20041785 Ver 2_401 Application_20121207

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: NC Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown St
Winston- Salem, NC 27107
13 �- I18sua-
RECEIVED
N.C.Dept. of ENR
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL DEC 0 5 2012
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Winston -Salem
7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC Regional Office
(919) 749 -8259
[phone] Fax
DATE: November 29, 2012 COURTESY
ATTENTION: Sue Homewood COPY
RE: Vaughn Village
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING:
® Pre- construction Notification (PCN) ® Plans ® Maps
® Documents ❑ Other
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For approval ® As requested ❑ For review & comment
❑ Please reply ❑ See below ® For your files
® Regular Mail ❑ Fed -Ex ❑ Delivered by KE
❑ Specifications
❑ Picked Up
COPIES
DATE
DESCRIPTION
2
11 -29 -12
PCN Cover Letter
2
11 -10 -12
PCN
2
10 -17 -12
Agent Authorization
2
Soil Survey Ma
2
USGS Map 7 2012
2
Jurisdictional Determination Form
2
Wetland Data Form UtNR - ATER OUALI
2
A roval Letters OT, DWQ stormwater, DLQ E &SC
2
10 -18 -12
Town of Swe sonville letter
2
Vaughn Village Goo le Aerial
2
11 -15 -04
DWQ RFMI letter
2
12 -16 -04
US Army COE Incomplete Application Notification 2004
2
Site photographs
2
11-15-04
Vaughn Village - DWQ RMI
2
11 -20 -12
8.5 x 11" surveys
Remarks:
THANK YOU!
Rec'd By-
Signed

KE
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
To: Andy Williams
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive; Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Re: Vaughn Village
Swepsonville; Alamance County, North Carolina
Keller Environmental Job No. 1226
USACE Action ID 2005 -20147
DWQ Project # 04 -1785
Dear Andy:
N.C.Dept. of ENR
DEC 0 5 2012
Winston -Salem
November 29, 2012
°f� � ���z r
Thank you for assisting AMEC and Keller Environmental (KE) resolving these
permit discrepancies. On behalf of Cape Fear Properties II, LLC, we are pleased to
submit the following project to you for US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) 404 approval
using Nationwide Permit 29. We are requesting After - The -Fact authorization to
permanently impact 140 - 1-inear Feet of Stream. We are also requesting to impact
0.0109 Acres of riparian wetland areas.
The existing subdivision is located '/o -mile west of the intersection of NC -54 and
NC -119 (East Main Street) in Swepsonville, NC. It is comprised of 44 lots, one house,
open space, 4 paved streets and utilities. There are also two streams and one pond.
There is an intermittent stream flowing to the pond from the off -site eastern wooded
property. The second stream flows on to the subdivision in the northeast corner and
transitions to a perennial stream below Colorado Drive.
The managing partner, Don Hadley, was recently notified that the COE 404 permit was
not finalized for this project. Mr. Kieth Kime previously applied for the 404 and 401 permits
but he is no longer involved with this project. The following permits and notification letters, for
your files, were obtained.
• NCDOT- January 18, 2005;
• NCDWQ Stormwater Permit NCGO10000 September 25,2006;
• NCDENR S &EC Plan June 22, 2004.

Vaughn Village Subdivision
404/401 Permits
November 29, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Since the other aforementioned NCDOT and NCDENR permits were obtained, the
current ownership team assumed that they had all of the involved permits. According to
google earth historical imagery, it appears that the property was cleared in 2005 and the
roads and utilities were constructed in 2006.
Since 2006, one house was constructed and is currently occupied as a private
residence. Though the remaining 43 lots do not have homes, the property has been routinely
maintained. Fortunately, DR Horton Homes (DRH) recently purchased some of the lots and
is under contract on several others. During their due diligence, their environmental team
discovered that the 404 permit process was not completed. DRH's consultant, James Cutler
of AMEC, appreciates your site meting with him on September 25, 2012. KE's involvement
started October 3, 2012 to finalize the permits and assist with the Lake Jordan riparian buffer
rules.
Stream and Wetland Impacts with Proposed Miti-gation
We are requesting that the three culverted stream areas be allowed to remain.
Additionally, we are proposing to fill the .0109 -acre wetland area in the middle of Lot 43.
Approximately 2.8 acres around the pond will be preserved for open space and
recreation. There is also a 20 -feet wide recorded easement around the approximately 1,275 -
foot stream on the property.
We have attached several items to the attached PCN to assist your staffs review of
the project. If you should have questions or require additional clarification please feel free to
contact me at 749 -8259 (cell) or email: iav(&-kellerenvironmental.com.
Sincerely,
Keller Environmental, LLC
Jay Keller
Principal
Cc: Sue Homewood, NCDWQ Winston -Salem Regional Office
Don Hadley
James Cutler, AMEC

