20051290 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20110121

-
��
33 2 e

0
McCain Stream Restoration
0 EEP Pro'ect #443
J
D Sophia, North Carolina
Randolph County
MY -02 Monitoring Report - Final
Prepared By:
Ward Consulting Engineers, P C
Firm License Number C -2619
Project Manager Becky Ward, P E
8368 Sic Forks Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615 -5083
Ph 919 - 870 -0526
Fax 919 - 870 -5359
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Momtorrng Report final
NCEEP Project number 441 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers P C November 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I Executive Summary 2
II Methodology 3
A Vegetation Methodologies 3
B Stream Methodologies 3
III References 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
5
Figure 1 a Vicinity Map
6
Table la Project Components
7
Table lb Component Summations
7
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
8
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
9
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
10
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
11
Figure 2 Consolidated Current Conditions Plan View
12
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Assessment Table
16
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
20
Photos 1 -6 Stream Station Photos
22
Photos 7 -13 Vegetation Monitoring Plots Photos
25
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data 29
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment 30
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata 31
Table 9 CVS Planted and Total Stem Counts 32
F' Appendix E Hydrologic Data 53
Table 12 Verification of Bankfiill Events 54
J
Photo 14 Wrack Line 54
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report final
i NCEEP Project number 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers P C November 2010
i
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
33
J
Figure 3 Cross - Section 1
34
Figure 4 Cross - Section 2
35
P
Figure 5 Cross - Section 3
36
Figure 6 Cross - Section 4
37
Figure 7 Cross - Section 5
38
Figure 8 Cross - Section 6
39
i
Figure 9 Longitudinal Profile
40
Figure 10 Pebble Count Plots — XS -1
41
Figure 11 Pebble Count Plots — XS -2
42
i
Figure 12 Pebble Count Plots — XS -3
43
Figure 13 Pebble Count Plots — XS -4
44
Figure 14 Pebble Count Plots — XS -5
45
Figure 15 Pebble Count Plots — XS 6
46
Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
47
Table 10b Baseline Stream Data Summary
49
P
Table l la Dimensional Morphology Summary
50
'
Table 1 lb Stream Reach Data Summary
51
F' Appendix E Hydrologic Data 53
Table 12 Verification of Bankfiill Events 54
J
Photo 14 Wrack Line 54
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report final
i NCEEP Project number 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers P C November 2010
i

the stream length providing vertical stability throughout the project site In general, all pools are
maintaining their depth with most of the very deep pools formingron the downstream,side`'of
structures In Reach 1, the upper 286, linear feet stream segment, 100 %,of riffles and pools are ii I
stable and functioning as designed The riffle pebble count in this reach exlubits (slight fining, ,
which may be contributing to ,a lower gradient Reach 1, with a total length of 286 linear feet,,,
exhibits, total bank erosion of 21 % of the overall reach length) The total bank erosion length of t
58 feet is a relatively small length of the total project length but a high percentage of the`short^
reach length The bank erosion will be monitored next year to see if the bank,problem areas %
tabilnze In the future as vegetation continues to estabhsh The two structures In Reach(1 are,,,,,
functioning properly and are showing no, signs of piping or integrity Issues In Reach 2, X94 %,and
88 %fof raffles and pools are functioning properly; respectively� Thalweg centering appears to be
I Issue on about 24% of the upstream side of pools (Run) This Is mostly due to aggradatron,
which appears in about 8% of the overall reach length The structures In Reach 2 are showing a
functionality of 100% throughout the reach and exhibit no signs of piping or Integrity issues,, w
The banks of Reach 2 appear to be stable with only about 1'% of the, reach overall length
exhibiting signs of erosion ' The area of Cross Sectron`2 has Increased 15 %,*which reflects a
shallow pool formation In the cross section location The pebble count In Cross Section 2 Is
coarsening showing good riffle function Cross `Section 3, a pool'has a well developed point bar
that Is decreasing the pool cross sectional area The substrate throughout Reacl 2� Is consistent
with appropriate riffle and pool function
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of Items such as beaver encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be' found In the
supporting Information formerly'found'In th'eselreports'can be found'In the'Baselme Monrtonng
Report (formerly Mitigation' Plan) and In the Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan)
documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting the tables and irguresFinl the
appendices is available f r o m EEP upon request ` ` 1-1 "A " I `'' ` ' t r `
I �r it it , J 'f1J tO 1 — if t�`3 a , i t �— ! �� r ( t li �" 1 t t ► .. , I it °v
H. Afethodology"
d � � i ,.. f
Methodologies follow EEP'momtoring report template Version ,1 3 (1/15/2010) and guidelines
(Lee et a14111 2008) Photos `were�taken with a digital�camera- A Trimble�Geo XT handheld unit , }1
with'sub eter accuracy was used)to collect vegetation monitoring plot origins, and problem
area locations Cross sectional and longitudinal surveys were conducted using itotal�station
� � a
ro
survey equipment Data was entered Into AutoCAD CIvil3D to obtain s dime, nsions of the cssf , 11
sections and'parameters applicable, to the longittudinal profile (Reports were then generated to ,
display summaries of the stream survey, t
ti t i ti C� r�Ef S 4) � i t f SIt )1 t }
r i „� Lt`Jti(t
A Vegetation Methoidologiesm,i
Level I of,the EEP /CVS protocol�Version,4 2 was usedlto�collect data for the, seven
representative vegetation monitoring plots ,within the conservation, easement for MY` 02 Data ,(
collected for these plots are in Appendix C )-t,
,-
il
McCain Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number 441
Ward Consulting Engineers PC
r
Year 2 Monitoring Report final t
Year 2 of 5
`� Novembei 2010 n ��

B Stream Methodologies
Stream profile and cross - sections were surveyed using total station equipment and methods The
survey data was plotted using AutoCAD Civi13D The longitudinal profile was generated using
the MY -00 alignment Cross sectional data was extracted based on a linear alignment between
the end pins
III References
Lee, Michael T Peet Robert K Roberts, Steven D Wentworth, Thomas R (2008) CVS EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4 2
Weakley, Alan (2007) Flora of the Carolinas Virginia Georgia and Surrounding Areas
http / /www herbarium unc edu/flora htm
R
McCain Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number 441
Ward Consulting Engineers P C
Year 2 Monrtonng Report final
Year 2 of 5
November 2010

o r-
I
0
0
�o
0
o�
o
or
1 {
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables ,
0
}
0
o `
FI
F1
f ! 5
_ _ t
� � 1
t
2
- 8
r
I I 1
r
1
i
o McCain Strcatrt Restoration ~ _Year 2 Monitoring Report final
NCEEP Project number 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers P C November 2010
L

a
0
v
ti
0
N
O
O
N
ti
ti

Table la Protect Components ` it '
Tablee1 la Project Components ,
McCain Stream Restoration Project No -443
Project
r�:,:.. w... -
Restorat
Footag
'.Y �`;"Y/t: ls,'.;:. y'.
BMP
-:. l
Compone
Existing
ton
Approac
a or
Stationin
Mitigatio
Mitigation
Ele
Comment
nt or
FeeUAcres
Level
r h
Acreag
g
n Ratio
Units
men
Reach ID
a
ts'
Preservation
Stream was
,L:'y� .•,i..,�. y ,.M.: •
10+00—
realigned and
Reach I
490 If
R
P2
286 If
12 +86
1
286
-two cross
oar N
vanes were
installed
Non Arwhicable
'
Stream was
_
realigned and,
-
-
-
six cross
vanes were
installed A
_
-2184
53 length of
Reach II
1955 If
R
P2
If
12 +87
1
2131
channel,
_
34 +70
through an
easement
-
-
exception has
�+
been'excluded
from the
mitigation unit
calculation
—1 = UH = bioretention cell Sf = Sand fitter SW = Stormwater Wetland WUP = Wet Detention Pond DDP = Dry Detention
Pond FS = Filter Strip 'S = Grassed Swale LS = Level Spreader NI = Natural Infiltration Area O = Other CF = Cattle Fencing
WS = Watering System CH = Livestock Housing r s
Table lb Component Summations
' Table 11b Component Summations
McCain Stream Restoration Site/Project No 443
Strea Non-
Restoration m Riparian Riparian Upland Buffer
Level If Wetland Ac Ac Ac Ac IBMP
Non-
" Rlvenne Rlverine
Restoration 2417 0 0 1 0 0
Enhancement 0 0 1 0 0
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report final
NCEEP Project number 441 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engmeers P C November 2010
., .�... .,. .:, r
r�:,:.. w... -
:��k��..r��,:�i'� '
't( ^';.:';.. '
'.Y �`;"Y/t: ls,'.;:. y'.
K,�:ti "• .
-:. l
.•'�� 'r'4'.. '
j `
'�.�...., * -
.:. .::n ...•.
VQX.... .
HQ
Preservation
,L:'y� .•,i..,�. y ,.M.: •
•: l'.; v >t± -
-:G: ?:.i, .'Ii n.:�4.'Mi �
�n �
�.�•' :.i6.�: �tt...'........ .
........ :���:5' "'�������� '1
oar N
Non Arwhicable
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report final
NCEEP Project number 441 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engmeers P C November 2010

Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
f Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
McCain Stream Restoration Site /Project No 443
Elapsed TIme,Since Grading Complete 1 yr 10 months ,
Elapsed Time Since'Planting Complete 1 yr 10 Months
F Number of Reporting Years 2
3 r ,
lb i
r
-Activity or Deliverable - - —
Data Collection
Complete - --
Completion or
- Delivery-
Restoration Plan
2003/2004
Jun -05
Final Design — Construction Plans
N/A
May -06
Construction i I
N/A
Mar -09
Temporary seed mix applied to entire protect area
i
N/A
a Mar -09
Permanent seed mix applied to reach /segments ' l -4
N/A 4
Mar -09
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
May -09 =
Jul 09
Year 1 Monitoring '
Oct -09
Dec -09
Year 2 Monitoring - _ _ _
Nov -10
Nov -10
Year„ 3 Monitoring ,
Year 4 Monitoring
'
Year 5 Monitoring
r
1 ;`Equals the number of reports or-data points produced excluding the baseline -
i
i
t , -
t f
f
f
McCain Stream Restoration t
NCEEP Project number 443
Ward Consulting Engineers PC
Year 2 Monitoring Report final
Year 2 of 5 fl
November 2010

Table 3 Protect Contacts Table
Table 3 Project Contacts'Table
- McCain Stream Restoration Site/Project No 443
Designer
-KCI Associates-of NC
-
Landmark Center II, Suite 220 -
- - -
-4601 Six Forks Rd - -
Raleigh, NC 27609
Primary project design POC
Adam Spiller (919) 783 -9214 -' -
Construction Contractor
Carolina Contracting, Inc
-
_Environmental
PO Box 1905 -
Mount Airy, NC 27030 -
Construction contractor POC
Stephen James (336) 320 -3849
Survey Contractor -
-
t ..
-
Survey contractor POC
Planting Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc
a
PO Box 1905
Mount Airy, NC-27030
Planting contractor POC
Stephen James (336) 320 -3849 -
Seeding Contractor
Contractor point of contact
r -
Seed Mix Sources -
Company and Contact Phone - -
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Virginia Department of Forestry
(504) 363 -5732
Monitoring Performers
Ward Consulting Engineers, P C
- -
8368 Six Forks Rd,' Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615 - i r, -
Becky Ward (919) 870 -0526 - r -- - -
Stream Monitoring POC
Becky Ward (919) 870 = 0526_,
Vegetation Monitoring POC _
Chris Sheats - The Catena Group - (919) 732 -1300 - -
Wetland Monitoring POC
Chris Sheats - The Catena Group - (919) 732 -1300 -
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Momtormg Report final
NCEEP Project number 441 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers P C November 2010

