The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20120752 Ver 1_Application_20120808'I LTy .a �A1F o. y STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA �apSgNp Wq RRiyry� n' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION R at"VC8 BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A CONTI JR GOVERNOR SECRETARY August 3, 2012 Raleigh Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District 3331 Heritage Trade Drive Suite 105 c 5 2 Wake Forest, NC 27587 6 Attention Mr Eric Alsmeyer, Project Manager Subject Proposed guardrail along NC 56 at Robertson Creek in Granville County TIP Project No SF 4905C, WBS No 43467 The North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) proposes shoulder widening to accommodate guardrail placement Shoulder widening will include minor dirt work with rock plating throughout Some concrete work will be done to the box culvert to accommodate attaching guardrail to the structure This project will involve permanent wetland, open water, and buffer impacts associated with pushing out the fill slope where necessary Application is hereby made for USACE Section 404 NWP 14 & NWP 13 and corresponding NCDENR DWQ Section 401 Water Quality Certifications along with a Buffer Authorization for Road Improvements and Bank Stabilization A pre construction notification, construction plan sketch project mapping photographs and wetland data sheets are attached with this request If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Mrs Heather Montague at (252)492 0111 or hwmontaguegncodot gov Sincerely, J W Bowman P E Division Engineer cc Mr Rob Ridings, Project Coordinator, N C Division of Water Quality Mr Ben Upshaw P E NCDOT Division 5 Division Design Engineer Mrs Dawn Phipps, P E CPESC NCDOT REU Field Operations Staff Engineer Division Five — 2612 North Duke Street Durham North Carolina 27704 Telephone 919 220 4600 Fax 919 560 3371 78 683 333 W, I 1 1 178 666d666 W, I 1 I 178 650 000 W I I I I 78 6831333 W I I 1 1 178 6661666 W 1 1 1 1 178 6500000 W 1 I I I Name CREEDMOOR Location 036 1218100 N 078 6619083 W Date 8/3/2012 Caption NC 56 guardrail SF -4905C DDC safety project Scale 1 inch equals 2000 feet Granville County Fig are 1 uopyngn[l,.,) iaai iviapcecn inc � T It ( �� ,�-i -\ ___.'� \ �/( % Jr7 fy 1 r� 382 r /s gem tom` 7 1 l \ r ��) �}, � A l z M c r— cti�! % r� err / �� r " °� r � � � �� + I �" � err /� � �. �... �' _ 11) rt �� 3�r'il ,- j(I ti .� 4�- p`�f � �+ tv.,^ �..,� ti r, -`� ,_ V f"'J \-.. ( �" ` (! y✓ 1 �� 89 /1 � t'� \ \ Nit TnOT1 �hY \`l�l V t f i .�f \"' \\ Z , }�;h`t Vii% kaJ I } Y -.�I� �r,41 /r 1 f \("".� t j 7 { ,^'rr ( �� {,-"�„ v ll \ ,�ik! "`. ( 3 lie Nk _ Z C1 M Cl) Cl) — f`^ —''- -- —�*`• I c�'{{ y„ "y. �i l,` �k...».\ `.. Y "i+ �„�`. R I ; ✓ h' R '� 1 f-. . .-M i \ tt `� MtlEner yr �—�� +� �� 1 ' J (1(�"'�� `--, r ' rem Jt l' 4ox h G nn Ilse r ° 300_ h i S h 'r�1 �� r 11 3T��, k Site i( P e fz- �l � � �l3c� } a� yf,�.� '� at ovse � r ^v z r �'> �%s'✓ _ F 'yt� n�.,� �`'� _ O a Creeumoor� � � z .jF C' -,�s, p =r� iLf ---�' =) I li'3 � �� ''a k` _ � 5 "" � 1 � �� l ti ��-�t t � ` �� .: �, ✓,� `�. _ -- �` �Cem z t0 (�^„�� i� l rr I�'� � y� "°c, rs �• i (��! / + �� f r � ✓ - i� —� .�-� ( I � I'� tl J L I j ,/� { 1� �, Ll� �y� --r, 11.. ✓i� L -t''�r 1 `� 1 J ...3Jt1 "k �Yi r 2� I O c0 M — f( (0 1\r j r -��E chi ��t�l l��.I �t(k(i'1 �� ,.� ( � � '�•� � ��.�.i/`'� tfJ60 rY � --'--- �� r er 1 I I 17000 It ti 345 r )} J itAil ��yr�., � � Z i � u _l - . �} Cem r� fry +` I ( n ( 11( u�RM \l { by 7 z\ It _ 1'X CO ce) 9 W ., L 1 (° }r 78 6831333 W I I 1 1 178 6661666 W 1 1 1 1 178 6500000 W 1 I I I Name CREEDMOOR Location 036 1218100 N 078 6619083 W Date 8/3/2012 Caption NC 56 guardrail SF -4905C DDC safety project Scale 1 inch equals 2000 feet Granville County Fig are 1 uopyngn[l,.,) iaai iviapcecn inc d r° UrC VMWI f CrB l -II t C�a CrB f � wz {CrB i 13E 1 K R17 � z SHEET NO 15 SOIL SURVEY OF GRANVILLE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA CrB PnDCrC 1 78 3730 DCrC� e g CrB rB r Cr v" CrB 36 07 30 11c1rC CfC s dB C'�6 S p CrB Cr6 Ft � °.CrB �CrC 1702 s s L:, G.Cry MaB -CrB U CrB C:rR CrB s 1 �_.. X . s Cf - I} v 6rB M N rtMMa Ot k 0 CrB 1 rt`�fi /t MaB Kac CIS i i CrB >�'�`< b ❑ ,fit i Y w � CrB CrB J B i va �vta2sn a n t a + --CrB MaB CrB ; 1 CrB C B 10 e x� MaB c CrB Mad -=-CrB AaA .