WAIF
0 t 90 RECEIVED Office Use Only:
,o N.C.DeDt. of ENR
Corps action ID no.
c < DEC 0 5 2012 DWQ project no.
Winston -Salem Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre- Construc
ion o t1fication CN) Form
A. Appficant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit [I Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
El y es
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Vaughn Village
2b. County:
Alamance
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Swepsonville
2d. Subdivision name:
Vaughn Village
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
p
3. Owner Information luu
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Cape Fear Properties II LLC DEC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
1750/643
Don Hadley Mk�rds � wayf
QU
Branch
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
4009 Village Park Drive
3e. City, state, zip:
Knightdale, NC 27545
3f. Telephone no.:
(919) 261 -9850
3g. Fax no.:
(919) 261 -9849
3h. Email address:
dhadley @appliedvisionworks.com
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jay Keller
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Keller Environmental
5c. Street address:
7921 Haymarket Lane
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e. Telephone no.:
(919) 749 -8259
5f. Fax no.:
(919) 803 -0970
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8892 -69 -1300
Latitude: 36.026036 Longitude: -
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
79.350060
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
20.35 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Haw River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V; NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This existing subdivision Site is comprised of 44 lots, one house, open space, 4 paved streets and utilities. There are
also two streams and one pond. There is an intermittent stream flowing to the pond from the off-site eastern wooded
property. The second stream flows on to the subdivision in the northeast corner and transitions to a perennial stream
below Colorado Drive. The vicinity is mostly comprised of agriculture, silviculture & residential areas. There is an
elementary school, Dollar General & Honda manufacturing facility 1/4- mile to the northeast.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
.0701
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1275
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To provide suitable residential lots for homes and associated infrastructure and recreational areas for future residents.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This constructed neighborhood includes 4 roads, 44 lots, utilities and open space. There are 3 culverted stream areas for
2 roads and 1 driveway. Equipment that was used included excavators, bull- dozers and other land- grading equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Yes ❑ Unknown
No ® ❑
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: AMEC
Name (if known): James Cutler
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
September 25, 2012
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
We have attached the following permits and notification letters for your files.
NCDOT- January 18, 2005;
NCDWQ Stormwater Permit NCG010000 September 25, 2006;
NCDENR S &EC Plan June 22,2004.
COE Incompleted Application Notification 2005 -20147 December 16, 2004.
NCDWQ Request For More Information Letter November 15, 2004; DWQ Project # 04 -1785
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ®P ❑ T
grade & fill
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
.0109
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
.0109
2h. Comments: We propose filling the .0109 -acre wetland area in the middle of Lot 43.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Culvert & Fill
LIT to Haw River
❑ PER
® INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
6
47
S2 ®P ❑ T
Culvert & Fill
LIT to Haw River
❑ PER
® INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
6
50
S3 ®P ❑ T
Culvert & Fill
LIT to Haw River
® PER
❑ INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
6
43
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P [IT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and
tributary impacts
140
3i. Comments: the 3 stream impacts listed above have been culverted and headwalled.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

r
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4b.
Open water Name of wa
impact number — (if appli
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction ro o
5a. 5b.
terbody
cable) I Type of impact
then complete the chart below.
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
IPond ID I Proposed use or purpose
number of pond
J. 4e.
Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
5d. 5e.
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Flooded Filled I Excavated I Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number — Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary M impact
B1 ❑P ❑T
B2 ❑P ❑T
B3 ❑P ❑T
6i. Comments:
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
All 3 stream crossings utilized headwalls to minimize stream impacts. The Silverado Drive entrance road was constructed
immediately above the pond where the intermittent stream flows into it to avoid pond impacts. Stream impact 1 was
constructed just above where the stream transitions to perennial.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Grading was minimized to prevent erosion to the streams and pond.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
iverl ity
3c. Comments: Approiamately 2.8 acres around the pond will be preserved for open space and recreation.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool []cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Perrnittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
❑ Yes No
❑
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
22%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This low- density subdivision was
reviewed and approved by the local Swepsonville stormwater authority. Please refer to the attached October 18, 2012
letter.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Swepsonville
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
El ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes° to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The managing
partner, Don Hadley, was recently notified that the Corps 404 permit was not finalized for this project. Mr. Kieth Kime
previously applied for the 404 and 401 permits but he is no longer involved with this project. Since the other aformentioned
NCDOT and NCDENR permits were obtained, the current ownership team assumed that they had all of the involved permits.
According to google earth historical imagery, it appears that the property was cleared in 2005 and the roads and utilities were
constructed in 2006.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This development should not result in additional development nor impact nearby downstream water quality since it's
entire property is built-out.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
There's an existing wastewater line on the property that will convey to the town of Swepsonville's wastewater treatment
plant.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
®Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Sources included USFWS Ipac and NC Endangered Species websites. Also consulted with NC Wildlife Resources
Commission and NC Natural Heritage Program.
S. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
National Marine Fisheries Service
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping and recent property
topographic survey.
Jay Keller
11/29/2012
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC
(919)749 -8259
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name:
Address:
City, State, Zip:
Phone:
Project Name /Description:
Date:
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Staff
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Wake Forest, NC 27587
To Whom It May Concern:
Don Hadley
4009 Village Park Drive
Knightdale, NC 27545
(919) 261 -9850
Vaughn Village
October 17, 2012
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Staff
Mail Service Center 1650
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
As a representative concerning the subject site, I do hereby authorize and give
permission for Keller Environmental to represent or act as agent on my behalf and allow
the COE or any other regulatory agency to go on the property with a Keller
Environmental representative for such purposes as necessary to perform the job tasks.
Don Hadlev C �^
Name
Jay Keller
Keller Environmental, LLC
Owner's Signature
Preliminary Wetland & Stream Assessments - Jurisdictional Wetland Dellneatlons -Meuse & Tar River Stream Buffer
Evals & Coordination - 401/404 Water Quality Permitting - Stream & Wetland Restoration Threatened & Endangered
Species Surveys- Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling -Phase I-IV Environmental Site Assessments -Tree Surveys

