20130186 Ver 1_Mitigation Information_20130222

20130186
CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
PART 5: TECHNICAL APPROACH FOR THE CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
5.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The proposed Cedar Creek stream and wetland mitigation project will provide ecological and water quality
benefits within the Cape Fear River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the project area, others,
such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far - reaching effects.
Expected improvements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined as project benefits in Table 1.
Table 1. Benefits of Proposed Stream and Wetland Mitigation at the Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland
nn; +;­+ -i ,., ci +o
Benefits Related to Water Quality
Benefit will be achieved through filtering of runoff from adjacent agricultural areas,
Nutrient removal
the conversion of active farm fields to forested buffers, improved denitrification
and nutrient uptake through buffer zones, installation of BMPs at the headwaters
of selected reaches.
Benefit will be achieved through the stabilization of eroding stream banks and
reduction of sediment loss from field areas due to lack of vegetative cover. Channel
Sediment removal
velocities will also be decreased through a reduction in slope, therefore decreasing
erosive forces.
Increase dissolved
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures to increase
turbulence and dissolved oxygen concentrations and riparian canopy restoration to
oxygen concentration
lower water temperature and increase dissolved oxygen capacity.
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas that will receive and
Runoff filtration
filter runoff, thereby reducing nutrients and sediment concentrations reaching
water bodies downstream.
Benefits to Flood Attenuation
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas which will infiltrate
Water storage
more water during precipitation events than under current site conditions.
Wetland areas will provide additional storage of runoff and flood waters.
Improved
Benefit will be achieved through the increased storage of precipitation in buffer
groundwater
areas, ephemeral depressions, and reconnection of existing floodplain. Greater
recharge
storage of water will lead to improved infiltration and groundwater recharge.
Improved /restored
Benefit will be achieved by restoring the stream to a natural meandering pattern
hydrologic
with an appropriately sized channel, such that the channel's floodplain will be
connections
flooded more frequently at flows greater than the bankfull stage.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-17-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
Benefits Related to Ecological Processes
Restoration of
Benefit will be achieved by restoring riparian buffer habitat to appropriate
habitats
bottomland hardwood ecosystem. Protected riparian corridors will create
contiguous natural areas with uninterrupted migration corridors.
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures designed
Improved substrate
to improve bedform diversity and to trap detritus. Stream will be designed with the
and instream cover
appropriate channel dimension and will prevent aggradation and sedimentation
within the channel.
Addition of large
Benefit will be achieved through the addition of wood structures as part of the
woody debris
restoration design. Such structures may include log vanes, log sills, and log weirs.
Reduced
temperature of water
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of canopy tree species to the
due to shading
stream buffer areas.
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of riparian buffer bottomland
Restoration of
hardwood habitats. Further benefit will be realized from the preservation of intact
terrestrial habitat
high quality bottomland forest habitat on the Great Coharie Creek and its
tributaries.
The proposed project will achieve the above goals through the technical expertise of the project team, a
proven track record of EBX to deliver high quality mitigation, and suitable site - specific physical characteristics.
The following sections describe the site and proposed mitigation in detail.
5.2 Project Description
The Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site is located in Sampson County, approximately three miles
southwest of Clinton, NC (Figure 1). The site is located in the Cape Fear River Basin within Cataloging Unit
03030006 (NCDWQ 10 Digit Watershed HUC 0303000604; Stream Index # 18- 68 -1). The Sampson County
Airport is located adjacent to the Cedar Creek East portion of the Project northeast of the project site. The
project area is located adjacent to Great Coharie Creek. The mitigation channels have a wide range of past
disturbances. As a result, the mitigation approach is tailored to address the specific impairments found on
each reach. The mitigation approach includes Priority Level 1 restoration (131), Priority Level 2 restoration
(P2), Headwater Valley Restoration (HWVR), Enhancement Level 2 (Enh II), and Preservation. All mitigation
approaches will provide functional uplift through direct action (i.e. stabilization) or catchment -scale ecological
connectivity (i.e. preservation). All mitigation areas will be protected in perpetuity with a permanent
conservation easement. The project's watershed is primarily agricultural and silvicultural.
Physiography, Geology, and Soils
The Cedar Creek site is located in the Southeastern Plains Physiographic Province. The geology in the area
consists of sand, clay, saprolite, and some rock outcrops within the Rolling Coastal Plain Ecoregion. The
topography is dissected by irregular plains and flat plains with broad inter - stream divides that contain gently
to steep side slopes and low to moderate gradient sandy bottom streams.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-18-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
The Sampson County Soil Survey depicts 6 soil types present within the project area (Figure 2). A detailed
description of mapped soil series and on -site investigations by a North Carolina licensed soil scientist are
included in the Appendix.
Stream Channels
The project area is situated on several tributaries to Great Coharie Creek. All reaches are located in natural
valleys. Generally, the tributaries occupy higher gradient channels that flow into the Great Coharie Creek
floodplain valley. These drainages contain bands of hydric soil. Great Coharie Creek drains into the Black
River and then ultimately into the Cape Fear River (Figure 3). A FEMA flood zone is mapped along Great
Coharie Creek and extends into portions of the proposed easement (Figure 4a and 4b). A portion of the
proposed restoration and channel improvements are located within the mapped flood zone. FEMA
coordination will be required for the proposed project; however, this is not expected to be a detriment to the
proposed mitigation.
NCDWQ stream identification forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets were completed at
representative locations throughout the project area and are included in the Appendix. Results of the
preliminary data collection are detailed in Figure 7a and 7b, and included in the Existing Conditions Summary
Table and the Stream Morphology Table in the Appendix.
Great Coharie Creek is not listed as a 303(d) listed stream. The stream is classified as a Class C and Swamp
Waters, which are waters that have low velocities and are protected for recreation, fishing, and agriculture
purposes.
Natural Communities
Land use around the project area is primarily agricultural and silvicultural. On the west side of Great Coharie
Creek, land use immediately surrounding the project consists of concentrated animal feeding operations
(CAFOs) and row crop production. On the east side of Great Coharie Creek, land use consists of row crop
production, silviculture, and sand mining areas. The CAFOs consist of 3 turkey houses and 8 hog houses.
There are four (4) waste lagoons adjacent to a restoration reach on the west side. The remaining channels are
adjacent to cultivated fields, relic pasture areas, or disturbed forested areas. The channels have been
straightened, dredged, or re- aligned in the past to promote drainage. Current land use practices have caused
increased erosion and sedimentation along drainage -ways and stream banks.
The cultivated fields are cotton, corn and soybeans. After harvest and during winter months, agricultural fields
are planted in winter wheat. Soil investigations show that much of the low -lying landscape on the east side,
adjacent to UT1, and its confluences with UT2 and UT3, exhibits hydric characteristics and a shallow seasonal
high water table, with most low lying fields considered prior converted wetlands (PC) that were drained and
currently utilized for row crop production (see Figures 8a and 8b).
The altered stream channels are routinely maintained on the west side, keeping vegetation weedy and early
successional. Although woody stems generally mirror local seed source, common species observed include
black willow (Salix nigra), red maple (Acer rubrum), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), and common
persimmon (Diospyros virginiana). Weedy species common to cultivated fields and disturbed areas dominate
these buffers. These include annual ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), blackberry (Rubus argutus), Canadian
horseweed (Conyza canadensis), dogfennel (Eupotorium capillifolium), morning glory (Ipomea sp.), and
pokeberry (Phytolocca americana).
Most of the forested area is bottomland hardwood forest that has a dense understory. Areas having a higher
elevation have scattered loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) and a few red oaks (Quercus falcota). Lower and wetter
landscapes are hardwood. The hardwood species include black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) red maple (Acer
rubrum), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora), sweet gum (Liquidambor
styraciflua), water oak (Quercus nigra), and willow oak (Quercus phellos).
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-19-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
A mid -story layer, within recently cleared areas adjacent to UT 1 -east, is comprised of green ash (Froxinus
pennsylvanica), red maple, tulip poplar, and water oak. Shrubs and woody vines are locally dense and include
American holly (Ilex opaca), eastern poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), large gallberry (Ilex coriacea),
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), redbay (Persea borbonia), swamp greenbriar (Smilax lourifolia), sweet bay
(Magnolia virginiana), tag alder (Alnus serrulato), and wax myrtle (Morella cerifera). Herbaceous vegetation is
variable. Vegetation includes giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), arrowleaf tearthumb (Polygonum
sagittatum), blackberry (Rubus argutus), common rush (luncus effusus), Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum
pensylvanicum). Some exotics were noted, including Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
National Wetland Inventory mapping depicts wetlands within the project site (Figures Sa & Sb). The floodplain
adjacent to the main run of Great Coharie Creek is mapped as PF01 /2F (Palustrine Forested Broad and
Needle- Leaved Deciduous Semi - permanently Flooded). The riparian zones of UT1, on the east side and upper
edges of the floodplain on the west side are mapped as PF01A (Palustrine Forested Broad - Leaved Deciduous
Temporarily Flooded). Above Reach 1E on the east side, the riparian zones of UT1 are mapped PF01C
(Palustrine Forested Broad - Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded).
Protected Species
The US Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) database (updated 22 September 2010) lists three endangered
species for Sampson County, North Carolina: red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), wood stork
(Mycteria Americana), and pondberry (Lindera melissifolia) (Table 2). The American alligator (Alligator
mississippiensis) is listed as Threatened due to similarity of appearance, but is not protected. No protected
species or potential habitat for protected species was observed during preliminary site evaluations.
In addition to the USFWS database, the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) GIS database was consulted to
determine whether previously cataloged occurrences of protected species were mapped within a one -mile of
the project site. Results from NHP indicate that there is one known occurrence of the red - cockaded
woodpecker within a one -mile radius of the project area. Based on initial site investigations, no impacts to
federally protected species are anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Table 2. Federally Protected Species in Sampson Count
Common Name
Scientific name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Vertebrate
American alligator
Alligator mississi iensis
T (S/A)
No
American eel
Anguilla rostrato
FSC
No
Bachman's sparrow
Aimo hila aestivalis
FSC
No
broadtail madtom
Noturus s . c . le tacanthus
FSC
No
Carolina crawfish frog
Rana ca ito ca ito
FSC
No
mimic glass lizard
O hisourus mimicus
FSC
No
red - cockaded
woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
No
southern ho nose snake
Heterodon simus
FSC
No
wood stork
M cteria americana
E
No
Invertebrate
American sandburrowing
mayfly
Dolania americana
FSC
Vascular Plant
awned meadowbeauty
Rhexia aristosa
FSC
No
butternut
lu lans cinerea
FSC
No
Carolina bo mint
Macbridea caroliniona
FSC
No
rassleaf arrowhead
Sa ittaria weatherbiona
FSC
No
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-20-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
Common Name
Scientific name
Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
pondberry
Lindera melissi olia
E
No
onds ice
Litsea aestivalis
FSC
No
Raven's boxseed
Ludwi is raven ii
FSC
No
sandhills milk -vetch
Astra alus michauxii
FSC
No
spring - flowering
goldenrod
Solidago verna
FSC
No
Venus' fly_trap fly—trap
Dionaea musci ula
FSC
No
Nonvascular Plant:
No
a liverwort
C lindrocolea andersonii
I FSC
No
E = Endangered
FSC = Federal Species of Concern
T(S /A) = Threatened due to similarity of appearance
The proposed project has the potential to improve or create suitable habitat for several Federally listed
species. Habitat may be improved or created for species that require riverine habitat by improving water
quality, in- stream and near - stream forage, and providing stable conditions not subject to regular
maintenance. Improved stream habitat may benefit American eel (Anguilla rostrata) and broadtail madtom
(Noturus sp. cf. leptocanthus). The environmental screening phase of the project will include USFWS
coordination to confirm these findings.
Cultural Resources
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office GIS Web Service database did not reveal any
listed or potentially eligible historic or archeological resources in the proposed project area. Located adjacent
to the south of the project area is the National Register listed General Thomas Boykin House (1986 — SP0014).
In addition, located adjacent to the project area on the west side of Bass Lake Road is the Marsh Williams
House (1997 - SP0643), which has been Determined Eligible for the National Register. The proposed
conservation easement will be located along the edge of the parcel containing the General Thomas Boykin
House. The proposed project will not have*an effect on the listed places of historical significance.
Constraints
The subject parcels that make up the project area are primarily agricultural. No major constraints exist that
will prevent a successful mitigation project. On the east side of the project, no significant physical constraints
exist within the proposed project area. On the west side, the primary constraint is the level of incision
exhibited in the upper reaches of UT3. The incision existing along UT3 will necessitate a Priority 2 restoration
approach for approximately 1,100 linear feet until the stream can be reconnected to its historic floodplain.
Another potential constraint is an elevated water table that will be the result of Priority 1 stream restoration
in the lower portion of the site, Headwater Valley Restoration, and Riparian Wetland Restoration. This
potential constraint is not expected to be a concern due to two reasons. A second reason is that wetland
restoration is proposed in areas where the water table will be raised; therefore, there will be no adjacent
cropland that could be adversely affected. In addition, the easement area encompasses all areas that will be
altered by the increased hydrology.
The east side of the project is adjacent to an airport facility. EBX has communicated their desire to perform
stream and wetland restoration to the airport and has received letters supporting the project. In addition, the
United States Department of Agriculture Animal Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA APHIS) will be
contacted to perform long -term management to alleviate the airport's current and future wildlife hazards
associated with the project area.
5.3 Project Development
Stream and wetland buffers throughout the project site will be restored and protected in perpetuity.
Proposed mitigation for the Cedar Creek site involves Priority Level I stream restoration, Priority Level 2
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-21 -

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
stream restoration, Headwater Valley Restoration, stream Enhancement Level II, stream preservation,
wetland restoration, and wetland preservation. The proposed mitigation design divides the site into two main
areas "east" and "west" (Figures 7a and 7b). Approximately 12,000 linear feet of restoration is proposed and
is made up of 10,000 linear feet of Priority Level I restoration, 1,000 linear feet of Priority Level 2 restoration,
and 1,000 linear feet of Headwater Valley Restoration. The project also entails approximately 3,000 linear
feet of stream Enhancement Level 2. Options include wetland preservation areas that range from 109 acres to
219 acres. Three separate wetland restoration areas are proposed with total of 15.0 acres of riparian wetland
restoration. A total of fifteen (15) project options are proposed in Table 3.
Priority I restoration reaches will typically include a meandering stream pattern constructed to mimic the
natural planform of low- gradient, sand bed channels. Proposed sinuosity will depend on local reference reach
conditions and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling. The stream floodplain will be inundated frequently during
a range of mid to high flows. As a result of the restoration of planform and dimension, periodic flooding and
restored riparian buffer will provide the appropriate hydrology and sediment transport throughout this
coastal plain watershed. Restoration activities along UT1 east Reach E will entail reconnecting the existing
stream to remnants of its relic location as shown on Figure 713.
Headwater valley restoration will follow current regulatory guidance and published research. This restoration
approach will result in a fully vegetated valley bottom following natural existing contours. Any ditches or
channels present will be completely backfilled and stabilized. Vegetation will be restored across the entire
headwater valley. Headwater valley restoration will include approximately 1,250 linear feet. With a mitigation
ratio of 1:1, headwater valley restoration will provide 1,250 SMUs (10 percent of the total SMU yield).
Enhancement Level II may include minor bank and floodplain grading, installation of woody habitat structures,
invasive species management, and supplemental riparian planting. As stated above, Enhancement Level II will
include approximately 3,000 linear feet yielding approximately 750 SMUs at a ratio of 4:1.
Proposed riparian wetland restoration areas have been evaluated by a licensed soil scientist. The restoration
will consist of raising adjacent stream channels and reconnecting the floodplain with seasonal and out of bank
flows. Raising the stream bed will also lessen the "dry shoulder" effect near the stream channel. Specific
restoration activities will include: reconnecting low lying areas of hydric soil with the floodplain, plugging
agricultural drainage ditches, planting native tree and shrub species commonly found in small stream swamp
ecosystems, and surface roughening to increase infiltration and storage. Wetland restoration limits and
hydroperiods will be determined by on -site soil investigations and hydrologic modeling in conjunction with
pre- construction water table monitoring at the restoration sites and reference wetlands.
In addition, there is a large amount of wetland preservation area proposed as part of this project. No
mitigation credit is being requested for these areas. Rather, they are included as part of the overall project.
Marking and Protecting of Easement Boundary
Marking and protecting of the easement boundary will utilize various methods depending upon the existing
land use. All easement areas will utilize rebar on all corners. Areas adjacent to cultivated or maintained fields
will be marked using 10 -ft yellow easement poles. EBX conservation easement signs will be posted at all
corners, gates, access points, and at 200 -foot intervals. Marking and protecting of the easement boundary will
be in accordance with the "Survey Requirements for Full Delivery Projects Version 02- 14 -12."
Stream Mitigation Approach
Stream restoration efforts along the tributaries to Cedar Creek will be accomplished through a combination of
analytical and analog and /or reference reach based design methods. The result will be a combination of
Priority Level I and II stream restoration and headwater valley restoration. The cross - section geometry,
planform, and profile will be modified to restore appropriate capacity and sinuosity to the channelized, sand
bed streams. The Priority Level I stream restoration will incorporate the design of a single- thread meandering
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROIECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-22-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
channel with parameters based on reference sites to be identified later, empirical relationships, and NC
Coastal Plains Regional Curves.
Current stream conditions demonstrate significant degradation with a high degree of incision as a result of
straightening and channelization performed to promote agricultural activities. Surveyed cross sections
indicate significant incision and bank instability throughout the restoration reaches. Additionally, the riparian
buffer is in poor condition throughout most of the project area. Most of the riparian buffer is devoid of trees
or shrubs, and row crops or active pasture is present up to the edge of the existing channel.
To address the incision caused by channelization, the proposed restoration design will incorporate both raised
bed elevations and the filling of drainage ditches to raise the water table to elevations closer to pre -
disturbance conditions. Conceptual plan views are provided in Figures 7a and 7b.
The Cedar Creek Site design approach will begin with a thorough study of existing conditions, including the
onsite streams and ditches, valleys, and watershed. Design parameters, including active channel, habitat, and
floodplain features, will be developed from analysis of suitable reference streams. Other empirical data sets
such as the NC DOT reference reach database may be used to verify design parameters. Analytical design
techniques will be an important element of the project, and will be used to determine the design discharge
and to verify the design as a whole because of the nature of sand bed channels.
Deep pool -steep riffle patterns are not natural for sand channels, the planform of straight reaches and tight
bends is not necessary. In fact, tight bends are extremely erosive in sand channels and should be avoided.
Gently turning bends will be designed for this stream system. During storm flows, sediment transport in sand
channels is accomplished through dune migration. Sand dunes are waveforms with frequencies and
amplitudes. Sand bed channels are actively mobile during bankfull flows, and will have a thalweg depth that is
well below the observed base -flow channel bed. This characteristic is a significant design constraint when
determining the placement of in- stream structures. If dune heights are not considered, structures are likely to
fail due to undermining.
Due to these differences, the design process for restoration of sand bed channels is much more rigorous than
for gravel or cobble bed streams. Because sand bed streams have entirely mobile channel boundaries, proper
design requires comprehensive analyses of stream mechanics for a variety of flood stages to reduce the risk of
channel degradation.
Engineering analysis will be performed using various hydrologic and hydraulic models to verify the reference
reach /analog based design. A combination of methods (including HEC -HMS, Hydraflow Hydrographs, and
flood frequency analysis) will be used to calculate flows received by the channel for bankfull and other
significant storm events. A HEC -RAS model will then be used to simulate water surface elevations of flows
generated by the hydrologic analysis. The development of the HEC models is an important component to the
design; therefore, model input parameters are field verified when possible. Design parameters developed
through the analyses of reference reach data and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling will be confirmed using
the Stable Channel Design function and /or the Sediment Transport Analysis components within HEC -RAS.
Engineering analyses are performed concurrently to geomorphic and habitat studies. While stream design will
be verified by simulations of hydrology and fluvial processes, analogs of desirable habitat features will be
derived from reference sites and integrated into the project design. Both in- stream and riparian habitat
features will be designed. In- stream woody structures such as root wads, log vanes, and log weirs will be used
throughout the project to act as grade control and for bank stabilization by dissipating and redirecting the
stream's energy. Bank stability will be enhanced further through the installation of brush mattresses and
cuttings bundles consisting of species such as black willow (Salix nigro).
In- stream habitat is highly dependent on available cover and organic material. A quantitative habitat
assessment method will be used to measure type, location, and quantity of habitat in the reference streams.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-23-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
During design, the habitat assessment results will be scaled appropriately to the design parameters, and
habitat features will be located in the restored channels to mimic reference conditions. This process provides
a natural channel design that addresses aquatic function in addition to stability.
Sections of abandoned stream channels will be backfilled with material excavated from the site to the
elevation of the floodplain in areas adjacent to the new channel. The floodplain will be planted with native
species creating a vegetated buffer, which will provide numerous water quality and ecological benefits.
Species selection for re- vegetation of the riparian buffer will consist of those suggested by Schafale and
Weakley (1990) for Coastal Plain small stream swamp - blackwater subtype communities. Stream banks will be
stabilized using a combination of erosion control matting, bare -root plantings, soil bioengineering techniques,
structure placement, and sod transplants where possible. The stream and adjacent riparian areas will be
protected by a minimum 50 -foot permanent conservation easement.
When all of these components are combined, a functional low gradient sand channel with diverse habitat will
be created. According to Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003) published by the US Army Corps of Engineers,
the US Environmental Protection Agency, The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and the
NCDWQ, the proposed restoration will meet the guidelines of stream restoration and will be subject to a
mitigation ratio of 1:1. Preliminary design parameters are included in the Stream Morphological Table in the
Appendix.
Headwater valley restoration is proposed in certain reaches of the project where channel and valley gradients
are low, and where the stream channels are located at the uppermost portions of the sub - basin. Criteria for
determining which reaches would be suitable were taken primarily from guidance found in the document
"Information Regarding Stream Restoration In The Outer Coastal Plain Region of NC", published by USACE and
NC DWQ in December of 2005, as well as the technical paper "A Methodology for Predicting Channel Form in
Coastal Plain Headwater Systems" published by Kevin L. Tweedy, PE in November of 2008. Based on this
guidance, coastal plains channels of zero to first order that are in a clearly defined valley are appropriate
candidates for headwater valley restoration. LIDAR data from the NC FMIS website show valley formations in
the headwater regions of the drainage basins of the Cedar Creek West site in the location of UT4 and UTS
(Figure 8a).
Cedar Creek and each of the unnamed tributaries are discussed in detail below. The existing conditions are
also briefly summarized. The Appendix contains NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms, USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheets, Existing Conditions Summary Table, and Morphological Parameters Table.
The project name Cedar Creek originates from local vernacular that is used in reference to the Great Coharrie
Creek, which is the central drainage feature that links the east and west portions of the site and creates a
habitat corridor and a large undisturbed preservation area that provides the keystone parcel of this proposed
+/ -300 acre stream and riparian wetland mitigation project. The portion of the site that drains from the west
toward Great Coharrie Creek is referred to as Cedar Creek West and the portion that drains from the east is
referred to as Cedar Creek East.
Invasive species management is proposed throughout the buffer areas where privet growth and other
invasive vegetation is observed. Privet and other observed invasive vegetation will be removed and treated
according to the safest and most effective method based on time of year, vegetation type, and extent of
colonization. Areas where invasive vegetation is removed will be demarcated in the field and the entire
invasives treatment area will be replanted with hardwood trees.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-24-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
Cedar Creek East
Cedar Creek East consists of a single main tributary, UT1 East, and two smaller tributaries UT2 and UT3 East.
Land use along UT1 East is primarily wooded on the left bank side and active agriculture on the right bank
side. Historical information and site observations indicate that that UT1, UT2, and UT3 East have been
significantly modified over time. A system of ditches have been installed over time to facilitate agricultural
production on the site. The riparian area for these reaches is in poor condition. Areas adjacent to active
pasture lack a 50 -foot mature wooded buffer and all other areas are a sparse mix of pine and hardwoods with
significant clusters of privet and multiflora rose. Streambank erosion is systemic and is a result of past
channelization. Evidence of a dam along UT1 Reach C was observed and major channel relocation activities
along UT2 and UT3 were evident. Cattle have had access to UT3 in the past and may continue to use the area
for pasture if the proposed project is not implemented. Cattle access along this reach has promoted soil
erosion, sloughing stream banks, and prevented the establishment of a wooded riparian buffer. Cattle are not
currently present, but the landowner has reserved the right to reintroduce them to this area in the future
unless this project is implemented.
UT1 East
Preservation is proposed along the first two reaches of UT1,
which are Reach A and B. Significant areas of privet growth within
these sections will be treated and planted with native vegetation.
Enhancement Level II is proposed for UT1 Reaches C, and D. UT1
is currently channelized with unstable banks, a narrow or non-
existent wooded buffer, and is adjacent to active cropland. The
bedform diversity is low, and the buffer is mostly devoid of
appropriate hardwood vegetation. Enhancement Level II
activities will include the establishment of a minimum 50 -foot
riparian buffer, the creation of a bankfull bench where needed,
and the treatment of invasive vegetation. Currently, overland
flow within the active agricultural field is forming a headcut area.
This issue will be corrected once a wooded buffer is established
along the area.
Priority Level 1 restoration of UT1 is necessary along UT1 Reach E
to address all existing impairments, particularly the greatly
oversized channel and lack of bedform diversity. UT1 is currently
channelized with unstable banks, a narrow or non - existent
wooded buffer, and is adjacent to active cropland. Along UTl
Reach E the buffer is mostly devoid of appropriate hardwood
Existing XS
Reach UT1E
A = 39.6 ft'
10.0' 15.0'
3.4'
172'
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed XS
Priority 1 Restoration
vegetation. The design approach will include meandering the
proposed channel within the natural valley and backfilling the existing stream. As shown on Figure 7B and on
Cross - Section 9 for Reach E, a portion of the former channel (relic channel) exists along the proposed channel
alignment. The restored stream channel will be returned to the relic channel to the greatest extent possible.
The culvert crossing along UT1 East Reach E will be replaced with an elevated bridge to discourage beavers
from building dams along the proposed channel. All areas within the 50 -foot buffer will be planted with native
riparian vegetation. Because the buffer along the right bank side is devoid of significant woody vegetation,
woody debris will be installed along the bed to improve in- stream habitat.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-25-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
UT2 East
UT2 East is divided into two reaches where Enhancement
Level II is proposed along Reach A and Priority Level I
restoration is proposed for Reach B. Enhancement Level
II for Reach A is proposed with a conservative 4:1
mitigation ratio. Site observations and historical
information indicate that UT2 East has been significantly
modified to accommodate crop production. The upper
half of the stream is incised and located in a sparsely
wooded area and the lower half is surrounded by -
agricultural field on both sides. To maintain access to
the field areas a culvert crossing will be installed at the
end of UT2 Reach A. The crossing will be installed in .r tiw•,
conjunction with Enhancement Level II activities which
include invasives removal, establishment of a buffer and
creation of a bankfull bench where necessary to prevent
future erosion. Flow from the upper half of the UT2 --
Reach B channel has been diverted to the east away East UT2 Reach 8 Looking Downstream
from its natural valley. This diversion exists to dewater
the adjacent agricultural fields. This diversion channel will be closed to restore natural flow into UT2. UT2 East
Reach B is laterally unstable and its past modification is evident from the spoil piles and irregular topography
within the area of the channel. The proposed project will return the stream to its natural historical channel.
The lower section of channel is straightened in the field and is actively cultivated over. Priority II restoration
will be utilized to reconnect the channel bed with UT1 Reaches C and D.
UT3 East
Priority I Restoration is proposed along Reach UT3 East
downstream of the existing agricultural pond. The
pond is to remain in place for farm use; however, as
part of this project a stormwater wetland will be
installed in between the pond and the road (Main
Street Extension). The stormwater wetland will not be
included in the conservation easement for the site, but
the pond and the stormwater wetland will be
protected by a 30 -foot buffer and covenants that will
prevent future development and impairment and
livestock.
East UT3 Reach 8 Proposed Wetland Area
East UT3 Reach A - Looking Downstream
Downstream of the pond, past surface drainage patterns
are highly modified and multiple historic channels can be
observed. Downstream of the pond the channel is highly
incised and has been diverted in a northwest direction
into a large manmade drainage ditch. A headcut was
observed in this location where the channel is extremely
over sized. The stream continues down a ditch line
toward the main stem, UT1 Reach E, and flows parallel to
its natural valley. Spoil piles are evident along the
existing top of bank, evidence of historic channelization.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-26-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
During a 2008 site visit, cattle were observed in this area and have likely contributed to stream bank sloughing
and erosion.
Restoration along UT3 East will begin downstream of the pond using a Priority 1 approach. The channel will
be directed back into its natural stream valley. Existing spoil on site and from excavation of the new channel
will be used to fill the abandoned channel along Reach A. UT3 East Reach B begins in the open field area and
will be directed to the natural valley where it is visually apparent.
Existing XS
Reach UT3A Midway B/T Pond & Field
2LL' A -68.8 H'
4.9'
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed XS
Priority 1 Restoration
1.7' 3.3'
fbeF = 5.9 f1'
NOT TO SCALE
EAST X4
Cedar Creek West
Cedar Creek West consists of five (5) distinct drainage
features which have been designated UT1 through UT5
(West). Proposed activities in this portion of the site are
predominantly Priority Level I Restoration, and to a lesser
extent Priority Level II Restoration, Enhancement Level II,
and Headwater Valley Restoration. UT1, UT3, and UT5 are
included for mitigation purposes. UT1 and UT3 West are
perennial streams that originate off -site. UT5
predominantly oriipinates on -site with a drainage area of
76 acres (0.12 mi ). Site observations indicate UT2 and
UT4 West are very likely man -made drainage features and
have small drainage areas; 25 acres (0.04 mil) and 19
acres (0.03 mil) respectively. UT2 and UT4 are not
included for mitigation purposes; however, these features
will be inside the conservation easement for the project
and will be planted and protected into perpetuity.
Practices currently implemented by the Owner include
irrigation of lagoon wastewater into the adjacent
agricultural fields. Forested buffers will be added in this
area to help mitigate the impact to the adjacent streams.
Existing XS
Reach UT3B
A =56.4 ft'
D tch to
be filled
Law point to nerd 1.8 Dkch to
Propose stream IoeaDOn be filled
532'
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed XS
Priority 1 Restoration and Wetland Restoration
NOT TO SCALE
ABKF — 5.9 ft'
X6
West UT1 Reach 8 - Looking Downstream;
Upstream of XSEC 10
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-27-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
UT1 West
Enhancement Level II is proposed along the beginning of
UT1 West within Reach A. In this area the stream is
connected to its floodplain but is lacking a protected 50 -foot
buffer on either side. Additionally, a drainage ditch parallel
to the edge of the field in that location likely has a de- - ---
watering effect on the channel. The riparian buffer is also
denuded in some areas. At cross section 10, UT1 Reach B,
the channel is extremely incised. Priority 1 Restoration is
proposed in this location to reconnect the channel to its
historic floodplain. It is also likely that along the remainder
of Reach UT1 B and UT1 C that the channel was relocated to
the edge of the field to maximize available cropland.
Priority I restoration in this area will enable the stream
channel to be moved away from the edge of the slope and
will provide an adequate floodplain for stability and West UT1 Reach D - Looking Downstream
development of a healthy riparian buffer. Priority 1
restoration will continue along UT1 Reach C where UT3 West connects and then flows to Reach D that will
also be restored through a Priority I approach. Restoration of this reach will prevent future sedimentation
downstream and will establish a riparian buffer. It is important to note that the proposed relocation of UT1
will move the stream from the toe of the existing embankment for the lagoon storage pond towards the
agricultural field while remaining in the natural valley, which will help to alleviate groundwater seep from the
lagoon into the stream.
Existing XS
Reach UT1B
f� A = 14.9 ft'
5.0'
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed XS
Priority 1 Restoration
"off = 11.4 ft'
NOT TO SCALE
Existing XS
Reach UT1D
24.5 A = 59.9 ft'
5.2'
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed XS
Priority 1 Restoration
A,� = 15.0 ft'
NOT TO SCALE
X51
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-28-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
UT2 West
UT2 West scored a 19 using NCDWQ Stream Classification
standards. However, based upon field observations, the
limited drainage area, and excessive drainage ditching for
agricultural purposes, UT2 West is not proposed for
mitigation since it appears to only function as a drainage
ditch. Regardless, this project proposes a 50 -foot buffer
within the conservation easement that will protect this
area and provide ancillary water quality benefits.
UT3 West
Restoration activities along UT3 West include Priority Level
II and Priority Level I Restoration. UT3 West Reach B is a
highly incised and over -wide channel. This stream has
been channelized in the past to lower the water table and
facilitate crop production. The stream is laterally unstable West UT2 — Inlet Pipe at Start
and completely disconnected from its historic floodplain.
The stream banks lack woody vegetation and are maintained regularly to facilitate cop production. Priority
Level II restoration will be necessary along the first 1,000 feet of channel to raise the existing stream bed to its
historic floodplain. Priority Level 1 begins at UT3 West Reach B and continues until it confluence with UT2
and UT1. Restoration activities along this reach will establish a wooded riparian corridor, floodplain
connectivity, bedform diversity, and aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
. - .,. . .
West UT3 Reach A Looking Upstream
Existing XS
Reach UT3A
A — 165.4 ft'
39.7'__
6.9'
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed XS
Priority 2 Restoration
NOT TO SCALE
WEST x2
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-29-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
West UT3 - Looking Downstream
to
UT4 West West UT4 - Looking Downstream
UT4 West is very similar to UT2 West in that it has a
limited drainage area, excessive agricultural ditching, and
simply functions as a drainage ditch. As part of Wetland Restoration Area W2 shown on Figure 7a, UT4 West
will be filled in to raise the water table in support of the wetland restoration effort.
UT5 West
Headwater Valley Restoration is proposed for UT5 West. Activities along this reach include filling the existing
ditch feature and then creating a hummock and pool complex through minor surface roughening within the
natural valley feature. The varying topographic relief within the Headwater Wetland Valley will promote
diverse habitat and vegetation conditions. Surface irregularities are expected to be less than +/ -10" —12" and
will be based on reference conditions. The area adjacent to UT5 encompasses approximately 35.5 acres and
will provide an expansive area for vegetation and habitat conditions to improve.
Existing XS
Reach UT5
10.7'
85,
I
NOT TO SCALE
Proposed XS
Headwater Valley Restoration
Hummock /pool
mK. idth 60'
Hummock
Valley width
min. 100'
__�,$'
T
--
Pool
1.0' Pool Depth
NOT TO SCALE
WEST X8
West UT5 - Looking Downstream
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-30-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
Wetland Mitigation Approach
The Cedar Creek site offers a total ecosystem restoration opportunity. As such, the wetland restoration is
closely tied to the stream restoration. The proposed wetland restoration areas are located adjacent to the
proposed stream restoration of Cedar Creek site. There are three (3) proposed wetland restoration areas.
Cedar Creek East contains a wetland area along UT3 East. Cedar Creek West Contains two (2) wetland areas.
One wetland restoration area is within the easement area for UT5 West and the other is along UT1 West
Reach D. Wetland restoration is proposed only in areas that have been designated as hydric by a licensed soil
scientist; however, the majority of the fields within the project area have been designated as Prior Converted
(PC) cropland Figures 8a and 8b.
Hydric soils within the proposed wetlands were verified through auger borings by a licensed soil scientist
(Appendix). Within W1 (near UT3 East), the majority of the mapped soils are Johns and Bibb and Johnston
soils. The Bibb and Johnston soils are mapped within a shallow, concave depression along the slope. In W2
(near UT5 West) and W3 (near UT1 West Reach D) Johns soil is present within a shallow concave depression.
The stream channel bed will be raised, reconnecting the floodplain with seasonal and out of bank flows.
Raising the stream bed will also lessen the "dry shoulder" effect near the stream channel. A preliminary
assessment of hydrologic trespass was performed on the site. It appears that the adjacent agricultural fields
are topographically elevated sufficient to provide drainage onto the floodplain without impacting existing
drainage. Restoration activities will include:
• Reconnecting low lying areas of hydric soil with the floodplain through stream restoration;
• Plugging /filling agricultural drainage ditches to raise the seasonal groundwater elevations;
• Planting native tree and shrub species commonly found in small stream swamp ecosystems; and
• Creating a rough soil surface to aid in infiltration and storage by ripping and disking.
These hydrology restoration activities will result in an elevated seasonal high water table, increased flood
frequency and duration, and increased precipitation infiltration across all of the restored wetlands.
It is estimated that riverine wetland restoration will be approximately 15 acres. Minor grading along the
restored channels is proposed to remove fill excavated from channel dredging. No fill is proposed beyond
plugging previously excavated channels and ditches. Soils in the wetland restoration area will be tested for
fertility and soil amendments may be specified as needed. These wetlands expand habitat along the easement
and provide a more diverse community. Once constructed, these wetlands will be monitored to document the
success of hydrologic and vegetative restoration.
W1
This 9.0 acre wetland is located along UT3 East along the channel and where it reaches the confluence of with
UT1 East. The current land use is sparsely wooded and active cropland. Hydrology will be restored by
removing dredge material along the channel and raising the streambed elevation, bringing the water table
closer to the ground surface.
W2
This 3.0 acre wetland is located near UT5 West within the +/ -35.5 acre portion of the field the lies within the
conservation easement. Two mapped hydric areas make up the wetland restoration within W2. Hydrology
will be restored by removing dredge material, filling the UT4 ditch, and removing the UT5 ditch to create a
headwater valley restoration. This construction will bring the water table closer to the ground surface.
W3
This 3.0 acre wetland is located along the UT1 West Reach D. The current land use is row crop along the
dredged channel. Hydrology will be restored by removing dredge material along the channel and raising the
streambed elevation, bringing the water table closer to the ground surface.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-31 -

