NC0088366_Wetland Impact_20070726

1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolijiti'27610
e-mail: rgoldstein( RJGAcarolina.com
26 July 2007
Robert J. Goldstein and Associates, Inc.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
.Since / 985
Mr. Ronnie Smith
US -ACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Ct NR-F
/ Li 10 2007
DWQ
Re: PCN for Harnett County South -Central Sewerline & WWTP
Dear Mr. Smith,
Tel: [phone] or (80(1) 41)7-088)I
Fax: [phone]
websilc: www.R.IGAcarolin:rcum
0 7_ 1 3'.3
Attached is a Section 404-401 PCN and supporting documents for stream and wetland
impacts that will result from construction of Harnett County's proposed gravity sewerline, pump
station, force main, and Little River wastewater treatment plant in south-central Harnett County
near Spring Lake, NC. A NEPA EA for this project was reviewed by USDA and DENR and
issued a FONSI, which should adequately address DWQ's concerns regarding secondary and
cumulative impacts of the project. This PCN application package includes the following items:
1) PCN application form (11 pages)
2) Agent authorization letter from Harnett County (1 page)
3) NC-EEP In -Lieu Fee Acceptance Form (1 page)
4) EA-FONSI sign -off letters (3 pages)
5) ACOE and DWQ stream assessment forms (3 pages)
6) ACOE Wetland Data Forms (8 pages)
7) Figures 1 - 6h (23 pages)
8) JD Form (8 pages)
Please contact me if you have any questions about the jurisdictional delineations, or contact .
engineers Hiram Marziano and Charlie McGougan at 336-629-3932 if you have questions about
construction or design issues.
Sincerely,
eledli/B/e
Gerald Pottem
[e-mail]
cc: , s. Cynd=i Ra%oly;
aiicop7;es= (1 Attrg AC04 JD Form, plus $200. application fee check).
El©EIWIEB
AUG 1 -,2007
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMIER BRANCH
NEPA & SEPA Environmental Documents: EA, EIS. CE • Jurisdictional Wetland & Stream Buffer Delineations • 404 - 40/ Permits • GIs/zips mapping • II nlrr
Quality Studies • Stream & Wetland Mitigation and Restoration • Endangered Species Surreys • Biological Assessments & Conservation flans • Water ter Inrul,(S r1•
Reservoirs • .Water Lines & Treatment Plants • Sewerlines & Wastewater Treatment • /nstreanr /•inw Analyses • Wei -basin Trans/i'r Certificates • IPnmr,ltrrl
Assessment & Management •Archaeological Surveys and Testing • Phase 1 Site Assessments • /'arks d'• Green ways /'/nn i ) ' • ('W,1471' Grain Applicatrum

II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Harnett County Public Utilities
Mailing Address: Rodney Tart, Director
308 West Duncan Street {or: PO Box 1119}
Lillington NC 27546
Office Use Only:
Form Version No% ember n;
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project. please enter "Not Applicable" or "N-A".)
I. Processing
0 7- 1 3 1 3
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
❑ Section 10 Permit Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
• 401 Water Quality Certification l 1 Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit (s) Requested: NWP-12 (sewerline and effluent
discharge pipe) and NWP-39 (pump station and wastewater treatment plant sites)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: n .
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section \`III.
and check here: ® (EEP Request Form copy attached; response pending)
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
AU G 1 - .2007
pENR - WARAY H
WETLANDS AND ST
Telephone Number: 910-893-7575 Fax Number: 910-893-6643
E-mail Address: rtartP,harnett.org
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name, Company: engineer: Charlie McGougan, P.E. Marziano & Minier, PA
Mailing Address: 147-A Dublin Square Rd., Asheboro, NC 27203
E-mail /Tel/Fax/: cmcgouganO,,marziano-mcgougan.com /336-629-393 I /629-3932
Name, Company:
Mailing Address:
E-mail /Tel/Fax/:
Updated 11/1/2005
wetland consult: Gerald Pottern, Robert J Goldstein & Assoc
1221 Corporation Pkwy suite 100, Raleigh NC 27610
gpotternP,rjgacarolina.com /919-872-1 174 /872-9214
South Central Harnett C'o. Sewer & \b'WTI'
Page 5 of 15

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map. and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at -the applicant's discretion.
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 1 7-inch format:
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans arc
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: South Central Harnett County 24" Interceptor, Punip Station & WWTP
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): WWTP prop # 0524-91-2707.000
4. Location
County: Harnett Nearest Town: Spring Lake (Cumberland Co)
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The 24" gravity sewer
will extend from Rainey Drive (SR 1147) east of Lake McKay southeastward 2.3 miles along
an unnamed stream, crossing Rambeaut Road (SR 1124) and NC 210, ending at the pump
station site on Shady Grove Rd (SR 2050) 0.8 mile - east of NC-210, near the
Harnett/Cumberland county line. The force main will extend from the pump station site 2.4'
miles eastward along the south edge of SR 2050 to the Little River WWTP site. 1.he NL
corner of the WWTP site is 0.2 mile west of Shady Grove Rd (SR 2050) and Elliott Bridle
Rd (SR 2045) intersection. 'The 52 acre WWTP property is 960 feet wide along Shady Grove
Rd, and extends southward 2,600 feet to the north bank of Little River where the effluent will
discharge.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits min): wwtp = 35.2330 °N, 78.8849 °W; see also attached list.
6. Property size (acres): WWTP prop = 52 acres; PS prop = 1 acre, Gravity sewer I 1.960
feet, Force main = 12,600 feet.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: (Lower) Little River.
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River, DWQ sub -basin 03-06-14 (Lower Little River)
Updated I I/I/2005
Page 6 of 1
South ('entral Harnett Co. Se er b \\ \V 11'

