20200447 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20210507

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 4, 2021 Ver 4
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes ( No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20200447 2
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Kyli Knolls S/D
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wyatt Brown
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
5/7/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Little Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C,NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.62774
A. Processing Information
What amout is owed?*
F $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Longitude:
-78.48736
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes G No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes G No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
✓ Yes f• No

ID#
20200447
Version
2
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
4/1/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form (23).pdf
Fie type mast be FIT
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
fJ Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
I— Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
6 No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
I7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
I- Regional General Permit (RGP)
I— Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
✓ Yes(-No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
17 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
I— Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
I— Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
If. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
✓ Yes 0' No
56.56KB
I— 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
I— Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes ( No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes r: No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes r No
✓ Yes 6 No
✓ Yes 6 No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
fJ Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
6 Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Steel Bridge Crossings, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
05381, 0649

2c. Contact Person:
Lanny Clifton
2d.Address
Street Address
5160 NC HIGHWAY 42 W
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Garner NC
Postal / pp Code aunty
27529 US
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
POGO Development, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
05381, 0649
2c. Contact Person:
Brad Gordon
2d. Address
Street Address
496 Skinner Road
Address Line 2
atY
Four Oaks
Postal / Zip Code
27524
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Wyatt Brown
4b. Business Name:
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
4c.Address
Street Address
242 Batten Farm Road
Address Line 2
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
2f. Fax Number:
City State / Province / Region
Selma NC
Postal / Zip code Country
27576 US
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
brownenvgrp@g mail.com
Agent Authorization Letter*
agent letter.pdf
231.32KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
same

lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Clayton
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
165803-23-2656
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
Oty
Rat / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Little Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C, NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011005
2b. Property size:
18.5
State/ Rovince / Region
Country
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Site is a farm field for row crops, being located in the ETJ of the Town of Clayton. The general area is changing from rural farming to urban growth. The site is mostly upland (Norfolk
soil) with 2 wetlands (Toisnot soil) located on the northern end that protrude into the site from a wooded wetland area to the north. Row crop farming is difficult in these wet areas. There
is a small pond located in the southern portion of the site. There is a small wetland at the head of the pond. A Neuse Buffer determination (letter attached) was made for the feature
found on the soil map at the head of the pond, the feature was determined not there. The quad sheet showed a small pond on the north side of the tract in the vicinity of the 2 wetlands,
this feature was also determined not to be on the tract.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes ( No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Quad (3).pdf 337.41KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
sois.pdf 291.87KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.668
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The project is to construct a single family home subdivision with utilities provided. There will be onsite septic for each lot. The streets will be paved and utilities (water and power) will be
ran along the street and down the driveways. There are no streams on the property. The tip of the wetlands on the north are impacted to make the building lots more viable.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project area is in a farm field which includes 2 wetlands on the north side and a small pond with wetland on the southeast side. There will be no clearing and grubbing of trees and
stumps. The streets consist of a main street with a cul-de-sac. My client requests to impact the tip of the wetland to make the lots more viable. A bull dozer and motor grader will be used
to grade the streets. The utilities will be installed in the street and ran down the home site driveways. The septic will be on -site drain fields for each individual house. The streets will be
paved and the lawns stabilized with a ground cover. The is a single phase project, I don't forsee any indirect impacts.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Kyli Knolls Wetlands Subdivision 5-7-21.pdf 789.09KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
0. Yes
r No C Unknown
Comments:
Stream Buffer Determination January 7th 2020 (attached)
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved ( Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-00251

5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Kyli Knolls Buffer 2321 Amelia Church Rd..pdf 3.23MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
rYes GNo
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
Not to my knowledge
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
fJ Wetlands r Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
r Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (2)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
6S
fill
P
Seep
Wetland B
No
Both
0.010
(acres)
7S
fill
P
Seep
Wetland B
No
Both
0.086
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.096
2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.096
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
In planning, minimization and avoidance was practiced in filling only the top of Wetland B, the fill was also reduced to fill enough wetland to make the 2
lots more viable but also to leave a much wetland as possible.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fence will be placed between the fill and the remaining wetland during construction to protect it from sedimentation. The remaining wetlands and
pond will be protected from sedimentation by temporary sediment control and temporary seeding. The project will be inspected by the Town of Clayton
for sedimentation and erosion control. an approved sedimentation and erosion control plan will be followed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
rYes (No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts will be less than the required 0.10 acre threshold.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?

✓ Yes R No
If no, explain why:
No Neuse buffered streams on or beside the project.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
C Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
6' Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
✓ Yes (No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes f• No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes ( No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This S/D has no more phases and should not result in generating additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes r No ( N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes ( No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
✓ Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes f• No
r No C Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
✓ Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes f• No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes f• No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?

