20051290 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20130212

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 4 (2012)
McCAIN STREAM RESTORTION SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project No. 443, Contract No. 004807)
Construction Completed March 2009
llec l
DC-
_ 2012
NC ENHANcEA tNT pRo
aRAA4
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
/--NISi1��
U
FF91 2,3
1) R - Y /,rxEacifa'�
Rd3'&
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
r�
Ecosystem
December 2012

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 4 (2012)
McCAIN STREAM RESTORTION SITE
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project No. 443, Contract No. 004807)
Construction Completed March 2009
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
December 2012

1 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2 0 METHODOLOGY
2 1 Vegetation Assessment
2 2 Stream Assessment
3 0 REFERENCES
Table of Contents
Appendices
APPENDIX A PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attributes Table
APPENDIX B VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -213 Monitoring Plan View
Tables 5A -513 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Tables
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Fixed - Station Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
APPENDIX D STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross - section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plot
Substrate Plots
Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table I Ob Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment
Parameter Distributions)
Table 11 a Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters —
Cross Sections)
Table 11 b Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Table of Contents

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has completed stream restoration at the
McCain Stream Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site ") to assist in fulfilling stream
mitigation goals in the area Site activities consisted of restoration of 2470 linear feet of stream, however,
53 linear feet of channel is located within a power line utility right -of -way and has therefore been
excluded from credit assets, resulting in 2417 stream mitigation units This report (compiled based on
NCEEP's Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports Version 14
dated 11/7/11) summarizes data for year 4 (2012) monitoring
The Site is located one mile southeast of the intersection of Lake Lucas Road (SR 1518) and Spero Road
(SR 1504) in Sophia, Randolph County, North Carolina The project reach is located within United States
Geological Society (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03040103050050 (Yadkin River Basin), in a non - targeted
portion of the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Sub -basin 03 -07 -09
The drainage area contributing to the most downstream extent of the project reach is 0 88 square miles
The contributing drainage area consists of forest (67 %), agriculture (16 %), rangeland (12 %), and urban
(4 %) land use / land cover
Project Goals
• Restore stable stream channel morphology that is capable of moving flows and sediment provided
by its watershed
• Restore riparian buffer habitat and functions
• Improve water quality to the receiving watershed by reducing bank erosion and bed degradation
• Improve aquatic habitat
Project Objectives
• Build an appropriate C4 channel with stable channel dimensions
• Plant a functional Bottomland Hardwood Forest community to create an effective riparian buffer
• Exclude livestock from the riparian areas
Prior to construction, the Site was characterized by an active farm with a portion of the property dedicated
to pasture and livestock grazing Primary land uses on the property include rangeland, agriculture (small
grain), and hardwood forest Site streams were characterized by entrenched, narrow, deep, step -pool
channels with low to moderate sinuosity Project construction was completed in March 2009 The
project restored 2417 linear feet of stream using Priority 2 restoration by constructing a new meandering
channel within and excavated floodplain bench Site activities provide 2417 Stream Mitigation Units
The Site will be protected by a permanent conservation easement held by the State of North Carolina
Seven vegetation monitoring plots were monitored on October 10, 2012 for monitoring year 4 (2012)
Vegetation success criteria dictate an average density of 320 stems per acre must be surviving in the first
three monitoring years Subsequently, 288 stems per acre must be surviving in year 4 and 260 stems per
acre in year 5 Stem counts will be based on an average of the evaluated vegetation plots Based on the
number of stems counted, average densities were measured at 358 stems per acre surviving in year 4
(2012) The dominant species identified at the Site were planted stems of river birch (Betula nigra),
greeb ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and willow oak
(Quercus phellos) Four of the seven individual plots met success criteria based on planted stems alone
Plots 1, 2, and 7 were below success criteria based on planted stems alone, however, when including
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina page 1

naturally recruited stems of river birch (Betula nigra) and dogwood (Corpus amomum) plots 2 and 7 were
well -above 288 stems per acre
The dominant herbaceous vegetation throughout the Site is mainly comprised of planted grasses such as
fescue and Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) Although fescue occurs throughout the Site, the
northernmost end of the Site is characterized by dense fescue resulting in planted stem mortality (depicted
on Figures 2A -213, Appendix B) Additional vegetation problem areas include two small Japanese
stiltgrass populations on stream banks located at stations 17 +50 and 22 +10 On the right bank of the
southernmost end of the Site, a small population of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) has established,
however, the area is small enough to not be problematic Chinese privet will be assessed during future
Site monitoring For additional information relating to vegetation, see Appendix C
Success criteria for stream restoration will be assessed using measurements of stream dimension, pattern,
and profile, site photographs, visual assessments, and vegetation sampling Stream success criteria are
based on significant changes in channel morphology between baseline measurements and the present
monitoring year
Stream problem areas include areas of minor bank erosion/scour in the upstream 300 linear feet of the
Site (Reach 1) Stream problem areas do not appear to be worsening and no immediate maintenance
actions are recommended at this time Many areas considered problems during previous monitoring years
have recovered and vegetation has established, therefore, these areas are no longer considered problems
Stream problem areas are depicted on Figures 2A -213 (Appendix B) and include the following
Map
Label*
Station
Notes
PA -1
10 +00
Undercut banks at easement boundary
PA -2
11 +25
Minor erosion and undercut bank on outer /left bank, vegetation is establishing
PA -3
12 +90
Some erosion on outer /right bank, vegetation is establishing
PA -4
13 +50
Minor scouring in riffle, vegetation is establishing
PA -5
25 +00
Erosion on outer/right bank
PA -6
26 +50
Minor erosion on outer /left bank, vegetation is establishing
*Map labels on Figures 2A -2B, Appendix B
Success criteria for stream restoration will include documentation of two bankfull channel events during
the monitoring period In the event that less than two bankfull events occur during the first five years,
monitoring will continue until the second event is documented In addition, bankfull events must occur
during separate monitoring years A crest gauge is located within the Site to assist with documentation of
bankfull events (Figures 2 -2A, Appendix B) No bankfull events were documented during the year 4
(2012) monitoring season A total of two bankfull events have been documented to occur during the four
year monitoring period, in addition, bankfull events occurred in separate monitoring years (2009 and
2010)
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in tables and
figures within this report's appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found
in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on NCEEPs website All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from NCEEP upon request
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina page 2

2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Seven vegetation plots were established and marked after construction with four foot metal U -bar post
demarking the corners with a ten foot, three - quarter inch PVC at the origin The plots are 10 meters
square or 5- meters by 20- meters and are located randomly within the Site These plots were surveyed on
October 10th for the year 4 (2012) monitoring season using the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 2 (Lee et al 2008) (http / /cvs bio unc edu /methods htm), results are included in
Appendix C The taxonomic standard for vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas,
Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas ( Weakley 2007)
2.2 Stream Assessment
Annual stream monitoring was conducted for 2550 -linear feet of channel Six permanent cross - sections,
four riffle and two pool, were established and will be used to evaluate stream dimension, locations are
depicted on Figure 2 (Appendix B) Cross - sections are permanently monumented with 4 -foot metal
garden posts at each end point Cross - sections were surveyed to provide a detailed measurement of the
stream and banks including points on the adjacent floodplain, top of bank, bankfull, breaks in slope, edge
of water, and thalweg Data will be used to calculate width -depth ratios, entrenchment ratios, and bank
height ratios for each cross - section Photographs were taken and pebble counts were conducted at each
permanent cross - section location annually Thirteen permanent photo points were established throughout
the restoration reach, locations are depicted on Figure 2 (Appendix B) and are included in Appendix B
In addition, visual stream morphology stability assessments were completed in each of the monitoring
reaches to assess the channel bed, banks, and in- stream structures
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4 2 (online) Available http //cvs bio unc edu/methods htm
Weakley, Alan S 2007 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (online)
Available http //www herbarium unc edu /WeakleysFlora pdf [February 1, 2008] University of
North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina page 3

APPENDIX A
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attributes Table
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom'Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices

Dwn. by. FIGURE
Axiom Environmental SITE LOCATION MAP KRJ
218 Snow Avenue McCAIN STREAM RESTORATION Date:
Raleigh, NC 27603 EEP PROJECT NUMBER 443 Oct. 2012
(919) 215 -1693 Randolph County, North Carolina Project:
em a.i„
I 11 12- 004.14

