Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100099 Ver 2_Mitigation Information_20121213Axiom Environmental 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 MEMORANDUM TO Pancho Mitigation Bank IRT FROM Axiom Environmental, Inc DATE December 13, 2012 RE Pancho Mitigation Site NC SAM Effort 10 -010 The goal of this effort is to make a case, using the current draft version of the N C Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM), that stream functions will be unproved through the implementation of Enhancement Level 1 efforts in Kennedy Mill Branch and the Main Tributary to Kennedy Mill Branch (hereafter referred to as the Main Tributary) at the Pancho Mitigation Site in Wayne County Although NC SAM has been designed for use on existing conditions, we have used the functional framework provided by NC SAM to anticipate changes that can reasonably be anticipated to occur as a result of proposed enhancement activities We used NC SAM draft version 4 (dated July 20, 2012) for this effort Axiom staff members visited the site on December 7, 2012 and walked the two subject streams During this walk, it was determined that a single NC SAM Field Assessment Form will suffice to document the current function of the two streams The specific site where this form was completed is approximately 400 feet upstream of the upper end of proposed Priority 1 stream restoration on Kennedy Mill Branch (designated as site number "KMO" on the field assessment form and in Figure B) The proposed Enhancement Level 1 activities include raising the stream bed for approximately 1334 linear feet in Kennedy Mill Branch and 852 linear feet in the Main Tributary (Figure B) and the removal of non - native, mvasive species (specifically Chinese privet [Ligustrum smense]) within the project boundaries adjacent to these streams The implementation of these activities is anticipated to result in positive changes to five NC SAM metrics Metric (M) 4 (Feature Longitudinal Profile), M5 (Signs of Active Instability), M6 (Streamside Area Interaction), M15 (Wetland Presence), and M24 (Vegetative Composition) Based on this information, Axiom divided Kennedy Mill Branch into three reaches (KM 1, KM2, and KM3) and the Main Tributary into two reaches (MT1 and MT2), each anticipated to receive different metric ratings resulting from the proposed enhancement activities The locations of these reaches are depicted on Figure B The results of this analysis is, in current condition, the subject reaches of Kennedy Mill Branch and the Main Tributary receive an overall NC SAM rating of Medium (Hydrology = Low, Water Quality =Medium, and Habitat= High) The proposed enhancement activities are anticipated to result in all five reaches receiving an overall NC SAM rating of High, with all primary functions receiving ratings of High, with two exceptions being the upper reaches of each stream, which are anticipated to receive Hydrology ratings of Medium due to the contmued incised state of the stream channel in these areas Table 1 displays the descriptors selected to represent current conditions for the five metrics and the anticipated future descriptors for these metrics following implementation of enhancement activities Reasoning for the selection of descriptors follows M4 (Feature Longitudinal Profile) — It is anticipated that raising the streambed as proposed in the Figure B cross - sections will improve the longitudinal profile in the lower half ofthese sand -bed stream reaches so they will no longer be considered "substantially" altered M5 (Signs of Active Instability) — It is anticipated that the raising of the streambed and flattening of streambed slope will reduce energy on stream banks, resulting in stabilization of the stream bed and banks in the entire length of the streams subject to enhancement M6 ( Streamside Area Interaction) — It is anticipated that raising the streambed will restore reference interaction within the lower third of both streams (KM 1 and MT 1), improve streamside area interaction to a moderate level in the middle reach of Kennedy Mill Branch (KM2), and have no effect on the current rating of the upper reach of each stream (KM3 and MT2) M 15 (Wetland