WQ0014756_NOD-2021-PC-0277_20210506

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
May 7, 2021
Certified Mail Number 1078 1130 0000 1612 5747
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Eric M. Drye
Trinity American Corporation
601 Old Thomasville Road
High Point, NC 27260
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Tracking Number: NOD-2021-PC-0277
Permit No. WQ0014756
Trinity American Corporation WWTF
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Drye:
On April 28, 2021 Division of Water Resources staff persons Caitlin Caudle and Patricia
Lowery completed a scheduled compliance inspection. Jeff Wyatt, ORC, was present
during the entire inspection. A review of the facility, records, and the irrigation zone was
completed. This review did not reflect compliance with the subject permit. The following
deficiencies were noted:
1. It was discovered during the inspection that Mr. Wyatt has been reporting flow
through the wastewater treatment facility as the total daily volume of wastewater
that is being land applied in the drip zones. Permit Condition IV.3 states "flow
through the treatment facility shall be continuously monitored, and daily average
flow values shall be reported on Form NDMR. Flow may be estimated from water
use records... Daily average flow values shall be calculated by dividing the monthly
metered water usage by the number of days in the month." Mr. Wyatt stated he
records water meter values weekly, making it possible to report flow as a weekly
average.
Moving forward, please begin to record flows through the wastewater
treatment facility as the monthly or weekly average based on water meter
values. Failure to do so will be a violation of the subject Permit.
2. Mr. Wyatt stated that a local septic company is used to pump and haul wastewater
from the system during high flow events. Mr. Wyatt stated that pump and haul is
only used during emergency situations, such as the storage tank being close to
D_E
NORTH CAROLINA
fleoaroeeal al Emrorm nM ouai
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

overflowing. Ms. Caudle provided Mr. Wyatt a copy of the regulations relating to
pump and haul activities.
Please be mindful that pump and haul activities should only be used during
emergency situations, such as all septic and storage tanks being full with no
possibility of irrigating, or during maintenance events during which the
system cannot be operated. Moving forward, please notify Ms. Caudle of any
emergency pump and haul activities and apply for a temporary pump and
haul permit. Pump and haul activities may become unnecessary as flow is
reported correctly and the irrigation system is operated correctly within the
bounds of the permit.
The following items of concern were noted:
A. At the time of inspection, a Spill Plan was not on site. This was also referenced in
February 23, 2018. Permit Condition 111.1 states "the Permittee shall maintain an
Operation and Maintenance Plan, which at a minimum shall include operational
functions, maintenance schedules, safety measures and a spill response plan."
Please be mindful that emergency contact information may need to be
updated in the Spill Plan. Moving forward, please keep a spill response plan
on site at all times and provide Ms. Caudle an electronic copy of the Spill
Plan within 15 days of receipt of this letter.
B. The drip zones were clear of most woody debris, but there was a large amount of
ground cover present. There was evidence of briars beginning to establish
themselves in the drip zones. Many of the drip lines were not clearly visible under
the growing vegetation. Permit Condition 111.3 states "a suitable year round
vegetative cover shall be maintained at all times, such that crop health is optimized,
allows for even distribution of effluent and allows inspection of the irrigation
system."
Please be mindful that if briars and other woody vegetation are allowed to
establish in the drip zones it could cause future problems maintaining the
system.
C. Mr. Wyatt stated that the facility has been having chronic issues with seasonal high
flows. The facility has previously received Notice of Deficiencies for flows greater
than 800 gallons per day for the months of May, June, and December of 2020,
December of 2019, and July of 2017. After discussing flows at the facility with Mr.
Wyatt, it became clear that reporting flows correctly as referenced in Item 1 will
likely result in future violations of the permitted flow.
Please be advised that continued violations of the permitted flow could
result in additional action from the Division. Efforts should be made to
address the existing and potential violations through a Plan of Action. This
can include assessing the current system to determine the maximum flow
LD_E
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental quaky
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality j Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

that the wastewater treatment facility can treat and seeking permit
modification to increase the permitted flow; or expanding the existing
wastewater treatment facility to accommodate the increased flows through
permit modifications and approved engineer plans. Please provide Ms.
Caudle a Plan of Action within 120 days of receipt of this letter. The Plan of
Action should list the proposed actions to remedy violations related to
permitted flow exceedances and a timeline for completing these actions.
It was also apparent that dosing of the drip zones had previously been limited by
the assumed 800 gallon per day permitted limit. A larger volume of effluent may
be dosed to the drip zones, within the limitations of the hourly maximum rate and
yearly maximum rate listed in Attachment B. The last reported 12 month floating
totals for the drip zones ranged from 7.04 inches to 10.04 inches, well below the
permitted yearly maximum.
Please be advised that volume of effluent applied to the drip zones is limited
by the total inches of effluent applied in the preceding 12 month period. For
example, when calculating the 12 month floating total for a given month, the
total inches of effluent applied in that month and the preceding 11 months
will be added together and reported as the 12 month floating total on
reporting form Non Discharge Application Report. A violation will have
occurred if that 12 month floating total exceeds the permitted rate of 20.64
inches per year, as listed in Attachment B. Be aware that months where the
drip zones are heavily loaded will impact the available volume to be irrigated
in the following months. As a larger volume of effluent is applied to the drip
zones the storage issues, referenced in Item D, may remedy themselves.
D. Mr. Wyatt stated that a new control panel was installed in the Fall of last year. The
Operations and Maintenance Plan was developed based on the old operating
system.
Please be mindful that the Operations and Maintenance Plan may need to be
reviewed and updated as needed.
E. Upon reviewing the lab results provided by Mr. Wyatt, it was noted that the fecal
coliform results for 2019 and 2020 were > 2420 MPN/100 mL.
Moving forward, please ensure that the tablet chlorinator is working properly
to effectively treat the wastewater.
F. Mr. Wyatt stated that the facility is currently up for sale. If the facility is purchased,
a change of ownership form must be submitted on Division approved forms. The
appropriate change of ownership form is enclosed.
Please take the appropriate corrective actions to address the above described
deficiencies and concerns. Be mindful that a Plan of Action, as described in Item C,
should be submitted to Ms. Caudle within 120 days of receipt of this Notice. Please
D_E
NORTH CAROL viro
Department
ooff EnEnvironmentalOpAl
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional comments and observations. If you
have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me or Caitlin Caudle at the
letterhead address or phone number, or by email at caitlin.caudle(a�ncdenr.gov or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
DocuSiiggned by:
LA.
145B49E225C94 EA
Lon T. Snider, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ-WSRO
enc: Change of Ownership Form
Inspection Report
cc: Jeff Wyatt, ORC ([e-mail])
Randolph County Environmental Health([e-mail])
Laserfiche File WQ0014756
WSRO Electronic Files
LD_E
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental quaky
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality j Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0014756 Effective: 09/01/17
SOC: Effective:
County: Randolph
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Eric M Drye
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SI,
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 04/28/2021
Primary Inspector: Caitlin Caudle
Secondary Inspector(s):
Expiration: 08/31/22
Expiration:
Title: President
Entry Time 10:05AM
Patricia Lowery
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Wastewater Irrigation
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent
II Treatment Flow Measurement -Water
Use Records
▪ End Use -Irrigation
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement
(See attachment summary)
Certification:
Owner : Trinity American Corporation
Facility: Trinity American Corporation WWTF
5275 Glenola Industrial Dr
Archdale NC 27263
Exit Time: 12:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent
▪ Treatment
▪ Treatment Influent Pump Station
▪ Storage
▪ Miscellaneous Questions
▪ Record Keeping
▪ Treatment Disinfection
▪ Wells
Page 1 of 8

