20070503 Ver 2_More Info Received_20070530

SINCE
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
O GEOTECHNICAL . ENVIRONMENTAL . MATERIALS
a ENGINEERS . LABORATORIES
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
A
1881 310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
To: NC DWQ
Express Permit Review
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh NC 27604
Attn: Ms. Cynthia Van Der Weile
We are sending you
The following items:
? Engineering Reports
? Test Reports
?? Attached
? Prints
? Samples
MAIN OFFICE AND LABORATORIES
3015 DUMBARTON ROAD
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23228
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Date: May 29, 2007
F&R No.: G66-273GE
Reference: Mills Park Elementary (E22)
Ek of • DS D3 c r z
? Under separate cover via
? Copy of Letter
? Contract
? Plans
? Other: PCN
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
5 5-29-07 Response to Request for More Information Dated May 22,2007
5 5-29-07 Revised PCN for re-submition to the Express Review Program
5 5-29-07 Revised Bioretention Worksheets Including Dissipater Calculations
5 5-29-07 Revised full size plan sheets

Remarks:
Distribution:
Signed
Form No. 1027
SINCE
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC
GEOTECHNICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL • MATERIALS
ENGINEERS • LABORATORIES
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
310 Hubert Street
1881 ® Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
May 29, 2007
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Express Permit Review
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250,
Raleigh, NC 27604
Attn: Cynthia Van Der Wiele
Re: Response to Request for more Information
Mills Park Elementary (E-22)
DWQ EXP No. 07-0503v2
Cary, North Carolina
F&R Project No. G66-273GE
Dear Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele:
Froehling & Robertson, Inc., (F&R) has been contracted by Wake County Public School System
(WCPSS) to provide wetland and stream consulting services for the proposed Mills Park Elementary
School (E-22) project site. The project site is located in Cary, Wake County approximately 4,000 feet
south of the intersection of Green Level Road and Durham Road in Cary, North Carolina. The project site
will impact approximately 0.491 acres of wetlands and an unnamed tributary of Panther Creek, which is
located in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit Number 03030002.
On May 21, 2007 representatives from F&R, WCPSS, Dewberry, and McNealy Associates met with Ms.
Lia Myott and Ms. Annette Lucas at the DWQ's office prior to resubmitting the 401/404 permit
application. As a result of that meeting the DWQ issued a request for more information dated May 22,
2007. F&R is submitting this letter in response the request for more information.
In addition to the responses included in this letter 5 copies of the following have been submitted;
• Revised Bioretention Worksheets
• Dissipater Calculations
• Revised full size plan sheets
• Revised PCN
HEADQUARTERS: 3015 DUMBARTON ROAD • BOX 27524 • RICHMOND, VA 23261-7524
TELEPHONE [phone] • FAX [phone] • www.FandR.com
BRANCHES: ASHEVILLE, NC • BALTIMORE, MD • CHARLOTTE, NC • CHESAPEAKE, VA
CROZET, VA • FAYETTEVILLE, NC • FREDERICKSBURG, VA
GREENVILLE, SC • HICKORY, NC • RALEIGH, NC • ROANOKE, VA • STERLING, VA
SINCE
1881
Below are the DWQ's requests for more information and corresponding responses.
1. "Please update your PCN Application with the modified acreage calculations including the
proposed road acreage and the associated BMP locations. You may remove the proposed
Middle School site from the project boundary if approved by the USACE."
a. The modified acreage is approximately 34.7 acres. This area includes the proposed
road, associated grading, road BMP's, and site disturbance area including BMP's. The
site plan cover sheet and PCN has been revised to reflect the "Project Work Limits"
F&R spoke with Mr. James Shern, USACE Field Representative for Wake County
regarding limiting the PCN to the 34.7 acres on Tuesday May 29, 2007. Mr. Shern gave
verbal authorization to reduce the project to just the 34.7 acres of the proposed
Elementary School.
2. "Bioretention No. 1 and 2; You have indicated a design depth of 6 feet and excessive inlet
velocities. Additionally, bioretention no. 2 does not have sufficient surface area. Please design
the bioretention facilities according to the 1999 or the draft 2005 Stormwater BMP Manual
(NC DENR)."
a. Both bio-retention 1 and 2 are designed per the 1999 Stormwater BMP Manual as
requested. The depth of the bio-retention basin consist of 1 foot of sand with a 6"
slotted underdrain and 4 feet of bio-media for a total of 5 feet. There is 1 foot between
the bottom surface of the basin and the outlet structure which controls the water
quantity required by code. The bio-retention worksheets have been revised and
included per the telephone discussion between Mr. Keith Downing of McNealy
Associates and Ms. Van Der Wiele on Thursday, May 24, 2007. The required surface
area is 5% of the drainage area using the rational formula if an underdrain is provided.
We have provided the underdrain and used the 5% calculation. Calculations are
provided in the hydrology report submitted for the site. In summary, bio-retention
basin 1 requires a surface area of 18,401 square feet (sf) and the design provides 20,037
sf at elevation 310.00. Bio-retention basin 2 requires a surface area of 4,048 sf and the
design provides 7,396 sf at elevation 322.00.
Mills Park Elementary (E-22) 2 May 29, 2007
Cary, North Carolina F&R Project No. G66-273GE
I
If you have any questions/comments or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact F&R
Velocities shown on the rip rap dissipater chart are for the 10 year storm and are the
entering velocities into to the dissipater. The dissipaters are designed to "dissipate" the
velocity before entering the basin. Please find attached calculations using the weir
equation which shows that all flows exiting the designed dissipaters do not exceed 6" of
flow depth which are not excessive velocities. Please also review the dissipater detail
on the plans as it is designed to function as a level spreader. Calculations have been
provided showing the velocities leaving each dissipater. No velocity exceeds 3 feet per
second.
3. "Two obligate (OBL) tree species arc included in your bioretention planting plan: Nyssa
aquatica and Taxodium distichum. Obligate species arc not recommended for bioretention
areas because they are not tolerant of periods of drought (bioretention areas arc designed not to
hold water). Please revise your bioretention planting plan to replace these two species with
more tolerant species such as American elm (Ulmus americana), Eastern redbud (Cercis
canadensis), or American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)."
a. Per telephone conversations with Lia Myott, McNeely Associates has kept the
Taxodium distichum and Nyssa Sylvatica and have added Cercis Canadensis and
Platanus occidentalis per the DWQ's request. McNeely Associates has a bio-retention
basin that has been fully operational for two years in the Town of Cary with this same
specified bio-retention media mix and the plant material there (Taxodium and Nyssa)
are thriving. We have agreed to add the additional plant material requested to observe
how different plant species will adapt to the bio-retention design.
at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
SINCE
1881
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Christophe . Burkhardt
Project Manager
Mills Park Elementary (E-22)
Cary, North Carolina
3
May 29, 2007
F&R Project No. G66-273GE

.. 10
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No.
DWO No.
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
II.
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP No. 39 (verified)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
The project site is not located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties.
Applicant Information

Owner/Applicant Information
Form Version March 05
CR - o503

Name: Wake County Public School System -
Mailing Address:c/o Timothy Driscoll
Planning and Construction Department
1551 Rock Ouarry Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: tdriscoll(a,wcpss.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Christopher J. Burkhardt
Company Affiliation: Froehling & Robertson, Inc. (F&R)
Mailing Address: 310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: cburkhardt(aDfandr.com
Page 1 of 11
,.
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Mills Park Elementary School (E-22)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): PIN# 0735002296
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The project site is located
east of Green Level To Durham Road SR1625 and approximately 4,000' south of the
intersection of Green Level To Durham Road and Carpenter Fire Station Road in Cary, Wake
County, North Carolina (please see Figures in Attachments). The access road is being
proposed directly across Green Level to Durham Road from Courtland View Rd.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.81283 ?N 78.90068 ?W
6. Property size (acres): 20 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed Tributary of Panther Creek
Stream Index No. 16-41-1-17-3 WS, IV, NSW
8. River Basin: Cape Fear - 03030002
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of I 1
,v
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The project site consists of wooded, undeveloped land. The
site is located in a fast growing, semi-rural, residential area within the Town of Cary limits.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Wake County Public School System is proposing to construct Mills Park Elementary
School (E-22) on a 20 acre parcel. In order to access the School, the Coun!Y plans to
construct Mills Park Drive across an approximately 150 foot wide wetland which includes an
unnamed tribuIM (UT) to Panther Creek. The UT is considered an Important Perennial
Stream. A secondary Unimportant Channel that caries flow through the wetland will also be
Construction of Mills Park Drive will take place within a 75 foot wide right of way. The
right of way will consist of earthen fill, a three lane asphalt-paved road, sidewalks, curb and
gutters, and underground utilities (water, sewer, and electric). The total impervious surface
will be 55 feet wide. An additional 10 feet of grassed fill will also be present on each side of
the proposed road.
One 12 foot wide by 7 foot tall box culvert and one 12 foot wide by 8 foot tall box
culvert, both 145 linear feet long, will be installed side by side at the important channel. The
8 foot tall culvert will be installed 1 foot below the existing grade to allow free water
movement and aquatic life passage under the road. The 7 foot tall culvert will be installed at
grade to maintain the natural hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the
floodway that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant char eggs in hydrology of
the stream and/or wetland. In addition a .081 acre dissipater pad will be placed at the outfall
of the two box culverts in the bed and bank of the important channel.
One 36 inch reinforced concrete pipe measuring 142 feet in length will be installed 6
inches below grade at the seconds /rimportant channel to maintain the natural h dy rology
of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in aggradation,
degradation or significant changes in hydrology of the stream and/or wetland.
All construction activities will be performed in accordance with Best Management
Practices and the NC Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual. The
mechanical equipment used during the constriction of the project site will include
conventional earth moving equipment used during development such as excavators,
bulldozers, compactors, and other conventional earthwork construction equipment.
Temporary impacts will include placing approved dewatering devices, clean water dikes,
pumps, and discharge hoses within the streams and wetlands. These approved dewatering
devices will be used to temporarily divert each of the stream channels through the discharge
hose during the installation of the culverts and pipe as well as during a portion of the road
construction process. These dewatering devices will be removed and the area will be
restored to the original , grade (where applicable) upon completion of the project. Please see
the attached site plans for additional information.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of Mills Park Drive is to gain
access to Mills Park Elementary School from the main thoroughfare (Durham to Green Level
Road). The purpose of the school is to help alleviate some of the overcrowding within the
school system and provide the local residents with adequate learning facilities. According to
their website, the Wake County Public School System gained more than 7,500 new students
Page 3 of 11
1 10
11
for 2006-07. Estimates show WCPSS increasing by 40,000 students between 2005 and 2010,
bringing total enrollment to more than 160,000 students.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. F&R is not aware of jurisdictional delineations and/or permits that
have been requested and/or obtained for this project in the past.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Future permit requests are not anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The Wake County Public School System is proposing to construct an asphalt road across an
approximately 150 foot wide wetland which includes one important channel that is a UT of
Panther Creek and one unimportant channel. The crossing is part of a larger plan to construct
Mills Park Elementary School. Construction of the road will take place within a 75 foot wide
right of way. The right of way will consist of earthen fill, a three lane asphalt paved road,
sidewalks, curb and gutters, and underground utilities (water, sewer, and electric). The total
impervious surface will be 55 feet wide. An additional 10 feet of grassed fill will also be
present on each side of the proposed road.
One 12 foot wide by 7 foot tall box culvert and one 12 foot wide by 8 foot tall box
culvert, both 145 linear feet long, will be installed side by side at the primary op rtant
Page 4 of 11
.4P
channel. The 8 foot tall culvert will be installed 1 foot below the existing grade to allow free
water movement and aquatic life passage under the road. The 7 foot tall culvert will be
installed at grade to maintain the natural hydrology of the system as well as prevent
constriction of the floodway that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant
changes in hydrology of the stream and/or wetland. In addition a .081 acre dissipater ad will
be placed at the outfall of the two box culverts.
One 36 inch reinforced concrete pipe measuring 142 feet in length will be installed 6
inches below grade at the seconds /ry unimportant channel to maintain the natural hydrology
of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in aggradation,
degradation or significant changes in hydrology of the stream and/or wetland.
Temporary impacts will include placing approved dewatering devices, clean water dikes,
pumps, and discharge hoses with in the streams and wetlands. These approved dewatering
devices will be used to temporarily divert each of the stream channels through the discharge
hose during the installation of the culverts and pipe as well as during a portion of the road
construction process. These dewatering devices will be removed and the area will be
restored to the original grade (where applicable) upon completion of the project. Please see
the attached site plan for additional information.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Located within Distance to Area of
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland 100-year Nearest Impact
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, Floodplain Stream (acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no linear feet
A Permanent Crossing Forested Yes 0' 0.332
fill / riprap
B Permanent Forested Yes 0' 0.039
12'x7' Box Culvert
C Permanent Forested Yes 0' 0.032
12'x8' Box Culvert
Permanent
D 36" Reinforced Forested Yes 0' 0.007
Concrete Pipe
E Permanent Forested Yes 0' 0.081
Dissipater Pad
F Dewatering devices Forested Yes 0' 0.000
(temporary impact)
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.491
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: - 10 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
Page 5 of 11

plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Intermittent? Before Impact linear feet acres

1
UT Panther Creek Permanent Fill for Perennial/ 2' 154' 0.0070
12'x8' Box Culvert Important
Permanent Bed & Perennial/
2 UT Panther Creek Bank Sabilization/ 2' 105' 0.0048
Dissipater Pad Important
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 259' 0.0118
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc. Area of
Impact
acres
None None None Open water impacts are not None
anticipated as part of this project

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Imp act (acres): 0.0118
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.491
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0000
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0118
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 259'
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ® uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Page 6 of 11

Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Excavation -Please see Attached Storm Water
Management Plans
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Local stormwater requirements Pleas see attached
stormwater plans
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Wooded uplands
Size of watershed draining to pond: Pond A 6.59 acres Pond B 1.67
Expected pond surface area: N/A detention pond only
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the extent practical during project planning and
design. In order to meet the purpose and need of this project and to access the developable
portion of this tract from the closest main thoroughfare, the wetland and streams will need to be
crossed. The crossing will be perpendicular to the streams and wetland in an area that offers the
least amount of impact while still meeting the purpose and need of the project site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Page 7 of 11
. v
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
F&R has sent a letter to the EEP Requesting acceptance into the EEP Program
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 259'
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): none
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.491
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): none
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No
PLEASE NOTE: An Environmental Assessment has been submitted to the State Clearinghouse,
a copy of the Finding of no Significant Impact will be forwarded upon receipt.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
Page 8of11

justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify)? Yes[:] No 0
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact Required
Zone* ,...-.--_ r -" I Multiplier
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) none
2 N/A 1.5 none
Total N/A none
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Buffer mitigation is not required in the Cape
Fear River Basin.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. Please see the attached Storm Water Management Plans.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Waster water generated from the nroiect site will be conveved to the Neuse River Waste
Water Treatment plant via sanitary sewer line. The waste water will be treated prior to being,
discharged into the Neuse River.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ® No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The Wake County Public School System is proposing to cross a wetland and small stream
with an access road and utility lines as part of a larger plan to construct a new elementary
School. The proposed road and utility lines are intended to provide access as well as safe and
reliable drinking water, power, and sanitary sewer for use by the school. Residential growth in
the project area is already increasing rapidly and is likely to continue with or without the
construction of the school. However, residential growth in the area may hasten as a result of the
construction of the proposed school.
Indirect and cumulative water quality impacts may accrue from future development. It is
presumed that future development will be in accordance with the Town of Cary's Land Use Plan,
and NCDENR Sediment and Erosion Control Plans. However, loss of riparian forests and
increased impervious surface area reduces rainfall infiltration, increases soil erosion, and
concentrates pollutants. Urban stormwater pollutants include motor vehicle fluids, heave metals,
pesticides, fertilizers, solvents, detergents, eroded soil, and animal waste. As a result, peak
stream flows are typically increased, causing stream bank erosion, channel destabilization,
degradation of in-stream habitat, and increased majznitude and frequency of flooding.
Conversely, the increase in impervious surface area and soil compaction that occurs with
development can reduce infiltration rates, which may in turn reduce base stream flows during dry
weather, adversely affecting aquatic habitat. Sediment, nutrients, and other forms of pollution
from agricultural sources will likely decline as the area develops, but urban stormwater impacts
will likely increase.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The E22 Access Road is being proposed to gain access to a proposed school in order keep
pace with the rapid growth of students in Wake County, which is expected to increase by an
additional 8,000 students by the start of the 2008 school year. Based on this rapid growth, Wake
County is attempting to have this school completed by July 2008 in order to lessen the effects of
expected student population growth and to compensate for overcrowding within the existing
schools. The proposed elementary school has a capacity of 800 students and would help to
reduce overcrowding within the elementary school system if it can be completed by the proposed
Page 10 of 11

May 25, 2007
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
?2/28/2007 09:11 WCPSS CONSTRUCTION MGMT 4 98285751
sluce
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC
GEOTECHNICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL* MATERIALS
ENGINEERS • LABORATORIES
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
310 Hubert Street
I a s i ® Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Telephone: [phone] Fax- [phone]
December 6, 2006
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District - Raleigh Regulatory Ficld Office
6308 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Subject: US Army Corps of Engineers
Agent Authorization Letter
Proposed E22 Elementary School
F&R Project Number 066-273E
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
NU . 144 WI-Id
The undamped hereby authorizes Froehhng & Robertson, Inc. (F&R) to proceed on behalf of the
current property owner(s) as the agent for wetland consulting and permitting issues pertaining to
the above rem project site. This agent authorization letter supersedes any previous agent
atttl?olrizatians. From this day forward; please contact F&R for wetland related issues associated
with this project and prior to site visits.
Simerely,
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Christopher I Burkhardt
Project Manager
Additional Signature block may not be mquircd
Signature: Signature:
Printed Printed
Name: "Affr vtf ahetsc o" Name.
wAce CWA+rN AA0W c SOO" sue.
14'A4i?Tl?
*A4"k*4dwsT
Address: .ss? 4Qacx twady Reaea Address:
.414iGQtGN,,ye .8 7&v
Phone :No-] ( stv) sve •90ve Phone No.: ( )
NEADOM7ONUM: 9013 CUML TON ROAD • BOX 27524 ? RICI MO. VA 23281-7524
TWW"ONE (004( 281-2?0" 4 FAX [phone] w wf6r4kaam
WWWA a: ABMEW-M. NC A BAITWORE. MO • CMAR40TTE. NC • C"ESAPSAa8 VA
C MUt VA • rAYaTTEVOUE. NC • FReDeRKAMURO. VA
OREDMU.E. $C 4 MICKORY. NC • RAf eIOM, NC 9 ROANOa. VA • STERUNG. VA
`
? ?,_ ?t.© _ / \ y , +Ir•i ill ? ?,t ?,?,' ? , ?? .? I 1YI,. ,?E ? •
-
" 'Y'irl 'tJ ?Iy - - _,\•, - - - \-?-.,-,?'? \'h,`r?, ,. !{1JP?•`1Y??1:?..
',I ,, !.? ? ''•i? 35J.
'..'
'c?0 1 S ?j 6;<,'7"? "."., 1
11
•?p' `
'6?r- \
r '\?
?= irk} ?1-:
).
?'Y ?r?-
-
_
,
I
..
1
t1
r
A\ _ _
_
'7 V
? <]!-?,. ,?. ?.V? ',, 'l _? ?'??'I? `\i ?i?f;,-. i •.l r %?. r, ?I L, •?.? ?? .I
f
r ISlir ?`I\
???}tr,'J.
! ,?
r
?Il ... 0 lyi? f?fr'•'?f ?? VIII \./J ^r _'.1 ??' tr _(1 p 1
i 111,, ?`,''Jt
f ? - ,, ?,'??F? ?? ??s ?'•' f ? %`,r ?! l

' //' , \ ? Y. ? l .? ? a _ mar I : l..t _,? "•yy.?`.. t
t 49-41
,
`
,
'... t
/E'rV/ `
'
V . r f i
.,' ?il !
t
( f ] I I
?
•
{
f
i ` y
r
ter. r 1 1Ii' `E -- `
;
'
f'
-
? -
?
- ?r"'.
1 ; ???? r ?, , :I ?
_ r-?.
'?,L?f,l I
\_ ' ?3? ?" ? III - ;.
1" ?
1?.
•
~^
I
I
k %
l
,
'
1
i2L11 ?i 'I ;,r
r r
? '. I i J
[
II L / J/'. ?f. (,,
:.L l ?J,
?Iy,
co
?
?
"
?
'
? J
4+
.
: ??,,
_
,:?
-\
?. , ; 1 f ??? y S
•+ l r .
I 1 I : .?i--? 6 ?.'f?'i-, I `.?? I
I rr l
O
SI -? './'"?`f',"
??
?'
.,?( \? \'?? ''.[ iI a ,`'',•f" ,f\ „` 1 r ''I ?` ,? ,1,. ?r 1i II r;, '1'-` •_ •I r
r•L'., `+;.
?
.
.
'. - _ r;;.V .r.. ?
rte , ' I '~`` ?' t't?.i?' ._
-3" -?5Q
,???
035) + •- ,?` /, ?,?'- i .
1
,
r
1
%
', ,, .
.
j
? f
.
o
?-
?.
Y
-?
•`a
? -?
d
!
, .,
f
_,.
_
1,
. ?
.
,
. ?. .._
. 1
I
?}?_.
,f
t??¢/???Jc

,', ?`?tV' S f/: 'r` ,_ " l'.. ?`,.•' i, , y / ... l , r '1 1 t . 1? I
'a; A
III
!ri _ -,
I
J .t I JJJ???"'"`I"' II I' ?
•`.. .A? \\? I l?.I 4' '+I tin}` ' '?? r ', 1 I ? f ? ? .. .? r `l

14
??, ?? 36J? J ' r' ?1? `t??` .?I+, - :?.?-••k?' - "L? ?'' 1 ?- ?' ,r
•r.t'' (I
,
'f? '`?:sJi?..;= - ?
l '?.:.,
$vJ) 'I'
?§ [?l?`? ? ~,`?•?•?.f ?. ? y ? ? IL
_ ?
?
f\?
i/.'I' r ' lr
, _ 11 -? /i' ,. ?,. '?
• _ M __,
1.
r' !l'` +
.I? 1

f
.('
?
..
.44

' `
f
'
'?
I
r L1
''
q
_
ti L
4'
.\ 1!
1 / /. ,i r.J •--?'•s
\ r / r 5' -? ( I Il•I+.
'Cfd3. ' l?~ I , I 6 `.' ? - .r I ^' ?C.•Y"r. -...??,\, '?? .' f + I r •'f ..
!
?r '?

Uso
,' i y,,y _ t E .. `i '-` ?l L I, J f , ,Jr J .'??. I Lr S `• I ?.
r ?I ?I
I '
L
7?` I ,?,? "•? ...,
I
L
;
l
?
'
\, ' i
,.
-
_""1 ?.'• '
t
SITE VICINTY MAP North
Client: Wake Countv Public School System.
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Project: WCPSS F,-22 Access Road
FQ,
? GEOTECHNICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL • MATERIALS Location: Wake County, North Carolina
V ENGINEERING • LABORATORIES F&R Project No: G66-273G
"Over one hundred years of service " 7.5 Too Quad: -Green Level, NU dated 1993
Date: March 2007 Approximate Scale: F= 2,000' Figure 41
SITE ORTHO PHOTOGRAPH North t
Client: Wake Countv Public School Svstem
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Project: WCPSS E-22 Access Road
GEOTECHNICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL • MATERIALS Location: Wake County, North Carolina
VV?? ENGINEERING • LABORATORIES F&R Project No: G66-273G/E
"Over one hundred years of service ° Source: Microsoft's Terraserver website dated 2002
Date: March 2007 Not to scale Figure No. 2
SITE SOIL SURVEY North t
Cfient7 Wake Countv Public School Svstem
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. Proiect WCPSS E-22 Access Road
F& GEOTECHNICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL* MATERIALS Location: Wake County, North Carolina
V? ENGINEERING • LABORATORIES F&R Project No: G66-273G/E
"Over one hundred years of service" Source: Wake Count Soil Survey Sheet 45
Date: March 2007 1:24,000 Figure No. 3

OD
f?
N -Q
cu U
L)
N
r 'C QJ
O U X O >
Q N

o ?-
O O_ f6
Q-a
E
N
N N
U > y N
m > ,? N?
?- O O I- ? cp
LL m
L) z;
ML)
U _
U coo _
UJ Cw _
U ms

Cl) o

m
f
E O
a l) O X

Eom
CL
7
E
3
CL

E O C
o c
I
-
I r U
U
i
v

r v r --
?
r
s

r-

a p
co -.?
1 ?e

r a
cc m
rn a
a)

m m
r!B r
,
+
CL
E r
, p ?tg
LL
J C
O
N N r rs
cu "M

{ 3
{ Lf , f 36
fills ?
U
L)
00
cu m
? a
c - m fl
Cl
_N o c co m U)
c m 1 0 U p o
J EEC X0)-0 N
W a N f9 Q U C C 0
U O-C U< = f° U mU
m f6 Q CV U a Q P
N 0 0 M x U 0
lug
{

a

3

N

3

3

? U
O

O
? ?

?
a o
z ^N
-O
c
C
-
U r? R$
Q U Q. n-1 ? Q I--i

U
Q
a z
z?:?
O ' o
H ?z?4 o

Oo??
LJ zxs

o
w??

F
w
0

w
1 3
ENCICIPIFEM0 CONSULTANTS, INC. www.trigoneng.cora
PO< Box 18846 • Zip 27419-8846.313 Gallimore Dairy Road • Greensboro, NC 27409 • p 336.668.0093 • f 336.668.3868
October 31, 2006
Mr. Chad Howard
Taylor Wiseman & Taylor
3500 Regency Parkway, Suite 160
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Reference: Wetlands and Stream Buffer Delineation
97 Acre Revised E22 Wake County School Site
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Trigon Project No. 042-06-165
Dear Mr. Howard:
Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. (Trigon) is pleased to provide this report of our survey for wetlands
and streams at the referenced site. This report summarizes our field methods, observations, and
conclusions.
BACKGROUND
The site is located southeast of the intersection of Green Level to Durham Road and Cary Glen
Boulevard in Wake County, North Carolina (Figure 1). Site access was provided by a dirt road entering
the property from the east near the intersection of Twyla Road and Hilliard Lane. The site consists of
approximately 87 acres of wooded rolling land draining to the west toward an unnamed tributary to
Panther Creek and north toward Panther Creek. Figure 2 is a 1994 aerial photograph showing the recent
condition of the property. The site is reportedly being evaluated as a possible future location for a
school. The property boundaries were not marked at the site at the time of our field work.
WETLANDS
The site was visited on September 13 and 19, 2006 for the purpose of identifying conditions supporting
wetlands. "ibe methodology used to identify areas suspected of having conditions to support wetlands
included walking the suspected areas to observe existing vegetation, soil characteristics, and hydrology.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United States
Environmental Protection Agency as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or
groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances, do
support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In order for an

Mr. Chad Howard Taylor Wise- Re Taylor October 31, 2006
a7 Acre Reviud E22 Wake County School Site, Cory, Wake County. North Carolmo Tr+gon P?ogect No. 04e-p6-163
area to be classified as wetlands, hydrophytie vegetation, hydric soils, and wetlands hydrology indicators
must be present. Identification of wetlands was based on the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual.
Several small areas at the site were observed to be inundated at the time of our site visit, and extensive
areas of wetlands and stream channels were observed at the western property boundary and northeastern
corner of the property (Figure 3). Wetlands were also observed within the interior of the site along an
intermittent stream channel. Hand auger soil borings were performed to observe soil and hydrology at
multiple locations at the site. Soil observed within our hand auger borings appeared to confirm the
mapped soil types. A copy from Sheet 45 of the Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina produced
by the USDA Soil Conservation Service is attached (Figure 4). Wetlands were marked in the field with a
combination of white and red survey tape.
STREAMS
Based on our observations at the site, three first order stream channels are located within the property
limits. One intermittent stream channel originates at a head cut on-site in the central portion of the
property. The stream flows approximately 1,250 feet to the western property boundary. A second
intermittent stream channel drains to the west from an origin approximately 350 feet inside the property.
The third stream channel appears to be perennial and flows approximately 700 feet to the northern
property boundary.
Surface waters at the site are within the watershed of Panther Creek. Panther Creek flows into Jordan
Lake and the Haw River. These watersheds are within the Cape Fear River Basin. Based on the North
Carolina Administration Code (I SA NCAC 213 .0300), Panther Creek and its tributaries are classified as
WSdV waters intended for water supply purposes and are nutrient sensitive waters. The state currently
has no buffer requirements for these surface waters. Surface waters at the site would be considered
jurisdictional "Waters of the United States" regulated under Section 404 and Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. Section 404 is administered by the USAGE. Section 401 is administered by the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality (DWQ). These
programs regulate the discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States," and ensure
State Water Quality Standards are maintained. Any impacts to the streams may require permitting.
Impacts may include such activities as placing fill within the stream banks, temporary or permanent
stream crossings, or re-routing or piping the stream channels.
The Town of Cary, North Carolina Land Development Ordinance (LDO) Section 7.3.2(A) requires the
following stream buffers:
1. All perennial and intermittent streams, including lakes, ponds, and other bodies of water as
indicated on the most recent version of the 1:20,000 scale (7.5 minutes) quadrangle topographic
maps prepared by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) shall have a 100-foot-wide
riparian buffer directly adjacent to such surface waters, excluding wetlands.
2. All other surface waters as indicated by the most recent version of the Soil Survey of
Wake or Chatham County, North Carolina, shall have a 50-foot-wide riparian buffer
adjacent to such waters.
'I7u£.r A FW3Pv?iRt:?i COVS1ITAWX 1.V Page 2
.
Mr. Chad Howard Taylor Wiseman & Taylor October 31, 2006
87.4cre Revued E22 Wake Couiuy School Site, Cary, Wake County, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 032-04-165
Based on review of the Green Level USGS Quadrangle (Figure 5), Panther Creek and the unnamed
tributary to Panther Creek west of the site would be subject to the 100 foot buffer. The 100 foot buffer
would likely extend onto the property from portions of the stream located along the western boundary of
the site. In addition, a 100 foot buffer may extend onto the northeast corner of the property adjacent to
Panther Creek (Figure 3).
Based on review of Sheet 45 of the Soil Survey of Wake County (Figure 4), North Carolina, portions of
four streams are mapped at the property. However, our field reconnaissance indicates that portions of
three of the streams mapped in the soil survey are present at the site. The site was visited with Mr. Matt
Flynn of the Town of Cary Engineering Department on October 12, 2006 to confirm the results of our
field reconnaissance since it conflicted with the soil survey map. Based on the Town of Cary LDO, a 50
foot buffer would extend from the top of the stream banks (both sides of stream) for each of the streams
within the property boundaries shown on Figure 3.
CLOSURE
Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be of service during this phase of
your project. Please contact Chris Hay if you have any questions concerning the content of this letter.
Sincerely,
TRiGON ENGiNEERiNG CONSULTANTS, INC.
4
Ch Y, E.I.
Natural Resourc Department Manager
Stewart, P.G.
Regist Geologist
CWWJMS:mes
Attachments
t: W4.70 prtgecrsQ006V 6J14Z06165 doc
THU.nvR:H;nF?,c cars+?tr?.ti?r:r, 1u'
Page

