NC0021555_Permit Issuance_20040112

NPDES DOCIMENT !;CANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC00.?',-PC555
:MR"` proggazaao „,, /Ve„ or f
Document Type:
Q.LezfLt,Issuance .
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
January 12, 2004
This document is printed on reuse paper - igrzore any
content on the rezrerse side

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Mayor Derryl Garner
Town of Newport
P.O. Box 1869
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Dear Mayor Garner:
NCDENR
January 12, 2004
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NC0021555
Town of Newport WWTP
Carteret County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for
renewal of the subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached
NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated
May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
The final permit authorizes the Town of Newport to discharge up to 0.750
MGD of treated domestic wastewater from the Town of Newport's current WWTP
to the Newport River, a class C water in the White Oak River Basin. The permit
includes discharge limitations and/or monitoring for flow, biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), ammonia, dissolved oxygen, fecal
coliform bacteria, pH, and total residual chlorine.
These are the modifications that have been included in the final NPDES
permit:
• An effluent limitation page for flow of 0.750 MGD has been added to the
permit. The Division must approve a request for Authorization to
Construct or rerating prior to construction and/or modification of the
WWTP to treat flows in excess of 0.500 MGD.
• The addition of a total residual chlorine limits for 25 ug/1 at 0.500 MGD
and 23 ug/1 at 0.750 MGD. In response to comments received concerning
the TRC limits, you will find attached DWQ guidance for dechlorination
and ultraviolet disinfections systems. According to current DWQ
procedure, all dischargers to North Carolina waters must receive limit of
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]/FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Newport WWTP
NC0021555
Page 2
total residual chlorine. If the discharge provides information that chlorine
is not used for disinfection, the limit could be removed.
• The addition of summer and winter weekly average NH3-N limits at 0.500
and 0.750 MGD to reflect the Division's current policy. According to the
Code of Federal Regulations [40 CFR 122.45 (d)(2)], "continuous
discharges ...shall unless impractical be stated as... average weekly and
average monthly discharge limitations for POTWs". The weekly average
limit is established based on a ratio of 3:1 (weekly average: monthly
average) for municipal dischargers. The corresponding weekly average
limits for ammonia nitrogen at the flow of 0.500 MGD are 4.2 mg/1 for the
summer and 10.8 mg/1 for the winter. At the flow of 0.750 MGD, the
corresponding weekly average limits for ammonia nitrogen are 3 mg/1 for
the summer and 7.2 mg/1 for the winter.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in
this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory
hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this
letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and
binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit
does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of
Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Federal or Local
governmental permits may be required.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Ms. Jacquelyn Nowell at telephone number [phone], extension 512.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Mark McIntire
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachments
cc: Wilmington Regional Office / Water Quality Section
Mike Wicker/ Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P. A
P.O.Box 1737
300 S.W. Broad Street
Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
Wayne Mobley/DEH-Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational WQS
NPDES Unit/Permit File

Permit NC0021555
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management C mmission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
is hereby autho
Town of Newport
ed to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Newport WWTP
Kirby Lane
Newport
Carteret County
to receiving waters designated as the Newport River in the White Oak River Basin in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
The permit shall become effective February 1, 2004
This permit and
the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2007.
Signed this day January 12, 2004
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
Mark McIntire
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0021555
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are
hereby revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number
is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this
facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included
herein.
The Town of Newport is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.5 MGD wastewater treatment facility located at the
Newport WWTP (Kirby Lane, Newport) in Carteret County. This permitted facility
discharges via outfall 001 and includes the following wastewater treatment components:
• Bar screens
• Dual activated grit chambers
• Influent /waste sludge pump station
• Oxidation ditch with dual mechanical rotors,
• Parallel dual clarifiers
• Chlorination feed facilities
• Chlorine contact chamber
• Dechlorination unit with floating aerator
2. Upon receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division, construct and operate
facilities for a design capacity of 0.75 MGD, and
3. Discharge from said treatment works into Newport River, currently a class C stream in
the White Oak River Basin, at the location specified on the attached map.
•
Rio ".4
j ! •i r.

V •
1
71101
1
•
•
Facilit
Latitude: :
Longitude:
Quado
Stream Class:
Receiving Stream:
34° 46' 50.3 '
76°51' 51.7'.
Newport
Newport River Permitted Flow: 0.500, 0.750 MGD
• 1.•
• .*:•-
. 74.
.r 11,.. • , :
'•,
st • •
....1
Information
Sub -Basin: 03-05-03
Facility
Location
flor'I
j
Newport WWTP
NC0021555
Carteret County
1
8
0
lf
11

Permit NC0021555
A. (1) EFFL1 DENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (0.5 MGD)
Beginning on February 1, 2004 and lasting until expansion above 0.5 MGD or
expiration, tho Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from outfall
001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified
below:
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample Locationl
Flow
0.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 20°C 2
(April 1 - October 31)
11.0 mg/L
16.5 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 20°C 2
(November 1 - March
31)
22.0 mg/L
33.0 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 - October 31)
1.4 mg/L
4.2 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(November 1 - Mar
h 31)
3.6 mg/L
10.8 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Effluent
Temperature
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
See Note 1
Grab
U, D
pH3
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen4
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
See Note 1
Grab
U, D
Total Residual Chlorines
25 µg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
See Note 1
Grab
U, D
Total Nitrogen
(NO2+ NO3+ TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Oil and Grease
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Notes:
1. U: upstream at Highway 70 Bypass bridge. D: downstream at Highway 70-A bridge. Instream samples shall
be collected 3/week during the months of June through September and once per week during the remaining
months of the year.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. The daily average effluent dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L.
5. Chlorine limit applicable only if chlorination used for disinfection.
There shall be
discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0021555
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (0.75 MGD)
Beginning upon expansion above 0.5 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge treated wastewater from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be
limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample
Locations
Flow
0.750 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 20°C 2
(April 1 - October 31)
7.0 mg/L
10.5 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 20°C 2
(November 1 - March 31)
14.0 mg/L
21.0 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Influent and
Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 - October 31)
1 mg/L
3 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
(November 1 - March 31)
2.4 mg/L
7.2 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
Effluent
Temperature
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
See Note 1
Grab
U, D
pH3
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen4
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
See Note 1
Grab
U, D
Total Residual Chlorines
23 µg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
14/100 ml
28/100 ml
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean)
See Note 1
Grab
U, D
Total Nitrogen
(NO2+ NO3+ TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Oil and Grease
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Notes:
1. U: upstream at Highway 70 Bypass bridge. D: downstream at Highway 70-A bridge. Instream samples shall
be collected 3/week during the months of June through September and once per week during the remaining
months of the year.
2. The monthly average effluent CBODS and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent
value (85% removal).
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4. The daily average effluent dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L.
5. Chlorine limit applicable only if chlorination used for disinfection.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

TOWN OF NEWPORT
P. O. BOX 1869, 200 Howard Blvd.
Newport, NC 28570
December 18, 2003
Ms. Jacquelyn M. Nowell
NPDES Unit
NCDENR DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
RE: NPDES Draft Permit No. NC0021555
Dear Ms. Nowell;
The Town of Newport has received our draft permit. Please be advised that our plant as
currently configured is not designed to remove chlorine, and will be unable to comply
with the new 0.25 pglL Chlorine effluent limit at 0.5 MGD flow. If I were to reduce the
chlorine level enough to comply with this limit, I would not meet the Fecal Coliform limits.
I consider the Fecal limit to be the more important, and we will strive to meet that limit.
It would take an A to C to add dechlorination equipment. Our plan is to submit an A to C
for the plant revisions to 750,000 GPD later this month. In that request we will be
including a change in disinfection to an Ultraviolet System. This is a part of the Town's
shift away from gas chlorine for safety reasons. We will also be installing a bleach
disinfection system in our water system in the near future.
The Town of Newport agrees to all of the other provisions in the draft permit. They are
in line with what we were expecting.
To keep from being in a non-compliance situation from the effective date of the new
permit until we can get the plant upgrades completed, we are requesting that this
provision of the permit be removed.
Sincerely,
Clay Dulaney
Public Utilities Director
Cc: Michael Wicker, Hobbs, Upchurch & Assoc.
R.E. Mason, Town Manager

CARTERET COUNT
NORTH CAROLINA
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a notary public of said County and State, duly commis-
sioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared
Patti J. Lyerly
first duly sworn, deposes and says that he (she) is Clerk
who being
(Owner, partner, publisher or other officer or employee
authorized to make this affidavit)
of THE CARTERET PUBLISHING CO., INC., engaged in the publication of a
newspaper known as CARTERET COUNTY NEWS -TIMES, published, issued,
and entered as second class mail in the Town of Morehead City, in said County
and State; that he (she) is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement;
that the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached here-
to, was published in CARTERET COUNTY NEWS -TIMES on the following
dates: 1 1 /21 /2003
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document, or legal adver-
tisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a news-
paper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the
General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the mean-
ing of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This 21st day of November, 2003
(Signature oaf rson making affidavit)
Sworn and subscribed to before me, this:
21st day of November, 2003
ti (..0 - 'C' )vl\C-V
Notary Public
My commission expires July 16, 2006
Public Notice
State of North Carolina
Environmental Management
Commission/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Notification of Intent
to Issue a NPDES
Wastewater Permit
On the basis of thorough staff review and application of NC
General Statute 143.21, Public law 92-500 and other lawful
standards and regulations, the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission proposes to issue
a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to the person(s)
listed below effective 45 days from the publish date of this
notice.
Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be
accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice.
All comments received prior to that date are considered in
the final determinations regarding the proposed permit. The
Director of the NC Division of Water Quality may decide to
hold a public meeting for the proposed permit should the
Division receive a significant degree of public interest
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting information
on file used to determine conditions present in the draft
permit are available upon request and payment of the costs
of reproduction. Mail comments and/or requests for
information to the NC Division of Water Quality at the above
address or call Ms. Valery Stephens at (919)733-50133,
extension 520. Please include the NPDES permit number
(attached) in any communication. Interested persons may
also visit the Division of Water Quality at 512 N. Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, NC 27604-1148 between the hours of 8:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to review information on file.
Permit Number NC0021555, Town of Newport, Carteret
County, has applied for renewal and modification of its
permit discharging treated wastewater to the Newport River
in the White Oak River Basin. Currently BOD5, NH3 as N
(ammonia), dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, and total
residual chlorine are water quality limited. This discharge
may affect future allocations in this portion of the receiving
stream.N21
DEC 2 9 2003
13102343
13526567

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0021555
Facility Information
Applicant/ acility Name:
Town of Newport/ Newport WWTP
A licant Address:
PP
P.O. Box 1869 Newport, NC 28570
Facility Address:
Kirby Lane Newport, NC 28570
Permitted Flow
0.500 MGD
Type of Waste:
100% Domestic
Facility/Pe
it Status:
Renewal; Modification request
Facility C1a
sification
11
County:
Carteret
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Newport River
Regional Office:
Wilmington
Stream Classification:
C (Tidal)
USGS Topo Quad:
Newport NC.
H31 SE
303(d) _ Listed?:
See Below
Permit Writer:
Jackie Nowell
Subbasin:
030503
Date:
11 / 17 / 03
Drainage Area
(mi2):
46.8
f.
�.�"' -�
.,
_�k;: -
'
Summer 7Q10
(cfs)
0.4
Winter 7Q1(�
(cfs):
0.9
Average Flow
(cfs):
63
IWC (%):
74.4
Primary SIC
Code:
4952
SUMMARY OF
FACILITY INFORMATION AND WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
The Town of Newport is requesting the renewal of existing permit of 0.500 MGD in addition to a
modification and expansion of plant to 0.750 MGD based on minor changes to the plant.
Facility discharges to Newport River with a stream classification of C. The discharger is located
7.4 miles upstream of the SA classification. The SA segment is listed on the 2002 303d list.
The cause of impairment is fecal coliform and waters are closed for shellfishing.
Town will be requesting a re -rating of WWTP for the expansion to 0.750. (Rerating of the facility
will be very crucial to increasing the design flow to 0.750 MGD. Submitted calculations will
have to show hat every unit could meet the hydraulic loading due to increased capacity.) The
WWTP serves the Town of Newport and Newport Correctional facility for a total population of
3649 persons Facility has reached the 80/90 capacity therefore the request for expansion by
plant re -rating. Application states 300,000 GPD of inflow and infiltration comes into plant.
The existing effluent Limits @ 0.5 MGD are as follows:
Summer Winter
Qw 0.500 MGD 0.500 MGD
BOD5 11 mg/1 22 mg/1
NH3 1.4 mg/1 3.6 mg/1
DO 5 mg/ 1 5 mg/ 1
Fecal Coliform 200/ 100 ml 200/ 100m1
Effluent monitoring for TRC, temperature, TN, TP , Oil & Grease
Instream monitoring for DO, fecal coliform, temperature and conductivity.
Per historical WLA information, at the Newport discharge point:
DA = 46.8 mi2
QA = 63 cfs
s7Q 10 = 0.4 cfs
w7Q10= 0.9cfs
30Q2 = 2.8 cfs
Newport WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 1

c
WiRO Staff Report recommendations:
Site of Newport discharge is 5-10 feet above sea level. Newport River is used for commercial
fishing and recreational boating and fishing. The river is tidal although designated Class C.
Town wants to upgrade to 0.75 MGD by making improvements to clarifiers and adding a
mechanical grit removal system and UV disinfection. Plant is Class 2 facility.
WiRO is unclear whether Shellfish Sanitation will approve of the request. Shellfishing waters
downstream are closed or conditionally open and portions of the river are on the 303d list for
fecal coliform. RO thinks Newport may be limited to spray irrigation or reuse options for
expansion. Newport is on the 80% list due to exceeding design flow in 1998 and needs to
expand. IB&I work has been done and continues. Because of recent drought, its not clear
whether the tlepairs have reduced flow because 2001 flows averaged about 66% of design flow.
Plant meets current limits on a consistent basis and is well operated.
RO Staff review of alternatives - 1) Underground disposal is not feasible with this amount of
flow. WiRO has attempted to get the Town to discuss regionalization with surrounding towns
including Mo ehead City and Beaufort. 2) Regional discharging system may be unfeasible due
to the pro 'ty of waters in the area to shellfishing waters. 3) A regional nondischarge system
is conceptual y workable but in the individual towns do not want to participate in a regional
system and a pursuing expansion options on their own.
WiRO recommends renewal of existing permit, but recommends careful and thorough review of
expansion opion with all concerned parties.
Consultation with Shellfish Sanitation
Called J. D. Potts of Shellfish Sanitation in Morehead City about the Newport expansion. Said
that a dye study would be needed to see the effects of the effluent. Because of the tidal effects
of Newport River the dye would start to come back before it reaches the SA waters. They
would have to do a hydrographic study. He used to inspect the plant, it appears to be fairly
well operated and the effluent looks good. Problems: 1) People around there blame the
treatment plant for problems in the river. 2) The Newport River has a lot of political backing as
far as the she lfish farmers.
fi
Return call: Shellfish will definitely have to do the hydrographic dye study and they will reserve
comment until the study is completed. It may take some time for the planning of the study
because of the shorthanded staff, the actual study should only take 3-4 days. They will want
to install a tidal gage, because they want measure the flow so that they can release the dye at
flood time, wI ile the water is coming in. They will also sample the treatment plant at various
places where it could fail. They will sample the clarifier, get a bacterial count, determine the
dilution factors and then apply the final count of fecal at various points in the river.
RESULTS OF SHELLFISH SANITATION NEWPORT RIVER DYE STUDY
Dye study was completed on August 26, 2003. Purpose to see if the increased flow from the
Newport WW'ITP (to 750,000 GPD) would affect the permanent shellfish closure approximately
nine miles downstream. Tidal cycle information was needed and collected. The study shows
that an increase of 250,000 GPD by the Newport WWTF will not effect the present
location of > he permanent closure line in the upper Newport River. With proper
notification of a spill or malfunction, Shellfish Sanitation would have time to enact a temporary
closure.
DWQ RECOMMIZNDATION FOR EXPANSION TO 0.750 MGD
Due to lack of adequate modeling tool for tidal river, will recommend that existing loading for
oxygen consuing parameters be held the same and equivalent load be given at 0.750 MGD.
For ammonia limits must compare to see whether oxygen consuming or toxicity limits are more
Newport WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 2

