NC0002071_Wasteload Allocation_19911118

NPDES DOCUMENT :SCANNINe COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0002071
Pamlico Packing
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Monitoring Report
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
November 18, 1991
This document is; printed on reuse paper - ignore any
content on the re'erse side

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
S ubbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Pamlico Packing Company, In
NC0002071
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Bay River
SA -NSW
03-04-10
Pamlico
Washington Regional Office
Charles Lowe
10/4/91
G32NW
Request # 6465
c.--pipe 002
1
RECEIVED
WASHINGTON OFFICE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
No compliance data available. Fish processing.
r ie-� sv e5 rnai vc, ni Ivri,1. .
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
'0CT221991
D. E. M.
Tidal
Recommended by: /i'N�Uow: Date: / 6 / S • `-,
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
Date:
Date: (07Z8/v
NOV 18 1991
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:

2
Existing Limits
Daily Aver Daily Max. Frequency
Flow 0.0015 Annual
TSS 20# 36# Annual
Oil and Grease 5.5# 10# Annual
Recommended Limits
VKov'-
Daily Aver Daily Max. WQ or EL Frequency
Flow (MGD): 0.0015 -� Annual
TSS (fl}: 36#4220#/el W E. L..A
Oil and Grease (fttf& 5.5#/4i 10#'d -WQ Annual
pH (SU): 6.8-8.5 WQ Annual
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent l Limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

v
3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If 9o, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 6466
Pamlico Packing Company, Inc. --pipe 003
NC0002071
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Bay River
SA -NSW
03-04-10
Pamlico
Washington Regional Office
Charles Lowe
10/4/91
G32NW
RECEIVED
WASHINGTON OFFICE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
No compliance data available. Shrimp processing.
t2e q j g-n. - i 5 rytoa' 2 .%r&ktt meY c�o`k Jiff C 4 5
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
0CT2 2 19CiI
D.r- M.
Tidal
Recommended by: ‘YA-Let.A.:-.
(�
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
Date: M • lS • q /
Date: /Dh7A/
10-1//
Date: f0 726'7I/
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: N aV 8 11

2
Existing Limits
Daily Aver Daily Max. Frequency
Flow 0.0025 Annual
TSS 380# 1100# Annual
Oil and Grease 120# 360# Annual
Recommended Limits
•I ft Aver Daily Max. WQ or EL Frequency
Flow (MGD): 0.0025 -EL— Annual
TSS (mg/1): 3804/ 1100o WQ€L Annual
Oil and Grease.( 12 el 360# d € W L- Annual
pH (SU): 1 6.8-8.5 WQ Annual
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluenthmitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional
Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Pamlico Packing Company, Inc. --pipe 004
NC000207 1
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Bay River
SA -NSW
03-04-10
Pamlico
Washington Regional Office
Charles Lowe
10/4/91
G32NW
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
No compliance data availaple. Crab processing.
qi c9-vL • —Mote
WASH RECEID
NGTON OFFICE
6467 '0CT2 2 1991
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
b.ENA.
Tidal
iN)
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
Date: /l7/I
Date: / (9/2_60(
Date: 1/0%,9///
NOV 1S 1991

2
Existing Limits
Daily Aver Daily Max. Frequency
Flow 0.001 Annual
TSS 11.1# 33# Annual
Oil and Grease 3.0# 9.0# Annual
Recommended Limits
Daily Aver Daily Max. WQ or EL Frequency
Flow (MGD): 0.001 eliE• Annual
TSS : 11.1#/d 33#/cI *IQ EL Annual
Oil and Grease ( 3.0#/d 9.0#/c1 WQ L.. Annual
pH (SU): 6.8-8.5 WQ Annual
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
3 vo
PERMIT NO.: NC0002071
PERIViITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Pamlico Packing Company, Inc.
Pamlico Packing Company, Inc.
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor �l
Pipe No.: 002
Design Capacity: 0.0015 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 0 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
Fish processing n v
2 c'
t
ot
RECEIVING STREAM:Bay R.
Class:W ,5-0 —
Sub -Basin: 3 0-
Reference USGS Quad: G 32NW
County: Pamlico
Regional Office: Washington Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 3/31/92 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
Almost in Vandemere Creek - SC-Sw-NSW.
(please attach)
Requested by: Charles M. Lowe Date: 10/4/91
Prepared by: / Date:
Reviewed by: Date:
-8oDu.
Modeler
Date Rec.
Drainage Area (mi2 )
(p4'5
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): F S
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Acute/Chronic
Toxicity Limits: IWC %
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Kser
- y,_3,
BOD5 (mg/1)
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS -
old *Pb
�4,
1/4
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
6—a/6 re_ e-
S:6-
*/.A
4hol_
-
\
i.10
Com ntsa
Nr C r-cO -s S-« �,tr•� `s r

