NC0069311_Fact Sheet_20210331

Fact Sheet
NPDES Permit No. NC0069311
Permit Writer/Email Contact Nick Coco,[e-mail]:
Date: October 6,2020
Division/Branch:NC Division of Water Resources/NPDES Municipal Permitting
Fact Sheet Template: Version 09Jan2017
Permitting Action:
❑X Renewal
❑ Renewal with Expansion
❑ New Discharge
❑ Modification(Fact Sheet should be tailored to mod request)
Note: A complete application should include the following:
• For New Dischargers,EPA Form 2A or 2D requirements,Engineering Alternatives Analysis,Fee
• For Existing Dischargers(POTW),EPA Form 2A, 3 effluent pollutant scans,4 2"d species WET
tests.
• For Existing Dischargers(Non-POTW),EPA Form 2C with correct analytical requirements based
on industry category.
Complete applicable sections below. If not applicable, enter NA.
1. Basic Facility Information
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name: Franklin County Public Utilities/Franklin County Wastewater
Treatment Plant(WWTP)
Applicant Address: 1630 US Highway 1,Youngsville,NC 27596
Facility Address: 1099 Lane Store Road,Franklinton,NC 27525
Permitted Flow: 2.0 MGD with expanded flow tier 3.0 MGD'
Facility Type/Waste: MAJOR Municipal; 56.25% domestic,43.75% industrial2
Facility Class: Grade IV Biological Water Pollution Control System
Treatment Units: Influent pump station with mechanical and manual bar screens,Grit
chamber,Dual aeration/anaerobic/anoxic basins,Dual clarifiers,Dual
tertiary filters,Dual train UV system,Parshall flume,Post aeration,
Aerobic digester
Pretreatment Program(Y/N) Y
County: Franklin
Region Raleigh
'The Franklin County WWTP is designed for 3.0 MGD,but operates currently at 2.0 MGD. Once the
monthly average flow equals or exceeds 90%of the 2.0 MGD tier(1.8 MGD),the permittee is authorized
to operate a 3.0 MGD plant.
2Based on permitted flows.
Briefly describe the proposed permitting action and facility background: Franklin County Public
Utilities has applied for an NPDES permit renewal at 2.0 MGD for the Franklin County WWTP. This
facility serves a population of 2,865 residents,as well as 2 significant industrial users(SIUs),including
one categorical significant industrial user(CIU),via a pretreatment program. Treated domestic and
Page 1 of 12

industrial wastewater is discharged into Cedar Creek,a class C-NSW water in the Tar-Pamlico River
Basin. The facility has a primary Outfall 001.
Authorization to Construct permit 069311A02 was issued on November 10, 2020 to Franklin County
Public Utilities for repairs and replacements of units at the Franklin County WWTP.
During the 2016 renewal,the facility was classified as Grade III.However,per 15A NCAC 08G.0302(c)
and(f),the facility has been reclassified as a Grade IV facility.
2. Receiving Waterbody Information:
Receiving Waterbody Information
Outfalls/Receiving Stream(s): Outfall 001 -Cedar Creek
Stream Index: 28-29-(2)
Stream Classification: C;NSW
Drainage Area(mi2): 25.3
Summer 7Q10(cfs) 1.6
Winter 7Q10(cfs): 5.2
30Q2(cfs): 7.0
Average Flow(cfs): 25.3
IWC(%effluent): 66 at 2.0 MGD, 74 at 3.0 MGD
303(d)listed/parameter: Yes,Listed for Turbidity in 2018 list
Subject to TMDL/parameter: Yes- State wide Mercury TMDL implementation.
Subbasin/HUC: 03-03-01/03020101
USGS Topo Quad: C25SW Franklinton,NC
3. Effluent Data Summary
Effluent data for Outfall 001 is summarized below for the period of September 2016 through September
2020.
Table 1. Effluent Data Summary Outfall 001
Parameter Units Average Max Min Permit Limit
Flow MGD 1.0 3.391 0.417 MA 2.0
Total Monthly Flow MG/month 30.7 41 18.33
BOD(summer) mg/1 2.5 12.5 2 WA 12.0
MA 8.0
BOD(winter) mg/1 2.5 9.8 2 WA 27.0
MA 18.0
TSS mg/1 2.6 14 2.5 WA 45.0
MA 30.0
NH3N(summer) mg/1 0.5 1 0.1
MA 1 WA 1 3.0
.0
NH3N(winter) mg/1 0.6 3.082 0.1 WA 6.0
MA 2.0
DO mg/1 8.3 10.75 5.93 DA> 5 mg/1
(geometric)
Fecal coliform #/100 ml (geo 3 an) 117 1 WA 400
MA 200
Page 2 of 12

Temperature ° C 19.5 28.6 9.3
Conductivity umhos/cm 1807 3038 439.5
pH SU 7.6 8.2 6.7 6.0 <pH<9.0
Total Copper µg/l 11.6 43 3
Total Zinc 1.ig/1 33.8 77 10
TKN mg/1 1.8 5.5 0.18
NO2+NO3 mg/1 10.5 23.2 1.07
TN mg/1 12.3 23.9 3.45
TN Load lb/mo 3140 5414 1800
TN Load lb/yr 43,347 64,947 36,045 42,784
TP mg/1 2.0 5.71 0.02
TP Load lb/mo 530 1294 68
TP Load lb/yr 5,639 6,802 4,867 7,732
MA-Monthly Average,WA-Weekly Average,DM-Daily Maximum,DA-Daily Average,QA-
Quarterly Average
4. Instream Data Summary
Instream monitoring may be required in certain situations,for example: 1)to verify model predictions
when model results for instream DO are within 1 mg/1 of instream standard at full permitted flow;2)to
verify model predictions for outfall diffuser; 3)to provide data for future TMDL;4)based on other
instream concerns. Instream monitoring may be conducted by the Permittee,and there are also
Monitoring Coalitions established in several basins that conduct instream sampling for the Permittee (in
which case instream monitoring is waived in the permit as long as coalition membership is maintained).
If applicable, summarize any instream data and what instream monitoring will be proposed for this
permit action: The current permit requires instream monitoring for dissolved oxygen,conductivity and
temperature upstream of the outfall at NCSR 1116 and downstream of the outfall at NCSR 1114. The
Town is a member of the Tar-Pamlico River Basin Association and their instream requirements are
provisionally waived as long as they maintain membership.As such, data from September 2016 through
September 2020 were observed from TPBA monitoring station 01600000, located upstream of the
facility,and station 01920000,located downstream of the facility. The data has been summarized in
Table 2 below.
Table 2. Instream Monitoring Coalition Data Summary
01600000 Upstream 01920000 Downstream
Parameter Units
Average Max Min Average Max Min
DO mg/1 8.3 11.7 5.8 8.3 11.6 5.9
18.5 27.6 5.5
° C 19.2 29.1 6.2
Temperature
Conductivity umhos/cm 80.3 99 55 228.6 445 79
Students t-tests were run at a 95%confidence interval to analyze relationships between instream
samples.A statistically significant difference is determined when the t-test p-value result is<0.05
Page 3 of 12

The downstream temperature did not exceed 32 degrees Celsius [per 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (18)]. The
temperature differential was greater than 2.8 degrees Celsius on no occasion during the period reviewed.
It was concluded that no statistically significant difference between upstream and downstream
temperature exists.
Downstream DO did not drop below 5 mg/L [per 15A NCAC 02B .0211 (6)] during the period reviewed.
It was concluded that no statistically significant difference between upstream and downstream DO exists.
It was concluded that a statistically significant difference between upstream and downstream conductivity
exists.
Is this facility a member of a Monitoring Coalition with waived instream monitoring (Y/N): Y
Name of Monitoring Coalition: Tar-Pamlico River Basin Association
5. Compliance Summary
Summarize the compliance record with permit effluent limits (past 5 years): The facility reported no limit
violation resulting in enforcement during the period reviewed.
Summarize the compliance record with aquatic toxicity test limits and any second species test results
(past 5 years): The facility passed 18 of 19 quarterly chronic toxicity tests as well as 4 of 4 second species
toxicity tests from January 2016 to July 2020. The facility failed its toxicity testing in October 2018,but
followed with passing tests in November and December 2018.
Summarize the results from the most recent compliance inspection: The last facility inspection conducted
in February 2019 reported that the facility was in compliance with NPDES permit NC0069311.
6. Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations (WQBELs)
Dilution and Mixing Zones
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206,the following streamflows are used for dilution considerations
for development of WQBELs: 1Q10 streamflow(acute Aquatic Life); 7Q10 streamflow(chronic Aquatic
Life;non-carcinogen HH); 30Q2 streamflow(aesthetics);annual average flow(carcinogen,HH).
If applicable, describe any other dilution factors considered(e.g., based on CORMIX model results):NA
If applicable, describe any mixing zones established in accordance with 1SA NCAC 2B.0204(b): NA
Oxygen-Consuming Waste Limitations
Limitations for oxygen-consuming waste (e.g.,BOD)are generally based on water quality modeling to
ensure protection of the instream dissolved oxygen(DO)water quality standard. Secondary TBEL limits
(e.g.,BOD=30 mg/1 for Municipals)may be appropriate if deemed more stringent based on dilution and
model results.
If permit limits are more stringent than TBELs, describe how limits were developed: The existing
limitations for BOD at the 3.0 MGD flow tier are based on the results of a 2000 Level B model conducted
upon request by the County for speculative limits for an expansion to 3.0 MGD.The existing limitations
for BOD at the 2.0 MGD flow tier are consistent with those at the 3.0 MGD flow tier.No changes are
proposed.
Page 4 of 12

Ammonia and Total Residual Chlorine Limitations
Limitations for ammonia are based on protection of aquatic life utilizing an ammonia chronic criterion of
1.0 mg/1(summer)and 1.8 mg/1(winter).Acute ammonia limits are derived from chronic criteria,
utilizing a multiplication factor of 3 for Municipals and a multiplication factor of 5 for Non-Municipals.
Limitations for Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)are based on the NC water quality standard for protection
of aquatic life (17 ug/1)and capped at 28 ug/1(acute impacts). Due to analytical issues,all TRC values
reported below 50 ug/1 are considered compliant with their permit limit.
Describe any proposed changes to ammonia and/or TRC limits for this permit renewal: The current
permit does not set a limit or require monitoring for TRC,as the facility used UV without backup
chlorination. There are no proposed changes for TRC.
The existing limitations for BOD at the 3.0 MGD flow tier are based on the results of a 2000 Level B
model conducted upon request by the County for speculative limits for an expansion to 3.0 MGD. The
existing limitations for BOD at the 2.0 MGD flow tier are consistent with those at the 3.0 MGD flow tier.
No changes are proposed.Ammonia-nitrogen limits have been reviewed in the attached WLA and have
been found to be protective.No changes are proposed for ammonia.
Reasonable Potential Analysis(RPA) for Toxicants
If applicable, conduct RPA analysis and complete information below.
The need for toxicant limits is based upon a demonstration of reasonable potential to exceed water quality
standards,a statistical evaluation that is conducted during every permit renewal utilizing the most recent
effluent data for each outfall. The RPA is conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44(d)(i). The NC
RPA procedure utilizes the following: 1)95%Confidence Level/95%Probability;2)assumption of zero
background; 3)use of detection limit for"less than"values;and 4) streamflows used for dilution
consideration based on 15A NCAC 2B.0206. Effective April 6,2016,NC began implementation of
dissolved metals criteria in the RPA process in accordance with guidance titled NPDES Implementation of
Instream Dissolved Metals Standards,dated June 10,2016.
A reasonable potential analysis was conducted on effluent toxicant data collected between September
2016 through September 2020 Pollutants of concern included toxicants with positive detections and
associated water quality standards/criteria. Based on this analysis,the following permitting actions are
proposed for this permit:
• Effluent Limit with Monitoring. The following parameters will receive a water quality-based
effluent limit(WQBEL)since they demonstrated a reasonable potential to exceed applicable
water quality standards/criteria: Total Cadmium, Total Copper
• Monitoring Only. The following parameters will receive a monitor-only requirement since they
did not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria,
but the maximum predicted concentration was>50%of the allowable concentration: Total Lead
• No Limit or Monitoring: The following parameters will not receive a limit or monitoring, since
they did not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality
standards/criteria and the maximum predicted concentration was<50%of the allowable
concentration: Total Arsenic,Total Chromium,Total Cyanide,Total Molybdenum,Total Nickel,
Total Selenium,Total Silver,Total Zinc
• POTW Effluent Pollutant Scan Review: Three effluent pollutant scans were evaluated for
additional pollutants of concern. (PPAs from 2016,2017 and 2018)
Page 5 of 12

o The following parameter(s)will receive a water quality-based effluent limit(WQBEL)
with monitoring,since as part of a limited data set, two samples exceeded the allowable
discharge concentration: N/A
o The following parameter(s)will receive a monitor-only requirement, since as part of a
limited data set,one sample exceeded the allowable discharge concentration: N/A
o The following parameters will not receive a limit or monitoring,since they did not
demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria and
the maximum predicted concentration was<50%of the allowable concentration: Total
Beryllium
If applicable, attach a spreadsheet of the RPA results as well as a copy of the Dissolved Metals
Implementation Fact Sheet for freshwater/saltwater to this Fact Sheet. Include a printout of the RPA
Dissolved to Total Metal Calculator sheet if this is a Municipality with a Pretreatment Program.
Toxicity Testing Limitations
Permit limits and monitoring requirements for Whole Effluent Toxicity(WET)have been established in
accordance with Division guidance (per WET Memo, 8/2/1999). Per WET guidance,all NPDES permits
issued to Major facilities or any facility discharging "complex"wastewater(contains anything other than
domestic waste)will contain appropriate WET limits and monitoring requirements,with several
exceptions. The State has received prior EPA approval to use an Alternative WET Test Procedure in
NPDES permits,using single concentration screening tests,with multiple dilution follow-up upon a test
failure.
Describe proposed toxicity test requirement: The permit requires quarterly chronic toxicity testing at
66% effluent concentration at the 2.0 MGD flow tier and 74%effluent concentration at the 3.0 MGD flow
tier.No changes are proposed.
Mercury Statewide TMDL Evaluation
There is a statewide TMDL for mercury approved by EPA in 2012. The TMDL target was to comply
with EPA's mercury fish tissue criteria(0.3 mg/kg)for human health protection. The TMDL established a
wasteload allocation for point sources of 37 kg/year(81 lb/year),and is applicable to municipals and
industrial facilities with known mercury discharges. Given the small contribution of mercury from point
sources(-2%of total load),the TMDL emphasizes mercury minimization plans(MMPs)for point source
control. Municipal facilities>2 MGD and discharging quantifiable levels of mercury(>1 ng/1)will
receive an MMP requirement. Industrials are evaluated on a case-by-case basis, depending if mercury is a
pollutant of concern. Effluent limits may also be added if annual average effluent concentrations exceed
the WQBEL value (based on the NC WQS of 12 ng/l) and/or if any individual value exceeds a TBEL
value of 47 ng/l.
Table 3.Mercury Effluent Data Summary(2.0 MGD)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
#of Samples 2 4 1 9 4
Annual Average Conc.ng/L 3.2 3.6 3.0 1.46 2.725
Maximum Conc.,ng/L 3.56 9.41 2.98 3.09 3.66
TBEL,ng/L 47
WQBEL,ng/L 18.2
Page 6 of 12