stringent and assign the lower limits. Total residual chlorine limits will be added for both 0.5
MGD and 0.75 MGD.
Existing Loading (a, 0.500 MGD
Summer BOD5 = 0.5 MGD * 11 mg/1 * 8.34 = 45.87 lbs/day
Winter GODS = 0.5 MGD * 22 mg/1 * 8.34 = 91.74 lbs/day
Summer NH3 = 0.5 MGD * 1.4 mg/1 * 8.34 = 5.84 lbs/day
Winter NH3 h 0.5 MGD * 3.6 mg/1 * 8.34 = 15.01 lbs/day
Equivalent Iloading (a, 0.750 MGD
Summer BOD5 = 45.87 lbs/day _ 8.34+ 0.750 MGD = 7.33 mg/1
Winter BOD7 = 91.74 lbs/day _ 8.34+ 0.750 MGD = 14.66 mg/1
Summer NH3 = = 5.84 lbs/day _ 8.34+ 0.750 MGD = 0.93 mg/1
Winter NH3 -- = 15.01 lbs/day _ 8.34+ 0.750 MGD = 2.39 mg/1
Will not assi NH3 limit <1 mg/1 for a minor municipality. Summer and winter NH3 toxicity
limits at 0.75 MGD are 1.1 mg/1 and 3 mg/1, respectively. Since the oxygen consuming limits
are more stringent, will assign those limits at the expansion flow of 0.750MGD.
For protection of shellfishing waters downstream will recommend that fecal standard for SA
waters be giv n for fecal limits = 14/ 100 ml
Recommended limits at 0.750 MGD
Summer
0.750 MGD
7 mg/1
1 mg/1
3 mg/1
5 mg/1
Fecal Coliform 14/100 ml
Total Res. Chlorine 23 ug/1 23 ug/1
Effluent monitoring for temperature, TN, TP, Oil & Grease
Instream monitoring for DO, fecal coliform, and temperature. Will delete conductivity
monitoring due to DWQ policy. Fecal coliform will continue to be monitored instream because
of the pending TMDL that will be imposed for the Newport River.
Qw
BOD5
NH3 (monthly avg.)
NH3 (daily max.)
DO
Winter
0.750 MGD
14 mg/1
2.4 mg/1
7.2 mg/1
5 mg/1
14/ 100m1
TOXICITY TESING:
Current Requirement: None
Recommended Requirement: None
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY:
Facility has maintained a good compliance record since 2000. There have been recent flow
violations in June and August 2003 in addition to some pH violations in 2002 and 2003.
Average Qw fog 2003 = 0.4964 MGD. Average BOD5 = 2.49 mg/1, Average NH3-N = 0.57 mg/1.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
Parameters: Dissolved Oxygen, Fecal Coliform, Temperature, Conductivity
Upstream: US 70 Bypass Bridge,
Downstream : US 70A Bypass Bridge,
Review of instream monitoring data shows that the Newport River upstream of WWTP has DO
problems in the summer months. From June to September 2003, the upstream monthly
average DO values ranged from 3.7 mg/1 to 4.8 mg/1. Downstream values during the same
period averaged from 4.2 to 5 mg/1 DO. Fecal values exceeded the standard both upstream and
downstream in June 2003.
Newport WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 3

st
From June to October 2002, the upstream monthly average DO values ranged from 3.6 mg/1 to
4.8 mg/1. Downstream values during the same period ranged from 3.7 mg/1 to 4.7 mg/1.,
except for the month of June when the average DO was 5.4 mg/1. Upstream and downstream
fecal coliform values averaged above the standard in August and September.
From June to September 2001, the monthly average DO values ranged from 3.9 mg/1 to 4.6
mg/1. Downstream values during the same period averaged from 3.9 mg/1 to 4.2 mg/1. Daily
values were s low as 2.3 mg/1 both upsteam and downstream.
From May t September 2000, the monthly average DO values ranged from 3.9 mg/1 to 4.9
mg/1. Down tream values during the same period averaged from 3.7 mg/1 to 4.8 mg/1.
Recommen the continued instream monitoring for temperature, DO and fecal coliform.
Fecal is rec mmended because of the projected fecal coliform TMDL that will be applied
in year 2001.
PROPOSED CHANGES:
The following modifications have been made to the permit:
• The addition of a summer and winter weekly average ammonia limit at 0.500 MGD.
• The adds ion of a total residual chlorine limit at existing flow of 0.500 MGD and
expansio flow of 0.750 MGD.
• The addition of effluent page and limitations for conventional parameters at 0.750
MGD.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 11/19/2003
Permit Scheduled to Issue: 01/12/2004
Projected Effective Date: 02/01/2004
STATE CONTACT:
If you have ally questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Jackit Nowell at [phone] ext. 512.
NAME:
Ct4f�tlt/
REdIONAL OFFICE COMMENT:
DATE: ///[ /63
Newport WWTP Fact Sheet
NPDES Renewal
Page 4

Newport WWTP @ 0.750 MGD
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (U
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (ug/
Fecal Limit
Ratio of 0.3 :1
0.4
0.75
1.1625
17.0
0
74.40
22.85
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (m
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
200/100mI DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (m
0.4
0.75
1.1625
1.0
0.48
74.40
1.18
0.9
0.75
1.1625
1.8
0.22
56.36
3.02
NC0021555
11/6/03

Newport WWTP@ 0.500 MGD
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (U
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (ugl
Fecal Limit
Ratio of 0.5 :1
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
0.4 7Q10 (CFS)
0.5 DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.775 DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L)
0 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
65.96 IWC (%)
25.77 Allowable Concentration (m
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
200/100mI DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (m
0.4
0.5
0.775
1.0
0.48
65.96
1.27
0.5
0.775
1.8
0.22
46.27
3.63
NC0021555
11/6/03

r
r
Facility: Newport WWTP
NPDES#: NC0021555
Receiving Stream: Newport River
Comment(s):
gage number not available
Low Flow Record Station Number:
Hydrologic Area Number:
Drainage Area Low Flow Record Station:
Qave Low Flow Record Station:
s7Q10 Low Flow Record Station:
37Q10 Low Flow Record Station:
0Q2 Low Flow Record Station:
01.
Drainage Area New Site:
MAR New Site:
Qave per Report Equation:
s7Q10 per Report Equation:
w7Q10 per Report Equation:
30Q2 per Report Equation:
HA1
must be < 400 sq. miles
46.80 sq. miles
1.35
Drainage Area Ratio:
[ new DA / Da at gage
Weighted Ratio:
er-ride Inappropriate Site (y ):
63 cfs
not applicable HA
not applicable HA
not applicable HA
Continue
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
[
Drainage Area New Site:
MAR New Site:
WeigE ted Qave per Report Equation:
eighted s7Q10 per Report Equation:
WeightId w7Q10 per Report Equation:
Weighted 30Q2 per Report Equation:
II
46.80 miles squared
1.35
#VALUE!
#VALUEI
#VALUE!
#VALUE!

�5'
rim./o,S iG,t' i`1 co
rze_ z ove
/(097 - 2, c)
�2c 1 G,ee
Lc-e—e .3/0v n-C.
6,r pkix
cio:x Affr, Awl tic 7di
�( 7' o fie4 G„it
Zb � v vv
/ z(f8 2z 13 / 3 5)
Veri
7/ri
dla3
.2i 6
z 3 c)
6 2 'Z 78
.SC /(63 Er
-2Y, o -7; z- r 6 d
d r"r •• / ,, / /3 (3 7 z
03 /3,y `,ng /6A,b 4 % /cZ_ 7v
(r, Y 3", 2-
0 V
�lo2— y,g /`7 /oo/
efot- 3,(
//( zY9
Zv, Z
to, J S-- /67 '/5,
p Z i 7, 2 21-y (03
�0�6v /9,3 Yr( A- 2- A7 /1,p
//7 $7o
/ 7y' /7//
sy //S 1
Aar /sf
(g /7/

2,50 rs
/14 6
2 2, 7
25 /
3 Z/ Z85' 2 7

UPSTREAM
Newport VWVfP
DOWNSTREAM
MONTH Temp DO aturationFecal onductivity Temp DO aturationFecal onductivity
Apr-00
May-00
Jun-00
JuI-00
Aug-00
Sep-00
Oct-00
Jan-04
-Jan-04
- Mar-04
- Mar-04
16
20
23
24
6.7
4.9
4.5
4
68%
54%
52%
48%
100
158
212
355
110
125
151
200
16
21
24
25
6.6
4.8
4.3
3.9
67%
54%
51 %
47%
129
186
184
281
129
150
215
255
23
4.6
54%
326
99
24
4.3
51%
258
114
22
3.9
45%
152
64
22
3.7
42%
166
72
16
5.1
52%
127
106
16
4.8
49%
116
130
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0%
0%
Notes ps - US 70 Bypass, Dwn- US 70A Bridge
NC0021555 3/6/03

oFwA7- 9
>�lC
O
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
October 17, 2003
Mr. Bill Boulia
Boulia Enterprise Real Estate Development
P.O. Box 1765.
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Subject: NPDES Permit for Town of Newport
Permit No. NC0021555
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Boulia:
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) recognizes and acknowledges your concern
regarding the reissuance of the NPDES discharge permit for Town of Newport. Regrettably, the
permitting process for increasing the permitted wasteflow that Newport discharges has taken
longer than usual, however progress has been made and we are moving forward with the
expansion process.
Newport is currently permitted to discharge 500,000 gallons per day of treated wastewater
into the Newport River and is asking that the discharge permit be increased to a total of 750,000
gallons per day.
Our mandate is to protect and maintain the water quality of North Carolina's streams and
rivers. Areas as environmentally sensitive as the shellfishing waters downstream of the Town of
Newport are of special interest to our agency, as well as, the Division of Environmental Health,
commercial fisherman, and citizens like you. Furthermore, this segment of the Newport River is
listed on North Carolina's list of impaired streams based on high fecal coliform counts. Fecal
coliform is a bacterial indicator for the presence of pathogenic organisms in water.
Both DWQ and the Division of Environmental Health -Shellfish Sanitation Section have
collaborated to insure an additional 250,000 gallons per day of wastewater will not cause any
further water quality problems to the shellfish, fish and other aquatic life in the Newport River.
A study was recently completed to evaluate the effect that an increase in wastewater would have
on the permanent shellfish closure area approximately nine miles downstream of the wastewater
treatment plant. The results indicate that the increase in wastewater will not effect the location
of the permanent shellfish closure line in the upper Newport River. With the receipt of the study
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone]
Airca
NnDENR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Mr. Bill Boulia
October 17, 2003
Page 2
data, DWQ is now ready to proceed with processing and evaluating the limits needed for the
other wastewater constituents in the Newport discharge permit.
The permit to allow this expansion will be drafted by mid -November 2003. By law, there
must be a public notice period of 45 days to allow for public input. If there is no request for a
public hearing on the modification of the permit, the permit authorizing the increase in wasteflow
should be issued in January 2004. Again, we appreciate your input regarding this permit. If you
have any questions regarding this issue, please contact Jacquelyn Nowell of the NPDES
Permitting Unit at 919-733-5083, ext. 512.
cc: Central Files
Lt. Governor Beverly Perdue
Rep. Jean R. Preston
Senator Scott Thomas
Wilmington Regional Office / Rick Shiver
NPDES Permit File

Newport WWTP
Newport River Class C waters (TIDAL) White Oak River Basin
030503
Carteret County
Facility is r
2) expansio
Per 1993 W
1/28/03
questing: 1) renewal of existing permit of 0.500 MGD and
i of plant to 0.750 MGD based on minor modifications to the plant.
A, DA = 46.8 mi2
QA= 63 cfs
S7Q10 = 0.4 cfs
W7Q10 = 0.9 cfs
30Q2 = 2.8 cfs
Existing limits for Newport WWTP:
Summer Winter
Qw = 0.5 0 MGD 0.500 MGD
GODS = 11 mg/1 22 mg/1
NH3 = 1.4 mg/1 3.6 mg/1
DO 5 mg/1 5 mg/1
Fecal 200/ 00 ml 200/100m1
Effluent mo itoring for TRC, temperature, TN, TP , Oil & Grease
Instream mo itoring for DO, fecal coliform, temperature and conductivity.
WiRO Staff eport recommendations:
Site is 5-10 f et above sea level. Newport River is used for commercial fishing and recreational
boating and fishing. The RIVER IS TIDAL ALTHOUGH DESIGNATED CLASS C WATERS.
Town wants o upgrade to 0.75 MGD by making improvements to clarifiers and adding a mechanical
grit removal ystem and UV disinfection. Plant is Class 2 facility.
WiRO is unc ear whether Shellfish Sanitation will approve of the request. Shellfishing waters
downstream re closed or conditionally open and portions of the river are on the 303d list for fecal
coliform. RO thinks Newport may be limited to spray irrigation or reuse options for expansion.
Newport is oithe 80% list due to exceeding design flow in 1998 and needs to expand. I&I work has
been done an continues. Because of recent drought, its not clear whether the repairs have reduced
flow because 001 flows averaged about 66% of design flow. Plant meets current limits on a
consistent ba, is and is well operated.
RO Staff review of alternatives —1) Underground disposal is not feasible with this amount of flow.
WiRO has attempted to get the Town to discuss regionalization with surrounding towns including
Morehead City and Beaufort. 2) Regional discharging system may be unfeasible due to the
proximity of waters in the area to shellfishing waters. 3) A regional nondischarge system is
conceptually workable but in the individual towns do not want to participate in a regional system
and are pursuing expansion options on their own.
WiRO recommends renewal of existing permit, but recommends careful and thorough review of
expansion op ion with all concerned parties.
1/15/03 — rec'd email from Michael Wicker asking about status of permit application and
recommends hat DWQ, WiRO, Newport and Shellfish Sanitation meet to discuss all the issues.
Application siubmitted Dec. 21, 2001

Facility ser
persons.
es the Town of Newport and Newport Correctional facility, total population of 3649
Indicates t t 300,000 GPD of inflow and infiltration comes into plant. Plant is requesting a permit
modificatio and ATC for clarifier, UV construction and re -rating of WWTP.
2002 303d list - Part 6 - The proper technical conditions do not vet exist to develop TMDLs.
Newport River with a SA class (located 7.4 miles downstream of segment where the Newport WWTP
discharges)1- Partially Supporting - Cause of impairment is fecal coliform- Potential Sources are
onsite wast water systems (septic tanks), urban runoff/storm sewers, silvaculture, agriculture,
municipal pint sources.
2/7/03 - Co ultation with SAW - recommended that I look at what limits for 0.750 MGD would be if the
existing loading were held the same. Also said that the re -rating of the facility would be very crucial and
that calculatiins would have to be submitted that showed that every unit of the facility could meet the
hydraulic loading due to increased capacity. Said to consult with DAG but that Town, RO, and Shellfish
Sanitation could have meeting.
2/14/03 (??) Walked with Michael Wicker. Called to check the status of the application. Town has applied
for a grant a lication and it should be approved by the end of Feb. or early March. Said that town is
above the 80 0 - 90% of design capacity. They have to do something. Carteret County is a fast growing
county. Newport can be expanded easily by improving the units that they have. I&I have been looked at.
Town is mostly domestic flow.
Year Ave age Flow (MGD) % of Capacity
1999 0.388 77.6
2000 0.436 87.2
2001 0.349 69.8
2002 0.348 69.2
Told him I wuld check with WiRO. Steve Reid had done the staff report in June 2002, but has since left
the Division. Should send email to Rick Shiver.
Existing Loading @ 0.500 MGD
Summer BO 5 = 0.5 MGD * 11 mg/1* 8.34 = 45.87 lbs/day
Winter BODE = 0.5 MGD * 22 mg/I * 8.34 = 91.74 lbs/day
Summer NH3 = 0.5 MGD * 1.4 mg/1* 8.34 = 5.84 lbs/day
Winter NH3 r- 0.5 MGD * 3.6 mg/I * 8.34 = 15.01 lbs/day
Equivalent Loading @ 0.750 MGD
Summer BOW = 45.87 lbs/day + 8.34+ 0.750 MGD = 7.33 mg/1
Winter BOD5 = 91.74 lbs/day + 8.34+ 0.750 MGD = 14.66 mg/1
Summer NH9 = = 5.84 lbs/day + 8.34+ 0.750 MGD = 0.93 mg/1 *
Winter NH3 = = 15.01 lbs/day + 8.34+ 0.750 MGD = 2.39 mg/1
Is probably n
limit of 2 me/
�t technologically possible to get down to less than 1 mg/I of NH3. May have to give
, since this is not a major municipal?

