NC0000744_Wasteload Allocation_19911217

NPDES DOCUMENT !;CANNING COVER :SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0000744
Captain Charlie's Seafood
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
c.
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Monitoring Report
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
December 17, 1991
This document is printed on reuse paper - igore any
content on the reYeriae wide

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Englehard Shrimp,Fish, &
NC0000744 Outfall 001
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Far Creek
S C-HQW
030307
Hyde
WaRO
C. Lowe
11/13/91
Englehard West
Request # 6591
Oyster Co.
NOVV 2 :> 1i 9i
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): Tidal - 0.0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Previous limits were based on outfall 001 only, which was attributed to crab processing. With
renewal of the permit, two outfalls were discovered: one consisting of crab cooler blowdown (001)
and the other of oyster shucking & oyster meat rinsing wastewater (002).
The facility also has direct runoff to the creek that consists of condensate from refrigeration
equipment, washdown water from dock, crab picking and oyster shucking from floors, and
shrimp heading/packing and fish packing [ref. staff report].
Technical Support recommends that some type of schedule be implemented so that the facility
could install floor drains or basin to contain runoff and direct it,to a distinct discharge point (to be
called 003 in the future). f`7 e- .case i i d.icrxfr vnbn i fiv; r3 - fre eJtt ct--
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by: 14a ,�,.� C 4,,d.,, -)
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: Off,..au Date:
- Regional Supervisor: � _ Date:
Permits & Engineering: .,; . �.� Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: OEG i t
rZ-
/q
Date:
`'

2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits: - o urFA LL 001
mon.avg. daily max
Wasteflow (MGD): nol nol
TSS (#/day): 7.4 22
pH (SU): 6.8-8.5
Oil & Grease (#/day): 2 6
Recommended Limits: - ouTF41.1- c
Wasteflow (MGD):
TSS (#/day:
pH (SU):
Oil & Grease (#/day):
temperature
Bops
-- effluent
nit.-tvi/
wits were based on 6000#/day raw material (40 CFR 408.22 BPT)
Limits Changes Due To:
New facility information
mon. avg. daily max WQ or EL
0.0007 0.0007
4.44 13.2 EL
6.8-8.5
1.2 3.6 EL
will not be increased by more than 0.8 °C
during the months of June, July and
August nor more than 2.2°C during other
months and in no case to exceed 32°C
due to discharge of heated liquids
Parameterfs) Affected
change in production (TSS,
O&G)
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
X No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the abilityto meet the proposed new limits with existingtreatment
tY P Po
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N_ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request #
Englehard Shrimp,Fish, & Oyster Co.
NC0000744 Outfall 002
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Far Creek
SC-HQW
030307
Hyde
WaRO
C. Lowe
11/13/91- e
Englehard West
6592
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Tidal - 0.0
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Previous limits were based on outfall 001 only, which was attributed to crab processing. With
renewal of the permit, two outfalls were discovered: one consisting of crab cooler blowdown (001)
and the other of oyster shucking & oyster meat rinsing wastewater (002).
The facility also has direct runoff to the creek that consists of condensate from refrigeration
equipment, washdown water from dock, crab picking and oyster shucking from floors, and
shrimp heading/packing and fish packing [ref. staff report].
Technical Support recommends that some type of schedule be implemented so that the facility
could install floor drains or basin to contain runoff and direct it to a stinct discharge point (to be
called 003 in the future). f'ea6e cock prut-Prin re� Uenc
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by: /1,44,,,,K.lfne,��
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: 6/CiALQ' Date:
If2rRegional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:C�, _-_ Date: (`'i % ' I
��'1'
Date: 't/ s/9 i
Date:
Ch
iz/619f—'7
DEc
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:

2
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
TSS (#/day):
pH (SU):
Oil & Grease (#/day):
Recommended Limits;
Wasteflow (MGD):
TSS (#/day):
pH (SU):
Oil & Grease (#/day):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
For Outfall 001
mon.avg. daily max
nol nol
7.4 22
6.8-8.5
2 6
For Outfa11002
mon. avg. daily max WQ or EL
0.0015 0.0015
8 12 EL
6.8-8.5
0.41 0.60 EL
-- effluent limits were based on 500 #/day finished product (40 CFR 408.262 BPJ)
Limits Ch
New facilii
ges Due To; Parameter(s) Affected
information new outfall (TSS, O&G)
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
X No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N_ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

ooc74 L
IS dA �J 5N/1rn•P, riS{.r S ©Y57riZ Co.
F z C2c�l� $C flq w [94 zos
% 14*. Do v.,N 1�7
00/ — c16‘ f = O . 000 7 M4 Tj ©o Z — o . oo/5 M 'q v
•n14E0 4i2D $ 4f c,j Co.
7QIo5 = o
iA
°o
p'"Cu(2r%i'
/IOI.<s LlM, Ts
LS7
PAMuc.o'
PuTry ci/ON Wf? c5 t o ooa /Difi
755 = 7,4(zi,) t/vty
o,‘, 4 = z C&' /DAY
P`l - Co.S -
AFG 8:60Cg7 Z ou71-11 5
fir
1/4.01
SA-
0303a7
34 5E
40CF2 ¢v.
001 - Geo Cooker Pico JZ 2 )A/ W4
00Z - ey.srCtz SWW 044 fit/4 5-, o y$feL
niEAr - 4Ns,Ny 1.04
6' OFFL(IEJ4 C(a l7cL/N65
OO/ - (oNVFk (OAML iutE C/),A6 P/LoCE55l'S '7d CF-R
✓) 6/' / , 4u' MAT/c/4
/voN / c4 y/( 44/15.
fiy s 4.4¢ '1/P4-1 /3, Z.
6 1. Z 3. 6
P -5 s
s4-¢`HM Evv,0 lCfee• L,/f /34SEG Gv✓ c.b/
NZ v 7,Sc.i/f7fifs'er-
Dot - `/i(-46r) 0y377> C ao s5(,1; - Y
AoN Avs DA/G, AWE
: 8 /2
Of 4 ° o.4I 0.6o
4D5. ZZ BP

tA141.E1/A2z Sfle-rn,.P C".
i( f' S C _ QN
,FZi7/77o 1J 70 7N 5'c 7 ow a7F/9GGS l/f&"gE itl FF
76/26.67L G4,,t.c � 6 p2 ce.rn/S F6/4-77y, n/o�� C%Ns, s
c r'eN SAr& ,2/yEPA TivA/ 6o4 7)1 E-ti%, f/F `F/ F,' j
Dock CMe P/U4/NoySTelZ,'MC/' /Alc 0At F0007Z5 4N.D 5f/%z//11/"
/ /f4 C,c (tJ 5F( PA�:E /N» .
j GC ( Su POo P � ,P Cof /)-7 wp✓5 7WA r % F/6 �%C /v/U 5/ICZ LD P6/1Ais
/ 17`f / / VP6 O/ 5c/4= ut6 - 77(4 /HG / is/L / T y
(06(1_. 0 c1/4v6 4 2l57 JCT
7 4T 7/7 , /L tfrioFr Co uND c/e_ c-iEA/
Cr Ui,�GU,/Cj /i%N - G2ADED
SKI/mg PreR 5 SIAJ4 /A) 7,4
CO/-17/404u 5 C'F e SNepA%ZT L
(7f(e 02 ; woRF /a 2/5"r7A .T ou TF/k r_ ,02