20050408 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20110114 403

I
R i
!''�7-� . ''�' • .fit i
UT to Sandy Creek
Randolph County, North Carolina
2010 Year 3 Monitoring Report - Final
EEP Project Number: 403
USGS Ht 1C 0-30-3000310200 10
EcoEn`ineerin`g, Project Number: IEP -08030
Prepared for:
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Pro`7ram
?7?8 Capital Blvd., Suite 1 H 103
Raleigh, NC 27604
r. ii'•-� ; it �.�'itK;i.+
P. 0. Box 14005 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
919 -287 -4262 FAX [phone]
www.ecoengr.com

1
0
1
1
1
0
UT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Third Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011)
Table of Contents
1 0 Executive Summary/Project Abstract
I 1 Project Goals and Objectives
1 2 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
1 3 Stream Stability /Condition and Comparison
1 4 Wetland Conditions and Performance
1 5 Monitoring Plan View
2 0 Methodology
3 0 References
Protect Conditions and Monitoring Data Appendices
Appendix A — General Figures and Plan Views
O Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
1
0
L,
11
0
0
0
0
I
0
1
Appendix B — General Project Tables
Table 1 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Appendix C — Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 6 Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
— Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (see Appendix F — Project Photo Stations)
— Vegetation Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically)
— Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically)
Appendix D — Stream Assessment Data
dA
Table 8 Visual Morphological Stability Assessment �, r
Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events+
— Stream Station Photos (see Appendix F — Project Photo Stations) `�'�'
— Cross Sections with Annual Overlays l
— Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
— Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
— BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates Table (omitted, not applicable)
— Baseline Stream Data Summary Table [Exhibit Table VIII] (submitted electronically)
— Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary [Exhibit Table IX] (Cross Section and Reach
Parameters submitted electronically)
— Stream Problem Area Photos (submitted electronically)
— Stream Problem Area Inventory Table (submitted electronically)
1
1
1
2
2
3
[JEcoEngineenng
A di ismn of The John R McAdams Company Inc

OUT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Third Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011)
Appendix E — Wetland Assessment
Table 10 Wetland Criteria Attainment (omitted, not applicable)
— Precipitation and Water Level Plots (omitted, not applicable)
0 Appendix F — Protect Photo Stations
1
0
1
0
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
ii
[JEcoEngineering
A di ism of The John R McAdams C mpany Inc
O

OUT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Third Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011)
0
10 Executive Summarv/Proiect Abstract
O11 Project Goals and Objectives
0 The goal of the restoration project is to improve the water quality and biological habitat of
the site's streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers through the following
-Restoration (pattern, dimension, and profile) of unstable streams using natural channel
O design techniques
-Re- establishment of riparian buffers (Kimley -Horn, 2008)
0 12 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
It should be noted, Vegetation Plots 1, 2, and 3 are located in a planned low - height planting
O zone These plots will not be re- sampled in the future Original baseline vegetation
monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 and 2008 is
considered a drought year The 2009 Monitoring Year 2 is considered the baseline datum
because after two years of monitoring it is assumed all planted stems within a vegetation
0 monitoring plot have been surveyed and accounted for Therefore, any additional species
observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer species During the 2009
Monitoring Year 2, some planted stems surveyed during the 2008 Monitoring Year 1 became
O dormant and missing due the drought During the 2010 Monitoring Year 3, the missing
planted stems of the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 were revitalized and were surveyed A total of
9 stems which were missing during the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 was surveyed in during the
O 2010 Monitoring Year 3 A total of 3 stems surveyed during the 2009 Monitoring Year 2
were listed as missing during the 2010 Monitoring Year 3
Current stem counts were calculated using vegetation plot monitoring data For stream
O restoration, interim density targets (stems /acre) are 320 at year 3 and 288 at year 4, final stem
count criteria are 260 stems per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring For buffer
mitigation, final stem count criteria are 320 stems per acre at the end of the five (5) year
O monitoring As for monitored Year 3, UT Sandy Creek had 6 plots encompassing 0 15 acres,
containing 83 planted and volunteer stems, which yielded a density of 560 trees per acre
including planted and volunteer species Planted and volunteer vegetation survival threshold
was met for each of the plots
0 Various invasive species were observed at the site The following invasive species were
observed at the site Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and cattail (Typha latifolia) The
O extent of exotic /invasive species is depicted in the Consolidated Current Condition Plan View
Appendix A
O13 Stream Stabihty/Condthon and Comparison
The primary concern at UT to Sandy Creek is the sporadic flow conditions observed in the channel
0 The stream was dry during a site visit this year in August, although flow was observed during the
survey work in September Flowing water in the stream channel has been observed approximately
half of the time the site has been monitored To document bankfull events a crest gage is located
approximately 11 feet upstream of cross - section 4 and is depicted in the Consolidated Current
OCondition Plan View Appendix A Evidence of a bankfull event was observed this monitoring year
1 FE-I]EcoEngineering
A di ision of Th John R McAdams Company Inc
0

OUT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Third Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011)
O
O14 Wetland Conditions and Performance
No wetlands are being monitored for mitigation credits at this project site
0 15 Monitoring Plan View
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment
0 and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found
in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration
O plan documents available on the EEP webs>te All raw data supporting the tables and figures
in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
O2 0 Methodoloyv
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by
EEP (EEP, 2006, EEP, 2009) Photographs were taken at high resolution using an Olympus
0 FE -115 5 0 megaplxel digital camera GPS location information was collected using a
Tnmble Geo XT handheld mapping grade GPS unit Stream and vegetation problem areas
were noted in the field on As -Built Plan Sheets
0 The methods used to generate the data in this report are standard fluvial geomorphology
techniques as described In Applied River Morphology (Rosgen, 1996) and related
O publications from US Forest Service and the interagency Stream Mitigation Guidelines
(USACE, 2003)
Vegetation monitoring methods followed the 2008, Version 4 2 CVS -EEP Protocol for
O Recording Vegetation (Lee et al , 2008) Vegetation plot photographs were collected for
each vegetation plot Vegetation monitoring plots were re- marked In the field by replacing all
old flagging with new orange flagging Monitoring taxonomy follows Flora of the Carolinas,
D Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (Weakley, 2007) Stem height was measured with
a folding one -meter rule Diameter at breast height and decimeter height were measured with
calipers
1
■1
1
1
2 [JEcoEngineering
A di ision of The John R McAdams Company Ioc
O

