20061137 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20210329

I I DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26,2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
0 Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS#Assigned* Version#*
20061137 2
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required What amout is owed?*
✓ Fee received F $240.00
6 Fee needed-send electronic notification r $570.00
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office-(336)776- Select Project Reviewer*
9800 Dave Wanucha:eads\djwanucha
Information for Initial Review
1a.Name of project:
Kersey Valley Road(SR 1154)Realignment
1a.Who is the Primary Contact?*
Troy Beasley
1b.Primary Contact Email:* 1c.Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
3/29/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Richland Creek(Stream Index 17-7-(4))
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-IV;CA:*
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.946100 -79.931305
Pre-Filing Meeting Information
ID# Version
061137
Pre-fling Meeting or Request Date*
7/10/2018
Attach documentation of Pre-Filing Meeting Request here:*
EMAIL_USACE-NCDWR Confirmation of Onsite Pre-App Meeting on 2018-07-10.pdf 175.51KB
A. Processing Information
County(or Counties)where the project is located:

Guilford
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes a No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
a Yes r No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
✓ Yes 6. No
1a.Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps:
r7 Section 404 Permit(wetlands,streams and waters,Clean Water Act)
I—Section 10 Permit(navigable waters,tidal waters,Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
✓ Yes
a No
lb.What type(s)of permit(s)do you wish to seek authorization?
r Nationwide Permit(NWP)
r Regional General Permit(RGP)
17 Standard(IP)
1c.Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
a Yes r No
Id.Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR:
r 401 Water Quality Certification-Regular r 401 Water Quality Certification-Express
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit r Riparian Buffer Authorization
f7 Individual Permit
le.Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? *
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: r Yes a No
For the record only for Corps Permit: r Yes a No
If.Is this an after-the-fact permit application?*
✓ Yes ( No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
6 Yes r No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
✓ Yes rNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Kersey Valley Road Realignment DMS Acceptance_2021-02-25.pdf 362.76KB
1h.Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
✓ Yes (No
1j.Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
✓ Yes 6' No
B. Applicant Information
Id.Who is applying for the permit?
rJ Owner r Applicant(other than owner)
le.Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
a Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a.Name(s)on recorded deed:
City of High Point
2b.Deed book and page no.:
002648;00157
2c.Responsible party:
Robby Stone
2d.Address

Street Address
PO Box 230
Address Line 2
Oly State/Province/Region
High Point NC
Postal/Zip code Country
27261 USA
2e.Telephone Number: 2f.Fax Number:
[phone]
2g.Email Address:*
ro b by.sto n e@ h ig h po i n t n c.g ov
4.Agent/Consultant(if applicable)
4a.Name:
Troy Beasley
4b.Business Name:
WithersRavenel
4c.Address
Street Address
219 Station Road
Address Line 2
Suite 101
Oty State/Province/Region
Wilmington NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
28405 USA
4d.Telephone Number: 4e.Fax Number:
[phone]
4f.Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
SIGNED_Agent Authorization_City of High Point.pdf 538.1 KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
lb.Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c.Nearest municipality/town:
High Point
2. Project Identification
2a.Property Identification Number: 2b.Property size:
187002,161511,161474,161511,161511 Project Area-3.0 acres
2c.Project Address
Street Address
Kersey Valley Road
Address Line 2
Oty State/Province/Region
High Point NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27263 USA
3.Surface Waters
3a.Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Richland Creek(Stream Index 17-7-(4))
3b.Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV;CA:*
3c. What river basin(s)is your project located in?*