NC Natural Heritage
IPaC 1)Red-cockaded Woodpecker -Project area is a cleared formally farm field, no affect.
2) Neuse River Waterdog-No stream in Project Area, No affect.
3) Carolina Madtom-No stream in Project Area, No affect.
4) Atlantic Pigtoe, Dwarf Wedgemussel, Yellow Lance -Habitat is flowing stream, no stream in Project Area, no affect.
5) Michau:(s Sumac -Project Area was farmland, herbicides were frequently used, I did not observe and Michaux in the Project Area, No affect.
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC_ Explore Location.pdf
project_report_kyl i_kn of Is_sd_24025_24025. pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes r No
474.33KB
952.2KB
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
None in Project Area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
✓ Yes (7 No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO above.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO.pdf 236.56KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
✓ Yes (No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Link Above
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Preliminary JD.pdf
Kyli Knols Peliminary Wetland Map.pdf
Kyli Knolls Buffer 2321 Amelia Church Rd. (1).pdf
COE number reciept.pdf
Realtor Letter.pdf
140.61 KB
881.06KB
3.23MB
114.51KB
292.49KB
Signature
*
CJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Wyatt Brown
Signature
Date
5/7/2021

February 6, 2020
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Chris Hopper
Re: Kyli Knolls, Johnston County
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the
property/properties identified herein, do authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing
a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The
property's PIN is 178000-92-6027.
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
has my permission to act as my agent on this property
concerning wetlands and streams.

SAW-2020-00251--Kyli Knolls / Amelia Church Road /
Clayton / Johnston County
Inbox
RaleighNCREG Fri, Feb 7, 12:22
PM (7 days ago)
to me, Andrew
We received your Jurisdictional Determination (JD) request. We have assigned the
request file number SAW-2020-00251 and forwarded the project to (Andy Williams) for
further processing, please refer to this file number on all correspondence.
Sincerely,
Joyce A. Thames

TODAY HOMES
REALTY, NC
Regarding Kyli Knolls homesites;
Homesite 7S -
Without encroaching into the wetlands on this homesite, there is NO backyard.
Making this homesite undesirable and giving it no value to a buyer.
Thank you,
Deborah D'Armetta, BIC
Today Homes Realty, NC
3100 Smoketree Ct
Raleigh, NC 27604

12/9/2019
The National Map - Advanced Viewer
lj sGs
science for a changing world
f
/
Scale: 1:9,028
Zoom Level: 16
The
"" National
4.4.51 Nlap
Help Data Download Services
600ft
-78.483 35.626 Degrees
i T T
Find address or place
ANGv
R
MEAC.,Ow cr USGS The National Map: Nati
https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/advanced-viewer/ 1/1

OHN CON
NORTH•CAROLINA
* * * DISCLAIMER
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Scale: 1:4932 - 1 in. = 410.99 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
January 28, 2020

D
P1
m
r
SITE 6.4-Rrro„
DR/f,
ROAD
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE)
LOT
AREA IN
LOT
AREA IN
WETLANDS
AREA OF
IMPACT
% OF LOT
IMPACT
6S
27457 SF
0.630 AC
4977 SF
0.144 AC
424 SF
0.010 AC
1.54%
7S
33693 SF
0.773 AC
15309 SF
0.351 AC
3751 SF
0.086 AC
1 1 ' 1
NO WETLANDS CAN BE IMPACTED WITHOUT AN APPROVED
PERMIT FROM THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
S89' 10'38"E 159.38'
N/F
FRANCES B. PARRISH
DB 2998 PG 915
PN 05G03009B
L1 S89'10'38"E 122.76'
CURVE
RADIUS
ARC LENGTH
CHORD LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
C1
25.00'
37.03'
33.74'
S43' 15'42"W
C2
255.00'
58.99'
58.86'
S79'04'24"W
C3
255.00'
85.28'
84.88'
S62'51'58"W
C4
25.00'
39.27'
35.36'
N44'10'38"W
WETLAND LINES ON LOTS WILL BE INCLUDED ON THE FINAL PLAT
S89'10'38"E 149.91'
S89'10'38"E 112.00'
4204 SF
0.096 AC
AREA IN WETLANDS
7594 SF
0.174 AC
11.99'
75.77'
!WETLANDS
w
v- a
cA.o
-. O
co
&X61'
.3.390 SF
0.078 AC
N
O
0
0
/// 1 I 1• 111 P\\\\
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS
THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE SECTION 404 OF THE
CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS
DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED
REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION
MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS
FROM THIS DATE. THE UNDERSIGNED COMPLETED THIS DETERMINATION
UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL,
33 C.F.R. PART 328 AND OTHER U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
GUIDANCE.
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
DATE
USAGE ACTION ID NO
C2
z
O
0
27.71 '
4977 SF
0.144 AC
27457 SF
0.630 AC
C4L--1157
AREA OF
IMPACT
424 SF
0.010 AC
97.76'
ti
15.309 SF
0..351 AC
AL
AREA IN WETLANDS
22206 SF
0.510 AC
AL
3„ZZ,6i.00N
AREA OF
IMPACT
3751 SF
0.086 AC co
33693 SF
0.773 AC
66.91
thNi
1920 SF
0.. 044 AC
45. al'
3„ZZ,6i.00N
N89' 10'38"W
N89'10'38"W 149.91' N89'10'38"W 112.00'
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S89'10'38"E
50.00'
L2
S50'26'04"W
35.35'
L3
S49'54'33"W
52.99'
L4
S54'01'59'W
36.03'
L5
S48'01'27"W
47.38'
L6
N64' 16'00"W
66.59'
L7
N64' 16'00"W
20.90'
L8
N28'48'50"W
29.61'
L9
N43'59'02"W
75.32'
L10
S23'32'08"W
44.37'
L1 1
S37'38'1 1 "W
37.60'
L12
S50'50'35"W
12.77'
L13
S50'50'35"W
15.26'
L14
S50'50'35"W
42.54'
L15
N18'36'23"W
56.89'
L16
N22'28'32"E
67.49'
L17
S54'01'S9"W
32.33'
L18
N28'48'50"W
16.93'
L19
S89' 10' 14"E
27.33'
L20
589' 10' 14"E
121.05'
0 60 120 180
SCALE: 1 " = 60'
WETLANDS SURVEY
FOR
STEEL BRIDGE
CROSSING, LLC.
MARCH 15, 2021
SURVEYED BY:
TLS
DRAWN 8Y:
MIKE
CHECKED BY:
C. LANE - PLS
17�11AR1;'I
WETLANDS.DWG
z'�OAO Y OAT
E
JOB NO.
430.090
TRUE LINE AS'URYL'YING, P.C.
205 WEST MAIN STREET
CLAYTON, N.C. 27520
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
www.truelinesurveying.com
C-1859

VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE)
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON AND
I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION WITH
MY FREE CONSENT, ESTABLISH MINIMUM BUILDING
SETBACK LINES AND DEDICATE ALL STREETS, ALLEYS,
WALKS, PARKS AND OTHER SITES AND EASEMENTS
TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USE AS NOTED.
DATE OWNER
THIS
SURVEY:
I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS RECORDED PLAT HAS BEEN FOUND
TO COMPLY WITH THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE OF CLAYTON,
NORTH CAROLINA, AND THAT THIS PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED
FOR RECORDING IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF JOHNSTON COUNTY.
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR
❑ A. CREATES A SUBDMSION OF LAND WITHIN THE AREA OF
A COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY THAT HAS AN ORDINANCE
THAT REGULATES PARCELS OF LAND.
❑ B. IS LOCATED IN A PORTION OF A COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY
THAT IS UNREGULATED AS TO AN ORDINANCE THAT
REGULATES PARCELS OF LAND.
❑ C. IS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
1) IS OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND OR
ONE OR MORE EXISTING EASEMENTS AND DOES NOT
CREATE A NEW STREET OR CHANGE AN EXISTING
STREET.
2) IS OF AN EXISTING FEATURE, SUCH AS A BUILDING
OR OTHER STRUCTURE, OR NATURAL FEATURE, SUCH
SUCH AS A WATERCOURSE.
3) IS A CONTROL SURVEY
4) IS OF A PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR A PUBLIC UTILITY
AS DEFINED IN G.S. 62-3.
❑ D. IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION
OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT —ORDERED SURVEY, OR
OTHER EXEMPTION OR EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF
SUBDIVISION.
❑ E. THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE SURVEYOR IS SUCH
THAT THE SURVEYOR IS UNABLE TO MAKE A DETERMINATION
TO THE BEST OF THE TO THE BEST OF THE SURVEYOR'S
PROFESSIONAL ABILITY AS TO PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN
(A) THROUGH (D) ABOVE.
DATE SURVEYOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOHNSTON COUNTY
I, CURK T. LANE , DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN
ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED
DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK , PAGE
ETC.); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY
INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN
BOOK PAGE • THAT THE RATIO OF
PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS 1. 10.000+ ; THAT THE
GLOBAL POSITIONING ACCURACY (GPS) OBSERVATIONS WERE
PERFORMED TO THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING ACCURACY
STANDARDS, PART 2: STANDARDS FOR GEODETIC NETWORKS
AT 1 CENTIMETER ACCURACY CLASSIFICATION (95% CONFIDENCE)
USING RTK NETWORK; THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. THAT THIS
PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF G.S. 47-30 SECTION
F-11 WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
AND SEAL THIS DAY OF , A.D. 2021
1111/1/4
\N 1 � CAR
‘�oFEssio,�;�.�/
le 'S7
= SEAL _ -
L-3990 = —
.*$ SURVEYOR
/0/111110
L — 3990
LICENSE NUMBER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ROAD
DESIGN STANDARDS CERTIFICATION
APPROVED
DISTRICT ENGINEER
ONLY NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION APPROVED STRUCTURES
ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON PUBUC
RIGHT-OF-WAYS
NOTE: SIGHT TRIANGLES TAKE PRECEDENT OVER
ANY SIGN EASEMENT
R—E ZONING STANDARDS
1. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 35'
2. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PER LOT = 4200 SF
3. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE = 35%
4. MINIMUM LOT SIZE = 25,000 SF
5. MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE = 1,400 SF
MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS
FRONT = 35'
SIDE = 15'
REAR = 30'
STREET SIDE = 25'
10'x70' SITE TRIANGLE
(TYP)
R = 25'
TYPICAL INTERSECTION
DETAIL
ALL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE DEDICATED AS PRIVATE AND IT SHALL BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
AND ANY DRAINAGE STRUCTURES THERE IN, SO AS TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF
THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND INSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
THE OWNER, DEVELOPER, OR CONTRACTOR SHALL SET THE CENTERUNE OF THE EXISTING
ROADWAY DITCH BACK TO A MINIMUM OF 12 FEET FROM THE EXISTING/PROPOSED EDGE
OF PAVEMENT ALONG ALL ROAD FRONT LOTS.
ALL LOTS SHALL BE SERVED BY INTERNAL STREET SYSTEMS ONLY.
NO WETLANDS CAN BE IMPACTED WITHOUT AN APPROVED
PERMIT FROM THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS LOCATED IN ZONE X
AND OUTSIDE THE CURRENT DESIGNATED FLOOD PLAIN
FEMA FLOOD HAZARD PANEL NO. 3720165800 K
EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 20, 2018
DATE SURVEYOR
SURVEYOR'S DISCLAIMER: NO ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO
LOCATE ANY CEMETERIES, WETLANDS, HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
