20201569 Ver 1_More Info Received_20210428

Strickland, Bev
From: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 1:58 PM
To: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); [e-mail];
Turlington, Chad
Cc: Scott Brown
Subject: [External] RE: AID# SAW-2020-00870 Spring Village SD NWP-Notice of 401
Certification Process, Incomplete Application, and Additional Information
Attachments: C-2.0.pdf; 1633-IMPACT MAP.pdf; spring village PCN table V2.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Emily,
Below you will find responses in red as prepared by Terracon (Env. Consultant) and 4D Site Solutions (project
engineer). The primary change is that the developer has identified a way to reduce the wetland impact to <0.1 acre,
which will hopefully allow DWR to more easily process without an Individual WQC. I have updated the impact table from
the PCN accordingly (attached). We look forward to continuing to assist you with your final 404 review.
Chad,
The reduction in the wetland impact to <0.1 acre should negate the Individual WQC requirement even though it has
already been placed on public notice.
Please let me know if either of you have additional questions or comments.
Regards,
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Senior Scientist — Natural Resources
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Rd., Suite 1071 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
D [phone] 1 M [phone]
[e-mail] I terracon.com
From: Greer, Emily C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 6:05 PM
To: [e-mail]; Turlington, Chad <[e-mail]>
Cc: Harbour, Jeff W <[e-mail]>
Subject: AID# SAW-2020-00870 Spring Village SD NWP-Notice of 401 Certification Process, Incomplete Application, and
Additional Information
This notification is for the above referenced project and serves to notify the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) and applicant of the 401 certification process and inform the applicant about the deficiencies of the permit
application. Please provide your response in direct reply to this email within 30 days from the date of this notification or
contact the Corps county representative to request an extension of this deadline. Otherwise, the application will be
automatically withdrawn. Also, please ensure the AID# is provided in the subject line of all correspondence related to
this project.
1

To NCDWR: After review of the submitted Spring Village SD permit application, dated March 15, 2021, and the attached
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 Water Quality General Certification (GC) No. 4256, dated December 18, 2020, it appears
that an individual 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) is required from the NCDWR for the proposed activities. The
permit application received by our office on March 15, 2021, provided the nine required elements for an individual
WQC, and receipt of the dated permit application constitutes the Corps' initial receipt of the 401 WQC application.
Unless NCDWR is granted a permit review time extension, a waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on
this request for certification within the set reasonable period of time from the date of the complete 401 request. The
reasonable period of time for the NCDWR to act on this WQC request is 120 calendar days. The date upon which the
waiver will occur if NCDWR fails or refuses to act on the certification is July 13, 2021.
Applicant/Consultant: Please note, should we finalize our review prior to receiving the 401 WQC, you may receive a
provisional general permit verification from the Corps. Once a 401 WQC is issued or waived by the DWR, the Corps will
provide you with a final general permit verification. Your proposed work shall not commence until after the 401 WQC
has been issued or waived AND until a final general permit verification has been provided to you by the Corps.
The following information is required to complete the permit review:
1. Hyacinth Lane, both ends of Amaryllis Lane, Hosta Way, and Bloodroot are not proposed to connect to existing
roads, but rather terminate in a manner that either supports the need for additional impacts to complete the
road or are roads to nowhere with an unknown potential for additional impacts; therefore, the proposed project
does not meet the terms and conditions of the applicable permit. The Corps sees the applicant's note about the
Town's requirements for stub roads, as well as the statement regarding no responsibility on the applicant's part
for activities that may occur on adjacent properties. Upon learning the Town's requirements, the applicant
should have redesigned to accommodate both Town and Corps requirements. Furthermore, because the
proposed project would provide the avenue by which additional impacts would likely occur on adjacent
properties in the foreseeable future, these activities fall within the scope of review for the applicant's permit
request, despite the statement. As such, the applicant must redesign road termini at the above referenced
locations in the form of a hammerhead/T-stub, cul-de-sac, etc., without impacts to wetlands, and provide the
updated information and drawings, as applicable. Failure to do so will result in the elevation of the permit
application by the Corps to an Standard Permit review and the application will be withdrawn for
incompleteness. Withdrawal of the application by the federal agency will result in an automatic withdrawal of
the 401 WQC application. Please note, that reapplication of the project following the federal withdrawal will
require the applicant to restart the 401 WQC application process, beginning with the pre -filing
requirement. The roads as shown on the site plan meet the requirements as set forth by the town. The town
requires that public roads be extended to undeveloped properties for possible future extension. To our
knowledge, there are no plans for development of the adjoining parcels. We have no control on how the future
projects will be developed. Bloodroot Street is not projecting into a wetland on the adjoining property to the
best of our knowledge. The road stub is less than 150' long and therefore a turnaround is not required. The
northern end of Amaryllis Lane is also not projecting into a wetland and is less than 150'. The southern end of
the street is providing access for maintaining the proposed storm pond. The street will not be extended beyond
what is shown. The southern end of Hyacinth Lane is a dead end street that provides access to a wet pond for
maintenance. The pond is less than the required length for a turnaround.