Cape Fear
3d.Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300030103
4. Project Description and History
4a.Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project site consists of portions of the existing Kersey Valley Road,as well as undeveloped woodlands within the proposed alignment.The general land use in the vicinity consists
of a mixture of residential and commercial land uses.
4b.Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project(including all prior phases)in the past?*
s Yes r No r Unknown
4c.If yes,please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID(exp.SAW-0000-00000).
The previous permitting actions for the Kersey Valley Landfill consist of the following:
•Kersey Valley Landfill—Phase 3(10/13/2000)
o USACE 404 Individual Permit(AID:SAW-199920165)
o NCDWR Project#Unknown
•Kersey Valley MSWLF—Area 2(11/6/2007)
o USACE 404 Individual Permit(AID:SAW-2006-40164-241)
o NCDWR Project#061137
Project History Upload
4d.Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site.(for DWR)
USGS Quads.pdf 584.91 KB
4e.Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site.(for DWR)
Guilford Co Soil Survey.pdf 1.61MB
4f.List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.01 ac within project area
4g.List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
82 If within project area
4h.Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to relocate Kersey Valley Road(SR 1154)out of the Kersey Valley Landfill to improve commuter safety by eliminating commuter traffic through
the landfill,allow for more efficient and safe internal travel/access within the landfill for landfill users and staff and allow for expansion of the landfill over the existing portion of Kersey
Valley Road within the landfill.
41.Describe the overall project in detail,including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project consists of construction of±4,000 If of new two-lane roadway for the realignment of Kersey Valley Road.The proposed realignment begins approximately 775 If
south of the intersection of Kersey Valley Road and Cashatt Road(Lat:35.944001°N;Long:-79.931236°W)and runs north and west to tie into Jackson Lake Road(Lat:35.949963;
Long:-79.939328)across from the entrance to the OFS Brands campus.
The project also consists of improvements at the existing driveway just south of Stream 1 and improvements(riprap lining)to an existing drainage ditch along the Kersey Valley Road
into Stream 1.
The existing Kersey Valley Road will be abandoned and blocked north of the last residence,just south of Stream 1.This portion of Kersey Valley Road south of Stream 1 will remain to
provide access to the residences south of the landfill to the new alignment of Kersey Valley Road.The driveway entrance at the last residence will be improved to provide a turnaround.
As part of driveway entrance improvements to provide a turnaround,the existing culvert will be relocated and the existing roadside drainage ditch will be relocated and stabilized with
riprap.
Kersey Valley Road currently bifurcates the Kersey Valley Landfill.Currently,motorists are required to drive through the active landfill to the intersection with Kivett Drive to reach
northern destinations,including 1-85.The mingling of commuter traffic and landfill traffic causes significant issues with both commuter and landfill staff safety and is problematic to the
logistics of the operation of the landfill as noted in the attached letter from the City of High Point to the USACE.Currently,when landfill customers bring in non-treated wood products,
the customer is directed to transport the material to the"wood yard".Customers seeking to dispose of this material drive past the scales,make a U-turn on the landfill site,turn left onto
SR 1113(Kivett Drive),turn left into the"old landfill"driveway and follow the drive to the wood yard.Once the product is off-loaded,the customer then exits the facility by following the
drive,turning right on SR 1113(Kivett Drive),and then turning back into the new landfill scalehouse location to weigh and make payment.Relocation of SR 1154(Kersey Valley Road)
would allow customers to enter at the primary landfill entrance while commuting to the woodyard on the private landfill road.The relocation project will eliminate turning and re-entry
movements to the traffic system on public streets.
Furthermore,when landfill staff needs to transport equipment from one site(westside)to another(eastside)it requires travel across Kersey Valley Road and flagging operations,road
plates,and other safety measures are implemented to assure staff and commuters are protected.The absence of the roadway further eliminates crossing traffic conflicts and increases
safety for landfill staff as well as commuters.
The proposed relocation of Kersey Valley Road would provide a roadway constructed to NCDOT standards that meets or exceeds existing posted speed limit(45 mph)and traffic
volumes while creating a more direct access to Interstate 85 and Business 85 and eliminating commuter traffic through the landfill.
4j.Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Kersey Valley Rd Stream Impact Maps.pdf 4.34MB
5.Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
6 Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:

5b.If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,what type of determination was made?*
F Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2018-00217
5c.If 5a is yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name(if known): Troy Beasley
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Other:
5d.List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
The USAGE issued a Preliminary JD for the project area on 6/10/2019(SAW-2018-00217),which has been attached to this application.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the project area on 10/3/2018 which has been provided as an attachment to this application.
5d1.Jurisdictional determination upload
USAGE PJD_2019-06-10.pdf 1.06MB
NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter_2018-10-03.pdf 433.51 KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a.Is this a phased project?*
r Yes ( No
Are any other NWP(s),regional general permit(s),or individual permits(s)used,or intended to be used,to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a.Where are the impacts associated with your project?(check all that apply):
17 Wetlands fJ Streams-tributaries I? Buffers
I-Open Waters r Pond Construction
2.Wetland Impacts
2a.Site#*(?) 2a1 Reason(?) 2b.Impact type*(?) 2c.Type of W.* 2d.W.name* 2e.Forested* 2f.Type of 2g.Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
Site 1 Hand Clearing in T Headwater Forest Wetland B Yes Both 0.010
Wetlands (acres)
2g.Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g.Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.010 0.000
2g.Total Wetland Impact
0.010
2h.Comments:
See PCN for information on proposed impacts.
3.Stream Impacts
3a.Reason for impact(?) 3b.lmpact type* 3c.Type of impact* 3d.S.name* 3e.Stream Type* 3f.Type of 3g.S.width* 3h.Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Site 2-Road Crossing Permanent Culvert Stream 4 Intermittent Both 3 65
Average(feet) (linear feet)
$2 Site 2-Temp Construction Temporary Culvert Stream 4 Intermittent Both 3 4
Access Average(feet) (linear feet)
S3 Site 3-Relocated Drainage Temporary Other Stream 1 Perennial Both 12 13
Ditch Outlet Average(feet) (linear feet)
3i.Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i.Total permanent stream impacts: 3i.Total temporary stream impacts:
65 17