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
Riparian Vegetation
The Cedar Creek site permanent conservation easement will extend a minimum of 50 feet from the top of
bank on all outside bends, or to the adjacent wetland boundary, whichever is wider. The riparian buffer
restoration target natural community will be a small stream swamp - blackwater subtype as described in
Schafale and Weakley (1990). This type of riverine system is common throughout the coastal plain. Table 6
lists proposed bottomland tree seedlings to be planted at the site.
Table 3. Conceptual Planting Plan
Common Name
Scientific Name
Wetland Indicator
River birch
Betulo nigra
FACW
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
FACW+
Laurel oak
Quercus lourifolia
FACW+
Overcup oak
Quercus lyrato
OBL
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
FACW+
Water oak
Quercus nigra
FACW
American sycamore
Plantanus occidentalis
FACW -
Bald cypress
Toxodium distichum
OBL
Site Preparation and Stabilization
All disturbed areas will be stabilized to prevent erosion. To provide a rapid herbaceous cover, planting of a
temporary seed mix will be required. All disturbed areas within the buffer will receive an appropriate
permanent riparian seed mix (Table 7, Table 8). Preservation areas will be seeded and planted with
appropriate hardwood tree species. The seeding will be undertaken to prevent re- colonization of the
disturbed areas by privet or other invasive species. The provider will treat the entire conservation easement
for invasive species removal.
Table 4. Conceptual Permanent Riparian Seed Mix
Common Name
Scientific Name
Broomsed eBluestem
Andro 0 on vir inicus
Sedge, Fringed
Carex crinita
Sedge, Tussock
Carex stricta
Virginia Wildr a
El mus vi r inicus
Purple Love grass
Era rostis s ectabilis
Hairawn Muhly
Muhlenber is ca illaris
Switch grass
Panicum vir atum
Little Blue Stem
Schizach rium sco arium
Eastern Gama rass
Tri sacum doct loides
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-32-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
T�61a c r n +viol To nrory Rirarinn rnnrl Miv
Seed Mix A - Winter
Seed Mix B - Summer
Common Name
Scientific Name
Common Name
Scientific Name
Barley
Hordeum sp.
Browntop Millet
Ponicum ramosum
Winter Rye
Secale cereale
Pearl Millet
Pennisetum glaucum
SMU / WMU
SMU / WMU
Sudangrass
Sorghum bicolor
East UTl -C
Perennial
German Foxtail Millet ( Foxtail
bristle rass
Setaria italica
253
253
Japanese Millet
Echinochloa frumentacea
5.4 Proposed Mitigation
The Cedar Creek Mitigation Site presents the opportunity to provide 12,000 stream mitigation units with all
options. The site also provides an opportunity for 15.0 acres of wetland mitigation units. Two different options
(A and B) are also presented that allow an opportunity to achieve either 218.0 acres or 109 acres, respectively,
of wetland preservation to connect Cedar Creek East to Cedar Creek West thru the Great Coharie Creek.
Please refer to Table 6 for details regarding the mitigation type and amount per reach /wetland site.
Table 6. Mitigation Summary by Stream Reach
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-33-
Stream
Mitigation Total LF or
Option 1A
Option 1B
Option 2A
Option 28
Option 3A
ID
Classification
Type* AC
Ratio
SMU /WMU
SMU / WMU
SMU / WMU
SMU / WMU
SMU / WMU
East UTl -C
Perennial
Enh II 1011
1:4
253
253
253
253
253
East UT1 -D
Perennial
Enh II 1131
1:4
283
283
283
283
283
East UT1 -E
Perennial
P1 1914
1:1
1914
1914
1914
1914
1914
East UT2 -A
Intermittent
Enh II 263
1:4
66
66
66
66
66
East UT2 -B
Intermittent
Pi 467
1:1
467
467
467
467
467
East UT3 -A
Perennial
P1 1466
1:1
1466
1466
1466
1466
1466
East UT3 -B
Perennial
Pi 646
1:1
646
646
646
646
646
West UT3 -A
Perennial
Enh II 760
1:4
190
190
190
190
0
West UTl -B
Perennial
Pi 606
1:1
606
606
606
606
0
West UT1 -C
Perennial
Pi 883
1:1
883
883
883
883
0
West UT1 -D
Perennial
Pi 1143
1:1
1143
1143
1143
1143
1143
West UT3 -A
Perennial
P2 1069
1:1
1069
1069
1069
1069
1069
West UT3 -B
Perennial
Pi 1993
1:1
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
West UTS -A
Intermittent
HWVR 1250
1:1
1250
1250
0
0
1250
Wl
--
Restoration 9
1:1
9
9
9
9
9
W2
Restoration 3
1:1
3
3
3
3
3
W3
--
Restoration 3
1:1
3
3
3
3
3
Total SMUs offered"
12000
12000
10750
10750
10000
Total WMUs offered
15
1s
15
15
15
Preservation (acres)
218.5
109.3
218.5
109.3
218.5
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-33-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
ID
Stream
Mitigation
Total LF or
9
Option 38
Option 4A
Option 48
Option S
Option 6A
0
Classification
Type*
AC
Ratio
SMU /WMU
SMU/WMU
SMU/WMU
SMU/WMU
SMU / WMU
East UTS -C
Perennial
Enh II
1011
1:4
253
253
253
253
0
East UTS -D
Perennial
Enh II
1131
1:4
283
283
283
283
0
East UT1 -E
Perennial
P1
1914
1:1
1914
1914
1914
1914
0
East UT2 -A
Intermittent
Enh II
263
1:4
66
66
66
66
0
East UT2 -B
Intermittent
Pi
467
1:1
467
467
467
467
0
East UT3 -A
Perennial
Pi
1466
1:1
1466
1466
1466
1466
0
East UT3 -9
Perennial
P1
646
1:1
646
646
646
646
0
West UT1 -A
Perennial
Enh II
760
1:4
0
0
0
0
190
West UTl -B
Perennial
Pi
606
1:1
0
0
0
0
606
West UT3 -C
Perennial
P1
883
1:1
0
0
0
0
883
West UT3 -D
Perennial
P1
1143
1:1
1143
1143
1143
0
1143
West UT3 -A
Perennial
P2
1069
1:1
1069
1069
1069
0
1069
West UT3 -B
Perennial
Pi
1993
1:1
1993
1993
1993
0
1993
West UTS -A
Intermittent
HWVR
1250
1:1
1250
0
0
0
1250
W1 - -- Restoration 9 1:1
9
9
9
9
0
W2 — Restoration 3 1:1
3
3
3
0
3
W3 — Restoration 3 1:1
3
3
3
0
3
Total SMUs offered**
10000
9000
9000
5000
7000
Total WMUs offered
15
15
15
9
6
Preservation (acres)
109.3
218.5
109.3
0
218.5
0
0
283
283
East UTi -E
Perennial
Total SMUs offered ** 7000 5700 5700 10000 10000
Total WMUs offered 6 6 6 15 15
Preservation (acres) 109.3 218.5 109.3 218.5 109.3
*HWVR= Headwater Valley Restoration, P1= Priority 1 Restoration, P2 = Priority II Restoration, Enh 1= Enhancement Level I
Enh 11= Enhancement Level II
**Total SMUs offered are slightly less than the actual estimated SMUs possible for each tributary
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-34-
Stream
Mitigation
Total LF or
Option 68
Option 7A
Option 7B
Option 8A
Option 8B
ID
Classification
Type*
AC
Ratio
SMU/WMU
SMU/WMU
SMU / WMU
SMU / WMU
SMU / WMU
East UTi -C
Perennial
Enh II
1011
1:4
0
0
0
253
253
East LI71 -D
Perennial
Enh II
1131
1:4
0
0
0
283
283
East UTi -E
Perennial
Pi
1914
1:1
0
0
0
1914
1914
East UT2 -A
Intermittent
Enh II
263
1:4
0
0
0
66
66
East UT2 -B
Intermittent
Pi
467
1:1
0
0
0
467
467
East UT3 -A
Perennial
Pi
1466
1:1
0
0
0
1466
1466
East UT3 -B
Perennial
P1
646
1:1
0
0
0
646
646
West UT3 -A
Perennial
Enh II
760
1:4
190
190
190
190
190
West UT3 -8
Perennial
PS
606
1:1
606
606
606
606
606
West UTl -C
Perennial
PS
883
1:1
883
883
883
883
883
West UT! -D
Perennial
P1
1143
1:1
1143
1143
1143
1143
1143
West UT3 -A
Perennial
P2
1069
1:1
1069
1069
1069
1069
1069
West UT3 -8
Perennial
P1
1993
1:1
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
West UTS -A
Intermittent
HWVR
1250
1:1
1250
0
0
0
0
W3
--
Restoration
9
1:1
0
0
0
9
9
W2
—
Restoration
3
1:1
3
3
3
3
3
W3
—
Restoration
3
1:1
3
3
3
3
3
Total SMUs offered ** 7000 5700 5700 10000 10000
Total WMUs offered 6 6 6 15 15
Preservation (acres) 109.3 218.5 109.3 218.5 109.3
*HWVR= Headwater Valley Restoration, P1= Priority 1 Restoration, P2 = Priority II Restoration, Enh 1= Enhancement Level I
Enh 11= Enhancement Level II
**Total SMUs offered are slightly less than the actual estimated SMUs possible for each tributary
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-34-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
5.5 Current Ownership
EBX has acquired an Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Easement from 18 landowners along the 22 parcels
that comprise the proposed project Table 7 summarizes the landowners, agreement date, and agreement
expiration date Copies of the landowner options to purchase are provided in the Appendix
Tnhla 7_ Snmmary of The radar Creek Site Current Land Ownership
Owner of Record
Agreement Date
Agreement Expiration Date
Ralph Hamilton
Feb 1 2012
July 1 2013
Eleanor Lamb, Billie Devane, James Hamilton,
Ralph Hamilton, Johnny Hamilton
Feb 1, 2012
July 1, 2013
Ray Williams
Aril 5, 2012
July 31 2013
Ralph Hamilton
May 15 2012
July 1 2013
Frances Price, Jeffrey Creech (Frances Creech
Estate
March 20, 2012
July 1, 2013
Mary Lily Nuckolls, Faison Dana, James
Nuckolls, Jr, Stephen Nuckolls, Susan Fordham,
Ellen Bailey
Feb 21, 2012
July 1, 2013
Kimbrell and Louanna Williams
A ril S 2012
Jul 31, 2013
Ray and Jeanette Williams
Aril 5 2012
Jul 31 2013
The Agreement allows EBX to acquire an easement on behalf of the State of North Carolina on a portion of
properties, which is needed for the Restoration Plan EBX is prepared to convey an easement to the State on
the acreage necessary to achieve the restoration objectives outlined In the restoration plan
5.6 Project Phasing
EBX has extensive restoration and mitigation banking experience, including stream and wetland mitigation,
and understands the most recent requirements and standards applicable to mitigation in North Carolina.
Accordingly, EBX is in a strong position to Implement the Cedar Creek site mitigation, and will Implement the
project schedule outlined in Table 8
T!ahla & Dmiart Crhadida
Project Task
Scheduled Completion Time
after contract execution
Task 1 CE Document and Public Meeting
4 months
Task 2A Deliver Conservation Easement to EEP for Review and
7 months
Task 2B Record Fully Executed Conservation Easement
Within 1 week of receipt from EEP
Task 3 Final Mitigation Plan
8 months
Task 4A Permit Obtained
8 months
Task 4B Mitigation Site Earthwork Completed
1 year, 5 months
Task 5 Mitigation site Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices
1 year, 9 months
Task 6 Baseline Monitoring Report (Including As -Built Drawings)
1 year, 11 months
Task 7 Submit First Year Monitoring Report
2 years, 8 months
Task 8 Submit Second Year Monitoring Report
3 years, 8 months
Task 9 Submit Third Year Monitoring Report
4 years, 8 months
Task 10 Submit Fourth Year Monitoring Report
5 years, 8 months
Task 11 Submit Fifth Year Monitoring Report
6 years, 8 months
Task 12 Submit Sixth Year Monitoring Report
7 years, 8 months
Task 13 Submit Seventh Year Monitoring Report and Project Close -Out
8 years, 8 months
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-35-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
5.7 Monitoring and Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site will follow current accepted and
approved success criteria presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines, NCEEP requirements, and
subsequent agency guidance Specific success criteria components are presented below Monitoring reports
will be prepared annually and submitted to EEP
As -Built Survey
An as -built survey will be conducted following construction to document channel size, condition, and location
The survey will include a complete profile of thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of bank to compare
with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in annual monitoring reports unless
requested by NCEEP or USACE Stream channel stationing will be marked with stakes placed near the top of
bank every 100 feet, as specified in the RFP.
Visual Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas will be conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year by
qualified individuals The visual assessments will include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species, and
easement encroachments Visual assessments of stream stability will include a complete streamwalk and
structure inspection Digital images will be recorded at fixed representative locations (photo points) during
each monitoring event; any noted problem areas or areas of concern will also be photographed Results of
visual monitoring will be presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital
images Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal photos should
indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral
photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time A series of
photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation
Cross Sections
Permanent cross sections will be installed at a minimum of one per 20 bankfull widths with half in pools and
half in shallows All cross section measurements will include bank height ratio and entrenchment ratio Cross
sections will be monitored annually There should be little change in as -built cross - sections If changes do
take place, they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable
condition (for example down - cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability
(for example settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width /depth ratio). Bank
height ratio shall not exceed 12, and entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2 2 within restored reaches
Channel stability should be demonstrated through a minimum of two bankfull events documented in the
seven year monitoring period
Bank Pin Arrays
At each cross section located on a meander, a bank pin array will be installed along the outer bend and
upstream third and downstream third of the meander Bank pins will be a minimum of three feet long, and
will be installed dust above the water surface and every two feet above the lowest pin Bank pin exposure will
be recorded at each monitoring event, and the exposed pin will be driven flush with the bank
Surface Flow
Headwater valley restoration areas will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface flow This
will be accomplished through direct observation, photo documentation of dye tests, and surface flow gauges
Wetland Hydrology
Success criteria and monitoring for wetland hydrology within the wetland restoration areas on the site will
follow NCEEP Guidance dated 7 November 2011 Target hydroperiods and groundwater elevation monitoring
gauge locations will be determined in the Mitigation Plan Auto recording gauges will be used to measure
daily groundwater elevations throughout the Sampson County growing season in all 7 years of monitoring
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-36-

CEDAR CREEK SITE STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE, SAMPSON COUNTY
Vegetative Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the wetland restoration and riparian buffers
on the site will follow NCEEP Guidance dated 7 November 2011. Vegetation monitoring plots will be a
minimum 0 02 acres in size, and will cover a minimum of two percent of the planted area The following data
will be recorded for all trees in the plots species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location.
Monitoring will occur in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. The interim measures of vegetative success for the site will be
the survival of at least 320 3 -year old trees per acre at the end of Year Three, and 260 trees per acre at the
end of Year 5 The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 trees per acre at the end of Year
7 of the monitoring period and the average of 10 feet of height among planted trees in each plot
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or alter the
desired community structure of the site If necessary, EBX will develop a species - specific control plan
Remedial Actions
The Mitigation Plan will include a detailed adaptive management plan that will address how potential
problems are resolved In the event that the site, or a specific component of the site, fails to achieve the
defined success criteria, EBX will develop necessary adaptive management plans and /or implement
appropriate remedial actions for the site in coordination with NCEEP and the review agencies Remedial action
required will be designed to achieve the success criteria specified previously, and will include identification of
the causes of failure, remedial design approach, work schedule, and monitoring criteria that will take into
account physical and climatic conditions.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOR FULL DELIVERY PROJECT IN CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
-37-