SITES, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR ANY OTHER FEATURES
ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN.
DATE SURVEYOR
REVIEW OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
REVIEW OFFICER OF JOHNSTON COUNTY,
CERTIFY THAT THE MAP OR PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS
AFFIXED MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING.
DATE REVIEW OFFICER
LEGEND
D•O.O❑•O
IPF
IPS
CMF
PKNF
PNKS
RRS
CSF
CSS
CC
CP
P/P
OPW
R/W
S.F.
AC
DB
PB
BOM
PG
LF
15S
15SL
15R
13
IRON PIPE FOUND
IRON PIPE SET
CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
PARKER-KALON NAIL FOUND
PARKER-KALON NAIL SET
RAILROAD SPIKE
COTTON SPIKE FOUND
COTTON SPIKE SET
CONTROL CORNER
COMPUTED POINT
POWER POLE
OVERHEAD POWER UNE
RIGHT OF WAY
SQUARE FEET
ACRE
DEED BOOK
PLAT BOOK
BOOK OF MAPS
PAGE
LINEAR FEET
LOT HAS OFFSITE SEWER
OFFSITE SEWER LOT
RECOMBINATION LOT
STREET ADDRESS
LINES NOT SURVEYED
CERTIFICATE OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF WATER SUPPLY AND
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS INSTALLED OR PROPOSED FOR
INSTALLATION IN SUBDIVISION MEET PUBLIC
HEALTH REQUIREMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN APPENDIX II
JOHNSTON COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. FINAL APPROVAL
FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE BASED
ON DETAILED LOT EVALUATION UPON APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION
OF PLANS FOR PROPOSED USE. THIS PRELIMINARY CERTIFICATION
IS ADVISORY ONLY AND CONFERS NO GUARANTEE.
DATE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED REP.
NOTE: EACH LOT SHOWN HEREON MAY REQUIRE THE USE
OF SEWAGE PUMPS, LOW PRESSURE PIPE SYSTEMS, FILL
SYSTEMS, INNOVATIVE SYSTEMS OR ANY OTHER ALTERNATIVE
SYSTEM TYPE AND SITE MODIFICATIONS SPECIFIED IN THE
NORTH CAROLINA LAWS AND RULES FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT
AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, 15A NCAC 18A SECTION. 1900,
THE ACTUAL SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN AND SITE MODIFICATIONS
WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
SHALL NOT EXCEED 4200 SQUARE FEET
PER LOT
THE OWNER OF LOTS 10 & 11, AS SHOWN, AGREE TO GRANT TO
LOTS 6 AND 7, AND IT'S SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, THE SEPTIC EASEMENT
AS DESIGNATED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF UTILIZING THE AREA FOR
INITIAL CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROPRIATE OFF —SITE SEPTIC SYSTEM
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND THEREAFTER TO MAINTAIN THE SEPTIC
FIELD TO PROVIDE A FUNCTIONING SEPTIC DISPOSAL SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE AFORESAID GOVERNMENTAL REQUIREMENTS. THIS SEPTIC EASEMENT
ALLOWS THE RIGHT OF CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND
INSPECTION BY THE OWNER OF THE SEPTIC SYSTEM.
THE OWNERS OF LOTS 10 & 11, AS SHOWN, AGREE TO BEAR THE COST
OF DAMAGE TO THE AFORESAID SYSTEM, AND RESTORE THE AREA TO IT'S
PRIOR CONDITION AFTER ANY CONSTRUCTION OR MAINTENANCE FOR ANY
NEGLIGENT ACTION ON THEIR PART.
LINE LEGEND
NOTES:
1) ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES
2) AREAS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD
3) PROPERTY SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD
4) NO. 5 REBAR IRON STAKES SET AT ALL LOT
CORNERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
5) ALL INTERIOR LOT LINES SHALL HAVE A 10' DRAINAGE
AND UTILITY EASEMENT, 5' EACH SIDE OF ALL LOT LINES
6) A 10" DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT SHALL LIE
INSIDE OF ALL EXTERIOR BOUNDARY LINES
7) A 10' WIDE GRADING, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENT IS RESERVED ON THE LOT SIZE OF AND
ADJACENT TO ALL STREET RIGHTS —OF —WAY
8 ZONING: R—E
9 PARCEL NO.05G03009A
10 PARENT TRACT DEED DB 5381 PG 649
11 GRID TIE BY GPS
12 PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TOWN OF
CLAYTON ETJ
13) 15' ACCESS, UTILITY AND SEPTIC TANK SUPPLY LINE
EASEMENT
14) LOTS TO BE SERVED BY JOHNSTON COUNTY PUBLIC
WATER AND PRIVATE SEPTIC.
15) FOLLOW USPS REQUIREMENTS FOR MAIL KIOSK
REFERENCES:
DB 5381 PG 649
DB 4413 PG 768
DB 1029 PG 140
DB 3114 PG 436
DB 791 PG 016
DB 1795 PG 880
DB 600 PG 319
DB 2998 PG 915
DB 2998 PG 912
PB 60 PG 363
PB 35 PG 31
LOT LINE
RIGHT—OF—WAY
TEXT
ADJOINER
POND
WETLANDS
SHEET BORDER
ACCESS EASEMENT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
SIGN EASEMENT
ACCESS, UTILITY & SEPTIC TANK SUPPLY LINE EASEMENT
SIGNATURE LINE
SITE TRIANGLE
TIE LINE
SPETIC EASEMENT
WETLAND HATCHING
ARROW LEADERS
LINE AND CURVE CHART
SUBDIVISION PLAT
OF
KYLI KNOLLS
CLAYTON TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MARCH 19, 2021
SHEET 1 OF 2
OWNER: STEEL BRIDGE CROSSING, LLC.
5160 NC HWY 42 W
GARNER, N.C. 27529
SURVEYED BY:
TLS
DRAWN BY:
MIKE
CHECKED BY:
CURK
DRAWING NAME:
RECORD.DWG
SURVEY DATE:
1-15-21
JOB NO.
430.090
IWI/E LINE SUJ? VEYJYVC, P.0
205 WEST MAIN STREET
CLAYTON, N.C. 27520
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
www.truelinesurveying.com
C-1859

VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE)
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
N00'25'50"E
0.95'
L2
N00'30'54"E
30.95'
L3
S89' 10'38"E
91.85'
L4
S89' 10'38"E
50.00'
L5
SO0'34'56"W
26.52'
L6
S84'29'50"W
51.73'
L7
N21'41'59"W
32.66'
L8
N88'24' 13"W
53.62'
L9
N5648'32"W
1.83'
L10
N5719'03"W
100.79'
L1 1
N56'41 '00"W
44.04'
L12
N79'05'33"E
22.12'
L13
S10'54'27"E
19.78'
L14
S10'54'27"E
22.72'
L15
S79'05'33"W
23.77'
L16
S89' 10'38"E
86.44'
L17
N89'10'38"W
60.03'
L18
N89'10'38"W
61.08'
CONTROLI
CORNER I
NC GRID COORDINATES IPF
N 684076.5970
E 2151697.6210
3„L0,6Z.00N
N/F
KIMBERLY HENDERSON IPF
DB 600 PG 319
PN 05G03069
N/F
JOSEPH F. BUTLER
DB 1795 PG 880 N
PN 05G03071L
IPF
60
•
L3
S89'10'38"E
209.25'
!WETLANDS
28897 SF
0.663 AC
L1 N 34736 SF
1857 SF 0.797 AC
0.043AC:
L2
L1-
<7
IPF
NOTE: L10 & L26 ARE
TIE LINES ONLY
NOTE: LOTS L1-L2 WERE CREATED TO SATISFY THE TOWN OF
CLAYTON LANDSCAPING RULES. THOSE LOTS WILL BE DEDICATED
AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOHNSTON COUNTY
I, CURK T. LANE DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN
ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED
DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK , PAGE
ETC.); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY
INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN
BOOK PAGE • THAT THE RATIO OF
PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS 1. 10.000+ ; THAT THE
GLOBAL POSITIONING ACCURACY (GPS) OBSERVATIONS WERE
PERFORMED TO THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING ACCURACY
STANDARDS, PART 2: STANDARDS FOR GEODETIC NETWORKS
AT 1 CENTIMETER ACCURACY CLASSIFICATION (95% CONFIDENCE)
USING RTK NETWORK; THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. THAT THIS
PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF G.S. 47-30 SECTION
F-11 WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
AND SEAL THIS DAY OF , A.D. 2021
.t\111111,.
\:• CA ////
SEAL
L-3990 = =
o SURVEYOR
L - 3990
LICENSE NUMBER
co
25'x25'
SIGN
EASEMENT
(TYP)
�27
C1 `7
C18 <9.
IPF
TjF
N/F
WADE J. TART
JOYCE M. TART
DB 1658 PG 591
PN 05G03059
oR,
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L19
S33' 16' 14"W
39.66'
L20
S33' 16' 14"W
9.56'
L21
N54'59'59"W
87.09'
L22
N00'49'22"E
44.11'
L23
N 23' 1 1 ' 22'E
35.00'
L24
S00'49'22"W
58.08'
L25
553'56'26"E
129.91'
L26
S24'36'42"W
90.29'
L27
S89' 10'38"E
46.87'
L28
S89' 10'38"E
96.56'
L29
S89' 10'38"E
81.77'
L30
S00'34'56"W
99.83'
L31
S00'49'22"W
39.16'
L32
S87'24'22"E
96.61'
L33
N00'49'22"E
42.15'
L34
S00'49'22"W
13.13'
L35
560'43'01 "E
14.08'
L36
S60'43'01 "E
79.41'
L37
N5648'32"W
57.26'
L38
S89' 10'38"E
112.00'
CURVE
RADIUS
ARC LENGTH
CHORD LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
C1
25.00'
39.27'
35.36'
N80'00'01 "E
C2
255.00'
9.26'
9.26'
N34' 18'39"E
C3
255.00'
79.82'
79.50'
N44'19'06"E
C4
255.00'
85.28'
84.88'
N62'51'58"E
C5
255.00'
58.99'
58.86'
N79'04'24"E
C6
25.00'
37.03'
33.74'
N43'15'42"E
C7
25.00'
39.27'
35.36'
S44'10'38"E
C8
25.00'
8.83'
8.78'
N80'42'34"E
C9
25.00'
12.20'
12.08'
N56'36'53"E
C10
50.00'
61.57'
57.75'
N77'54'41"E
C11
50.00'
28.76'
28.36'
S50'19'59"E
C12
50.00'
25.30'
25.03'
S30'58'58"W
N/F
FRANCES B. PARRISH