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
McCain Stream Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 443)
*Site activities restored 2183 linear feet of Reach 2, however, 53 linear feet of this reach are located within a power line utility right -of -way have been excluded from credit asset
calculations
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices
MI i ation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Type
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
Buffer
Totals
2417
—
--
--
Projects Com onents
Project
Component/
Reach ID
Station
Range
Existing Linear
Footage/
Acreage
Priority
Approach
Restoration/
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Linear Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
Comment
Reach 1
10 +00—
12 +86
490
P2
Restoration
286
1 1
Priority 2 stream restoration
Reach 2
12 +87
34 +70
1955
P2
Restoration
2131*
1 1
Priority 2 stream restoration
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream (linear footage)
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Buffer (square footage)
Restoration
2417
--
--
Totals
2417
--
Mitigation Units
2417 SMUs
—
—
*Site activities restored 2183 linear feet of Reach 2, however, 53 linear feet of this reach are located within a power line utility right -of -way have been excluded from credit asset
calculations
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
McCain Stream Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 443)
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 3 years 9 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 3 years 9 months
Number of Reportine Years: 4
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
2003/2004
June 2005
Final Design — Construction Plans
Raleigh, NC 27609
May 2006
Construction
Construction, Planting, and Seeding
March 2009
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
PO Box 1905
March 2009
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
March 2009
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
May 2009
July 2009
Year 1 Monitoring (2009)
October 2009
December 2009
Year 2 Monitoring (2010)
November 2010
November 2010
Year 3 Monitoring (2011)
August 2011
November 2011
Year 4 Monitoring 2012)
October 2012
November 2012
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
McCain Stream Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 443)
Designer
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
Adam S iller (919) 783 -9214
Construction, Planting, and Seeding
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc
Contractor
PO Box 1905
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Stephen James (336) 3 20-3 849
Survey Contractor
Unknown
Seed Mix Source
Unknown
Baseline Data Collection and Years 1 -3
Ward Consulting Engineers, P C
Monitoring Performers
8368 Six Forks Road Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615 -5083
Becky Ward 919- 870 -0526
Years 4-5 Monitoring Performers
Axiom Environmental, Inc
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919- 215 -1693
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 4. Project Attributes Table
McCain Stream Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 443)
Project Information
Project Name
McCain Stream Restoration Site
Project County
Randolph County, North Carolina
Project Area
13 34 acres
Project Coordinates (NAD83 /WGS84)
734162 6573, 1746572 2892
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph siogra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Carolina Slate Belt
Project River Basin
Yadkin
USGS 8-digit HUC
03040103
USGS 14 -digit HUC
03040103050050
NCDWQ Subbasm
03 -07 -09
Project Drainage Area
0 88 square miles
Project Drainage Area Impervious Surface
2%
Watershed Type
Rural
Reach Summary
Information
Parameters
Reach 1
Reach 2
Restored/Enhanced Length
286 linear feet
2184 linear feet
Drainage Area
0 88 sq mi
0 88 sq mi
NCDWQ Index Number
13- 2- 3 -3 -(0 3) (UT to Back Creek)
NCDWQ Classification
C
Valley Type/Morphological Descri tion
VB4c V /C4
Dominant Soil Series
Do ue Sandy Loam
Drainage Class
Moderately Well Drained
Soil H dric Status
Nonh dric
Sloe
00066
FEMA Classification
Zone C
Native Vegetation Community
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasives
>5
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Waters of the U S — Sections 404 and 401
Yes - Received Appropriate Permits
Endangered Species Act
No
Historic Preservation Act
No
CZMA /CAMA
No
FEMA Flood lam Compliance
Unknown
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft)
EEP Protect Number 443
Randolph County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
December 2012
Appendices

APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -213 Monitoring Plan View
Tables 5A -5B Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Tables
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Fixed - Station Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices

Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
— (919) 215 -1693
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
MONITORING PLAN VIEW
McCAIN STREAM RESTORATION
EEP PROJECT NUMBER 443
Randolph County, North Carolina
Dwn. by.
KRJ
FIGURE
Date:
Oct. 2012
2
Project:
12- 004.14

Dwn. by. FIGURE
Axiom Environmental MONITORING PLAN VIEW KRJ
-v-�, 218 Snow Avenue McCAIN STREAM RESTORATION Date: A
Raleigh, NC 27603 EEP PROJECT NUMBER 443 Oct. 2012 2A r (919) 215 -1693 Randolph County, North Carolina Project:
12- 004.14

own. by. FIGURE
Axiom Environmental MONITORING PLAN VIEW KRJ
218 Snow Avenue McCAIN STREAM RESTORATION Date:
Raleigh, NC 27603 EEP PROJECT NUMBER 443 Oct. 2012
(919) 215 -1693 Randolph County, North Carolina Project:
12- 004.14

Table SA Visual Stream Mon3holoay Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 7
Assessed Length 286
Adjusted %
Number Number With Footage With for
Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody
Category Sub-Category Metric as Intended As -built Segments Footage as Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
Y 9 significantly o
1 Vertical Stability 1 Aggredation -Bar formatioN rowth sufficient to sl nificenfl deflect
1 Bed ( Rifle and Run units) flow laterally (not to include point bars)'. 100 /o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutung '�; "�fu,.�'"�- x�= ` °;.�, 1 30 90%
2 Riffle Condition 1 Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 2 2 � ' , „ ,.Im_,. _ 100%
3 Meander Pool
Condition 1 Depth Suffiuent (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth > 1 6) 3 3 ` 100%
— a -
iS.c"�y`�i II
2 Length appropriate ( >30% of centerine distance between tail of
_ upstream nflle and head of downstrem riffle) 3 3 100% - � a
4 Thalvreg Position 1 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 3 3 n 100%
2 Thalwe centering at downstream of meander Glide 3 ' R� z �raa..^ o
9 9 (Glide) 2 2 ,;�r�" s�c� � �",+a 100 /o
} Wi" ` tt 1
i•
i rd
2 Bank 1 Scoured /Eroding Bank lacking vegetaflve cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or 100% 100%
scour and erosion a'
Banks undercutioverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears f
2. Undercut likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable 1 50 91% 91%
and are providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting Bank slumping calving, or collapse 100% 100%
tr13s! ,.° `, t :� 9�2T 1 50 91 % 0 0 91%
3 Engineered
11 Overall Integrity 4 Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 2 2 100%
Grade Control IGrade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of Influence does not exceed
15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 16 Rootwadsllogs providing some cover at base -flow
2
2
'`
f
— s _
100%
2
2
100%
2
2
100%
2
2

Table 5B Visual Stream Moroholooy Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 2
Assessed Length 2184
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
100%
scour and erosion
Adjusted %
Number
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
Number with Footage with
for
Major
2 undercut
likely Does NOT Include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Ve etation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability (Riffle
1 Aggradatlon -Bar fonnahon/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
3 Engineered
1
30
99%
8
100%
Structures
and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
1,
r
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
8
8
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcuttmg
100%
"r
k
1
125
94%
8
I, Iii
I
Y
100%
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
16
17
I
94%
15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
3 Meander Pool
1 Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth > 1 6)
16
18
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
89%
6
100%
Condition
Depth raLo > 1 6 RootwadsAogs providing some cover at base -flow
2 Lencith appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
18
18
100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4 Thalweg Position
1 Thelweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
13
17
76%
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
1 16
17
94%
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 undercut
likely Does NOT Include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
100%
and are providing habitat -
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
100%
ver�"
P
f T
0
0
100%
3 Engineered
t Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
8
8
100%
Structures
r
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
8
8
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or anus
8
8
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
5
6
83%
15% (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull
6
6
100%
Depth raLo > 1 6 RootwadsAogs providing some cover at base -flow
0 1 0
100%
100%
100%
100%

McCain Property
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Planted Acreaae' 7.98
Easement Acreage' 13.34
Veaetation Cateaory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Microstegium, tall fescue, multiflora rose, Chinese privet, Chinese lespedeza
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Ve etation Cateciory
Definitions
Threshold
De fiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of planted woody and herbaceous material on stream banks
0.1 acres
Solid Green
0
0.14
1.7%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on visual observations and MY3 stem
1count
0.1 acres
Solid Green
1
0.14
1.8%
criteria.
Total
1
0.28
3.5%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.25 acres
N/A
0
0.28
0.0%
Cumulative Total
1
1 0.56
7.0%
Easement Acreage' 13.34
Veaetation Cateaory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Microstegium, tall fescue, multiflora rose, Chinese privet, Chinese lespedeza
1000 SF
Green
3
0.02
0.1%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Microstegium encroachment
none
Green
3
0.02
0.1%
= Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
= The acreage within the easement boundaries
= Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
= Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of conoemAinterest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-tens (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2 decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in r >.. are of particular
interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particulady earlry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the
executive summary.

