NC0050105_NPDES Permit_20110621

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 21, 2011
MEMORANDUM
TO: . Jackie Nowell
Point Source Branch -Complex Unit
FROM: (-Mark Brantley, Erivironmental'Chernist• ,-t-
THROUGH: Belinda S. Henson, Regional Supervisor Surface Water Protecti n S tio2 FRS O
SUBJECT: Staff Report for NPDES Permit Renewal
NPDES Permit No. NC0050105 .
City of Fayetteville/Public Works Commission
Rockfish Creek Water Reclamation Facility
Cumberland County
Please find enclosed a staff report and recommendations from the Fayetteville Regional
Office concerning the renewal of subject new NPDES Permit.
If you have any questions or require any further information, please advise.
Enclosure

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: YES NO X
If Yes, SOC No.
To: NPDES Unit -Complex Permits Section
Water Quality Section
Attention: Jackie Nowell
Date: June 21, 2011
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY: Cumberland
Permit No. NC0050105
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. , Facility and Address: City of Fayetteville/Public Works Commission
PO Box 1089
Fayetteville, NC 28302-1089
2. Date of Investigation: May 20, 2011
3. Report Prepared by: Mark Brantley, Environmental Chemist, FRO
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Dickie Vinent [phone]
Chuck Baxley [phone]
5. Directions to Site: Take NC 87 East from Fayetteville. Travel to SR 2218 (Tracy Hall Road)
Turn and follow signs to wwtp.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 34 deg. 58'07.65" N Longitude: 78 deg. 49' 38.53" W
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S.Quad No. 34078-H7-TF-024 and FRO H 23 NE
U.S.G.S. Quad Name: Cedar Creek, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? Yes X NO
8. Topography (relationship to flood included):
9. Location of nearest dwelling: Greater than 1,000 feet
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Cape Fear River
a. Classification: - Lower Little River Class C
b., River Basin and Subbasin No.: Cape Fear River Basin 03-06-15
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
Fishing, boating, fish, and wildlife propagation

PART II - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 21 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment facility? ' 21.0 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity). 21.0 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued
in the previous two (2) years.
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities:
UNITS
NUMBER OF UNITS
Influent Screw Pumps
4
Parshall (Influent)
4
Barscreens:
-
(a) Screw press Barscreens
3
(b) Manual 2-inch Barscreens
1
Grit Chambers -
2
Aeration Basins
5
Aeration/Mixing Blowers
4
Flow.Splitter Box
1
Secondary Clarifiers
3
RAS Pumps
5
Sand Filters ..
6
Chlorine Contact Chamber
1
Parshall Flume (Effluent)
1
Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Tanks
2
Sodium Hypochlorite Recirculation Pump
2
Sodium Hypochlorite Metering Pumps
4
Sodium Bisulfate Storage Tanks
2
Sodium Bisulfate Metering Pumps
2
NPW- Pumps
2
Cascade Aerator
6
Scum Pump
3
WAS Pumps
3
Aerobic Digester
5
Sludge Pumps
4
Gravity Belt Thickeners
2
Thickened Sludge Receiving Tanks
2
Thickened Sludge Pumps
3
Aerated Sludge Storage Tanks
3

PART II - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS (continued):
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities:
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
h. Pretreatment Program: N/A
In development
Should be required
Approved X
Not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilizing/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ Permit No. WQ0000527
Residual Contractor: Synagro
Telephone: [phone]
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP X PFRP Other
c. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Grade TV (see attached)
4. • SIC Code (s):
PART III —.OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds (municipals only)?
N/A
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:
No special monitoring requested. Monitoring and limitations should be
In keeping with basinwide strategy.
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates (please indicate): None
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications N/A
Begin Construction .N/A
Complete Construction N/A

PART III —.OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION -(continued)
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge options
available? Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: N/A
Connection to Regional Sewer System: N/A
Subsurface: N/A
Other disposal options: N/A
5. Other Special Items: The Rockfish Water Reclamation Facility is presently a member of the
Cape Fear River Assembly and instreain Cape Fear River monitoring is performed by this group,
thus upstream and downstream monitoring by the company should not be a permit requirement.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This facility is in compliance with all NPDES effluent permit parameters. It is recommended that
the Permit be issued for 21.0 MGD in keeping with the Cape Fear River Basinwide Strategy. The
final effluent limits should be flow based on completed design not average flows."
Signature of Report Preparer
1)04144deD
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
1,-a�a-Il
Date