Presence) — The extent of wetlands in the streamside area following enhancement activities has been determined based on the degree of incision of the channel ofthe two streams The areas anticipated to be restored to jurisdictional wetlands are currently underlain by hydric soils and support a primarily hydrophytic vegetation community Raising the stream bed, and the resulting elevation of groundwater levels in the adjacent floodplam, is anticipated to result in the restoration of streamside area wetlands in the lower third of Kennedy Mill Branch and the lower half of the Main Tributary M24 (Vegetative Composition) — The existing condition selection of descriptor B is primarily a result of the existence of extensive stands of Chinese privet within the streamside area The removal of privet is anticipated to result in the future selection of descriptor A for the streamside area of both streams The five NC SAM metrics anticipated to be affected by proposed enhancement activities are used to generate ratings for all three primary stream functions Hydrology, Water Quality, and Habitat Table 2 displays the current condition ratings for the function classes affected by the five metrics and the anticipated future ratings for these functions following implementation of enhancement activities A description of how these metrics are used in the determination of stream functions and the effects of the anticipated change in ratings resulting from proposed enhancement activities follows M4 (Feature Longitudinal Profile) is used by the Hydrology Class 4 function Stream Geomorphology and the Habitat Class 3 function Stream Stability Proposed enhancement activities are anticipated to elevate the current rating of Stream Geomorphology from Medium to High for the lower two reaches of Kennedy Mill Branch (KM 1 and KM2) and the lower reach of the Main Tributary (MT 1) and not change the rating of the upper reaches of the streams (KM3 and MT2) Proposed enhancement activities are anticipated to elevate the current rating of Stream Stability from Low to High for the lower two reaches of Kennedy Mill Branch (KM 1 and KM2) and the lower reach of the Main Tributary (MT 1) and elevate the current rating from Low to Medium for the upper reaches of the streams (KM3 and MT2) M5 (Signs of Active Instability) is used by the Hydrology Class 4 function Channel Stability, the Water Quality Class 2 function Indicators of Stressors, and the Habitat Class 3 function Stream Stability Proposed enhancement activities are anticipated to elevate the current rating of Channel Stability from Low to High for all five reaches considered Proposed enhancement activities are anticipated to eliminate NC SAM Water Quality stressors, elevating the current rating of the Water Quality primary function from Medium to High for all five reaches considered Proposed enhancement activities are anticipated to elevate the current rating of Stream Stability from Low to High for the lower two reaches of Kennedy Mill Branch (KM 1 and KM2) and the lower reach of the Main Tributary (NIT I) and elevate the current rating from Low to Medium for the upper reaches of the streams (KM3 and MT2) M6 (Streamside Area Interaction) is used by the Hydrology Class 4 function Floodplain Access and the Habitat Class 3 function Streamside Habitat Proposed enhancement activities are anticipated to elevate the current rating of Floodpla►n Access from Low to High for the lower reach of Kennedy Mill Branch (KM1) and the Main Tributary (MT 1), from Low to Medium for the middle reach of Kennedy Mill Branch (KM2), and not change the rating of the upper reach on each stream (KM3 and MT2) M 15 ( Wetland Presence) is used by the Baseflow sub - function of all primary stream functions as well as Water Quality Class 3 function Upland Pollutant Filtration For these functions, wetland presence is a value -added metric that increases a rating that is not already optimal In the case of these streams, Baseflow and Upland Pollutant Filtration are optimal in the current condition, therefore, a change in the status of streamside area wetlands has no effect on the NC SAM ratings M24 (Vegetative Composition) is used by the Habitat Class 3 