,,O r LEI (Joins sheet 38) �g
—
LS I -- -- -- - - t Y f — - — E. -- ,
co Y vBb l' Ly\ GoA Co
Ra // / . z
2G4
LY Bd
ExA
°e
Ly
ExA \ Ra GoA P
t
\`\ \\ x GoP
R
\ OcB
ExA FxA Ra LY 1 z v
Ly
il
� J \
II ExA'�� � rn
p
1
.I II
it v s Ly _ GoA qaq
ExA u t
LY It IIWk o GoA Gofi ,
ExA OcB . it OcB II ♦ \ Pg
rr Li
Ra 11
ExB Ly GoA j r \ t BY Y U Ly /
�.,.. a ExB n • \ \\ \ J Cc \- - ��- ExA Ib /
GoA .. ! R
\ a
AYA J
Co 11 / a i' :. l Ra + GoA II -`f Ra
II - ExA- J`- =-jl Ly NrA \ L Y_ _ - - =� GoA \ q
ExAir Ra GoA ^ / Co \
II P Al
E.B GoFl ExA • Lv
II Co ExB L3b`S ` Ra
Co i!I NrB GoR l L.A
Wa
Il GoA Bd i^
I AY62 ExA Co _ LY( � Ly v
11 t Bd // -
I OI Ly Y, xA Ra
it /j ExA'
° °Q
co
n;
♦.�\ Co jj ExB lI BY Ly e--
\ L ..
6 0 y _
- \ Nr6 GoA,y Y Y Nre
� Site \ GAS r., `� o o ,
LY
Bb OcB i
°\ IH,I GoA t VJaB
Ly u
-� - ExA ExA
O c p Ly'.:. / o0
�t� \ OcB e
\ Ly �\ - ` n GoA s^ Wa6
Ra
n Nr6 ` \� II GoA // / I . • a
x y GoA ' Go8 �4 —
\
ExB _ !l uUUU
// - GoA �
\ \\ ExA :1
GoB <
GoA . I Bb / / GoA o
` Co Bb Y 1 v�
B. � ExA\ NrA ExB Ly
\ \\ Cr62
OcB OcB
WaB % Co
1p CrB2 Ra p
Bb //� GoA J
Bd
CrB LY \ Jt
I CrC
ExA Re, r oo°
v
ExB
1 , WaB Bb
o-' V F xA
• , CrB2 GoA
OCB
Tu Ly o°
NrA GoA NrB .n
r
. _ . .... mss..
f
l \Tu� NrB NrA ExA�
(Joins inset, sheet 54)
John Field Pump Station Site, Town of Farmville, Pitt County, NC

�f

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Johnson Field Pump Station City /County: Pitt Sampling Date: Nov 12, 2012
Applicant/Owner: Town of Farmville State: NC Sampling Point: Wet Flag A2
Investigator(s): Scott Stone Section, Township, Range:
7 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope ( %): 0 - 1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35 °3342.7' N Long: 77 °35'18.2" W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains NWi Classification: PFO1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No_(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _, Soil or Hydrology _____significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation �, Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary lndicators minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_
X High Water Table (A2)
_
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
— Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
— Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (B3)
_
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Iron Deposits (135)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Y X N
De th (inches): 5"
Water I able Present. es o p
— — Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No _ Depth (inches): 0"
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Visual observation of static groundwater in open bore hole on 11 A 2/12.
Remarks:
o
■ ■�:
_ fr
MAR 0 7 2013
EN NI I