McCain
Fixed - Station Photographs
Taken October 2012
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft)
EEP Project Number 443
Randolph County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
December 2012
Appendices

McCain Stream
Fixed - Station Photographs
Taken October 2012
(continued)
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices

McCain Stream
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs
Taken October 2012
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft)
EEP Project Number 443
Randolph County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
December 2012
Appendices

APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Mr('ain [ reek Restoration Site (EEP Proiect Number 443)
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
No*
57%
2
No*
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
No*
*Based on planted stems alone, these plots don't meet success criteria, however, when including naturally recruited stems of river
birch (Betula nigra) and dogwood (Cornus amomum) these plots 2 and 7 were well -above 288 stems per acre
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft)
EEP Protect Number 443
Randolph County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
December 2012
Appendices

Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
McCain Creek (EEP Proiect # 443)
Report Prepared By
Corn Faqum
Date Prepared
10/12/2012 11 10
database name
Axiom -EEP- 2012 -A mdb
database location
C \Documents and Settings \pperkinson \Desktop
computer name
PHILLIP -LT
file size
57331712
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data
Prof, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This excludes live stakes
Prod, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
1A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY------------------------------------
Project Code
443
project Name
McCain
Description
Stream restoration site located in the Yadkin River Basin
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
length(ft)
2450
stream -to -edge width (ft)
50
area (sq m)
2275894
Required Plots (calculated)
7
Sampled Plots
7

Tahln O Tntal Planted and N--1 Rnrnnt Ctemc by Plot and sne[Ie{
Color for Density
Exceeds req`uliements by;1096
req s, but less than 10%
Falls tRe�°etliemey less than 10%
F.allsito.m_re�t,require"'tnents by more than 10%
current Plot Data (MY4
2012)
stem count
StemsperACRE
Color for Density
Exceeds req`uliements by;1096
req s, but less than 10%
Falls tRe�°etliemey less than 10%
F.allsito.m_re�t,require"'tnents by more than 10%

APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross - section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plot
Substrate Plots
Tables 10a -b Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 11 a -b Monitoring Data
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices

Project:
McCain Property
Sumrrx
bankfull
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Cross Section: Cross Section 1
Feature
Riffle Reach 1
A (BKF)
18.6
20.8
16.7
17.8
18.1
Station:
12 +11.30
W (BKF)
16.9
172
18.1
162
16.7
Date:
1 WWII 2
Maxd
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.6
Crew.
PP.
Mean
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.1
W/D
15.4
14.2
17.5
14.8
15.5
MY04 -2012
_ !
'�_•
MYOO -2009
MY01 -2009
MY02.2010
MY03 -2011
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station Elevation
- 0.30 548.26
Notes
LPIN
1. - f
YYY
548.39 LPIN
548.39 LPIN
548.39 LPIN
548.39 LPIN
6.50
547.76
0.30
548.19
0.10
548.26
0.05
54829
2.67 548.03
14.00
546.79
6.00
547.72
2.80
548.15
5.83
547.82
9.95 54723
21.10
546.16
13.40
546.76
9.25
547.37
12.62
546.94
20.17 546.32
25.50
545.21
22.10
545.85
14.42
546.82
20.31
546.45
25.41 545.25
TOBL BKFL
30.60
644.82
TOBL BKFL
24.30
54516
21.29
546.18
24.04
545.38
30.41 545.03
34.10
543.31
27.40
545.05
24.14
545.36
28.52
545.04
33.37 544.06
36.20
543.19
29.40
544.79
1 26.88
545.13
30.27
545.03
TOBL BKFL
35.27 543.58
38.70
543.11
30.60
544.68
TOBL BKFL
30.72
544.75
TOBL BKFI
32.31
544.35
37.75 542.78
TW
40.50
643.01
32.30
544.06
32.01
544.09
34.81
543.63
40.22 542.98
42.80
543.01
33.90
543.25
34.33
543.58
36.83
542.97
TOE L
42.95 542.93
_
45.20
642.91
TW
35.60
542.88
35.79
543.04
TOE L
38,90
542.70
TW
45.29 543.06
45.70
543.12
37.40
542.76
37.32
542.96
41.08
542.95
47.83 543.82
47.10
543.83
38.30
542.66
TW
38.96
542.80
TW
43.22
543.04
50.09 544.87
rOBR BKFR
-
48.40
544.42
rOBR BKFF
40.60
542.70
40.26
542.86
45.19
542.99
TOE R
5326 544.85
54.20
645.10
42.60
542.84
42.10
543.01
46.40
543.72
56.66 545.56
-
56.50
645.81
45.50
542.84
44.62
543.00
TOE R
47.56
543.93
1 60.38 546.50
59.70
546.45
46.60
543.50
1 45.27
543.34
48.93
544.72
rOBR BKFF
63.50 547.02
64.50
547.03
48.70
544.32
rOBR BKFF
47.77
543.97
52.94
544.89
67.70 547.38
69.00
647.76
52.70
544.82
50.16
544.56
rOBR BKFF
54.97
545.21
73.25 548.00
RPIN
72.60
548.15
RPIN
55.60
545.44
53.54
544.93
57.36
546.08
58.50
546.15
57.71
545.95
61.77
546.79
62.40
546.77
61.30
546.66
66.47
547.42
67.40
547.45
65.01
547.13
72.63
548.02
71.90
547.93
68.96
547.59
72.79
548.25
RPIN
72.70
548.13
RPIN
72.76
547.99
72.79
548.14
RPIN
Cross
Section 1
549.00
548.00
547.00
LL546.00
C
O
W
W
544.00
543.00
542.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00
Station (Feet)
-As -BUR tYearl - * - Year 2
tYeer3
-Year4 --*-BKF

Project
McCain Property
Sumtle
bankfull
MYO
MY1
MY2
Cross Section: Cross Section 2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Feature
Riffle Reach 2
A (BKF)
33.7
42.7
44.4
43.3
38.3
Station:
16 +25.07
W (BKF)
24.6
25.2
28.0
26.3
25.3
Date:
10/22/12
Max d
1.8
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.3
Crew:
PP, KJ
Mean d
1.4
1.7
1.6
1.6
11.5
W/o
18.0
14.9
17.6
16.0
18.7
MY03.2011
MY04 -2012
MYOO.2009
MY01 -2009
MY02 -2010
Station Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
I Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevatbn
543.03
Notee
LPIN
Station
Elevation Notes
542.89 LPIN -
643.01 LPIN
543.02 LPIN
643.01 LPIN
8.50 542.71
1.30
542.72
0.10
542.79
0.09
542.81
11.68
543.01
16.90 642.73
20.10 542.57
11.30
20.50
542.75
542.51
5.41
14.66
542.74
542.73
6.21
15.09
542.76
542.65
20.91
24.51
542.58
54128
23.80 541.30
23.80
54124
19.98
542.59
20.18
542.59
29.46
541.12
29.50 641.02
TOBL BKFL
29.60
540.96
TOBL BKFL
23.53
541.30
23.71
541.22
31.85
540.28 TOBL BKFL
32.90 539.61
31.30
540.34
26.44
540.93
27.35
541.03
33.72
539.49
36.00 539.40
33.00
539.64
29.09
540.91
TOBL BKFL
29.74
540.88
TOBL BKFL
36.05
539.55
39.20 539.30
33.40
539.14
32.32
539.92
32.33
539.92
38.05
538.91
42.90 539.26
TW
36.10
539.09
32.96
539.31
33.87
539.16
TOE L
41.53
538.69
45.90 53929
37.80
538.98
35.92
53925
3659
539.19
42.61
538.67
48.20 539.47
38.90
538.47
38.49
538.73
TOE L
3821
538.78
43.86
539.04 TW
50.10 639.68
41.30
538.40
TW
39.90
538.58
39.07
538.76
45.61
539.18
51.60 539.98
rOBR BKFF
42.80
538.42
43.14
538.44
TW
41.63
538.39
TW
48.25
538.88
54.40 541.11
45.70
538.49
47.21
538.60
46.73
538.82
51.02
539.91
60.30 541.36
48.00
538.67
49.50
538.65
TOE R
48.55
538.82
TOE R
53.34
540.31
62.30 542.52
49.90
539.01
50.39
539.68
50.50
539.80
55.28
541.08 FOBR BKF
69.30 542.78
51.90
539.86
52.52
540.26
52.65
540.18
60.39
541.48
76.70 543.18
RPIN
53.60
540.51
1 53.87
541.01
54.33
541.10
rOBR BKFF
62.69
542.58
55.00
540.87
rOBR BKFF
54.13
540.97
rOBR BKFF
57.37
541.09
65.37
542.70
60.60
541.14
55.94
540.94
60.79
641.42
70.25
542.83
63.60
542.52
58.75
541.06
6220
542.47
73.48
543.17 RPIN
71.70
542.84
60.44
541.46
65.96
642.66
7620
543.03
62.34
542.42
71.83
542.97
76.70
543.23
RPIN
66.25
642.68
76.31
543.08
71.59
542.89
76.64
543.18
RPIN
76.49
543.12
76.58
543.13
RPIN
Cross Section 2
544.00
- _-
-
i
543.00.
II
-
-
-
542.00
8
LL
p 541.00
al
W
540.00
I
539.00
538.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00
Station (Feet)
-+As -Built tYearl -Year 2 tYear3 -Year4 BKF