0
1
it
U
1
1
1
1
it
0
0
0
0
UT to Sandy Creek EEP Project Number 403 USGS HUC 03030003020010
Third Year Monitoring Report Randolph County North Carolina November 2010 (Updated January 2011)
3 0 References
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2006 Monitoring Report Guidelines, November
16, 2006
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), 2009 Monitoring Report Guidelines, June 1, 2009
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc, 2008 UT to Sandy Creek Stream Mitigation Report
Submitted to NCDENR -EEP, March 2008
Lee, Michael T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (http Hcvs bio unc edu/methods htm)
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied Morphology Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003 April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2005 Information Regarding Stream Restoration In
The Outer Coastal Plain of North Carolina US Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, Regulatory Division and North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, December 1, 2005
Weakley, A S , 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virgmia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and
surrounding areas University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina
Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, working Draft as of
April 7, 2008
3 [JEcoEngineering
A dv �m of The John R McAdams Company Inc

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
i
0
1
a
APPENDIX A
General Figures and Plan View

� : ✓ fir,.. Ir l •�4 { /J4A �. a.�
d . .,,,fi P` fr J f r`� 1. � � •:��'y V � '+� � y, `,� –� �.
y,.:. ,� �,.�""'�., ' •,.,� �G it ttr° w �'� _ _
N
Tf
d
`-PROJECT AREArr
igzjL
cl
0 64
5_11
� r
,
r
f
Y '
G _
r`
J�
uSGS, 7.5 MINUTE, TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE;
GRAYS CHAPEL, N.C.; 1974; LAT: 35.8380510' N
ON: 79.6601200' W
PROJECT NO EEP -08030 ~
T SANDY CREEK [JEcoEngineering'
FILENAME: EEP — 08030 � UT TO A division of The Jolm R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Cy `�(r * { A n ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS • ENVIRONMENTAL
SCALE: �` C III ,. VICINITY l 1 1V1L -1r
,'a 1 �� = 1,000 � RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK •CHARLOTTE
DATE: 08-13-10 l I I i II�� (F�i;' f LPH COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA zla5 Harlmao Park�a9, Durham NC 27717
} IOo-M5646 • w joharmeaduro -rom . Ij— No.: C -0217 -A

UT TO SANDY CREEK
CONSOLIDATED CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW - YEAR THREE MONITORING
VICINITY MAP
NTS
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP PROJECT NUMBER: 403
DATE: AUGUST 23, 2010
NORTH CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
NC -EEP CONTACT: MELONIE ALLEN (919) 368 -9352
SHEET INDEX
I of4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN VIEW (STA. 100 +00 TO 105+00)
2 of4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN VIEW (STA. 105 +00 TO I 11+00)
3 of4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN VIEW (STA. 111 +00 TO 118 +00)
4 of4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN VIEW (STA. 118 +00 TO 123 +55)
®gym
��i
/sr.; ..R:Yar•ir.�.cYt.
�• 59 �A,'N �aanehton
:•irs�a.r!'..s�
PROJECT AREA
�iL:!
r'• YiF :•iir.:..:SL!:R.;.)•t.'.1.5!t�
°��'
11 (aw
\l
e
�iL.T,.
Y7f4iiL?'•!9ii.T.'..i�'i��
�r
VICINITY MAP
NTS
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP PROJECT NUMBER: 403
DATE: AUGUST 23, 2010
NORTH CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
NC -EEP CONTACT: MELONIE ALLEN (919) 368 -9352
SHEET INDEX
I of4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN VIEW (STA. 100 +00 TO 105+00)
2 of4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN VIEW (STA. 105 +00 TO I 11+00)
3 of4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN VIEW (STA. 111 +00 TO 118 +00)
4 of4 CONSOLIDATED PLAN VIEW (STA. 118 +00 TO 123 +55)
NOTE: SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP -OF -BANK - 06/28/10 TO 06/30/10.
Y
i •�tp
JllITI
�R�GtPII
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc,
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS• SURVEYORS• ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK • CHARLOTTE
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713
600- 733 -5646 . www.johnrmeadams.com . License No.: C -0293
®gym
��i
/sr.; ..R:Yar•ir.�.cYt.
}fsr���t
:•irs�a.r!'..s�
�iL:!
r'• YiF :•iir.:..:SL!:R.;.)•t.'.1.5!t�
°��'
�iL.T,.
Y7f4iiL?'•!9ii.T.'..i�'i��
��_iL.'n:
iiw.�.iiL
}•.r.1.f }1•
`�iiaia�'
11�C'�
E'.L ➢aiL.?
�'�GiiL�S_'r
-C [,14'���ii���'
Jl�
�:;,.�a��`.�._y�
-tom
.�.:a:��s�>•
�_i�SL•
?.FLT
iE'.:�.':Y1r:!.i�'•Yw•
i �
��_
�'iLL?:YId:!:1♦iL:SliTd:
?.i
��: -�R�
�a�3�ir-
rYlr.!iS3L:R:Y�
'1C
`y�airsr..:w.Yair
sr.yxri�'�
���
+fir
rl•:FYa�.�.rs�.��rc��
����
•Yrc:.�©
�• •Y..1•ir
rrxr�ir
rrx.:.��a0
NOTE: SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND TOP -OF -BANK - 06/28/10 TO 06/30/10.
Y
i •�tp
JllITI
�R�GtPII
EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc,
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS• SURVEYORS• ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK • CHARLOTTE
2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham NC 27713
600- 733 -5646 . www.johnrmeadams.com . License No.: C -0293