— " - SR —.L a, 17 8 t � i )
ZY, I - %
184
4
7-
1 �- � •� o ' i � U r� � .',•_ g + t \� r! `1n 56' '
o S
Shy IN 123
k�y H q-
9 , 4k
Ri 12
r f 1 2
.423 j
r tt
SR 12,
-f -
p Cedar Creek Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Site
.,J
SR 7
1221 X
4
1219 SR 114 SR 194
Legend
SR 1146
Airports
E3 SR 11 3 W,
NC Highways 14- b
State Roads
Streams SR 11
QCedar Creek Site 4`. r
5-Mile Avaition Zone
r
HUC 03030006090060
t.
EEP Easements
L
----------

Sq suns QtAp Noe" .J
I. �� ; 41.0 -
=" CO y
fn1
3H /� 2 NoA Ln
N
. EiOS M •.,;� ,: �-- J` `� � w ;.� #.' . doe
Re f
1
Re 2z
NaB //� I ` rR
y wan
V
jo / w
i. Pit r� - 0 NuR
IR .a a Wse
ti 1 NOA
Mac
BOB
��
,1 SR 228 NUB
NoA _ iz.
Nob FaA 1
Bod
to , FaR
Wa8 9
IM Ivey R
1
' MSC � Alaf.
N w
'y
BOB Tr r?+u .
n' +
= P` ( -
w
r
` r�
f J NOR
'
XaA for Lm J RoR
SR 1236 1 r _
IT 1
to - - --
C
"pA Soil Symbol Name
tm �`° NOR �-= ,T BH Bibb and Johnston soils, frequently flooded
,o`,'. ChA Chipley sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
N t �` ' • Jo Johns fine sandy loam
la - MaC Marvyn loamy sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
-� ,y�- , , ✓: NoB Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Legend
Figure 2
—Proposed streams
Soils Map
Proposed Easements
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 5001,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Airport
Feet Cedar Creek Site
1 inch = 2,000 feet - Existing Streams

r
111• � 'r l ,w4� ,�.
1 •
�� 4 %.�•' ` � y t � e / ^J' � 4 � °i.`'1' i � _ �i r t \ � j .,:1 i�, LI t `
,�,� • +° l; i J. .:fir% .` t! � =t �`.'.'��'-.'��1 ,� l,'%1Y F1_A
,��� \ / ' �- ••'�:n ;( / tr- `' -�:y_� � Fir..• <, (ur. -f r• •.I
�``, ';,i X11 ;�: ��1 ---�. T - .�s''s� - °" ", ti��• -, `: `L, •,
_�,•r, • � �. '+•, r; -.'sue` \ .• ; _pa'• Y i; ,a•� -- •� ; l , g+.rtw. '�t :� • � _i•�
� � r , Y. � •1 r � tip: �Y, .t, �'� r�. '.. ` -
Y�= ��"r�� <:`p / `I i. I IJ / \•)�Y1 (+b! I`-�� 3•`�T_F •.::1,•c •yl l - y.``
ip6� Y , --``. ��'3.. t! /�� it ;r..• -.Tr .�i1hi ,/t c.0 y � ��• L''f ._
:'k
' .-cam
A
-fro _ Yt , �,; � �,l i� • k r � �� � '.T � � ( ��• _ � -„�c I �. ..r I � _ ..,� 4 •"' „��
� �; T- ,(; /) �i it , ) - �• X01' (f a�i'S , � •Ik r�� l
''t7f � )% t.1� . _. /;f ,r':�li, ... i •f�,',a(+i; �I•__� °�� i.,`� .I,. -/tl,
,I� , i � °(„jii I�' \_,� \•,, y' s ^.•.. r f'r( f`.• l( 1� '•a+S, .i' i yc.. I _)
0'
';y,••\ _ -..._ .+ •-._ - �T-��n• �' '. t = lei.. tVi, 1� /� - - _ ' __ ' }�? Vii` : -�
�'- � � _!�1S[72 ILN '�'` •� \( 1 4 '�� I t - It �t'��'��'Yf.� tF,a'� i._ .� �$J •_
sir -`-� l� ` � [[ ` . /Vi� 1 ) ^`i ''•s� _ j -. `,r.
\ �� S13 i I %; �-', � � tf ;1� /�,,�t,•- /y'yj l / � I,, r ` • c ) •� 4 '���e° -r - �'',r�%" " \ � `� r
� ,� )'• �' Y�C -- a�:�t S } � �:/r t�'-• P i' , `�. _.a.- 1 r � r'� \',- 1. w.- _
t � _ � ! �. jai 1 `,• • -�I � 1 ' 4i. �' ,� r�r. �'' •.' ,, � z . ews. ? � y � �.• 1�..
Legend
� Figure 3 Le 9
USGS Map ® EEP— Easements
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Proposed Easements
0 2,000 4,000 8,000
Feet Proposed Streams
1 inch = 4,000 feet Drainage Areas

Figure 4a
FEMA Map (West Parcels)
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
1-41 Feet
1 inch = 500 feet
Legend
Proposed Streams
Proposed Easements
Target Parcels
Detailed 100yr. Floodplain

B Legend Figure 4b — Proposed Streams
FEMA Map (East Parcels)
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Proposed Easements
Target Parcels
lio.e. 0 150 300 600 900 1,200
Feet Detailed 100yr. Floodplain
1 inch = 600 feet M Future Airport Expansion

Figure 5a
NWI Map (West Parcels)
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
L41rm 0 125 250 500 750 1.000
Feet
1 inch = 500 feet
Legend
Proposed Streams
Proposed Easements
Target Parcels
NWI Wetlands

Figure 5b
NWI Map (East Parcels)
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 150 300 600 900 1,200
L10", Feet
1 inch = 600 feet
Proposed Streams
Q Airport
OProposed Easements
Target Parcels
® NWI Wetlands

Figure 6
Existing Conditions Map and Proposed Easements
Ll*.� Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 5001,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet

Figure 7a
Conceptual Design (West Parcels) Map
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
Feet
1 inch = 500 feet

Figure 7b
Conceptual Design (East Parcels) Map
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 150 300 600 900 1,200
Feet
1 inch = 600 feet

Figure 8a
1979 Prior Converted Cropland Map
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
Feet
1 inch = 500 feet

17
N Ak r ~f
Iw
iL_
Figure 8b
1979 Prior Converted Cropland Map
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 155 310 620 930 1,240
Feet
1 inch = 600 feet

Figure 9
Wetland Preservation Options
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
00M 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
1 Feet
1 inch = 1,000 feet

\� w
\ r t
---I
4\
MA,
2
5
MR OU
r
gig / o
lie
1.
dig
© Figure 10
Future Airport Expansion
' Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
2
n
Zjai
IHE
IIIII

mrpn,n propcnv
S rATH or AIORTH,CAROI.tNA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
We consider the Cedar Creck Proposal to be conceptual and preliminary In nature but
agree, if it will reduce currentwldhfeattractants, it is,lnneficml unditherefore concur
BMIRIA pAVUS PJMDUh Fuotl.uA.CUxu
with this plan based upon the preliminary information you have provi&d` Future
-Jut
"" �' switin -r
correspondence concerning this prolcet4ill need to be;apanded to include CAA.,
May 17, 2012
Sanrpcon County and the current Division of Aviation Pfolect Aanager for this turport
Also be aware that arc Airport +Sponsor Sampson County. as the owner of the airport
fat,thty and the group of Individuals who know most about the airport's day to day
Martin Hovis
operations and salcly Issues, will also neLdrtu give tht,ir concurrence for this project
Environmental Bunt, &,Exchange
909,Cupabdrty Dr Suite 3100
'Pleane keep us informed of the progress of this,prolect
Raleigh. NC 27606
RE Ccdor'Crrek Casement Project Sampson County
Sincerely,
e.�
Dear Mr.,l lovis.
IU111Cr I tier PI.
NCDO I - Dntstun of Aviation
ftus is in resplon8e to your letter dated March 30 2012 dnd your follow up cummuus via
email regarding the Proposed Cedar Creek Easemetml Project adjacent to the Clinton
Cc Chris Willis USD %- AN [IS Wildlife Scr%ices
Sampson County Airport Runway 6 approach
Andrew Mourc USDA- APHIS Wddhfc ScrvIees
Rick Barlics NCDO I Division of Aviation
The Di%ismon of Aviation Is soy glad to scc on -going beater dam management Is
Kathryn Vollcrt NCDO r Decision of Asuuwn
proposed to be Included this prujcct as that will certuinh reduce current urws of standing
water Wt, also are glad to read the wutiinds will be designed to hold water fora short
time PAA guidelines suggest a draw down time of 48 hours or less We agree a is
possible the restoration will improte the current situation with respect to wildlife Ium rd
attraction, howLvcr the agreement you mentioned, to work %%iih USDA- Aphis in
perpourty, is crucial to insure. this is rite Luse We Usk you In expand this agreement to
include general wildlife hwaard management as needed in addition to the ben%er dam
management
Addltionalh we request that tht hardwood plartumg plan be carefully implcrncnted as to
not create addruorual obstruclions in the urport approach as wt11 as consider plant species
that do not encourage bcut er habitat
Concerning future airport development rte encourage public airport Sponsors to own the
RPZ (rumcay protectionvonc) fee sunplC Iles acquisition mot be something the airport
pursuer due to I'AA saluy guidelines to the future YOU have indicated the proposed
casements can be clapped at such mnrC 1 have BiWchcd a pdf of thr. airport lavout its well
as Runwnt 6 approach surfaces thal'are of importance to the Clinton - Sampson Counn
airport for your information I'he propo,e1easement may NO I cncrodch on current
FAMUNO ADDNNaa LOCATION
Nc 01 -1 am o, Bouwmoor,
Uw+aa O.Aw,V. PAX 919a.042261 10.0 Mt .D.K
,4;9IA.r: SrAV[a Giv,rA Rou Nc wan
R..uG. NC 715M MC WeasirE WAw1ICO F QRG

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400,266 Old Coats Road
Lillington, NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
wwsv.halowensoil.com
10 May, 2012
Mr. Martin W. Hovis
EBX Project Manager
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh NC 27606
Reference: Hydric Soil Delineation
Cedar Crack Mitigation Site - Approximately 55 Acres
Sampson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Hovis,
An investigation has been conducted at the above referenced property to determine the
existence and extent of hydric soils located within the specified portions of the site. All hydric
soil and wcdand determinations were made in accordance with the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal
Plain Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.
East Tract
Hydric soil was were observed on the property and am depicted n the attached map.
The areas labeled u hydric soils were observed to meet the technical criteria for hydric soils, but
they appear to have been modified by drainage or filling. Two wetland determination data forms
were collected at his site and are attached to this report On the eut tract, all the hydric soils
indicated on the attached map appear to have been modified by human activities and significant
amounts of fill material were observed both in the drainage area (lowing south from the pond and
in the crop field Fill materials ranging from 0 -24 inches were observed in the crop field
Evidence of surface smoothing and possibly depression filling was frequently observed in the
crop field The southern and in particular exhibited one to two feel of fill. The drainageway
Rowing south from the pond also had spoil piles of significant depth and several ditches which
appear to be altering hydrology.
The was on the eastern end of the site shown u natural streams with adjacent wetlands
do not appear to have been significantly impacted by put human activities. Some ehannclization
may have occurred for a short distance on the larger stream draining from the large pond near
Boykin Bridge Road. Observations of both of these streams were Ivnited by very dense
vegetation.
Nn -hydric soils were observed on the northern side of the manmade ditch along the edge
of the crop fields. The southern side of the manmade ditch appears wetter and wetlands likely
dominate the adjacent property to the south. However, I did trot cross the ditch and make
subsurface observations. Significant amounts of spoil material from the ditch digging activities
were not observed. These materials were apparently removed to allow surface water to freely
drain from the cmp fields into the ditch.
Soil Science Investigations a Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
West Tract
Hydric soil amu were observed on the property and arc depicted on the attached map.
The areas labeled as hydric soils were observed to meet the technical criteria for hydric soils, but
they appear to have been modified by drainage or filling. Two wetland determination data forms
were collected at his site and arc attached to this report. On the west tract, all the hydric soils
indicated on the attached map appear to have been modified by human activities. Significant
amounts of fill material were observed along the ditch on the southcastcm and southwestem cads
of the property. On the southeast m end a long narrow strip of fill material has been plated
immediately adjacent to the ditch on the wooded side. This fill material appears to have been
placed over hydric soils. A natural sham was observed in the wooded are, end wetlands were
also observed adjacent to that stream. It is likely that the hydrology has been modified for some
arcs along the ditch but may not be much wider than the are overlain by fill material. The ditch
on the southwestem end provides an outlet into the swamp to the west. The hydric soils
observed adjacent to croplands appear to have been modified by the draining effect of the ditch.
However, the area west of the crop fields has clearly been modified by the spoil material from
the ditch being placed adjacent to the ditch. It appears likely that the hydrology has also ben
altered in part of this area. The draining effect of the ditch diminishes as you travel wet and the
last approximately 200 feet appears to have been primarily impacted by fill only.
The other hydric soil areas appear to have been modified by drainage only. It is possible
that the larger hydric soil area in the 27 -aac tract contains a small are with wetlmd hydrology
not temoved The smaller hydric soil area in the 27 -acre tract has a shallow ditch through it;
water was never observed in the ditch, and it is questionable as to whether or not wetland
hydmlogy can be restored to this area.
I appreciate the opportunity to provide this service and trust that you will feel free to call
on me again in the future. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
AWE
Hal Own
Licensed Soil Scientist
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Penitting, and Consulting
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permining, and Consulting

WETLAND DETEPMRATION DATA FORM- Atlauuc am Gulf Coastal Plain Rogion
ff41C5ar C•aa.Caaaa6waT aM Wegnl RvylpgYOn cry S-V— yaplp Dom, 2012-050)
AV,A a,av sac• NC s-Wgi a f
bty; K,%0M Ne —ft. H Oonn
.ana4enlaaa'K•wan. m[I tmt+amlmoa•. mNac rapt. tang S..Ml IQ
%M"p MAR a WAN. MPr VI" 13)A - La _ Dataa-
sau•aunit;•.a e - 7ek•s 4•ne sa•dy I••.. •ara mllKOSa.
aan pmal:.IMa'vEpCtaarbunlYe Y•raplalbMWYlam)Yn�KO )I Aro.eyl.nn Rmnata.J
M Vapawv, X Sm _,a HIaWiY X YTar.RY)Y•bRONT MtivM GOama,ai'pe+at) Yea X tb_
He Vagau9n _�Da�aMltrY.y)_.M•a'1)patlanft+ (U naa•aY. aaptaY ary fwwnn Ramletal
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - AM0 silo nap ah—i it —pGRp point I- Miotn, W.—la, important features, atc
✓lOValEac Vaemnm Rrlmfr Yn_ WX
Ipie3aae YnX W_ lmnn•alalYaP Yn_ N.—
US Drougld Monitor for NC indicates Sampson County is suROring Moderate Drought Conditions.
HYDROLOGY
lnsrab0r alaKrr.:
e
a .rwsda.a,a,..,..,Y
❑ awn sal o— ran
yYaa•Wamr l/nl
1W Ew AUJ
1PVMI wem— Cavaw —u. IM
Nm, walar Tal+a 4\a
arND ovft AlRnM VI
pY'u9YPWan 16141
snrWm Wl
Igeaap, sure. —.11
v.. Trr•- 110tel
1wtrYMf AlI
OH.� MtaV IC]J
y5mwrT"tCry
snn,.,t D—.lry
❑ Yaaeaua •oe (:.p
U.A. D--MAl
on 0.—(M
tLM am a.ma•an TUe SYSIUI
❑ SaeaYOn Vntlan AerY mlflaY RW
Nral Wra pwtal
1M lR lDri'�tm
Gaamv•mYnn An
Iran lkenOlDfl
OxatEvyM.nRnunN
l� SfJ1a+IpUIrYtJ]!
❑ 41Nrrin Vneb an AVa avgmY 16)1
(eGNnbYTN (05)
VHaS:aNe teens tap
Srtq.>m lms 1201nRR 1. pl
fMa(ANfYaOwu:
9Nnwma Pmlr.e) Yn_
_ tb X Dcl 4KRrp __
NtMa iatlr P.aaM) Yn
W_ee�e,annT >'DO
.ira/ab'�P•afer5)
55mm
_Ib_p'F I^a+fl'AD
tYaYrlrye.ataltrwar•m'f Yam R•X
Gaoae Mur W»<. r�aab.9wer.aTY WMa.wYwotmp4Y >.AwrYe'e
aMFfi
Significant rainfall event two days ago.
S M,/Cxpa a Enllwn AEWC aY pyl CeaYY Nn Aron -Yafm} (1
—04
_ 01
(A9J
IMty,
m
aYpn
c6Yn•;
f'YaYY ^f^t
eta m
n)TYYa. Nf
)IY
a.cgaC�
+rI }aR�
-ve o

VEOETATH31(Pwr trusts) -Use FdeMM1C names d Pfards. BeObv wAO. 2
lavitticst QreQa ) xc.r. 9adm2 .IDS
1
m.m.atm�ae sv.a..
Tr<M OBL PACW mFAG W
TaelNucerAOadrm
6pri+AaamN6eY. (0)
vTmtl albmb.a s.mr
i1pM WI, FApY mPAC (AIB)
_ __
2
���
e
�__
�'
— — —
eeen
oilv(
8taee 0ea lCtl
T
Taexcan.c
�� t
FI,LW.palr ^.v.
FAC arYx .s•
FACU ndm .
Ts.proba W tW
Pmalmv ltdn •Bx.
Oeso- a aeawa
- --
,Tara Cap
saxdaAa a.r_mxabrom.._
dotl efa )
1
z
- --
a
Dwotopm
--
nQn 1 RpN Ted b.NNFa''/OONpaalp,
y2 Omananr T.xb.eax
Qs franano wnbno'
❑ Fmtlxedt NpapVlbVe0alOm'(egYary
'edsrm.dWeroMadmdWtltYi,dopTeet
aF.ma,ucnawamemaammt
0.
- --
T
- -�
e
_.Taa Caa
sox amr vo.er_ mx ara a.ar
�6vx eltr 1
1 �a
_ _ _
a F«. smm
nw- weaaryme. .aadeprn..,eh.nnuya
md.m.emdbesdlelye t0elp �waar.d
ee0e"Y'aemb -weoq Wale eetlAyw4.. am
vp,eh DeN andFadm epiLm en.d bz
IMb -N 1pe.etae lmn'neoed a.m. wWdw
dmx .id.omtrgvebb mtnameW
WoaeT Nn- N.aoeypw P.eex bma]Bab
ntleit
a
- --
e
__
9l,tree lae.n @W
T
___
0.
9FOUwabr Pnsa7 ro_NOX O'Oe,aCrj
t0.
�-�� -�
11
_ _ _
12
_,TOItl CFwr
s»aamlam..._ mxdw—
v.vmtbo
eas.exm Po ow ro_M_OVa, Pab.k > LI
a
amemeovoa
Prom. If .neck
_•TddCw v
ltlar emtl.eoo
Crop field planted m wheat
G9 Amry Cop, d FJptreme NeTOe YIO GNtaaa Pleh aepvn -VertM 20
W AmYC
VVETI.AND DETERUMATION DATA PORG - Atlmdio and Duff Caasttl PW o Raglon
pt*�Ceda OVOStreemmdCwlMWPOW en QyoroWS.mpam 3.nvoq �7a12LLS07
A Bb NC S.nxeeoPo 2
bndY. IOBWO N—onD Nat Omen SMavt Tanmlp iuM
IagNmP'edm..lemr.abj lanln9erlaewe.an.—t WnCaVe OWN 11
q�aoppaeap� lRR P /AaM173A lap Derr_
ep.xvuaeemr LI,6 .ed 7.6nsti. ..h Fl.odad NN dmamua
M Oboeelnraaeebmddxeana..ee tlpd raabbn.di..11 Vr_Ibz pinq..pbhh MS4)
M VepWeAx ac�axeaaepTX etr1'aeaa/eee.a.TT M TVomd Glecdsm P—n rrx Im_
Mvspdeem— W— o, llaedeeT_ndaea/amrneffir lnaplea mp.x M.aw.b RavNa)
SULWAARY Of PIT MW - AResb she map showing sampling Print 1ooat1WM ftWMM, enlTOetsrd TeaIWOa, etc
MYdlopWec V..a Pmae7 ro_ rmX bM e.mvba An.
N.blesd Ptrm/ ro =N._ Meb.Vhm.a1 rr NeX
Wdxd bmdup it ro__ M.M
US Drought Monitor for NC Indicates Sampson County is suffering Moderate Drought Conditions
NTDROLOOY
e. nree�n.taal.n
ebhm seO Cnda (e0
eeen
oilv(
8taee 0ea lCtl
<<rsTme lmr 0110
4
o, .tat)
Oeso- a aeawa
owm pp
[A10M.0
waa.aaa.ear bn (Gl
Cb ft eme.o obi
Dwotopm
orc —osa
TNt etraA aexre lCn
GeoompNe Pmmmota
eW." 1D1
oerr(Ew1M himrN)
❑ stsvo.'Aaaa,004
doobovbOber
9l,tree lae.n @W
eaxtl.ee ivov (aa oTaT in
9FOUwabr Pnsa7 ro_NOX O'Oe,aCrj
ryla sac 1
_
v.vmtbo
eas.exm Po ow ro_M_OVa, Pab.k > LI
a
amemeovoa
Prom. If .neck
_•TddCw v
ltlar emtl.eoo
Crop field planted m wheat
VVETI.AND DETERUMATION DATA PORG - Atlmdio and Duff Caasttl PW o Raglon
pt*�Ceda OVOStreemmdCwlMWPOW en QyoroWS.mpam 3.nvoq �7a12LLS07
A Bb NC S.nxeeoPo 2
bndY. IOBWO N—onD Nat Omen SMavt Tanmlp iuM
IagNmP'edm..lemr.abj lanln9erlaewe.an.—t WnCaVe OWN 11
q�aoppaeap� lRR P /AaM173A lap Derr_
ep.xvuaeemr LI,6 .ed 7.6nsti. ..h Fl.odad NN dmamua
M Oboeelnraaeebmddxeana..ee tlpd raabbn.di..11 Vr_Ibz pinq..pbhh MS4)
M VepWeAx ac�axeaaepTX etr1'aeaa/eee.a.TT M TVomd Glecdsm P—n rrx Im_
Mvspdeem— W— o, llaedeeT_ndaea/amrneffir lnaplea mp.x M.aw.b RavNa)
SULWAARY Of PIT MW - AResb she map showing sampling Print 1ooat1WM ftWMM, enlTOetsrd TeaIWOa, etc
MYdlopWec V..a Pmae7 ro_ rmX bM e.mvba An.
N.blesd Ptrm/ ro =N._ Meb.Vhm.a1 rr NeX
Wdxd bmdup it ro__ M.M
US Drought Monitor for NC Indicates Sampson County is suffering Moderate Drought Conditions
NTDROLOOY
e. nree�n.taal.n
ebhm seO Cnda (e0
eeen
oilv(
8taee 0ea lCtl
<<rsTme lmr 0110
4
o, .tat)
Oeso- a aeawa
owm pp
[A10M.0
waa.aaa.ear bn (Gl
Cb ft eme.o obi
Dwotopm
orc —osa
TNt etraA aexre lCn
GeoompNe Pmmmota
eW." 1D1
oerr(Ew1M himrN)
❑ stsvo.'Aaaa,004
doobovbOber
9l,tree lae.n @W
eaxtl.ee ivov (aa oTaT in
9FOUwabr Pnsa7 ro_NOX O'Oe,aCrj
1Yam TtlY Feraer ro_w_DOao.d•a %31
eas.exm Po ow ro_M_OVa, Pab.k > LI
w.tb.e ebe,.mb. P"aadl r.._ wx
amemeovoa
Prom. If .neck
Significant ratnfag avant two days ego
N aemer+a.
rsotL
tlb.am.mwe
a-0 tOYN all _
614 itIYR LI _
14-11 N26n _
2711 N 161 92
R
Niarb efaleYeaar ml
tmma NO
1010:1j'p.t fA>7
eeewolAy
NTatga'Ans(A.q
m.ad tee.. psi
d'v/ea eaar (Tq 1LM P rut
emmrreex,r psi pARe T
twet,e.mmtAq (uay
ta.aW p0 aA1[P n
Oep1.W eaeadee eFbm Ntp
Tad OexeAr ptp
CrA P,dib a.da. pttp vitxA 11
as11! aaaf taws ryt)oaa q l
Baief Gina adb C�1e
mndyaabelsq
svypw ebvb tsq
O.e Budu (STI AM
4 r y
< anrwc
Typ.�
son andr.t
U9 AngCapdEnpbeaa
Aeaxc via om tr+u vb., awb,- vam.2o