F -*-",----,--,*,--,r—,--,-, , 7 - I 000oz: aIRDS
,OR-- 000S 0
P,PJdrl
ANIP" I
MLJ

9 °20' S
— \�
IS
— W79 °21
-
1
•
�'
{ �►
• ir
I `�
`
Mr. o0
i
w7s
- -z
i
W9 21-5
Aw
5
lb

_ J -1
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State-North Carolina County/parish/borough: Alamance City: Swepsonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.026036° 1% Long. - 79.350060 °
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Haw River
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Haw River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03030002
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g,, offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc... ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
®Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ick Lis "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
®Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ® "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 1275 linear feet: 6 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: .0701 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 987 Delineation Manua
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
Non - regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section ULA.I and Section III.D.l. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILAA and 2
and Section IILD.1.; otherwise, see Section ID.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section ULB.1 for
the tributary, Section ULB.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section ULB3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IU.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: ick Lis
Drainage area: Pick Lis
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through ick Lis tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are ick Lis river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are ick Lis aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are ick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain: Linear channel appears to be modified and exhibits side-
cast soil piles adjacent to channel
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick Lis
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/0/6 cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g,, highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: fair /good.
Presence of run/rifile/poot complexes. Explain: intermittent complexes.
Tributary geometry: tc�k Li_s
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 1 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: ick Lis
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: ick Lis
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: ick Lis Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: ick Lis Explain findings: iron oxidation & ground water seepage.
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
scour
❑ sediment deposition
❑
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
® High Tide Line indicated by: ® Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation linestchanges in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality-, general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: headwater wetland.
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:Very good.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick Lis Explain:
Surface flow is: ick Lis
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: ick Lis Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: Linear channel connects wetland directly to Conaby Creek.
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are ricklfsA river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Yick Lis aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: ick Lis
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the ick Lis floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: water color is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain-wetland marsh with facultative trees on perimeter.
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findingswery good diversity according to identified species and observed
indicators.
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: ick Lis
Approximately ( ) acres in total arc being considered in the cumulative analysis.

.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (YM) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Ropanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IILD:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD: Headwater Wetland connects directly to RPW via.
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: fish in stream channel.
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILB. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: 1275 linear feet 6 width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWL
® Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes,
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
t0 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act larisdicdon Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
®Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
® Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
® Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
udgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit RUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1:2,000; Mebane.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Alamance County.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Google Maps March 28, 2012.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

d
&J e4a�Ot 00 r i — (,4/ e7i/01 tid P1 A
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont ,�
ProJect/Site: Ir e CWCounty:�W SPVVj* �I11QN� Sampling Date: opy -.plZ
Applicant/Owner. h State: IV �j
Sampling Point: GyCTl4 .11A
Investigator(s): of el' Pw1 Section, Townshlp, Range: JVAI
Landform (Nilslope, terrace, etc.): _ LD Local relief {concave, oonvex, none): _/Iq %n oI- Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: N 3A M12 /a Lon W Q JLF2 -1 oZ ._.
Soil Map Unit Name: 4' 9 Datum:
�� sl � NWI classification: D�'
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ,*! f% No (If no, explain in Remarks.) oK NOW7
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation-X—, Soil , X or Hydrology _X naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects. imeortant faatura*_ A+n_
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes—X— No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No a �1.
Remarks: j j
' �/ ~�P� ,f/�4�'� a�QA �4.i J'p 4 P/i
HYDROLOGY c -d,►,P ,.L i i _ ..!_ ...d,.,.�_�_.L
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indk�tore (minimum of two rea �i di
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is reaurredi
check all that away)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (Be)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized
_ Drainage Pattems (B10)
_ Rhizospheres on living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (CO)
_, Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface {C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (86)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aqultard (03)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
— Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D6)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches);
Water Table Present? Yea No
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Depth (Inches): �
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Oncludes capillary frin a
�0
Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available.
Remarks:
Pe ;6k of Mcr:�rA, r+�, n rI o d�
�hordiny ofr�' ✓isf¢
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont– Interim Version i
i
,
i

