HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210195 Ver 1_NRTR Memorandum Friendly_20210423
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
Telephone: (919) 707-6000
Fax: (919) 212-5785
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610
Memorandum
Date: November 15, 2018
To: Jerry Parker, DEO
NCDOT Division 7
From: Brandon Phillips, Senior Environmental Specialist
STV Engineers, Inc.
Subject: NRTR Update – STIP U-5841
Guilford County, North Carolina
West Friendly Avenue Widening and Intersection Improvements
WBS Element No. 50232.1.1
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), proposes to make improvements to
West Friendly Avenue between Pembroke Road and North Elam Avenue for 0.2 mile in Guilford
County. The NCDOT has designated this project as State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) Project U-5841. The following Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) Update has
been prepared to assist in the preparation of a planning document for the purposes of the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and is an update from the NRTR prepared for the NCDOT
Division 7 in September 2018. All work was conducted in general accordance with the NCDOT’s
Environmental Analysis Unit’s latest NRTR Guidance and Template (November 2017). Field
work for this update was conducted on October 12, 2018.
The principal personnel contributing to this document were:
Group Manager: Michael Iagnocco, P.W.S.
Education: B.S. Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Oneonta, NY
Experience: Proj. Manager/Sr. Environmental Scientist, STV, 2003-Present
Project Manager/Principal, Law Environmental 1996-2003
Sr. Environmental Scientist, Woolpert, LLP 1990-1996
Project Manager, Carpenter Environmental Associates 1981-1990
Environmental Scientist, Lawler, Matusky & Skelly, Inc. 1980-1981
Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations and assessment, impact assessment, Section
404 permitting, document preparation, task coordination.
Principal
Investigator: Brandon J. Phillips, CHMM
Education: B.S. Biology, 1989
Experience: Senior Environmental Specialist, STV, 2005-Present
Project Manager, Schoor DePalma, 2000-2005
Consultant, Spectrum Environmental, 1998-2000
Principal, Ecological Science and Env. Management, 1996-1998
Project Manager, SAIC, 1993-1996
Senior Environmental Analyst, Carpenter Environmental, 1990-1993
Biologist, Ridge Environmental, 1989-1990
Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, mitigation, natural resources inventory,
protected species surveys, stream assessment, document preparation.
Investigator: Joshua L. Kotheimer, W.P.I.T.
Education: B.S. Environmental Technology, 2011, B.A. Chemistry, 2011,
G.I.S. Graduate Certificate, 2013
Experience: Environmental Scientist, STV, 2013-present
Research Assistant, North Carolina State University, 2012-2013
Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, GIS and GPS data handling, preparation of
documents and figures.
There has been a change in the Endangered Species Act Protected Species listed for Guilford
County. As of October 5, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists two federally
protected plant species and two fish species, and only one plant species was identified in the
September 2018 NRTR. Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) was added to the
Guilford County list on October 5, 2018. None of the listed federally protected plant species were
observed in the project study area and the October survey was conducted during the flowering
season for Schweinitz’s sunflower. For the plant species, the Biological Conclusion is rendered
based on survey results in the study area (Table 1).
Table 1. ESA federally protected species listed for Guilford County
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status
Habitat
Present
Biological
Conclusion
Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz’s sunflower E Yes No Effect
Isotria medeoloides Small whorled pogonia T Yes No Effect
Notropis mekistocholas Cape Fear shiner E No No Effect
Percina rex Roanoke logperch E No No Effect
T – Threatened
E – Endangered
Schweinitz’s sunflower
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: late August-October
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present in the study area along roadside
shoulders. A plant by plant survey was conducted by STV biologist Brandon Phillips,
CHMM on October 12, 2018. No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed and
the field survey was conducted during the flowering season. A review of NCNHP records
on November 15, 2018 indicates no known occurrences within one mile of the study area
and no effect to Schweinitz’s sunflower is anticipated.
Small whorled pogonia
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: Mid-May through early July
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Potential habitat exists within limited areas of the forests of the study area. Plant by plant
surveys were conducted by STV biologists Brandon Phillips, CHMM, and Joshua
Kotheimer, WPIT, throughout areas of suitable habitat on July 3rd 2018. No individuals of
small whorled pogonia were observed and the July survey was conducted during the
flowering season. There are records of small whorled pogonia being located in Guilford
County, but no records of small whorled pogonia being located in the study area USGS
topographic quadrangle. The NCNHP website was reviewed (November 15, 2018) to
determine the locations of the nearest populations of small whorled pogonia. The NCNHP
determined that no populations of small whorled pogonia were present within one mile of
the study area, so no effect to small whorled pogonia is anticipated.
Cape Fear shiner
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April-June (tributaries); year round (large rivers)
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Cape Fear shiner habitat includes clean streams with gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates
with pools, riffles, shallow runs; slack water areas with large rock outcrops; and side
channels and pools with water of good quality and relatively low silt loads. Potential habitat
does not exist in the project area streams. No formal survey for Cape Fear shiner was
performed. There are records of Cape Fear shiner being located in Guilford County, but no
records of Cape Fear shiner being located in the study area. The NCNHP website does not
list Cape Fear shiner and the USFWS IPaC has determined that no populations of Cape
Fear shiner were present within one mile of the study area, so no effect to Cape Fear shiner
is anticipated.
Roanoke logperch
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: year round; April – June (optimal)
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
In North Carolina, the logperch is known from the upper Roanoke River basin. The fish
typically inhabits warm, usually clear, small to medium sized rivers. Potential habitat does
not exist in the project area streams. No formal survey for Roanoke logperch was
performed. There are records of Roanoke logperch being located in Guilford County, but
no records of Roanoke logperch being located in the study area. The NCNHP website does
not list Roanoke logperch and the USFWS IPaC has determined that no populations of
Roanoke logperch were present within one mile of the study area, so no effect to Roanoke
logperch is anticipated.