WETLAND DETERM NATION DATA FORK -Atlantic and GO Cn.atal Plain Ragba
rq,M Cedm Cmak eaem a,d WetWW Rotoratbn q Kl r Samp.Pn a.,.- 20124)6-07
1p➢aorn0.rir Sw NC smarrpPM.3
b k /daub Naavmb Hal Own sa nm. r~,ro Rms,
7 Qaaaa, aaa aw Wadnea(maaw.mrw .w Shp R) 1"2
*nfLM. tlUGk LRR P I LaRA OU Lt 34.0360 mp. 7e 9866 prm
a la6wisJ. JP line candy awn Mp aa.Mebn
wa dawk,ft myc.m®aam w a.baalbob s.. /war Yn_wx 01. eaaabbRam.b1
A.Yap. x W_ a1lrm*wxwoo=* anaaA MT(aaa CbamaLUrYyne.uc7 Yex w_
a YpOam�s.l��aRpMpy__.r4 q.tl.ns15at NI..a..a ambb a.arRa.abRmrM1a)
SUMMARY OF FINDING6- AU=h sib map ahoMng wmpaag pebd bcafl ro traroaeb ImpoMnt lesbras etc.
*IOWWWV"Pd Prwri Yr_ wx blbfaaw Ana
.V-mp..w Ya x w_ .Reb.7MMa7 Yr wx_
Ya..r Fry/NprPm.rsr Y., M.
US Drought Monitor for NC Indicates Sampson County Is suffering Moderate Drought Conditions
HYDROLOGY
USAwrc.P.d FPtiraa
Atl.nlic err OJlf:.ulr Pbb R.pm -NNmip
SOIL samba Part a
aab.t.ara Qsame sd ta.m (e4
8.ram Wra (A1)
Agtaft F. (213)
br.aly V.pMWa Qm. 4 (94
.p- rry.fW
IM Daaari (0111) (UM U)
0.00600 P.aam(stol
8-0. (ax
I.laapris®d. oda(C1)
r.b TAn unr(m4
Y iwarlsl)
oae, Who aaa. rap U.aq Ra (0)
Drf3 -Ybm Taw(c4
saaaaa oapabl0a
PAaradaaax.tlem(c0
CI.Yba eMan'. KR
Oa omam fp
RaaN aan Rebmbn bTbaa ad.fe4
sa.alPn Wblam Arblw3eyfC4
010dwaO,00e4
Tb1.NWi 9ubm(cr)
Gamaptlapaam(04
em ORasb sl9
OPa'aW."Ramn.)
❑fimla.Aaaw(P]I
ar.rla va4bmArW r.prY 1sT
n.NaaY.mPt4larWa.lalu taaAal
cAC�1nMl Tan 104
❑ VAa s ad taaat(84
PYa+mlReeq,bh8ab Plq pARp aT
6a.anaarraa 104 pAmT in
Rando..�
saber Was PmaV7 Y._wx D40% ores.).
MammaelTlLU.m ee®ffaq
Oa.aa 9da (A4(LImP T H
baea.ra'---IT q
War7rt.sAwady r.._ w_ MP..Ral..r�
paFA tpeJ
.tea P.ran YlbprfiF3J
MV Pwary PV -0IUIR UI
abrdat Pno 0 Yo_w_oynp,mbl.
VnY Sn.00w DN Baba (IF+p)
Yrabw MPllabarAraa7 Ya._ wx
R.o.ea Ob trraw pap
wA Prw•r.ear bgnaary brbeb'
0.abbd BYw Dare sahm N + +)
TMd Ora6urbm(A17)
5,9n P. can+ ra.b
+W. A.Y. e,.
Lai.R a.haPlaJ (LRRPrq
USAwrc.P.d FPtiraa
Atl.nlic err OJlf:.ulr Pbb R.pm -NNmip
SOIL samba Part a
saw
.rasa rmetm.l
0� ras1.
� naarmebp CebfmMp
j�ee
T.nw. RaM.
��
Dag foYR 717
��t_
6L
2401 10YR 7h >O tOYR g/l r D M
L
gl�g8 tOYR BR
_ -
_•TarCaa
]OYabttl aP.v_xmLabLlanv_
$asd6n.W Smaa (Ptl rOS )
1
L
�
eonbr4a errflaM1e.
Maw
Maak esO btCrvF (APpaaael.bam LRRa.abaatlrtn7..
mice)
Iwkata.. b. Ptaawslk Mask Bar
IaadNtl
Pa//r.ar etbn6abe 164 M1Ra ATN tan WdtUW M1aRq
Tam PPpda.fAn
Tw Oae Blrbm(a4M1Rae T UI
xmlaaa Nl4 M1RRq
e1.albua tA4
LorrrytAaar marPn Mllm
n.NaaY.mPt4larWa.lalu taaAal
Iy.apmsWee (A4
WmfWYad II.W lF4
PYa+mlReeq,bh8ab Plq pARp aT
dv.aw U.ea(n5)
n..Maa M.Y.O4
MammaelTlLU.m ee®ffaq
Oa.aa 9da (A4(LImP T H
baea.ra'---IT q
R.dm O.Y Bbl.ap.I
0..bba pasaaMa Pn
paFA tpeJ
.tea P.ran YlbprfiF3J
MV Pwary PV -0IUIR UI
R.Im Oyrar.r lF4
VnY Sn.00w DN Baba (IF+p)
t en W!(A9IPARP T)
.ISnptW MRUI
ger(Bpbhb MMa)
0.abbd BYw Dare sahm N + +)
TMd Ora6urbm(A17)
0mabd Oebb Pl+)(.nRA 1mJ
tlm.al.na.Map Yetr Pia (LRRa P 4 'b.bab. dh/baarytl.nytlab.rr
cent vaw Reran Nt4 tlRRn t®AJ
Lai.R a.haPlaJ (LRRPrq
nardRdi.aaraamrabet
BanyYWrebvrfsll (LAIp 6)
pm GNt P1Tl PailA t6n
Ifla. manaaa Pra0lua.!
eanp 0rl.a.tW (sO
Rae./. VaaeP +40aNA 1alA Gael
15eVr Ram I6W
P,bnsYFbembb soe. Pl4lrLAAUW
9raad llaakp4
hiv..r.in B�NlarPYBab S"3a1 (atnA laM taa,tool
0w Bad.0 (64 fL]m P 14 T q
art•.ak
lypc
oab(bmm)
Mrew am n..an Ywx w_
Us "cap./ Figreen Albrdc.a GWfb.N Pbh Aybn- Vnabn20
b
saw
.rasa rmetm.l
0� ras1.
� naarmebp CebfmMp
j�ee
T.nw. RaM.
��
Dag foYR 717
��t_
6L
2401 10YR 7h >O tOYR g/l r D M
L
gl�g8 tOYR BR
_ -
_•TarCaa
]OYabttl aP.v_xmLabLlanv_
$asd6n.W Smaa (Ptl rOS )
1
L
�
eonbr4a errflaM1e.
R•Pon Nntbpb.
Maak esO btCrvF (APpaaael.bam LRRa.abaatlrtn7..
mice)
Iwkata.. b. Ptaawslk Mask Bar
IaadNtl
Pa//r.ar etbn6abe 164 M1Ra ATN tan WdtUW M1aRq
Tam PPpda.fAn
Tw Oae Blrbm(a4M1Rae T UI
xmlaaa Nl4 M1RRq
e1.albua tA4
LorrrytAaar marPn Mllm
n.NaaY.mPt4larWa.lalu taaAal
Iy.apmsWee (A4
WmfWYad II.W lF4
PYa+mlReeq,bh8ab Plq pARp aT
dv.aw U.ea(n5)
n..Maa M.Y.O4
MammaelTlLU.m ee®ffaq
Oa.aa 9da (A4(LImP T H
baea.ra'---IT q
R.dm O.Y Bbl.ap.I
0..bba pasaaMa Pn
paFA tpeJ
.tea P.ran YlbprfiF3J
MV Pwary PV -0IUIR UI
R.Im Oyrar.r lF4
VnY Sn.00w DN Baba (IF+p)
t en W!(A9IPARP T)
.ISnptW MRUI
ger(Bpbhb MMa)
0.abbd BYw Dare sahm N + +)
TMd Ora6urbm(A17)
0mabd Oebb Pl+)(.nRA 1mJ
tlm.al.na.Map Yetr Pia (LRRa P 4 'b.bab. dh/baarytl.nytlab.rr
cent vaw Reran Nt4 tlRRn t®AJ
Lai.R a.haPlaJ (LRRPrq
nardRdi.aaraamrabet
BanyYWrebvrfsll (LAIp 6)
pm GNt P1Tl PailA t6n
Ifla. manaaa Pra0lua.!
eanp 0rl.a.tW (sO
Rae./. VaaeP +40aNA 1alA Gael
15eVr Ram I6W
P,bnsYFbembb soe. Pl4lrLAAUW
9raad llaakp4
hiv..r.in B�NlarPYBab S"3a1 (atnA laM taa,tool
0w Bad.0 (64 fL]m P 14 T q
art•.ak
lypc
oab(bmm)
Mrew am n..an Ywx w_
VEGETATION (Pour Strata)- Use scienURc names W plama smpep Past a
USAmgtbm. a PApen Aaal..nOOW cawr Plan Realm - Wnba 2a
)�aam Fta vu )
1
AlLPa6 ,9P1D7123fa71L
no r
Iaatn.aDan.mY. sP.w.
la.IMODL GA4YI afAL (A)
Tdtl M.N. d.abnw
vaaaaomrraLaws.
TnrMOaL PIOw /PAC (Wal
� -_
3'
- --
�
- --
sooam W4
r
eba TaF law Rt4
Pmrwralwaawara.aa
1'art.d
�¢de ri•
FACN.Pwe at.
PlCawn __._a]•__
FaCI1 tA.ae
era•
CWP.Taw
Pay.lro PM •a'A•
-
a
_ -
_•TarCaa
]OYabttl aP.v_xmLabLlanv_
$asd6n.W Smaa (Ptl rOS )
1
i
- --
�
0.
--
--
rN�Ya
RarO T�raNNNPMk Yq.laam
❑] Oantuna Twb.W1.
❑ ] Obva.na. a�haagD'
QPNa:maF Hydmpryl V.aebibn'(6aprnl
'caws. atybaw m0.a.mlryaraarvrm
rPtaam.ubadWe..OaPabv.dc
-
7
- --
0.
_•Tar Cabr
rot alarmar- 70t{ alum o..r
tivIDSbem Pr ma• )
' can -_
o31. PmINnb Remadsl
-
ea
Tnr- Waadyplmb adrap.Ym 3h(/Aada
bbanwalaealrlal fOeM rap.rda•d
aWfL
t�t aloe -vaaM W.. .wo.rp.aw m.
amahaml.m aM.•. sun ueennu l.L
wn -w le0a0aaP.aamtdPbab. /seam
daht.adwmd /WWbu ion l]DnbL
Ilea�ar- Aa•.oarmo aemam.a7sab
1
- --
a
- --
0.
--
7 -_
-_
a
- --
a_ - -____ ___
a
- --
1L
15oxaar ma._
w.na.wamrma. 180.00 )
1
_.Tar Caa
awalarmaG-
Ityaaparlk
Y.a.bean
Rmn Yw_ w�
_-
a
- -
1
_-
a -_
a
- -Tar cw.r
Wltded m.ar- A{abr mar
RmW.. ( aa.arMd. W nvPaa ampbuve etlo.k
Crop Reltl planted In COr1t
WETLAND DETERWHAT10N DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Room
P.iears� Cady Ceaa Strwm and Waded Rnb w C4+_a Sampson SWOM, , 2012-0507
AarenaO.enQ s IC s.r0n; F.Kif
eaaip1.01 R kWm N.aconb, Hal O m Sam=Ta,wnP Rap,
1.1.ampiWaO..Imaaarai Law nori(maaw.a.rn nom) ° a Sba is, 1.2
Sicteym OnNawtgt LRRP!Lt.RA1]9A , Malay Lap, TO 31571
301 LI+P Leat.tnae b .hawllmodybm NWabm15blb.
Mdla.11hlaaat omarmmdae 0pm,rub an.al..7 Ya_ wx or. skdenb Rrawa)
MV.a.Wl.nx sd�aNyawax -WA- *dmrP.d/ M'Iwmrpemaarra PeaFl Yex w_
MVap .aam- SOt�a.0ama- -%,*laaaawla7 0rne.d.a a.rm.ry.rarr.hR.ner)
SUKrAARYOFFOmMM- Alflah aNS map shoadng sampling point k=dk a, bvumb ImportantheWnn..ta
Myaalaea Yagwam- Yo_ N°x b sanpMa aro
..,*tw, awn Y. x w_ .- a,ablbd? Y.- wx_
WNIar MYOWNPbab7 Ye_ N.x
US Drought Monitor for NC Indicates Sampson County Is suffering Moderate Drought Conditions
HYDROLOGY
us"Qa OE.lmr Aa.Maana Gar0o aJPbh R.pbn -Va 10
❑ art.Fe soa LYwafesl
SVma7'abr NtJ
MalaFw te.4
9aw.W,ry.rb.[basw SUrtaa.laN
Nlpa Nelr Tab. ND
❑Ya10epW.(B140.PRN
Oae.B. P.ara(Bla
sooam W4
R1aaa••slmaa(cq
eba TaF law Rt4
YMnlbrr atl
Oddae0 Rt4a.Pli.a roan Lary Rab 1pl
orysaa.mMhbrTtlb(@
BNerK./OYPaeea (e4
1_�
pnar..dpWmdb.n (cq
firy..n earaa lC4
Om GPrb 183)
p.a.a Yalgaalam.blyd9.a (C4
S.aa.rnbraa an ASdr lm.aery(W7
Aprbraoal(e4
>wta.abrara(Cr)
r].anaprk PO.am (oa
am DSmsb lSy
o31. PmINnb Remadsl
BM.rpamafD4
mAN1llwary an
FAGW Wr ibf I05)
Q Was Bb/W LwYl.le4
speaae mm. W4 M1RRT U)
eaba.wmrFema7 Yr_
w x INpm Orawk
7vmr.a. vlomrt Yu_r._ueyn
Oatral' >7Y
SafaabiPmrdl rr_
w_ er]m0ate.k 37
3Nttm Nraaap M.w.G Yw_ M. x
sm 9aV pass Parr. a.a.]me.
Pa.nfnl! event -h.3o days o9a

rgi
8 It
�y
Y
b
m �
l
y
F �
as s5ppppe
ysyy yaa
�dI03
Ip
ICI
d�g25S�R��B
00�� lB
E
AI�I
ajReej
d d $��
IIIII.s
IIII.$
Iolul
I
I333-���g�
��g 3'SaaaaB
IIIIIII;�
�
I I
Inl�l
(
Q���
liaa���P¢�?��apy$py�4 �8B[p{5¢��2bFlaA�
e
�S
��9dE8�
Y
§C9�d8��O�8f
tl
id 5
qq FF¢g2gqp
2
•-'I•-
c
'I
n��.�x�
$g � p 5Aq p$Lpp' 4
6�eI9I�liJ
al
g
I ��fA}
@� N
8 g
3
$ a
i
9 92991
F �
as s5ppppe
ysyy yaa
p$eO
Ip
00�� lB
ajReej
IIIII.s
IIII.$
IIII
IIIIIII;�
IIIII$i$
Y
tl
@� N
8 g
3
$ a
i
9 92991

MORPHOLOGIC,.. PARAMETERS
Cedar Creek East - Morphological Summary
Existing Conditions
Tributary Reach
UT1A
UTiA-C
UTiC
UT10
UT10
UTIE
UT1E
UTIF
UT2
UT28
UT3A
UT3A
UT3A
UT3B
Cross - Section
695
640
1011
X8
X9
X10
X11
—
—
467
X3
X4
X5
X6
Drainage Area ac
P
2793
E2
2723
2723
3314
3314
3375
30
R
139
161
188
190
Drainage Area m12)
0
436
4
425
425
518
518
527
005
1
022
025
029
030
Cross Section Area ft)
0
—
253
347
327
111
408
--
—
467
69
114
103
i
646
Width, Wbkf ft
929
—
929
111
—
—
—
—
—
708
8
791
W/D Ratio
201
—
201
35
45
I
190
23
—
—
0 51508
9 3
101
91
98
93
0 896110979
Mean Depth, Dbkf ft
—
31
25
08
—
—
—
09
11
11
Channel Sloe %
C/E
035
C/E
035
03S
022
022
022
27
B
17
17
17
13
Stream Type
—
E5
ES
--
—
--
—
G5
G5
GS
C/E
Veloci ft/s)
45
4
17
27
–
—
44
52
5
Discharge /Channel Capacity (ft3 /sec)
k—A -- eir
—
156
110
190
100
*Discharge ralrulatad ucina Manninoc Fnu
otinn
—
—
30 6
59 4
52
—
Proposed Mitigation
UT1A
UT1B
UTiC
UTiD
UT1E
UT1F
UT2A
UT28
UT3A
UT313
Proposed LF
695
640
1011
1131
1914
1208
263
467
1466
646
Mitigation Approach
P
P
E2
E2
R
P
E2
R
R
0296875
Proposed Ratio, X 1
0
0
4
4
1
0
4
1
1
R
SMUs
0
0
253
283
1914
0
66
467
1466
i
646
Design Reaches
Total SMUs 5094
Total WMUs 9
Parameter
UT1A
UTiB
UT1C
UTSD
UT1E
UT1F
UT2A
UT2B
UT3A
UTSB
Mitigation Type
P
P
E2
E2
R
P
E2
R
R
R
Drainage Area (M12)
436
436
436
488
517813
5 27344
0 046881
0 04688
0 25781
0296875
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
3840
3840
3840
4135
429854
43 5059
192658
192658
5 93509
6514261828
Bankfull Width, Wbkf ft
1865
186S
1865
1941457
198294
199'6'
3 6454
3 6454
6 73405
7 084890351
Bankfull W/D Ratio
929
929
929
935
939
940
708
708
784
791
Bankfull Mean Depth, Dbkf (ft)
201
201
201
2075825
2112721
212431
0 51508
0 51508
0 85898
0 896110979
Channel Sloe %
Stream Type
C/E
C/E
C/E
C/E
C/E
C/E
8
B
C/E
0 0093
Veloci ft/s
C/E
Discharge, Qbkf (ft 3 /s)
*P-1—n— nlecmn a ... h resinanti—
k—A -- eir
o i
* *HWV = Headwater Valley Restoration, R = Restoration, P = Preservation, E1= Enhancement Level 1, E2 = Enhancement Level 2

MORPHOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
Cedar Creek West - Morphological Summary
Existing Conditions
Tributary Reach
UT1A
UT18
UT1C
UT1D
UT3A
UT3B
UT 5A
Cross - Section
XS 9
XS 10
XS 4
XS 5
XS 2
XS 3
XS8
Drainage Area ac
386
416
446
670
180
222
79
Drainage Area (mil )
060
065
070
105
028
035
012
Cross Section Area W
633
633
464
633
1654
725
1 68
Width Wbkf (ft)
401
401
301
401
397
199
107
W/D Ratio
254
254
195
254
95
54
167
Mean Depth, Dbkf ft
16
16
15
16
42
37
0 6
Channel Slope ( %)
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
eam T e
-
-
-
-
-
-
ocit ft/s
E
charge /Channel Capacity (ft3 /sec)
'Discharge calculated using Mannings Equation
Proposed Mitigation
UT1A
UT1B
UT1C
UT1D
UT3A
UT36
UT 5A
Proposed LF
760
606
883
1143
1069
1993
1250
Mitigation Approach
E2
R
R
R
R
R
R
Proposed Ratio, X 1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
SMUs
190
606
883
1143
1069
1993
1250
Total SMUs 7134
Total WMUs 6
Design Reaches
Parameter
UT1A
UT2B
UTiC
UT1D
UT3A
UT313
UT 5A
Mitigation Type
E2
R
R
R
R
R
HWV
Drainage Area (mil)
060
065
070
105
028
035
012
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1040
2093
1144
1497
629
722
365
Bankfull Width, Wbkf ft
914
939
963
it 15
695
749
517
Bankfull W/D Ratio
825
829
832
853
788
798
750
Bankfull Mean Depth, Dbkf ft
111
213
116
131
088
094
06
Channel Sloe
-
Stream Type
C/E
C/E
C/E
C/E
C/E
C/E
C/E
Velocity (ft/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
Discharge, Qbkf (ft3 /s)
"Preliminary Design Reach Calculations are based on NC Regional Curve Data and Site Data
* *HWV = Headwater Valley Restoration, R = Restoration, P = Preservation, E1= Enhancement Level 1, E2 = Enhancement Level 2

EXISTING CONDITIG..., SUMMARY TABLE
Physical
Geomor 101gy
255
235
19
25 5
20
225
17
17 5
10
Hydrology
115
9
9
10
11
65
11
115
5
Bolo
925
925
Brol
1025
11
525
925
9 35
5
7Gt`rflcatlo : jy`
i, e �w" 4675251 f
>c$L" E� 41w75
"v�"i3
$ 4 s 45 S
Gtx`L`�..42k'�..�- ..e- �a,.�1,,,.�w
ti a ;y mtV M.1
„ 257xA4 `
�;"
e'�.'th�'S` -.i, 2x. ;e- v�
W"`t.'� tl'✓�° y +i Q
Proposed Mitigation Typel
Cassdcation
1 were C*... n—ir.. w..e...........u..a..r.....
E2
E2
R
E2 /R
R
R
r$
Buffer Condition
Physical
24
21
19
19
16
21
West UT S
Stability
8
10
7
7
5
9
row crop
Habitat
8
8
8
5
3
6
disturbed
Brol
6
6
6
5
1
5
herbaceous
�.A��rT 'SCOfB`aw,,��5�
«�" 4.."C 'A3 t
�; �; _ , : �r:46„.,a >, ...,$.'- �H�s`�
„
e��.�".v,i#�'.t•:45�.r.�
MPt4"�40ur--A��_!N,
unstable
„ 257xA4 `
�;"
e'�.'th�'S` -.i, 2x. ;e- v�
W"`t.'� tl'✓�° y +i Q
Proposed Mitigation Typel
E2/ P
E2
E2
R
E2 /R
R
R
Geomorphology
Reach
West UT 1 A/B
West UT 1C
West UT 10
West UT 2
West UT 3
West UT S
Y
Buffer Type
other woody vegetation/ row aop
row crop
row crop
row crop
row crop
row crop
mBuffer
Condition
disturbed
disturbed
disturbed
disturbed
disturbed
disturbed
'
Bank Vegetation
other woody vegetation
herbaceous
herbaceous
herbaceous
herbaceous
herbaceous
z7 a' 1e{ �v5:�
Bank Stability
unstable moderately unstable
unstable
unstable
unstable
unstable
unstable
Y
c
Buffer Type
partial mature hardwood
herbaceous
row crop
row crop
row crop
raw ao
r$
Buffer Condition
disturbed
disturbed
disturbed
disturbed
disturbed
disturbed
BankVeg elation
Partial mature hardwood
herbaceous
herbaceous
herbaceous
herbaceous
herbaceous
c
Bank Stability
unstable moderate) unstable
unstable
unstable
unstable
unstable
unstable
Bed Stability
a radm
a din
a radio
stable
a dm
a radio
Channel Size
oversized
oversized
oversized
appropriateiv sized
oversized
oversized
Geomorphology
205
19
18
8
165
1 8
Hydrology
10
10
30
5
10
1 75
Blol
825
925
825
6
7
5
uwryTdtatSwilWbf sus9�a�38'75�'
Ma�3
%&W 75 a
'
,
s , c,
�t5S 777
classification
z7 a' 1e{ �v5:�
� `19 �3 '
=.s',_ `7717p18f
Physical
24
11
17
7
11
12
Stability
7
6
6
6
6
6
Habitat
6
2
4
0
2
0
Blol
4
1
1
1
0
0
rS iotal5coie 4
z7 a' 1e{ �v5:�
� `19 �3 '
=.s',_ `7717p18f
Proposed Mitigation Typel
R
R
R
N/A
R
HWV