Permit: WQ0014756 Owner - Facility:Trinity American Corporation
Inspection Date: 04/28/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On April 28, 2021 Division of Water Resources staff persons Caitlin Caudle and Tricia Lowery conducted a scheduled
compliance inspection. This inspection was prompted by questions from the ORC about how to handle high flow situations.
Jeff Wyatt, ORC, was present during the entire inspection. A review of the facility, records, and drip zones was completed.
This review reflects noncompliance with the subject permit. The following deficiency was noted:
1. It was discovered during the inspection that Mr. Wyatt has been reporting flow through the wastewater treatment facility
as the total daily volume of wastewater that is being land applied in the drip zones. Permit Condition IV.3 states "flow
through the treatment facility shall be continuously monitored, and daily average flow values shall be reported on Form
NDMR. Flow may be estimated from water use records... Daily average flow values shall be calculated by dividing the
monthly metered water usage by the number of days in the month." Mr. Wyatt stated he records water meter values weekly,
making it possible to report flow as a weekly average.
Moving forward, please begin to record flows through the wastewater treatment facility as the monthly or weekly average
based on water meter values. Failure to do so will be a violation of the subject Permit.
2. Mr. Wyatt stated that a local septic company is used to pump and haul wastewater from the system during high flow
events. Mr. Wyatt stated that pump and haul is only used during emergency situations, such as the storage tank being
close to overflowing. Ms. Caudle provided Mr. Wyatt a copy of the regulations relating to pump and haul activities.
Please be mindful that pump and haul activities should only be used during emergency situations, such as all septic and
storage tanks being full with no possibility of irrigating, or during maintenance events during which the system cannot be
operated. Moving forward, please notify Ms. Caudle of any emergency pump and haul activities and apply for a temporary
pump and haul permit. Pump and haul activities may become unnecessary as flow is reported correctly and the irrigation
system is operated correctly within the bounds of the permit.
The following items of concern were noted:
A. At the time of inspection, a Spill Plan was not on site. This was also referenced in February 23, 2018. Permit Condition
111.1 states "the Permittee shall maintain an Operation and Maintenance Plan, which at a minimum shall include operational
functions, maintenance schedules, safety measures and a spill response plan."
Please be mindful that emergency contact information may need to be updated in the Spill Plan. Moving forward, please
keep a spill response plan on site at all times and provide Ms. Caudle an electronic copy of the Spill Plan within 15 days of
receipt of this letter.
B. The drip zones were clear of most woody debris, but there was a large amount of ground cover present. There was
evidence of briars beginning to establish themselves in the drip zones. Many of the drip lines were not clearly visible under
the growing vegetation. Permit Condition 111.3 states "a suitable year round vegetative cover shall be maintained at all times,
such that crop health is optimized, allows for even distribution of effluent and allows inspection of the irrigation system."
Please be mindful that if briars and other woody vegetation are allowed to establish in the drip zones it could cause future
problems maintaining the system.
C. Mr. Wyatt stated that the facility has been having chronic issues with seasonal high flows. The facility has previously
received Notice of Deficiencies for flows greater than 800 gallons per day for the months of May, June, and December of
2020, December of 2019, and July of 2017. After discussing flows at the facility with Mr. Wyatt, it became clear that
reporting flows correctly as referenced in Item 1 will likely result in future violations of the permitted flow.
Please be advised that continued violations of the permitted flow could result in additional action from the Division. Efforts
should be made to address the existing and potential violations through a Plan of Action. This can include assessing the
current system to determine the maximum flow that the wastewater treatment facility can treat and seeking permit
modification to increase the permitted flow; or expanding the existing wastewater treatment facility to accommodate the
Page 2 of 8

Permit: WQ0014756 Owner - Facility:Trinity American Corporation
Inspection Date: 04/28/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
increased flows through permit modifications and approved engineer plans. Please provide Ms. Caudle a Plan of Action
within 120 days of receipt of this letter. The Plan of Action should list the proposed actions to remedy violations related to
permitted flow exceedances and a timeline for completing these actions.
It was also apparent that dosing of the drip zones had previously been limited by the assumed 800 gallon per day permitted
limit. A larger volume of effluent may be dosed to the drip zones, within the limitations of the hourly maximum rate and
yearly maximum rate listed in Attachment B. The last reported 12 month floating totals for the drip zones ranged from 7.04
inches to 10.04 inches, well below the permitted yearly maximum.
Please be advised that volume of effluent applied to the drip zones is limited by the total inches of effluent applied in the
preceding 12 month period. For example, when calculating the 12 month floating total for a given month, the total inches of
effluent applied in that month and the preceding 11 months will be added together and reported as the 12 month floating total
on reporting form Non Discharge Application Report. A violation will have occurred if that 12 month floating total exceeds the
permitted rate of 20.64 inches per year, as listed in Attachment B. Be aware that months where the drip zones are heavily
loaded will impact the available volume to be irrigated in the following months. As a larger volume of effluent is applied to the
drip zones the storage issues, referenced in Item D, may remedy themselves.
D. Mr. Wyatt stated that a new control panel was installed in the Fall of last year. The Operations and Maintenance Plan
was developed based on the old operating system.
Please be mindful that the Operations and Maintenance Plan may need to be reviewed and updated as needed.
E. Upon reviewing the lab results provided by Mr. Wyatt, it was noted that the fecal coliform results for 2019 and 2020 were
> 2420 MPN/100 mL.
Moving forward, please ensure that the tablet chlorinator is working properly to effectively treat the wastewater.
F. Mr. Wyatt stated that the facility is currently up for sale. If the facility is purchased, a change of ownership form must be
submitted on Division approved forms. The appropriate change of ownership form is enclosed.
Other observations:
• Ms. Caudle asked the ORC to email soil reports, lab results for effluent and the monitoring well, and the back up ORC
designation form. The ORC emailed those items the afternoon of April 28, 2021.
• It was noted in correspondence dated May 20, 2020 that a Back Up ORC was not designated. At the time of inspection
a back up ORC had not been designated in the NCDEQ database. The ORC provided a copy of the designation form and
Ms. Caudle sent that form to the email listed on the form.
• It was noted in correspondence dated February 23, 2018 that lime amendments had not been applied per agronomist
recommendation. A review of the 2019 and 2020 soil reports showed that soil pH ranged from 4.1 — 5.0 and 4.2 — 5.6,
respectively. The drip zones were established in a naturally forested area, and as a result may have a lower pH. The
wastewater being applied is not high strength and does not pose any concern to significantly impacting the soil. Please
continue to monitor the pH in the drip zones.
• Zinc levels in Zone 3 jumped from 38 in 2019 to 487 in 2020. Please continue to monitor zinc levels and review soil
sampling techniques and supplies to ensure that soil samples were collected properly.
• The ORC stated that space in the facility is being rented out by 4-5 different businesses, two of which are furniture
manufacturers who have seasonal workers. Seasonal workers, and as a result flows, increase during the winter holidays and
the spring and fall furniture markets. This increase in workers causes high flows through the WWTF.
• The ORC has stated that the facility owners have installed low flow bathroom features and asked the security guards to
monitor water features for continuous flows during after business hours.
• Four water meters are installed that measure the water that goes to each of the five buildings on site. Two buildings are
tied together. The water meters are located in a small white building close to the entrance of the facility.
• Mr. Wyatt stated that the irrigation system operates using timers and floats. The system is set up to irrigate each drip
zone for 30 minutes with 60 minutes between each zone. If the float in the storage tank is activated when the timer ends a
Page 3 of 8

Permit: WQ0014756 Owner - Facility:Trinity American Corporation
Inspection Date: 04/28/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
zone will be irrigated, but if the float is not activated the zone will be skipped.
• The ORC stated that all residuals removal records and pump and haul records are sent directly to the facility.
• The rain sensor for the system is located on the roof of the pumphouse.
• The ORC considers the second pump currently installed as the "spare pump" as required by permit condition 111.13. The
ORC stated that the system can be pressurized and operated using a single pump and the system alternates between each
pump every time it is turned on.
• MW2 was in good condition. The grout around the well cap and the concrete appeared to be intact.
• The ORC stated that Zone 1 is not used because of its proximity to surface water.
• There are no earthen berms around the facility.
• PT-1 has an audible high water alarm.
• PV-1 appeared to be a valve box of some sort.
• The irrigation system was last calibrated April 1, 2020.
• The ORC stated that the sand filters are recirculating sand filters, with --60% going to the storage tank and --40% going
back to the septic tank.
• A small tree was present in the sand filter. The ORC stated he would remove it soon.
• The entire tablet chlorinator was not available for review. The tubes and chlorinator lid visible in the box. The tablets werE
broken into pieces and visible in the tubes.
• Influent is measured through water meters, and effluent is measured by a flow meter leading to the zones.
• The ORC stated that about 5,000 gallons are kept in the storage tank based on the float tree.
• The ORC stated that the new system will send him an email when something is wrong with the system or the system
loses power. There is no back up power for the system beyond a battery pack that ensures the computer can continue to
work.
• A chain link fence is surrounding the WWTF and the drip zones.
Page 4 of 8