(Note — this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:/!h2o.enr.statc.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The proposed WWTP property is predominantly loblolly
pine plantation with pines mostly 6 to 11 inches dbh, and an understory of red maple,
sweetgum, black gum, sourwood, water oak, inkberry, sweet pepperbush, blueberries, and
other shrubs and trees typical of cutover mesic flatwoods. The southernmost portion adjacent
to Little River and other areas along property edges contain natural mixed hardwood and pine
forest with canopy trees 12 to 20 inches dbh. A petroleum pipeline lies along the eastern
property boundary and traverses the southern part of the property 500 feet north of the river.
Adjacent properties are forested, agricultural, and residential. The pump station property
contains fallow field and mixed pine/hardwood forest. The gravity sewer and force main
corridors traverse a mix of forested, cutover, agricultural, roadside, and residential lands.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The 24-
inch diameter gravity sewerline will be installed by open trenching in a 40-foot wide
construction corridor (total corridor area = 11.0 acres), which will be cleared using timber
harvesting equipment and bulldozer. Seven proposed stream crossings range from 10 to 35
feet wide. Erosion will be minimized at stream crossings using portable dams and pumping
to de -water a short segment of stream bed for a few hours during trenching and pipe laying.
Directional boring at stream crossings is not be feasible due to the precise pipe gradient
required. The gravity sewer corridor will also cross eight wetland areas totalling 0.2395 acre
(temporary and permanent wetland impacts combined). The pipe will be installed and stream
banks and wetlands restored in accordance with applicable NWP-12 and GWQC-3374
conditions regarding riparian buffer protection, crossing angle, pipe joint locations, herbicide
and fertilizer use, rip -rap placement, erosion control, stabilization and seeding, anti -seep
collars, and other US -ACE and NC-DENR requirements. The pump station and its access
road will require clearing 1.0 acre, mostly forested, including 0.1740 acre of wetland. The
24-inch ductile iron wastewater force main will be installed alongside SR 2050, requiring
minor new land clearing and no stream or wetland impacts. The WWTP facilities, access
road, and effluent outfall will requiring clearing 17.5 acres (mostly pine plantation) on the
southern half of the 52 acre WWTP property. Beginning at the northwest property corner on
SR 2050, the 18-foot wide WWTP access road will extend 1,400 feet southward just inside
the western property line. The 24-inch force main and a 4-inch diameter potable water main
will parallel this road. The WWTP buildings and treatment facilities will occwpy 14.0 acres
north of the east -west gasline. This area includes a man-made ditch wetland 6 feet by 800
feet (.1102 acre) that will be filled. The effluent outfall will cross the gasline, extend 200
feet southward to a cascade aerator, then another 400 feet southward to the discharge point
on the north bank of Little River. There is no stream or wetland crossing in the 40-foot wide
effluent outfall corridor. The discharge pipe will be flush with the river bank, disturbing not
more than 0.0092 acre of river channel below ordinary high water. The river bank will be
stabilized with rock and native vegetation in accordance with NWP 12 and GWQC 3374
conditions. Construction equipment to be used will include bulldozer, rubber tired excavator,
and pipe -laying equipment.
Updated 11/1/2005 South Central Harnett C'o. tie\ er 8 \\'\\'I 1'
Page 7 of 15

11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: South-central Harnett County's population has
grown substantially during the past decade and this trend is expected to continue, due largely
to the importance of Fort Bragg as a major military training and staging facility. Past
development has relied mainly on septic systems, which are becoming less feasible as the
region becomes more urbanized. To prevent water quality and health problems associated
with septic system failures, Harriett County plans to make central wastewater collection and
treatment available to serve existing and new development as soon as possible. This will also
accommodate more densely clustered development that will provide more efficient use of the
land and require less land clearing and less impervious surface per capita. (The proposed
collection system serving the Jumping Run and Twin Lakes areas west of Rainey Drive will
be designed and permitted separately). -
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits.
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No previous 404/401 permits requested for this or related project:
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The proposed collection system serving the Jumping Run and Twin Lakes areas west of Rainey
Drive will be designed and permitted separately. Construction of the WWTP and pump station
needs to begin as soon as possible, as they are more complex and time-consuming to build than
the upstream collection system.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed. separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts.
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should 'be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Updated I I/1/2005 South Central I larnett Co. Sewer \k'\\`II'
Page 8 of 15

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The gravity sewerlinc will cross
portions of wetlands MA, GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P totalling 0.2395 wetland acre. A 40 foot
wide construction corridor will be cleared O and the 24" interceptor pipe installed by
trenching. The trench will be backfilled with stockpiled native soil, pre -construction
contours restored, and the corridor stabilized with appropriate native and/or annual
groundcover. The permanent sewer easement will be 20 feet wide, but the permanent mowed
access corridor in segments crossing wetlands will be limited to 10 feet wide. The only
permanent impact to these wetlands will be conversion of 0.0740 acre from forest/scrub
vegetation to an herb/low scrub community in the 10-foot wide maintenance corridor.
Wetland GP on the pump station site (0.1740 acre) and 800 feet of wetland DC (Ditch C) on
the WWTP site (0.1102 acre) will be permanently filled and graded. Acreages of each
wetland impact type are listed below. Stream crossings 1 through 7, ranging from 10 to 35
feet wide, will also be installed by trenching. Directional boring is not be feasible due to the
precise pipe gradient required. Erosion will be minimized at stream crossings using portable
dams and pumping to de -water a short segment of stream bed for a few hours during
trenching and pipe laying. The two streams crossing Shady Grove Road are piped where they
cross the force main corridor; the force main will be installed under or over these pipes
without impacting these streams. Effluent outfall construction on the north bank of Little
River will disturb not more than 40 x 10 feet (0.0092 acre) of river channel below ordinary
high water. The river bank will be stabilized with rock and native vegetation in accordance
with NWP 12 and GWQC 3374 conditions.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland
Impact
Site Number
(indicate on
map)
Type of Impact
Type of Wetland
(e.g.,•forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Located
within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no)
Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet)
Area of Impact
(acres)
Temp
Perm
MA, fig 6a
30' temp clear, perm mow 10'
forest/shrub - contig
yes
90 ft
0.0034
0.0000
GA, fig 6b
30' temp clear, perm mow 10'
forest/shrub contig
yes
75 ft
0.0046
0.0023
U, fig 6c
30' temp clear, perm mow 10'
forest/shrub - contig
yes
60 ft
0.0137
0.0069
T, fig 6d
30' temp clear, perm mow 10'
forest/shrub - contig
yes
35 ft
0.0490
0.0256
S, fig 6d
30' temp clear, perm mow 10'
forest/slu-ub - contig
yes
50 ft
0.0622
0.0273
R, fig 6e
30' temp clear, perm mow 10'
forest/shrub - contig
yes
50 ft
0.0072
0.0014
Q, fig 6f
30' temp clear, perm mow 10'
forest/slu-ub - contig
yes
>100 ft
0.0208
0.0089
P, fig 6f
30' temp clear, perm mow 10'
forest/shrub - contig
yes
>100 ft
0.0046
00016
GP, fig 6g
permanent fill and grade
forest/shrub - contig
\:es
45 It
---
0 17-Itt
DC, fig 6h
permanent fill and grade
ditch in forest - contig
no
— 50.
---
u. 1102
Updated 11/1/2005
South Central I larnelt (.0 ScN‘ei \ \\.\\ I1'
Page 9 of 15

