20070911 Ver 1_Restoration Plan_20070522

Stream Restoration Plan for 601 West
(UT to Lanes Creek)
Union County, North Carolina
Project ID No. D 06054-E
Prepared for:
~.
~C~S~'S~~~11
{. j?,,,
(.ta: i~. l! A M
NCDENR-Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Submitted: Apri127, 2007
Submitted by:
©Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2007

Prepared By:
©~~ Kimiey-Hom
~ and Assoaates, Inc,
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
[phone]
[phone]
Project Manager: Daren Pait, P.E
Submitted By:
Environmental Banc & Exchange
10055 Red Run Blvd., Suite 130
Owings Mills, MD 211117
Phone Number: [phone]
Project Manager: Norton Webster, PWS
Phone Number:
[phone]
Phone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]

~ Executive Summary
•
Site Description
• The 601 West site, here after referred to as the "site", is located off of highway 601 approximately
• eight miles south of Monroe, North Carolina in Union County. The project is located in the USGS
Hydrologic Unit Code 03040105070010 and all of the project streams are located in the Yadkin
River Basin and the 03-07-14 NCDWQ sub-basin.
In response to RFP 16-D06054 the 601 West Site was proposed by Environmental Banc and
Exchange (EBX) and accepted by the North Carolina Division of Natural Resources, Ecosystem
• Enhancement Program (EEP) to provide stream mitigation in the Yadkin River Basin (Cataloging
• Unit 03040105).
• The site contains one Unnamed Tributary to Lanes Creek. The Unnamed Tributary (UT) flows
North to South and enters Lanes Creek at the property line. Lanes Creek is listed as NCDWQ Water
Supply (WS-V) waters. The UT has a drainage area of 0.41 square miles. The project site is
currently maintained as an active agricultural field. The streams appear to have been historically
straightened and have gone through periods of having the riparian buffer cleared.
S Reference Location
~ One reference reach was located outside of the project watershed. The reference reach is within the
• same hydrophysiographic region as the project reaches. The reference reach has a drainage area of
0.18 square miles and is located in an isolated forested area upstream of a culvert grade control
under Roscoe-Howey Road. The reach exhibited stable pattern, profile, and bankfull dimension and
will be used to generate dimensionless ratios for design comparison.
Restoration Approach
The objective of this restoration approach is to plan, design, and construct a dynamically stable
stream/riparian floodplain to provide an ecological improvement for the entire site and watershed.
The pattern, profile, and dimension of the channel will be adjusted to approximately match Regional
Curve values and to mimic reference reach conditions. Structures such as rock cross vanes, a-vanes,
j-hook vanes, log sills, and root wads will be used to provide grade control, added habitat, and/or
bedform diversity. It is proposed that the UT will be relocated to a more natural position in the
center of both the valley and the historic floodplain of the stream. Adding pattern to the stream
would result in additional length and proper pool-to-pool spacing. The existing channel bed
elevation will be maintained and an inner berm and floodplain bench will be excavated to add flood
relief and to reduce shear stress on the banks. Proper pool-to-pool spacing and the use of appropriate
structures are critical for providing sufficient energy dissipation throughout the stream.
Table 1: Project Restoration
Stream Restoration I 3,890 ~ 4,500

Contents
1.0 Project Site Identification and Location ........................................................... 7
..................
1.1 Directions to Project Site .................................................................................................... ..
.. 7
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations ............................. .. 7
1.3 Project Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................... .. 7
2.0 Watershed Characterization ................................................................. 7
...............................
2
1 Draina
A ..
.
ge
rea ..................................................................................................................... .. 7
2.2 Surface Water Classification /Water Quality ..................................................................... .. 7
2.3 Physiography, Geography, and Soils .................................................................................. .. 8
2.4 Land Use and Development Trends .................................................................................... .. 8
2.4.1 Historical Land Use .................................................................................................... .. 8
2.4.2 Development Trends ................................................................................................... .. 8
2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................................. .. 9
2.6 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................. .. 9
2.7 Potential Constraints ........................................................................................................... .. 9
2.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary ............................................................................... 9
2.7.2 Site Access .................................................................................................................... 9
2.7.3 Utilities ........................................................................................................................ 10
2.7.4 FEMA /Hydrologic Trespass ..................................................................................... 10
3.0 Project Site Streams ....................................................................... 10
.......................................
3.1 Channel Classification ........................................................................................................ 10
3.2 Channel Discharge .............................................................................................................. 10
3.3 Channel Morphology .......................................................................................................... 11
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment ............................................................................................. 11
3.5 Bankfull Verification .......................................................................................................... 11
3.6 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 12
4.0 Reference Streams .........................................................................
. 12
..
....................................
4.1 Watershed Characterization ................................................................................................ 12
4.2 Channel Classification ........................................................................................................ 12
4.3 Discharge ............................................................................................................................ 12
4.4 Channel Morphology .......................................................................................................... 13
4.5 Channel Stability Assessment ............................................................................................. 13
4.6 Bankfull Verification .......................................................................................................... 13
4.7 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 13
5.0 Project Site Restoration Plan ............................................................ 13
...................................
5.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives ........................................................................... 13
5.1.1 Designed Channel Classification ................................................................................ 15
5.1.2 Target Buffer Communities ........................................................................................ 15
5.2 Sediment Transport Analysis .............................................................................................. 15
5.2.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................... 15
5.2.2 Calculations and Discussion ....................................................................................... 16
5.3 HEC-RAS Analysis ................................................................................................................ 16
5.3.1 No-Rise, LOMR, CLOMR ......................................................................................... 16
5.3.2 Hydrologic Trespass ................................................................................................... 17
5.4 Stormwater Best Management Practices ............................................................................ 17
5.4.1 Site-Specific Stormwater Concerns ............................................................................ 17

9.0 Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Project Site Vicinity Map
Project Site Location
Project Site Watershed Map
Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map
Project Site Hydrologic Features Map with Gauge Locations
Reference Site Vicinity Map
Reference Site Watershed Map
Reference Site NRCS Soil Survey Map
Project Site FEMA Firm Map
Reference Site Vegetative Communities Map
10.0 Appendices
Appendix 1 Project Site Photographs
Appendix 2 Project Site NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
Appendix 3 Categorical Exclusion Report
Appendix 4 Rainfall Information
Appendix 5 HEC-RAS Analysis
Appendix 6 Soil Nutrient Testing Report
Attachment
Restoration Plan Design Sheets

~9~~
1.0 Project Site Identification and Location
1. i Directions to Project Site
The 601 West project area is located eight miles south of Monroe, North Carolina in Union County.
From Raleigh take US 1 South and bear right onto US 74 West. Continue on US 74 West and turn
left on Highway 601 South and the site is approximately 9 miles on your right. See Figure 1 for the
project site vicinity map.
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
The project is located in the USGS Hydrologic Unit Code 03040105070010 and all of the project
streams are located in the Yadkin River Basin and the 03-07-14 NCDWQ sub-basin.
1.3 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 1 shows the project site vicinity map.
2.0 Watershed Characterization
Table 2 provides hydrological and surface water classification information for the major project
reaches. See Figure 3 for the project site watershed map.
2.1 Drainage Area
The site contains an Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Lanes Creek. The UT flows from North to South
and drains into Lanes Creek at the property line and has a drainage area of 0.41 square miles.
Table 2: nrainaue Area and CtYPam f'laccifiratinn
Reach Drainage Area
z Surface Water Stream Order
mi Classification
l1"I' 0.41 WS-V l
2.2 Surface Water Classification /Water Quality
The onsite tributary is not classified under the NCDWQ water bodies report. Lanes Creek has a
NCDWQ stream index number 13-17-40-(1), and is described as "From source to dam at Marshville
former water supply". Lanes Creek is listed as NCDWQ Water Supply V (WS-V) waters, which
are waters that are generally upstream and drain to Class WS-1V waters or waters used by industry to
supply their employees with drinking water or as waters formerly used as water supply.
7

2.3 Physiography, Geography, and Soils
The project watershed lies within the Carolina Slate Belt Ecoregion, part of the Piedmont
physiographic providence. Valley slopes between 0.007 and 0.012 typify the topography of the
project watershed. The elevation within the project area ranges form 500 to 535 feet above sea level
The geology of the site cosists of Metamudstone and Meta-Argillite which is thin to thick bedded;
bedding plane and axial-planar cleavage common; interbedded with metasandstone,
metaconglomerate, and metavolcanic rock and is considered a Cid formation. Chewacla silt loam,
Cid channery silt loam, and Secrest -Cid complex soils cover the floodplain of UT as shown in
Figure 4.
2.4 Land Use and Development Trends
2.4.1 Historical Land Use
Historically, cultivated farmland and forests have dominated the landscape. Based on a review of
aerial photography (2004) (Figure 4), forest and cultivated land cover over 99 % of the watershed.
Developed land cover the remaining watershed area. Table 3 shows the distribution of land cover
within the watershed.
Table 3: Land Use of the Watershed
Land Cover Acreage Percentage of Total
Coverage
Upland Forest 87 33.6
Herbaceous Planted/Cultivated 172 66.2
Developed 0.4 0.2
Impervious surfaces comprise approximately 0.2 % of the watershed.
2.4.2 Development Trends
Based on an analysis of aerial photographs there has been no increase in impervious surface in the
project watershed between 1998 and 2004. The landowner expects to continue to cultivate the land
adjacent to the project site. It is anticipated that there will be little to no increase in impervious
surface in the project watershed.
Zoning
The project area is zoned as RA-40. The RA-40 zoning district is low density residential that allows
most types of residential housing and agricultural uses. It is not anticipated that there be a
significant increase in urbanization in the project watershed because of this zoning type.
Major Transportation Projects
The North Carolina Department of Transportation has listed several projects in there Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) that are located within the Monroe, NC vicinity.
• R-2616 - US 601 widen to four lanes
• R-2559 -Monroe Bypass four lanes new location
• U-4024 - US 601 to US 74 multilanes
8

•
•
•
These TIP projects will not directly affect any construction activities associated with this project.
The current Highway 601 right-of--way is approximately 70-feet from the easement boundary and it
is not expected that the widening of Highway 601 will cause any conflicts. These projects are
anticipated to encourage some growth; however, it is expected most of the development will be
outside of the project watershed.
2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
According to a search of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database on March 2, 2006,
three federally listed endangered species occur within Union County: vascular plants Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii) and Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthusschweinitzii) and a freshwater
mussel, the Carolina heel splitter (Lasmigona decorata). The entire 601 West site has been under
intensive agricultural use for an extended period of time. The frequent disturbance of the proposed
site along the proposed restoration corridor makes it unlikely that any of the listed plant species
occur in this area. The channel is also highly disturbed and impacted by sediment. The present
channel condition makes it unlikely that the heel splitter occurs in this system. Additional
investigations will be conducted for these species to determine if suitable habitat exists. A Section 7
ESA clearance will be obtained from the USFWS prior to restoration activities.
A search of the US Fish and Wildlife Service website (http://www.fws.gov/endangered/) and the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program website (http://207.4.179.38/nhp/) in August 2006
identified the Carolina heel splitter (Lasmigona decorata) as an endangered species residing within
Union County.
2.6 Cultural Resources
A review of properties to be determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places at the
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was conducted for the project area and the surrounding
area. According to the most recent (2002) NCCGIA database, there are no National Register
properties within a 1-mile radius of the project area. In addition, the SHPO Archaeological Database
was reviewed, and no significant archaeological sites were identified within a 1-mile radius.
2.7 Potential Constraints
2.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX) has entered into an Agreement for Purchase and Sale
of Easement with the landowner for the Site. The conservation easement exists entirely on a parcel
owned by Anna P. Howey and the conservation easement area has been secured by Environmental
Banc and Exchange. The conservation easement boundary is shown on the attached Restoration
Plans.
2.7.2 Site Access
The Site will be accessed for construction off of Highway 601. It is not anticipated that there will be
any site access conflicts.
9

2.7.3 Utilities
The certified survey map, Environmental Data Resources report, and visual field inspections
indicated that there were no known utilities on site.
2.7.4 FEMA /Hydrologic Trespass
The project reach is not a designated flood zone under the Federal Emergency Management
Association (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) program according to map number
3717900200 C effective July 5, 1994. The project is anticipated to lower flood stage elevations due
to the construction of a floodplain bench, and debris removal.
3.0 Project Site Streams
Kimley-Horn and Associates performed a geomorphic survey (cross sections, longitudinal survey,
and pattern) and sampled stream materials (classification and entrainment pebble counts, bar
samples, sub-pavement and pavement samples) on several reaches representative of the geomorphic
settings within the project area. Table 4 below summarizes the channel classifications of the
surveyed reaches within the project area and Restoration Table IV (Section 8.0) provides detailed
morphological data.
3.1 Channel Classification
The UT is classified as a Rosgen stream type BS/ES channel. The reach has an entrenchment ratio
of 1.5, a width-to-depth ratio of 8.8, bank height ratios of 1.9 to 3.0, and a slope of 0.0086. The
stream morphology is included in Restoration Table IV.
Table 4: Summary of Stream Classification
Assmt.
Reach Drainage
Area (mil) Entrenchment
Ratio
Abkf
Wbkf Width/Depth
Ratio
K
Slope Stream
Type
UT 0.41 l.5 2.8 5.7 8.8 1.1 0.01 F35/I;5
3.2 Channel Discharge
The designer estimated the peak flows for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storms using the North
Carolina rural flood-frequency equations for the Blue Ridge-Piedmont Region (United States
Geological Survey 2003) (Table 5).
Table 5: Proiect Site Streams Peak Dischar¢es
Assessment
Reach Area
(ac.) Bankfull
Dis(chsjge* 2yr Q
(cfs) 10yr Q
(cfs) 25yr Q
(cfs) 100yr Q
(cfs)
UT 256 46.9 71 182 264 420
*Calculated using Manning's equation (n=0.038)
10

3.3 Channel Morphology
Most of the project reach has been historically straightened and relocated to the edge of the valley to
maximize usable farmland. As a result the channel has become incised and disconnected from the
historic floodplain. Restoration Table IV shows complete channel morphology data including
channel, pattern, dimension, and profile for all restoration and project reaches.
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment
Appendix 1 displays photos of existing conditions.
The restoration reach lies within an area that historically has been used for agricultural purposes.
Most of the UT has a limited riparian buffer that includes some exotic and invasive species. Most of
the upper UT has been cleared to the banks and has no riparian buffer.
The agricultural practice of the historical floodplain has caused the soils to become compacted and
has decreased the infiltration rate. As a result the surface mimics the characteristics of a semi-
impervious area, increasing the quantity and rate at which storm event hydrology reaches these
streams. The restoration reaches have downcut and incised until it encountered bedrock outcrops
which act as grade control. The stream is currently attempting to widen which is accelerating the
erosion the banks. There is also evidence of beaver activity which is causing a backwater effect on
the lower end of the UT.
Bank height ratios (low bank height divided by the maximum bankfull depth) were determined for
the surveyed reaches. In the methodology used for this report (Rosgen 2001), bank height ratios
between 1.1 and 1.3 are regarded as "moderately unstable," ratios between 1.3 and 1.5 as "unstable,"
and bank height ratios greater than 1.5 are "highly unstable."
Table 6: Restoration Reach Characteristics
A
t B
k Ve etative Buffer Ad D
ssm
. HA jacent isturbance /

Reach Right Bank Left Bank Land Use Relocation
Ratio
Upper
1'9 Scatterd Shrubs Scatterd Shrubs
Active Agriculture
Channelization
UT /Field /Field
Lower
2'S Scatterd Shrubs Scatterd Shrubs
Active Agriculture Beavers /
UT /Field /Field Channelization
3.5 Bankfull Verification
Determination of the bankfull elevation is vital to generating meaningful geomorphic values. Field
indicators for bankfull were strong for the reference reaches; however, due to down cutting and bed
and bank instability, the restoration candidates had weaker bankfull indicators. To verify bankfull
elevations, the bankfull area values for the project reaches and reference reaches were checked
against the North Carolina Piedmont Rural regional curves (Harman, Jennings et al. 1999). The
results indicate a general agreement between the three sets (site, references, and regional curve) thus
providing a measure of validation.
11

3.6 Vegetation
Three major areas of land cover were observed within the project area: piedmont alluvial forest;
piedmont bottomland forest (Schafale and Weakley 1990); and open fields.
The piedmont alluvial forest community is situated along the higher floodplain predominantly in the
upper sections. The alluvial forest are commonly dominated by river birch (Betula nigra), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), black willow (Salix nigra), box elder (Ater negundo), black walnut (Juglans
nigra), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Ater rubrum), muscle wood (Carpinus
caroliniana), and tag alder (Alms serrulata).
Piedmont bottomland forests are located in the lower project area and isolated areas within the upper
section. The forest is typically dominated by yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), American elm (Ulmus americana), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red
maple (Ater rubrum), sugar maple (Ater saccharum), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styrac flua). The
understory includes spice bush (Lindera benzoin), tag alder (Alms serrulata), arrowood (Viburnum
spp.), and poison ivy (Toxicondenron radicans).
The fields were dominated with fescue (Festirca spp.) and corn. There was little woody vegetation
growing in these areas.
4.0 Reference Streams
4.1 Watershed Characterization
One reference reach was located outside of the project watershed. Figure 6 shows the location of the
reference reach. The reference reach is within the same hydrophysiographic region as the project
reaches. The off-site reference reach has a drainage area of 0.18 square miles
4.2 Channel Classification
The reference reach classifies as a Rosgen stream type E channel. The reach has an entrenchment
ratio of 17.9, a width to depth ratio of 6.0, bank height ratio of 1.0-1.1, and a slope of 0.0127. The
reference stream morphology is included in Restoration Table IV.
4.3 Discharge
The peak flows for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storms were modeled for the given drainage areas.
These flows were calculated using the North Carolina rural flood-frequency equations for the Blue
Ridge-Piedmont Region. The peak flows calculated are summarized in Table 7.
Table 7: Reference Stream Peak Discharges
Reference Area Bankfull
Discharge 2yr ~ 10yr Q 25yr Q 100yr Q
Reach (ac.)
cfs (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
UT 115 30.9 40.5 107 157 255
*Calculated using Manning's equation (n=0.045)
12

•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
4.4 Channel Morphology
Restoration Table IV shows a complete channel morphology data including channel pattern,
dimension, and profile for all restoration and project reaches.
4.5 Channel Stability Assessment
KHA staff determined that the reference stream exhibits stable dimension, pattern, and profile
because it is located within a forested area upstream from a culvert grade control at Roscoe-Howey
Road. The channel also has been isolated from adjacent land uses with a stable vegetative buffer.
4.6 Bankfull Verification
Determination of the bankfull elevation is vital to generating meaningful geomorphic values. Field
indicators for bankfull were strong for the reference reaches. To verify bankfull elevations, the
bankfull area values for the reference reaches were checked against the North Carolina Piedmont
Rural regional curves (Harman, Jennings et al. 1999). The results indicate a general agreement
between the three sets (site, references, and regional curve) thus providing a measure of validation.
No discernible bankfull indicators exist in the project reach. These dimensions represent a stable
inner bench that was consistently visible in the field and thus incorporated into the typical cross
sections. Designed bankfull dimensions rely more heavily on the reference and regional curve data.
4.7 Vegetation
The restoration plan will use the vegetation communities associated with and surrounding the
reference reach as reference communities for riparian restoration. Two distinct communities lie
within riparian area of the reference reach: piedmont alluvial forest and piedmont bottomland forest
(Schafale and Weakley 1990). These landscapes match landscapes within the project area. The
piedmont alluvial forest landscape is flat, somewhat frequently flooded. The piedmont bottomland
forest landscape is flat, frequently flooded, and the water table remains close to the surface.
5.0 Project Site Restoration Plan
5.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives
The goal of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning stream system designed
to ameliorate the impairment issues typically associated with highly disturbed systems. The project
will provide ecological functional lift to the existing system by restoring the stream and riparian
habitat to a stream type and vegetative community appropriate for the given valley and watershed
conditions. Benefits will include improved water quality by reducing sediment load through
stabilization and by reducing nutrient and other pollutant input by the addition of forested riparian
buffers planted with native species. Additionally, the forested buffers and reconnection with the
historic flood plain will improve channel hydraulics and system capacity. Improvements to the
ecosystem include the addition of in-stream habitat by the use of in-stream structures and bank
revetments such as root wads. By providing an appropriate mix of native forest vegetation to create
an appropriate canopy and understory, the soil structure will improve, a leaf litter source will be
13

established to support aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and shading and cooling will be provided
to improve water quality. This will provide functional uplift for the watershed as a whole.
Stream Restoration Approach
A natural channel design technique, using priority I and II methodologies was used to adjust the
channel dimension, pattern, and profile to a stable configuration. The configuration was based on
reference reach morphology, values from regional curves, regime equations, experience from other
restoration projects, and the existing channel morphology. These reference values are presented in
Restoration Table IV. The stream restoration either restored the streams in place or created a new
channel. The base flow elevation will remain relatively in place and lower, more active flood prone
areas will be created along with an inner berm bench to help alleviate bank stress during
intermediate storm events.
Channel restoration will be based on Rosgen "C" type stream modified from Rosgen "E" type
reference streams. Alluvial streams in the Piedmont of North Carolina tend to be Rosgen "E" type
channels or relatively narrow and deep. Such geometry typically forms because the existing, mature
vegetation root system holds the bank soil in place causing the stream to develop a relatively narrow
and deep cross section. Typically when an alluvial stream is relocated or restored in an open field in
the Piedmont, it cannot be constructed as an "E" channel because there is no existing, mature
vegetation root system to hold the banks in place. As such, it is better to construct a "C" type channel
cross section with flatter banks to reduce the possibility of bank erosion. However, it is anticipated
that as mature vegetation is established on the stream banks that the root system will cause the
stream to develop a deeper, narrower bankfull channel (or an "E" type channel). As such, the
relocated channel maybe constructed with a "C" type channel cross section, but will quickly develop
into an "E" type channel as mature vegetation is established.
Dimension
The riffle channels cross sectional areas were calculated from the hydraulic geometry curves derived
from the reference reaches and regional curves. The riffle cross sections were shaped to have a mean
depth and width capable of transporting existing and predicted future sediment loads for the
designed channel slope. A bankfull bench was added to create access to a lower flood prone area.
The pool cross sections were shaped based on riffle to pool cross section relationships found in the
appropriate reference reach. The reference dimensionless ratios are included in the morphological
table (Restoration Table IV) and typical cross sections are shown in the attached Restoration Plan
Design Sheets.
Pattern
The channel planform was dictated by reference ratios for meander wavelength and radius of
curvature derived from the reference reaches and typical Rosgen reference reach values for C type
channels. The belt widths were based on reference ratios but were limited in some areas by the
topography of the valley. The proposed planform sinuosity allowed pool to pool spacing and riffle
locations to match reference conditions. The proposed sinuosity provided the appropriate slope to
transport the material coming into the reach. The planform values and ratios are provided in the
morphological table in Restoration Table IV and the Restoration Plan Design Sheets provides the
designed channel alignment.
14

Bedform
The design channel Bedform predominantly consists of a riffle -pool sequence with runs and glides
between them. The design depths and pool to pool spacing of the features were based on reference
reach values and typical Rosgen reference reach values for C type channels (Restoration Table IV).
• The pools were located in the apex of meander bends with riffles located between the pools in the
tangent portions of the channel. The pools will be over-dug to allow for some sedimentation during
construction activities. The profile section of the Restoration Plan Design Sheets shows the
designed channel Bedform.
Structures
In-stream structures were placed in the design channel to provide grade control and maintain overall
design slope. In-stream structures also were used to protect stream banks and increase aquatic habitat
diversity. The types of structures incorporated into the restoration project include rock cross vanes,
• A-vanes, rock vanes, root wads, log sills, and log vanes. Root wads were used only for the purpose
• of providing habitat.
Beaver Management
The project reaches appeared to have been impacted by past beaver activity. The beavers have since
been removed or have left; however a beaver management program will be implemented to insure
• that beavers do not repopulate the site.
~ Riparian Buffer Restoration Approach
Reestablishing the riparian buffer will restore habitat connectivity throughout the conservation
easement. Prior to planting, the soils will be treated as described in section 5.5 to facilitate plant
• establishment. New plants will be installed as directed in section 5.6.