Table 4 Protect Attribute Table
i ► t ' I
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
McCain Stream Restoration Site/Project No 443
" Project County
5' °" _ Randolph County
Ph sio ra hic Region
^Y Piedmont
Ecore ion
Carolina Slate Belt
Project River Basin
Yadkin
USGS HUC for Project 14 digit)
3040103050050
NCDWQ Sub basin for Pro ect'
03 07 09
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
No
WRC Hab Class arm Cool Cold
ti Warm w
% of ro ect easement fenced or demarcated
s 100% z s
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
No
t
Restoration Com onent Attribute Table
t
r Reach 1
Reach 2 , ,t
- °- Drainage area
0 88 sq mi
—0 88 sq mi
Stream order
First
First `
Restored length feet
286 ,
2184
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed type Rural Urban Developing etc
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution (e g)
s �y Urban
Ag Row Crop
Ag Livestock
Forested
Water/Wetlands
4%
, 16%
12%
I 67%
<1% t�
Watershed impervious cover %
2% m
NCDWQ AU /Index number
13 2 3 3 UT Back Creek - "
NCDWQ classification
C
303d listed?
No
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
i N/A
° Total acrea a of easement
' 12 9 Acres "
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
4 8 Acres
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
7 6 Acres
- Ros en classification of pre existing
B4c - Y
` C5 /E5 /C4
Ros en classification of As built
134c
C4
Valley type
V
V
- Valley sloe
- 00066
Valley side slope ranee 11 2 3 %
138% 326%
Valley toe slope ranee q 2 3 %)'
A 252% 615%
Cowardin classification
t ; , N/A ' N/A
Trout waters designation
No
Species of concern endangered etc ? (Y/N)
No _
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
a- Doque-Sandy Loam
Do ue Sandy Loam
- Depth
U -
U - -
` Cla /o
` U
U
K
U
U
T
U
U
Use N/A for items that may not apply Use for items that are unavailable and U for items that are unknown
c
,
i
�I
t
t 4
w
t
.i
t
r
k
i
i
i
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report final
NCEEP Project number 443 Year 2 of 5 �
Ward Consulting Engineers PC November 2010

� 11
[ I
f McCain Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number 443
Ward Consulting Engineers P C
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Year 2 Monitoring Report final
Year 2 of 5
November 2010

18x
,l
w '�
o� 00
P-
1 X00 -
LULU
ICJ
PROBLEM AREA -MIN ❑R
a
o
n,
PROBLEM AREA - MEDIUM
U
�
o
Cross Section Pin Coordinate Table (NAD83)
PROBLEM AREA -MAJOR
s.
Cross Section Left Pin
Right Pin
N
Ln
m
�y PROBLEM AREA L❑CATI ❑N
Number
Northing
Easting
Northing
Easting
ME- 20 AXY 2010
IiV ®I@
• CROSS SECTI ❑N
1
734735.9
1746381.9 734750.7
1746310.8
r,
PROPOSED THALWEG
2
734473.6
1745659.4 734404.4
1746536.5
EASEMENT
3
733888.1
1746462.6 733915.0
1746403.8
m
E►-� VEG PLOT
25 50 too
4
733744.3
746493.0
733773.5
1746430.1
PHOTO POINT
p
5
733469.0
1174673 2.4 733442.5
1 1746673.0
VEG PROBLEM AREA
-. -:
~
6
733326.2
11746726.51 733291.0
11746668.6
L J STREAM CROSSING
' �,
m
FIGURE 213
pr
1
/ r j
a
Vegatation
Plot Pin Coordinate
Table (NAD83)
Vegatation
Pin 1
Pin 2
Pin 3
Pin 4
Plot Number
Northing
Easting
Northing
Easting
Northing
Easting
Northing
I Easting
1
734720.6
1746458.3
734703.2
1746430.5
734674.8
1746448.4
734691.7
11746476.8
2
734493.4
1746543.0
734476.2
1746571.3
734446.9
1746550.0
734465.4
1746523.3
3
734162.7
1746572.3
734168.9
1746541.4
734136.8
1746534.4
7341303
1746567.2
4
733830.0
1746523.9
733863.9
1746517.8
733868.0
1746550.0
733835.2
1746556.2
5
733565.2 1
1746579.5
733597.1
1746572.7
1746606.0
733570.7
1746613.3
733602.5
6
733365.1
11746622,0
733331.8
1746625.4
733336.5
174665T31
733368.9
1746654.4
7
733124.5 1
1746641.1
733095.5
1746656.9
733080.5
1746628.01
733109.4
1746612.9
LULU
PROBLEM AREA -MIN ❑R
a
o
n,
PROBLEM AREA - MEDIUM
U
�
o
PROBLEM AREA -MAJOR
s.
L'
Ln
N
Ln
m
�y PROBLEM AREA L❑CATI ❑N
_
Ln
tn
ME- 20 AXY 2010
IiV ®I@
• CROSS SECTI ❑N
°o
r,
PROPOSED THALWEG
,C
bO
GRAPHIC SCALE
EASEMENT
C
W
z
on ,A""
OCPV
m
E►-� VEG PLOT
25 50 too
200
SME
a�
PHOTO POINT
p
m
e
VEG PROBLEM AREA
-. -:
~
( IN FEET )
U_
L J STREAM CROSSING
' �,
m
FIGURE 213
pr
1
/ r j
a
U �1
P -5 ^�
i
O
P -8 s Q
i / z U
P -7 _ CS_4 QQ
,- P -7 w J
o -
CS -3
W
f==
A-
CL V Q
-�-
U
-
_
ME- 20 AXY 2010
IiV ®I@
nnea �:
GRAPHIC SCALE
PROPERTY
on ,A""
OCPV
50 0
25 50 too
200
SME
1._50.
sffr wu
( IN FEET )
DowRandolph ty, NC G1.S
1 inch = 50 ft.
FIGURE 213

00
Vegatation Plot Pin Coordinate Table (NAD83)
Vegatation
Pin 1
Pin 2
Pin 3
Pin 4
'lot Number
Northing
Easting
Northing
Easting
Northing
Easting
Northing
Easting
1
734720.6
1746458.3
734703.2
1746430.5
734674.8
1746448.4
734691.7
1746476.8
2
734493.4
1746543.0
734476.2
1746571.3
734446.9
1746550.0
734465.4
1746523.3
3
734162.7
1746572.3
734168.9
1746541.4
734136.8
1746534.4
734130.7
1746567.2
4
733830.0 1
1746523.9
733863.9
1746517.8
733868.0
1746550.01
733835.2
1746556.2
5
733565.2
1746579.5
733597.1
1746572.7
733602.5
1746606.0
733570.7
1746613.3
6
1733124.5
733365.1
11746641.1
1746622.0
733331.8
1746625.4
733336.5
1746657.3
733368.9
1746654.4
7
733095.5
11746656.9
733080.5
11746628.01
733109.4
1746612.9
- ! / P-
P -5
o
O
`i CID
f= p A-
= ,
from Randolph County, NC GIS
-1
00
A -10
­r
D
X_
P -6
LEGEND
PROBLEM AREA -MIN ❑R
PROBLEM AREA - MEDIUM
PROBLEM AREA -MAJOR
�- PROBLEM AREA LOCATION
•
CROSS SECTION
PROPOSED THALWEG
EASEMENT
�- VEG PLOT
PHOTO PINT
VEG PROBLEM AREA
L STREAM CROSSING
F ,r
xp0
3x00
34 +00
FE,/
Cross Section
iss Section
Number
Pin Coordinate Table (HAD83)
Left Pin Right Pin
Northing Easting Northing Easting
1
734735.9
1746381.9 734750.7
1746310.8
2
734473.6
1745659.4 734404.4
1
1746536.5
3
733888.1
1746462.6 733915.0
1746403.8
4
733744.3
746493.0 733773.5
1746430.1
5
733469.0
1746732.4 733442.5
1746673.0
6
1 733326.2
1746726.5 733291.0
11746668.6
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100 2(
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 fL
V 0O m
ice+ +1 O m
N
Ln ,
0
0
N
W v m
Z -
bD
ap v
10
M
C �
O
L
3
1 V
1 - I
5 a:
U
CL n W CL
W
v�
WE
WD
Z
CL 8g
aW CL
�
QJ
U Z
WE 20 JULY 2010
OWNS.
FILM M
YcCAN PROPERTY
WC WNE
CCPV
Cur.
1._50.
FIOL F1E 2C

>r`
''
Vegatation
Plot Pin Coordinate
Table (NAD83)
Vegatation n 1
Pin 2
Pin 3 Pin 4
'lot Number Easting
Northing Easting
Northing Easting Northing Easting
1
F734720.6
1746458.3
734703.2
1746430.5
734674.8
1746448.4
734691.7
1746476.8
2
1746543.0
734476.2
1746571.3
734446.9
1746550.0
734465.4
1746523.3
3
1746572.3
734168.9
1746541.4
734136.8
1746534.4
734130.7
1746567.2
4
733830.0
174652391
733863 -9
1 1746517811
733868 -0
174655001
733835 2
1746558 2
FIGURE 2B
5
733565.2
1746579.5
733597.1
1746572.7
733602.5
1746606.0
733570.7
1746613.3
6
733365.1
1746622.0
733331.8
1746625.4
733336.5
1746657.3
733368.9
1746654.4
7
733124.5
1746641.1
733095.5
1746656.9
733080.5
1746628.0
733109.4
1746612.9
Aerial Photo from Rsddph County, NC GIS
'pop
/!I
_ U �
;; Ln
m
••••� $ Uj Ln LO u 1
g C O O
oL r-- O
PC
-
bA
Cr � m d7 v
� C9
C �
0
FIGURE 2C 3
�3 a
W Cu U
Wks
wUg
a�
U�
Z � U
Q _
Cross Section Pin Coordinate Table (NAD83) "
ass Section Left Pin Right Pin ��!+ 8
Number Northing Easting Northing Easting
1 734735.9 1746381.9 734750.7 1746310.8 z
2 734473.6 1745659.4 734404.4 1746536.5
3 733888.1 1746462.6 733915.0 1746403.8
4 1 733744.3 746493.0 733773.5 1746430.11 m 2o xLY mo
5 733469.0 1 1746732.4 733442.5 1 1746673.0
6 1733326.2 11746726.51 733291.0 1 1746668.6
GRAPHIC SCALE O,sw
PROPE
'`
ccPV
ISO O 75 150 300 600 SME:
1' 150'
slffr w
( W FEET )
i inch = 150 ft. FOOLIFE 2