Describe proposed permit actions based on mercury evaluation: Since no annual average mercury
concentration exceeded the WQBEL,and no individual mercury sample exceeded the TBEL,no mercury
limit is required. Since the facility is 2 MGD in design capacity and reported multiple quantifiable levels
of total mercury,a mercury minimization plan(MMP)is required.The MMP requirement will remain in
the permit.
Other TMDL/Nutrient Management Strategy Considerations
If applicable, describe any other TMDLs/Nutrient Management Strategies and their implementation
within this permit:
History of Nutrient Management Strategy for Point Sources
• On September 12, 1989,the Environmental Managements Commission classified the Tar-Pamlico
River Basin as Nutrient Sensitive Waters(NSW). On February 13, 1992,the Commission approved a
revised NSW Implementation Strategy that established the framework for a nutrient reduction trading
program between point and nonpoint sources of pollution. The Strategy also established certain
conditions to be met by an association of dischargers known as the Tar-Pamlico Basin Association
(the Association). Those conditions are defined in the Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Implementation Strategy (the "Agreement").
Addition of Nutrient Limits
• In 2009,the U.S. EPA Region 4 offices raised concerns that, although the Agreement set collective
nutrient caps for the members of the Tar-Pamlico Basin Association,the members'NPDES permits
lacked nutrient limits and,as a result,EPA had no means to enforce nutrient controls should it
become necessary.As part of the 2009 permit renewals,the Division added the group caps for
nitrogen and phosphorus,along with related special conditions,to the permits of the fifteen TPBA
member facilities. The Division could not add individual N and P limits at that time,because no basis
existed at the time for dividing the available wasteload allocations among the members. Instead,the
Division agreed to work with the Association to determine an appropriate distribution and to then add
individual N and P limits to the permits as part of the 2014 renewals.
• With the consent of the Association,the group caps are distributed among the members in proportion
to their 2014 maximum permitted flows,as follows:
TPBA Members and Nutrient Allocations/Limits
Permit Owner Facility TN Load TP Load
(lb/yr) (lb/yr)
NC0030317 City of Rocky Mount Tar River Regional WWTP 299,491 54,124
NC0023931 Greenville Utilities Commission GUC WWTP 249,576 45,103
NC0020605 Town of Tarboro Tarboro WWTP 71,307 12,887
NC0025054 City of Oxford Oxford WWTP 49,915 9,021
NC0020648 City of Washington Washington WWTP 52,054 9,407
NC0069311 Franklin County Franklin County WWTP 42,784 7,732
NC0020834 Town of Warrenton Warrenton WWTP 28,523 5,155
NC0026042 Town of Robersonville Robersonville WWTP 25,671 4,639
NC0020231 Town of Louisburg Louisburg WRF 19,538 3,531
NC0026492 Town of Belhaven Belhaven WWTP 14,261 2,577
NC0025402 Town of Enfield Enfield WWTP 14,261 2,577
NC0023337 Town of Scotland Neck Scotland Neck WWTP 9,626 1,740
NC0020061 Town of Spring Hope Spring Hope WWTP 5,705 1,031
NC0042269 Town of Bunn Bunn WWTP 4,278 773
NC0020435 Town of Pinetops Pinetops WWTP 4,278 773
Page 7 of 12

• Given the size and characteristics of the river basin,transport losses were judged to be somewhat
uniform across the basin and were not considered in these calculations. Thus,nutrient limits equal the
nutrient allocations for each facility,unlike in other nutrient management strategies in the state.
• The draft permit includes new conditions designed to meet the Division's 2009 commitment. The
group caps and related conditions have been deleted and replaced with individual N and P limits and a
new set of related special conditions.
• The nutrient limits are annual mass limits and become effective January 1, 2016. Each members'
limits are equivalent to approximately 4.7 mg/L TN and 0.85 mg/L TP for the member's full
permitted flow.
The special conditions document the N and P allocations assigned to the facility and provide for
consistent calculation of nutrient loads by all members. They also establish how compliance with the N
and P limits will be determined if the Association members apply for and obtain a group NPDES permit
to control their nutrient discharges collectively. The members have indicated they plan to apply for such a
permit,and the Division initiated discussions with the members on that approach in 2012.
The Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Strategy is covered under 15A NCAC 02B .0730.
Other WQBEL Considerations
If applicable, describe any other parameters of concern evaluated for WQBELs:NA
If applicable, describe any special actions (HQW or ORW) this receiving stream and classification shall
comply with in order to protect the designated waterbody: NA
If applicable, describe any compliance schedules proposed for this permit renewal in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0107(c)(2)(B), 40CFR 122.47, and EPA May 2007 Memo:NA
If applicable, describe any water quality standards variances proposed in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.3(e)and 15A NCAC 2B.0226 for this permit renewal:NA
7. Technology-Based Effluent Limitations (TBELs)
Municipals(if not applicable,delete and skip to Industrials)
Are concentration limits in the permit at least as stringent as secondary treatment requirements (30 mg/l
BODS/TSS for Monthly Average, and 45 mg/l for BOD5/TSS for Weekly Average). YES
If NO,provide a justification for alternative limitations (e.g., waste stabilization pond). NA
Are 85%removal requirements for BODS/TSS included in the permit? YES,Overall removal of BOD
and TSS was greater than 85% during the period reviewed.
If NO,provide a justification (e.g., waste stabilization pond). NA
8. Antidegradation Review (New/Expanding Discharge):
The objective of an antidegradation review is to ensure that a new or increased pollutant loading will not
degrade water quality. Permitting actions for new or expanding discharges require an antidegradation
review in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0201. Each applicant for a new/expanding NPDES permit
must document an effort to consider non-discharge alternatives per 15A NCAC 2H.0105(c)(2). In all
cases,existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing use is
maintained and protected.
If applicable, describe the results of the antidegradation review, including the Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA) and any water quality modeling results:NA
Page 8 of 12

9. Antibacksliding Review:
Sections 402(o)(2)and 303(d)(4)of the CWA and federal regulations at 40 CFR 122.44(1)prohibit
backsliding of effluent limitations in NPDES permits. These provisions require effluent limitations in a
reissued permit to be as stringent as those in the previous permit,with some exceptions where limitations
may be relaxed(e.g.,based on new information,increases in production may warrant less stringent TBEL
limits,or WQBELs may be less stringent based on updated RPA or dilution).
Are any effluent limitations less stringent than previous permit(YES/NO):NO
If YES, confirm that antibacksliding provisions are not violated:NA
10. Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring frequencies for NPDES permitting are established in accordance with the following
regulations and guidance: 1) State Regulation for Surface Water Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B.0500;2)
NPDES Guidance,Monitoring Frequency for Toxic Substances(7/15/2010 Memo); 3)NPDES Guidance,
Reduced Monitoring Frequencies for Facilities with Superior Compliance (10/22/2012 Memo);4)Best
Professional Judgement(BPJ). Per US EPA(Interim Guidance, 1996),monitoring requirements are not
considered effluent limitations under Section 402(o)of the Clean Water Act,and therefore anti-
backsliding prohibitions would not be triggered by reductions in monitoring frequencies.
For instream monitoring,refer to Section 4.
As the Franklin County WWTP is a Grade IV facility,monitoring frequencies for pH,BOD, ammonia,
total suspended solids,temperature,conductivity, fecal coliform and dissolved oxygen have been
increased from 3/week to daily at the 2.0 MGD flow tier,per 15A NCAC 02B .0508.
11. Electronic Reporting Requirements
The US EPA NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was finalized on December 21,2015. Effective
December 21,2016,NPDES regulated facilities are required to submit Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMRs)electronically. While NPDES regulated facilities would initially be required to submit additional
NPDES reports electronically effective December 21,2020,EPA extended this deadline from December
21,2020,to December 21,2025. The current compliance date,effective January 4,2021,was extended as
a final regulation change published in the November 2,2020 Federal Register This permit contains the
requirements for electronic reporting,consistent with Federal requirements.
Page 9 of 12

12.Summary of Proposed Permitting Actions:
Table 4. Current Permit Conditions and Proposed Changes 2.0 MGD w/expansion to 3.0 MGD
Parameter Current Permit Proposed Change Basis for Condition/Change
Flow MA 2.0 MGD with No change 15A NCAC 2B .0505
expansion tier to
3.O MGD
Total Monthly Flow Monitor and No change For calculation of TN and TP
Report Monthly Loads
BOD5 Summer: No change to limits WQBEL.2000 Level B model.
MA 8.0 mg/1 Daily monitoring 15A NCAC 2B; Surface Water
WA 12.0 mg/1 Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B. 0508
Winter:
MA 18.0 mg/1
WA 27.0 mg/1
3/week monitoring
NH3-N Summer: No change to limits WQBEL.2000 Level B model.
MA 3.0 mg/1 Daily monitoring 15A NCAC 2B; Surface Water
WA 9.0 mg/1 Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B. 0508
Winter:
MA 6.0 mg/1
WA 18.0 mg/1
3/week monitoring
TSS MA 30 mg/1 No change to limits TBEL. Secondary treatment
WA 45 mg/1 Daily monitoring standards/40 CFR 133 / 15A
3/week monitoring NCAC 2B .0406; Surface Water
Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B. 0508
Fecal coliform MA 200/100m1 No change to limits WQBEL. State WQ standard, 15A
WA 400/100m1 Daily monitoring NCAC 2B; Surface Water
3/week monitoring Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B. 0508
DO DA> 5 mg/1 No change to limits WQBEL. State WQ standard, 15A
Monitor and Daily monitoring NCAC 2B .0200; Surface Water
Report 3/week Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B. 0508
Temperature Monitor and Daily monitoring Surface Water Monitoring, 15A
Report 3/Week NCAC 2B. 0508
pH 6- 9 SU No change to limits WQBEL. State WQ standard, 15A
Monitor and Daily monitoring NCAC 2B; Surface Water
Report 3/week Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B. 0508
Conductivity Monitor and Daily monitoring Surface Water Monitoring, 15A
Report 3/Week NCAC 2B. 0508
Total Copper Monitor and @ 2.0 MGD: WQBEL.Based on results of RPA;
Report Quarterly MA 37.9 ug/L RP shown- apply Monthly
DM 53.6 ug/L Monitoring with Limit
Monitor and Report
Monthly
@ 3.O MGD:
MA 33.6 ug/L
DM 48.1 ug/L
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Page 10 of 12

Total Zinc Monitor and Remove requirement Based on results of RPA;No RP,
Report Quarterly Predicted Max<50% of Allowable
Cw-No Monitoring required
Total Cadmium No requirement @ 2.0 MGD: WQBEL.Based on results of RPA;
MA 2.4 ug/L RP shown- apply Monthly
DM 15.0 ug/L Monitoring with Limit
Monitor and Report
Monthly
@ 3.O MGD:
MA 2.2 ug/L
DM 13.5 ug/L
Monitor and Report
Monthly
Total Lead No requirement Monitor and Report Based on results of RPA;No RP,
Quarterly Predicted Max > 50%of
Allowable Cw- apply Quarterly
Monitoring
Total Hardness No requirement Quarterly monitoring Hardness-dependent dissolved
Upstream and in metals water quality standards
Effluent approved in 2016
TKN Monitor and No change For calculation of Total Nitrogen
Report Weekly
NO2+NO3 Monitor and No change For calculation of Total Nitrogen
Report Weekly
Total Nitrogen Monitor and No change Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Management
Report Weekly Strategy
T15A NCAC 2B .0730
TN Load Monitor and No change WQBEL.Tar-Pamlico Nutrient
Report Monthly Management Strategy
(as lb/mo) T15A NCAC 2B .0730
Annual TN mass
limit of 42,784
lb/yr
Total Phosphorous Monitor and No change Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Management
Report Weekly Strategy
T15A NCAC 2B .0730
TP Load Monitor and No change WQBEL.Tar-Pamlico Nutrient
Report Monthly Management Strategy
(as lb/mo) T15A NCAC 2B .0730
Annual TP mass
limit of 7,732 lb/yr
Chronic Toxicity Chronic limit, No change WQBEL. No toxics in toxic
66% effluent @ amounts. 15A NCAC 2B
2.0 MGD,74%
effluent @ 3.0
MGD
Page 11 of 12

Effluent Pollutant Scan Three times per No change,Conducted 40 CFR 122
permit cycle in 2022,2023,2024
Mercury Minimization MMP Special Maintain MMP Consistent with 2012 Statewide
Plan(MMP) Condition Mercury TMDL Implementation;
Municipality with Q<2 MGD
Electronic Reporting Electronic No change In accordance with EPA Electronic
Reporting Special Reporting Rule 2015.
Condition
MGD—Million gallons per day,MA- Monthly Average,WA—Weekly Average,DM—Daily Max,QA
—Quarterly Average,DA—Daily Average,AA—Annual Average
13. Public Notice Schedule:
Permit to Public Notice: December 15,2020; affidavit received March 26,2021
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0109& .0111,The Division will receive comments for a period of 30 days following
the publication date of the public notice.Any request for a public hearing shall be submitted to the
Director within the 30 days comment period indicating the interest of the party filing such request and the
reasons why a hearing is warranted.
14. Fact Sheet Addendum (if applicable):
The draft was submitted to the Franklin County Public Utility, EPA Region IV, and the Division's
Raleigh Regional Office,Aquatic Toxicology Branch, Ecosystems Branch and Operator Certification
Program for review.No comments were received from any party.
Were there any changes made since the Draft Permit was public noticed(Yes/No):YES
If Yes, list changes and their basis below:
• As the Monitoring Coalition will not be conducting hardness sampling on behalf of the Permittee,
the footnote language in Sections A.(1.)and A.(2.)has been updated.
15. Fact Sheet Attachments (if applicable):
• RPA Spreadsheet Summary
• BOD and TSS Removal
• Monitoring Reduction Frequency Spreadsheet
• Dissolved Metals Implementation/Freshwater
• Waste Load Allocation Spreadsheet
• Mercury TMDL Spreadsheet
• Toxicity Summary
• Instream Monitoring Summary
• Renewal Application Addendum
Page 12 of 12

P.O, BOK 114, 1095 ]ickett rI�ri_
Duisburg,NC 27549
Phone: 9 t .650 Fax(919) 1
The Franklin imes
kegai5gthert`attkfir l _egret
Legal Ad CQ.py
PUBLIC NOTICE Lim! opp�; act Val � ri�r err ani AFFIDAVIT
NORTH CAROLINA wsrh,ir qua ly limited parsmr3 rs
elf VIRONFIIENTAL Th.5 d's{herga may aged fulur i
h1ANACEtriENT allocations in Itm. svyT rL or GedEir North Carolina - Franklin County.
commiSSION,INFuEs Creek.
UNIT 11517 (PAIL
SERVICE CENTER I, Gary Cunard, Publisher of Ti 1l FRANKLIN
RALEt0H, PIC 21699.r1617 TIMES, a newspaper published at Louisburg,
NOTICE OF WENT TO I$$1,11E A Franklin County,i PDE w S1-E TE _C_, hereby certify that the
PERMIT NCpUG131 ndvertiscirent of
FRANKLIN C J N1 ' ININTP
The N c th Camino! Er )firer rn ni I
IV Gila rnard Grim rr is5 i, r. Advertise r:NCDEN IVEIWQ/NPDES
irn-inses Lc. issue a N POE.$ Description:Notice of Intent Wastewater Perrot
xiesiawar discharge permit h $
person' lion beltrw Wrifl$n 00 931
c om rner Ls regarding Lie pro:Qsa.d
parm:k w iII be aredpiad unit .3 a copy of which is hereto attached, appeared m the
d a.yr s alr fie r. h h ea this
no4ee. The cirecbr of u•,e IBC f01101.11ingisties of said publications:
Div isicn of W her Resources *Frank l n Times: 1 2124/20 0
f f YWH) rri y :mild a publ.c rycaring
�h�rrl Lhcrei be a s rgriif art dagrae
rmhI: interest Please mail T'oda 's date: 1 0 0.
comment ardor Initernslthrin
62.4JeSt Ir, Dt.1 :}I the abaw
address InlerGaXid persons rn E}.
'r rgr`. trig UVAI al 512 pi.
, nut Ralo Fw, F;C 2 F6Ga Io
ri 'i i rr :nfjrrr!a ton on hilt'
Acditanal intorrna.ari rrr riunFs Subsdrthe and sworn k. before ITC the day of
FoRrrir hind ra notice may be 121 712 O.
icund on our
w ebS;t f.
htp:ifthq.r0.901.ra la.LtdA.,isions"
wuater•rese rcesMaher.resourti es•
;}9 rrl itS'rtir ati tew r-branih'E odes•
b k
IN asap ale•,pi.Cl ,ic s Notary 1.
My onion expires July l I, 2024
C! oy+ cs e ti 19)
rank am County 4ub!r La L Idts
1:163C. ij. d-Iw ' 1, Yourevil:�
r11 i I a requested normal of
NP[E5 pe.im t NCCI �i:i11 kr its
Franklin Dainty I'a_iEW air
T rearm r;nI F•1ink leafed In f rarklir
[tuna Th 5 permiryed fac
isc ha les treated m rrrirlpai and
:ndaSlna iriastaiv atir In Got r
Creme, a class ra-IV.4.11 wdlEr in the
Tar-yarn boo River 3osirti.
C urr r,ly, SOD, ammonia, tecaL
c.cliiprm dismved x y ier p11,