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0050105
FACILITY NAME: pWCfFayetteville - Rockfish Creek WWTP
CITY: Fayetteville
OUTFALL: 001
EFFLUENT
COUNTY: Cumberland
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 12 - 2009
REGION: Fayetteville
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 5 OF 7
00010
deg c
Temperature,
Water Deg.
Centigrade
00300
mg/1
DO, Oxygen, -
Dissolved
00400
su
pH
00530
mg/1
Solids, Total
Suspended
00600
mg/1
.Nitrogen, Total
(as N
00610
mg/1
Nitrogen,
Ammonia Total
(as N)
00665
mg/1
Phosphorus,
Total (as P)
01092
mg/1
Copper, Total
(as Cu)
1 -09
16.95
9.4
6.5 - 7.2
30
2.945
17.4
2
0.21
4
--
2-09
16.05
9.42
6.7 - 7.3
30
2.545
_
15.8
2
0.1725 .
3
3-09
17
9.681818
6.6 - 7.2
30.
0.586957
10.35
2 .
0.052174
1.75
4-09
•
18.857143
9.271429
6.7 - 7.5
5-09
•
21.15
8.795
6.6 - 7.2
-
6-09
23.909091
8.436364
6.7 - 7.3
7-09
25.181818
8.336364
6.9 - 7.2
31.9
8-09
25.857143
8.142857
6.8 - 7.2
9-09
24.857143
8.033333
- 6.6 - 7.2
"
10-09
23.090909
8.322727
6.7 - 7.7
11-09
21.315789
8.436842
6.6 - 7.5
.
12-09
18.47619
8.766667
6.6 - 7.2
-

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0050105
FACILITY NAME: PWC/Fayetteville - Rockfish Creek WWTP
CITY:. Fayetteville
COUNTY: Cumberland
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 12 - 2009
REGION: Fayetteville
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 6 OF 7
01077
ug/1
Silver, Total
(as Ag)
01092
mg/1
Zinc, Total (as
Zn)
31616
#/100m1
Coliform, Fecal
MF, M-FC
Broth, 44.5C
50050
mgd
Flow, in
conduit or thru
treatment plant
50060
ug/1
Chlorine, Total
Residual
80082
mg/1
,BOD,
Carbonaceous 05'
Day, 20C
C0530
mg/1
Solids, Total
Suspended -
Concentration
CO600
mg/1
Nitrogen, Total
(as N) -
Concentration
16
10
1-09
.
0
117.7
22.144945
11.945161
0
2.2075
2 09
16
;
10
11.39461
11.528571 ,
0
3.02
3-09
16
10_...
.
7.509284
12.967742
0
0.41913
16 .
5
30
4-09-
0
112.2
11.042867
12.58
0
0
0.742857
.12.2
16
5
30
5-09
24.335324
12.019355
0
0
0.525
13.1
16
5
30
6-09
41.468202
11.693333
0
0
0.404545
17
16
5
30
7-09
0
103.4
32.067308
12.429032
0
0.095238
0.214286
16.69
8-09
16
5
30
27.022246
14.051613
0
0.099545
0.272727
15.4
• 9-09
16
5
30
24.099693
13.086667
0
0
0.147619
15.45
10-09
16
5
30
0
36.473082
13:367742
0
0
0.471429
11.5
16 .
10
30
11-09
35.364374
15.42
0 •
0
0.63
12.27
16
10
30
12-09
32.609476
14.248387
0
0.1035
0.255
10.05

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0050105
FACILITY NAME: PWC/Fayetteville - Rockfish Creek WWTP
CITY: Fayetteville
COUNTY: Cumberland
C0610
mg/1
Nitrogen,
Ammonia Total
(as N) -
Concentration
C0665
mg/1
Phosphorus,
Total (as P) -
Concentration
TGP3B'
pass/fail
P/F STATRE 7Dax
Chr Ceriodaphnia
'1-09
1
2-09
3-09
1
.
4-09
0.011429
2.55
1
1
5-09
0.0335
2.4
1•
6-09
0.02
3.85
'
1
7-09
0
4.85
1
1
8-09
0.055
4.5
1
l
9-09
'
0.005238
2.9
1
10-09
•
0.01619
2.3
1
2
11 -09
0.007
2.43
2
12-09
0
2.8
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 12 - 2009 DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 7 OF 7
REGION: Fayetteville