2. An analysis of all supporting infrastructure, such as roads, utility lines, and stormwater, is the crux of
determining if a proposed project is single and complete. The application states that six wet ponds are proposed
for stormwater; however, none are identified on the provided drawings. Will new or existing utilities support the
development? Will the development be on septic? Are there sidewalks? How many lots are being
proposed? Please provide an overall drawing showing all relevant infrastructure and information. Additionally,
please label the open areas and any attendant features on the overall impact layout. The project will be served
by new utilities to include public water and public sewer and a storm drainage system. The six wet ponds have
been shown on the overall site plan. This is a stand along project when completed. No additional wetland
2

impacts are needed for the construction and functioning of the project. The information about the site that you
are asking for is too much to show on the reduced 11x17 scale. We have attached a 24x36 overall site plan that
should provide the answers to your questions.
3. What activity is proposed along the bank of PHB? It is noted that the activity appears to be above the OHWM;
however, the question remains. No activity is proposed along the bank of the existing pond. There will be some
clearing along the western side in order to utilize the existing pond as an amenity feature for the site.
4. Please clearly label the limits of disturbance/location of S&E measures on the overall layout drawing. The limits
of disturbance has been shown as requested. However, individual measures have not been shown. The measures
will not be legible at the scale on the 11x17 overall. NCDEQ has approved the erosion control plan for the project.
5. Please define the label "OPL" shown on the drawings. OPL stands for old property line. The property hasn't been
recombined to date. Once the property is recombined, the OPL line will be removed.
6. Please provide a cross-section: facing downstream from the head of the culvert at the proposed crossing; cross
section included in attachments
that shows Blackhorn Lane and the wetland line; profile included in
attachments; no wetland impact
that shows the southern termini of Amaryllis Lane and the wetland line. profile
included in attachments; no wetland impact
7. The downstream inverts on the plan view and longitudinal profile for the crossing are different. Please explain or
correct. The downstream invert is 306.60'. This was a typo and has been corrected.
8. Please clarify what the road slope and width are. The road is 27' wide from back of curb to back of curb to meet
the Town of Angier standards. The roads within the development will be public maintained roads constructed to
town standards. The cross slope is 2% per the town standards.
9. Is that a proposed scour hole on the upstream side of the crossing at the pipe invert? If so, please provide a
purpose and need. If not, please provide a purpose and need justifying the impact area on the upstream side of
the crossing. There is no scour hole. The existing area required some excavation to meeting pipe separation
requirements. The grading in this area has been tightened up which reduces the initial wetland impact that was
submitted.
10. Will a riprap dissipator be installed at the downstream invert out point? If not, please provide a purpose and
need justifying the permanent wetland fill beyond the pipe. No rip rap dissipator will be installed on the
downstream side. The impact area shown is the clearing needed for the pipe installation, etc. The impact area
has been modified to the toe of the fill slope.