2/27/03 — C lled J. D. Potts of Shellfish Sanitation in Morehead City (252-726-7021) about the
Newport a ansion. Said that a dye study would be needed to see the effects of the effluent. Because
of the tidal ffects of Newport River the dye would start to come back before it reaches the SA
waters. They would have to do a hydrographic study. He used to inspect the plant, it appears to be
fairly well dperated, and the effluent looks good. Problems: 1) People around there blame the
treatment plant for problems in the river. 2) The Newport River has a lot of political backing as far
as the shellfish farmers.
Return call: Shellfish will definitely have to do the hydrographic dye study and they will reserve
comment until the study is completed. It may take some time for the planning of the study because of
the shorthanded staff, the actual study should only take 3-4 days. They will want to install a tidal
gage, because they want measure the flow so that they can release the dye at flood time, while the
water is coning in. They will also sample the treatment plant at various places where it could fail.
They will sample the clarifier, get a bacterial count, determine the dilution factors and then apply the
final count f fecal at various points in the river.
Again, most political pressure will come from the shellfish farmers, who blame a lot of the problems
on the WWTP.
2/28/03 — G up review of EAA
Recom-; end review of effluent data to see if they arebelow existing limits: See if they are
curren below 7 nig/l GODS (the equivalent loading of 11 mg/l at 0 7501VIGD). if they are
meeting 7 mg/I now, it may be possible to meet 7 mgfl: BODS at the expansion flow of 0.750 MGD,
without dding tertiary filters.
Reco end; for the expansion to 0.750 MGD 1).no increase in loading 2) recommend lower
fecal co orm limits for SA waters downstream
Check aaplication rates for non -discharge facility
Check costs and if land is available
Check. 'th RO to see if land application is available as an alternative
3/3/2003 — Rick Shiver of WiRO — called and said the expansion of the Newport WWTP is a very
sensitive issue. The N.C. Coastal Federation had some real issues with the expansion of the Newport
WWTP. T ey believe that the expansion would have the effect of having to expand the closure
lines. If thathappens it would cause a change in the stream use. The Coastal Federation will
become very active if there are changes in stream use. He does not think its time for a pow -wow
with all the agencies yet. We should wait and see the results of the Shellfish Sanitation study and
then move frimm there. Told him the study could take some time for planning but the actual dye
study would only take about 3-4 days.
Newport wants to use natural wetlands for land application, but he does not think that it will be
allowed. WitO wants to recommend regionalization for nearby towns of Beaufort, Morehead City,
Atlantic Beach and Newport. Rick thinks that there can be some type of land application on federal
land, but no �e of the towns want to go the regionalization route. There are problems with all the
facilities.
Agrees with the strategy to wait for Shellfish Sanitation before proceeding with the permit. This one
will have son1e issues.
Review of historical wasteload allocations
Notes of mod
1 run are not included in the WLAs included in the historical files.
Limits assigned in 1976 for a Qw=0.25 MGD were 5/2/5, ultimate BOD of 13.

11/81- Li 'ts for Newport WWTP, Class SC, Qw=0.28 MGD. Limits are 16/6/5, TSS=30, Total
coliform = 00/100 ml. "These limitations are based on a re-evaluation of the Newport model. DO
violations are predicted in the river even with no waste discharge from the Newport facility. These
suggested limitations will depress ambient DO concentrations by 0.1 mg/l."
2/83— WLA for 0.28 MGD, Existing summer limits with the addition of winter limits of 24/14, no DO,
TSS=30 mg/I, pH = 6-8.5 S.U.
8/84 _WLA noted a request to run at both 0.4 MGD and 0.5 MGD. Used the Autoss model
previously timed. Wasteflow needs to be converted to cfs in the model.
6/85 — limits for 0.5 mgd are 11/5/5 (summer) and 22/10/5 (winter). Note: These limits are being
submitted t?EPA with the AT checklist for Newport. The technical basis for them is uncertain at
best and wemay need to do an intensive study to develop new, better limits. Recommended by Meg
Kerr on 5/30/85
10/87 — permit renewal at 0.25 mgd and 0.5 mgd. Recommended two downstream monitoring sites at
Hwv 70 and Hwy 70A bridges. Existing limits are recommended for a based on 6/85 analysis. DO in
the Newport River of < 5mg/1 have been regularly observed.
Permit renewal
Talked with
River would
upstream of
Michelle Woolfolk of Planning: see attached emails. She did say that the entire Newport
have a TMDL for fecal coliform in 2006. Checked instream data and high fecals are
Newport and therefore also downstream. There are also substandard DO readings
upstream and downstream of the facility.
6/18/03 — Coleen asked had I talked to JD Potts about the study for Newport. Asked when I had
initially talkd with him and asked me to send that information to her via email.
9/30/03 - received results of Shellfish Sanitation Study- recently completed to evaluate the effect that
an increase in wastewater would have on the permanent shellfish closure area approximately nine
miles downstream of the wastewater treatment plant. The results indicate that the increase in
wastewater ¶ ill not effect the location of the permanent shellfish closure line in the upper Newport
River. With the receipt of the study data, DWQ is now ready to proceed with processing and
lievaluating 'te limits needed for the other wastewater constituents in the Newport discharge permit.

SEP-17-2003 13:24
NC LT. GOVERNOR OFFICE
919 733 6595 P.01/02
'ERISE
REAL ESTATE & DEVELOPMENT
Lt. Governor Beverly Purdue
20401 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: DEHNR Permit for Newport
Dear Governor Purdue,
r)ci-3o6 J
September 10, 2003
I am a general contractor / developer from Carteret County and I have some grave
concerns with what I'm being told from the "City of Newport". I believe this item needs to be
brought to your attention.
I am owner and developer of the Newport River Shoppes. The project was submitted
to the Town of Newport in 1999 and approved, at this time it is only 50% complete. Due to
money restraints and other personal hurdles I have not been able to pursue my investment
until today. My first step was to apply for a building permit to allow the calculation of the
impact fees for water and sewer. The Newport Chief Building Inspector told me that he was
unable to write any permits that required sewer extension from the towns system due to a
moratoriurol_imposed on the town from NCDEHNR.
I was told that the town has "fixed" the problem and has made improvements to the
wastewater plant and collection system. The town has applied for a new permit to lift the
moratorium and increase the discharge capacity of the plant. The permit application has been
at DEHINR for about 2 years. DEHNR has sat on the permit and done nothing to respond to
the cities needs. In the mean time Newport has not been able to meet the demand except to
complete projects that were allocated sewer capacity prior to the moratorium.
As a builder involved with similar permitting I have heard of other instances similar to
what The Town of Newport is experiencing. This is indicative of the problem with DEHNR
all over the county and state.
I relocated in the town of Newport because of the "commercial highway"
classification my business fall's under within the permitting required by the county. The
approval of my plans several years ago allowed me to continue to follow my dream. It takes
allot of planning from an entrepreneur to even be able to maneuver in this world. I would
hope the processes are not being held up from "Red Tape" that would stop a small business in
continuing to operate in Carteret County.
Please look into the time it is taking for the NCDEHNR has such a Iong and so
forgiving guide lines from which as a contractor and a citizen would not be able to exercise_
We all must answer to someone. Is there a specific time frame that is required to answer to
permits?
Unlimited General Contractor Lk. 1031262
HUS [phone] FAX [phone]
P.O. Hoz 1765 [e-mail]
Locaucd PU
The Newport River Shoppes
6931 Hwy. 70E Newport, NC 28570

SEP-17-2003 13:25
• a srw•�M ollism r.r.w4saM
•
NC LT. GOVERNOR OFFICE 919 733 6595 P.02/02
Thank you in advance for you support.
Sincerely,
Bill Boulia
President
Xc:
Representative Jean Preston
603 Legislative Office Building
Raleigh, NC 27601-1096
Senator Scott Thomas
622 Legislative Office Building
Raleigh, NC 27601
City Manager of Newport:
Ronald Earl Mason
P.O Box 1869
Newport, NC 28570
Carteret County Manager
Mary Ann Hinshaw
Unlimited General Contractor Lie. i131262
BUS [phone] FAX [phone]
P.O. Ba:1/65 boa rr cam
Located At
The Newport River Shappes
[all Vi.... MVP N..owwr• *if` 4QC1A
Tf1TAI P _ AP

Town of Newport Wastewater Treatment Plant
Newport River Dye Study
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
Shellfish Sanitation
September 12, 2003
4kOF '3 6.04?6,00
T°'?'e Q&
04701/
A dye stud for the Newport Waste -water Treatment Plant (WWTP) was completed on the
Newport Rjver on August 26, 2003. The Town of Newport has requested a NPDS permit from
NCDWQ to increase their flow to seven hundred fifty thousand gallons per day (gpd). The
purpose of the dye study was to see if the increased flow would affect the permanent shellfish
closure approximately nine miles downstream. The plant's discharge is located at the head of the
Newport River (See Closure Line Location Map) and has a permitted flow of five hundred
thousand 4d. The plant uses an activated sludge oxygen ditch with secondary clarification.
Chlorination is used for disinfection of the effluent.
In order for the study to be performed on an outgoing tide, tidal cycle information was needed.
Collection 9f tidal data using a Remote Data System (RDS) WL-80 began on the 10th of July. The
tide gauge lavas located within five feet of the outfall pipe. Travel time through the outfall pipe
from the injeection point to the discharge was determined with a slug of Tracing Dye prior to the
study date. During the study, Rhodamine Wt dye with a known volume and concentration was
pumped into the treated effluent outflow. Precise dye injection was accomplished with a Watson
Marlow 504U peristaltic pump. Dilution of the dye in the river was measured with a Turner Design
Model 10 AU Flourometer. The flourometer was calibrated and blanked before data collection.
Data point lIpcations were captured using a Trimble GeoExplorer 3. The points were differentially
corrected. Aseries of Fecal Coliform samples were collected from the Newport WWTP influent
pipe and secondary clarifier. The results are used to project a worst -case scenario if the plant
were to hav a malfunction. (Refer to Chart two, page 4)
The dye stuffy was attempted on August 12th but it was ended prematurely due to a
malfunctioning pump that was used to release dye at a constant rate. A replacement pump was
obtained frorn the manufacturer within the week, however the next favorable tide did not occur
tn. study date were high at
until August 26 The general predictions for the Newport River on the s y g
1

8:04 am and low at 2:20 pm. Exact tidal information for the outfall pipe is included. (Refer to
Graph 1, page 3)
Beginning at 9:36 am on August 26th, Rhodamine Wt Dye (120*106 ppb concentration) was
released
ten minut
t a rate of 43 mUmin into the outfall pipe. The dye entered the river in approximately
s. Overall eight liters of dye mixture were injected into the outfall over 185 minutes.
Newport WWTP's average flow for the duration of the release was 0.54 MGD. Flourometer
readings v
tide. Conc
for the trey
ere taken at the discharge pipe and downstream as the dye followed the out -going
ntration of dye in the pipe, dilution factor and projected fecal counts were calculated
tment plant. (See Formulas, Appendix 1; Chart 3, page 5)
The last flourometer reading was taken approximately five hours after the dye entered the river,
and fell well short of the existing permanent shellfish closure line. (See Closure Line Location and
Study Sample Sites Map) The downstream sites were nearing the end of their tidal cycle. The
maximum fecal sample from the clarifier was used to project the fecal count downstream,
simulating the Newport WWTP having a failure in the disinfection system. A MPN of less than two
per 100 mi was projected for the last sample location using both the current and proposed flow.
In the event of a malfunction the effluent would under go multiple tidal mixings before reaching
the permanent closure line. The study shows that a flow increase of .25 MGD by the Newport
Treatment, Plant will not effect the present location of the permanent closure line in the upper
Newport R!ver. In addition with proper notification of a spill or malfunction, Shellfish Sanitation
would havel time to enact a temporary closure. The results and conclusions derived from this
study are only applicable for the conditions present during the study period.
2

Newport River Tide Data
@ WWTP Discharge
TIDE
70
9:46 am, Dye entered the River
60.
50
15 40
w
1
a
12:41 pm, Dye injection ended
a
c
03
30
U
20
10
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Q o
N ai
r T
25-Aug-03
1 I
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 cD N e6
r T
26-Aug-03
Time
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 cd N
27-Aug-03
GRAPH 1, Page 3

Newport River Dye Study
August 26,2003
Chart 1
Pump Time
Start
End
Duration (min)
9:36 AM
12:41 PM
185
Rhodamine Wt Dye
Dye Concentration 2.40E+08
Cd Release Mixture (conc 1.20E+08
Volume (L) 8
Release Rate (ml/min) 43.24
Qd Dye (GPD) 16.45
Cs Dye (Conc in pipe) 3.64E+03
2nd hour
3rd hour
End
Qs Average
WWTP Flow (MGD)
Begin 0.65
1st hour 0.50
0.50
0.59
0.47
0.54
Proposed Increase
Qs Flow (MGD)
Cs Dye (Conc in pipe)
0.75
2.63E+03
Chart 2
Fecal Counts
Sample
Date
Clarifier
Inflow
Flow(MGD)
1
7/10/2003
49000
5400000
2
8/6/2003
79000
-
3
8/27/2003
7000
-
0.49
4
8/28/2003
13000
3300000
0.53
5
9/2/2003
23000
2300000
0.65
Maximum
79000
5400000
Page 4

Newport River Dye Study
August 26,2003 ,*,.
Chart 3
S
as 0.—NCol TtIACOI�G0CD°'—
la CO
Description
Flourometer Reading (Cf)
Time
Projected Fecal Count (Fp) Study Flow
Projected Fecal Count (Fp) Projected Flow
Max
Min
Avg
Count
(clarifier max Cf)
(inflow max Cf)
(inflow-avg Cf)
(clarifier max Cf)
(inflow max Cf)
(inflow-avg Cf)
outfall Pipe
grab
grab
684
grab
10:00 AM
1.48E+04
1.01E+06
1.01E+06
2.05E+04
1.40E+06
1.40E+06
Old Hwy 70 Bridge
5.230
0.68
2.947
68.00
10:52 AM
113.44
7754.33
4369.83
156.98
10730.17
6046.81
Railroad Bridge (south)
0.086
0.07
0.078
21.00
11:07 AM
1.87
127.51
116.00
2.58
176.44
160.52
Railroad Bridge (north)
0.090
0.07
0.079
21.00
11:11 AM
1.95
133.44
117.77
2.70
184.65
162.96
Power Line
0.086
0.07
0.078
33.00
11:26 AM
1.87
127.51
115.56
2.58
176.44
159.90
North of Deep Creek
0.079
0.06
0.072
34.00
11:49 AM
1.71
117.13
107.19
2.37
162.08
148.32
South of Deep Creek
0.082
0.03
0.069
28.00
11:52 AM
1.78
121.58
102.25
2.46
168.24
141.49
Gamer Rd Ramp
0.057
0.04
0.048
21.00
12:19 PM
1.24
84.51
70.81
1.71
116.94
97.99
Black Creek
0.018
0.00
0.007
35.00
12:56 PM
0.39
26.69
11.06
0.54
36.93
15.30
Private Ramp
0.013
0.00
0.003
60.00
1:28 PM
0.28
19.27
4.25
0.39
26.67
5.88
Transect (between 9 & 11)
0.017
0.00
0.007
132.00
2:45 PM
0.37
25.21
10.64
0.51
34.88
14.72
i
Page 5