~ 5.1.1 Designed Channel Classification
The restoration reaches are designed as Rosgen CS~ES channels.
~
• 5.1.2 Target Buffer Communities

~ The vegetation communities for the reference reaches were similar to the on-site piedmont alluvial
forest and bottomland communities (described in Section 4.7). See Figure 10 for the Reference Site
V
i
egetat
ve Communities Map.

~ 5.2 Sediment Transport Analysis
~
5.2.1 Methodology
• Sediment transport was calculated using shear stress equations to verify that the designed channel
would be able to transport at bankfull its bedload without aggrading or degrading. The Shields curve
was used for initiation of particle movement to estimate the range of particles transported for a given
shear stress.
Two physical characteristics of the channel design that affect the shear stress on the channel bed are
the slope of the channel and hydraulic radius.

15

~ _ ~yRs
Where: i= shear stress (Ib/ft2)
y =specific gravity of water (62.4 lb/ft3)
R =hydraulic radius (ft)
s =water surface slope (ft/ft)
The hydraulic radius equals the cross sectional area divided by the wetted perimeter.
R- A
P
Where: R =hydraulic radius
A =cross-sectional area (ft~)
P =wetted perimeter (ft)
5.2.2 Calculations and Discussion
The restoration reaches were designed with a mean depth and slope sufficient to transport a range of
particles. Table 8 provides the results of the sediment transport calculations using the shear stress
equation and Shields curve. The channel is designed to eliminate bank erosion and to flush the sands
and transport the characteristic sediments. The characteristic sediments were determined from
analyzing bed materials in comparative streams having less impacted watersheds. The shear stress
results show that the proposed channel should transport a range of materials that include the existing
or characteristic (in case of the sand laden channels) channel materials.
Table 8 : Summary of Shear Strecc C'alcnlatinns

Proposed Proposed
Shear Particle
Restoration Reach Slope Hydraulic Stress Transport Size '~
Radius (mm)
(ft/ft) (ft) (Ib/ft2) ~
Upper U,1. 0.009
0.0110 0.7 -
0.28 - 0.48 -
19 - 28
Lower UT 0.0030
0.005 8 0.8 0.15 - 0.29 9 - 20
5.3 HEC-RAS Analysis
Bankfull, 2-, 10-, and 100-year peak discharge flows were analyzed for both existing and proposed
conditions. The HEC-RAS model (v. 3.1.3) verified a net reduction in water surface elevation in the
upper section and there was a slight increase in the lower section due to an increase in the channel
bed elevation. Bankfull channel velocities were typically less than 4 ft/s for both sections. The
proposed 15-inch floodplain pipes will add conveyance to the crossing, reducing backwater above
the crossing. There is also a decrease in total velocity, shear, and power downstream of the crossing.
See Appendix 5 for the results.
5.3.1 No-Rise, LOMR, CLOMR
The project streams are not mapped under the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program; therefore,
approval is not required by FEMA or the State of North Carolina.
16

•
•
•
• 5.3.2 Hydrologic Trespass
The project streams were designed to eliminate any hydrologic trespass issues. A priority UII
• approach will raise the stream bed elevation in some areas; however, a stabilized pattern, profile, and
dimension combined with the inner berm and bankfull benches should create a net decrease in flood
• stage thus reducing any chance of hydrologic trespass. After cross section 800 there is an increase in
• water surface elevation for the 100-year event. This increase in water surface only extends the flood
boundary approximately 5-feet beyond the existing limits; thus not creating a significant risk to the
• adjacent fields.
•
•
• 5.4 Stormwater Best Management Practices
•

• 5.4.1 Site-Specific Stormwater Concerns
• The project site is situated in a predominately rural setting. It is anticipated that the re-established
• riparian buffer will be sufficient in filtering and treating any Stormwater runoff from the adjacent
agricultural fields.
•
• 5.5 Soil Restoration
Soils within the riparian restoration areas will be treated to facilitate the growth and development of
plantings. The soils will be ripped prior to planting to break up compacted soils and create a
• favorable environment for new plantings. Plant nutrients and soil amendments will be applied to the
• soils as prescribed by the soils test report performed by the North Carolina Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services Agronomic Division for sample sites located throughout the
• project area (Appendix 6).
•
• 5.6 Natural Plant Community Restoration
• The goal of the riparian restoration is to provide long-term improvements to ecological functions of
• the existing forest community. The restoration plan has been developed to provide these functional
• uplifts through the re-establishment of target natural communities. The target natural communities
• have been determined based on comparison of existing site conditions with established type
communities with verification of appropriate species from proximate reference natural communities.
• Based on the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program's Nature Community Classification, the
• site's riparian area most closely correlates to Piedmont Bottomland Forests within the lower
• floodplains and Piedmont Alluvial Forest in the remaining riparian areas. (Schafale and Weakley
• 1990).
~ 5.6.1 Reforestation Scheme
• The goal of the planting scheme seeks to establish a riparian community consistent with the
• reference community using an approach that accelerates the successional process leading to a mature
riparian community. The planting plan will use reference plant communities discussed in the
previous paragraph as a base to design a planting scheme and develop a vegetation list.
•
•
•
• 17
•

Re-colonization of cleared riparian habitats characteristically begins with an invasion of pioneer
species that creates an environment (e.g. shading) suitable for species more typical of a mature
community. To initialize the proposed riparian community, the restoration area will be planted with
a mix of pioneer and climax species that have been selected and arranged to meet the following
objectives:
^ Establish mix of shade intolerant canopy and shade tolerant understory species
^ Provide vegetative source of dominant species
^ Establish local seed sources for those species less likely to migrate into the restoration area
^ Provide stability to disturbed or high stress areas
The design of a planting plan involves several components. The planting zones have been developed
considering site hydrology, soils, and disturbance regimes and are referenced to natural
communities. Each zone has a unique environment that dictates species selection and community
structure. The planting list (See Restoration Table V) is developed for each zone to match the
vegetation in the reference community and meet the objectives given above. The planting list also
reflects which species are readily available and have a reasonable expectation of survival. For a
given zone and species, a plant source and planting type (e.g. containerized or bare root) is
recommended. A planting schedule is developed so that site preparation and plant installation occur
at the optimal time and season. After installation, the planting should be verified. The maintenance
plan is developed to promote long-term success of the planting. These planting plan components are
described below.
5.6.2 Planting Zones
The planting plan includes 5 zones of distinct vegetative composition and structure.
^ Zone 1 -Stream Channel
^ Zone 2 -Stream Bench
^ Zone 3 -Riparian
^ Zone 4 - Bottomland
^ Zone 5 -Transitional
Zone 1 -Stream Channel
The stream channel zone includes the stream channel from base flow to bankfull. The zone features
the steepest slopes of the zones and highest saturation levels. This environment dictates the planting
offast-growing, obligate pioneer species to provide stability to areas at or below bankfull.
Zone 2 -Stream Bench
The stream bank zone includes the area from the top of bank outward away from the stream 10 feet.
It is an area exposed to regular stream flows and frequent soil deposition. The most stressed areas are
located on the outside bends of meanders. The benches will be planted with fast-growing, deep-
rooted species that will provide biostabilization and shading to the stream
18

Zone 3 -Riparian
The riparian zone includes the area beyond zone 2 to the edge of the floodplain where the hydrology
supports piedmont alluvial hardwood forest vegetation. The area is flat, somewhat frequently
• flooded. The composition of the vegetation includes a mix of canopy and understory trees.
Zone 4 -Bottomland
The Bottomland zone includes the area beyond zone 2 to the edge of the floodplain where the
hydrology supports Bottomland hardwood forest vegetation. The area is flat, frequently flooded, and
• the water table remains close to the surface. Zone 4 remains flooded or saturated for longer periods
• than Zone 3. The composition of the vegetation includes a mix of canopy and understory trees.
• Zone 5 -Transitional
The transitional zone includes an approximately 10-foot buffer between zone 3 or 4 and an adjacent
• open area such as a field outside of the conservation easement. The planting list consists of a subset
• of species consisting of smaller species that tolerate full sun and will eliminate an abrupt boundary
between the open field and zone 3 or 4.

~ 5.6.3 Plant List
The plant list is based on the target community, reference community, and recommendations from
. the North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute (Hall 2001) and the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (Smith 2004). The selection of species also depends on availability from
local nursery sources.

i 5.6.4 Plant Sources
• The planting plan preferentially selects local genetic stock and utilizes three sources of plants. Two
• sources-nursery stock and on-site transplants-will be tied directly to the initial planting and will
be utilized in numbers to support permit guidelines. The remaining source-recruitment-has been
factored into the selection of species in the plant list. The plant list includes a significant portion of
species not likely to establish from natural propagation.
~ Nursery Stock
~
The planting plan may utilize any of the following nursery stock forms of woody species: bare roots,
containerized seedlings, and ball and burlap. Additionally, the planting plan also may use sod or
seeds from commercial sources. The planting plan prescribes that nursery stock are grown under
environmental conditions similar to the target environment. The planting list includes alternates in
• case specific species ofpre-ordered plants are not available or acceptable for installation.
~ On-Site Transplants
Several favorable species grow within the existing site. In the course of constructing a new channel
alignment, some individual plants may need to be removed. The individuals of a target species that
i are of an appropriate size and age maybe transplanted into the restoration area.

i
~ 19

Recruitment
It is expected that the restoration sites will be populated with species from adjacent communities.
The restoration sites will be maintained to keep unwanted species at less than 10% of the total
population.
5.6.5 Plant Care and Installation
The plantings will be cared for and installed based on guidelines provided in the included planting
notes. When planted properly, bare root seedlings are the most cost-effective and successful plant
material. Containerized plantings, live stakes, and other plant materials will be used based on the
needs of the planting zone (e.g. frequent disturbance, immediate shading, and others). Larger
unprotected trees will be guarded using tree shelters that should protect against herbivory and inhibit
site occupation by beavers.
5.6.6 Schedule
The planting plan will be scheduled around stream construction activities and growing season.
Special attention will be paid to stabilizing disturbed areas that include newly-constructed channels
and temporary construction easements. The final vegetation planting will occur after proper site
preparation (described below) during the appropriate season.
Plantings maybe staggered based on surrounding activities. Live stake planting on stream banks
(zone 1) will follow closely after channel construction to provide immediate stabilization. On-site
transplants will be planted immediately after removal from their existing habitat. Planting of zones
2-4 will occur from late winter to early spring after construction to minimize or eliminate threats
from the construction; exotic vegetation treatment; unpredictable weather; and beaver activity.
5.6.7 Stabilization
Immediately after construction, the stream banks and all disturbed areas will be seeded with
permanent and temporary seed mixes. If within the appropriate season, permanent seeding will be
completed in conjunction with construction with temporary seeding applied per Land Quality
Section requirements. Within the stream channel (Zone 1), pioneer species that provide immediate
bank stabilization will be planted. Live stakes and bare roots will be planted around structure
installations and the outside of meander bends to provide an area of high density root mass. Coir
fiber matting and live stakes will be used along the entire reach of the restored channels to provide
stabilization until vegetation can be established.
5.6.8 Site Preparation
Prior to planting the riparian buffer, efforts will be made to eradicate fescue and invasive plants such
as multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Chinese privet (Lingustrum sinews), and Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica). These efforts should include herbicide use during the spring and afollow-up
spraying in early fall to eliminate any fescue that was not killed in the spring. A permanent seed mix
can be used after application of the pre-emergent. Woody planting can follow during the dormant
season.
20

~ 5.6.9 Planting Review
After the final planting is complete, the planting supervisor will verify that the site was planted
properly though inspection of stem counts and condition. The planting contractor will be responsible
for replacing damaged plantings.
~

• 5.6.10 Monitoring and Maintenance
Monitoring will verify that the restoration area is meeting restoration goals. Damaged plantings will
be removed and replanting will occur if the planting survival fails to meet restoration goals. If
monitoring indicates that an area is trending towards greater than 10% coverage by nuisance
vegetation, that area will be treated to remove the nuisance vegetation.

~ 6.0 Performance Criteria
•
~ 6.1 Stream Success Criferia
The stream geometry will be considered successful if the cross-section geometry, profile, and
sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium. It is expected that there will be minimal changes
in the designed cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition. Changes that may occur during
• the monitoring period will be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a more
• unstable condition (e.g. down cutting, erosion, etc.) or are minor changes that represent an increase
in stability (e.g. settling, vegetative changes, coarsening of bed material, etc.).
An initial, though not exclusive, indicator of success will be adherence to design or reference ratios
of stream geometry found in the morphological table (Restoration Table IV) or in comparable and
stable reference systems. The channel may not adhere to design or reference ratios of stream
• geometry, but can be considered stable if the following key indicators are present:
^ Stream Type: Maintenance of the design stream type or progression or conversion to stable
• stream type such as B, C, or E will indicate stability
^ Bank Height Ratio: Bank height ratio between 1.0 and 1.1 will indicate flood flows have access
to the active floodplain and that higher flows do not apply excessive stresses to stream banks

• Determination of true bankfull maybe difficult until the stream has had adequate flooding events to
• create strong bankfull indicators.
• The nature of the watershed presents challenges to stream restoration. The contributing watersheds
lie within a rapidly developing region. The urbanizing watershed's runoff character will continue to
change as the nature of the land cover shifts to less permeable surfaces. The hydrograph will shift
such that bankfull flooding events will become more frequent and peak discharges will be higher.
• The cross sections have been designed with bankfull benches to account for some shifting in
• bankfull discharges.
• Upstream construction activities driven by land development likely will lead to episodic sediment
pulses sent downstream through the stream network. Additionally, erosion of upstream unstable
stream banks will persistently contribute sediment to the project reaches. Excess sediment will either
be routed though the project area or deposited in target areas such as point bars and the floodplain.

21

Minor sedimentation of pools and glides may occur. The pools are designed to be over dug to
account for some sedimentation of pools and glides.
If a large storm event occurs before the woody vegetation has established, isolated bank erosion may
occur in sections where the flood prone area has been restricted due to topography and/or utility
easements. Areas of bank erosion will be repaired as necessary.
6.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
The success of riparian and wetland vegetation planting will be gauged by stem counts of planted
species. Stem counts of over 320 trees per acres after 3 years and 260 trees per acre after 5 year will
be considered successful. Photos taken at established photo points should indicate maturation of
riparian vegetation community.
6.3 Schedule /Reporting
The monitoring plan to evaluate the success of the stream restoration project is based on guidance
provided by The Stream Mitigation Guidelines disseminated by the United States Corps of
Engineers -Wilmington District (McLendon, Fox et al. 2003) and recommendation from the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The collection and summarization of monitoring data will be
conducted in accordance with the most current version of the EEP documents entitled "Content,
Format, and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports"
Upon completion of the restoration project, an as-built survey will be conducted that documents the
following conditions:
^ Geomorphology (dimension, pattern, and profile)
^ Channel materials
^ Channel stability and in-stream structure functionality
^ Wetland hydrology
^ Vegetation (stream and wetland)
The survey of channel dimension will consist of permanent cross sections placed at approximately
two cross sections (one riffle and one pool) per unique stream segment. The cross sections will
represent approximately 50% riffles and 50% pools. Annual photographs showing both banks and
upstream and downstream views will be taken from permanent, mapped photo points. The survey of
the longitudinal profile will represent distinct areas of restoration and will cover a cumulative total
of 3,000 linear feet of channel. Newly-constructed meanders will be surveyed to provide pattern
measurements. Channel material measurements will be collected by using pebble counts for at least
six of the permanent cross sections.
The entire restored length of stream will be investigated for channel stability and in-stream structure
functionality. Any evidence of channel instability will be identified, mapped, and photographed. All
structures will be inventoried for functionality and photographed.
Successful restoration of the vegetation on a stream mitigation site is dependent upon hydrologic
restoration, active planting of preferred canopy species, and volunteer regeneration of the native
plant community. In order to determine if the criteria are achieved, vegetation-monitoring quadrants
22

r
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
r
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
will be installed across the restoration site, as directed by NCEEP monitoring guidance. The number
of quadrants required will be based on the species/area curve method, as described in NCEEP
monitoring guidance documents, with a minimum of at least three quadrants. The size of individual
quadrants vegetation-monitoring plots will be installed on approximately 1.0 percent of the
restoration site. The individual monitoring plots will be 0.01 hectare in size. Vegetation monitoring
will occur in spring after leaf-out has occurred. Individual quadrant data will be provided and will
include diameter, height, density, and coverage quantities. Relative values will be calculated and
importance values will be determined. Individual seedlings will be marked such that they can be
found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality will be determined from the difference between the
previous year's living planted seedlings and the current year's living planted seedlings.
At the end of the first growing season, species composition, density, and survival will be evaluated.
For each subsequent year, until the final success criteria are achieved, the restored site will be
evaluated between July and November. Permanent photo points will be set up for each quadrant.
The monitoring will occur annually for five years. The monitoring period should include two
separate years with bankfull events. Bankfull events will be verified using an installed crest gauge
that will be inspected during each monitoring visit. If a bankfull event has not been documented by
the end of the second year of monitoring, a mandatory quarterly check will be required. If there are
not two bankfull events, the monitoring period maybe extended at the discretion of the Corps of
Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Project Manager and the 401-Wetlands Unit. Monitoring
reports will be submitted during every year for years 1-5.
23

7.0 References
Hall, Karen (2001). Recommended Native Plant Species for Stream Restoration in North Carolina.
Raleigh, NC, North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute NCSU.
Harman, William A., Gregory D. Jennings, et al. (1999). Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry
Relationships for North Carolina Streams. Wildland Hydrology Symposium, Bozeman, MT,
AWRA.
McLendon, Scott, Becky Fox, et al. (2003). Stream Mitigation Guidelines. United States Army
Corps of Engineers -Wilmington District, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and North Carolina Department of Natrual Resources -
Division of Water Quality.
Rosgen, David L. (2001). A Stream Channel Stability Assessment Methodology. Seventh Federal
Interagency Sedimentation Conference. Reno, NV. w: 18-26.
Schafale, Michael P. and Alan D. Weakley (1990). Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina, Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Smith, Cherri L. (2004). Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. Raleigh, NC, North Carolina
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources -Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
United States Geological Survey (2003). The National Flood-Frequency Program.
24

8.0 Restoration Tables

0 7 0 9 1 ~
.~
a
as ~
'~ o
~ ~
~ w o
~ ~
~ ~ ~
® o °'
~ '~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ U
O
v
~ ~ .~ O O
~ ® N M
J ~ N N
d

L
~ O ~ ~ ~--i
.--+ ~
J N ,--. ~
W
Lde ~-+

~; ~
~
~ Al

Q ~

7,
~':'; O
~
~
~ fJ')
~
;_. ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
r F°
: O
v O
v ~
fP1 C.J
..
s
f" ~ ~i

,; =
o O O
O ~ O ~
a~i ~`..~ l4 p ~
~- ~
.

' ° O
C v,
~ _
•
~
ue ~
s
.
O
~
~
~ ~
s, ~
~
.
~'
V1
~ :.~
V
= t4 t U1

~ ~

~
C
., ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~
~ "-,~+ d
'
~ ~ ~ ~ a ~
U
~
~ -
-~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~®
.~ ~' oc ~ c
~
Q A a
a, ._
;
: ~

~ ,
~ ~
~
~
~
E-+ ~
F ~
E-~

O
F ~
a o
U ~
~ E
m
o `
x
o °'
~ ~
F

-
o

~ I
~ I 1 I N

N N I I
o
.-
~ `
Q

h^~
°mv

N
N

~ ~°
n

fV N 1
~ I
~

O
o°o.
r

O N
oo
~ N p~

O
~ O ~

C °

N ~

~ r

N N

'

~ N
K~
m; Y
~
Q W
, r
I
I
I
I
N
I
1
~ O
~ °
i
of
t o 0
l 0 0
~
` O 00 O N
° [V
i
n
~ ~ N
N
b
~ J o
U
~ C O
o
rv
~
~~ ..
m
~ y n
~
~~ y ..
~~
~~ 'v n

~~ .. ..
~m
a~ ~ m
~
~~ ~
~
~ 2 ~
m
~~ c

~ ..
~
~ .
m~
~~ . ~ m
a~
~~~ .. c
~
~~ ~ c
~m
~~ ..
~
~ c ~
m~
~~ n

~ .. ..
~~
~~
~
a .. di ..
° a
~~~ y m

~~ y
~
~ ..
z
~ y
~
~ m ~
~
~a .. y
°~
~~ ..
m~
~a ~ m
a~
~a .. v
A~
~~ y
m~
~~ ..
A~
~a .. y .. .. v .. m
B~~~m
~a~~~~~~
ro I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 a f ~ 1 1 1 1 I I N I i ~

d°. ~

d>

~

~
o
y
°~
~6

a

I

1

1

1 I

.-

' I
m
N

I

I

I 1

I

I

~

1

0

I

~

~ I

I

~ I I I

I I I

A
U C 1 W O I I 1 1 l l 1 ~ I I I 1 1 N 1

_ m I I I I 1 1 0 1 1 I I I
N
w
° ~
.~
d
~ ..
~~
~~
°°
~ ~
~a
~~ .. ..
~`s
~~
.,a
~g ~ ..
~°`
~~
~a
~~ 'ti
~
a ~ m
x
~~
~
~ ai
~
~ di
~~
~~ di
a€~A
g~~ ui
~z
~~ ti .,
~q
~~ y
~
~ .. ~
a€
E~ ..
q
~ ..
~a
~~ ..
~
~
m"a
~~~
m~
~~
~
~
~~
~~ ..
~~
~~
z~
~~ ..
m~
~~
~~
~a ..
a~
~~ ..
$~
~~
A~
~~ ..
'"~~~~°'_"
~~~~~~~~
I I 1 1 N ~
N 1 I ~ N

' O
1 N °
. ~

W ~ m
V 1 I ~

0 vN
O

N N
O

O ~y
lV

O N
m
~ y o! O m
O N r

~
A C
~ •
N
-
~
ap
`

N
r
N
O

~
O ~

in

N
~ O

O
1

N
° w
0 N
~
O O
o
p O
O~
<
N
n
VI
~~
~~ y
~ W
~ N
1
I
I
1 ~ tV
i O
N
I
I
°,
° m
N
o ,
°~ n
m
~
c N 0
G
1 O
I q
~
N O
o~
0 c
'
`?
~~ dNv

D= p
S N C

`! W
m~
f K
a ~~
K ~~ a
LLB' ~! K te'
g ~~
K ~
W' ~
tY ~~
K a~
K K ~~°
K f K ~~
K ~m
~ ~
~ ~~
R
f K ~
~! ~
K ~ ~
K ~
K
K
~ K ~
K ~
K
L K ~q
f K
~ Rte'
~ K
~ K g y~}
`L K 2~ 2~ f K
p 1 I 1 I I I I I I I

b N
~

~

G

~

'

°~

1

e

I

I

I I I ti

'

I I

H

M

I I

I 1 I

I I 1

I I I N I

o I

~ I ~

~ I I I
a
1 W
C
1
I
I n e
l
I N
I
I
I
I
I
I'~
I
C I I
o f
N I
~ I I 1
~
_ m i I I I i 1 I l I ~j I I I 1
~w
° ~
~ C d
s~ C
a
~ C~
~
a~
~ g
'
~~ d C
a C d
~a
~ r
~~
~
~~ C d C

~~ 0
~
~ C
a~ C m C
~~~ C d
~
~ C
~m ~
~
~ ~ ~
~ C
m
~ m C

~ d
~ C d ~~
$
~ 0 C

~
~
~ C S
€~
~ C
~ C d
'~ ~~ ~
z~ C~
s C
ay C 0
~ C
~~ C d C C~ ~~ N
~a~
~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ f~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~
~ti ~ m ~ O
~ ~
~ tj of Y I I I I I 1 1 I I O
S ~
O ci N I
' I 1
N
ro
~
~ ~
N
o
~ h
d
~
~ N ~
' n
' Q
Z
N Q
2 Q
Z Q
\2 Q
Z Q
\Z
O
~
o V m 0
O
O
`
1~ N
°i f~j
~ N
m ti C v ~ c i a G °i (V I i I 1 I I I t o I N
C OS N 1 1 I N

. ~
K
•. ~
~ K
•• pww
~¢ ~
j ..
~ K c .
~ C
~~ . w .
~
f Rte . c
$
' $ .. c
~ N
K g ~ c

K~
ry~ry ~
R f ..
~
K c ~
~ ~ ~
~ W, ~ C c .
~
~ K . c
Q
$ ~ c
~ ~
K f ~
~
K c .
• E
f C . c
~ gq
S' ..
~
K~ ~ e~

K~ LL~ w

'~ ~ .
~
K~ . y ~
~
K~ y
~
K ~ y
~'
~ K ..
~
f~ ~ Y
C
~ K di
C ~
~ K
~ ~
~ K ~ ii
~`
`C~ LLB' ., y m .. y
A C~ G~ C
~ C f~~ K f LLB'
I I 1 I 1 I 'I I ~
~ N N < N

N °~ 1 I I O ~
o C N 1 1 I I tp N
u
~ 3
r

~-

m

m

M
O
N

~

'
N
~
^
'
~
~
n1
lh

'
O
N
O
Cof
O
d
lV
i°
~
O
lV

N
m
N O
~
~
<
m !' I W 1 I I I ,~ G O o ~ p
I I I 1 n I
I l G $ N I I I
N
I
N
Z C G
M1'

c
f

¢

~
f K

c
`C K
.
°'
~ K
. .
c
~ K
. .

g K
.
c
S
y .

~ S~
. ~~
°1 c
K~
y .

R f
. y

Rte'
8i
c
~ R ~ 2
..
c
~¢

~
~
c
K S'
..

LL'
~

f C

c
g
.. ~

K f
v m
c
K K

c
ti
c
K
Si
c
¢ 'd
_.

K
v
c
K
.. ti

~~

c
LL~
5i

~ K
m
c
I' K
..
c
~C tY
~ .. ~ ..
c c °' 01
LLB' `C K K K

y
i
O
4 ~~p
ti
y U
v y E
8
Q
$ £22~
°.~~ t23a $
~
~ ~
> Q
~ a
8 a
°O $
L ~ ~ Nn
B~
~
p
p
F
a ~
d 4 m
~ .
C iA
u c
E ~ E
.~ m $ q
~ ES ~
~ o
'~ s
4 $~
Y a
«fV N
~ ~, f~
~ N o~y, 5s-~ O g ~ c .U a
Qa N 8~
> E
'"
v ~
~ s~
E~

3 9
~5
° xD
~
~ Q
~
°'
~
~ o
~
~ ~.
~ ~
e
~~ c
m
4 8 °
@
~ 3

~ ~ ~J
F a~
~
'~ m
_ `o

$ ~
~ ~
3 ~ `m
8 $
~~
~= EW
a.
~' m
m ~s
N
`o ~

~ s
y a°~8
`o ~
~
~ E ~
~~ a ~
s n 4
3.-~ a3
Q c ~ a°¢ a o
a_oc a
°

N rc
O
a0
,... m
m a 3 mE
mQ
GO Z. m
m O
m'
~ ~ ~
~
~~ $
o ~
Q E d
W ~ E~
Ka0
K
~ 4' m
$ 22
mL
~ 22
GN m~
N>. 3'
Q g~
N K ~~
.. R' s
N $ ~
dy T
os
~N
f ~ Ta
Kt~
~~ Ta
Km ~
g ~~~ m
LL.a. O: m ~ KE
N ~ ^ ~ ~ rv N N N N N N N t0'1 M Cdi

g
m
g
8
F
s
3
~p
A m
~ .4
~ ~
~' .4 ~
g E~
O
~ 'S
N
d
~ E
s ~ c N
c '~ ~ s
~ ° c
Ic ~ y._
~' E
°~ ~a
E.lP .~ `m
w°°~ ~
~DBo
~~a~
~p~p~~
7 = ~
~NZe
ti

4 0
a o
U ~
~ E
O y
O
5 ~
C ..
O ~
o
F

d ~

~ I I 1
I
I 0
I
I

~
VV
O

O
K O
~; '
, w
1
1
I
I
I
l o
g
o
o ~ m
p o
o U
O J
~
`L ¢ ' A
~ c°i
dam' rt~~
f ~ ~ c
¢ rv
~ ~ n
¢ E ~ n
~ f c m
K ~ ~
¢ n c
f K n
~ W
2d' A
~ c n
K f m m
K S
K
~ °~
K f
K
~ CO n
K f ~ A
K f d ~
K ~ d
K ~ °i
~ K p °
~ K ' ~ m
~ K A
~ ~
~ A cC
~ tt O rv e
~ K n
F ~
K rv
~ K ~<
~ <°
K ~ ~° ~
~ K ~ °~ c ai c
¢ ~ Rd' ~ '~
K
I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I
O m
~~
d >
j u

I

U

\

I

I

I

I
I

I

I
I

I
I

I
I
I

I

I
I
N

I
I
I
I
I
i
I

f
I

o
I

~
1
I 1
I

~
U m I I I I I I t I I I I
O
~
~ n cm

~ K n

E ~'

K n c rv

~~ f c

K A

f c `d

~~ m ~

K f a m

K~ N

K .. d

f K A

~ ~

K ..

f y E
d
~~
~ C
K F ..
~
¢
N
~
~°
~~ ..
~
K
n
~ ~ c

~~ ~ °

K `t ~ c

¢ f ~

K ° ~

~ K .. ..
N~
~ K ..
C~
~ K
R
~ ..
C
K c ~
d
~ K c ~

~ K
C
f ..
~
~ .. ~
C
~ K ~

f ~

K .. iu ~

f K~ m .°. v ~

K~ K~ ui

K
1 1 I I N I I
N
M I I
O
N
'
N F- N ~ ~ 0 o
i a O
p rv ~ ~
N
¢'
~d .-
Q' W
J
U
1
I
I
~
D
I
I
~
~
t o
I O ~ o
o O
~
d =
O o
rv C
F ~ N
f c
~ m~ m
~ ~ f c
¢ ~
f ~ R
¢ ~ ~ 0
~ ~ ~ ~ n
~ c
a m~
E ~ N
F c
~ 0
f ~ m
~ ~ ~ m
¢ ~ ~
~ N
F ~ R
¢ ~ ~
~ i~u
~ ~ c~
f ~ n
~ f c N
~ f d
~ n~
~ ~ m~
~ ~ rt c
~ ~ rt
~ ~
~ F €'
~ ~ m C
f rc n
F ~
~ ~ €'
f ~ i°e
~ c
~ N~~
~ ~ ~ ~~ N ~
~ ~ ¢ f a~
¢

G u
I)= ?
a > I I I I I

N I

I 1 1

1

I I

1 I

I I
I I

N
~
I I
I I
1 I
I I I
I I
I
N

~
I I

o
o I
f

~
m 1
l
f I
I I I I
I

~
j ~ I W I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I
U y
mK

~
`t
K
F
¢ E
KE
¢ f
K drn A
f¢ dm
f K
f~
f
K f
K~ C
K ~ R
E~
f
K
f K
P
K o
f K f q °p
E~ l C
f¢ S C
~ ° C
¢ f a
~ f n~
K C
f~
f
K f
~ C C
~ K C
'L
K f
~
~
K~
~ f ..
¢ F K P
¢

I I I i I I I I I I

~
~
z
z a
z a
z `¢
z a
z

~ m
m i I I I I l o l o l o p I I I
w

m ~ R c A ~ A c R ~ n cp 1 ~~ n c ~ ~ rt ~ N ~ n~ R ~ rt~ rv ~ m~ 2~ n d n d rt m ~d ~ N~ N ~'A c~ R C x~ R ~ m c~ m ~ q °i ~ d C d
~ K ~ K~ K~ K~ K f K ~ K ~ K f K f K~ K f K f K ~ K ~ K `t K ~ K f K f K~ K~ K ~ K 'f K `r K f K ~ K~ K f K f K E K~ K~ K

i I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I
K 3
p

o

o
a
N ~ a) N

~
~

~
m
d
b 3 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I l l I ~ I I I
I
vZ
K
m
f ~
Rte' mcm
f K f g'rvcA
K f~~ C
K n €
~~ 'm~
~ K mc
~~ n
E g'm
K~ c n
~~ g
K 'm ~
~ K '`~
f g
K A c
~ K B
F ~
K A c
~ K `~c
f K me
E~ m
f ~rv
~ f c~
~~ ~
K mc~°
~ Rte' mmm
f dd' f c
~ A~
E K Ad`
f K f m
K A~`
f a' ~ ~A~`d`"
K f~ f~ f~

J

O

.4

Y~ S
U
~
O
~
3

O

.4
`
~
220
~

~ d
~
U
^
~

's
J
d

q

°
a
°
<
~
a
t
y
t ~ ~ D
d~
oG _ ° ~
3 r
N
FC ~
a` 4
3
m m ~
~",~ ~ m
~a~
te y
o E
~ s
~ ~
x
°

LL
- E
aE
~
~ F
~ c
3 ~
~ 9
~ s
3
S 4
3 s 5
~ `f
s ~
in m
ui ~dj
~ ~ o
a° pj
g o_
a $
E o
a°
~
o
3 " gy m
d ° 03
a¢
°
E d
m

w K
c

O` _
E~

m
o

~ -D O
cSP
°. 4
ma 3 a-
°.~m~

3 mam
,x

? _
~ F

m"~? __
4
$
mD ~

~ .°
~ ~
m
30 .~
c
~
a3 3 ~

~ ~
`

~
~

m r.
~~: o

.4
~ -
~

m
~
0 ~
~~ a
°
.«
~ c

m
3^

"3
°c~
d
~~ y E
o°
~ m
n ~' N

S_'
>
m
,~ `m
'~
' 9
° m
~ ~
'
I

_
N .. ai
°
_0 3
~ S o
o
~ 'm
°' N
m
o a
EL
~~ a ~
oc o
Y v
°

~ ~
0
o
~ c
° a
o c
°
$ .4 ~ o _4 m
°
a
w 3 m C
pi i ¢ L
K w a
? K m ~o ~a a ~ Km a ? ~m a
~ o

`s
A
v
N t~
g E~
O
~ '>
~ E
3 _ a y
5 4
~~-' E
E ~ ° ~
W d ~
~o ~~
~_°~
~;, ? o

y
~`~
~ x x x x x x x x x x x
o
N

~
°' x x x x x x x x
N ~'
a
a
e%~ ~

~ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
o
Na

~ ~

~ ~
~H
~
~ ~,~ x x x x x x x x x x x x
Nv
~
~
O ~
~
o
N o
~
+~
~ c~
~ ~ V

~ ~ -~
~ ~ a
~ ~ ~
~ x x

°o a
,~
N d V

c~

0

a~
z
U ~
v ~ .c '~ ~ ~ m ' ~ ~° ~ ~'~ a cc ~
O L cu
"" ~ a
i ~
',,,, ~ U (0 ;B •~ ~ (p ~ ~II p fCi .C (0 O ~ (0 (B
~ ~ ~ OU O ~ ~ (~E O ~ ~ a ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ N ~ N
v O

~
O
c
~ ~
v
v
v
v
v
v
v

~
N c~a
~ cB cB ~ . c
x
~ ~ co
~ .
~ ~
a~
a
a
a
a
a
i
~X ~ ~
a
i .
°' = o ~ c
a ~
° ~ i
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
U m ~ E
Q Q o
O D U U D ~L ~i ~ ~ Z a ~ U
' U' U
' U' U
' U
' ' ~ I

f: . ~ •a
c~~
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
~
~+

^, ~~

,
~
°'~ x x x x x x x x
N +~
0

F:.
• i..i
M ~
•
;~;,
s ~~„
~ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
p
N a
a.

i CSS
~+ [~
~ o

N c"~a
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
~ ~
O P1
0
N y
~
, 'O
ai t° ~
~ C~
~ ~
' U
,y i X X X
G b
~` N Pa
O O
~, a

~
Z
~
coo
•~
~
~ ~,
~
~
c
m ~
c
co
~
~
`~°
°

c°
~
~
co
~
ca
c
~ o
a~i

~
c
•~
c a
aoi
a ~
~
°

~

,V
~
~
cB
.U v,
O •
•~
' a~
a ~
U
U
.O ca
0
0 ~
U .~
i o .c_
O •c
L ~a
O
.~
N ~

~ ~
O ,m
O
N
a

c
0
~ •c~
0
-Q •E
t; ~
~ ~ o ~
° a~ a
` o
` `°
~ o a~ a~ ~
`° •- ~ o N v, ~, .c c~a .c •,
-~ •~ o o ~ ~
. o m E co
.G
~
~ ~
~ ~
ca ••
.~ E
ca o
~ c
o
U c
a
U E
co E
cu E
ca .~
~ m
a
o ~
> •~
; .x
c~ ~
`i° ~
.Q ~
•- •
•~ .~
~ .Q
i .~
~ co
~ ~ .~
5 ~
U .
c ~
U °
r `B
E •c '°
i o a~i •~

e~ , •,:, U a ~
.v
~
c
0
c
0
c
0

.~ .c m .c .~ ~ , ca o o ~ co
• 'o
O °
O ~, ca o 0 0 ~
~
~ a o
~ :~
i o
0 0 ~ ~ •~ v i i i O E U
0 U a C
O i •,_. 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~
~ U ~
N
Q S
Q ~
Q ~
Q c0
U cE
U N
U a>
U O
U O
U O
W cu
= ~ N N N a
i
J N
J •~
J
J cp
~ c0
~ O
~ v>
O ,O
~ -C
~ -c
~ cB
fn cp
Vj m
Vj ~
Vj ~
Cn
(~ ~
~ ~
~ :Q
~ ~
x

9.0 Figures

Figure 1 Project Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Project Site Locations
Figure 3 Project Site Watershed Map
Figure 4 Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map (1994)
Figure 5 Project Site Hydrologic Features Map with Gauge
Locations
Figure 6 Reference Site Vicinity Map
Figure 7 Reference Site Watershed Map
Figure 8 Reference Site NRCS Soil Survey Map (1994)
Figure 9 Project Site FEMA Firm Map
Figure 10 Reference Site Vegetative Communities Map

Figure 1 Project Site Vicinity Ma

Figure 2 Project Site Location
-~~ - ,1' .may-y-~-~-~- ~ Y
t
} , 1 ~
_~, V tia`r~etti3~' r. , ~ ~ N` L~`~ ~ Wingate ~arshvill
.,~ ~ t
1 .. :r ,f,~- ~_. ~ ' ~` ~ Monroe „
a0 ~ ~~ K ~.. ~ `
~~ ~ ,
( .~19~P~
,~
_- v ~
F
t ~ as ~, ; a
Ro '" ;
P
o; ,j ?' r f ', ~% ~~-_ <`~ desvill~ge g' ~ ornsbor
`~, ~ , f ~ - ~_ ~ i Pa eland ~I
' ~ ;
r ~ ! ~t
~,~ ~ ~_ ~ ~"F ~ 01 = 1 ~ _;
' ~ a . ~ .. ~ t ~ ~ ~~J ~~ Gam" ~ ~•.
t (~J ~ ~ -..ti..ri. ~
'~; ~~,., ~'_ ~(2'~.,t ~~~ ~ ~ 1 ,
~, }~ l ~~
u ~ !'`~--
~- ~ ,~~ ~ ~~ 1 . ~ I {~
~~ eti ~`~, /(~ 1. ~ ~~ 4 ~, ,!
~ ,
/r ~ ' ,
~~
z
r I i~ '~ t - 52D ~' .,
d i~~ ~" ~ -. E ~"~(~ / - ~
4 ~ S L
~ ~ z -
,
kf fi 1 , ~~'~ i s'j~~ _.~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~s9A,
t ~ ~
_ . '~.
' ~.~
..
{
( ,~ ~` ~ 1 jf ~~ o! ,~ °, - ~~ ~ gCp
J , I u'~ l~ ~ I,.
~-~ ~ _~~"~; ~ ~ f ,~,~,; Via, Legend
__
N 0 1,000 2,000 - ;' ~ ~ • ~ ' ~~ .~ a ~ j ProjectArea
A ' - - '_-_
•Y eulnb
Feet ~ h a~0 ~~,, ~ ~•"\ '?,~ __ _____~ Project Watershed
t
--
Title Project Site Location/LTSGS Quad Map (Pageland 1988)
Prepared For 601 West Stream Restoration Prepared By
~~ Project Union County, North Carolina
Date Pro ect Number
l ;cc}system j
~.., 4/26/07 012620007

Fieure 3 Yroiect Site Watershed Ma
PAS PASOUOTANK b' _ ®'~' ~ ~ F J"~ T ~- ~~ ~~
YAD YADKIN ~GHO t ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 C' ~~ 1
CHO CHOWAN ~ ~ PAS ~ L ts~ (ro ~l~ '~ 3e f ? ~~ \\ !"~ 1 l \
ROA ROANOKE e~ '4~' 3
TAR TAR-PAMLIGO .: RRB ~ GTH /1~\~ Z. TAR ~ ~'eT ~S~ ~ ~ `~.3 ` U ~~J ~C
NEU NEUSE ~H NEU r+` ~ ~,.~ "~1,: i ~ 1 ~ f M1~ %'`~.f~.:;, ((1
WAT WAiAUGA ,.l'N - BRD r y~ @a. '~fF \~ I ~ ~ )~
CPf CAPE FEAR HfW CPF ' ~"~?~S r \-e ~ ,~ j .\ l ~`""~j I
fRB FRc'NGN BROAD ) J ~ i
CT8 CATAWBA Wof( / _ ~ ~ .! ~ „j1 ~ r I ~~~, I -~^ ' ; _.,I J
LTN LITTLE TENNESSEE r '~~,~'~ '~ J ~\ } j
BRD BROAD LBR i C,~F /y""'. ( ~ ~ 1 11.
HIW HIWASSEE ~ ~ ~S~ I Q i f -. ~". ~ ` 2
LBR LUMBER - ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ `' ~ 1
SAV SAVANNAH ~~~ ~t" ~. ,~
WOK WN~TE OAK ~ '~Y'i I ~~ ~\` ` ~l 1
{
01
a
Total Dra na a Area 0 41 miZ
I1 `,,
~~ s_i: i
F- ~~
rJ _~
/~ ~~ f
j ,°-~~
1~ °• ~.~
~~ r ` ~
~ ~}
,~
~..~~ f
.r=
Legend
A 0 1,250 2,500 01 f__~__! Project Area
~ '~ ~ ~ Pro ect Watershed
Feet ~~
1-----1 1
Title Project Site Watershed Map
Prepared For 601 West Stream Restoration Prepared By
~~ Project Union County, North Carolina
•
~~~('gSyS~i Date Project Number
4/26/07 012620007

4 Proiect Site NRCS Soil
Prepared For
Project
r?
,1{;casystem
601 West Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620007
Prepared By
Title ~ Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map (1994)

Fi rug°e ~ Vr'u'ect ~li~~ 3 b+, z E ~ ,,;,~ ~ s:,z a:~~a k, r~ a . ' ,,: _I .i;;,~tios~s _
~ ~..,, - ~~ ~ ;w ,
;f~ FZ a ~" _ ~ S ~ ~, ~.'
„sni
~ d~~' .f P r t .F ~ ~ `"T ~ ; fi~ x ~' ~4
Upper UT : ,s ~ ~ °f `` ~ ,; '~`
`.'4 ~ ~~ :~ a '~'rtk ski <ry4~,' s '' ~~ ,~ ~~~"~
~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~e ~ ~;
z~ ~
i k ~t~ ~5 $L':- ~ y t b
i ,
~~ -~rt~y\ r sus '`~,~ ~ ~ z U f t ~ ,y~f ! '~
'%rt k ~ _ ~-}~~tk 4 T~ ~R~' y L I"~ ~kA Vie.
~r~: t ~ k.
c ~r~ 7 ~ `:y .y D#= r'r~t ~; ~ by 5 f~~ t'~, _:
'+*«r
`Lower UT y~ ~~`~~.~, ~ ~~~~~~,,a ~~~~ ~~" ~x Y ~,~ktif,~ ~fi k'
P. 9 x ~ ~ a F ~,:, Z`g
'¢ wct o §^ f ` F ~ r
4 ~'~+ ~`~~ iii ° Vf ~' 'fC ~ t '~
[ C 0~ ~ `~`, LS ,r„~ .~a,n->w ro~ ~£~N" 1L ~ p~ y ~ \ ~ { 4 ~~
} F ,~~a~ rot i =e~4? ~ .
~+t _ Y
4' ~~,' ~. ~ J Legend
^~j Project Area
g,l y ,~ Approximate Easement Boundary
,.
'`i Existin Stream
~ ~,r.... ~ __- ~ 9
i~~ct~
Title Project Site Hydrological Features Map with Gauge Locations
Prepared For Prepared By
Project 601 West Stream Restoration w
~- Union County, North Carolina ~.
a , ~ Date Project Number
l,ws~stetu ~
.M 4/26/07 012620007

Figure 6 Reference Site Vicinity Ma
_:~,; ,~~ t3a-,~',~~. + '',k.~ sa __ x -:r~P h~~vt a. ~~j~j(~ ~q, ~ I_ 29 ~ ~ ,"/ ~ ~~~'~`•i; ~`~
y ~~ _ Tt\"r"F. S~~"
-- - t~ f \ t, , _
~ ~.~,~,,
°S~ a: ~,/ ~ ~ 24
i g~` ~- ~ ^~ ~ CktA SO~"TE ~:
`~ ,-.
._
~ ~~~ 521 ~., ' _F.~ ~L'
_ Off ~ ~ '~_~ ~ ~ 52 ~--. ~
.. ~. _~}d..~
0 50 100 ~`~~ ©~ ~ ~ 0 10 20
~~ ~ NCA ~ ~
Miles ~ Miles
84 ~ ."~~~; _ ~ '3
2909
s3nford Ln ~d
2889 o a~ ~ai~~~s- ~Monro
m~ ~eado~L 9o a ~~
2890 ~a~ ~ N ~o~g ~~ t`e`e a a :
6 . ooa Ga ~ ~Oa o
~~ a~ w;i ~ ~ ~~
iJr iO~9hby Rd ~ 84 Z a
o ~ ~ ~9
0
~°~~e~(n
vc~°~ DeeRraek Lnl
/~atec ~ J
~n
S6 ~ N~ ~~ Ftd
e
d~~O'~ 2822 ° TN ~o
a _ /~ `/
Q'a y/ ~, U
5~~e~~ Q~ \ ~ Q v°o O
~ ~ m ~P L
1~ ~p°~ ~ ~ ~?a a~~
G~/ Grove• ~ r A~"'~ J r~ ~
Q
sS~o a` ~~e a, ~`
~,,to Pd O ~ ``
sad ~ G
--1C C
o ~ e-d
e 0.
\ 75 a \ ~
sddler- d. F~d \K S~ ~~a~a+r v
c, a~~ ` ~~b ~ ,ryj
® ;9 /a
~, M~NeelyRd wee ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ster-Rd ° ~
a~ ~prin9 iew-Dr eea~
~,a
,~o~
G o~.FL~~ ~~--~/ NoPe ~d "
o L~eP-
0
U t
~' ~` Miles ~•~~•, 9
,a ~\ ~ ~.t
Title Reference Site Vicinity Map
Prepared For Prepared By
Project 601 West Stream Restoration w
~~- Union County, North Carolina
t ~ Date Project Number
l ,co ~ystcm ~ ~'
4/26/07 012620007

Figure 7 Reference Site Watershed Ma
PAS PASOUOTANK ..7 s~ rf ~ \..
) Ivry
YAD YADKIN i~ ~~.! ~.;'"! .r' %~ ' S~ ~ Z.~ /~ ,~"v
cHO cHOwAN S 5I ~j r ~' _E t - ~-~~ N/ ~
ROA ROANOKE NE ~ ! u ~ J ~ ~ ~ f ` 4 ~l ~ ~'
TAR TAR PAMLICO 1 ~ 1§ ~" '.
NEU NFUSO -.,<,..~~ - CHO ( S~ ~; ~ ` ~4~. F '.IR d~ ~' t 1 .`~~-.Y`''"/~,;
WAT WATAJGA RQ4 lei `.'>~~l„' t,;°y+~i t ~ f/ " "~~
CPF CAPE FEAR i ~~ PA5 ~ I ~S,.F t ," ~~~ It : P~ ~.K~ : ~ )j r/" r ~
FRB FRENCH BROAD r 'f ft8 / ~ TAR y },~ /Ei ~ ` h / / `~ /
CTB CATAW BA ~. CTe tiA S ~ I Jt/ 3 ' +.ri ~Y 1 ~ ~ ~ /~`\ t
t~ t g d J ~ / ~ '7
LTN LITTLE TF_NNESSEE HNV ' , LT7~ BRD `/ NEU ~ ~~ ~ _ T t~~ ~ j ~[ ~ __ i /,y_, • /~
BRD 8ROAO
HIW HIWASSEE OPF `( r ~ n) ~ ,1 ~ l
LBR LUMBER - Site- ~~~~ ~` \\\
SAV SAVANNAH VJOK ~ , ~+~ /-- \ \
WOK WHITE OAK LBR TL~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ \ '1.
mar/ ,`>~ ? , L~ ~ `~~.,~~
~ `~ ~`~ t~~y ~,
aTotal(DramagehArea ~0 18~~mi2,_
~~.
-----~.
`~
1
\ `.
,1
I '
75 Legend
~ ~„ ~ _ ~ Reference Reach Watershed
~' -°°._~ -1---~-~°~ Reference Reach Stream
Feet
Title Reference Site Watershed Map
Prepared For 601 West Stream Restoration Prepared By
Project Union County, North Carolina •
~'
1',CQSyStCIII Date Project Number ~t,,~
. •.-, 4/26/07 012620007

Soil ..:,.~
Soil Series Descri lion "r
Bd62 Badin channe sil cla loam 2-8% slo e s eroded
" BdC2 Badin channe sil cla loam 8-75% slo s eroded
- " Cm6 Cid channe silt loam, t-5 % slo es
- GaB2 Gaston cla loam, 2-8 % slo es eroded
~~~ Ta8 Tatum ravel) silt loam 2-8 % slo es
Ta62 Tatum ravel) silt cla loam, 2-8% slo s , eroded

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
9 Yro~ect Site N'Lt'MA P'1HM
- ~NE A \ ~~ -"
~16 Q 11115\
{en[ or call the National Floo Insurance Program a1 (800) 638-667(1.
f... '.
APPRO%IMATE SCALE
7.000 0 2000 FEET
unaou Fuo asuoANCL ruouur
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
UNION COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA AND
INCORPORATED AREAS
PANEL 200 OF 200
laoaa roa r.aeu no. ra~arew
mnpls: ~
tmraln 4J! Oa.4 L
mow. aremw~...,.w..ra.,~w..
MAP NUMBER
37179C020D C
EFFECTIVE GATE:
® JULY 5.1994
Federal ~tRau'Y Mamjement A{epcy
an anma copy a a ponlon a iW avow rarerenaetl npotl map. rc
trac[etl uelnp F-MR On-LJne. This map tloeY not relect charges
rMnenh xTlch may haw Wen metle auhseWeM to the tlale on [he
ok. Forthe le[eat protluct lnaxma[lon aWUt Natlonal FlOatl Insurance
n 9ootl maps c Wck [he FEMN Float Map Store at wwi.mac.hma.gov
Title Project Site FEMA FIRM Map -Panel Number 3717900200 C effective September 7, 2000
Prepared For 601 West Stream Restoration Prepared By
Project Union County, North Carolina
c~
F~:os~steln Date Project Number
~'~,tl i~t en1el~P 4/26/07 012620007

10 Reference Site Vegetative Communities Map
Prepared For
Project
~`
~'~dS~St~111
601 West Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
Date
4/26/07
oject Number
012620007
Prepared By
Title I Reference Site Vegetative Communities Map

10.0 Appendices

Appendix 1
Project Site Photographs

Phntn Pa QP 1

;; i~r~ ~:
1i. ~
~~~ ~
~'' , ~ ~ h?s,,

`~ ~"k~3~t~l~Y ~+~
'`S
~.
S
+ ~
~
it
RC~'3@
eYP
t°P-c=:~sC~~~
~..
~~
w '.
a.~g ~
$.¢ 1 ~ p iv .'4 ~ '£" 'gyp ke.
~ s1. ~,5 4~` "?."gyp g ~ 21 'u"
~ a ~2S'. _ ~xk~~m~' 3

~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ 4 `d ~F ~~9y'y 1~

. 3
a
~
~ t y 5 v F ~~~'
9
y
~ ~'
~ ~ ~
}
t5~.~~k.
S
~
.Sy
3 ~
~~~ ~ s ~, a f ~ ~ ~~'e}'~t ti

Photograph 1: Upstream Reach of the UT to Lanes Creek
'q L< j~~~,.- <'j tlKtt^ ''~S K~ ":.; ~'d`~`` ~ ,ytzrp~y "f5. ~¢¢ ~. ~ '
q~ C~ ~ P~ ''F". ,~~~N~~ Gl~.b
td
~
y
~~
~ iyUy Ibh 'tea Vie` ~~3 i ~ v4~"'0.p' ~
~.. i~ }K S
~
av
~~ "ii4E ~ ~
.
~
'r~x4a'' f r
p ~

'.
~V ~ ~ ~~ ~~
~~
~`T ~
~~ 3i
4
~
l
~
,i
F, ,,
t
1 .
'rt.' X 1 ~B Jr
~'~ M1
+9 <~%'~
":yo Y t.
~
.
•
c{
t _a':w.
r `Y
`
z
.
.
,
a,
a
i"~a.
£_i ~.. :':gip ..,~
.W °'
Y'~i'~ ~
a
g
ggeF(~

! '~ ~ ~, rr~'g y ,,~.~
~°
~ ~~
x ~ a~i
'
Y~
~
°
~
'
*t
~
~
E~
a
.
n,
~,~
~
~
,
~`
3s•~~d
~ B
g9 X5^6
he
4
~~
~
'
P s ~ ~~e i r , ~, a~ a '~ ~~. ~ y.
~
~~ -. t4 \ +;~~"~$bi {~~B~f ~~l.l\''~ L .~ '~ ~iy~aa" 3 ' ~ I :''~ ~~
~~

,,/~II ,."~.~~~ !i f 1 4
~` j,la c '~f~:i~Jb ~. w~~S7~9 '", L ~A~~ ~, y 3 i ~ ~r'~ ~'~
'gifiS~Se * _
'~
~~
!~ ` ~~ `~`•qq,~'~a x'21 e~eyyy
~~a ~~ ~') ~~§~~~ ~ !I7/
f
~
y
'
!
F
"~Jl 1 °~ - ~° 1
i ~~7'a` ~ S"
~i ~ ~ ~i~A9 ~"6 I d f ~~f£ ~ iS
•l.~_., .'~'! 6- it ~ _ •~iC~~`~'..~ `~ fii.~IP~~~ ~+r~ b_k .-~6.s1.~~~ _1W:i \_... ~ ~ - :~`',-. '.4.~,
Photograph 2: 30-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe at the upstream end of the project reach
Title Appendix 1. Project Site Photographs
Prepared For
601 West Stream Restoration Prepared By

~- Project
Union County, North Carolina ,
~
' OS S
1
~
~ Date Project Number
~'''
~ ' ".' ' 4/26/07 012620007

A
'rt ~ ~,~ ~~ r~ 'y- y ~~~+~ ~ ,~ ~ i {
w t ,~
~~ ;
~ '~,
S 3
~ '~ ~ `a Xis gg~ ERR ~ P P d } `k :. y~ 'd" ° ~+J C ^u {'}x ~,.~ 3 ~ '
•~ J". a' " `b.
~ t~ ~
deb" ~~~~'~~~~~ r~y.. 1 <:ai~'~~~~~`~~=,~
L°as" ~ _°4~ .
s~ ~~ e { s, t .``~ F~k; f ~,* ~i J e ~v~ "` ~~ i
~~ d ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ' ~ V 'mss "R
'„~' ~Sfi'IY1'.`~ A:.~ ~~ l~'A tom. ~~ } p n1'E.
Photograph 3: Middle of UT to Lanes Creek
~r~~ 3 ~h.~ ~ 0'y r it~+'iF~{~'"~ ~ r ry.~ t~ e~ ~~ k~R ~` ~~~,,~r l~g ,
i!s~ (~itt1dp~ ''~. i ~! rl ~~~~v.t~,~~ ;1,,~~~,~, ~ ! ~~ d~ y' 4- ~ ~ ~ a
7i) / .F ~~ii \~tCR- , y~tia dr . SF 4~ ~ ~ ~ • ~'.T~f~{~ _
s° ~t~ 'r~1~~y ~x' ~y ~'~~ ,~ ~." `"" ~~~~ ~o " ~~ X13 ~` .r/
Y r it
.. ~f ~~k'`/~!~ fE~A ~{5~~1~~ ~ ;iv ?,~ 7 r ~ti-. ~'~~ y"1,~=~ j„1.^5 Fuze {1 , ~'~. r
~~~ }r f"e",. S ' i6~ rp M° P~,~' +"k.~ ra rL P" ,r L ~ 4 t.,'a~Sf~~y7 fi J ~:a~j ~n
~ ~
FL,~~1s~~~. ~f^y~~4 { ~ yf §sif~~~.~`~~~-:'~~~t ~r~F,~~4'`}f~"4.
~F 3~ • ~~~ r ~.~ . ~~, .hr ~~a skmrLj q"'
a 1 t ~ aaac '~! - ~^k a
~ $ b i~
~~a ~r drF, kt i jY•r 1,
p°t ~ LCt'T d~`~f~~ ~= P f.t u~r ~Mifd~ -.ti
~/Y~~f4~~~~g~~ ~ ( k' ~ p l I
~1~ tag ~ a~~'~r3~~~ ~~ ~_ ~~ x ~ y~~_:-`~'.
~ ~ ' . ~,;
E ~~ ~ z
3
b Y
t. ~, s ~ 1
~r
2 3 7
Photograph 4: Lower UT to Lanes Creek
Title Appendix 1. Project Site Photographs
Prepared For 601 West Stream Restoration Prepared By
Project
~~ Union County, North Carolina
~,COSy$tOn] Date Project Number
~• 4/26/07 012620007

Appendix Z
Project Site NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms

r ... :, Z •: ~~`.'YS?t~h. ~ . .. A~~'~.'S:rr. .. -,.. eKZUwr.=ir,afh'.-r.*: t~?s .~cm..:-..ww,.atMr~.~...
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•.
•
•
.. •
•
•
•
- •
•
•
. •..
•
•
•
•
•
•

4 7 0 4 1 a
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 3/5/2006 Project: EBX Latitude: 34.853064
Evaluator: Todd st..lonn, Norton Site: 601 West Longitude: -80.442206
Webster
Total Points: 37.25

Stream is at feast intermittent
County: UnlOn Other
Pageland
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or perennial if 2 30
A. Geomor holo Subtotal = 15.5 Absent`; `4:1Neak ,' "Moderate ;~Sfron '=~ ~%~S Q, _,` r
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool se uence 0 1 2 3 ,
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sortin 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3 ~ t
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valle or draina a wa 0 0.5 1 1.5 _
Y
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3 O s
~ ~c-~
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = 10.5
14. Groundwater flow/dischar e 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel --dry or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Or anic debris lines or files (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 :,
19. H dric soils (redoximorphic features present? No = 0 Yes = 1.5 ~5`'
C. Biolo Subtotal = 11.25
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21e. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Cra fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversit and abundance) 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous al ae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5 ~~~~0;~`~~`:
29e. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = o.s; Facw = o.~s; oat_ = 1.5; s,av = z.o; other = o ..0'~5~'s
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•~
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

• A endix 3
pp
~

• Categorical Exclusion Report
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

~ ^ ~ ^ Kimley-Horn
• ~ and Associates, Inc.
September 29, 2006
Mr. Donnie Brew
• Environmental Protection Specialist
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601

Re: 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site
• Full Delivery Project
Union County, North Carolina
•
Dear Mr. Brew:
This letter serves to re-transmit a Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem
• Enhancement Program Projects to your agency for 601 West Property Stream
Restoration Full Delivery Project for your review and approval. Per your request,
ddi
i
l d
a
t
ona
ocumentation including correspondence to and from resource
• agencies, a completed NRCS AD-1006 form, Environmental Data Resource
• maps, and a biological assessment of affect for federally listed endangered
species have been attached.

The 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site is located 8 miles south of
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The 601 West site contains an
• unnamed tributary to Lane's Creek. This stream is highly unstable due to the
straightening of portions of the channel, removal of riparian buffer, .moderate to
h
d
eavy se
imentation, and impacts from beaver activity as well as past and
• present intensive agricultural activities.
•
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream system. The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and
profile to approximately 3,744 linear feet of existing stream channel. Total
• stream length within the restoration area will be increased to approximately 4,500
linear feet. Approximately 11.2 acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be
t
t
d
ith
pro
ec
e
w
a permanent conservation easement. Invasive plant species will be
• removed and all restored areas will be planted with native vegetation to provide
• biological diversity. Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-
rootplantings, and bio-engineering.

• TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]

^
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068

~ Kimley-Horn
~ antl Associates, Inc.
I appreciate your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions regarding
this application, please do not hesitate to call me at 919.653.5843.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Lang
Environmental Scientist

Version 1.4, 8/18/05
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement Program Projects

Project Name: 601 West Property -Stream Restoration Full Delivery Project
County Name: Union County
EEP Number: D06054-E
Project Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Project Contact Name: Norton Webster
Project Contact Address: 2530 Meridian Parkway, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27713
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
EEP Project Manager: Guy Pearce
-- ~• ~ .
The 601 West stream restoration site is located 8 miles south of Monroe in Union County, North Carolina (Figure
1). The 601 West site contains an unnamed tributary (UT) to Lane's Creek. This stream is highly unstable due to
the straightening of portions of the channel, removal of riparian buffer, moderate to heavy sedimentation, and
impacts from beaver activity as well as past and present intensive agricultural activity.
The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and profile to approximately 3, 744 linear feet of
existing stream channel. Total stream length within the restoration area will be increased to approximately 4,500
linear feet: Approximately 11.2 acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanenf
conservation easement. Invasive plant species will be removed and all restored areas will be planted with native
vegetation to provide biological diversity. Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-roof
plantings, and bio-engineering.
The purpose of this projecC is to restore the site. back to a naturally functioning stream system. Benefits will include
improved .water quality by reducing sediment load through stabilization and by reducing nutrient input by the
addition of forested riparian buffers. Ultimately, the restoration is being conducted to provide compensatory stream
and wetland mitigation credits for the NCEEP in lieu mitigation fee program. It is anticipated that the project will
provide functional uplift for the watershed as a whole.
• - •
Reviewed By
Date EEP Project Manager.
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
^Cheek this box ifthere are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA

Version 1.4, 8/18/05

-. ~ ..
Coastal Zone Manaaement Acf{CZMA)
.. . _..
1. Is the project located. in a CAMA county? ^Yes
®No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of Environmental ^Yes
Concern (AEC)?
^No
®N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management ^Yes
Program?
^No
®N/A
Comprehensive.. Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ®Yes
^No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been ^Yes
designated as commercial or industrial? ®No
^N/A
3. As aresult of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous -^Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ®No
^ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous waste ^Yes
sites within or adjacent to the project area? ^No
®N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous waste ^Yes
sites within the project area? ^No
®N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
~~ ~Na'tional ~Ha'stor+~-~~Presevation=Act (Section~1061 ~~ ~ ~-=
..,
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic ^Yes
Places in the project area? ®No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
UniformRelocation Assistance and-Real Property Acquisition Policies Act 7~liiiform,Acf) : ,
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ®Yes
^No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? Yes
^No
^ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? ^Yes
®No
^ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed` ®Yes
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and ^No
* what the fair market value is believed to be? ^N/A

Version 1.4, 8/18/05
..

-. ~
American fndian'Religious Freedom Act tAIRF-A1
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of Cherokee ^Yes
Indians? ®No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American fndians? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
Ant_iguities.,4ct (AA) ~ . '
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? ^Yes
®No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects of ^Yes
antiquity? ^No
®N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ^Yes
^No
~ N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) ;
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? ^Yes
®No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal. agency be required? ^Yes
^No
~ N/A
4. Has a permif been obtained? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
`Ertdangered~S{~eciesAct.:(_ESA),.'
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat listed for Yes
the county? ^No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable-habitat present for listed species? Yes
^No
^N/A
3: Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical Habitat? ^Yes
®No
^N/A
4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect" the species and/or''likely to adversely modify" ^Yes
Designated Critical Habitat? ^No
®N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAH-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? ^Yes
^No
~N/A

~. ~~ yr •vrv/
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy' determination?
^Yes
^No
®N/A
Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory" by the ^Yes
EBCI?
®No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed project? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
` Farmland Protection Policy_Act (FPPA}
1. Will real estate be acquired? Yes
^No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally important ®Yes
farmland?
^No
^N1A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? ®Yes
^No
^N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act {FWC~A)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any water body? ®Yes
^No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? ®Yes
^No
^ N/A
Land: and Water.Conserv~ation Fund Act7Sectiori'6(f)}
__ .

1. Will the ro'ect re uire the conversion of such ro ert to a use other than ublic, outdoor
P 1 q ~ P P Y
p [+
Yes
recreation?
®No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
__
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conseivation and Management Act (E'ssential Fish Ha bifat)`.
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? ^Yes
®No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the project on ^Yes
EFH?
^No
®N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
MigratorY.;Bird Treaty A~t;(MBTA)'
1. Does the USFWS have an recommendations with the project relative to the META
Y ? ^Yes
®No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? ^Yes
^No
®N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? ^Yes
~No

Version 1.4, 8/18/05
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining federal agency? ^Yes
^No
®N/A

Title I Site Location
Prepazed For
Project 601 West Site
® Union County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
9/27/06 012620007 1
T:\pn\012620007601 West Restoration\Categorical Exclusion\Figures\601 West Figures.doc Prepared by Tommy Cousins [gin , ,,,,2

t,
~,
Q
_, ,..
(~ ~ ~} j- ti a... i
l,\ ~
'
~ J
~

r
~~~ ~
d^ J Ij
¢~?'
'f'If
~ ~.~y.. ~ F;
.i
J ~> ~ ~~ L^'~ ~ ~~~.
f , V ss~~ ~f f F ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~~.~~.~~ ~ ~ 4. f1 ~.
r
: t.-
/ ~ \

t ~,
l/ ? t r f
~ S ~ ~,`
~` . 'r' ' e
a
1 ~ : 5gp ~ l<'
.
~
_~ ~ ~
~, j °~.
!' _
~ h-

..- \'~
~ \
l _.
`~' f
~ ~, ~~~~ ~
~,4 ; 7 ~ r
i '
m
tom}
t ~~
Project Number Figure
012620007 _ 2
. T:\pn\012620007 601 West Restoration\Categorical Exclusion\Pigures\601 West Figures.doc Prepared by Tommy Cousins
•

t.{
II
F
4
~i '~~ _

at ~
4 ar
x
S
1. `;,
t ~ '.'
x r * k ~~ ^~
,3
t
;= i , ,: A

~ j
x

~ ~ yr
i ~~ ~ -
~
-
~ (
j
~# ~ ~ f
~~ _,-~ ~ i 1 a A/
_

i `\ `~
~ , i
_ 1~i
1' ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~.
r a
~
T
i
t
t
.
,l

a g:
'~ri "x E~F ~ "+` t p i ~t
15~Y{~ ~ ' ~7Y~fc_ ~'F a~"~ ~ *i
~~ ~,s,~t f $yA i ~ t~*.~ %
3
t
~
~ ~
r
$'+r ~ ~ ~~i r,
..
~
~. 1r _°
ASS` J Y ~ ': * ~
~ ,y +
~
~ ~~ ~ F?~h: t ~~ ~j s3~l .~~ ., ~
. ~d~,,l~ ~. ~"J~'s# A~ 1ST§4~j~
~ 1st c S>' 'C ~ ~'
~
3 R~~
~ M
~
~
-b
~
~
'~
i '
v~
p
'
.
.
,
.. ~
.z
3
~ y {
;i
r
7
t ~
e
~ ~ s~ yy d ~ 'PY m`i~~,fr.~Y]~~~i. ry~;P ." J rYF .`~"~ .~.
-,
s
1
{
''i
3
•~
~3\W
A 4
`
~.
~
T - t~}~
'`1~4x is '. r+i t~ h s~9' ~'+r"}'y1'S
~ '"
~`
~~
b 'eY 9" 4 5..~ % ;'. ;~' °t~ aY°"~~ y ~ r~.t
4 .;
~ ~ b f ~x ~Yg ^t~ ~5xclh .°u~a
i~~ i ~' ~} 5
'4u
~ `5A~' ~+~ ~
'°d -: 14'
y
`
C'~i
i
1
yr
~
'
r /
j
,,
;
i
_ ~ ~~0
Photograph I . Upper reach of UT to Lanes Creek
4 S ~
~ 'P ~ ~ °b 5 i ° I il~yg4 ~
s_ ~ ~- ~ S I p~
i-
~' s'~wi'
/p
t.
r
' t ice. _: ~~ ~ ~il 2i fi~ ~~5 4 ~ >`~r,~ ~ f ~ i ~ a5'
d ~L Y .. ~Y Q 3 ~ S Y~ d ~5 i~
„" G 7'~ '~ Y~ ~` i l ~ II 1 4 ~ S~Y'R'~{ VLt ,a '"` p FM ~ 4
4 ~'{ 1 ~, t 2 ""`~ y 4' r
~r 4 f
',4 i i ik
~
~
~, d * 116
l~~rit
1
.r., e ~ ~'
i~ ~ z ~ ^. t ~,
1
~ #fi' ~ ;r
y
,
yf
p
I
~ ~ 4Y r Vx'3.~"`~~ ~.9~' A`r~ M'.'LR ~a ~k ~7a ~ _ ~ ~ ~! ~ f
tp~tp''~ C.,y~,-~ ~~ y d i ~ ~y +~y.~aS'"# ; ~~~14'.~' ~~&Y i~ :'~ F ^T? r
i ~ i~~y~; €4 'vim' ~l ~i_~4k lii~ p f~~~~ 4'^ 1 fie' ~'. a ~ i .G ~ - ~ y,,, R"~1
~" e t~ ~y-'& ~,'..,,.a .'nip i a ~i~.,. 1+y~ ~, $ at. ' ~ e i9 -" , ~i^t S ~,, ~
'~'! '~
~ ;.•.! 9`7,i~' ~ 1iR ~7'a ~+t i.h•~ Nf9 ~,'K»,4R~. "
~, ~`k ~
PC ~V~u -4
lam'
'
~
~
,
,
'fy ~s ,y{ shy[ ,...y+
~',
3~ +'~' ~~f l~~ ~ 'A <ZR- ~ $r5~ J T ~,~~~r ~ y. ?, s~;'~~ W'~~•~ ~ ~ :tia~S.~M~ $' "~ ` t.: fib' ~
µ ~ ~ 4 { 3x ~~4M 4 _~ 4 ~ ~~
idw~~ ;~, +t ~ ~E fie.. ~ a32 °#~ ~~3" i ~ Ck ~ ~ ~~ sw~ A
y` ~ il`R ~ ~t-t~ ,~ •. '¢ tr ~ ''l~fift.' F uv ... ~ ~x~~`~. l~ ,~,.p`~ ~
p:.. . Syi3- ~~. ~'M# ~yr. iT".r.~. ~ "~"& ~.Fy,~ ~~ V d {'~ri r. l "~S ~ANY,K

}q ~ L r br 3
'. ~
r
ve
• ,
•
~
, ~
~
~~y +
q 'W
~
2
dS` "q.'r`~ x,41. +giv
dpE~ r ~
„
~i
±q
~q~,~ygF ~ Tv -kt 5 fi'` ?~~~+T{~ ^' 3 ~+' y'~ggt 3g 'S.
• P`~ yp ~ 1' 1 ~'3 ~ ~~ ~a ~ ~ ~ G . ~ ~' T~~r Yom"' T ~ `i
~ {~ as
~ -x~4w~` !~ +3 !~"~
I -'`
~ 7•~ $
~2`
~.y °Drt
E ~k:
~
~
_
.
g
y.
/~ ~. ,~ ~ !~ ~ ~ ~ ~~`~~ y.~ }std 'tB- ~ y ~~~ ~`~~
F_~ ~ ~::' fu i'~~iY
Photograph 2. Incised channel with Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica)
Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
lMi7a\
~ Project 601 West Site
Union County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Page
9/27/06 012620007 1
T:\pn\012620007601 West Restoration\Categorical Exclusion\Photos\601_West_Photos.doc Prepared by Laura Lang C~~wr wn.irc.

+ k
~' ~ r '~, ~ t ~ ~ k~
~ .~ ~ 4 ~,
~r ~
r L .,P ~' YLr~,. d we q/~. E ~. 4- 1~,~" ~ ~~'4a L,~ft-`Y~sv ':
Photograph 3. Middle section of channel
__
~_ ~~~ .~ .
Photograph 4. Lower section of channel
Title ~ Site Photographs
Prepared For:
~ Project 601 West Site
Union County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Page
9/27/06 012620007 2
T:\pn\012620007 601 Wes[ Restoration\Categorical Exclusion\Photos\601_Wes[_Photos.doc Prepared by Lana Lang [~~ aan~,r,u~

• Memoran dum
i To: Donnie Brew
Federal Highway Administration

• From: Laura Lang
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

~ Date: October 30, 2006
•
Subject: Threatened and Endangered Species
601 West Property Stream Restoration Site
r Union County, NC

• This memo is intended to document the absence/presence of threatened and endangered
species or suitable habitat at the 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site.
•
~ The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database (updated Apri127, 2006) lists
• three federally endangered species for Union County, NC: the Carolina heelsplitter
• (Lasmigona decorata), Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii), and Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii). Review of the Natural Heritage Program (NfIP) database of
documented occurrences did not reveal the presence of any of these species within aone-
mile radius of the proposed mitigation site.
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmi~ona decorata)
The Carolina heelsplitter is a medium-sized mussel with an ovate, trapezoidal shaped,
greenish-brown to dark brown shell. This species has been reduced to six known
i populations, two of which occur in Union County. The Carolina heelsplitter has been
~ found in a variety of substrates including mud, muddy sand, or muddy gravel along
stable, well-shaded stream banks. The decline of the Carolina heelsplitter has been
attributed to a variety of factors including siltation and channelization due to agricultural
• and forestry practices, road construction, impoundments and streambank scouring caused
• by storm water runoff.
The unstable stream proposed for restoration at the 601 West Property site has little to no
woody buffer as current agricultural practices have reduced the riparian buffer to a
• narrow fringe. The stream has been heavily sedimented in some areas and moderately
sedimented in others. Historical agricultural activity and the associated channelization of
the stream have left the channel deeply incised with actively failing banks along some
portions. Suitable habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter does not occur at this site.
No occurrences of the Carolina heelsplitter have been documented in the NHP database
within aone-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has
not been observed by KHA or EBX biologists.
• BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.
1

Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxir1
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous, densely hairy, deciduous shrub, usually 1 to 3 feet
high. Small, greenish-yellow to white flowers usually occur from June to July. The fruit,
a small, red drupe, is produced through the months of August to October. Michaux's
sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods and survives best in areas where some form
of disturbance, such as fire, has provided an open area. Thirty one of the thirty six known
extant populations exist in North Carolina, twelve of which occur on highway rights-of-
way, roadsides, or on the edges of artificially maintained clearings.
The entire 601 West property site has been under active, intensive agricultural use for an
extended period of time. Nearly the entire site has been cleared for the cultivation of
crops. Much of the area around the stream is open, active agricultural field void of any
native vegetation. Where buffer does exist along the stream, it is highly degraded. The
frequent disturbances associated with agricultural practices across the site, and
specifically along the proposed restoration corridor, make this site unfavorable for
Michaux's sumac. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on the 601 West
property site.
No occurrences of Michaux's sumac have been documented in the NHP database within
a one-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has not
been observed by KHA or EBX biologists.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweiuitzial
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb, usually 3 to 6 feet tall with yellow flowers
which occur in late August to October. Schweinitz's sunflower is found in relatively open
habitats such as roadsides, maintained rights-of--way, early successional fields, and
woodland openings. Generally, Schweinitz's sunflower occurs on shallow, poor, clayey
and/or rocky soils.
Marginal habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower exists along the agricultural field edges at
the 601 West property, however suitable habitat does not occur along the stream, or
within the area proposed for restoration as much of the area around the stream is open
active agricultural fields void of any native vegetation.
No occurrences of Schweinitz's sunflower have been documented in the NHP database
within aone-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has
not been observed by KHA or EBX biologists during site investigations or surveys
conducted during October 2006 while Schweinitz's sunflower is in bloom.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.
2

~` ,
• U.S. Department of Agriculture
~ FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
• PART 1 (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of land Evaluation Request 8/24/06
Name Of Project 601 West Property Stream Restoration Federal Agency Involved FHWA
• Proposed Land Use Stream Restoration Easement County And State -Union County, North Carolina
," t ,
• PART tl (i o b.,e compl~tod by MRCS) to R4~tfi'~~s'(R~~er~~-d Eiy NRCS J
1),~ ~' rt~tain pnme, unique, statewide or local impor~aritfarmlandv Yes ' No _
"
• Acres Irng3ted + Average Fa~rm S/iz
e "
~' ` (If~ ~l~,e ;snot ~
pply - clo not cgrit~lete addifronal'j~ar(s of this form): • ~~ : U. ~
~
,rzs k~ z~ . ~`~
~.~YI '~,~ ~ Farmable Land(I~ G JurlsziiGlion ~
±.~ d~ ~ ~ ~~ 'Acres., ~C~=S~ % 9~! o ,
AmoUrif Of V~atniland As'~Defined in FPPA`~
~~. ~ %~7~
Acres; ~
i
g ~ sterq ~ sed NarneOf t fit SySt~m ~
~ ~ ~ ~ nd Evalua6 y',NRCS : ~ x'
~
-
s~ _
b
~ ~~ .
x _ ~
PART III (To be completed by Federal Agency) Alternative Site Ratin
Site A Site B Site C Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 11,1
B
v
B
T
t
l A
T
C
rt
d I
di
tl
..
o
a
cres .
o
e
on
e
e
n
rec
y
• C Total Acres In Srte 11 1 0 0 0.0 0 0
PART~1'~~(/'' e co`~~lofe'd by NRCS) Land ~valuanon Informatn ~
r~ >#'~~'~ ~
•
x
~ ~.~,, ~^~ , ~~r
-`. ~'~~ ~
,~.
~
~ ~ -~ ~„,~
~ ,
~.o ~
ma
.,
r
_,
<' A ~a'A~cre'ys',~Pnme And Unigue F~rnland ~ '_ ~ - .
~ fr~
~, ~ i r - .

x
B ~+f • a `~r;~e fatewide And "l_ocat'p, or~t~~rt Farmland '~
C e'r ~ ~Farrnland In'Cour
~;O~~i~~,c~l Govt Unit To Be Converted L.~,~j0
•~ ;: ~
~ _
~ ~> ~ ~
~,, ~,~
.
u
ie
'
` '
~ ~ ~ ` ~
D . Pei~c~ Gg,,;*~ ~rmland In GovtSJ
~
t
~
i
` Samc,O~ HigherRelative Value ~ ~ ~~ a-••
~
• pi R~ '" Torbe c,o~~ofei^J by NRCY~~,~~dvalUation G`r(enon `, ',

r
" Q ,: ~ry~
"~`~ ~, ~

• ~ ,~ rV
.~
•
e at~e:~alu+~ Of F,narrnfan~o;~e;~~~onv~d"
(Sca1~(17•~p '00 P,~ptnC~y t'" s+ , ','~~' ,',. ). .. ,~~~~_~ ~~~ '
PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Maximum
• Site Assessment Criteria (These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.$(b) Points
1. Area In Nonurban Use ~Jr
2. Pi:rimpter In Nonurban Use
• 3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed --~
4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government.
r
•
a
A Q
5. Distance From U
b
n Builtup
rea ~
• 6. Distance To Urban Support Services
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average
8. Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland
• 9. Availability Of Farm Support Services
10. On-Farm Investments
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 0 ~ S 0 0 0
• PART VII (To be
l
t
d by F
d
l A
comp
e
e
e
era
gency)
•
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Parf V) 100 g3 0 0 0
Total Site Assessment (From Part VI above or a local
site assessment) 160 0
~ U 0 0 0
.
TOTAL POINTS (Tofa! of above 2 lines) 260 0 ~Jt" 0 0 0
- Site Selected: ~ Date Of Selection ~ ~ 1
t ~D (~J Was A Local Site
Yes Assessment Us
~ N ed?~
o
-Reason For Selection: r
~ ~(,~ f~- ~.S se4~=cam ~e~cu.uS~ i-~ VY'c~' `}-~,-Q
~ t~ ~~/ ava i l a1~ 1e ~ c. t~ .
•
•
(See Instructions on reverse side) Forth AD-1006 (10-83)
• This form was elecbonically produced by National Production Services Staff
•
•
l

~ Kimley-Horn
~~ and Associates, Inc.
August 24, 2006
Mr: Mark Ferguson
NRCS Soil Conservationist
3230-B Presson Road
Monroe, NC 28112
Re: 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site,
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Ferguson:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) is writing this letter on behalf of our
client, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), to request input from your
agency regarding a proposed stream restoration site located 8 miles south of
Monroe in Union County and potential effects it may have on farmland
resources. We have completed sections I and III of Form AD-1006. A location
map and site overview map are also included.
I appreciate your help with this matter. Please either mail or fax [phone])
your reply to my attention. If you have any questions regarding this request,
please feel free to call me at 919.653.5843.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Laura Lang
Environmental Scientist
^
TEL [phone]
fAX [phone]
^
P.o. Box 33066
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068

~ ~a ~~° RECEIVED
~ ~ AUG 0 7 2006
~ ~ '~ KimJe -Horn & Ass
,~.,n t oc.
~ ~~~ Civil Department
~ North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
i State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Adminisuatoc
IvGchael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archives and History
• Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Resottrces
• Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
August 2, 2006
Laura Lang .
Kimley=Horn and Associates, Inc.
PO Box 33068
• Raleigh, NC 27636-3068
Re: 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site, Union County, ER 06-1950
• Dear Ms. Lang:
Thank you for your letter of July 20, 2006, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources that would be
• affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as .proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
• Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations far Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
• Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
• contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at.919/733-4763. In all future
.communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
~ ~~-
eter Sandbeck
• Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
• ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-0617 [phone]/733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801
• SURVEY & PLANNING 815 N. Biount Street, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-0801
•

^~^ Kimley-Horn
~ and Associates, Inc.
July 20, 2006
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
515 Blount Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request a no effect determination
from your agency regarding a proposed stream and wetland mitigation project.
The 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site is located 8 miles south of
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The 601 West site contains an
unnamed tributary to Lane's Creek. This stream is highly unstable due to the
straightening of portions of the channel, removal of riparian buffer, moderate to
heavy sedimentation, and impacts from beaver activity as well as past and
present intensive agricultural activities.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream system. The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and
profile to approximately 3,744 linear feet of existing stream channel. Total
stream length within the restoration area will be increased to approximately 4,500
linear feet. Approximately 11.2 acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be
protected with a permanent conservation easement. Invasive plant species will be
removed and all restored areas will be planted with native vegetation to provide
biological diversity. Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-
root plantings, and bio-engineering.
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
^
P:O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068

^ ~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ and Associates, Inc.
I appreciate your help with this matter. Please either mail or fax [phone])
your reply to my attention. If you have any questions regarding this request,
please call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
ra Lang
Environmental Scientist

0 leTorth Carolina 'wildlife Resources Commission ~_
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
8 September 2006
Ms. Laura Lang
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636-3068
Subject: 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site, Union County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Lang:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 66I-667d) and North Carolina General Statutes
(G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Kimley-Horn and Associates proposes to restore, using natural channel design, 3,744 linear feet
of an unnamed tributary to Lane's Creek in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin. Approximately 11.2 acres
of bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanent conservation easement. Invasive
plant species will be removed and restored areas will be planted with native vegetation. Stream banks
will be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering.
There are records for the federal species of concern and state endangered Carolina creekshell
(Villosa vaughaniana), Savannah lilliput (Toxalasma pullis) and Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masonry in
Lanes Creek downstream of the project site.
Stream and wetland restoration projects often improve water quality and aquatic habitat.
Provided measures are taken to minimize erosion and sedimentation from construction/restoration
activities, we do not anticipate the project to result in significant adverse impacts to aquatic and terrestrial
wildlife resources.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. If you require further assistance, please
contact our ol~ice at [phone].
Sincerely,
"'~----" "'~-c-~j
~~
Shari L. Bryant
Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries 1721 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
E . d SZ9L-6b~b-9EE ~,ueR~g • 1 • S dE0 = E0 90 80 daS

^ ~ ^ Kimley-Horn
~ antl Associates, Inc.
August 14, 2006
Ms. Shannon Deaton
NCWRC Division of Inland Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Re: 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Deaton:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request a no effect determination
from your agency regarding a proposed stream and wetland mitigation project.
The 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site is located 8 miles south of
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The 601 West site contains an
unnamed tributary to Lane's Creek. This stream is highly unstable due to the
straightening of portions of the channel, removal of riparian buffer, moderate to
heavy sedimentation, and impacts from beaver activity as well as past and
present intensive agricultural activities.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream system. The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and
profile to approximately 3,744 linear feet of existing stream channel. Total
stream length within the restoration area will be increased to approximately 4,500
linear feet. Approximately 11.2 acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be
protected with a permanent conservation easement. Invasive plant species will be
removed and all restored areas will be planted with native vegetation to provide
biological diversity. Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-
rootplantings, and bio-engineering.
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
^
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, Norfh caroling
27636-3068

^~^ Kimley-Horn
~ antl Associates, Inc.
We would appreciate a reply from you as soon as possible. Please either mail or
fax [phone]) your reply to my attention. If you have any questions
regarding this request, please call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
ra Lang
Environmental Scientist

•
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WII.,DLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
August 22, 2006
Ms. Laura Lang
Environmental Scientist
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3068
Dear Ms. Lang:
Subject: 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site, South of the Town of Monroe, Union
County, North Carolina
In your letter dated July 20, 2006, you requested our comments on the subject project. (Please
note that your letter was sent to our Raleigh Field Office. In the future you would receive
our responses in a more timely fashion if .requests were sent to the appropriate office. To
assist you with this, enclosed is a list of North Carolina's counties showing which ones are
handled by our respective offices in North Carolina.) We have reviewed the information you
presented and are providing the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). .
Project Description. According to the information provided, your client (Environmental Banc
and Exchange, LLC) is proposing to conduct a complete stream restoration project on an
unnamed tributary to Lane's Creek. The purpose of the project is to restore the site back to a
naturally functioning stream system. The upper portion of the stream will be relocated, and the
appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile will be restored based on reference data gathered
from similar local stream systems. The lower reach will be reestablished by creating a channel
with a proper cross-section and slope using the same reference data as previously described.
Invasive plant species will be removed, and all restored areas will be replanted with native
riparian vegetation. Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion-control matting, bare-root
plantings, and bioengineering. As a result of the stream restoration activities, total stream length
within the area will be increased from about 3,744 linear feet (lf) to about 4,500 lf, and about
11.20 acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be protected with a permanent conservation
easement.

Federally Listed Species. Based on the project location and pictures obtained from the Union
County GIS web site, there appears to be suitable habitat for the federally endangered
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). Your letter did not indicate whether surveys
have been conducted for this or other rare plant species within the project impact area. Unless an
area has been specifically surveyed for this listed species, a survey should be conducted to ensure
that it is not inadvertently lost. Though we agree that Schweinitz's sunflower is not likely to
occur in the disturbed agricultural fields or along the stream, we do believe potential suitable
habitat exists along the edges of the fields and riparian buffer. These areas may not be included
in the project plans, but they should be surveyed before any equipmendconstruction staging or
invasive plant eradication activities take place. Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in relatively open
habitats-=road, power line, and other maintained rights-of-way; early successional fields; forest
ecotonal margins; forest clearings; etc. The species thrives in full sun but also grows in the light
shade of open stands ofoak-pine-hickory. Schweinitz's sunflower generally occurs on soils
characterized as moist to dryish clays, clay-foams, or sandy-clay foams that often have high
gravel content. The species is known from a variety of soil types, including Iredell (Fine,
Montmorillonitic, Thermic Typic Hapluduff), Enon (Fine, Mixed, Thermic Ultic Hapludalf), and
Cecil (Clayey, Kaolinitic, Thermic Typic Hapludult). Schweinitz's sunflower is difficult to
identify at any time, but even more so outside the flowering season of late August to October, so
we recommend that surveys for this species be conducted during this period.
In accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of the appropriate federal agency or its
designated representative to review its activities or programs and to identify any such activities
or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. If it is
determined that the proposed activity mayadversely affect any species federally listed as
endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be initiated.
We recommend that you contact Ms. Linda Pearsall, Director of the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program, for further. information about North Carolina's rare species and/or unique and
rare habitat types located in the subject project areas. Her mailing address is Natural Heritage
Program, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601.
Project Recommendations. Your letter did not mention the width of the riparian buffers that
will be preserved/restored along the stream and protected within the conservation easement. We
recommend that riparian buffers (a minimum of 100 feet-wide along perennial streams and
50 feet wide along intermittent streams) be created and/or maintained along all aquatic areas.
Riparian buffers provide travel corridors and habitat for wildlife displaced by development. In
addition, riparian buffers protect water quality by stabilizing stream banks, filtering storm-water
runoff, and providing habitat for aquatic and fisheries resources.
We are pleased with this proposed restoration effort. However, at this stage and without more
specifics about restoration plans, reference reaches, and stream design, it is difficult for us to
fully assess and comment on the proposed project. We request the opportunity to be involved
throughout the restoration process, review all future design plans, and -make recommendations
about the entire restoration design as more information becomes available. We are available to
assist with the selection of reference sites for the stream and riparian restoration designs and

subsequent monitoring. As a measure of restoration success, we recommend sampling fish,
benthic macroinvertebrates, and water quality before and after project completion.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments early in your planning efforts. Please
keep us informed of the progress of this project. If we can be of further assistance or if you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at
828/258-3939, Ext.240. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4-2-06-381.
Sincerely,
~~~
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor.
Enclosure

^~^ Kimley-Horn
~ and Associates, Inc.
July 20, 2006
Mr. Dale Suiter
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Re: 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Union County, North Carolina
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request a no effect determination
from your agency regarding a proposed stream and wetland mitigation project.
The 601 West Property Stream Restoration Site is located 8 miles south of
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The 601 West site contains an
unnamed tributary to Lane's Creek. This stream is highly unstable due to the
straightening of portions of the channel, removal of riparian buffer, moderate to
heavy sedimentation, and impacts from beaver activity as well as past and
present intensive. agricultural activities.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream system. The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and
profile to approximately 3,744 linear feet of existing stream channel. Total
stream length within the restoration area will be increased to approximately 4,500
linear feet. Approximately 11.2 acres of bottomland and riparian buffer will be
protected with a permanent conservation easement. Invasive plant species will be
removed and all restored areas will be planted with native vegetation to provide
biological diversity. Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-
root plantings, and bio-engineering.
According to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, there are three endangered
species and no threatened species potentially occurring in Union County. The
endangered species are: the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata),
Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii), and Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzir~. Review of the Natural Heritage Program database of documented
occurrences did not reveal the presence of any of the aforementioned species
within aone-mile radius of the site. Potential habitat for the listed species was
not identified within the project area.
^
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
^
P.o. Box 33068
Raleigh, NodhCarolina
27636-3068

^ ~I ^ Kimley-Horn
e antl Associates, Inc.
Specifically, we would like information that the area described above -
• is not located in an officially designated wildlife refuge
• will not affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated
critical habitats; or will not jeopardize the continued existence of any
proposed endangered or threatened species or likely to result in the
destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats, as
determined by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Endangered
Species Act of 1973.
We would appreciate a reply from you as soon as possible. Please either mail or
fax [phone]) your reply to my attention. If you have any questions
regarding this request, please call me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
aura Lang
Environmental Scientist

EDR®Environmental
Data Resources Inc
The EDR Radius Map
with GeoCheck®
601 West
Pageland Highway
Monroe, NC 28112
Inquiry Number: 1736016.1Os
August 15, 2006
The Standard in
Environmental Risk
Management Information
440 Wheelers Farms Road
Milford, Connecticut 06461
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: www.edrnet.com
wRai-sraEnro

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary--------------------------------------------- ---------- ES1
Overview Map------------------------------------------------- ---------- 2
Detail Map---------------------------------------------------- ---------- 3
Map Findings Summary------------------------------------------ ---------- 4
Map Findings-------------------------------------------------- ---------- 6
Orphan Summary-----------------------------------=---------- ----------~ 7
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum____________________________ ______________. A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary_____________________________ ______________. A-2
Physical Setting Source Map_________________________________ _______________ A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings__________________________ ______________ A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched______________________ ______________. A-41
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Re~ort that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLI D, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. PUrChaSef accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2006 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or In part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the ro ert of their res ective owners.
TC1736016.10s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
PAGELAND HIGHWAY
MONROE, NC 28112
COARnINeTFc
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranver;
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
34.852100 - 34° 51' 7.6"
80.443100 - 80° 26' 352"
~e Mercator: Zone 17
550910.8
3856586.0
578 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 34080-G4 PAGELAND, SC
Most Recent Revision: 1988
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL__________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL______________froposed National Priority List Sites
Delisted NPL_______________.Natlonal Priority List Deletions
NPL RECOVERY_____________Fedeval Superfund Liens
CERCLIS_____________________Compvehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System
CERC-NFRAP_______________. CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
CORRACTS__________________ Corrective Action Report
RCRA-TSDF_________________ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
RCRA-LQG__________________ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
TC1736016.10s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RCRA-SOG__________________ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
ERNS________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
HMIRS_______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
US ENG CONTROLS________. Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL__________ Sltes with Institutional Controls
DOD_________________________. Department of Defense Sites
FUDS________________________ Formerly Used Defense Sites
US BROWNFIELDS__________ AListing of Brownfields Sites
CONSENT___________________ Supertund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
ROD_________________________. Records Of Decision
UMTRA______________________ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
ODI__________________________ Open Dump Inventory
TRIS_________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
TSCA________________________ Toxic Substances Control Act
FTTS_________________________ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &
Rodenticide Act)lTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
SSTS________________________. Sectlon 7 Tracking Systems
ICIS__________________________ Integrated Compliance Information System
PADS________________________ PCB Activity Database System
MLTS________________________ Material Licensing Tracking System
MINES_______________________ Mines Master Index File
FINDS_______________________. Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
RAATS_______________________ RCRAAdministrative Action Tracking System
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
SHWS________________________ Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
NC HSDS____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
IMD__________________________ Incident Management Database
SWF/LF______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI___________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
LUST________________________. Regional UST Database
LUST TRUST________________. State Trust Fund Database
UST__________________________ fetroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST__________________________ RST Database
INST CONTROL____________. No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
VCP__________________________ Responslble Party Voluntary Action Sites
DRYCLEANERS_____________ Drycleaning Sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
NPDES_______________________ NPDES Facility Location Listing
• TRIBAL RECORDS
• INDIAN RESERV_____________ Indian Reservations
INDIAN LUST________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
• INDIAN UST_________________. Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
•
•
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Manufactured Gas Plants___ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Historical Auto StationsEDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations
EDR Historical Cleaners_____ EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC1736016.10s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:
Site Name
SCOVILL INC/SECURITY PRODUCTS
SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW
GREY'S GROCERY
BOREN BRICK-MONROE
BOREN BRICK - 5000 H.O.
YALE NORTON
MONROE MALL
BOREN BRICK CO.
LAKE LEE GROCERY-NCDOT
ZIPP (CYNTHIA) PROPERTY
ROY WALTERS PROPERTY/NCDOT#10
NCDOT SITE #5/DAVID WILSON PRO
BARRY HELMS RESIDENCE
PENEGAR PROPERTY
NEWELL HELMS RESIDENCE
FRANKLIN PLAZA
CHARLOTTE PLASTICS - MONROE
MONROE OIL PROPERTY
PRUITT, JOHNNYMCDOT SITE #15
BANTAM MART
COOK'S GROCERY
BANTAM MART (FORMER)
CROWN NC - 632
CITY OF MONROE ASPHALT PLANT
Database(s)
SHWS
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST TRUST
LUST TRUST
LUST TRUST
IMD
TC1736016.10s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

OVERVIEW MAP -1736016.10s
I®
i

^~9
. 0
r 9
'~ y ti9 ~
~,~ 6
a tl ~
~~ ~ ,

a u
±:~
+ ~ ,
i~ ,~:
.w rv~ 6~

a T . ~
~s
.r

!
~g
PW .
' V r~~

~•_~
tim a ~.u~
v
~
Q
9

t
/~/ Target Property
• ® Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
• 1 Manufactured Gas Plants
• ~ National Priority List Sites
Landfill Sites
• J_ Dept. Defense Sites

0 t/2 1 2 Yllec
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Power transmission lines Disposal Sites
Oil & Gas pipelines
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
DAME: 601 West CLIENT: IGmley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
ESS: Pageland Highway CONTACT: Laura Lang
Monroe NC 28112 INQUIRY #: 1736016.10s
LNG: 34.8521 / 80.4431 DATE: August 15, 2006
Copyright ®2006 EDR. Inc. ~ 2006 Tele Atlas Rel. 07!2005.
--,
1'
a ~
~` ,~
~~'v

~ ss

k
~~
a
Fey;

DETAIL MAP - 1736016.10s
~. ~~?'~
f Fv
~ y e
~'~~ o
,,r_„ y
~1
,' -:i
q
~~ d 9
t;
l_ ~ ~,
9
2
O
S
s~~y~
~`
+`i
o t_._>
9
J
J
kwy ~ 9
h~ ` y
Q
Y
~ S
& 00
8k ~'°, ti
t~;n
~~9
r u ^ '~s'
;~~ 3~
~,~~;
':
~;~~"
q
9
F
/~/ Target Property
~ Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1 Manufactured Gas Plants
t Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Landfill Sites
' Dept. Defense Si[es
0 1B 1/4 1l2 Ylles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Oil & Gas pipelines Disposal Sites
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: 601 West CLIENT: IGmley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
ADDRESS: Pageland Highway CONTACT: Laura Lang
Monroe NC 28112 INQUIRY #: 1736016.10s
LAT/LONG: 34.8521 / 80.4431 DATE: August 15, 2006
Copyright ~ 2006 EOA, Inc. ®2006 Tele Atlas Rel. 07/2005.

i
i
•
•
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Target Distance Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
Proposed NPL 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
Delisted NPL 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
NPL RECOVERY 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CERCLIS 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CERC-NFRAP 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CORRACTS 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
RCRA TSD 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RCRA Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
RCRA Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ERNS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
HMIRS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US INST CONTROL 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
FUDS 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
US BROWNFIELDS 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CONSENT 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROD 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
UMTRA 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ODI 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
TRIS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FTTS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
SSTS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ICIS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PADS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MLTS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MINES 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
FINDS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RAATS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
State Haz. Waste 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
NC HSDS 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0
IMD 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State Landfill 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
OLI 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
LUST 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
AST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INST CONTROL 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
VCP 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
BROWNFIELDS 0.750 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPDES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TC1736016.10s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

Search
Tar
et Di
t •
g
s
ance Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted •
•
TRIBAL RECORDS
•
INDIAN RESERV 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0

INDIAN LUST 0.750
0
0
0
0
NR
0 •
INDIAN UST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR _0
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS •
Manufactured Gas Plants 1.250 0 0 0 0 0 0 •
EDR Historical Auto Stations 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0

EDR Historical Cleaners 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0 •
•
NOTES:

TP =Target Property
NR =Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database •

TC1736016.10s Page 5 •
•
•

Appendix 4
Rainfall Information

MONROE 4 SE, NORTH CAROLINA Period of Record General Climate Summary -Pre... Page 1 of 2
MONROE 4 SE, NORTH CAROLINA
Period of Record General Climate Summary -Precipitation
From Year=1933 To Year=2005
Station:(315771) MONROE 4 SE
Averages Daily Extremes
Precipitation
>_ >_
Mean High Year Low Year 1 Day Max. 0.01 0.10
in. in.
dd/yyyy # #
in. in. - in. - in. or Days Days
yyyymmdd Total Snowfall
>_ >_
0.50 1.00 Mean High Year
in. in.
# #
Days Days in. in. -
January 3.96 9.81 98 0.48. 81 3.62 11/1984 ~0 0~ 1.5 19.0 100
February 3.80 8.58 39 0.63 78 2.65 14/1984 ~~~~ 1.0 11.0 69
March 4.36 9.86 80 1.30 85 3..93 24/1989 0~0~ 0.5.10.5 60
April 3.30 7.60 36 0.48 76 3..49 01/1973 0©~~ 0.0 0.0 33
May 3.18 8.25 57 0.04 41 3.11 28/1990 ®©~0 0.0 0.0 33
June 4.01 10.30 37 0.35 90 3.25 30/1951 ®~~~ 0.0 0.0 33
July 4.91 12.19 59 0.75 83 4.90 10/1959. 10 ®00 0.0 D.0 33
.August 4.86 13.66 86 0.32 97 5.01 24/1983 00~~ 0.0 0.0.33
September 4.16 13.90 104 0'.00 54 6.74 04/1998 ©~~~ 0.0 0.0 33
October 3.29 15.94 90 0.00 74 7.72 11/1990 ©®~0 0.0 0.0 33
November 2.9b 11.12 48 0.35 73 2.69 28/1948 0~5 0~ 0.0 1.5 68
December. 3.40 9.07 72 0.44 55 3.65 15/1972 ®©~~ 0.6 11.8 35
Annual 46.19 61.56 64 31.12 40 7.72 19901011 96 76 32 13 3.8 19.5 100

Winter 11.16 21.57 84 3..55 86 3.65 19721215 26 20 ®0 3.2 27.5 36
Spring 10.84 20.10 103 3.24 104 3.93 19890324 24 20 ®0 0.5 10.5 60
Summer 13.78 22.54 85 5.84 80 5.01 19830824 27 21 ~® 0.0 0.0 33
Fall 10.41 19.6E 90 2.77 33 7.72 19901011 19 15 ~ ~ 0..0 1.5 68
Table updated on Jul 28,
For monthly and annual means, thresholds, and sums:
Months with 5 or more missing days are not considered
Years with 1 or more missing months are not considered
Seasons are climatological not calendar seasons
Winter =Dec., Jan., and Feb. Spring =Mar., Apr., and May
http://cirrus.dnr.state.sc.us/cgi-bin/serec/cIiGCStP.pl?nc5771 12/5/2006

•
•
MONROE 4 SE, NORTH CAROLINA Period of Record General Climate Summary -Pre... Page 1 of 2
MONROE 4 SE, NORTH CAROLINA
Period of Record General Climate Summary -Precipitation
II From Year=1933 To Year=2005 II
I Station:(315771) MONROE 4 SE I
Averaces Dailv Extremes
Precipitation ~~ Total Snowfall
High
>_ >_ >_ >_
Low Year 1 Day Max. 0.01 0.10 0.50 1.00 Mean High Year
in. in. in. in.
dd/yyyy # # # #
in. in. - in. - in. or in. in. -
yyyymmdd Days Days Days Days
January 3.96 9.81 98 0.48 81 3.62 11/1984 ~9 ~7 0~1 1.5 19.0 100
February 3.80 8.58 39 0.63 78 2.65 14/1984 0001 1.0 11.0 69
March 4.36 9.86 80 1.30 85 3.93 24/1989 ~9 0~3 ~l 0.5 10.5 60
April 3.30 7.60 36 0.48 76 3.49 01/1973 ~7 ©~~1 0.0 0.0 33
May 3.18 8.25 57 0.04 41 3.11 28/1990 ®©0~1 0.0 0.0 33
June 4.01 10.30 37 0.35 90 3.25 30/1951 ®0~3 ~1 0.0 0.0 33
July 4.91 12.19 59 0.75 83 4.90 10/1959 10 ®~~l 0.0 0.0 33
August 4.86 13.66 86 0.32 97 5.01 24/1983 ~9 ~7 ~3 0 0.0 0.0 33
September 4.16 13.90 104 0.00 54 6.74 04/1998 ©0~~1 0.0 0.0 33
October 3.29 15.94 90 0.00 74 7.72 11/1990 ©®0~1 0.0 0.0 33
November 2.96 11.12 48 0.35 73 2.69 28/1948 ~7 ~5 ~~1 0.0 1.5 68
December 3.40 9.07 72 0.44 55 3.65 15/1972 ®©~~1 0.6 11.8 35
Annual 46.19 61.56 64 31.12 40 7.72 19901011 96 76 32 13 3.8 19.5 100
Winter 11.16 21.57 84 3.55 86 3.65 19721215 26 20 ®0 3.2 27.5 36
Spring 10.84 20.10 103 3.24 104 3.93 19890324 24 20 ®0 0.5 10.5 60
Summer 13.78 22.54 85 5.84 80 5.01 19830824 27 21 0® 0.0 0.0 33
Fall 10.41 19.61 90 2.77 33 7.72 19901011 19 15 ~~3 0.0 1.5 68
Table updated on Ju128,
For monthly and annual means, thresholds, and sums:
Months with 5 or more missing days are not considered
Years with 1 or more missing months are not considered
Seasons are climatological not calendar seasons
Winter =Dec., Jan., and Feb. Spring =Mar., Apr., and May
http://cirrus.dnr.state.sc.us/cgi-bin/sercc/cIiGCStP.pl?nc5771
12/5/2006

Appendix 5
HEC-RAS Analysis

Reach
River Sla
Profile
Plan T Q Total
Min Ch EI
W 5. Elev
Vel Chnl --
Vel Total _
Shear Tolal - __ _
Power Total
~~, (cfs)
. ((t) ... _..(h) - ((Us) _. (ft!s) (Ib/sq ft)--- -~R s) .._

601 West
4085
Bankfull -._ _
--
Prop
47.00 -
533.00
533.59
2.25
2.25
0.23
0.51
601 West __ ____
4085 Bankfull _____
Exist
47.00 533.00 533.67 1.93 1.93 0.21 0.41
601 West _
4085 2Year _ _
Prop
~ , 71.00 533.00 533.80 2.31 2.31 0.22 0.51
601 West 4085 2Year __
Exist
71.00 533.00 533.93 1.87 1.87 0.18 0.34
601 West 4085 10 Year _
Prop I 182.00 533.00 534.47 2.61 2.53 0.19 0.49
601 West 4085 10 Year Exist
182.00 533.00 534.70 2.16 2.05 0.16 0.32
601 West 4085 25 Year ~
Prop
264.00 533.00 534.84 2.85 2.66 0.20 0.52
601 West ~ 4085 _
25 Year __
Exist 264.00 533.00 535.06 2.46 2.26 0.18 0.40
601 West 4085 100 Year ___
Prop 420.00 533.00 535.37 3.28 2.90 0.21 0.62
601 West _
4085 _
100 Year __
Exist 420.00 533.00 535.56 2.95 2.57 0.21 0.54

601 West 4035 Bankfull Prop 47.00 532.00 533.16 2.45 2.41 0.19 0.46
601 West 4035 Bankfull Exist 47.00 532.00 533.41 1.82 1.70 0.11 0.19
601 West 4035 2Year , _
Prop 71.00 532.00 533.36 2.90 2.73 0.22 0.60
601 West 4035 2Year __ _
Exlsl 71.00 532.00 533.72 2.05 1.78 0.12 0.21
601 West 4035 10 Year. Prop 182.00 532.00 534.08 3.98 3.16 0.28 0.89
601 Wesl 4035 10 Year Exisl 182.00 532.00 534.49 2.95 2.18 0.17 0.38
601 West 4035 25 Year Prop 264.00 532.00 534.43 4.54 3.33 0.32 1.06
601 West 4035 25 Year Exist ~ 264.00 532.00 534.82 3.49 2.44 0.22 0.54
_
601 West 4035 100 Year Prop 420.00 532.00 534.91 5.44 3.64 0.41 1.46
601 Wesl 4035 100 Year Exist 420.00 532.00 535.28 4.28 2.81 0.31 0.88

601 West 3995 Bankfull Prop 47.00 531.00 532.59 4.37 4.37 0.58 2.52
601West 3995 Bankfull Exist 47.00 532.00 532.95 4.06 4.06 0.81 3.30
601 West - 3995 2Year Prop 71.00 531.00 532.81 4.44 4.44 0.51 2.27
601 West 3995 2Year Edst 71.00 532.00 533.14 4.92 4.76 0.79 3.78
601 West 3995 10 Year _
Prop 182.00 531.00 533.37 5.84 5.73 0.96 5.51
601 West 3995 10 Year Exisl- ! 182.00 532.00 533.88 5.98 4.09 0.62 2.55
601 West 3995 25 Year Prop 264.00 531.00 533.72 6.23 5.63 0.88 4.94
601 West 3995 25 Year Exls[ 264.00 532.00 534.19 6.50 4.05 0.70 2.85
601 West 3995 100 Year Prop 420.00 531.00 534.22 6.80 5.35 0.91 4.86
_
601 West __ _
3995 100 Year Exist. 420.00 532.00 534.59 7.43 4.30 0.89 3.83

601 West 3900 Bankfull Prop
I 47.00 530.30 532.15 2.50 2.48 0.13 0.31
_
601 West 3900 Bankfull _
Exist' 47.00 531.00 532.40 2.79 2.29 0.17 0.40
601 West 3900 2Year Prop 71.00 530.30 532.43 2.22 2.18 0.16 0.34
601 West 3900 2Year Exist 71.00 531.00 532.62 3.21 2.31 0.20 0.45
601 West 3900 10 Year Prop 182.00 530.30 533.19 2.54 2.23 0.19 0.41
601 West 3900 10 Year Exist 182.00 531.00 533.30 3.94 2.30 0.27 0.62
601 Wesl 3900. 25 Year Prop 264.00 530.30 533.55 2.80 2.35 0.22 0.51
601 West 3900 25 Year Exlst 264.00 531.00 533.64 4.25 2.41 0.31 0.75
601 West . 3900 100 Year Prop 420.00 530.30 534.05 3.24 2.57 0.27 0.71
601 West 3900 100 Year Exist 420.00 531.00 534.13 4.78 2.62 0.38 1.01

601 West 3800 Bankfull Prop 47.00 529.70 531.43 3.62 3.21 0.25 0.79
601 West 3800 Bankfull Exist 47.00 530.00 531.09 5.12 5.06 1.03 5.23
601 West 3800 2Year Prop 71.00 529.70 531.58 4.59 3.78 0.38 1.45
601 West _
3800 2Year Exist 71.00 530.00 531.41 5.36 4.64 0.71 3.28
1601 West 3800 10 Year _
Prop 182.00 529.70 532.19 6.43 4.27 0.65 2.79
__
601 West _
3800 ___
10Year Exist 182.00 530.00 532.19 6.52 4.19 0.72 3.02
_ _
601 Wesl 3800 25 Year Prop 264.00 529.70 532.54 6.97 4.22 0.71 2.98
601 West 3800 __
25 Year Exist 264.00 530.00 532.54 7.09 4.16 0.76 3.23
601 West 3800 100 Year. Prop ~ 420.00 529.70 533.01 7.81 4.32 0.83 3.57
601 West 3800 100 Year Exist 420.00 530.00 533.01 7.97 4.30 0.91 3.92

601 West 3700 Bankfull Prop 47.00 529.10 530.52 3.88 2.60 0.25 0.66
601 West 3700.. Bankfull Exist 47.00 528.00 529.89 0.94 0.94 0.04 0.04
601 W esC 3700 2Year Prop 71.00 529.10 530.76 3.73 2.31 0.28 0.64
601 West 3700 2Year Exist 71.00 528.00 530.29 1.08 1.06 0.04 0.04
601 West 3700 10 Year Prop i 182.00 529.10 531.46 4.04 2.33 0.33 0.78
601 West 3700 10 Year Exist 182.00 528.00 531.46 1.54 1.32 0.05 0.06
'601 West
601 Wesl 3700
3700 25 Year
25 Year Prop
Exist 264.00
264.00 529.10
528.00 531.84
531.85 4.27
1.89 2.38
1.54 0.35
0.06 0.84
0.10
601 West __ _
3700 100 Year __
Prop 420.00 529.10 532.36 4.64 2.55 0.40 1.03
601 West 3700 100 Year Exist 420.00 528.00 532.38 2.44 1.86 0.10 0.18

HFl'-RAS Rivor I IT In I a..o~ r^.ve oe.,,-r.• any ul....~ in.....: _.._~~
Reach

-__ Rrver Sta
-
I
_._ _.__ ~ Profle
- -- Plan_ _ I Q Total

(ofs) _ Min Ch EI
-- --

(R) W.S. Ele~

_ (tQ Vel Chnl

(ftls) Vel Total

- --
(ftls) ~ Shear Tota~

- ---
QblsgfQ Power Tolal

--- -,
Qb/fls)

601 Wesl
3600 _ _
Bankfull
Prop ~
47.00
528.10 __
530.18 .
_
2
25 _
1
55
0
08 __
0
12
601 West 3600 _ _
Bankfull Exist 47.00 528.00 529.47 .
4.24 .
4.24 .
0.81 .
3.42
601 Wesl
601 West
601 West 3600
3600
360 2Year
2Year
10 Year Prop
Exist
Prop 71.00
71.00
182.00 528.10
528.00
528.10 530.38
529.71
531.00 2.69
5.25
3.95 1.77
5.25
2.42 0.12
1.19
0.28 0.22
6.24
0.67
601 West 360 10 Year Exist 182.00 528.00 530.76 6.36 4.55 0.58 2.64
601 West 3600 25 Year Prop ~ 264.00 528.10 531.31 4.67 2.75 0.35 0.97
601 West
601 Wesl 3600
3600 25 Yaar
100 Year Exisl
Prop - 264.00
il 420.00 528.00
528.10 531.19
531.74 6.63
5.66 4.02
3.17 0.59
0.47 2.38
1.49
601 West 3600 100 Year Exist 420.00 528.00 531.62 7.63 4.21 0.78 3.29
601 West 3500 Bankfull Prop 47.00 527.90 529.42 4.79 4.79 0.66 3.25
'601 West 3500 Bankfull Exisl 47.00 527.00 528.98 2.10 2.10 0.21 0.44
601 West _ 3500 2Year Prop 71.00 527.90 529.74 4.32 2.93 0.24 0.71
601 West 3500 2Year Exist 71.00 527.00 529.20 2.54 2.46 0.21 0.53
601 Wesl 3500 10 Year Prop 182.00 527.90 530.19 5.64 3.21 0.50 1.59
601 West 3500 10 Year Exist _ 182.00 527.00 529.77 3.93 3.17 0.32 1.02
601 West 3500 25 Year Prop 264.00 527.90 530.40 6.31 3.49 0.64 2.23
601 West 3500 25 Year Exisl 264.00 527.00 530.06 4.59 3.41 0.40 1.35
601 West 3500 100 Year Prop 420.00 527.90 530.71 7.32 3.94 0.87 3.42
601 West _ 3500 100 Year Exist 420.00 527.00 530.47 5.47 3.71 0.52 1.92

601 West __ 3400 Bankfull _ Prop 47.00 526.70 528.44 3.51 2.74 0.12 0.32
601 West 3400 Bankfull _ Exist 47.00 527.00 528.57 2.62 1.69 0.11 0.19
1601 West 3400 2Year Prop 71.00 526.70 528.68 3.43 2.01 0.15 0.30
601 West 3400 2 Year Exist 71.00 527.00 528.80 2.90 1.66 0.13 0.22
601 West 3400 10 Year Prop 182.00 526.70 529.30 3.77 2.01 0.23 0.46
601 West 3400 10 Year Exist 182.00 527.00 529.41 3.51 1.82 0.21 0.38
601 West 3400 25 Year Prop 264.00 526.70 529.61 4.05 2.14 0.27 0.58
601 West 340_0__ 25 Year Exist 264.00 527.00 529.71 3.85 2.00 0.25 0.51
601 West 3400 100 Year Prop 420.00 526.70 530.04 4.61 2.43 0.35 0.86
601 W est
r 3400 100 Year Exist 420.00 527.00 530.12 4.49 2.33 0.35 0.81
I _
601 West 3300 Bankfull Prop 47.00 526.00 527.74 3.59 3.18 0.21 0.66
601 West 3300 Bankfull Exist 47.00 526.00 527.69 5.00 2.87 0.43 1.23
601 West 3300 2Year _ Prop 71.00 526.00 527.92 4.32 3.34 0.28 0.94
601 Wesf
~ 3300 . 2Year Exist 71.00 526.00 527.90 5.61 2.97 0.53 1.56
60
t 3300 10 Year Prop 182.00 526.00 526.44 6.05 3.75 0.56 2.09
601 Wesl 3300 10 Year Exlst 182.00 526.00 528.44 7.17 3.50 0.86 3.00
1601 West 3300 25 Year Prop 264.00 526.00 528.72 6.75 3.95 0.69 2.71
601 West 3300 25 Year Exist 264.00 526.00 528.70 7.85 3.78 1.02 3.87
601 West 3300_ 100 Year Prop 420.00 526.00 529.21 7.17 3.91 0.75 2.93
601 Wesl 3300 100 Year Exist 420.00 526.00 529.37 7.08 3.33 0.81 2.69

_.601 West 3200 Bankfull Prop_ 47.00 525.00 526.51 4.87 4.87 0.72 3.51
601 West 3200 Bankfull Exist 47.00 524.00 526.08 3.10 3
09 0
36 1
12
601 West 3200 2Year Prop 1 71.00 525.00 526.83 4.80 .
3.89 .
0.32 .
1.26
601 West _ 3200 _ _
~ 2_Year Exist 71.00 524.00 526.51 3.40 2.99 0.27 0.80
601 West 3200 10 Yaar Prop 182.00 525.00 527.40 5.92 3.66 0.58 2.12
f601 Wesl
1 3200 10 Year _ Exist_ 182.00 524.00 527.74 3.76 2.35 0.23 0.53
601 West 3200 25 Year Prop 264.00 525.00 527.65 6.67 4.04 0.78 3.14
,601 West 3200 25 Year East 264.00 524.00 528.32 3.88 2.21 0.22 0.49
601_ West 3200 100 Year Prop 420.00 525.00 527.98 8.12 4.83 1.17 5.67
601 West 3200 100 Year Exist 420.00 524.00 528.95 4.44 2.36 0.27 0.65
i
601 West 3100 Bankfull Prop 47.00 524.10 526.03 2.69 1.87 0.09 0.17
601 West 3100 Bankfull Exist 47.00 523.00 525.27 3.90 3.90 0.65 2.53
601 West 3100 2Year Prop 71.00 524.10 526.27 2.90 1.81 0.13 0.23
601 West 3100 2Year Exist 71.00 523.00 525.68 4.50 4.50 0
83 3
71
X601 West 3100 10 Year Prop 182.00 524.10 526.95 3.67 2.17 .
0.24 .
0.53
601 West 3100 10 Year Exist 182.00 523.00 526.77 6.30 5.34 0.74 3.94
601 West 3100 25 Year Prof 264.00 524.10 527.32 4.07 2.37 0.30 0.71
601 West 3100 _ 25 Year Exist 264.00 523.00 527.15 7.54 5.68 0.84 4.79
801 West 3100 100 Year Prop 420.00 524.10 527.91 4.60 2.64 0.37 0.98
!601 West 3100 100 Year Exist 420.00 523.00 527.91 7.85 4.56 0.70 3.18

nc Rl,.er~ ~ IT r.. ~ n~oc Croc Rn~rh RnI 1N ccr lrlnnfinuarll
( Reach River Sta Profile Plan Q Total Min Ch EI W.S. Elev Vel Chnl Vel Total Shear Total Power Total
_ (of6) (ff) (ft (ft/s) (ft/s (Ib/sq ft)_ (Ib/ft s)
601 West
,601 Wesl 3000
3000 Bankfull _____
Bankfull Prop
E>usl 47.00
47.00 523.70
523.00 525.41
524.74 3.56
2.90 2.66
2.55 0.13
0.24 0.35
0.61
601 West 3000 _
2Year Prop ~ 71.00 523.70 525.63 3.65 2.27 0.19 0.43
~- --
1601 Wesl
3000 __
2Year _
Exlst I
71.00
523.00
525.20
3.09
2.51
0.24
0.61
_
6D1 West 3000 10 Year Prop ~ 162.00 523.70 526.33 3.93 2.28 0.29 0.66
~~601 West 3000 10 Year E>u
st 182.00 523.00 526.54 3.45 2.40 0.22 0.53
_
601 West 3000 _
25 Year _
~
Prop 264.00 523.70 526.73 4.12 2.39 0.32 0.77
601 West __
3000 25 Year ____
Exist 264.00 523.00 526.81 4.38 2.93 0.33 0.97
601 W est ____
3000 100 Year _
Prop 420.00 523.70 527.34 4.46 2.59 0.38 0.98
601 West 3000 100 Year Exist 420.00 523.00 527.47 5.09 3.10 0.37 1.14

601 West 2900 Bankfull Prop 47.00 522.70 524.24 4.67 4.67 0.66 3.10
601 West __ _ _
2900 Bankfull _
Exist 47.00 522.00 524.45 2.55 2.39 0.17 0.39
601 West 2900 2Year Prop 71.00 522.70 524.50 5.01 4.35 0.47 2.05
601 West 2900 2Year Exis[ 71.00 522.00 524.88 3.06 2.59 0.19 0.50
1601 Wesl 2900 10 Year Prop 182.00 522.70 525.17 6.49 4.75 0.83 3.92
601 WesC 2900 10 Year Exisl 182.00 522.00 526.27 3.81 2.30 0.20 0.45
601 West 2900 25 Year Prop 264.00 522.70 525.50 7.31 5.11 1.02 5.20
601 West 2900 25 Year Exist 264.00 522.00 526.19 5.76 3.53 0.45 1.59
601 West 2900 t00Year Prop 420.00 522.70 526.02 8.41 5.58 1.27 7.11
601 West _ _
2900 100 Year _
Exist 420.00 522.00 526.57 7.54 4.32 0.74 3.18

601 West 2800 Bankfull Prop 47.00 521.70 523.52 3.22 2.75 0.16 0.50
601 Wes[ 2800 Barkfull Exist 47.00 522.00 524.25 2.14 2.03 0.11 0.23
601 West 2600 2Year Prop 71.00 521.70 523.75 3.71 2.82 0.23 0.66
601 West 2800 2Year __
Exist 71.00 522.00 524.72 2.32 1.80 0.09 0.16
601 Wesl 2800 10 Year Prop 182.00 521.70 524.49 4.66 3.02 0.39 1.19
601 West 2800 10 Year Exisl 182.00 522.00 526.26 2.16 1.31 0.08 0.10
601 West 2800 25 Year Prop i 264.00 521.70 524.89 5.09 3.23 0.47 1.53
601 West 2800 25 Year Exst 264.00 522.00 526.14 3.33 2.03 0.19 0.38
601 West 2800 100 Year Prop 420.00 521.70 525.49 5.81 3.55 0.58 2.06
601 Wesl 2800 100 Year Exist 420.00 522.00 526.51 4.40 2.63 0.33 0.86

601 West 2700 Bankfull Prop I 47.00 520.90 522.41 4.88 4.88 0.72 3.52
601 Wesl 2700 Bankfull Exist 47.00 522.00 523.17 6.07 6.07 1.74 10.60
601 WesC 2700 2Year Prop ~ 71.00 520.90 522.70 5.06 4.46 0.49 2.18
601 West 2700 2Year Exist 71.00 522.00 523.54 6.81 6.81 2.05 13.96
601 West 2700. 10 Year Prop 182.00 520.90 523.38 6.48 4.72 0.80 3.78
601 West 2700 10 Year Exist 182.00 522.00 524.93 8.28 7.60 1.92 14.56
601 Wesl 2700 25 Year _
Prop 264.00 520.90 523.72 7.26 5.02 0.97 4.86
601 West 2700 25 Year Exlst 264.00 522.00 525.08 7.93 4.56 0.97 4.44
601 W esl 2700 __
100 Year Prop 420.00 520.90 524.24 8.36 5.44 1.20 6.52
601 West _ __
2700 100 Year Exisl 420.00 522.00 525.63 7.68 4.26 1.05 4.49

601 West 2600 Bankfull Prop 47.00 519.50 521.30 3.22 2.58 0.17 0.44
601 West __
2600 Bankfull Exist 47.00 519.00 521.18 3.02 2.48 0.20 0.49
601 West 2600 2Year Prop ~ 71.00 519.50 521.53 3.63 2.69 0.25 0.67
601 West 2600 2 Year Exist 71.00 519.00 521.50 3.76 2.81 0.25 0.70
j601 West 2600 10 Year Prop 182.00 519.50 522.17 5.06 3.50 0.53 1.86
601 West . 2600 10 Year Exisl I 182.00 519.00 522.26 6.08 3.76 0.53 2.00
601West 2600 25 Year Prop 264.00 519.50 522.42 6.17 4.21 0.78 3.29
601 West 2600 25 Year. Exist 264.00 519.00 522.60 7.37 4.32 0.75 3.23
601 West _
2600 _
100 Year Prop 420.00 519.50 522.83 7.70 5.13 1.17 6.01
601 West 2600 100 Year Exist 420.00 519.00 523.14 8.77 4.80 1.02 4.92

601 West 2500 Bankfull Prop 47.00 518.80 520.42 4.17 4.07 0.28 1.16
601 Wesl 2500 Bankfull Ea7st 47.00 519.00 520.24 5.28 4.91 0.80 3.92
601 West 2500 2Year Prop 71.00 518.80 520.67 4.46 3.26 0.25 0.82
601 West 2500 2Year Exisl 71.00 519.00 520.58 5.50 4.27 0.63 2.67
601 West 2500 10 Year Prop 182.00 518.80 521.16 5.93 3.69 0.61 2.27
601 West 2500 10 Year Exfst 182.00 519.00 521.34 6.79 4.23 0.85 3.61
'60tWest. 2500 25 Year Prop i 264.00 518.80 521.52 6.05 3.73 0.70 2.61
601 West _
2500 25 Year Exist 264.00 519.00 521.79 6.98 4.19 0.90 3.77
601 West 2500 100 Year Prop 1 420.00 518.80 522.16 6.07 3.78 0.74 2.80
601 West 2500 100 Year Exist 420.00 519.00 522.38 7.74 4.51 1.07 4.83

HEC-RAS River l1T to I anal crag riaa~r,~ any tme~r rr,..,n..~ ~,.a~

Rea_ ch
~_ ..

01 West _ _

_ River Sta
_

400 ~... __-_._

Profile
--.

_-
Bankfull T-_

~ Plan
.--

rop __•-
~.
0 Total
- --

-..(Gfs)
47.00 _ _

Min Ch EI

-

_ ((t) --
517.90 _

T V~:S.. Elev
-

(R)
519.63

-
_Vel Chnl
-
_(fUs)
3.49

~ Vel Total
- -

(ft(s)
2.68

II Shear Total
1 -

_Qblsgft)
0.15
..- __
Power Total
----.

_ (Ib/ft s) --
0.39
601 West 2400 Bankfull Exist 47.00 518.00 520.19 1.46 0.93 0.04 0.04
_601 West 2400 _ 2Year Prop 71.00 517.90 519.92 3.34 2.17 0.18 0.40
601 West_ 2400 2Year Exisl 71.00 518.00 520.54 1.63 1.00 0.05 0.05
601 Wesl ,2400 10 Year _ Prop 182.00 517.90 520.71 3.78 2.33 0.27 0.63
601 West
601 West
601 West
601 West
601 West 2400
2400
2400
2400
2400 tOYear __
25 Year _
25 Year
100 Year _
100 Year Exisl
Prop
Exist
Prop
Exist ~ 182.00
264.00
264.00
420.00
420.00 518.00
517.90
518.00
517.90
518.00 521.50
521.16
521.92
521.91
522.50 2.25
3.98
2.66
4.23
3.31 1.34
2.43
1.58
2.57
1.97 0.10
0.30
0.13
0.33
0.20 0.13
0.72
0.21
0.86
0.40

601 Wesl 2300 Bankfull Prop 47.00 517.10 518.76 3.97 3.78 0.30 1.12
601 West 2300 Bankfull _ Exist 47.00 518.00 519.51 5.48 4.44 0.68 3.00
601 West 2300 2Year Prop 71.00 517.10 518.89 5.09 4.54 0.52 2.38
601 West 2300 2Year Exist 71.00 518.00 519.86 5.85 4.07 0.66 2.70
601 West 2300 10 Year_ Prop 182.00 517.10 519.58 6.68 5.18 0.95 4.91
j601 West 2300 10 Year Exist 182.00 516.00 520.71 7.17 3.87 0.77 2.99
601 Wes[ 2300 _ 25 Year Prop 264.00 517.10 519.95 7.53 5.62 1.16 6.55
601 West 2300_ 25 Year Exist 264.00 518.00 521.07 7.77 3.98 0.69 3.54
601 Wesl 2300 100 Year Prop. 420.00 517.10 520.41 9.17 6.57 1.63 10.73
601 West 2300 100 Year Exisl 420.00 518.00 521.48 8.98 4.57 1.25 5.69

601 West 2200 Bankfull Prop 47.00 515.90 517.41 4.86 4.86 0.72 3.49
.601 West 2200 Bankfull Exisl 47.00 514.00 517.88 1.28 1.11 0.04 0.04
601 West 2200 2Year Prop 71.00 515.90 517.73 4.50 3.23 0.29 0.95
601 West 2_200 2Year Exist 71.00 514.00 518.11 1.72 1.41 0.06 0.08
601 West 2200 __ tOYear Pro 182.00 515.90 518.21 6.14 3.98 0.73 2.69
601 Wesl 2200 10 Year Exist 182.00 514.00 518.63 3.39 2.48 0.19 0.47
h601 West 2200 25 Year Prop 264.00 515.90 518.59 6.25 4.02 0.80 3.22
X601 West 2200 25 Year Exis[ 264.00 514.00 518.92 4.29 2.96 0.28 0.84
'601 Wesl 2200 100 Year Prop ~ 420.00 515.90 519.13 6.93 4.35 0.92 3.99
601 West 2200 100 Year Exist 420.00 514.00 519.34 5.53 3.64 0.48 1.74

601 West 2100 Bankfull Prop _ 47.00 514.50 516.25 3.52 3.15 0.23 0.71
601 West 2100 Bankfull Exist 47.00 517.00 517.73 1.91 1.91 0.21 0.41
601 West 2100 2Year Prop 71.00 514.50 516.46 4.07 3.28 0.30 0.99
601 West 2100 2Year Exist 71.00 517.00 517.93 1.95 1.95 0.21 0.40
601 West 2100 10 Year Prop 182.00 514.50 517.08 5.81 3.96 0.59 2.32
601 West 2100 10 Year Exist 182.00 517.00 518.18 3.47 3.46 0.58 2.00
601 West 2100 25 Year Prop 264.00 514.50 517.36 6.76 4.38 0.76 3.35
601 West
F- 2100
- 25 Year Exist _
- 264.00 517.00 518.44 3.77 3.73 0.60 2.23
~601 Wesl 2100 100 Year Prop _ 420.00 514.50 517.80 8.00 4.88 1.02 4.98
601 West 2100 100 Year Exist 420.00 517.00 518.73 4.64 4.54 0.81 3.69

601 West _ 2000 Bankfull Prop 47.00 513.50 515.01 4.68 4.68 0.65 3.02
601 West 2000 Bankfull Exlst 47.00 515.00 516.41 3.82 3.82 0.74 2.84
601 West 2000 2Year Prop 71.00 513.50 515.27 4.90 4.37 0.45 1.95
'601 West 2000 2Year E>ost-_ 71.00 515.00 516.60 4.50 4.50 0.99 4.46
601 West 2000 10 Year Prop 182.00 513.50 515.92 6.02 4.04 0.60 2.44
601 West 2000 _ 10 Year Exist 182.00 515.00 517.00 4.32 2.89 0.59 1.70
601 West 2000 25 Year Prop 264.00 513.50 516.22 6.64 4.13 0.71 2.93
601 West 2000 _ 25 Year Ebst 264.00 515.00 517.07 5.70 3.82 1.01 3.86
601 West 2000 100 Year Prop 420.00 513.50 516.65 7.39 4.32 0.87 3.77
601 West 2000 100 Year Exist 420.00 515.00 517.31 6.69 4.47 1.33 5.93

601 West 1900 Bankfull Prop 47.00 511.90 513.36 4.70 4.70 0.64 3.03
601 West 1900 Bankfull Exist 47.00 514.00 514.22 2.57 2.57 0.51 1.30
'601 Wesl 1900 2Year Prop 71.00 511.90 513.66 4.76 4.11 0.35 1.42
601 West 1900 2Year Exist 71.00 514.00 514.29 2.90 2.90 0.59 1.72
601 West 1900 10 Year Prop 182.00 511.90 514.27 5.63 3.34 0.44 1.48
601 West 1900 10 Year Exist 182.00 514.00 514.52 3.82 3.82 0.86 3.26
601 West 1900 25 Year_ Prop 264.00 511.90 514.53 6.17 3.39 0.53 1.78
601 West 1900 25 Year Exist 264.00 514.00 515.67 1.34 1.33 0.07 0.09
601 West 1900 100 Year Prop 420.00 511.90 514.67 7.05 3.61 0.68 2.44
1601 West 1900 100 Year Exist 420.00 514.00 514.67 4.78 4.78 1.16 5.56

Reach

601 West ~ River Sta

1800 - Profile

Bankfull Plan
___ _
Prop Q Total Min Ch EI
__ (cfs) - -- ~(K~ ~
47.00 509.90 W.S. Elev
~ft~ -
511.40 Vel Chnl
- ~ft1s)
4.48 Vel Tof<~I
~ftis) --
4.48 Shear Total
- ~Iblsy fQ
0.58 Power Total
Qafft s)
2.62
601 West 1800 Bankfull Exist 47.00 510.00 511.66 3.25 2.15 0.21 0.45
601 West 1800 2Year Prop 71.00 509.90 511.62 5.02 4.70 0.49 2.28
601 West 1800 2Year __
Exist 71.00 510.00 511.89 3.64 2.20 0.24 0.53
601 West 1800 tOYear Prop 182.00 509.90 512.31 5.71 3.60 0.48 1.74
601 Wesl 1800 10 Year Exist 162.00 510.00 512.52 4.69 2.48 0.36 0.90
601 West 1800 25 Year Prop j 264.00 509.90 512.58 6.30 3.71 0.60 2.21
601 West 1800 __
25 Year Exist ~ 264.00 510.00 515.66 1.08 0.56 0.02 0.01
601 West ____ _ ___
1800 100Year Prop ~ 420.00 509.90 513.15 6.15 3.35 0.57 1.91
6D1 West _
1800 __
100 Year Exist 420.00 510.00 513.39 5.25 2.64 0.43 1.15
__~
601 West 1700 Bankfull Prop 47.00 508.30 509.78 4.95 4.95 0.90 4.45
601 West 1700 Bankfull _
Exisl ~ 47.00 510.00 510.52 3.56 3.56 0.73 2.61
601 West 1700 2 Year Prop 71.00 508.30 510.04 5.35 5.35 0.83 4.44
601 West 1700 2Year Exisl ~ 71.00 510.00 510.64 4.28 4.28 1.00 4.27
601 Wesl 1700 10Y
ear Prop 182.00 508.30 510.80 6.36 4.83 0.73 3.52
601 West __ _
1700 ___
_
10 Year Exist 182.00 510.00 511.15 5.65 5.65 1.46 8.22
st
601 W e 1700 25 Year Prop
j 264.00 508.30 511.15 7.00 5.00 0.86 4.30
_
_
601 West 1700 25 Year _ _
Exist I 264.00 510.00 515.64 0.99 0.81 0.02 0.01
601 Wesl 1700 _
100 Year Prop i 420.00 506.30 511.65 8.10 5.43 1.10 5.96
_
601 West 1700 100 Year Exist ' 420.00 510.00 511.91 7.10 7.10 1.98 14.07

601 West 1600 Bankfull Prop 47.00 507.10 508.89 3.51 3.51 0.35 1.23
__
601 West 1600 Bankfull Exisl 47.00 507.00 507.97 4.52 4.52 1.04 4.70
601 West 1600 2Year Prop 71.00 507.10 509.11 4.04 3.28 0.22 0.74
601 West 1600 2Year Exist 71.00 507.00 508.23 4.99 4.83 0.89 4.32

601 West .
1600 _
10 Year --i
Prop
182.00
507.10
509.58
6.03
4.13
0.63
2.61
601 West 1600 tOYear Exist 182.00 507.00 510.10 3.12 2.08 0.18 0.37
601 West 1600 25 Year Prop 264.00 507.10 509.87 6.76 4.47 0.83 3.70
601 West 1600 25 Year Exist 264.00 507.00 515.64 0.72 0.35 0.01 0.00
601 West 1600 100 Year Prop _
420.00 507.10 510.29 7.92 5.08 1.15 5.83
_
601 West 1600 100 Year Exist 420.00 507.00 510.02 7.53 5.05 1.03 5.18

601 Wesl 1500 Bankfull Prop 47.00 506.10 507.51 5.36 5.36 1.07 5.74
60
1 Wesl __ _
1500 Bankfull __
Exist 47.00 505.00 506.57 3.97 3.97 0.69 2.73
_
601 West 1500 2 Year Prop 71.00 506.10 507.84 5.39 5.39 0.84 4.55
601 West
x 1500 2Year _
Exist 71.00 505.00 507.02 4.35 4.35 0.75 3.26
_
601 West 1500 10 Year Prop 182.00 506.10 508.55 5.88 3.84 0.55 2.12
601 West 1500 10 Year Exist 182.00 505.00 510.08 1.91 0.94 0.04 0.04
_
601 West 1500 25 Year Prop 264.00 506.10 508.95 5.93 3.56 0.52 1.86
601 West 1500 25 Year Exist 264.00 505.00 515.64 0.44 0.21 0.00 0.00
601 West 1500 100 Year Prop 420.00 506.10 509.73 5.33 2.91 0.40 1.17
&01 Wesl 1500 10DYear _
Exist 420.00 505.00 509.60 5.74 2.95 0.37 1.09

;601 Wesl 1400 Bankfull Prop 47.00 504.90 506.71 3.30 3.28 0.18 0.59
X601 West 1400 Bankfull Exisl 47.00 504.00 506.44 1.67 1.67 0.11 0.19
__
1601 Wesf ___
1400 2Year Prop 71.00 504.90 506.94 3.83 3.37 0.28 0.94
.601 West 1400 2Year Exist 71.00 504.00 506.85 2.05 2.05 0.16 0.34
601 West _14_00 _ 10 Year _ Prop__ _ 182.00 504.90 507.68 5.27 4.11 0.57 2.35
601 Wesl 1400 10 Year Exist 182.00 504.00 510.05 1.45 0.91 0.03 0.02
~ 601 West 1400 25 Year Prop 264.00 504.90 508.08 5.97 4.52 0.72 3.25
601 West 1400 25 Year Exist 264.00 504.00 515.64 0.34 0.19 0.00 0.00
601 West 1400 100 Year Pro 420.00 504.90 508.77 7.00 4.97 0.83 4.12
j601 Wesl 1400 100 Year Exist 420.00 504.00 508.97 5.48 4.89 0.59 2.87

601 West 1300 Bankfull Prop 47.00 504.00 505.41 5.36 5.36 1.07 5.74
601 West 1300 Bank(uIl Exist 47.00 504.00 505.92 3.91 3.91 0.74 2.88
601 Wesl _
1300 2 Year Prop 71.00 504.00 505.74 5.35 5.35 0.83 4.43
601 West 1300 2Year Exist 71.00 504.00 506.25 4.18 4.18 0.81 3.39
601 West 1300 10 Year Prop i 182.00 504.00 506.48 6.54 5.26 0.88 4.62
601 West 1300 10 Year Exist 182.00 504.00 510.05 0.87 0.52 0.01 0.01
601 West 1300 25 Year Prop 264.00 504.00 506.85 7.29 5.66 1.09 6.19
601 West 1300 - 25 Year Exist j 264.00 504.00 515.64 0.31 0.18 0.00 0.00
601 West 1300 100 Year - Prop ~ 420.00 504.00 507.31 8.87 6.67 1.58 10.50
601 West 1300 100 Year Exist 420.00 504.00 507.81 7.10 6.09 1.18 7.19

H Fr:.RAC Rivcr~ I IT fn 1 ~..e~ Imo.,... ....,.f.. mn .n._ __..
Reach River Sta
-- -

_ Profile ~ Plan _

_ ~Q Total _
-

i (cfs) ~ Min Ch EI
--

(fll_ W.S. Elev
--------

~ft~
~ ~
VeLChnl
~fUs)
T -
Vel Total
Mils) Shear Total

~Iblsq ft -i Power Total

- -
(Ittlft s1

601 West
1200
Bankfull
Prop_
47.00
502.70 --
505.25 --
1.5 ,
2 1.0
9 0.0 -- -
4 0.04
601 West
X601 West _
1200 _
1200 __ Bankfull
2Year _ _
Exist _
Prop 47.00
71.00 504.00
502.70 505.50
505.47 2.3
1.91 7 2.04
1.31 0.1
0.06 3 0.27
0.08
601 West 1200 2Year Exist 71.00 504.00 505.71 2.97 2.35 0.18 0.42
601 West 1200 10 Year Prop 182.00 502.70 505.85 3.73 2.46 0.24 0.59
601 West 1200 10 Year Exist 182.00 504.00 510.05 0.69 0.37 0.01 0.00
601 West 1200 __ 25 Year Prop 264.00 502.70 506.11 4.64 2.96 0.35 1.03
601 West 1200 25 Year Exist 264.00 504.00 515.64 0.33 0.17 0.00 0.00
601 West 1200 100 Year Prop 420.00 502.70 506.53 5.97 3.54 0.50 1.78
601 West 1200 100 Year Exist 420.00 504.00 507.18 5.82 3.17 0.48 1.51

601 Wesl 1100 _ Bankfull Prop 47.00 501.80 505.23 0.96 0.68 0.01 0.01
601 West 1100 Bankfull Exist 47.00 503.00 505.29 2.49 1.32 0.09 0.11
.601 West 1100 2Year Prop 71.00 501.80 505.44 1.30 0.87 0.02 0.02
601 West
~ 1100
~ 2Year Exist 71.00 503.00 505.38 3.39 1.73 0.16 0.27
~
601 West 1100 10 Year Prop 182.00 501.60 505.71 2.90 1.79 0.10 0.17
1601 Wesl _ 1100 _ 10 Year _ East ~ _ 182.00 503.00 510.04 0.52 0.26 0.00 0.00
601 West _ 1700 __ 25 Year Prop 264.00 501.80 505.90 3
81 2
25 0
16 0
35
601 West
r- 1100 25 Year _ _
Exist 264.00 503.00 515.64 .
0.25 .
0.13 .
0.00 .
0.00
601 Wesl 1100 100 Year Prop 420.00 501.80 506.18 5.15 2.89 0.29 0.83
801 West 1100 100 Year Exist ~
420.00 503.00 506.23 6.35 3.74 0.94 3.50
I
601 West 1080 Bankfull Prop 47.00 501.70 505.21 1.58 0.96 0.02 0.02
601 West 1080 Bankfull Exist 47.00 503.00 505.13 4.78 1.96 0.25 0.50
601 West 1080 2Year_ Prop 71.00 501.70 505.45 1.19 0.71 0.02 0.01
601 West 1080 2Year Exist 71.00 503.00 505.26 5.20 2.11 0.36 0.76
601 West 1080 10 Year Prop 182.00 501.70 505.73 2.54 1.45 0.07 0.11
601 West 1080_ 10 Year
_ Exist 162.00 503.00 504.98 22.91 12.41 11.24 139.48
601 West 1080 _
25 Year Prop 264.00 501.70 505.92 3.28 1.83 0.12 0.23
601 West 1080 25 Year Exist 264.00 503.00 504.98 33.23 18.00 23.65 425.71
601 Wesl 1080 100 Year Prop 420.00 501.70 506.23 4.39 2.38 0.23 0.55
601 West 1080 100 Year Exist 420.00 503.00 506.04 8.33 3.78 1.02 3.85

j601 West 1050 _ __ Mult Open

601 West 1_020 Bankfull Prop 47.00 501.50 503.45 7.86 7.86 1.73 13.62
601 West 1020 _ Bankfull Exist 47.00 502.00 503.68 4.74 2.48 0.39 0.97
6_01 West 1020 2Year_ Prop 71.00 501.50 504.06 9.01 9.01 2.08 18.75
601 West 1020 __ 2Year Exist 71.00 502.00 503.85 5.30 2.62 0.48 1.26
,601 West 1020 10 Year Prop 162.00 501.50 504.38 4.09 2.37 0.23 0.54
601 West 1020 10 Year _ Exist 182.00 502.00 504.28 6.98 3.32 0.86 2.85
601 West _ 1020 25 Year Prop _ 264.00 501.50 504.46 5.48 3.13 0.41 1.30
601 Wesl 1020 25 Year Exist 264.00 502.00 504.49 7.86 3.74 1.10 4.12
601 West 1020 100 Year Prop 420.00 501.50 504.77 6.76 3.72 0.64 2.40
601 West 1020 100 Year Exist 420.00 502.00 504.75 6.10 4.09 1.05 4.31

'601 West 1000 Bankfull Prop 47.00 501.40 503.38 2.69 2.18 0.08 0.18
601 West 1000_ Bankfull Exist _ 47.00 501.00 502.01 5.31 5.31 1.37 7.26
'601 West _ 1000 2Year Prop 71.00 501.40 503.60 3.04 1.99 0.10 0.21
601 West 1000 2Year Exist _ 71.00 501.00 502.30 5.98 5.98 1.61 9.65
601 West 1000 10 Year Prop 182.00 501.40 504.18 3.78 1.94 0.18 0.35
601 West 1000 10Year Exist 182.00 501.00 503.61 5.84 3.93 0.36 1.50
6_09 Wesl 1000 25 Year Prop 264.00 501.40 504.44 4.14 2.12 0.24 0.51
601 West 1_000 25 Year Exisl 264.00 501.00 504.04 5.68 3.02 0.35 1.07
601 West 1000 100 Year Prop 420.00 501.40 504.80 4.84 2.50 0.36 0.89
601 West 1000 100 Year Exist 420.00 501.00 504.33 6.73 3.46 0.58 2.00

601 West 900 Bankfull Prop 47.00 501.10 503.04 2.73 2.07 0.08 0.16
,601_West _ 900. Bankfull Exist 47.00 499.00 501.43 2.22 2.22 0.20 0.44
601 West 900 2Year Prop 71.00 501.10 503.26 2.99 1.92 0.12 0,22
601 West 900 2Year Exist 71.00 499.00 501.94 2.54 2.54 0.24 0.62
601 West 900 10 Year Prop 182.00 501.10 503.69 4.44 2.45 0.26 0.63
601 West 900 10 Year Exist 182.00 499.00 502.92 4.08 3.22 0.25 0.79
601 West 900 25 Year Prop 264.00 501.10 503.96 4.84 2.52 0.30 0.77
601 West 900 25 Year Exist 264.00 499.00 503.30 4.93 3.37 0.26 0.94
601 West 900 _ 100 Year Prop 420.00 501.10 504.39 5.11 2.62 0.38 0.99

rw o ~„~.~ i it ~.. i ~..e~ r.ee Donr6• FM 1Al ocf Mnnfi ni ror11
Reach River Sta Profile ~ Plan Q Total I Min Ch EI W.S. Elev Vel Chnl Vel Total Shear Total Power Total I
_.
(efs)
(fi)
(ft)
(ft/s) _
(ft/s)
(Iblsq fQ
Qblft s)
601 West 900 t00Year i Ewst 420.00 _
499.00 503.84 5.61 3.27 0.34 1.10
-- _.
601 West 800 Bankfull Prop ~ 47.00 500.70 502.46 3.62 3.62 0.38 1.37
601 West B00 Bankfull Exisl I 47.00 499.00 500.55 5.24 5.24 1.24 6.51
601 West 800 2Year Prop 71.00 500.70 502.65 4.14 2.86 0.16 0.45
B01 West 800 2Year ____
Exist 71.00 499.00 500.78 6.55 6.55 1.88 12.30
601 West 800 10 Year Prop 182.00 500.70 503.20 4.63 2.53 0.32 0.82
601 West 800 10 Year Exist 182.00 499.00 502.09 6.35 4.20 0.65 2.75
601 Wesl _
800. 25 Year Prop 264.00 500.70 503.45 5.12 2.74 0.41 1.11
601 West 800 25 Year Exist 264.00 499.00 502.42 7.05 4.29 0.76 3.27
601 West 800 1
00 Year Prop 420.00 500.70 503.83 5.79 3.05 0.52 1.60
_
601 West ____
800 _
t00Year Exist 420.00 499.00 502.90 7.86 4.38 0.91 3.99

601 West 700 Bankfull Prop 47.00 500.20 502.01 2.68 1.48 0.07 0.10
601 West 700 Bankfull Exist 47.00 497.00 500.73 1.17 1.07 0.03 0.03
West
601 700 2Year Prop 71.00 500.20 502.26 2.35 1.16 0.08 0.09
_
601 West ___
700 2Year Exist _
71.00 497.00 501.04 1.54 1.32 0.04 0.06
1 West
60 700 10 Year _____
Prop 182.00 500.20 502.47 4.22 2.14 0.29 0.61
_
601 West _
7
00 10 Year ___
Exist 182.00 497.00 501.76 2.86 2.02 0.11 0.21
601 West _
_
700 25 Year _ _
Prop ~ _~ 264.00 500.20 502.69 4.59 2.37 0.37 0.87
601 West 700 25 Year Exisl I 264.00 497.00 502.08 3.60 2.32 0.15 0.35
601 West 700 100 Year Prop j 420.00 500.20 503.00 5.27 2.74 0.47 1.27
_
601 West 700 100 Year Exist 1 420.00 497.00 502.50 4.73 2.72 0.23 0.63

601 West 600 Bankfull Prop 47.00 499.60 501.20 4.22 4.22 0.52 2.20
601 West 600 Bankfull _
Exist 47.00 499.00 500.62 2.04 1.87 0.12 0.22
601 West 600 2Year Prop 71.00 499.60 501.35 5.30 5.30 0.82 4.32
601 West 600 2Year Exist 71.00 499.00 500.88 2.58 2.24 0.17 0.37
601 West 600 10 Year Prop 182.00 499.60 501.63 4.83 2.10 0.30 0.64
601 West
601 West 600
600 1D Year
25 Year Exisl
Prop 182.00
264.00 499.00
499.60 501.31
501.74 4.77
5.58 3.02
2.44 0.23
0.44 0.70
1.07
601 West ___
600 25 Year Exisl ! 264.00 499.00 501.62 5.20 2.75 0.27 0.75
16-01 West 600 100 Year Prop 420.00 499.60 501.92 6.54 2.91 0.65 1.88
_
601 West 600 100 Year _
Exist 420.00 499.00 501.85 6.62 3.20 0.45 1.43

601 West 500 ~ Bankfull Prop 47.00 498.80 500.93 2.31 2.00 0.10 0.21
601 West 500 Bankfull Exist 47.00 499.00 499.97 4.24 4.24 0.86 3.65
601 West ___
500 2Year Prop 71.00 498.80 501.07 1.14 0.54 0.02 0.01
601 West 500 ^ 2Year _
Exist 71.00 499.00 500.40 3.78 2.48 0.19 0.46
601 West 500 10 Year Prop 182.00 498.80 501.00 3.42 1.58 0.15 0.23
601 West 500 10 Year Exist 182.00 499.00 501.17 3.06 1.32 0.11 0.14
601 West 500 25 Year Prop 264.00 498.80 501.01 4.88 2.26 0.30 0.67
601 West 500 25 Year Exisl 264.00 499.00 501.65 2.38 1.03 0.07 0.08

601 West
500
100 Year -~
Prop
420.00
498.80
501.13
6.00
2.90
0.50
1.45
601 West 500 100 Year Exist 420.00 499.00 501.25 6.31 2.71 0.47 1.27

601 West 400 Bankfull Prop 47.00 498.70 500.44 3.56 3.56 0.37 1.31
601 West 400 Bankfull Exis[ 47.00 498.00 499.81 1.77 1.77 0.13 0.22
601 West 400 2Year Prop 71.00 498.70 500.45 5.32 5.32 0.82 4.37
601 West 400 2Year Exist' 71.00 498.00 500.13 2.25 2.25 0.20 0.44
601 West 400 10 Year Prop 182.00 498.70 501.00 0.09 0.06 0.00 0.00
601 West 400 10 Year ' Exist 182.00 498.00 499.99 6.19 6.19 1.49 9.21
601 West __
400 25 Year Prop 264.00 498.70 501.00 0.13 0.09 0.00 0.00
_
601 West 400 25 Year Exist 264.00 498.00 500.23 7.96 7.96 2.43 19.31
601 West 400 100 Year Prop 420.00 498.70 501.00 0.20 0.15 0.00 0.00
601 West 400 100 Year Exist 420.00 498.00 501.00 0.21 0.15 0.00 0.00
--
601 Wesl 300 Bankfull Prop 47.00 498.20 499.76 4.43 4.43 0.58 2.56
601 West 300 Bankfull __
East ~ 47.00 498.00 499.71 1.81 1.81 0.14 0.25
601 West 300 2Year Prop ~ 71.00 498.20 500.10 2.03 0.39 0.01 0.01
601 West 300 2 Year Exist I 71.00 498.00 500.03 2.04 0.87 0.01 0.00
601 West 300 10Year Prop 182.00 498.20 500.14 3.57 0.71 0.06 0.04
601 Wesl 300 10 Y
ear. _
Exist 182.00 498.00 500.25 1.61 0.41 0.02 0.01
601 Wesl _ _ _
300 _
__
25 Year Prop 264.00 498.20 500.18 3.90 0.83 0.08 0.07
601 West 300 25Year Exist I 264.00 498.00 500.30 1.93 0.51 0.03 0.01
601 West 300 100 Year Prop 420.00 498.20 500.23 4.63 1.06 0.14 0.14

HEC-RAS River: UT to Lanes Crew Raarh~ Fns tnre~r rr.,,,rc..,wa~
Reach River Sta T- Profile ~ Plan ~Q Total P,1in.Ch E( W.S;.Elev Vel Ghnl Vel Tota~ Shear Totat Povrer Total
_. _ (cfs
) (fl) ~h) (ftlsl (fUs) ~
(Ib/
fl) ~
I

j601 West
.

300
-
100 Year
- -
Exist _
-
420.00
-
498
00
_
500
40
-
2
1
-
5 0
62
sq
- s
_:
-
'
.
.
--
X601 West __
1601 West ..
-
200 _
200 _ -
-.
Bankfull__
.Bankfull
_..
Prop __
Exist

47.00
47.00 .

496.80
498.00 .

498.84
498.72 .

2.49
4.79 .

2.23
4.79 0.0

0.22
1.19 4 0.02

0.50
5.70
601 West
601 Wesl
---
601 West
601 West
~-- _ 200 _
200

200 _
200 2Year
2Year

10 Year
10 Year Prop
Exist

Prop
Exist
- 71.00
71.00

182.00
182.00 496.80
498.00

496.80
498.00 499.14
498.96

499.50
500.26 0.12
5.42

0.18
0.11 0.07
5.42

0.12
0.07 0.00
1.40

0.00
0.00 0.00
7.61

0.00
0.00
601 West 200 25 Year Prop 264.00 496.80 499.30 D.35 0.21 0.00 0.00
601 West 200 25 Year Exist 264.00 498.00 500.31 0.15 0.09 0.00 0.00
601 West 200 100 Year Prop 420.00 496.80 499.39 0.49 0.31 0.01 0.00
601 West 200_ t00Year Exist r 420.00 498.00 500.40 0.23 0.14 0.00 0.00

601 West 183.333 Bankfull Prop 47.00 496.80 498.76 2.77 2.53 0.14 0.36
601 West_ 183.333 Bankfull Exist I 47.00 497.00 498.38 2.73 2.52 0.21 0.52
601 Wes(
601 West 183.333 _
183.333 2Year _ _
2Year Prop
Exist _ 71.00
71.00 496.80
497.00 499.13
498.77 1.46
2.97 0.34
2.41 0.01
0.19 0.00
0.47
601 West 183.333 10 Year Prop __ 182.00 496.80 499.50 0.74 0.24 0.00 0.00
601 Wesl 183.333 10 Year Exist 182.00 497.00 500.03 3.98 1.29 0.02 0.02
601 Wesl 183.333 25 Year Prop 264.00 496.80 499.28 2.29 0.61 0.03 0.02
601 Wes( 183.333 25 Year Exist 264.00 497.00 500.27 2.23 0.47 0.02 0.01
601 West 183.333 100 Year Prop _ 420.00 496.80 499.37 2.55 0.75 0.05 0.03
601 West 183.333 100 Year Exist 420.00 497.00 500.37 2.61 0.58 0.03 0.02

601 West 166.666 Bankfull Prop _ 47.00 496.80 498.67 3.05 2.90 0.16 0.47
601 West 166.666 Bankfull Exist _ 47.00 497.00 498.27 3.11 2.97 0.31 0.93
601 Wesl 166.666 2Year Prop 71.00 496.80 498.93 3.48 3.00 0.24 0.71
601 West 166.666 2Year Exist 71.00 497.00 498.68 3.32 2.83 0.27 0.77
601 West 166.666 10 Year Prop 182.00 496.80 499.50 0.74 0.24 0.00 0.00
601 West 166.666 10 Year Exist 182.00 497.00 500.00 3.45 2.18 0.20 0.43
601 Wesl 166.666_ 25 Year Prop 264.00 496.80 499.26 2.51 0.66 0.03 0.02
601 West 166.666 25 Year Exist 264.00 497.00 500.26 2.31 0.49 0.02 0.01
601 West 166.666 100 Year Prop 420.00 496.80 499.35 2.74 0.79 0.05 0.04
601 West 166.666 100 Year Exist 420.00 497.00 500.36 2.66 0.60 0.03 0.02

601 West 150 Bankfull __ Prop 47.00 496.80 498.53 3.59 3.59 0.37 1.34
601 West 150 Bankfull Exist 47.00 497.00 497.84 5.07 5.07 1.29 6.52
601 West 150 . 2Year Prop 71.00 496.80 498.65 4.71 4.53 0.38 1.73
601 Wesl 150 2Year Exist 71.00 497.00 498.45 4.29 4.29 0.78 3.37
601 West 150 10 Year Prop 182.00 496.80 499.50 0.74 0.24 0.00 0.00
601 West 150 10 Year Exist 182.00 497.00 499.52 5.88 4.90 0.54 2.63
601 West 150 __ 25 Year Prop _ _ 264.00 496.80 499.19 3.71 0.90 0.06 0.05
601 West 150 25 Year Exist _ _ 264.00 497.00 500.25 2.53 0.54 0.02 0.01
601 West 150. 100 Year Prop 420.00 496.80 499.33 2.98 0.64 0.06 0.05
601 West 150 100 Year Exist 420.00 497.00 500.34 2.86 0.64 0.04 0.02

601 West 133.333 Bankfull Prop 47.00 496.70 498.13 5.23 5.23 1.02 5.32
601 West 133.333 Bankfull Exist 47.00 496.00 497.79 2.70 2.70 0.30 0.81
601 West 133.333 2Year Prop 71.00 496.70 498.44 4.27 4.27 1.26 5.38
601 Wesl 133.333 2Year Exist 71.00 496.00 498.50 2.68 2.68 0.28 0.76
601 West 133.333 10 Year Prop 182.00 496.70 498.95 5.63 5.63 1.90 10.72
601 West 133.333 _ 10 Year Exist 182.00 496.00 499.67 3.68 3.21 0.25 0.80
601 West 133.333 25 Year Prop 264.00 496.70 499.00 0.50 0.32 0.01 0.00
601 Wesl
x 133.333 25 Year Exist _ 264.00 496.00 500.23 2.35 0.57 0.02 0.01
'601 West 133.333 100 Year Prop 420.00 496.70 499.35 0.44 0.31 0.01 0.00
601 West 133.333 100 Year Exist 420.00 496.00 500.31 2.85 0.69 0.03 0.02

601 West 116.666 Bankfull Prop 47.00 496.70 497.63 1.65 1.65 0.10 0.17
601 West 116.666 Bankfull Exist 47.00 495.00 497.77 2.25 2.25 0.19 0.43
601 West 116.666 2Year Prop 71.00 496.70 497.88 1.91 1.91 0.12 0.24
601 West 116.666 2Year Exisl 71.00 495.00 498.48 2.36 2.23 0.15 0.32
601 West 116.666 10 Year Prop ~ 182.00 496.70 498.74 2.64 2.64 0.20 0.53
601 West 116.666 10 Year Exist 182.00 495.00 499.69 3.21 2.23 0.15 0.33
601 West 116.666 25 Year Prop _ 264.00 496.70 498.04 6.18 6.18 1.26 7.76
601 Wesl 1 16.666 25 Year Exist _ 264.00 495.00 500.11 3.49 0.89 0.02 0.02
601 West 1 16.666 100 Year Prop 420.00 496.70 498.49 7.06 7.06 1.50 10.61

HEC-RAS River: UT to Lanes Cree Reach_ ~ 601 Wesl (Continued) _ _ _
Reach River Sta Profile ~ Plan Q Total Min Ch EI ~ W.S. Elev Vel Chnl _ Vel Total Shear Tolal Power Total
_ _ (cfs) _ (ft) ~ (ft) (ft(s) (Ns) _ (Ib/sq fl) _Q_blft s)
601 West 116.666 100 Year Exlsl 420.00 495.00 500.25 3571 0.79 0.04 0.03

Appendix 6
Soil Nutrient Testing Report

Appendix 6
Soil Nutrient Testing Report

~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_
~ ~1+
~
N Y i ~ ~ ~

C.J ~ N .-~ ~ ~ N ~--~ '~' ~ N ,.~ Z ~ N ,--i Z

O ~
~ .~ O ~
~ ~, O vj
~ ~ O try
~
C
U ~ ~ .-a ~ ~ M ~ ~ N ~ ~ G~
O Vj M (' M C' i~ C' N
N o o N o o N o o N o o
V ~ ~ ~ M ~ 00 ~ ~
~
V O O U .-~ V O O U~ V O O U~ V 0 0 v M
~ O O ~~ ~ O O ~ M ~ O O ~ ~ O O ~1
~
N ~ l!'~
N ~ N
N a~ ~
N
~~ o o ~ o o b o o ~ o o
~ ~/'~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ W

~; O o o
~ cq 'tyO~ o o c j O o o
~ ^
N O o o
~ ~
N
p N M ~.. "_ M M ~. O .ry ~
.. M cY'I ~
..
t~ ~

~
O ~

~ a~
~ M ~
ue ~ ~ ~
~ h
O
~ ~ O O
O
~--~
s
.
p
O N ~ G
~ O O
~
N O O
~I t/1 N ..
~
~ N O O
'~1 ~ 1~ ,,
~
~ N N
O
~ n' t!~ ~C~
~
.
~-ri
~ a~ y V C
~
~
~ .0-+

,. ~ ~ ~ z a o
'C O
'C O
'G o
'C

^' ~ U M V ~ r~ 0 0
N ~~
'C "' O O
N ti ~t
'C O O
N ~ 00
'C O O
N ti ~O
'G •-~
O ~ O ~ O ~ O
b ~
U' 4i
~ O O ~ N 0~
~ O O ~ ~
'C 0)
~ ~ O ~ W
'G 0~
O O ~0 ~
'~i
~
N \ O ~ \ O ~ \ O ~ \ O
v v ^ ' v~ v
O ~
~ 1 ~
~~ ~ N
!vim
^V ~ .--1
~~ ~1 .--1
~~
w
N y w ~ W ~ w
~1 Q ~L O ~, ~ O ~ ~ O ni ~ O
•~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn x Q ~ ~ x ~ ~ Ci cn x
~
O C~ ~ ~ h .yr ~ ~ `? y 0~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
?~i
r
~
.
: ~
~ ~ a ¢
o ~ `~ ~ ~ ¢ ii
o
° ~y `r~ ~ p.
O
° ~ `~ ~
q r
ii
o
° v
~
J
p
^_
wO v o ~
O V b N N
~ o
O C.7 ~? ~ o
O V M ~ o
O C.7 -

~
Cf
V ~ V
~' ~
Y b
V ~ U
~' •-•
PL b V
~' N
~ C
~
V G.l ~
Q ~
,~ z N {
i N L V .-+ N f
V
w
Q
v
~

~
~ o

N
V
sr
~
Fr
o o

r
a~
~
~
I~
~ q

~
a~
~
Q
L..
~ o

t
o
cn ~ j
QO °° a c.~
~0 '~ a t~j r
QO ~ ,_ ,~
~ ~

~ ¢+ V~ ~ v~ a v~ ~ v~
o o o o

7 C/~ {.~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ,R ~
a ~' ~° ~' 30 ~' ~~' ~' 3-~'
~
a
V a ~
~l a e
V a ~
~1
0 0 O o
~ S
•~ ° ~ vii y w ~ vi y ~° ~ i h w ~ i h

o
-"
,~ ~
~
,~ z ~
'~
,~ ~ i
~
ti z .~
ti ~ v
i
a~ et z , ~ a, ~ v
i
a> ~ z
_ _ o~ ~ ~ ~, x ti
C1
w
~ ~
F '' u
~ y
w ~ ~
h ~ r.+
H '~
~° y
w ~ ~
~n ~ ~+
F ' ~
~ y
w ~ ~
~ ~ ~
F
~ ~'
-

Cpl N N
~ ',~ O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
z
y vj V~ N
~ N o o N~ bs N o o N~~ ~ o 0
V o o V° V o o U o V o o V °o° V o o U ~" U U ~.
0 0 ~~
0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ N ~ o o ~ ~ ~ o o ~ .-. ~ o o ~ m
c<'~
o ~ o o N ~ 0 0 N ~ o o N ,~.~ o o N' ~ o o N
_ ~ i
~ ~ ~ N ~ V'\ ~ eMr ~ M
~ M
O O N ~Ory °v, ~n ,1 O cow ° ~ O ~ ~°, ~ O o o
O O
O M .-+ p 0~ O ~ ...~ O . ~t ,~ O
O O ~ t} O O ti 00 O O ti ~t O O ~ O O O ~ 00
.--~ 'C ~ 'C N 'C N ~ N N
~V., ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ O
'C ~ N 0~ N
~, ~ o o ,~ o o ~ .,~ o ~ o o ~ 0 0
3~ N ~ ° y ~ o N ~ ° ~ ~ o N
3 U o U~ U~ U^ U~
a~
.c N va ~ ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~ w ~
~ ~ ~ b .~ ~ o ,~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~
,., o
Q {~ p p
o~ o
oG o
3 ~ o O o0
vii C Ct ci] x ~ ~ cn .% ~; ~ cn x ~ b ~ ~ x ~ ~, ~ cn x
O O z.
~ o v O v O v c> ~
r' ~ o L -tea v ~" ~ o ~ -ci ~ v~ v p ~ -~i v ~` v o ~ .~ v oo v p ~ -~ v~
rl .-.-~
n ~i V ~ N d' ~ x V .-r N ~' ~ ~r V .N N ~' ~ ~r U .Ni N ~' ~ ~ V ~ N ~' O
C.1
aj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h
o, o U° ¢+ o V~ a+ o CWj r o» o V~ O, o V o0
.~
~~ ~
A ~ ?o ° .ago o ~~ o ~~ o ?~
~ h .~ .~ +~
h h h
,v b Ct Ct
C O ~ n O 'J ~ O 'v o O 'v o O 'V o
~O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ur ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'"" O L7 O O ~ ~ O ~ ~ O
~"'~ ~~- vii h ''~+ ~ vii y w ~ ~ h `~ ~ vi r;~ c~~y ~ r~ y
CL' ~ ,~ :Z ~ v ~ ~ v Z ~ ~y ~ ~ v Z ~ ti ~ O v _Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ti z
A .~ pC, ~ ~ ~ +Z, ~ ~ V ~ d ~, ~ ~ V ~ "d ~ ~ ~ V cn pC, V
~ ~ ~~ ~