Page 10B The 1 ankh Z f A nes Louisburg, NC, Thursday, December 24,2020
ciassTeds
CLASSIFIEDS General Services Legals Legals Legals Estate Notices
ROBERT SHIELDS PLUMBING fore 12:00 pm on the day prior to the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF OFFER TO ADMINISTRATOR'S
Notices Drains Cleared meeting by calling town hall at(919) Louisburg Town Council PURCHASE PROPERTY NOTICE
All Water Leaks Repaired 925-3401 or by visiting the following The Louisburg Town Council shall AND REQUEST FOR Having qualified as Administrator of
CHECK US OUT Water Heaters website: tinyurl.com/Youngsville- hold a public hearing on the evening UPSET BIDS the estate of Susan Renee Chappell,
ON THE WEB! Well Pumps&Tanks comment.When requesting to regis- of Monday,January 11,2021 at 7:30 deceased, late of Franklin County,
www.thefranklintimes.com FREE ESTIMATES ter for a public hearing,persons must PM at the Louisburg Operations NOTICE is hereby given that the North Carolina,this is to notify all per-
www.thefranklintimes.com
SENIOR ad will also SENIOR DISCOUNTS provide their name,physical address, Center Training Conference Room, Town of Franklinton Board of Com- sons having claims against the estate
be included on lineou ad will al 919-729-4283 comment topic,and the phone num- 115 Industrial Drive, Louisburg, NC missioners has declared the fol- of said deceased to exhibit them to
More exposure to your ad ber used to dial-in to the electronic 27549.The purpose of this hearing is lowing Town owned real property to the undersigned on or before the 11th
meeting. Registered persons will be to allow for comments from the public be surplus, authorized its disposal day of March,2021,or this notice will
means more customers! HOLLAND POWER VAC recognized for comments in the order regarding the following matters being pursuant to the negotiated offer, ad- be pleaded in bar of their recovery.All
Call us to place your Classified Robert Holland&Sons,Own- registered. The time limit for each considered by the Town Council: vertisement, and upset bids method persons indebted to said estate will
Line ad ers Commercial/Residential Duct speaker shall be five minutes. prescribed in N.C.G.S. §160A-269, please make immediate payment.
919-496-2910 Cleaning 1) Consideration of a Text Amend- and has received the following offers This the 10th day of December,2020.
NOTICE TO READERS Remodeling,Painting Written public comments will also be ment to the Louisburg Zoning Ordi- to purchase:
Footers to Roofs, accepted via U.S.mail, nance to add 911 Communications Address:7 West Mason Street, Sandra Chappell,
The Franklin Times scans all classi- Repair Sills&Floor Systems customerservice@ Center as a Permitted Use to the Franklinton,NC Administrator
fied ads, but we advise our readers PVC Roofs,EPDM Roofs, townofyoungsville.org Light Industrial(LI)District;and, Parcel ID #: 1865-07-1005 129 Winn Dr.
to investigate a company asking Tree Removal and in-person at Town Hall until 24 OFFER: $100,000.00 Louisburg,NC 27549
for money to be mailed in advance. Free Estimates hours before the public hearing. 2) Consideration of a Text Amend-
Companies asking you to dial "900" [phone],[phone](cell) ment to the Louisburg Zoning Ordi- Upset bids will be accepted by the Pub.dates:12/10,17, 24,31
prefix phone numbers are asking you Full meeting agendas may be nance to allow Wholesale Landscap- Town of Franklinton at 101 N Main
to pay for the call amounting to a per downloaded via the Town's website ing Supply as a Permitted Use to the Street, Franklinton, North Carolina,
call cost or minute cost.Any ad with Strickland Auto Supply (townofyoungsville.org)by clicking on Agricultural-Residential(A-R)District. up to ten days from the date of this ADMINISTRATOR'S(CTA)
the"Get Rich Quick"sound should be Foreign•Domestic•Car&Trucks the"Government" link near the top- publication. To be accepted, upset NOTICE
checked into. Auto Parts&Accessories center of the home page. The public is invited to attend and bids must raise the previous bid by Having qualified as Administrator
TO SUBSCRIBE At Competitive Prices written comments may be addressed: not less than ten percent(10%)of the CTA of the estate of Clellan Wilbur
344 S.Bickett Blvd.,Louisburg Philip Slayter, Planning Administra- first one thousand dollars ($1,000) Southall, deceased, late of Franklin
TO THE FRANKLIN TIMES, 496-41ZZ Hours:M-F:7:30am-6pm NOTICE OF SERVICE OF tor, 110 W. Nash St., Louisburg, NC of investment and five percent(5%) County,North Carolina,this is to no-
Call(919)496-6503 or go online, Sat:7:30am-1pm PROCESS BY PUBLICATION 27549. of the remainder. Buyer shall be re- tify all persons having claims against
www.thefranklintimes.com In the General Court of Justice sponsible for all closing costs and the the estate of said deceased to exhibit
At The Franklin Times, Repair District Court Division Pub.Dates:12/24,31 total cost of the upset bid publication them to the undersigned on or before
subscribing is File Number 20-CVD-533 process.The Board of Commission- the 4th day of March, 2021, or this
as easy as 1-2-3! BLAIR MAINTENANCE ers may at any time reject any and notice will be pleaded in bar of their
Mastercard and Visa accepted. All Types of Home Repair PUBLIC NOTICE all offers. recovery.All persons indebted to said
(LOCAL) STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA estate will please make immediate
PLEASE CHECK YOUR AD-Every All Plumbing Needs FRANKLIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL payment.This the 3rd day of Decem-
effort is made to avoid errors in ad- Woodwork MANAGEMENT PUBLIC NOTICE ber,2020.
vertisements.Each ad is carefully Bathroom&Kitchen LAURA WORLEY, COMMISSION/NPDES SALE OF CITY PROPERTY
checked and proofread, but when All Roofing/Any Leaks PLAINTIFF UNIT 1617 MAIL Jennifer S.Parrish,
hundreds of ads are handled through Vinyl Siding&Painting SERVICE CENTER An offer of $12,000.00 has been Administrator CTA
our staff, mistakes may slip through. Seamless Gutters V. RALEIGH,NC 27699-1617 submitted for the purchase of certain 1339 NC 56 Hwy.E
The Franklin Times asks that you All Flooring and Much More NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE A property owned by the Town of Louis- Louisburg,NC 27549
check your ad carefully and in the 252-469-0449 BENJAMIN HALL, NPDES WASTEWATER burg, more particularly described as
event there is an error,report it imme- 919-272-3970 DEFENDANT PERMIT NC006931 follows: Pub.dates:12/3,10,17,24
diately to our Classified Department www_blairmaintenance.com FRANKLIN COUNTY WWTP A 0.2514 acre lot(72'x 151')
by calling(919)496-2910.The Frank- To BENJAMIN HALL: The North Carolina Environmental located at 701 Kenmore Avenue,
lin Times will accept responsibility for Management Commission proposes Tax Parcel ID 015899. Note: ADMINISTRATOR'S
only one incorrect insertion at the ADVANCED APPLIANCE Take notice that a pleading seeking to issue a NPDES wastewater dis- Deed restrictions apply to the NOTICE
time we are notified of the error and &AIR REPAIR LLC relief against you has been filed in the charge permit to the person(s)listed property. Having qualified as Administrator of
will reprint the correct version only Trusted Residential Heating above-entitled action. The nature of below. Written comments regarding the estate of Carolyn Jones Ball,de-
once without additional charge. and Cooling the relief being sought is as follows: the proposed permit will be accepted Persons wishing to upset the offer ceased,late of Franklin County,North
Replacement Specialists ABSOLUTE DIVORCE. until 30 days after the publish date of that has been received shall submit Carolina, this is to notify all persons
CLASSIFIED Serving Franklin County You are required to make defense to this notice. The Director of the NC a sealed bid with their offer as well as having claims against the estate of
ADVERTISING DEADLINES: Since 2002 such pleading not later than 40 days Division of Water Resources (DWR) signing a receipt of the deed restric- said deceased to exhibit them to the
Monday,12 noon for the Call for Free Estimate from the first publication of this notice may hold a public hearing should tions(available from the Town Clerk) undersigned on or before the 4th day
THURSDAY edition. 919-607-6468 published originally on the 10th day there be a significant degree of public to the Town Clerk, Louisburg Town of March,2021,or this notice will be
LEGAL ADVERTISING of December, 2020, and upon your interest.Please mail comments and/ Hall,110 W.Nash St,N.C.,27549,by pleaded in bar of their recovery.All
DEADLINES: failure to do so the party seeking or information requests to DWR at 5:00 pm on Monday January 4,2020. persons indebted to said estate will
Friday,5pm for the Lawn Care service against you will apply to the the above address. Interested per- At that time,the city clerk shall open please make immediate payment.
THURSDAY edition. court for the relief sought. This, the sons may visit the DWR at 512 N. the bids,if any,and the highest quali- This the 3rd day of December,2020.
DAVE'S LAWN SERVICE 10th day of December,2020. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 fying bid will become the new offer.
6 MONTH(26 WEEKS) Leaves Mulched or Removed. to review information on file. Addi- A qualifying higher bid is one that Amy E.Ball,
CLASSIFIED AD SPECIAL! FREE ESTIMATES Lawrence Edward Tickle,Jr., tional information on NPDES permits raises the existing offer to an amount Administrator
25 Words,Runs 26 Times! 919-496-6224 Attorney for Plaintiff and this notice may be found on our not less than$12,650.00 900 Brookwood Dr.
Only$80 for 6 Months! 206 S.Main Street website:http://deq.nc.gov/about/ A qualifying higher bid must be ac- Raleigh,NC 27607
Plus,your ad will be on www. Tree Service Louisburg,NC 27549 divisions/ companied by a deposit in the amount
thefranklintimes.com water-resources/water-resources- of five percent(5%)of the bid;the de- Pub.dates:12/3,10,17,24
at no additional charge QUALITY PLUS TREE SERVICE Pub.dates:12/10,17,24 permits/wastewater-branch/npdes- posit may be made in cash,cashier's
Call(919)496-6503 Removal,topping,stump removal, wastewater/public-notices, check, or certified check. The town
to schedule. lot clearing.Call for details. will return the deposit on any bid not CO-EXECUTORS'NOTICE
35 years experience. or by calling(919)707-3601. Frank- accepted,and will return the deposit Having qualified as Co-Executors of
for Sale Bonded and insured.[phone]. TOWN OF YOUNGSVILLE lin County Public Utilities (1630 US on an offer subject to upset if a quali- the estate of Jake Hill Wright,Jr.,de-
MerchandiseSenior citizens discount. PUBLIC HEARING ELECTRONIC Hwy 1, Youngsville, NC) has re- fying higher bid is received.The Town ceased,late of Franklin County,North
MEETING NOTICE quested renewal of NPDES permit will return the deposit of the final high Carolina, this is to notify all persons
FOR SALE Alterations NC0069311 for its Franklin County bidder at closing, or apply it to the having claims against the estate of
The Youngsville Board of Commis- Wastewater Treatment Plant,located balance if the high bidder requests. said deceased to exhibit them to the
SALLY J'S TAILOR sioners will hold a public hearing in Franklin County. This permitted The buyer must pay cash or provide undersigned on or before the 11th
&ALTERATIONS at 7:00 p.m., or soon thereafter, on facility discharges treated municipal a certified check at closing. day of March,2021,or this notice will
Wedding Gowns, Thursday, January 14, 2021. Please and industrial wastewater to Cedar The Town Council must approve be pleaded in bar of their recovery.All
Bridesmaid,Prom be advised that this meeting will be Creek, a class C-NSW water in the the final high offer before the sale is persons indebted to said estate will
Alterations for Men, held electronically. Consequently, Tar-Pamlico River Basin. Currently, closed,which it will do within 30 days please make immediate payment.
Women&Children public participation in this meeting will BOD, ammonia, fecal coliform, dis- after the final upset bid period has This the 10th day of December,2020.
[phone] be via electronic means only.Immedi- solved oxygen,pH,total copper and passed.The town reserves the right
Canon 346 S.Bickett Blvd.,Louisburg ately below is the electronic meeting total cadmium are water quality lim- to withdraw the property from sale at Jane W.Riggs,
ImageRunner information. ited parameters. This discharge may any time before the final high bid is Co-Executor
1670F Copier/Fax Real Estate for Rent affect future allocations in this seg- accepted and the right to reject at any 103 Dickens Ave.
If joining via Microsoft Teams,use the ment of Cedar Creek. time all bids. Louisburg,NC 27549
s'250 Reducedto$275 4BR/2BA,Private Lot.LOTS of trees. following link: Further information may be obtained
Call 252-459-7101 Centerville area.[phone]. tinyurl.com/boc-2021-01-14 at the office of the Town Administra- Jake H.Wright III,
NOTICE OF SERVICE tor, Louisburg Town Hall, 110 W. Co-Executor
Ask for Jo Anne If joining via phone,use the following OF PROCESS Nash St., Louisburg, N.C.,27549 or 7409 Post Oak Rd.
LEGALS dial-in info: BY PUBLICATION at telephone [phone] during Raleigh,NC 27615
Phone Number:872-240-8002 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA normal business hours.
Pets for Sale Conference code:451 326 813# FRANKLIN COUNTY Pub.dates:12/10,17,24,31
Legals IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
PUREBRED GERMAN SHEP- The Board of Commissioners will re- CASE NO 20CVS1276 TO SUBSCRIBE
HERDS. Not registered. Parents TOWN OF YOUNGSVILLE ceive public comments on proposed TO THE FRANKLIN TIMES, EXECUTOR'S NOTICE
on-site. 3-month warranty to return PUBLIC HEARING ELECTRONIC amendments to the Youngsville De- NORMA ESTHER JUAREZ Call(919)496-6503 or go online, Having qualified as Executor of the
for full refund.Ready now.Beautiful, MEETING NOTICE velopment Ordinance to rezone a FOMBONA, www.thefranklintimes.com estate of Andria T.Childs,deceased,
smart, loving, loyal.$300. (919)556- lot located at 2045 Hicks Road,near Plaintiff late of Franklin County, North Caro-
1401. The Youngsville Board of Commis- the Corner of Hicks and Cedar Creek v. lina,this is to notify all persons hav-
sioners will hold a public hearing Roads (a portion of PIN 1853-92- Estate Notices ing claims against the estate of said
Employment at 7:00 p.m., or soon thereafter, on 4364) from Single-Family Residen- JESSICA IRENE KREGER and deceased to exhibit them to the un-
Thursday, January 14,2021. Please tial-3 (SFR-3) to Mixed-Use-1 (MU- HEATHER MARIE KREGER, NOTICE TO CREDITORS dersigned on or before the 25th day
FULL TIME LPN, be advised that this meeting will be 1).For more information,contact the Defendants of March,2021,or this notice will be
FULL AND PART-TIME CNA'S, held electronically. Consequently, Youngsville Planning Department at Having qualified as Administrator pleaded in bar of their recovery.All
PART-TIME DIETARY COOK public participation in this meeting will [phone]. YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED of the Estate of Charles Edward persons indebted to said estate will
AND DIETARY AIDES be via electronic means only.Immedi- and required to answer the Complaint Broughton IV, deceased, late of please make immediate payment.
Apply in person at ately below is the electronic meeting Citizens are welcome to attend the in this action that seeks damages Franklin County, North Carolina, This the 24th day of December,2020.
Louisburg Manor or information. hearing electronically and provide arising from a motor vehicle collision the undersigned Administrator does
Liberty Healthcare.com comment. All persons requesting occurring between the above named hereby notify all persons, firms and Tracy Solomon,
If joining via Microsoft Teams,use the to speak during a public comment parties and within Nash County on corporations having claims against Executor
following link: period must register in advance be- or about 24 August 2018, more spe- the Estate of said decedent to pres- 9315 East Carondelet Drive
Instruction/Training tinyurl.com/boc-2021-01-14 fore 12:00 pm on the day prior to the cifically detailed in a full copy of the ent such claims to Holly Slovic Manassas Park,VA 20111
meeting by calling town hall at(919) Complaint which is available from the Broughton at 75 Creekbend Trail,
YOUNGSVILLE CONTINUING If joining via phone,use the following 925-3401 or by visiting the following below listed office and/or available Louisburg, NC 27549 on or before Pub.dates:12/24;31;1/7,14
EDUCATION CENTER dial-in info: website: tinyurl.com/Youngsville- from the Clerk of Court,Nash County, the 20th day of March,2021,or this
Christian Education Courses Phone Number:872-240-8002 comment.When requesting to regis- North Carolina;and said Complaint is notice will be pleaded in bar of their
&Certificates Conference code:451 326 813# ter fora public hearing,persons must herewith served upon you. You are recovery. All persons,firms and cor- NOTICE
Dr.Janet McCowan Harris,Director provide their name,physical address, required to serve a copy of your An- porations indebted to the said Estate
[e-mail] The Board of Commissioners will re- comment topic,and the phone num- swer to said Complaint on the Plaintiff will please make immediate payment All persons, firms or corporations
Classes held at ceive public comments on a develop- ber used to dial-in to the electronic or the Plaintiff's undersigned attorney to the Estate. having claims against Sean Michael
Allen Chapel Missionary ment agreement for a lot located at meeting. Registered persons will be at 2629 Central Avenue, Charlotte, Loughran, deceased, of Franklin
Baptist Church 2045 Hicks Road, near the Corner recognized for comments in the order North Carolina,within thirty(30)days This, the 17th day of December, County, North Carolina, are notified
693 T.K.Allen Road of Hicks and Cedar Creek Roads registered. The time limit for each after service hereof,exclusive of the 2020. to exhibit the same to the under-
Louisburg,NC (a portion of PIN 1853-92-4364)for speaker shall be five minutes. day of such service,and if you fail to signed on or before March 25,2021,
[phone] or(919)801-7094 a proposed townhome subdivision answer the Complaint within the time Holly Slovic Broughton or this Notice will be pleaded in bar of
development.A copy of the develop- Written public comments will also be aforesaid, judgment by default will 75 Creekbend Trail recovery.Debtors of the decedent are
ment agreement and associated ma- accepted via U.S.mail, be rendered against you for money Louisburg,NC 27549 asked to make immediate payment.
General Services terials is on file at Youngsville Town customerservice@ damages and relief demanded in said This the 24th day of December,2020.
Hall. For more information, contact townofyoungsville.orq, Complaint. C.Terrell Thomas,Jr.
DAN SMITH the Youngsville Planning Department and in-person at Town Hall until 24 Latorre Law Firm,P.A. Kirk,Kirk,Howell,Cutler Sandra Loughran,Administratrix
PLUMBING,HEATING&AC at(919)925-3401. hours before the public hearing. /s/Erik Pozek &Thomas c/o Warren,Shackleford&Thomas,
Water Pumps/Heaters Attorney for the Plaintiff Post Office Box 729 PLLC
Drain Cleaning Citizens are welcome to attend the Full meetingagendas maybe 2629 Central Avenue
9 Wendell,NC 27591 Post Office Box 1187
Commercial&Residential hearing electronically and provide downloaded via the Town's website Charlotte,North Carolina 28205 Attorney for the Estate Wake Forest,NC 27588-1187
Small Front End Loader/Back Hoe comment. All persons requesting (townofyoungsville.org)by clicking on Telephone:[phone] [phone] [phone]
Lic.#10506.33 Years Experience to speak during a public comment the"Government" link near the top- Facsimile:[phone]
[phone] or(919)306-4548 period must register in advance be- center of the home page. Pub.dates:12/10,17,24 Pub.dates:12/17,24,31;1/07 Pub.Dates:12/24,31;1/7,14