Newport WWTP
Discharge Pipe
Newport River Dye Study
August 26, 2003 Datum: NAD 83
V
3000
•
0
Closure Line Location and Study Sample Sites
3000
•
+ram. 6000 Feet
A ,A
DEM - Shaikh Bantle/on
Rmsallonal Wafer Dually

cO,L\
•
c--
G 143*N D
_-•
• )
741\•\\
=
.„
. 1
*, I --'r•
al
1
Newport River Dye Study
August 26 2003
...• i 1 0
P •,,, 1
,
....--%
r-..1 r, • i ...... ..., i • t ' • ',.
...-/- i!
( 1,...--.1"" •-;;1"( i;
4
, r / •;:
... .....--- 0
..-/•
.. -• ‘
•),........ --1:
.••..-4.r•
••••-- ..;
•tr ._,..•••• •.: ••••
't
t•••:, -... . ; rt 1.". .
i ,
o----'' - • .i ...„.\\
li
'.., •.
1'
,.I
,----
.) itiii • " ,/- ; ,..`,'-,
fl):
.1.'\ ''''• . C-':'\C-'.. 4'1 • . f, (:;:.' // . if
1 -;;"'.....\',3 L5 ''• .1;,) ; • • ' •{",,
/ i 1
,• 1 -,',-,i :/,-c____,.----; -
, --.-__c•Tii... ,-',-/ „......,
,f,.......... , - - ), -.( /f/., ,„„ •-•
).‘„ ,_)•:70,6.,..... 1 c.... • 4
;„66 _2•----7:t4p•••
dm. :1 1 .1'1._ .1 4.1:: :
f'
• • , „ e
_
. \.,', . ,N • • e • 7
'
•
/,,/} / •
k• • —
-rD _ •
r
..i
rr
!•-•-•
, •
;,s
v.'''. • .."
• - - I
x)1
•
.0 .1
..;A•Pr
•••
,---/_:0-'-'-.;.•-,;';-;'''..i!' , 4 c-.;•,,--•
,i;. -• ,"/".-J 1 ...-1.`.1 ,,,,,..c_h) -,1.1 „, ,--) „--._.\ ' rTh.,,..'
...,• ••'''" :4:$ i 't '"..;;•--. ',i ,-':.,,,i
--, 5. -
\ . -: -- ).; 1 ' • fi ••„• ' -
."'''-'-.1 . i',.• t . I
V t; '
ft, ,.;
.. '0, ...
....,...,,, ' Li/ -_
,41 .....,...
...- ',..
BPI
19
—
.
;'? .."
fL
; I?
f g
rr,'7 • J .1 Lr t. ,r• ' -.."." ''.x4;. • C 41 f ."-;="„".•, •
l''..' J.:Ir'I- tir '''....'"••-..,!
J 4 11
' \'' ‘: ',7 a r, 1 ••••,-*=.....-,,.:-...." -r-'''..,..i'' 1., ‘ (7'.'..,'11,;...-7,:-Y1.;,1-.4k., ..'r- - N...i.,`,.,
, / '1••• ./‘;I: (.,r, — -;:ilt '''''-'! ,-;?'''':;', ----- „Jr,. '-'-.--
,,t,,' , ..,-.,..,: .......f • L, X.: j
r) ' •• ,
r--, .- • -. -'4 .....,..„-• i,...1.,......,_..r....
'..• rr ,:r • ;,,!"..,-0 .'-'1,;• ,11.— ••',"- ' - .• ' / --:: ---
• 4 off -oar". r,- —...Akr:" .--
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Feet
Calculated Fecal MPN/100m1 WWTP Flow @ 0.54 MGD
A
DEM - Chatillsh Conflation &
Rem ational Vial. Dually

•
_re
t
,
.•-
•
Newport WWTP
Discharge Pipe
f
_
LTh 24.)‘
1 `4. 0(
• •
t
---, vricimtarnix . •
3 MPN -, •
;
Newport River Dye Study
August 26, 2003
. 1,-. )
lz- C -,'
/ / 1 ••• -. P4.....y,...i 4 , -......- 1 1 ...
t.
I ' 't •"- ! :7
,,,
i• t
_...,-----(4- 1 ..--:1-.::\°•....?:
It I\ N. 'I.-.,, ''. . i•
1 V
. _ V
i' P. .1 . -.•
i. ff ,_„,..,.fr: . . • r , ,.. ' , ( ','"+`' '-'
.-: .', .'•
N„. l' 'h . ,• • ,.__ ..,'-' • ' '''''' '`. ' 1 ''
,-,-/ ......,,,
,, , L ...:
c.,- ....7' ';;;;'7---''. j i :„...r'' - .,k;•.' -,....'
•''''? 1 ', - ' ..';' •iPi, 1 --.'
•:•`-'' ) •-" -1
l'o
t•
Nt \ ---
--..) •i• .„.., :_:: :::
A ••
Iv '-•. )
,---..
i ....„...„....:._..... t....- 4
• -
,.. • / ..: !", .
" i''' •
...,:-..),,.._ f 1. . ,rt• --'.. ' '':',1,-.•"'/ ''''' .
`•,i ‘, \ !..--; - --'. -: --7.4., •
. i Wit), -.1._, • . --""-. (.
''', i L, ‘....) d',„, t•-,,-- ,,-, /7 , ▪ , .
, , - ..• c / I. I - •
....` ...,...S., 11,4.1- .1..'•.•'I',- ,. -- '.'4....•7;": 'it''l,t
'.,,1I '-''-,'.,.''''';-s '')}.,;' ..1.:,:.• . ..,... s
.t.z Lt ir.,,. ,,...„f•15. . .psi.•: -•- •' -' c1'
f , ;, • I-
. . ;:• i s`.'.-...''---
4„ -- r .:."7.•'1,'f-•.-'..1,'3''--,\'..'.....:----.--..' :rji•(--.• Z::;.,.,,..-,.'.,'-.,'-::.4111p1.I, -r,
' /
.4t,-f..1
- ."1; ;-1 ;
7 ..\:::' - I' ‘0.•," ,:,--:
- ... -
..'.;,_,;,,..,.:4,....,-1:44.......%--',..:..,:.-- ...-1 ,-,,.,.. .: ---_,:::)
117::\ ..i 1 ....:; ... ..,.: . . ' .- ;17C-:-.4‘----
li f'-'' •4''
,b
41 N k
-a - --11-_'..4:4-t---- 0.17---ZA:%:::;--44- --IS.,----".1-÷ *1.7 - *IT - ...,------, - .. f.
—47;4*. -• ,,-. Jic 4"-- .•:- "ta,..
- , „_-_-„--• i
—._
Ith..7.2-jo_ -'.. --• .1,
,,
-. -.1
•
' )
) )1-•etv
'N? •
) • aR 661( P
' •
,"" •
Calculated Fecal MPN/100m1 WWTP Flow @ 0.75 MGD
4.,
..' •
..• 1
ALA
Nmpett Dy• 6huly

Appendix 1
Concentr tion of Dye in the Discharge Pipe
Cs = Cd Qd
Qs
Cs Concentration of Dye in the Discharge Pipe (ppb)
Cd Concentration of Rhodamine Wt Dye (ppb)
Qd Flow Rate of the Dye (gpd)
Qs Flpw Rate of the Sewage (gpd)
Dilution 7actor
D=Cs
Cf
D Dilution Factor or Dilution at point x
Cs Concentration of Dye in the Discharge Pipe (ppb)
Cf Flourometer datalog reading (ppb)
Projected Fecal Loading
Fp=Fs!
D
Fp Projected Fecal Loading or Fecal Count at point x
Fs Fecal MPN at source
D Dilution Factor

ATA
NCDENR 1
PA-98-2003
North Carolina Department of Environment and NaturalResources
Michael F. Easley, Governor i Division of Marine Fisheries Preston P. Pate Jr., Director
William G. Ross Jr,, Secretary PROCLAMATION I - Y-. .7 `ljn `t c"I
CE t .. CH
RE: SHELLFISH POLLUTED AREA
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director, Division of Marine Fisheries, upon the recommendation of Leah Devlin, D.D.S., M.P.H.,
State Health Director, Department of Health and Human Services, hereby announces that the following changes in shellfish
harvesting areas will take effect at sunrise, Wednesday, October 8, 2003.
All those waters in Carteret and Onslow Counties will return to the status in existence immediately prior to the
September 18, 2003 temporary closure of all coastal waters with the following exceptions which will remain closed:
No person shall take or attempt to take any oysters, clams or mussels or possess, sell or offer for sale any oysters,
clams or mussels taken from the following polluted areas:
CARTERET / BEAUFORT / HYDE / DARE / TYRRELL / WASHINGTON / CHOWAN / PERQUIMANS / CAMDEN
ANDCURRITUCK COUNTIES
South River - All those waters in South River upstream of a straight line across the mouth.
Newport River - All those waters in Newport River upstream of the Telephone Cable Crossing.
All those waters north and west of a straight line beginning at Wades Point on the east shore of Pungo River thence in
a straight line to Shell Point; thence to a point on the southern most tip of Great Island; thence to Bluff Point Shoal FI.
Beacon; thence in a straight line to Long Point on the east shore of Wysocking Bay; thence in a straight line to Long
Shoal Point; thence to Sandy Point; thence in a straight line to the southern most tip of Bodie Island; to include all of
Pungo River; Spencer Bay; Rose Bay; Swanquarter Bay; Juniper Bay; Wysocking Bay; Long Shoal River; Stumpy
Point Bay; Croatan Sound; Roanoke Sound; Currituck Sound; Albemarle Sound; all tributaries of Albemarle Sound and
all bays and tributaries within said boundaries.
Hatteras / Avon Area - All those waters 1000 yards offshore of Hatteras Island between Hatteras Inlet and Avon
Harbor.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. This proclamation is issued under the authority of G.S. 113-170.4; 113-170.5; 113-182; 113-221(e); 143B-289.52
and N.C. Marine Fisheries Rules 15A NCAC 3H .0103 and 3K .0101.
B. It is unlawful to violate the provisions of any proclamation issued by the Fisheries Director under his delegated
authority per 15A NCAC 3H .0103.
C. This proclamation returns the following areas to normal closure boundaries: White Oak River, Bogue Sound, and North
River.
D. These openings are due to satisfactory bacteriological sampling results.
October 7, 2003
11:30 a.m.
PA-98-2003
/sab
BY:
OCT 1 0 2003
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Direct
DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. BoX 766. Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
L--Phone: [phone]LIAX:1252 726-60621 Internet: wuwv.ncfisheries.net
U- •'3 - HO TE;? OU.ALI fY
350 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of 10 cents per copy.

AVAIL PA-99-2003
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Govern r Division of Marine Fisheries Preston P. Pate Jr., Director
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary PROCLAMATION
RE: SHELLFISH POLLUTED AREA
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director, Division of Marine Fisheries, upon the recommendation of Leah Devlin,
D.D.S., M.P.H., State Health Director, Department of Health and Human Services, hereby announces that
the following temporary shellfish closures will take effect immediately:
No person shall take or attempt to take any oysters, clams or mussels or possess, sell or offer for
sale any oysters, clams or mussels taken from the following polluted areas:
BRUNSWICK /-PENDER AND ONSLOW COUNTIES
Lockwoods Folly River - All those waters in Lockwoods Folly River upstream of a straight line
beginning at a point on the east shore at Howells Point; thence through Channel Marker #1 to the west
shore at 33 55' 44" N - 78 13' 32" W.
All those waters bordered on the northeast by a straight line from Swan Point through Intracoastal
Waterway Channel Marker #4 to the eastern tip of West Onslow Beach, (south shore of New River Inlet)
and bordered on the southwest by the Surf City Bridge.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
A) This proclamation is issued under the authority of G.S. 113-170.4; 113-170.5; 113-182; 113-
221(e); 143B-289.52 and N.C. Marine Fisheries Rules 15A NCAC 3H .0103 and .3K .0101.
B) It is unlawful to violate the provisions of any proclamation issued by the Fisheries Director under
his delegated authority per 15A NCAC 3H .0103.
C) These temporary closures are due to heavy rainfall and resultant runoff.
October 8, 2003
10:35 A.M.
PA-99-2003
/sab
BY:
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
Division of Marine Fisheries
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. Box 769. Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: www.ncfisheries.net
160 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of 5 cents per copy.

ATA PA-97-2003
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Marine Fisheries Preston P. Pate Jr., Director
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary PROCLAMATION
RE: SHELLFISH POLLUTED AREA
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director, Division of Marine Fisheries, upon the recommendation of Leah
Devlin, D.D.S., M.P.H., State Health Director, Department of Health and Human Services, hereby
announces that the following changes in shellfish harvesting areas will take effect at sunrise,
Saturday, October 4, 2003.
-Surf City/Stump-Sound-in Onslow and Pender-Counties will return to the status in existence
immediately prior to the September 30, 2003 temporary closure.
ONSLOW AND PENDER COUNTIES
All those waters between the North Topsail High Rise Bridge and Intracoastal Waterway
Channel Marker #72 located south of the Surf City Bridge.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. This proclamation is issued under the authority of G.S. 113-170.4; 113-170.5; 113-182;
113-221(e); 143B-289.52 and N.C. Marine Fisheries Rules 15A NCAC 3H .0103 and 3K
.0101.
i
B. It is unlawful Ito violate the provisions of any proclamation issued by the Fisheries Director
under his delegated authority per 15A NCAC 3H .0103.
C. This opening is due to satisfactory bacteriological sampling results.
October 3, 2003
11:35 a.m.
PA-97-2003
lsab
BY:
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Diror
DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES
360 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of 5 cents per copy.
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] Internet: www.ncfisheries.net

AAA
__ PA-96-2003
NCDENR
Nort Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Govern r Division of Marine Fisheries Preston P. Pate Jr., Director
William G. Ross Jr., Secre ary PROCLAMATION
RE: SHELLFISH POLLUTED AREA
Preston P. Pate, Jr. Director, Division of Marine Fisheries, upon the recommendation of Leah Devlin, D.D.S., M.P.H., State Health
Director, Department o Health and Human Services, hereby announces that the following changes in shellfish harvesting areas will
take effect at sunrise, Friday, October 3, 2003.
All those waters in Carteret, Craven, Pamlico, Hyde and Dare Counties will return to the status in existence immediately prior
to the September 18, 2003 temporary closure of all coastal waters with the following exceptions which will remain closed:
No person shall take or attempt to take any oysters, clams or mussels or possess, sell or offer for sale any oysters, clams or mussels
taken from the following polluted areas:
PENDER / ONSLOW / CARTERET / BEAUFORT / HYDE / DARE / TYRRELL / WASHINGTON / CHOWAN / PERQUIMANS
CAMDEN AND CURRITUCK COUNTIES
All those waters between the North Topsail High Rise Bridge and Intracoastal Waterway Channel Marker #72 located south of the
Surf City Bridge.
White Oak River - All ttiose waters in White Oak River upstream of the Highway 24 Bridges at Swansboro.
South River - All those waters in South River upstream of a straight line across the mouth.
Bogue Sound - All those waters in Bogue Sound from the Intracoastal Waterway.to the mainland between ICWW Channel Marker #6
and the Atlantic Beach High Rise Bridge.
Newport River - All those waters in Newport River upstream of the Telephone Cable Crossing.
North River - All those
waters in North River upstream of the North River Bridge.
All those waters north nd west of a straight line beginning at Wades Point on the east shore of Pungo River thence in a straight line
to Shell Point; thence t a point on the southern most tip of Great Island; thence to Bluff Point Shoal FI. Beacon; thence in a straight
line to Long Point on th east shore of Wysocking Bay; thence in a straight line to Long Shoal Point; thence to Sandy Point; thence
in a straight line to the southern most tip of Bodie Island; to include all of Pungo River, Spencer Bay; Rose Bay; Swanquarter Bay;
Juniper Bay; Wysocking Bay; Long Shoal River; Stumpy Point Bay; Croatan Sound; Roanoke Sound; Currituck Sound; Albemarle
Sound; all tributaries of Albemarle Sound and all bays and tributaries within said boundaries.
Hatteras / Avon Area - All those waters 1000 yards offshore of Hatteras Island between Hatteras Inlet and Avon Harbor.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. This proclamation i
Marine Fisheries
issued under the authority of G.S. 113-170.4; 113-170.5; 113-182; 113-221(e); 143B-289.52 and N.C.
les 15A NCAC 3H .0103 and 3K .0101.
B. It is unlawful to violate the provisions of any proclamation issued by the Fisheries Director under his delegated authority per
15ANCAC3H.0103.
C. This proclamation returns the following areas to normal closure boundaries: a portion of Bogue Sound, a portion of Newport and
North Rivers; Whittrhurst Creek; Sleepy Creek; Core Sound; Jarrett Bay; Oyster Creek; Nelson Bay; Thorofare Bay; West Bay;
Cedar Island Bay; Neuse River; Pamlico River; Ocracoke; and a portion of Pamlico Sou, d.
D. These openings ardue to satisfactory bacteriological sampling results.
October 2, 2003
3:30 p.m.
PA-96-2003
/sab
BY:
reston P. Pate, Jr., Director
DIVISION OF MARINE FISH S
3441 Arendell Street, P.O. Box 769, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] l FAX: [phone] Internet: www.ncfisheries.net
460 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of 10 cents per copy.