41
I? ? ? t'? ?i •1«r l'1?? ?"a ,fl??I fi`f t ?+e?it ,,,
T 1
.-F
_-t1 e ,a.«y,? ?? 4..•._ t? .'_
. it tct?•,,?'.r,• (T( _ 4
r
fr+ar # j ? .1 4 09"
?. f
ls? /- t
7 \•` ,
1 1f ! . ?Drti h'?SV RAVE ^.,AME r-AND
..+ I Ff.? »
1 1 F
Im"
- Fz.
Site
4- \41 "I
-16
•4 t '? ? 9jj
?. .r t l ' xFh'f?,',1:)tltis,tJ r,?"` of
z
j ff 7 q
.. ? \ ?? ley _ _. ' _ ?? - 7 '???1 y ?'?? •? ? ? ` i i ? i? `
=t -
.?
?p
1 r } sc•....... i s?.rac?rh 4 S: ,! t i - - !""pr(V
f, ?r,x ? ? ?` t s
a ? • ?' , ?s ? ?rqy. _ - rStA11 ,rtxy?. ??? « ? ? ? ^? {" ? ' ? p ? _
NEW?NC?P?L,AMF,LA?YD r'? ??• x ? ?? ? ?`:?.? ?? iJ ;?
I' t .rte 4bs
yid
... ', .. -r f,,,..;?.....,.? '.,? ?rwcC+u.+exw ?. l .? a.- wn. • _.._-- ?Y.
e ?
x
"twt.'t" / Od ? 7
s
l ,
1
'XI
e t ''?v s y 7 -'
8•- #•a
„ SCALE: DATE: APPROVED BY: ??g? SOURCE:
1"=2,000' 09/26/06 LV.A USGS
7A& 87 ACRE REVISED E22 WAKF, COUNTY SCHOOL SITE
CARY, WAKE COUNTY,' NORTH CAROLINA
ITIVGoril TRIGON PROJECT NO. 0424)&165
Trigon FrtgincenrtgCoosultanu Inc_ SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE
13 Callinutic Dairy Road
OccnAmo,NeithCatolrun 27409 ?

I
CON?
Trigon Engineering Consui,anrs. Inc
313 Galiivaore Dam Road
Greensboro, Nonh C arolina 274010
SCALE: )ATE: APPROVED BY: _ SOURCE: WAKE
NO SCALE 09!26/06 COUNTY GIS
87 ACRE REVISED E22 WAKE: COUNTY SCHOOL SITE
CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TRIGON PROJECT NO. 042-06-165
1999 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
FIGL HE
2

TOTAL SURVEY AREA (#1 & #2) = 87 ACRES +/-
, / _/ ,?. _ - •` ? ,fit
ti
r W N ?. ? \\\? \
1\
...--? ? jt)f r r ? ? ?.' "..? ?/,t?J? .r,,,+' r ?-t'? ; /? `, i ?•-/' ?is ?`?? t ; ? !` jt
7
-; r'SURVEY
1 i?; \?\} t l i j?El r ( EC.!tCx?
IAN
? f / mss- `yam i f'*?-'j ".ter' fj?'`?:`. °? ?+ fir, %f / `{ ?4, •. ???
Ak'`?1,?, +// / ' - ?-i`' ?.Tc? _ ? taazafrrrrr?? !l r??? . "r
t `i t
. 1 ,
400 aw
- r,
? SCALE 1 400 +l- ? ;- ??? ? ?t?? { t ? ?tfF 'ti i?r?'"?^
SCALE: DATE: APPROVED BY: SOURCE: TAYLOR
AS SHOWN "!26!06 c WISEAL3.N & 'rAVLOR
87 ACRE REVISED E22 WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL SITE
CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
? ON TRIGON PROJECT NO. 042-06-165
TrigcmEngineeringConsultants,inc. SITE SURVEY NAP FIC:URE
313 Gallitnnre Dairy q xad
Greensboro, Nornh Carolina '_7,169 3

r/4,
? r
!t'csi
s.
?.r GYBE
KsE
sC2 `
ws(°
F
1ks%7
$? `Crtf i?
W. c
I &M 41,
`i f ??? c•rr ? esr".?
WsE .? J N, •?A
r i
f rE ft? t ? .
Vol

Ai'& 7_7 F
i+14 F• I _ti qqq{.1. l:? W I i? LYsi.. j ?- \? ' R f
y ?
OK,
c,fo
UP'
. 'f
ri ? \? ? vYsCY ? '
WtE
}z .t wsC2 wsC2 ?'?r ??\ ,?s, r t'yy ,? ? 1 f ? 1 .
R i n;` < a?? \•}\?, 1 ??- -??-f ?C„ ` ??'r..-i t? ' Cr[i2 c(Q2
SOURCE: LSD % SCNL
SCAI.F.: DATE: APPROVED BV:
1 I"=2,(NIII' l b;tlf? I L,+ruNl _T CONSERVATION SERVICE
87 ACRE REVISED E22 WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL SITE
CARY, \%-AKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
17Aj
.,RIGIN; I-RIGON PROJECT NO.042-Oh-165
Tngon Fnginccnnc, 4L on;uliwts, in` HG I RE
313 Crdlirr„re Uw?n Road SOIL SURVEY N'IAP 4
Greenshom, Nvnh C-at.:in.j _741.0
0171 K. .`?_
'WsE ? r
r lrL,'
/ V. E
\V\n?.w
w
wngr• .?C?c
_A..p 1
C
fJ)

ft
. 0
0.1 0.?. 0.3 0.4 0.5 ni

SCALE: DATE: APPROVED BY: SOURCE:
AS SHOWN 09/26106 CL';? TOPOZONF-COM
87 ACRE REVISE:I) E22 WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL SITE
CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
rTRIGON PROJECT NO. 042-06-165
TRIG
Tngcm Engineering Consultmu. Inc USGS GREEN LEVEL, NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLE FIGURE
313 Gallimore Dair Egad 5
4reensboro, North Carolina 27409 `

1--
stem
?.1111?t . `?'117?11.?
PROOPAM
April 16, 2007
Timothy Driscoll
Wake County Public School System
1551 Rock Quarry Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Project: E-22 Elementary Access Road County: Wake
This letter replaces one previously issued dated April 4, 2007. The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept payment for impacts associated with the above
referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will be approved by the permit issuing
agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if
payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permitt401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.neeep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
Cape Fear
03030002 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 259 0.491 0 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 518 1.0 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
Wi - D. Gilmore,
Director
*ilo-o &I
PE
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jamie Shem, USACE-Raleigh
Cynthia Van Der Weile, DWQ-Raleigh
Christopher Burkhardt, agent
File
Ra toring... Ex""... 'Prot" OGGY Stu&
HCDM
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
It.
Addendum to the Pre-Construction Notification and "Buffer Rules" Application Required for
Projects Submitted Under the
"Express Review Program"
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Version 5.0
October 1, 2006
Email Address: 401 [e-mail]
Purpose: To provide a detailed explanation of the information required by the Division of Water Quality
in order to expedite the review of applications for 401 General Water Quality Certifications, Isolated
Wetland Permits, Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plans and Riparian Buffer Approvals (Please Note: do
not leave any questions unanswered or use terms such as "N/A" without an explanation).
Fees:
401 Water Quality Certifications
Riparian Buffer Authorization:
Riparian Buffer Minor Variance:
Coastal General "Major Variance"
Isolated Wetland Permit:
Major (>/= 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $2,000.00
Minor (< 150' stream or < 1 acre wetlands) $1,000.00
(exclusively or "in addition" to) $2,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
General $1,000.00
Please read the entire document before attempting to determine the proper fee. Fees are additive for
particular projects.
Things to keep in mind when filling out the application:
A specific answer must be provided for each question. For instance, if a numerical answer is requested
then a numerical answer must be provided along with the supporting information necessary for DWQ staff
to verify that the number is accurate. Likewise, if explanations are presented to justify certain responses,
the explanations must be completely supported by documentation. DWQ staff cannot assume that
unsupported or undocumented information is accurate. "N/A" is not an acceptable answer for any
question since the DWQ Staff reviewing the application must have an opportunity to determine whether or
not any requested information is pertinent.
All forms, guidance, worksheets, applications, etc. used must be the current versions as posted on our
web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The Express Review Program website can be found at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/express_review.htm. Please note that it will be responsibility of the
applicant or the applicant's consultant to verify that the current versions are used. The versions posted
on our web site will be considered to be the current versions.
You are a very important part of the success of this program, if you have suggestions or clarifications
please send your comments to the Wetlands/401 Unit of the DWQ (via email at
401 [e-mail]).
Filling Out the Pre-Construction Notification Application:
The Corps of Engineers (USACE)/DWQ official, joint Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
must be used as a basis for the expedited review process. The completed application should be
presented first and the supporting information tabbed and collated in the same order. Using a custom
format is not recommended. The open squares 0 are checklist items. The following items correspond to
the numbering system on the Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN):
IMPORTANT: USE CHECK BOXES TO TRACK PROJECT INFORMATION!!
t
2
SECTION 1. PROCESSING
Ivf 1 & 2.The USACE determines which Nationwide, Regional, or General Permit is
required. If you have verified with the USACE which permit they intend to use for
your project or if you already have written approval from the USACE, please
indicate by adding "verified" or "verified, attached", respectively, in the blank next
to the Permit number requested.
? Attach the USACE Approval if you have it.
X 3. It is not anticipated that the expedited process will be requested for this situation.
Me 4. If you propose to impact 150 feet or more of perennial stream or 1 acre or more
of wetland and onsite mitigation is not proposed, it is recommended that you
either locate an acceptable private bank with available credits (with
documentation to show that the bank can and shall provide the credits needed)
or obtain approval from the EEP for the entire amount of stream and or wetland
as DWQ will make the final determination as to whether or not mitigation applies.
A complete Express application is not considered received unless an EEP
approval letter is attached if mitigation is requested through EEP. Please note
that the USACE may have different mitigation requirements and thresholds.
N/A ? 5. State whether your project will require a CAMA Minor, Major or General Permit
and give the status of the permit.
SECTION II - APPLICATION INFORMATION
1. 15 NCAC 2H.502(t) reads as follows: "Who Must Sign Applications. The application
shall be considered a "valid application" only if the application bears the signature of a
responsible officer of the company, municipal official, partner or owner. This signature
certifies that the applicant has title to the property, has been authorized by the owner to
apply for certification or is a public entity and has the power of eminent domain. Said
official in signing the application shall also certify that all information contained therein
or in support thereof is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge."
me Please indicate how the applicant meets the above definition and provide
supporting documentation.
Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax
number and email address.
2. If the application is not signed by the applicant, please attach the agent authorization
letter. The applicant must sign the agent authorization letter. The applicant's name
and position must also be spelled out as many signatures are difficult to read.
3. Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax number and
email address.
SECTION III - PROJECT INFORMATION
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the
information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the
types of pertinent information required at a minimum:

3
Maps and Plans:
I' The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map- Please cleanly
delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the
features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the
quadrangle name. You can go to the USGS web site (http://mac.usgs.gov/maplists/) to
verify the most recent version.
LEI The most recent version of the NRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within
the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman Lake Watershed and the
Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) - Please cleanly delineate the
site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is
recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the page or map number
from which the copy of the map was made. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil
survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS County Office
(http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/). GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the
property and project on the map. Please indicate north and scale. Please include
applicable road names or State Road numbers.
Cr The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide
full sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
e Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet must be scaled and
include all jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features,
State regulated buffers, topographic contours with elevations, approximate extent
and nature of forest, field, landscaping, or other cover. Any existing structures and
impervious area must be shown. Existing utility lines and easements must be
shown. Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features must be shown. North
arrow and the scale must be shown. Please note that the impact boundaries on the
maps should correspond to the flagged impact boundaries in the field.
Le Proposed conditions - These sheets must be scaled and show all existing
jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State
regulated buffers (delineated into Zone 1 and Zone 2) must be underlain on the site
plan(s). The plans must show all built-out structures and impervious cover. The
plans must include the final grading contours with elevations. The plans must
indicate all utilities and easements. It is likely that several versions of the final built-
out site plans will be necessary.
ie Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must be included. The plans should include
the locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the collection system and
drainage ways. All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations.
Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and
policies. In certain cases, final stormwater management plans must also be
provided, but that will be addressed later in this document.
l? Plats - The plans must show the location and layout of all sub-divided parcels with
lot identifications. Platted parcels must be developable without further impacts to
iurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State
regulated buffers.
e Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland,
stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on
the site plans. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will
be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated.
I
4
Wetland Impacts (on the site plan):
Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and
any clearing must be specified.
N/A ii All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars. Construction
detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
l? Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
Lr When surface drainage features or groundwater recharge areas that feed or would
reasonably feed wetlands that are not to be filled are made impervious, it may be
necessary to direct some stormwater runoff to those areas in order to maintain hydrology.
You must identify these areas and address them. Supporting explanations and discharge
information must be provided to show that the wetland would not be eroded or receive
too much or too little hydrology. In many cases this could help satisfy part of a
stormwater management plan.
L? Flooding
LEI Draining
Stream Impacts:
I? Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks
of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be
impacted.
Culverting:
The inlet and the outlet of the culvert should be aligned with the stream as much as
possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should be indicated.
N/A? Any widening of the stream must be shown with elevations.
The extent of and plan details for all dissipation or grade control devices should be shown
with pertinent elevations.
For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a longitudinal cross section that
shows the stream bed invert at the inlet and outlet, the existing stream bank elevations
and the invert of the inlet and outlet of the pipe(s) must be provided.
I? For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a vertical cross section must be
provided that shows the stream cross section at the inlet and outlet overlain with the
culvert and fill cross section.
N/A? For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that
shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross
section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the
edge of each footer to each stream bank.
N/A? For bottomless culverts or other spans, a plan view must be provided that shows the
location of the spans and the stream banks.
Lvj For longer culverts or culverts that will pass beneath substantial impervious cover, it will
be necessary to provide adequate plan detail to show that discharge velocity/energy will
be adequately dissipated.
Lr cross section details must be provided showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
Aquatic life passage through culverts is typically achieved by placing the invert of the
culvert below the existing bed of the stream per the USACE or North Carolina Wildlife
Resource Commission guidelines. Other methods such as baffles may also be used.
Please be aware that such placement may require the use of grade/velocity control
measures up or down stream of culverts on steeper streams to prevent head-cuts or
streambed erosion. The culvert placement relative to the streambed can be indicated on
the longitudinal profile. Grade and velocity control measures must be indicated on the
plan view and typical designs should be provided.
l? Multiple culverts, wide culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills,
off-setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to
maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the
culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section
including the stream flood-prone area.
N/A? Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated
with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of
stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated.
Stream Relocations: NIA
? Stream relocations must be conducted as specified in General Certification numbers
3402 and 3404 (available on the Wetlands Unit web site). Stream relocation plans must
include:
? Morphological measurements (see Appendix B of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina available on the Wetlands Unit web site) - not all of the
measurements are applicable in every instance.
? Typical stream cross sections - Typically, a riffle cross section and a pool cross section
that includes the entire flood prone area. The bankfull and flood prone area elevations
should be indicated. Similarly, a riffle cross section of the reference stream(s) should be
provided.
? Plan view - Provide scaled plans that show the location of the proposed (preferably with
stationing) and the existing stream. In most instances, the bankfull contours and flood
prone area contours, in stream structures, bank revetments/stabilization, channel plugs,
planting plan, vegetation conditions, stormwater outlets, grade controls, bridges, culverts,
sewer lines, roads, fencing, and easement lines should also be provided.
? Longitudinal Stream Profile - A scaled profile that indicates the thalweg, bankfull, and top
of bank elevations should be provided for the design and reference streams. In many
cases, it will also be necessary to show the existing land elevations for the design
stream.
? Planting Plan - A planting and/or vegetation management plan should also be provided
that makes use of appropriate native vegetation. The plan should indicate the extent,
density, and species of plants to be provided.
? In-stream structure, bank revetment/stabilization, and stormwater outlet typicals -
Detailed, typical plans should be provided for all in stream structures, bank revetments or
stabilization, and stormwater outlets. The typicals should include materials and
specifications as well as relative lengths, positions, and angles.
? Sediment transport analysis - A sediment transport analysis should be provided based
on the current, relevant, accepted practices. The sediment transport analysis should be
relevant to the streambed load type and should predict bed load transport equilibrium.

6
? Permanent conservation easement or similar means of protection must also be provided.
Other Information:
1. The project should always be referred to by this name in all correspondence as well
as the DWQ # once it is provided.
N/A? 2. This only applies to DOT projects, which are not expected to utilize the Express
Review Program.
If 3. This should be the size of the project as identified by the USACE for 404 Permits or
by the Division of Water Quality for Buffer Approvals and Isolated Wetland Permits.
e 4. Please provide the name (as depicted on the USGS topographic map and DWQ
Stream Classification Lists) of the nearest water body(ies) to which your project is a
tributary to (e.g. "Neuse River (Falls Lake below normal pool elevation)"). (Do not
simple state "stream", "river", "ocean", "sound" or "lake".) Please provide the "stream
index number" of the named water body or water body section (e.g. "27-(1)"). Also,
please provide the full water quality classification (e.g. "WS-IV NSW CA") of the water
body. This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.htmi.
l? 5. Please state which river basin and sub-basin that your project is in (e.g. "Neuse River
Basin, NEU01"). This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB.htm1.
6. Conditions should also be indicated on the existing site plan where applicable.
Photos (including aerial photos) can be helpful in describing the existing conditions.
7. You must provide an attachment that explicitly describes what the proposed project
will entail from the planning stage to final construction.
L? 8. This can be a simple explanation, but it is critically important because the purpose
dictates how the no practical alternatives are reviewed.
SECTION IV - PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
N/A? Please include copies of all 401 Water Quality Certifications, Isolated Wetland
Permits, Buffer Approvals, USACE Permits, CAMA Permits for the site as well as a
copy of the final approved, site plan.
SECTION V - FUTURE PROJECT PLANS
e For projects utilizing the express review process, all impacts both present and
potential future must be indicated. For instance, the location or configuration of
platted lots sometimes suggests that future impacts will be necessary to build,
access, or otherwise develop such lots. Failure to account for such potential impacts
could delay or disqualify a project from the rapid review process. If you believe that
the lot can be developed without impacts, but you anticipate that your assertion may
be questioned, it is recommended that you provide a potential building foot print
and/or grading plan to show that future impacts could be avoided.
SECTION VI - PROPOSED IMPACTS TO WATER OF THE US
L? 1. It is recommended that the individual impacts be described if there are special things
to note about the impacts. Typically the most important thing is to have detailed
accurate site plans as described above. Please make sure they are clearly labeled.
e Please include all proposed temporary impacts.

7
? Also, a current, signed delineation map from the USACE should be provided (if
available) and a map locating the stream origins signed by the appropriate DWQ
Staff must be provided if applicable.
2. Each impact to a wetland must be clearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The
type of impact must be clearly stated. If the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please list
any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. If there is any doubt,
it is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams. Please follow current DWQ
policy with respect to whether a stream is perennial or not. It is recommended that
you assume that a stream is perennial (unless you are positive that it is not) so if
mitigation is required then the appropriate amount of mitigation would be anticipated
or requested from the EEP or private bank. If the EEP or private bank has pre-
approved too short of an amount of stream or if inadequate mitigation is proposed,
then that situation will result in delays.
Mr 3. Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a feature is a modified natural channel
or a ditch, especially in the eastern part of the State. Soils, drainage features,
topography, macroinvertebrates, and similar factors, all are important for making that
determination.
4. Other items to address not specifically requested in the application include
downstream sediment starvation, thermal pollution, low flow releases from dams, and
aquatic life passage. Other important considerations are buffer reestablishment or
mitigation around ponds on buffered streams. The site plan should include the
precise elevation contour of the normal pool as well as the dam footprint. Mitigation
is required for wetland flooding of an acre or greater and for stream fill (if over the
150 foot threshold) under the dam footprint and any outlet stabilization.
SECTION VII - AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization are critical aspects of an application particularly if you desire the application
to be processed expeditiously. The following is a checklist of avoidance and minimization questions that
DWQ Staff often look for in applications.
no o Are there any stream crossings at angles less than 75° or greater than 105°?
no? Are there any stream crossings that cross two streams above or at the confluence of those
streams?
no? Are there any stream, wetland, water, and/or buffer impacts other than perpendicular road
crossing near the edges of the property?
no? Can the stream be relocated as a natural channel design as opposed to culverted or
otherwise filled?
no? Is any single stream crossed more than once?
noo Can property access routes be moved or reduced to avoid stream, wetland, water, and
buffer impacts?
noo Can a building, parking lot, etc. be realigned to avoid impacts?
no? Can the site layout be reconfigured to avoid impacts?
no ? Can headwalls or steeper side slopes be used to avoid/minimize impacts?

8
n0? Can a retaining wall be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
N/A? Can cul de sacs be used in place of a crossing?
WAD Can lots be reshaped or have shared driveways to avoid impacts?
If based solely on the practicable physical possibility, the answer is "yes" to any of the above questions
then you must have to provide substantial and convincing justification as to why the impacts are
necessary. If the impacts are required by a local government or other agency, the claim must be
supported with appropriate written documentation from the local government or other agency. Most
projects typically involve the need to justify avoidance and minimization. If this information is not readily
available, then the express review process may not be the appropriate venue to use. Providing
alternative plans (such as plans that avoid the impact, minimize the impact and the preferred plan, similar
to those used in environmental assessments) and explanations as to why the preferred plan is needed
and why the alternative plans won't work are many times helpful in the no practical alternatives review.
SECTION VIII - MITIGATION
Mitigation for the Express Review Program, final mitigation plans must be presented up front. The final
plans (except for plans that propose payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund, private mitigation banks, or similar banking instruments) must contain detailed
plans, specifications, calculations and other supporting data that show that the appropriate mitigation will
be achieved at the ratios required. The design plans must be developed to at least the "90W level.
Monitoring plans must be final and specific. Any means of permanent protection, such as a permanent
conservation easement must be provided. If you elect to use the EEP or a private mitigation bank, it is
recommended that you request the maximum possible mitigation amount that DWQ may require so that
you will not have to get further approval from them on short notice. The EEP and private banks are not
part of the expedited review process and cannot be expected to meet any such deadlines. There will be
no conditional expedited approvals that require final plans at a later date. It is not recommended that
innovative mitigation techniques or greater than 10% preservation be requested as part of an expedited
process.
SECTION IX
If your project requires the preparation of an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA and an
approval letter has not been issued by the State Clearinghouse, then you cannot apply under the
expedited review process. It is your responsibility to find out if such documentation is required.
SECTION X
There are many aspects of the Buffer Rules that must be addressed in every application, if applicable.
The first and most important thing to keep in mind is that allowable activities that require written Approval
from DWQ triggers a review of the entire project for compliance with the Buffer Rules.
Diffuse Flow & Stormwater Management:
The most common issues that arise involve the requirement for diffuse flow of stormwater
through riparian buffers. Basically one of three things must be indicated in regards to all
"new" stormwater that is collected and subsequently discharged. First, provisions for
diffuse flow through the protected buffer must be made. This usually involves the use of
level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ guidance on level spreader design,
which is available on our web site. Please keep in mind that it does not matter how far a
discharge point is from a buffer. The stormwater must be flowing in a diffuse manner at
whatever point it eventually reaches the buffer. If the stormwater will not be flowing in a
diffuse manner through the protected buffer at the point it reaches the buffer, then one of
the following options may be allowed:
go You may provide a nitrogen removing measure such as a forested filter strip,
grassed swale, stormwater wetland, etc. The measure employed should be
At
designed according to the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual or other DWQ Guidance available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/regcert.htmi. After the nitrogen is treated, the
stormwater can be directly conveyed through the buffer with written DWQ approval.
WAD You may discharge the stormwater to an existing man-made conveyance that
currently conveys stormwater through the protected buffer (assuming the
conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Rules) as long as that
conveyance does not need to be altered to convey the flow. Please remember that
there are no other choices. The following checklist is intended to help insure that
your application will not be deemed incomplete as a result of improper stormwater
design.
Stormwater Management (for Buffer Rules compliance only - Also, see Section XI):
N/A? All stormwater out-falls must be clearly shown and labeled on the site plan for projects in
Buffered watersheds. List each out-fall as labeled:
? Option 1: Level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ Guidance, and
devices that merely control velocity but do not provide diffuse flow such as rip rap
dissipators are not proposed. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site
plan and provide a DWQ worksheet available at
http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands/regcert. html:
? Option 2: Nitrogen removing measures designed to DWQ Standards are
proposed for discharges for which diffuse flow through a protected Buffer cannot be
met. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site plan and provide a DWQ
worksheet available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/regcert.html
? Option 3: The stormwater will be discharged to an existing man-made (not
including modified natural channels) conveyance that carries the stormwater
through the Buffer. The conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Buffer
Rules. List each out-fall as labeled:
? All stormwater out-fall must meet one of the options above. (Note: if you cannot check this
box your application will likely not be accepted into the express review process.)
Site Plans:
N/A? All applications on properties with DWQ protected buffers must clearly depict the buffers
and any impacts to the buffers on the site plans. The impact maps should clearly depict
both zones of the protected buffers and the proposed impact areas (provided in square
feet).
Surface Water & Buffer Delineations:
N/A? Any surface waters subject to DWQ protected buffers must be field located and accurately
depicted on the site plans and impact maps. The width, dimensions and pattern of the
surface water must be delineated. The surface water location must not be taken simply
from a USGS map, soil survey or local municipality's map. The buffers must be measured
from the surface water as required within the applicable buffer protection rule (e.g., all
buffers along streams subject to the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules must be
measured from the "top-of-bank" of the stream and not the centerline of the stream). All
streams must be surveyed or located by GPS and shown precisely on the site plans.
Impact Table:

10
N/A? Please provide additional impact tables that clearly state the area of impact for each
corresponding impact site.
Variances:
N/A? Projects that require a Major and/or "General" Variance will not be eligible for the use of the
Express Review Program (with the exception of the Coastal General "Major" Variance.
Mitigation:
N/A? As opposed to applications that are submitted under our regular process, final mitigation
plans must be presented up front (see requirements for Section VIII above). The mitigation
plans must comply with the applicable buffer mitigation rule.
SECTION XI - STORMWATER
Please provide the following information in regards to potential stormwater requirements:
The total acreage of the site. 15.84 (acres)
L? The total built-out impervious acreage 4.33 (acres)
I? The total area that will be disturbed 8.26 (acres)
If the total area exceeds 20% imperviousness, the development on the site is uniform in
density, and you claim that the total impervious area is less than 30%, you must provide a
complete, detailed breakdown of the assumed built-out conditions. The breakdown must
be detailed enough to show that all potential impervious areas are accounted for.
N/A? If there are concentrated areas of development such as multi-family, commercial, cluster,
club houses, etc. that exceed 30% imperviousness and the total imperviousness for the site
does not exceed 30%, a stormwater management plan will likely be required for those
areas that exceed 30% imperviousness.
Ir Stormwater management plans must be complete with a final design and an executed
Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There will be no conditional stormwater approvals
for the express review process that allow for approval of the final plans at a later date.
Worksheets must be provided that are available at
hftp://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.htm1.
SECTION XII - SEWAGE DISPOSAL
if Response must be clear and detailed. Any disposal method that suggests further impacts
may be required other than those shown must be clearly addressed on the site plans.
SECTION XIII
L? Answering yes to either of these responses automatically precludes you from the express
review process.
SECTION XIV - SIGNATURE
if The name, position and/or title of the applicant must be in type or long hand script here with
the signature. It should be the same person as described in Part II.
If you have any questions about these requirements, please email the Express Review Program at
[e-mail] and include your question and phone number and the appropriate staff will
respond as soon as possible.