—f n t ii Intl ._ i R Sure Z Z z Z9 1 Z9 ELI 01 I Z9 z Z9 -Nil ;� IF I� la � It 1.1 3 0 ,1 0 1 I JA I 1 -ll 16 1 1 I' 1 I' I' 1 II 1 II 1 II 1 1 1 I� BZ 2 BZ I E TB TB 1 BZ I I� BZ 2 f; I' 1 I' 1 i; I3 I' 1 I' 1 I' 1 I' 1 I� 1 I' 1 1 I' 1 I' 1 .1 12 1 I' 1 1 I' 1 1 1 iII 1 I� 1 c w 4V i I V i I 1 -ll 16 1 1 I' 1 I' I' 1 II 1 II 1 II 1 1 1 I� BZ 2 BZ I E TB TB 1 BZ I I� BZ 2 f; I' 1 I' 1 i; I3 I' 1 I' 1 I' 1 I' 1 I� 1 I' 1 1 I' 1 I' 1 .1 12 1 I' 1 1 I' 1 1 1 iII 1 I� 1 c w ii V, I V o�OF WATFgPG LE.J]0 -r Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version Pre - Construction Notification PC Form A Applicant Information 1 Processing 1a Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps non reporting ®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit 1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number NWP 14 and NWP 13 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No 1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ❑ Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes ® No 1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu fee program ❑ Yes ® No 1 g Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h below ❑ Yes ® No 1h is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2 Project Information 2a Name of project NC 56 Guardrail @ Robertson Creek 2b County Granville 2c Nearest municipality / town Creedmoor 2d Subdivision name N/A 2e NCDOT only T I P or state project no SF -4905C WBS 43467 3 Owner Information 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed NCDOT Division 5 3b Deed Book and Page No N/A 3c Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable) N/A 3d Street address 2612 N Duke Street 3e City state zip Durham NC 27704 3f Telephone no (919)220 4600 3g Fax no (919)560 3371 3h Email address wbowman(@ncdot qov 4 Applicant Information (If different from owner) N/A 5 Agent/Consultant Information (If applicable) N/A Page 1 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version B Project Information and Prior Project History 1 Property Identification 1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) N/A 1 b Coordinates (in decimal degrees) Site 1 Latitude 36 1218 N Longitude 78 6620 W (DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD) 1 c Property size Project area 0 92 acre 2 Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to Robertson Creek proposed project 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water WS IV NSW 2c River basin Neuse 3 Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application Existing consists of paved 2 lane highway dirt shoulders and existing box culvert Surrounding area includes wetlands and woods mostly undeveloped 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 028ac 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 60ft 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project To improve the safety of this section of NC 56 as a pattern of crashes has been identified here 3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used Shoulder widening to accommodate guardrail placement Shoulder widening includes minor dirt work with rock plating throughout Shoulder work will be completed by backhoe or excavator type equipment Guardrail to be set by appropriate equipment Some concrete work to be done to the box culvert to accommodate the attaching of the guardrail to the structure 4 Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments N/A 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type ❑ Preiiminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company N/A Name (if known) N/A Other N/A 4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation N/A 5 Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions N/A Page 2 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 6 Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes explain N/A C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ® Wetlands ❑ Streams tributaries ® Buffers ® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps 404 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ —non 404 other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ®P ❑ T fill in wetlands Palustrine ❑ Yes ® No ® Corps ® DWQ 0 028 2g Total Wetland Impacts 0 028 2h Comments N/A 3 Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number (PER) or (Corps 404 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non 404 width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T N/A N/A ❑ PER ® Corps N/A N/A Stream 1 ❑ INT ® DWQ Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ® Corps Stream 1 ❑ INT ® DWQ Site 1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ® Corps Stream 1 ❑ INT ® DWQ 3h Total stream and tributary impacts NONE 31 Comments N/A 4 Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Temporary T 01 ®P ❑ T Robertson Creek fill beaver swamp 0 015 4f Total open water impacts 0 015 4g Comments N/A Page 3 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 5 Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed the complete the chart below 5a Pond ID number 5b Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d Stream Impacts (feet) 5e Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A P2 5f Total NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE 5g Comments N/A 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required ❑ Yes ®No If yes permit ID no N/A 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) N/A 5i Size of pond watershed (acres) N/A 5k Method of construction N/A 6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a Project is in which protected basin? ® Neuse ❑Tar Pamlico El Other Jordan Lake ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b Buffer impact number — Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c Reason for impact 6d Stream name 6e Buffer mitigation required? 