11. Has the road width at the crossing been reduced aside from crossing at a narrower point? For instance, if present,
have the sidewalks been reduced to only one at the road crossing (with crosswalks to ensure safety) to reduce
the width of the crossing? If not, please provide a justification for why avoidance and minimization measures
beyond siting were not pursued. The road is a standard cross section throughout the site. The road is a public
road that must meet town standards. The road as shown in the standard cross section as required by the town.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Thank you -
Emily Greer, Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington District - Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
910.251.4567 (o)
3

:\Carolina Land Group\1633-Ogburn Property Subdivision\CIVIL 3D\DWG\1633-DESIGN.dwg • C2.0 SITE • 4.5.2021 7:44:07 AM
CIRCLE
DRIVE
0
NORTH
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
EIP Oo EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE
EPKO EPK-EXISTING PK NAIL
ERBO ERB-EXISTING REBAR
N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
CMP - CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
HW - HEADWALL
PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
- SETBACK LINE
WETLANDS
EDGE OF WATER
PERMANENT EASEMENT
FENCE LINE
I SIGN I
X
SIGN
PP • UTILITY POLE
C• GUY WIRE
❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
N WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
WATER SURFACE
SITE NOTES
CIRCLE DRIVE
PUBLIC R/W (27' BC TO BC)-
— I—
— 5/8'
ERB
' 8 ,/
N /F
kMES P. O'BRIEN & WIFE,
JULIA M. O'BRIEN
DB 1578, PG 514
PB C, PG 160A
5/8„ 9/8„
ERB
ERB
gij 5/8" 1
ERB I
N /F
JBS'S COMPANY, LLC
DB 2132, PG 106
PB F, PG 552C
1. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN ONLY WHERE
EVIDENCE COULD BE FOUND TO VERIFY LOCATION. PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION OF THE SITE, THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO
VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE UTILITIES. ALL
DAMAGE INCURRED TO EXISTING UTILITIES DURING
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
2. ASPHALT AND BASE TYPE SHALL BE PER THE DETAILS.
3. HANDICAP RAMPS, SIGNAGE AND PARKING SPACES SHALL
BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INSTALLED PER
FEDERAL ADA AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.
4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB OR TO THE
FACE OF SIDEWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. ALL RADII ARE 5' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
6. PARKING STALLS MUST BE STRIPED WITH A 4 INCH
CONTRASTING STRIPE (YELLOW ON CONCRETE AND YELLOW
OR WHITE ON ASPHALT PARKING LOT).
7. HANDICAP PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE DESIGNATED BY
BLUE STRIPING AND EITHER A BLUE SYMBOL ON A WHITE
BACKGROUND OR A WHITE SYMBOL ON A BLUE
BACKGROUND. ALL HANDICAP PARKING STALLS REQUIRE
THE INSTALLATION OF THE PROPER SIGNAGE.
8. ALL PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LAID OUT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE PLAN DIMENSIONS.
9. ALL WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND
REGULATIONS.
10. ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER TOWN
OF ANGIER AND STATE REGULATIONS.
LANDSCAPING NOTES:
■
■
5/8"
ERB
5,250 SF
�. AC)
52
\ 5,250.ASF
— —
1
i
TBM
4D DISK #1
N 640,966.035 —
E 2,081,389.279
ELEV 326.40
NC GRID NAD 83
(2011)
NAVD 88
5/8" \
ERB
WETLANDS`.`.`.`..
+ . y r�
C
5,928 SF
(0.14 AC
C
5,394 SF
(0.12 AC)
©2,2
N /F
JEFFERY B. STEPHENSON
DB 3198, PG 802
PB 2001, PG 853
■
P
C
6,511 SF
(0.15 AC)
MS
EXISTING
POND
N /F
EDWARD J. BOWDEN & WIFE,
CHARLOTTE ROSE B. BOWDE
DB 533, PG 90
PB 15, PG 5
5/8"
ERB
0
5/8„
!Eh OILY.