Project:
McCain Property
Summa
bankfull
_
MYO
MY7
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Cross Section: Cross Section
3
•r
Feature
Pool Reach
2
A (BKF)
33.6
34.1
30.8
30.7
32.5
.J
Station:
23+45.75
W (BKF)
22.6
23.0
22.3
22.1
22.95r
Date:
10/22/12
Max d
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.5
" -
Crew.
PP, KJ
Mean d
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
W/D
+
MY00 -2009
MY01 -2009
MY02 -2010
MY03 -2011
MY04.2012
Station Elevation
537.42
Notes
LPIN
Station
Elevation
537.41
Notes
LPIN
Station
Elevation
537.42
Notes
LPIN
Station
Elevation
537.42
Notes
LPIN
Station
Elevation Notes
537.17 LPIN
,�
.4-
0.40 537.22
0.30
537.10
0.16
537.17
0.21
537.24
7.91
53722
f ✓� f-.
4.90 537.35
5.60
537.18
5.47
537.30
4.81
537.34
10.96
537.14
10.80 537.23
10.70
537.06
10.85
537.15
9.33
537.27
13.84
536.32
E
14.80 536.00
15.30
535.76
TOBL BKF
14.13
536.24
11.21
537.15
16.41
535.78
_
; -
17.00 535.61
17.80
535.49
16.82
535.75
13.68
536.22
20.63
535.63 TOBL BKFL
20.40 535.64
TOBL BKFL
20.20
535.53
19.75
535.67
1721
535.66
23.16
535.01
t °.•
�"7
23.50 534.21
22.60
534.71
20.55
535.75
20.39
535.65
TOBL BKFL
25.11
534.66
24.80 534.18
25.30
53423
20.59
535.67
TOBL BKFI
22.90
535.00
28.42
534.48
•,
26.20 534.48
26.70
533.93
22.15
535.28
25.74
534.65
29.48
534.16
y,.
''r,
28.30 534.03
30.20
533.65
23.51
534.96
28.41
534.53
32.14
533.38
4y.: -
29.30 533.96
31.70
533.39
25.84
534.66
30.85
533.46
TOE L
34.34
533.14 TW
. "
33.50 533.72
33.90
533.39
27.64
534.57
33.36
533.03
TW
35.07
533.32
35.00 533.47
36.20
533.49
29.25
53426
35.53
533.29
36.44
53328
?�� "•-
35.70 533.43
TW
37.60
533.34
TW
29.91
533.73
TOE L
37.70
533.41
TOE R
38.43
533.46
37.80 533.51
39.40
533.90
31.73
533.51
39.46
534.12
39.88
533.94
39.90 534.03
40.70
534.41
33.44
533.24
TW
4227
535.48
1 42.06
534.73
43.90 536.10
rOBR BKFF
44.60
536.11
fOBR BKFl
35.66
533.40
45.16
536.37
fOBR BKFF
44.12
535.84
45.10 536.35
49.90
536.30
38.05
533.44
4822
536.31
46.90
53624
50.00 536.45
53.40
537.72
38.48
533.49
TOE R
5024
536.56
50.68
536.47 fOBR BKFR
56.60 539.15
56.90
539.05
39.52
534.06
53.15
537.77
53.23
537.38
60.60 539.51
62.70
539.47
42.28
535.18
57.12
539.19
56.76
538.91
64.70 539.76
RPIN
64.70
539.77
RPIN
44.41
53624
fOBR BKFF
61.55
539.63
58.11
539.21
45.35
536.32
64.93
539.74
62.53
539.57
47.78
536.29
64.94
539.74
RPIN
65.83
539.67 RPIN
50.18
536.53
53.78
537.89
56.63
539.17
60.69
539.57
64.01
539.66
64.85
539.63
RPIN
Cross Section 3
541.00
540.00
539.00
538.00
53700
C
_O
%
-_
536.00
f
O
W
535.00
534.00
533.00
532.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
80.00 70.00
Station (Feet)
-AS -Buhl --w- Year I -t- Year 2 t Year 3
-+r Year 4 -*-BKF

Project:
McCain Property
Summa (ban kfu11
rfa
Cross Section:
Cross Section 4
MYt
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Feature
Riffle Reach
2
A (BKF)
29.7
31.3
30.3
27.6
Station:
25+05.32
W (BKF)
23.4
24A
24.3
23.9
Date:
10/22112
Max d
L3.3
2.0
2.1
2.0
1.9
Crew.
PP, KJ
Mean d
1.3
1.3
12
1.2
W/D
18.4
19.1
19.5
20.8
MY00-2009
MY01 -2009
MY02.2010
MY03 -21
MY04 -2012
P F T
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
LPIN
536.98
LPIN
537.03
LPIN
536.86
LPIN
536.96
LPIN
530.96
5.00
536.62
1.00
536.72
0.14
536.83
0.23
536.82
5.93
536.63•r�
r-
�y4 .
11.40
536.32
4.90
536.57
7.07
536.48
5.72
536.58
11.54
536.32
18.80
535.00
9.80
538.21
14.93
536.07
1125
53627
15.54
536.08
23.90
534.73
TOBL BKFL
14.40
536.09
16.99
535.36
15.98
536.05
18.37
535.18
t _
27.90
533.01
16.30
635.79
1844
534.99
18.75
534.99
21.55
534.92
j .
r
28.30
532.96
1 8.40
535.04
21.09
534.85
20.51
534.83
24.11
534.77
TOBL BKFL',_
29.40
632.71
TW
19.50
534.82
24.04
534.62
TOBL BKFL
24.67
534.67 TOBL
BKFL
26.00
533.99
31.60
532.89
24.00
534.68
TOBL BKFL
26.40
533.67
27.38
533.45
28.74
532.71
33.60
532.94
27.00
533.34
27.45
53325
28.91
532.51
31.59
532.72
34.80
532.81
28.50
532.52
28.30
532.55
TOE L
30.66
532.63
33.78
532.63
TW
37.20
532.76
29.30
532.54
30.05
532.64
33.36
532.48
TW
35.17
532.80��'
39.50
532.94
30.60
532.80
32.15
532.61
35.06
532.56
36.08
532.90
43.80
533.13
32.40
532.56
34.29
532.44
TW
36.68
532.80
TOE R
37.76
533.06
47.70
634.52
34.60
532.46
TW
35.57
532.61
41.65
533.62
40.54
533.54,
49.30
534.51
rOBR BKFF
37.00
532.74
37.56
532.76
TOE R
44.80
533.62
42.64
533.79
y
ljy
50.40
534.87
41.50
533.59
38.34
533.03
47.59
534.02
45.76
533.75
53.20
634.93
43.00
533.59
39.76
533.07
50.48
534.80 rOBR BKFF
49.07
534.59
58.70
536.66
44.70
533.49
41.03
533.43
53.81
534.94
50.93
534.90
rOBR BKFR
65.90
636.65
46.00
533.70
42.30
533.59
57.03
536.13
53.73
535.16
69.40
536.72
RPIN
47.90
534.44
row BKFF
44.75
533.51
58.87
536.53
55.15
535.49
50.50
534.82
45.77
533.63
69.44
536.54
57.23
536.39
54.00
535.03
47.37
534.37
69.69
536.63
RPIN
58.41
536.62
56.80
536.06
48.46
534.42
1
63.04
536.75
59.60
536.53
49.95
534.79
rOBR BKFR
69.71
536.68
RPIN
6620
536.62
52.78
534.80
69.40
536.70
RPIN
5429
535.10
55.49
535.47
56.50
535.96
56.90
536.10
58.93
536.48
62.10
536.53
69.35
536.50
69.47
536.59
RPIN
Cross Section
4
599.00
537.00
ir
53940
0
53540
a
a
W
- -
534.00
533.00
532.00 0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
80.00 70.00 80.00
Station (Feet)
-As-Built t Year 1
- Year 2
t Year 3
- Year 4 t8KF