6f Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g Zone 2 impact (square feet) Site ® P ❑ T Buffer Impact 1 fill Robertson Creek ❑ Yes ® No 773 546 6h Total buffer impacts 773 546 61 Comments N/A D Impact Justification and Mitigation 1 Avoidance and Minimization la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project The wetlands open water and buffer impacts are only those necessary in order to install guardrail and BMPs will be followed lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques Sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices for protection of wetlands open waters and riparian buffers will be enforced during project construction Page 4 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State'? ❑ Yes ® No 2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank ❑ Payment to in lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank N/A 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type N/A Quantity N/A 3c Comments N/A 4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached ❑ Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested N/A linear feet 4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) N/A square feet 4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested N/A acres 4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested N/A acres 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested N/A acres 4h Comments N/A 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan N/A 6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required Zone 6c Reason for impact 6d Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 N/A N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A Zone 2 N/A N/A 1 5 N/A 6f Total buffer mitigation required NONE 6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund) N/A 6h Comments N/A Page 5 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1 Diffuse Flow Plan 1a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? lb If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why ❑ Yes No Comments these guardrail work will not alter storm water runoff at this site 2 Stormwater Management Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 20% 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why NCDOT state Permit No NCS000250 2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan N/A ❑ Certified Local Government 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3 Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government s jurisdiction is this project? Granville County ❑ Phase II ❑ NSW 3b Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? N/A 4 DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply) N/A ❑ Session Law 2006 246 ❑ Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been El Yes El No attached? N/A 5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version F Supplementary Information 1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal /state) land? lb if you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c if you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter ) Comments N/A 2 Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an after the fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s) N/A 3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description N/A 4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility N/A Page 7 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted ❑ Asheville 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? http / /www fws qov /nc es /es /countvfr html and NC Natural Heritage Program Database Element Occurrences 6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat'? http / /ocean floridamanne org /efh coral /ims /viewer htm 7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? (Note that this site is over 0 2 mile away from northern edge of the Green Level Historic District) HPO s historic layer using GIS ArcView database and http / /gis ncdcr qov /hpoweb/ 8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a WIII this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain? ® Yes ❑ No 8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements N/A 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http / /www ncfloodmaps com/ for J W Bowman P E Q 08/03/12 Applicant/Agent