A
SINCE
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC
GEOTECHNICAL • ENVIRONMENTAL • MATERIALS
ENGINEERS • LABORATORIES
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
310 Hubert Street
$ $ Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
April 13, 2007
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Express Permit Review
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250,
Raleigh, NC 27604
Attn: Cynthia Van Der Wiele
Re: Written Verification for use of NWP No. 39
Mills Park Drive (E-22 Elementary School Access Road)
Cary, North Carolina
F&R Project No. G66-273GE
Dear Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele:
Froehling & Robertson, Inc., (F&R) has been contracted by Wake County Public School System
to provide wetland and stream consulting services for the proposed Mills Park Drive (E-22
Access Road) project site. F&R is submitting this letter as written verification that the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) will accept Nation Wide Permit (NWP) No. 39 for this project in
response to your request for more information.
The project site is located in Cary, Wake County approximately 4,000 feet south of the
intersection of Green Level Road and Durham Road in Cary, North Carolina. The project site
will impact approximately 0.491 acres of wetlands and an unnamed tributary of Panther Creek,
which is located in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit Number 03030002.
The initial Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) listed approximately 425 linear feet (LF) of
stream impacts for one primary channel and one secondary channel of a braded stream network.
The stream impact threshold for NWP No. 39 is 300 LF. On Tuesday, March 27, 2007 F&R met
with James Shern, field representative for the USACE, at the project site. Mr. Shern confirmed
that the secondary channel is an un-import channel thereby reducing stream impacts to 259 LF of
important channel. Mr. Shern gave verbal confirmation that the USACE would accept NWP No.
39 for this project.
HEADQUARTERS: 3015 DUMBARTON ROAD • BOX 27524 • RICHMOND, VA 23261-7524
TELEPHONE [phone] • FAX [phone] • www.FandR.com
BRANCHES: ASHEVILLE, NC • BALTIMORE, MD CHARLOTTE, NC • CHESAPEAKE, VA
CROZET, VA • FAYETTEVILLE, NC FREDERICKSBURG, VA
GREENVILLE, SC • HICKORY, NC • RALEIGH, NC • ROANOKE, VA 9 STERLING, VA
` x
4
si.cc
f
un
If you have any questions/comments or require further information, please do not hesitate to
contact us at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Christopher J. Burkhardt
Project Manager
Mills Park Drive (E-22 Access Road) 2 April 13, 2007
Cary, North Carolina F&R Project No. G66-273GE

46
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WAKE COUNTY - MILLS PARK ELEMENTARY
Pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. § 113A-1,
et seq.), an environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared by Wake County for the construction
of Mills Park Elementary School and a public park in Cary. The County is proposing to build a 3-
story, 101,000 square foot building and associated roads, landscaping, parking, and athletic fields,
which will impact approximately 20 acres of a 239 acre site. The remaining 186 acres will be
utilized for the park.
Impacts to topography and floodplains are not expected to be significant. Grading the site and the
construction of temporary access roads will affect site soils. DENR-approved sediment and erosion
control plans will be obtain prior to construction to limit excessive silt and sediment loadings to
streams. Also, a stormwater plan for the site has been submitted to DWQ to prevent excessive
runoff from the site; stormwater will not be discharge directly into surface waters. Wetland and
stream impacts have been reduced by project planning and design; one wetland, one stream, and one
unimportant channel will be crossed. Crossings will incorporate culverts to maintain the natural
hydrology of the stream and prevent constriction of the floodway. 100-foot wide riparian buffers
will be maintained along streams. All federal and state permits will be obtained prior to
construction. Mitigation for jurisdictional impacts will be through payments to the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Emissions from construction vehicles may result in minor localized air
quality impacts. Frequent wetting of disturbed soils and prompt soil stabilization should minimize
air quality impacts. Open burning of construction debris is not proposed. Nuisance noise
associated with project construction will be limited to daylight hours on normal workweek days.
Approximately 9 acres will be cleared for construction, with efforts made to preserve older and
larger trees. Also, grubbing will not be allowed under the tree canopy. While wildlife may be
displaced during construction, it is anticipated that species will return once noise associated with
construction is complete.
The proposed project will not impact prime or unique agricultural lands; any public, scenic,
recreational, or state park areas; or areas of archaeological or historical value.
This project will not result in secondary and cumulative impacts.
Based on the findings of the EA, the impact avoidance/mitigation measures contained therein, and
reviewed by governmental agencies, the Division of Water Quality has concluded that the proposed
project will not result in significant impacts to the environment. This EA and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) are prerequisites for the issuance of Division of Water Quality permits
necessary for the project's construction. An Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared
for this project. This FONSI completes the environmental review record, which is available for
inspection at the State Clearinghouse.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
I8 May 2007

lWia eme nt
PROGRAM
April 16, 2007
Timothy Driscoll
Wake County Public School System
1551 Rock Quarry Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Project: E-22 Elementary Access Road County: Wake
This letter replaces one previously issued dated April 4, 2007. The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept payment for impacts associated with the above
referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will be approved by the permit issuing
agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if
payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. N we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Perm1t1401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
Cape Fear
03030002 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 259 0.491 0 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 518 1.0 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
Wi ' D. Gilmore,
Director

PE
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jamie Shern, USACE-Raleigh
Cynthia Van Der Weile, DWQ-Raleigh
Christopher Burkhardt, agent
File _
kutoru-1?5 ... EKha"... Pro", Ou,Y Ster&
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715.0476 / www.nceep.net
lorz
DWQ Project No. Q W Q E-,<,O 407- 05P3
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: E -zz F L,Erti6rlT??,(Ly Sc-r}?o ?--
Contact Person: 71"4QT:44 i 1_Z rm,r Phone Number: (9,e) 5o8 - ! pc4
For projects with multiple basins, specity which basin this worksheet applies to: ro - ad.:PA'_4 P-ox i b,9 t r 1
Permanent Pool Elevation :310: 6e> ft.
Temporary Pool Elevation 3)1,00 ft.
Bioretention Surface Area zo 10 37 sq. ft.
Drainage Area, 14. 3 Z ac.
Impervious Area S (07 ac.
Rational C Coefficient 0. 59
Size % S %
Inlet Velocity (? S fps
Inlet flow depth L Co in
Depth to Ground Water Co ft.
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate 1 I Z in./hr.
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate O, S in./hr.
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(either 5% in w/sand under drain or 7% in w/o)
(the soil layer down to 4 feet)
(the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed) Jq,_04
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Practices Manual, April 1999)
Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
i4m D Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
KMP An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
1 L M t"..4 Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Applicants Initials
16-M r;> No vertical sand bed is proposed
I?v?D The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet.
lh Sheet flow is provided at inlet.
M 0 Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
Lm D Minimum of 6" ponding is provided.
km ,D The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
k-?4n Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 in/hr.
I1-M.r.;> The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 in/hr.
ILMD A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
IL-M D Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains

DWQ Project No. D w Q r,,.rP yJ0 07- D573
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name :
Contact Person: Phone Number. (y,?) Sog _qQ1 ,
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to:
Permanent Pool Elevation ;Z Z , yp ff
Temporary Pool Elevation 37_3,CO ft
Bioretention Surface Area -7 sq ft
Drainage Area 7-195- ac

Impervious Area
h 91 .
ac

Rational C Coefficient
p , ?3 .
Size %
S
%
Inlet Velocity 5_1 Z fps
Inlet flow depth < Co in
Depth to Ground Water Z 5- ft

Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
I z_ .
in./hr.
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate in./hr.
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(on-site and off--site drainage to the basin)
(either 5% in w/sand under drain or 7% in w(o)
(the soil layer down to 4 feet)
(the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been, met..and supporting documentation is attached. if a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials _
) (, M D No vertical sand bed is proposed
Lm A The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet.
1 w1 0 Sheet flow is provided at inlet.
w^ Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
D Minimum of 6" ponding is provided.
lw? 0 The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
IZ-A 6 Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 in/hr.
14A 0 The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 in/hr.
14,M-O A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
14AA 0 Mulch layer is specified in plans.
't Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
)O Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
14AO Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
)? ? An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
i
C A&C . 5 ZGl c?'7
ti
?- 1,71 c
;I s
t?
?.
i
t ??c
, rf
17
?L
?, - - 49, 4 Cry
T
-14
-14I-,a4 p4r- -ov-%=---
;1

------- -._
-- _..---------
. 3 I+ TIL
------ - --------
. I t - ?'t

Zc. C . -1,sl

.y

:' I
.;I
- 61
?i
=,l
t.
_ a
is -
=mot ,o
3
?4
_. -- -- - -- 'c' ,? .3 0 _ = /-I Ae-ru At -- ? ?a w ???? l? m n?,? ?i s a • .?t ,?s ?
s F-

C4--s I
3

M'-> 1,4-, - ri + /
---- -:III P? zZ
t
13
3cp
----- - ------ - ---
}
i?
Channel Report
Hydraftow Express by Intelisolve
FES A - Dissipator
Rectangular
Botom Width (ft) = 10.00
Total Depth (ft) = 0.20
Invert Elev (ft) = 310.00
Slope (%) = 0.50
N-Value = 0.025
Calculations
Compute by: epth
nown Depth (ft) = 0.16
Friday, May 25 2007, 8:56 AM
Highlighted
Depth (ft) = 0.16
Q (cfs) = 1.940
Area s ft = 1.60
elocity (ft/s) 1.21
Wetted enm (ft) = 10.3
Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.11
Top Width (ft) = 10.00
EGL (ft) = 0.18
Elev (ft) Section
311.00
310.75
310.50
310.25
310.00
309.75
Depth (ft)
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
_n Orl
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reach (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express by Intelisolve Friday, May 25 2007, 9:2 AM
FES B - Dissipator
Rectangular Highlighted
Botom Width (ft) = 19.00 Depth (ft) = 0.50
Total Depth (ft) = 0.60 Q (cfs) = 24.30
Area (sgft) = 9.50
Invert Elev (ft) = 310.00 [Velocity (ft/s) = 2.561,
Slope (%) = 0.50 Wetted Perim (ft) = 20.00
N-Value = 0.025 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.38
Top Width (ft) = 19.00
Calculations EGL (ft) = 0.60
Compute by: Kn own Depth
Kniow6-Depth (ft) -I Oj?
Elev (ft) Section
311.00
310.75
310.50
310.25
310.00
309.75
Depth (ft)
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
_n 'Irl
7 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Reach (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express by Intelisolve Friday, May 25 2007, 9:4 AM
FES C - Dissipator
Rectangular Highlighted
Botom Width ()t) = 14.00 Depth (ft) = 0.48
Total Depth (ft) = 0.50 Q (cfs) = 16.56
Area s ft = 6.72
Invert Elev (ft) = 310.00 [Velocity ftA = 2.46
Slope (%) = 0.50 Wetted Perim (ft) = 14.96
N-Value = 0.025 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.36
Top Width (ft) = 14.00
Calculations EGL (ft) = 0.57
Compute by: Kn own Depth
P nown Depth (ft) = ?
Elev (ft)
311.00
310.75
310.50
310.25
310.00
309.75
Section
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Reach (ft)
Depth (ft)
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1 -0.25
18
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express by Intelisolve Friday, May 25 2007, 9:5 AM
FES D - Dissipator
Rectangular Highlighted
Botom Width (ft) = 10.00 Depth (ft) = 0.17
Total Depth (ft) = 0.20 Q (cfs) = 2.143
Area (sgft = 1.70
Invert Elev (ft) = 310.00 eloaty (ft/s) -
Slope (%) = 0.50 e e enm ft) = 10.34
N-Value = 0.025 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.12
Top Width (ft) = 10.00
Calculations EGL (ft) = 0.19
Com ute b : Kn own Depth
-own Depth (ft) = 0.17
Elev (ft) Section
311.00
310.75
310.50
310.25
310.00
309.75
Depth (ft)
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
_n Orl
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 vw
Reach (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express by Intelisolve Friday, May 25 2007, 9:6 AM
FES E - Dissipator
Rectangular Highlighted
Botom Width (ft) = 10.00 Depth (ft) = 0.30
Total Depth (ft) = 0.35 Q (cfs) = 5.433
Area s ft = 3.00
Invert Elev (ft) = 310.00 Lelocity (ft/s)
Slope (%) = 0.50 Wetted Perim (ft) = 10.60
N-Value = 0.025 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.21
Top Width (ft) = 10.00
Calculations EGL (ft) = 0.35
Compute b : Known Depth
nown Depth
Elev (ft) Section
311.00
310.75
310.50
310.25
310.00
309.75
Depth (ft)
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
_n 7r,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reach (ft)
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express by Intelisolve Friday, May 25 2007, 9:7 AM
FES F - Dissipator
Rectangular Highlighted
Botom Width (ft) = 7.00 Depth (ft) = 0.02
Total Depth (ft) = 0.10 Q (ds) = 0.043
Area sgft) = 0.14
Invert Elev (ft) = 310.00 Veloci ft/s) = 31
Slope (%) = 0.50 Wetted Perim (ft) = 7.04
N-Value = 0.025 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.02
Top Width (ft) = 7.00
Calculations EGL (ft) = 0.02
Compute b : Known Depth
nown Depth (ft) _?L `?
Elev (ft)
311.00
310.75
310.50
310.25
310.00
309.75
Section
0 1 2 3
4 5
Reach (ft)
6 7 8
Depth (ft)
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
9
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express by Intelisolve
FES G - Dissipator
Rectangular
Botom Width (ft) = 7.00
Total Depth (ft) = 0.35
Invert Elev (ft) = 310.00
Slope (%) = 0.50
N-Value = 0.025
Calculations
Compute b : -Kn Qwn Depth
nown Depth (ft) = 0.30