Vegatation Plot Pin Coordinate Table (NAD83)
Vegatation
Pin 1
Pin 2
Pin 3 Pin 4
Plot Number
Northing
Fasting
Northing
Easting
Northing Easting Northing
Easting
1
734720.6
1746458.3
734703.2
1746430.5
734674.8 1746448.4 734691.7
1746476.8
2
1746543.0
734476.2
1746571.3
734446.9 1746550.0 734465.4
1746523.3
734493.4
3
734162.7
1746572.3
734168.9
1746541.4
734136.8 1746534.4 734130.7
1746567.2
4
733830.0
1746523.9
733863.9
1746517.8
733868.0 1746550.0 733835.2
1746556.2
5
733565.2
1746579.5
733597.1
1746572.7
733602.5 1746606.0 733570.7
1746613.3
6
733365.1
1746622.0
11746641.1
733 .
1 1746625.4
733336.5 1 1746657.3 733368.9
1746654.4
7
733124.5
733095.5
1 1746656.9
733080.5 1 1746628.0 733109.4
11746612.9
Cross Section Pin Coordinate Table (NAD83)
Cross Section
Number
Left Pin
Right Pin
Northing
734735.9
Easting
1746381.9
Northing I
734750.7
Easting
11746310.8
1
2
734473.6
1745659.4
734404.4
1746536.5
3
733888.1
1746462.6
733915.0
1746403.8
4
733744.3
746493.0
733773.5
1746430.1
5
733469.0
11746732.4
733442.5
1746673.0
6
733326.2
11746726.5
733291.0
1746668.6
F�
CS -1
•
• 7,
lam.
P-
A
112007Aefial Photo from Randolph County, NC GIS
LEGEND
7 %
CS -2
P -4
x �-
ti�
N +y�
k i.
PROBLEM AREA -MINOR
PROBLEM AREA - MEDIUM
PROBLEM AREA -MAJOR
®� PROBLEM AREA LOCATION
• CROSS SECTION
PROPOSED THALWEG
EASEMENT
VEG PLOT
PH ❑T❑ PINT
VEG PROBLEM AREA
STREAM CROSSING
50
GRAPHIC SCALE
25 50 100
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft
w
U
a 0
m
i m
N
75- U , 0
( N O
_ W �
m
� m
O
U �l
i.
W CL
W
E
z
J
�U 8
9
DAE 20 JULY 2010
91
rcriw �xrY
200 sowF
sffr 11a
FKXF E 2A

O 1 _-_J i C+ C=J -D C= M
Table 5 Visual Stream Morpholoov Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 1
Assessed Length 286
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aaaradab sufficient on Bar formation/growth fficient to significantly deflect
t I`
1
10
97%
-
(Riffle and Run units)
Adjusted %
Banc lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
r I
i � �
2
Number
79%
79%
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
100%
Stable
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
f
Performing
Number In
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cateaory
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended As built
ments
Foot a
as Intended
V station V elation
V etation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
1 Aaaradab sufficient on Bar formation/growth fficient to significantly deflect
t I`
1
10
97%
-
(Riffle and Run units)
_
flow laterally (not to include point bars) -
Banc lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
r I
i � �
2
120
79%
79%
2 Dearadabon Evidence of dowrx;uttmg
scour and erosion —
�
100%
-
2 Riffle Condition
1 Texture/Substrate Riffle maintains coarser substrate
w c
2
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2 Y
r,
100% #
f
3 Meander Pool
Condition
1' Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth > 1 6)
3
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable
3
100%
t
I
100%
2 Length appropriate ( >30 / of centerline distance between tail of
3
and are providing habitat- - -
3
-
m
upstream riffle and head of downstre riffle)
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse _
t
100%
1000/_
4 Thalweg Positron
1 Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) -
— 3-
3-
Total
2
100%
79/6
0
t
�
1 Overall integrity
�
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
I
- 1000/
I
2 Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
2
Grade control stnicbaes exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
1000/
2 Bank
l
1 Scoured/Erodlnq
Banc lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
r I
i � �
2
120
79%
79%
- -
scour and erosion —
�
-
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
Y
2 Undercut
likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable
100%
100%
I
and are providing habitat- - -
-
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse _
t
1000/_
100%
Total
2
120
79/6
0
- 0 - -79%
3 Engineered
Structures
1 Overall integrity
�
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
I
- 1000/
I
2 Grade Control
Grade control stnicbaes exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
1000/
d
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
2
2
1
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does 1Q exceed
3 Bank Protection
15 / (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
2
r 2 t
100%
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull -
2
2
1000/
vi
Depth ratio > 1 6 Roolwads/logs providing some cover at base flow
I
4
Y
b
i
1

Criteria, Definitions and Thresholds for Visual Stream MorohologV Assessments
kta)o r
Channel
Chanml Sub-
Catewry
Ca
Netlt
Palintlbna
Gtab In ThleshOld
CCPV Depiction
1. Bed
!. Varl ca ny( Ifk
Be, amWlo eu ntmegn Wdel ne1I mot bark)
ale! enbal 1 reKm shs marl. bye,
soda has moat thscharaclerklcs u
and Run unls�
0! rinks IX IYIInp of Daok N or babes Mas14W a4ysaons. M aQgrxeg rowh'w ~ chrecbrimd by sand W R+vd
Ina bh IcM Et 1'. antl r at bs! 15 /aN n tango) or 20'k of me
nv IermalgNprowm vein asme4d inky d real) tubahW antlsnmothhp d thp roach Wg prelile. BarsiaggrWSd
din Wron Innam. which~ k I—.
pas sgnR tsro,rphm dalkcl llwvaPWtprrFa Mardd t4caWOp:wd RepaelchannelpMkwints eakeybd
nassng wolxl appatVllm. (SS fMrob mr. t'r 1 below ton range el dmmpb tar tlsvdepmanVappradelbn)
z. QUAdalkl
Whmep,oWt, have r W" Lpasd wgWawedgrade mntrd. bgtKWiD vdxwna V k wpml*d only h anal.
caukg only 6IS4rc has msii Of the ch —tore tics ow b
decree) b gthc. 'l ficamra include parched till e➢uamrs. chr 1 bed "sups• h dily rah amen) nwbriel. wkim. d
s krN (call Et2j and k tl est 161eer F bngm or 20% d me
bad rWew at me bank me Iparwlt rrwparel may ba erpocsd)', mma,Bapn d umraa rile wbstra4 m to poop
ull Wrun Wyth. whic —Y Isn
Wwnstream. and pemepc roues vein run rrmmllolppy. tarrPIXdW wrvq➢ shwa swpon W aseramant of bed
degrade on where the —I --t andourvay wadap.
2. Nnk Condltlan
1. S➢Eada
RYIYe ehmk makoamamsrasnaas sfmlrbtlw aaegn ds➢EU1bn. Synikcanl lhwpd the rMlM wHap hdcalae non
rrynlfIXawrMne. WpWpabbecerm4dronkauppIXianasaeaamerddrMl inhVwhNaww4pocwrsfcnr
vslha praphc 2 balvw mw;rthp amlaeodnp lur p� eumbbb syalema).
3. elowneor Pool
t. Deo!n $un¢1n1?
'r metrekused Io puss mender pace end Else dapyotaa alongaRmpn &lypechannM s. .sopped
Nn
COntllbon
enhes are pock .111 be wawebd and 41ed here and under the Habitat Sub4C -gmy below. The max pool bwkf,*
depth shook be 1.6 bmee the mean bank41 depth (Max Pool naplh : MW Ben kfJ Depth > 1.6). The nwan banklull
depth from me 4.1, Nbasekne eum" ran be u ➢lined to make mk deb —Whon. FH ,t 1 1 prwMas rsldrd pool depths
using the 1.6 mu ltiplyr fm a range of mean channel rlek depths that typiy reirt ation proWts.
2. Laaa appmpdetet
mablo WI only be ap,led m meerxer pooh. —der pool brgm should ba>30w of the - Wear canterline
NA
n
dooms behreen the 41101 the ulvtrrm rdfb end IM head of the rlwvnstrsm Me.
a.Thdw" Posltle ,
1, Thil can" of upsmram of meander band (Run)?
n. metrle a uoW to ohYesledas "" pethc aWp rYRamn -pod tranaitlans. il+e a1Wrp k sepslW m ba opens! the
NA
NA
wlar bank h the bend apea, but vacua oriented ewwfi am outer bank Igo for "a me band spex may'rnmle me
potential for Imrowe d bank arosm. Slmlerli. the pool glklo-riRle k—illon make 04-hod m demarxlrale flow path
Wkg IMMre 42 boowl. no ounont -Yew Iftweg rndowd on the CCM figure an mist m m'w Wessmenl.
2. TheAVeg con4rkg r dbwnalreem of meande, bend IGbde!?
See Meek 4.1 aboxe
NA
N4
2. Bank
1, ScouredE --leg Bank
Banks wih pion! our I—.
lahk MYelmurn
per'
INlght Length
Sae Foglno4/ExhL1
In — to boner seas cm ➢roved bank erslon Wk. ➢dud bnk eego —. xe nbo chxncicrlsE with romaec or to
pmdmM and nogra m event d sbkblizkg .9-6on. Cont— wsYn rkk In a gin bank ha4dliy -bled le
ntway misced rmwmswrde by a o-1 mwprn+e,e atan andbr e4bikbg dm4. One r rtrxe mono Lowe h c
o—il," la g 10 lee! or Ise) a awmus hbgre!un or rm1 mse w the, - benk lapurs en chraMetloe that ww
Banks �no wwV- 0-ving 4 the wbnl UW mass..n q appeorf lkey? OoeE NOT kmmdb undrab thin nmOSt.
e War sus4haddstabb and era pw of g habiul.
6
3-6 8
10
bee. dba
2. Iandartai
-
Thk Labe provide. a wide tar wmrldng thealmlde for
pmmpl the 41" o1 a given bank objmt non Ina aoldaIXW wb —gory reeked m risk of f—or -toed y 1
bark eroaon cMalopr#nnappirp based on ban, height,
IM a l dak. tel Essonaaiy. the v g tat re el.—ts of roo4y dw f y"date, a p. I— a BEHI assassmann
need to be crosidired hare.
For the ban, High rarpee above, the movi length of
berktpb— lippedardtefedenpeci.. Forr.pe,
-
3. Nana Waedng
Bonk slurry'alg'cdvegmlb,pee?
where bake are <3 )eel Ngh only map an unstabe
aegmers d X k z 10 fool.
.st -Mhlse
1. Uwnlllelaprly
TMassass -1.1 evowedclmC➢rrepWwmnmchauklnrd , db all strucmrs mat prwke grade coned. bank
Bulk of alauot— pyarally htacl will, nu deyoQlad bauldw, or kgs?
clV rakbIXwma other mesh to maintain lglblly, nno!ete
pmlacbw, a hmlM1!umlims -Thane Pc de Vans. J- hooks, nd momadl son.
Mu na With, red 'S' If all fdLra hap amurred
2. GreM Control
Badgredacontrol- Arr4hW{acesmeoil!0uoorn? Nowi dantbudbedebvatimimmedaulyupalrs cod!
U.W move IX wma other mane 10 mdn4n ft1birly, annotate
atrudmle? some loping oboe will not mncllmu a toes of gade amtrd.
sbuemro wYh rod "G' If struc4rc has loot grade eonbol
L. Piping
Labk6W slm — Im1mg any Wn ntb Ikev U, wjI. or around wma
)lump caI.WIX —to 41n y. annotate
�Irx— rW'P' It ogn,lianl piping nn mcunW
3. Bank Prot bon
Sm eA,hl n below for retarminog Oxon lsphera iAluance. It the amount of bank thd k donned to ecWSy
cmgcaloulsonsIXMOth — .fo-*n%h Wg fly. anno44
wodbg within the s ➢mlurs ether{ of Infer —aorta 15% of the 1041 ban k I." wino the eVUCmrs sphere al
". vnth red '0" N a➢ueGae has lekad to proske tank pro4apon
hflu m ban Ina • ➢ncWre ehonk be hueffled as at6 mwId1 qad.*.* bank erdacllonin the do% table
9, 11sbl41
pm s men ed - .1 a ep1 > .6? or dmlkva . 1 prwi means
eng cal k ov some o er n—W lo ta iy. —out{
hternbrg wYh baselbw and pmvibg cover.sn
bu oo with,:x N seI1CWre a rot pmldry hill