Project:
McCain Property
Summa
bankfull
, >4 - r +►'.5a*';, :
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Cross Section: Cross Section 5
Feature
Pool Reach 2
A (BKF)
22.2
17.8
20.5
18.7
18.8
Station:
29+60.52
W (BKF)
18.1
14.3
16.0
14.0
14.4
Date.
1 OW12
Max d
2.8
2.5
2.8
2.8
2.8
T • :� -
11
Crew.
PP,KJ
Mean
12
12
1.3
1.3
1.3
w
W/D
_
_
_
MY04 -2012
MYOO.2009 MY01 -2009
MY02.2010
MY03 -2011
Station Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notea
- �' -q,e )>:'•�+'� t,+�
534.81
LPIN
534.83
LPIN
534.81
LPIN
534.81
LPIN
534.70
LPIN
H. A
1.30 534.81
0.65
534.55
0.10
534.66
0.18
534.64
6.04
534.52
4.50 534.49
7.04
534.34
4.64
534.53
3.54
534.58
10.18
534.32
7.10 534.47
9.74
534.25
8.58
534.52
9.37
534.39
13.37
533.11
_
. - "r�;•
9.90 534.27
12.69
533.03
11.79
533.58
12.19
533.54
16.07
532.04
15.60 532.08
1
15.31
532.09
14.13
532.51
16.43
531.84
18.30
531.75
22.10 531.29
TOBL BKFL
17.68
531.53
16.94
531.79
19.79
531.65
TOBL BKFL
20.89
531.58
TOBL BKF
23.50 530.57
21.06
531.28
TOBL BKFL
19.09
531.58
22.63
531.30
23.18
531.05
=
24.30 530.15
22.28
531.15
21.52
531.32
TOBL BKFL
23.11
531.03
24.43
530.44
24.80 530.05
23.71
530.35
22.78
530.98
25.13
529.44
TOE L
25.75
529.35
26.10 528.48
TW
25.07
529.71
24.38
530.40
26.28
528.76
27.22
528.49
TW
27.00 528.84
26.46
528.68
25.37
529.46
TOEL
27.09
528.53
TW
29.02
528.75
28.20 528.85
28.01
528.70
26.16
528.67
2825
528.76
30.66
529.27
29.20 529.10
28.55
528.61
TW
27.85
528.46
TW
30.17
529.34
32.05
530.09
29.90 529.40
29.77
529.27
30.26
529.36
31.33
529.92
TOE R
33.29
530.81
31.00 529.75
30.71
529.72
31.96
529.68
TOE R
32.59
530.68
3525
531.15
31.70 530.04
32.08
530.26
32.69
530.30
34.37
530.98
38.74
531.57
-
33.10 530.28
34.31
530.73
33.54
530.76
38.32
531.55
1 42.03
531.93
rOBR BKF
35.60 530.77
38.84
531.56
rOBR BKFI
34.93
530.94
42.21
532.13
rOBR BKFF
4528
53226
38.60 530.66
42.10
531.99
37.34
531.25
43.66
53224
47.81
532.38
42.30 532.07
rOBR BKFF
45.60
532.03
39.09
531.60
47.59
532.37
49.55
533.22
46.90 532.25
47.75
532.36
42.04
531.96
52.99
534.59
53.11
534.40
53.00 534.62
50.39
533.56
44.65
532.04
54.72
534.70
57.85
534.86
56.70 534.80
53.09
534.59
47.54
532.32
rOBR BKFF
59.47
534.88
66.52
53522
RPIN
60.80 534.90
57.36
534.68
49.05
53330
6523
535.31
65.10 535.20
RPIN
61.80
534.85
50.87
533.82
65.25
535.30
RPIN
65.09
535.23
RPIN
53.22
534.64
57.43
534.76
61.37
534.89
64.64
535.11
64.92
535.11
RPIN
Cross Section 5
536.00
535.D0
534.00
P
533.00
p
532.00
�W
m
W 531.00
530.00
A
529.00
528.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00 60.00 70.00
Station (Feet)
� As -Buih -t - Year 1
Year 2
t Year 3 - Year 4
-0- BKF

Project:
McCain Property
Sumrer bank/ull
`r 4i7
MYO
MY7
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Cross Section: Cross Section
6
-' 1: }' -� :• -!
Feature
RItfle Reach
2
A (BKF)
30.8
252
27.8
28.1
29.6
=
Station:
31 +23.66
W (BKF)
20.6
18.4
20.8
20.6
21.4
Date:
10/22/12
Max d
2.1
2.0
2.2
2.3
2.4
Crew:
PP, KJ
Mean d
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.4
W/D
13.8
13.4
15.5
15.1
15.5
�+ `
MY00 -2009
MY01 -2009
MY02 -2010
MY03 -2011
MY04 -2012
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station Elevation Notea
533.90 LPIN
534.05 LPIN
534.06 LPIN
534.05 LPIN
534.05 LPIN
1.20
533.88
0.70
533.82
0.46
533.87
021
533.90
5.06 533.78
6.30
533.79
6.70
533.62
3.65
533.88
3.74
533.84
7.16 533.54
12.00
532.04
11.40
532.13
6.56
533.73
824
533.32
8.37 533.39
18.40
631.79
19.30
531.73
9.79
532.77
11.43
532.21
11.72 532.17
27.20
631.57
TOBL BKFL
27.10
531.56
TOBL BKFI
12.11
532.09
1628
531.88
15.86 531.93
31.90
529.62
30.00
530.32
17.67
531.84
21.94
531.68
20.48 531.87
35.40
529.32
31.90
529.56
23.58
531.71
27.12
531.67 TOBL BKFL
24.45 531.55
37.20
529.17
35.50
529.56
25.48
531.75
29.67
530.68
26.92 531.56
.-
39.20
529.13
TW
3720
529.46
27.37
531.63
TOBL BKFL
32.05
530.04
27.93 531.39 TOBL BKFL
41.30
52929
39.00
529.10
29.66
530.59
35.18
529.78
28.98 530.95
43.10
52925
40.30
528.98
TW
31.44
530.13
38.76
529.38
TOE L
31.40 530.17
43.70
52927
41.60
529.06
32.62
529.76
41.58
529.14
34.69 529.66
44.30
529.66
43.80
529.14
35.86
529.59
TOE L
43.06
529.00
TW
36.81 529.57
48.60
531.25
rOBR BKFF
44.70
529.74
37.90
529.44
44.22
529.13
TOE R
38.41 529.57
53.70
531.47
46.80
530.99
39.26
529.27
46.05
530.54
39.51 529.32
57.90
533.34
48.90
53122
rOBR BKFf
41.25
529.31
47.47
531.15
1 41.26 529.05
60.00
533.68
53.90
531.45
43.16
529.12
TW
49.15
531.36 rOBR BKFF
42.37 528.99
`
65.80
533.81
56.60
532.70
44.05
529.34
TOE R
51.66
531.41
43.16 528.86 TW
67.80
534.22
RPIN
58.60
533.60
44.57
530.01
54.75
531.69
44.18 529.03
63.50
533.69
45.87
530.55
56.72
532.65
44.73 529.17
67.40
533.93
47.21
531.14
58.73
533.58
45.40 529.86
67.70
534.23
RPIN
50.46
531.45
rOBR BKFF
62.86
533.76
46.34 530.54
54.62
531.68
67.76
534.04
47.46 531.05
56.73
532.93
67.85
53424
RPIN
48.90 53127 rOBR BKFR
58.82
533.61
51.61 531 .39
60.49
533.81
53.98 531.52
63.53
533.88
55.35 531.76
67.45
534.10
56.67 532.49
Cross Section 6
535.00
I
534.00
533.00
Af
532.00
e
0
O
531.00
W
530.00
529.00
529.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
60.00 60.00
70.00 80.00
Station (Feat)
�As46ulfl
t Year 1 - Year 2 t Year 3
- Year4 --*-BKF

N
j
°
+
O
O
1
j
+
°
O
J
N
O
0
0
1
JI
+
°
O
O _
+
O
O
l
v
o
°
< °o
0
W
+
O
O
N
O
+
O
O
N_
+
� O
N N
N
� O
O
O
N
W
� O
N
+
O
� O
O N
W CT1
+
O
O
N
W
O
O
I N
J
O
� O
� N
W
+
O
O
N
CO
+
O
O
O
O
fn O
W
O +
A 0
O
W
N
O
O
O
O
W
t
O
O
W
O
0
Elevation (feet)
O co O N WP 0) W O N A M
0
RI
C
T
7
n�
G1
O A
r
SO�Oi
NO
�« "0
O O O
w (D
3 O
O O
O O
O
4
5
6