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARG RS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
p.
/
Effluent Characteristics
z�
IN
Monthly
Average
Type of Product Produced
&. i) /'6('r)c'r:
Daily
Maximum
/b S
to
Comments
Lbs/Day Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference
10, 000

A. (4. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Final
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number(s).002 - Fish Processing
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
fluent Characteristics
lbs/day
Daily Avg. Daily Max,
Flow
Total Suspended Residue
Oil and Grease
v`
r
01
�O
The pH shall not be less than 6.8 standard units nor
and shall be monitored greater than 8.5 standard units
annually at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amount
s.
20.0 36.0
5.5 10.0
*Sample location: E - Effluent
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Other Units (Specify) Measurement Sample * Sample
Daily Avg. Daily Max. Frequency -Type- Location
0.0015 MOD Annually Instantaneous E
Annually Grab E
Annually Grab E

Cash Corner
BM
t-;Mt Zion Ch
f -
o i II w`1l� 1 ii ,r1 r
all 1 s
isc Pete><s raf` yar
�C d Pt
" h1 n`� �, ear oin
/ �, r' \� �_
St James ii rug
Ch
L , -'T
" Vandemere
/x,ti.
/ ��.
i r) `� ' °o Piles
J 7
,1• l
\_J�\ „ —.\) Windmill
i� Point
Cr64
Smith Cr
Point
5
•
Cr seeks
Poorhouse Pt
Near (C)
Parch Corn
Bay
/z
i" /AHorton (C)
Darby
Point
�ANtIW
.TA
p:.
e
Mt Olive
;c- .Ch
BM 5
c.
x4
-i=sEFlFooD�
( t
:r ...: 1221
hod'
Box Pointer
Mere (C) L' '
Light (C)
A
Bell Point
fight
(,)
i
II
Petty Pt o
Gull (C)
Skip(C)
!3
Mesic (C)
Q'Dun (C) ,
Wise Pt
3
3896
"95 -
'R93
10'

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0002071
PERMTTTEE NAME: Pamlico Packing Company, Inc.
FACILITY NAME: Pamlico Packing Company, Inc.
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 003
Design Capacity: 0.0025 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 0 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
Shrimp processing
3 <ri
r
RECEIVING STREAM: B Riveri
C1ass:_SA= ISNAT-- Se—ivsw
Sub -Basin: 03-04-10
Reference USGS Quad: G 32 NW
County: Pamlico
Regional Office: Washington Regional Office
(please attach)
Previous Exp. Date: 3/31/92 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
Almost in Vandemere Creek - SC-Sw-NSW.
Requested by: �/ Charles M. Lowe Date: 10/4/91
Prepared by: 'ray ui. 1 Date: /e . z . gi
Reviewed by: Date:
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
A) 1-6
101 11 61t
64(plo
Drainage Area (mi2 )
Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: 1WC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
f� v,
,�,
BOD5 (mg/1)
,
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (
2)73'Z5 4k I 1 ?
tt oo 4-/
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
(p, 8= , S-
p;\ l r ca.S-c__,
1.2 0 * A,
3 c.. e 4 ig..4„,t
Com7nts:

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
• Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Comments
/ -
//o0 /,‘_c
()a ''ib 2/0e. 120 c:ve/)/g1 -
/2_D /L
- /
t /)
.- -4.
'..
1C1)1 S %
CP 'A
by ‘,.- •
3 eft 4.4
f _. !
/1
Type of Product Produced
/4k0 1,-16
Lbs/Day Produced
/0,00d
Effluent Guideline Reference