5,322 SF
(0.12 AC)
6,390 SF
(0.15 AC)
6,404 SF
_(0.15 AC)
N
6,018 SF
5,819 SF
-(0.13 AC)
5,328 SF
0
5,250 SF
(012 AC)
5,250 SF
5,250 SF
(0.12 AC)
SITE DATA
DEVELOPER
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY, STATE
PIN NUMBER
TOWNSHIP
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE
ACREAGE TO BE DEVELOPED
ZONING
EXISTING USE
PROPOSED USE
DISTURBED/DENUDED AREA
CAROLINA LAND GROUP, LLC
341 KILMAYNE DRIVE - SUITE 201
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA
0683-19-2678
0684-10-3784
0684-10-5183
0684-20-7231
BLACK RIVER
49.25 AC
49.25 AC
PUD
UNDEVELOPED
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
42.21 AC
SETBACKS REQUIRED:
SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOME
20 FT 20 FT
15 FT 10 FT
5 FT 5 FT
20 FT 10 FT
FRONT
CORNER SIDE
SIDE
REAR
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED:
429,095 SF
(10%) 214,548 SF
619,546 SF
248,016 SF
TOTAL REQUIRED (20%)
USEABLE SPACE REQUIRED
TOTAL PROVIDED
USEABLE SPACE PROVIDED
N /F
RODNEY E. McGEE & WIFE,
ANGELA J. McGEE
DB 2138, PG 474
PB 99, PG 177
EIR (BENT)
WITI ANGLE
IRON WITNESS
BEGONIA STREET
50' PUBLIC R/W (27' BC TO BC)
1"
EIP
©2,
N /F
CREO M. McIVER, II & WIFE, /
BENITA H. McIVER
DB 805, PG 330
J
J
J
0
J
CO
0
0_
0
/
ECS
II
6 626 SF
(0.15 AC)
6,626 SF
6 626 SF
(0.15 AC)
BLUEBELL STREET
50' PUBLIC R/W (27' BC TO BC)
W1— E..-�//� EIR.
—�
rdIN
-- 1
/
5,460 SF 5,460 SF
0.13 AC 0.13 AC
E1I
5,460 SF
(0.13 AC)
5,460 SF
(0.13 AC)
5,460 SF
0.13 AC
5,460 SF
0.13 AC
/
5,460 SF
0.13 AC
5,460 SF
0.13 AC
5,460 SF
(0.13 AC
O7 ® O 10 11
Ay
-------------------------
vl2/T---- w12
1. ONE LARGE CANOPY TREE REQUIRED PER SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT, TO BE PLANTED IN THE FRONT YARD
OUTSIDE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. TWO SMALL MATURING TREES (CREPE MYRTLES PREFERRED) MAY BE USED IN LIEU
OR LARGE CANOPY TREE UNDER OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES.
2. HEIGHT AND SPREAD OF TREE SPECIMEN SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS
OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, AMERICAN STANDARD
FOR NURSERY STOCK.
3. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH THE TREE TRUNK. KEEP MULCH A MIN. OF 4" AWAY FROM THE TRUNK
BASE.
*THIS LANDSCAPING PLAN IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TO MEET WITH THE TOWN OF ANGIER UDO. THE OWNER OR
DEVELOPER IS ENCOURAGED TO CONSULT WITH A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN ORDER TO DEVELOP A PLAN THAT IS
MORE IN DEPTH THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. THIS PLAN IS FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY.
EXISTING
T—POST
i
•
i
•
•
•
•
N /F
ALEX & EVANDER BALLENTINE
DB 253, PG 160
N/F
ALCOLM DAVID WATSON & WIFE,
• MARIE COATS WATSON
• DB 871, PG 749
i!
•
•
5,460 SF
0.13 AC
5,460 SF
0.13 AC
MN
5,460 SF
0.13 AC
(\1C)
N /F
GREGORY FAMILY PROPERTIES, LLC
DB 3741, PG 692
PB C, PG 76B
MN _ MN
NC 210 N
60' PUBLIC R/W (35' BC TO BC)
0
m
0
0
m
iNJ
CV
0
J
CO
0
3-
O
5/8"
ERB
1/2„
ERB
3„
EIP
�•I •T • }T T 7 •�• • �:1 • .� •j
Eiji --_
1Eiji •11111111 MOM
I!I!IIPI 11i110l 1111l-
257
256
255
259
0
I
0
0
1
0
0
I
262
251
I
237
0
ip
238
0
239
0
0
0
241
246
242
0
243
244
50' PUBLIC R/W (27' BC TO BC)
MINN
Ligno
mai
1111111101
MINIM
cmcsoivo
e11e=
acaac,aaAan`'•
EXITING
T— POST
co
0
1-
0
N /F
YVONNE Y. GREGORY
DB 1398, PG 286
PB 2007, PG 976
BLOODROOT STREET
50' PUBLIC R/W (27' BC TO BC)
iIN:NIiiIN
ocewowso
li
2
EIR
4V
•
©2,
m
0
0
co
C
Ct
0
J
co
0
0_
O 1
•
• • • L *WETANDS,',*,'.'