Total Wetland to be Cleared : Vegetation Change Only; No Topographic Impact
0.1655
0.0740
Total Wetland to be Filled and Graded : Wetland Eliminated
---
0.2842
Total All Types of Impacts, Temporary and Permanent = 0.5237 acre
0.1655
0.3582
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.5237 wetland acres in the proposed construction areas (interceptor corridor, pump station,
and WWTP site).
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, clam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip -rap,. crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed.
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Peren or
Intermit
Average
Stream Width
Before Impact
Impact
Length
(linear feet)
Area of
Impact
(acres)
S-1 fig 4a
UT Little River
temp sewer trench xing
Peren
18 ft
40
0.0 165
S-2 fig 4b
UT Little River
temp sewer trench xing
Peren
18 ft
40
0.0165
S-3 fig 4b
UT Little River
temp sewer trench xing
Inter
10 ft
40
0.0092
S-4 fig 4b
UT Little River
temp sewer trench xing
Peren
15 ft
40
0.0138
S-5 fig 4b
UT Little River
temp sewer trench xing
Inter
10 ft
40
0.0092
S-6 fig 4b
UT Little River
temp sewer trench xing
Peren
35 ft
40
0.0321
S-7 fig 4c
UT Little River
temp sewer trench xing
Peren
15 ft
40
0.0138
S-8 fig 5f
Little River
outfall pipe in bank
Peren
90 ft
40
0.0092
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
320
0.1203
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact
Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.)
Area of
Impact
(acres)
none
none
none
none
none
Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Updated I I/I/2005
Stream Impact (acres):
0.1203 temp
Wetland Impact - Vegetation Impact Only (acres):
0.1655 temp
0.0740 perm
Wetland Impact - Permanent Fill and Grade (acres)
0.2842 perm
South Central I'arnen Co SeWer & \ WTI'
I'
Page 10 of 15

Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.2858 temp
0.3582 perm
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
320 11 temp
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? I I Yes F1 No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
All wetlands to be impacted are hydrologically contiguous with perennial or relatively
permanent intermittent streams.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this.application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): n uplands stream wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw -down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower -impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed gravity interceptor alignment was selected to be at least 50 feet from the
parallel stream bank and to avoid stream and wetland crossings wherever practicable, while
minimizing impacts to private property and accommodating sewer service to both sides of the
stream. The selected alignment shown here represents a balance of these constraints. As there
are numerous small floodplain depression wetlands throughout the project vicinity, it is
impossible to avoid them all. No permanent grade changes are proposed in these wetlands. The
force main is routed along a roadside where it will not affect streams or wetlands. Only two
wetlands will be permanently filled: a 0.1740 acre depression wetland on the pump station site
and 0.1102 acre ditch on the WWTP site. Neither of these wetlands appears to have sufficient
ponding duration to serve as regular breeding sites for frogs or salamanders, nor do they have
high potential value for floodwater storage, pollutant assmi lation, stream bank stabilization,
wildlife habitat, or recreation based on DWQ evaluation criteria.
Updated 1 I/1/2005 South Central I larneu Co. Sewer & \1 W I I'
Page 11 of 15

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE — In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream .and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
If required, Harnett County proposes to provide compensatory mitigation for the permanent
wetland fill impacts (0.2842 acre) by in -lieu fee payment to NC-EEP. A copy of the EEP In -
Lieu Fee Requset Form is attached (response pending). No mitigation is proposed for the
wetland and stream impacts along the sewerline, where no permanent topographic changes
will occur, or the effluent outfall which will be essentially flush with the river bank.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating,
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be 'attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process foi- the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: .
Updated I I/1/2005 South Central I lanien Co Sewer & WWII'
Page 12 of 15

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.2842 acre
Amount of Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes [X] No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
YesM No❑
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes XI No n
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar -Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ❑ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Updated I I/1/2005
Zone*
Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
1
3 (2 for Catawba)
2
1.5
Total
South Central 1 larneu Co. Se\\LT
Page 13 of 15

* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Impervious surface at the pump station will occupy less than 20% of the 1.0 acre site, and
impervious surface at the wastewater treatment plant will occupy less than 20% of the 52 acre
site. The buried gravity sewerline and force main will have no impervious surface area. .
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The new wastewater treatment plant will will discharge into Little River upstream of Elliott
Bridge Road. Harnett County is also seeking potential reuse customers to receive as much of the
effluent as possible, as discussed in a NEPA EA approved by USDA RuralUtilities and NC-
DENR in August 2006 .
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ❑ No
Is this an after -the -fact permit application? Yes n No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes [XQ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: This
wastewater project will serve existing and future development in the Overhills, Twin Lakes, and
Anderson Creek areas of southern Harnett County and the northern portion of Fort Bragtv, Army
Reservation. Population growth, wastewater flow projections, and direct and secondary impacts
are discussed in a NEPA EA approved in August 2006 by USDA Rural Utilities and NC-DENR.
Updated I I/1/2005
[1
South central I Iarnru (o tir\u•r / \V\\' I I'
Page 14ofl5

XV. Other Circumstances.(Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these pen -nits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw -down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
7 � Gerald B. Pottern (agent) o?5- � G�/ 200
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Digital Longitude & Latitude coordinates of stream and wetland crossings
Wetland Stream Long W Lat N Figure
24" Gravity Interceptor, Rainey Drive to Shady Grove Pump Station
Station Feature Jurisdic Impact Latit °N , Longit °W
119+60 --- SR 1147 Rainey Dr
116+00 Wetland MA 0.0034 ac 35.2369 , 78.9484
112+20 Stream 1, 18 ft wide 18 x 40 ft 35.2366 , 78.9473
105+00 Wetland MB no impact 35.2349 , 78.9467
101+00 Wetland N no impact 35.2346 , 78.9448
90+60 Stream 2, 18 ft wide 18 x 40 ft '35.2325 , 78.9436
87+40 Stream 3, 10 ft wide 10 x 40 ft 35.2318 , 78.9440
78+60 --- SR 1124 Rambeaut Rd
63+10 Stream 4, 15 ft wide 15 x 40 ft 35.2288 , 78.9380
58+20 Stream 5, 10 ft wide 10 x 40 ft 35.2296 , 78.9367
53+80 =-- NC-210
52+80 Stream 6, 35 ft wide 35 x 40 ft 35.2295 , 78.9355
47+50 Wetland GA 0.0069 ac 35.2284 , 78.9352
36+20 Wetland U 0.0206 ac 35.2269 , 78.9328
31+80 Stream 7, 15 ft wide 15 x 40 ft 35.2261 , 78.9321
21+50 Wetland T 0.0746 ac 35.2237 , 78.9323
18+00 Wetland S 0.0895 ac 35.2236 , 78.9317
14+80 Wetland R 0.0086 ac 35.2229 , 78.9306
08+50 Wetland Q 0.0297 ac 35.2227 , 78.9288
06+30 Wetland P 0.0062 ac 35.2228 , 78.9281
Shady Grove Pump Station, 24" PVC Force Main, and Little River WWTP Site
Station Feature Jurisdic Impact Latitude/ Longitude
Pump Sta
FM 10+25
FM 74+50
WWTP site
Wetland GP
Piped Stream, 30" RCP
Piped Stream, 36" RCP
Wetland DC (Ditch C)
0.1740 ac
no impact
no impact
0.1102 ac
35.2236 , 78.9259
35.2241 , 78.9232
35.2301 , 78.9034
35.2330 , 78.8849
Updated 11/1/2005 South (Antral 1larnett (.0 tir\\rr<C \ \\'I'1'
Page 15 of.15