serf- 471/4///3
oab 0;,/2., I'Z.1
prol.,"in Ced.. C4 A If
Lama. 3y %, 75-a
EYakowor X Y. 4,f
c ... tr SAM ton
Lnnsn•a. - j$ 30660
TOtai POkda
S1ipd •rk•a••^"1n"• ` 25
BlmmDebrodnatbn ldtd. oib)
Eph.m.rol la.en1 —t Paran'"
OOm 5•7.e. %'L L+r17f13
av otaar.a..
_ 7 f i wed..ea .Crone
1 CtpknuW of dermal end" tank 0
0 1
1 2
2
2 SvvaaN a da+nel a 0
0 1
1 3
3
ak.aamnamadue o nOAWa N.Vp..L 0
0 1
1 2
2
ParOde a(a of stream aMbrio 0
0 1
1
5 A<Meheka OOOd eh 0
0 1
1 2
2
rw.aa Oo lna 0
0 1
1 2
2
1 R.wv hula 0
0 1
1 3
3
a Ilea@aa 0
0 1
1 J
J
v Grme mntrd 0
0 0
05 1
1
11 S...4 Wermter ends demW N
No -
-0 Y
Yro ]
]
of 11.0 w 0 1 2
ti kon m.dm Waana 0 1 J
74 Le.l Ymr 1 5 O S 0
In Sm�manlon nemd.edt 0 OS 5
la Wba Otesm S.. 0 05 1 1
17 SdIbtW HnaalkY m rVh veW lata7
m
skslah (q _ r�. 1.1E 1 „6rro4 / l7� yr /,F1/ _ /�`A, .r/
�. V4' h s.` J /�rp // /j Ia ro h,4(.
"�f1.64e /i=. (..% Sot` Cd..� ire., n...Y4 r&0
NC DWQ Sth]am Identlfit.t on Form Vkrama 4 11
A O.Oma hol 6ubroal -�� Atmeft :WnkMod� Situ 12 Prpenae a R-11- 0 1 2 13 Ian mda.l sd— 0 2 14 Leal ntet 19 1 0 15 sedmmma on m m derma 0 1 S 10. dabd. ib. m Prm 0 d5 15
17 SaA4 —od olMOnte0 high+.tar nol.'1 C 1S Fltp t roots m sreamded 2 1 0
a mr —bock 2 _ 1 0
2 3
21 Aawtk: Mok ke 0 2 3
22 Fah Po OS 1 +S
1 15
05 1 15
2a 0 05 1 13
?d We— a h s4rumted FACPI= 7 ML - 1 5 OM -0
'pn.malboa. .ben Wabaa vawaede.t See0.75Wmou.l blotto Skem21 r �an( t, f,.. Cr �S -!or f"J 50 S a....
°u• U� 20 %0l Prol.cuSaeCr.l..Cr4 Ewwmr � ><tJ ceanlr 5AP1 f.n Oner � 7i•.17`f1]
.dnitl«d Wnnnal L /N+.q .at�
0 0 J
t 4 nwPptal sleppod, p . ParMtle aneaa.e.m aumaeta 0 a amte0dw 0 7 neuMatkNMa o B Neaa.n o 9 Gnm c.rlYd 0 1S
f0 Naea.l 0 03 1 15
1t Seamxlm radar Wnrel NO =p Ym ]
Oafs p� 'Cp�go7 ProlacoBla Cr/..Cr4 -E.rt latnuaa 3y 96756X
E.ua.mr Y4
ltodpWn
�rl sO11y SA foA lartvnar. - 78 XSKO
Total Pairtb Scum Deamlbumnlorw oml OOnrS.�.w 1.1 ,krr4111]
l.evnb Ubetl MrabYa C '� EDiimenl MtsnNnenl P.rarmai •0.0abNm�L jn}.
_7
A G--rphlon SatroW = � 5 5 AOSent Wak l0oaann say
1 adu.lm mdreid EanR 0 1 2 3
z shag awmw o 1 z
3 Incmnn.l .askew sot nm►pka4 fa•pyo.L 0 I 2
4 P¢ltle dmatirtam almnb 0 t J
5 Ae0vehdlet 0 1
a imkW ben. m mncMs o 1 2
7 Reavn.l4r.ma Ib --- 0 1 ]
e Neaem o 1 a
B Gro. modal 0 06 1 Is
10 Nal.al vam 0 OS / 15
11 Second m ro.dr ardor dmrunl Va. 7
F.lrt 1F
ma U% r,Zp /'tol ProH•OSim Crt.. Crl E.rt LWada 3!/ 9b 736
EvamYOr ,� S; fel G°� ^n Sa« fp/1 �a•b• - 78 xfuo
Taal
Points. 42 i ereun Debmtkutl.n kka. onel ppw s.y�j•L rltdt]
Stn' ptlAUa.uenitMrO Epe.aanl Innrmld.ndPUenitlal •OOa.. L /nian Sar
A Gearnarpholow Subla[d= � Amens Weak 7AOd.ral. strong
1 Caninky adannelmanna nark 0 1 2
28 aNOml OWw 0 2 3
3 Inrftmn atmoturo .x �ywl eteypool, p 1 ]
4 Ptltica sort ab..m .uWVau 0 2 ]
n AGakala 0 1 3
n con of tarlptaa o 1 ]
7 RateM..wlal d 0 1
It. 1(.0amda o 1 z
e Ga0a am4a1 0 O E 1 5
IO Naanl r•m 0 O n 1 1 5
It $.Cma or eat M001 NmMI Not = 0 Yu ]
•mesa arm enrol wt .ae tan nm.aw�
8 H.pdroloOY (Suotanl
riz vre.enm.r eabnmr o + —�2�
1
skean. (`C �ix.kc� rL 50 - /la r•f `lyo
1-171
Fivuenf l'�lapn /.;.F �y-rr fr•eeLl
m
skslah (q _ r�. 1.1E 1 „6rro4 / l7� yr /,F1/ _ /�`A, .r/
�. V4' h s.` J /�rp // /j Ia ro h,4(.
"�f1.64e /i=. (..% Sot` Cd..� ire., n...Y4 r&0
NC DWQ Sth]am Identlfit.t on Form Vkrama 4 11
A O.Oma hol 6ubroal -�� Atmeft :WnkMod� Situ 12 Prpenae a R-11- 0 1 2 13 Ian mda.l sd— 0 2 14 Leal ntet 19 1 0 15 sedmmma on m m derma 0 1 S 10. dabd. ib. m Prm 0 d5 15
17 SaA4 —od olMOnte0 high+.tar nol.'1 C 1S Fltp t roots m sreamded 2 1 0
a mr —bock 2 _ 1 0
2 3
21 Aawtk: Mok ke 0 2 3
22 Fah Po OS 1 +S
1 15
05 1 15
2a 0 05 1 13
?d We— a h s4rumted FACPI= 7 ML - 1 5 OM -0
'pn.malboa. .ben Wabaa vawaede.t See0.75Wmou.l blotto Skem21 r �an( t, f,.. Cr �S -!or f"J 50 S a....
°u• U� 20 %0l Prol.cuSaeCr.l..Cr4 Ewwmr � ><tJ ceanlr 5AP1 f.n Oner � 7i•.17`f1]
.dnitl«d Wnnnal L /N+.q .at�
0 0 J
t 4 nwPptal sleppod, p . ParMtle aneaa.e.m aumaeta 0 a amte0dw 0 7 neuMatkNMa o B Neaa.n o 9 Gnm c.rlYd 0 1S
f0 Naea.l 0 03 1 15
1t Seamxlm radar Wnrel NO =p Ym ]
Oafs p� 'Cp�go7 ProlacoBla Cr/..Cr4 -E.rt latnuaa 3y 96756X
E.ua.mr Y4
ltodpWn
�rl sO11y SA foA lartvnar. - 78 XSKO
Total Pairtb Scum Deamlbumnlorw oml OOnrS.�.w 1.1 ,krr4111]
l.evnb Ubetl MrabYa C '� EDiimenl MtsnNnenl P.rarmai •0.0abNm�L jn}.
_7
A G--rphlon SatroW = � 5 5 AOSent Wak l0oaann say
1 adu.lm mdreid EanR 0 1 2 3
z shag awmw o 1 z
3 Incmnn.l .askew sot nm►pka4 fa•pyo.L 0 I 2
4 P¢ltle dmatirtam almnb 0 t J
5 Ae0vehdlet 0 1
a imkW ben. m mncMs o 1 2
7 Reavn.l4r.ma Ib --- 0 1 ]
e Neaem o 1 a
B Gro. modal 0 06 1 Is
10 Nal.al vam 0 OS / 15
11 Second m ro.dr ardor dmrunl Va. 7
F.lrt 1F
ma U% r,Zp /'tol ProH•OSim Crt.. Crl E.rt LWada 3!/ 9b 736
EvamYOr ,� S; fel G°� ^n Sa« fp/1 �a•b• - 78 xfuo
Taal
Points. 42 i ereun Debmtkutl.n kka. onel ppw s.y�j•L rltdt]
Stn' ptlAUa.uenitMrO Epe.aanl Innrmld.ndPUenitlal •OOa.. L /nian Sar
A Gearnarpholow Subla[d= � Amens Weak 7AOd.ral. strong
1 Caninky adannelmanna nark 0 1 2
28 aNOml OWw 0 2 3
3 Inrftmn atmoturo .x �ywl eteypool, p 1 ]
4 Ptltica sort ab..m .uWVau 0 2 ]
n AGakala 0 1 3
n con of tarlptaa o 1 ]
7 RateM..wlal d 0 1
It. 1(.0amda o 1 z
e Ga0a am4a1 0 O E 1 5
IO Naanl r•m 0 O n 1 1 5
It $.Cma or eat M001 NmMI Not = 0 Yu ]
•mesa arm enrol wt .ae tan nm.aw�
8 H.pdroloOY (Suotanl
riz vre.enm.r eabnmr o + —�2�
1
skean. (`C �ix.kc� rL 50 - /la r•f `lyo
1-171
Fivuenf l'�lapn /.;.F �y-rr fr•eeLl
°u• U� 20 %0l Prol.cuSaeCr.l..Cr4 Ewwmr � ><tJ ceanlr 5AP1 f.n Oner � 7i•.17`f1]
.dnitl«d Wnnnal L /N+.q .at�
0 0 J
t 4 nwPptal sleppod, p . ParMtle aneaa.e.m aumaeta 0 a amte0dw 0 7 neuMatkNMa o B Neaa.n o 9 Gnm c.rlYd 0 1S
f0 Naea.l 0 03 1 15
1t Seamxlm radar Wnrel NO =p Ym ]
Oafs p� 'Cp�go7 ProlacoBla Cr/..Cr4 -E.rt latnuaa 3y 96756X
E.ua.mr Y4
ltodpWn
�rl sO11y SA foA lartvnar. - 78 XSKO
Total Pairtb Scum Deamlbumnlorw oml OOnrS.�.w 1.1 ,krr4111]
l.evnb Ubetl MrabYa C '� EDiimenl MtsnNnenl P.rarmai •0.0abNm�L jn}.
_7
A G--rphlon SatroW = � 5 5 AOSent Wak l0oaann say
1 adu.lm mdreid EanR 0 1 2 3
z shag awmw o 1 z
3 Incmnn.l .askew sot nm►pka4 fa•pyo.L 0 I 2
4 P¢ltle dmatirtam almnb 0 t J
5 Ae0vehdlet 0 1
a imkW ben. m mncMs o 1 2
7 Reavn.l4r.ma Ib --- 0 1 ]
e Neaem o 1 a
B Gro. modal 0 06 1 Is
10 Nal.al vam 0 OS / 15
11 Second m ro.dr ardor dmrunl Va. 7
F.lrt 1F
ma U% r,Zp /'tol ProH•OSim Crt.. Crl E.rt LWada 3!/ 9b 736
EvamYOr ,� S; fel G°� ^n Sa« fp/1 �a•b• - 78 xfuo
Taal
Points. 42 i ereun Debmtkutl.n kka. onel ppw s.y�j•L rltdt]
Stn' ptlAUa.uenitMrO Epe.aanl Innrmld.ndPUenitlal •OOa.. L /nian Sar
A Gearnarpholow Subla[d= � Amens Weak 7AOd.ral. strong
1 Caninky adannelmanna nark 0 1 2
28 aNOml OWw 0 2 3
3 Inrftmn atmoturo .x �ywl eteypool, p 1 ]
4 Ptltica sort ab..m .uWVau 0 2 ]
n AGakala 0 1 3
n con of tarlptaa o 1 ]
7 RateM..wlal d 0 1
It. 1(.0amda o 1 z
e Ga0a am4a1 0 O E 1 5
IO Naanl r•m 0 O n 1 1 5
It $.Cma or eat M001 NmMI Not = 0 Yu ]
•mesa arm enrol wt .ae tan nm.aw�
8 H.pdroloOY (Suotanl
riz vre.enm.r eabnmr o + —�2�
1
skean. (`C �ix.kc� rL 50 - /la r•f `lyo
1-171
Fivuenf l'�lapn /.;.F �y-rr fr•eeLl
0 0 J
t 4 nwPptal sleppod, p . ParMtle aneaa.e.m aumaeta 0 a amte0dw 0 7 neuMatkNMa o B Neaa.n o 9 Gnm c.rlYd 0 1S
f0 Naea.l 0 03 1 15
1t Seamxlm radar Wnrel NO =p Ym ]
Oafs p� 'Cp�go7 ProlacoBla Cr/..Cr4 -E.rt latnuaa 3y 96756X
E.ua.mr Y4
ltodpWn
�rl sO11y SA foA lartvnar. - 78 XSKO
Total Pairtb Scum Deamlbumnlorw oml OOnrS.�.w 1.1 ,krr4111]
l.evnb Ubetl MrabYa C '� EDiimenl MtsnNnenl P.rarmai •0.0abNm�L jn}.
_7
A G--rphlon SatroW = � 5 5 AOSent Wak l0oaann say
1 adu.lm mdreid EanR 0 1 2 3
z shag awmw o 1 z
3 Incmnn.l .askew sot nm►pka4 fa•pyo.L 0 I 2
4 P¢ltle dmatirtam almnb 0 t J
5 Ae0vehdlet 0 1
a imkW ben. m mncMs o 1 2
7 Reavn.l4r.ma Ib --- 0 1 ]
e Neaem o 1 a
B Gro. modal 0 06 1 Is
10 Nal.al vam 0 OS / 15
11 Second m ro.dr ardor dmrunl Va. 7
F.lrt 1F
ma U% r,Zp /'tol ProH•OSim Crt.. Crl E.rt LWada 3!/ 9b 736
EvamYOr ,� S; fel G°� ^n Sa« fp/1 �a•b• - 78 xfuo
Taal
Points. 42 i ereun Debmtkutl.n kka. onel ppw s.y�j•L rltdt]
Stn' ptlAUa.uenitMrO Epe.aanl Innrmld.ndPUenitlal •OOa.. L /nian Sar
A Gearnarpholow Subla[d= � Amens Weak 7AOd.ral. strong
1 Caninky adannelmanna nark 0 1 2
28 aNOml OWw 0 2 3
3 Inrftmn atmoturo .x �ywl eteypool, p 1 ]
4 Ptltica sort ab..m .uWVau 0 2 ]
n AGakala 0 1 3
n con of tarlptaa o 1 ]
7 RateM..wlal d 0 1
It. 1(.0amda o 1 z
e Ga0a am4a1 0 O E 1 5
IO Naanl r•m 0 O n 1 1 5
It $.Cma or eat M001 NmMI Not = 0 Yu ]
•mesa arm enrol wt .ae tan nm.aw�
8 H.pdroloOY (Suotanl
riz vre.enm.r eabnmr o + —�2�
1
skean. (`C �ix.kc� rL 50 - /la r•f `lyo
1-171
Fivuenf l'�lapn /.;.F �y-rr fr•eeLl
ltodpWn
�rl sO11y SA foA lartvnar. - 78 XSKO
Total Pairtb Scum Deamlbumnlorw oml OOnrS.�.w 1.1 ,krr4111]
l.evnb Ubetl MrabYa C '� EDiimenl MtsnNnenl P.rarmai •0.0abNm�L jn}.
_7
A G--rphlon SatroW = � 5 5 AOSent Wak l0oaann say
1 adu.lm mdreid EanR 0 1 2 3
z shag awmw o 1 z
3 Incmnn.l .askew sot nm►pka4 fa•pyo.L 0 I 2
4 P¢ltle dmatirtam almnb 0 t J
5 Ae0vehdlet 0 1
a imkW ben. m mncMs o 1 2
7 Reavn.l4r.ma Ib --- 0 1 ]
e Neaem o 1 a
B Gro. modal 0 06 1 Is
10 Nal.al vam 0 OS / 15
11 Second m ro.dr ardor dmrunl Va. 7
F.lrt 1F
ma U% r,Zp /'tol ProH•OSim Crt.. Crl E.rt LWada 3!/ 9b 736
EvamYOr ,� S; fel G°� ^n Sa« fp/1 �a•b• - 78 xfuo
Taal
Points. 42 i ereun Debmtkutl.n kka. onel ppw s.y�j•L rltdt]
Stn' ptlAUa.uenitMrO Epe.aanl Innrmld.ndPUenitlal •OOa.. L /nian Sar
A Gearnarpholow Subla[d= � Amens Weak 7AOd.ral. strong
1 Caninky adannelmanna nark 0 1 2
28 aNOml OWw 0 2 3
3 Inrftmn atmoturo .x �ywl eteypool, p 1 ]
4 Ptltica sort ab..m .uWVau 0 2 ]
n AGakala 0 1 3
n con of tarlptaa o 1 ]
7 RateM..wlal d 0 1
It. 1(.0amda o 1 z
e Ga0a am4a1 0 O E 1 5
IO Naanl r•m 0 O n 1 1 5
It $.Cma or eat M001 NmMI Not = 0 Yu ]
•mesa arm enrol wt .ae tan nm.aw�
8 H.pdroloOY (Suotanl
riz vre.enm.r eabnmr o + —�2�
1
skean. (`C �ix.kc� rL 50 - /la r•f `lyo
1-171
Fivuenf l'�lapn /.;.F �y-rr fr•eeLl
A G--rphlon SatroW = � 5 5 AOSent Wak l0oaann say
1 adu.lm mdreid EanR 0 1 2 3
z shag awmw o 1 z
3 Incmnn.l .askew sot nm►pka4 fa•pyo.L 0 I 2
4 P¢ltle dmatirtam almnb 0 t J
5 Ae0vehdlet 0 1
a imkW ben. m mncMs o 1 2
7 Reavn.l4r.ma Ib --- 0 1 ]
e Neaem o 1 a
B Gro. modal 0 06 1 Is
10 Nal.al vam 0 OS / 15
11 Second m ro.dr ardor dmrunl Va. 7
F.lrt 1F
ma U% r,Zp /'tol ProH•OSim Crt.. Crl E.rt LWada 3!/ 9b 736
EvamYOr ,� S; fel G°� ^n Sa« fp/1 �a•b• - 78 xfuo
Taal
Points. 42 i ereun Debmtkutl.n kka. onel ppw s.y�j•L rltdt]
Stn' ptlAUa.uenitMrO Epe.aanl Innrmld.ndPUenitlal •OOa.. L /nian Sar
A Gearnarpholow Subla[d= � Amens Weak 7AOd.ral. strong
1 Caninky adannelmanna nark 0 1 2
28 aNOml OWw 0 2 3
3 Inrftmn atmoturo .x �ywl eteypool, p 1 ]
4 Ptltica sort ab..m .uWVau 0 2 ]
n AGakala 0 1 3
n con of tarlptaa o 1 ]
7 RateM..wlal d 0 1
It. 1(.0amda o 1 z
e Ga0a am4a1 0 O E 1 5
IO Naanl r•m 0 O n 1 1 5
It $.Cma or eat M001 NmMI Not = 0 Yu ]
•mesa arm enrol wt .ae tan nm.aw�
8 H.pdroloOY (Suotanl
riz vre.enm.r eabnmr o + —�2�
1
skean. (`C �ix.kc� rL 50 - /la r•f `lyo
1-171
Fivuenf l'�lapn /.;.F �y-rr fr•eeLl
F.lrt 1F
ma U% r,Zp /'tol ProH•OSim Crt.. Crl E.rt LWada 3!/ 9b 736
EvamYOr ,� S; fel G°� ^n Sa« fp/1 �a•b• - 78 xfuo
Taal
Points. 42 i ereun Debmtkutl.n kka. onel ppw s.y�j•L rltdt]
Stn' ptlAUa.uenitMrO Epe.aanl Innrmld.ndPUenitlal •OOa.. L /nian Sar
A Gearnarpholow Subla[d= � Amens Weak 7AOd.ral. strong
1 Caninky adannelmanna nark 0 1 2
28 aNOml OWw 0 2 3
3 Inrftmn atmoturo .x �ywl eteypool, p 1 ]
4 Ptltica sort ab..m .uWVau 0 2 ]
n AGakala 0 1 3
n con of tarlptaa o 1 ]
7 RateM..wlal d 0 1
It. 1(.0amda o 1 z
e Ga0a am4a1 0 O E 1 5
IO Naanl r•m 0 O n 1 1 5
It $.Cma or eat M001 NmMI Not = 0 Yu ]
•mesa arm enrol wt .ae tan nm.aw�
8 H.pdroloOY (Suotanl
riz vre.enm.r eabnmr o + —�2�
1
skean. (`C �ix.kc� rL 50 - /la r•f `lyo
1-171
Fivuenf l'�lapn /.;.F �y-rr fr•eeLl
•mesa arm enrol wt .ae tan nm.aw�
8 H.pdroloOY (Suotanl
riz vre.enm.r eabnmr o + —�2�
1
skean. (`C �ix.kc� rL 50 - /la r•f `lyo
1-171
Fivuenf l'�lapn /.;.F �y-rr fr•eeLl

L F
� kJ
NC DWQ Stram ldentif&atma Form Venda 4 11
/ 4
oej !
�WP
Proi.Fasu. Ce.t. . <lerlL
htn a y y8 G
C-11 '54M C104
va' u aro K . >
SMmaakW4Mtdwtl
R. > rlV
377303•'YW
Omn SayalN ' fill!]
aUr .a s.4 •YI'l.r •d wY
a � S
�
.4 yd .Ea.mIf )
EPh.m mt I mkbd Pmnd
OtsIM
J7 .4
L /n . Mii
S yy�wa= .. 3
1
A Subtotiq 3 S Abs.at Weak kbd9rtle Stnn
1
r Oftft'd W b.d•md b-k
a
1
2
]
.mean u dI1.i0al.ND'P -1
e1e.
2 shmity dr1t14na
0
1
2
1 P.ddaeNda�.Wlsumir.N
b
u dglsawi d.a00a1
0
1
T
91
1
4 P.MkMisim WV—ab.YaO
0
1
0
]
T
e
7 Ruu1d•dd
0
05
I
3
e en abaidw.
0
_a
1
2
3
9 Ond.Odprd
t Rama dbwa
0
t
e rleawb
o
t
0 6
1
/ S
9 Otab mrir9l
0
Ob
Ya•1
1 S
0
10 !baud YImw
0
Q6
1
1
11 Bemlea darmWrltiveid
No
=0
Ye
2
3
4Utlaede an,tar.kd .s dbmabo h wlr+Nr
(j. mwrdugy (smam •
12 Pi..ntn of Bawlmr 0 1 2
OS
t) bon Md9n.
a
1
2
1
15
11 l.d Ybr
13
1
5
0
06
Is ftdieenl-Pwft.ftnts
0
0.5
1
=15 Ontra •0
1e de0rb k-a a
0
05
1a
1 .4mnte d NOh utl.r Mk7
NO = 0
Ye
Cefd t;Wtdai. _
W Fdme raob h q.embed
2
1
0
t0. Rwt.O ib m a4elrrOad
2
_
1
0
xiAl.aaxrne. .te.wW�)
0
_ 7
21 00-1,
0
3
hFM
0
0 t
1
1s
T3
0
05
1
i6
z1
0
S
?s A
0
b
15
18 N►IbnO pla iid—.d d
FACW•015 O8
.15 Olha•0
'pYY..a r.s... W.O.bNr.lod rnYta a.n ai4lnd. B'e
P36drmm.t
Ufth -- to o� 4 od (�uu �9{-- t✓ t l!. /�/ 7 �'l r 7( ��,
,11454 -0k
ca. Ox A. 2P!
wahlOSae CeA., CrL - E.rf
LAtaud. -3q to 73-M
EY.Iu.1or X Y. �rj
C-11 '54M C104
Lartp80d. - 78 30460
SMmaakW4Mtdwtl
R. > rlV
Sawn —n— (.bd. 9n.)
EPM nl Inl.rwm.rll Par..d•t
Omn SayalN ' fill!]
A G... . Stlbt W- I ,� A .m Week rW Btron
71 cmi d m.nrm b.d are Wrk
0
1
2
1
2 Ski dm.mla
0
1
2
J
.mean u dI1.i0al.ND'P -1
e1e.
0
t
2
3
1 P.ddaeNda�.Wlsumir.N
b
z
]
SAdN id flood
0
1
2
3
a OdtlOIW WmOfbuch.4
0
1
T
9
7 Ruu1d•dd
0
05
I
3
e waxes
0
O5
2
15
9 Ond.Odprd
0
0
t
Ib
10 Ndmel
0
0 6
1
/ S
11 S.mr1av gnum "'d—w
I NO
0
Ya•1
1
12 P—d B—ft.
Skaa+l C((�rf ��Nk 4- ,r,("l -� "-
1*11 Ox /2oh-
Pnpol9lb Ce..r CA' ff
L'ft'*Sy S, 75a
En1•d.r K Y. A-i
a—,/ 54.'.1.4
- 78 3040
Tot.!Fohtts
3...•kaN.v tn•mena -3 7 2S
S.— DM—hud.. (eklk ant)
EPMm.ni ft, mrm..tM W
oaln%-I —J6 31.'111 /1
.aamwm. Lrn +a. Sr.
.r.�r.1>. �nrer511111ee �r.��r�� �t1•.1 -�
t Gmd ddimnd tro0 an0 Mrd
0
1
1
tan
7 Sne.byd dl.rultl P
0
1
z
3
3 1nchlmitel arud0ra ec X001 .bp0oal
AMPW IIM
0
1
Stton
3
/ PWds lam d.awn.WaVals
0
1
]
S Advel2hd
0
t
2
Qv
8 OWW mn m b.ndee
a
2
3
7 Wmril.nnbl depo.2s
1
1
2
3
Q Nedode
0
1
2
3
s 0ro0e cm
0
05
2
is
10. Ndtnl ..0.
0
O5
i3
15
tt S,aond a 9 oNer dmriri.l
No
0
Yes
• 3
12 Pe.ae. I Ba,.ea•
Skakh „(e�,(y Ii1C i(I!y r! CA) dJ11��
C t(uI 4np 1. ieq 're 4
)A r4 l-A u�I OR,
J i
:VA CA- F If
L.atuaa 3y f4 75.46
tan
'°'gm'd' " 78 7G9G{p
Awmttebwoe.f
t.'r.IMUt P'.'.OrrW
om.rSy..h� 3A " +ICF/3
.R aed3ds L� +,n S..
W"k
teadmds
Stton
2
1
2
1
Qv
3
3
1
3
�9
2
]
2
3
ai
i3
5
15
le
Ye.
• 3
1 7 On
1 z
05 0
0 1 1S
10.0 Yea
2
1
0
2
1
_
0
1
2
)
1
2
3
OS
1
15
0
1
15
05
15
06
15
FACW. 7 OBL
=15 Ontra •0
a
4o e4jj
J

