HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0081825_Civil Penalty Assessment_20000728DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT
Violator: Town of Ansonville
County: Anson
Case Number: LV 00-303 (APRIL 2000)
ASSESSMENT FACTORS
1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to private property
resulting from the violation;
(X) not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant ( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(X) not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant ( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(X) not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant ( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
The cost of rectifying the damage;
(X) not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant ( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
( ) not significant (X) moderately significant ( ) significant ( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(X) not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant ( ) very significant ().X r .m .lv sin c nt
7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(X) not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant ( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(X) not significant ( ) moderately significant Gant ( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
Date Paul E. Rawls
REMISSION FACTORS
Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the detriment of the
petitioner;
Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation;
Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; and
Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
Date Kerr T. Stevens