9108936643
043201p.m
06.0S 2007 1 /1
Harnett
COUNTY
N0R1 H (ARO! I'E:;
June 5, 2007
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610
Re: Agent Authorization Letter
Dear Mr. Pottern,
nwwA
MIMIIt
A6a/T Au rrtae zA nu/
Public Utilities Department
www.hamett.org
PO Box 1119
308 West Duncan Street
Lillington. NC 27546-1119
Robert J Goldstein & Associates has permission to serve as an authorized agent of Harnett
County for the purpose of environmental field studies and permitting of Harnett County's
proposed water and wastewater projects.
Steve Ward
HCDPU Assistant Director
SW/ckm
ph: 910-893-7575
tax: 9104193-6643
strong roots • new growth
1Q•')a
MCDTI-I f ADlli IAIA 01f10nOCCAO

Ir=i-
1,1osystem: lar ceinent
PROGRAM
July 24, 2007
Rodney Tart
Harnett County Utilities
PO Box 1119
Lillington, NC 27546
ffP AccOalice Env_
Project: South -Central Harnett Interceptor WWTP County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authoriz::ci
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
followine table.
Cape Fear
03030004
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer 1
(Sq. Ft.)
Buffer lI
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non -Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Impacts
0
0
0
0.2842
0
0
0
0
Credits
0
0
0
0.57
0
0
0
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
tl ia I. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401, Unit
Ronnie Smith, USACE-Wilmington
Ken Averitte, NCDWQ-Fayetteville
Gerald Pottern, agent
File
ReistorL g... .. Protectiki Ow State,
QA
fMENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

MAY-30-2007 11:25A FROM:MARZIAO & MC-GOLICAN 3366293932 TO:1919872921.4 P.2/3
DIV WATER QUALITY Fax [phone]bSr L__.y,.
_ •
Mti-FFNSI COMile &if
Michael F. Easley, Governor
WaWarn G. Roma Jr., Secretary
North Caen* Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
„e =1 Division of Wafer Coady
WATT
.t"
September 20, 2006
Mr. Rodney Tart, Director
Harnett County Departrtsent of Public Utilities
P.O. Box 1119
Lillington, North Carolina 27546
RE: EA/FONSI for Implementation of a centralized wastewater collection and treatment system
in the south central district of Harnett County
DWQ#13650
Dear Mr. Tart:
On September 19, 2006, the State Clearinghouse deemed tee Northrthe Clearinghouse). Carolina
nviro Ittal now
Act review on the above project complete (see attached the Division of Water Quality for the
acceptable to proceed with your permit applications through
proposed project. No further actions on the Environmental Assessment are required.
If there is anything I can assist you with, please do not hesitate to give me a call at [phone],
ext. 555.
Sincerely,
afrytta-i÷a107‘,0
Hsnnah Stallings
SEPA Coordinator
Attachments: (SCU Sign Off Letter, FONS1)
Cc: Belinda Henson - Surface Water Protection Supervisor, FRO
Gil Vi1%Zani - NPDES East
Jeff Poupatt - PERCS
Customar Service
[phone]
1-eTr•623-6748
httly.EvAr.v.enr.state.no.us
us
Dtvlslon of Water Quaity 1017 Mall Service Center Raleigh, NO 27699.1617
?nn7_1-ic in.•Qp
n.1AD7lAnin Q.-nairtu
f'7 C C'? O': O']'7

JUN-19-2007 10:QQA FROM:MARZIAO & MC-.GOUGAN
LUV WA LK 1.01-9...1IT raX:ylyflX,t f
)r.Nk�c,e,,ekori W
TO:19199729214 P; /S
Hug L Ud 11 • J1 i c3 bT 0R)
Miallel F. Easley. Governor
WaUtun G, Rocs Jr., Secretary
North Caroling Deelrtrotrit of Snvitonment and Nee:ral Resources
Alan W.1Climek, P.E. Director
Division of Waur Quality
August 2, 2006
To: Chrys Baggett, State Clearinghouse
Frorn: Darlene Kucken, NCDENR/Oivisbn_of Water Quality
Subject E.AIFONSI: Harnett County South Central WWTP
The Division of Water Quality is submitting for State Clearinghouse
review i pact the e ctos subject
six
copies of the Environmental Assessment and Finding of NoSignificant
project.
The Department of Environment and Natural -Resourcs he enhas vironmedt the
do menu PleaseEA. publish
this project`in the Eniivironmentet Bolietln and -circulate
appropriate. .
Contact me at 919.733.5083 ext. 354 if you have any questions.
Thank You
FOR LEAD STATE AGENCY USE ONLY
COlnchlskOi1 Statement (Must be completed and signed by responsible state agency and submitted with
the E4 document to the State Clearinghouse.)
Se e appropriate statement below:
Ater preparation/review of this EA, the responsible state agency has concluded there is a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) and will not be preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). (Attach any..
additional information regarding this conclusion that you deem important to this fording.)
•
The agency has completed this EA and is hereby submitting it for review and comment After a
consideration of the comments received, the agency will proceed with a FONS% or prepare an EIS.
ail Service Center Ra1eig,h, NC 27699.161.1 Phone919 7 3.7O15
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Lee*t17 ita': 512 N. SoNsbury St Raleigh. NC 27664
Fax ,w newu�atlUlHty. ru
,2496
Internet: s,._
An Equel pppapmiryrAMffnative xdon Empbyor- 5a°l RacyeledHpub post Consumer Paper
Agency
vaitrzsrally
o
nna
Customer Service
1-877.673-674.4
7ffl7-IlR-1q nqlS
MAR7IANfl Iu11N1
po/) 4Z
rono :'l

TUN-19-2007 09:59A FROM:MARZIAO & MC-GOUGAN
S �C\ecv\
TO:1919872921} P.2/5
NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
and.
Final Notice of Potential Conversion of Important Farmland
The USDA Rural Utilities Service has received an application for financial assistance from the
South Central Water & Sewer District -Phase I (SCWSD). The proposed service area is within the
Anderson Creek Township of Harnett County. The proposed project consists of approximately
357,110 feet of gravity flow sewer lines (sized from 8" to 24 "), 76,500 feet of force main lines
(sized from 6" to 20"), construction of six pumping stations (sized from 180 to 2,800 gpm), and
the purchase of wastewater treatment from Harnett County.
Rural Development has assessed the environmental _ impacts of this proposed project and
determined that if implemented, the proposed project may cause so a minor direct conversion of
important farmland on sites where it is necessary to construct ` stations. There could
be some indirect conversion of important farmland in areas designated as growth corridors. The
amount of farmland conversion is a relatively small area in relation to the total amount of
important farmlands in the area, and is not significant in terms of the total land available for farm
use: It has been determined that there is no practicable alternative to avoiding this conversion
As required by the National Environmental Policy Act, the Rural Utilities Service has assessed the
potential environmental effects of the proposed, project and has determined that the proposal will
not have a significant effect on the human environment and for which. an Environmental Impact
Statement will not be prepared. The basis for this determination is a thorough review and analysis
of the environmental information reported in the environmental assessment including public and
regulatory agencies' comments regarding the proposed project. In order to avoid or minimize any
adverse environmental impacts, the Rural Utilities Service will require South Central Water &
Sewer District to incorporate the following mitigation measures into the proposed project's design.
The potential impacts to floodplains will be mitigated through the enforcement of Harnett
County's "No Tap in the Floodplain" restriction on future development and the sealing and
venting of all lines crossing a designated floodplain at one foot above the 100-year floodplain
level to ensure no inflow into the collection system occurs thereby putting the system at minimal
risk for a sewerage spill. The potential impacts to wetlands will be mitigated "through the
requirement that planning and construction at stream crossings and associated wetlands be
designed and performed in accordance .with the provisions of the Nationwide Permit 12 and
through the US Army Corps of Engineers' Section 404 (Clean Water Act) permitting process and
NCDWQ General 401 Water Quality Certification and the use of anti -seep devices on all lines
crossing wetlands to prevent drainage ,from occurring along the pipelines: Adequate erosion
control measures will be employed, requiring both temporary and permanent measures, to return
the disturbed land to its pre -construction state as soon as possible.
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its -programs and
activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political" beliefs,
sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202)
720-2600 (voice and TDD).' '
2007-11R-lq 0414 •
MAR7IANn R MINI