Attachment A—Request for Missing Information
NPDES APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REVIEWS
FOLLOWING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
NPDES APPLICATIONS AND PROGRAM UPDATES RULE
On February 12, 2019, the EPA finalized revisions to the application requirements at 40 CFR 122.21 in the NPDES
Applications and Program Updates Rule. The final rule became effective on June 12, 2019. On and after this
date, applicants for EPA-issued permits are required to meet the new application requirements through
completion of updated application forms that conform to the final rule.
During the transition to the updated forms,the EPA anticipates that applicants may inadvertently complete and
submit applications using the older outdated forms for a period after the June 12, 2019 effective date. If this
occurs, applications submitted using the outdated Forms 1 and 2A will not conform to the regulatory
requirements for applications at 40 CFR 122.21 and should be deemed incomplete by the EPA Regions. (Note
that the final rule did not include regulatory changes pertaining to the form requirements for Forms 2B, 20, 2D,
2E, and 2F;therefore, submission of the outdated forms may be deemed complete at the EPA Regions'
discretion.)
Requiring applicants to transfer information from the outdated forms and resubmit the new updated forms may
be time-consuming and costly. In lieu of transferring the information and resubmitting the updated forms, EPA
Regions may consider issuing a "Notice of Incomplete Application"to the applicant requesting only the missing
information. Any information provided by the applicant in response to the notice must include the certification
statement from 40 CFR 122.22(d) and be signed in accordance with 40 CFR 122.22(a).
The EPA Regions have the discretion to determine the period of time for which they will allow applicants to
submit the outdated forms along with the missing information to accommodate applicants that may have begun
the permit application process prior to the availability of the updated forms; however, it is expected that this
practice will only be allowed for a short period of time (perhaps six months), after which the EPA Regions should
require that all applications be submitted using the updated forms.
Permittees to which the aforementioned transition period applies may complete and submit the tables
provided on Attachment A to the North Carolina DEQ's Division of Water Resources as an addendum to their
NPDES renewal applications.
These addenda only apply to facilities submitting Forms 1 and/or 2A:
Applicants submitting a renewal application addendum for Form 1 (Non-POTW, private facilities)
should fill out Table 1,found on page 2 of this document & sign and submit document.
Applicants submitting a renewal application addendum for Form 2A(Municipal & POTW's)should fill
out Table 2, found on page 3 of this document &sign and submit document.
Submit completed files to the following address:
NC DEW Division of Water Resources/Complex NPDES Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699- 1617
'The final rule clarified that existing data may be used, if available, in lieu of sampling done solely for the purpose of the
application, provided that sampling was performed, collected,and analyzed no more than 4.5 years prior to submission.

Attachment A—Request for Missing Information
Table 1. EPA Application Form 1 Missing Information
40 CFR 122.21(f)(2)
1.1 Email address of facility contact:
40 CFR 122.21(f)(3)
1.2 NAICS Code(s) Description(optional)
40 CFR 122.21(f)(4)
1.3 Email address of operator:
40 CFR 122.21(f)(9)
1.4 Does your facility use cooling water?
❑ Yes No 4 SKIP to Item 1.6
1.5 Identify the source of cooling water.(Note that facilities that use a cooling water intake structure as described at 40 CFR 125,
Subparts I and J may have additional application requirements at 40 CFR 122.21(r). Consult with your NPDES permitting
authority to determine what specific information needs to be submitted and when.)
40 CFR 122.21(f)(10)
1.6 Do you intend to request or renew one or more of the variances authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(m)? (Check all that apply. Consult
with your NPDES permitting authority to determine what information needs to be submitted and when.)
❑ Fundamentally different factors(CWA ❑ Water quality related effluent limitations(CWA Section
Section 301(n)) 302(b)(2))
❑ Non-conventional pollutants(CWA ❑ Thermal discharges(CWA Section 316(a))
Section 301(c)and(g))
Not applicable
40 CFR 122.22(a)and(d)
1.7 Certification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that
there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
Name(print or type first and last name) Official title
Signature Date signed

Attachment A—Request for Missing Information
Table 2. EPA Application Form 2A Missing Information
40 CFR 122.21(j)(1)
1.1 Email address of facility contact:[e-mail]
1.2 Applicant email address:[e-mail]
1.3 Email address of the organization transporting the discharge for treatment prior to discharge
1.4 Email address of the organization receiving the discharge for treatment prior to discharge
1.5 Do you intend to request or renew one or more of the variances authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(n)?(Check all that apply. Consult
with your NPDES permitting authority to determine what information needs to be submitted and when.)
Discharges into marine waters(CWA Section ❑ Water quality related effluent limitation(CWA
301(h)) Section 302(b)(2))
• Not applicable
1.6 Email address of contractor responsible for operational or maintenance aspects of the treatment works:not applicable
40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)
1.7 Indicate the number of SIUs and NSCIUs that discharge to the POTW.
Number of SIUs Number of CIUs
3
40 CFR 122.22(a)and(d)
1.8 Certification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that
there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
Name(print or type first and last name) Official title
Christopher Doherty Public Utilities Director
Signature��I�411� Date signed 12-07-2020

fikFy_ankl i n Public Utilities
1630 US#1 Hwy
•— ounty Youngsville, NC 27596
NORTH CAROLINA Phone: [phone]
A Research Triangle Region Community
Fax: [phone]
www.franklincountync.us
FRANKLIN COUNTY WWTP
Flow Description Narrative
Flow enters the WWTP at the head-works where it flows through an automatic bar screen. The
flow is then pumped to the grit removal system and then distributed to the aeration (AAA) basins.
Mixed Liquor from the aeration basin flows to sedimentary secondary clarifiers where the return
activated sludge (RAS) is sent back to the head-works. Final effluent from the clarifier flows to
the tertiary cloth media filters and then through a UV disinfection channel. After the UV system,
the effluent flows over finger weirs and through a Parshall flume before being discharged at the
point source on Cedar Creek. Waste activated sludge is pumped from a wet well in the RAS
stream to the digester where it is digested and later land applied. Supernatant is drawn off the
digester and returned to the head-works.

Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information Table 2. Parameters of Concern
❑CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS Name WQS Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units
Facility Name Franklin County WWTP Par01 Arsenic Aquactic Life C 150 FW 340 ug/L
WWTP/WTP Class IV Par02 Arsenic Human Health C 10 HH/WS N/A ug/L
Water Supply
NPDES Permit NC0069311 Par03 Beryllium Aquatic Life NC 6.5 FW 65 ug/L
Outfall 001 Par04 Cadmium Aquatic Life NC 1.6392 FW 10.5388 ug/L
Flow, Qw(MGD) 2.000 fPar05 Chlorides Aquatic Life NC 230 FW
Receiving Stream Cedar Creek Par064 Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds Water Supply NC 1 A ug/L
HUC Number 03020101 Par07 * Total Phenolic Compounds Aquatic Life NC 300 A ug/L
Stream Class Par08 Chromium III Aquatic Life NC 356.6624 FW 2740.1920 ug/L
C,NSW
❑Apply WS Hardness WQC Par09 Chromium VI Aquatic Life NC 11 FW 16 pg/L
7Q10s (cfs) 1.600 Par10 Chromium, Total Aquatic Life NC N/A FW N/A pg/L7Q1 Ow(cfs) 5.20 Par11 Copper Aquatic Life NC 25.0488 FW 37.4535 ug/L
30Q2 (cfs) 7.00 Par12 Cyanide Aquatic Life NC 5 FW 22 10 ug/L
QA(cfs) 25.30 Par13 Fluoride Aquatic Life NC 1,800 FW ug/L
1 Q10s (cfs) 1.34 - Par14 Lead Aquatic Life NC 13.2020 FW 338.5084 ug/L
—
Effluent Hardness 96.12 mg/L (Avg) Par15 Mercury Aquatic Life NC 12 FW 0.5 ng/L
Upstream Hardness 98 mg/L (Avg) Par16 Molybdenum Human Health NC 2000 HH ug/L
Combined Hardness Chronic 96.76 mg/L Par17 Nickel Aquatic Life NC 116.9872 FW 1052.6128 pg/L
Combined Hardness Acute 96.68 mg/L Par18 Nickel Water Supply NC 25.0000 WS N/A pg/L
Data Source(s) Par19 Selenium Aquatic Life NC 5 FW 56 ug/L
❑CHECK TO APPLY MODEL Par20 Silver Aquatic Life NC 0.06 FW 3.0355 ug/L
Par21 Zinc Aquatic Life NC 398.9195 FW 395.4306 ug/L
Par22
Par23
Par24
69311 RPA, input
12/4/2020

Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information Table 2. Parameters of Concern
❑CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS Name WQS Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units
Facility Name Franklin County WWTP Par01 Arsenic Aquactic Life C 150 FW 340 ug/L
WWTP/WTP Class IV Par02 Arsenic Human Health C 10 HH/WS N/A ug/L
Water Supply
NPDES Permit NC0069311 Par03 Beryllium Aquatic Life NC 6.5 FW 65 ug/L
Outfall 001 Par04 Cadmium Aquatic Life NC 1.6372 FW 10.5248 ug/L
Flow, Qw(MGD) 3.000 DPar05 Chlorides Aquatic Life NC 230 FW
Receiving Stream Cedar Creek Par064 Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds Water Supply NC 1 A ug/L
HUC Number 03020101 Par07 * Total Phenolic Compounds Aquatic Life NC 300 A ug/L
Stream Class Par08 Chromium III Aquatic Life NC 356.1820 FW 2736.7752 ug/L
C,NSW
❑Apply WS Hardness WQC Par09 Chromium VI Aquatic Life NC 11 FW 16 pg/L
7Q10s (cfs) 1.600 Par10 Chromium, Total Aquatic Life NC N/A FW N/A pg/L
7Q10w(cfs) 5.20 Par11 Copper Aquatic Life NC 25.0136 FW 37.3998 ug/L
30Q2 (cfs) 7.00 Par12 Cyanide Aquatic Life NC 5 FW 22 10 ug/L
QA(cfs) 25.30 Par13 Fluoride Aquatic Life NC 1,800 FW ug/L
1 Q10s (cfs) 1.34 7 Par14 Lead Aquatic Life NC 13.1783 FW 337.9467 ug/L
Effluent Hardness 96.12 mg/L (Avg) Par15 Mercury Aquatic Life NC 12 FW 0.5 ng/L
Upstream Hardness 98 mg/L (Avg) Par16 Molybdenum Human Health NC 2000 HH ug/L
Combined Hardness Chronic 96.6 mg/L Par17 Nickel Aquatic Life NC 116.8245 FW 1051.2571 pg/L
Combined Hardness Acute 96.54 mg/L Par18 Nickel Water Supply NC 25.0000 WS N/A pg/L
Data Source(s) Par19 Selenium Aquatic Life NC 5 FW 56 ug/L
❑CHECK TO APPLY MODEL Par20 Silver Aquatic Life NC 0.06 FW 3.0276 ug/L
Par21 Zinc Aquatic Life NC 398.3636 FW 394.9205 ug/L
Par22
Par23
Par24
69311 RPA, input
12/9/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
H1 H2
Use"PASTE SPECIAL. Use"PASTE SPECIAL.
Effluent Hardness Values"then"COPY" Upstream Hardness Values"then"COPY"
. Maximum data . Maximum data
points=58 points=58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/25/2016 70 70 Std Dev. 16.3301 1 11/19/2019 76 76 Std Dev. 31.1127
2 7/25/2017 120 120 Mean 96.1154 2 12/10/2019 120 120 Mean 98.0000
3 6/7/2018 104 104 C.V. 0.1699 3 C.V. (default) 0.6000
4 6/14/2018 80 80 n 13 4 n 2
5 7/13/2018 83.5 83.5 10th Per value 73.60 mg/L 5 10th Per value 80.40 mg/L
6 12/6/2018 96 96 Average Value 96.12 mg/L 6 Average Value 98.00 mg/L
7 12/20/2018 108 108 Max. Value 120.00 mg/L 7 Max. Value 120.00 mg/L
8 12/28/2018 104 104 8
9 1/4/2019 112 112 9
10 11/19/2019 72 72 10
11 12/10/2019 116 116 11
12 1/9/2020 92 92 12
13 1/9/2020 92 92 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
57 57
58 58
69311 RPA, data
- 1 - 12/4/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par01 & Par02
Use"PASTE SPECIAL.
Arsenic Values"then"COPY"
. Maximum data
points=58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/25/2016 < 10 5 Std Dev. 2.9727
2 1/10/2017 < 10 5 Mean 5.1395
3 1/12/2017 < 10 5 C.V. 0.5784
4 4/4/2017 < 10 5 n 43
5 4/6/2017 < 10 5
6 7/25/2017 < 10 5 Mult Factor = 1.08
7 7/27/2017 < 10 5 Max. Value 23.0 ug/L
8 10/10/2017 < 10 5 Max. Pred Cw 24.8 ug/L
9 10/12/2017 < 2 1
10 1/23/2018 < 10 5
11 1/25/2018 < 10 5
12 4/3/2018 < 2 1
13 4/5/2018 < 2 1
14 4/6/2018 < 10 5
15 7/10/2018 < 10 5
16 7/12/2018 < 10 5
17 7/13/2018 23 23
18 10/9/2018 < 10 5
19 10/11/2018 < 10 5
20 11/27/2018 < 10 5
21 11/29/2018 < 10 5
22 12/11/2018 < 10 5
23 12/13/2018 < 10 5
24 1/15/2019 < 10 5
25 1/17/2019 < 10 5
26 4/16/2019 < 10 5
27 4/18/2019 < 10 5
28 5/14/2019 < 10 5
29 5/16/2019 < 10 5
30 5/23/2019 < 10 5
31 7/18/2019 < 10 5
32 10/15/2019 < 10 5
33 10/17/2019 < 10 5
34 11/19/2019 < 10 5
35 12/10/2019 < 10 5
36 1/7/2020 < 10 5
37 1/7/2020 < 10 5
38 1/9/2020 < 10 5
39 1/9/2020 < 10 5
40 4/28/2020 < 10 5
41 4/30/2020 < 10 5
42 7/14/2020 < 10 5
43 7/16/2020 < 10 5
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
69311 RPA, data
-2 - 12/4/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par03 Par04
Use"PASTE SPECIAL. Use"PASTE SPECIAL.
Beryllium Values"then"COPY" Cadmium Values"then"COPY"
. Maximum data . Maximum data
points=58 points=58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/25/2016 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1 10/25/2016 < 2 1 Std Dev. 0.9240
2 7/25/2017 < 5 2.5 Mean 2.5000 2 1/10/2017 < 2 1 Mean 1.1628
3 7/13/2018 < 5 2.5 C.V. (default) 0.6000 3 1/12/2017 < 2 1 C.V. 0.7947
4 n 3 4 4/4/2017 < 2 1 n 43
5 5 4/6/2017 < 2 1
6 Mult Factor = 3.00 6 7/25/2017 < 2 1 Mult Factor = 1.11
7 Max. Value 2.50 ug/L 7 7/27/2017 < 2 1 Max. Value 7.000 ug/L
8 Max. Pred Cw 7.50 ug/L 8 10/10/2017 < 2 1 Max. Pred Cw 7.770 ug/L
9 9 10/12/2017 < 2 1
10 10 1/23/2018 < 2 1
11 11 1/25/2018 < 2 1
12 12 4/3/2018 < 2 1
13 13 4/5/2018 < 2 1
14 14 4/6/2018 < 2 1
15 15 7/10/2018 < 2 1
16 16 7/12/2018 < 2 1
17 17 7/13/2018 7 7
18 18 10/9/2018 < 2 1
19 19 10/11/2018 < 2 1
20 20 11/27/2018 < 2 1
21 21 11/29/2018 < 2 1
22 22 12/11/2018 < 2 1
23 23 12/13/2018 < 2 1
24 24 1/15/2019 < 2 1
25 25 1/17/2019 < 2 1
26 26 4/16/2019 < 2 1
27 27 4/18/2019 < 2 1
28 28 5/14/2019 < 2 1
29 29 5/16/2019 < 2 1
30 30 5/23/2019 2 2
31 31 7/18/2019 < 2 1
32 32 10/15/2019 < 2 1
33 33 10/17/2019 < 2 1
34 34 11/19/2019 < 2 1
35 35 12/10/2019 < 2 1
36 36 1/7/2020 < 2 1
37 37 1/7/2020 < 2 1
38 38 1/9/2020 < 2 1
39 39 1/9/2020 < 2 1
40 40 4/28/2020 < 2 1
41 41 4/30/2020 < 2 1
42 42 7/14/2020 < 2 1
43 43 7/16/2020 < 2 1
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
57 57
58 58
69311 RPA, data
-3 - 12/4/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par10 Pal
Use"PASTE SPECIAL. Use"PASTE SPECIAL.
Chromium, Total Values"then"COPY" Copper Values"then"COPY"
. Maximum data . Maximum data
points=58 points=58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/25/2016 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1 10/25/2016 14 14 Std Dev. 9.3830
2 1/10/2017 < 5 2.5 Mean 2.5000 2 1/10/2017 11 11 Mean 11.6000
3 1/12/2017 < 5 2.5 C.V. 0.0000 3 1/12/2017 7 7 C.V. 0.8089
4 4/4/2017 < 5 2.5 n 36 4 4/4/2017 19 19 n 40
5 4/6/2017 < 5 2.5 5 4/6/2017 28 28
6 7/25/2017 < 5 2.5 Mult Factor = 1.00 6 7/25/2017 8 8 Mult Factor = 1.14
7 7/27/2017 < 5 2.5 Max. Value 2.5 pg/L 7 7/27/2017 43 43 Max. Value 43.00 ug/L
8 10/10/2017 < 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 2.5 pg/L 8 10/10/2017 5 5 Max. Pred Cw 49.02 ug/L
9 10/12/2017 < 5 2.5 9 10/12/2017 5 5
10 1/23/2018 < 5 2.5 10 1/23/2018 5 5
11 1/25/2018 < 5 2.5 11 1/25/2018 3 3
12 4/3/2018 < 5 2.5 12 7/10/2018 8 8
13 4/5/2018 < 5 2.5 13 7/12/2018 9 9
14 4/6/2018 < 5 2.5 14 7/13/2018 11 11
15 11/27/2018 < 5 2.5 15 10/9/2018 8 8
16 11/29/2018 < 5 2.5 16 10/11/2018 6 6
17 1/15/2019 < 5 2.5 17 11/27/2018 40 40
18 1/17/2019 < 5 2.5 18 11/29/2018 13 13
19 4/16/2019 < 5 2.5 19 12/11/2018 29 29
20 4/18/2019 < 5 2.5 20 12/13/2018 13 13
21 5/14/2019 < 5 2.5 21 1/15/2019 15 15
22 5/16/2019 < 5 2.5 22 1/17/2019 8 8
23 5/23/2019 < 5 2.5 23 4/16/2019 5 5
24 7/18/2019 < 5 2.5 24 4/18/2019 4 4
25 10/15/2019 < 5 2.5 25 5/14/2019 9 9
26 10/17/2019 < 5 2.5 26 5/16/2019 18 18
27 11/19/2019 < 5 2.5 27 5/23/2019 16 16
28 12/10/2019 < 5 2.5 28 7/18/2019 7 7
29 1/7/2020 < 5 2.5 29 10/15/2019 4 4
30 1/7/2020 < 5 2.5 30 10/17/2019 5 5
31 1/9/2020 < 5 2.5 31 11/19/2019 5 5
32 1/9/2020 < 5 2.5 32 12/10/2019 7 7
33 4/28/2020 < 5 2.5 33 1/7/2020 6 6
34 4/30/2020 < 5 2.5 34 1/7/2020 6 6
35 7/14/2020 < 5 2.5 35 1/9/2020 4 4
36 7/16/2020 < 5 2.5 36 1/9/2020 4 4
37 37 4/28/2020 6 6
38 38 4/30/2020 12 12
39 39 7/14/2020 18 18
40 40 7/16/2020 20 20
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
57 57
58 58
69311 RPA, data
-4 - 12/4/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par12 Par14
Use"PASTE SPECIAL. Use"PASTE SPECIAL.
Cyanide Values"then"COPY" Lead Values"then"COPY"
. Maximum data . Maximum data
points=58 points=58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/25/2016 < 5 5 Std Dev. 0.0000 1 10/25/2016 < 10 5 Std Dev. 1.2344
2 1/10/2017 < 5 5 Mean 5.00 2 1/10/2017 < 10 5 Mean 5.1905
3 1/12/2017 < 5 5 C.V. 0.0000 3 1/12/2017 < 10 5 C.V. 0.2378
4 4/4/2017 < 5 5 n 34 4 4/4/2017 < 10 5 n 42
5 4/6/2017 < 5 5 5 4/6/2017 < 10 5
6 10/10/2017 < 5 5 Mult Factor = 1.00 6 7/25/2017 13 13 Mult Factor = 1.04
7 10/12/2017 < 5 5 Max. Value 5.0 ug/L 7 7/27/2017 < 10 5 Max. Value 13.000 ug/L
8 1/23/2018 < 5 5 Max. Pred Cw 5.0 ug/L 8 10/10/2017 < 10 5 Max. Pred Cw 13.520 ug/L
9 1/25/2018 < 5 5 9 10/12/2017 < 10 5
10 7/10/2018 < 5 5 10 1/23/2018 < 10 5
11 7/12/2018 < 5 5 11 1/25/2018 < 10 5
12 7/13/2018 < 5 5 12 4/3/2018 < 10 5
13 11/27/2018 < 5 5 13 4/6/2018 < 10 5
14 11/29/2018 < 5 5 14 7/10/2018 < 10 5
15 12/11/2018 < 5 5 15 7/12/2018 < 10 5
16 12/13/2018 < 5 5 16 7/13/2018 < 10 5
17 1/15/2019 < 5 5 17 10/9/2018 < 10 5
18 1/17/2019 < 5 5 18 10/11/2018 < 10 5
19 4/16/2019 < 5 5 19 11/27/2018 < 10 5
20 4/18/2019 < 5 5 20 11/29/2018 < 10 5
21 5/14/2019 < 5 5 21 12/11/2018 < 10 5
22 5/16/2019 < 5 5 22 12/13/2018 < 10 5
23 7/18/2019 < 5 5 23 1/15/2019 < 10 5
24 10/15/2019 < 5 5 24 1/17/2019 < 10 5
25 10/17/2019 < 5 5 25 4/16/2019 < 10 5
26 11/19/2019 < 5 5 26 4/18/2019 < 10 5
27 12/10/2019 < 5 5 27 5/14/2019 < 10 5
28 1/7/2020 < 5 5 28 5/16/2019 < 10 5
29 1/7/2020 < 5 5 29 5/23/2019 < 10 5
30 1/9/2020 < 5 5 30 7/18/2019 < 10 5
31 1/9/2020 < 5 5 31 10/15/2019 < 10 5
32 4/28/2020 < 5 5 32 10/17/2019 < 10 5
33 4/30/2020 < 5 5 33 11/19/2019 < 10 5
34 7/21/2020 < 5 5 34 12/10/2019 < 10 5
35 35 1/7/2020 < 10 5
36 36 1/7/2020 < 10 5
37 37 1/9/2020 < 10 5
38 38 1/9/2020 < 10 5
39 39 4/28/2020 < 10 5
40 40 4/30/2020 < 10 5
41 41 7/14/2020 < 10 5
42 42 7/16/2020 < 10 5
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
57 57
58 58
69311 RPA, data
-5 - 12/4/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par16 Par17 & Par18 Use"PASTE
Use"PASTE SPECIAL. SPECIAL-
Molybdenum Values"then"COPY" Nickel Values"then
. Maximum data "COPY".
points=58 Maximum data
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results points=58
1 10/25/2016 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 5.4459 1 10/25/2016 < 10 5 Std Dev. 5.7092
2 1/10/2017 < 5 2.5 Mean 4.2907 2 1/10/2017 < 10 5 Mean 5.8810
3 1/12/2017 < 5 2.5 C.V. 1.2692 3 1/12/2017 < 10 5 C.V. 0.9708
4 4/4/2017 < 5 2.5 n 43 4 4/4/2017 < 10 5 n 42
5 4/6/2017 < 5 2.5 5 4/6/2017 < 10 5
6 7/25/2017 < 5 2.5 Mult Factor = 1.16 6 7/25/2017 < 10 5 Mult Factor = 1.14
7 7/27/2017 < 5 2.5 Max. Value 27.0 ug/L 7 7/27/2017 < 10 5 Max. Value 42.0 pg/L
8 10/10/2017 < 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 31.3 ug/L 8 10/10/2017 < 10 5 Max. Pred Cw 47.9 pg/L
9 10/12/2017 < 5 2.5 9 10/12/2017 < 10 5
10 1/23/2018 < 5 2.5 10 1/23/2018 < 10 5
11 1/25/2018 < 5 2.5 11 1/25/2018 < 10 5
12 4/3/2018 < 5 2.5 12 4/3/2018 < 10 5
13 4/5/2018 < 5 2.5 13 4/5/2018 < 10 5
14 4/6/2018 < 5 2.5 14 4/6/2018 < 10 5
15 7/10/2018 < 5 2.5 15 7/10/2018 < 10 5
16 7/12/2018 < 5 2.5 16 7/12/2018 < 10 5
17 7/13/2018 < 5 2.5 17 7/13/2018 42 42
18 10/9/2018 < 5 2.5 18 10/9/2018 < 10 5
19 10/11/2018 < 5 2.5 19 10/11/2018 < 10 5
20 11/27/2018 < 5 2.5 20 11/27/2018 < 10 5
21 11/29/2018 < 5 2.5 21 11/29/2018 < 10 5
22 12/11/2018 < 5 2.5 22 12/11/2018 < 10 5
23 12/13/2018 < 5 2.5 23 12/13/2018 < 10 5
24 1/15/2019 < 5 2.5 24 1/15/2019 < 10 5
25 1/17/2019 < 5 2.5 25 1/17/2019 < 10 5
26 4/16/2019 < 5 2.5 26 4/16/2019 < 10 5
27 4/18/2019 < 5 2.5 27 4/18/2019 < 10 5
28 5/14/2019 10 10 28 5/14/2019 < 10 5
29 5/16/2019 24 24 29 5/16/2019 < 10 5
30 5/23/2019 14 14 30 5/23/2019 < 10 5
31 7/18/2019 < 6 3 31 10/15/2019 < 10 5
32 10/15/2019 < 5 2.5 32 10/17/2019 < 10 5
33 10/17/2019 < 5 2.5 33 11/19/2019 < 10 5
34 11/19/2019 < 5 2.5 34 12/10/2019 < 10 5
35 12/10/2019 < 5 2.5 35 1/7/2020 < 10 5
36 1/7/2020 < 5 2.5 36 1/7/2020 < 10 5
37 1/7/2020 < 5 2.5 37 1/9/2020 < 10 5
38 1/9/2020 < 5 2.5 38 1/9/2020 < 10 5
39 1/9/2020 < 5 2.5 39 4/28/2020 < 10 5
40 4/28/2020 < 5 2.5 40 4/30/2020 < 10 5
41 4/30/2020 < 5 2.5 41 7/14/2020 < 10 5
42 7/14/2020 27 27 42 7/16/2020 < 10 5
43 7/16/2020 14 14 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
57 57
58 58
69311 RPA, data
-6 - 12/4/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par19 Use"PASTE Par20
SPECIAL-Values" Use"PASTE SPECIAL-
Selenium then"COPY". Silver Values"then"COPY".
Maximum data points Maximum data points
=58 =58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/25/2016 < 10 5 Std Dev. 0.6862 1 10/25/2016 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 0.0000
2 1/10/2017 < 10 5 Mean 4.8953 2 1/10/2017 < 5 2.5 Mean 2.5000
3 1/12/2017 < 10 5 C.V. 0.1402 3 1/12/2017 < 5 2.5 C.V. 0.0000
4 4/4/2017 < 10 5 n 43 4 4/4/2017 < 5 2.5 n 43
5 4/6/2017 < 10 5 5 4/6/2017 < 5 2.5
6 7/25/2017 < 10 5 Mult Factor = 1.02 6 7/25/2017 < 5 2.5 Mult Factor = 1.00
7 7/27/2017 < 10 5 Max. Value 5.0 ug/L 7 7/27/2017 < 5 2.5 Max. Value 2.500 ug/L
8 10/10/2017 < 10 5 Max. Pred Cw 5.1 ug/L 8 10/10/2017 < 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 2.500 ug/L
9 10/12/2017 < 10 5 9 10/12/2017 < 5 2.5
10 1/23/2018 < 10 5 10 1/23/2018 < 5 2.5
11 1/25/2018 < 10 5 11 1/25/2018 < 5 2.5
12 4/3/2018 < 10 5 12 4/3/2018 < 5 2.5
13 4/5/2018 < 10 5 13 4/5/2018 < 5 2.5
14 4/6/2018 < 10 5 14 4/6/2018 < 5 2.5
15 7/10/2018 < 10 5 15 7/10/2018 < 5 2.5
16 7/12/2018 < 10 5 16 7/12/2018 < 5 2.5
17 7/13/2018 < 10 5 17 7/13/2018 < 5 2.5
18 10/9/2018 < 10 5 18 10/9/2018 < 5 2.5
19 10/11/2018 < 10 5 19 10/11/2018 < 5 2.5
20 11/27/2018 < 10 5 20 11/27/2018 < 5 2.5
21 11/29/2018 < 10 5 21 11/29/2018 < 5 2.5
22 12/11/2018 < 10 5 22 12/11/2018 < 5 2.5
23 12/13/2018 < 10 5 23 12/13/2018 < 5 2.5
24 1/15/2019 < 10 5 24 1/15/2019 < 5 2.5
25 1/17/2019 < 10 5 25 1/17/2019 < 5 2.5
26 4/16/2019 < 1 0.5 26 4/16/2019 < 5 2.5
27 4/18/2019 < 10 5 27 4/18/2019 < 5 2.5
28 5/14/2019 < 10 5 28 5/14/2019 < 5 2.5
29 5/16/2019 < 10 5 29 5/16/2019 < 5 2.5
30 5/23/2019 < 10 5 30 5/23/2019 < 5 2.5
31 7/18/2019 < 10 5 31 7/18/2019 < 5 2.5
32 10/15/2019 < 10 5 32 10/15/2019 < 5 2.5
33 10/17/2019 < 10 5 33 10/17/2019 < 5 2.5
34 11/19/2019 < 10 5 34 11/19/2019 < 5 2.5
35 12/10/2019 < 10 5 35 12/10/2019 < 5 2.5
36 1/7/2020 < 10 5 36 1/7/2020 < 5 2.5
37 1/7/2020 < 10 5 37 1/7/2020 < 5 2.5
38 1/9/2020 < 10 5 38 1/9/2020 < 5 2.5
39 1/9/2020 < 10 5 39 1/9/2020 < 5 2.5
40 4/28/2020 < 10 5 40 4/28/2020 < 5 2.5
41 4/30/2020 < 10 5 41 4/30/2020 < 5 2.5
42 7/14/2020 < 10 5 42 7/14/2020 < 5 2.5
43 7/16/2020 < 10 5 43 7/16/2020 < 5 2.5
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
57 57
58 58
69311 RPA, data
-7 - 12/4/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par21
Use"PASTE SPECIAL.
ZincValues"then"COPY"
. Maximum data
points=58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 10/25/2016 55 55 Std Dev. 15.8488
2 1/10/2017 22 22 Mean 33.6512
3 1/12/2017 25 25 C.V. 0.4710
4 4/4/2017 75 75 n 43
5 4/6/2017 30 30
6 7/25/2017 19 19 Mult Factor = 1.07
7 7/27/2017 21 21 Max. Value 77.0 ug/L
8 10/10/2017 17 17 Max. Pred Cw 82.4 ug/L
9 10/12/2017 14 14
10 1/23/2018 59 59
11 1/25/2018 56 56
12 4/3/2018 58 58
13 4/5/2018 35 35
14 4/6/2018 40 40
15 7/10/2018 41 41
16 7/12/2018 37 37
17 7/13/2018 < 10 5
18 10/9/2018 19 19
19 10/11/2018 24 24
20 11/27/2018 20 20
21 11/29/2018 21 21
22 12/11/2018 17 17
23 12/13/2018 17 17
24 1/15/2019 27 27
25 1/17/2019 23 23
26 4/16/2019 14 14
27 4/18/2019 17 17
28 5/14/2019 41 41
29 5/16/2019 40 40
30 5/23/2019 41 41
31 7/18/2019 47 47
32 10/15/2019 77 77
33 10/17/2019 32 32
34 11/19/2019 33 33
35 12/10/2019 30 30
36 1/7/2020 34 34
37 1/7/2020 34 34
38 1/9/2020 34 34
39 1/9/2020 34 34
40 4/28/2020 38 38
41 4/30/2020 40 40
42 7/14/2020 40 40
43 7/16/2020 44 44
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
69311 RPA, data
-8 - 12/4/2020