Permit: WQ0014756 Owner - Facility:Trinity American Corporation
Inspection Date: 04/28/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type
Reuse (Quality)
Recycle/Reuse
Activated Sludge Drip, LR
Activated Sludge Spray, LR
Activated Sludge Spray, HR
Single Family Spray, LR
Infiltration System
Single Family Drip
Lagoon Spray, LR
Treatment
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit?
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.)
Comment:
Treatment Influent Pump Station
Is the pump station free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the general housekeeping acceptable?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are floats/controls operable?
Are audio and visual alarms available?
Are audio and visual alarms operational?
# Are SCADA/Telemetry alarms required?
Are SCADA/Telemetry available?
Are SCADA/Telemetry operational?
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent
Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
Is flowmeter operating properly?
Does flowmeter monitor continuously?
Does flowmeter record flow?
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Use Records
Yes No NA NE
•
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑•❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Page 5 of 8

Permit: WQ0014756 Owner - Facility:Trinity American Corporation
Inspection Date: 04/28/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is water use metered?
Are the daily average values properly calculated?
Comment: The water meter usage has not been reported as the flow.
Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent
Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
Is flowmeter operating properly?
Does flowmeter monitor continuously?
Does flowmeter record flow?
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
Comment:
Treatment Disinfection
Is the system working?
Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
Is there adequate detention time (>=30 minutes)?
Is the system properly maintained?
If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe?
Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable?
Is the chlorinator accessible?
If tablets, are tablets present?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth?
If UV, are extra UV bulbs available?
If UV, is the UV intensity adequate?
# Is it a dual feed system?
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: Fecal results for the past two years have been >2420 MPN/100 mL. The chlorine contact
chamber could not be inspected as it was recessed into the ground.
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Record Keeping
Is a copy of current permit available?
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR?
NDAR?
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
Yes No NA NE
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
•
❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
❑ ❑ ❑ •
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ •
❑•❑ ❑
Page 6 of 8

Permit: WQ0014756 Owner - Facility:Trinity American Corporation
Inspection Date: 04/28/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Are application rates adhered to?
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)?
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters?
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW?
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards?
Are annual soil reports available?
# Are PAN records required?
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime?
If so, has it been applied?
Are operational logs present?
Are lab sheets available for review?
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR?
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Flow rates have not been reported correctly and the estimated influent flow is greater than the
permitted limit. There are no groundwater violations. Lime has not been applied.
End Use -Irrigation
Are buffers adequate?
Is the cover crop type specified in permit?
Is the crop cover acceptable?
Is the site condition adequate?
Is the site free of runoff / ponding?
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
Is the application equipment present?
Is the application equipment operational?
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes?
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use?
Are any supply wells within the CB?
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
How close is the closest water supply well?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
Page 7 of 8

Permit: WQ0014756 Owner - Facility:Trinity American Corporation
Inspection Date: 04/28/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is municipal water available in the area?
# Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells?
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB?
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval?
Are monitoring wells damaged?
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The drip zones were overgrown with ground cover and the zones were not easily accessible for
inspection. Zone 1 is not used to give an additional buffer to a surface water feature downslope
of the drip zones. The monitoring well was in good condition.
Page 8 of 8

\PJCAV)1 \pw\k(5

nerSci����
E�vrroneivalSalunnis �
R. Jeff Wyatt
Project Manager
(336) 3896_73,_ 2050 North oint Drive,
FAX (336) 6g6_yp20 WinstonPSuite A
Salem, NC 27106
email - rjw®geotec.com
""ww.geotec.com

+eCtaX 43/4,ia1)114 N C(kt#- L
North Carolina Department of Environmental Qualit rAc CC)1 \ I
Division of Water Resources �(� N 'L \9R Ld� y�G S,
Water Quality Section 6v<1\ brl (_tt-T d
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION
General Information
Facility Name: Trinity American Corportation WWTF
Permit No.: W000 14756
Owner: Eric Drye
ORC Name: R. Jeff Wyatt
County: Randolph
Issuance Date: 09i01i2617
Expiration Date: 08/31/2022
Telephone No.: 336-896-1300
Backup ORC: Telephone No.:
Other Contact: Telephone No.:
Location (address, gps or directions): 5275 Glenola Industrial Drive, Archdale, NC 27263
Reason for Inspection
ROUTINE ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ COMPLAINT ❑ PERMITTING ❑Other:
Co • ments (attach additional pages as necessary)
here is flow measured?
i► . )r i►� 1 GYl
• u4\ex nZAc& w le1ii SV- t Fl tAtn l-
t05 tt rough the three differentump tanks and explain flow path
ackupORC designated?er\--papU v0a-I(L tGk$k Sinn
here is the rain sensor?
6h ?br_sivracebull(vng d solls,LoJo resu(+s
-Chronic issues with high. flows. Why? v W{ ePL �,�+ Rig _C
of analysis. pH? Any lime amendments? �����1 1
WVhy isn't zone 1 used? Pon A ( 5e_ I k- 10-I' Cause 04 •-, 4 c IP-- a DWY\ SI opt
-Pump and Haul activities?
Infr ca, `ds rs5 6 f)put m? as -}(ALs vac, ptt m 9s altos- flak
I 2?1 o&k50(4y
4v-1? ? ?7 va\ve b6Y7
-)v-/is the vegetative cover? (4/O(A t\l pQ 3y 8 gvty\� ( 0 )/
�A/ny earthen berms? Mb 7
v6&M plan? Naas,1'6 lit inydaa-C-d.1NM pard was `\n.�r}abl.ed tizo(�
VL ' m edv up 4ke o -k'Nl (A ft4 s res_ O n.se-
P(av�
Submit permit renewal by Feb 2022
Is a follow-up inspection necessary ❑ Yes
❑ No
Primary Inspector: Caitlin Caudle Secondary Inspector: Tricia Lowery
Date of Inspection: 04/28/2021 EntryTime: 2 P 1��6�� Exit Time: I Z�.)
�\y Q(Amylost hau r1 Wheivi gaol is Fokl( nod- h4fpeMd i4 4Me IAm_ 2rv`
vms f.o0\nafelg vvyl� seiYvite, 364o Gllc,` (Am
I Irucl�s
�E OLkn�0Nlevt.c c 165Zdd1.1-6 s VAIN1? d slti r

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Record Keeping and Reporting Information
Is current permit available upon request?
Has the facility been free of public complaints for the last 12 months?
Are maintenance and inspection logs present (date & time of inspections, visual observations
any maintenance (adjustments, cleanings, equip changes) or repairs taken)?
Ate webeard-reeerels-pEesant?
Are irrigation tracking records present (date, weather, volume, length time, field #,
H d l' loading, nutrient loading other)?
Y
y rau tc oa tng, nu
Has irrigation equipment been calibrated (once/permit cycle) & records present? til 112 V.
Are records present for residuals removal (date, volume, Residual Hauler Name,
Name/permit of the receiving parry or letter from Mynic' ality)?AI off�,{� Od
Is an Operation & Maintenance Plan, and Spill'PQan present?�'gyp
Are appropriate grade ORC & Backup QRC designated?•T1r to date on CE?
NO) IA1iS1S N6
Effluent Monitoring:
Were effluent monitoring reports present? ® NDMR ® NDAR ❑ NDMLR
Are flow rates less than permitted flow? Permitted Flow:800 GPD
Are application rates adhered to? Permitted Rate: 0.2 inthr; 20.64 intyr
Are lab sheets available for review and support monitoring reports?
Are samples analyzed for the required parameters (See permit)?
Effluent concentrations do NOT exceed permit limits or 2L GW standards?
If required, are PAN records present and complete?
Groundwater Monitoring: As V4 -b seYn4 ta-b retAt-5
Is groundwater monitoring required?
Were GW-59's and lab results present?
Were samples analyzed for the required parameters (See pe
Observed records indicate no 2L GW quality violations?
saes
Soil Analysis: act-C.p seal t Y'e.)0C-0\R r'•I -S 0 w,
Were annual soil analyses results present for each irrigaatiarrfieIW? g(j 20 t{,2 -5 • (01A
If lime was called for on the Agronomist report, was lime applied? ❑
2,000 ❑ 2,000 — 3,000 111 >3,000
Copper and Zinc indices:
W Sodium less than 0.5 meq/1b0 cm3 ? ❑
as Exchangeable �Sodium Percentage (ESP) less than 15% ❑
Inlluent Pump StatlOiVVA r edDescl p° ` 3 g (Za\ Rn Jra Li CZeZ61
All pumps present, operational
Floatsyentrols operable
Audio & Visual Alarms Operational
Free of bypass lines or structures
General housekeeping good
Back-up power available, routinely tested & fueled?
Description:
e . ars spaced properly & free of excess deb
Are screenin•s �' ...-:: ...• y
in good condition (excess corrosion)?
i uauzanon nos es
aeration present?
Arepumps present.anci-oper-atianal? ❑�❑�0
—IS-unit_11L ng___�l�^P 21-66 ❑ ❑
N
NA
❑❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
NA NE
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
Y N N& E
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
0
Page 2 of 4
❑ ❑
Y— N — —NA _
❑❑ C❑ ❑❑g
EMEDIDE OM