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0050105
FACILITY NAME: PWC/Fayetteville - Rockfish Creek WWTP
CITY: Fayetteville
OUTFALL: 001
EFFLUENT
COUNTY: Cumberland
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 12 - 2010
REGION: Fayetteville
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 5 OF 6
00010.
deg c
Temperature,
Water Deg.
Centigrade
00300
mg/1
DO, Oxygen,
Dissolved
00900
su -
pH
01092
mg/1•
Copper,- Total
(as Cu)
01077.
ug/1
Silver, Total
.(as Ag)
01092
mg/1
Zinc, Total (as
Zn)
31616
i/100m1
Coliform, Fecal
MF, M-FC
Broth,49.5C
50050
mgd
Flow, in
conduit or thru
treatment plant
1-10
15.631579
9.331579
6.6 - 7.6
0
13.960376 .
16
14.429032
2-10
15.05
9.69
6.7 - 7.1
16.562835
16 •
15.582143
3 10
15.565217
9.665217
6:5 - 7.3
12.251954
16
14.467742
4 10
'
18.809524
9.157143
6.4 - 7.3
3.52
0
-
22.908187 -
16
15.24
5 10
21.5
8.715
6.4 - 7.1
40.623882
16
15.119355
6 10
23.5
8.318182
6.8 - 7.2
25.330506
16
14.996667
7-10
25.952381
7.7
6.8 - 7.4
3.15
0
56.662014
16
14.767742
8-10
26.681818
7.786364
6:8 - 7.3
61,.119795
16
13.325806
9 10
26.190476
7.5
6.7 - 7.2
29.96911
16
14.316667
10 -'10
24.142857
8.019048
6.4 - 7.3
2.7
0
118.8
37.980802
16
14.154839
11 10
21.4
8.84 '
6.5 - 7.3
46.731837
?6
13.976667
12 - 10
17.65
9.535
. 6.2 - 7.4
0
26.004522
16
14.25'1613

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0050105
FACILITY NAME: PWC/Fayetteville - Rockfish Creek WWTP
CITY: Fayetteville
COUNTY: Cumberland
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 12 - 2010
REGION: Fayetteville
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 6 OF 6
50060
ug/1
Chlorine, Total
Residual
'80082
mg/1
BOD,
Carbonaceous 05
Day, 20C
C0530
mg/1
Solids, Total
Suspended
Concentration
C0600
mg/1
Nitrogen, Total
(as N) -
Concentration
C0610
mg/1
Nitrogen,
Ammonia Total
(as N) -
Concentration
C0665
mg/1
Phosphorus,
Total (as P) -
Concentration
NC01
yes=1 no=0
Annual
Pollutant Scan
[126 parameters]
TGP3B
pass/fail
P/F S^.ATRE 7Day
Chr Ceriodaphnia
1-10
• 10
30
2
0
0
0.215
12.85
0.046
1.85
1
10
30
2
2-10
0
1.686
1.05
10.2
0.0145
1.85
10
30
2
3-10
0
0.867826
0.786957'
11.1
0.066087
1.85
5
30
1
4-10
0
0.19
0.895
10.35
0.046
"2.38
1
5
30
1
5-10
0
1.784286
1.461905
13.55
0.359524
4.5
5
30
1
6-10
0
0.786364
0.677273
7.82
0.151818
1.6
5
30
1
7-10
0
0.608
0.225
9.85
0.0855
2.6
1
5
30
1
8-10
0
0
0.621739
9.43
0.004783
2.95
5
30
1
9-10
0
1.032857
1.195238
12.78
0.214286
3.85
10 - 10
5
30
1
0
0.371429
1.080952
14.02
0.087143
2.1
0
1
10 -
30
2
11 - 10
0
0.931
1.48
14.32
0.139
.2.05
0
10
30
2
12-10
0
0.125789
0
16.14
0.011579
3.6
0