Franklin County WWTP > Outfall 001
NC0069311 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators Qw = 2 MGD
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
Qw (MGD) = 2.0000 WWTP/WTP Class: IV COMBINED HARDNESS (mg/L)
1Q1OS (cfs) = 1.34 IWC% @ 1Q1OS = 69.81981982 Acute = 96.68 mg/L
7Q1OS (cfs) = 1.60 IWC% @ 7Q1OS = 65.95744681 Chronic = 96.76 mg/L
7Q1OW (cfs) = 5.20 IWC% @ 7Q1OW = 37.34939759
30Q2 (cfs) = 7.00 IWC% @ 30Q2 = 30.69306931
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 25.30 IW%C @ QA= 10.91549296
Receiving Stream: Cedar Creek HUC 03020101 Stream Class: C,NSW
PARAMETER NC STANDARDS OR EPA CRITERIA _1 REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE Chronic Stapda d AcuteoCi n n # Det. Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw
Acute (FW): 487.0
Arsenic C 150 FW(7Q10s) 340 ug/L
43 1 24.8 Chronic (FW): 227.4
No value > Allowable Cw _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Arsenic C 10 HH/WS(Qavg) ug/L Chronic (HH): 91.6 No RP, Predicted Max< 50% of Allowable Cw- No
No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring required
Acute: 93.10
Beryllium NC 6.5 FW(7Q10s) 65 ug/L 3 0 7.50 ____ _ ______ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____
Note: n< 9 C.V. (default) Chronic: 9.85 No detects; All values < 5 ug/L- No Monitoring
Limited data set NO DETECTS Max MDL = 5 required
Acute: 15.094
Cadmium NC 1.6392 FW(7Q10s) 10.5388 ug/L 43 2 7.770 -- _ _ ---- _ _
-2.485--------------------------------
Chronic:- RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
1 value(s) >Allowable Cw
Acute: 22.9
Chromium VI NC 11 FW(7Q10s) 16 µg/L 0 0 N/A -- _ _ -----_ _
- --------------------------------
Chronic: 16.7
a: No monitoring required if all Total Chromium
Chromium, Total NC µg/L 36 0 2.5 Max reported value =2.5 samples are < 5 pg/L or Pred. max for Total Cr is <
NO DETECTS Max MDL = 5 allowable Cw for Cr VI.
Acute: 53.64
Copper NC 25.0488 FW(7Q10s) 37.4535 ug/L 40 40 49.02 -- _ _ ---- ___
-37 98--------------------------------
Chronic:- RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
2 value(s) >Allowable Cw
Acute: 31.5
Cyanide NC 5 FW(7Q10s) 22 10 ug/L 34 0 5.0 ____ _ ____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____
Chronic: 7.6 No detects; All values < 5 ug/L- No Monitoring
NO DETECTS Max MDL = 10 required
Acute: 484.831
Lead NC 13.2020 FW(7Q10s) 338.5084 ug/L 42 1 13.520
Chronic: 20.016 No RP , Predicted Max >_ 50% of Allowable Cw-
No value > Allowable Cw apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Molybdenum NC 2000 HH(7Q10s) ug/L 43 5 31.3 ____ _ ____ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 3,032.3 No RP, Predicted Max< 50% of Allowable Cw- No
No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring required
69311 RPA, rpa
Page 1 of 2 12/4/2020

Franklin County WWTP > Outfall 001
NC0069311 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators Qw = 2 MGD
Acute (FW): 1,507.6
Nickel NC 116.9872 FW(7Q10s) 1052.6128 µg/L __ _ _ _____ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
42 1 47.9 Chronic (FW): 177.4 No RP, Predicted Max< 50% of Allowable Cw- No
No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring required
Nickel NC 25.0000 WS(7Q10s) µg/L Chronic (WS): 37.9
1 value(s) >Allowable Cw
Acute: 80.2
Selenium NC 5 FW(7Q10s) 56 ug/L 43 0 5.1 ____ _ ____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
Chronic: 7.6 No detects; All values < 10 ug/L and < 1 ug/L - No
Monitoring required. Permittee shall report to lowest
NO DETECTS Max MDL = 10 PQL (1 ug/L)
Acute: 4.348
Silver NC 0.06 FW(7Q10s) 3.0355 ug/L 43 0 2.500
Chronic: 0.091 No detects; All values < 5 ug/L- No Monitoring
required. Permittee shall report to lowest PQL (1
NO DETECTS Max MDL = 5 ug/L)
Acute: 566.4
Zinc NC 398.9195 FW(7Q10s) 395.4306 ug/L 43 42 82.4 ____ _ ______ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 604.8 No RP, Predicted Max< 50% of Allowable Cw- No
No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring required
69311 RPA, rpa
Page 2 of 2 12/4/2020

Franklin County WWTP > Outfall 001
NC0069311 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators Qw = 3 MGD
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
Qw (MGD) = 3.0000 WWTP/WTP Class: IV COMBINED HARDNESS (mg/L)
1Q1OS (cfs) = 1.34 IWC% @ 1Q1OS = 77.6293823 Acute = 96.54 mg/L
7Q1OS (cfs) = 1.60 IWC% @ 7Q1OS = 74.4 Chronic = 96.6 mg/L
7Q1OW (cfs) = 5.20 IWC% @ 7Q1OW = 47.20812183
30Q2 (cfs) = 7.00 IWC% @ 30Q2 = 39.91416309
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 25.30 IW%C @ QA= 15.52587646
Receiving Stream: Cedar Creek HUC 03020101 Stream Class: C,NSW
PARAMETER NC STANDARDS OR EPA CRITERIA _1 REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE Chronic Stapda d AcuteoCi n n # Det. Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw
Acute (FW): 438.0
Arsenic C 150 FW(7Q10s) 340 ug/L
43 1 24.8 Chronic (FW): 201.6
No value > Allowable Cw _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Arsenic C 10 HH/WS(Qavg) ug/L Chronic (HH): 64.4 No RP, Predicted Max< 50% of Allowable Cw- No
No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring required
Acute: 83.73
Beryllium NC 6.5 FW(7Q10s) 65 ug/L 3 0 7.50 ____ _ ______ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____
Note: n< 9 C.V. (default) Chronic: 8.74 No detects; All values < 5 ug/L- No Monitoring
Limited data set NO DETECTS Max MDL = 5 required
Acute: 13.558
Cadmium NC 1.6372 FW(7Q10s) 10.5248 ug/L 43 2 7.770 -- _ _ ---- _ _
-2.201 --------------------------------
Chronic:- RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
1 value(s) >Allowable Cw
Acute: 20.6
Chromium VI NC 11 FW(7Q10s) 16 µg/L 0 0 N/A -- _ _ -----_ _
- --------------------------------
Chronic: 14.8
a: No monitoring required if all Total Chromium
Chromium, Total NC µg/L 36 0 2.5 Max reported value =2.5 samples are < 5 pg/L or Pred. max for Total Cr is <
NO DETECTS Max MDL = 5 allowable Cw for Cr VI.
Acute: 48.18
Copper NC 25.0136 FW(7Q10s) 37.3998 ug/L 40 40 49.02 -- _ _ ---- ___
-33 62--------------------------------
Chronic:- RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
2 value(s) >Allowable Cw
Acute: 28.3
Cyanide NC 5 FW(7Q10s) 22 10 ug/L 34 0 5.0 ____ _ ____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____
Chronic: 6.7 No detects; All values < 5 ug/L- No Monitoring
NO DETECTS Max MDL = 10 required
Acute: 435.334
Lead NC 13.1783 FW(7Q10s) 337.9467 ug/L 42 1 13.520
Chronic: 17.713 No RP , Predicted Max >_ 50% of Allowable Cw-
No value > Allowable Cw apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Molybdenum NC 2000 HH(7Q10s) ug/L 43 5 31.3 ____ _ ____ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 2,688.2 No RP, Predicted Max< 50% of Allowable Cw- No
No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring required
69311 RPA, rpa
Page 1 of 2 12/9/2020

Franklin County WWTP > Outfall 001
NC0069311 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators Qw = 3 MGD
Acute (FW): 1,354.2
Nickel NC 116.8245 FW(7Q10s) 1051.2571 µg/L __ _ _ _____ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
42 1 47.9 Chronic (FW): 157.0 No RP, Predicted Max< 50% of Allowable Cw- No
No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring required
Nickel NC 25.0000 WS(7Q10s) µg/L Chronic (WS): 33.6
1 value(s) >Allowable Cw
Acute: 72.1
Selenium NC 5 FW(7Q10s) 56 ug/L 43 0 5.1 ____ _ ____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
Chronic: 6.7 No detects; All values < 10 ug/L and < 1 ug/L - No
Monitoring required. Permittee shall report to lowest
NO DETECTS Max MDL = 10 PQL (1 ug/L)
Acute: 3.900
Silver NC 0.06 FW(7Q10s) 3.0276 ug/L 43 0 2.500
Chronic: 0.081 No detects; All values < 5 ug/L- No Monitoring
required. Permittee shall report to lowest PQL (1
NO DETECTS Max MDL = 5 ug/L)
Acute: 508.7
Zinc NC 398.3636 FW(7Q10s) 394.9205 ug/L 43 42 82.4 ____ _ ______ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 535.4 No RP, Predicted Max< 50% of Allowable Cw- No
No value > Allowable Cw Monitoring required
69311 RPA, rpa
Page 2 of 2 12/9/2020

Permit No. NC0069311
NPDES Implementation of Instream Dissolved Metals Standards-Freshwater Standards
The NC 2007-2015 Water Quality Standard(WQS)Triennial Review was approved by the NC
Environmental Management Commission(EMC)on November 13,2014. The US EPA subsequently
approved the WQS revisions on April 6,2016,with some exceptions. Therefore,metal limits in draft
permits out to public notice after April 6,2016 must be calculated to protect the new standards- as
approved.
Table 1.NC Dissolved Metals Water Quality Standards/Aquatic Life Protection
Parameter Acute FW, µg/1 Chronic FW, 14/1 Acute SW, 14/1 Chronic SW, µg/1
(Dissolved) (Dissolved) (Dissolved) (Dissolved)
Arsenic 340 150 69 36
Beryllium 65 6.5 --- ---
Cadmium Calculation Calculation 40 8.8
Chromium III Calculation Calculation --- ---
Chromium VI 16 11 1100 50
Copper Calculation Calculation 4.8 3.1
Lead Calculation Calculation 210 8.1
Nickel Calculation Calculation 74 8.2
Silver Calculation 0.06 1.9 0.1
Zinc Calculation Calculation 90 81
Table 1 Notes:
1. FW=Freshwater, SW= Saltwater
2. Calculation=Hardness dependent standard
3. Only the aquatic life standards listed above are expressed in dissolved form. Aquatic life
standards for Mercury and selenium are still expressed as Total Recoverable Metals due to
bioaccumulative concerns(as are all human health standards for all metals). It is still necessary
to evaluate total recoverable aquatic life and human health standards listed in 15A NCAC
2B.0200(e.g.,arsenic at 10 µg/1 for human health protection; cyanide at 5 µg/L and fluoride at
1.8 mg/L for aquatic life protection).
Table 2. Dissolved Freshwater Standards for Hardness-Dependent Metals
The Water Effects Ratio (WER)is equal to one unless determined otherwise under 15A
NCAC 02B .0211 Subparagraph(11)(d)
Metal NC Dissolved Standard, µg/I
Cadmium,Acute WER*{1.1366724ln hardness](0.041838)} • e^{0.9151 [ln hardness]-3.1485}
Cadmium,Acute Trout waters WER*{1.136672-[ln hardness](0.041838)} • e^{0.9151[ln hardness]-3.6236}
Cadmium,Chronic WER*{1.101672-[ln hardness](0.041838)} • e^{0.7998[ln hardness]-4.4451}
Chromium III,Acute WER*0.316 • e^{0.8190[ln hardness]+3.7256}
Chromium III,Chronic WER*0.860 •e^{0.8190[ln hardness]+0.6848}
Copper,Acute WER*0.960 •e^{0.9422[ln hardness]-1.700}
Copper,Chronic WER*0.960 •e^{0.8545[ln hardness]-1.702}
Lead,Acute WER*{1.462034ln hardness](0.145712)} •e^{1.273[ln hardness]-1.460}
Lead,Chronic WER*{1.462034ln hardness](0.145712)} •e^{1.273[ln hardness]-4.705}
Nickel,Acute WER*0.998 •e^{0.8460[ln hardness]+2.255}
Nickel,Chronic WER*0.997 •e^{0.8460[ln hardness]+0.0584}
Page 1 of 4