3i.Total stream and ditch impacts:
82
3j.Comments:
See PCN for information on proposed impacts.
6. Buffer Impacts(for DWR)
6a.Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
r Neuse r Tar-Pamlico
r Catawba 17 Randleman
r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
6b.Impact Type 6c.Per or Temp 6d.Stream name 6e.Buffer mitigation required? 6f.Zone 1 impact 6g.Zone 2 impact
Site 1-Perp Road Crossing;<1/3 ac- P Stream 4 No 5,128 4,642
Allowable Upon Authorization
Site 2-Perp Road Crossing;<1/10 ac- P Stream 4 No 543 2,225
Deemed Allowable
Site 3-Realignment of Existing Roadside P Stream 1 No 492 336
Drainage Ditch-Allowable Upon Authorization
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 6,163.00 7,203.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 6,163.00 7,203.00
6i.Comments:
See PCN for information on proposed impacts.
Supporting Documentation
Kersey Valley Rd_Buffer Impact Maps.pdf 1.59MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation L)
1.Avoidance and Minimization
la.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Prior to site plan design,the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and"waters"could be
minimized.
The original alignment would have resulted in 280 If of permanent stream impacts to two streams(Streams 2&4)and 0.01 acres of permanent
wetland impacts(Wetland B).The revisions to the proposed road alignment shifted the road as far east as possible while being able to maintain a
minimum curve radius as the road transitions to the west to meet NCDOT requirements for 50 mph design speed(45 mph posted speed limit).The
proposed alignment results in 65 If of permanent stream impacts from one stream crossing(Stream 2)and no wetland impacts.The revisions to the
proposed alignment results in a minimization of 215 If of permanent stream impacts and 0.01 acres of permanent wetland impacts.
The proposed alignment has been designed to only impact the extreme upper reach of Stream 4 to minimize impacts.
The proposed alignment has also minimized riparian buffer impacts and will result in perpendicular crossings of the buffers associated with Stream 2
(Deemed Allowable)and Stream 4(Allowable Upon Authorization).The realignment of the existing roadside drainage ditch has been designed to cross
the buffers perpendicularly(Allowable Upon Authorization).
Installation of the culvert for the Stream 4 crossing(Site 2)will be completed"in the dry"by constructing temporary coffer dams and pumping flow
around the project area during construction.Additionally,the culvert construction will be scheduled during a period with no forecasted rain.Once
construction is complete,the temporary coffer dams will be removed and the temporarily impacted stream restored to natural grades,lined with
biodegradable matting and seeded with rye grass to provide temporary stabilization until regrowth of native vegetation permanently stabilizes the
stream banks.Matting will not be placed on the stream bed.
lb.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
During construction,silt fencing will be installed around all areas to be disturbed to prevent sediment from escaping into downstream waters.Access
during construction will be in uplands.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State?
✓ Yes rNo
2c.If yes,mitigation is required by(check all that apply):
r DWR fJ Corps
2d.If yes,which mitigation option(s)will be used for this project?
I—Mitigation bank fJ Payment to in-lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
( Yes r No
4b.Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet) 4c.If using stream mitigation,what is the stream temperature:
130 warm
4d.Buffer mitigation requested(DWR only): 4e.Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(square feet) (acres)
4f.Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g.Coastal(tidal)wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h.Comments
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 65 If of permanent stream impacts through the purchase of offsite mitigation credits at a 2:1 ratio,resulting
in the purchase of 130 If of stream mitigation credits.WithersRavenel checked with mitigation banks within the Cape Fear 0303003 basin,and there
was no stream mitigation credits available.Therefore,the applicant proposes to provide the 130 If of stream mitigation through the purchase of credits
from NCDMS.A copy of the NCDMS letter of acceptance has been provided as an attachment.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
( Yes rNo
What type of SCM are you providing?
I—Level Spreader
17 Vegetated Conveyance(lower SHWT)
I—Wetland Swale(higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30%nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2.Stormwater Management Plan
2a.Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes ( No
2b.Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H.1003(2)?
✓ Yes ( No
2c.Does this project have a stormwater management plan(SMP)reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state-approved local government stormwater
program?
( Yes r No
✓ N/A-project disturbs<1 acre
2d.Which of the following stormwater management program(s)apply:
17 Local Government r-State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
17 Phase II I— NSW I— USMP I—Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of High Point
Comments:
NODE Winston-Salem Region
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
la.Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the use of public(federal/state)land?*
6 Yes rNo
lb.If you answered"yes"to the above,does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State(North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?*
✓ Yes r No
1c.If you answered"yes"to the above,has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House?*
✓ Yes ( No
Comments:*
The proposed realignment of Kersey Valley Road was included in the SEPA EA/FONSI for the Kersey Valley Landfill required by the NCDEQ Division
of Waste Management.The Draft EA was submitted to the NCDEQ Division of Waste Management and is currently under review.There is no federal
funding or nexus associated with the expansion of expansion of the landfill and therefore NEPA is not required.
2.Violations(DWR Requirement)
2a.Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0500),Isolated Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H.1300),or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
✓ Yes 6. No
3. Cumulative Impacts(DWR Requirement)
3a.Will this project result in additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes f No
3b.If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project consists of realignment of Kersey Valley Road to improve public safety and facilitate expansion of the Kersey Valley Road
Landfill.Additionally,the proposed road alignment will be located primarily on City property and is located on additional parcels that currently have
public road frontage.Therefore,the proposed project is not anticipated to be a catalyst for future development that could impact nearby downstream
water quality.
4.Sewage Disposal(DWR Requirement)
4a.Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes r No 6 N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a.Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ yes ( No
5b.Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
✓ Yes r No
5d.Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes r No r Unknown
5e.Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes G No
5f.Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
s Yes r No
5g.Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes ( No
5h.Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r No
5i.Does this project involve(1)blasting,and/or(2)other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines,such as jackhammers,mechanized pile drivers,etc.?
✓ Yes ( No
5j.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?

WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database,located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home,as well as NCNHP GIS data to identify if
there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project.The review of the NHP data did not identify any
occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project,see
attached NCNHP project review letter dated 3/21/2021.
The project is located in the Cape Fear River Basin,and therefore is not located within the USFWS known range of the Roanoke logperch.
Additionally,the project is not located within the USFWS known range of the Atlantic pigtoe or Cape Fear shiner.
Pedestrian surveys of the proposed alignment did not identify any eagle nests,and no bald eagles were observed in flight during the pedestrian
survey.The review of the NCNHP GIS data did not identify any known eagle nests within 1.0 miles of the project.The project is located approximately
1.6 miles from Randleman Lake,which is the nearest potential foraging habitat.Therefore,in accordance with the USFWS"National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines(May 2007),surveys of the areas within 660'of the project area were not required.Additionally,the National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines specifies that activities taking place more than 660'from a bald eagle nest will have No Affect on the nesting activities.
Therefore,based on the results of the pedestrian survey,lack of nearby records and distance to the nearest potential foraging habitat,WR concludes
that the proposed project will not adversely affect bald eagles.
Pedestrian surveys were conducted in September 2020 for Schweinitts sunflower and were focused along the existing ROWs for Kersey Valley Road
and the driveways to the Jackson Lake Substation and City's construction equipment storage yard in September 2020.The pedestrian survey did not
identify any populations of Schweinitz's sunflower.Additionally,the review of the NCNHP GIS data did not identify any known occurrences of
Schweinit. s sunflower within 1.0 miles of the project area.Therefore,based on the results of the pedestrian survey and lack of nearby records,WR
concludes that the proposed project will have will not adversely affect Schweinitts sunflower.
Pedestrian surveys of the proposed road alignment did not identify any potential habitat for small whorled pogonia,as the canopy within the forested
areas were too dense to allow sufficient sunlight penetration,and the vegetation within the non-forested areas were extremely dense to be considered
potential habitat.Additionally,review of the NCNHP GIS data did not identify any known occurrences of small whorled pogonia within 1.0 miles of the
project area.Based on a lack of potential habitat and lack of nearby records,WR concludes that the proposed project will not adversely affect small
whorled pogonia.
Therefore,WR concludes that the proposed project will not adversely affect federally listed species or their designated critical habitat.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NCNHP Project Review Report_2021-03-21.pdf 232.65KB
USFWS T&E List for Guilford County_2020-07-17.pdf 134.25KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes f No
6b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
WR reviewed the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat online mapper,located at:http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.html.There are
no waters classified as EFH in Guilford County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources(Corps Requirement)
7a.Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
✓ Yes f No
7b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database,located at:http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/,to determine if there were any
known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.The database review did not identify any known resources within or
in the vicinity of the proposed project.
7c.Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation(Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
✓ Yes R No
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
vnwv.ncfloodmaps.com
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
PCN Cover Letter.pdf 157.58KB
Parcel-Owner Info Exhibit.pdf 340.26KB
Adjacent Property Owner Exhibit-Info.pdf 435.15KB
Approved Wetland-Buffer Delineation Exhibit.pdf 378.88KB
Memo from City to USACE.pdf 857.37KB
Kersey Valley Road Closure Feasibility Study-10_4_16 Reduced.pdf 1.56MB
Alignment Alternatives Exhibit.pdf 374.62KB

Signature
R By checking the box and signing below,I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief;and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true,accurate,and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature;AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Troy Beasley
Signature
Date
3/29/2021