Friday, May 25 2007, 9:8 AM
Highlighted
Depth (ft) = 0.30
Q (ds) = 3.743
Area s ft = 2.10
Velocity (ftts) ; 8
Wetted Perim (ft) = 7.60
Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.21
Top Width (ft) = 7.00
EGL (ft) = 0.35
Elev (ft) Section
311.00
310.75
310.50
D
310.25
310.00
309.75
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Reach (ft)
Depth (ft)
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
o3
Q
CHERRY HUFFMAN
135 E. Martin St., Suite 101 1
Rtileigfi, Nut-tli Cai-ulimt 276UI
1 0 919.82-1 0805 T 919..8:_'1.070 F
www cherrylitlffrnati cony
as k: _dP'.PE 0 J -
• y • I • • • • • • • • • • •
f`1 f~..;`~~ 1 i • Y • • • O • •
- em 509 Mills Park Drive en ar c o0 r~ ' U t +~'1J '~3~ MF`I R ~ '~aa~ 40 do a 49
Z C/~ I ' III ) I III I • , J
i0p
r,mct
• Cary, North Carolina COASUL TA 7S
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
McNeely Associates, P.A.
P.O. Drawer 30126
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27622
TABLE OF CONTENTS TfE DATA 919.782.9677 T
T CA 1 - _ - L FIRE ST 1l J~ = - ~ . . CARPENTER /F Cover Sheet ~-goo TOWN OF CARY PROJECT NUMBER 07-SP-022 )2 STRUCTURAL
~-~o~ TOTAL AREA f238 ACRES Lassiter-Hopkins-Chang
E STATION ROA _ ~ _ , ~ I, _ Overall Plan. .S 1015 Wade Avenue
, _ Site/Layout Plan. ~ ~-~02 PROJECT AREA (PROPOSED) 153.7 ACRES L Raleigh, NC 27605
Site/Layout Plan. L-103 ZONNGED USE ELEMENTARY SC R~0
~ >a 1 Erosion Control Plan. ~-20~ WAKE COUNTY PIN # 0735-00-2296 10 919.82.5587 T
PLUMB, MECH, ELEC & CIVIL
Grading and Siorm Drainage Pla - Grading and Storm Drainage Pla ~ Roof Drainage Collection Plan. Plan. L-301 MINIMUM YARDS AND BUILDING SETBACKS: Dewberry & Davis
1- 2~„ Plan. L-302
~ ~ - gyn. L-303 $RD $T -20/15 FEET 87 2301 Rexwoods Drive Suite 210 Raleigh, NC 27607-3366
Traffic Marking and Signage Plan Plan ~R 30 FEET N'T 919.881.9939 T
DOT
Traffic Marking and Signage Plan PIaR ~-~2 THOROUGHFARE CORRIDOR 50 FEET
c~~ / ~ ~ Planting Plan. L-501 WATERSHED JORDAN RNER DOT ROOFING CONSULTANT
Planting Plan. ~-5°2 BUILDING SIZE 96 806 S.F. Stafford Consulting Engineers
7424 Chapel Hill Rd. Suite 102
J Site Delails. L-601 BUILDING HEIGHT 53 Ff.~3 STORY Raleigh, NC 27607 919.852.1038 T
Site Details. ~-so2 BUILDING LOT COVERAGE -EXISTING 0%
Siie Details. " , L-603 BUILDING LOT COVERAGE -PROPOSED 4.1% YO
L-604 PARKING RE(~UIRED 115 SPACES YO FOOD SERVICE
Erosion Control Details. Foodesign Associates
rosion Control Details. L-605 ~~~vr~ir nn rtn~n ~e~ ~nerrr 5828 Oak Dnve
L-606 rhRnliv~ rRVVlu~u ~wc~ss ~oc~a~ ~u~Fxr~ t~t~ ~rM~W .J Charlotte, NC 28227
l ~ Basin 1 Section Details .S 704.545.6151 T
Basin 2 Section Details ~ L-607 ACCESSIBLE PARKI~rG RE UIRED 1 Van Included in 5 SPACES
Storm Drainage Details. ACCESSIBLE PARKING PR DED 2 Van Included in 6 SPACES ~-so8 IMPERVIOUS -EXISTING 0 S.F. J
. Planting Details. L-609 IMPERVIOUS - PRa~OSED 274 801 S.F 11,7% PHOdECT
'/o E--22 Elementary School
Lighting Plan E-101 ~ ~
Utilitly Plan ~ C-101 LINEAR FOOT OF ROAD 2,465 L.F. F. VCPSS Project No. 000-0000 F Mille Perk Drive
Entrance Road Plan and Profile LINEAR FOOT OF WATER 2,455 L.F. >fiie . . c-102 LINEAR FOOT OF SEWER (IN PU811C RIGHT-0FWAY Cary, North Carolina F. Township, Wake County
Entrance Road Plan and Profile >file c-~o3 ~ 942 L.F. . . . . . . . . . . Site Plan
SITE BOUNDARYLINE Entrance Road Plan and Profile >file . , C-104 Town of Car General Notes: Submittal
~ - Road Widening Plan C-105 - - . . . . . . . . . . . CL l£.1'T
PRO]ECT LIMIT LINE Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile. >file. . C-~~6 1. No changes to any aspe_ct_ of this site plan, including but not limited to, landscaping, grading, building elevations
_ ~ _ Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile. >file. C-107 (~~y ~gnbn~, or utilities will be made witl~out the approval of the Development Review Group of the Departrnent of Planning and Development. Wake County
oC Signing and Marking Plan . . C-108 i. The site shall be stabilaed and seeded prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Public Schools
F Signing and Marking Plan . C_~~ 3. NI FNAC s~rs~ert~s will be scteer~ed from off-sibs views. 1551 Rock Quarry Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
Signing and Marking Plan . 4. NI dumpster and cardboard recycling locations will be sa~ened from off-site views. (919)-850-1600
. . C-~~ 5. Wt~e existing vegetation fails to function adequately as required, (i.e. buff type A, B, C and 100' Thoroughfare
Striping Plan C-111 ~a ) ~ ~ry ~ ~ ~9f?t to require wpple~nenbl plantlngs in addition oo tho6e . shown on the planting plan based on actual field conditions.
D Grading, Drainage and Erosion Grading, Drainage and Erosion Grading, Drainage and Erosion Typical Sections and Details, ion Control C-~2 6. a~ exterior site ~gr,bng wiY ne signed mpreventofd---sites glare. sQ.
ion Control C-113 ~ ~ ~ ~ P~?~~9 area and size of plant material at maturity shall allow fora 2s' a,~ o~,a~ ~ n,e ~ C v~I "Y A,
C-~4 back of curb.
PROPOSED ion Control 8. No tree shall be located within a roadwa y right-of-way a witl~in 5' of a sidewalk. ~Z
. C-115 9. All tree probecdon ~endng sltal~ be maintained urrol all site wait is oompleoed. The fendng shall be removed prior 0
MILLS PARK DRIVE Culvert Details C-116 m aye final she i~p~on fa aie o~tificate of «wpancy ~co~. . 10. NI above 9~ Y ~W t and fadNties associated with on-site electric, cable, telephone, gas a other v co
Culvert Details . C-~7 similar utility shall be located in the side a rear yard area of the site and sa~eened, to the extent possible, witl~
W C_~8 evergreen plantings. Plantings shall allow fa a minimum of a 5' clearance around the structure to allow for access.
W ~ - - Details. . AddidonaUy, anY sirde of the structure having a door a lock, the plantings shah flow fora 10' deararxe. The amour
~ ~ Details. C-119 of clearance shall account for the size of the plant material at matu~ty.
~ Details. . C-120 11. NI vehicular use areas (dmres and parking areas) shall be s from off-site views. PROJECT NUMBER:
_Y C-121 12. AID vent pi'pess, etc. extending above tfie roof w~faoe must be painted In a cda mat blends with me roof oo~or. CAP22
g Details. . 13. pJl construmon must be pe~famed in accordance wi~? wrrent Town of Cary Standards Spedfications and Details.
Details. . C-~22 14. The developer will be responsible for all installation costs assoaabed witl~ street Ighti~9 along proposed sue, . adjacent stress and tltoraghfar~es as required per Town of Cary Pdicy Stabernent No. 13. The developer sh~l PHASE:
Composite 1st Flr Plan . A-100 contact Progress Energy after plan approval and prior to construction in oroer to develop a street G9~9 P~ ~ Site Plan Submittal
~ Composite 1st Flr PIaR A-101 ~ ~Iw~ v~~s.
. . . . . . . . . DATE:
Elevations. . A-201 15. Site method of watershed pro0ection and controlling Total Suspended Solids is accomplished by routing scam water (site drainage) tlxou9h two bio-retention basins located on the site, dissipatlng flows by the use of a 030807
Elevations. . A-ZO2 level-spreader and directing sheet flow at the pre~devebped rate into an undisturbed Urban Transition Buffer.
. Building Sections. A-301 16. The Project will meet all ~ ~e requi~nents relative m asst Management ~raceoes and Engineered Smrmwater DRAWN BY:
. Control Strtxtures as outlined in die Town of Cary land Development Ordinance. (Chapter 4, Part 4.6, lD0). KMD
- - Building Sections. A-302 . . . . . . . . . . .
Mills Park Drive is shown for Reference CHECKED BY:
DEP
_ There are Two (2) Bid Break oQ~ Town of Ca Wake Coun ~ ~o ry/ ~r ~eakdowns for this PI~]~: Only -See Drawings by Dewberry for Documentation regarding Mills Park Drive
kEV /510,1:5
i~
my Public School System "Road Bid Breakdown" no. revision data
1 TOC 1st Reveiw Responses 04 26 07
ODv Everytl~ing insided of the Right-of-Way 2 NCDWQ Review Response 052507
Cary Project Number 07-SP-022
L

Wake County Public School S Includes "L" Series Sheets by McNeely Associates P.A. col System "E22 Elementary School Breakdown" APPROVED
TOWN OF GARY
VICINITY AAAP Inside of school Proaerty une only
end outside of Public Easements will be paid by Wake County Public Scholl System Approved by Date:
Scale:m 1"=500' Water and Sewer construction outside of Right-of-Way and outsid
Planning Date:
Engineering Date: Cover
Sheet L-1 00
i

