Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW6210303_Watson Ridge Report Alternate Site 020721_20210329Scott Cole, NCLSS 312 Copples Road Ext Asheboro., NC 2 7205 (336) 460-4554 Double D Engineering, PLLC Attn: Mr. Lee Humphrey 150 S. Page Street Southern Pines, NC 28387 January 21, 2021 Re: Seasonal High -Water Table Identification and Soil Infiltration Rates: Watson Ridge; Harnett County NC Parcel 9557-57-4906 Soil conditions and infiltration rates were evaluated and measured on the above -referenced property within proposed storm water BMP devices. Work was conducted in accordance with Parts A-2 and C- I of the North Carolina Department ofEnvironmental Quality Stormwater Design Manual. Soil samples were evaluated with a hand auger. SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE IDENTIFICATION Seasonal High Water Table depth is determined by field evaluation for soil wetness conditions which are indicated by the presence of redoximorphic (redox) features with a chroma of 2 or less (in Munsell color notation) in mottles or the horizon matrix. Colors of chroma 2 or less due to relic minerals from parent material (underlying rock), anaerobic activity created by placement of fill material, or soil textural class transitions (perched water) are not considered as indicators for seasonal high water. Upon determination of SHWT depth, an additional 6" will be deducted from the observed depth to account for capillary fringe water movement above the SHWT. Stormwater infiltration trenches are designed to ensure the lowest point is at least two feet above the Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT). SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (K.t) Soils evaluated on this property are typical of those within the Candor Sand series (CaB), Blaney Loamy Sand series (BnB) and the Gilead Loamy Sand series (GaA). These soil series consist of deep, well drained soils with varying rates of permeability. Infiltration rates were measured to determine if soil conditions were suitable for the installation of ston-nwater infiltration trenches. Infiltration rates were measured using a Johnson Constant Head Permeameter. Measurements were recorded at varying intervals until equilibrium was reached. A summary of observations within each proposed Stormwater BMP Device is shown in the tables below. BMP Device Site #1 SHWT Munsell Color Ksat Ksat (inches below Notation (0-48"; SL/LS) (48"-72"; ground surface) SCL/SC) 72" (elevation 2.5Y 8/1 18.15" / hour .545" / hour 365.5') 2.5Y 7/1 BMIP Device Site #2 SRWT Munsell Color Ksat Ksat (inches below Notation (0-45"; LS) (45"-56"; ground surface) SCL/SC) 56" (elevation 2.5Y 8/1 20" / hour .545" / hour 332') Scott Cole, NCLSS 312 Copples Road Ext Ash ehoro, NC 2 7205 (336) 460-4554 BMP Device Site #3 SHWT Munsell Color Ksat Ksat (inches below Notation (0-32"; LS) (32"-72"; ground surface) SCL/SQ Depths vary 2.5Y 8/1 18.15" / hour .545" / hour between 32"-72" 2.5Y 7/1 bgs. I I I I Note: BMP site #3 has 18' of elevation change. Expansive clay layer present at depths ranging from 32-72" bgs. BMP Device Site #3 (Alternate Location) SHWT Munsell Color Ksat (inches below Notation 2round surface) Not Observed Heavy Gleying Not measured within 15' of within expansive ground surface. Clay layer due to (Evaluation perched water, conducted to elevation 317') CONCLUSION Field evaluation of hydraulic conductivity provides estimations of soil infiltration rates; however, methods used to measure these rates can influence the results. Side walls of the bore hole are "smeared" by the soil auger as the hole is prepared and loose soil in the bottom of the hole is placed in suspension when water is applied; both of these factors negatively influence water infiltration rates. To help overcome these issues, after excavation of each infiltration trench, it is recommended the trench bottom and sidewalls be raked and dusted with pulverized limestone. These are practices that have been in place within the on -site wastewater industry to help loosen the soil and aid in restoration of soil structure. I am pleased to be of service in this matter and can be contacted at your convenience should you have any questions concerning information within this report. --moommaw— Thank you, Scott Cole North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist soil A N 0 Coto aN S Z�I. I�N J LOT 4; .,,4 20,8'1 S, F 3 LOTA2 i 21,478 SF L T 36 7, 9 4 C, Q) LOT '1 LOT 7 PROPOSED 2 27,014 F 2217 6 SF F WATER MAIN L 7, T 7 ,7 6 F BMP Site #3 (Alternate location) SHWT: Not Observed within 15' of surface. (evaluated to elevation 31T) LO F 13� 20,%',)10 6-F NOTE: Heavy Expansive Clay observed m surface to 15' bgs. (!ro PRO! T40 j --H 5,841 SF LIC LIEQ-T 39 46,98�1/ 40, Ap, / VVETL. C14 JSAC Cl) 0 LINE n hea xp- SH)NT NO OPEN StPACE In10 15' heavy lay- WT 4,279 SF XV) CV) PROPOSED 20' RAINAGE AND ACCESS EASEMENT UNSUITAKE SOUS STORM -WATER so It sc TREAPAEN� le, --VLANK4/ �� A, L? 0 LP, 0." 0 � Q m JOPEN SPACE ",101,291 SF 1263 A, linch 100 feet/'