LEGEND
EASEMENT MARKER FOUND
IRON MARKER FOUND
OVERHEAD WIRE OW
EXISTING FENCE LINE x x
THALWEG OF CREEK
INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR - - -- - -
INDEX CONTOUR — — — — —
TOB OF BANK --TB --
BOTTOM OF BANK - -eg --
LOG VANE
ROCK OR STONE
ROOT WAD
ROCK VANE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT CE
50 FOOT BUFFER
INVASIVE /EXOTIC VEGETATION
PHOTO POINT 1
CREST GAGE
STREAM PROBLEM AREA
r
D
_ Q _
_ D
I )
0
D
QD
50 FOOT BUFFER
II VEG.
PLOT #2*
72 CM
V �5 -
72
_
VEG.
PLOT #1
J
NOTE: SURVEY DATES OF THALWEG AND
TOP -OF -BANK - 06/28/10 TO 06/30/10.
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
CROSS SECTION 2
;4
50
;5
VEG.
PLOT A
/
QROSS SECTION 1
/A 5002
*NOTE: VEGETATION PLOTS 1, 2, AND 3 ARE LOCATED IN A PLANNED
LOW— HEIGHT PLANTING ZONE. VEGETATION PLOTS 1, 2, AND 3 WILL
NOT BE RE— SAMPLED IN THE FUTURE.
m
i m
a
cy
Q9920
- - - - -I I Q a
/
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
/
/
50 FOOT BUFFER
19-
w
U
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
SHEET 1 OF 4
i
w <°
T�
1�
,W
�w
V
Q
z
0
H
z
O
U
z
r✓
0
z
F-
z
O
U
z
n.
O
Q
z
O X
O
0o 0 4-
I
a of II
w d t 00 I
w w 0
w °
Z
F
o Z F
o
NIcADAMS

STREAM CROSSING -, �_ /
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
50 FOOT BUFFER /
/
5
/
/
Nqq
Y
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
too&"
ra
"a
9903 ��
— — — LIGUSTRUM SINENSE \
FOOT BUFFER
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
g
4P
5�
�y
z
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
I inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 2 OF 4
w
o e
0
Lu
F
!� Q
V 1
O
Q
z
O
CC
Q
U
s
0
z
O
U
s
a
O
D
z
0 X
pr) 0 0
m 0 ° i
0 00
1 ° u
a
w 0
W W a0
w °
c
z
F �
:J
McADAMS

LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
ENCROACHMENT
i
�\ 5008'
i CROSS SECTION 6 5007
w
CROSS SECTION 5 41 \
501
PLOT #6 w •
5006 6`d� 5009
0 FOOT BUFFER MQSE BOULDE �____,ea' z�/`�/
5005 _ �` v
71 \ ...y
— — — — — — — CROSS SECTION \3\ a
0 FOOT BUFFER
r i
VEG. '
TYPHA LATIFOLIA PLOT #5
* i
/'ENCROACHMENT — — — — —
� s
I �
TYPHA LATIFOLIA
-�:
ENCROACHMENT
u cr:."
LaO ma
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
I inch = 50 ft.
SHEET 3 OF 4
O'
W
i
W
U
Q
z
O
0
n
0
0
I
d
w
w
zz
F
U
O
C
x
0 0
p) o
o
Co
0 II
I j
a
w 0
w
s
G {�
z < F
fU/1 O
McADAMS

M
F
W �
W
Z /
W
W
W
x
U
F-
Q
♦
SAND BAR
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE ENCROACHMENT
7a \ * \ \ \ -�.� 50 FOOT BUFFE
`♦ 9B
\`B`''" --- T814*09'-- TB--- - -7e_,
i \ �
— - -TB— _ ��4 SI_ -7B
\ — TB — — ��— �• n
TB
— �BB--
\ —
—TB — —
50 FOOT BUFFER \
\
4t, \
TYPHA LATIFOLIA
ENCROACHMENT
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE
ENCROACHMENT t
LIGUSTRUM SINENSE x
ENCROACHMENT
GRAPHIC SCALr,
40 0 20 40 BO
1 inch = 40 ft.
U
CD
w4•�o
0 e ��
Wd
rg;��
0
0
m
0
I
a
w
w
0
z
F
U
W
Q
z
a�
O
x
0 0
n 0
0 I
0
0 II
d ao
w
w 0
Z
Z
O
SHEET 4 OF 4 J VIcADA11S

0
U
0
0
u
1
1
1
1
0
n
ri
Fl
u
1
APPENDIX B
General Project Tables

1
1
I
i
1
1
Exhibit Table 1 Project Restoration Components
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Pro , ect /EEP Project Number 403
Protect
eo
O
O
Segment or
Q
O
O CQ
R
°,-1° 12
O
LIE
Reach ID
W"I
F
Q
W. Q
Stationing
Comment
Mitigation Units exclude 2
ford structures which total 50
Reach 1
1 000
R
P1
1 400
1
1,350
100 +00 - 114 +00
feet
J
Reach II
870
R
P1
900
1
900
114 +00 - 123 +00
J384
Reach III
290
R
P1
384
1
200+00 203 +84
Pond Tributary
Mitigation Unit Summations z' d
Riparian
Nonnpanan
Total Wetland
I(Ac)
Stream
Wetland Ac
Wetland Ac
Buffer Ac
Comment
2,634
01
0
413
R= Restoration
OEI= Enhancement
1
1'
D
0
0
0
0
0
EH= Enhancement II P1= Priority I P3= Pnonty III
S= Stabilization P2= Priority II SS =Stream Bank Stabilization

1
1
1
1
i`i
1
1
0
1
0
I
0
1
0
0
Exhibit Table 2 Protect Activity and Reporting History
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Project/EEP Project Number 403
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
Wmter 04
Jan -05
Final Design — 90%
Summer 06
Wmter 06
Construction
Summer 07
Fall 07
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
Summer 07
Fall 07
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments 1 & 2
Fall 07
Fall 07
Containerized and B &B plantings for reach/segments 1 & 2
Fall 07
Wmter 07
Mitigation Plan / As built ear 0 Momtorm — baselme
Wmter 07
Mar 08
Year 1 Momtormg
Oct 08
Nov -08
Year 2 Mowtoring
Sep 09
Nov -09
Year 3 Monitoring
Jun -10
Oct 10
Note Tuneframe estimated from information provided by EEP

0
0
0
iI
i
0
1
Exhibit Table 3 Protect Contacts Table
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 403
Designer
Krmley Horn and Associates Inc
P O Box 33068, Raleigh, North Carolma 27636
Prunary project design POC
POC name and phone [phone]
Construction Contractor
Appalachian Environmental Services
PO Box 52, Webster, NC 28788
Construction contractor POC
phone [phone]
Planting Contractor
Contact Appalachian Environmental Services
PO Box 52, Webster, NC 28788
Planting contractor POC
phone [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Contact Appalacluan Environmental Services
PO Box 52, Webster, NC 28788
Planting contractor POC
phone [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Contact Appalachian Environmental Services
phone [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Contact Appalachian Environmental Services
hone 828 -586 1973
Monitoring Performers
EcoEngineenng - A Division of The John R McAdams Co
2905 Mendian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
Stream Monitoring POC Jim Halley
919 287 -4262
Vegetation Monitoring POC Jun Halley
919 287 4262
Wetland Monitoring POC NA INA
Q Note Information obtained from EEP documents and bid tabulation results Use contacts in table for additional
information or to verify data
1
1
1
0
0
1
0