-022 CHERRY HUFFMAN
Cary Project Number 07-SP-022
135 E. Martin St., Suite 101
APPROVED See Sheet L-502 for Plant Lisp See Sheet L-502 for Drawing Legend Raleigh, North Carolina 27bU1
See utility drawings to avoid utility line and Planting Notes and Calculations 919.821.0805 T 919.821.0720 F
TOWN OF GARY conflicts with large trees. BEFORE YOU DIG 10 www. cherryhuf fman. com
Approved by Date: ~ ~ I
GENERAL NOTES: ~ . i ~
Planning Date: See Sheets L-401 for location 1. Field topographic information taken from digital file by Taylor, Wiseman & Taylor 40 0 20 40 80 160 CALL 1 $00 632--4949 - __.v _
• Engineering Date: of Weed Barrier Mat Engineers, Surveyor, Scientists dated October 1, 2006 2. The wetlands and stream locations wbject to Town of Cary Riparian Buffers shown hereon are N.C. ONE I,ALL CENTER `CAPE P N O S C
based on field ties to the flags set by Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. • S) 100
3. No plantings shall be located within Town of Gry Greenway Easement. IN I~ I,I~,I ) • •Q • • •Or • • WW )K
O • iiic~li I fl. • r W
/ ~ •n Q• 0 A%,
y W y i i i J r r 0.0 woo
~ 2q" RCP I ` ~ ~ F~QSTING 50' URBAN ~Y L i / / ~L i y / i/~ i .,II A SSCG ~P~~~. IIII s• E
. ~ TRi4NSIlION BUFFER ' ' W / ~ / / / / W W ~ ~ i i i W ~Y W W W W
w 1' W / / / / y y y y i W W W i W W W i i W W W
W W ~Y L W J ~L W W W W W ~Y W J~ y W W W W i J i J i y W y i W i W i L i W i i i i i i i i i i i i i i W COAS'UL TANTS
4' I ULPA ~ T ~L ~ T 1 T ~7 r ~ r 1 r• T ~ti ~l~ ~ ~ T 1 T 1 ~ J~ ~Y W W W W W ~Y W W W W ~V ~Y ~Y i W Y W i Y y 1- L 1 ~Y i i i ~Y ~Y 8 T~ ^Y~ ^ W W W W ~Y W W W W W i i i i i ~Y i i i •Y W [NG
3-CF~P / CJY y W y W W W W W W i y i L i i i i i i i J i L i i / i i 1 i • i y LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
+ 3-PICH 4"~ CFCP 3- 3- A~ W 1 W W W W W W i~ ~i i W W ~i i i i Y
• - --r ~ i 3--- ~~--3RR~-- ---$Lf~- - --a.~R-- ~ i i i i i J i J i i i i J i i 1 i ~ McNeely Associates, P.A.
i _ W ~L W W W W W W ~Y W J~ W W W W W J~ ~Y ~Y Y W W i ~Y J~ ~Y ~Y J~ i J~ ~Y N Y J ~Y L i L i 1 L W W W W W i i i i i i i i J ~ ~ i 1 a ~ / / / / i y i i i i i i J i i i i + ~ i ~ 1 i i ~ i ' P.O. Drawer 30126 Raleigh, North Carolina, 27622
i J~ W W W y W W W ~ ~ ~ ~ W W W W i W W W W W W •~Y ~w 6-ICN W W, W W W W W W W W i- W W W •Y i y i i W i i i 919.782.9677 T
W W J' W W ~Y W W ~ W J~ I W J~ J~ y W W W W W W ~Y W J~ ~Y W y + / ~Y J' W W W J~ W W y y y W i i i i i J i i i i i i + i W W W W W W W y y W y W i i i W i W i i i
~i Q ~ u~A- •y ~ ~ W ~ -NDBP W ~Y y ~ W ~Y W / ? ~ / / / 1~ ~Y / / 1' V' . W W W W y W W W W W W ~Y W W W W W i i W i i i i i i
2 ~ W W W J~ GAP • ~ + ~ ~ ~ W W W W W W W W i W W W W i i y W W J' W W i i i- i y W y ~ L i i STRUCTURAL
Vl1N CJINOPY TREE W W W / W W W W ~ i W ~i y W W Lassiter-Hopkins-Chang
~ NO BUFFER REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENT ~ 00-LMV ' ~ ~ ALONG WEST SIDE ~ ig• p ICN y3- /~/r~ W W ~Y W W W W W W W W y W W W W W W W W W W W W i W W i W W W i 1015 Wade Avenue
~ ~ OF PROPERTY ASGM ~Y W X18" 0/C 3-NDRP e N J i i i i i i i i + i i ~ i i i i f'1~I' ~iD - ~ i ~ ~ i ~ i i i i i / Raleigh, NC 27605
~ ' H NDH i ~Y ~ i i W i i i i i i i i i 919.82.5587 T
~ ~ j 3-EAC 3-EAC ~ ~ 7-LCRR / / ~Y W W W W W W i W W i i i W W i W W i i W i i i i y i i i i i -
J ~ ZSGV ICN ;N W / / W W W i i~ W i i i W i W i~ W i PLUMB, MECH. ELEC i CIVIL
~ 13-JCNC \ 10'x400' \ ~ y ( L4F i W i i i i i y i i y i i i i W W W W W W W i W W W i~ i W y /a Dewberry & Davis
W }lam 1&LMV 18-LMV 111-LhN 6 / ? i i i +r i i i i i i i i i i / / / W W W i i i~ i J i i 1 J 1 ~ 1 2301 Rexwoods Dave Suite 210
I SnE TRiANGIE , UI,Pp ~ ~ ~ ~ 2-PRCT ~ \ W W @38" OI 3~~ A 518" OTC y W i i W W W i i i y y i i i i Raleigh, NC 27607.3366
' ~ pR ~18"'n/C 31-LMN @18 0/C 3{SY ~ W ~I~ W ~ ~ ~18~ 3-ICBM ~ 5-A]V --31-LMV i' W W W W W i i i W i W i i i M W i W •i i •b W i i i• i i i i / 919.881.9939 T
~ ~ ~ _ _ _ , % W W W ~W 67 ~C 3-ICBM 9-ICBN ~D18 OTC X18" 0/C 31-lMV Y"1~ ~ ~Y W W W W W W i i i W W W i r
I X18" 0/C W ~Y W W ? ~~/Rr i W W i W W W i W i i y i i~ i i~ i~ 1-I.MV / 1-I,MV W W y y W ~ W i i y i W W L i N ROOFING CONSULTANT
~ W W W W W'\~ W ~ ~1/~p I J. W ~ ~~1\VIV_ TLW\ 1 W W W i W W i i i W i i i i~ i / 1 Stafford Consulting Engineers
i , ~ ~ f W W W W ~ ~QQ i W W W i i i i i i i i i i J / MVO / / r W ~Y W W W i• i i i i i i i i i~ i~ r~ 7424 Chapel Hill RQ. Suite 102
~ j 12-ICR 4ICR `Y W ~Y W W W W W W ~ W W y ~ y /0/ ~ W W W W W W W W W i W W W W W W Raleigh, NC 27607
wp S~IIHG ;i - ' ~ \ i \ \ ZSGV y W ~Y ~ ~Y ~ W W W W W W W W W • 919.852.1038 T
DQSTING QONDITlONS 2-ICN -ICN ( 5-I W y W ~ ~1 0/C ~ W W ~Y W ~Y W W W W W W W W W ~Y W ~Y W ~Y •Y W W W W W ~Y W W W W W /v
. • • MEET REQUIREMB~T'S ~ 2-ICN - - W W W W W W W W W W W W W W •Y W 1 a FOOD SERVICE
~ ~ PICH \ W ~ APA W W W W W W W ~i y W i i W i i y / W W W W W W W W W W y y i y i~ W Foodesign Assoc sales
3-CFCP ~ ULPA ' X18" 0/~ . ~ 4AN ' y y y W W W W W W W W W i W W i W i i i ~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W i• W W W i W W W 5828 Oak Drive
• ilNvdM~ ~ \ / 0/ y y y y ' y y y y 1 y y y y 1 1 .L 1 L ~L _ Charlotte, NC 28227
iv ~~vu \ 1.1"1 ~ •ICBN / i J~ J~ y y ~ i y i i i L i i L i i ~ i ? V i 704.545.6151 r
TRIAN GLE • 1 - i 12- 1 T ~ N 1 W y W W J y y 1 . W~ ~ ~ y y i L i y L i L i i i W W W / W W W W y y ~ ~ W ~ y y i• ~ ~ ~ W
~ i • + ii `Y ~Y ~Y / / / ~Y / ~Y W ~ W y W y y y y y y y y y y i y y
ti ~ y ~Y y y y • y y / / d y W W y y y y y y ~ y y y ~ y y y ~ y ~ ~ W W y W y y y y y y W ~ y y y y y y ~ PROJECT
• ~ ~ . ~ y ~Y r' ~Y W ~Y y ~ y ~ W ~Y W y y y ~ ~ y y ~ /
~ • J' ~ 1 _ ~Y ~Y W W W y y y ~ y y y i ~ ~ y i l y ~ y y /v i ~ y y y i J' y y y ? i i ? i i i V V ~ L Y L Y E-22 Elementary School
DE ~ ~ 30 / ~ / / ~ y y y 11-]SEP ~ _ P. ~ 60 `Y / J~ y L y y y y y y L L ~ i i i L L / i i / WCPSS Project No. 000=0000 509 Mllk Park Drive
¢ ~ ~ / ~b7-LMV ~ i / / e 1 OC + ° / i y C W 'Y ~ y ~Y y ~ y i ~ ~ y ~ y y. y y y i C ?t North TowneMp, Wake Cow*
~ ~ UIPA ~ ~ N ~ / / / 1 ~ \ \ + ~ y y ~ L i L ~ i L ,Y i i Y 1 < < i V Y ? Y Y i ? ~ J~ ~ y y y y L i ~Y ~Y y y y i i i i L L L i i
• ~ • ~ p ~ ' y LAN i ~ y / t _ . ? ~Y ~ L L y y y y ~ ~ i ~Y i y y ~ y i i / Site Plan
- y 60 ~Y y y / ~ W ~ y y y W W W ~ y y / / Submittal
~Y / / / y ? y y y y
5 ~ ~Y J' o ~ W y y ~ W ~ W W ~ W y y W ~ ~ W W / W y ~ W y y y ~ y ~ ~ W y / y CLIENT
t + 2-PR -60 1, ~ • / ~ • ~ ~ q / ? y y y i l y L y y i L y i ~
Q , . / / • N . y y y ~ ~ y y y y W L ~ ~ y y n ~ ~Y J~ y ~Y J- W i W W ~ ~ y ~ i ~ Wake County
1 0 1 ~ /d 1~ W W y y ~ ~ y ~ y y W y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Public Schools
, u -I 1 , 1 / • 1 ,1 ~ / ~ 1. ~ y ~ i L ~ y y i _ f~~ ~ L ~ y ~ ~ i r' y y I "I Rock Quarry Road
ICN ~ 5I ICN . 6 HR /a J- i i i ? i / / / i i / / / / ~L / / W W y ~ W RaWgh, North CAMAm V610 (919 1600
4 y -60 y y i i / ~ / y. ~Y ~Y ~
-60 ~ , y y ~Y ~Y y W y y y. - / / - / / / ~ / W W W W ~k ~
•rr....• ...rN..• •..r..N. • 0 • 0 I I / / I / / / J~ ~Y ~ ~ y y y / ? / / r / e\~BU C s
~ N N / / ~ / / J~ ~Y y y y y .•..N.• • • / / / .~i i ~ ~ / , • y y . / / / / / , 1 y ~Y y y W W
~ ~ \ / / \ i i y ~ y / N ? ~ ~0 / u , ~Y ~Y ~Y ~Y L ~Y ~Y ~Y ~ / / ? ? /
/ ~ / / y ~ y W y y ~ y ~ i i ~ W y W y y y y y y i i ~ ~ y y i ~ z
2-C ~ 1 s ~ \ i Tff ~ , Ic ~ 3 FIIG y y y W y ~ i ~ ~ y L y i i' i ~
u ~ ~ ~ . .y 11 ~ y ' / -r / y . / ~Y 1 / / / / y y y ~ y ~ i . / ~ ~ ~ y v co
PT - , /6/ '1' J~ y y y y y y y y / / / / J' y y . / / /
11 . ~Y y y y y y y y y y y y y / • y y / / y y / W y / W y y y ~ ~ ~ / / `j1 p C6
11 , t~ ~Y ~V y / y W 1L ~Y ~Y / / J~ _ / II ~ / 41
;1 °h ~~n 1~~. ' 1 ~ - u ' / J~ J~ J~ y y y y y y y y y y y 1 / / ? < / / n y y y y y y y y y ! y 'y / 'r u ~ / /
Ih~ l • ~ 1 / 11 i / 11 ~ N ~ u III r 11 1, 11 1, + 1 a , - , 11 y W J~ ~V W y ~V ~Y L ~l ~ / W 1 LI ~ / i J+ 4' J' + J~ y < ~ 1 y ~ y / W ~V ~Y i W ~ y W W y ~
~ 1 ~i~ ~ y ~ • 1 1 1~ 1 y y y y y y J y I / ~y BN / / 4- ro / / ~ I / /y ~ y 1 y ~ PROJECT NUMBER:
/i ~ ~ 11 • II/~ ~i ~ - y y / y y 0 1 ~ I ~ al / y _ ~ 1 it /r / / / / J~ J' y y I ~1 y J~ y y y y y y y a /O / y i J' ~L _ " AID r' ~Y J. ~Y ii / ~ 4 ~ y ~Y J' ~ y y y ~ i ~Y y N~ CAP22
11 1 / / / ~ ~ • • • • • i ` ~ 11 ' 11 11 y y y y y / r y y / J- y y ' Y y ~1 / /f/ ~ ~ i i Y ~Y W L W W W W y ~ ~ L ~ ~ r'~ PHASE:
. . / 1 s}/ 1 L 117 J~ ~Y W ~ W W ~ ~ y y ~ y M y ~Y ~ / I
y y y J~ / ~Y y y y y y 'y J~ ~Y y y / y y y LI < / / / / ~Y / ~Y ~Y ~Y ~ ~Y ~Y y' u ~ / / ~ / J~ ~Y ~ y I ~ y _ Site Plan Submidal
/ 1 ~I t' 1 < -1 ~ ~ i i / ~Y ~Y W y W J ~ y W ~ ~ / DATE:
• r~ - ~r / / / y J~ J. 1 y W y y y y y ` y y y W y y ~ . W W y ~
1. 1 1 L y y y y y y y 1 LI N < a~ 11 ~ r ~ y ~ u i~ / 03 08 07
y , y / 'I / / `u y y / y y y y I / r y - 5-MGBB y ~ y ~ I ~ y i, ~GBB ow?wr+ BY:
3_qR__.. - r- - 4- -~-,--1-~- - - y y W / y y y ~ t 1 li ~ / _ + / / < 1 / i ~ y ~ ~ / ~ r
/ y y y y y y J 4-IG - / r r' ~ y ~i ~Y ~ W i ~ y i/ i i KMo
• iii ii ii ~ 1-TD - / -I ~ - u q . CHECKED BY:
2-IOG / • • , / / W ~Y ~Y W W ~Y ~Y 1~ ~ ~ OEP
i i i ~ i i i ~ 11- / ~Y ~Y J~ ~Y V~ ~Y ~Y ~Y y y y y y i ~ ~ y y y ~ / r ~Y W W y y y. ,y y ~ r~ r, k p
' i ii iii i ?1 / / ~ y y y ~ y y y y y y y y / / / 11r ~ y ~ y ? W i ~i r~ / 1
i i iii iii ii ~ i ~ . y y y y y y y y y y J' y / / / / ////r/ / / / ?1 , / ',1 W W W y / '4 REVISIONS
- 1 1 1 - 1 / 1 , - ~ ~ , I 3 P NE AKIN 110. revision dab
i+~ - 11 b 1 / I 1 / ~i i r 11 ~ 11 ~ i • 4- - EXSITING VEGETATION MEETS -60 -PT BUFFER iREMENTS BETW EE 1 TOC 1st Raveiw Responses 04 46 07
i - 1 ! 1 / 1 \1 / I 1 2 NCDWQ Review Real- iw 062507
11 . / ~ ` ~ ~ ~ r/~ I II 11 i 1 ~ / ~ - ~ ~ / i / 1 r~ 1l ~j ( ~ , ,\11 fr~~ i l i
1 1 ii , l/ II Ii ~ ~ 11 1 I / i 11 / i ~ i i i
i 1 1\ ~ ' - 3 1 ~11 / / ~'i, 11~``` ~ / \ 1 / i \ ~i / " ~ II i ~i J / ~r 1 11 i I / - X11 ~ / 1/ i _ \ r _ , TO REMAIN
• / / a.~ y i \I Ir 1 _ ~ ~ ~ 11 1 rr II N ? ~i II ~ ~ ~ ri 11 ~ ~ ~~~r 11 ~ 1 11 , 11 \ ~ H it I, NI , I~ 1 / i i
, ~ ~ ~ ? . 1 I f ` 1\ Ir ~ i
RE IREME DQSTI DTTI ? 11 \ 3-N / ~
. ~
1-PT
'0( )0( roc )OC 00
_10'x400' -roc - ~ ~ ` SITE TRIANGLE ~ M M r W` wW 1 I~\ wW- Planting
. Y• i1 1 ` Xx XX XX
Ak ir Plan L 501
logo*