So -C.l /-r Wko7P
ACC S R.tem
USACE AID#
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for thestreamstream reach under assessment:
u
1. Applicant's name: Z{�/WM vo
3. Date of evaluation: IroZnn--ji4ne. AO 7
5. Name of stream: C/(TW` C C 17
qO «arc
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
z000 feet
2. Evaluator's name:
4. Time of evaluation: if • OD lv :Or, t/Lt
6. River basin: Cap2 Rqr� --� Liti't Purer
8. Stream order: Q1/7l <f CI)
10. County:blarklat-
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): tit%((/ I/n{'t 1i
Longitude (ex.—77.556611): 77. gppf ,t� r9
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
3. 2330
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roa.s any an mar s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Vet d'>Jt CI -� c 17 614 pi-opascd (A)CeTP Eifel Shgzi7 give iQd s,e 02050
-Crtl Sao di1
Diet
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: pR y
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Iluhitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV )
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YESif yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use:
22. Bankfull width: 6'8 -rut
% Residential
% Forested
% Commercial
ao % Cleared / Logged g0 % Other ( PIa ilirthfrt
23. Bank height (from bed to top of -bank): 07 feet
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep t • I (t'!).i
25. Channel sinuosity: S Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based un
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g.. the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. fi�/ r''
Total Score (from reverse): 7(/1 Comments: `tilts 'WI ddei f©� et D✓V62 S
f`rPaWt rr�`
Evaluator's Signature
% Industrial °.o ;\t.ricultural
Date la J70402
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment oI' stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and floes not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment. please call 91 9-S76-S-14 I x

Yari so -644 w.iitrrP
f cod saufh dif4 C C 17
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET lob Tuv. 2047
<.
YM. "S°...:A...
6 J."°11'��.".'1, o--.. 1RA \,VSLT.l:I f;,:'i',"�
'
.,:«W
e ►Wont., ,%=dntam,,,
�
-- ,_K
�•,;''='k< „>rsi' " <,raY'eei o$"tYfl'ow ,ipewsis,4,�..poo...*s ivals, r1 ea'a t t
noflowkor_saturation,4„roo „�ma:Qin
,
4.
,0._ '
'��� w,<�•-
`
self
e�k+t?t fag.SS-v:a<i av1um taltera on$®.t",,.
"ojalterafionn_:nxoiits
�:
`ut
. .
.O 5
.p..,
- 0.ixtensivetalteration :x. .
; Rl�aiianone -`6- _ -`#.: n}-
'z
- ile�� �u "erg-inax� oints � .
a,(nobuffe�n '�0;°coiittguous.wt- b ff, p )
3 �-
•" _
,
,�:
��.`:
•c;r�.�i«;.' _
•
.rt: ,�,"
°Evidencerto.'.'iiutrtent'orchenicaldts¢Irar es'rt<y:
�,.°.:ems",< g._
°eXterisive�. se areas '0`. no°.'iiischar "es = mak- -,oints� , r; ,°�
.:�: =:: ``
_.i::
.-
i
'rti '- , t s z :i!'
roundwatertdis`e}►atge
-"=
o4tschar=s riris see sn.yetlandsl-.,niaxsants
t
�.:
�
,,.res'ence.'rp jae- en tloox%-..p9'.la u•; •,p
o fodplatQ xens veaftoo, p alM dints
•?
ii ntrenehment l fliin lat access a . ;
t _,. _ate ,. � ; ° .. ...:0-�5:
dee 1 pen rene led°= Oafre uentiftoodrn imaki dines
, ' : ` - -
' 0..:-4
0"-20
fi
V
;i�
";0.: "N,
i^ 1r, •a<.t 3=:-"q'.➢y.'2 gyr.�. :,R ; r�:is}�"r�nY'.y:F '1i/; t's.. . R•.
Presenceof.adjacent�w n s
; ; _ ��»,�,<,., .,� � �.�,:x �.r',°
pr v,a ;,,€.� ,�.—a F • arg .. zz''-td-rs,�f. R "1»'<e ::.•=«y
�0 filar e aci agent etlan '"sse
no.;w`e land=-m�ax� ruts �,�,,
:r � �<.0��`6:'=
-"0 -�-4`
,�.,.
v$
_ . i..
.0=`2ni
I
.,
hannel sinuostt �.� ��"
ya �,.,
e`c�a eli tion-.0�`naturahineanderu--sntiut�oints�
(eXtensiv h rin za s', � .p )'
,"'•
,
x._
"3
Sediment mn
'a « fr
tenstve,:de osition=b:0•'ylitfleor.,no-seiiimerif'�,�:�niaz' oin
�
- r
` `
- =
�4�:5i:-
^'Lr y
...,;�•.- -;:�
'
;.-
�" ., � `
iFa'rv.=Y a` x` v.E 'y - - ::�..
t =° "Size.&;dtverst{�`y�, of,e aline' bed substra e'�``�`
k ,isX'X: ,.,,, ,_y. ._,•'J as
��.r�:.�� �•`N •��w.�*�;,_��» �'�o .kE ,
ft omo genus 0 lar _ixerse sizesr:7,rpeal.is >a:<-'
-. �•C±
-, =E
—
y WO:` .'4--.'"F ��,
-_
�` ,0. , .
`"
`.-n/
et
":�
.•"-✓+,;w ^-a'„', a-,s.';,c<<�^ar1'ssz":��,:Pr'c' ,� rid::':.. -
;� Vi enc ofrhannei infston�ox°wii'denm " "
detl lyiine e'd 0 st nie ,e *S banks �pnints '' �
.,r�,E`"t?•d-
xis
'v :,
�'
,.,faT:-�;c°,:;.�:,
t
k,° fir;
Presence a majar,ba xlnres °s
€ a, " �r,5a ,.�r ';wr
b fmax porn)
� s�ve a rosioif no<erosion stable" z
x n «
c'
0 `�.°�x
3
.. ' nn
`�V - 5�"
s , ::,
c•
Z"-�, �oT-.'✓
y,
9
•
1:
i. •6;s(,"„',"CaLa•-.r„ h':.:` >;.i: .w,1wr•a5.t, i"�'-•rr shd�;Af
Root depti u t dens . en banks
s (nouis t le roofs1 0; densee`roots througltou`tfsma potn
,'3aa„p". s... „ra .;
:;:��
i;$,'P'"R:'�:•.>-•
n. £
,;.fix* a,. }IT:+�
Impact b �agQrtcu1ture {livestock or,t mbar rodactton ,{
fry.. �- .
suls'tantialsrii <act;=0 noRevid'ence--max` orris k z'-�°'
+'"T"�'
0:� S`
�i�� « -°^
r d'i: :.
;£.,
e:0
-
'-3.;5 c
Q .5;':''":
w,'
1
�°'}reseiice s,of r`iftleP=''ool%ritle-" 00 l:con leXes° `>P.
riffles/rip le`.or',00ls,=°0�°ywelf='deVelo ed:_'nso[its
;,
_
-
._ =
«iio�
5. abitaticomp leii`i
(httle or no habitat 41:equentivaried"lia$it'afs°Fiiiaz5points)•
,
".:`^.�cN"asri 4
9.i`a ✓,:'!'.n«.ir, t;;'4 .. .a$,i.. fk . " �,.
ann' ' coveru' e'6Ver,a,:t ri lied ,.;=r,°�'�:,
{io,shadingkvegefation=,O;.continuous„canopyn=inaxvpom
we' . per ;.., .
Sabstrate;;embeldedness,` 'x
°(deepiy a abedded- O., loose str c,iure _ma ic)P _
X
NA
0.- �t- ,
0. - 4 .
n
r» �-. 3�;a• +�i"'�..e. '. s'^'*';�, s'�` 't*-�F',�.Yz"^l^�;;:',.a-�',:u..t,,
resence°ofgstream=.inverfebr „,&C seepage "4,;r
o`.evidence:-`';Ot'coniinon;.ririirierousaes..,mak)poinis)�;�p=
� .
f
rese.nce'df am Itibrtan s aE'}" rr ,`b t
�4�>�,�.:w°�,�4, X$��:<�,�.,�,...,...<,",�.�_z:
no evidence"``= O;�common:numerous,types' .=<6max�polnts),� >
t O.:-=4',=.
° ,
�.0`:
,f'
,.,
..0�,�4;:::
_
r"i-�+,-.
�sf' HI1117esence`of•fish5: -
.•(iio evidence ``0;`coinnion,'numerous'ty:pe5'=na(points)
-
,
—�
"W -
Evidence of.wtldli#•e;us
_' _
no ev,id'ence . I; aburid"ant ev, dance`=,niax:points)"e' °f `` ,.'x
};:':'
r. "
`°;_
" _
a
'
;iY.1"a�';�:,;^ ,.s<i%. S%,, a`a.�1 =�m'�' < "':Mw:r:�z". ,G":} ,`»*'.-'•.m.:r:°,. -` ,'a;�.
.".+," .�+3" �<z ,'Tim,-`;'�i�3,h , '�:+E ,n, "y'#T."' �'.,'•t6
f£e X FrX'r."X'4r'.
Tot`a yoints.Posstble..-.,"r�,�� - >� . ,ems' -�;;`
A 1�5 "�'"'"�;�-t))�#'i, G�''-.E,•{r
,'i5,:r � ,� � ;
r.
- �� t. x».
, 7-0.�<�,
`�'�° i`sl`(�%
'x .$ `• ` `
:. s.'...
.:l'00
`�'('.
;Ie. :..SP.-,...•
�:�i�
�'dE QO�-`-
� ^d b
l• °�: q�';•;
' . $' qs, s_ q,f', y� ,°�`'-ys,� ate$ �$s��"=t�P.�� .✓t ,�.,.:�t� r , ysi �::r7..r , z% '..°i�ii: sv�
a� lexort��trspa
� __ a aa"x,',� , rz�. ,r � _, �, _ < ,. �T;".S�zf,�iJ%.,',J'��'�.
���s�-'�. y w r ns �� d j ti � �+,rory r> f,✓�•C :Y.:`,<`t.."f .,�'
e;
�✓s:"tix✓a-.«. �'-`�„w: ,... _ .F _ , -- _, � �_'k., .. . ;x,`
_' _ —___
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