a
bjell�i*ill Ala,
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Pofr�t:Q1`Ni°®f
TreeSlCtum (Plot size: ) % Cover Spades? Status
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
Seal (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
/� y Total Cover
Shrube turn (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
0.
7.
7.
8.
9. '
10.
11.
12
=Total Cover
ood a (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
or on a
Number of Dominant Spades
That Are DBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Spades
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
Total % Cover of,
Multloly by-,
OBL spades
,reh&40' G
Lv=
Mv_
/o
en! apt Ica P
Nd
CGt
o 'r A cctl �0
D
F�9c
_sde An #1 e-ar Oklowlte /O
AN G
tWR
7.
8.
9. '
10.
11.
12
=Total Cover
ood a (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
or on a
Number of Dominant Spades
That Are DBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Spades
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
Total % Cover of,
Multloly by-,
OBL spades
x 1 =
FACW species
FAG species_
x2=
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: 9_
(A) 9-10 (B)
9, 63
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophyde Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >60%
3�ncee IndexIss:93 A"40
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.8 cm) or larger In diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and less
than 31n. (7.8 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, Including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 It (1 m) in height
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophyda
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL
Mefla,,W No, l --- jvolo oe x4ile
Sampling Point:
Depth Matrix Rodox
fingbeal Color (moist) % (moist) Tvae Textu Remarks
0 YA TA deLAAW V& N'+!° o .
' r»�wctt
'Type: C= Conoentratlon, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL=Pore Unina. M=Matrix.
Hydrtc Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydrtc Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (MLRA 147)
_ Hlstic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (AALRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A18)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (89) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_. Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 138,147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F8)
_ Red Parent Material (72)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow bark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
r Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 138)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbdc Surface (F13) (MLRA 138,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (85)
Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (If observed): A) 0
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydrtc Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: NDA&
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

iid =5 2912 17 :92 25225714:8 HARRIS U-0JIPMENT P. =.ta�E 04/ 16
• a..s4vt.
A
i
f
STATE OF FORTH CAROU N A
DEPARTMENT OF TRA,N+SPORTA,TION
MICHAEL F EASLEY i.YNDO TIPPET r
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 18.22
ALAMANCE COUNTY
Keith Kime
Cape Fear Properties 11
3246 Swepsonvrllc- Saxapahavr, Road
Graham. North Carolina 27233
SUBJECT: Driveway Permit —V I aughp Village (Private) Subdivision Located on
Swepsonville Road ISR 2116'
Dear Mr. Kirne.
Attached for your files is a copy". of the Driveway Permit properly executed Approval of this permit is
subject to the attached special provisions and comments made on the standard driveway construction
drawing This permit is valid for one year from the date of approval. A written request is needed for an
extension. You will need to submit a request by January 18, 2006.
When the wont has been completed, notify Nanette Fogleman, by letter at P. O. Box 766. Graham. NC
27253 -0766 so that a final inspection can be made. if you have any quc;tions. pica; a contact Ms.
Fogleman at ( ?36) 5770-6833.
Sincerely.
C Iq Edwards. P E
ntl�lRIC r ENGINEER
Attachments
CNE/INDF /ndf
cc- .1. M Mills. P.E.. NCD01 7ivision Engineer
1%lamance County Plannir.�! Dcpartmant
Fred Grogan 314M 7eaigr
DPA0511 S 19 Vaughn V 511211::

17:02
JUL 18 2006
a "'4
J
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNMO TIPPFTT
GOVCRVOR SFCRFT%R'v
July 13, 2006 v
ALAMANCE COUNTY
SUBJECT: Encroachment Agreemen; - Harris Equipment Company and the Town of
Swepsonville - Installation of 35 LF of 18" Steel Encasement by Bore and Jack
Method Located on SR 2159
Hams Equipment Company
PO Box 565
Warrenton, North Carolina 27589
Dear Sir:
Attached is Right of Way Encroachment Agreement, which has been properly executed.
The Department of Transportation does not guarantee the right of way on this road, nor will it
be responsible for any clairh for damages brought by any property owner by reason of the
Installation.
Approval is given subject 1:6 posting a $2,500.00 Performance and Indemnity Bond with the
Department of Fransportation and upon adhering to the attached special provisions.
If you need additional information, please advise.
]MM /NDF:ndf
Attachments
Cc: J. Robert Memory, State Utll•r/ Agent
C.N. Edwards, Jr.
Town of Sweasonvllle
John Coxey
P 0. Box 765. Gruham. NC 2- 253.0766
Sincerely,
e1SMIi P.E.
ENGINEER