0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
FI
1
0
[J
�rl
U
�I
0
1
Exhibit Table 4 Protect Background Table
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Pro ect/EEP Project Number 403
Project County
Randolph County
Drainage Area
4 2 square mules
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %) For example
Estimated at 1 %
Stream Order
1st for UT to Sandy Creek
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Carolina Slate Belt
Rosgen Classification of As -built
C
Cowardm Classification
R3UBH
Dominant soil types
Chewacla loam, Vance
Reference site ID
Reference Reach Tributary to Sandy Creek
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
3030003020010
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -06 -09
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
WSIH
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
NA
of project easement fenced
100%

0
i
1
0
1
OAPPENDIX C
Vegetation Assessment Data
D
li
0
El
1
1
0
fl
0
0

1
i
1
0
1
i
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
Table 5 Vegetation Plot NLti ation Success Summary Table
UT to Sandy Creek Restoration Pro ect/EEP Project ID 403
Tract
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold
Mete
Tract Mean
UT to Sandy Creek
VPl
Y
100%
VP2
Y
VVP4
Y
VP5
Y
VP6
Y
Note Threshold criteria based on planted and volunteer species

0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
II
i
0
1
Table 6 Vegetation Metadata
UT to Sand Creek Restoration Pro ect/EEP Project ID 403
Report Pre ared By
George Buchholz
Date Prepared
10/4/2010 15 27
database name
EcoEngineermg 2010 C mdb
database location
X \Projects\EEP\EEP 08030 (UT to Sandy Creek) \Storm \CVS Vegetation Data\2010
Vegetation Data
coin uter name
BUCHHOLZGEO
Me size
48701440
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN
THIS DOCUMENT- --- - —
Metadata
Descnption of database file the report worksheets and a summary of project(s) and
project data
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre for each year This excludes
live stakes
Pro j, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live
stakes all planted stems and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems dead stems
missing etc
Vigor
Frequencv distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total
stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matnx of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot dead
and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natut al
volunteers combined ) for each plot dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJECT SUMMARY - - -- -- --
Project Code
403
project Name
UT to Sandy Creek Williams Tract
Description
River Basin
Cape Fear
length(ft)
2 680
stream-to-edge width ft
25
areas m
0 02 sq miles 10 2
Required Plots calculated
6
Sampled Plots
6

(i
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
it
0
Table 6A Vegetation Condition Assessment
UT to Sandy Creek Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect ID 403
Planted Acreaae 6 86
Easement
Acreaae 1018
Number
% of
egetation
CCPV
of
Combined
Planted
C Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Very limited cover of
both woody and
0 1 acres
—
0
0
00%
1 Bare Areas
herbaceous material
red
of Concern
Woody stem densities
clearly below target
levels based on MY3
0 1 acres
—
0
0
00%
2 Low Stem
4 or 5 stem count
5 Easement
Density Areas
cntena
Encroachment
polygons at map
none
�o_tal
0
0
00%
Areas
Areas with woody
stems of a size class
3 Areas of Poor
that are obviously
0 25 acres
—
0
0
00%
Growth Rates or
small given the
i or
monitoring year
Cumaltiv"%T,i3t'al
Easement
Acreaae 1018
Number
% of
egetation
CCPV
of
Combined
Easement
Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Areas or points (if too
small to render as
1000 SF
diagonal
19
0 5
005%
4 Invasive Areas
polygons at map
red
of Concern
scale)
Areas or points (if too
5 Easement
small to render as
Encroachment
polygons at map
none
--
0
0
00%
Areas
scale)

000000000000000000000000000
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
UT to Sandy Creek Restoration PrgLect(EEP Project ID 403
Notes
1 - Original baseline veyetahon monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Momtormg Yea I and 778 is considered a drought year The')009 Momtonny Year 2 is considered the buehne datum because of two yeas of mom wring it a assumed all planted sums within a vegw&on mandotmg plot have been surveyed
and accounted for Therefore arry additional spew observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer specm&
I = Total of planted stems and volunteer stems
I - Total of planted stuns only
4 - An acer rubrum was surveyed during 2008 monitoring season even though it is not a spot laced as bentg planted Although aver rubmm is a volumeer stun it was decrmmed that thus speafic stem would continued to be monitored in the proeeedab momronng yeas.
5 - Durmi, the')009 Monitoring Year 2 some planted stemma sun eyed during the 2008 Momtom% Yea 1 became dormant aid min due the drought dummy the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 During the 2010 Monitoring Year 3 the misang planted stems of the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 were revnalmed and were as vied, A total of
9 stems Much were miss rig during the 7009 Monitoring Year) was surveyed in during the 2010 Momtorml; Year 3 A total of 3 stars surveyed during the 2009 Monnonrg Year 2 were hind as mrs % during the 2010 Momtomig Year 3
6 - Vegetation Plots I I and 3 are located in a planted low height planting zone. These plots will not be re-sampled in the future
Current Plot Data MY3 2010
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
i Type
E403-01 VPla
E403 -01 VPIa
E403 -01 VP3a
E403 -01 VP4
E403-01 VP5
E403-01 VP6
MY3 (2010)
M (2004)[
MYl (2M)
P LS
Iptill
IT,
P LS
P all
T'
P LS
P ell
T2
P LS
P all
Ta
P LS
P all
Ta
P LS
P all
T'
P LS
P all
71
P LS
P-aR
V
P LS
pan
Tr
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
14
3
1
3
1
I
I
I
Betula to
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
Celtis leevt ata
sat
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Comus emomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
5
65
9
10
10
18
24
19
19
I4
I
Fraxmus pcitmylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
6
3
51
45
71
75
71
17
25
it.
It-
I4
1
Hamamelis virgutiana
American witchhazel
Shrub Tree
2
2
5
5
7
7
7
7
3
3
Ju lens Mgm
black walnut
Tree
I
!
I
I
I
1
I
I
Lmdera benzom
northern s icebush
Shrub Tree
Is
I
I
1
1
I
N ssa s Ivattca
black gum,
Tree
1
I
I
1
1
1
Prunus serottna
black cherry
Shrub Tree
I
1
I
I
uercus hellos
willow oak
Tree
I
1
I
I
I
I
3
3
3
3
1
I
Rhus co Ihnum
flameleaf sumac
Shrub Tree
2
2
Viburnum dentate n
southern arrowwood
Shrub Tree
1
1
3
3
1
I
I
1
43
10
1
9
9
7
Stem court
size (ares)
sine (ACRES
Species court
Stems r ACRE
0
7
1
0
Il
1
0
12
18
0
19
19
0
7
9
0
9
9
0
655
83
0
59
5
0
48
48
I
1
1
1
I
1
6
6
6
002
002
002
002
002
002
015
0 15
0 15
0
4
4
0
5
6
0
4
4
0
4
0
3
3
0
3
3
0
111
12
0
I I
111
0
11
l I
0
2813
404
0
44521
7284
0
485 6
728 4
0
768 9
76891
01
28331
36421
01
364 21
364 21
01
43841
5598
7 9
01
32371
323
Notes
1 - Original baseline veyetahon monitoring data was not provided prior to the 2008 Momtormg Yea I and 778 is considered a drought year The')009 Momtonny Year 2 is considered the buehne datum because of two yeas of mom wring it a assumed all planted sums within a vegw&on mandotmg plot have been surveyed
and accounted for Therefore arry additional spew observed in proceeding monitoring years are considered volunteer specm&
I = Total of planted stems and volunteer stems
I - Total of planted stuns only
4 - An acer rubrum was surveyed during 2008 monitoring season even though it is not a spot laced as bentg planted Although aver rubmm is a volumeer stun it was decrmmed that thus speafic stem would continued to be monitored in the proeeedab momronng yeas.
5 - Durmi, the')009 Monitoring Year 2 some planted stemma sun eyed during the 2008 Momtom% Yea 1 became dormant aid min due the drought dummy the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 During the 2010 Monitoring Year 3 the misang planted stems of the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 were revnalmed and were as vied, A total of
9 stems Much were miss rig during the 7009 Monitoring Year) was surveyed in during the 2010 Momtorml; Year 3 A total of 3 stars surveyed during the 2009 Monnonrg Year 2 were hind as mrs % during the 2010 Momtomig Year 3
6 - Vegetation Plots I I and 3 are located in a planted low height planting zone. These plots will not be re-sampled in the future