Pebble
■■n��lllrr
■
■1!!��`lii
■1111111■■1111111
■�rl�
Ilii
���i�l
_ _ .. , _
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type

Pebble
..
■■ 1111111 ■■ 1111111■■
-
i■ IIII
■ ■IIIIIII�rr111111ir1111111
IN!-..
,
..
■
■nlllll■■
1111111■■
1
■IIII■■111�II�
■1111111■■1111111
,
■■
1111111■■
1111111
■■
1111111
■
■111���
■
■nlllll
■
■nlllll
,..
..
■nll
II ■■
11111■
1111111
■
■IC1111■
■11111111111111
'�
. ,
■nll
II■■
11111■
1111111■
■/111111■
■1111111■
■1111111
,.
■■■11111■■1111111■■1111111��
►111111
■
■1111111■■1111111
.,..
■
■1111111
■■
1111111■■
1
■�II��I�IIIIII
■
■nlllll■■1111111
,.,
■■nlj11!MM!!j!!!j
■
■w���I■
■111111
■
■nlllll■■1111111
,.
NMI
111111■■
1111111■■
11111i1m
■iiiuilii■1111111■■1111111
,.
,. NMI IIIIII��IIIIIII��IIIIt�li�a111�11��
l71111111�1111111
�„ sell
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type

.. ■■ 1111111 ■■ 1111111 ■■ 1111111 ■ ■Illllll��rlrlll����lllll
,
..
■■
1111111■■
1111111■■
Inllll
■
■nlil���
■1111111■■1111111
,
.
■■
mull■■
1111111■
■�
■1111
■
■1111�11�
■nlllll■■1111111
,
..
■
■n1111■■111111
■
■nllll■
■111
I ■
■nlllll■■1111111
. ,
■
■1111111■■111111
■■�
■1111■
■111
I ■
■1111111■■1111111
,. ,
■■nlllll■■
1111111
■■
1111111■
■111111■
■11111111111111
,. ,
.
■■
1111111■■
�I��III
■
■n�lll■��I�I��■m��lil■■�I��ul
i
,
■
■Illiul■■
1111111
■
■Inllll
�
■Illlul
■
■nlllll■■1111111
''
,. ,
■■
n11111v1111111��111111
,��
■1�1�111
■
■nlllll■■1111111
,. ,
. , ■■© 11�n.!., �p����iiri���r�i� l�ai���illl�a�1�1111�1111111
- - - oil sell
...
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent

. ■■ 1111111■■ 1111111 ■ ■1■ 1111 ■ ■IIIIIII.�rr111111�1111111 '
, ,
..
■■
1111111
■■
1111111
■■
1111111
■
■Illlti�
■
■1111111■■1111111
�
,
■■1111111■■1111111■■Inllll■
■111.111
■
■nlllll■■1111111
111111
■Ioil
II ■
■1i'd
Him
1111I■■111
II
111111
■111111
■
■111
II
,.
■■
1111111■■
1111111■■
IIIIIII�i1111111
■
■1111111■■1111111
. ,. ,
■■
1111111■■
1111111■■
Inl��l�
!�■illnll■■111111■■111111I
;.;
■
■Illriii�iiiiiiii���ill■
■1111111
■
■nlllll■
■1111111
■■nlllll■
■1111111
■
■Inlill
■7111110
■nlllll■■1111111
,.,
,.. ■■ 1111111�1111111� ■IIIIC�I� ■MM1�111 ■1111111�l1111111
Size percent less
substrate type
. ,�
���
... _
0 ... _
. _ . .

.-
Reach 2 Total
■ ■1111111■ ■11111 I■ ■1111111 ■ ■IIIIINI�r �11111� ■1111
.
■
■1111111■
■11111
I■
■1111111
■
■11111l�
■■
111111■
■11111
,
■■
1111111
■■
111111
■■
1111111■
■11110■
■1111111■
■111111
,..
.
■■
1111111
■■
1111111
■■
1111111
■
■11��11■
■1111111■
■1111111
. , ,
.
■
■illllil■■
1111111
■■
1111111
■
■i�llll
■
■Ililill■
■1111111
. , ,
.
■■
1111111
■■
1111111
■■
1111111
■�JIIIII■
■1111111■
■111111
,
■■
1111111■■
1111111
■
■IIIII�I�i1111111■
■1111111■
■111111
,..
■
■IIIIIIIV1111111��1111���i
■111111■
■1111111■
■1111111
,. ,
.
■■
III����r����111�i�����111
■
■1�1116l�
■1111111■
■1111111
,
.
■
■111111111
X1111111
■■1111�!I
■
■aliMlll
■!!!!lillll■
■1111111
,
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
McCain Stream Restoration Site /Project No. 443 - Reach: 1 286 feet
Parameter
Gauge
I Regional Curve
Pre - Existing
Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring
Baseline
Dimension and Substrate w Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
I Med
I Max
SD'
n
Min
Med I
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (it)
14.6
18.7
25.9
29.3
4
10.4
27.1
18
16.9
Floodprone Width (it)
34
95
125
125
3
150
200
35
Bankfull Mean Depth (it)
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.7
4
0.8
1.5
1.4
1.1
'Bankfull Max Depth it
1.7
2.7
2.8
3.5
4
1.4
2
2
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
21.3
1 25.6
1 25.9
29.3
4
12.5
22.3
24.6
18.6
W idth/Depth Ratio
8.3
14
15
17.6
4
11.6
18.5
13.2
15.4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8
5.6
6.4
8.5
3
7.4
14.4
2.1
'Bank Height Ratio
1
1.2
1.1
1.7
4
1
1
1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (it)
9
108
58
54
63
63
72
12
2
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.01
0.076
0.007
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.002
2
Pool Length (it)
28
108
38
16
21
22
25
4
Pool Max depth (it)
1.8
3.1
3
t2�,
Pool Spacing (it)
38
181
95
107
113
113
119
8
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (it) 75 135 78
Radius of Curvature (it) 14.5 26.8 30 35 35 38 38 40 2
Rc:Bankfull width (f Ift) 1 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4
Meander Wavelength (H)i 1 70 148 190 204 1
Meander Width Ratio 3.6 13 4.6
raneport parameters
Reach Shear Stress com etenc Ib /P
j
I
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
i
I
Stream Power trans ort ca acit W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B4c /E4/C4-5
B4c /C3/C4
134c
134c
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
Bankfull Discharge (cis)
Valley length (it)
2155
Channel Thalweg length (it)
2475
285
286
Sinuosity (h)
1.15
1.50 -1.70
1.17
1.3
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0070 - 0.0120
0.0067
0.0068
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0070 - 0.0120
0.0067
0.0065
'Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Sl-d ceg., ivdicue 1h these wAi "pbogy - he filled in.
1 = The diarauibv. k l peramder, cav iackale irifmmwon f- hM dm cros, -cwmn -, and the b.pl.d ml pmf dc. . = Fm Mjw, wiN a mu USES pop in firs wih th prnlav Ji leddW henkfuh v.if..- -meal.
3. Ulikeb6 w^'ey dve produce m euimwe of the bnNfug goodp6in ecru b one,, whkh shautl be she area fiom the lnp of bank in the me of die serrwx riser /abpe
4 = P,p nm of mwh e+ ft mg honk, O we eroding twsed on the viwd -ty fr cnmparisav to mrvuoting ",.. i. Of vduryneeded ndy Y the v ea 6 3