O� .'e' W
_co
Cape Proaerhes II, 1 LC
Alto: W. James C. Hams, Jr
P.O. Box 517
Warrentown, NC 27589
Subject: Construction Stormwater Permit No. NCG010000
Project Name: Vaughn Village
Project ID: Alama 2004 -036
Alamance County
Dear Mr Harns-
Michael F Easley. Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Can la Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Sep mber 25, 2006
Alan W. Klimek, RE Director
Division of Water Quality
TM-DiV%ian a1 Land Resources Vas informed our briice-of the-Div,—on of Water Quarity (DWQ)
that your Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for the abovementionec land disturbing activity has
been approved. Our office would like to remind you that, upon approval cf your Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan, you were also issued a Stormwater Permit (NCG010000) to discharge
stormwater associated with construction activities. This Permit is enforceable by DWQ; therefore, your
site is subject to inspections by our office in addition to the Division of Land Resources.
Please read and become familiar with all of the permit conditions if you have not already done so.
Some of the major permit requirements are outlined below: -
1) During active construction, maintain a copy of the approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Plan on site.
2) Maintain a rain gauge on site and keep a record of the rainfall arr,ounts and dates, to be made
available to DWQ upon request.
3) Inspect all erosion and sedimentation control facilities and stormwater runoff discharges at least
once every seven calendar days and within 24 hours after any storm event of greater than 1/2 inch
of rain per 24 -hour period. Provide record of inspections to DWQ upon request.
4) Provide the operation and maintenance necessary to maintain the optimal performance of all
stormwater controls. Take corrective action Immediately If facilities are not functioning properly
and k Sep record of z ny such action with the above inspection records.
5) Notify our office within 24 hours f you observe significant amounts of sediment In a river, stream,
pond, wetlands, or other body of water. Provide written notice within 5 days.
It is your responsibility, as the financially responsible party, to insure that the persons performing
the construction activities at the site are familiar with the requirements of the Stormwater Permit, as well
as the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. Please be advised that violations of the Stormwater
Permit may be subject to civil penalty assessments of up to $25,000.00 per day, per violation. Should
you have any questions, pie, ise contact me at (336) 771 - 51100.
Sincerely, J
�.
Jennifer M. Freeman
Division of Water Quality
cc. SWP — WSRO / LO — WSRO / SWP — Central Files I Steve W. Tedder, SWP Regional Supervisor_ cuo
Q
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtowa Street Winston Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone] Customer Service
In:emet httpJlh2o.enr.state.nc.us FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Actors Employer -50% Recyded10% Post Consumer Paper

F"' Winston- Salem Fax:[phone]
North CarMHU s�
Deputnent of Environment and Natural
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Rose, Secretary
James D. Simons, P.G, P.E., Aizector
And State Geologist"
June 22, 2004
Cape Fear Properties A, LLC
Attention: Mr. Keith Kime
P.O. Box 86
Swepsonville, NC 27359
Dear Mr. Kime:
Jun 22 04 1103
', .- .
NCDENR
WINE, ON -SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIYI IQN OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SEMON
LETTER OF APPROVAL
WITH MODIFICATIONS
This office has reviewed the subject erosion and sedimentation ct,ntrol plan and hereby issues
this letter of approval with modifications. A list of the modifications is attached. This plan
approval shall expire three (3) years following the date of approval, if no land- disturbing activity
has been undertaken, as is required by Title 45A NCAC 4B .0029. Should the plan not perform
adequately, a revised plan will be required (U.S. 113A -54.1 (b)).
Please be advised that Title 15 NCAC 4E.0018 (a) requires that a copy of the approved erosion
control plan be on file at the job site. Also, you should consider this letter to give the notice
required by GS 10A -61.1 (a) of our right'of periodic inspection to insure compliance with the
approved plan.
North Carolinas Sedimentation Pollution Control Program is performance- oriented, requiring
protection of existing natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following the
commencement of this project, it is determined that the erosion and jedimentation control plan is
inadequate to meet the regWfl-imeats of tra Sedimentation and Foution Control Act of 1973
(North Carolina General Statute 113A, -51 through 66), this office may require revisions to the
plan and implementation of the revisions to insure compliance with the Act.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is-conditioned upon your compliance with
Federal and State water quality laws, regulations, and rules. in addition, local city
or county ordinances or rules may also apply to this land - disturbing activity. This
approval does not supersede any other permit or approval.

DBR Winston -Scilem Fax:[phone] Jun 7 '04 1103 P.03
LETTER OF AJ?I&OVAL WIT'S MODMCATIONS — Vaugao Village — Clearing and
Grubbing Only
June 22, 2404
Page 2 «
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the
Financial Responsibility Form, which you have provided. You arb requested to file an amended
form if there is any change in the information included on the Arm. in addition, it would-be
helpful if you notify this office of the proposed starting date for flats project. Please notify as if
you plan to have a preconstruction co er , an we vin p o
Your cooperation is appreciated, and we look forward to working'with you on this project.
Sincerely,
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
MEG/Is
Enc: Certificate of Approval With Modifications
NPDES
cc: BHM Design
WSRO File