1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
APPENDIX D
Stream Assessment Data

0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 8a Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
UT to Sandy Creek Stream
Restoration Project/EEP Project Number
403
Reach 1 1,410 Linear Feet
Feature Category
Metric (per As built and reference baselines)
(# Stable) Number
Total number per
Total Number / feet in
% Perform in Stable
Feature Perform
Performing as Intended
As built
unstable state
Condition
Mean or Total
I Present 9
12
12
NA
100
2 Armor stable e g n o ch lacement)9
12
12
NA
100
3 Facet grade appears stable9 (slo <— design range)
1
12
NA
12
4 Minimal evidence of embeddm finmg7
12
12
NA
100
A_ Riffles
5 Length a ro nate?
NA
NA
NA
NA
78
1 Present9 (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat ?)
15
15
NA
100
2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf> 16?)
Max Pool / 12 > 16
Design = 3 5/12 =
NA
77
12 of 15
29 15
B Pools
3 Length a ro nate? ( s acmg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
89
1 Upstream of meander bend (mm/inflection) centering?
10
10
NA
100
2 Downstream of meander (glide/mflection) centenng9
9
10
NA
100
100
C Thalweg
1 Outer bend in state of hmited/controlled erosion?
10
10
NA
100
2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation
10
10
NA
100
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
8
10
NA
85
D Meander
4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief?
10
10
NA
100
95
1 General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
NA
NA
5/25
99
2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down
NA
NA
NA
100
100
E Bed General
cutting or head cuttm
�s
F Bank
1 Activelyeroding wast or slumping bank
NA
1/18
NA
99
99
1 Free of bank or arm scour9
10
10
NA
100
2 Height appropriate?
10
10
NA
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
10
10
NA
100
G Vanes
4 Free of pigg or other structural failures?
10
10
NA
100
100
1 Free of scour?
NA
NA
NA
100
H Wads/ Boulders
2 Footing stable?
NA
NA
NA
100
100

0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 8b Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 403
Reach II 886 Linear Feet
Feature Category
Metric (per As built and reference basehnes)
(# Stable) Number
Performing as Intended
Total number per
As built
Total Number / feet in
unstable state
% Perform in Stable
Condition
Feature Perform
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1 Present v
13
13
NA
100
2 Armor stable e g n o displacement)?
13
13
NA
100
3 Facet grade appears stable9 (slo a <_ design range)
2
13
NA
12
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
13
13
NA
100
5 length a ro nate?
NA
NA
NA
NA
78
"Room
iarvilwaffim
B Pools
1 Present? (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat ?)
16
16
NA
100
2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf>1 6 ?)
Max Pool / 12 > 16
12 of 16
Design = 3 5/12 =
2 9 16
NA
77
3 Length appropriate? (p p spacing)
NA
NA
NA
NA
89
C Thalweg
1 Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection) centering?
10
10
NA
100
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
10
10
NA
100
100
100
D Meander
1 Outer bend in state of hmrted/controlled erosion
10
10
NA
2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation
10
10
NA
100
3 Apparent Rc within spec?
9
10
NA
85
4 Sufficient floodplain access and reheP
10
10
NA
100
95
E Bed General
1 General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
NA
NA
5/25
99
2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down
cutting or head cutting?
NA
NA
NA
100
100
F Bank
1 Actively erodm wast or slumping bank
NA
1/18
NA
99
99
G Vanes
1 Free of bank or arm scour?
11
11
NA
100
2 Height appropriate?
11
11
NA
100
3 Angle and geometry a appropriate?
11
11
NA
100
4 Free of piEm& or other structural failures9
11
11
I NA
100
100
WNIN
H Wads/ Boulders
1 Free of scour?
NA
N �Ai
0000"M
NA
100
2 Footing stable?
NA
NA
I NA
100
100