Permit No. NC0069311
Silver,Acute WER*0.85 •e^{1.72[ln hardness]-6.59}
Silver,Chronic Not applicable
Zinc,Acute WER*0.978 •e^{0.8473[ln hardness]+0.884}
Zinc,Chronic WER*0.986 •e^{0.8473[ln hardness]+0.884}
General Information on the Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
The RPA process itself did not change as the result of the new metals standards.However,application of
the dissolved and hardness-dependent standards requires additional consideration in order to establish the
numeric standard for each metal of concern of each individual discharge.
The hardness-based standards require some knowledge of the effluent and instream(upstream)hardness
and so must be calculated case-by-case for each discharge.
Metals limits must be expressed as `total recoverable' metals in accordance with 40 CFR 122.45(c). The
discharge-specific standards must be converted to the equivalent total values for use in the RPA
calculations. We will generally rely on default translator values developed for each metal(more on that
below),but it is also possible to consider case-specific translators developed in accordance with
established methodology.
RPA Permitting Guidance/WQBELs for Hardness-Dependent Metals -Freshwater
The RPA is designed to predict the maximum likely effluent concentrations for each metal of concern,
based on recent effluent data,and calculate the allowable effluent concentrations,based on applicable
standards and the critical low-flow values for the receiving stream.
If the maximum predicted value is greater than the maximum allowed value (chronic or acute),the
discharge has reasonable potential to exceed the standard,which warrants a permit limit in most cases. If
monitoring for a particular pollutant indicates that the pollutant is not present(i.e. consistently below
detection level),then the Division may remove the monitoring requirement in the reissued permit.
1. To perform a RPA on the Freshwater hardness-dependent metals the Permit Writer compiles the
following information:
• Critical low flow of the receiving stream, 7Q10(the spreadsheet automatically calculates
the 1Q10 using the formula 1Q10=0.843 (s7Q10,cfs)0.993
• Effluent hardness and upstream hardness,site-specific data is preferred
• Permitted flow
• Receiving stream classification
2. In order to establish the numeric standard for each hardness-dependent metal of concern and for
each individual discharge,the Permit Writer must first determine what effluent and instream
(upstream)hardness values to use in the equations.
The permit writer reviews DMR's, Effluent Pollutant Scans, and Toxicity Test results for any
hardness data and contacts the Permittee to see if any additional data is available for instream
hardness values,upstream of the discharge.
If no hardness data is available,the permit writer may choose to do an initial evaluation using a
default hardness of 25 mg/L(CaCO3 or(Ca+Mg)). Minimum and maximum limits on the
hardness value used for water quality calculations are 25 mg/L and 400 mg/L,respectively.
If the use of a default hardness value results in a hardness-dependent metal showing reasonable
potential,the permit writer contacts the Permittee and requests 5 site-specific effluent and
upstream hardness samples over a period of one week. The RPA is rerun using the new data.
Page 2 of 4

Permit No. NC0069311
The overall hardness value used in the water quality calculations is calculated as follows:
Combined Hardness(chronic)
=(Permitted Flow, cfs *Avg. Effluent Hardness,mg/L)+(s7Q10,cfs *Avg.Upstream Hardness,mg/L)
(Permitted Flow,cfs+ s7Q10,cfs)
The Combined Hardness for acute is the same but the calculation uses the 1Q10 flow.
3. The permit writer converts the numeric standard for each metal of concern to a total recoverable
metal,using the EPA Default Partition Coefficients(DPCs)or site-specific translators,if any
have been developed using federally approved methodology.
EPA default partition coefficients or the "Fraction Dissolved"converts the value for
dissolved metal at laboratory conditions to total recoverable metal at in-stream
ambient conditions. This factor is calculated using the linear partition coefficients
found in The Metals Translator: Guidance for Calculating a Total Recoverable
Permit Limit from a Dissolved Criterion(EPA 823-B-96-007,June 1996)and the
equation:
Cdiss = 1
Ctotal 1 + { [Kpo] [SS(11 [101 }
Where:
ss=in-stream suspended solids concentration [mg/1],minimum of 10 mg/L used,
and
Kpo and a=constants that express the equilibrium relationship between dissolved
and adsorbed forms of metals.A list of constants used for each hardness-dependent
metal can also be found in the RPA program under a sheet labeled DPCs.
4. The numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the default partition coefficient(or
site-specific translator)to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient conditions.
In some cases,where an EPA default partition coefficient translator does not exist(ie. silver),the
dissolved numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the EPA conversion factor to
obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient conditions. This method presumes that the metal is
dissolved to the same extent as it was during EPA's criteria development for metals. For more
information on conversion factors see the June, 1996 EPA Translator Guidance Document.
5. The RPA spreadsheet uses a mass balance equation to determine the total allowable concentration
(permit limits) for each pollutant using the following equation:
Ca=(s7Q10+Qw)(Cwqs)—(s7Q10)(Cb)
Qw
Where: Ca=allowable effluent concentration(µg/L or mg/L)
Cwqs=NC Water Quality Standard or federal criteria(µg/L or mg/L)
Cb=background concentration: assume zero for all toxicants except NH3* (µg/L or mg/L)
Qw=permitted effluent flow(cfs,match s7Q10)
s7Q10= summer low flow used to protect aquatic life from chronic toxicity and human
health through the consumption of water,fish,and shellfish from noncarcinogens(cfs)
* Discussions are on-going with EPA on how best to address background concentrations
Flows other than s7Q10 may be incorporated as applicable:
1Q10=used in the equation to protect aquatic life from acute toxicity
Page 3 of 4

Permit No. NC0069311
QA=used in the equation to protect human health through the consumption of water,
fish,and shellfish from carcinogens
30Q2=used in the equation to protect aesthetic quality
6. The permit writer enters the most recent 2-3 years of effluent data for each pollutant of concern.
Data entered must have been taken within four and one-half years prior to the date of the permit
application(40 CFR 122.21). The RPA spreadsheet estimates the 95th percentile upper
concentration of each pollutant. The Predicted Max concentrations are compared to the Total
allowable concentrations to determine if a permit limit is necessary. If the predicted max exceeds
the acute or chronic Total allowable concentrations,the discharge is considered to show
reasonable potential to violate the water quality standard,and a permit limit(Total allowable
concentration)is included in the permit in accordance with the U.S. EPA Technical Support
Document for Water Quality-Based Toxics Control published in 1991.
7. When appropriate,permit writers develop facility specific compliance schedules in accordance
with the EPA Headquarters Memo dated May 10,2007 from James Hanlon to Alexis Strauss on
40 CFR 122.47 Compliance Schedule Requirements.
8. The Total Chromium NC WQS was removed and replaced with trivalent chromium and
hexavalent chromium Water Quality Standards.As a cost savings measure,total chromium data
results may be used as a conservative surrogate in cases where there are no analytical results
based on chromium III or VI. In these cases,the projected maximum concentration(95th%)for
total chromium will be compared against water quality standards for chromium III and
chromium VI.
9. Effluent hardness sampling and instream hardness sampling,upstream of the discharge, are
inserted into all permits with facilities monitoring for hardness-dependent metals to ensure the
accuracy of the permit limits and to build a more robust hardness dataset.
10. Hardness and flow values used in the Reasonable Potential Analysis for this permit included:
Parameter Value Comments(Data Source)
Average Effluent Hardness(mg/L) 96.12 Data provided in DMRs
[Total as,CaCO3 or(Ca+Mg)]
Average Upstream Hardness(mg/L) 98 Data provided in application
[Total as,CaCO3 or(Ca+Mg)]
7Q10 summer(cfs) 1.6 NPDES Files
1 Q 10(cfs) 1.34 Calculated in RPA
Permitted Flow(MGD) 2.0& 3.0 NPDES Files
Date: 12/9/2020
Permit Writer: Nick Coco
Page 4 of 4

NC0069311 Franklin County WWTP 12/8/2020
BOD monthly removal rate TSS monthly removal rate
Month RR(%) Month RR(%) Month RR(%) Month RR(%)
September-16 98.44 March-19 97.58 September-16 98.50 March-19 97.31
October-16 98.42 April-19 98.49 October-16 98.41 April-19 98.48
November-16 98.65 May-19 98.53 November-16 98.89 May-19 98.46
December-16 98.42 June-19 98.62 December-16 99.05 June-19 98.74
January-17 98.52 July-19 98.06 January-17 98.77 July-19 98.52
February-17 98.26 August-19 96.02 February-17 98.79 August-19 98.69
March-17 98.12 September-19 98.74 March-17 98.77 September-19 98.70
April-17 98.61 October-19 98.77 April-17 98.01 October-19 98.60
May-17 98.27 November-19 98.83 May-17 98.55 November-19 98.82
June-17 98.33 December-19 99.38 June-17 98.49 December-19 99.58
July-17 98.24 January-20 98.51 July-17 98.35 January-20 98.72
August-17 98.29 February-20 98.71 August-17 98.19 February-20 98.62
September-17 98.15 March-20 98.85 September-17 97.98 March-20 98.84
October-17 98.61 April-20 98.29 October-17 98.49 April-20 98.72
November-17 98.97 May-20 98.29 November-17 98.68 May-20 98.71
December-17 98.88 June-20 98.68 December-17 98.57 June-20 98.69
January-18 98.18 July-20 98.39 January-18 98.23 July-20 98.69
February-18 98.72 August-20 99.07 February-18 98.51 August-20 98.94
March-18 98.74 September-20 March-18 98.33 September-20
April-18 98.56 October-20 April-18 98.27 October-20
May-18 98.38 November-20 May-18 98.12 November-20
June-18 98.44 December-20 June-18 98.46 December-20
July-18 98.45 January-21 July-18 98.31 January-21
August-18 98.87 February-21 August-18 98.87 February-21
September-18 98.48 March-21 September-18 98.44 March-21
October-18 98.49 April-21 October-18 98.26 April-21
November-18 98.53 May-21 November-18 98.47 May-21
December-18 98.32 June-21 December-18 98.12 June-21
January-19 97.72 July-21 January-19 98.13 July-21
February-19 98.55 August-21 February-19 98.01 August-21
Overall BOD removal rate 98.45 Overall TSS removal rate 98.52

Instream Conductivity Summary NC0069311 Franklin County WWTP
Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream
Date [umhos/cm] [umhos/cm] Date [umhos/cm] [umhos/cm]
9/12/2016 91 440 9/17/2018 73 98
9/29/2016 79 193 9/27/2018 93 294
10/24/2016 75 211 10/29/2018 82 182
11/28/2016 80 232 11/29/2018 79 156
12/19/2016 81 198 12/19/2018 69 143
1/23/2017 85 150 1/28/2019 73 154
2/27/2017 86 205 2/18/2019 63 108
3/27/2017 87 195 3/27/2019 71 125
4/27/2017 57 79 4/22/2019 71 115
5/8/2017 67 196 5/7/2019 81 162
5/26/2017 55 120 5/30/2019 86 314
6/14/2017 74 272 6/11/2019 66 106
6/26/2017 73 140 6/24/2019 74 161
7/12/2017 83 374 7/16/2019 88 346
7/31/2017 76 253 7/29/2019 86 310
8/18/2017 70 120 8/15/2019 86 339
8/31/2017 82 347 8/27/2019 84 256
9/11/2017 84 341 9/12/2019 88 375
9/22/2017 87 441 9/25/2019 90 445
10/23/2017 88 411 10/30/2019 95 320
11/27/2017 86 246 11/21/2019 90 245
12/7/2017 84 240 12/16/2019 73 119
1/29/2018 76 131 1/13/2020 74 168
2/26/2018 88 218 2/10/2020 65 114
3/26/2018 73 124 3/9/2020 72 180
4/12/2018 81 186 4/14/2020 77 188
5/9/2018 89 267 5/14/2020 78 261
5/22/2018 85 184 5/28/2020 67 140
6/5/2018 88 284 6/9/2020 85 246
6/18/2018 87 213 6/29/2020 88 274
7/2/2018 92 359 Average 80.3 228.6
7/25/2018 99 381 Max 99 445
8/7/2018 94 183 Min 55 79
8/27/2018 87 254 p-value < .05

Instream Dissolved Oxygen Summary NC0069311 Franklin County WWTP
Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream
Date [mg/L] [mg/L] Date [mg/L] [mg/L]
9/12/2016 6.1 7.4 9/17/2018 8 6.4
9/29/2016 9.4 9.1 9/27/2018 7 6.4
10/24/2016 8.8 8.9 10/29/2018 9.4 9.7
11/28/2016 11.1 11.6 11/29/2018 10.9 10.7
12/19/2016 10.8 10.6 12/19/2018 10.7 11.1
1/23/2017 10.1 9.9 1/28/2019 11.7 11.5
2/27/2017 9.7 10.5 2/18/2019 11.2 11
3/27/2017 8.8 10 3/27/2019 10.4 10.3
4/27/2017 7.8 6.9 4/22/2019 9 8.9
5/8/2017 8.6 8.2 5/7/2019 7.1 7.3
5/26/2017 7.7 7 5/30/2019 7 7.4
6/14/2017 7 7 6/11/2019 7.6 6.9
6/26/2017 6.8 6.4 6/24/2019 7.2 7
7/12/2017 6.1 5.9 7/16/2019 5.8 7.1
7/31/2017 7.3 7.6 7/29/2019 6.2 6.7
8/18/2017 6.4 6 8/15/2019 6.1 6.7
8/31/2017 6.6 6.8 8/27/2019 7.2 7.3
9/11/2017 7.4 8.3 9/12/2019 6.6 7
9/22/2017 6.4 6.7 9/25/2019 6 7.4
10/23/2017 6.8 8.6 10/30/2019 7 7.6
11/27/2017 10.9 11.1 11/21/2019 10.9 9.9
12/7/2017 11.7 11.3 12/16/2019 11.2 11
1/29/2018 10.2 9.7 1/13/2020 9.4 8.8
2/26/2018 8.1 7.1 2/10/2020 10.8 10.6
3/26/2018 11.2 11 3/9/2020 11 11.1
4/12/2018 9.7 9.4 4/14/2020 8.9 8.6
5/9/2018 8 7.3 5/14/2020 9.2 8.8
5/22/2018 7.3 6.6 5/28/2020 7.7 7.5
6/5/2018 8.6 7.1 6/9/2020 7.4 7.3
6/18/2018 6.2 6 6/29/2020 7.4 7.4
7/2/2018 6.4 7 Average 8.3 8.3
7/25/2018 6.9 5.9 Max 11.7 11.6
8/7/2018 6.3 5.9 Min 5.8 5.9
8/27/2018 6.6 6.3 p-value > .05

Instream Temperature Summary NC0069311 Franklin County WWTP
Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream
Date [degC] [degC] Date [degC] [degC]
9/12/2016 24.2 25.2 9/17/2018 24.6 24.1
9/29/2016 22.6 21.7 9/27/2018 24.1 23.8
10/24/2016 15.8 15.3 10/29/2018 13.9 13.1
11/28/2016 8 7.8 11/29/2018 6.2 5.5
12/19/2016 7.5 8.4 12/19/2018 7.1 6.1
1/23/2017 12.1 12.2 1/28/2019 7.2 6.8
2/27/2017 13.1 11.8 2/18/2019 9.3 9.4
3/27/2017 17.7 17.3 3/27/2019 12 11.3
4/27/2017 19.8 19.8 4/22/2019 17.8 17
5/8/2017 17.7 16.6 5/7/2019 23.6 21.4
5/26/2017 21.3 20.4 5/30/2019 26.8 25.6
6/14/2017 26.7 24.9 6/11/2019 23 23.5
6/26/2017 25.1 24 6/24/2019 24.8 23.8
7/12/2017 28.6 26.8 7/16/2019 28 27.6
7/31/2017 24.6 23.2 7/29/2019 26.2 25.7
8/18/2017 27.3 25.7 8/15/2019 27 26.5
8/31/2017 24.6 23.4 8/27/2019 23.5 23.2
9/11/2017 20.1 18.3 9/12/2019 26.7 25.5
9/22/2017 24.1 22.7 9/25/2019 23.6 22.3
10/23/2017 18.5 16.1 10/30/2019 18 18.1
11/27/2017 8.9 8 11/21/2019 9 9
12/7/2017 9.7 9.7 12/16/2019 9.5 8.8
1/29/2018 8.8 9.9 1/13/2020 14.4 14.7
2/26/2018 16.4 16.4 2/10/2020 9.6 9
3/26/2018 9.7 9.2 3/9/2020 11.4 10.7
4/12/2018 15.6 14.6 4/14/2020 18.1 17.9
5/9/2018 19.8 19.3 5/14/2020 16.8 16.4
5/22/2018 24.5 23.4 5/28/2020 23.6 22.2
6/5/2018 24.2 22.6 6/9/2020 24.6 24
6/18/2018 27.6 26.1 6/29/2020 25.7 25.7
7/2/2018 29.1 27 Average 19.2 18.5
7/25/2018 26.2 24.3 Max 29.1 27.6
8/7/2018 27.8 26.7 Min 6.2 5.5
8/27/2018 25.9 24.2 p-value > .05