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
p
Aeration mechanism operable & accessible?
Aeration basin thoroughly mixed?
Settleometer & dissolved oxygen results acceptable?
Is sludge an acceptable color?
Residual Storage/Treatment
❑ Lagoon ❑ Basin
® Septic Tank Capacity (gallons):
N— NA. NE __--_ _
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Y N NA NE
3 1,000 gal tank
❑ ❑ ❑
N NA NE
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ A
If Septic Tank, is a sanitary T or filter present?
How often are residuals pumped?
Treatment Filter(s) Description: sand -fi Ir Nf (,l all k t
Is unit accessible for review (i.e. inspection port or not subsurface)? 5fj?k1L wi `tQ.
Is the filter media present, correct size & type?
Is mud well free of excess solids and filter media?
Is media free of ponding, algae or excess vegetation?
Is clear well free of excess solids and filter media?
Does backwashing/air scour frequency appear adequate?
Des= lion:
Weirs level, free of excessive solids & a gae:
Scum removal system operational and 'b4-. u.ge leve
Sludge blanket at ptah evel?Izsi (generally 25% or less of the sidewall)
Clarifet of uent free of excessive solids?
Treatment Disinfection Description: 32 GPM
Type: ® Tablets ❑ Gas ❑ Liquid ❑ UV Y N NA NE
Is the system properly maintained and working? f ICI.E ❑ ❑
Fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection? j 1'1-W,OZ0 *7 , (,tL- !IK., ❑ ❑
Adequate detention time (> 30 minutes)? ❑ ❑ ❑
If tablets, proper size & type? ❑ ❑ ❑
Present in Cylinder(s)? (j ❑ ❑
If UV bulbs, are replacement bulbs on hand? ❑ ❑
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids and growth? ❑ ❑
Flow Meas reme t � P
Flowmeter location: 0 flue tZ-CII Y N NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated a ually (design flow>10,000 gpd)? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flowmeter operating properly? Calibration records present (w/in 10%)? ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter record flow? ❑ ❑ ❑
If no flowmeter (<10,000 gpd), are water -use records available (water meter)? L• ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the daily average values properly calculated? ❑ ❑ ❑
Treatment Y N NA NE
Are treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in permit? J( ❑ ❑ ❑
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? If no, note below. X ❑ ❑ ❑
List any items/units):
0
1A
❑ ❑
0
Page 3 of 4

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report ,
Effluent Storage \LLtf) Gt kom* s, 000 fcarias �QGLSCc1 oi� T I OC 4 , u
❑Lagoon(s) ❑ Above ground tank(s) ® Un erground tank(s) ❑Other:
Amount of Storage (days, months, gallons, etc.):20,000 gallons VZ — 1t\A\I s
—E€fluer-Stepageta
nmary ❑secondary
ructure(s) free of obstructions?
No st �f seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion on embankments?
Proper vegetaion-type w/ no excessive vegetation present on embankments?
Liner (if visible, is it intact)?
Baffles/curtains in good condition?
Freeboard is >2 feet from overtopping? Measa ent-a time of inspection:
Staff gauge is clearly marked?
No evidence of overflow (vegetation discolored -or laying down/broken)?--
No unusual color (very black, textile
No Foam present? Are antifoarn agents used? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No floating mats (slu geliflants, inorganics)?
No signs ofcessrve solids buildup (from bottom)?
Aerat ixers operational (if present)?
E uent structure is free of obstructions and easily accessible?
Effluent Pump station
All pumps present, operational
Floats/Controls operable \ /r��/�! ��``
Audio & Visual Alarms Operational �tN1tl.S €,kY INl1 �ll OT-c-
Free of bypass lines or structures
If required, is a rain sensor present and operational
General housekeeping good
Back-up power
Description:
End Use -Irrigation Number of Fields: 7
Are buffers adequate?
Are cover crops the type specified in permit and/or in good condition? ,
No signs of runoff, ponding, or drift?
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized? l U.- q-or
Is the application equipment present, operational, and in good condition?
No limiting slopes present in irrigation fields?
Is site access restricted and/or signs posted in accordance with permit?,2 flL&J.
No water supply wells within the CB?
No water supply wells within 250' of the CB?
Is permit being followed?
Groundwater Monitoring Wells MW2
Does the permit require monitoring wells? If so, answer the following.
Are the monitoring wells properly installed according to the permit?
Are the monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB & CB?
Are the wells •roperly identified & free of damage?
Ma�(R Y1 U� Gn e 6-�' o f vY�¢X6h i 1 n bus i
cA,
b�c �t/�s Q 01 r, IrQ�Vlo� l 11meaY
e(m0- bags how3thr0 w \ `"
(,\(\\,(\ 441\ 0,3
k/ ill Kw 5 v-1_ re poi -RAJ t,v04/ 0271-(x• usa5
Page 4 of 4
Y N
❑ — ❑ ❑
R
❑ ❑
N
g
NA
El
El
El
NA
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑4
NE
N NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
rrQkAres &h e
oS il�( -Flow 0 P OLOY1Mthip
FOr Orl

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY20-SL024559
"" 4,
, Predictive
", x
1 Soil Report Mehl lch-3 Extraction
-"x "" �'t Links to Helpful Information
Client:
Client ID:
Jeff Wyatt
GeoSci- Peter Devries
2050 Northpoint Drive
Winston Salem, NC 27106
Sampled County : Randolph
428982
Advisor:
Advisor ID:
Sampled: 12/26/2019 Received: 01/17/2020 Completed: 02/15/2020 Farm: Trinity
Sample ID: Z-1
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.7 0 0
2- Hardwood, E 0.0 0 0
K2O
50
50
Mg S Mn Zn
0 0
0 0
Cu B
$ 0
$ 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.46 1.27 5.2 37 3.3 4.4 135 32 25 10
S-I
55
Mn-I
112
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
31 31
Cu-I Na ESP
25 0.2 4
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-2
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.8 0 0
2- Hardwood, E 0.0 0 0
K2O
60
60
Mg S Mn Zn
0 0
0 0
Cu B
$ 0
$ 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.41 1.26 5.4 35 3.5 4.3 144 30 23 9
S-I
51
Mn-I
107
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
29 29
Cu-I Na ESP
23 0.2 4
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-3
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 - Hardwood, E 0.7 0 60
2- Hardwood, E 0.0 0 60
K2O
70
70
Mg S Mn Zn
0 0
0 0
Cu B
0 0
0 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.36 1.12 4.9 57 2.1 5.0 11 22 34 21
S-I
39
Mn-I
344
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
38 38
Cu-I Na ESP
32 0.2 4
SS -I NO3-N
North Carolina
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler. Commissioner of Agriculture
Tdbaccu Trust Putrid Coe misskzn