A
'r
DEPR Winston -SalEm Fax :[phone] Jun 22 34 11 :04 P.04
LETTER OF APPRO i WITH MODMCATIONS - Vaughn Village - Clearing and
Grubbing Only
June 22, 2004
Page 3
PROJECT NAME: Vaughn Village- ClearinS and GubbiDg Only
COUNTY: Alamance
RIVER BASIN: Cape Fear
WATER CLASSIFICATION: Other
FACILITY NUMBER: Alama 2004 -036
SUBMI`r= BY: BHM Design
RECEIVED BY'L.Q.S.. June 9, 2004
REVISED SUBMITTAL (X)
MODIFICATIONS
This plan is approved with the following modifications:
1. The energy dissipater at the pipe outlet must be at least 4.5 feet wide and 6 feet long.
2. Check dams on the north west corner of the site must outlet through the silt fence.
r

MAYOR
RAYMOND L. HERRING
MAYOR PRO TEM
HUGH DOSS
TOWN CLERK
ANGELA WALKER
Matthew K. Brubaker
Land Acquisition Manager
DR Horton, Inc.
2000 Aerial Center Pkwy
Suite 110
Morrisville, NC 27560
TOWN OF SWEPSONVILLE
P.O. Box 282
TOWN COUNCIL
GAIL MILLER
DOUG SCOTT
DARRELL NEWTON
Swepsonville, North Carolina 27359,-
(336) 578 -5644 :
Fax [phone] October 18, 2012
Re: Vaughn Village Subdivision
Jordan Lake Nutrient Management Strategy
Riparian Buffer Applicability
Dear Mr. Brubaker:
This office has reviewed the plans and documents pertaining to Vaughn Village and the Jordan Lake Riparian
Buffer Rules. A certificate of approval and signed plat were provided to Cape Fear Properties II, LLC on August 8,
2007. The subdivision plat was found to comply with the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance of the Town of
Swepsonville and was approved for recording in the Alamance County Office of the Register of Deeds Book 72; pages
63 -65. Vaughn Village Subdivision is approved as -is including recent changes.
The Town of Swepsonville received a Phase II Stormwater permit on September 8, 2005 with subsequent
modifications in 2007. As part of the Jordan Lake Nutrient Management Strategy (NMS), that became effective on
August 11, 2009, we incorporated the Jordan Lake NMS into our stormwater program. This includes the 50 -feet
riparian buffer rules on all jurisdictional surface waters. Since Vaughn Village received approval prior to August 11,
2009 and was constructed in accordance with the approved plans, the Jordan Lake NMS Riparian Buffer Rules do not
apply to the subject properties.
If you should have questions or require Additional clarification please feel free to contact me at (336) 578-
5644 or email: swepsonvilletown @ttriadbiz.rr.com
Sincerely,
Town of Swepsonville
Raymond Herring '
Mayor
Cc: Jay Keller, Keller Environmental LLC
Don Hadley, Cape Fear Properties, LLC

EM
:0001/
r N
,4"
490
0*-*.
*N
�o/
COloradil"
1,0
2012 Google
Fl, cl g e ry Date: 3/28.,'20 1112 1993 !at 36 027775- Ion -79.351240° elev 555 ft
Eye alt 3225 ft.
'0

�Et I,\ 11,
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200520147 County: Alatnance
Incomplete Application Notification
Property
Owner Cane Fear Proverties
Attn: Mr. Kieth Kane
Address P.O. Box 86
Swepsonville, NC 27253
Telephone Number 336 -578 -6281
Location/Description of Proposed Activity: The proposed site for the Vaughn Village Subdivision is
located on the north side of Highway 119, west of its intersection with Highway 54; in Swepsonville,
Alamance County, North Carolina.
Type of Permit Applied For (check one): IP 0 NWP # 39 (X) GP # 0
Applicable law: Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (X); Section 10, Rivers and Harbor Act ( )
YOUR APPLICATION/PRECONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE AND
CANNOT BE EVALUATED UNTIL TIDE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS RECEIVED:
Your application/pre- construction notification form has not been completed and/or signed (see remarks).
X Under the conditions of Nationwide Permit #_39, you are required to submit an aquatic resource mitigation
plan. The required plan has not been included with your notification.
Your application/pre - construction notification did not include information describing measures you have
implemented to avoid and minimize impacts to Waters of the United States.
Your submitted project plans or maps were insufficient, too large, or not legible (see remarks).
X Your application/pre - construction notification did not include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites,
including wetlands, vegetated shallows, and riffle and pool complexes as Jequired.
Your project is in a designated trout water county. Natiunwide pernmif regional conditions require that a
copy of your application be submitted to the local NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) for comment.
(Address: Western Piedmont Region Coordinator, 3855 Idlewild Road, Kernersville, NC 27284 -9180)
other
REMARKS:
If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
Andrea Wade at telephone number nn__ (919) 876 - 8441 extension 31.
Project Manager Signature �)'C,_ Date December 16, 2004
CF: Winston -Salem DWQ Regional Office, 585 Waughtown Street, Winston- Salem, NC 27107 -2275

Site Photography — October 8, 2012 AMEC Project No. 6735124008
Vaughn Village Alamance County, NC

Site Photography — October 8, 2012 AMEC Project No. 6735124008
Vaughn Village Alamance County, NC