function Streamside Habitat Proposed enhancement activities are anticipated to elevate the current rating of Streamside Habitat from Medium to High for the lower two reaches of Kennedy Mill Branch (KM 1 and KM2) and the lower reach of the Main Tributary (MT I) and not change the rating of the upper reaches of the streams (KM3 and MT2) Table 1 The NC SAM metrics affected by proposed stream enhancement activities, their current condition descriptors, and anticipated future descriptors following mitigation implementation The initials "KM" refer to locations of reaches on Kennedy Mill Branch, and the initials "MT" refer to locations or reaches on the Main Tributary to Kennedy Mill Branch The locations of stream reaches (KMO, KM1, etc ) are provided in Figure B Current Condition Post Restoration Estimated Descriptors NC SAM Metrics Affected by Mitigation Descriptors KMO KM1 KM2 KM3 MT1 MT2 M4 - Feature Longitudinal Profile A B B A B A M5 - Signs of Active Instability C A A A A A M6 - Streamside Area Interaction CC AA BB CC AA CC M15 - Wetland Presence NN YY NN NN YY NN M24 - Vegetative Composition BB AA AA AA AA AA Table 2 The NC SAM functions affected by proposed stream enhancement activities, their current condition ratings, and anticipated future ratings following mitigation implementation The initials "KM" refer to locations of reaches on Kennedy Mill Branch, and the initials "MT" refer to locations or reaches on the Main Tributary to Kennedy Mill Branch The locations of stream reaches (KMO, KM1, etc ) are provided in Figure B Gray highlighting indicates ratings anticipated to be improved by proposed enhancement activities NC SAM Functions Affected by Mitigation (in bold) Hydrology (1) Baseflow (2) Flood Flow (2) Streamside Area Attenuation (3) Floodplain Access (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer (4) Microtopography (4) Stream Stability (3) Channel Stability (4) Sediment Transport (4) Stream Geomorphology (4) Water Quality (1) Indicators of Stressors (2) Current High High High High High Condition In- stream Habitat (2) Post Restoration Estimated Ratings High Ratings High Stream Stability (3) Low High High KMO KM1 KM2 KM3 MT1 MT2 Low High High Medium , _ -High Medium High High __ High -- -- -- - High High High_ dMe Low High High _ :Mediu_m�N__ High -di um Low High - High , Low tHigh' Low Low I High g Medium Low ` � e High Low High High High High High High High High High High High High Medium High High High High High Low High High High High High High High High High High High Medium High High Medium High Medium Medium High High High - ---High--- High Yes No No No No No Habitat (1) High High High High High High In- stream Habitat (2) High _ High High High High High Stream Stability (3) Low High High Medium High _ Medium r ' Streamside Habitat (2) High High High High High High Streamside Habitat (3) Medium High High Medium _ i = x High Medium OVERALL Medium High High _ ° High" x High, High Easement Boundary Major Contour Minor Contour Priority 1 Stream Restoration - 5,322 It Stream Enhancement Level 1 - 1969 It -'� Abandoned Channel and Ditch Backfill Log Vane Cross Vane Kennedy Mill Br Start Restoration Sta 00 +00 End Enhancement Level 1 Elev 91.31 Kennedy Mill Reach 1 (KM1) Kennedy Mill Reach 2 (KM2) Kennedy Mill Reach 3 (KM3) Start Enhancement Level 1 Sta 13 +34 Elevation at grade 'o. o 1 J Location of Data Fonn KM 0 l QE1ev ributa estoraion \ +00 \ \\ hancement Level 1 0.5 loS Main Tributary / Reach 1 (MT 1) _Ilo•. Start Enhancement Level 1 Ste 08 +52 Elevation at grade Alan FrlkMomlenW. no. Main Tributary Reach 2 (MT 2) Main THlb itary 90 -_ 96 Y 9/ e 92 % 90 Y "' 88 86 0 100 100 300 400 500 600 ]00 B00 900 xrtbn(laatl raMne Channel Bed tpraposed Channel Bed tTOp Bank KMM1 — KM2 — KMM3 — Kennedy Mill Branch 96 C� 92 9 90 BB 86 0 200 400 600 900 low 1200 1400 ilatbn (hal) —*—Erlsdn9Channe1 Bed -4*- proposed Channel Bed -0 -TOp Bank Note: Pools are not depicted in profile due to scale. Pool locations will be determined In the field during construction. NOTES/REVISIONS Project: Pancho Mitigation Bank Wayne County North Carolina Title: NC SAM Evaluations 1 In = 200 ft FIGURE NO. Date: B Deoember2010 ii O No.: 10-010