Imo..=: •• ..
0,01,0010,
01100000
000104
..ram <:.=.71at . i
ha ow
.•tr.1r0K
.„••—r:=
1 '
PA-96-2003
10/3/2003
LORWC
OOEM1 evTuuno.

PA-96-2003
10/3/2003
Wmr c,�
le Green
gird Isi
vpR-�¢1-
41114
=� = .sue✓i ERNS SIG!
i3cy q T 7
..., (Duncan �� elip:
�1
Otte
0.
QQ¢aaaoe Hartenf
`',Cphlhooae (Abandl
1; ,Cape
Hatteras
2000 4000 Ya

PA-96-2003
10/3/2003

11
facsimile transmi
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL
RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
-ro: wayne Mobley Fax: [phone]
From: Jackie Nowell, NPDES Unit Date: June 24, 2003
P one: 919-733-5083 EXT 512 Pages: 14 INCLUDING COVER PAGE
E-mail: Jackie.Nowell @NCMAIL.NET
• Urgent For Review • Please Comment 0 Please Reply • Please Recycle
• • • • • • •
otes: Per your request. The Town of Newport is requesting a permit
odification for expansion from 0.500 MGD to 0.750 MGD. Please contact me
a email or at the phone number above if any questions.

[Fwd: Newport WWTP]
Subject: [Fwd: Newport WWTP]
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:58:08 -0400
From: Dave Goodrich <[e-mail]>
To: Jackie Nowell <[e-mail]>
Jackie -
You may have lready forwarded the application package, but here's
another message. I didn't know who Wayne Mobley was until now... Bob
Benton was the Section Chief when I started and his second in command
(George Gilbert) took his place. George must have retired.
- Dave
L.
Subject: Newp rt WWTP
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:17:50 -0400
From: Wayn Mobley <[e-mail]>
To: Dave oodrich <[e-mail]>
I am the new Section Chief for the Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational
Water QualitySection. Today I got a call from Cheryl Stevens about our
comment on the proposed expansion of the Newport WWTP and about the dye
study that we are suppose to do. J.D. Potts got a call several months
ago asking for our comment on the WWTP. As of this date my office has
not received a copy of the proposed expansion plans for the plant.
Before we can comment we need to know what is in the proposal. We will
need to complete the dye study but due to increased shellfish closures
and recreational water quality advisories and postings from rainfall
this spring, we have not had the opportunity to do this. I am sorry for
the delay but we will make every effort to complete the work as soon as
possible. If you have any questions please call at 252-726-6827.
Wayne Mobley
1 of 1 6/24/03 10:21 AM

Re: Town of Newport inquiry'
Subject: ae: Town of Newport inquiry
Date: ri, 20 Jun 2003 17:10:22 -0400
From: oleen Sullins <[e-mail]>
Organization: C DENR DWQ
To: 4ckie Nowell <[e-mail]>
CC: Sheryl Stephens <[e-mail]>,
Dave Goodrich <[e-mail]>
Jackie - please get a copy of the Town of Newport's application to Mike Mobley.
Sheryl - do yo have a number we can reach Mike Mobley at so we can get a fax
number to get the information to him. Thanks Coleen
Sheryl Stephens wrote:
I just spoke with Mike Mobley regarding the dye study, and he indicated
that he nee ed a copy of the Town of Newport permit application before
proceeding. Can you make sure he receives a copy?
Thanks.
Sheryl
Coleen Sullins wrote:
>
Sheryl -
informati
This disc
cases, th
the risk
am still investigating some of this. However, some of the
n that you need is the following:
arge is upstream of SA waters (shellfishing waters) . In these
Shellfish Sanitation staff evaluate the discharge to determine
nd whether in their opinion the increase in discharge would result
in additional closures of shellfish resources. If the answer to that
question is yes, we can not permit an expansion. We contacted J.D. Potts
with Shellfish Sanitation in late February. They advised that they were
going to schedule a dye study to determine the probability of increased
impacts to the shellfish resources. We have not gotten that information to
date. We also informed the consultant of Shellfish Sanitation process and
encouraged them to contact them as well. I do not believe that the dye
study has been completed (expected to be this summer is my understanding).
An additional problem is that the waters are currently classified as
impaired due to fecal coliform (the issue with shellfish) and low dissolved
oxygen. We will be constrained as to what actions we can take by both the
determinaIion from Shellfish and the impaired waters (federally we can not
allow any additional load of pollutants into impaired waters). Until we
receive the results from the study, we can not proceed.
I am still checking into the sewer capacity issue and do not have an anwer
on that question. I'll get that as soon as possible. Thanks. Coleen
Sheryl Stelphens wrote:
> Coleen,
> Do you have any info that I can pass along to Ronald Mason regarding his
> permit inquiry? I need to call him this morning to let him know that we
> haven't forgotten about him, and it would be great if I at least had
> some information for him.
> Thanks.
> Sheryl
> --
> Sheryl Stephens
> Director, Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
> NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1 of 2 6/24/03 10:23 AM

Re: Town of Newport inquiry
Subject: ge: Town of Newport inquiry
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:25:33 -0400
From: Coleen Sullins <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Sheryl Stephens <[e-mail]>
CC: Jackie Nowell <[e-mail]>,
have Goodrich <[e-mail]>
Sheryl - I amstill investigating some of this. However, some of the
information t
at you need is the following:
This discharge is upstream of SA waters (shellfishing waters). In these
cases, the Shellfish Sanitation staff evaluate the discharge to determine
the risk and whether in their opinion the increase in discharge would result
in additional closures of shellfish resources. If the answer to that
question is yes, we can not permit an expansion. We contacted J.D. Potts
with Shellfish Sanitation in late February. They advised that they were
going to schedule a dye study to determine the probability of increased
impacts to the shellfish resources. We have not gotten that information to
date. We also informed the consultant of Shellfish Sanitation process and
encouraged them to contact them as well. I do not believe that the dye
study has been completed (expected to be this summer is my understanding).
An additional problem is that the waters are currently classified as
impaired due to fecal coliform (the issue with shellfish) and low dissolved
oxygen. We will be constrained as to what actions we can take by both the
determination from Shellfish and the impaired waters (federally we can not
allow any additional load of pollutants into impaired waters). Until we
receive the results from the study, we can not proceed.
I am still checking into the sewer capacity issue and do not have an anwer
on that question. I'll get that as soon as possible. Thanks. Coleen
Sheryl Stephens wrote:
Coleen,
Do you have any info that I can pass along to Ronald Mason regarding his
permit inquiry? I need to call him this morning to let him know that we
haven't forgotten about him, and it would be great if I at least had
some information for him.
Thanks.
Sheryl
Sheryl Stephens
Director, Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Sheryl . Stephens@ncmail .net
1 of 1 6/18/03 10:40 AM

FW: Town ofNewport NPDES Permit
•
Subject: FW: own of Newport NPDES Permit
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:25:06 -0500
From: "Mich el Wicker" <[e-mail]>
To: "Clay ulaney (E-mail)" <[e-mail]>
CC: <jacki [e-mail]>
Clay,
Jackie Nowell forwarded me the following in response to our request for an update.
When you get your Rural Center Contract we may need to adjust the timeline to
reflect the dlays by Shellfish Sanitation. Since the increase from 0.5 mgd to
0.750 mgd does not require a EA we did not request speculative limits. Also since
your permit rnewal was due in conjunction with the WWTP evaluation and the need to
expand the WWTP it only made sense to just request a renewal with a modification.
Speculative 4mits are normally requested for EA impacts and prior to major
expansions and renovations to not invest too much prior to proceeding with expansion
plans. Lately speculative limit requests take as long as permit requests.
Speculative limits are not required in the DWQ rules for NPDES permits nor in the
SEPA rules for which, this project meets the minimum critera.
DWQ does need to develop the limits as part of the NPDES permit review process and
may need to m del the river to do so. They also can request that a study of the
Shell fish im acts be undertaken. I am not sure that either DWQ or Shell Fish
understand tht Newport is under the assumption that you would not be increasing the
pounds per day of pollutants because you expect the concentrations of your limits to
decrease. Th fact that we will improve the solids settling and removal and go to
UV disinfects n in hopes to not only meet the new limits but also the reuse rules
seems to be missing in their concerns; however, all this will be addressed during
their review. At this time it appears to be a cursory review and when they see what
we plan to do the increased treatment levels should address the concerns listed
below.
Original Message
From: Jackie Nowell [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Michael Wicker
Subject: Re: Town of Newport NPDES Permit
Hello Mike, I called and left a message for you earlier this week. Just to let you
know how the Newport project is progressing. The following issues are being
addressed.
1) Our files co not show a request from Newport for speculative limits for the
expansion to 0.750 MGD. These should have been developed prior to the request for
permit modification. Because of the tidal effects in the Newport River,
conventional nodeling tools may not be appropriate. Additional DWQ staff are being
consulted and we are working to establish speculative limits. For clarification,
the development of speculative limits does not guarantee that an expansion will be
allowed.
2) We have contacted Shellfish Sanitationt. They have indicated that they want to
do a hydrographic dye study in the Newport River to determine the effects of
additional of luent into the river. Due to staff shortages, they were unable to
pinpoint how ong the setup of this study would take, although the actual study will
only take 3-4 days. With the fecal coliform problems in the Newport River and
shellfish water closures downstream of the Newport discharge, DWQ feels that
Shellfish Sanitation input and comment is vital before moving forward with the
Newport request. Any questions regarding the study can be addressed to J.D. Potts
at 252-726-7021.
3) A thorough review of the alternatives report is to be done. A preliminary review
has been done and any questions or requests for additional information will be
forwarded to you.
4) Finally, as a point of information, there will be a TMDL for fecal coliform in
1 of 2
6/18/03 10:05 AM

FW: Town of Newport NPDES Permit
the entire Newport River which will be effective in 2006. Any questions regarding
the TMDL should be directed to Michelle Woolfolk of the TMDL/Modeling group,
919-733-5083 ext 505.
Thank you and
Michael Wicke7
please contact me if there are any questions.
wrote:
> Jackie,
> Could you please update me on the status of the Town of Newport NPDES permit
modification. We submitted this permit application December 2001 and the Town is
anxious to pr ceed with expansion plans.
>
> The Town has had some conversations with the Wilmington Regional Office. They
have forwarded their staff report re NPDES permit to NPDES unit. They also
mentioned that the only opposition noted to date was from Shellfish Sanitation
Branch. The Town wishes to find out if these comments have been received by NPDES
unit and should we have a meeting with NPDES unit, Wilmington Regional Office and
Shell Fish Sanitation Branch now to avoid any problems prior to draft NPDES permit
or are you waiting until draft and comments receipt period to address these. The
Town is willing to schedule a public meeting now to discuss NPDES permit if this
will avoid adverse public comment or delays. The Town can go to Raleigh or to
Wilmington or Morehead to meet with the parties as needed. We request either the
NPDES unit or the Wilmington Regional Office to advise whether this is needed at
this time. We do not want to stir this up and cause a problem that is not there but
if it would help we would
> like to go ahead and address it.
2 of 2 6/18/03 10:05 AM

Re: Town of Newport discharge
Subject: Re: Town of Newport discharge
Date: Thu, 0§ Mar 2003 10:21:18 -0500
From: Cam McNutt <[e-mail]>
To: Chris Roessler <[e-mail]>,
Michelle Woolfolk <[e-mail]>, [e-mail],
[e-mail]
Cam McNutt wr
te:
> I think someone asked about this a few weeks ago. When I opened my WOK project
guess
> where it was focused. Bitmap attached if it helps.
> I think Lejeune had their fecal limits set for SA even though they were going into
SC
> waters at the time. At the AMS DO has been pretty low and pH has been low but
not
> that low. There is the possibility that the low DOs are not just from swamp
> drainage. There is also a lot of ditched area downstream of the discharge. The
head
> of the Newport estuary is evidently several feet shallower than it was several
years
> ago because of sedimentation. A good dredging would probably help flush the area.
> Fecal geo mean last assesment was 160 or thereabouts at our AMS. The little black
> dots on the map are DEH monitoring sites. DEH station 5A had a geomean of 14.83.
> (that is the third station out on map) . The two closer stations are not sampled
> regularly anymore. I think they just got too bad.
> Newport has also some problems with a couple of lift stations being inundated
during
> high tides in the Newport river. I do not know if that problem has been fixed.
> Chris Roessler wrote:
> > Is it possible to set the fecal coliform (or whatever is appropriate -
enterococci
> > in coastal waters?) limits at or below the standard? Not sure if that's too
much
> > chlorine or whatever. An expansion might help flush the area.
> >
> > Michelle Woolfolk wrote:
> >
> > > Jackie Nowell received an inquiry about increasing the discharge from the Town
> > > of Newport into the Newport River (0.5 to 0.75 MGD) . This is located
upstream
> > > of the impaired shellfish area covered by the Duke Univ 319 grant to develop a
> > > TMDL. Shellfish sanitation has been contacted and will do a dye study to
> > > determine the influence the discharge may have on the shellfish beds, which
are
> > > already closed or conditionally approved closed. We have a downstream ambient
> > > site (P730) which shows high levels of fecal coliforms. The area where the
> > > discharge is located is Class C.
> > >
> > > If you have any thoughts about this discharge increase, please let me know.
> > > There is no need to run any model at this time, but if you have suggestions as
> > > to how this might be evaluated, send those too.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >>Michelle
1 of 2 6/18/03 10:09 AM