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY20-SL024559
Jeff Wyatt
Page 2 of 3
Sample ID: Z-4
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.1 0 60
2 - Hardwood, E 0.0 0 60
K2O
60
60
Mg S
0
0
Mn Zn
$
$
Cu B
$ 0
$ 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.36 1.20 3.9 38 2.4 4.6 8 29 20 14
S-I
37
Mn-I
213
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
11 11
Cu-I Na ESP
12 0.1 3
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-5
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.0 0 60
2 - Hardwood, E 0.0 0 60
K2O
70
70
Mg S
0
0
Mn Zn
$
$
Cu B
0 0
0 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.46 1.20 3.9 41 2.3 4.6 8 20 23 15
S-I
39
Mn-I
102
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
6 6
Cu-I Na ESP
27 0.2 5
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-6
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.3 0 20
2 - Hardwood, E 0.0 0 20
K2O
60
60
Mg S
25
$
Mn Zn
$
$
Cu B
0 0
0 0
Note: 11 Note: $
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.46 1.16 4.1 36 2.6 4.4 30 24 25 8
S-I
54
Mn-I
193
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
11 11
Cu-I Na ESP
29 0.2 5
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-7
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.5 0 50
2 - Hardwood, E 0.0 0 50
K2O
70
70
Mg S
25
$
Mn Zn
$
$
Cu B
$ 0
$ 0
Note: 11 Note: $
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.36 1.28 3.4 24 2.6 4.1 12 20 14 7
S-I
44
Mn-I
37
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
6 6
Cu-I Na ESP
13 0.1 3
SS -I NO3-N

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY20-SL024559
Jeff Wyatt Page 3 of 3
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Lime
Report Abbreviations
Ac exchangeable acidity
B boron
BS% % CEC occupied by basic cations
Ca% % CEC occupied by calcium
CEC cation exchange capacity
Cu-I copper index
ESP exchangeable sodium percent
HM% percent humic matter
K-I potassium index
K20 potash
Mg% %CEC occupied by magnesium
MIN mineral soil class
Mn manganese
Mn-AI1 Mn availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2 Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I manganese index
M-0 mineral -organic soil class
N nitrogen
Na sodium
NO3-N nitrate nitrogen
ORG organic soil class
pH current soil pH
P-I phosphorus index
P205 phosphate
S-I sulfur index
SS -I soluble salt index
WN weight per volume
Zn-AI zinc availability index
Zn-I zinc index
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at one
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-I and P-I values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS -I levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www•ncaor.pov/agronomi/obpart4.htm1s{ind information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
Test Results
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-AI1, Mn-Al2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinely
indicate levels fertility Visit www•ncapr.pov/apronomi/uyrst.htm
available)] of plant nutrients or other measurement.

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY21-SL022797
"" 4,
, Predictive
", x
1 Soil Report Mehl lch-3 Extraction
-"x "" �'t Links to Helpful Information
Client:
Client ID:
Jeff Wyatt
GeoSci- Peter Devries
2050 Northpoint Drive
Winston Salem, NC 27106
Sampled County : Randolph
428982
Advisor:
Advisor ID:
Sampled: 12/30/2020 Received: 01/07/2021 Completed: 02/17/2021 Farm: Trinity
Sample ID: Z-1
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.1 0 0
2 -Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 0
K2O
70
40
Mg S Mn Zn
0 $
0 $
Cu
0
0
B
0
0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.41 1.26 4.1 40 2.4 4.5 231 20 23 15
S-I
52
Mn-I
39
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
22 22
Cu-I Na
49 0.2
ESP
5
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-2
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.5 0 0
2 -Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 0
K2O
70
40
Mg S Mn Zn
25 $
$ $
Cu B
$ 0
$ 0
Note: 11 Note: $
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.27 1.29 4.2 33 2.8 4.2 116 17 23 8
S-I
67
Mn-I
78
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
25 25
Cu-I Na
24 0.2
ESP
5
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-3
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 - Hardwood, E 0.0 0 20
2 -Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 20
K2O
60
20
Mg S Mn Zn
0 0
0 0
Cu
0
0
B
0
0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.51 1.18 7.9 78 1.7 5.6 28 27 63 13
S-I
41
Mn-I
1533
Soil Class: Mineral
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI
487 487
Cu-I Na
35 0.2
ESP
3
SS -I NO3-N
North Carolina
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler. Commissioner of Agriculture
Tdhaccu Trust Putrid CnnSmisskan

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY21-SL022797
Jeff Wyatt
Page 2 of 3
Sample ID: Z-4
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 0.5 0 30
2 -Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 30
K2O
60
30
Mg S
0
0
Mn Zn
0
0
Cu B
$ 0
$ 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.36 1.24 5.9 66 2.0 5.1 23 25 49 15
S-I
49
Mn-I
503
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
61 61
Cu-I Na ESP
20 0.2 3
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-5
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.0 0 50
2 -Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 50
K2O
70
40
Mg S
0
0
Mn Zn
$
$
Cu B
$ 0
$ 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.51 1.38 4.8 49 2.4 4.7 15 20 35 12
S-I
48
Mn-I
318
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
16 16
Cu-I Na ESP
18 0.1 2
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-6
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 0.9 0 0
2 -Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 0
K2O
70
30
Mg S
0
0
Mn Zn
0
0
Cu B
$ 0
$ 0
Note: 11
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.36 1.38 3.8 45 2.1 4.6 42 21 32 10
S-I
49
Mn-I
478
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-AI
41 41
Cu-I Na ESP
23 0.2 5
SS -I NO3-N
Sample ID: Z-7
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Information
Note: 11
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1 -Hardwood, E 1.4 0 0
2 -Hardwood, M 0.0 80-120 0
K2O
70
40
Mg S
25
$
Mn Zn
$
$
Cu B
0 0
0 0
Note: 11 Note: $
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
0.22 1.28 3.6 28 2.6 4.2 67 17 17 8
S-I
64
Mn-I
42
Soil Class:
Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2
Mineral
Zn-I Zn-Al
19 19
Cu-I Na ESP
29 0.2 6
SS -I NO3-N

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY21-SL022797
Jeff Wyatt Page 3 of 3
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Lime
Report Abbreviations
Ac exchangeable acidity
B boron
BS% % CEC occupied by basic cations
Ca% % CEC occupied by calcium
CEC cation exchange capacity
Cu-I copper index
ESP exchangeable sodium percent
HM% percent humic matter
K-I potassium index
K20 potash
Mg% %CEC occupied by magnesium
MIN mineral soil class
Mn manganese
Mn-AI1 Mn availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2 Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I manganese index
M-0 mineral -organic soil class
N nitrogen
Na sodium
NO3-N nitrate nitrogen
ORG organic soil class
pH current soil pH
P-I phosphorus index
P205 phosphate
S-I sulfur index
SS -I soluble salt index
WN weight per volume
Zn-AI zinc availability index
Zn-I zinc index
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at one
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-I and P-I values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS -I levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www•ncaor.pov/agronomi/obpart4.htm1s{ind information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
Test Results
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-AI1, Mn-Al2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinely
indicate levels fertility Visit www•ncapr.pov/apronomi/uyrst.htm
available)] of plant nutrients or other measurement.

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATOR DESIGNATION FORM (WPCSOCC)
NCAC i5A 8G .0201
Permlt'tee Owner/Officer Name:
Press TAB to enter Information
le fl+i. Drye
Email Address: IN)
Pennittee Signature: f fT
•
Date:
Facility Flame: Trinity American Corporation WF Permit # VVQ0014756
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH CCAS56FlCATION OF SYSTEM: Facility Type: VVVV
Facility Grade: I
ORE - OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE SIBLE CHARGE
Print Full Name:
Certificate Type: Select Certificate Grade: Select
Email Address:
Work Phone:
Certificate 4:
Signature: Effective Date:
"1 certify that I agree to my designation as the Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth in 25A NCAC 08G .0204 and failing to do so con result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
17
z /
Print Full Name: e4eg ffnsc s-c; 1C II/
Certificate ,.___,_: Select 5 Certificate#: Y8-.74 ..3 /
BP CUP ORC
tooj a Co..O 6°o..r�cia..is,..,5,y�. sa-6+a ,
Signature! ivc - Effective Date: "7/7t0
"1 certify that I agree to my designation as o Back-np Operator tn Responsible Charge for the facility noted, I understand and will abide by
the rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the OR4 as set: forth in 154 rWCAC OBG .0204 and failing to do so Can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Cootie! System Operators Certification Commission."
WPCSOCC, 1618 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
Email: [e-mail] Fax: [phone]
Work Phone: ,?5(. yds". 79aV
Certificate Type:
Email Address:
Mail, fax or email
ORIGINAL to:
Mail or Fax a COPY to:
Asheville
2090 US Hwy 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Fax:[phone]
Phone: S284296-4500
Washington
943 Washington Sq. Mall
Washington, NC 27389
Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Fayetteville
275 Green St., Suite 714
Fayettevilte, NC 28301-5043
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Wilmington
127 Cardinal Dr.
Wilmington, NC 23405-2845
Fanc: 910.350-2004
Phone: [phone]
Mooresville
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Fax:[phone]
Phone: [phone]
Winston-Salem
45 W. Hanes Mill Rd.
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Fax: [phone] Phone:
336-776-9800
Raleigh
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Fan: 919-571-4718
Phone: [phone]
Revised5/sofa