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0050105
FACILITY NAME: PWC/Fayetteville - Rockfish Creek WWTP
CITY: Fayetteville
OUTFALL: 001
EFFLUENT
COUNTY: Cumberland
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 12 - 2011
REGION: Fayetteville
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE '5 OF 5
00010
deg c
Temperature,
Water Deg.
Centigrade
00300
mg/1
DO, Oxygen,
Dissolved
00400
su
pH
01042
mg/1
Copper, Total
(as Cu)
01077
ug/1
Silver, Total
(as Ag)
01092
mg/1
Zinc, Total (as
Zn)
31616
4/100m1
Coliform, Fecal
MF, M-FC
Broth,44.5C
50050
mgd
Flow, in
conduit or thru
treatment plant
•
1-11
16
15.7
9.67
6.6 - 7.4
3
0
135.3
8.777845
13.919355
2-11
16
16
9.46
6.5 - 7
4.303072
14.15
3-11
16
16.891304
9.43913
6.6 - 7.2
11.147772
14.025806
50060
ug/1
Chlorine, Total
Residual
80082
mg/1
BOD,
Carbonaceous 05
Day, 20C
C0530
mg/1
Solids, Total
Suspended -
Concentration
C0600
mg/1
Nitrogen, Total
(as N) -
Concentration
.00610
mg/1
Nitrogen,
Ammonia Total
(as N) -
Concentration
C0665
mg/1
Phosphorus,
Total (as P) -
Concentration
NC01
yes=1 no=0 -
Annual
Pollutant Scan
[126 parameters]
TGP3B
pass/fail
P/F S^-ATRE 7Day
Chr Ceriodaphnia
10
30
2
1-11
0
0.720952
0
13.52
0.211429
2.3
0
1
10
30
2
•
2-11
•
0
1.245
0
9.71
0.255
1.95
0
10
30
2
3-11
0
2.406957
0.808696
15.91
0.423043
1.5 '
0 '

A711
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment. and Natural Resources
• Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director • Secretary
May 26, 2011
Mick J. Noland
PWC/Fayetteville
P.O. Box 1089
Fayetteville NC 283021089
SUBJECT: May 20, 2011 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
PWC/Fayetteville
Rockfish Creek WWTP
Permit No: NC0050105
Cumberland County
Dear Mr. Noland:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection conducted on
May 20, 2011. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Mark Brantley, Environmental Chemist,
of the Fayetteville Regional Office. The cooperation of Mr. Chuck Baxley, Grade IV ORC, was greatly
appreciated. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit NC0050105. As a reminder, preservation of
the Waters of the State ban only be achieved through consistent NPDES Permit compliance.
Comments
• Facility was very clean and neat in appearance on the day of the inspection.
• Records and equipment are well kept.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have
any questions, please call me at 910-433-3327.
Sincerely,
Mark Brantley
Environmental Chemist
Surface Water Protection Section
Fayetteville Regional Office
cc: Wendell C. Baxley, ORC
Central Files
• Fayetteville Files, (kmb)
NorthCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality/Aquifer Protection Section 225 Green St./ Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPAA Washington, D.C. 20a60
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code • NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
1 I NI 2 151 31 NC0050105 111 121 11/05/20 117
Type Inspector Fac Type
181 c1 191 SI 2011
1111 11 1 1 11166
Remarks
211 1 11 1111 111 1 1 111 1111 11 L1 ] L1 111.11111
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 81 QA Reserved.
671 1 69 701 31 711 NI 721 N 1 - 731 1 1 74 751 1 1 1 1 1 I- 180
- Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Rockfish Creek WWTP
2536 Tracey Hall Rd
Fayetteville NC 28306
i
Entry Time/Date
10:00 AM 11/05/20
Permit Effective Date
07/03/01
Exit Time/Date
12:30 PM 11/05/20
Permit Expiration Date
11/10/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Wendell C. Baxley/0RC/910-223-4701/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mick J Noland,PO Box 1089 Fayetteville NC 283021089//910-223-4733/ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
■ Permit ■ Flow Measurement ■ Operations & Maintenance ■ Records/Reports
. Self -Monitoring Program . ■ Sludge Handling Disposal ■ Facility Site Review • Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Mark Brantley p� !� ,7 ._``------ FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext-727/
f ite:dZ-NL /.�,- ,,,.,,,6
•
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer % Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Belinda S Henson � �,,n _,/_-0 �1,4 yt,,L-1FR0 WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.726/ 6 -a "1 -I, )
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES
31 NC0050105. 111 1.21
yr/mo/day
11/05/20
Inspection Type
117
18ICI
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