Re: Town of Newport discharge
•
Subject: e: Town of Newport discharge
Date: ed, 05 Mar 2003 16:49:22 -0500
From: Jackie Nowell <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Chris Roessler <[e-mail]>
When thinking about limits for the expansion, one option considered was equivalent
loading for BOD5 and NH3, and giving the fecal coliform limit of 14/100m1 to protect
for the SA waters standard. Newport's average fecal coliform discharge ranged
between
1 - 6/100m1 for 2002, so they should not have any problems meeting the more
stringent
fecal limit.
Chris Roessler wrote:
Is it possible to set the fecal coliform (or whatever is appropriate - enterococci
in coastal waters?) limits at or below the standard? Not sure if that's too much
chlorine or whatever. An expansion might help flush the area.
Michelle Wool folk wrote:
Jackie Nowell received an inquiry about increasing the discharge from the Town
of Newport into the Newport River (0.5 to 0.75 MGD) . This is located upstream
of the impaired shellfish area covered by the Duke Univ 319 grant to develop a
TMDL. Shellfish sanitation has been contacted and will do a dye study to
determine the influence the discharge may have on the shellfish beds, which are
already closed or conditionally approved closed. We have a downstream ambient
site (P730) which shows high levels of fecal coliforms. The area where the
discharge is located is Class C.
If you have any thoughts about this discharge increase, please let me know.
There is no need to run any model at this time, but if you have suggestions as
to how this might be evaluated, send those too.
> Thanks
> Michelle
>
"You can't depend on your eyes when your
imagination is out of focus." M. Twain
MICHELLE WOOLFOLK
NCDWQ PLANNING BRANCH
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1617
PH: 919/7331-5083 x505 FX: 919/715-2941
Michelle. Woolfolk@ncmail .net
1 of 1 6/18/03 10:27 AM

Town of Newport discharge
Subject: 'own of Newport discharge
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 16:21:32 -0500
From: Michelle Woolfolk <[e-mail]>
Organization: NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Jackie Nowell received an inquiry about increasing the discharge from the Town
of Newport into the Newport River (0.5 to 0.75 MGD). This is located upstream
of the impaired shellfish area covered by the Duke Univ 319 grant to develop a
TMDL. Shellfish sanitation has been contacted and will do a dye study to
determine the Shellfish
the discharge may have on the shellfish beds, which are
already closed or conditionally approved closed. We have a downstream ambient
site (P730) which shows high levels of fecal coliforms. The area where the
discharge is located is Class C.
If you have any thoughts about this discharge increase, please let me know.
There is no need to run any model at this time, but if you have suggestions as
to how this might be evaluated, send those too.
Thanks
Michelle
"You can't depend on your eyes when your
imagination is out of focus." M. Twain
MICHELLE WOOLFOLK
NCDWQ PLANNINGBRANCH
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1617
PH:919/733-5083 x505 FX:919/715-2941
[e-mail]
1 of 1 6/18/03 10:07 AM

Town of Newport NPDES Permit
Subject: Town of Newport NPDES Permit
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:43:26 -0500
From: "Michel Wicker" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Jackie,
Could you please update me on the status of the Town of Newport NPDES permit
modification. We submitted this permit application December 2001 and the Town is
anxious to proceed with expansion plans.
The Town has had some conversations with the Wilmington Regional Office. They have
forwarded their staff report re NPDES permit to NPDES unit. They also mentioned
that the only opposition noted to date was from Shellfish Sanitation Branch. The
Town wishes to find out if these comments have been received by NPDES unit and
should we have a meeting with NPDES unit, Wilmington Regional Office and Shell Fish
Sanitation Branch now to avoid any problems prior to draft NPDES permit or are you
waiting until draft and comments receipt period to address these. The Town is
willing to schedule a public meeting now to discuss NPDES permit if this will avoid
adverse public comment or delays. The Town can go to Raleigh or to Wilmington or
Morehead to meet with the parties as needed. We request either the NPDES unit or
the Wilmington Regional Office to advise whether this is needed at this time. We do
not want to stir this up and cause a problem that is not there but if it would help
we would like to go ahead and address it.
lio 03 .01 7-
Zo'(e
U TDB -474,4„J7 c). ato stot_ /1/6 Ct02-4-e
L444,44/44) IL/
lc- .*-64)
1 of 1 1/28/03 4:42 PM

UPSTREAM
Newport WWTP
DOWNSTREAM
MONTH Temp DO aturationFecal onductivity Temp DO aturationFecal onductivity
Apr-00
May-00
Jun-00
Jul-00
Aug-00
Sep-00
Oct-00
Jan-04
- Jan-04
- Mar-04
- Mar-04
16
20
23
24
23
22
16
6.7
4.9
4.5
4
4.6
3.9
5.1
68%
54%
52%
48%
54%
45%
52%
100
158
212
355
326
152
127
110
125
151
200
99
64
106
16
21
24
25
24
22
16
a0 CO 0) CO00 O O O O
co v v ri v ri v
67%
54%
51%
47%
51%
42%
49%
129
186
184
281
258
166
116
129
150
215
255
114
72
130
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0°%°
0
0
0
0°%0
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0%
0%
Notes ps - US 70 Bypass, Dwn- US 70A Bridge
NC0021555 3/6/03

UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAM
MONTH Temp DO aturationFecal onductivity Temp DO aturationFecal onductivity
Apr-01
May-01
Jun-01
JuI-01
Aug-01!
Sep-Ot
Oct-01
Jan-04
-Jan-04
-Mar-04
-Mar-04
16
6.4
65%
222
171
17
5.9
61%
243
160
20
5.2
57%
259
361
21
5.6
63%
279
548
24
4.3
51%
321
285
25
4.2
51%
293,
414
24
4.5
53%
566
210
25
4.1,
50%
506
227
25
4.6'
56%
408
121
25
4.2
51%
461
177
22
3.9'
45%
120
605
23
3.9
45%
173
1178
17
5.1
53%
109
1844
18
5.6
59%
150
3780
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0%
0%
Notes ps - US 70 Bypass, Dwn- US 70A Bridge
3/6/03

UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAM
MONTH Temp DO aturationFecal onductivity Temp DO aturationFecal onductivity
Apr-02
May-02
Jun-02
Jul-02
Aug-02
Sep-02
Oct-02
Jan-04
- Jan-04
- Mar-04
-Mar-04
19
5.2
56%
116
249
20
5.2
57%
117
535
21
5.5
62%
187
914
21
5.7
64%
175
1941
25
4.6
56%
109
2062
26
5.4
67%
119
3050
27
4.8
60%
169
1884
27
4.9
61%
191
3070
25
3.6 -
44%
526
398
26
3.7--
46%
637
700
23
4.2..
49%
224
118
23
3.9
45%
406?
184
19
4.5
49%
162
127
20
4.2
46%
180
171
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0%
0%
Notes ps - US 70 Bypass, Dwn- US 70A Bridge
3/6/03

Alryipie.--
J r°
044 -
CUd , s:
/ / $ I s.4 Aid- __ _ 8
/V a-4t
fr/
/o"'`'''i"✓S
k_61.____6-
WI t, 77 ,25-o, as v Gp%r
Ak7)(d- — ?--e- Z'71-Iii. I. '
() A/ta :,<- 4,-di ‘"-,,, ,4 -
/c,,,,w ft,,,
4
------ /� / 4l /I G ittr�
/w
2yr
,
_,,f�/ll,,
/,�
/
/
cPPUf
�l
&4rf,v;��
J
s
i ,N 4 -V
—ram �.
/ 4 ;" e--' �di✓t
;a_
• /tit it'(( d____tA_AILI cifLK
r
0 ' g,,Y't 1 i of r-/-4v-13 Afcay
t/hl ► s cow',

Z? ?k
03
OA
--dcwo,rrC'4 (71 rr v
ali) , /M !Nle. (IAA/ p (W c+---

(4,/-71- uu771
77e
Ai t A164q/K4.
(Al
6/
/ CAI ite
iv) 44; t IC CA- utv./Cr-S
'
I/ tivi I-0 -/zi
1
1
/

4"/ /'
s"-/27— c-fAsfG
/tot, 4. 7 v,,,Jigi.--d
A ots
7, vie-6A,
l99 7
7'
/f`
z8. 6
zoo oi
7
/Z
Gto.r
1
z40 /
3
%
33.3
Zoo z
1
/Z
3 3. 3
•
I
7
.21,E-4..,.t ad,,,,,
.< ritifie
Ywi. a44.,
'7; ° 45
} t)/e4111.1.
2 do o
/8
33
,
zoo /
/�
3®
5-0
(A
2d02-
/3
30
'13
//6
C%xj .5,4-
r—
i/
X'„e (4.,,,---" e_
q //6-d ---e._
20-bo ,
/
7
//R,
/ /
,--
/
Z
2,

�.e
•
./
77 n -
00
r _j
; /
V A , c77 ,e scr! `A'''`
Y
V/0/
7/4
o/•
el '
A/
"A
A/
_
/°l
V/°/
.
4
?Ay
/
Z6Z
Yi
bL
51
!AL
(o/./0z
-
l0 L
'02
9
/G2.

STATION DATE DEPTH m METHOD C METHOD NAME RESULT REMARK COMMEN1
P7300000 2/3/99 11:25 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 420
P7300000 2/22/99 11:20 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 18
P7300000 3/22/99 11:45 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 580
P7300000 4/20/99 12:00 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 150 rising tide
P7300000 6/1/99 12:15 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 57
P7300000 6/30/99 12:40 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 140
P7300000 7/29/99 12:30 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 85
P7300000 8/26/99 12:15 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 90 J
P7300000 8/31/99 11:30 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 1500 L
P7300000 9/1/99 15:30 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 370
P7300000 9/8/99 13:10 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 30 J
P7300000 10/14/99 11:40 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 80
P7300000 11/9/99 13:40 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 110 J
P7300000 12/7/99 9:25 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 120 J
P7300000 1/13/00 12:40 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 280 CO= 3
P7300000 2/22/00 12:15 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 73
P7300000 3/14/00 10:50 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 360 A
P7300000 4/13/00 12:45 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 370
P7300000 5/24/00 11:50 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 360/' :4:3
P7300000 6/20/00 11:45 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C3100/P7300000 7/27/00 13:00 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 210,
P7300000 8/31/00 13:30 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 1100
P7300000 9/14/00 11:55 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 140
P7300000 10/4/00 12:45 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 91
P7300000 11/28/00 12:05 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 210 sil�7
P7300000 12/12/00 12:20 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 54
P7300000 2/26/01 12:00 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 440
P7300000 4/24/01 12:50 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 180
P7300000 5/17/01 12:50 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 150 B1,Q
P7300000 6/19/01 12:28 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 250 Q
P7300000 7/16/01 11:47 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 100 B4,0
P7300000 8/29/01 12:00 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 160 Q
P7300000 9/25/01 12:35 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 140 B1,0
P7300000 10/31/01 11:30 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 240 Q
STATION DATE DEPTH m METHOD C METHOD NAME RESULT REMARK COMMEN1
P7300000 11/29/01 12:15 0.1 31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C 140 B1,Q

P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
1/8/02 13:30
2/14/02 12:40
4/1/02 12:00
4/29/02 12:25
5/21/02 13:00
6/20/02 12:10
7/9/02 13:30
8/8/02 13:15
9/26/02 13:00
10/30/02 13:00
11 /21 /02 12:15
12/17/02 12:40
2/3/99 11:25
2/22/99 11:20
3/22/99 11:45
3/22/99 11:45
3/22/99 11:45
4/20/99 12:00
4/20/99 12:00
4/20/99 12:00
6/30/99 12:40
6/30/99 12:40
6/30/99 12:40
7/29/99 12:30
7/29/99 12:30
7/29/99 12:30
8/26/99 12:15
8/26/99 12:15
8/26/99 12:15
9/8/99 13:10
9/8/99 13:10
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.5
3
0.1
1
2
0.1
1.5
3
0.1
1.5
3
0.1
1.5
3
0.1
2
P7300000 9/8/99 13:10 4
P7300000 10/14/99 11:40 0.1
STATION DATE DEPTH m
P7300000 11 /9/99 13:40 0.1
P7300000 12/7/99 9:25 0.1
P7300000 1 /13/00 12:40 0.1
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
METHOD C, METHOD
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
NAME
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
77 Q,B4
81 B4,Q1
250 01
120 Q1
220 Q1,B4
160 Q1
150 Q1
93 Q1
1200 Q1
700 Q1
110 Q1
70 Q1
6.7
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.9
6.8 rising tide
6.8 rising tide
6.9 rising tide
5
4.7
4.7
6.1
5.9
6
5.9
5.8
5.6
3.3
3.4.
3.4
1.2
RESULT REMARK COMMEN1
5.9
6.9
7.2

P7300000 1/13/00 12:40 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.3
P7300000 1/13/00 12:40 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.1
P7300000 2/22/00 12:15 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.9
P7300000 2/22/00 12:15 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 8.1
P7300000 2/22/00 12:15 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 8.1
P7300000 4/13/00 12:45 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 6.5
P7300000 4/13/00 12:45 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 6.5
P7300000 4/13/00 12:45 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 6.6
P7300000 5/23/00 11:50 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.8
P7300000 5/23/00 11:50 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.9
P7300000 5/23/00 11:50 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.9
P7300000 6/20/00 11:45 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.8
P7300000 6/20/00 11:45 1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.8
P7300000 6/20/00 11:45 2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.8
P7300000 7/27/00 13:00 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.9
P7300000 7/27/00 13:00 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4
P7300000 7/27/00 13:00 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.1
P7300000 8/31/00 13:30 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4
P7300000 8/31/00 13:30 2 30 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.6
P7300000 8/31/00 13:30 4 300 XYGEN DISSOLVED MG/ 3
P7300000 9/14/00 11:55 0.1 300 O YGEN DISSOLVED Me/L 2.9
P7300000 9/14/00 11:55 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MI /L 2.8
P7300000 9/14/00 11:55 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3
P7300000 10/4/00 12:45 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED _ MG/L 3.5
P7300000 10/4/00 12:45 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.2
P7300000 10/4/00 12:45 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.8
P7300000 11/28/00 12:05 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 6.1
P7300000 11/28/00 12:05 1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 6.1
P7300000 11/28/00 12:05 2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 6.2
P7300000 12/12/00 12:20 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.2
P7300000 12/12/00 12:20 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.6
STATION DATE DEPTH m METHOD C, METHOD NAME RESULT REMARK COMMEN1
P7300000 12/12/00 12:20 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.5
P7300000 1/25/01 11:10 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 8.8
P7300000 1/25/01 11:10 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 8.9
P7300000 1/25/01 11:10 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 8.9
P7300000 2/26/01 12:00 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.1
3

P7300000 2/26/01 12:00 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.6
P7300000 2/26/01 12:00 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.7
P7300000 4/24/01 12:50 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5.4
P7300000 4/24/01 12:50 2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5.3
P7300000 4/24/01 12:50 4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5.4
P7300000 5/17/01 12:50 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.4
P7300000 5/17/01 12:50 1.6 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.7
P7300000 5/17/01 12:50 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.9
P7300000 6/19/01 12:28 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.1
P7300000 6/19/01 12:28 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4
P7300000 6/19/01 12:28 2.9 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4
P7300000 7/16/01 11:47 0.2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.6
P7300000 7/16/01 11:47 1.4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.8
P7300000 7/16/01 11:47 2.8 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5.1
P7300000 8/29/01 12:00 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.7
P7300000 8/29/01 12:00 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.7
P7300000 8/29/01- 12:00 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.7
P7300000 9/25/01. 12:35 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.3
P7300000 9/25/01- 12:35 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.4
P7300000 9/25/01 12:35 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 3.9
P7300000 10/31/01 11:30 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.1
P7300000 10/31/01 11:30 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.6
P7300000 10/31/01 11:30 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.7
P7300000 11/29/01 12:15 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.3
P7300000 11/29/01 12:15 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5
P7300000 11/29/01 12:15 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5.4
P7300000 1/8/02 13:30 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 8.4
P7300000 1/8/02 13:30 1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 8.5
P7300000 1/8/02 13:30 2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 8.7
STATION DATE DEPTH m METHOD C. METHOD NAME RESULT REMARK COMMEN1
P7300000 2/14/02 12:40 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.8
P7300000 2/14/02 12:40 1.8 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.9
P7300000 2/14/02 12:40 3.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 7.9
P7300000 4/1/02 12:00 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5.2
P7300000 4/1/02 12:00 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5.2
P7300000 4/1/02 12:00 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 5.2
P7300000 4/29/02.12:40 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED MG/L 4.5
v