s Signatur Date Applicant/Agents Printed Name I (Agents signature is valid only If an authorization let er from the applicant Is provided 1 Page 8 of 8 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version Wetland Determination Data Forms //r WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont /�C Project/Site 56 / 1l,2, Ge "r � City /County �ru`7 V1 //e- Sampling Date Z Applicant/Owner /f��(� �(yS 1 State Sampling Poi t J Investigator(s) C /f%urra�, /7 Nv44RG2 Section Township Range Landform (hdlslope terrace etc) L0 6-1» C/ Local relief (concave convex none) 0017(�a tl2 Slope ( /o) D -Z /� // 3P t 219 N - 78 (&I I ° NAM Subregion (LRR or MLRA) PPGr/yto n Lai' Long W Datum ,/ [, Soil Map Unit Name l;h A - C h e wa c La A We Ina ct %e.e. NWI classification Pro I (A- Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this bme of year? Yes No (If no explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes No Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FiNUINGS — Attach site map snowing sampling point iocabons Iransects important teatureS ett: Hydmphybc Vegetation Present? Yes -/ No is the Sampled Area / Hydnc Sod Present? Yes �No within a Wetland? Yes y No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that anolyl _ Surface Sod Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) , True Aquatic Plants (314) — sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _'/Drainage Patterns (610) _ ✓Saturation (A3) _V Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Tnm Lines (616) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (37) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _,Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (35) _,/Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Water Stained Leaves (139) _ Ijicrotopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ FAC Neutral Test (05) Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches) Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches) O Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous Inspections) if available Remarks / 7z S-U 1 -47e- e US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum (Plot size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1� Sampling Point ��"''r.{ Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet / Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species C That Are OBL FACW or FAC J (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata rJ (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL FACW or FAC ,90 % (A/B) Total / Cover of Multiply by 8 o = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = Saplino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 ) FACW species x2= 1 At P.f OA (7r a 0" / O � Fiat FAC species x3= 2 FACU species x4= 3 UPL species X5= 4 — Column Totals (A) 5 Prevalence Index = B/A = 6 7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators (B) 8 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is >50 / 3 Prevalence Index is 53 Or —4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 9 10 O = Herb Stratum (Plot size 2-0 ) Total Cover �— 1 Zo U aL 2 &:k O-A cr-p en s is S rAe Inl _y_ 3 Sa u r t^ r u 5. C P ✓ Y1 N U S $ y �� L 4 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata 5 Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of 6 7 height 8 Sapling /Shrub -Woody plants excluding vines less g than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall 10 Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants regardless of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall 11 12 Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in height L 40 =Total Cover Zp Woodv Vine Stratum` (Plot'sfizer - ) 2 3 4 5 Hydrophytic Vegetation 6 Present? Yes No S = Total Cover Remarks (Include photo numbers here oron a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point e #6,- US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators ) Depth Matrix Redox Features Anchess) (moist) / Color (moist) _� Type' Loc Texture Remarks - /Cnolor 0YX 5%, D y,,f 313 G�it u�br �is x hyoYtfaq .�ra.,�. 'Type C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matnx MS= Masked Sand Grains zLocation PL=PoreLining M =Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils' _ HlstDsol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Hishc Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Black Histic (A3) hm Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148) Loamy (MLRA 147 148) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodpiain Solis (F19) _ Stratified Layers (AS) _ Depleted Matrix (173) (MLRA 136 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (72) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (fF12) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N _ Iron Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N MLRA 147 148) MLRA 136) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed) Type Depth / (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project(Site me S�i Aaa,"A t, City/County 9 re, t7 (/, Me- Sampling Date Applicant(Owner f V- S State NC Sampling Point �tei Investigator(s) C 1,46(rrar -7 /{, lkf&,i Tit,?