©MI
i1
N /F
GREGORY FARM PROPERTIES, LLC
TRACT 1 OF
DB 2952, PG 625
PB 2007, PG 898
•
5/8"
ERB
EXISTING
POND
x
5/8"
ERB
( 2
N/F
GEORGE STANLEY ROYAL
& WIFE,
MICHELLE LATRONE ROYAL
DB 3612, PG 515
PB 2007, PG 898
L
_J
100
3"
EIP
EXISTING
I —BEAM
EIP
(LEANING)
5/8"
ERB
N /F
YVONNE Y. GREGORY
DB 1398, PG 286
PB 2007, PG 976
LADISLAV MICHALKA & WIFE,
ALZBETA MICHALKA
DB 2462, PG 367
PB 2007, PG 898
0
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
LENGTH
RADIUS
BEARING
CHORD
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 100
200
0.0
NC GRID NAD 83 (2011)
400
1 inch = 100 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 1.12, Fayetteville, NC 28306
REVISIONS
011111111//,
02
PROJECT NAME
SPRING
VILLAGE
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
CLIENT
CAROLINA LAND
GROUP, LLC
341 Kilmayne Drive - Suite 201
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
SEAN/ CALEB
DRAWN BY:
SEAN/ CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1633
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=100'
MI
DATE RELEASED
APRIL 5, 2021
SHEET NUMBER
C-2.0

4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
wwwADaltesolutlon.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
SPRING
VILLAGE
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
CLIENT
CAROLINA LAND
GROUP, LLC
341 Kilmayne Drive - Suite 201
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SEAN
PROJECT NUMBER:
1633
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=250'
DATE RELEASED
APRIL 26, 2021
SHEET NUMBER
w-1
OF 5

VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
INV - INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
- CREEK
WETLANDS
WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA: 3,781 SF
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
AA UHT Ur ANW\, H.U., LULU.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PP(1FFCCInMAI I Ann CI IPVFYnP — I —dc71
IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 3,781 LF
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
INSTALLATION OF A NEW ROADWAY AND CROSS
PIPES. THE WETLAND IMPACT WILL CONSIST OF
THE PROPOSED ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED
STORM SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN.
TOTAL IMPACT: 3,781 LF
0
4,
312
CI-86`\\ /CI-84
312 311 -DI-89_-��,��_
18.37 LF ® 0.54% 15" RCP
310warm
—
■ 3 3 / CI„-85
oP^wiI
— 4bPt- 4 4
� I
INV: 307.00 I II
\_
,III
1=
pp —
' -AL
0 309
308
/ / .jenne'■ ■ maw / / /
•
1 118.37 LF ® 0.54% 15" RCP
CI-83 w
1
0
li I
1a
CV
315
310
305
300
NN
INV: 306.60
3
3
PIPE 1 3
USE NCDOT
HW 838.01
FINISHED
GROUND
_ 2X 74.00
EXISTING
INV 307.00'
LF ®0.54% 24" RCP
GROUN
INV
— -
306.60'
oca
0
V)
0
N-)
co 0
o
pry M
L0
0
r.,-)
0+00
1+00
3
3 3
3
315
310
305
300
40
3
3
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
20
40
(L LOZ) CS GVN GIND ON
80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax I910-426-5777 license number I C-2354
wwwADalbmlutlonacom
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
SPRING
VILLAGE
WETLAND
IMPACT MAP
CLIENT
CAROLINA LAND
GROUP, LLC
341 Kilmayne Drive - Suite 201
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SEAN
PROJECT NUMBER:
1633
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
APRIL 26, 2021
SHEET NUMBER
W-2
OF 5

LF ® 1.62% 15" RCP
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
313
LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— CREEK
WETLANDS
WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA: 3,781 SF
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
UHT Ur hNvVn, A.U., LULU.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PP(IFFCCI(IAIAI 1 Akin CI IPVFY(IP — I _A 71
IMPACT AREA
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 3,781 LF
DESCRIPTION
THE EXISTING WETLAND WILL BE IMPACTED BY
INSTALLATION OF A NEW ROADWAY AND CROSS
PIPES. THE WETLAND IMPACT WILL CONSIST OF
THE PROPOSED ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED
STORM SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN.