elf Vf IA16
Dd. U ,
v+y.eBSh. ,4. 0, !!it
3 Y 9
Er.Nr.tor �"
co.My �n+r w.
konBlpN. _ 78 let/f
TSmlPwma
-37 75-
1
S S�
Btre.mCebnnWOon,Wrtl..M) an.r
s..r.braan+lve..Aeera Fyb•vuml InbrmlMd P.nndal •o-
1. GenWudy of daub bed and b"
►np.ustb 4/e.r Crk -(•ro,
1
2
COOMy' ]OM �
2 d dmM W.rg Bmb+c�__
0
1
S S 1 k
3
] k,4,.mpebabbP0..>L,.eopaoi otD'POaI
0
v
J
2
a
l P.Aca rm drrmn aratnb "-
0
0
2
]
B AtavrAafet
0
0
2
a
8 OnN Denabmchn
0
1
Y
a
7 ftev]nIMMWde0ae0a
0
1
tv
fl 11s.do4
0
1
2
%:
B GnM a.4d
0
OS
am
1
,p NNaal
0
Q6
1S
11 9emdar .+d. N.Md
N.
• 0
1 1
l
12 Pr.arn d .amr
►np.ustb 4/e.r Crk -(•ro,
,Bad• 3 9 /
2
COOMy' ]OM �
13.k- baobab
0
1
S S 1 k
3
14. Id Inr
15
,
0
1SGaNcnpenload.DM
0
0
_
_ ,B
1B dmbl.iuW b.
D
0
1
15
17 SaabmN t.ldence h—t.bb
N_0
•0
Y
]
9kelU, -s -/( /'J < r 4 //r 1(w,.. %l.! /p' / ", for/ /
/1(,(/(r
/-I-,n 4rea yru., /fal.� d1.,3 1, ?'/8
C .c 14, ✓Y
147 1
Lf %/�
om U ,
►np.ustb 4/e.r Crk -(•ro,
,Bad• 3 9 /
2
COOMy' ]OM �
25ddvv.d
real Pama. t
5...ma r.ririrrdlM � � 2 j
1
S S 1 k
nn> va>o
:... ......
0
/9
SOnm O.l.rmlm0on (elyd..n•1 am.r k. .M IJ
I:Pn.m«W idrmllmd w+mnb0 .a aa0"�"C . S.,
r—_ —r
12 P,aaenn d e...O. 0 1 2
Sketch - C I,•+n „F( -- "( /w„ n!• nod L` (e dI /,1 � !c /�c` t.i �
11 I r J
+•a
Ai ,j Jar ,5 4)e} �..•, e/ cn
6 <,aSro^
el .O 1, t,1) (.J.
�0i 01) 4—( 1 r
NC DWO 51— ldentlileadoa Form Venlan t 11
J /z, / Po1.etl91n I-Ja• C,k -4A, �+ 3Y
e•wmf.r f coaary S"a 1..aBIWd. _ 78 id
Tdal Polnn L 7 Btn.m OW.rmirptba l.kcb oM) amr S., /y,. Sa(, �4rry •2
Sr•em ON.ml genrrCd Eph.mrr mNrmltlmf P.nnnbl .a Owd Name
v+vor ea25
V C-nftafty _ —. 0 dw-md be0.4 ball
0
1
2
COOMy' ]OM �
25ddvv.d
0 )
1
2
]
:... ......
0
1
]
. P.,kw m dabmn.tnt.
0
05
_
a
6 Ad.YnbtWH OOOOpUIn
0
1
]
B O.pa.Davlb.na mnNaf
oss�o�©
•0
2
]
7 RaOent Whm.l doporb
0
1
2
B InWaM
Ooi7�t+
1
2
%:
B GM.cn
o
■a•s
am
5
t0 Nrtural
0
06
16
11 Secxk ar mlydleMN
NO
a 0
I Yae
l
12 P,aaenn d e...O. 0 1 2
Sketch - C I,•+n „F( -- "( /w„ n!• nod L` (e dI /,1 � !c /�c` t.i �
11 I r J
+•a
Ai ,j Jar ,5 4)e} �..•, e/ cn
6 <,aSro^
el .O 1, t,1) (.J.
�0i 01) 4—( 1 r
NC DWO 51— ldentlileadoa Form Venlan t 11
J /z, / Po1.etl91n I-Ja• C,k -4A, �+ 3Y
e•wmf.r f coaary S"a 1..aBIWd. _ 78 id
Tdal Polnn L 7 Btn.m OW.rmirptba l.kcb oM) amr S., /y,. Sa(, �4rry •2
Sr•em ON.ml genrrCd Eph.mrr mNrmltlmf P.nnnbl .a Owd Name
v+vor ea25
V C-nftafty _ —. 0 dw-md be0.4 ball
0
1
2
COOMy' ]OM �
25ddvv.d
0 )
1
2
]
a IntlmmeltmNLae a IO.." flep, -w
0
1
]
. P.,kw m dabmn.tnt.
0
05
_
a
6 Ad.YnbtWH OOOOpUIn
0
1
]
B O.pa.Davlb.na mnNaf
0
•0
2
]
7 RaOent Whm.l doporb
0
1
2
B InWaM
0
1
2
B GM.cn
0
05
5
t0 Nrtural
0
06
16
11 Secxk ar mlydleMN
NO
a 0
I Yae
l
12 Pnr. of s—br
0
1
2
COOMy' ]OM �
17 het b.drl.
0
1
S S k 0
0.
14 I IV W
15
1
0
159.8 mnlan Nf ddeOm
0
05
tLj
5
18 MOM IM. ar PO..
0
0
1 6
17 B.BW..d eYldW,r2 al hrrer table?
No
•0
Ya
�S+ UI-
Dalr U , P
ProNcuBN. �erar irk 1.n N
Nhw.. 3
Eql— A' 4 C
COOMy' ]OM �
�WreSad. � 7$ u /9
r S
Bw.ml2wrmk,.nonaw . r,., o
S S k 0
0.
nar � epnmronlbbdaalbalPerrmbl .aaadwmaC S.-
i aannleiea.me.ak D , a
i dwanWw 0 , a
a k.tlW2l .DUdOn a ftale pa,l smppop 0 1 2 a
. P. I* rro d Wn.m •dJ•a.r. — -- 0 ,
SAMrdu410m m 0 1
6 DeputlbnW b.n w b. Jra 0 1 a
? Resat ld 0 , 2
B tk.mn 0
0.GeM mod 0 05 B
1aNrWel o as r 1s
1, S.Obnda adW ch. Na +O yeik,, J
12 Pn>arcv d Bigler 0 I 1 1 2
llft --G gbK0.ft 0 ,
1l Ip1BJ.r t 1 OS
A
1i 5adlmeaan pan. or o.bM 0 05 li, 15
to d.bM br. or In 0 O S t 1 5
17 SaD.nMeMdeM. Olh w.brlablel No•0 Ye a]
Skew 6,1 rs.lkr ,n�rsl.�� ,/(,j .,,ro 6,e.,4 �� <r„
12 Pn>arcv d Bigler 0 I 1 1 2
llft --G gbK0.ft 0 ,
1l Ip1BJ.r t 1 OS
A
1i 5adlmeaan pan. or o.bM 0 05 li, 15
to d.bM br. or In 0 O S t 1 5
17 SaD.nMeMdeM. Olh w.brlablel No•0 Ye a]
Skew 6,1 rs.lkr ,n�rsl.�� ,/(,j .,,ro 6,e.,4 �� <r„
Skew 6,1 rs.lkr ,n�rsl.�� ,/(,j .,,ro 6,e.,4 �� <r„

' -u Psf — u7 z
NC DWO Sirmm Idenlllkation Form Venion 4 11
o.b U /Z. / Pmjanta a, (flc.W udmdc s Y. 9,e -711
Eaa— A l C-0 Sit Larmbd. - 78 u
Tool P.M. Sb.tln OaMmhulon Id J. one) Mnea $..ty„ 5..11 hre/A /]
�' ^dell P.pimnaral Mmrmllbm Perennial
e � raM.lrnv r_cAa..a. � Abamlt "t I Abd.rm. I SbonO
1. Can ._.ddurmli+W rm e"k
0
1
2
3
ddiEl
0
1
2
3
R2
6Warolmmd,ra a dQ.papL sNppo.l
0
Q
1)
2
3
1 Panao •rm dm"m aarotmb
ttodMto
2
3
6AdMl16d OrW - - - --
0
1
7
]
a D.POmQbae bare w btlmYb
+
1
2
3
7 PemeaQlM.l
6
1
2
3
e Walla
0
1
3
3
B O-b mNr.1
1
04
3
is
d
e PaNfb atra dstnam.nmatnb
05
1
15
10 t
2
v "•a
a Ib.d.ib
(-ue -,A QT-3
NC DWQ Stream Identllimtlon Porm Venion 0.11
D.b ()2 h. /
Pr.i.ad3ib tJur �f11 -IaPi
umud. 2
Batla.br A' -t
tounn Sr .n/
Lon0a0. - 78 3186
TOM Panb
Smmr•etlMtl•tivarbd � � /j
SMM D.W ft lO JCM*Ono)
6pMm.n11n1m1a0bm Ponnnhl
OQm S.,�I,w 5x71 ufaR
eO OmdAlsa( .Sw
A GeWWfphdM L otai i
to L "flmn
T0b1 Pant.
A.oarY.n w.smn.n 2() f7
Nor ea
SMm D.wmMaBan ldral. aryl
Eplmis lmarmiLL.a Pvww4ld
a0mr S.qL Su f l SII•rl�
as 0maw.tlC S• YA
Abeam
Wuk I
ttodMto
stlo
11 .f m bed mtl b.di
0
+
2
ut
1 `_ dananui stm0_
0
+
2
3
] n+drlmtl mncWa'm nM.pw wpJ d
D
i
e!J
3
a Pamd. W W. dml.am tW.trab
0
3
2
3
5 AmWn9d n
0
1
QA
3
fl Daposlbnal aam a Umaina
0
e PaNfb atra dstnam.nmatnb
2
3
7 Roam. WWW dapnds
0
2
3
a Ib.d.ib
0
1
3
a4YWO mnbtl
0
O6
7
10 Nanrm
0
0.5
1
i
113- .nOnpmbr -Wd-.d
W
0
Ym•3
'mlitl.la.tlf w ml rota. ca.61os1omh mtl.N
B N dro Subb#d= G
12 Pneen4 ai Baanw
0
+
Pmiae081b /of irlc -41'1
Lalbum 3 Y $-(
13 ton oadhm2 bl .
1
count' Snr
3
to L "flmn
T0b1 Pant.
A.oarY.n w.smn.n 2() f7
Nor ea
SMm D.wmMaBan ldral. aryl
Eplmis lmarmiLL.a Pvww4ld
a0mr S.qL Su f l SII•rl�
as 0maw.tlC S• YA
15 Sdmbd m pbrt, ar debrh
1
Is
1B O debit Ima n paa
0
ut
1
15
17 SaaLnWevkbnwdtuT -W bbb7
W•0
_ _ - -1
Ym
3
Iske1M bol "- / "4`1JI ", Try / r4 21f (2l
70 70
W e4, VTS
NC DWO Stream IdwUDeytlon Form Venon 4 11
wb 02 /
Pmiae081b /of irlc -41'1
Lalbum 3 Y $-(
/
eaammr A- V. f
count' Snr
LOn01m - 78 U
ll
T0b1 Pant.
A.oarY.n w.smn.n 2() f7
Nor ea
SMm D.wmMaBan ldral. aryl
Eplmis lmarmiLL.a Pvww4ld
a0mr S.qL Su f l SII•rl�
as 0maw.tlC S• YA
A f3eor1+0 h SubldW •
1
ut
PMa
Stm
t dm.mal O.O Ond OaM
_ _ - -1
3
2 Ofdam.m
+
2
3
3hTtlwlsQ bra v. mvpw
(OS
1
2
3
e PaNfb atra dstnam.nmatnb
0
2
3
3 AdnnldatQ
0
1
2
3
0 and bm. ar MndMa
7
3
7 RuMt aluNeld"o.a.
0
1
2
3
a WWOa
o
-
3
L or.deatlmpi
o
as
i s
10 /Uaatl
0
1 05
1 5
11 Sammn ror6r ar1NM1
W•
Ym.]
an W. mae•sa nelNM'set OOm.v.n au1
8 ub10W • 7 1 _
12 Pm•naadBmQaw 0 >l 2 3
!I mketrin bacbd.
1
3
to Lem inn
Is
1
00
0
iS Sa&h wpomp ndmnm
0
OS
1
15
16. ft,* dd"Elm or M
0
O6
1
is
i7s.n.baWaamioedepl+iwmrab.7
W
=o
vm
C Bf01
_
10 FIbwa i boom W
3
2
0
10 R000d ObriN h allew4md
l0 Wambmdirn Oat. wm ab.tl..a!
l__
—1- - _
1
1
2
0
3
21 AM— laSoa
2
3
22 Fbn
0
05
1
Is
xIC
0)
as
1
15
N
OS
3
2A
0
05
6
M Wtlgrm plu m.treammd
FACW -075, oSL•
10 am 0
pnMmmimm•mrytmdkltlmW Wip agar m.l•aa
Sap 35d own+
Not"
1 �
SkdM �wlnQ' i.e•! Mu1n+. ,f� /�'(O� /� /�t'� 4a. e�'S '...+

jr 41'( (47 / 4/3
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CHAliAC7ER73'11C5
BWRBGiON
POMP
RANGE
SCORE
-
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
-
,. q�g3uyJ
Pirdmbrn
Dfm.t.b
0_3
1
Framer of Mw /pmahha p.oh 1. drew
inflow weavmmn -P flow -rna mn
0 -s
0 -.
0 -s
S
0 -S
2
!.Worm Hpmt D.mm a[tr.0oo
ndvnw.dtemrmn- am.ttmoRm -enR
o -a
o -s
0 -s
„?
0 -3
)
robotkr- e � wNe batty -ew rffi
0 -6
0 -.
0 -S
[�
/
q
Edde.rr Hoarknf webendml dbrDar{p
aaa -o- -mml ieb
0 -7
0 -1
0 -1
2
6
3
on dO—
o -)
o -.
o -°
2
r`d
}
a
Pm.a«Hadjotta Omdpbin
no kb•0 exteneve Hood Ida -moR f
p_q
0 -.
0 -2
Z
q
if.
,
8nire.tOment /IloMpnb .eeefr
mlrtarMd -0 fieomM 1 -m°x orb
p -3
0 -.
0_2
/
0 -4
6
Pneeom of adjeemlfvrU.aM
m valands - O I ed t aellm6f • nbx l.b
0 -a
0 -/
0 -2
/
0 -1
9
Gaevd el.oedry
wtamve chmmellam.- mmnlmmldn.mu ul
0 -5
D -.
0 -3
0 -5
10
1ie01mevl f.Pa
eRtmuvo elan -0 bdemm.dnaa- nb
0 -S
0 -.
0 -°
z
a
11
BtrsAalrwsi4 ofdumdbd fuDftr.b
fi -PI dnero Ives -nvx
NA'
0 -.
0 -3
/
Itooc depcb and dmdry an bane
°tbao -0 dmbe moor n
12
e- Wenm.fmanat Wdlbo «wldedna
a mekd -o smile hedGbmba- nb
0 -3
0 -/
0 -3
(
0 -5 0
J2
Premeee H mym badthOnrn
0 -5
D -/
0 -S
'j
0 -1
13
fmveb wdm -o-m anDk bore -m.x drtb
0 -5
0 -3
0 -3
0
CI
t{
R.a dtpm.oe eemlbm Web
0 -3
0 -1
0
2
�
11
rmrlaNetmb- o-armefaenmmv -m. b
D-0
0 -1
-5
2
�
Is
lmwttM•pkmmr.. uw.ueD,wmaw pre0.etlm
mDaeodd b mwldmm -mu mu
a -s
o -.
a -s
-3
Sabstmlre *Wdrd—
a embddd - loom moan- � ¢
I6
inn �mhsw�P OAvrdcaoPU.r
-�
0 -1
0
P.... of drmm l.vwerhrtu(sa peJp.)
-
meridavm^ nlmine« nW
0 -4
17
R.Dimteempldry
orb ormtabnet- atvvom wermd h.Drtw -esss bm
0 -6
0 -a
0 -6
3
k-
�
16
c'°°��"m °rd
m aDnd -0 mnm.musr -nvx may
o -s
o -s
a -s
3
p�3
t
Iv
8uhant. ®bedddmv
1 ibcddd- laoudmnum-
NA'
0 -.
0 -1
3
C%
20
Pot.meofstre.m hautebrava (see paae {)
v
0 .
0 -5
0 -3
G.
Y 5
21
nmumav
° Peeaolx H.�wlM.m
noe,deeam -o avm
p_q
0 -{
0 -1
2
0.
21
meHde.oe -0 Prere.eeaflid b
• rvv
p_q
0 -.
0 -.
!J
M
2)
HvWmee effdWOh uu
- aahuomnt avldmu -mex
0 -6
0 -f
0 -5
6
Th W Pilau Pesamk
100
100
100
0 -3
TOTAL SCORE (also eetcrmJGet page)
[fG
Tad PolNf Pmdbk
IOD
IOD
100
TOTAL SCORE (ako e[tv oa fast page)
�()
tym
' The. ebmmv I.I. w mt uax.d In amad ammo.
2
/+ at 1 1 L( -7 ! ')
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CHAliAC7ER73'11C5
BWRBGiON
POMP
RANGE
SCORE
-
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
-
,. q�g3uyJ
Pirdmbrn
Dfm.t.b
0_3
1
Framer of Mw /pmahha p.oh 1. drew
inflow weavmmn -P flow -rna mn
0 -s
0 -.
0 -s
S
0 -S
2
!.Worm Hpmt D.mm a[tr.0oo
ndvnw.dtemrmn- am.ttmoRm -enR
o -a
o -s
0 -s
„?
0 -3
)
robotkr- e � wNe batty -ew rffi
0 -6
0 -.
0 -S
[�
/
q
Edde.rr Hoarknf webendml dbrDar{p
aaa -o- -mml ieb
0 -7
0 -1
0 -1
2
6
3
mill - aCrouvdwarer dhchassa� -m
o -)
o -.
o -°
2
r`d
}
a
Pm.a«Hadjotta Omdpbin
no kb•0 exteneve Hood Ida -moR f
p_q
0 -.
0 -2
Z
q
if.
,
8nire.tOment /IloMpnb .eeefr
mlrtarMd -0 fieomM 1 -m°x orb
p -3
0 -.
0_2
/
0 -4
6
Pneeom of adjeemlfvrU.aM
m valands - O I ed t aellm6f • nbx l.b
0 -a
0 -/
0 -2
/
0 -1
9
Gaevd el.oedry
wtamve chmmellam.- mmnlmmldn.mu ul
0 -5
D -.
0 -3
0 -5
10
1ie01mevl f.Pa
eRtmuvo elan -0 bdemm.dnaa- nb
0 -S
0 -.
0 -°
z
a
11
BtrsAalrwsi4 ofdumdbd fuDftr.b
fi -PI dnero Ives -nvx
NA'
0 -.
0 -3
/
Itooc depcb and dmdry an bane
°tbao -0 dmbe moor n
12
e- Wenm.fmanat Wdlbo «wldedna
a mekd -o smile hedGbmba- nb
0 -3
0 -/
0 -3
(
0 -5 0
J2
Premeee H mym badthOnrn
0 -5
D -/
0 -S
'j
0 -1
13
fmveb wdm -o-m anDk bore -m.x drtb
0 -5
0 -3
0 -3
0
CI
t{
R.a dtpm.oe eemlbm Web
0 -3
0 -1
0
2
�
11
rmrlaNetmb- o-armefaenmmv -m. b
D-0
0 -1
-5
2
�
Is
lmwttM•pkmmr.. uw.ueD,wmaw pre0.etlm
mDaeodd b mwldmm -mu mu
a -s
o -.
a -s
-3
Sabstmlre *Wdrd—
a embddd - loom moan- � ¢
I6
inn �mhsw�P OAvrdcaoPU.r
-�
0 -1
0
P.... of drmm l.vwerhrtu(sa peJp.)
-
meridavm^ nlmine« nW
0 -4
17
R.Dimteempldry
orb ormtabnet- atvvom wermd h.Drtw -esss bm
0 -6
0 -a
0 -6
3
k-
�
16
c'°°��"m °rd
m aDnd -0 mnm.musr -nvx may
o -s
o -s
a -s
3
p�3
t
Iv
8uhant. ®bedddmv
1 ibcddd- laoudmnum-
NA'
0 -.
0 -1
3
C%
20
Pot.meofstre.m hautebrava (see paae {)
v
0 .
0 -5
0 -3
TOTAL SCORE (alto enter on RM page)
Y 5
21
nmumav
° Peeaolx H.�wlM.m
noe,deeam -o avm
p_q
0 -{
0 -1
2
O
21
meHde.oe -0 Prere.eeaflid b
• rvv
p_q
0 -.
0 -.
!J
M
2)
HvWmee effdWOh uu
- aahuomnt avldmu -mex
0 -6
0 -f
0 -5
/\
v
Th W Pilau Pesamk
100
100
100
0 -3
TOTAL SCORE (also eetcrmJGet page)
[fG
/+ at 1 1 L( -7 ! ')
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CHAliAC7ER73'11C5
HCORBOiON
POMI'RANGB
SCORE
SCORE
-
_ k
~rrtammereowlpmdaeapmktvma.m
Cmia �
PI(dlOOH
MetOnla
no romttHlbwfpettlamtpnobrex>mb
m
0_3
!
m flow «mNmem -0 flow -ena h.s
p_s
D -{
o -s
S
0 -S
2
BWdmtt Hp.dhumor -H ti-
extwnnedwnxm -woo drrmbm- u
0_a
0 -!
0 -3
„?
0 -3
)
0 -P mn���wida bWfi -mvv Dar
0 -b
0 -1
�0
0 -3
0 -1
/
q
[rWmre of vvvfentermwlnl dkeberllm
eRtmnvoN r -Poo di ee- ms
p_3
-1
0 -{
/
6
3
wed - trCnavdwmer vnximds� env-
0 -7
0 -1
0 -1
2
�
y
6
Peeuaa of.dJaee.l aoadpbl.
rm -0 exrmvve food bm -nvb nnf
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
Z
SSA.
ro
Batrmmrnml /Ooodphla .eeea
enlrenehetl -P -maw
p_S
0 -x
0 -2
/
0 -4
6
Plrxner of •ill• ®rwetlxoda
.rdbaJr- a t.e0adt -maR
p_6
o -a
0 -2
/
0 -1
/
(A•nvdd.LLeab
o-s
o -1
0 -3
0 -5
12
y
t_ exmmr .aammnn�nm- o-nann+lmm„an -m,x i°b
0_5
0 -4
0 -5
2
a
to
sdimmtmpa
mlms .+ad Item -o mile «madlmmt -nmx moor
p_)
0 -1
0 -{
/
Itooc depcb and dmdry an bane
°tbao -0 dmbe moor n
11
Ens ®direniry efeWaad bd fubswe
6o holm -0 fu dlvmmam -mew nb
�.
p_{
0 -3
fmputb)o[+kn0•+a, Hvmted,."bnbM Pr•ducrl..
0 -5 0
J2
HhOenct of cn.vwl Iaddon w Srlda11.0
d I meted -0 aablehd Rtnoka -nor u
0 -5
D -/
0 -S
./
[
0 -1
13
heaenttHmalerhmh blare
severe emam- tr m aoslm. rWk Dade -max a
0 -5
U -S
0 -3
0
CI
t{
R°at depth and deuby ev Danb�
mvuMe moo- trdmxrmbehm. b
0 -3
0 -1
0 -S
�y
�
17
Impacfbl�y�dpkdlare.tt
0 -6
0 -6
0 6
2
Is
Is
�dmhwPr�„rnnn
[O
o -1
o -s
5
19
Sabstmlre *Wdrd—
a embddd - loom moan- � ¢
NA.
Fleenor of dlMpodmfrlopple •peal eoofpk+m
0 -1
0
P.... of drmm l.vwerhrtu(sa peJp.)
-
meridavm^ nlmine« nW
0 -4
16
mnmeah( ke er b -0 welldevekod -mu emv
o-3
0 -7
-6
0 -4
k-
�
17
ILOia mmpkRiry
one r m -a mn vmdlmblW. -sax orb
0 -a
0 -6
0 -6
3
p�3
t
Is
Cmop)mvwaseonr dreamOd
mfk•Aln V mnneLLaw u mob
o -s
o -3
0 -s
3
C%
19
taSbrens whmel0nrn
emhdded -0 looms
�.
p_q
0 -/
TOTAL SCORE (alto enter on RM page)
Y 5
20
PremrYr ofslramf.rerteDr•hs (ea pa[eQ
numom - hnf
0 -4
0 -S
0 -3
21
mev�.tt- common
Praa¢oa.myehlma
mewmeco- m®m nmvrmv v
0 -/
0 -/
0 -/
Z
-2
O
22
Preseslma0s0
m
mnixme- aoomnon mrrinory oral
1!
0 -°
0 -{
/\
v
�
�
HNdmtt orsrOdOk °m
rndeum -O .buMmt evldmee -onx .iob
0 -a
0 -3
0 -3
Tad PolNf Pmdbk
IOD
IOD
100
TOTAL SCORE (ako e[tv oa fast page)
�()
tym
4. PC
• TPeu ch.ndmeba at nm.bened to mead eer l
2
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
CHAliAC7ER73'11C5
HCORBOiON
POMI'RANGB
SCORE
SCORE
-
_ k
~rrtammereowlpmdaeapmktvma.m
Cmia �
PI(dlOOH
MetOnla
no romttHlbwfpettlamtpnobrex>mb
m
0_3
!
m flow «mNmem -0 flow -ena h.s
p_s
D -{
o -s
S
0 -S
2
BWdmtt Hp.dhumor -H ti-
extwnnedwnxm -woo drrmbm- u
0_a
0 -!
0 -3
„?
0 -3
)
0 -P mn���wida bWfi -mvv Dar
0 -b
0 -1
�0
0 -3
0 -1
/
q
[rWmre of vvvfentermwlnl dkeberllm
eRtmnvoN r -Poo di ee- ms
p_3
-1
0 -{
/
6
3
wed - trCnavdwmer vnximds� env-
0 -7
0 -1
0 -1
2
�
y
6
Peeuaa of.dJaee.l aoadpbl.
rm -0 exrmvve food bm -nvb nnf
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
Z
SSA.
7
Batrmmrnml /Ooodphla .eeea
enlrenehetl -P -maw
p_S
0 -x
0 -2
/
0 -4
6
Plrxner of •ill• ®rwetlxoda
.rdbaJr- a t.e0adt -maR
p_6
o -a
0 -2
/
0 -1
/
(A•nvdd.LLeab
o-s
o -1
0 -3
0 -5
12
y
t_ exmmr .aammnn�nm- o-nann+lmm„an -m,x i°b
0_5
0 -4
0 -5
2
a
to
sdimmtmpa
mlms .+ad Item -o mile «madlmmt -nmx moor
p_)
0 -1
0 -{
/
Itooc depcb and dmdry an bane
°tbao -0 dmbe moor n
11
Ens ®direniry efeWaad bd fubswe
6o holm -0 fu dlvmmam -mew nb
�.
p_{
0 -3
fmputb)o[+kn0•+a, Hvmted,."bnbM Pr•ducrl..
0 -5 0
J2
HhOenct of cn.vwl Iaddon w Srlda11.0
d I meted -0 aablehd Rtnoka -nor u
0 -5
D -/
0 -S
./
[
0 -1
13
heaenttHmalerhmh blare
severe emam- tr m aoslm. rWk Dade -max a
0 -5
U -S
0 -3
0
CI
t{
R°at depth and deuby ev Danb�
mvuMe moo- trdmxrmbehm. b
0 -3
0 -1
0 -S
�y
�
17
Impacfbl�y�dpkdlare.tt
0 -6
0 -6
0 6
2
Is
Is
�dmhwPr�„rnnn
o s
o -1
o -s
5
19
Sabstmlre *Wdrd—
a embddd - loom moan- � ¢
NA.
Fleenor of dlMpodmfrlopple •peal eoofpk+m
0 -1
0
P.... of drmm l.vwerhrtu(sa peJp.)
-
meridavm^ nlmine« nW
0 -4
16
mnmeah( ke er b -0 welldevekod -mu emv
o-3
0 -7
-6
0 -4
k-
�
17
ILOia mmpkRiry
one r m -a mn vmdlmblW. -sax orb
0 -a
0 -6
0 -6
3
p�3
t
Is
Cmop)mvwaseonr dreamOd
mfk•Aln V mnneLLaw u mob
o -s
o -3
0 -s
3
C%
19
taSbrens whmel0nrn
emhdded -0 looms
�.
p_q
0 -/
TOTAL SCORE (alto enter on RM page)
Y 5
20
PremrYr ofslramf.rerteDr•hs (ea pa[eQ
numom - hnf
0 -4
0 -S
0 -3
21
mev�.tt- common
Praa¢oa.myehlma
mewmeco- m®m nmvrmv v
0 -/
0 -/
0 -/
Z
-2
O
22
Preseslma0s0
m
mnixme- aoomnon mrrinory oral
0 -d
0 -°
0 -{
/\
v
�
�
HNdmtt orsrOdOk °m
rndeum -O .buMmt evldmee -onx .iob
0 -a
0 -3
0 -3
Tad PolNf Pmdbk
IOD
IOD
100
TOTAL SCORE (ako e[tv oa fast page)
�()
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
2
CA %4 (47 I'l
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
REWGIONPOINTRANGE
POINT R
RANGE S
SCORE
® -
-
cm na
Pidm.m
Mam1a6
1
no romttHlbwfpettlamtpnobrex>mb
m
0_3
0 -1
0 -3
5 2
2
H.Ncomofpon►om.o.nemen
sand —hmnm- mdozdion- w
D -6
0 -S
0 -3
)
wpet.. man
m bnfrb -a mml we3e bnff. -rtax b
d -b
0 -1
0 -3
'�
q
BvWenm amnkntw eheminl Naeh.r[n
mlmsMd -trm -ma nb
0 -5
0 -1
0 -1
/
6
Gray.Ovrra dhcharp
ma -o „dmde eb -nnx u
0 -7
0 -4
0 -1
.S
6
Prxemm efWJeee.e Omdplan
(inn - tx lain -mu gat
0 -4
0 -1
0 2
7
Itnvenchmmt /Ilosdpl.ly seem_
mt —Ind -a flans .v
0_5
0 -4
0_2
�7
C
s
mwnhaLPrnsxo H.d'l 1we0mldf-rrisx u
0 -6
0 -4
0 -2
/
9
Choral dnawlb _
w
ndma chamidrmam- f-
0 -3
0 -4
0 -5
10
-1011 la9nt
wundm alm4mmeeNmmu-
0 -5
0 -1
0 -1
/
II
maa el.wnb HrLmdbd medals
-P dlvwerlma -emx imr
NA•
0 -1
0 -5
12
y
HvWmm acbaee•1lndde. wwldmWS
n'-o Ded de hlnlu- hie
0_5
0 -4
0 -5
2
a
PresrxoermeJar b.. hdlonr
even ndAe Daafu -maa u
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
2
C1 la
e<.
Itooc depcb and dmdry an bane
°tbao -0 dmbe moor n
0 -3
0 -4
0 -5
2
6n
fmputb)o[+kn0•+a, Hvmted,."bnbM Pr•ducrl..
0 -5 0
0 -{ 0
0
'`
li
-a w -d- -mu
0 3
0 -1
-3
V
Pectcnm of dtn..pmlGlpplclmW r.mplmn
p_) 0
0
0 -6
/
16
and w °awen -mex vdr
0 -3
-3
17
Hddntmm lrrp
Inik «no NNml -tr vaddm luv -rrmx tee
0 -6
0 -6
0 6
"
Is
Ce..Pl mvera0v orer strmmhea
-shod m.•0 C .m -- dOv
0 -3
0 -5
0 -3
/
5
19
Sabstmlre *Wdrd—
a embddd - loom moan- � ¢
NA.
0 1
0 -1
2D
y
P.... of drmm l.vwerhrtu(sa peJp.)
-
meridavm^ nlmine« nW
0 -4
0 -5
0 -3
,
21
Prtfena H.mPONlsm
-a .mamma -mss
0 -4
0 -4
D -<
2
r(yVl'
O 22
Peeexe Hllrh
.0 mrvme.s - m
p_I
0 -.
0 -4
G
m
- 23
HvWmm HwOdNRon
mavWmca- rDaldern er(dmce -mn tw
0 -6
0 -3
0 -3
S
Tea Palen Pao1Wr
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (alto enter on RM page)
Y 5
2
CA %4 (47 I'l
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
WORE
POINT R
RANGE S
SC�BB
® -
- ��� r
dmmt -
-/ 0
0 -5 5
5 2
HNde.m Hputb.vm..Ibrnie. -
-3 0
0 -3
2 H
exteudve ahbenm- P) b
bLL -a mntM���de tm i°b
0
0 -. D
D -3 e
BvWmttfa4tmtremlW dl.lursn 0
0 -{ 0
0 -♦
e B
0
0 -1 0
0 -1
mabm -a e
enceHnoaepW� a
0 -/ 0
0 -1
a W
Wn- P 0
7 g
gnvevrhmmr /flwOPW..mvss 0
0 -2 2
2
Premee.r.aJ.mneadvnNm� D
D -x 3
h
6 P
n. wnkoN -P a Iwedmar -mrx Iw '
Chamd dvrlm[r 0
0 -5 0
0 -{ 0
0 -7 V
'`
P C
ut dve eba.ndimlev -O mmNnrtmdb -max orb
V
&dtmm•tapot p
p_) 0
0 -{ 0
0 -{ /
/
10 &
K Imo- Oludo «msdmlmt -m.x ms
I I �
�• & dlrwdb of dunotl Dd mbmele �
�. p
p_. 0
0- S
[vWeore efeMaW l.ddon er aWmloit 0
0 -5 0
0 -{ 0
0 -3 /
/
12 [
nrcnd -0 mHe hed RDWb -tome let
I7 0
0t � °r oe°ah�ro l
ll -5 0
0 -s 0
0 -5 /
/ [
J
4. PC
L.
• These chaedmala m mt eaa.eed m uafbl muvls.
2
[
f,? seven 0. matosam enhk hank! -mu Inb1 -
W 11 m RmrdryW and dmutry on basbmu 0 -3 0 -. 0 -5 2
<� vnfblermv -0 demarmv v
IS ImPaal63rylm�. Urabea. er tlmbw Products. p_3 0 -4 0 -5
s.63brdd b'mevde.ce -mu b
16 PreammefdlRcpeaPdpPle 'Foot nmpivm 0 -3 0 -f 0 -a /
F moor « - weD.deve -mu im
17 IsDtnt mmpidry 0 -6 0 -b 0 -6
h0to «rolvhlm -0 mn nrld hebiun -mx �`
Is Goep7 cevenseover rammed p_) D -3 0 -3 [ ",Cf
� mshadn r my
19 SLesbnle emhe0dee0en NA
0 -/ 0 -.
d embedird =a kwe
20 Pretmm otdraml..ersa+tm (see prpo <) p_a 0 -3 0 -3 /
no mdenm -0 mmvom - a tab
21 Prerexe Hn�whibnm p_I 0 -/ 0 -. i
no rneev. -tr -mm orb
O 22 Premm H(1+1 p_q 0 -{ 0 -. C)
rndmoe -0 Our
fA evWmce olv11d8R vu "
y ob 0 -6 D -3 0 -3
mowdemm -0 dmffiwarWerim -fmx b
Taal Polatr PostlDk 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (elm mlu by feat page) 3 G
WORE
POINT R
RANGE S
SC�BB
® -
- ��� r
dmmt -
-/ 0
0 -5 5
5 2
HNde.m Hputb.vm..Ibrnie. -
-3 0
0 -3
2 H
exteudve ahbenm- P) b
bLL -a mntM���de tm i°b
0
0 -. D
D -3 e
BvWmttfa4tmtremlW dl.lursn 0
0 -{ 0
0 -♦
e B
0
0 -1 0
0 -1
mabm -a e
enceHnoaepW� a
0 -/ 0
0 -1
a W
Wn- P 0
7 g
gnvevrhmmr /flwOPW..mvss 0
0 -2 2
2
Premee.r.aJ.mneadvnNm� D
D -x 3
3
6 P
n. wnkoN -P a Iwedmar -mrx Iw '
Chamd dvrlm[r 0
0 -5 0
0 -{ 0
0 -7 V
'`
P C
ut dve eba.ndimlev -O mmNnrtmdb -max orb
V
&dtmm•tapot p
p_) 0
0 -{ 0
0 -{ /
/
10 &
K Imo- Oludo «msdmlmt -m.x ms
I I �
�• & dlrwdb of dunotl Dd mbmele �
�. p
p_. 0
0- S
[vWeore efeMaW l.ddon er aWmloit 0
0 -5 0
0 -{ 0
0 -3 /
/
12 [
nrcnd -0 mHe hed RDWb -tome let
I7 0
0t � °r oe°ah�ro l
ll -5 0
0 -s 0
0 -5 /
/ [