P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P7300000
P8700000
4/29/02 12:40
4/29/02 12:40
5/21/02 13:00
5/21/02 13:00
5/21/02 13:00
6/20/02 12:10
6/20/02 12:10
6/20/02 12:10
7/9/02 13:30
7/9/02 13:30
7/9/02 13:30
8/8/02 13:10
8/8/02 13:10
8/8/02 13:10
9/26/02 13:00
9/26/02 13:00
9/26/02 13:00
10/30/02 13:00
11/21/02 12:15
12/17/02 12:40
1/6/99 10:10
1.3
3.5
0.1
1.5
3
0.2
1.6
3
0.1
1.5
3
0.1
1.5
3
0.2
1.5
3.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
P8700000 1 /21 /99 9:45 0.1
P8700000 3/2/99 9:50 0.1
P8700000 3/29/9911:15 0.1
P8700000 5/4/99 10:00 0.1
P8700000 5/18/99 14:10 0.1
P8700000 6/23/99 9:50 0.1
STATION DATE DEPTH m
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
7/22/99 9:20 0.1
10/26/99 9:42 0.1
12/8/99 10:10
2/1/00 10:40
2/29/00 9:50
4/24/00 10:00
5/15/00 9:15
7/5/00 16:00
8/1/00 14:35
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
METHOD G METHOD NAME
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
31616 FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
4.8
4.8
6.5
6.6
6.4
3.2
3.6.
3.7
5.4
5.5
5.7
2.6
3.5
3.8
3.9
4.3
4.5
4.7
6.1
7.8
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
RESULT REMARK
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
10 K
rising tide
rising tide
COMMEN1
S

P8700000 8/15/00 11:00
P8700000 9/20/00 9:45
P8700000 11/16/00 11:10
P8700000 1/3/01 13:20
P8700000 1 /31 /01 9:40
P8700000 4/23/01 9:40
P8700000 5/30/01 10:01
P8700000 6/27/01 9:38
P8700000 7/17/01 9:37
P8700000 8/28/01 9:30
P8700000 9/19/01 10:25
P8700000 10/23/01 10:00
P8700000 11/28/01 12:05
P8700000 12/13/01 9:45
P8700000 1/15/02 9:55
P8700000 2/19/02 9:55
P8700000 4/30/02 12:30
P8700000 6/5/02 9:45
P8700000 1 /6/99 10:10
P8700000 1 /21 /99 9:45
P8700000 3/2/99 9:50
P8700000 3/29/99 11:15
P8700000 3/29/99 11:15
P8700000 3/29/99 11:15 3
P8700000 5/4/99 10:00 0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1.5
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
31616
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
FECAL COLIFORM MEMBR
OXYGEN DISSOLVED
OXYGEN DISSOLVED
OXYGEN DISSOLVED
OXYGEN DISSOLVED
OXYGEN DISSOLVED
OXYGEN DISSOLVED
OXYGEN DISSOLVED
STATION DATE DEPTH m METHOD C, METHOD NAME
P8700000 5/4/99 10:00 2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 5/4/99 10:00 4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 5/18/99 14:10 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 5/18/99 14:10 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 5/18/99 14:10 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 6/23/99 9:50 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 6/23/99 9:50 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 6/23/99 9:50 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 7/22/99 9:20 0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 7/22/99 9:20 1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
P8700000 7/22/99 9:20 3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
FILTER M-FC BROTH 44.5 C
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
10 K
54
10 K
10 K
10 K
1
1 B2,Q
1 B2,Q
1 B2,Q
1 B2,Q
1 B2,Q
1 B2,Q
5Q
1
2 Q1
1 Q1
1 Q1,B2
1 Q1
11.1
10.7
8.8
11.1
11
11
8.2 rising tide
RESULT REMARK COMMENT
8.2 rising tide
8.4 rising tide
8.3 rising tide
8.4 rising tide
8.3 rising tide
7.3
7
6.9
5.7
5.7
6

P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
STATION
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
10/26/99 9:42
10/26/99 9:42
10/26/99 9:42
12/8/99 10:10
12/8/99 10:10
12/8/99 10:10
2/1/00 10:40
2/1/00 10:40
2/1/00 10:40
2/29/00 9:15
2/29/00 9:15
2/29/00 9:15
4/24/00 10:00
4/24/00 10:00
4/24/00 10:00
5/15/00 9:50
5/15/00 9:50
5/15/00 9:50
7/5/00 16:00
7/5/00 16:00
7/5/00 16:00
8/1/00 14:35
8/1/00 14:35
DATE
8/1/00 14:35
8/16/00 11:00
8/16/00 11:00
8/16/00 11:00
9/20/00 9:40
P8700000 9/20/00 9:40
P8700000 9/20/00 9:40
P8700000 10/17/00 10:50
P8700000 10/17/00 10:50
P8700000 10/17/00 10:50
P8700000 11 /16/0011:10
P8700000 11 /16/0011:10
P8700000 11 /16/0011:10
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
5 -300-OXYGEN-DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
DEPTH m METHOD C. METHOD NAME
4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
3.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
7 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
8.9
8.7
8.7
8.2
8.1
8.2
12.7
12.9
13.2
8.6
8.4
8.4
7.6
7.7
7.7
6.4
6.8
6.9
7.9
7.8
5.8
6.7
6.7
RESULT REMARK COMMEN1
6.8
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.4
6.4
6.4
7
6.9
6.9
7.2
7.3
7.5

P8700000 1/3/01 13:20
P8700000 1/3/01 13:20
P8700000 1/3/01 13:20
P8700000 1/31/01 9:40
P8700000 1/31/01 9:40
P8700000 4/23/01 9:40
P8700000 4/23/01 9:40
P8700000 4/23/01 9:40
P8700000 5/30/01 10:01
P8700000 5/30/01 10:01
P8700000 5/30/01 10:01
P8700000 6/27/01 9:38
P8700000 6/27/01 9:38
P8700000 6/27/01 9:38
P8700000 7/17/01 9:37
P8700000 7/17/01 9:37
P8700000 7/17/01 9:37
P8700000 8/28/01 9:30
P8700000 8/28/01 9:30
P8700000 8/28/01 9:30
P8700000 9/19/01 10:25 0.1 300 OXYGEN
STATION DATE DEPTH m METHOD C. METHOD
P8700000 9/19/01 10:25 2.5 300 OXYGEN
P8700000 9/19/01 10:25 5 300 OXYGEN
P8700000 10/23/01 10:00
P8700000 10/23/01 10:00
P8700000 10/23/01 10:00
P8700000 11/28/01 12:05
P8700000 11/28/01 12:05
P8700000 11/28/01 12:05
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
12/13/01 9:45
12/13/01 9:45
12/13/01 9:45
1/15/02 9:55
1/15/02 9:55
1/15/02 9:55
2/19/02 9:55
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1.3 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1.9 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
4.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
1.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2.8 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
NAME
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
4 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
2.5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
5 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
0.1 300 OXYGEN DISSOLVED
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
9.7
9.3
10.1
8.6
8.6
7.4
7.6
7.8
7.1
7.1
7.2
6.7
6.4
6.4
6.9
6.9
6.7
5.8
5.7
5.9
5.9
RESULT REMARK COMMEN1
5.8
6
6.4
6.4
6.7
7.7
7.7
7.9
7.1
7.3
7.4
8.6
8.7
8.6
8.4
1
8

P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
P8700000
2/19/02 9:55
2/19/02 9:55
4/30/02 12:30
6/5/02 9:45
6/5/02 9:45
-6/5/02 9:45
3
6
0.1
0.1
2
4
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
300 OXYGEN
-300 OXYGEN
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
DISSOLVED
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/C
8.3
8.5
6.9
6.7
6.7
6.
9

54--J c4b
owAi
31 Po
c17. p2o — Zflt�
/fSO—/99C.)
Z wo
zefv / --4 0,3 ✓1-' �-
lc.-- ZOO c.1
-�- / 6 20 ift
s/ b,/[ cs /1/1C-9
35 t g/6 z/9—
�i
(c)L. v 3 /c z — 39r, ssg
600 /r 7 cmo
Z71 0 368 s98
ivytkiK
.%
jJ�/i/t;
Etil �G -L7 f t4; c, (4✓5,„Lr

/4 7 4,9-6d
2V 017%"oL /14.0 ZS'd(VO &ALI
6 c17 )/W7 /4v
4-7d- f .lM/
Aiva 4 e..) . ,e4",.,/,_
i,ei !.„,„
(-oil 7/ V057/
fig./.1/41 (-- ?a
U6/9) Jv/ t I7f4
%1/ Lf /�,� f i>4: 7 L
�� 9
/WC. �sz.'E� .1
7
2S 3 d
- 0° 74�- �- /@ fxc oe
7 77 — is . / 640 /i s /i eN - /g,t i f;
f'!z1 z 5-- 4

c-1.04-0
eve- iW4 %-t/ '7 Mc elD (477
wr
i_____.,014,44,„frd 6A 4-)s- (144r/4y
ce040.7 J C �i1YJ ,

co &Sir
1)//)3C-, /t.e1_5
/ 11451) 5.4-u(val
7(.44-1- kt, -1;r4IC
cd(
4-1-44-7 1-72-Ves__
LA)4;71C
(C,--kfie7 C4_5
ifk C4rrl

(2)
‘,../LINJ tc / c.ki:_‘ /A.1 col-IC4n4ILLQ,7 144
e /
/
3, / e,7 2-7,0
, Sid 3 3, y Z,b 0./4 8 20./
g O. 3,5'8 2,y z, 6 6,ilz /7, 0 z
26 06 °. Y3 2, z //7 0, /06 /6%8 z,z. 3,8
zovi 5yy 2,z 2, 7 6,z3o -Cr 2 3 3-7
6-7,11-1
4-e rii,11/
_VS/ ohl ,50
C4) tAX)f.
4-44 Le; c( 6A/r-44,SE
tJud-r- 6dirp,-A7
/E-.,,e0 4,-, 7 9 -
iz
,A, ci 4£.1
6.407LV-r-e.' 7;4, 14/-74-
C/gvi, 69,7 skA., ?ovule& Aic Arceivc. Pf-&,mric. ,A(c)
gor-4 Mc &At/ /4,,5

t 7T6 AGO wde
114
17-e .4;15 ��j"U?//emu �, �i.✓�tl
�1 Itx,.c_ /� lib Za ao,C.2_24-/

•
2/2_03
Wereri-- 6Jd
6Q54) 6r4,4,,,
964) _-; 6...5-60,44615
_____.
bodes : al/—e (, -4,
/341/2 5 ,22 Ay /t (w,4,/4,2
A173 = /. «froite (. 401.41m >
/VII> - 3, ief /e ( % )
✓
r✓ O,, 60/ P it, /e AL 17.3y = �S:`.7#ia.
A., In/
0, 5- <KGe 7Y- 2znuf(e )14 f, 3y = 7/, 7fL 7I
e
-3 44,
5,i,,..10,5o0 "1aee /•z -/t IY ^ 5 33
we, 74-' =. v, Saa Al 2 i-- 3,6 44r(-e X- /34 = /S G/- -
' ✓ ,
1 , ✓,o-/ G a. 6, 7� �l� = (. s��. 7-
6
.n<►tc D$_ = VS:g7 ,' Pix 7.= a 75a,'1 = 733 74.E
a<✓t Ai,% = 9/, 71#/t ; x3,/ ; 5. 7so tit„ = /5`. G c :� f7.e.
..t„MM L,/
I'Vij3 -- 3, V g 4Vce. —' 7 3y G. 7r0 M 2 4,--/.0
Tbc,},coicor,
,'vr<<rG?
r_iplft, ^ b 9.3
C,J,MT i+- ,✓H) = /5 0/ ea?. = a 1 ; o, 7-rd ,ice _- a?• 39 417e
e o, 7Sd Mao
P.m S'= 7 3 Aid/--' r3=49 s'= /y G -`/e_
Aie3, 0,9 Aidie Alif3= 02,4/ i`�

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: iVke--Myers
Date: July 29, 2002
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Carteret
Permit No. NC0021555
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
I. Facility and Address:
Town: Facility:
T. of Newport Newport WWTP
P.O. ox 1869 Kirby Lane
New ort, NC 28570 Newport
2. Date
of Investigation: 7/25/02
3. Report Prepared by: Steve West
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Clay Delaney, PWD, ORC
[phone]
5. Directions to Site: From US Hwy 70 turn onto Howard Boulevard. Travel about
%mile to Kirby Lane and turn right. The facility is located about Yrnile on the
right.
6. Discharge Point, List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 34° 46' 50.3"
Longitude: 76° 51' 51.7"
U.S.G.S. Quad No: 5653 IV SE U.S.G.S. Quad Name: Newport, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application ? N/A
8. Topo raphy (relationship to flood plain included): The site is 5 to 10 feet above
msl a d slopes gently from north to south.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: — 300 yards

10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Newport River
a. Classification: Class "SC" Waters
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: WOK03
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The
river is used in this segment for commercial fishing and recreational boating
and fishing. The river is tidal here although designated class " C" waters.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1 . a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 0.75 MGD
b. What is the current permitted flow limit? 0.5 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility? 0.5 MGD
c. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to
Construct issued in the previous two years: None
d. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed
wastewater treatment facilities: There are two influent structures, one with
a manual bar screen and grit chamber, the other with a mechanical bar
screen and manual grit chamber; 0.52 MGD dual brush rotor oxidation
ditch; dual 0.25 MGD secondary clarifiers; chlorine contact tank with gas
chlorination; mechanical post aeration; 0.15 MGD aerobic digestor; six
gravity sludge drying beds; and a dried sludge storage building.
e. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities:
The Town hopes to upgrade to 0.75 MGDby making improvements to the
clarifiers and adding a mechanical grit removal system and UV disinfection.
f. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: chlorine
g. Pretreatment Program (POTWs onlyQ: Not needed
i
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: The Town holds permit no.
WQ0008349 for land application of dried residuals.
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Class 2
4. SIC Code(s): 4952
Wastewater Code: 01
Main Treatment Unit Code: 100X3

PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public
monies (municipals only) involved? No
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: None
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Included with submittal. Underground
disposal is not feasible for this amount of flow. This office has attempted to
persuade the Town to discuss regionalization with surrounding towns
including Morehead City and Beaufort. A regional discharging system
appears to be unfeasible at this time due to the proximity of waters in the
area to shellfishing waters. A regional nondischarge system is conceptually
workable, but it appears as though the individual towns do not want to
participate in a regional system and are pursuing expansion options on their
own. See further comments below.
5. Other Special Items: None
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Newport is requesting renewal to include an expanded discharge to 0.75 MGD
to the Newport River. It is unclear from the outset whether Shellfish Sanitation
will approve of the request. Shellfishing waters downstream are closed or
conditionally open, and portions of the river are on the 303d list for fecal
coliform.
With the proximity and condition of shellfishing waters and the bleak outlook
for a regional disposal system, it appears as though Newport may be limited to
spray irrigation or reuse options if it wants to expand. The Town is currently
on the "80% list" due to exceeding 80% design flow during 1998 and is in
need of expanding. Work has been performed to repair I&I sources and is
continuing. It is unclear due to the recent drought whether the repairs have
reduced flow significantly. Flows during 2001 averaged 66% of design flow.
The plant is operated well and consistantly complies with current effluent limits.
Although submitted with the renewal, the expansion proposal was not reviewed
closely due to the uncertainty of approval.