�0F WArFgp [.Michael F Lasley, Go�cmor
�0 G William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P E Director
Division of Water Quality
November 15, 2004
DWQ Project # 04 -1785
Alamance County
CER'I'IFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Cape Fear Properties, LLC
Attn: Kieth Kime
Post Office Box 86
Swepsonville, NC 27253
Subject Property: Vaughn Village
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Kime:
On November 3, 2004, the Division of WatcC Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
November 2, 2004114 feet of streams to construct the proposed culverts. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as
discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your
application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore,
unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move toward
denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 21­1 .0506 and will place this project on
hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following
information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Detailed Map
Please provide a location map for the project large enough to show roads from I -85.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in
writing and Daryl Lamb of the DWQ Winston -Salem Regional Office. If we do not hear from
you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we
will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands,
waters or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application
are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Larry Eaton or Ms. Cyndl Karoly at
NOn arolma
401 Oversight(E)press Review Permitting Unit �rlTtl!!Yl /if
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolma 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] Internet: htip• 1/h2o.enr state no us /nctivetiands
An Equal Opportunity /At irmatrve Action Employer-50% Recycledll09b Post Consumer Paper

Cape Fear Properties, LLC
Page 2 of 2
November 15, 2004
919 - 733 -1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss
this matter.
Sincerely,
I'/
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight Unit
CBKlbs
cc: Daryl Lamb, DWQ Winston -Salem Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Rename: 04.1785 • Vaughn Village (Alamance) On Hold

P.B.
�o
A
64. ® /
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the
jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on
this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Name:
1 itic:
Date:
ID#:
Wool U
Q�
0
m, p
©p
I rl
IIll
lj I
UI
GRAPHIC SCALE
zoo o ioo no wo eoo
( IN FEET )
i inch = 200 ft
%WKff YAP
MIGEND:
4 TOP OF TiANt POEM
p STREAM CA POW
o WMAND POINT
X POND POW
is
STREAM ARFA
WETLAND AREA
POND AREA
57RFAM CROSSING AREA

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
32.87
N '
L2
48.20
N 9' "
L3
29.37
-
L4
12.40
N ' 'W
L5
44 95
N46.01'59'E
L61
14.91
S28. 5'34
L7
41.35
S4
L8
21.73
1677
L9
24.74
00' 7'E
L10
38.95
1983
L11
45.84
8443'37"
L12
42.94
N '15'47"
L13
5386
54.46'15
1-141
56.24
N Ir '
L15
2740
48'
L16
7766
5'42' 1"E
L17
52.96
N38'23'11'E
L18
36 80
5 ' '
1-19
4947
S37'03'1
L20
989
'29'11 "W
L21
51 13
37'5 "
LINE TABLE a� m SCHM
LENGTH BEARING GpA0 �� 4�
37.83 551.35'00 +r 10 44
82.16 S3W25*24W 2880 S51'13'47'W ZC �Y� P1 \ 8`B ^ �oY„ S6°R \
L531 45.26 S61'09'15
L94 36.94 •1 8J4 �`11��� S15 851 0
L551 2512 5 '47' ! ' 842
L561 25.15 '09'W STREAM AREA-
L571 31.66 S4703' -W 0.103 ACRES
L58 48.06 S46.40'07'W /' 1 S14 N7:
L59 35.33 'W 8 �0 ,r E VICINITY MAP
L60 1043 '48
L61
62 57 790 w''S
14.37
LENGTH
1• •W
29 �', !�/
838
'52'48 "E
L62
4.88
4011
L68
N30' 'S
S12 W2 -8
L69
A� �j\ P7
L83
L70
21.38
N26' 5'W
N8 3 '44'
818 � S13
�
/ •si �S. �"
L64
N7Z32'46V
26.46
1677
S50 3'0 'W
B72 827
"~
2 -11 •'��•
N 22'01 V
L65
1983
16.80
L76
1426
S7 49'50"
L77
P8
4•p ' 5"
L78
34.91
APPROXIMATE Nc �5'S8" E 555. 72 YG 64) 803 `3 j>kG:f,�.,,• 1-7a,h, c �`y °j
STREAM CROSSING 1413 �p�RYB• � ,! � � 2 -7 v
0.0130 ACRES d< lr" S9
42.79 798 S11 821'6 8 W2 -12-
i �% r: w2 -5 P9 -
42 789 S10 810 W2 -4 _
96 W1 -3 W2- W2 -1 -
�'�1/]ry n f, _ 784 `,01�!„ S8 L83 WOSq W2 -2 _ - - _ -
7 769
LINE TABLE
62 57 790 w''S
LENGTH
•
L66
16.42
'52'48 "E
L67
4.88
6 •30'321W
L68
2253
S60' 4'19
L69
1673
I W1- 1 WELNDS AREA=
L70
11.56
N26' 5'W
L71
1776
88•
L72
1199
N7Z32'46V
L73
1677
76.30' 6'W
L74
535
N 22'01 V
L75
1983
LURES OF ENCHNEERS R80ULNIORY
JURM01CrM VAUCAM VFUMM
L76
1426
S7 49'50"
L77
1893
4•p ' 5"
L78
34.91
S1 746 S2
179
389
74, Q
J
62 57 790 w''S
•
757 S8 782 w
- S5 767 1Q `' Wt -7
I W1- 1 WELNDS AREA=
- _ _- - -
WETLANDS AREA=
764 43 0.0109 ACRES
O
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
0.0194 ACRES
-
.777 750
STREAM AREA=
, Sa 0.0252 ACRES
755
= - _- _ - _ - - _- - - - _ - - '
tcruaros8 Suav6Y OFUS ARMY
''
- - - - - -
'
LURES OF ENCHNEERS R80ULNIORY
JURM01CrM VAUCAM VFUMM
0
774 ��s wscES�ex�
- - - -
nnvRw msiav uwiwaa earn
S1 746 S2
WATER __
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of thee P 10
74, Q
jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on
P71 P 13
this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
P12
LEGEND:
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
O TOP OF BANK POINT
STREAM CA POINT
five year; from this date. This determination was made utilizing the appropriate Regional
GRAPHIC SCALE
o WETIAND POINT
Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
X POND POINT
50
o u 50 100
STREAM
WETIANO AREA
Name:
WETLAND MAP 1
POND AREA
Title:
+rte .. b - M
STREAM CROSSING AREA
Date:
( IN FEET)
+ooue .oro� m m
2
:
1 inch - 50 ft.
4
J