ShedN ced, indicwe lhm rhea will ty,"Ay - he F&d in.
= Tie dicnTuii>n. for �h«c paruneer� can -Wde informwun f-. Mxh de -, .-1- wrvey+ .1 the Wegaud- ­rde. - = For pm ,(, wvh a pro.inwl USGS gouge m -We w ah de pro , reach f w d b Vn U vcnCxnnon - we).
i. lliitizivg wrvey Jwo produce on «ranee of Je huNfud tbodpYU eren nt ttxex. whM Mould 4 the area fmm she top of huN io iM is of the rertuce rwerrtWpe.
� = Pmponno of leech e�hihamg hunk Ner art ercNing hnrni nn the riwwl .wrvey fnr cnmpurivon in mrvoriog de�e. S. (x veWeloenled only if she n eueeJ. 1
Table 1Oa. Baseline Stream Data Summary
McCain Stream Restoration Site/Project No. 443 - Reach: 2 2184 feet
Parameter lGauge
Z 1
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring
Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.6
18.7
25.9
29.3
4
10.4
27.1
18
20
1 24
20.6
22.8
1 23.3
24.6
0.9
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
34
95
125
125
3
150
200
47
54
51
63
6.2
3 if
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.7
4
0.8
1.5
1
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
0.1
3
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.7
2.7
2.8
3.5
4
1.4
2
1.3
1.7
2
1.8
1.9
1.8
2.1
0.2
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft),
21.3
25.6
25.9
29.3
4
12.5
22.3
25
25.5
26
30.8
31.89
31.2
33.7
1.3
3
Width /Depth Ratio
8.3
14
15
17.6
4
11.6
18.5
12.7
15.6
23
13.8
16.4
17.4
18
0.8
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8
5.6
6.4
8.5
3
7.4
14.4
2
2.3
2.5
2.5
0.1
3
'Bank Height Ratio
1
1.2
1.1
1.7
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
9
108
59
67
88
20
68
76
97
23
13
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.01
0.076
0.008
0.008
0.01
0.003
0.009
0.008
0.019
0.004
13
Pool Length (ft)
28
108
47
52
59
12
22
23
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.8
3.1
2.3
2.8
3.3
2.2
2.5
jjjA
Pool Spacing (ft)
38
161
106
56
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)l
1
75
135
20
66
62 97
24
10
Radius of Curvature (ft)j
1
14.5
26.8
35
60
35
49
43 80
14
12
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1
1.6
1.8
3.1
1.5
2.2
2.2 3.3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
70
148
212
236
294
158
221
229 261
36
10
Meander Width Ratio
3.6
13
1.9
3.1
2.7 4.8
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib /e
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B4c /E4 /C4 -5
B4c /C3/C4
64c
B4c
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
2155
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2475
285
286
Sinuosity (ft)
1.15
1.50 -1.70
1.17
1.3
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0070 - 0.0120
0.0067
0.0068
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0070 - 0.0120
0.0067
0.0065
'Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
"% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
ShedN ced, indicwe lhm rhea will ty,"Ay - he F&d in.
= Tie dicnTuii>n. for �h«c paruneer� can -Wde informwun f-. Mxh de -, .-1- wrvey+ .1 the Wegaud- ­rde. - = For pm ,(, wvh a pro.inwl USGS gouge m -We w ah de pro , reach f w d b Vn U vcnCxnnon - we).
i. lliitizivg wrvey Jwo produce on «ranee of Je huNfud tbodpYU eren nt ttxex. whM Mould 4 the area fmm she top of huN io iM is of the rertuce rwerrtWpe.
� = Pmponno of leech e�hihamg hunk Ner art ercNing hnrni nn the riwwl .wrvey fnr cnmpurivon in mrvoriog de�e. S. (x veWeloenled only if she n eueeJ. 1

Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions(
McCain Stream Restoration Site /Project No 443 - Entire Stream (2470 If)
Parameter
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reach es Data
Design
As-built/Baseline
- __ 11 -+>wk_
-
ffi
v7FiaYU '�,'
IiiYlll
=
®�
'e e'r�"'
:_- �s,��,:,�_-
.,....
. :111Z::�$
�,
:.xwv .s.s-r,
c
..'-
RI %IRu %IP % /G %IS
=
56%
40%
2�k
SC*AISa % /G %I CIA /B% / Bell
Yee
S'2
441W
6IMM16"smka
'dl 6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 I dip l di" (mm)
®�
WWWAMMMM
=Entrenchment Class <1 5/1 5-1 99/2G-49150-991 >1
1
MA
r�durd
Incision Class <1 2112-149/16-199/,
aNN
Sol
We
-M
=1
MIMAIMM
=
Sul
1==Mj
Shaded ails bdbato that mean will typically not be egad in
1 -Rife Run Pool Glide Step 6Wa.y Sand Grew! Cabbie Soddar Bede k dip •max pave dip •maeubp-
7 • Entrenchment Gass Aaalgn/bin the reach footage Into the dams Indicated and provida the peroamigis of the total reach footage In each dam In the table Tht wal reNt from the measured voce- aedloro m wel as Voted estimates
3 • Amign bat the reach footage into the dams indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each dam in the table That well reWt from the measured voaeaedkme as well ea the longitudinal profile
Footnotes ;3 These dame are looalay bdg around the Roagen classification and hatard raniong breaks but wan adprated slightly to make for easier ammnmem to somewhat .— blro based on vtual mthate in the add such that maasuramant of awry segment for ER would ne be neeewry
The intent hen is to provide the reader /consumer of design and monitoring bdvmation with a good general sense of the extent of hydrologic contalnmant In the pro-e iating and the rehabilitated term ae wail a compadoom to the reference dldnbdbm
ER and BHR have been addressed in prior eubmtsione a e eubmmpte (crossasabro as pan lithe design survey) however them stiesampies have oxen focused ardindy on facilitating design wahod providing a grorough p—reso alon didribubon of them parameters leaving the mader/coroumar want a sample that is weighted heavily on the stable —bon,
the roach This .corn the the dhtnbwerr for them parameter ah.0 include darn from both the chwoaeaim surveys and the longita irol press and in the cam of ER Hand estimates For maniple the typi d Ivpiwdinal prof, permit sampling of the BHR a Mlles beyond those nbJect to vw- sactiero and therstom an be readily Wcgramd and provide
e more —plate sample dntribdbn for them peremean thereby providing the dimbdlonAcoverage necessary to provide maaningfd compan me, _

Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Sections)
McCain Stream Restoration Site/Project No. 443
Cross Section 1 (Reach 1- Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Reach 2- Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (Reach 2 -Pool)
Based on° fixed 'baseline`bankfulllileVitSh�'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 I
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 I
MY3
MY41
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
5444
5443
5444
5444
5444
541
540 9
541
541
541
5356
5355
535 6
535 6
535 6
Bankfull Width (ft)
169
172
1811
1622
167
246
252
2787
2632
253
226
23
22 25
22 08
22 9
Floodprone Width (ft)
35
37
35
35
46
63
>75
63
63
63
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
11
12
1 033
1 096
11
14
17
1 584
1 645
15
15
15
1 384
1 388
14
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
15
16
16
17
16
18
25
255
261
2 3
22
22
236
257
25
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft'
186
208
1871
1777.
181
337
427
4414
433
383
336
341
308
3065
325
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
154
1 142
11752
1479
155
18
149
1759
16
167
-
-
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
21
22
1 933
2 158
27
25
>30
2 261
2 394
25
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
11
1 188
13
1
1
0 969
0 954
1
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ftZ
1742
182
1848
1842
—
119
137
1374
1369
—
97
87
90
1673
—
d50 (r
21
18
135
329
491
19
17
242
32
367
81
1 7
31
431
—
Cross Section 4 (Reach 2- Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (Reach 2 -Pool)
Cross Section 6 (Reach 2- Riffle)
Based fixed line IO— ull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation datum used
534 5
5344
5345
5345
5345
531 3
531 2
531 3
531 3
531 3
531 3
531
531 3
531 3
15313
Bankfull Width (ft)
1
233
234
2399
2432
239
181
143
1646
1396
144
206
184
2079
206
214
Floodprone Width (ft)
47
52
47
47
47
-
-
-
-
51
505
51
51
51
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
13
1 3
1 234
1 246
12
12
12
1 282
1 339
13
15
14
1 339
1 363
14
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
18
2
1 99
202
19
28
25
288
277
28
21
2
218
23
24
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
312
297
2961
30291
276
222
178
21 1
1869
188
308
252
2784
2808
296
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
174
184
1944
19531
208
134
_1552
1511
155
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2
22
1 959
1 932
2
2 7
2 453
2 476
2 4
Bankfull Bank Height Rati
1
1
1 095
1 084
1 05
F25
1
1 069
1 026
1
Cross Sectional Area between end ins ft2
103
120
132 3
124 2
—
146
148
158 3
155 8
—
159
157 1
159 2
—
d50 (mm)
17
14
24
29
53 7
0 6
3
9 3
16 9
—
46
168
26
1 242
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional /depositional development Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum
established If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with EEP If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote In this should be included that
states "It Is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmabon Values will be recalculated in a
future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary '

shaded celrc indicate [na[ [nese ­1 [yp -Ily -1 oe tmeo in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can Include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide. Step, Sift /Clay, Sand, Grawl, Cobble. Boulder, Bedrock, dip = max paw, disp = max subpaw
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
McCain Stream Restoration Site /Pro ect No. 443 - Reach: 1 286 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- S
Dinierision and Substrate - Riffle only
in
Mean
Med
Max
SD°
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SO
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD°
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD°
n
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD'
n
Bankful Wdth(ft)
16.8
17.2
17.03
16.22
16.7
Floodprone 7Mdth (ft)
35
37
35
35
46
Sanldul Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.2
0.92
1.096
1.1
'Bantdul Max Depth ft
1.5
1.6
1.42
1.7
1.6
Bankful Cross Sectional Area 11)
18.6
20.8
15.67
17.77
18,1
1A1dlh/Deplh Ratio
15.4
14.2
18.5
14.79
15.5
Entrenchment Ratio
2.7
2.2
2.056
2.158
2.7
'Bank Height Rati
1
1
1.239
1.188
1.3
lofts
Riffle Length (ft)
54.0
63.0
63.0
72.0
12.0
2
67.0
50.46
54.87
54.87
59.27
6.23
2
43.86
49.61
49.81
55.36
2
7
42
32
123
29
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.002
2
0.007
0.002
0.005
0.005
0.009
0.005
2
0.005
0.007
0.007
0.008
2
0.000
0.010
0.008
0.649
0.010
Pool Length (ft)
16.0
21.0
22,0
25.0
4.0
3
25.0
30.0
31.0
93.02
96.96
96.96
100.9
5.57
2
28.85
63,2
58,56
102.2
38.88
3
7
25
22
86
15
Pool Max depth (ft)
3.72
4.82
4.82
5.91
1.55
2
3.31
4.35
3.39
6.35
1.733
3
2.5
2.6
2.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
107.0
113.0
113.0
119.0
B.0
2
112.0
125.0
194.0
127.1
1
104.5
117.9
117.9
131.4
2
7
58
59
86
29
ttem
Channel BekWdth (ft) 78
Radius of Curvature (ft) 35 38 38 40 2
Pattern data volt not typically be collected unless visual data ch neramnal data or profile data
ihd,cete significarrt shirts from baseline
Rc:Bankfd width (ft/!t) 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4
Meander Wavelength (ft) 204
Meander Wdth Ratio 4.6
Reach Pansnsten
Rosgen Classification
84c
C4
B4c
B4c
B4c
Channel Thakveg length (ft)
286
286
286
288
286
Sinuosity (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0068
OAS
0.0074
0.008
0.0078
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0085
0.0039
0.0037
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
38%
10%
47%
10%
34.89
5.619
15.81
8.255
43
73
27
17
SC% / Sa% I G% / C% / B% / Be%
4%
19%
85%
11%
0%
1%
0%
9%
68%
22%
1%
0%
15
0
46
all
0
0
d78/d35/d50/d84 /d85
0.2
14.2
21.1
58.2
90
7
18.4
32.9
82.2
162.7
8.3
32.4
49.7
BS
117
°b of Reach with Eroding Banks
1%
21%
9%
10%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
shaded celrc indicate [na[ [nese ­1 [yp -Ily -1 oe tmeo in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can Include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide. Step, Sift /Clay, Sand, Grawl, Cobble. Boulder, Bedrock, dip = max paw, disp = max subpaw
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3

snaaea ceps inoicare mac mesa wiu lyp eery nor oe naec in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the Nsual survey from Nsual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step: Sitr/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock, dip = max peen, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only 8 the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 11b. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
McCain Stream Restoration Site /Project No. 443 - Reach: 2 2184 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY-1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - P. A °w
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
$D°
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD`
n
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankful 1AAdth (ft)
20.6
22.8
23.3
24.6
0.9
3
18.4
22.33
23.4
25.2
3.523
3
20.79
23.08
23.99
24.44
1.992
3
20.6
23.75
24.32
26.32
2.904
3
21.4
23.5
23.9
25.3
2
Floodprone Wdth(ft
47
54
51
63
6.2
3
51
55.33
52
63
6.658
3
47
53.67
51
63
8.327
3
47
53.67
51
63
8.327
3
47
53.7
51
63
8.3
Bankfc� Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
0.1
3
1.3
1.467
1.4
1.7
0.208
3
1.281
1.425
1.339
1.655
0.201
3
1.246
1.418
1.363
1.645
0.205
3
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.5
0.2
'Bankfull Max Depth tt
1.8
1.9
1.8
2.1
0.2
3
2
2.167
2
2.5
0.289
3
2.06
2.197
2.18
2.35
0.146
3
2.02
2.31
2.3
2.61
0.295
3
1.8
2.2
2.3
2.4
0.3
Bankful Cross Sectional Area ft
30.8
31.89
31.2
33.7
1.3
3
25.2
32.53
29.7
42.7
9.088
3
27.84
32.85
31.3
38.71
6.102
3
28.08
33.89
30.29
43.3
8.222
3
27.6
31.8
29.8
38.3
5.7
Witlth/Deplh Ratio
13.8
16.4
17.4
18
0.8
3
13.4
15.57
14.9
18.4
2.566
3
14.5
16.37
15.52
10.09
2.41
3
15.11
16.88
16
19.53
2.335
3
15.3
17.4
18.9
19.9
2.4
ErRrenchma. Ratio
2
2.3
2.5
2.5
0.1
3
2.2
2.467
2.5
2.7
0.252
3
1.023
2.334
2.453
2.626
0.386
3
1.932
2.267
2.394
2.476
0.293
3
2
2.3
2.4
2.5
0.3
'Bank Height Rati
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
1.051
1.058
1.058
1.089
0.009
3
0.954
1.021
1.026
1.084
0.065
3
1
1
1
1.1
0
rape
Riffle Length (R)
20.0
68.0
76.0
97.0
23.0
13
1640
37.6
86.8
13.9
65.8
89.2
112.0
29.3
17
15.63
74.41
6947
196
37.61
17
7
42
32
123
29
Riffle Slope (ft/fl)
0.003
0.009
0.008
0.019
0,004
13
0.001
0.012
0.027
0.002
0.011
0.007
0.059
0.013
17
0.000
0.005
04006
0.011
0.003
16
0.000
0.010
0.005
0.049
0.010
Pool Length (ft)
12.0
22.0
23.0
33.0
640
13
12.0
29.2
44.3
29.4
57.0
50.1
160.4
30.6
19
26.74
48.29
45.31
78.75
14.47
18
7
25
22
66
15
Pool Max depth (ft)
22
2.5
2.8
2
1,8
3.1
2.8
5.9
0.9
19
2.15
3.372
3.405
4.43
0.655
18
2.5
2.6
2.8
Pool Spacing (M)
56.0
117.0
723.0
150.0
25.0
12
52.0
144.0
317.0
78.8
121.5
116.5
183.7
30.7
78
48.5
124.9
121
241.2
43.89
17
7
58
59
66
29
Pattern
Channel Beirwidth (ft) 20 66 62 97 24 10
Radlus of Curvature (ft)l 35 1 48 1 43 1 80 1 14 1 12
nsional data or profile data
Pattern data veil not typically dices lsignificant shits from baseline
Ro Banldul vndlh (f /ft) 1.5 2.2 2.2 3.3
Meander Wavelength (fill 158 1 221 1 229 1 261 F 36 1 10
Meander NAdth Ratio 1.9 3.1 2.7 4.8
6--
ach Paramaten
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel ThaWag length (ft)
2182
2182
2182
2182
2228
Sinuoshy (ft)
1.18
1.18
1.18
1.18
118
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/fl)
0.0068
0.0067
0.0066
0.0066
0.0064
BF slope (ft/ff)
00
0.65
0.0067
0.0068
0.0063
Ri% I Ru% I P% l G% I S%
54%
1 2%
32%
16%
61%
2%
52%
13%
21 %
14%
SC% 1Sit %IG % /C %18 % /Be%
:#
qj
11%
10%
71%
7%
0%
1%
5%
7%
71%
15%
1%
1%
13
3
40
27
1
i6
d161 d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
1.8
16.22
114.DB
141.34197.76
1
5
115.8 8
1 29
174.881163.61
0.1
1 18.2
136.5
1
2% of Reach with Emdl Ban
0%
1%
0%
0%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
snaaea ceps inoicare mac mesa wiu lyp eery nor oe naec in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the Nsual survey from Nsual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step: Sitr/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock, dip = max peen, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only 8 the n exceeds 3

APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
McCain Site Stream Restoration - Project No. 443
Date of Data
Date of
Collection
Occurrence
Method
Photo #
17- Nov -09
13- Nov -09
Site Visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm events
N/A
Photo 14
30- Sep -10
30- Sep -10
NWS COOP Station and site visit for confirmation
MY -02
Report
McCain Stream Restoration Site (Draft) Axiom Environmental, Inc- Monitoring Year 4 of 5 (2012)
EEP Project Number 443 December 2012
Randolph County, North Carolina Appendices