,,,NIIIIIIIINI
RESEARCII & ANALYTICAL = "' '_
LABORATORIES, INC.�ot�
f:
Analytical/Process Consultations '•���fDANP�N•`�,
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Water Sample
(A Geoscience & Technology, P.A. Project, collected 25 July 2019)
1. Volatile Organics Quantitation MW-2
EPA Method 8260 Limit
Parameter (me/Ll (mg/I,)
1, I -Dichloroethane 0.001 BQL
2,2-Dichloropropanc 0.001 BQL
Chloroform 0.001 BQL
1, I, I- Trichloroethanc 0.001 BQL
1, I-Dichloropropenc 0.001 BQL
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.001 BQL
Benzene 0.001 BQL
1,2-Dichloroethene 0.001 BQL
Trichloroethene 0.001 BQL
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.001 BQL
Dibromomethane 0.001 BQL
Toluene 0.001 BQL
1,1,2- Trichloroethanc 0.001 BQL
1,3-Dichloropropanc 0.001 BQL
Tetrachloroethene 0.001 BQL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethanc 0.001 BQL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethanc 0.001 BQL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.001 BQL
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.001 SQL
Bromobenzene 0.001 BQL
Ethylbenzenc 0.001 BQL
Styrene 0.001 BQL
Bromoform 0.001 BQL
p-Isopropyltoluenc 0.001 BQL
N-Butylbenzene 0.001 BQL
Naphthalene 0.001 BQL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenc 0.001 BQL
1,2,4.Trimethylbenzene 0.001 BQL
I,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.001 SQL
I,2,3-Trichlorobenzenc 0.001 SQL
Chlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
2-Chlorotoluene 0.001 BQL
4-Chlorotoluene 0.001 BQL
Tert-Butylbenzene 0.001 BQL
Scc-Butylbenzene 0.001 BQL
I,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
I,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
I-Propylbenzene 0.001 SQL
N-Propylbenzene 0.001 BQL
1.3-Dichlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
Dibromochloromethane 0.001 BQL
Dichlorodilluoromethane 0.001 BQL
Chloromethane 0.001 BQL
Vinyl Chloride 0.001 BQL
Bromomethane 0.001 BQL
Chloroethane 0.001 BQL
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.001 BQL
I,1-Dichloroethene 0.001 BQL
Methylene Chloride 0.001 BQL
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethenc 0.001 BQL
Cis-I,2-Dichloroethene 0.001 BQL
Bromodichloromethane 0.001 BQL
Bromochloromethane 0.001 BQL
C is- 1,3-Dich loropropene 0.001 BQL
Trans-I,3-Dichloropropene 0.001 BQL
Total Xylenes 0.001 BQL
Dilution Factor 1
Sample Number 69916-01
Sample Date 07/25/19
Sample Time (hrs) 1515
Date Analyzed 07/31/19
Time Analyzed 0016
Surrogate Recovery Range
Fluorobenzene (70-130%) 95%
BFB (70-130%) 88%
BFB (70-I30%) 108%
mg/L - milligrams per Liter = pans per million (ppm) BQI. - Below Quantitation I.imils

1
RESEARCII & ANALyTICA[
LABORATORIES, INC.
For: Geoscience & Technology
2050 Northpoint Drive, Suite A
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Attn: R. J. Wyatt
Report of Analysis
8/9/2019
� NC ##34 %;
17. NC#37701 :
,ter, `49 o oti, `��
no
Client Sample ID: MW-2
Site: Geoscience & Technology
Parameter
Method
Lab Sample ID: 69916-01
Collection Date: 7/25/2019 15:15
Result Units Rep Limit Analyst Analysis Date/Time
Ammonia Nitrogen
Chloride
Dissolved Solids
Fec Coli-MF
Nitrate Nitrogen
Total Kjedjahl Nitrogen
Total Phosphorous
SM 4500 NH3 D-1997
SM 4500 CI B-1997
SM 2540 C-1997
SM 9222 D-1997
(SM 4500 NO3 E-2000)-(SM
4500 NO2 B-2000)
Hach 10242
SM 4500 P E-1999
<0.1 mg/L
15.2 mg/L
229 mg/L
48 col/100 ml 1
<0.05 mg/L
<1
mg/L
0.501 mg/L
0.1 FK 8/2/2019
1 EE 7/26/2019
25 AW 7/30/2019
BJ 7/25/2019 1645
0.05 DW 7/26/2019 1020
1
FK 7/31/2019
0.05 BJ 8/2/2019
Client Sample ID: WWTP Effluent
Site:
Geoscience & Technology
Lab Sample ID: 69916-02
Collection Date: 7/25/2019 14:50
Parameter
Method
Result Units Rep Limit Analyst Analysis Date/Time
Ammonia Nitrogen
B O D-5
Fecal Coliform QT
Nitrite Nitrogen
Total Kjedjahl Nitrogen
Total Phosphorous
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
SM 4500 NH3 D-1997
SM 5210 B-2001
Colilert 18
SM 4500 NO2 B-2000
Hach 10242
SM 4500 P E-1999
SM 2540 D-1997
66.4 mg/L 0.1
8.81 mg/L
>2420 MPN/100m1 1
1.08 mg/L
71.2 mg/L
16.0 mg/L
<5 mg/L
FK 8/9/2019
2 HW 7/26/2019 1200
BJ 7/25/2019 1636
0.01 DW 7/26/2019 1020
1 FK 8/9/2019
0.05 BJ 8/2/2019
5 AW 7/29/2019
P.O. Box 473 106 Short Street Kernersville, North Carolina 27284 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.randalabs.com Page 1

RESEARCH & ANAEyTICA[
LABORATORIES, INC.
Analytical / Process Consultations
Phone [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
COMJOB
/PANY _lite 4p
NO.
NO. OF CONTAINERS
5 v
`Q .Z-
v� OPT
'Z - ,
T• \y O
co C9 Q�
F
ry �a ry�o �,o ^v
tea• �" ,?
��x�`._O y1p•2'
k "
cp J 1 O` `a =a
'Z'"y`o•A.2 ,Z-`°0�1ei..
1 h .. <, 2 G�
O p• co 00 ti Ali-
4O Q, C9` C` C�` o
Q Q Q Q C
^ by ,�v ��
STREET ADDRESS
�� �� 11�� A' _ ')
DCV IV,.i.fLlti- Pi/ �l
PROJECT
CITY, STATE, ZIP
L •.S . /L/c_ 2716h�
SAMPLE/R%NAM_E (PLEASE PRINT)
/\ . (- AiK4ri
CON CT
TT7� PHONE /�
/am. lid Y4 I l ! 3 (;J V v (s 6 / C l :
/
SAMPLERSI ATURE
( Pi ,, e,
SAMPLE NUMBER
(LAB USE ONLY)
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
TEMP P
CIRES
CIIL°Rt7E
r a NIo
SABRE
( A«R
SAMPLLOCATION I I.D.
REQUESTED ANALYSIS
ICi IL-0 01
7Z5-lti
t5(
..-
vJ
AN. w - Z,
S
3O2..( •4AAM. NiTRoU I
cl-'LvPb& 7DS f&A/
C01-/k1,14 N(TA4Tc
&r/10G6v ix/A( or4(-
V
1--?
)45o
/
L)
InIWTi9 ELct-VE FF
9
AMrtil. N/71Z0� vv /30O5
T-Et41-- rots o./i`'`
Ni-P,/rc N/T/ 6e-Al lkAl
T b L Pii-oQy.og,MA 1 SS
REL
ISHED BY
D TEITIME
iIME
RECEIVED BY
REMARKS:
U1\-k-
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE AT RECEIPT 3 • l °C
R
OISH "D BY
D
RECEIVED BY