CHERRY HUFFMAN
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PLAN (S~ L-501 At~D L-50?J
• THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY AND THEIR AG Buffers per Section 7.2.3 HQRS OR ASSIGNS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR p~pposed use class =pass 4 (per Table 7Z-2) INSTALLATION, PRESERVATION AND MAINTENAN HEIR AGENTS, ~TMm ~r^ LEGEND 135 E. Martin SL, Suite 101
3LE FOR THE Key QueMdy ~ Botericel Name Caman Neune Hl Spr. Gl Root Corrma~ts Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
INTENANCE OF ~ ~ A~ ` y~~,' Gdd pint agba 24' 18' - - Cont. NUMBER OF PLANTS IN BED OR GROUPING 919.821.0805 T 919.821.0720 F
Norlfi: No buffer required (Section 7.2.3 (B)(1) No buffer ~s required between s~'~ared Public uses) ALL PLANTINGS ANp PHYSICAL FEATURES ON TH PLAN. THE OWNERS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FO ~p{~~t; (~q~jf~d bUf~ type = 40A (p2~' Tebl~ 7.2-1) ANNUAL MAINTENANCE OF THE VEGETATION TO BLE FORTS APA t Acer peYnahm'AtroprPiram' ~'~P°^°~° ~ ~ - 2' 8~-B O1p TION TO ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~O O" O~C `r- K~ ~R PLANT IDENTIFICATION www.cherryhuffman. com
(SEE PLANT LISn
. ~ ~ ~~j~~t INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A9c31d 5 Auer aaodienm 'green I~o~nten' green I~lourlan Super ?~tePle 1~~ 2~ ~ ~ 15 Beh~a ri~a'hleriteoe' Heritteae F~ Birch T 3' _ 2' B-B__ ~ Slam SPACE AT 10" ON CENTER
East: Existing vegetation to rrieet buffer requirements between schod and future I-540 i. FE~tTILIZATION: CC 1i Ceroia cenadaneie Re~ud 8' 3' 2' B-B See Sheet L-502 for Plant List PROPOSED TREES OR SHRUBS See utili drawin s to avoid utili Ime ' ' ; ~ : INDICATES FULL EXTENT OF MULCH tY 9 ~Y Soo P"66 % so JA • OS kc'. q,o•• •
West: No buffer' required (Section 7.2.3 (B)(1) No buffer is required between shared public uses) gUg~v~n- REPRESENTATIVE SOIL SAMPLES OF SH • AREAS FOR AGRONOMICAL CHEMICAL ANAYSIS FIVE YEARS OR WHLN SHRUBS ARE PERFORMIN Streetscape per Section 7.Z.4 POORLY. APPLY NUTRIENTS AT RATE RECOMME BY THE SOIL LABORATORY. APPLY A SLOW RELE 30' wide Sh'~Cdpe FERTILIZE TO TREES AND SHRUBS, ONCE IN TH Street trees: 890 linear feet of street~cape/ 22 street trees required = 23 AR provided AND SPRING. 5 OF SHRUB ~ 18 CortKw faxJa'q~erokee Princess' Red Flarai~p Dogwood 8' 3' 2' B-8 , „ er 00
NAYSIS EVERY CJY 2~ (xypiameria japwtica'YoeWrw' Yoetii~o CryPiomerie 8' 4' - - ~ conflicts with large trees. .11 4~1 ell- ..I • • •tv 4 C~ ~p •
FORMING CW 1 geyera jeporica Jeper~eee CbYxa 4' 30' - - B-B :COMMENDED (SY b Certieia easenque'Y~letida' 'Y~eids' 3~anqua Ceme~ia (Redd 3' 24' - - Cant INDICATES INDMDUAL TREE TO REMAIN ~ 0 040 W
)W RELEASE EAC 56 Euonym~u elaiue 'Comvactue' Comvad 8~~++~+~+ Bush 18' 15' CoM See Sheets L-401 for location n % (11 4L i~ ti. •
.E IN THE FALL A,G 21 Fo~ylhia x i~ierm'Lynwood Gold' 'LY?wrood Gold Forsyltia 24' 24' - - CoM. - PROPOSED TREELINE of Weed Barrier Mat A • Opp 00
FNA 26 F~ktrwmefe vrQ~rx Carrran Nl~d~hezel 24' 18' - - Cunt E • 4i A SSOC 001% ~ ~11% S
Ornamental Veer: to be spaced eveaY 20' on average = 12 CFPP + 8 PRC1' provided BIO-RETENTION PLANTING SHALL ONLY RECQV TIME APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER WHEN INSTA • Vehicular Use Area (VOA) Landscaping per Section 7.2.6 2, PRUNING: WF 27 lex x aiter~uata 'Fo~ten Foelx Holy 6' 3' - - B~ RECQVE A ONE ~ gg bx ~a~ Dwarf Buiord Holy 1B' - ~ 5 c~}~ni~~~~c ~c~a~,~~; 788
:N INSTALLED. ~ ~ bx oor~le 'NeedepoN P~ ~'~Y 24' 24' - - Cord. _10 DETAIL FLAG DETAIL #/SHEET #
ICR 116 bx canxda'Roluid~' Dwarf Hort?ed Holy 12' 15' - - Cad. 40 (1 20 40 80 1ti0
SPROUTS AT THE ~ ~ bx ~elxa ~~Y ~ ~ _ _ ~ CONSUL TAN TS
Panting areas: 1 gnopy tree trunk witl~in 60' of all parking spaces WITH THE IXCEP~TTION OF UNWANTED SPROUTS ~ p~~ men y~q and Rpyy = exi~ng vegetation to meet requireme~lt BASE OF A TREE, AND TIMYGS THAT SPROUT FR • TREE TRUNK, PRUNING SHALL BE LIMITED TO R OF DEAD WOOD OR BRANCHES FROM TREES OR ;OUT FROM THE ~ 28 kz hybrids 'Ncie R :~evene' Neie R Ste~rene FbN 5 _ _ ~ NO-MOW VEGETATION
ED TO REMOVAL p ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ - - ~ l IN I'I;l"I' 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
REFS OR FOR ~ 5 kx opaca '6dy Bruner' ~Y F'~O~Y g ~ - - ~ HE PRUNING OF b4 20 bz opaa 'treeNeat' treeNeat HoN _ 8' 3' _ _ _ ~ iii l~ tl~ (I McNeely Associates, P.A.
SIGHT DISTANCES/SAFETY REASONS. THE PRUN SHRUBS SHALL ~ LIMITED TO THE PRUNING 1NING N 36 bx vomitaria Y~ F'~Y 4~ _ _ ~ y y y y FESCUE SOD W W . ~ . GENERAL NOTES: P.O. Dravier 30126
NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE NATURAL SHAPE ,L SHAPE OF JCNC 193 ~knperue chneneie 'Dick's Compact Nck'e Camped Jinx 1B' 24' ~ W 1. Field topographic information takes from digital file by Taylor, Wiseman & Taylor Raleigh, North Carolina, 27622
THE PLANT IXCEPT FOR SHEARED HEDGES. oES. .13EP 328 .k~aue e4uemata'Paraon' Person's Ju~per - - 18' - - CoM. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E~lyIf12Cf5, $UN2y01', SCI2fltlStS dat2d OCtOI~Y 1, 2006 919.782.9677 T
JY 95 ,knperue Kyirena Esetern Red Ceder 8' - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ LCRR 73 L.oropeiYMm Chilenee 'Rubnm' R~eberri FTiIQe F9oM~er 30' 24' - - ~1t iii HRUB BEDS MAY LMV 2760 liiope rt~ueceri'Variegata' Yer~sted ~?tope ; ; ; ; SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 2. The wetlands and stream locations subject to Town of Cary Riparian Buffers sFawn hereon are
3. PEST CONTROL: BEFORE YOU GIG PRE-EMERGENT WEED CONTROL FOR SHRUB BE ~ BE APPLIED IN FEBRUARY, SPRAY PROPERLY LA ~ T J ; -J HERBICIDE ON MULCHED AREAS FOR WEED C0 CALL 1 800 632-4949 ~ NEEDED. CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR INSEC N. C. ONE-CALL CENTER INFESTATION AND DISEASE MAY BE APPLIED IF Cant 5 W~ irrmMm/PIeM ~ ~ ~ 'ERLY LABELED 1~6 9 Me~ofa ¢ar~aa'Bradcere BB' Bracken Brown Beauly Magnofa 12' 6' - - B-8 based on field ties to the flags set by Trigon Engir~ing ConsultanCs, Inc. STRUCTURAL
Lassiter-Hopkins-Chang
TEED CONTROL ~ 1 I~IeQ~ofe eoulerpana Sauoer 61eQai~ 6' - - ~ . LAWN/GRASSING PLANTING NOTES: 1015 Wade Avenue
~R INSECT ~,~q 11 Nyeee aquatics Wafer T~peb T - - ~ . 'PLIED IF ~,p~.p 10 Neu~drw~ domeetice'Fierbo~r Dwer' hlerbar DMwrf Nendna - - 10' - - Copt 1. All areas of the site shall be covered by lawn grassing, sprigging, sodding, Raleigh, NC 27603
NEEDED AND SHALL BE SPEQFIC TO THE PROB IT'S THE LAW 1E PROBLEM. pp~ 14 Nor?dna domee~ca 'Royal P~i~cea' Royal Riioe~ Nerri~a 24' 1B - - Cant no-mow vegetaUOn, plantings or mulch, No areas on the site shah be left bare• 919.82.5587 T
Plgi 8 Pieiachio cMeraio Chiieee Phtadro 12' 6' - - B-8 2. NI Bermuda. S,prigginy at the Multi-Purpose Field shall be Substar~dallY Complete by Montl~/~Yne~.
4. MULCHING: D WITH A DEPTH PJ 4 Pieria jepares 'I~lou?tei? Fre' Mou~tai? Rro Pbrie 24' 24 - - ~i 3. NI Lawn Grassing on the site shall be Substantially Complete by MonWDay/Nex. PLUMS, MECH, ELEC i CIVIL
MULCHED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED WITH OF 2"-3" OF MULCH. MULCH SHALL BE REAPPLI EVERY TWO YEARS OR AS NEEDED. REAPPLIED ~ 7 Plaferrr occider~fe Sycanare 14' T 2' B-B 4. No plantings shall be located within Town of Cary GreanNay Easert~ent. Dewberry & Davis
PRCT 20 - i 2301 Rexwoods Drive Suite 210
P80 2 Prue ~eml~ta'Okems' Okems Cherty T ~ 2' B-9 PT 100 Prue taeda LablolY Phs 8' - - 2' CanUB-B Raleigh, NC 27607-3366
5. PLANT PROTECTION: t00T ZONE AREA aN 1B Quercw nuMei Mltd Oak 1D' 4 Y ~ 919.881.9939 T
' ~ AVOID IXCESS INTRUSIO~NTO THE ROOT Z0 ~ OF FSTABLiSHED PLANTING TD 20 Toxoci~m c~icl?un Cam'a^ B~Idcyprea 12' - - 25' ~
UPA _ 6 linos Rlry~aia'Alee' Abe L_Gmeee Elm ------------]2'-- _ 2E ~ ROOFING CONSULTANT
. 6. WATERING ~ Z8(3Y 10 Zekova ~aia'treen Vane' (been Vats Zekova 12' 4' 25 B"B
~ WATER PLANTS DUkING DROUGHT~iQ AVOID \ ~ ~ INJURY OR DEATH. ~ ~ AVOID PIANT g-g g~kd end B~rl~pped ~ ` Ca~i. Conteii~ Grown Stafford Consulting Engineers 7424 Chapel Hill Rd. Suite 102
• aanlNy not {~ueranieed Al pknb ~fwwn on plan muM be phnted Raleigh, NC 27607
~ FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ALL PLANTINGS IN ~ .IN ~ 919.852.1038 T
\ 1 EXCAVATED EDGE ~ ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PLAN MAY CONSTTfI -60 NP. ~ VIOLATION OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ~vsrrr~ Cary Project Number 07-SP-022
FOOD SERVICE
~ ORDINANCE AND MAY RESULT IN FINES. ~ s~ ~ APPROVED
No su~rt t~r~~rrr's iuorw rioRn~ s~oE of ~ 1~ ~O~TM TOWN OF GARY Foodesign Associates
~ 5828 Oak give
, iii~ii, 4 N LA I in ron o i ere uire a . Charlotte, NC 28227
- L . 6 _ an in s w rov e c oo , wi i in a 704.545.6151 T
iii ii a e. annin ruc ion ons view an
iii iii ii a i • a' n ineerin PROJECT
• iiii i ~
iii iiii iiii iii, i~ i~i~~ i iiiii ~i iii ii ii ~ E-22 Elementary School
• iii i iii i ii i iii iiiiii ~ ~ i iii i WCPSS Project No. 000w0000
ii i iiiii iiii iii i ii iii i i i $09 Nib Park Drive
URBAN NG 5 D(ISTI _ i c.n,. Coro, c..ain. Township, Waltz Cowley
Z Pi FFER ON BU
3-HVA 3-HVA Site Plan
v uH 13 HYA Submittal
? / ~ CLIENT
2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
6 ~ ,d A, i ~ ~ i ~ / /
~ ' / / / i i / / , /i / Wake County
~ ~ ~ / Public Schools
~ ~ ~ ~ -I.CRR ~ ~ ~ / / 1661 Rock Quarry Road Rakfth, North r610
~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ld X ~ ~ ~ / ~ i ~o ~N~ Iwo
13U C o,41
4S
//////r4? / • / ~f /////////i// / /
~ / y. .y ' / / / / z
/ / ///////1 1 ii ii iii iiiiii iir ~ ii i iii i i i i / / / / / / / y' L i y
~ ii ii ~ / i iii i .y / y ~Y y W y W W v co
5 W .
iii ii 3 y y y / y ~ / .y ~y 0,d ~y
6 -fi0 ~ ~ / / / y y y . / / / / / / / / /
/ W /i / / y' y /
iii / / ~Y `Y / / I~' y / / / W / / ~ y y y y y y / y y
iii i~ / / i / y y / / / / y / W / / / PROJECT NUMBER:
1 / / W CAP22
1~' W y J. W W y / / / / / /
/ / W / / / / y / / 1 J / y ~ y' y y ~L PHASE:
r y W W y W y y W / .y .y ~Y Site Plan SubrtuUal
~4~ iii N T ES THE N
. / / y y y `Y y ~Y W W y / DATE:
Q ~y / y y W W W / 03 08 07
r.. ~ / / ,Q,i y W
/ W ' W / 8 DRAWN BY:
~ ~ iii ; / + -6 KMD
CHECKED BY:
~Y y y W y DEP
y ~V ~Y
5 ~ _ 5 / _ ~ / / J' W J' y I y y y REVISIONS
60 24" ~ ~ RCP ~t._. ~ 60 W y y W
y W / / / / / ~ I ~ y y y y y~ y y W y y y y y y y W y W y y y rMX revision dote
/ / y y W / y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y 1 NCOENR First Review Response 041707
y y~ W y W W W W y W y y y y W y y y y W W y W W W W W W y y W J• y L 1' y i J' y i y y L y y ~ T ~~,r~ T ^ y y W y y y y 3 TOC 1st RwNw Wspaws 042607
ULPA ~Y y W W y L y W ~ y y y y ~ i y y y y y y y y L y A W y W W f' y y y y W y W i y y W y y ~ Y i i ~ i i 1 y ~ 1 L •i L y W y y J'
i ~ 4 - . I y' 3 NCDWG Review Response 05 2b 07
• 3 y + - - ~ J' 'L J• y y y y L y ~ W L y W W W y y W i i y y W i i i y L y i
3 y, y y W L y y 1 y i L i L i W J i L y y J'
y y J~ W W y W y y y y y y y W y~ y' y 2- N 2J y y y Y •Y J~ y ~L ~Y W W y y y W W W y y y y W y y y y ~ 'Y ~Y J' J~ ~Y J~ I W~ ~ y~ W W
~ ~ ~ / / y~ y L L y y L y y W y J~ y •y ~ / y, y y y y y y i y y y L W L y v, y W y W W i W y W W i W W a y r L ~ y
X*" 4x XX ***ft 000** . ~ y y y Y W Y y y / W W y y W y W y W W y i i W i Y Y W y y y
y y y y y y y y y y y y y y CS-Y N ~V J ~Y y J y y y W W W W W W W ~ W W i W y W ~ y y i y y ~ y y y Y i y W y W y y y W y y i 4e 4, -4e
ULPA + lOl I01 101 / W W y r c
WA CANOPY TREE ~ . 4 J J J 1 EA O/C Planting
NO BUFFER REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENT ~ 00-LMV *3- ~Csy CSY CS W41 y y 41 i y 41 y i W y W W ? i i W + i i Y Plan Z 502
ALONG WEST SIDE ~ ig' ICN / y ICN LMV 36- -VAIV 3-NDHD
~ C[ i OF PROPERTY