pUlQ smsther
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: (a nos aO0 7 Project: (urleff Sovt, Latitude: 35-,2330
Evaluator: 6_ Po tfern
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ?19 or perennial if >_ 30
Site: Difrik C
County: kht
Longitude: /7g e g'g'10
Other / �,I,
e.g. Quad Name: Mcis'iclies le
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__3-° )
1a. Continuous bed and bank
Absent Weak
0
Moderate Strong
1 2 () DjTC (
2. Sinuosity
1
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel
8. Recent alluvial deposits
IO
9 a Natural levees
10. Headcuts
11. Grade controls
co
0
0
0
d
co
12. Natural valley or drainageway
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
Yes = 3
3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ersQ _)
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- dry or growing season
16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ 11'45 _)
d
1.5
0
O
1
2 3
2 3
1 0.5 0
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1_.5
No = 0 Yes
20b. Fibrous roots in channel
21b. Rooted plants in channel
22. Crayfish
3
3
0.5
23. Bivalves
0
1
1
2
24. Fish
0.5 1
25. Amphibians
0.5
1
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus.
0.5
2
1.5
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
0 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW 0.75. OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0' Other - f?
b Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of -uluatic or wetltuid i,ldnii.
b
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
Sketch:
To-f-P A1-E+c = 9,a5 (iicucLf9 ipf
fir , .d/bai bank , a 11 4. L/4 .ticiuf-e rs a inan a
G{1Q . Co plc OT i seawl •
H
2 3
2 3
2 i 3
3
1 2 3
1 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1 5
1

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Wetlands GP, MA, GA, U. T, S, R, Q, and P
Project / Site: South Central Harnett County Sewer/ Job #2470
Date: I I /05/2004
Applicant / Owner: Marziano & Minier / Harnett County Utilities
County: Harnett
Investigator: Sean Peffer, Jessi O'Neal -- R.J.Goldstein & Associates
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Community: forest/shrub
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation) Yes No
X
wetland depression
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No
X
Transect ID: well GP
(explain on reverse if needed)
Plot ID: N ofGP-5
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vaccinium tenellum H FAC
9. Nyssa sylvatica T FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia V FAC
10. Clethra alnifolia S FACW
3. Lyonia lucida S FACW
11.
4. Ilex glabra S FACW
12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia V FAC
13.
6. Acer rubrum 1 T FAC
14.
7. Liquidambar styraciflua T FAC+
15.
_
8. Magnolia virginiana T FACW+
16.
or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Percent of Dominant Species that.are OBL, FACW,
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Vegetation is similar to above in
wetlands MA, GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 2 - 16 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 - 10 (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12"
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x Water -Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Typical floodplain depression hydrology indicators. Indicators are similar to above in wetlands MA, GA, U, T, S, R.
Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
�/b