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Planted Acreage 7.98
Vegetation Cateoory
Definitlons
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of planted woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acres
Brown Hatch
3
0.01
0.1%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.1 acres
Brown Hatch
8
1.34
16.8%
Total
11
1.35
16.9%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.25 acres
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
11
1.35
16.9%
Easement Acreage 13.34 acres
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Brown Hatch
9
1.34
16.8
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Brown Hatch
9
1.34
16.8%
= Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
= The acreage within the easement boundaries
= Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
= Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas. but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2 decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in rF'd italics are of particular
interest given their extreme risk /threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the

High Concern:
Low /Moderate Concern:
Vines
Genus /Species
Shrubs /Herbs
Genus /Species
Shrubs /Herbs
Genus /Species
Kudzu
Pueraria lobata
Japanese Knotweed
Polygon m cus idatum
Japanese Privet
Li ustrum Ja onicum
Porcelain Berry
Am elo sis brevi edunc
Oriental Bittersweet
Celastrus orbiculatus
Glossy Privet
Li ustrum lucidum
Japanese Honeysuckle
Lonicera japonica
Multiflora Rose
Rosa multiflora
Fescue
Festuca sp.p.
Japanese Hops
Humulus japonicus
Russian olive
Elaea nus an ustifolia
English Ivy
Hedera helix
Wisterias
Wisteria spp.
Chinese Privet
Li ustrum sinense
Microste ium
Microste ium vimineum
Winter Creeper
Euon mus fortunei
Chinese Silver grass
Miscanthus sinensis
Burning Bush
Euon mus alatus
Bush Killer Watch List
Ca ratia japonica
Phra mites
Phra mites australis
Johnson Grass
Sorghum hale ense
Bamboos
Ph Ilostach s SPP
Bush Honeysuckles
Lonicera, spp.
Trees
Sericea Les edeza
Sericea Les edeza
Periwinkles
Vinca minor
, ree of Heaven
Ailanthus altissima
Garlic Mustard (Watch List)
Alliaria petiolata
Morning Glories
Morning Glories
Mimosa
Albizia 'ulibrissin
Co on Grass Watch List
Im erata c lindrica
Bicolor Les edeza Watch List
Les edeza bicolor
Princess Tree
Paulownia tomentosa
Giant Reed Watch List
Arundo donax
Chinese Yams Watch List
Dioscorea oppositifolia
China Berry
Melia azedarach
Tro ical Soda Apple Watch List
Solarium viarum
Air Potato Watch List
Dioscorea bulbifera
Callery Pear
P rus calleryana
Japanese S irea Watch List
S iraea japonica
Japanese Climbing Fern Watch List
Lygodiurn 'a onicum
White Mulberry
Morus alba
Japanese Barber (Watch List) 1
Berberis thunber
allow Tree Watch List
Triadica sebifera

Stream Station Photos
Photo 1. Looking downstream at XS -1
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Rcport-final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

Photo 2. Looking downstream at XS -2
Photo 3. Looking downstream at XS -3
Photo 4. Looking downstream at XS -4
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report-final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

Photo 5. Looking downstream at XS -5
Photo 6. Looking downstream at XS -6
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report-final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

Vegetation Monitoring Plots Photos
Photo 7. Vegetation Plot 1
Photo 8. Vegetation Plot 2
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report-final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

P:
Photo 9. Vegetation Plot 3
Photo 10. Vegetation Plot 4
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report -final
NCEEP Project number. 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

Photo 11. Vegetation Plot 5
Photo 12. Vegetation Plot 6
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report-final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

Photo 13. Vegetation Plot 7
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report -final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report final
NCEEP Project number 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers PC November 2010
a
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report final
NCEEP Project number 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers PC November 2010

Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Mete
Tract Mean
VP 1
No
VP 2
Yes
VP 3
Yes
72%
VP 4
Yes
VP 5
Yes
VP 6
No
VP 7
Yes
r
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report final
NCEEP Project number 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers P C November 2010

Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata 1
McCain Stream Restoration Site/Project No 443
Report Prepared By
The Catena Group -
database name
McCain Property mdb
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - - - --
1
Description of database file, the report
worksheets and a summary of{profect(s)
Metadata
and project data
r
Each project is listed with its PLANTED ,
stems per acre for each year This
Prod, planted
excludes live stakes
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems
per acre, for each year This includes live
stakes all planted stems and all
Prod, total stems
natural/volunteer stems '
List of plots surveyed with location and
summary data (live stems, dead stems
Plots
missing etc
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for
Vigor
stems for all plots
Frequency distribution of vigor classes
Vigor by Spp
listed by species)
List of most frequent damage classes with
number of occurrences and percent of total
Damage
stems impacted by each
Damage values tallied by type for each
Damage by Spp
species P
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living
stems of each species for each plot dead
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY — ---
Project Code
443 -
project Name
McCain
Stream restoration site located in the
Description
Yadkin River Basin
River Basin
length(ft)
2450
stream to edge width (ft)
50
area (sq m)
2275894
Required Plots (calculated)
7
Sampled Plots
7
McCain Stream Restoration ` Year 2 Momtorxng Report final
NCEEP Project number 441 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers P C November 2010
F
0
7

UP Proiert fade 043 Pmn.rt Names McGln
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts
Current Plot Data MY2 2010)
Annual Means
Sdentlflc Name
Common Name
Specles Type
E443 -A 0001 -1
E443 A4)002
I E443 -A -0003
I E443 A-0004
I E443 A -0005
E443 A-0006
I E443 A-0007
MY2 (2010)
1 MY1(2009)
P LS
P all
T
P-LS
IP all
T
P LS
P all
T
P LS
Pall
T
P LS
Pall
IT
P LS
IP a8
T
P-LS
P all
T
P LS
P all
T
P-LS
P all
T
Betula ni ra
nver birch
Tree
2
2
1
1
6
6
3
3
1
1
4
4
1
1
18
is
19
19
mus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
8
8
8
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
4
5
5
15
18
18
15
20
20
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
Unodendmn tul fera
tuliptree
Tree
3
3
1`
Il
-
,1
1
5
5
6
6
Platanus ocddentalis
American sycamore
Tree
y
1
'` 1
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9
9
9
eras falcata
southern red oak
Tree
r
1
1
2
2
-
3
3
3
3
eras pagoda
Cher ark oak
1
1
1
1
1
1
eras phellos
willow oak
i 1=
1
`'
1
1
r
6
7
7
Inc mgre
black willow
LTTree
6
6
f-- 6
1
1
1
7
7
9
9
9
sericea
silky willow
1
1
1
-4
4
4
3
3
3
8
8
8
8
8
Stem count
size(ares)
size (ACRES)
Spedes counti
Stems per ACREJ
0
6
6
15
19
1
0
18
18
0
8
8
r11
11
0
6
6
7
11
11
30
79
79
32
86
1
)1-
1
1
�1
1_
1
7
7
002
002 -
002 -
002
002
002
002
017
017
Of
21
21
31
61
61
01
71
01
51
151
31
61
61
0
3
31
21
51
51
31
10
30
3
10
10
01
242 8
242 81
6071
7689176891
0
728 4
728 41
01
32371
32371
32371
44521
44521
0
242 8
242 81283
31
445 2
445 2
173 41
45671
456 7
185
497214972
'" f1
Ire Y nY t
Z
(
I i 1 r
r
I 1 �
t
' 1 t
-
I
1
s r
t
I
r � r

Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report-final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

Project:
McCain Property
Summa
bankful
Cross Section:
Cross Section
1
MVO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Feature
Rtffle Reach
1
A (BKF)
18.6
20.8
18.7
Station:
12 +11.30
W (BKF)
16.9
17.2
18.1
Date:
10/18/10
Max d
1.5
1.6
1.6
Crew!
BW, ZAP,
SV
Mean d
1.1
1.2
1.0
W/D
15.4
142
17.5
MY00.2009
MY01,2009
11111Y02 -2010
MY03.2011
Station Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
0.00 548.39 LPIN
0.00 548.39 LPIN
0.00 548.39 LPIN
6.50 547.76
0.30
548.19
0.10
548.26
14.00 546.79
6.00
547.72
2.80
548.15
21.10 546.16
13.40
546.76
9.25
547.37
25.50 545.21
22.10
545.85
14.42
546.82
5.
30.60 544.82
TOBL
24.30
545.16
21.29
546.18
34.10 543.31
27.40
545.05
24.14
545.36
36.20 543.19
29.40
544.79
26.88
545.13
-
38.70 543.11
30.60
544.68
TOBL
30.72
544.75
TOBL
-
-
40.50 543.01
42.80 543.01
45.20 542.91
45.70 543.12
TW
32.30
33.90
35.60
37.40
544.06
543.25
542.88
542.76
32.01
34.33
35.79
37.32
544.09
543.58
543.04
542.96
TOE L
,�j,•;-
`• "it '� �;�r
-
47.10 543.83
38.30
542.66
TW
38.96
542.80
TW
48.40 544.42
TOBR
40.60
542.70
40.26
542.86
54.20 545.10
42.60
542.84
42.10
543.01
-
56.50 545.81
45.50
542.84
44.62
543.00
TOE R�
59.70 546.45
46.60
543.50
45.27
543.34
'
64.50 547.03
48.70
544.32
TOBR
47.77
543.97
-
69.00 547.76
52.70
544.82
50.16
544.56
TOBR
72.60 548.15
RPIN
55.60
545.44
53.54
544.93
58.50
546.15
57.71
545.95
62.40
546.77
61.30
546.66
67.40
547.45
65.01
547.13
71.90
547.93
68.96
547.59
72.70
548.13
RPIN
72.76
547.99
,
72.79
548.14
RPIN
Photo of XS -1 looking in the downstream direction
Cross Section 1
549.00
548.00
547.00
546.00
c
s
a
m 545.00
W
544.00
543.00
542.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00 50.00
60.00 70.00 80.00
Station (Feet)
-� TW MY-00 t TW MY -01 -*- TW MY -02 ir- BKF

