20081644 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20110414

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review I >l Evaluator's Name(s)� -,-V&i
Date of Report 1'12 2CxD1A Report for Monitoring Year
Date of Field Review Evaluator's Name(s)
Other Individuals /Agencies Present
Weather Conditions (today & recent)
Directions to Site Project is SE of Goldsboro
Part 1 Approx 500' west of NC 111 south of the intersection of NC 111 and US 70
o.... ') c.. N. n .4.. —T I IC 7n CC ..i w9 1 IC 7A .....I klt� • 4 4
1 Office Review Information
Project Number 20081644
Project Name Walnut Creek Buffer Restoration Site
County(ies) Wayne
Basin & subbasin Neuse 03020202
Nearest Stream Walnut Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream C, NSW
Mitigator Type Full - Delivery (EEP)
DOT Status
Total Mitigation on Site
Event Date
Wetland
5/27/2008
Stream
10/29/2008
Buffer - acres
4/21/2009
Nutr Offset Ilp L4g
7/9/2009
Approved mitigation plan available?
Yes No
Monitoring reports available?
Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports?
Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site?
Yes No
Mitigation required on site
Associated impacts (if known)
Proiect History
Event
Event Date
Report Receipt Monitonng
5/27/2008
Report Receipt Monitoring
10/29/2008
Site Visit - Buffer
4/21/2009
Report Receipt Monitoring
7/9/2009
a.kD o `J� 31q111
*Add significant project- related events reports,
received, construction, planting, repairs, etc
- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results Record relevant data in Sections II and III
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and /or to be obtained during site visit
II Summary of Results
Mitigation Component
20081644 -1 � a rc es Buffer Restoration
— 2 11P y�cAJLO
Monitoring Success Success
Year (report) (field) Resolved
Version 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2

Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project
Additional comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc)
Version 10 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component 25 acres Buffer Restoration Component ID 20081644 -1
Description 2 parts (See above)
Location within project See above and maps
III Buffer Site Details
Riparian Buffer (Streams Only)
Streams verified by DWQ j� No
Comments cQ u-,AA -S U�Ak t-Cd 6�0
�'A O
Total Acres
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
Buffer Width 50' 550'
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only) `re No
IV Success Criteria Evaluation
Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Buffer Width .fib r
Comments
Total Acres i L0 4- (
Restored Acres
Enhanced Acres
VEGETATION
NOTE Success Criteria is 320 spa
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'/ cover
S -- '4 l-u
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report)
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
Date of last planting
C,)W m
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
General observations on condition of riparian /buffer areas and associated stream bank (e g bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc )
Version 12 (March 5, 2009) Page 1 of 2

Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover)
i
mI mo501 eu)\- 2- ( } l
(DYA VC:�- DbSQ_ . Xd - ryVos� U-\ J�Lrk 2
Easement Marking Method
List any remaining issues to address (e g plant survival, easement encroachment, etc )
Comte► -)nDn of q q un 8 (mlq pW-- Ln Pw&z) v3 a Cun
\ _L e� m vases, � Ctorrmw ct_ - , pLc 4- umul.J rick 11 ve-
MCA- 320 -WA LA4 M4 Pfd &krnS
MITIGATION SUCCESS
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component
Additional Comments (e g DWQ follow -up actions, recommendations, etc )
- �Mn'-�kA 40 a15Ae. 'Ntu- d'�h �o9�)qv'm &Pk' C Leo
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern Label and attach photos to
this report
— Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and /or important field observations
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component
Version 1 2 (March 5, 2009) Page 2 of 2
vc-qu a
R_ - Vo_