DB 2998 PG 915
PN 05G03009B
20' PUBLIC DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
S89'10'38"E 159.38' L4 S89'10'38"E
32697 SF
0.751 AC < ?ate.
2S 30' ACCESS EASEMENT
N88'24' 13"W 206.94'
79,
L8
its
966,
L2
3292 SF
0.076 AC
IPF
A
PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
ACCESS, UTILITY AND SEPTIC
TANK SUPPLY LINE EASEMENT
EFFEEFFE
ACCESS EASEMENT
SIGN EASEMENT
122.76'
AIL
S89' 10'38"E
149.91'
AIL
!WETLANDS
33693 SF
0.773 AC
10'x70' �97.76' i 149.91'
SIGHT
TRIANGLE S89' 1 0'38"E S89' 10'38"E
(T'"P) THUMPER WAY 50' R/WN
L18 N89' 10'38"W N89' 10'38"W 89' 10
100.00'
0
0
18
N
43258
N SF
0.993
AC
N88'24' 13"W N88'24' 13"W
F
7 8• 0
S• 6
6
CURVE
RADIUS
ARC LENGTH
CHORD LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
C13
50.00'
55.78'
52.93'
S7726'25"W
C14
50.00'
25.84'
25.55'
N55'47'36"W
C15
25.00'
21.03'
20.41'
N65'04'56"W
C16
205.00'
144.49'
141.51'
S70'37'53"W
C17
205.00'
61.43'
61.20'
541'51'19"W
C18
25.00'
39.30'
35.38'
S11'46'09"E
C19
25.00'
0.75'
0.75'
N34'08'08"E
NO WETLANDS CAN BE IMPACTED WITHOUT AN APPROVED
PERMIT FROM THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
z 100 00' /. 100.00'
20' PRIVATE
DRAIN. ESMT.
43393
SF
0.996
AC
N
41,
w
WETLANDS
N/F
JIMMIE L. HOLMES
DB 791 PG 16
PN 05G03061
N88'24'13"W
CONTROL
CORNER
L38 S89'10'38"E
25174
SF
0.578
AC
SEE NOTE #13
)OOC1 12.00' s
40415
SF
0.928
AC
0'
100.00'
z
0
0
'4 25488
N SF
0.585
AC
0
N 26822
SF
0.616
AC
S84 29' 50"W
IPF
N88'24'13"W IPF
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
SHALL NOT EXCEED 4200 SQUARE FEET
PER LOT
IPF
LEGEND
D•O.O❑•O
IPF
IPS
CMF
PKNF
PNKS
RRS
CSF
CSS
CC
CP
P/P
OPW
R/W
S.F.
AC
DB
PB
BOM
PG
LF
15S
15SL
15R
.3
IRON PIPE FOUND
IRON PIPE SET
CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
PARKER-KALON NAIL FOUND
PARKER-KALON NAIL SET
RAILROAD SPIKE
COTTON SPIKE FOUND
COTTON SPIKE SET
CONTROL CORNER
COMPUTED POINT
POWER POLE
OVERHEAD POWER UNE
RIGHT OF WAY
SQUARE FEET
ACRE
DEED BOOK
PLAT BOOK
BOOK OF MAPS
PAGE
LINEAR FEET
LOT HAS OFFSITE SEWER
OFFSITE SEWER LOT
RECOMBINATION LOT
STREET ADDRESS
LINES NOT SURVEYED
S84 29' 50"W
7SL
SEPTIC EASEMENT
FOR LOT 7S
3926 SF
0.090 AC
141.10'
SEE NOTE #13
rn
a-'
oo
L27 \ L28
25558
SF
0.587
AC
1 W
MAIL
KIOSK r
6SL
SEPTIC EASEMENT
FOR LOT 6S
6354 SF
0.146 AC
L29
28989 SF
0.665 AC
19.20, 04"E
161.24'
0
29030 SF
0.666 AC
S84'29.50"W 243.46'
N/F
RICHARD SCOTT BALL
DB 4413 PG 768
PN 05G03009J
N/F
LISA M. BARBOUR
DB 3114 PG 436
PN 05G03058D
0
100
200
300
SCALE: 1" = 100'
N/F
FRANCES B. PARRISH
DB 2998 PG 912
PN 05G03015
NC GRID COORDINATES
N 684058.4820
E 2152958.9290
IPF
w
0
13
cn
0
0
W
IPF
-r
14
T
S&W RANCHES
SUBDIVISION
PB 35 PG 31 /I
22A
NC GRID COORDINATES
N 683558.9750
E 2152953.8520 22B
N/F
NANCY A. BLINSON
DB 1029 PG 140
PN 05G03058A
SUBDIVISION PLAT
OF
r-
KYLI KNOLLS
8
CLAYTON TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MARCH 19, 2021
SHEET 2 OF 2
15
OWNER: STEEL BRIDGE CROSSING, LLC.
5160 NC HWY 42 W
GARNER, N.C. 27529
SURVEYED BY:
TLS
DRAWN BY:
MIKE
CHECKED BY:
CURK
DRAWING NAME:
RECORD.DWG
SURVEY DATE:
1-15-21
JOB NO.
430.090
TRIM' LINE SUJ? VEYJYVC, P.C.
205 WEST MAIN STREET
CLAYTON, N.C. 27520
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
www.truelinesurveying.com
C-1859