Sf
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
nwn•
- C TICS'
E00 GIONPOINT
�.ti'� �
ECORBQ
N POIIYT
RANGE
SCORE
Mo
C�IAI;iACTERI87SC9
ComW
nmm.at
tl6oamrdo
_
0 -a
o -J
Prwmmar8ewrptnddmipaobmsamm
o -+
o -s
tf
0 -J
0 -7
1
moor tat -tr now -rna aural
p_y
lup.tw ra.n
um wbo(Fu -tr cem wde Will. u
0-6
0 -4
0 -S
2
LNdmmaf paC kumm ahaatlm
0_6
0
0 -3
0 -+
f
- trmnituaum•mu n
0 -3
-3
0 -4
2
iq
6
Ptnanmafause tIbodplwa
no Hood I<i - flood hin -max nu
Mdnbantr -awa um
0 -+
0 - 2
/
RT7
LnnanekmeufrOmd0laln sums
p_y
8oldtoeedauttkv s ei [hmld dbek<[ges
0
0 -4
0 -+
3
e enrruxJrta -ar ineaa -mm n
+
mrmd -b -vna
-3
6
Presmu efaap[mt artnaaN
rm iwtlmdr- vnm,nds -min m,
i
0 -4
5
- Groundw,sm db[h,rye
mdamM1 ,rtdmM, en. -ma[ m
p_f
p -+
0 -4
7
0 -1
,.,
d
Rvmeeoredpeev,aoadpWa
mo I.b -o mrtmlwa hm =m.a I
p_I
a -+
o -z
2
0 -4
/
bFye
�
svnaa <hromtl noodplwa ,aeu
de I eaamded -0 wveHmdi - inn
p_g
0 -1
0 -2
0 -5
a
esamwsr.epmrlerwem�
m weUvads- ,doW nxJlamt -rota
0 -e
0 -4
0 -2
2
K]
IS
9
Cb.mddnnatlry
e[remsw dumolmd - wuN murder =mu n
o -s
0 -4
0 -7
P�
11
Raot d<ptb n,d dtn,hy as bmb
mva(ble mgft -0 dmurmn r =rmx pbml
0 -1
Sedirmnt l°Pw
0 -3
0 -<
0 -1
IS
Impau by,grlenWn, Ilvula[k, m•tlmbm pwdv<tloa
mNimWl -0 mendaacn -nm[
0 -J
l0
exrenshe d tr lada o m,edunem- Wino
16
Prmmea oftlme•poolMpplepad eomph,m
nonm Im or 1 -tr wdl-& cd -mu
W
0 -3
0 -6
slmrdlYmlq w•el,mtl bd mbwnrt
�.
p_<
o -s
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
It
fi -01 cute urea -nou mu
IB
C, anpy <overa{eowr artlmbtd
m,hama oan- ..d- - oux n
0 -3
0 -s
0 -3
Ipddeateer<bmntlmtltlmterwemlaa
o
o -t
o -s
0 -1
12
d I..ipd -O wb dk Wnb -mm nu,
-s
0 -5
0 -5
U
�r
r,0
G7
PrwOU Onmspkibhm
evtem cn p n
ua rinrmomm --a av min x
mvlm
12z 1
Pre,evea afm,JormM hOare
0 -5
0 -3
0 -3
•o�
P rmarn manaxr ev t
tr
mmevdamaem
13
avert Ioo -0 m n anbh do -mu mna
-+
D
m--a ot s -, ma
B = Mebw
0 ae tn
mk
0 -6
ltaat depth nod de,dry on b,vka
0_3
a -/
0 -3
Z
11
�
mrObb rooa•0 coon boot =mm
IS
rmP—b�w�n�t`"- oama�P""°`mn
p_y
o -+
d -3
3
PreuamordmrpmPilppbrpoweompk,e,
o
16
no h- -raa
0 -3
-s
It
17
=t, mp4dry
LOk ono hMW - rred b,blm °rrma
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
2
(oo erukaus -0 nbmdoa andm<a -mu
C,mpy mYer,peowr ttrmmbeC
p_y
0 -3
0 -5
z
100
100
Ia
woad. m- trawiimrom mm mr.
�f
8obswnoalsoldtdnm
�.
p_I
p -+
19
-p
1'rtunuwttrnm lncrt<Owtn Ueewen d)
0 +
0 -3
0 -3
O
20
w - [- m
0 -1
0 -+
0 -1
Prtunmw inn pa0siam
21
mwldtnee -o- mmmasr nomemm -nue
rOi
O �
Prmmnofllas
menamu -o- raeaam mm inn
p_+
0 -+
0 -+
�
Bvldmm wMldllNw
0 -6
0 -3
0
�
• Tyne clan to . me nm..cued in aasml Draw
2
-414 -U-(a
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
$
nwn•
- C TICS'
E00 GIONPOINT
RANGE
SCORE
-CamW
pUdmoat
Mo
�
Pisnm arna.. rp.ttl,tmr paw. m.rxam
Ilow or nranuan -Oq How -inn um
0_5
0 -a
o -J
3
2
HNdmm afpul kamm alter,tim
e,imTwea@,abm -0 mlbtrW00 -mm mb)
0 -6
0 -J
0 -7
2
7
lup.tw ra.n
um wbo(Fu -tr cem wde Will. u
0-6
0 -4
0 -S
2
1
ENdeaee Mnolrl ®t v[bmdtnl dh<bargm
eb war m -tr mdt
0 -5
0 -+
0 -+
5
no dhcb _ 0,crmudw,tcrdhh[ksrYama m aunt
0 -3
0 -+
0 -4
2
iq
6
Ptnanmafause tIbodplwa
no Hood I<i - flood hin -max nu
0 -1
0 -+
0 - 2
/
RT7
LnnanekmeufrOmd0laln sums
p_y
0 -1
0 -1
r
e enrruxJrta -ar ineaa -mm n
6
Presmu efaap[mt artnaaN
rm iwtlmdr- vnm,nds -min m,
0 -6
0 -4
0 -1
Z
9
Os,mtl,luvmity
axrennw elwmtliud mWnlmmder -mm n
0 - J
0 -1
()-1
/
10
mimuw m -O li Bma orm redlmmt -mm Inn
ri ad.
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
/
11
Aobm& dlrerany afc►anmf bad aubrmm an
NA-
0 -+
0 -5
12
HYIMmr afch,natl N[I[Im mttldeusep
I Ines -0 b 9bwk, -mea -,
0 -5
U -+
0 -5
K]
IS
Prwau Of maj mnk ba*.-
mvua awl -0 no erosm male bnakn -rm, In
p_y
P�
11
Raot d<ptb n,d dtn,hy as bmb
mva(ble mgft -0 dmurmn r =rmx pbml
0 -1
0 -+
0 -S
bs
IS
Impau by,grlenWn, Ilvula[k, m•tlmbm pwdv<tloa
mNimWl -0 mendaacn -nm[
0 -J
0 -+
0 -5
16
Prmmea oftlme•poolMpplepad eomph,m
nonm Im or 1 -tr wdl-& cd -mu
0 -5
0 -3
0 -6
�r
II,binr mtapkafty
Ldh ormtnbmr -0 vanedkabdal -rma
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
IB
C, anpy <overa{eowr artlmbtd
m,hama oan- ..d- - oux n
0 -3
0 -s
0 -3
19
Sulaa,u[mbeddedmu
1 � -p ,mmnne -�
NA-
0 -4
0 -1
20
Prment. oribmm NwN u,(seepyo+)
ne ev
0 -+
0 -5
0 -5
U
�r
r,0
G7
PrwOU Onmspkibhm
evtem cn p n
ua rinrmomm --a av min x
mvlm
12z 1
p -+
o -+
0 -1
G
•o�
P rmarn manaxr ev t
tr
mmevdamaem
6 -+
a -+
-+
D
m--a ot s -, ma
B = Mebw
0 ae tn
mk
0 -6
-f
otto
1bW P.W. Pona.
100
TOTAL SCORE (also ewer on fart page)
S-
-3
3
(oo erukaus -0 nbmdoa andm<a -mu
Taal PolaOlkdble
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also tinter on fast page)
�f
-414 -U-(a
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ml -... is [rIW [r -
$
nwn•
- C TICS'
E00 GIONPOINT
RANGE
SCORE
-CamW
pUdmoat
Mo
�
Pisnm arna.. rp.ttl,tmr paw. m.rxam
Ilow or nranuan -Oq How -inn um
0_5
0 -a
o -J
3
2
HNdmm afpul kamm alter,tim
e,imTwea@,abm -0 mlbtrW00 -mm mb)
0 -6
0 -J
0 -7
2
7
lup.tw ra.n
um wbo(Fu -tr cem wde Will. u
0-6
0 -4
0 -S
2
1
ENdeaee Mnolrl ®t v[bmdtnl dh<bargm
eb war m -tr mdt
0 -5
0 -+
0 -+
5
no dhcb _ 0,crmudw,tcrdhh[ksrYama m aunt
0 -3
0 -+
0 -4
2
iq
6
Ptnanmafause tIbodplwa
no Hood I<i - flood hin -max nu
0 -1
0 -+
0 - 2
/
RT7
LnnanekmeufrOmd0laln sums
p_y
0 -1
0 -1
r
e enrruxJrta -ar ineaa -mm n
6
Presmu efaap[mt artnaaN
rm iwtlmdr- vnm,nds -min m,
0 -6
0 -4
0 -1
Z
9
Os,mtl,luvmity
axrennw elwmtliud mWnlmmder -mm n
0 - J
0 -1
()-1
/
10
mimuw m -O li Bma orm redlmmt -mm Inn
ri ad.
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
/
11
Aobm& dlrerany afc►anmf bad aubrmm an
NA-
0 -+
0 -5
12
HYIMmr afch,natl N[I[Im mttldeusep
I Ines -0 b 9bwk, -mea -,
0 -5
U -+
0 -5
K]
IS
Prwau Of maj mnk ba*.-
mvua awl -0 no erosm male bnakn -rm, In
p_y
P�
11
Raot d<ptb n,d dtn,hy as bmb
mva(ble mgft -0 dmurmn r =rmx pbml
0 -1
0 -+
0 -S
bs
IS
Impau by,grlenWn, Ilvula[k, m•tlmbm pwdv<tloa
mNimWl -0 mendaacn -nm[
0 -J
0 -+
0 -5
16
Prmmea oftlme•poolMpplepad eomph,m
nonm Im or 1 -tr wdl-& cd -mu
0 -5
0 -3
0 -6
�r
II,binr mtapkafty
Ldh ormtnbmr -0 vanedkabdal -rma
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
IB
C, anpy <overa{eowr artlmbtd
m,hama oan- ..d- - oux n
0 -3
0 -s
0 -3
19
Sulaa,u[mbeddedmu
1 � -p ,mmnne -�
NA-
0 -4
0 -1
20
Prment. oribmm NwN u,(seepyo+)
ne ev
0 -+
0 -5
0 -5
U
�r
r,0
G7
PrwOU Onmspkibhm
evtem cn p n
ua rinrmomm --a av min x
mvlm
12z 1
p -+
o -+
0 -1
G
•o�
P rmarn manaxr ev t
tr
mmevdamaem
6 -+
a -+
-+
D
m--a ot s -, ma
B = Mebw
0 ae tn
mk
0 -6
-f
otto
1bW P.W. Pona.
100
TOTAL SCORE (also ewer on fart page)
S-
ml -... is [rIW [r -

U, ps+ I-t I ! A/h
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
_ �9ARACi'&R167'tGS
ECORHGLON
POINT
RANCH
SCOT
Caatal
Pleemoat
NowbOn
,.
1
Irasmmaf0ow /pets44m pmhladrom
ne R.w¢nnmam -tra /ba -ovo:
0 -3
0 -4
0 -3
2
Erktasc of pad bam.b •Ita•Uea
0 -6
0 -3
0
I/
`
x
ameslre Waaum- mdewmbo -mm t.b
0 -6
0 -5
_
-5
,
�° -my g
0 -6
0 -6
0 -f
.�
d
er.eenmt¢ehemk•I m.abmga
nab
abmem . -amel Irb
o -s
o -♦
0 -1
2.
CJ
�,
s
cr.anew.taabetage
ma -P nefimd eta -ma ul
o -i
o -1
o -d
,�
e
Prac.ce of.a.ce.tOmeplNa
n -o a=tanarven m -abx
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
Z
�
,
Haumdemmtln.eepbla . a¢b
o -s
o -.
o -x
3
,
Flamm oreyemt mth.da
mrrea¢da -Plv d Iwetlmdf -msx m4
0 -6
0 -4
0 -7
H
Prumm.fmlJ.emewetlmd.�
m Wlsd. -o- m.a bw -enm .•b
o -e
o -d
0 -:
3
9
n4adw rhmou ol ditmm.� da -nbx mn4
0_1
0 -4
0 -1
2
10
Scdlmmllnput
-0 6alsmm.edlenent -mss mb
0 -5
0 -1
0 -4
Z
11
! Sts @droadO;fr at�xetulbbne Im.
HA-
_
p_d
0 -S
)
I.
IZ
6vNmn o!<bmad IadahO er vlembg
r
fmhea- o-amtlenee @bxdu- m
0 -s
0 -/
0 -f
,�
IS
Prmea¢o/myar Watfaubro
o.a. emdm -o-m le tmt -amz ab
0 -3
0 -3
0 -3
/
u
R.ddeplt.neaemlrymWnW
lm w.mh tom. -a d.me meat t•nba u
o -i
o -d
o -s
,<
�A
Is
fmp.dby.pSmR.rq o.ebeckornmb.r proeaedea
aubwdW - amevidenm -m.° ab
o -s
o -d
o -s
/
F
�
Ia
Pram¢ of riN•gmIlrmplapod c.mplan
N ¢ - welWeval � -� 4
0 -3
0 -5
0 -6
/
t
i,
NmlLLt mmpbdry
m¢a Wbnd -o- vaeahae -mm .me
0 6
0 -6
0 -6
z
IH
Geepy mrerege erer.trmmbee
thadfug mn -P wnlm..u. .nbx n
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
m
19
Subatnb mMeOae °tl°
emaxlaoe -o- loon dmemn -tar•
NA'
0 -4
0 -4
20
Pr<rea¢.f drmm LLwttebratn (see peg. q
-
.Waco¢ -a mamm .am.emb mn
b
0 -3
0 -3
,(
p�
n
Irmem.en�mpbibhm
no.vide.ry -Pmmm. .tatr. -na3 4
0 -1
0 -1
�
O
�
Ptaeaeeernan _
eaidmca- o-mmmoa mm
EO-
/
o -•
G
G
�
6ridma. afwlWW.r--,
u
nos donee
o -e
0 -5
o -1
G
ToW Pdab Pov@I.
�
100
100
0 -!
TorALSCORE (ulsoeHferPRrNrxpage)
40
Tdtl Perffia Pdvfbl.
100
100
100
70'fAL SCORE (love vets tm first Page)
� a
5
• TMm elm. 1—cs sm ml moved in e¢.W .em.ma
2
wets U -f 1 U
�
_ �9ARACi'&R167'tGS
ECORHGLON
POINT
RANCH
SCOT
Caatal
Pleemoat
NowbOn
,.
1
Irasmmaf0ow /pets44m pmhladrom
ne R.w¢nnmam -tra /ba -ovo:
0 -3
0 -4
0 -3
2
Erktasc of pad bam.b •Ita•Uea
0 -6
0 -3
0
I/
`
x
ameslre Waaum- mdewmbo -mm t.b
0 -6
0 -5
_
-5
,
�° -my g
0 -6
0 -6
0 -f
.�
d
er.eenmt¢ehemk•I m.abmga
nab
abmem . -amel Irb
o -s
o -♦
0 -1
2.
CJ
�,
s
cr.anew.taabetage
ma -P nefimd eta -ma ul
o -i
o -1
o -d
,�
e
Prac.ce of.a.ce.tOmeplNa
n -o a=tanarven m -abx
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
Z
�
,
Haumdemmtln.eepbla . a¢b
o -s
o -.
o -x
3
,
Flamm oreyemt mth.da
mrrea¢da -Plv d Iwetlmdf -msx m4
0 -6
0 -4
0 -7
H
Prumm.fmlJ.emewetlmd.�
m Wlsd. -o- m.a bw -enm .•b
o -e
o -d
0 -:
3
9
n4adw rhmou ol ditmm.� da -nbx mn4
0_1
0 -4
0 -1
2
10
Scdlmmllnput
-0 6alsmm.edlenent -mss mb
0 -5
0 -1
0 -4
Z
11
! Sts @droadO;fr at�xetulbbne Im.
HA-
_
p_d
0 -S
)
IZ
6vNmn o!<bmad IadahO er vlembg
r
fmhea- o-amtlenee @bxdu- m
0 -s
0 -/
0 -f
,�
IS
Prmea¢o/myar Watfaubro
o.a. emdm -o-m le tmt -amz ab
0 -3
0 -3
0 -3
/
u
R.ddeplt.neaemlrymWnW
lm w.mh tom. -a d.me meat t•nba u
o -i
o -d
o -s
,<
�A
Is
fmp.dby.pSmR.rq o.ebeckornmb.r proeaedea
aubwdW - amevidenm -m.° ab
o -s
o -d
o -s
/
F
�
Ia
Pram¢ of riN•gmIlrmplapod c.mplan
N ¢ - welWeval � -� 4
0 -3
0 -5
0 -6
/
t
i,
NmlLLt mmpbdry
m¢a Wbnd -o- vaeahae -mm .me
0 6
0 -6
0 -6
z
IH
Geepy mrerege erer.trmmbee
thadfug mn -P wnlm..u. .nbx n
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
m
19
Subatnb mMeOae °tl°
emaxlaoe -o- loon dmemn -tar•
NA'
0 -4
0 -4
20
Pr<rea¢.f drmm LLwttebratn (see peg. q
-
.Waco¢ -a mamm .am.emb mn
0 -e
0 -3
0 -3
,(
p�
n
Irmem.en�mpbibhm
no.vide.ry -Pmmm. .tatr. -na3 4
0 -1
0 -1
�
O
�
Ptaeaeeernan _
eaidmca- o-mmmoa mm
EO-
/
o -•
G
G
�
6ridma. afwlWW.r--,
u
nos donee
o -e
0 -5
o -1
G
ToW Pdab Pov@I.
�
100
100
0 -!
TorALSCORE (ulsoeHferPRrNrxpage)
40
wets U -f 1 U
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
' CI(ARd�$���Ti�•
HCORSGION
POWTRANCH
SCORE
t_tm.LLl t �
P4avo.t
Maealtl.
I
Pteam¢af navel pa What potda in dramOr
0-3
0 -4
o -S
2
Hrdm¢ofpad bumaa tlta.eoa
-O:md Om
0 -6
0 -3
0 -5
E
`
,
mbdf�- PCmt�wdan mod' .4
0 -6
0 -•
0 -3
1
tNd.moof nbMml.r c8tednl ehetuga
enemlrc -P matcM1a
0 -5
0 -4
0 -1
3
- PCroundw.tat� e� -�ma to
1-3
0 -4
0 -1
2.
CJ
�,
a
Prom¢ef.e)mml g0.ep4tt
o -.
0 -4
o -x
/
wead.s m.maa tan
,
II
1_3
0 -1
0 -2
S
Flamm oreyemt mth.da
mrrea¢da -Plv d Iwetlmdf -msx m4
0 -6
0 -4
0 -7
9
Cb.aneld.mdp
extamvc chamelmuon- Pnanml ene..dm -mo
0_3
p_d
L
10
Bedlmebt l.pal
m4mba m-O lfilemm¢dment -tom omb
0 -5
0 -1
0 -4
/v
If
Slm @df.roiry.rdematl bm ND.Im4
One -0I aiwmebn -mmt inb
NA'
0 -4
0 -3
12
Hr10m¢ of eb.n.el hdaka.r wldetl•g
d mbaed -0 dW46ea @b.cW -mm omb
0 -3
0 -4
0 -3
)
li
Pmettta of m.Jsr bmt hunts
uvrm emvm -0 matanm s464 badb -mm mts
o -s
o -s
o -s
,�
11
Roo depth .vd dradry on fmab
mw,db6emb -0 Baba moo t -maa
a_i
a -d
o -s
/
IS
Imp•a by.OSe014u°, uvedmk er tlmbn prodaWen
mM4neWl .d -Pme am -nba Ida
0 s
0 -4
0-3
16
Prtua¢°fdlRo-po.Uripple • pmlmmpka <r
s -tr 1-0orel N -max m4
9 -3
0 -5
0 -6
/
F
�
HnbiLLt mmphdq
17
IIOIe¢mfbbtot- a vm h.Mm4 -m•a
0 -6
0 0
d
Z
IS
Gmpyeorrngr oru ronmbed
rm In -P mnnmm4 -mex mm4
0 -3
0 -5
0 -3
19
S06rtnb embNdedaaa
r embNded -Pbote sbmeme. ndx
�.
0_4
0 -4
20
Pmee¢af lneam la.atebnen (ue p.ge d)
-0
0 -e
0 -5
p�
mswd.m. eovmo numetom eve
ermpbml.m
O
21
no evdmu- ohaaa„enmo mb
p_d
1-4
0 -1
G
G
zz
Pre.ea¢ern.n
-�
mandm.c -o- „�,
o -e
0 -d
o -1
G
�
�
HHdmm etwildofa me
m evdmm- 0 ohmdyd atdm¢ a ob• w
0 -6
0 -!
0 -5
r'
Tdtl Perffia Pdvfbl.
100
100
100
70'fAL SCORE (love vets tm first Page)
� a
• Thn. chu°n ..m nut.sxsaed en m.W suamns
2
' CI(ARd�$���Ti�•
HCORSGION
POWTRANCH
SCORE
t_tm.LLl t �
P4avo.t
Maealtl.
I
Pteam¢af navel pa What potda in dramOr
0-3
0 -4
o -S
2
Hrdm¢ofpad bumaa tlta.eoa
-O:md Om
0 -6
0 -3
0 -5
E
`
,
mbdf�- PCmt�wdan mod' .4
0 -6
0 -•
0 -3
1
tNd.moof nbMml.r c8tednl ehetuga
enemlrc -P matcM1a
0 -5
0 -4
0 -1
3
- PCroundw.tat� e� -�ma to
1-3
0 -4
0 -1
2.
CJ
�,
a
Prom¢ef.e)mml g0.ep4tt
o -.
0 -4
o -x
/
wead.s m.maa tan
,
PmmNmeallnmdplW aaa
eeumebed -a atl -mm 4
1_3
0 -1
0 -2
S
Flamm oreyemt mth.da
mrrea¢da -Plv d Iwetlmdf -msx m4
0 -6
0 -4
0 -7
9
Cb.aneld.mdp
extamvc chamelmuon- Pnanml ene..dm -mo
0_3
p_d
L
10
Bedlmebt l.pal
m4mba m-O lfilemm¢dment -tom omb
0 -5
0 -1
0 -4
/v
If
Slm @df.roiry.rdematl bm ND.Im4
One -0I aiwmebn -mmt inb
NA'
0 -4
0 -3
12
Hr10m¢ of eb.n.el hdaka.r wldetl•g
d mbaed -0 dW46ea @b.cW -mm omb
0 -3
0 -4
0 -3
)
li
Pmettta of m.Jsr bmt hunts
uvrm emvm -0 matanm s464 badb -mm mts
o -s
o -s
o -s
,�
11
Roo depth .vd dradry on fmab
mw,db6emb -0 Baba moo t -maa
a_i
a -d
o -s
/
IS
Imp•a by.OSe014u°, uvedmk er tlmbn prodaWen
mM4neWl .d -Pme am -nba Ida
0 s
0 -4
0-3
16
Prtua¢°fdlRo-po.Uripple • pmlmmpka <r
s -tr 1-0orel N -max m4
9 -3
0 -5
0 -6
/
F
�
HnbiLLt mmphdq
17
IIOIe¢mfbbtot- a vm h.Mm4 -m•a
0 -6
0 0
0 -6
Z
IS
Gmpyeorrngr oru ronmbed
rm In -P mnnmm4 -mex mm4
0 -3
0 -5
0 -3
19
S06rtnb embNdedaaa
r embNded -Pbote sbmeme. ndx
�.
0_4
0 -4
20
Pmee¢af lneam la.atebnen (ue p.ge d)
-0
0 -e
0 -5
p�
mswd.m. eovmo numetom eve
ermpbml.m
O
21
no evdmu- ohaaa„enmo mb
p_d
1-4
0 -1
G
G
zz
Pre.ea¢ern.n
-�
mandm.c -o- „�,
o -e
0 -d
o -1
G
�
�
HHdmm etwildofa me
m evdmm- 0 ohmdyd atdm¢ a ob• w
0 -6
0 -!
0 -5
r'
Tdtl Perffia Pdvfbl.
100
100
100
70'fAL SCORE (love vets tm first Page)
� a