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Altavista fine sandy loam Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Thennic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description: '
Depth Matrix Colors MottleColors Mottle ' Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
12 B 2.5Y3/1 --- --
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in. Sandy Soils
X Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_Aquic
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors (Explain in Remarks)
_Other
Remarks: An unmapped hydric inclussion within the mapped Altavista (AtA) soil series. Soils in wetlands MA,
GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor are mapped as Altavista (AtA), Bibb (Bb), or Wahee
(We) series, and have soil color and redoximorphic features similar to wetland GP.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: Wetland, GP is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetlands MA, GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor
corridor have vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators similar to GP and are also classified as wetlands based on
the 1987 ACOE manual.
2/s

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Uplands near GP.•MA. GA. l 1. T. S. R. Q. and.,P
Project / Site:• South Central Harnett County Sewer/ Job #2470
Applicant / Owner: Marziano & Minier / Harnett County Utilities
Investigator: Sean Peffer, Jessi O'Neal- R.J.Goldstein & Associates
Date: 1 1 /05/2004
County: Harnett
State: • NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X. No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential problem area? •
(explain on reverse if needed)
Yes No X
Community: hw-pine
forest
Transect ID: wetl GP
Plot ID: S of GP-5
VEGETATION..
Dominant Plant Species
1. Vaccinium tenellum
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3. Lyonia lucida
Stratum
Indicator
H FAC
V. FAC
S FACW
4. Ilex opaca S , FAC-
5. Smilax rotundifolia V FAC
6. Acer rubrum
T FAC
7. Liquidambar styraciflua T ' FAC+
8. Magnolia virginia T FACW+
Dominant Plant Species
9. Nyssa sylvatica
10. Clethra alnifolia
11. Pinus .taeda
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Stratum Indicator
T FAC
S FACW
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 91%
Remarks:' Wetland Vegetation is Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species re Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Vegetation is similar to above in uplands
adjacent to•MA, GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.,
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment. Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water -Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators not present. Indicators are similar to above in uplands adjacent to MA, GA, U, T,'S,,,
R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
3/F

SOILS
Map Unit Name •
(Series. and Phase): Altavista fine sandy loam Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy(Subgroup): Thermic.Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle • Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-14+ A 10 YR 3/3 clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol • _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic
Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_Aquic
Reducing. Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Not hydric. Similar soil indicators in uplands mapped as Altavista, Gilead, and Wahee adjacent to
MA, GA, U, T,S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic.Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks: Areas adjacent to wetland GP are not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the
1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Non -wetland areas adjacent to MA, GA, U, T, S, R,.
Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor have vegetation, soils, arid hydrology indicators similar those near' GP
and are also classified as non -wetlands based on the 1987 ACOE manual.
Leg

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Wetland DC (Ditch C')
Project / Site: South Central Harnett County Sewer & WWTP
Applicant / Owner: Marziano & Minier / Harnett County Utilities
, Investigator: Gerald Pottern -- R.J.Goldstein & Associates
Date: 12 June 2007
`County: Harnett
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation) Yes No X
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X
(explain on reverse if needed)
Community: herb/shrub
man-made ditch wetland
Transect ID: CI - C'1 7
Plot ID: near C10
VEGETATION
' Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Cyrilla racemiflora S FACW
9.
2. Woodwafdia areolata H OBL
10.
3. Lyonia lucida S FACW
11.
4. Ilex glabra S 'FACW
12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia V FAC
13. .
6. Acer rubrum T FAC
14.
7. Osmunda regalis H OBL
15.
8. Magnolia virginiana S FACW+
16.
or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List Of -Plant Species'that Occur in Wetlands
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
,
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
= Aerial Photographs
Primary Indicators:
Other
Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations:
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to,Free Water in Pit: 2 - 10 (in.)
X Water -Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 '- 6 (in.)
FAC-Neutral Test
"Other (Explain in Remarks)
,
Remarks: Ditch bed has saturated soil; surrounding mesic flatwoods does not. Recent weather has been dry.
SOILS
sag

Map Unit Name .
(Series and Phase): Wahee fine sandy loam Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Thermic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors ' .Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,,
finches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) . Abundance/Contrast ,Structure, etc.
10 9 . 2.5 Y 3/ 1 --- ---
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic
Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_Aquic
Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils'List
_Reducing
X Gleyed or Low-Chroina Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: An unmapped hydric inclussion within.the mapped Wahee.(We) soil series. Redoximorphic features
likely developed as a result of ditching. Soils oil either side of the ditch are not hydric.
•
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present?Yes X No
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks: Wetland DC is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
6/8

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Upland near Wetland DC
Project / Site: South Central Harriett County Sewer & WWTP
Applicant / Owner: Marziano & Minier / Harnett County Utilities
Investigator: Gerald Pottern -- R.J.Goldstein & Associates
Date: 12 June 2007
County: Harnett
State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation
Is the area a potential problem area?
(explain on reverse if needed)
Yes X No
Yes No
Yes No
X
X
Community: shrubby
mesic flatwoods
Transect ID: CI - C17
Plot ID: \ofC'10 •
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Cyrilla racemiflora S FACW
9. Quercus nigra S ,FAC
2. Nyssa sylvatica S FAC
10. Clethra alnifolia S FACW
3. Lyonia lucida' S FACW
11. Vitis rotundifolia V FAC
4. Ilex glabra S FACW
12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia V FAC
13.
6. Acer rubrum - T. FAC
14.
7. Pinus taeda T FAC
15.
8. Magnolia virginiana S FACW+
16.
or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50%'of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands
HYDROLOGY
, Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Primary Indicators:
Other
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12" .
No Recorded Data Available
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations:
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.)
Water -Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.)
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No evidence of saturation within the upper 16 inches. Recent weather has been dry.
7/S

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and -Phase): Wahee fine sandy loam Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Thermic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
10 ? 2.5 Y 5/2 --- none
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils in the adjacent wetland ditch DC appear to have developed,redoximorphic features as a result of
ditching.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No .X
Remarks: The mesic flatwoods adjacent to Wetland DC is not classified as a wetland based upon lack of wetland
hydrology and hydric soil indicators as set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

1.'
Big"
i
Y - L i
/>- tc
• /
-'
<
s' D•
r J
--\ ` --
a r
13
LLQ66t-o.'>_1 `� (2 I.
// 7 _
L
aerta
J t
•
-f6Rf'
MU -
Continue Page 73
0
Little
MANCHESTER : QUAD
2 3 'i 5
cc
n
82
66.
t6l
66
ss
MCLEANI CH ND
TDy NARY FD
i
52'30' SLOCOMB QUAD
!I4eno n
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map: South Central Harnett
County Proposed Sewerline and Little River WWTP.
Robert J. Goldstein- & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
-n :-1-
FAYETfEVILLE
C
e On Page 74