-e- Section Township Range Landform (hilislope terrace etc)" tc )) /�� PL�1 h Local relief (concave convex none) U ,e.- Slope (°/) D —L Subregion (LRR or MLRA) / Pd YZtO✓! T Lat• 3� 1 Z Z o ' N) Long IS Datum NO 27 Sod Map Unit Name Ck A — NWI classification 1OF01 e- Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes If'No (If no explain in Remarks) / Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes _t AND Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map snowing sampnng point rotations transacts trnpunam rU Urea CLU Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area / Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks HYDROLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) _ Surface Sod Cracks (136) _ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (610) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) _ Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction m Tilled Sods (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (133) _ Water Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAG- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes No L// Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches) / Z r ✓ Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches) ;717- Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum (Plot size ) Absolute Dominant Indicator °/ Cover Species? Status 2 Lr r i o Af h vv vi +'A f\P� 3 r&r- O �^-- S CAA,01 0- 4 " V, u Ir 5 1-1 s a( i 6 7 8 � Sa IIn /Shrub Stratum (Plot /size ) � - =Total Cover 2 S S a a s a 1d(u 4A 5 F c (( 3 GaNr aar,� 3 Urea cxr S FHI^d 4 Wrvv S a v" e^,-c a rip - ` 5 PU, rGv W. S' If Fft 6 6kr 11Vr" 7U L( L� S A �R) I o 1 _ imp �vT 8 �6 o r Fdt 1 9 () nor c r., n ✓h I G a U x1 1 � 4' G CA) 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size 3o ) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 =Total Cover i '7' = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum tPlot size 30 ) 1 W- I-.ori l c-Qr a iv-rP�tm i nr-- �w - 2 Vr 7 L, 5 Co hAV\ A t � n, �l !l AG 3 4 5 6 = Total Cover Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Sampling Poin Dominance Test worksheet Number of Dominant Species (A) That Are OBL FACW or FAC Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL FACW or FAC (O� /a (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet Total / Cover of Multiply by OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species / ,� .2= 30 FAC species x3= / S` FACU species x4= 6 D UPL species C� X5= Column Totals _ O (A) ZS-b (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 /Z- 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ,--2 Dominance Test is >501/ _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0' —4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata Tree - Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH) regardless of height Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines less than 3 In DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants regardless of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in height Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No `f S US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - interim Version SOIL Sampling Point* or confirm the absence of Indicators ) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) _L Color (moist) q Tvoe Loe Texture Remarks zf 1, fY,2 V3 IV Hydric Soil Indicators _ Histosoi (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) — Black Hishc (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N MLRA 147 148) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Type Depth (inches) Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matnx Indicators for Problematic Hydric _ Dark Surface (S7) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147 148) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147 148) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (177) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Iron Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N MLRA 136) _ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136 122) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147 148) _ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (1719) (MLRA 136 147) _,_, Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Hydric Soil Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version North side of roadway, looking west. South side of roadway, looking west. NC 56 guardrail (SF- 4905C) DDC — Safety Project Granville County