NH3/TRC WLA Calculations
Facility: Franklin County WWTP
PermitNo. NC0069311
Prepared By: Nick Coco
Enter Design Flow(MGD): 3
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 1.6
Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 5.2
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Ammonia (Summer)
Daily Maximum Limit (ug/I) Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/I)
s7Q10 (CFS) 1.6 s7Q10 (CFS) 1.6
DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 3 DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 3
DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 4.65 DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 4.65
STREAM STD (UG/L) 17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/I) 0 Upstream Bkgd (mg/I) 0.22
IWC (%) 74.40 IWC (%) 74.40
Allowable Conc. (ug/I) 23 Allowable Conc. (mg/I) 1.3
UV used.No limit applied. Less stringent than current permit limit.Maintain limit.
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/I)
Fecal Coliform w7Q10 (CFS) 5.2
Monthly Average Limit: 200/100m I DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 3
(If DF >331; Monitor) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 4.65
(If DF<331; Limit) STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.8
Dilution Factor(DF) 1.34 Upstream Bkgd (mg/I) 0.22
IWC (%) 47.21
Allowable Conc. (mg/I) 3.6
Less stringent than current permit limit.Maintain limit.
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit(Municipals)
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit(Non-Munis)
If the allowable ammonia concentration is > 35 mg/L, no limit shall be imposed
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit(Municipals) = Daily Max limit(Non-Muni)

NH3/TRC WLA Calculations
Facility: Franklin County WWTP
PermitNo. NC0069311
Prepared By: Nick Coco
Enter Design Flow(MGD): 2
Enter s7Q10 (cfs): 1.6
Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 5.2
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Ammonia (Summer)
Daily Maximum Limit (ug/I) Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/I)
s7Q10 (CFS) 1.6 s7Q10 (CFS) 1.6
DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 2 DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 2
DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 3.1 DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 3.1
STREAM STD (UG/L) 17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.0
Upstream Bkgd (ug/I) 0 Upstream Bkgd (mg/I) 0.22
IWC (%) 65.96 IWC (%) 65.96
Allowable Conc. (ug/I) 26 Allowable Conc. (mg/I) 1.4
UV used.No limit applied. Less stringent than current permit limit.Maintain limit.
Ammonia (Winter)
Monthly Average Limit (mg NH3-N/I)
Fecal Coliform w7Q10 (CFS) 5.2
Monthly Average Limit: 200/100m I DESIGN FLOW (MGD) 2
(If DF >331; Monitor) DESIGN FLOW (CFS) 3.1
(If DF<331; Limit) STREAM STD (MG/L) 1.8
Dilution Factor(DF) 1.52 Upstream Bkgd (mg/I) 0.22
IWC (%) 37.35
Allowable Conc. (mg/I) 4.5
Less stringent than current permit limit.Maintain limit.
Total Residual Chlorine
1. Cap Daily Max limit at 28 ug/I to protect for acute toxicity
Ammonia (as NH3-N)
1. If Allowable Conc > 35 mg/I, Monitor Only
2. Monthly Avg limit x 3 = Weekly Avg limit(Municipals)
3. Monthly Avg limit x 5 = Daily Max limit(Non-Munis)
If the allowable ammonia concentration is > 35 mg/L, no limit shall be imposed
Fecal Coliform
1. Monthly Avg limit x 2 = 400/100 ml = Weekly Avg limit(Municipals) = Daily Max limit(Non-Muni)

12/4/20 WQS= 12 ng/L MERCURY WQBEL/TBEL EVALUATION V:2013-6
Facility Name
Franklin County WWTP/NC0069311 No Limit Required
/Permit No. :
MMP Required
Total Mercury 1631E PQL= 0.5 ng/L 7Q10s = 1.600 cfs WQBEL= 18.19 ng/L
Date Modifier Data Entry Value Permitted Flow= 2.000 47 ng/L
10/25/16 2.75 2.75
10/27/16 3.56 3.56 3.2 ng/L-Annual Average for 2016
1/12/17 1.45 1.45
4/6/17 1.47 1.47
7/27/17 1.91 1.91
10/10/17 9.41 9.41 3.6 ng/L-Annual Average for 2017
12/6/18 2.98 2.98 3.0 ng/L-Annual Average for 2018
1/13/19 3.09 3.09
5/14/19 1.14 1.14
5/21/19 1.24 1.24
5/23/19 1.42 1.42
5/24/19 1.64 1.64
7/18/19 1.18 1.18
10/15/19 < 1 0.5
10/17/19 1.09 1.09
11/19/19 1.86 1.86 1.5 ng/L-Annual Average for 2019
5/5/20 1.68 1.68
5/7/20 2.44 2.44
7/21/20 3.66 3.66
7/23/20 3.12 3.12 2.7 ng/L-Annual Average for 2020

Franklin County WWTP/NC0069311
Mercury Data Statistics (Method 1631E)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
#of Samples 2 4 1 9 4
Annual Average, ng/L 3.2 3.6 3.0 1.46 2.725
Maximum Value, ng/L 3.56 9.41 2.98 3.09 3.66
TBEL, ng/L 47
WQBEL, ng/L 18.2

MONITORING REPORT(MR)VIOLATIONS for: Report Date: 10/06/2C Page 1 of 1
Permit: NC0069311 MRs Betweet 9 - 2016 and 9 - 2020 Region: % Violation Category:Limit Violation Program Category:%
Facility Name:% Param Name% County: % Subbasin:% Violation Action:%
Major Minor: %
PERMIT: NC0069311 FACILITY: Franklin County-Franklin County WWTP COUNTY: Franklin REGION: Raleigh
Limit Violation
MONITORING VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED %
REPORT OUTFALL LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE Over VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
12-2016 001 Effluent Nitrogen,Total-Quantity 12/31/16 Annually lbs/yr 42,784 64,946.14 51.8 Annual Load Exceeded No Action, BPJ
(Yearly)

United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
E PA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 2 I5 I 3 I NC0069311 I11 12 I 19/02/05 117 18[ 19 G I 201
21III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
671
I 7°I I 711 I 72 I N I 731 1 174
7511 I I I I I 1180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 09:30AM 19/02/05 16/04/01
Franklin County WWTP
1099 Lane Store Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
Franklinton NC 27525 11:30AM 19/02/05 19/09/30
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Luther Payton Proctor/ORC/919-494-5850/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Bill Harvey,PO Box 685 Franklinton NC 275250685//919-494-5415/9194942225
Yes
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
▪ Permit Flow Measurement Operations&Maintenar Records/Reports
▪ Self-Monitoring Progran Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Wate Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Erin M Deck DWR/RRO WQ/919-791-4200/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.) 1
31 NC0069311 111 121 19/02/05 117 18 „
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
3. Record Review: ORC Log Book is filled out and maintained as required. Discharge monitoring
reports (DMRs) for March and September 2018 were checked with bench sheets and no
discrepancies were noted. Chain of custody forms are completed and kept on site. Mercury
Minimization Plan was also reviewed.
4. Discharge Monitoring reports for the period of January 2018 through December 2018 were
reviewed for compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. A limit violation for toxicity in
October 2018 was noted as well as in December 2018 there were frequency violations for BOD and
Ammonia. These violations will be addressed through separate correspondence.
5. The onsite laboratory (Certification no. 350) analyzes for pH, Conductivity, Fecal, Total Suspended
Solids, Alkalinity, Ammonia, Dissolved Oxygen and MLSS. Meritech, Inc. performs the analysis on thi
remaining permit parameters.
6. The temperature of the effluent 24-hour composite sampler was in the appropriate range. The flow
meter was last calibrated on 01/09/2019.
7. The facility discharges to Cedar Creek, a class C Nutrient Sensitive waters in the Tar River basin.
Effluent on the day of the inspection was clear and minimal foam was noted in the receiving stream.
Page# 2

Permit: NC0069311 Owner-Facility: Franklin County VVVVTP
Inspection Date: 02/05/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ • ❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ • ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Permit expires 09/30/2019. reminded then to submit renewal
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable • ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: MLSS
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Comment:
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual ❑
b.Mechanical •
Are the bars adequately screening debris? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the unit in good condition? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page# 3

Permit: NC0069311 Owner-Facility: Franklin County VVVVTP
Inspection Date: 02/05/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are UV bulbs clean? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is UV intensity adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is transmittance at or above designed level? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there a backup system on site? ❑ ❑ ❑ •
Is effluent clear and free of solids? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? • ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Flow meter last calibrated 01/09/2019
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Comment:
Page# 4

2018 NC Category 5 Assessments "303(d) List" Final 4 D E
Tar-Pamlico River Basin Subbasin
�rWIMlwlwwwrri..
29-28-14 11Schooner Creek
From source to South Creek (0.559800028800964 S Miles)
Classification SA;HQW,NSW Length or Area 3 Units S Acres Previous AU Number
Assessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating Parameter of Interest Category
Exceeding Criteria SH PRO Shellfish Growing Area Status (Fecal,SH,SA) 15
Upper Tar Subbasin 03020101
28-29-(2)b Cedar Creek
From Franklinton Branch to Tar River
Classification C;NSW Length or Area 12 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
Assessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating11111 Parameter of Interest Category
Exceeding Criteria Turbidity(50 NTU,AL, FW miles) 5
28-30a Crooked Creek
From source to NC 98
Classification C;NSW Length or Area 15 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
Assessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating Parameter ogilmall Category
Exceeding Criteria > 10%and >90 conf Dissolved Oxygen (4 mg/I,AL, FW) 5
28-11c Fishing Creek
From#1 outfall to SR 1608
Classification C;NSW Length or Area 1 Units FW Miles Previous AU Number
Assessment Criteria Status Reason for Rating Mk Parameter of Interest Category
Exceeding Criteria Fair Benthos (Nar,AL, FW) 5
6/3/2019 2018 NC Category 5 Assessments "303(d) List" Approved by EPA May 22,2019 Page 144 of 262

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing and Self Monitoring Summary
Former Schlage Comp.GWR NC0079227/001 County: Nash Region: RRO Basin: TAR02 Feb May Aug Nov SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF Begin: 6/1/2015 Chr Monit:90% NonComp: Single 7Q10: 0.0 PF: 0.124 IWC: 100.0 Freq: Q
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D
2016 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2017 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2018 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2019 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2020 - Pass - - H - - H - - - -
Fortron Industries/001 NC0082295/001 County: New Hanover Region: WIRO Basin: CPF17 Feb May Aug Nov SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF Begin: 7/1/2018 chr lira:0.9% NonComp: Single 7Q10: 910 PF: 0.834 IWC: 0.9 Freq: Q
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D
2016 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2017 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2018 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2019 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
2020 - Pass - - Pass - - - - - - -
Franklin Co.WASA NC0069311/001 County: Franklin Region: RRO Basin: TAR01 Jan Apr Jul Oct SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF Begin: 4/1/2016 chr lim:2 MGD @ 66 NonComp: Single 7Q10: 1.6 PF: 3.0 IWC: 74.4 Freq: Q
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D
2016 Pass - - Pass - - Pass>100(P) - - Pass - -
2017 Pass - - Pass - - Pass>100(P) - - Pass - -
2018 Pass - - Pass>100(P) - - Pass - - Fail >100 >100
2019 Pass - - Pass >100(P) - Pass - - Pass - -
2020 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - - - -
Franklin WTP NC0089737/001 County: Macon Region: ARO Basin: LTNO1 Mar Jun Sep Dec SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF Begin: 1/1/2019 Chr Monit:1.92% NonComp: 7Q10: PF: IWC: Freq: Q
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D
2019 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass
2020 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - -
Franklin WTP(CMUD) NC0084549/001 County: Mecklenburg Region: MRO Basin: CTB34 Jan Apr Jul Oct SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF Begin: 6/1/2015 Chr Monit: 90% NonComp: 7Q10: PF: IWC: Freq: Q
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D
2016 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2017 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2018 Pass - - Fail - - Pass - - Pass - -
2019 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
2020 Fail - - Pass - - Pass - - - - -
Legend: P=Fathead minnow(Pimphales promelas),H=No Flow(facility is active),s=Split test between Certified Labs Page 46 of 121

NPDES/Aquifer Protection Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
PERMIT WRITER COMPLETES THIS PART: PERMIT WRITERS - AFTER you get this form back
Check all that apply from PERCS:
- Notify PERCS if LTMP/STMP data we said should
Date of Request 12/4/2020 municipal renewal X be on DMRs is not really there, so we can get it for
Requestor Nicholas Coco new industries you (or NOV POTW).
Facility Name Franklin County WWTP WWTP expansion - Notify PERCS if you want us to keep a specific POC
Permit Number NC0069311 Speculative limits in LTMP/STMP so you will have data for next permit
Region Raleigh stream reclass. renewal.
- Email PERCS draft permit, fact sheet, RPA.
Basin Tar-Pamlico outfall relocation - Send PERCS paper copy of permit (w/o NPDES
7Q10 change boilerplate), cover letter, final fact sheet. Email RPA if
other changes.
other
check applicable PERCS staff: Other Comments to PERCS:
Ni BRD, CPF, CTB, FRB, TAR
Facility is rated 2.0 MGD wtih 2 SIUs, including 1 CIU listed in its
CHO, HIW, LTN, LUM, NES, NEW, ROA, YAD application.
PERCS PRETREATMENT STAFF COMPLETES THIS PART:
Status of Pretreatment Program (check all that apply)
1 ) facility has no SIU's, does have Division approved Pretreatment Program that is INACTIVE
2) facility has no SIU's, does not have Division approved Pretreatment Program
-I 3) facility has SIUs and DWQ approved Pretreatment Program (list "DEV" if program still under development)
3a) Full Program with LIMP
-I 3b) Modified Program with STMP
4) additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below
Flow, MGD Permitted Actual Time period for Actual STMP time frame:
Industrial 0.875 0.5314 Most recent: 2019 - 2020
Uncontrollable n/a 0.3029 Next Cycle: 2024 - 2025
a POC due to
E a Parameter of Required POTW POC STMP LTMP
_ Concern (POC) NPDES/ Non- Required by EPA* by 503 POC due (Explain Effluent Effluent
u' Check List Disch Permit Sludge** to SIU*** below)**** Freq Freq
o
a Limit
BOD -I -I Q
TSS -I -I Q Q = Quarterly
NH3 -I -I Q M = Monthly
Arsenic Al Q
Al Cadmium Al Al -I Q
Al Chromium Al -I Q
Al Copper -I Al Al -I Q
Cyanide -I Q Is all data on DMRs?
Al Lead Al Al -I Q YES -I
Mercury Al Q NO (attach data)
Molybdenum Al Q
Al Nickel Al Al -J Q
Silver -I Q
Selenium Al -I Q
Al Zinc -I Al -I -I Q Is data in spreadsheet?
solids -I Q YES (email to writer)
Total Phosphorus -I -I Q NO -I
NO2+NO3 -I Q
TKN -I Q
Antimony -I Q
Sodium -I Q
Potassium -I Q
*Always in the LTMP/STMP ** Only in LTMP/STMP if sludge land app or composte (dif POCs for incinerators)
*** Only in LTMP/STMP while SIU still discharges to POTW **** Only in LTMP/STMP when pollutant is still of concern to POTW
Comments to Permit W riter (ex., explanation of any POCs; info you have on IU related investigations into NPDES problems):
PERC NPDES_Pretreatment.request.form.may2016
Revised: July 24, 2007