A. (3). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Final
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number(s).003 - Shrimp Processing
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
luent Characteristics
lbs/day
Daily Avg. Daily Max.
Flow
Total Suspended Residue 380.0 1100.0
Oil and Grease
2 �
M CA t *Sample location: E - Effluent
r
% "`
01
niti '
� 3 1 "T
CNJ
00
120.0
360.0
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Other Units (Specify) Measurement Sample * Sample
Daily Avg, Daily Max. Frequency hype Locat on
0.0025 MGD
Annually Instantaneous E
Annually Grab E
Annually Grab E
The pH shall not be less than 6.8 standard units nor greater than 8.5 standard units
and shall be monitored annually at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0002071
PERNIITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Pamlico Packing Company, Inc.
Pamlico Packing Company, Inc.
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 004
Design Capacity: 0.001 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 0 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
Crab processing
Z
f-
RECEIVING STREA4ay R.r
Class: SC"'
Sub -Basin: 03-04-10
Reference USGS Quad: G 32 NW
County: Pamlico
Regional Office: Washington Regional Office
(please attach)
Previous Exp. Date: 3/31/92 Treatment Plant Class:
Classification changes within three miles:
Almost in Vandemere Creek - SC-Sw-NSW.
Requested by: Charles M. Lowe Date: 10/4/91
Prepared by: Date:
Reviewed by: Date:
"boDb
C L- —
Modeler
Date Rec.
Ai
Drainage Area (mil )
to Net
(,4(,1
Avg. Streamflow
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC %
Instream Monitoring:
30Q2 (cfs)
Acute/Chronic
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
, ,
t
, .
BOD5 (mg/1)
NH3-N (mg/1)
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS
Yt.k
4' !
13 AO
F. Col. (/100 ml)
PH (SU)
G . Sr -
5 4
et )/441 r.e_gz-vz_
3. 0
i 4 el
i 461
e-L)
ents •JLSLS i,�. hA
C v-e -si s scs
tiwA4
11-J

ij
FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics•
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Comments
•
/j—C
* //. / /d s
gT O /s
440 c,-r Z/r)g,
(L- (. As,--
cf,0/iS•
30//
.Ze:)
day
- `)
4-
•
•
'07".
.
ci.
t
57
Type of Product Produced
• ( .(r)<' PQr>Strl6_
Lbs/Day Produced
Effluent Guideline Reference
1

A. (4). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Final
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number(s). 004 - Crab Processing
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
fluent Characteristics
Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
lbs/day Other Units (Specify) Measurement Sample * Sample
Daily Avg. baily Max. Daily Avg. Daily Max. Frequency e Locat on
Flow
Total Suspended Residue 11.1 33.0
Oil and Grease 3.0 9.0
*Sample location: E - Effluent
0.001 MG1)
Annually Instantaneous E
Annually Grab E.
Annually Grab E
The pH shall not be less than 6•8 standard units nor greater than 8•5 standard units
and shall be monitored annually at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

TO: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Date October 8, 1991
RECEIVED
OCT 211991
StWf'UR% BRA,CH
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County Pamlico
Permit No. NC 0002071
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address:Pamlico Packing Company
P.O. Box 308
Vandemere, N.C. 28587
2. Date of Investigation:
9-10-91
3. Report Prepared by:
Patrick Towell
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
Mr. Doug Cross 919-745-3688
5. Directions to Site: Located at terminus of NC 307 in
Vandemere, N.C.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35 11' 00" Longitude: 76_39'_40"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment
facility site and discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No.R-15-p_ U.S.G.S. Quad Name
Vandemere
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading):
None
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
Flat; aprox. 5 feet above sealevel
9. Location of nearest dwelling: 500 feet
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 8/91
Page 1

10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
a. Classification: SC
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Neuse 03-03-07
c. Describe receiving stream features and
pertinent downstream uses: Bay River is used
for boating and fishing both commercial and
recreational.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wasteater: 0 % Domestic
100 % Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.006 MGD (Design Capacity)
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:
Crab, Fish, and Shrimp processing and packing
c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater:
NA
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved
should be required not needed X
2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in
pounds per day:
a. Highest month in the past 12 months:10,0001bs/day
b. Highest year in the past 5 years:15,000 lbs/day
3. Description of industrial process (for industries
only) and applicable CFR Part and Subpart:
001-Na,002-40CFR 408.21, 003-40CFR 408.12,
004-40CFR 408.20
4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or
existing):Existing screens over discharge pipes.
5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme:
solids are hauled to landfill
6. Treatment plant classification (attach completed
rating sheet): NA
SIC Code(s): 2092
7. Wastewater Code(s): Primary 25 Secondary a0
Main Treatment Unit Code: 0 00 0 0
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 8/91
Page 2

PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction
Grant Funds (municipals only)? NA
2. Special monitoring requests: At least semi-anually
for all discharge points.
3. Additional effluent limits requests: None
4. Other: None
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that this facility have its NPDES permit
renewed for a period of five (5) years. There shall be no
discharge of fish offal or shrimp heads into the waters of
the state.
Signature of report preparer
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
M1w A
Date
NPDES Permit Staff Report Page 3

die .
40,....1%. ‘..
it i ,.... • -„, a
- • 4I, Ns ,
•••. , ..• I 1--.
. .
.../ . • - •• . S•
... "...4.4.. .! 1* 11 . • . N, N., 1
i ..,. ' *J. 1... •-. • • •
.
II
/7/- 4 ...: -.-4---_ '... • I-.
- .. - ..7..: • ...."'-- ' -7 - .r.-7;4‘, ''. . •
4t
4 • A. -N : I .. Mt Olive • . •..\\ ...'..--* ..--• ': V A A r 4. 4.; • , . . .-.--s. -4,-.z • ..--,-.....t .. • Ch II
c.• •
J-, • ,....4•,... _
--.-.• • _4, • ...•
w• ,
43145
. .4 i :..., , • ... II
Ropen • , .
... • . •;.•12:;'t•--',N— .,-'%--t
4 .
gi
.-.;, , • . ._ • ,--
. \ ... ,................A - ._-- _• • • ,9 _ .
• --... t..•
7
•• . .
. .t.'
1 • 4 - t._
. ! •••A • . t
4
t *
10 •
. %
\ •
•''
- '.' •
.. ..'.
% -
• • ) C4S
..... ' ;
• ' :,
r1‘.. ......,.
.., ,I ...
,„09 • • ...V.. ••
....11 ,/.. 'I ..1 ,Z.... VI i
e• • e • „,-„,
•
•
••.4.-........ l4 /" r.
.1 ..
.
..-..
s
.
r:--v
.
..,...
..
...
""•
4•-
,1
7'.
•
r
a -# . • 0-• bt.•
.-
X 7
_ — .
•
•
• ••
.11:4
•
•:\
,ti
.
Maribel Sch
4
4
•
•
•
r
•• BrckC)
Hap
•
-
•
1
1
•••••-
• •• • .
.
%•-
%
••:•.
,r' ,•
-. • :
--
%....../a.
.:.0%
- —1.....4
.
-
-ll
.
.4. 4 \
Cash Corn 5 ' .-ligatorr ,-— Point
/p \ k•
• 4,i• 1
. li f.17.z.,.. .. ' -‘1%.„,‘Cin N,„. /',
i
... —r,.F.
/ 0
.1. -- i .. r• 1
• .-
.••, co
Peters ./ 47..0., • • ? 4;_,-.1
i 1 c-Gravqyard
*
4Po° / .
., •__ -„,„ •i ---:://' • • ' *-t,Cedar Pt ;:point
4* / .. 7.—, . 7,, et; c;.
.., .0 _i30;' '4,, 4e-.- l‘ ,--/
• ;/ t James , • .....,- 7-3, ."--0,„4,... Darby_ j -4•N's.
# i 4,-1 ill,...
g. •.. • C.h -.-....-......- -_, .. ---.• -,., -- ....r
..* Point .
.4-
..4if
. ,. .
.. / Jai andemere
. ...
-.....• / ‘
..v,
• ,
i . • ....ytmai'itne 4'4 _
/4 • - • ../.•
. l. A. . f -. ••-,
il
,l'i 8Piles
. • /-
&___)\ • ‘• •
...5' . ' e---1
\ il ‘‘
.0. .„ , ....../1 . . ,
-..• • %-, e• • , • • . •..-/
..,4
,," ...sj
•,1: • . • I
V' .."‘. .4 .
- • I t t ' •
ti- ; ,--) Windmill
..., .
L..a.- "..;;,.
v.-/ : Point •
t.-
- ?Smith Cr---------"
. Point".
$
a
a
t Zion Ch
STA
bert Pt
•
9
4
‘.%
Poorhouse Pt
a
Near (C)
Parch Corn
Bay
•J
P.7
139/77G/ea
R (9C
• P /OE
2
t (C)
Bell Point
Light
e
•
•
#sic
or•
$te-
rt.
4
X.•
2
4.4
ctv
• ••7'
(An
Box PointA
mere (C)
9
••••