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Wet Flag
Sampling Point A2
Test
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
6. Ph'i A­ nt n
C)Q1 ;:nrw nr FA(- Inn (A/B)
50 % of total cover: 22
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30x30
1. Nvssa sylvatica (Gum,black)
2. Quercus michauxii (Oak,swamp chestnut)
3.
4.
5.
6.
44 = Total Cover
20 % of total cover: 8.8 Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
20 Y FAC FACW species X2=
7 Y FACW FAC species X3=
FACU species X4=
UPL species XS=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Acer rubrum (Maple,red)
15
Y
FAC
2. Quercus nigra (Oak,water)
15
Y
FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua (Gum,sweet)
7
FAG
4. Nyssa sylvatica (Gum,black)
7
- Prevalence Test is s 3.0'
FAC
5
_3
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
Wet Flag
Sampling Point A2
Test
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
6. Ph'i A­ nt n
C)Q1 ;:nrw nr FA(- Inn (A/B)
50 % of total cover: 22
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30x30
1. Nvssa sylvatica (Gum,black)
2. Quercus michauxii (Oak,swamp chestnut)
3.
4.
5.
6.
44 = Total Cover
20 % of total cover: 8.8 Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
20 Y FAC FACW species X2=
7 Y FACW FAC species X3=
FACU species X4=
UPL species XS=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
27 = Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 13.5
20 % of total cover: 5.4
Prevalence Index = BIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum
(Plot size: 30x30 )
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1. Arundinaria
gigantea (Cane,giant)
15 Y FACW
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
2'
- Prevalence Test is s 3.0'
_3
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
_
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
15 = Total Cover
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50 % of total cover: 7.5
20 % of total cover: 3
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: 30x30 )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. Microstegium
vimineum (Japanese grass) _
14 Y
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
2.
3
4
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
5•
6.
7.
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
9.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
14 = Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 7
20 % of total cover: 2.8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:_
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No _
4
5
0 = Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 0
20 % of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wet flag A2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
inches Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Locz
Texture Remarks
10YR3/2 95
2.5YR4/6 5 C PL
Sandy
—0-3
3-16 10YR3/1 95
10YR5/1 5 D M
Sandy
16-20 10YR511 50
10YR3/1 25 CS M
Loamy
10YR5 /8 25 C M
Loamy
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Suface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
X Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 160A, 116013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Johnson Field Pump Station City /County: Pitt Sampling Date: Nov 12, 2012
Applicant/Owner: Town of Farmville State: NC Sampling Point: Up Flag A2
Investigator(s): Scott Stone Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) PC - Fill Area Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope ( %): 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35 °33'42.4" N Long: 77 °35'18.3" W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NA NWI Classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No_ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation T, Soil X , or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site
int I
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland area was filled during installation of existing sewer line and pump station.
HYDROLOGY
No X
etc.
Wetland Hydrology Indi cators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
— Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
— Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
_
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_
Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
_
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
` FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
— Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No static groundwater observed in open bore hole to 15" on 11/12112. hand auger boring could not be advanced past 15" due to debris.
�
)
MAR 0 7 2013
t

o ver Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
oa
50 % of total cover: 50 20 % of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:__}
1.
2.
3. Hydrophytic
4 Vegetation
5 Present? Yes X No _
0 = Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 0 20 % of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Up Flag
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. S
Sampling Point AZ
Dominance Test worksheet:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %
% Cover Species? Status N
Number of Dominant Species
1. T
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
3 T
4 S
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
6 P
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (AIB)
0 = Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 0 2
20 % of total cover, 0 P
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: } O
OBL species x 1 =
1. F
FACW species X2=
2
2• F
3.
FACU species X4=
4
4.
UPL species X5=
6
5 U
Column Totals: (A) (B)
0 = Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 0 2
20 °% of total cover: 0 P
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: } 1
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1.
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
2. —
— 3 - Prevalence Test is <- 3.0'
3.
Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4 _
_Problematic H
5. '
6. b
be present, unless disturbed or problematic..
0 = Total Cover D
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
50 % of total cover: 0 2
20 % of total cover: 0
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) a
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. Andropogon virginicus (Broom - sedge) 5
50 Y FAC (
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium (Rabbit tobacco) 50 Y S
3 a
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4 t
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. S
6. a
7.
$ H
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
9• p
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
10. 3
11.
100 = T t 1 C o
oa
50 % of total cover: 50 20 % of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:__}
1.
2.
3. Hydrophytic
4 Vegetation
5 Present? Yes X No _
0 = Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 0 20 % of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL
Sampling Point: Up Flag A2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) 016 Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
Filled with various debris (concrete,
0-15
N/A N/A N/A
Gravel dirt)
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Suface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 163B)
_
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
, Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
— Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Upland area filled as part of existing sewer line installation and construction of existing pump station.

{ X55 Z
N i O J
��i�n� z
NN I
� Him
pm
US
ZOW
g - 3 Z �wW
LL1 00
�.
�
Q pm
y _ I•" it 0 LL 0c 1u111
0 d R G
w
alaB e I m
y! 1— n 44S a
Z ORA, F
$�
o
AM"
j�jufa Id
$kgHdR�
HAMHlS J1
ee161/ a5 5 0JIN J
tl 7
W ,ro ee1
ampaa wm
bj
3 ! � rc of ��� ad�� o�? %:�E •..Z':
p_d?
••� 7 n / muu m
a- 0
gggg a # y ##
91 E �S U
7,• ••••�h ^.S 0'l. � aas�a �� &s�3W���� a &aF �R��9 �A s�Sa sa �n ♦$RS�� dT
ti f_.. +•• l� *w 8 8 5 ? 4� $ da � a � 35lit
E
J
Sa it 11 ,
�BCiv:� •noL •oc .�.wr •dw..wnR a•Ilaa
.__ _.... ... _ .. pwR \M Bd RRL w•WR :Ilelul