• ,
•
` t
e Mc
•
• •
♦
1\
J �\
ii _
%; •
/. /j 1
,� --:\�%/ �1/ 1 i\I
,� /
./ - ; /-•r/
/ q
/,
\
Figure 2a. USGS Topographic Map: Gravity Interceptor
from Rainey Drive to Shady Grove Road Pump Station. .
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
f.
•
•
o ° "o
N
9
•
•
.
I I
I I
II I 1 ft F
0 00
1
'
L1
IL =
\

2°v/
•
v---� MANtH'ES:TE
C049
•
147;-
(
o;
Figure 2b. USGS Topographic Map: Force Main from
Shady Grove Road Pump Station to Little River WWTP.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

•
B n B
GaD GRAV..
SWR
Figure 3a. NRCS Soil Map: Gravity Interceptor from
Rainey Drive to Shady Grove Rd Pump Station.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

Figure 3b. NRCS Soil Map: Force Main from Shady
Grove Road Pump Station to Little River WWTP.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

\\
Lake
McRatt \�
Wetland MA
impact = .O0311
acre
SOO- feet
Stream 1
(8 ft wide
Wetland l
No- impact
Wetland ME �\
NO Impact.
ST TI0N !i + 00
Figure 4a. Stream and Wetland Impacts along Gravity Interceptor -
.Construction Corridor, Station 119+60 to Station 94+00..
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc -
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

4,--\.sTATioN 99+ oo
Streatn ,2 is ft tAilde.
Str.earn 3 , /0 ft wide
44.
Cc'
/e5eco". ••••
SOO ft
Strecom S
10 ft wide
-Stream 4
15 t- w
-------- -- ----- -
--------- -
Figure 4b. Stream and -Wetland -Impacts along Gravity Interceptor
Construction Corridor, Station 94+00. to Station 43+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Stream 6
35 ft wide
---
.1-1\TIOt•1 43+ 00

Figure 4c. Stream and Wetland Impacts along Gravity Interceptor
Construction Corridor, Station 43+.00 to Station, 22+00.
Robert J.• Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
It t
II

Figure 4d. Stream and Wetland Impacts along Gravity Interceptor
Construction Corridor, Station 22+00 to Shady Grove Pump Station.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
SrfTioN aatoo
wetland T
i tnpact=.0`121,
ac
V,letland 5
impact =.0875 ac
W etlard R
impact = .0086 ac
300 feet
lhf f.
Ce
/511
wet ivta Q
impact -.0V17 ac
Purnp Staf ion
we-L(and GP
Impact=,17'10ac
r
Wetland P
iw,pact=,006.ac
Lat e RI
yer
Farce Main
STATION 0+00
w r ;r
sii f10N
0+00

Force Maih-
STATION 0+00,
Shady Grove i20a0(
-_.
-r•
PUMP
STAT1O N
a11 9 ravr+9
interceptor
61:Li J RI‘je.r
piped StreQYrt
No Impact
Force Mails
STATION 2q +00
=' � '' arc a
26
500 feet
• 1
Figure 5a. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little River WWTP,
Station 0+00 to Station 29+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
c
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

•
/'
`Force Mash
sTAtlor4 29+o0
qo
e i
h ''
so
- Force Mai&i
STATION -too
•
•
SS
500 feet
Figure 5b. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little River WWTP.
Station 29+00 to Station 62+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

fot-'ce Main
STATION ( 2+00
a°
Piped stream
No .Evnpact
Je
add �°
a
50o feet
4
Figure 5c. Stream and Wetland Impacts'fromShady Grove'
Pump Station along Force Main -Corridor to Little River WWTP:. -
Station 62+00 to Station 92+00.
• Robert J. Goldstein & Associates; Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

Force
sTATioN1 7.24-00
\1
500 feet
Figure 5d. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little River WWTP,
Station 92+00 to Station 123+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

Figure Se. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little River WWTP,
Station 123+00 to WWTP.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
,
WWTP Site

ro4
Shaul n O0
s
Access Road'
do Force Main
�etfand Nor
Pad....;
Figure 5f. Stream and Wetland Impacts at
Little River WWTP Site, Harnett County.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
feet .
200 400
s.
Cascade
Aerator
Effluent Stream 8'
Disciacge, (Bank impact)

Lake\\
Mcit \\
!1i
o \
e
. • .
----
ID SCAL
8
too feet
. . .
Wetland MA
.0034 acre temp. impact
(no topographic diah.ye)
Figure 6a. Close -Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland MA.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

i
o' ConstriC O7' Corridor
2o" ?erwianeht Easerient
(io' mowed in wetlands)
Vlekland GA
o
30 j ew porarj Cleared = . OOy6 ac
101 Permanent Mowed .0023 ac
total = .0o67 ac
(no p rvpta i ent iopo rrpWc chap ye)
50 feet
0
0
Figure 6b. Close -Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland GA.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

1
Wetland U J
30 1emp cleareds .0137
10' Pery vhDwed = .0067
+Ai-.02% acl
(tio fopoy v phic chavr�e
1
1
1
feet
0
NN
Figure 6c. Close -Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland U.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
50

.e r4
i
Wetland
30' Temp Cleared = ac
101 perm. mo ded = .0256 ac
total = .0l4(' ac
(no topographic chawje)
*4;
0
0
r
Figure 6d. Close -Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetlands S and T.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
feet
0 SO
Wetland S
30' Temp Cleared = .0622 ac
Perm. Mowed = .0273 ac
-ppted = .bg9S ac
(no ttpo9raphic chaviie)
100

*Ali I's'
Wetland F \
30' Temp deer:: .007a c
.2 \
I 01 Perm mow •Oollt ac
-total -008(0 ac
(no toporplic chatije)
•
Feet
0
•
•
So 100
•
Figure 6e. Close -Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland R.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

I
0
-Fee t
50
I00
Wetlgnd R
Temp cleared z . Oa0 S ac
Perm mowed = 0081 ac
t5-ta,t = . 0,277 ac.
610 topoyv p lvc. chavi9e)
i
0
0
Welland P
Temp cleared = .00N( ac
Perm v1Ouled = .DOl(ac
total = . 04 6 a ac
Cho 13popaphic ct►alle)
7
� s
7
Figure 6f.. Close -Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetlands P and Q.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

y11101.4 I k1
F.XIS'?NL d W
.`�.. �._O Lgai' .02;2 — — — ...c— — — — $
� — --
I rA
Shady Grove Road
4<<�s roQ
i rniav►er^t f i 11= . vM O ac
(No -temporary in,
-—N
N interCept°r
w
"13.
ALA
111'
L
Purnp
Station
Site
21111 Arcemaif to ANTI'
—S — — — — o— — — -8 — —
'J
EIS
A—
OZ
1
1,1
100 feet
•
Figure 6g. Close -Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland GP.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

Figure 6h. Close -Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland DC.
; ‘s,
..... . ) c
D1T viel
W la
200 feet
Access Road
3( Force Mairt
L
\cVd
we
tio
•
_ ...... .......
- • -
Robert .1. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
. op
11_
4
I
11 II
' t . , • P,
Effluent
O'.4tfall to
Little River
(yo wetlawds)