TOTAL IMPACT: 3,781 LF
BEGONIA
STREET
num
I■
h,1
;Lu
+T D CO _ar
GI N 4
c-18.37 LF ® 0.54% 15" RCP
II
cO
0
-
uu
0
9+
co
0+00
rn
co
18.37 LF ® 0.54% 15" RCP
315
310
305
300
314 -
co I f--
I�_9ZI—
r
1_Z 1-10
0+68.8s
r II
OO•
•
8+00
vAOv
WETLANDS
co
CO
0
rn
o• o
M
•
°'
r70
0+00
315
310
305
300
1+00
8Zl—
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
20
40
80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax license number 1 C-2354
wwwADalMaolutlon.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
SPRING
VILLAGE
WETLAND
IMPACT MAP
CLIENT
CAROLINA LAND
GROUP, LLC
341 Kilmayne Drive - Suite 201
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SEAN
PROJECT NUMBER:
1633
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
APRIL 26, 2021
SHEET NUMBER
W-3
OF 5

VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— CREEK
WETLANDS
WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
AA UHT Ur = VJ\, H.U., LULU.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PP(1FFCCInMAI I Ann CI IPVFYnP — I —dc71
330
325
320
315
Q
Z
0
0
r
W
0)
z
o
N
N
r
N
vi
N
r7
co
C71
6
N1,-)
M
0+00
330
325
320
315
1+00
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
20
40
80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax I910-426-5777 license number I C-2354
wwwADalbmlutlonacom
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
SPRING
VILLAGE
BLACKTHORN LN
X-SECTION
CLIENT
CAROLINA LAND
GROUP, LLC
341 Kilmayne Drive - Suite 201
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SEAN
PROJECT NUMBER:
1633
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
APRIL 26, 2021
SHEET NUMBER
W-4
OF 5

VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PROPERTY LINE
— CREEK
WETLANDS
WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS
AA UHT Ur h71vyc, A.U., LULU.
FINAL DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
PP(1FFCQInNAI I Ann Cl IPVFYnP — I —dc71
- 315
N
314
0
J
O
O
`l' `l' 4' 25.00 LF © 0.52% 18" RCP
• st, sk CI-25
0+I 0 I 0+58.33
�Y 4, 4' 4, 4 f }
4, 4' 4, 4, y'
• 4, 4,4, 4 \sfr fJ/
W 4, 4, * 4, 4
• y 4, 4, 4, 4, a•\ •
4, 4, 4/ 4, 4/ 4, 4, 4, V- '1310
.l, .l. 4, 4' 4, `,
320
315
310
305
314
312
66.67 LF ® 0.53% 30" RCP
FES-5
WETLANDS
EXISTING GROUND
FINISHED GROUND
co
r7
M
N•
M
N
r7
117)
0+00
320
315
310
305
1+00
40
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax I910-426-5777 license number I C-2354
wwwADalbmlutionacom
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
SPRING
VILLAGE
AMARYLLIS LN
X-SECTION
CLIENT
CAROLINA LAND
GROUP, LLC
341 Kilmayne Drive - Suite 201
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SEAN
PROJECT NUMBER:
1633
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
APRIL 26, 2021
SHEET NUMBER
W-5
OF 5

5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docirrent
eSAW-2020-00870 Carolina Land Group PJD September 2020.pdf
Fie type rmst be FDF
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes G No
2.62MB
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This
includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
fJ Wetlands
✓ Open Waters
✓ Streams -tributaries
✓ Pond Construction
E Buffers
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
2a. Site #* (?)
Impact #1
2a1 Reason*(?)
road crossing
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.110
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.110
2h. Comments:
NCWAM form attached
2b. Impact type * (.)
P
2c. Type of W.*
Headwater Forest
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
2d. W. name*
WHA
2e. Forested*
Yes
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition * (?)
Both
2g. Impact
area
0.110
(acres)
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
The engineer has designed the project 10 avoid all wetlands and waters other than the small impact that is needed for the road crossing. The road
cannot be shifted due to an abutting property line.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
The road crossing is designed to impact the smallest area of wetland while still meeting all necessary engineering criteria. All applicable BMPs will be
used throughout the duration of project construction to prevent any additional wetland or waters disturbance
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
G Yes C No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
✓ DWR ,r! Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank F7 Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
F' Yes r No