Project:
McCain Property
Summs banQul
Cross Section:
Cross Section 2
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3
MY4 MY5
Feature
Riffle Reach 2
A (BKF)
33.7
42.7
44.4
Station:
16.25.07
W (BKF)
24.6
25.2
28.0
Date:
10118/10
Max d
1.8
2.5
2.6
Crew:
BW, ZAP, SV
Mean d
1.4
1.7
1.6
W/D
18.0
14.9
17.6
MYDO.2009
MY01 -2009
MY02 -2010
MY03 -2D71
Station Elevation
Notes Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes Station
Elevation Notes
0.00 543.01
LPIN 0.DO
543.02
LPIN
0.00
543.01
LPIN
8.50 542.71
1.30
542.72
0.10
542.79
16.90 542.73
11.30
542.75
5.41
542.74
20.10. 542.57
20.50
542.51
14.66
542.73
23.60 541.30
23.80
541.24
19.98
542.59
29.50 541.02
TOBL 29.60
540.96
TOBL
23.53
541.30
32.90 539.61
31.30
540.34
26.44
540.93
Xs -2
36.00 539.40
3320
539.64
29.09
540.91
TOBL
39.20 539.30
33.40
539.14
32.32
539.92
42.90 539.26
45.90 539.29
TW 36.10
37.80
539.09
538.98
32.96
35.92
539.31
539.25
48.20 539.47
50.10 539.68
38.90
41.30
538.47
538.40
TW
38.49
39.90
538.73
538.58
TOE
- _ ""+-
y �,.`_• �' `� 1+`3� +' ,�
51.60 539.98
TOBR 42.80
538.42
43.14
538.44
TW
54.40 541.11
45.70
538.49
47.21
538.60
60.30 541.36
48.00
538.67
49.50
538.65
TOE R
62.30 542.52
49.90
539.01
50.39
539.68
'�
'1 r
69.30 542.78
51.90
539.86
52.52
540.26
+ f
o.y;
76.70 543.18
RPIN 53.60
540.51
53.87
541.01
- :,'4 •. -
�ti+o c -'�0 we a l
55.00
540.87
TOBR
54.13
540.97
TOBR
60.60
63.60
541.14
542.52
55.94
58.75
540.94
541.06
'+ c ` -. ^+v'4'(c�v�.v. -•�
71.70
542.84
60.44
541.46
,
;`,
t -'
-
7620
76.70
543.03
543.23
RPIN
62.34
66.25
542.42
542.68
71.59
542.89
76.49
543.12
`frc'A! a - .. F
._ WIN a. .. ...
76.58
543.13
RPIN
Photo of XS -2, looking in the downstream direction
Cross Section 2
544.00
543.00
542.01
s541.10
4
s
W
540.00
539.00
538.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00 50.00 60.00
70.00 80.00 90.00
Station (Feet)
-�TW MY -00 tTW MY-01 -*-TW MY -02 - +i-BKF

Project:
McCain Property
Summa
tankful
MYO
MY1
MY2
Cross Section: Cross Section
3
MY3
MY4
MY5
Feature
Pool Reach
2
A (BKF)
33.6
34.1
30.8
Station:
23+45.75
W (BKF)
22.6
23.0
22.3
Date:
10/18/10
Max of
2.2
2.2
2.4
Crew:
BW, ZAP,
SV
Mean d
1.5
1.5
1.4
W/D
MY03.2011
MYOD -2009
MY01 -2009
NM2 -2010
Station Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
0.00 537.42 LPIN
0.00 537.41 LPIN
0.00 537.42 LPIN
0.40 537.22
0.30
537.10
0.16
537.17
4.90 537.35
5.60
537.18
5.47
537.30
10.80 537.23
10.70
537.06
10.85
537.15
14.80 536.130
15.30
535.76
TOOL
14.13
536.24
17.00 535.61
17.80
535.49
16.82
535.75
20.40 535.64
TOOL
20.20
535.53
19.75
535.67
23.50 534.21
22.60
534.71
20.55
535.75
24.80 534.18
25.30
534.23
20.59
535.67
TOOL
XS -3
2620 534.48
26.70
533.93
22.15
535.28
28.30 534.03
30.20
533.65
23.51
534.96
29.30 533.96
31.70
533.39
25.84
534.66
33.50 533.72
33.90
533.39
27.64
534.57
35.00 533.47
36.20
533.49
29.25
534.26
35.70 533.43
TW
37.60
533.34
TW
29.91
533.73
TOE L
37.80 533.51
39.40
533.90
31.73
533.51
39.90 534.03
40.70
534.41
33.44
533.24
TW
43.90 536.10
TOM
44.60
536.11
TOBR
35.66
533.40
45.10 536.35
49.90
536.30
38.05
533.44
50.00 536.45
53.40
537.72
38.48
533.49
TOE R
56.60 539.15
56.90
539.05
39.52
534.06
60.80 539.51
62.70
539.47
42.28
535.18
64.70 539.76
RPIN
64.70
539.77
RPIN
44.41
53624
TOBR
45.35
536.32
47.78
536.29
50.18
536.53
53.78
537.89
56.63
539.17
60.69
539.57
64.01
539.66
64.95
539.83
RPIN
Photo of XS -3 lookino in the downstream direction
Cross Section 3
541.00
540.00
639 -00
538.00
537.00
Cp
S
536.00
W
535.00
534-00
533.00
532.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70-00
Station (Feet)
tTW MY -00 --m-TW MY -01 -*-TW MY -02 ->e-WF

Project:
McCain Property
Sumnr
bankful
Cross Section:
Cross Section
4
MY3
MY4
MYS
MYO
MY1
MY2
Feature
Riffle Reach
2
A (BKF)
30.5
29.7
31.3
Station:
25+05.32
W (BKF)
23.3
23.4
24.4
Date:
10/18/10
Max d
1.8
2.0
2.1
Crew:
BW, ZAP,
SV
Mean d
1.3
1.3
1.3
W/D
17.4
18.4
19.1
MY03.2011
MY00 -2009
INYo1 -2009
MY02 -2010
Station Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
0.00 536.98
LPIN
0.00
537.03
LPIN
0.00
536.96
LPIN
5.00 536.62
1.00
536.72
0.14
536.83
11.40 536.32
4.90
536.57
7.07
536.48
18.80 535.00
9.80
536.21
14.93
536.07
23.90 534.73
TOSL
14.40
536.09
16.99
535.36
27.90 533.01
16.30
535.79
18.84
534.99
28.30 532.96
18.40
535.04
21.09
534.85
29.40 532.71
TW
19.50
534.82
24.04
534.62
TOBL
31.60 532.89
24.00
534.68
TOBL
26.40
533.67
33.60 532.94
27A0
533.34
27.45
533.25
34.80 532.81
28.50
532.52
28.30
532.55
TOE L
37.20 532.76
29.30
532.54
30.05
532.64
39.50 532.94
30.60
532.80
32.15
532.61
43.80 533.13
32.40
532.56
34.29
532.44
TW
47.70 534.52
34.60
532.46
TW
35.57
532.61
49.30 534.51
TOBR
37.00
532.74
37.56
532.76
TOE R
50.40 534.87
41.50
533.59
38.34
533.03
_ fJ
53.20 534.93
43.00
533.59
39.76
533.07
33
58.70 536.66
44.70
533.49
41,03
533.43
[1
65.90 536.65
46.00
533.70
42.30
533.59
_
69.40 536.72
RPIN
47.90
534.44
TOBR
44.75
533.51
50.50
534.82
45.77
533.63
1
54.00
535.03
47.37
534.37
56.80
535.06
48.46
534.42
59.60
536.53
49.95
534.79
TOSR
..a .
66.20
536.62
52.78
534.80
g
69.40
536.70
RPIN
54.29
535.10
/(
55.49
535.47
56.50
535.96
56.90
536.10
58.93
536.48
62.10
536.53
69.35
536.50
69.47
536.59
RPIN
Photo of XS-4, looking In the downstream direction
Cross Section 4
538.00
537.00
536.00
LL
s 53520
a,
W 534.D0
533.00
532.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 90.00
Station (Feet)
-+-TW MY -00 - Tw MY -01 -r-TW MY -02 -x BKF

Project:
McCain Property
Summa
nkfull
MYO
MY1
MY2
Cross Section: Cross Section
5
MY3
MY4 MY5
Feature
Pool Reach
2
A (BKF)
22.2
17.8
20.5
Station:
29+60.52
W (BKF)
18.1
14.3
16.0
Date:
10/18/10
Max d
2.8
2.5
2.8
Crew:
BW, ZAP,
SV
Mean d
1.2
1.2
1.3
W /D
LIY03 -2011
MY00 -2009
NY011,2009
UY112 -2010
Station Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation Notes
0.00 534.81 LPIN
0.00 534.83 LPIN
0.00 534.81 LPIN
1.30 534.61
0.85
534.55
0.10
534.66
4.50 534.49
7.04
534.34
4.64
534.53
7.10 534.47
9.74
534.25
8.58
534.52
9.90 534.27
12.69
533.03
11.79
533.58
15.60 532.08
15.31
532.09
14.13
532.51
22.10 531.29
TOBL
17.68
531.53
16.94
531.79
23.50 530.57
21.06
531.28
TOBL
19.09
531.58
24.30 530.15
22.28
531.15
21.52
531.32
TOBL
>�
24.80 530.05
23.71
530.35
22.78
530.98
26.10 528.48
TW
25.07
529.71
24.38
530.40
27.00 528.84
26.46
528.68
25.37
529.46
TOE L
28.20 528.85
28.01
528.70
26.16
528.67
29.20 529.10
28.55
528.61
TW
27.85
528.46
TW
29.90 529.40
29.77
529.27
30.26
529.36
31.00 529.75
30.71
529.72
31.96
529.68
TOE R
31.70 530.04
32.08
530.26
32.69
530.30
33.10 530.28
34.31
530.73
33.54
530.76
TOBR
35.60 530.77
38.84
531.56
TOBR
34.93
530.94
38.60 530.66
42.10
531.99
37.34
531.25
42.30 532.07
TOBR
45.60
532.03
39.09
531.60
46.90 532.25
47.75
532.36
42.04
531.96
53.00 534.62
50.39
533.56
44.65
532.04
56.70 534.80
53.09
534.59
47.54
532.32
60.80 534.90
57.36
534.68
49.05
533.30
65.10 535.20
RPIN
61.80
534.85
50.87
533.82
65.09
535.23
RPIN
53.22
534.64
57.43
534.76
61.37
534.89
64.64
535.11
64.92
535.11
RPIN
Photo of XS-5, looking In the downstream direction
Cross Section 5
536.00
535-10
534.00
533-10
C
532.00
4
531.00
530-10
529-10
528.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.0 40.00 50.00 80.00 70.00
Station (Feet)
-� TW MY -00 f TW MY -0 1 -a- TW MY -02 -x- BKF