DP 2 Upland
All waters, non -wetland waters and open waters
are potential waters of the US
Wetland A
0.118 Acres
Wetland B
0.452 Acres
Wetland C
0.034 Acres
100 200 300 400
Feet
Kyli Knols Tract
Preliminary Wetland Map
,c_i_
BROWN'S
ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.
Map Drawn by
Wyatt Brown
1-29-2020

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
IPaC
IPaC resource list
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as
trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near
the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that
could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and
extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g.,
vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction
in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds,
USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Johnston County, North Carolina
(n_ /fa
*0\
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 1/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
fi [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
°lc
1111A.0
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 2/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of
influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be
indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can
move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To
fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required. .
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is
conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills
this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official
species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 3/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are
candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
S1>. 44c \10\*
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME STATU
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Proposed Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
`v�
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed Endangered
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat. 1
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAMElikk STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 4/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Critical habitats
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Flowering Plants
NAME
Proposed Threatened
Endangered
Threatened
STATUS‘c)1111111111
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. i
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
\4IS
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
:.Z
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
ibmiod
Migratory birds
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 5/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their
habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described
below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Itill111\16
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-as ssment-tools-
and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds • 111111:1°111c
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list
and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee
that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public
have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data .mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the
relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic
Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your
migratory bird report, can be found
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to
migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds
are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME 0 Ilki
Ilk
BREEDING SEASON (IF A BREEDING
SEASON IS INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 6/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
YOUR LIST, THE BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
4 el"11- 11‘460--)1
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project
area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please
make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN THE
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A VERY
LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE"
INDICATES THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT
LIKELY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
/01\
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (i)
'I‘bb
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a
particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species
presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have
higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
‘k.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 7/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey
events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the
probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is
the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible
values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
.40,cP‘
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are
no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. fiek,
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species
in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64
surveys. . k_
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to
this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is
currently much more sparse.
SPECIES
probability of presence
breeding season I survey effort no data
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 8/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Boald n-BCgVuln bl�is 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 —+-- —III 1111 1111 III,
is not a Bird of
Conservation Concern
(BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because
of the Eagle Act or for
potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain
types of development or
activities.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide (CON) (This
is a Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) throughout
its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
- I -
---1 1111 1111 1111 1111
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
,\6\11.4
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be
breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional
measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site. .Vo)
I
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birdsof onservitii Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special
attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based
on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle ( requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds
that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 9/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).
This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the
probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to
the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest
there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with
it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
c,-\ov4
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA
(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 1111
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements
(for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore
energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to
the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your
project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa
besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the
Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 10/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying
on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the
nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts
occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how
your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to
generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence"
of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high
survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is
not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be
there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and
helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can
implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATIONAlt Ifa
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 11/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
Palustrine
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,
or other State/Federal statutes.
1100 For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
Al Viiiii
Or \
oft 11131111111111111°
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlar Inventory website
Data limitations 1
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and
size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible
hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may
result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of
the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the
source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in
polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 12/13