Table 8c Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 403
Reach III 384 Linear Feet
Feature Category
Metric (per As built and reference baselines)
(# Stable) Number
Performing as Intended
Total number per
As built
Total Number / feet in
unstable state
% Perform m Stable
Condition
Feature Perform
Mean or Total
A Riffles
I Present 9
7
7
NA
100
2 Armor stable (e g n o displacement )9
7
7
NA
100
3 Facet grade appears stables slo a <— design range)
5
7
NA
71
4 Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
7
7
NA
100
5 Length ap ro nate?
NA
NA
NA
NA
93
B Pools
I Present? (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat ?)
5
5
NA
100
2 Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf>1 6 ?)
Max Pool / 0 5 > 16 4
of5
Design = 19/0 5 =
38 5
NA
80
3 Length a ro nate? ( 2 2acinj
NA
NA
NA
NA
90
C Thalweg
I Upstream of meander bend (run/mflection) centering?
7
8
NA
100
C Thalweg
2 Downstream of meander (glide/inflection) centering?
8
8
NA
100
100
D Meander
1 Outer bend in state of hmited/controlled erosion?
8
8
NA
100
2 Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation
8
8
NA
100
3 Apparent Rc within sped
8
8
NA
100
4 Sufficient flood lam access and relief?
8
8
NA
100
100
E Bed General
i General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
NA
NA
1
1/200
48
2 Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down
cutting or head cutting?
NA
NA
NA
100
74
F Bank
I Actively erodin wasting or sluamg bank
NA
NA
NA
100
100
G Vanes
1 Free of bank or arm scour?
5
5
NA
100
2 Height appropnate9
5
5
NA
100
3 Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
5
5
NA
100
4 Free of pipmi or other structural failures'
5
5
NA
100
100
NA
100
H Wads/ Boulders
I Free of scours
NA
NA
2 Footing stable?
NA
NA
NA
100
100

1
1
n
m
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
0
Table 9 Verification of Bankfull Events
UT to Sandy Creek Stream Restoration Prolect/EEP Protect Number 403
Method
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Photo # if available)
On Site Crest Gage located at
Between 09/09/09 and
Station 115 +32 Observed
06/29/10
Not Available
06/29/10
elevation on gage at elevation
156663
Note A crest gage was installed during the 2009 Monitoring Year 2 field investigations so that bankfull events can be
documented during the 2010 Monitoring Year 3 field investigations Monitoring Year 3 is the first monitoring year in which
bankfull events were documented

Q._A Creev r Prot, , v -,nber Anl l)SGc cnlr rj303M^'no'1010�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l� 0 0 Yeai �nng( 1 Rai Coun 1� Ca! -JSeot�... .1010
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS - SECTION 1
Year -0
Year -1
Year -2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Eley ($)
Station (ft)
Elev (ft)
Station (ft)
Elev (ft)
to n ft
IE ev (ft)
Station (ft) Elev ft
Station (ft) IE ev (ft)
Station (ft) Elev
000
58265
000
58268
021
58267
008
58263
014
58265
1300
58105
700
58164
1444
58077
1049
58120
3200
58035
2026
58075
3437
58021
1742
58072
4300
58010
2973
58039
4419
57990
4354
57995
4620
57965
3896
580 19
4963
57947
4860
57896
4900
57927
4359
58005
5082
57880
5060
57881
5000
57891
4781
57948
5404
57870
5353
57863
51 10
57869
5108
57896
5734
57879
5521
57871
5200
57880
5225
57882
6002
57919
5730
57881
5270
57869
5364
57878
6801
58045
5888
57922
53 10
57856
5489
57871
9349
58039
6087
57914
5360
57867
5599
57867
11782
58137
6491
57993
5400
57857
5768
57876
6693
58020
5450
57852
6081
57907
6969
58036
5490
57856
6469
57989
10436
58042
5520
57867
6808
58030
11802
58143
5580
57875
7326
58043
118 10
58143
5660
57880
8364
58045
5700
57901
9912
58040
5980
57919
11873
581 37
6260
57952
6750
58035
6920
58049
8700
58039
10420
58047
11800
58140
LIC Cem
lilt,tT1101
®EcoEngineenng
A d v ofTbc lob R McAdam C mpmy lm

M e CM P Prc mbet USG 0303 .1001(
iTf to Sandy Creek Cross Section 1 - Riffle
583
582
-581
c
°– - - - - - --
580 - - - - - -- - - - - --
- — — BankN11
579 - Year -0, 8/22/07
-- — Year -1, 9/16108
578 —X Year -2, 9111/09
--B— Year -3, 6130/10
577
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
%,�XVbb NEUTMIN PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 1
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Riffle
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/30/2010
CREW BUCHHOLZIPARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
21.8
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
32.1
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
1.5
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
>12
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
Classification
C
Bankfull Elevation: 580.21 ft.
r�
l:c:c>systelrl
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
®EcoEngineering
A divWw ofTAc John R McAdams Compoy, I'

UT t Cree' "' Pro nber ' -- "JSGF " " "- ]303' "' X010
J uuu Yew ........axing mepon • Ranaotpn County, nonh Caroima • Septemoer, 2010
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS - SECTION: 2
Year
-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station
Elev, ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev, ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev, ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
0.00
582.59
0.00
582.55
0.36
582.58
0.17
582.56
0.09
582.59
8.00
581.44
5.18
582.05
10.14
581.21
3.22
582.21
16.30
580.54
10.34
581.13
21.00
579.74
11.17
581.00
19.60
580.36
16.37
580.57
24.01
576.25
19.11
580.47
21.10
579.95
19.88
580.32
24.39
575.17
23.93
578.88
21.70
579.70
22.34
579.57
26.62
575.22
24.00
578.71
22.50
579.40
23.74
577.17
29.11
576.15
26.75
577.62
23.20
578.01
24.07
577.05
30.42
577.25
28.41
576.54
23.20
576.90
24.73
576.90
30.77
577.78
29.38
576.37
24.70
576.82
25.37
577.15
37.03
579.17
30.39
576.40
25.80
575.04
26.60
577.48
46.30
579.06
32.48
576.65
26.80
575.02
27.69
577.36
69.44
579.32
34.08
577.32
27.40
575.06
29.11
577.33
84.81
579.25
35.39
577.60
28.50
575.11
30.15
577.37
38.60
577.99
29.60
575.20
31.58
577.55
42.65
578.71
30.80
575.45
32.96
577.64
62.56
579.23
32.30
575.85
33.99
577.75
80.54
579.51
33.60
577.00
34.58
578.39
84.82
579.31
33.70
577.56
37.02
578.27
84.91
579.31
34.90
577.74
41.11
578.54
36.60
577.84
43.99
578.82
38.40
577.94
58.87
579.26
40.80
578.38
69.36
579.33
43.20
578.74
86.12
579.38
45.60
578.90
48.30
579.07
61.30
579.18
67.60
579.23
85.30
579.22
r.',CY��elll
FifEcoEngineering
A diviu- oflb� John R. MiAd.- Company. Inc.

584
583
582
tz
581
a580
0
'= 579
0 578
577
576
575
574
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 2 - Pool
— Bankfull
---8— Year -0, 8/22/07
— Year -1, 9/16/08
—�-- Year -2, 9/11/09
—$— Year -3, 6/30/10
JT to Creel PrqjI ibe ISGS 3030 1010
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOIINNG DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 2
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Pool
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/30/2010
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
65.3
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
64.0
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
4.6
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
n/a
Entrenchment Ratio
n/a
Classification
n/a
Bankfull Elevation: 579.74 ft.
r�
h�:o�7stem
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOIGNG DOWNSTREAM
®EcoEngineering
A d %*im ofll. bin R. McAd— coop -y. Inc.

UT t( Cree ' Proi nber: JSCS )303( )010
lturd Year Monitoring Report • Randolph County, North Carolina • September, 20I0
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS - SECTION: 3
Year
-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev, ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
Station ft Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev, ft
0.00
568.02
0.00
568.03
-0.62
568.02
0.37
568.11
0.09
568.02
17.00
567.86
10.62
568.12
17.28
567.99
9.21
568.14
22.50
567.60
18.89
567.71
24.28
567.38
23.76
567.49
25.00
567.04
23.48
567.43
26.91
566.64
25.00
566.95
28.00
565.96
25.40
566.76
28.95
566.13
29.60
565.22
28.70
565.55
26.42
566.41
29.31
565.12
31.28
564.86
29.00
565.15
28.69
565.81
29.73
564.94
32.56
564.86
29.50
564.95
29.16
565.08
29.82
564.80
35.05
564.85
30.40
564.70
29.81
564.72
31.04
564.63
35.31
565.18
31.30
564.61
30.68
564.58
31.97
564.58
39.92
566.95
32.40
564.54
31.84
564.51
32.45
564.58
43.70
567.12
33.10
564.65
32.82
564.57
33.32
564.54
52.54
566.95
34.00
564.65
33.59
564.58
34.18
564.62
61.36
566.85
34.70
564.74
34.21
564.64
34.99
564.71
61.50
566.85
35.20
565.27
34.76
564.68
35.44
565.14
36.40
565.83
35.46
565.55
35.92
565.81
40.00
566.82
37.39
566.14
39.81
566.94
41.00
566.93
40.15
566.86
49.89
567.09
48.00
566.93
48.11
566.90
61.37
566.93
61.50
566.86
61.47
566.88
r_;_1
E.coVsfel 11
aEcoEngineering
A di.ision ofThc John R. McAdams Company, t-

UT tc Cree ' Proi aber. ISGS 1303( )010
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 3 - Riffle
569
568
X567-------------- - - - - -- --
c—
0
566
— — — Bankfull
565 —e— Year -0, 8/22/07
— -- Year -1, 9/16/08
564 - Year -2, 9/11/09
—$-- Year -3, 6/30/10
563
-2 3 8 13 18 23 28 33 38 43 48 53 58 63
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 3
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Riffle
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/30/2010
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
18.5
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
14.7
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.3
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
2.4
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
11.6
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
Classification
C
Bankfull Elevation: 566.94 ft.
r�
I�c:c>sy�teln
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
®EcoEngineedng
A division ofThc John R. McAdams Comisny. Inc.

UT t( - ' Cree" Proj nber ' - -_ "ISGS 1303( )010
i nira Year monitoring Report • Ranaoipn County. North Carolina • Sentemher. 2010
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS- SECTION: 4
Year
-0
Year -1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev, ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
0.00
567.19
0.00
567.20
0.03
567.23
0.00
567.30
0.07
567.19
12,00
567.31
8.62
567.22
17.27
567.51
17.84
567.46
20.00
567.31
17.85
567.48
24.76
566.99
24.27
567.17
22.60
567.24
23.91
567.20
29.31
566.19
27.39
566.55
22,90
567.22
24.58
567.12
31.10
565.54
28.73
566.10
25.00
566.91
29.38
566.26
32.37
564.53
29.60
565.97
29.70
565.87
31.79
565.27
32.40
563.89
32.11
564.78
31.80
564.94
32.50
564.59
32.51
564.14
34.04
563.41
32.30
564.61
33.79
563.92
33.93
562.86
34.88
563.22
33.20
564.19
34.15
563.41
35.92
562.92
36.03
563.17
34.00
563.29
34.24
563.23
36.79
563.14
39.56
564.32
35.00
563.10
35.00
562.96
37.79
563.54
42.14
564.77
35.70
563.33
35.73
562.95
38.49
564.38
45.37
565.44
36.90
563.50
36.43
562.97
38.75
564.01
47.50
565.97
37.90
563.80
37.00
563.19
40.05
565.41
47.74
566.10
39.00
564.30
37.93
563.33
43.69
565.49
53.16
567.13
39.50
564.63
38.59
563.60
53.25
567.36
66.62
567.03
41.60
564.98
39.29
563.93
61.84
567.03
85.71
567.08
47.40
566.05
39.78
564.27
85.78
567.27
86.21
567.18
53.70
567.12
40.61
564.91
86.29
567.18
66.00
567.09
45.05
565.52
86.30
567.25
51.46
566.48
63.23
566.92
87.29
567.32
r�
L,ccnystem
[_ja]EcoEngineering
A division .M. John R. M. Adnms C um{mny. Inc.

569
568
567
c 566
565
w
564
563
562
UT tc - - Cree- - -- I Pmj nber: JSGS 1303( 1010
j mm Vr r mnmmrino .rP.....r . Ae..n..,.... T.......,. —L
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 4 - Pool
r-------- - - - - -- 5L---------- - - - - --
— — — Bankfull
—� Year -0, 8/22/07
— — - Year -1, 9/16/08
— —�— Year -2, 9/11/09
—� Year -3, 6/30/10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 4
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Pool
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/30/2010
CREW BUCHHOLLTARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area 44.1 sq. ft.
Bankfull Width 26.6 ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth 1.7 ft.
Bankfull Max Depth 4.1 ft.
Width/Depth Ratio n/a ft.
Entrenchment Ratio n/a ft.
Classification n/a
Bankfull Elevation: 566.99 ft.
-r~
l�:ci�ysteln
70 75 80 85 90
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
©EcoEngineedng
A division of The John R. McAd. Cowpwy. Igo.