Project:
McCain Property
Sunma
banktul
Cross Section:
Cross Section
6
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Feature
Rime Reach
2
A (BKF)
30.8
25.2
27.8
Station:
31 +23.66
W (BKF)
20.6
18.4
20.8
Date:
10/18/10
Max d
2.1
2.0
• 2.2
Crew:
BW, ZAP,
SV
Mean d
1.5
1.4
1.3
W/D
13.8
13.4
15.5
MYDO.2009
MY01 -2009
MY02 -2010
MY03.2011
Station Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation Notes
0.00 534.05
LPIN
0.00
534.06
LPIN
0.00
534.05
LPIN
-i
1.20 533.88
0.70
533.82
0.46
533.87
5.30 533.79
6.70
533.62
3.65
533.88
12.00 532.04
11.40
532.13
6.56
533.73
-
- .
..
18.40 531.79
19.30
531.73
9.79
532.77
i
�*' "' *,.,,
,; +y(
„ -
27.20 531.57
TOOL
27.10
531.56
TOOL
12.11
532.09
,y _•
31.90 529.62
30.00
530.32
17.67
531.84
°
35.40 529.32
31.90
529.56
23.58
531.71
'r
37.20 529.17
35.50
529.56
25.48
531.75
-:x<� x5-6
39.20 529.13
TW
37.20
529.46
27.37
531.63
TOOL'
41.30 529.29
3940
529.10
29.66
530.59
43.10 529.25
43.70 529.27
40.30
41.60
528.98
529.06
TW
31.44
32.62
530.13
529.76
- %i"�tt1•� ><tf ea t
44.30 529.66
43.80
529.14
35.86
529.59
TOE Lz
r
'S
y�e,
-?� '°'�
48.60 531.25
TOO R
44.70
529.74
37.90
529.44
} i } ,: t 1` % 1•. 3
�. "r 'b'}
53.70 531.47
46.80
530.99
39.28
529.27
57.90 533.34
48.90
531.22
TOM
41.25
529.31
60.00 533.68
53.90
531.45
43.16
529.12
TW
�"
65.80 533.81
67.80 534.22
RPIN
56.60
58.60
532.70
533.50
44.05
44.57
529.34
530.01
TOE R
i'+ np
a''.
qdC c.
63.50
67.40
533.69
533.93
45.87
47.21
530.55
531.14
a svSt
,yr"
< 1'
67.70
534.23
RPIN
50.46
531.45
➢
..
54.62
531.68
TOBR
A
a `r l rt;,
56.73
58.82
532.93`f
533.61
pct
y.
60.49
533.81
,
"•�
63.53
533.88
7. '!�"S 4`
I /u<
67.45
534.10
tK':Cc & ✓f Sr`� rs
67.46
534.26
RPIN
Photo of XS-6, looking in the downstream direction
Cross Section 6
53540
5344D
53340
53240
C
s
53140
W
530.00
52940
52840
0.00
1040
20.00
30.00 40.00 50.00 6040
70.00
MW
Station (Feet)
-�TW MY -00 . TW MY -01 --I--TW MY -02 tBKF

I
O
O
I
C�
G
Y
O
.L
NI
cn
x
co
T
1�
O
O
•
T
OI
n
O
i
CO
O
_ N
O
+
O
O
0
0
N
+
O
O
W
O
O
FAH
O
V
O
00
+
O
O
CC
O
0
N
O
+p
O
_N
+
O
O
N
+
O
N
W
t
O
O
O
N
+
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
4
0
0
co
0
0
N
+
O
O
W
O
+
O
O
W
+
O
O
N
O
O
W
W
+
O
O
+
O
O
W
(11
+
O
O
Elevation (feet)
W 01 o
n
7 N T+
7
vi IC
P* .0
o �: o
ROCK STRUCTURE
STA 10 +18
Y
+
77
m
n++
+
ROCK STRUCTURE
TA 12 +49
•
Y +
CROSS SECTION 1
+ STA 12 +11
iE+ 4F
•4+
r
r + +
+
+ ++
ROCK STRUCTURE i
STA 15 +50
eY
4f-
+
+ +
+
STA 16 +25
e
14
+
r
POCK
STRUCTURE
STA 18 +62
�{ }+
+
}
44M
+
' ++
r
e
1
�
N
'
"+Y
;K+ +
STA 23 +461,
ROCK STRUCTURE
STA 24+41
Y
Y
+
STA 25 +05
R
+
+
+ �+
r +
+
dr
Y
+
4.
CROSS SECTION 5
• +
STA 29 +61
MUUK
STRU
STA 3
URE
74 Y
r
i+
STA 31 +24
Y
ROC
STRU
TURE
f*
+
STA +41
+
+
+
fi +
n
7 N T+
7
vi IC
P* .0
o �: o

PEBBLE COUNT
Project: McCain Property Date: 9/10/2010
Location: Cross Section #1
Particle Counts
Inches
Particle
Millimeter
13.5
Riffles
Pools
Total No.
Item %
% Cumulative
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
::::S /i✓::::
3
3
3%
3%
Very Fine
.062-.125
S ::::
11
11
10%
13%
Fine
.125-.25
A ::::
12
12
11%
24%
Medium
.25-.50
N ::::
20
20
19%
43%
Coarse
.50-1.0
R.:.:.:.:.
4
4
4%
46%
.04-.08
1 Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
: S ::::
1
1
1 %
47%
.08-.16
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
1
1
1%
48%
.16-.22
Fine
4.0-5.7
:::::G:::::::::
1
1
1 %
49%
.22-.31
Fine
5.7-8.0
:::::R:::::
0
0
0%
49%
.31-.44
Medium
8.0-11.3
:::::a::::;::::
0
0
0%
49%
.44-.63
Medium
11.3-16.0
::: V ::::
2
2
2%
51%
.63-.89
Coarse
16.0-22.6
::-::::::::
2
2
2%
53%
.89-1.26
Coarse
22.6-32.0
:::::ir:::::
3
40%
3
3%
56%
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
:::S:::::::::
2
2
2%
57%
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
::
13
13
12%
69%
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C ::::
10
10
9%
79%
3.5-5.0
Small
90-128
:::::6:::::
16
16
15%
94%
5.0-7.1
Large
128-180
:::S:::::
5
5
5%
98%
7.1 - 10.1
Large
180-256
L ::::
0
0
0%
98%
10.1 - 14.3
Small
256-362
B ::::
1
1
1 %
99%
14.3-20
Small
362-512
1:::::::
0
0
0%
99%
20-40
Medium
512-1024
:::::D:::::
0
100000
0
0%
99%
40-80
Lr - Ve Lr
1024-2048
:::::::R:::::::::
0
0
0%
99%
Bedrock
;:;: >}RK ;:;
1
1
1%
100%
Totals 108 0 108 100% 100%
IF­dI6
d35
d50
d84
d95
0.2
0.4
13.5
103.6
144.6
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 1: Riffle
100%
90%
80%
m
A
70%
60%
V
- 0 MY -00
50%
—9 MY -01
c
t
A MY -02
40%
m
LL
30%
0
20%
10%
0%
0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
100000
Particle Size - Millimeter

PEBBLE COUNT
Project: McCain Property Date: 9/10/2010
Location: Cross Section #2
Particle Counts
Inches
Particle
Millimeter
24.2
Riffles
Pools
Total No.
Item %
% Cumulative
90%
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
Std::::
1
0
1
1%
1%
Very Fine
.062-,125
..5 :.
2
0
2
2%
3%
Fine
.125-.25
A ::::
2
0
2
2%
5%
Medium
.2,5-.50
4
0
4
4%
9%
Coarse
.50- 1.0
Q ::::
0
0
0
0%
9%
.04 -.08
1 Very Coarse
1 1.0 - 2.0
S ::::
15
0
15
15%
1 24%
.08 - .16
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0
0
0%
24%
.16-.22
Fine
4.0-5.7
:G::::-:
2
0
2
2%
25%
.22-.31
Fine
5.7-8.0
R:::::
3
0
3
3%
28%
.31 -.44
Medium
8.0 - 11.3
Q:::::::::
3
0
3
3%
31%
.44-.63
Medium
11.3 - 16.0
::'::::V*:':-:-:-
5
0
5
5%
36%
.63-.89
Coarse
16.0-22.6
::: :::::
12
0
12
12%
48%
.89-1.26
Coarse
22.6-32.0
: :::L:::::
9
0
9
9%
57%
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
::;S;:;:::::
5
0
5
5%
62%
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
9
0
9
90/.
71%
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
10
0
10
10%
80%
3.5-5.0
Small
90- 128
Ci::: : -:
9
0
9
9%
89%
5.0-7.1
Large
128-180
:B:::::
5
0
5
5%
94%
7.1 -10.1
Large
180-256
L
4
0
4
4%
98%
10.1 -14.3
Small
256-362
B ::::
1
0
1
1 %
99%
14.3-20
Small
362-512
::::::::::
0
0
0
0%
99%
20-40
Medium
512 - 1024
D ::: =:
0
0
0
00/.
99%
40-80
Lr Ve Lr
1024 2048
:::::R
0
0
0
0%
99%
Bedrock
BDRK
1
0
1
1%
100%
.. Totals 102 0 102 100% 100%
d16
d35
d50
d84
d95
1.5
14.7
24.2
105.5
197.1
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 2: Riffle
100%
90%
80%
d
70%
3
60%
— 0 MY -00
V
50%
3 MY -01
c
—A MY -02
r
40%
L
d
LL
30%
a
20%
10%
0%
0.1 1
10 100 1000 10000
100000
Particle Size - Millimeter

PEBBLE COUNT
Project: McCain Property Date: 9/10/2010
Location: Cross Section #3
Particle Counts
Inches
Particle
Millimeter
31.0
Riffles
Pools
Total No.
Item %
% Cumulative
90
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
SIC::::
9
9
9%
9%
Very Fine
.062-.125
2
2
2%
11%
Fine
.125-.25
A ::::
0
0
0%
11%
Medium
.25-.50
:::N ::::-
0
0
00/.
11%
Coarse
.50- 1.0
Q ::::
0
0
0%
11%
.04-.08
Very Coarse
1 1.0 - 2.0
S ::::
6
6
6%
1 17%
.08 - .16
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0
0%
17%
.16 - .22
Fine
4.0-5.7
G
0
0
0%
17%
.22-.31
Fine
5.7-8.0
R:::::
5
5
5%
22%
.31 -.44
Medium
8.0 - 11.3
R ::::
r
5
5
5%
26%
.44-.63
Medium
11.3 - 16.0
V ::::
6
6
6%
32%
.63-.89
Coarse
16.0-22.6
:.::::::::
9
9
9%
41%
.89-1.26
Coarse
22.6-32.0
:::::L:::::
10
10
10%
51%
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
:::S:::::::::
9
9
9%
60%
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
10
10
10%
70%
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C ::
7
7
70/.
76%
3.5-5.0
Small
90-128
O:::::
5
5
5%
81%
5.0-7.1
Large
128-180
:B:::::
0
0
0%
81%
7.1 -10.1
Large
180-256
L ::::
0
0
0%
81%
10.1 -14.3
Small
256-362
0
0
0%
81%
14.3-20
Small
362-512
:::: :::::::::
0
0
0%
81%
20-40
Medium
512-1024
: :::D—.*.
0
0
0%
81%
40-80
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
:::::R
0
0
0%
81%
Bedrock
BDRK
19
19
19%
100%
Totals 0 102 102 100% 100%
d16
d35
d50
d84
d95
1.9
17.8
31.0
0.0
0.0
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 3: Pool
100%
- -
90
80%
a�
a
70
60%
0 MY -00
v
50%
9 MY -01
r
—6 MY -02
�—
40%
m
LL
30
0
20%
10%
0%
0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
100000
Particle Size - Millimeter

PEBBLE COUNT
Project: McCain Property Date: 9/10/2010
Location: Cross Section #4
Particle Counts
Inches
Particle
Millimeter
24.0
Riffles
Pools
Total No.
Item %
% Cumulative
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S /C::::
1
1
1%
1%
Very Fine
.062-.125
S ::::
2
2
2%
3%
Fine
.125-.25
A ::::
2
d
2
2%
4%
Medium
.25-.50
::: IV ::::
1
1
1%
5%
Coarse
.50- 1.0
::: D ::::
0
0
0%
5%
.04-.08
1 Very Coarse
1 1.0 - 2.0
::: 5 ::::
4
4
4%
9%
.08 - .16
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
5
5
4%
13%
.16-.22
Fine
4.0-5.7
:::G:::::::::
5
5
4%
18%
.22-.31
Fine
5.7-8.0
R:::::
4
4
4%
21%
.31 -.44
Medium
8.0 - 11.3
4
—6 MY -02
4
4%
25%
.44-.63
Medium
11.3- 16.0
1L ::::
6
6
5%
30%
.63-.89
Coarse
16.0 - 22.6
:: ::E`:::::
20
m
20
18%
47%
.89-1.26
Coarse
22.6-32.0
:::L:::::
15
15
13%
61%
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
:::$;:::;:;:;
13
13
11%
72%
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
7
7
6%
78%
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C ::::
9
9
8%
86%
3.5-5.0
Small
90-128
:::O:::::
5
5
4%
90%
5.0 - 7.1
Large
128-180
:B:::::
3
3
3%
93%
7.1 -10.1
Large
180-256
L ::::
0
0
0%
93%
10.1 -14.3
Small
256-362
B ::
0
0
0%
93%
14.3-20
Small
362-512
f~ ::::
0
0
0%
93%
20-40
Medium
512-1024
:::D:::::
0
0
0%
93%
40-80
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
0
0
0%
93%
Bedrock
-BOR71
8
1
1 8
1 7%
1 100%
Totals 114 0 114 100% 100%
dll
d35
d50
d84
d95
5.3
1 17.8
24.0
83.5
0.0
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 4: Riffle
100%
- -
90%
80
d
70%
60%
0 MY -00
v
- l MY -01
50
t
—6 MY -02
40%
m
LL 30%
0
20%
-
10%
0%
0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
100000
Particle Size - Millimeter

PEBBLE COUNT
Project: McCain Property Date: 9/10/2010
Location: Cross Section #5
Particle Counts
Inches
Particle
Millimeter
1 66.6
Riffles
Pools
Total No.
Item %
% Cumulative
90%
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
E:�:::S/G-
3
3
3%
3%
Very Fine
.062-.125
S ::::
8
8
7%
10%
Fine
.12.5-.25
: A :::::
9
9
8%
18%
Medium
.25-.50
3
3
3%
21%
Coarse
so- 1.0
D ::::
5
5
4%
25%
.04-.08
Very Coarse
1.0 - 2.0
S ::::
12
12
11%
36%
.O8 - .16
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
3
3
3%
38%
.16-.22
Fine
4.0-5.7
:G:::::
3
3
3%
41%
.22-.31
Fine
5.7-8.0
R:::::
5
5
4%
46%
.31 -.44
Medium
8.0 - 11.3
i4 ::::
12
12
11%
56%
.44-.63
Medium
11.3 - 16.0
::: V ::::
12
12
11%
67%
.63-.89
Coarse
16.0-22.6
::- ::::::
12
12
11%
78%
.89-1.26
Coarse
22.6-32.0
6
6
5%
83%
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
:::$;:::::::
4
4
4%
87%
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
9
9
8%
95%
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C :
4
4
4%
98%
3.5-5.0
Small
90-128
:::O:::::
1
1
1 %
99%
5.0 - 7.1
Large
128- 180
::B:::::
0
0
0%
99%
7.1 -10.1
Large
180-256
L :
0
0
0%
99%
10.1 -14.3
Small
256-362
B .
0
0
0%
99%
14.3-20
Small
362-512
a :::::::
0
0
0%
99%
20-40
Medium
512-1024
:::D:::::
0
0
00/.
99%
40-80
Lr - Ver Lr
1024-2048
R
0
0
0%
99%
Bedrock
BDRK
1
1
1 %
100%
Totals 0 112 112 100% 100%
d16 I d35
1 d50
I d84
I d95
0.2 1 1.9
1 9.3
1 35.5
1 66.6
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 5: Pool
100% -
- - - --
90%
80%
d
70
60%-
U
50%
-0 MY -00
l MY -01
C
t
—A MY -02
40%
d
30%
LL
0
20%
10%
0%
0.1 1
10 100 1000 10000
100000
Particle Size - Millimeter

PEBBLE COUNT
Project: McCain Property Date: 9/10/2010
Location: Cross Section #6
Particle Counts
Inches
Particle
Millimeter
16.8
Riffles
Pools
Total No.
Item %
% Cumulative
90%
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
StC::::
4
4
4%
4%
Very Fine
.062 - .125
5
5
5%
9%
Fine
.125-.25
1R ::::
4
4
4%
13%
Medium
.25-.50
: N :: ::
7
7
7%
20%
Coarse
.50- 1.0
:: D ::::
1
1
1%
21%
.04-.08
Very Coarse
1.0 - 2.0
: S ::::
6
6
6%
27%
.08-.16
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
1
1
1 %
28%
.16-.22
Fine
4.0-5.7
G:::::::::
2
2
2%
30%
.22 - .31
Fine
5.7-8.0
:R:::::
7
7
7%
37%
.31 -.44
Medium
8.0 - 11.3
:idk;:: :::;::
4
4
4%
41%
.44-.63
Medium
11.3 - 16.0
: :V- ::::::::
8
MY -02
8
8%
49%
.63-.89
Coarse
16.0-22.6
::::::::::
11
11
11%
59%
.89-1.26
Coarse
22.6-32.0
:::::1:::::
11
11
11%
70%
1.26 - 1.77
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
S;:::::;::
17
17
17%
87%
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
7
7
79/.
94%
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C ::::
5
5
5%
99%
3.5-5.0
Small
90-128
::::0* -' ' ..
1
1
1 %
100%
5.0-7.1
Large
128-180
::B:::::
0
10%:
0
0%
100%
7.1 -10.1
Large
180-256
L ::::
0
0
0%
100%
10.1 -14.3
Small
256-362
B ::::
0
0
0%
100%
14.3-20
Small
362 - 512
0
0
0%
100%
20-40
Medium
512-1024
:::::D:::::
0
100000
0
0%
100%
40-80
Lr - Ve Lr
1024-2048
R::
0
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
BDRK
0
0
1 0%
1 100%
Totals 101 0 101 100% 100%
dll
d35
d50
d84
d95
0.4
1 7.5
16.8
42.6
68.9
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 6: Riffle
100%
90%
80%
m
70%
3
60
%
— 0 MY -00
V
50%
?— MY -01
`
c
MY -02
40%
m
aL
30%
20%
10%:
-
0%
0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
100000
Particle Size - Millimeter

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
McCain Stream Restoration Site /Pro'ect No. 443 - Reach: 1 286 feet
Parameter
Gauge'
Regional Curve
Pre-Existing Condition
Reference Reaches Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.6
18.7
25.9
29.3
4
10.4
27.1
18
16.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
34
95
125
125
3
150
200
35
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.7
4
0.8
1.5
1.4
1.1
Bankfull Max De th l
1.7
2.7
2.8
3.5
4
1.4
2
2
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
21.3
25.6
25.9
29.3
4
12.5
22.3
24.6
18.6
Width /Depth Ratio
8.3
14
15
17.6
4
11.6
18.5
13.2
15.4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8
5.6
6.4
8.5
3
7.4
14.4
2.1
'Bank Height Ratio
1
12
1.1
1.7
4
1
1
1
1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
9
108
58
54
63
63
72
12
2
Riffle Slope ( ft/ft)
0.01
0.076
0.007
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.002
2
Pool Length (it)
28
108
38
16
21
22
25
4
3
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.8
3.1
3
Pool Spacing (ft)
38
181
95
107
113
113
119
8
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
75 135 78
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14.5 26.8 30 35 35 38 38 40 2
Rc:Bankfull width ( ft/ft)
1 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
70 148 190 204 1
Meander Width Ratio
3.6 13 4.6
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress competency) Ib/
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport ca act W m
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B4c /E4/C4 -5
B4c /C3 /C4
134c
B4c
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3,9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
2155
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2475
285
286
Sinuosity (ft)
1.15
1.50-1.70
1.17
1.3
Water Surface Slope (Channel) ( ft/ft)
0.0070 - 0.0120
0.0067
0.0068
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0070- 0.0120
0.0067
0.0065
'Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
� c 1sr Wwlia.e vrlr ,ypcefry n•1 Rh11W rn
l =The dt +lribuR,na lnr the +c rynnxlerr cnn irclude infnrmatirn fn,n, Anh ln<.r,ir.- rau,m+wey. cord WC h,l+giurdirW rr„hW. _ =Fnr rr,rjcl +withs rn•ximnl USGS gaud rntirc,.ith tic v „jalruh,ndded brNfull •eriGr.d,•n -rare..
3. Ur .g+urvry d.h rndu c .o a +um.+e ,>(the be1t1'WI Ih.drWin smu in rrn, rhih a ,, W be Eu ue. farm the nrp,rf hat 1,, 4 - of dr terra <n+er�d.rPe.
J= Pn,rr,rH•w.,f mrheaWdring b.rrlx U, ere 6.g -d We N.,W xw•ey bye -r .In- ibmng&W: 5 .Of veludrcedd.M, 9 1h nc-N3

Table l la. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters -Cross Sections)
McCain Stream Restoration Site /Project No. 443
Cross Section 1 (Reach 1- Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Reach 2- Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (Reach 2 -Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
I MY2
I MY3
MY4
MY5
MY,
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
544.4
544.3
544.4
541
540.9
541
5376
535.5
535.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.9
17.2
18.11
24.6
25.2
27.87
22.6
23
22.25
Floodprone Width (ft)
35
37
35
63
>75
63
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.2
1.033
1.4
1.7
1.584
1.5
1.5
1.384
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
1.5
1.6
1.6
18
2.5
2.55
2.2
2.2
1 2.36
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
18.6
20.8
18.71
33.7
42.7
44.14
33.6
34.1
30.8
Bankfull Width /Depth Rati
15.4
14.2
17.52
18
14.9
17.59
-
-
-
Bankfull Entrenchment Rati
2.1
2.2
1.933
2.5
>3.0
2.261
Bankfull Bank Height Rati
1
1
1.1
1
1
0.969
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
174.2
182
184.8
119
137
137.4
97
87
90
d50 (mm)
21
18
13.5
19
17
24.2
8.1
1.7
31
Cross Section 4 (Reach 2- Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (Reach 2 -Pool)
Cross Section 6 (Reach 2- Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
534.5
534.4
534.5
531.3
531.2
531.3
531.3
531
531.31
1
Bankfull Width (ft)
23.3
23.4
23.99
18.1
14.3
16.46
20.6
18.4
20.79
Floodprone Width (ft )
47
52
47
-
-
-
51
50.5
51
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.234
1.2
1.2
1.282
1.5
1.4
1.339
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
2
1.99
1 2.8
2.5
2.88
2.1
2
2.18
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
31.2
29.7
29.61
22.2
17.8
21.1
30.8
25.2
27.84
Bankfull Width /Depth Rati
17.4
18.4
19.44
-
-
-
13.8
13.4
15.52
Bankfull Entrenchment Rati
2
2.2
1.959
2.5
2.7
2.453
Bankfull Bank Height Rati
1
1
1.095
1
1
1.069
Cross Sectional Area between end ins ft2
103
120
1 132.3
1
1
146
1 148
1 158.3
133
157.1
d50 (mm
17
14
24
0.6
3
9.3
11
H4.6
16.8
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional /depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline
datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be
included that states, "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be
recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary.'

iu ryp�cauy nut on nnw in.
1 = Th. distributions for these Daram etas can l.d ud. informavon from both the cross secvon surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 Proportion of reach exhioiting banks that are wooing based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
mmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
_
Bankfull ".
mmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
'Bankfull Max Depth
m®
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Wfim Miff
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Wicth/Deplh
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
--•
mmmmmmmmmmmmm�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
'Bank Height
mmmmmmmmmmmmm�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,
- -
•
.
mmmmm
,
mmmm
•
•
m
,.
�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�
mmmmmmmm
mmm���
•t
®
©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
mmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmm
®
©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmml
•
mmmmm©
mmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmi
• mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�mmmmmm��
mmmmmmmmmmmm
mommmmmmmmmmmmm
. ' from .:,: =
- -_ - --
mmmmmmmm
®®
®mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm-----
mmmmmmmm
Meander Width Ratio mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��
mmmmmmmm
L Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
=
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.O•:
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
of Reach with Eroding Bankz
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
iu ryp�cauy nut on nnw in.
1 = Th. distributions for these Daram etas can l.d ud. informavon from both the cross secvon surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 Proportion of reach exhioiting banks that are wooing based on the visual survey from visual assessment table

Parameter
I Baseline
I MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY-4
MY- 5
Dlmeretlon and Substrate - R:file only
Min
Mean
Mud
Mate
SD"
n
Mm
Mean
Med
Max
I SD`
Min
Mean
I Mod
I Max
SD`
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD`
I n
Min
Meanj
Med
I Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Mod
Max
S0"
n
Bankfull Width (11)
20.6
22.8
23.3
24.6
0.9
3
18.4
22.33
23.4
25.2
13.5231
3
20.79
23.08123
99
24.44
1.992
3
Floodprone Width (h)
47
54
51
63
6.2
3
51
55.33
52
63
6.658
3
47
53.67
51
1 63
8.327
3
Bankfuil Mean Depth (0)
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
0.1
3
1.3
1.467
1.4
1.7
0.208
3
1,281
1.425
1.339
1.655
0.201
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
1.8
1.9
1.8
2.1
0.2
3
2
2 167
2
2.5
0.289
3
2.06
2.197
2.18
2.35
0.146
3
Banklull Cross Sectional Area fix
30.8
31.89
31.2
33.7
13
3
25.2
32.53
297
42.7
9.088
3
27.86
32.95
31.3
39.71
6.102
3
Width /Depth Ratio
13.8
16.4
17.4
18
0.8
3
13.4
15.57
14.9
18.4
2.566
3
14.5
16.37
15.52
19.09
2.41
3
Entrenchment Ratio
2
2.3
2.5
2.5
0.1
3
2.2
2 467
25
2.7
0.252
3
1 923
2.334
2.453
2.626
0.366
3
'Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
1 051
1.059
1.058
1.069
0.009
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
20.0
68.0
76.0
97.0
23.0
13
16.0
13.0
65.8
692
112.0
29.3
17
Riffle Slope (tt/fi
0.003
0.009
0008
0.019
0.004
13
0.001
0.002
0.011
0.007
0.059
0.013
17
Pool Length (ft)
12.0
22.0
23.0
33.0
6.0
13
12.0
a292
29.4
57.0
50.1
160.4
30.6
19
Pool Max depth (ft)
22
25
26
2
1.8
3.1
2.8
5.9
0.9
19
Pool Spacing (ft)
56.0
117.0
123.0
1500
250
12
520
76.9
121.5
116.5
183 71
31
18
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 20 66 62
97
24 10
Radius of Curvature (ft) 35 49 43
80
14 12
Pattern data will not typically is cosigned unless visual data cline onal data or profile data
imticale significant shil;s from baseline
Rc:Banktull width (0/ft) 1.5 2.2 2.2
3.3
Meander Wavelength (ft) 158 221 229
261
36 10
Meander Width Ratio 1.9 3.1 2.7
4.8
Addltlonal Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2182
2182
2182
Sinuosity (ft)
1.18
1.18
1.18
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.0067
0.0066
BF slope (f /ft)
0.0065
0.0067
0.0068
Ri % /RU % /P % /G % /S°
54%
1 2%
32%
1 16%
SC %/ Sa % /G % /C %/ B %/ Be-.
###
11%
1 10%
171%
1 7%
0%
1%
d 16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
1.6
6.22
14.06
41.34
97.76
: % of Reach with Eredin Bank
D %
1 %
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Oth
snadad ceps indicate Inai mesa.11 typically not ae nll9tl in
I - The disInbutons for these parameters can include information from both the Cross- section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are anteing based on the visual survey from visual assessment fable

Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report-final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Chapel Creek Stream Restoration - Project No. 77
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo #
Collection
November 17, 2009
November 13, 2009
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage
N/A
after storm events
September 30, 2010
September 30, 2010
NWS COOP Station and site visit for
photo 14
confirmation
A stream crest gauge was installed on the site on November 1, 2010. The data for the rainfall
event was collected from NWS Cooperative Observer Station Asheboro 2 W (310286) located in
Asheboro, NC. The daily observed precipitation on September 30, 2010 shows rainfall of 3.81
inches over a 24 hour period which is greater than the bankfull storm event for the project
location. Photo 14 shows the wrack line on the bank providing evidence of the bankfull event on
the project site.
Photo 14. Wrack line
McCain Stream Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report -final
NCEEP Project number: 443 Year 2 of 5
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. November 2010

+ indicates record also occurred in previous years (last occurrence listed)
Official data and data for additional locations and years are available from the Regional Climate
Centers and the National Climatic Data Center
NOWData
- NOAA Online Weather Data -
ASHEBORO 2 W (310286)
-
Daily Almanac 1
i
Date Sep 30, 2010
- -
Daily Values -
Observed
- Normal
- Record /Year
Prev Year,
Max Temperature
76
_ i__761
90
in _1954
71 _
Min Temperature
r 63
1 561,
38
in 1967 +,,
50
Avg Temperature
69 5
- 66,
80 0
in 1954+
60 5
Precipitation- ' � -
- 3 81-
0 13 --
- 3 81
in 2010
0 00
New Snowfall' -_
- _
_ =
0 0
in- 2009+
_0 0 _
Snow Depth
-
t -
6
in 20'09+
- 0 _
HDD, (base 65)
0
2
r 13
in 1967 +'
4
CDD (base 65)
5 -
- -3
- 15
in 19154+
0
-. }
Month -To -Date
Observed
Normal
Record /Year
Prev Year
Avg Max Temperature
85 4
79 6
88 2
in 1933
78 3
Avg Min Temperature
63 3
61 1
54 9
in 1967
60 3
Avg Temperature
74 4
70 4
76 5
in 1933
69 3
Total Precipitation
6 63
4 22
14 16
in 1928
3 69
Total Snowfall
-
-
0 0
in 2009
0 0
Avg Snow Depth
-
-
0
in 2009
0
Total HDD
3
15
68
in 1928
14
Total CDD
293
175
355
in 1931
150
+ indicates record also occurred in previous years (last occurrence listed)
Official data and data for additional locations and years are available from the Regional Climate
Centers and the National Climatic Data Center

—.7 .iu u --. vi
Precipitation Frequency Estimates (inches)
ARI' 15 30 0 ff2-0- 12 10 20 3 [�55�Mo ��� 3 hr 6 hr 24 hr 48 hr 4 day 7 day min uun mm —0 hr y da
�1 Fo 4-01 064 OF 8 01 110 137 161 172 209 248 289 338 380 435 495 667 82
�2
0 48 F6-761
0 96 1 32 1 66 1 96 209
2 52
2 99
3 49
4 07
4 56
5 19 5 89
7 86 9 6
5055
089
112
159
204
243
260
314
374 437 505
561
631 708 928 11
10 060 097
122
177
231
277
298 361
434
505 580
643
719
800 1041
12
0 66 1 06
1 34 1 98 2 64
3 20 3 47 4 24 5 14
5 97 6 82
7 55
8 39
9 25 11 94
14
50
070
111
141
212
288
353
385
472
579
671
761
843
935
1023
1314
15
100
®0
0 73
76
1 16
1 20
1 47 2 25 3 10 3 84 4 21 5 22 6 45 7 45 8 43
1 51 2 36 3 31 4 15 4 58 5 71 7 14 8 22 9 26
9 34
10 32
11 22
14 36
16
10 26
11 32
12 23
15 59 17
500
0 78 1 24
1 56 2 48 3 56
4 54 5 06
6 38
8 09
9 27 10 39
11 53
12 69
13 60
17 27 19
1000 0 80 l 26
1 58 2 56 3 74 4 83 5 42 6 90 8 85 10 10 11 28
l2 52
1'i 77
l4 67 l 8 58 20
These precipitation frequency estimates are based on a partial duration senes ARI isthe Average Recurrence Interval
Please rater to NOAA Atlas 14 Document for more information NOTE Formatting forces eshmates near zero to appear as zero
n n n rn n n
®1041 1246 Q
1218 1453
26 13 94 1640
47 15 29 17 84
07 17 07 19 69
31 18 42 21 09
53 19 74 22 43 a
76 21 OS 23 73
39 227 7 25 42 O
65 24 08 26 69
y T O
_ a
y� o
a
r
a
a
Q
a
Q
0
a
D