RESEARCII & ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES, INC.
For: Geoscience & Technology
2050 Northpoint Drive, Suite A
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Attn: R. J. Wyatt
Report of Analysis
8/27/2019
40`G�& y1/�,'�i
a:co NC#34 2r •
S NC#37701 i if
0
r,.DN,',1/Siii
Client Sample ID: Trinity Foam Effluent
Site: Geoscience & Technology
Lab Sample ID: 71053-01
Collection Date: 8/21/2019 12:00
Parameter Method
Result Units Rep Limit Analyst Analysis Date/Time
Chloride
Dissolved Solids
Nitrate + Nitrite
Nitrate Nitrogen
Total Kjedjahl Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
SM 4500 CI B-1997
SM 2540 C-1997
SM 4500 NO3 E-2000
(SM 4500 NO3 E-2000)-(SM
4500 NO2 B-2000)
Hach 10242
Calc
94.1 mg/L
568 mg/L
49.6 mg/L
49.4 mg/L
66.2 mg/L
116 mg/L
1 EE 8/22/2019
25 AW 8/23/2019
0.05 DW 8/22/2019 1110
0.05 DW 8/23/2019 1110
1
1
FK 8/26/2019
P.O. Box 473 106 Short Street Kernersville, North Carolina 27284 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
rai coa basic vid
NA = not analyzed
www.randalabs.com Page 1

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
ett
�./ U]
•
O
▪ U°
C _
▪ 111 Uc,
u,
0 �nom � a N
O 0 as
a)
co) etr eS
a
LA —IC
A
D
C L
Qa
cn
Frn
Z
Q
cn
LI
w
1C401-6/Z).DE lac
AIITJITt A/�i7v Fig
..r�
Q
0
REMARKS:
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE AT RECEIPT 3 , l °C
re\CCC
W
F-
a (,e4/
wt, Sop °/oJJ
y(ssN( a .
a Oaele/s b /
srsy-,o) • pa /
wy(e Si
(°/(as°0. +19/.aa tit d >t
saJ0)
�`/2SS1o4adJd>1
> oU d>/
(;/,s, OU /�Lps2
d,,, 9.4, S/6,k'ps,
to
b4'8J 6 e
>e
.
M
JOB NO. gria / 6
SA PLEN/ / PRINT).604 ©si r
i ...),_r- l� v4T,
SAMPLERS ATJRE
sung e
MATRIX SAMPL.p LOCATION 1 I.D.
RECEIVED BY
RECEIVED BY
COMPANY
0
`N
-.�
Vlt
'
N
W ,,-
7 .
�)
o
u
J°
z 1
t
E\
DATE/TIME
C
1----
t........
DATE
p ;;
ca
Ei �'
n
N1
W
SAMPLE NUMBER
(LAB USE ONLY)
6
c
C-
ccTcc

RESEARCH & ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES, INC.
For: Geoscience & Technology
2050 Northpoint Drive, Suite A
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Attn: R. J. Wyatt
Report of Analysis
8/3/2020
wool mit.
•••' ''••
4.04%04
▪ :o
op NC #34 zz
• t NC #37701 •* :i4i.„.414-71E.:.DEPT:AillAstiV.x.0• :Is
Client Sample ID:
Site:
MW-2
Geoscience & Technology
Parameter
Method
Lab Sample ID: 85070-01
Collection Date: 7/22/2020 11:25
Result Units Rep Limit Analyst Analysis Date/Time
Ammonia Nitrogen
Chloride
Dissolved Solids
Fec Coli-MF
Nitrate Nitrogen
pH
Total Phosphorous
SM 4500 NH3 D-2011
SM 4500 CI B-2011
SM 2540 C-2011
SM 9222 D-2006
(SM 4500 NO3 E-2011)-(SM
4500 NO2 B-2011)
SM 4500 H+B-2011
SM 4500 P E-2011
<0.1 mg/L
14.4 mg/L
201 mg/L
3 co1/100 ml 1
0.066 mg/L
6.70 Std. Units
0.072 mg/L
0.1 FK 7/27/2020
1 EE 7/24/2020
25 AW 7/23/2020
BJ 7/22/2020 1606
0.05 DW 7/23/2020 1040
AB 7/22/2020 1654
0.05 BJ 7/30/2020
P.O. Box 473 106 Short Street Kernersville, North Carolina 27284 Tel: [phone] Fax [phone]
NA = not analyzed
www.randalabs.com Page 1

r! RESEARCII & ANnlyrical
LAbORATORIES, INC.
For: Geoscience & Technology
2050 Northpoint Drive, Suite A
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Attn: R. J. Wyatt
Report of Analysis
8/3/2020
Client Sample ID: Effluent
Site: Geoscience & Technology
Lab Sample ID: 85070-03
Collection Date: 7/22/2020 11:50
Parameter Method
Result Units Rep Limit Analyst Analysis Date/Time
Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 D-2011
BOD-5 SM 5210 B-2011
Chloride SM 4500 CI B-2011
Dissolved Solids SM 2540 C-2011
Fecal Coliform QT Colilert 18
Nitrate + Nitrite SM 4500 NO3 E-2011
Nitrate Nitrogen Hach 10206
pH SM 4500 H+B-2011
Total Kjedjahl Nitrogen Hach 10242
Total Nitrogen Calc
Total Phosphorous SM 4500 P E-2011
Total Suspended Solids SM 2450 D-2011
42.6 mg/L
5.85 mg/L
0.1 FK 7/27/2020
2
83.3 mg/L 1
441 mg/L 25
>2420 MPN/100m1 1
10.1 mg/L 0.05
9.53 mg/L 0.05
7.33 Std. Units
56.4 mg/L 1
66.5 mg/L 1
7.61 mg/L 0.05
<5 mg/L 5
HW 7/23/2020 1600
EE 7/24/2020
AW 7/23/2020
BJ 7/22/2020 1620
DW 7/23/2020 1040
DW 7/23/2020 1040
AB 7/22/2020 1655
FK 7/24/2020
BJ 7/30/2020
AW 7/22/2020
P.O. Box 473 106 Short Street Kernersville, North Carolina 27284 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
NA = not analyzed
www.randalabs.com Page 1

RESEARCH & ANALyTICAL
LABORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
Chemical Analysis for Selected Parameters and Water Samples Identified as Trinity Foam OSWWT
(A Geoscience & Technology, P.A. Project #98-166, collected 22 July 2020)
I. Volatile Organics Quantitation MW-2
SM 6200B Limit
(8021 Compound List)
Parameter ltneiLl (Rtpal
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.001 BQL
2,2-Dichloropropane 0.001 BQL
Chloroform 0.001 BQL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.001 BQL
1,1-Dichloropropene 0.001 BQL
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.001 BQL
Benzene 0.001 BQL
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.001 BQL
Trichloroethene 0.001 BQL
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.001 BQL
Dibromomethane 0.001 BQL
Toluene 0.001 BQL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.001 BQL
1,3-Dichloropropane 0.001 BQL
Tetrachloroethene 0.001 BQL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachlorocthane 0.001 BQL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethanc 0.001 BQL
1,2,3-Trichloropropanc 0.001 BQL
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.001 BQL
Bromobenzene 0.001 BQL
Ethylbenzene 0.001 BQL
Styrene 0.001 BQL
Bromoform 0.001 BQL
p-Isopropyltoluene 0.001 BQL
N-Butylbenzcne 0.001 BQL
Naphthalene 0.001 BQL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.001 BQL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.001 BQL
1,2,4-Trichlorobcnzene 0.001 BQL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
Chlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
2-Chlorotoluene 0.001 BQL
4-Chlorotoluene 0.001 BQL
Tert-Butylbenzene 0.001 BQL
Sec-Butylbenzene 0.001 BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
1-Propylbenzene 0.001 BQL
N-Propylbenzene 0.001 BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.001 BQL
Dibromochloromethane 0.001 BQL
Dichlorodifluoromethanc 0.001 BQL
Chloromethanc 0.001 BQL
Vinyl Chloride 0.001 BQL
Bromomethane 0.001 BQL
Chloroethanc 0.001 BQL
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.001 BQL
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.001 BQL
Methylene Chloride 0.001 BQL
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.001 BQL
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.001 BQL
Bromodichloromethane 0.001 BQL
Bromochloromethane 0.001 BQL
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropcne 0.001 BQL
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.001 BQL
Total Xylenes 0.001 BQL
Dilution Factor 1
Sample Number 85070-01
Sample Date 07/22/20
Sample Time (hrs) 1125
Date Analyzed 07/29/20
Time Analyzed 1444
Surrogate Recovery Range
Fluorobenzene (70-130%) 92%
BFB (70-130%) 99%
BFB (70-130%) 98%
mg/L = milligrams per Liter = parts per million (ppm)
BQL Below Quantitation Limits