�� WATF9
o -c
Q'
MAR 0 7 2013
- N
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
X❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes N No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
bel ow.
❑ Yes N No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information _
2a.
Name of project:
Town of Farmville - Johnson Field Pump Station Improvements
2b.
County:
Pitt
2c.
Nearest municipality /town:
Farmville
2d.
Subdivision name:
NA
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Rita Ruth Cockrell, ETALS Tract
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Deed Book 1183, Page 660
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
NA
3d.
Street address:
459 Wise Run Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Wanna, WV 26590
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Municipality
4b.
Name:
Town of Farmville
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
3672 N. Main St. / P.O. Box 86
4e.
City, state, zip:
Farmville, NC 27828
4f.
Telephone no.:
252 - 753 -5116
4g.
Fax no.:
252- 753 -2963
4h. Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Scott Stone
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Environmental and Soil Service, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
P.O. Box 82
5d. City, state, zip:
Pinetops, NC 27864
5e.
Telephone no.:
252 - 531 -3471
5f.
Fax no.:
252- 827 -1382
5g.
Email address:
esssoil @aol.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Portion of Parcel #12219
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 35.561716 Longitude: - 77.5B8493
1c. Property size:
0.37 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Middle Swamp
2b. Water Quality Gassification of nearest receiving water:
C,SW,NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The 0.37 acre tract adjoins the existing John Field Pump Station, which is part of the Town of Farmville sewer collection system. There is an existing
sewer line that is located west of the pump station and runs through the project site. The project site is currently part of a +1-708 acre tract. The project
area is in a partially wooded, partially cleared area between and agricultural field and Middle Swamp.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.3
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To renovate the existing pump station, which will include the Installation of a new sewer line In the project area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
+ /-6' wide excavation for new sewer line which will tie into the existing sewer line within the project area. Equipment used will be an excavator.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all riot phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Requested but no appointment set
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Scott stone
Agency /Consultant Company: Environmental & Soil Service, Inc
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Pertinent documentation, along with a copy of this PCN have been submitting to USACE and we are awaiting a response.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Oyes ❑ No p Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file' instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 T
Sewer line installation
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Partially
Corps
0.059
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.059
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
-
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
No streams on project site
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: NA
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
YeslNo
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
NA (See attached Pitt County Riparian Buffer map)
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Excavation is to install the new sewer line only_ Dirt from the excavation will be used to fill the excavation upon completion of the sewer line. Any other
construction will be done on the upland area that contains the existing pump station. Directional bore is not feasible due to size of sewer line (24 ")
r.-,WAI a i° j�,'� vZr<e_ -� 141A� ©.10 7` Vii; > G�r�`��rcF A 3c, t r"cl+s�r�fEO�w��
w .ic -r 0l <&K 4-el.&r__ T_4A'U✓0
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Atrack excavator will be used to distribute weight and reduce impacts to areas not excavated. Sediment fences will be installed along the perimeter of
the construction limits to control runoff during the excavation. Once the sewer line is installed, the excavation will be filled back to original grade.
Stabilization measures will be taken after filling to prevent erosion. After stabilization the impact area will be allowed to return to natural vegetation.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permitlee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes © No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
There is no impervious surface.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. in which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Pitt County Planning
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Prog ram Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
Oyes
❑
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
©Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments: The project mentioned in this PCN is an amendment to the original project approval.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
[]Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ulti mate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFM county endangered species list and USFWS critical habitat mapper
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
US Marine Fisheries and NCFWS
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Office of State Archaeology and NC Historic Preservation Office
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes X❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA web site (mscsema.govy See attached FIRM map.
Scott Stone
01 -15 -2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the a licant is ovided.
Page 10 of 10

3111AVYHV:i JO NM01
011VIS drind a131-4 NOSNHor - zt,oN lovbiwO
'ONI 'S3.LV10oSSV (IJAVaopy S1N3VGAQ)JdVY1 NOUVIS dVind 0151d NOSNHor Zl NO
Wd auS
I
F—MM
T
d4d
S6
HIM
......................
1K.3x
Al. 111 'a
T
N ij Ill It I �-A
i12!
...
533333 3
, em
Fi7-
11
. . . .
. . . . . .
1, RON
WIT
Ali
I
F—MM