. Permit: NC0050105 Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations 8 Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ n
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ n n n
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? n n i• n
Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ n n n
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? n n ■ n
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? E n n n
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ■ n n n
Comment:
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? ■ n n n
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? ■ n n n
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? ■ n n n
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on .DMRs? n n n ■
Is the chain -of -custody complete? Finn.
Dates, times and location of sampling ❑
Name of individual performing the sampling n
Results of analysis and calibration n
Dates of analysis n
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs n
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? • n n n
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ■ n n n
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGn permitted fi^w) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? E n n n
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? ■ n n n
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? ■ n n n
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • n n n
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? ■ n n n
Page # 3

•
✓ � \
Permit: NC0050105
Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record. Keeping
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment: •
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
- En n n
Yes No NA NE
■ .nnn
■ -nnn
nn■n
Flow Measurement -Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? - ■ n n n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?. • n .n n
Is the flow meter operational? • n n n
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ n ■ n
Comment:
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? ■ n ❑ n
Is the mixing adequate? • ❑ n n
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? ■ n ❑ n_
# Is the odor acceptable? ■ n n ❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ■ ' n n n
Comment:
Solids Handling Equipment Yes No NA NE
• Is the equipment operational? • n n n
Is the chemical feed equipment operational? ■ ❑ n n
Is storage adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of high level Of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters? ■ n n
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press? • n n n
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake? n n • ❑
•The facility has an approved sludge management plan? '■ n n n
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Page # 4

Permit: NC0050105 Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? ■ n n n
Is the wet well free of excessive grease? ■ n n n
Are all 'pumps present? ■ n n n
Are all pumps operable?, ■ n ❑ n
Are float controls operable? ■ n n n
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? ■ n n n
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? ■ n n n
Comment:
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual ■
b.Mechanical ■
Are the bars adequately screening debris? ■ n n n
Is the screen free of excessive debris? ■ 0 n n
Is disposal of screening in compliance? ■ n n ❑
Is the unit in good condition? ■ n n n
Comment:
Grit Removal Yes No NA NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manual . ■
b.Mechanical n
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter? ■ n n n
Is the grit free of excessive odor? ■ n n n
# Is disposal of grit in compliance? ■ n ❑ n
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? ■ n n n
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ■ n n n
Are weirs level? ■ n n n
Is the site free of weir blockage? ginnn
Page # 5

Permit: NC0050105 Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/ of the sidewall.depth)
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I)
Comment:
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
.Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in.use?
Comment:
Disinfection -Liquid
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■nnn
■ nnn
Yes No NA NE
Ext. Air
Diffused
■ nnn
nn■n
.nnn
■ nnn
■nnn
■ nnn
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
Liquid
mnnri
nn■n
■ nnn
nn■n
Yes No NA NE
Page # ,6

Permit: NC0050105 Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/20/2011 . Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Liquid Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant? ■ n n n
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational? ■ n n n
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains) ■ n n ❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? ■ ri ❑ n
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? n n n •
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? ■ n n n
Comment:
Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional? n n ■ ❑
Is sample collected above side streams? ■ n n n
Is proper volume collected? ■ n n n
Is the tubing clean? ■ n n n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ n n n
Is sampling performed according to the permit? ■ ❑ n n
Comment:
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ■ ❑ n ❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ■ n n n
Is proper volume collected? • n n n
Is the tubing clean? ■ n n n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ n n n
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ n n n
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? 0 0
Comment: Facility is a member of the Middle Cape Fear River Basin Association.
This association handles the instream montoring requirements for its members.
■n
Page # 7

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
PERMIT: NC0050105
FACILITY: PWC/Fayetteville - Rockfish Creek WWTP
COUNTY: Cumberland
Report Date: 05/25/11
Page: 1 of 1
REGION: Fayetteville
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL /'
_REPORT PPI
•
LOCATION
12 -2009 001 Effluent
04 -2009 001 Effluent
04 -2009 001 Effluent
PARAMETER
Annual Pollutant Scan [126
parameters]
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
N) - Concentration
VIOLATION • UNIT OF CALCULATED
DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE % OVER LIMIT • VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
12/31/09 Annually yes=1 no= Frequency Violation No Action, BPJ
04/04/09. 5 X week mg/I Frequency Violation No Action, BIMS
Calculation Error
Solids, Total Suspended - 04/04/09 5 X week mg/I Frequency Violation No Action, BIMS
Concentration Calculation Error
40 "�tr•/ 0/c I r(9r7S
,T14
474