It is recommended the permit be reissued to the Town of Newport in
accordance with the White Oak River Basinwide plan with the existing flow limit
in place. The expansion request should be looked at closely with all interested
agencies
U/NO
Signature of Report Preparer
Date
n ti Q r1 t o (� / UC:.Z
Water Quality Regional Supervisor DateU
cc: WiRO NPDES Permit File
Central Files

$7/5:0-0
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A. , yer,
Consulting Engineers
300 S.W. Broad Street • Post Office Box 1737 • Southern Pines, NC 28388
December 28, 2001
Mr. Dave Goodrich
NPDES Permit Group
Division of Water Quality
512 North Salisbury Street,
Archdale Building
Raleigh, NC 27626
Re: NPDES Permit Renewal/Modification
Town of Newport , N.C. WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0021555
Carteret County, NC
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
We are requesting a NPDES permit renewal/ modification on the behalf of the Town of Newport
for the existing 0.500 mgd wastewater treatment plant. The NPDES permit expires July 31, 2002
and the application for permit renewal prior to 180 days of expiration is enclosed. The Town
requests renewal of the existing 0.500 mgd NPDES discharge.
In addition the Town is requesting an expansion of the existing permitted discharge from 0.500
mgd to 0.750 mgd. Attached is an engineering evaluation of the existing wastewater treatment
facilities and the recommendations for expansion of the facilities. It appears that the existing
wastewater treatment facility has the design capacity to be expanded from 0.500 mgd to 0.750
mgd with relatively minor modifications. The recommendations are as follows: __ __
The 0.75 MGD WWTP is proposed to consist of the following unit processes:
• Screening
- Replace existing Manual bar rack (Main) with new Mechanical Bar Scre n
- Manual 'bar rack (Pump Station Discharge)
• Replace existing Manual Grit Removal with Mechanical Grit Removal
• Influent Pumping Station (Utilize existing pumps, replace controls)
• Secondary biological treatment
- Extended aeration using oxidation ditch (1) (Utilize existing basin, rbtors);___:-_ _
- Final sedimentation basins (2) (Replace existing clarifiers with new Flarifier optimization
package equipment)
■ Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) Pumping (Purchase Spare Pump for standby)
• Final Disinfection -Replace Chlorination with Ultra -violet Disinfection in existing chamber.
• Effluent Flow Measurement (utilize existing)
■ Post Aeration (Replace Floating Aerator with Blower and PVC diffuser)
121
Cr)
Southern Pines, NC • Telephone 910-6_92-5616 • Fax [phone] • e-mail: [e-mail]
Myrtle Beach • Nags Head • Raleigh • Charlotte • Beaufort

• Aerobic D
• Sludge De
• Sludge dis
• The above
effective
requested
The Regional
of Carteret, C
evaluated vari
quo. The ulti
discharge wer
for $2 per gall
serve the To
Please find a
area, the engi
has been forw
the consulting
If you have
office at 910-
Encl:
cc: Town
Wilmi
HUA
gestion (Renovate with Fine Bubble Aeration and new 40 HP Blowers)
atering (Drying Beds) utilize existing.
osal (Truck transfer to final land application disposal)
modifications can be done for approximately $500,000 and are the most cost
ternatives. An ATC for these changes and a re -rating of the WWTP will be
y the Town of Newport following issuance of the NPDES permit.
Sewer and Land application studies by Malcolm Pirnie for the Four County area
ven, Onslow and Pamlico counties and the COG study for Carteret County
us options including regionalization, land application, ocean discharge and status
ate recommendations are that regionalization, land application and ocean
not cost effective on a large scale. The additional discharge of 250,000 gallons
n of construction cost is the best option for the Town of Newport and should
for the next 20 year planning period.
ched three copies of the NPDES permit application, topographic map of discharge
eering evaluation, alternative analysis and a check for $215.00. A separate copy
ded to the Wilmington Regional Office. Hobbs, Upchurch & Assoc., P.A. are
engineers on the project and should be copied on all correspondence.
further questions about this matter, please contact me at our Southern Pines
92-5616.
f Newport, Clay Dulaney
gton Regional Office
NW0101/300/NPDES
Sincerely,
HOBBS, UPCHURCH & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Michael C. Wicker, P.E.
Project Manager

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Newport , NC, NC0021555
FORM
2A
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal, Modification
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow >_ 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
f C.) Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
I D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
II 2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
o..E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
II 2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
t-)1` F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that err -Pots process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
111
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
I I
1
a
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
aT G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
_ L=APP ICANTS MUST COMPLETE -PART C:(CERTIFICAT1ON
3 EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 1 of 21

'FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Newport , NC , NC0021555
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal/Modification
TA ASIC APPLIGAT1ON 1�1F9RIMMATION FOR ALL At PLiCA ITS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name Town of Newport WWTP
Mailing Address P.O. Box 1869, 200 Howard Blvd.
Newport , N.C. 28570
Contact Person Clay Dulaney
Title Public Works Director
Telephone Number ( 252 ) 223-4418
Facility Address Kirby Lane
(not P.O. Box) Newport , N.C. 28570
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following;
Applicant Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
f
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
x owner x operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
0 facility x applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES
UIC
RCRA
NC0021555
PSD
Other
Other
WQ0008349
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name
Town of Newport
Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
3,349 Separate Town of Newport
Newport Correctional Facility 300
Total population served 3 649
Separate NCDOC
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22.
Page 2 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Newport, NC, NC0021555
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal/Modification
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes x No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes x No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12th month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 0.500 mgd
b. Annual average daily flow rate
c. Maximum daily flow rate
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant.
contribution (by miles) of each.
x Separate sanitary sewer
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? x
b.
c.
d.
Two Years Aqo Last Year
CY1999 0.388 mgd CY2000 0.436 mgd
CY1999 1.54 mqd CY2000 0.934 mgd
Check all that apply.
This Year
Nov00-Oct01 0.349 mqd
Nov00-0ct01 0.734 mgd
Also estimate the percent
100
Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
v. Other
Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? 0 Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location: N!A
01 NC0021555 to Newport River
N!A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s) N/A
Is discharge
0 continuous or 0 intermittent?
Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location: N!A
Number of acres: N/A
x No
O Yes
mgd
® No
Annual average daily volume applied to site: N/A
Is land application
❑ continuous or 0 intermittent?
Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
mgd
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22.
Page 3 of 21

•
i
N
`FACILITY NAME AND PERA!1T NUMBER:
Town of Newport, NC0021555
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal/Modification
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
NIA
If transport is by a party other than the applicant. provide:
Transporter Narie NIA
Mailing Address
N/A
NIA
Contact Person N/A
Title N/A
Telephone Number
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
N/A
N/A
N/A
Contact Person N/A
Title N/A
Tetephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge N/A
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. N/A mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.$.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection): 0 Yes ® No
If yes, provide they following for each disposal method:
Description of meihod (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
N/A
Annual daily voluTe disposed by this method: N/A
Is disposal throug this method 0 continuous or 0 intermittent?
r
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 4 of 21

0FACIUTY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Nev;iport, NC, NC0021555
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal/Modification
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is disch#rged. Do not include information on combined sower overflows In this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
01. NC0021555
Newport 28570
(City or town, V applicable) (Zip fie)
Carteret
{County)
N.C.
(State)
34 deg 46' 48 " 76 deg 51' 51"
(Latitude)
c. Distance from shone (if applicable)
NA
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) NA
e. Average daily flo rate 0.500 mgd
(Longitude)
R
R
f. Does this outfall have either an internnittent or a periodic discharge? 0 Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times pr year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall eguipp with a diffuser? 0 Yes ®No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Newpo River 03-05-03
b. Name of watershed (if known) White Oak River Basin
United States SoilConservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known): White Oak River Basin
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute 15.6 cfs chronic cis
03020106
e. Total hardness of
eceiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
M
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 5 of 21

d
r
r
r
r
w
r
y
r
a
1111
'rACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Newport , NC, NC0021555
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal/Modification
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
❑ Primary ® Secondary
Other. Describe: -
❑ Advanced 0
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
98 %
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal
98
Design SS removal
50
Design P removal
50
Design N removal
Other
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
gas chlorination If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? 0 Yes ® No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ® Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
by the authority for each outfall through which effluent is
parameters. Provide the Indicated effluent testing required permitting
discharged. Do not include Information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
comply with QA/QC requirements of
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart
Outfall number:
_01 __
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE.
: AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.9
s.u.
pH (Maximum)
7.9
s.u.
Flow Rate
0.934
mgd
0.436
mgd
Temperature (Winter)
16
12
60
Temperature (Summer)
27.2
25
60
For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLJMDL
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
BOD5
CBOD5
6.1
ppm
2.2
ppm
365
FECAL COLIFORM
450
/100 ml
3.8
1100 ml
365
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
17
ppm
1.7
ppm
365
END.OF. PART A
HE. APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE '1).Ts ' T
OF FORM 2A IOU MUST CONIPL
4 •o� St. v ..
ICH OTHER PARTS
r
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 21

N
M
M
M
M
M
M
w
of
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Newport, NC, NC0021555
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal/Modification
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
BASIC APPLICATION ICATION INFORMATION
sue,. .. h..,:_ .. ,- �.
- PART B.. - . ADDITIONN L'APPLICATION INFORMATIONFOR APPLICANT'S WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL, 0.0.1 MG0 0 Os • I s a '" • ,
All applicants with a design flow rate >_ 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.S. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day
300,000 gpd
that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
VCP pipe in system
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
The Town has contracted to seal manholes and reline old
These projects have resulted in dampening of peaks during rainfall events.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is Injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within % mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is dassified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, fist the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: I )
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.S. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
01
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7of21

r
K
y
r
r
r
r
■
M
w
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Newport, NC, NC0021555
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal/Modification
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
c. I the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, inclu rng new-maxir daily inflow rate (if applicable).
Expansion of WWTP to 0.750 mgd, new clarifiers, UV disinfection
d. Ovile-dates imposed
applicable. For improvements
applicable. Indicate
Implementation Stage
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational
e. Have appropriate
Describe briefly:
by -any mp lance schedule
planned independently
dates as accurately as possible.
Level
permits/clearances conceming other
NPDES Permit Modification Required
or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed
of local, State. or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion
Schedule Actual Completion
MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
below, as
dates, as
® No
07/02/2002
requirements
/ /
07/01/2003
/ /
07/01/03
/ /
07/01/03
/ /
Federal/State
been obtained? ❑ Yes
ATC required for clarifier. UV construction, reratinq of WWTP
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must
effluent testing required by the permitting authority
on combine sower overflows in this section. All information
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be
Outfall Number: 01
ONLY).
provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide
for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include
the indicated
information
conducted
other appropriate
data must be
reported must be based on data collected through analysis
must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing
no more than four and on -half years old.
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
VAVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE •
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLUMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
3.2
pprn
0.11
ppm
365
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
6330
ppb
1741
ppb
365
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
11.3
ppm
8.28
ppm
365
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
1.6
ppm
1.30
ppm
4
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
19.8
pprn
17.42
ppm
4
OIL and GREASE
3.25
ppm
4.8
ppm
4
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
2.7
ppm
2.22
ppm
4
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
OTHER
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1)TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER.PARTS' ,
OF. FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
i
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 8of21

1
f
I
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT
Town of Newport,
NUMBER:
NC, NC0021555
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal/Modification
RIVER BASIN:
White Oak 03-05-03
BASIC APP CATKI
INFORM ►T(Oi1t l ,
P •�1 CER lFICAT(ON
', r. j
All applicants must comp!
certification. All applicantss
parts of Form 2A you have
Form 2A and have completed
the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained In the Application Overview. Indicate below which
completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts
® Basic Application
of Form 2A you have completed and
Information packet Supplemental
are submitting:
Application information packet
(Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
(Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
(Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
(Combined Sewer Systems)
• Part D
• Part E
■ Part F
• Part G
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLE
E T E OLLOit NG CERTiWiCATioN.'
certify under penalty of law that
designed to assure that qualified
manage the system or those
accurate, and complete. I am
for knowing violations.
Name and official title
Signature
Telephone number
Date signed
Upon request of the permitting
works or identify appropriate permitting
this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the Information Is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
_ .. f_t: 4 A 1AVQ
, 4 AILir
a
[phone]
December 21.2001
authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at time treatment
requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENRI DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

NEJPORT, N. C.
31076-G7-1F 024-00
1994
DMA 5653 N SE - SEAS V612
1 MILE
7000 FEET
1 KILOMETER
LATITUDE: 30'46'48" LONGITUDE: 76'51'51 "
MAP#: H31SE SUB -BASIN: 30503
STREAM CLASS: C
DISCHARGE CODES: 01
RECEIVING STREAM: NEWPORT RIVER
DESIGN 0: 0.5MGD PERMIT EXPIRES: 7/31/02
TOWN OF NEWPORT
NC0021555
CARTERET COUNTY

REMOTE
P.S.
0
0.17MGD
BAR SCREEN/
GRIT CHAMBER
0.33MGD
0
BAR SCREEN/
GRIT CHAMBER
C
520,000 GAL I I
(2) 40 HP ROTORS
0.500MGD
INFLUENT P.S.
(3) PUMPS
700 GPM EA.
WASTE
SLUDGE PUMP
80 GPM
0.500MGD
10" FORCE MAIN
0.250 \ / 0.250
MGD 1 MGD DUEL
30'0 12'SWD
/ I CLARIFIERS
RAS / WAS SLUDGE
0.250MGD
0.01 MGD
WAS SLUDGE
CHLORINE CONTACT/
DIGESTED SLUDGE POST AERATION CHAMBER
0.035MGD
SLUDGE DRYING
BEDS
7,500 SQ.FT
150,000 GAL
AEROBIC
DIGESTER
TOWN OF NEWPORT
0.500 MGD WWTP
BLOWER BUILDING
(3) 255 SCFM BLOWERS
IMI
0.500MGD
GAS CHLORINATION
16.000 GAL 33 LBS/DAY
11.000 GAL 2HP AERATOR
0.500MGD
12" EFFLUENT LINE
NEWPORT RIVER
CLASS C
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
Consulting Engineers
SOUTHERN PINES. NC — MYRTLE BEACH, SC
NAGS HEAD, NC — RALEIGH, NC — CHARLOTTE. NC
300 S.W. Brood Street. Southern Pines, North Carolina 28387
Phone: [phone] — Fox: [phone]

0.358MGD
REMOTE
P.S.
0
0
0.17MGD
520,000 GAL I
(2) 40 HP ROTORS
BAR SCREEN/
GRIT CHAMBER
MECHANICAL BAR SCREEN/
MECHANICAL GRIT CHAMBER
INFLUENT P.S.
(3) PUMPS
700 GPM EA.
WASTE
SLUDGE PUMP
80 GPM
DIGESTED SLUDGE
0.040MGD
o-
o-
SLUDGE DRYING
BEDS
7,500 SOFT
0.750MGD
10" FORCE MAIN
0.750MGD
/ o.375 0.375
MGD
RAS / WAS SLUDGE
0.375MGD
0.012MGD
WAS SLUDGE
150,000 GAL
AEROBIC DIGESTER
W/ FINE BUBBLE
AERATION
PROPOSED
TOWN OF NEWPORT
0.750 MGD WWTP
ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION/
POST AERATION CHAMBER
BLOWER BUILDING
REPLACE (3) 255 SCFM BLOWERS
W/ NEW BLOWERS
MGD
0.750MGD
16,000 GAL
DUEL
30'0 12'SWD
CLARIFIERS
W/ EDI
INLET,
STAMFORD BAFFLES
AND SPIRAL RAKE
11,000 GAL 2HP BLOWER
W/ PVC DIFFUSER
0.750MGD
12" EFFLUENT LINE
/ \
NEWPORT RIVER
CLASS C
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
Consulting Engineers
SOUTHERN PINES, NC — MYRTLE BEACH, SC
NAGS HEAD, NC — RALEIGH, NC — CHARLOTTE, NC
300 S.W. Broad Street, Southern Pines, North Carolino 28387
Phone: [phone] — Fax: [phone]