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L19
49.47
S37'03'1 8V
L20
9.89
NW29'1 VW
L21
51.13
'51
L22
15.63
S4 36'57'
L23
63.45
56'04'2 '
L24
3599
ND4' 8'18'W
L25
3887
N14'42'03'E
L26
92.94
N21-38-1 5-E
L27
73.58
14' '
L28
56.12
N36'49' 0'E
L29
3471
N20'I6'04'E
L30
5884
N3T31'1
L31
67.22
N4512'28
r.
I
o•.
V.9
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L32
24.21
N 1 5.55.38'
L33
9771
N31' 16'31'E
L34
1025
S52'44'28'E
L35
9678
S3 31' 8
L36
26.57
S 1 z 1 '
137
68.05
L38
57.18
S34'57'50'W
L39
33.43
T '
L40
57.57
5 T48' 'W
L41
71.39
S15'41'48'W
L42
93.77
S20'18'11'W
L43
35.89
L44
39.57
SO 29'56'
L45
65.99
55 08'56'1N
17
l6
APPROXIMATE
STREM CROSSING "It, 14
FJL=0.0146 ACRES &
49.86 LF ,p
L26
s _ Y
10
i C3 STRFA AREA=
�� 0.138 ACRES
12
d� 13
9 9.�
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the
jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on
this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be retied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Name:
Title:
Date: -- —
ID#: --
l9
OI �1
IP
L28 l 119 I L3 a
0 d�
1 L tag LJJ �2 _
1 •P� mo `p?
i
O �J
VAUGH VILLAGE
P.B. 72, PG. 65
10
O
O
I
f�
1CMI►YIIP
21
O �
o
y �S
2j
GRAPHIC SCALE
10 0 :e w iao sao
(
IN F'EIST )
I inch = 50 tL
LEGEND:
TOP OF BAWL POINT
0 STREAM CA POINT
0 WERAND POW
X POND PONT
STRFAM AREA
WETLAND AREA
POND AREA
STREAM CROSSING AREA

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
LBO
77.84
N46'34'07'W
LB1
53.58
41'16'52
LB2
71.02
S
L83
62.43
g
L84
7446
L85
13299
1'56 1
Las
19.61
S55-46 -41'
L87
69261
N83'57'46'
LBO
50031
N71'51 • '
L89
7924
N65'50'10'
L90
72.24
N76-25-2TJ
L91
66.59
N87.1 8'53'E
L92
32.44
N06.27'11
L93
16.66
N10'00'13'E
L94
667
NO '
L95
7378
N45-34-47X
L96
18.78
'07'E
L97
43.53
1 34'45'3 'E
L98
2569
S87.38'14'E
L99
62.41
L100
45 89
S8850'21'E
L101
7"
S '
L102
48301
N8Y50'21 'W
POND AREA=
1.19 ACRES
P6 PS �p
147241.28 E LOS
144.19'
\\ P3
/ >P P7SS
P8 - - - - -
X19 P9 - _- PZ
- -- POND -- - - - F
=Loo =- l
__-: - - - - -_ -- _-_ --- P15
-- - P14 P16
WATERVIEW DRIVE
p11 P72 P1,3
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the
jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on
this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Title: _
Date:
M #: --
GRAPHIC SCALE
WETLANDS AREA -
0.0398 ACRES
P18
P77
w 0 a W 100 200
(D1 FM)
1 Inch - 50 rL
1loRt NAP
LEGEND:
♦ TOP DF BANK POINT
P STREAM CA POOR
C WETLAND POINT
X POND POINT
STREAM AREA
WETLAND AREA
POND AREA
STREAM CROSSING AREA