Wesi- U ?
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
lhcm ehmMnutim a. nW ...,aped 1. de...l d
0
_
SARAri @►fl'I
ECOREGION
POW
f RANGE
SCORE
P
ktw.dl.
_
` s
rrefmmdltor /peabm.lpmbm afeam
flo. -a -nth hb
0_3
I
Prude dlbw/ per.blmtpooh In
me.wa..bvatm -0 am. flow -mss
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
0 -6
0 -3
2
EdOena dpnt human dtetmb.
exxmwn uteatm. -a ro.ltemhan -..x +nb
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
30
rta- nom, waa
m6rldasof.
-6
0-4
0-5
O
0
4
_-Id amk416 --poI
axtrmwd.da -Pm b
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
n
5
3
and = 4Ya0.dw.ur = -mm can
0 -3
1 0 -4
1 0 -4
Z.
m
6
P—..f dj.am fkwpt.w
0 -9
O -4
0 -2
B.treadewm /Roodw..erm
m.meha -o- --
0 -5
0 -4
m - vtemw(Io.ddam -mss b
D
2
Prdxoa dadjmfwad.nm
m - nux
0_6
y
d mbndded -0 Ir Oodp.daff cab
0 -5
0 -4
0 -2
O
0 -3
k
ro -O wp—n fdi —two o_
0 -6
0 -4
0 -2
0 -4
9
Cb.m! d..odry
vtendw chemelba.m -0 ommd mmdm -mss cab
0 -3
0 -4
0 -3
G`
IZ
}
10'I�iedr�et-
0 -5
0 -3
0 -4
0 -4
G
Pdamo or m°jor Wnk 4emna
.corn amk.-0 m Bubb b msa b en. -
r I i
6W B atwruq of e0mnd bed .e l ma
n am- I cl._n -_ mu
NA'
0 -4
0 -s
aea depth and demitr ou
ro rWb 0 dms mob d va
0 -3
IZ
6Hema of elu..d l.ddb. or wtdml.k
Id-ply -0 suMe bed Rb.fdb -mu MI
0 -3
0 -4
0 -7
0_5
0 -4
13
Prefe.e of wjornnftoorm
awr4 erwlm -am .nW -nu
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
14
�bmb
Rol dopth.d a.vdry bub
to wbl. cams- dent. mob both -mss of..)
0 -3
0 -4
0 -5
0 -6
Q
13
ImpM by optre0oao, Oeme..ta w amber praA.dsn
. -0 m.+dr.. -max cab
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
U
16
Petn.m aofriff" IMPPI•'P°°1 ..Pl.. ..
-P w.l -max cab
nmm.bltm
0-3
0 -3
0 -6
G
H
0 -3
pqb
do.WbA
__
4.
-�
0 -5
17
obbut -0 valedbbibb -me. im
p -6
0 -6
0-6
NA-
fF
<
Id
rod Gmq mwrgoe mb'd u
0_5
0 -s
0 -5
(j
(A
19
Smoot° .
12ded -0 woo amnae -mss
MA-
0 -4
0 -4
0 -5
(�
�+ °°°=°funphbkw
erMe.n- W -mm )
Puameedarnm l..nabntea (w pap 4)
-a emnram -
0 4
0 -5
0 -5
C�
22
21
Pwmco dui km
eo o.id.w -0 mm t
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
/
Lade.. or°OdMm°
22
Presma of nth
too -a .rfbb _
0 -1
0 -1
0 -4
G
27
23
-a .badmta.i6mn -mu
0 -6
0 -3
0 -5
too
Tow Pamb P.amw
loo
too I
100
TOTAL SCORE (alto cater 00 fort paV)
TOTAL SCORE (dad eater Od fim page) I
/—qd
lhcm ehmMnutim a. nW ...,aped 1. de...l d
y,dxs jt�
EQO
ON POWIRANOE
..
S
S
4D..hd, '
7ka"a d
I
rrefmmdltor /peabm.lpmbm afeam
flo. -a -nth hb
0_3
0 -4
0 -3
3
2
tMd<acedpal AOm...IlteOlm
nwmw Wm.m- ro. b
0 -6
0 -3
0 -5
3
RtJostoon osx
m6tMmra
0 -6
0 -4
0 -5
4
or cbmhal dbeA.rya
extemhe -Pro -mss
0_5
0 -4
0 -4
0
4
gomdaaer dbcbrge
0 -3
0 -4
0 -4
5
rod -a d. %vbndL clo, -max 1m
0 -3
0 -4
0-4
Z
r,. 6
Promn of.dl.eml0°odpkk
- P ext-l" e - om whft)
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
J
• 3
B.treadewm /Roodw..erm
m.meha -o- --
0 -5
0 -4
D -1
D
2
Prdxoa dadjmfwad.nm
m - nux
0_6
9
C4e.d amaaV
vendor dsmdWdm- ..unl -mu u
0 -5
0 -4
0 -3
(�
10
6dime.t lnpm
w trhtek er.o xdin..l -ma m
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
11
Sb°p�- °at3'nfeh.mdDM mkebsh
-0 N 4ae.-maa
NA.
0_4
0 -5
G`
IZ
}
E.tb- of ch4mwl bdtb. or wmml.2
keuN -0 stable bd8bnb -.vx d.
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
j
('G-7 13
Pdamo or m°jor Wnk 4emna
.corn amk.-0 m Bubb b msa b en. -
0 -3
0 -5
0 -5
pI
e 14
aea depth and demitr ou
ro rWb 0 dms mob d va
0 -3
0 -4
0 -5
2,
12
log by°p`ImLLmq Mvcmd6 w dmbw Produml.v
0_5
0 -4
0 -5
U
75
.wdaoo. -am kb
0 -5
fC 14
Prnr.mddrtb3mdhyplogod CO°Wln°
0
0 -5
0 -6
Q
16
-
m d ks w - a ar<aaswlo mu
-3
0-4
o -s
(�
N.bb.t da.,Pkuy
0
0 -5
0 -6
G
13
otlewmhrbw -O� caned bNbb -ms:
0 -3
4.
-�
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
U
19
b'nbabam embdd°doo
r.badded - 0 1— dneuu -max
NA-
0 -4
0 -4
Cj
19
Prm•°ee of b l.rertcb t (so 1w8°4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
20
-don -P rmeuom -nun b
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
(�
�+ °°°=°funphbkw
erMe.n- W -mm )
o -4
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
21
22
P.esm. dlleh _
ffbb
roC.ideme- amlaWw
0_4
0 -1
0 -4
U
-
Lade.. or°OdMm°
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
0
23
(m nwdmn -0 ebmmarddmn- nb
27
roepMace -0 abad.m arWmn- ems
Toil Petuts potable
100
too
100
loo
TOTAL SCORE (dso ewer Od ft191 page)
POIRC
RANGE _
4D..hd, '
7ka"a d
I
Preseebn dOew /paditentpoohmfnmm
mflD.t w.mmamn- M- b
0 -5
0 -4
0 -5
2
ttddneed bvm.. abrulm
e°fr.d.e.kamm Pa mdter.pm -.a. my
0-6
0 -5
0 -3
3
Pima. mm
m tmRtr- mdebrter -omt
0 -6
0 -4
0 -5
Eddnndn.uknlwebmkd dtrcb.rya
0
0 -4
0 -4
0
4
nemsrve m -mm
-5
w7
nt °aOdO°�PeP°
�
0 -3
0 -4
0-4
Z
y
and - a w ad b .m -mux polom
[)
►rtsne°0.41e°nte.odpl.l.
0
0 -4
0 -2
-3
6
m eatmdw km -mx b
-4
y
e Rm !7 �°°n"
w
0 -5
k
Presort ofmum,ol wak.m�
mw.loft -a lam d mmt W u
0 -5
9
aamad.taln
mme.aat cbame &a1m- Pvamalmnder - ®x b
0 -3
G`
10
6ldfine.rt.pm
0 -4
6bddua.lty.feh.mdbdmb4
ESO
0 -5
0 -5
12
11
ae..,e aasim -am able b°b -can
0 -5
fC 14
plow depth ..d d..dly cab
m.rslk b e se m u
0_3
0 -4
0 -5
ImP.etkyIS sdefnwadwd =,Znocb6 aramb. Pwd.d..
meddmm -mo Is
9_5
0-4
o -s
(�
Pdedrau'efrf111eyeollrlpplapml cmpkao
0 -5
0 6
0
16
well -. d -rtma b
and Imm - e
0 -3
17
x.am e°m""o
dde or hum -tr .rbed bbMh -mss
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
G
IA
CaeoSeo.c.6eowrmnmbrd
-
m
0_5
0 -5
0 -5
Cj
19
61.bteala.mOdded.m
embedded -a baa _boc - mma
NA'
0_4
0 -4
P.eatda ofarmm i.f.rtewa.(r.a for 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
(�
10
too, dkom -0 a .mmrom -nun
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
G
21
Presada ef.epbbb..
m -0 —ou .omvomf nth owb
22
rncPmarrfb
me.Atmn -a -enu cab
0_4
0 -4
0 -4
(j
�0
tfttlmn dw[19flk trs
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
[�
27
roepMace -0 abad.m arWmn- ems
Taal Pakb poem°
100
loo
100
TOTAL SCORE (alto cater 00 fort paV)
g

FILED
SAMPSON COUNTY
ELEANOR N 13RADSHAW
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED May 15 2012
AT 0121 36 pm
BK 01827 PG 0950 BOOK 01827
START PAGE 0950
END PAGE 0952
NORTH CAROLINA INSTRUMENT# 03009
SAMPSON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OF OPTION TO
PURCHASC REAL ESTATE EASEMENT
In consideration of ONE DOI LAR (51 00) and other valuable considerations, the
receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, Ray and Jeanette Williams ( "Scller(s) ) does
hereby give and grant to ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE LLC ( "Buyer")
the right and option to purchase the follouing real property casement
SEE MItBIT A' ATTACHED I EFIL f0 AND INCORPORATCD
HEREIN BY REFERENCE
This option sholl expite the 31" day of July 2013
The provisions set forth in a wntlen option agreement between the panics dated
the rday of April 2012 ore hereby Incorporated in thus memorandum
,h
Witness m) hared and seal this S day ofApnl 2012
04MONMENTAL BANC&
EXCHANGE LLC
BY_y LI"'
SCI LERS RAY WILLIAMS
JFANCnT�jWILLIAMS
/���r�s= 4[GG�lO^rvt
BK 01627 PG 0564 FILED
SAMPSON COUNTY
ELEANOR N BRADSHAW
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED May 10 2012
AT 09 43 45 am
BOOK 01827
START PAGE 0564
END PAGE 0566
INSTRUMENT# 02900
\0141 H CAROI I VA
SAMPSON COt INI Y
MEMORANDUM OF OPIIOV TO
PURCHASE RI AL ESTATF i ASf \IFPT
hi enwd<talmn of ONL Iii IF 14R (St (111) and tither c datable - ostdc,lo the
remrpi of wh¢h an heretic oe{.nnwkdgrd F�,�S i r, ar 1� - � ( �
{a nrs {rru)i Esi.1r) ( Sellegsl "I does hereby gnc and gram to
1_,V\ IRON II V I AI BANC S I XCHANQ I I C ( Ituccr 11h< n(.ht and nplooi to
pureium the IollaumE wal prupcn) easentcnl
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHLD iirRETO ANN) INCORPOItArCD
I IFREIN BY REFfRFNCE
I hs upnnn than . aPln ih< Lt Jac a1 tide 2011
4lbe pro—wils set forth w J wnnrn -pima -1 \nlcot bclwe[n the pane. d and
the 1K da) of March 2012 we hemb) Incnrporatcd in tits memorandum
Wnncss m) Iund ind seal this Pfsndas of March 2012.
LVVIROVMLNIALHAN( A
EACHANGEI LC
111 4��
SI 111 1
SK 01827 PG 0951
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTYOF Wolt
I 11, /-ell < Notw) Public for said County and State, cemfy,
Ulm _�1cttor_ , � 4/e6
,/ personally come heroic me this day and acknouiedged
that he is Membe flvki ogcr of ENVIRONMENTAI BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC a
corporation, and that he as MembcrlManagcr being authorized to do m executed the
Poregomg instrument on behalf of the corporation
4
Wlmess my hand and official seal this doyof_jF!4j 201?
r
Notary
M) Commission Expucs JK !3 Pubir 1 \010ODI
NOTARY
PUBLIC
STATL OF NORTI I CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WnL(
Ian --J 6s, r -,_, Notary Public for said Count) and State, cemf) that
P .. tt<"clte L: II s personally appeared before me Uiis day Y1311?
acknowlcdgcd the due exmution of the foregoing insmmcnL
re
Whom m) hand mid notarial seal this 5 day of A0 1 20 1?
Notary Public
``� �11p .G00(F`
M) Commission Expires 14 � O
NOTARY -
PUBLIC
COUiwo,\s
SKOIS27 PG 0565
JrA1LOI NORTHCAROLINA
W. °<
COU \Tl OF —141,
e
k1�6alli
I Vn 1an P"hb[ rut vid Cowin and State cemf
rlul Qlerlr„ lcr rbo�er P—o""' —o' Inlare — Uin dac and aeAnnw Atllicd
iha he IS \Iemhed\ImiJ(cr nt 1 \ %IROV\ILNI 41 BANC S 1 \CIIA \(IE LI(
er,rp..i,.. sad tbal he u Memhcd \lana(<r be auth.r W w dJ >o <.o<u cd ih,
famgmng oui—ni on behA f of the <orpoi vion
1
Wm— m. Iund and olLual 1L.1 Ihis 171 dac of R� ,, L___ 20
b 11
M, Co mntavan 1 .Pars
O�
NOTARY
PUBLIC
SIAII OF NOR IIF \R01 1V.1
Col \I 7 of C-�rpcl'(G I1,,
.&I y_ h 1e kj Vutan Pubh< fur cold C-la, arfd State c<nlh hat
F'r �e tyflea I P[rsonalls appeared bctam me this da) Oa ,I,fYVt
end ick— ..I.dged ihL up <\cnrtwn of the forrgmnf Instrwncm
\t'nn_.• u,a hand and iwnoal ae d Ihn,},:�t4c ul O'(.c(` 20 IL
CRYSTAL Y STREETER /�pl ��\.. t,
nO1agY vueLlt l \t_ .Ja�l t _ _
BTATE OF ROgTN OAROLrNa Nnlnn ubl,[
YY CO4111351ON E %Plgtia
M, Cammlav ri Fxpo -'; j uY1.

�cycnu
® Figure 5b
Proposed Streams
NWI Map (East Parcels) Airport
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Proposed Easements
0 150 300 600 900 1,200
Feet Target Parcels
NWI Wetlands

'00 _-� .� , red
Restrictive Covenant
Only Around Pond
- r.
W 1
4 UT3 - Reach A •. �jw,
.
Wetland Restoration 1 1,466 LF Restoration --
"1-= DA =0.26 min i
`-= 9 Acres
♦' y. \ 1.1, l
6/7 UT2 -Reach A
263 LF
DA =0.05 mil
t UT3 - Reach B `� • e
10 646 LF Restoration
UT1 - Reach E %
1,914 LF Restoration
UT2 - Reach B
UT1 - Reach D 1 ' a 467 LF Restoration
Legend 1,131 LF E2
CROSS SECTIONS
Oxbows 4 4.•
Enhancement II
UT1 - Reach C
Priority 1 Restoration 1,011 LF E2
Priority 2 Restoration
Preservation
Restoration UT1 - Reach B
�Y
Future Airport Expansion 641 LF PreservationM
Pond Easment 7.
NProposed Easements �s
Wetlands .,
Cedar Creek Site ' f UT1 - Reach Aa
695 LF Preservation
Existing Streams It. DA =4.40 miz
M �
Figure 7b
Conceptual Design (East Parcels) Map
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
0 150 300 600 900 1,200
---I Feet
1 inch = 600 feet

a.M ,
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARZM NT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAV" PERDUk
May 17, 2012
Martin Hovis
Environmental Banc & Exchange
909 Capability Dr. Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Cedar Creek Easement Project Sampson County
Dear Mr. Hovis,
B-CENE A. CONIL JR_
S&CIMtut
This is in response to your letter dated March 30. 2012 and your follow up comments via
entail regarding the Proposed Cedar Creek Easement Project adjacent to the Clinton -
Sampson County Airport Runway 6 approach.
The Division of Aviation is very glad to see on -going beaver dam maruulgement is
proposed to be included this project, as that will certainly reduce current areas of standing
water. We also arc glad to read the wetlands will be designed to hold water for a short
time. FAA guidelines suggest a draw down time of 48 hours or less. We agree it is
possible the restoration will improve the cturent situation with respect to wildlife hazard
attraction, however the agreement you mentioned, to work with USDA- Aphis in
perpetuity, is crucial to insure this is the case. We ask you to expand this agreement to
include general wildlife hazard management as needed in addition to the beaver dam
management.
Additionally, we request that the hardwood planting plan be carefully implemented as to
not create additional obstructions in the airport approach. as well as consider plant species
that do not encourage beaver habitat.
Concerning future airport development. we encourage public airport Sponsors to own the
RPZ (runway protection zone) fee simple. This acquisition may be something the airport
pursues due to FAA safety guidelines in the future. You have indicated the proposed
easements can be clipped at such time. 1 have attached a pdf of the airport layout as well
as Runway 6 approach surfaces that are of importance to the Clinton - Sampson County
airport for your information. The proposed easement may NOT encroach on current
MAILING ADORUS:
NC Dt;pAl ralMr Or tRANOPO"th"ON
Owaioft OF Aviv o%
1000 WtS€nvu C440 04
RA; K00 NC 210 1500
TwipNow 91944ao112
FAX [phone]
WtftrF W*WNMT ORG
LOCATION:
ROU A#WNW
10bc WROM 00M
ROU WC 2M3

airport property.
We consider the Cedar Creek Proposal to be conceptual and preliminary in nature but
agree, if it will reduce current wildlife attractants, it is beneficial and therefore concur
with this plan based upon the preliminary information you have provided. Future
correspondence concerning this project will need to be expanded to include FAA,
Sampson County, and the current Division of Aviation Project Manager for this airport.
Also be aware that the Airport Sponsor. Sampson County. as the owner of the airport
facility and the group of individuals who know most about the airport's day to day
operations and safety issues, will also need to give their concurrence for this project.
Please keep us informed of the progress of this project.
Sincerely.
ifef lief, PL
NCDOT- Division of Aviation
Cc: Chris Willis
USDA - APHIS Wildlife Services
Andrew Moore
USDA - APHIS Wildlife Services
Rick Barkes
NCDOT Division of Aviation
Kathryn Vollert
NCDOT Division of Aviation

I 1 $ t
:ttle r~
Hhk
__ L.
41
1
t�
MIA
wr-o
y loss
PIN OF.
;111 MIl;
1 3 5
I MUM 1i
e g /
zi
?
? 1,
ij
Figure 10
r�iAl, Future Airport Expansion
Cedar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site

spuellaAA leuoiloipsijnp . •
juawase3 • • • • ■ • • : • • I • I I • • • , l ���
•
i '•�1 - � yy � - '~V �� .tom ♦ � � (� ♦• - '. � = -' •
Ili 1 � •: 4� � p_<'s,r:•L v� r . �fF.� .•11C � � • a ' i• . t�
pI a' -` �- � -..' M> � _ _ 4 � � eft u - -� r�, `4�`�1�'� �• td -
{ A i.• E„ '4� �� :.� ''t �..! YR �._ �, ,4 f ,�;� �L '�f w L '�-.► D, �. •' �'. �� R T J y f' it S +- � �-
i
-�. 7 7. 4 s'. .D� •
R -• 7 YA °
ti � •.. �• 9
_00L Rte"
em
:jag N
She `1 .y,V -
r
IL
- P+ 1�4 r _ s-'1� may' '`1Vt� • �.. [' •�•. -
" ('
c�l fir ~' .. �� Y ��a- Ste. �r -r. ��:' � '� .(- - �•_` in ;�� t
t `

'14