RESEARCI I & ANALyTICA[
LAbORATORIES, INC.
Analytical / Process Consultations
Phone [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
WATER 1 WASTEWATER MISC.
COMP NY
( o c/EPVCE 4 lectiAmiz6Y
JOB NO
?e./(647
NO. OF CONTAINERS
,�pe o�
c
` �� y sT_ .., p
Q�G0' ,c`6- � cZa
v k '"
c1
\ hJ�4u oi-J
N"co, .- ypo 1G...0���CONTACT
OOp, p�J�`BOp
STREETADDRESS
7j-lET/0DSS/��ilr "�
PROECT
72A/71�G.I kJ
CITY,, STATE, ZIP
/VC- Vito()J.
SAM ER NAME (PLEASE PRINT)
boy,/
PiONE
SAMP
IGNATURE
�� Q� Q Q Q ��
b" ti ryh� ry2o ^v ^v ^v yam REQUESTED ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NUMBER
(LAB USE ONLY)
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRAB
TEMP
°C
nes
CI
1rn L)
CHLORINE
REMOVED
(YorII)
Mg
Mnr
(Sor
SAMPLE LOCATION 1 I.D.
g6070-6'1
1VJDilz5
w
Al w- 2
C/4LOPU f- coin
/4) i 4L 4414(i44 A J jAte..&
roiAL ViiitAfe N,Tttaff
pH MIA - Pis PN UM
i s 43011
-- p� ,,
I15ro
/
e.F.0.)Et.ir
pot 5 cAcoke L
f ELAL OD 01012A4
kV - 44%044 AhlltD6fiti
7Ta L gLA4L A/i TRAx)
TKAL 1J11121tit MTRt EA
ioTAL- Ai Zo(,EA)
if
p14 pio toios
,\/.
TDS 135
r
R
7UISI1EDBY
17
DATER'
ME
RECEIV D Y
r(
7
REMARKS:
SAMPLE TEMPERATURE AT RECEIPTQ-° % °C
INQUI HE.:Y
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED BY v\1

tl
RESEARCH & ANA1yTICAL
LABORATORIES, INC.
Analytical/Process Consultations
CASE NARRATIVE
Two (2) water samples were received in good condition on 22 July 2020. The
samples were analyzed without difficulties unless noted below.
Ail /i g.7
of/U,4 120
Sidney L. Champion Date
Director of Laboratory Services
P.O. Box 473 • 106 Short Street • Kernersville, North Carolina 27284 • 336-996-2841 • Fax [phone]
www.randalabs.com

QA/QC Summary
METHOD: 8260/6200B(5/10/20/50/500/1000 PPB QC) I
FILE NAME: WLC0729
CLIENT: GEOSCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (PROJECT: TRINITY OSWWT )
Sample ID:
85070-01
INSTUMENT: MS-2
Page 1 of 2
Extraction Method
N/A
Date Extracted
N/A
Weight Extracted
25ML
Final Extract Volume
25ML
_
Date Analyzed
07/29/20
% Surrogate Recovery
92
95
97
Acceptance Range
(70-130)
(70-130)
(70-130)
LCS
Acceptance
Range
MS
MSD
RPD
QC LIMITS
RPD
% REC
% Rec.
% Rec.
MDL
Method
LCS %
Compound
ug/L
Blank
Recovery
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
0.12
ND
72
70-130
CHLOROMETHANE
0.07
ND
73
70-130
VINYL CHLORIDE
0.11
ND
84
70-130
BROMOMETHANE
0.18
ND
71
70-130
CHLOROETHANE
0.11
ND
84
70-130
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
0.09
ND
96
70-130
ACETONE
1.18
ND
76
70-130
ACRYLONITRILE
12.38
ND
81
70-130
2-BUTANONE
0.88
ND
81
70-130
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
0.09
ND
90
70-130
71
70
1
14
70-130
METHYL IODIDE
0.19
ND
93
70-130
CARBON DISULFIDE
0.45
ND
110
70-130
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
0.57
ND
100
70-130
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
0.10
ND
93
70-130
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
0.17
ND
86
70-130
ISOPROPYL ETHER(IPE)
0.12
ND
116
70-130
METHYL-TERT-BUTYL ETHER(MTBE)
0.16
ND
108
70-130
VINYL ACETATE
0.24
ND
104
70-130
CIS- 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
0.09
ND
91
70-130
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
0.09
ND
105
70-130
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
0.12
ND
89
70-130
CHLOROFORM
0.05
ND
94
70-130
1,1,1-TRICI-iLOROETHANE
0.12
ND
96
70-130
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
0.10
ND
97
70-130
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
0.12
ND
92
70-130
BENZENE
0.05
ND
83
70-130
77
77
1
11
70-130
ETHYL ACETATE
0.35
ND
81
70-130
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
0.09
ND
88
70-130
TRICHLOROETHENE(TCE)
0.12
ND
103
70-130
82
87
5
14
70-130
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
0.10
ND
89
70-130
DIBROMOETHANE
0.25
ND
90
70-130
COMMENTS:

QA/QC Summary
Method: 8260/6200B(5/10/20/50/500/1000 PPB OC' IFILE NAME: WLC0729 I
Page 2 of 2
CLIENT: GEOSCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (PROJECT: TRINITY OSWWT )
SAMPLE ID:
85070-01
LCS
Acceptr
ange
MS
MSD
RPD
QC LIMITS
Compound
MDL
Method
LCS %
RPD
% REC
ug/L
Blank
Recovery
% Rec.
% Rec.
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
0.07
ND
96
70-130
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
1.01
ND
91
70-130
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
0.10
ND
93
70-130
TOLUENE
0.26
ND
93
70-130
78
83
7
13
70-130
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
0.12
ND
97
70-130
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
0.20
ND
89
70-130
TETRACHLOROETHENE(PCE)
0.17
ND
111
70-130
2-HEXANONE
1.42
ND
88
70-130
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
0.07
ND
96
70-130
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
0.13
ND
125
70-130
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE(EDB)
0.15
ND
98
70-130
CHLOROBENZENE
0.10
ND
105
70-130
90
93
4
13
70-130
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
0.10
ND
105
70-130
ETHYLBENZENE
0.07
ND
102
70-130
TOTAL XYLENES(M&P, 0)
0.29
ND
106
70-130
STYRENE
0.04
ND
106
70-130
BROMOFORM
0.29
ND
109
70-130
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
0.08
ND
111
70-130
BROMOBENZENE
0.07
ND
97
70-130
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
0.11
ND
98
70-130
TRANS-1,4-DICHLORO-2-BUTENE
0.52
ND
120
70-130
N-PROPYLBENZENE
0.08
ND
104
70-130
2-CHLOROTOLUENE
0.10
ND
106
70-130
4-CHLOROTOLUENE
0.09
ND
101
70-130
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
0.07
ND
_
111
70-130
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
0.08
ND
112
70-130
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
0.07
ND
115
70-130
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE
0.12
ND
116
70-130
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
0.12
ND
110
70-130
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
0.08
ND
75
70-130
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE
0.09
ND
116
70-130
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
0.08
ND
98
70-130
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
0.09
ND
100
70-130
N-BUTYLBENZENE
0.10
ND
112
70-130
I,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE(DPCP)
0.49
ND
85
70-130
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
0.47
ND
122
70-130
NAPHTHALENE
0.18
ND
103
70-130
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
0.18
ND
121
70-130
COMMENTS: