20050676 Ver 1_As Built Monitoring Report_20120130

Q5 0(' b
LITTLE RIVER STREAM AND WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
AS -BUILT & BASELINE MONITORING REPORT
Moore County, North Carolina
EEP Project Number 226
I
Prepared for
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
r~
Elk ht
PROGRAM
Status of Plan Final
Submission Date December 2011
Data Collection Completed February 2011
0 =COVE®
,IAN 1 0 2012
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Prepared by
StaMec
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
} Raleigh, NC 27606
�I
Fj
Pj
Ci

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The As Built & Baseline Monitoring Report presented here includes the monitoring plan success criteria,
methodology and baseline conditions for the Little River Wetland Enhancement Restoration site This
southeastern Moore County, North Carolina site is located on the "Little River J Bar Ranch" property
approximately 3 5 miles southeast of US Highway 1 along Little River
The project is funded by the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Initial project research and
design began in 2002 and was undertaken by BLUE Land Water Infrastructure PA (BLWI) Multiple
scope changes were made and the project went from having a major stream restoration component to
primarily wetland enhancement and preservation The project transitioned from BLWI to Stantec
Consulting Services Inc ( Stantec) in the spring of 2007 Portions of BLWI s initial data collection are
presented here The site was burned in December 2010 planted in January 2011 and the baseline field
monitoring was performed in February 2011
The project is located on the property sometimes referred to as the "Little River J Bar Ranch," `New J-
Bar Ranch,' or simply J Bar " Historically the property was sometimes known as the "McKeithen
Tract The property is currently owned by J J Barnes and his family The property is actively managed
for wildlife habitat to facilitate hunting on the overall tract
The project site is bounded on the west by the tract property boundary on the south by the Little River
and on the east by the tract property boundary The northern boundary is defined by the conservation
easement boundary on the J Bar parcel The project site is dominated by a cutover and bedded area Prior
to the initiation of this project this area was planted with loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) Various herbaceous
and woody species in addition to the loblolly pine are also found at the project site A bottomland
hardwood forest approximately 200 to 500 feet in width is located between the timbered area and the
Little River mainstem
The overall goal of the Little River project is to preserve and enhance a natural Bottomland Hardwood
Forest which exhibits desired functions appropriate to the existing geomorphic setting of the site Specific
goals include 1) preservation of wildlife habitat and 2) natural community enhancement The project
objectives include 1) partial removal of undesired vegetation via burning to promote desired species
growth and 2) planting of the project site with specific native species to enhance natural habitat
Several stream channels traverse the project site These channels are natural streams with headwaters
forming within J Bar parcel Small portions of the channels appear to have been altered in the past but
currently appear stable The projected included 3 593 linear feet of stream enhancement on two tributaries
to the Little River (Reach 1 & Reach 2) and 210 linear feet of stream preservation of one associated
tributary (Reach 3)
Wetlands within the conservation easement boundary were enhanced or preserved Approximately 39
acres of wetlands in the bottomland hardwood forest adjacent to the Little River channel have been
designated for preservation in addition to approximately 9 acres of successional wetland located in the
northwest portion of the project site The wetlands within the approximately 48 acre loblolly pine
plantation area and 7 -acre grassy field area have been enhanced through burning of the both areas and the
planting of native hardwood trees
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page i
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226) December 2011

Vegetative sample plots will be quantitatively monitored in the fall of each monitoring year Sixteen
vegetation plots will be monitored as per the CVS EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation version 4 2
(CVS EEP 2008) The plots will be monitored for a minimum of 5 years The vegetative success of the
restoration site will be evaluated based on the species density and survival rates Wetland vegetation
monitoring will be considered successful if 150 planted woody stems per acre are surviving in year 5 of
monitoring in the pine plantation area while 260 planted woody stems per acre must be surviving after 5
years of monitoring in the grassy field area Streams will be visually assessed each year to monitor for
stability One crest gauge has been installed onsite and is located adjacent to Vegetation Plot 7
The project involves the enhancement of existing jurisdictional areas within the pine plantation and the
preservation of existing wetlands and streams within the conservation easement Therefore hydrology is
already assumed to be present due to the presence of hydnc soil indicators and lack of drainage In order
to monitor and confirm the hydrology five continuous groundwater gauges were installed on the site
Four of the gauges are located in the jurisdictional areas of the pine plantation and a fifth is a reference
well located in the reference wetland in a preservation area on the west side of the project There is no
success criterion for wetland hydrology
Stantec staff installed groundwater wells and completed the baseline vegetation monitoring on February
2 2011 using the CVS EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation version 4 2 (CVS EEP 2008) Monitoring
was conducted in 16 vegetation plots According to the data collected the average plant density among
the 16 plots is 329 stems /acre The original planting plan specified 300 stems /acre for planting Zone 1
(pine plantation) which includes plots 4 16 while 600 stems /acre was specified for Zone 2 (grassy field)
which includes plots 1 2 and 3 The highest plant densities occurred in plots 1 3 6 and 8 Plots 2 4 7 9
10 12, 13 and 14 did not meet the planting density requirements by more than 10%
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page n
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226) December 2011

Table of Contents
Executive Summary i
10
Project Goals Background and Attributes 1
1 1
Location and Setting 1
1 2
Project Goals and Objectives 1
1 3
Project Structure Restoration Type and Approach 2
1 3 1
Project Structure 2
1 3 2
Restoration Type and Approach 2
1 4
Project History Contacts and Attribute Data 2
20
Success Criteria 4
21
Vegetation 4
22
Hydrology 4
22 1
Streams 4
2 2 2
Wetlands 4
30
Monitoring Plan Guidelines 5
31
Hydrology 5
311
Wetland 5
312
Stream 5
32
Vegetation 5
3 3
Photo Stations 6
34
Watershed 6
3 5
Monitoring Plan View 6
3 6
Maintenance and Contingency Plans 6
40
As Built Conditions / Baseline 7
41
As Built/Record Drawings 7
42
Baseline Data (Year 0) 7
42 1
Verification of Plantings 7
422
Photo Documentation 7
4 2 3
Hydrology 7
50
References 8
60
Appendices 9
Appendix A General Tables and Figures
Appendix B Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Appendix C Vegetation Data
Appendix D Supporting Documents
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page in
As built & Baseline Momtonng Report (EEP# 226) December 2011

7
(This page intentionally left blank for two sided printing)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5)
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226)
Page iv
December 2011
i
u
0
u
i
i
0
f

it
II
Pi
0
'.l
I'
I
10 Project Goals, Background and Attributes
1 1 LOCATION AND SETTING
The Little River project site is part of the J Bar Ranch which is owned and operated by J J Barnes and
his family The project site is near Vass in Moore County, which is located approximately 60 miles south
of Raleigh on US Highway 1 From US Highway 1 in Vass travel approximately 3 5 miles southeast
along Lobelia Road (NC Highway 690) and turn right onto a dirt access road Follow the dirt road
approximately 0 25 miles and then bear left at the fork in the road Continue an additional 0 65 miles
along the dirt road to a second fork The right hand side of the fork leads into the easement while the left
hand fork follows the northern boundary of the easement Refer to Figure 1 in Appendix A for a vicinity
map
The site is located at 35 22° North / 79 24° West on the northwestern portion of the United States
Geological Survey (USGS) 7 5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Lobelia (Figure 1 Appendix A) The
lJ project site is located in the Cape Fear River basin within the USGS 14 digit hydrologic unit
03030004070050
12 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The overall goal of the Little River project is to preserve and enhance a natural floodplam system which
jexhibits desired functions appropriate to the existing geomorphic setting of the site The main functions of
this system are nutrient processing aquatic and terrestrial habitat and floodwater storage
The preservation areas of the site will provide for perpetual protection of the currently functioning areas
Wetland enhancement on the site will improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat by restoring a natural diverse
plant community to existing wetlands This diverse plant community will help maintain the streams
Ft connectivity to the adjacent floodplain
Specific objectives to achieve the goals are
J• Preservation of 210 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 39 3 acres of bottomland hardwood
wetlands along the Little River, and 9 3 acres of successional wetlands,
�_ i • Enhancement of 3 593 linear feet of perennial stream channels and 54 8 acres of bottomland
hardwood wetlands with planting of native bottomland hardwood species
The bottomland hardwood wetland enhancement was accomplished with site preparation by removing
undesirable existing vegetation and planting native vegetation through a prescribed burn The conversion
a of the pme plantation and associated riparian areas to hardwood species will greatly improve the wildlife
habitat on the property and improve the aquatic species diversity and abundance in the streams on the site
0
a Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page 1
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226) December 2011
0

13 PROJECT STRUCTURE, RESTORATION TYPE AND APPROACH
13 1 Project Structure
The project involved enhancement of 3,593 linear feet (LF) of stream (Reach 1 & 2) and 54 8 acres (AC)
of riparian and non riparian wetlands and preservation of 210 LF of stream (Reach 3) and 48 7 AC of
riparian and successional wetlands along the project site A recorded conservation easement consisting of
125+ AC will protect all stream reaches riparian buffers and wetlands in perpetuity Refer to Table 1 and
Figure 2 in Appendix A for a table and detailed plan view of the project components
13 2 Restoration Type and Approach
Historically the site had been clear cut and a loblolly pine plantation was established on approximately
55 acres of the site Additionally two small areas were maintained as grassy fields for bird hunting
Various herbaceous and woody species, in addition to the loblolly pine are also found at the project site
A bottomland hardwood forest approximately 200 to 500 feet in width is located between the timbered
area and the Little River mainstem
Several stream channels traverse the project site These channels are natural streams with headwaters
forming within J Bar parcel Small portions of the channels appear to have been altered in the past but
currently appear stable A jurisdictional determination of the site in 2007 found approximately 105 acres
of existing wetland on the project site
The purpose of the project was to provide enhancement of existing jurisdictional riparian and wetlands
and stream functions to a pine plantation on the site The project also included preservation of existing
jurisdictional riparian and wetlands in the existing bottomland hardwood forest surrounding the pine
plantation, and the preservation of some existing streams on the site
The vegetative components of this project include streambank and wetland planting Bare root seedlings
were planted within designated areas of the conservation easement The planting plan for the site included
two planting zones pine plantation (Zone 1) planted at 300 stems /acre and grassy field (Zone 2) planted
at 600 stems /acre Both zones were planted with Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest as described
by Schafale and Weakley (1990) and in the NC Wetland Assessment Method User Manual (2010)
Project components are depicted in Figure 2 of Appendix A
14 PROJECT HISTORY, CONTACTS, AND ATTRIBUTE DATA
The project was initially designed by BLUE Land, Water, Infrastructure (BLWI) in 2002 The project
transitioned from BLWI to Stantec Consulting Services Inc ( Stantec) in the spring of 2007 The scope of
the project was changed to wetland and stream enhancement by EEP in 2009 The project underwent a
controlled burn in December 2010 and planting was completed in January 2011 Refer to Tables 2 4 in
Appendix A for additional project and contact details
The 410 acre project watershed is located in the Sandhills physiographic province of North Carolina The
project site is located on a terrace of the Lower Little River Slopes are generally less than one percent in
the floodplain/terrace area with steep slopes farther upslope in the watershed Elevations on the Little
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page 2
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226) December 2011
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
LI
[l
1
0
1
7
J
0
1
r]

r River enhancement site range from approximately 220 to 310 feet above mean sea level with the most
relief being outside the project area The subsurface geology in the project vicinity consists of the Cape
Fear formation, which is comprised of sandstone and sandy mudstone with yellowish gray to bluish gray,
mottled red to yellowish orange indurated graded and laterally continuous bedding and blocky clay
(Geologic Map of North Carolina NC Geological Survey 1998) Faint cross - bedding feldspar and mica
J are also common
F1 Soil types from the USDA NRCS Moore County Soil Survey were combined by BLWI with the digitized
USDA NRCS Moore County Soil Survey field sheets to get a more detailed assessment of the soils in the
watershed The most prevalent soil types are Bibb (33 7 %) Kalmia (2162%) and Ailey (19 53 %) Bibb
is a poorly drained sandy soil that forms in alluvial deposits while the well drained sandy Kalmia occurs
on stream terraces and Ailey is a well drained sandy upland soil (Figure 10 3) However the soils onsite
contain much more clay than those mapped
The watershed is mixture of mixed shrubs /trees (69 1 %), hardwood forest (16 0 %) southern yellow pine
(11 7 %) pasture (1 1 %) roadways /pathways (1 1 %) cultivated (0 8 %) and water (0 1 %) (Table 9 2)
The majority of the hardwood forest occurs in the floodplain of the Little River particularly in the
vegetated buffer directly adjacent to the primary channel
1-- Expected foreseeable land use / land cover change in the project site watershed is expected to include
general reforestation and expanded habitat management The new US Highway 1 Bypass in the Vass area
is expected to increase land development near the project site as the highway is less than three miles away
nand includes an exit ramp onto Lobelia Road
U
i
D
r
J
1
�i
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page 3
� As built &Baseline Momtonng Report (EEP# 226) December 2011
0

Cl
2 0 Success Criteria I 1
U
Vegetation survival and hydrology will be monitored on the project site Post - restoration monitoring will I ,
be conducted for a minimum of five years or until the success criteria are met following the completion of U
construction to document project success
21 VEGETATION
The vegetative success of the bottomland hardwood forest will be evaluated based on the density and
survival rates Wetland vegetation monitoring will be considered successful if 150 planted woody stems
per acre are surviving in year 5 of monitoring in the pine plantation area (Zone 1) while 260 planted
woody stems per acre must be surviving after 5 years of monitoring in the grassy field area (Zone 2)
There are two grassy field areas within the conservation easement as depicted in Figure 2 Appendix A
Vegetation plots 1 2 and 3 are located within these areas The success criteria for wetland enhancement
in Zone 1 is unique, and was discussed with the Interagency Review Team members in January of 2011
(see memorandum in Appendix D)
l_
22 HYDROLOGY
2 2 1 Streams
Changes in stream profile and pattern are not included in the stream enhancement project for Little River I
As such cross section longitudinal profile surveys and pebble counts were not performed for the Year 0 I r
monitoring, as directed by NCEEP However a general assessment of stream stability and potential
problem areas will be performed during field reconnaissance Photo stations along the stream have been (�
established and will be documented annually for stability and vegetation While bankfull events are not U
required for Enhancement II a crest gauge has been installed along Reach 1 as depicted in Figure 2 in
Appendix A n
2 2 2 Wetlands �I
The project involves the enhancement of existing jurisdictional areas within the timbered areas and the
I I
preservation of existing wetlands and streams within the conservation easement Therefore hydrology is
I�
already assumed to be present due to the presence of hydric soil indicators and lack of drainage In order
to monitor and confirm the hydrology five continuous groundwater gauges were installed on the site
O
Four of the gauges are located in the jurisdictional areas of the pine plantation and a fifth is a reference
well located in the reference wetland in a preservation area on the west side of the project There is no
success criterion for wetland hydrology for the site Wetland extent has already been determined on site
as per the jurisdictional determination completed in July 2007 (see Appendix D (9 sheets total))
1
0
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page 4
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226) December 2011 0

I 1
r
F-11
i
0
1
n
0
�1
I �
0
3 0 Monitoring Plan Guidelines
31 HYDROLOGY
3 11 Wetland
Four automated groundwater monitoring gauges have been installed across the project area to document
the hydrologic conditions of the site Refer to Figure 2 in Appendix A for the location of the groundwater
monitoring gauges All four wells have been installed in the riparian areas of the site Groundwater
gauges will be downloaded on at least a bi monthly basis during the growing season A reference well is
located in the reference wetland in a preservation area on the west side of the project site and is depicted
on Figure 2 in Appendix A All gauges were programmed to record water table data on a daily basis A
rainfall gauge was also located on the site to monitor precipitation, as depicted in Figure 2 In order to
determine if the rainfall is normal for the given year rainfall amounts will be tallied using data obtained
from the Moore County WETS Station as well as the on site ram gauge Hydrology will be monitored for
a minimum of five years
3 12 Stream
One crest gauge has been installed onsite and is located adjacent to Vegetation Plot 7 Each visit to the
site will include documentation of the highest stage for the monitoring interval and a reset of the device
Other indications of bankfull flow including the presence of wrack lines sediment, or flooding will also
be recorded and documented photographically Refer to Figure 2 in Appendix A for the location of the
crest gauge Additionally the streams will be visually assessed each year for stability
3 2 VEGETATION
Twelve 10m x 10m (100m) and four 5m x 20m (100m) CVS plots were established within the project
area and the four plot corners of each plot were located using a Global Positioning System (GPS) and
permanently located with rebar rods Vegetative sample plots will be quantitatively monitored during
September of each monitoring year per the CVS EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4 2
(CVS EEP 2008) Planted vegetation (Level 1) was recorded for the baseline monitoring while both
planted vegetation and natural volunteers (Level 2) will be recorded beginning in Monitoring Year 2
Refer to Figure 2 in Appendix A for the locations of the vegetation plots
The plots will be monitored for a mimmum of five years Baseline monitoring data is provided in the
Appendix C data tables Vegetation sampling plots are proximal to groundwater momtoring gauges
wherever practical to assist in correlating vegetation and hydrology parameters Any vegetative problem
areas in the project will be noted and reported in each subsequent monitoring report Vegetative problem
areas may include areas that either lack vegetation or include populations of exotic vegetation
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page 5
As built & Baseline Momtonng Report (EEP# 226) December 2011

f
3 3 PHOTO STATIONS
Representative photo station points have been identified and located using GPS The stations are shown
on Figure 2 in Appendix A Photos will be taken at each location at approximately the same time each
year Vegetation plot photos will be taken during the vegetation monitoring event each year
34 WATERSHED
Any changes to land use in the watershed that would cause changes to flow within the project streams will
be assessed over the five year monitoring period
3 5 MONITORING PLAN VIEW
A plan view of the monitoring scheme is presented in Figure 2 in Appendix A
3 6 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLANS
Any maintenance needs will be determined during monitoring visits During the baseline monitoring year
upon completion of construction the contractor must address any issues under their warranty In
subsequent monitoring years the monitoring firm will determine maintenance needs Maintenance items
will be coordinated with NCEEP to determine the appropriate course of action
The monitoring firm will visually assess the site to verify that the stream and wetland are functioning as
needed and will note any adjustments that may be necessary is not anticipated that invasive plant
species will be a significant problem onsite During the monitoring period, if any invasive species
establish to the point of threatening the desired vegetative community hand cutting and herbicide
treatment may be used to treat problem areas
Wildlife including but not limited to beavers and deer, have the potential to destroy vegetation and
stream features either by foraging or flooding Some beaver activity was observed on site during the
design phase Should a significant portion of the site be damaged such that the success criteria cannot be
achieved measures such as trapping beaver dam removal, or repellents may be implemented
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page 6
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226) December 2011

i
J
�1
4 0 As -Built Conditions / Baseline
4 1 AS- BUILURECORD DRAWINGS
t
A controlled burn of the site was completed in December 2010 Planting was completed in January 2011
(—� and the baseline vegetation data collection occurred on February 2 2011 Because the project involved
�) enhancement via only involved planting there are no As Built record drawings associated with the
project
4 2 BASELINE DATA (YEAR 0)
C�
[I
0
0
i
l
E
U
r�
4 2 1 Verification of Plantings
Stantec staff completed the baseline vegetation monitoring on February 2 2011 using the CVS EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation version 4 2 (CVS EEP 2008) Monitoring was conducted in 16
vegetation plots Plots 1 2 and 3 are located in the grassy area and the remaining plots (4 -16) are located
in the pine plantation
According to the data collected the average plant density among the 16 plots is 329 stems /acre The
original planting plan specified 300 stems /acre for planting Zone 1 (pine plantation) which includes plots
4 - 16, while 600 stems /acre was specified for Zone 2 (grassy field) which includes plots 1 2 and 3 The
highest plant densities occurred in plots 1 3 6 and 8 Plots 2 4 7 9, 10 12 13 and 14 didn t meet the
planting density requirements by more than 10% Additionally success will be met if 150 planted woody
stems per acre are surviving in year 5 of monitoring in the pine plantation area while 260 planted woody
stems per acre must be surviving after 5 years of monitoring in the grassy field area Vegetation sampling
details are included in Appendix C
4 2 2 Photo Documentation
Photo stations were established in 44 locations throughout the project The location of the stations can be
seen in Figure 2 in Appendix A Baseline stream station photos were taken on February 2 2011 Stream
station photos for the baseline monitoring year are provided in Appendix B Baseline vegetation station
photos were taken on February 2 2011 during the baseline vegetation monitoring Vegetation station
photos for the baseline monitoring year are provided in Appendix C
4 2 3 Hydrology
Four 40 Ecotone groundwater monitoring gauges were installed onsite on February 2 2011 and April 20
2011 All four gauges are located in the riparian wetland enhancement areas A reference gauge was also
installed on February 2 2011 and is located in a preservation area of existing wetlands on the west
portion of the site A ram gauge was installed onsite on February 2 2011 A crest gauge was installed
onsite April 20, 2011 The crest gauge will be used in future monitoring to identify bankf ill events The
location of the precipitation gauge, crest gauge reference well and groundwater monitoring wells are
included in Figure 2 in Appendix A
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page 7
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226) December 2011

5 0 References
Lee, Michael T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4 2 (http Hcvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
NCDENR 2010 N C Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, N C Wetland Function Assessment Team, Raleigh
NC Version 4 1 October 2010
NCEEP 2010 Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh
NC Version 13, January 15, 2010
NCEEP 2008 Mitigation Plan Document — Format Data Requirements and Content Guidelines North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh
NC Version 2 0 March 27 2008
Rosgen D 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Pagosa Springs CO
Schafale M P and A S Weakley, 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina
Third Approximation North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDEHNR Raleigh North Carolina
Stantec 2007 Little River Wetland Enhancement Restoration Plan Moore County North Carolina Report
prepared by Stantec Consulting Inc for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program Raleigh
NC
United States Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District North Carolina Division of Water Quality
United States Environmental Protection Agency — Region IV Natural Resources Conservation Service,
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
United States Department of Agriculture -Soil Conservation Service 1995 Soil Survey of Moore County
Raleigh NC
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement (Year 0 of 5) Page 8
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226) December 2011

I �
0
I,
0
r �
6 0 Appendices
Appendix A — General Tables and Figures
Appendix B — Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Appendix C — Vegetation Data
Appendix D — Supporting Documentation
UT to Jumping Run Creek Restoration Project (Year 0 of 5)
As built & Baseline Monitoring Report (EEP# 226)
Page 9
December 2011

1
1
(This page intentionally left blank for two -sided printing)
0
I
0
1
a
1
0
n
1
0
0
0
0
i
1
1
0

I '
l 1
Appendix A - General Tables and Fisiures
0
u
_I
.J
I�
1 I
0

r
(This page intentionally left blank for two sided printing)
a
J
0
0
Cl
J
1
t
1
0
1

Directions to Site: From Raleigh take US -1 S /US -64 W
toward Sanford /Asheboro. Continue to follow US -1 S
for 50.9 miles. Take the Carolina 690 Exit toward Vass.
Turn left onto N Carolina 690 E /Lobelia Rd. Continue
to follow 690 E /Lobelia Rd for 2.5 miles. Turn right onto .
a dirt driveway, follow the dirt driveway and make a left
at the fork. Continue down the dirt road to the NW
corner of the site.
0
Project Area '
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement
EEP Project #226
Moore County, NC
7.5' USGS Topoquad Lobelia
Project boundary
J -Bar Ranch parcel boundary
Municipal boundary 4";^ r;
tsaantec Ei 10 it

( This page intentionally left blank)

(This page intentionally left blank for two -sided printing)

Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Little River Stre am and Wetland Enhancement Pro eWEEP Pro ect No 226
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
TvDe
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
1479
324
Project Components
Project
Component or
Reach ID
Starionmg/ Location
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Approach
Restoration or
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Ratio
MRatio
Comment
Reach 1
Flows NW to SE across
the middle of the site
1 726
EII
RE
1 726
2 5 1
Enhancement planting occurred in the
riparian area of both banks
Reach 2
Flows NW to SE across
the middle of the site
1967
Ell
RE
1 867
2 5 1
Enhancement planting occurred in the
npanan area of both banks
Reach 3
Enters the site on the
middle N boundary
tributary of Reach 2
210
P
RE
210
51
Preservation planting occurred in the
riparian area of both banks
Wetland 1
Pme Plantation
478
E
RE
478
2 5 1
Enhancement weedy vegetation was
suppressed with fee and area was planted
Wetland 2
Grassy Field
70
E
RE
70
21
Enhancement EI as a result of no trees
present in this area Area was burned and
planted
Wetland 3
N W portion of the site
and the S boundary of
the site
487
P
RE
487
51
Preservation area is protected by a
conervatpon easement wtb sgnage
around the boundary
Component Summation
Restoration
Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland Ac
Non riparian
Wetland Ac
Buffer (sq ft
Upland Ac
Rrverme
Non Rrverne
Restoration
Enhancement
548
Enhancement I
®
®�
Enhancement II
3 593
Creation
Preservation
210
487
HQ Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement
Project/EEP Project No 226
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete
n/a
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete
1 month
Number of Reporting Years'
0
Data Collection
Completion or
Activity or De live rable
Complete
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Sep 2007
Oct 2007
Final Des — Construction Plans
n/a
n/a
Construction
n/a
n/a
Seeding
n/a
n/a
Prescribed Burn
n/a
Dec 2010
Planting
n/a
Jan 2011
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Feb 2011
Dec 2011
Year 1 Monitoring
n/a
n/a
Year 2 Monitoring
n/a
n/a
Year 3 Monitoring
n/a
n/a
Year 4 Monitoring
n/a
n/a
1 = Equals the number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
J
i
1
L.

r-�
�I
0
0
0
L!
0
Fil
F1
-J,
J
U
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project/EEP Project No 226
Designer
Stantec Consulting Services Inc
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606
Primary project design POC
Amber Coleman [phone]
Construction Contractor
None
Survey Contractor
None
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics, Inc
908 Indian Trail Rd Endenton, NC 27932
Planting contractor POC
Mary- Margaret McKinney (252) 482 -8491
Seeding Contractor
None
Seed Mix Sources
None
Nursery Stock Suppliers
ArborGen and Superior Trees
ArborGen - 180 Westvaco Road, Summerville SC 29483
Superior Trees - 12493 E US Highway Lee FL 32059
Monitoring Performers (MYO)
Stantec Consulting Services Inc
801 Jones Franklin Rd Suite 300 RaleWji, NC 27606
Stream Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman (919)865 -7399
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman (919)865-73W

Table 4 Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Pro ect/EEP Project No 226
Pro ect Information
Project County
Moore
Project Area acres
1258
Project Coordinates latitude and longitude)
35 223562 79 240977
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Region
Sandhills
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS RUC for Project 14 dirt
03030004070050
NCDWQ Sub basin for Project
03 03 14
Project Drainage Area (sq mi
052
Project Drainage Area % Impervious
<1%
CGIA Landuse Classification
Active Forest Management and Harvesting and Unused
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Length of reach linear feet
1 726
1 867
210
Valley classification
VIII
Drainage area acres
335
NCDWQ stream identification score
30 28 1 28
NCDWQ classification
Perennial
Morphological description stream
C5
E5
E5
EvoluWnary trend
C5
C5
C5
Underlying mapped soils
Bibb
Drainage class
Poorly drained
Soil h dric status
Yes
Slope
01%
FEMA classification
Zone X
Native vegetation community
Riverine bottomland hardwood
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0° /U 0% 0%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland I
Wetland 2
Wetland 3
Size of Wetland acres
478
70
487
Wetland Type (non riparian riparian riverme or
riparian non riverme
Riparian Riverme
Mapped Soil Series
Bibb
Drainage class
Poor drained
Soil H dnc Status
H dric
Source of Hydrology
Overbank flooding and groundwater
Hydrologic Impairment
None
Native vegetation community
Riverme bottomland hardwood
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0 1 0 0
Regulator,
Considerations
Regulation
Apphcable9
Resolved'
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States Section 404
Yes
Yes
USACE 404 permit
Waters of the United States Section 401
Yes
Yes
NCDWQ 401 permit
Endangered Species Act
No
n/a
n/a
Historic Preservation Act
No
n/a
n/a
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) /Coastal
Aream Management Act (CAMA)
No
n/a
n/a
FEMA Flood lam Compliance
No
n/a
I n/a

El
'a
0
0 Appendix B — Morpholoical Summary Data and Plots
0
0
l
El
L

0
0
(This page intentionally left blank for two sided printing)
0
0
I.
0
r
0
1
i
1
1
i
1
11
0
0

Stream Monitoring Photos
Photo Station S1— Reach 2 channel looking upstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station S1— Reach 2 channel looking downstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station S2 — Reach 2 channel looking upstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station S2 — Reach 2 channel looking upstream towards tributary (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station S2 — Reach 2 channel looking downstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station S3 — Reach 2 channel looking upstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station S3 — Reach 3 channel looking upstream into tributary (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station S3 — Reach 3 channel looking downstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station S4 — Reach 1 channel looking upstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station S4 — Reach 1 channel looking downstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station S5 — Reach 1 channel looking upstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station S5 — Reach 1 channel looking downstream (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Note: Tables 5 and 6 — Not applicable

i�
1
i
Fil
Appendix C - Vezetation Data
f
D
ul
r-
r�
II
i`1
F�
U

EEP Project Code 226. Project Name: Little River
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10°%
Exceeds requirements,�Jay less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requireni more than 10%
Table 7 - CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
EEP Project Code 226. Project Name: Little River
Current Plot Data (MYO 2011)
Annual Means
226 -02 -0001
226 -04 -0002 1
226-02 -0003
226 -04 -0004
226 -02 -0005
226 -02 -0006
226 -01 -0007
226-02 -0008 1
226 -02 -0009
226 -03 -0010
226 -01 -0011
226 -01 -0012
226-01 -0013
226 -03 -0014
226 -01 -0015
226-01 -0016
MYO (2011)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
IT
PnoLS
P -all
T
JPnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T JPnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
IP -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Aronia arbutdolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
Cyrilla racemiflora
swamp titi
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
5
5
-51
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
30
30
30
Ilex glabra
inkberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
12
12
12
Lindera benzoin
l northern spicebush
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 6
6
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
8
8
8
13
13
13
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
46
46
46
Quercus
oak
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
11
q
4
4
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
7
7
7
Quercus lyrata
oak
overcup o
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
13
13
13
Unknown
Junknown
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
Stem count
12
12
12
6
6
6
11
it
11
5
5
5
6
8
8
12
12
12
6
6
6
19
19
19
4
4
4
6
6
6
8
8
8
7
7
7
4
4
4
5
5
5
8
8
8
9
9
9
130
130
130
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
16
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.40
Species coun
51
5
5
3
3
3
4
4
4
2 2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
1 1
1
3
31
31
21
21
2
2 2
2
6
6
6
4
4
4
3
3
3
2 2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
10 10
10
Stems per ACRE
485.6
485.6
485.6
242.8
242.8
242.8
445.2
445.2
445.2
202.3
202.3
.82.3.
323.7
323.7
485.6
485.6
485.6
242.8
242.8
768.9
768.9
768.9
._1
161.9
161.9
242.8
242.8
��
323.7
323.7
283.3
283.3
283.3
161.9
161.9
161.9
202.3
202.3
'.
323.71323.71
364.2
364.2
364.2
328.8
328.8
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10°%
Exceeds requirements,�Jay less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requireni more than 10%

F1
1
19
0
G
Table 8 - CVS Metadata
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement EEP #226
Report Prepared By
Alex Baldwin
Date Prepared
6/30/20119 41
Database name
Stantec_LittleRiver 2011 A mdb
Database location
U \175613018\ roject \site data \vegetation
Computer name
BALDWINA
File size
35229696
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN
THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file the report worksheets and a
summary of project(s) and project data
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each
year This excludes live stakes
Proj total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre for each
year This includes live stakes all planted stems and all
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live
stems dead stems missing etc )
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of
occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage valuestalIied bytype for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species
for each plot dead and missing stems are excluded
PROD ECT SU M MARY a
Project Code
226
Project Name
Little River
Description
Stream and Wetland Enhancement
River Basin
Cape Fear
Length ft
Stream to edge width (ft)
Area s m
Required Plots (calculated)
Sam led Plots
16

Table 9 CVS Vigor by Species
Little River Stream
and Wetland Enhancement
EEP #226
r
r
Species
Common Name
4
3
2
1
0
Missing
Unknown
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
swamp tits
5
2
Cyrilla racemiflora
swamp tits
1
1
23
1
`6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
11
13
6
1
Ilex glabra
inkberry
7
4
6
1
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
42
3
1
1
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
oak
7
4
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
6
7
7
Quercus
oak
4
01
13
Lindera benzoin
northern spicebush
6
5
Unknown
110
4
1
11
11
7
TOT
10
9
75
47
7
1
Table 10- CVS Vegetation Damage by Species
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement - EEP #226
r
r
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
0
5
C nlla racemiflora
swamp tits
0
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
7
23
1
`6
Ilex glabra
inkberry
1
11
1
Lindera benzoin
northern s icebush
0
6
N ssa biflora
swamp tupelo
1
45
1
Quercus
oak
0
4
Quercus launfolia
laurel oak
0
7
Quercus I rata
overcup oak
01
13
Unknown
0
5
TOT
110
9
911211
11
11
7
r_
1
1
i
1
1
0
it
1
1
1
1
IIJ
1
11

T
L
f'.
G
Pi
P',
I�
Lj
i
5
L -1
ri
�J
0
0
Table 11- CVS Vegetation Damage by Plot
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement - EEP #226
w F
226 -02 -0001
2
10
1
1
226 - 040002
0
6
226 -02 -0003
0
11
226 - 040004
0
5
226 -02 -0005
11
7
1
226 -02 -0006
01
12
226 -01 -0007
51
1
5
226 -02 -0008
01
19
226 -02 -0009
01
4
226 -03 -0010
0
6
226 -01 -0011
0
8
226 -01 -0012
0
7
22601-0013
0
4
226 -03 -0014
01
5
226 -01 -0015
0
8
226 -01 -0016
1
81
1
TOT
16
9
1211
11
11
7

Table 12a CVS Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement EEP #226
ti -V ^f h �o O ti ti v O h to
8y 8~ 8�Y 8ti
� � � ti~ ti� ti~ ti� titi ti~ ti~ ti� ti~ ti~ � ti� � titi titi titi
/(Z/ y4O �� Q a� Q Q Q 4�
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
5
1
5
5
C nlla racemiflora
swamp tits
2
2
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
30
12
25
1
1
3
1
1
6
5
2
2
4
3
1
Ilex glabra
inkberry
12
7
171
1
1
2
3
1
1
3
Lindera benzoin
northern s icebush
6
3
2
2
2
2
N ssa biflora
swamp tupelo
46
10
46
5
4
5
5
8
13
3
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
4
2
2
2
2
Quercus launfolia
laurel oak
7
5
14
1
1
1
21
2
Quercus I rata
overcup oak
13
7
186
1
3
1
1
4
1
2
Unknown
5
3
167
3
1
1
TOT
0
10
9
1 iml
lol
1 12
6
11
5
8
12
6
19
4
6
8
7
4
5
8
9
Stems per acre
I
I
1
1 486124314451
202
324
486
243
769
162
243
324
283
162
202
324
364
Note Highlighted plots indicate planted density fails to meet requirements by more than 101/o

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Photo Station V1 - Veg Plot 1 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V2 - Veg Plot 1 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

ApIly.
Jt

Photo Station V5 - Veg Plot 3 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V6 - Veg Plot 3 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V7 - Veg Plot 4 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V8 - Veg Plot 4 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V9 - Veg plot 5 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V10 - Veg plot 5 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V 11 - Veg plot 6 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V12 - Veg plot 6 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V13 - Veg plot 7 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V14 - Veg plot 7 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V15 - Veg plot 8 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V16 - Veg plot 8 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

� • * iii . �; •, , .► . � � ,« � �
1
I
i
Aber
sip
w�
sip

Photo Station V19 - Veg plot 10 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V20 - Veg plot 10 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V21 - Veg plot 11 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V22 - Veg plot 11 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V23 - Veg plot 12 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V24 - Veg plot 12 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V25 - Veg plot 13 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V26 - Veg plot 13 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V27 - Veg plot 14 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V28 - Veg plot 14 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V29 - Veg plot 15 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V30 - Veg plot 15 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Photo Station V31 - Veg plot 16 looking along X -axis (2/2/2011 Year 0)
Photo Station V32 - Veg plot 16 looking across (2/2/2011 Year 0)

Appendix D — Supporting Documents

(This page intentionally left blank for two sided printing)

/1
U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
J WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID SAW- 2005 -00758 County Moore USGS Quad Niagara
1
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
(�I Authorized Agent North Carolma Ecosystem Enhancement Program
U Attn to Mr Lin Xu �� ® Ira EC E Address 1652 Mad Service Center `�
n Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 MAN ] 7 m MAR M9 1009
I` JI NC ECOSYSTEM NC ECOSYSTEM
Telephone No (919) 715 -7571 ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc ) Property is known as the Little River
l Wetland Restoration Protect, a 135 acre site located approximately 3 5 mdes southeast of Vass, along Lobelia Road
(NC Hwy 690), adiacent to the Little River, Moore County, North Carolma
Description of projects area and activity This Nationwide permit provide authorization to (1) restore 2 3 acres of
wetland hydrology by means of plugging an existing drainage ditch, (2) enhance 48 acres of wetlands by removing
1 stands of loblolly pines and planting native bottomland hardwood (BLH) species, (3) preserve 4,4331f of perennial
stream channels 40 acres of BLH wetlands and 9 5 acres of successional wetlands Plans will fall in accordance
with the final Little River Wetland Enhancement Restoration Plan dated September 28, 2007 and the October 28,
2008 Addendum letter of Best Management Practices from Santee Consulting Services, Inc
f�
LJ Applicable Law ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act 33 USC 403)
Authorization Regional General Permit Number 27
J Nationwide Permit Number
�I Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and -your submitted plans Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may
subiect the pernuttee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified
C' suspended or revoked If prior to the expiration date identified below the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified this venfication will remain valid until the expiration date identified below provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit activities which have commenced (i a are
C; under construction) or are under contract to commence m reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit s expiration modification or revocation unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case by case basis to modify suspend or revoke the authorization
j Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification You
Ushould contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone (919) 733 l 786) to determine Section 401 requirements
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N C Division of Coastal Management
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal
State or local approvals /penmts
If there are any questions regarding this venfication any of the conditions of the Permit or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program please contact Emily Hughes at [phone]
Corps Regulatory Official 4,
?MLL, It" -
Date 3/13/2009
Expiration Date of Verification 3/13/2011
I1
II

1 he Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we "ontmue to do so
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http / /rei?ulatory usacesurvey coin/ to complete the survey
online
Determination of Jurisdiction
❑ Based on prelimmary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1)
❑ There are Navigab Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed tive years from the date of this
notification
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination This site contains several waterbodies that exhibit an ordinary lush water mark and are
considered unnamed tributaries to the Little River and the Little River itself, a Navigable Water of the U S This site also
exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and is adiacent to the unnamed
tributaries to the Little River and to the Little River itself This determination is based on information submitted by the EEP
and a site visit by Jennifer Frye on February 8, 2006 and Emily Hughes on January 9. 2009
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations )
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional
determination you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331 Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA
form to the following address
District Engineer Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn Eirnly Hughes Project Manager
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 1398
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 3315 and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP Should you
decide to submit an RFA form it must be received at the above address by 5/13/09
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination m this correspondence **
Corps Regulatory Official 2PA
Date 3/13/2009
Expiration Date 3/13/2014
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJEC f PLANS, ETC, MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE
Copy Furnished

1
i
i
r �
i
t
II I I�. , ' asemen um
E
' � I
�
II C, atron Easement mgt � �D
r I
_ I 8 II I
Conse on Easement 7 1
1 I I I
I •Q 4 I 16 , -
, I ' 41
h
—o— - I� - - -T—
A
I
5,
`'
SHEETS CansejYpfron I e
COVERAGE Fos I
AREA a ►+t Cimt
I ( �
I
i
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
`�,,•�N'�CARpf.-,, LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL = J -BAR RANCH, INC
L -4449 = LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
�q o� NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
',yQ DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1-=400-
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURMURG NORTH CAROLINA
LRK 400' 200' o' 400' I SHEET 1 OF 8
FCN LITTLERIVER02 DWG
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7500+
O SET IRON STAKE
❑ SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
A SET P K NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P K NAIL
—W— EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
f
�Q EXISTING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47 -30
l
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
M SITE
-SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE
O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
<
p EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
© EXISTING POWER BOX
1� EXISTING UTILITY POLE
LOCATION SKETCH
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
1
i
i
r �
i
t
II I I�. , ' asemen um
E
' � I
�
II C, atron Easement mgt � �D
r I
_ I 8 II I
Conse on Easement 7 1
1 I I I
I •Q 4 I 16 , -
, I ' 41
h
—o— - I� - - -T—
A
I
5,
`'
SHEETS CansejYpfron I e
COVERAGE Fos I
AREA a ►+t Cimt
I ( �
I
i
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
`�,,•�N'�CARpf.-,, LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL = J -BAR RANCH, INC
L -4449 = LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
�q o� NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
',yQ DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1-=400-
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURMURG NORTH CAROLINA
LRK 400' 200' o' 400' I SHEET 1 OF 8
FCN LITTLERIVER02 DWG

j L, L
Woode
I
1r-01 ..
a
,•
J 1r -16b �
X / /nom •
1r -16n�
( \ (r-17
I I \
I ( �
I I
I
�MWoo,6ed 1r -13
� I
Q \
IRON PIPE
N 537067 640
4 _ �� k/E 1926786 770 (,
Conservation_ Easement Limit __. _- _ „. -.- ---- -- -A
'c
Wooded a�
\ 1r-08u
X, � 1r-06b x
r -0 /
` ` \ 1r-07/ WETLAND
Wooded a BOUNDARY
Wood
X, \ / ��) I
In
Wooded
a tr -OS 1x-06
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
a
Wooded SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
%V't%jl WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
�ARO�;.,,, LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
�o ww�ss ra, tiv
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL = J —BAR RANCH, INC
L -4449 = LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
`9 ion NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
" JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
JMM 100 50' 0 100 200 SHEET 2 OF 8
LRK
FN UTfLERIVER02 DWG
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7500+
O SET IRON STAKE
unss
O SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
0 SET P K NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P K NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
(
()Q EXISTING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47 -30
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
ITE
-SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
®
�Y
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE.
6 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
[0 EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
M EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
i3� EXISTING Un1mr POLE
LOCATION SKETCH
-0U- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
Woode
I
1r-01 ..
a
,•
J 1r -16b �
X / /nom •
1r -16n�
( \ (r-17
I I \
I ( �
I I
I
�MWoo,6ed 1r -13
� I
Q \
IRON PIPE
N 537067 640
4 _ �� k/E 1926786 770 (,
Conservation_ Easement Limit __. _- _ „. -.- ---- -- -A
'c
Wooded a�
\ 1r-08u
X, � 1r-06b x
r -0 /
` ` \ 1r-07/ WETLAND
Wooded a BOUNDARY
Wood
X, \ / ��) I
In
Wooded
a tr -OS 1x-06
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
a
Wooded SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
%V't%jl WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
�ARO�;.,,, LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
�o ww�ss ra, tiv
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL = J —BAR RANCH, INC
L -4449 = LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
`9 ion NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
" JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
JMM 100 50' 0 100 200 SHEET 2 OF 8
LRK
FN UTfLERIVER02 DWG

F ' FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY I I
k
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
j� -17 I
I � I
INX I ;
\ I Wooded '
� �,� 1r -19 \\
,1
1r -20 Wooded Wooded I�
I �C 1` � � I
v
Wopodel \\ Wooded
1r -44
t �\ I
Wooded \\ I
1r -42
Ix
1r -41\ \!y� jo
Y�oodect 0�
U' -4/ IRON PIPE
/ } N 536901 770
/ Conse
`E 1927269 970 rvati_j]_ Easement Limn
I
WL7003 WETLAND
I
LJ
Wooded UPLANDWL7004
1r -29 —I30
WEnAND
>'�'WL6007 BOUNDARY
/ WL7002 \ % (TYPICAL) I
/ (,A \
/\ WL7001
1r -2810 � WL6006 — — — — SHEET 6 — — — —
— — — — I I — — — SHEET 4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
/ 28 ki-6005 1r -26
- 1r -27 I
CARp� %.
SEAL
L -4449
4D Q
JMM
LRK
FN LMLERIVER02 DWG
I I _
I I
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
d -BAR RANCH, INC
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
100, 50, 0 100' 200'
SHEET 3 OF 8
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
i
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7500+
0 SET IRON STAKE
WSS +�
❑ SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
o
A SET P K NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P K NAIL
-yW.�- EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
�-C EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
M EXISTING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47 -30
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
-SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
SITE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE
^�
O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
M EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
EM EXISTING POWER BOX
\
% EXISTING UTILITY POLE
LOCATION SKETCH
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
F ' FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY I I
k
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
j� -17 I
I � I
INX I ;
\ I Wooded '
� �,� 1r -19 \\
,1
1r -20 Wooded Wooded I�
I �C 1` � � I
v
Wopodel \\ Wooded
1r -44
t �\ I
Wooded \\ I
1r -42
Ix
1r -41\ \!y� jo
Y�oodect 0�
U' -4/ IRON PIPE
/ } N 536901 770
/ Conse
`E 1927269 970 rvati_j]_ Easement Limn
I
WL7003 WETLAND
I
LJ
Wooded UPLANDWL7004
1r -29 —I30
WEnAND
>'�'WL6007 BOUNDARY
/ WL7002 \ % (TYPICAL) I
/ (,A \
/\ WL7001
1r -2810 � WL6006 — — — — SHEET 6 — — — —
— — — — I I — — — SHEET 4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
/ 28 ki-6005 1r -26
- 1r -27 I
CARp� %.
SEAL
L -4449
4D Q
JMM
LRK
FN LMLERIVER02 DWG
I I _
I I
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
d -BAR RANCH, INC
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
100, 50, 0 100' 200'
SHEET 3 OF 8

L -1 O
SITE 1
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
I
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7500+
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
O SET IRON STAKE
�� �"^•�
❑ SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
A SET P K NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
®
A EXIS11NG P K NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
M EXISTING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47 -30
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
SITE 1
SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE LEGAL REFERENCE
O
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
®
EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
®
EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
®
EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
®
EXISTING POWER BOX
iQ,
EXISTING UTILITY POLE
LOCATION SKETCH -OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UnLIIY LINE
1 / tr -28
1r -26
WL6005
I - l 27
-/-----IT-----------4--
tr -25T - - - - - - - - - / SHEET 3 EX 13
I
' WL6004 I I {
` WL1007 II I
�lr -24 ' ' WETLAND I
BOUNDARY
- 6003 I WLl 8�-
Tree (typ) WL1009 Z- -y- I
�1r -23 rWL6002 WL1006 WL1010 \ q
f Wooded I �WLI011
lD Der Stand 0 /1012'
' L WL6001 I q
WL1013
tr -22 WL5006 WL1005 4 ! f
_ a �C
\, WL5005 o I �o° / WL1014
tr -21 Wooded
WL1015 ,a
WL5004 �
� I
I WL,016 WL20021k,
WL2001 WL2003
1r -61 WL5003 iWL1004 WL1019�L1018 WL1017 O �,
C�WL5002 WL2Ni w I
/ WL2004( I
/ WL2005
Lr -62 Wood L03 W 5 / WL1020 SHEET 5
- -� - - - - - - - - - I - _ - - - - - -
E \ WL1002 1022 i WL3004
WL1021 --X�
iv WL1001 WL1025 I WL3003
1r -63 WL1023-- I
o \ 1 WL1024
Q
I J WL3002
a, 1r -74
0 J WI-1026 WL3001
lr6 4 ' � (IHooded tr- 3 * VL1027 4
\ I tr -75
tr- 5 ` I (r-72 1
- _ - lr 67-- tr-7 tr -70
tr -661 1r -68�
tr -50
lr 69 1 x- - -X- WL4003
I X WI-4002 UPLAND
•. WI-4001 I FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY I tr -51
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9 I
` - - j- - -
I
SEAL
L -4449 =
= c, �9 Q�
NQ S
-z1-Oq
JMM
LRK
FN LITTL.ERIVER02 DWG
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
d —BAR RANCH, INC
LIZ°PLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURTNBURG NORTH CAROLINA
100' 50' 0' 100' 200'
SHEET 4 OF 8

L
7
• ' ; ConseryQbon fos
• efienf V
♦ a �
i
!
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
v
Z
v
Q�
S
i WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
CARO'�� LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL = d -BAR RANCH, INC
L -4449 _ LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
S y yam NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
J " I ( LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
imm LRK
Too 50 o aoo 200
LRK SHEET 5 OF 8
FN LITTLERIVER02 DWG
.' I
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION
IN EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7500+
VASS q
O SET IRON STAKE
❑ SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
O SET P K NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P K NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
•�
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
S
DQ EXISTING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47 -30
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
1, l SITE
-SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE
A EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
0 EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
0 EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
!
® EXISTING POWER BOX
)0, EXISTING UTILITY POLE
LOCATION SKETCH
-0U- EXISTING OVERHEAD UITUTY LINE
WL1022
WL3004
1
/
WL1021 -�
\
WL1025
WL3003
1,
/
WL1023��_ _
!y
'�
WL1tT24 \
WL8011
\
J�
WL3002
1r -74
= 1
l co
/
WL1026
WL3001
3
/
I
ooded
k WL1027
3
�
I WLS012
ir- \ \ \
Ir -75
Ir 72
—
71
I
t 6 -- Ir
Wooded
-)<. Ir -70
!
1r -50
WETLAND
Ir -69
x- — —
WL4003
WL4002 UP
LAND
x
-�WL4004
WL4001
1r -51 � �
r
7 1-56— — — —
— — — — — — —
SHEET 6
— t- — — — — — — — —
— — —
— — — — /
I
i
�
-5
1r 3
— — —54
5 4
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
`
(TYPICAL)
7
• ' ; ConseryQbon fos
• efienf V
♦ a �
i
!
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
v
Z
v
Q�
S
i WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
CARO'�� LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL = d -BAR RANCH, INC
L -4449 _ LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
S y yam NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
J " I ( LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
imm LRK
Too 50 o aoo 200
LRK SHEET 5 OF 8
FN LITTLERIVER02 DWG
.' I

LEGEND SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE RATIO OF PRECISION
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT 1/7500+
VASS
O SET IRON STAKE
D SET CONCRETE MONUMENT AREA DETERMINED BY
SET P K NAIL COORDINATE METHOD
SKETCH
I
Exis�ing D,tohe
d Sire
I c'77 Ch
I
I
4 I
I
I
I
W LtRAYO
WL80 WL8005WL8007
I /
WL8001 WETLAND '
i — WL82 — — WLL88003
UPLAND \ / WL8008
I ` /
WL8009 WETLAND
BOUNDARY
(TYPICAL.)
WLS014
SHEET 5 1 X WL8010
WL— — — — — —I — — — — — — — 1 — — — — — — �
/ p WL9007
W3003
<`i I WL9006r
JQ <y1O I y / WL8011
WL3002 r ' / IWL9001
WL3001 I :k-
WL8013 yy(( I
WLE3012
I I �/ � WL9002
° I I � /
WL9005
I I � �
Ir -50 I
X_ _ WETLAND L UP L400 I i / / / WL�03
1- WL4001 LAND I / Ir -51/I ( WL99004 Wooded
1r -56
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
CAR61'; LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
sEAL = J--BAR RANCH, INC
L -4449 - LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
�y o� NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
� prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
imm ,00' So' o' goo' 200'
LRK SHEET 6 OF 8
tJ�K
FN LITTLERIVER02 DWG
A EXISTING P K NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
DQ EXISTING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47 -30
S
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
5S- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE
6 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
M EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
1
[El EXISTING POWER BOX
% EXISTING UTILITY POLE
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
I
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY WL10005
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
X10
`v
=WL10o04)r
W
�
Exis�ing D,tohe
d Sire
I c'77 Ch
I
I
4 I
I
I
I
W LtRAYO
WL80 WL8005WL8007
I /
WL8001 WETLAND '
i — WL82 — — WLL88003
UPLAND \ / WL8008
I ` /
WL8009 WETLAND
BOUNDARY
(TYPICAL.)
WLS014
SHEET 5 1 X WL8010
WL— — — — — —I — — — — — — — 1 — — — — — — �
/ p WL9007
W3003
<`i I WL9006r
JQ <y1O I y / WL8011
WL3002 r ' / IWL9001
WL3001 I :k-
WL8013 yy(( I
WLE3012
I I �/ � WL9002
° I I � /
WL9005
I I � �
Ir -50 I
X_ _ WETLAND L UP L400 I i / / / WL�03
1- WL4001 LAND I / Ir -51/I ( WL99004 Wooded
1r -56
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
CAR61'; LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
sEAL = J--BAR RANCH, INC
L -4449 - LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
�y o� NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
� prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
imm ,00' So' o' goo' 200'
LRK SHEET 6 OF 8
tJ�K
FN LITTLERIVER02 DWG

L—_
-- = = O [— ! O 11 a_ —, r= O = O = C�.�'
Easement L-v- ! /
ConServatLon, /
tee_" ne�e� ch /
� A /
_ _ s v Per /
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
I ,
I l
it
I
1
1
I
iI
CARi5
SEAL
= L -4449 =
' 9q,4$
MM
RK
LITTLERIVER02 DWG
WL12004
WL12005
WL12003
WL12006
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
(TYPICAL)
WL12002 \
\ x- _
}( O /WL11008 '- WL11009
WL12001/O
�WLIIO07 \
WL11005 / \
WL11004
\ \ / WL11010'X
/ X •
' Wooded
/ WL11006 ,X Wooded
1r-87
/ 1r -85 /
WL11003 / Ir -B6
1 1r -84 /
WLU002
WI-11001 , i tr-83
\ �1r -82
1r -81
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
J -BAR RANCH, INC
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
100 50 0 100 200'
R
Z
Rl
v
SHEET 7 OF 8
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7500+
Y
O SET IRON STAKE
O SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
A SET P K NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P K NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
EXISTING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47 -30
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
--SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
SITE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE
O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
® EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
% EXISTING unary POLE
LOCATION SKETCH
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
IRON PIPE N 537358 410
E 1922963`8,620
Easement L-v- ! /
ConServatLon, /
tee_" ne�e� ch /
� A /
_ _ s v Per /
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9
I ,
I l
it
I
1
1
I
iI
CARi5
SEAL
= L -4449 =
' 9q,4$
MM
RK
LITTLERIVER02 DWG
WL12004
WL12005
WL12003
WL12006
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
(TYPICAL)
WL12002 \
\ x- _
}( O /WL11008 '- WL11009
WL12001/O
�WLIIO07 \
WL11005 / \
WL11004
\ \ / WL11010'X
/ X •
' Wooded
/ WL11006 ,X Wooded
1r-87
/ 1r -85 /
WL11003 / Ir -B6
1 1r -84 /
WLU002
WI-11001 , i tr-83
\ �1r -82
1r -81
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
J -BAR RANCH, INC
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1" =100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
100 50 0 100 200'
R
Z
Rl
v
SHEET 7 OF 8

i
i
II i
i
i
I �
li
/I
I
�I
I
� \I
r,
I
I \
II �
I
III
Wooded
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEEP 9 OF 9
Wooded
";
���
/�
Wooded I' ,• , �� _ -,
"
Wood ed rv&on Ease --- L�m�t _M
Conse ..... -- '
W701
• iwiui
Wooded .' hng II
I
w �
W511
I
I I vso� -- - - -- - --
II
I
it
�I
I
ILl
I `^
I
I
I
W506
601
2
03 ei
Ex`►ng
3 % � �.
-�nd I \
Existing Ditched 3 tr
"'e/
SHEET 6
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I
WL10005
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
3
► ►oARO' -'', LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL
444 9 = J--BAR RANCH, INC
L --444 = jMLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
�y NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 21, 2009 / 1" =100'
�' ►� prepared by
a( -o9 JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
ioo' So' o' goo' 200' SHEET 8 OF 9
LITTLERIVER02 DWG
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
�
(UNLESS_ OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7500+
O SET IRON STAKE
VASS ��
O SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
*+�
A SET P K NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P K NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
f
DQ EXISTING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47 -30
1
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
SITE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE.
O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
® EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
% EXISTING UTILITY POLE
LOCATION SKE'T'CH
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
i
i
II i
i
i
I �
li
/I
I
�I
I
� \I
r,
I
I \
II �
I
III
Wooded
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEEP 9 OF 9
Wooded
";
���
/�
Wooded I' ,• , �� _ -,
"
Wood ed rv&on Ease --- L�m�t _M
Conse ..... -- '
W701
• iwiui
Wooded .' hng II
I
w �
W511
I
I I vso� -- - - -- - --
II
I
it
�I
I
ILl
I `^
I
I
I
W506
601
2
03 ei
Ex`►ng
3 % � �.
-�nd I \
Existing Ditched 3 tr
"'e/
SHEET 6
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I
WL10005
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
3
► ►oARO' -'', LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL
444 9 = J--BAR RANCH, INC
L --444 = jMLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
�y NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 21, 2009 / 1" =100'
�' ►� prepared by
a( -o9 JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
ioo' So' o' goo' 200' SHEET 8 OF 9
LITTLERIVER02 DWG

yam,
S
SITE 1
LOCATION SKETCH
LEGEND SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE RATIO OF PRECISION
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT 1/7500+
O SET IRON STAKE
❑ SET CONCRETE MONUMENT AREA DETERMINED BY
A SET P K NAIL COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P K NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
EXISTING WATER VALVE WITH NCGS 47 -30
® EXISTING WATER METER AS AMENDED
-SS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE LEGAL REFERENCE
O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL DEED BOOK 2225 PAGE 90
® EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
0 EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
% EXISTING UTILITY POLE
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
DESCRIPTION
NORTHING
EASTiNG
DESCRIPTION
NORTHING
0 G
EAS
WL6007
536 50 570
1927126 387
WL10004
8 27
1928281 63
Ir-27
536W7 972
1926981 3
JWL6006
536697321
1927187 546
WL10005
5366453 O6
1928384 1
Ir- 8o
5366 3 0
1927010 69
WL6005
536623 574
1927198 056
WL10006
536621 239'
1928450 045
Ir -2
5.36694724
192 04 066
WL6004
536541 138
1927161 901
WL11001
536420295
19294052
Ir -29
5 6 9 1
1927107 194--
6003
5364-43576
1927131347
WL11002
536477 30Y
1929313 3
Ir-30
536785011
192 2
WL 002
536402 318
1927023 521
WL1 1003
536502 407
1929190 224
W501
536930922
1927969 572
WL6001
536323 176
1927009 515
WL11004
536618183
1929251838
w502
536920 016
1928021 17
WL5006
53 281 063
192706 659
WL11005
---539934 04
192934-4 990
W503
536897 891
1928069942
WL5005
536270411
1927119 35
WL11006
536560202
1929416 46F
w564
53688 662
1928128 588
WL 004
536198 35T
1927136 5 9-
WL11007
536665 94T
w505
536898361
WL5003
536118 280
1927107 545
WL11008
536727854
1929569 884
w5O6
536887 173
192-8-2-06 23
WL5002
53610 008
192711 370
WL11009
536700417
1929 69 220
w507
536923 089
1 q28235 25
WL5001
536049 304
1927090 849
WL110 0
536618 430
1929756 144
w508
536940761
1928263 249
WL1001
535990 428
1927124 055
WL12001
536714 638
1929428 321
w509
536966 591
1928278091
WL1002
536014 500
1927196 114
WL12002
536773 065
1929353 864
w510
537017 241
1928253 398
WL1003
536046 870
1927224 217
WL12003
536923539-
1929381 626
w511
537029 234
19282-20 15
WL1004
536120 848
1927 19 656
WL12004
536980 042
1929468 748
w 1
537201 896____1_92_a_592"93_3
WL1005
536287 180
1927236 996
WL12005
536944 123
1929549988
w602
5.37160 437-
1928491 4
WL1006
536404589
1927256 398
WL12005
53 854 992
1929564 304
w603
537133 215
1928466 989
WL1007
536489 695
1927271 841
Ir -18
537461 770
1926975 703
w604
53706 654
1928419 893-
WL1008
536440 899
1927358 517
Ir -19
537393 458
1927007948
w605
537067 019
1928340 299
WL1009
536419046
1927403 606
it -20
537323463
1927043 0 2
w 13
537047 289
1928301 507
WL1010
536406 186
1927489 993
Ir -16a
-537595752
1926885 496
w 1
537042 98
192 2
WL1011
53636 880
1927579 538
Ir -16b
5 628 063
1926838 530
w701
537166 893
1928241 262
WL1012
536356 761
1927582 359
Ir -15
537 85 817
1926802 448
w702
537122 978
1928251 822
WL1013
536330 900
1927540 556
Ir -10a
537102 396
1926934 523
w703
537089858
1928253 104
W11014
536279 197
192 519 135
Ir -10b
537047 48
1926908 13
w704
537066 611
7 9 T81T4 985
WL1015
536219 101
19 7484 263
Ir -40
53 945 815
1927153 668
w705
___w766_
I 537051 762
19 8209 825
WL1016
536173 872
1927475 848
Ir -41
7022 755
1927074 617
53 091 085
1 8188 750
WL1017
536131 203
1927454 358
Ir -42
53704-4821
1927051 346
w707
1 5371269521
1928198 250
WL2001
536142 219
192 507 595
Ir -43
537095 464
1927072 406
NOTE THESE MAPS PREPARED TO SHOW WETLAND LOCATIONS
ONLY AND NOT BE CONSIDERED A BOUNDARY SURVEY
BOUNDARY LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT TAKEN
FROM PLAT RECORDED AT PLAT CABINET 10 SLIDE 346
ALL COORDINATES SHOWN WERE LOCATED BY USING
MAPPING GRADE TRIMBLE GPS RECEIVERS
POST- PROCESSED USING TRIMBLE PATHFINDER
SOFTWARE AND BY CONVENTIONAL TOTAL STATION
PORTION OF DATA USED IS FROM PREVIOUS WORK
PERFORMED BY FROM BLUE LAND WATER
INFRASTRUCTURE AND I JOHN MCLEAN PARTICIPATED
IN THE FIELD WORK TO OBTAIN THE DATA USED OF
BLUE LAND WATER INFRASTRUCTURE
COORDINATES LOCATED BY GPS ARE NC GRID
NAD 83 AND THE POINTS PROVIDED BY BLUE LAND
WATER INFRASTRUCTURE THAT COULD BE VERIFIED BY
GPS WERE WITHIN THE SUB -METER ACCURACY
STANDARD
TOTAL WETLAND ACREAGE = 106 91f
MAP REVISED ON 1 -21 -09 TO ADD WETLAND POINTS
SHOWN ON SHEET 8 MAKING MAP A TOTAL OF 9
SHEETS
WL2002
536159 447
192 532 107
Ir -44
537163378
19 7091 756
WL2003
536137 786
1927565 428
Ir -50
535749 819
1927675 043
WL2004
53b091 421
1927563 930
Ir -51
535692 431
1927684783
WL2005
536080278
192 552 807
Ir -52
53 613 418
1927656 953
WL2006
536118 140
1927524 427
Ir -53
535520 879
19276920
WL1018
536117 132
1927413 625
Ir -54
535525 858
192 845 2-F2-
WL1019
536106 831
1927373 689
Ir -55
535603 938
1927849 952
WI 1070
536050 437
1927330 947
Ir -56
535662 860
1927904 795
WL1021
535998 719
---19"27322 690
Ir -68
535793 476
1927464 969
WL1022
535988 054
1927351 964
Ir -81
536387294
192 451 844
WL1023
535977 301
1927384 413
Ir -82
536401 032
1929491 364
WL1024
535955 224
192/433610
Ir -83
536429 340
1929549 53
WL1025
535959 508
1927480 880
Ir -84
536478 446
19295 296
WL1026
535908 876
1927521 512
Ir -85
536510576
1929647736
WL1027
535869 447
1927514 414
Ir -86
536510 577
1929707 585
WL.3001
935912 300
19 617 619
Ir -87
536552 007
1929780T20
WL3002
535 33 209
1927662 524
Ir -61
536131 249
1926980 581
­1-90-6-63
WL3003
535980 185
1927653 379
Ir -62
536067 456-
58
WL3004
536008 007
1927642 740
Ir -63
535977 590
1927048 619
WL4001
535720 765
1927704 430
Ir -65
535832 519
1927174168
WL4002
5 5741 059
1927751 455
Ir -64
555885237
1927124 256
WL400
535733856
1927817 846
Ir -66
535801 4,37-
1927255 37
WL4004
535709 179
1927872 761
Ir -67
535810957
1927403 137
WL8012
535880 062
1928084163
Ir -75
535851 723
1927498 91
WL8013
5358984-46
1928040 900
Ir -74
535896 766
1927400303
WL8014
536048 661
1928008 955
Ir -73
535876 987
1927383 644
WL8001
536196 719
1927964 980
Ir -72
535832 76T---1q-2T4--62
787
WL8002
536189 563
1928068 770
Ir -71
35812 139
1927512 935
WL8003
536203 029
928170 920
Ir -70
535803 647
1927560532
_ WL8G04
WL8005
536253 139
1928210 834
Ir -69
535755461
1927571 010
536267 550
19282 23
Ir- 1
537045765-
1926110 448
WL8006
536293 215
192834 829
Ir -02
536962 102
1925191916
WL8007
536261 687
1928377 126
Ir -03
536938 042
1926258738
WL8008
5361808
1928369 013
Ir -04
536896 222
1926386 154
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY
DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION
404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE
IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE
RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS
FROM THIS DATE THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING
THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
DATE
USACE ACTION ID
WL8009
536128 242
1928280 103
Ir -05
536823836
1926474 925
WL8010
536029 737
1928215 436
Ir -06
536825 321
1926535 974
WL8011
535954 115
1928145 534
Ir -07
536929 040
1925619 619
WL9005
535828 192
1928300 877
Ir -08b
53 959 056
1926654398
WL9006
535959 497
1928356 461
Ir -08a
536985 982
1926718535
WL9007
536001 159
192a426 369
Ir -09
537012 507-
1926783 545
WL9001
535934 907
1928455 003
Ir -11
537175 931
1926864 076
WL9002
535868 010
1928457 139
Ir-12
537272 080
19265b3 317
WL9003
535764 329
1928406 705
Ir -13
537329 908
1926806 5 27
WL9004
535688 607
1928297 915
Ir -14
5374-45871
1926802 704
WL7001
536714 389
1927676 206
Ir -17
537526 155
1926933795
WL7002
536751 272
1927611 808
Ir -21
536243 085
1926867 2
WL7003
5 6514-301
1927564 909
it -22
536299 922
1926852585
WL7004
536815 133
192 712 034
Ir -23
536405 141
192687 947
WL10001
536513 676
1928440 710
Ir -24
536487871
19 6 91 55
WL10002
536488 245
1928373 929
Ir -25
536576 056
1926884399
WL10003 536468 570 1928279 687 Ir -26 536605 532 1 1926931_007
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
,,.��N "�ARo��;.,,, LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL. J -BAR RANCH, INC
L-4449 IJTM RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1n =100'
prepared by
" Cp JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
/ _ °2f _ d I LAURINBURG NORTH CAROLINA
JMM 100 50' o' 100 200'
LRK SHEET 9 OF 9
FN LTTTLERIVER02 DWG

ll
Ci
1
i�
0
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Tugwell Chair
Interagency Review Team
FROM Tracy Stapleton Project Manager
THROUGH Jeff Schaffer Eastern WPPI Supervisor and Marc Recktenwald WPPI Manager
RE Second Follow Up on Project Strategy
Iattle River (IMS #226)
Cape Fear 03030004
DATE 19 January 2011
This memo serves as an update of the restoration approach for the subject project and to seek approval of the monitoring and
credit strategy for this project
As you may recall, the Little River project is located near Vass in Moore County in CF 04 (Figure 1) It is a WRP originated
project that originally proposed a large amount of stream restoration In 2001 the site was timbered streams channelized soil
bedded and loblolly pines planted in much of the floodplain wetlands by the owners for silviculture The conservation easement
was purchased by EEP in 2003 During design development visits to the site with agency staff and a change in design firm delayed
and changed the restoration strategy at the site In 2009 Stantec finalized plans to enhance the bedded pine plantation wetlands
by removing pines and re planting Concerns at EEP continued though including bringing large equipment into the site and
disturbing the recovering soils After another site visit with agencies, and internal discussion EEP decided to plant a small
portion of the site below existing pines for enhancement of the stream and wetlands and comparison of bottomland hardwood
community development in planted and unplanted portions of the pine plantation
Wedand Community type
Acres
Wetland pine plantation
48
Wetland grassy fields
7
BLH preservation
49
Total
104
Warm Stream
Linear ft
Channel A
1726
Channel B
1867
Total
3593
As discussed in the June 2010 IRT meeting an approach being considered for restoration was to contract for burning of the site
_4 to clear the existing underbrush for bareroot planting EEP contracted with ASIS to burn the site in December 2010 The burning
was successful in opening up the understory at the site Therefore EEP is changing its restoration approach and the resulting
credits from the approach s implemententation EEP will now plant all 55 acres of wetland and stream buffer (pine plantation and
grassy fields) with bare roots of climax community species The pine plantation including stream buffer will be planted at a rate
of 300 stems per acre with a target of 150 planted stems per acre at Year 5 These bare roots will mimic the understory
development of these species at a lower density than other wetland enhancement projects because of the high density of pines
i
forming a canopy above them We anticipate more closely mimicking a jump started successional community by bringing in
climax species to the nine year old loblolly stand The grassy fields will be planted at a rate of 600 stems per acre
Most of EEP s wetland enhancement projects invovle planting bare roots in a jurisdictional wetland barren of woody stems For
these projects, the ratio of 2 1 has been set by agreements that establish EEP policy For this project we propose 2 5 1 credit in
pine plantation areas because of the lower density of planted woody stems In the grassy fields we anticipate 21 credit This
would result in approximately 19 2 credits from the pine plantation 3 5 credits from the grassy field area, and 9 8 credits from the
preservation area The total anticipated wetland credits from this site are 32 5 riparian wetland mitigation units, all of which are
restoration equivalent credits Stream credits total 1437 credits attributed to Enhancement II of 3593 linear feet of stream
through planting
�I
�I

Summary Table of Little River Proposed Mitigation
Type
Acres /If
Ratio
Total Credits
Riparian Wetland Enh
(pine plantation)
48
2 5 1
192
Riparian Wetland Enh
(grassy field
7
21
35
Riparian Wetland Pres
49
51
98
Stream Enh 2
3593
2 5 1
1 437 2
Monitorin>?
In the pine plantation wetlands monitoring will include 8 CVS monitoring plots Success will be met if 150 planted woody stems
per acre are surviving in year 5 of monitoring in the pine plantation area while 260 planted woody stems per acre must be
surviving after 5 years of monitoring in the grassy field area This lower density in the plantation area is a result of the loblolly pine
presence and abundance The grassy field area will have 2 CVS vegetation plots In addition five monitoring wells will be re
installed to collect hydrology data about the site
The stream portion of the site will be equipped with a crest gage photo points and 6 CVS vegetation plots Stream buffer plots,
because they are within the planted pine plantation, will also have a stem density requirement of 150 planted woody stems per
acre surviving in year 5 of monitoring to meet success
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 715 1658
References
0
U
Parker, G R and W T Swank Tree Species Response to Clear cutting a Southern Appalachian Watershed, 1982 Coweeta Hydrologic
Laboratory US Forest Service North Carolina, USA o
Cain, Michael D and Michael G Shelton Secondary forest succession follo=ng reproduction cutting on the Upper Coastal Plain of southeastern
Arkansas USA 2000 USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Monticello Arkansas 0
ri
1
n
ri
u
� 1

Figure 1.0 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
CO
� Y •
f �+' ♦ � ir'��yr f �f� L
Local Pbuk
Ralroaft
County Boundary
Strearris
Munickoity
Site Boundary
l
r.r.�►r-
Directions to Little River project site: From Raleigh follow US I South approximately 50 miles to Vass. Take
the NC 690 exit and follow NC 690 east for approximately 2.3 miles. Turn right into project site.

Figure 2.0 Project Vegetative Communities