3/19/2020 IPaC: Explore Location
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data
source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal
zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded
from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that
used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of
any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons
intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state,
or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
1111111101%\111114%)11\11.11111.1111C
01
01\41S
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXTKPVEMGJCLNPO4KUPL27RCOM/resources 13/13

• ■■■
�� � NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ ■m■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■■■
wyatt brown
Brown's Environmental Group, inc
242 Batten Farm Road
Selma, NC 27576
RE: Kyli Knolls S/D
Dear wyatt brown:
Roy Cooper. Governor
Susi Hamilton, Secretary
Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
March 19, 2020
NCNHDE-11670
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 'M9.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Kyli Knolls S/D
March 19, 2020
NCNHDE-11670
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group servation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
In i Date IM Rank
Dragonfly or 33753 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H? 5-Very Significantly G3G4 S2?
Damselfly georgiana Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wner
Johnston County Open Space Johnston County: multiple local
government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation
Owner Type
Local Government
State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/help. Data query generated on March 19, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2020.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

March 19, 2020
O
O
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-11670: Kyli Knolls S/D
1:21,633
0 0.175 0.35
0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55
1.1 km
Sources' Esri, HERE, Garmin,, Intermap, increment P Corp_, GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 3 of 3

j
SQEe \
� 2
Z�St f
62
—
E k podtJ
tt
< ' 0
L.
4,7 2
©gee
4§@ e..3 ±
2
i JOHNSTON /
0 / - I ,
< ®
An O, +`
}
$ n
▪ Dr
c=wn■Crl
E
/
£
31©m
H_ £l
file _ et
mat
ƒ b 4
±
/
one m!
Town of Cary, »Ws 3y,St @ of North Carolina DOT,Esri, HERE Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20200447
Version*
2
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Stephanie Goss
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 3/25/2021
Contact Name * Wyatt I brown
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name* Kyli Knolls
Project Owner* Steel Bridge Crossing, LLC and POGO Development, LLC
Project County* Johnston
Owner Address: Street Address
5160 NC HIGHWAY 42 W
Address Line 2
City State / Rovince / Region
Garner NC
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
27529 US
Is this a transportation project?* C Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
l 401 Water Quality Certification - I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Reg ula r Express
I— Individual Permit I— Modification
I— Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes C No
Please list all existing project ID's associated with this projects.*
20-0447, SAW-2020-00251
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Rick Trone, or Stephanie Goss
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*

Kyli Knolls is a single family individual home site S/D near Clayton.
There is a wetland on the north end of the S/D that is found on lot 6S,
7S and Lot 8. To made the lots viable we are requesting a permit to
fill part of the top of the wetland on lots 6S and 7S. We are
requesting 0.096 acres of fill.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
4/1/2021
4/2/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Kyli Wetlands (2).pdf
pdf only
707.54KB
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• !also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
�iyazcfft
Submittal Date 3/25/2021