UT tc - ' Cree ' Proj nber: JSGS 1303( )010
I Tura Year monitoring Keport - Ranaotpu County, North Carolina • Sentember. 2010
UT to SANDY CREEK
EEP PROJECT # 403
CROSS- SECTION: 5
Year
-0
Year-1
Year
-2
Year -3
Year -4
Year -5
Year -6
Station (ft)
Elev, (ft)
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station ft
Elev. ft
Station (ft)
Elev, ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev. ft
Station (ft) Elev, ft
0.00
568.53
0.00
568.57
-0.49
568.61
0.20
568.64
0.09
568.53
15.00
568.53
13.72
568.67
17.05
568.40
13.42
568.56
25.00
568.17
18.08
568.44
26.23
568.14
28.15
567.90
25.80
568.14
21.40
568.50
29.84
567.40
29.56
567.39
28.30
567.81
26.64
568.07
30.89
567.26
31.60
567.39
29.50
567.41
29.10
567.68
32.76
567.57
32.47
567.20
30.40
567.23
29.70
567.51
34.34
567.78
33.55
567.42
30.70
567.22
30.75
567.35
37.47
568.41
35.00
567.90
31.10
567.27
31.43
567.45
48.74
569.39
36.06
568.37
32.50
567.25
32.17
567.40
54.10
569.50
45.50
569.05
33.80
567.41
32.75
567.44
53.56
569.52
34.30
567.70
33.44
567.51
53.69
569.52
36.60
568.37
34.12
567.74
38.00
568.40
35.07
567.99
46.00
569.08
35.86
568.27
53.90
569.51
36.94
568.42
40.46
568.72
43.26
568.97
49.66
569.42
53.98
569.58
c�
L yhystem
aEcoEngineering
A division o(Th<John R. WAda Company. Inc.

UT tc Cnx ' Proi nber. JSGS )3031 0010
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 5 - Riffle
570
569 — - -- — --
w
=568 ---------------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ------------------
0
567 — — — Bankfull
--6— Year -0, 8/22/07
566 Year -1, 9/16/08
--�— Year -2, 9/11/09
—El--- Year -3, 6/30/10
565
-1 4 9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
URUSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 5
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Riffle
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/30/2010
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
4.6
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
9.9
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.5
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
0.9
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
>12
ft.
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
ft.
Classification
C
Bankfull Elevation: 568.14 ft.
r�
Lc:c�system
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
®EcoEngineedng
A dWW. of The John R. McA&= Cmm -y. Inc.

UT to SANDY CREEK EEP PROJECT # 403
Year -0
Station ft
Elev, ft
0.50
568.58
0.68
568.58
12.89
568.59
28.12
568.41
31.34
568.24
36.54
567.12
37.49
566.46
38.98
566.10
39.82
566.29
41.29
567.15
43.08
567.92
43.76
568.13
44.00
568.24
44.80
568.50
51.46
568.90
58.25
569.65
58.30
569.65
l�:u�ysten�
Year -1
Station ft
Elev. ft
0.00
568.57
17.00
568.35
31.20
568.16
34.10
567.65
35.70
567.24
36.40
567.04
37.70
566.39
38.90
566.19
40.10
566.33
41.00
566.80
41.70
567.2I
42.70
567.60
45.60
568.39
50.00
568.59
57.90
569.57
Year -2
Station (ft)
Elev. ft
-0.37
568.62
10.17
568.63
17.91
568.36
25.12
568.46
29.87
568.33
32.73
567.90
33.48
567.84
34.07
567.68
34.77
567.54
35.55
567.34
36.26
567.06
36.73
566.81
37.18
566.56
37.97
566.54
38.61
566.45
39.50
566.48
40.41
566.52
40.79
566.91
41.52
567.38
42.29
567.68
43.52
568.15
45.41
568.54
51.85
568.86
57.89
569.65
CROSS - SECTION:
Year -3
Station ft
Elev. ft
0.08
568.64
13.95
568.53
33.81
567.84
35.85
567.29
37.13
566.63
38.34
566.39
40.59
566.46
42.27
567.50
43.07
567.86
49.14
568.57
57.65
569.62
UT t< " ' Cree I Proi nber. JSGS 13031 3010
i nun Year monitoring ttepolt a Randolph County, North Carolina • Sentember_ 20 i n
6
Year -4 Year -5 Year -6
Station (ft) Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. ft Station (ft) Elev. R
FE-g]EcoEngineering
A division oM. John R- M.:Adnms Company, I-

571
570
569
v
c 568
.4
567
w
566
565
564
UT to Sandy Creek Cross Section 6 - Pool
— — — Bankfull
—� — Year -0, 8/22/07
— Year -1, 9/16108
-- Year -2, 9/11/09
—EF— Year -3, 6/30/10
UT t( Cree Proi nber JSGS 1303( )0I0
-1 4 9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59
Width from River Left to Right (ft)
CROSS SECTION PLOT - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
YEAR-3,2010 SURVEY DATA CROSS - SECTION: 6
PROJECT SANDY CREEK FEATURE: Pool
TASK CROSS SECTION
REACH SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/30/2010
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Summary Data
All dimensions in feet.
Bankfull X -sec area
8.1
sq. ft.
Bankfull Width
9.2
ft.
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.9
ft.
Bankfull Max Depth
1.5
ft.
Width/Depth Ratio
n/a
Entrenchment Ratio
n/a
Classification
n/a
Bankfull Elevation: 567.84 ft.
r�
I�c.�cnysten�
CROSS SECTION PHOTO - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
ra-j�EcoEngineedng
A division of The John & McAdams Company, lnc.

580
579
578
577
IX 576
Z
O
E■
Q 575
w
.a
w 574
573
572
571
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2010 (Year -3) Monitoring
/ - -J
2n\,
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O YR -3 Structures
— —YR -3 WS
570
10000 10100 10200 STATION (feet) 10300 10400
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally on average 10 feet. Structures were used as a guide. Year-3 water surface was sporadic due to
low / absent flow; therefore, when connecting water surface data points the dashed line is plotted below ground surface in some locations.
10500
®EcoEngineedng
dn,uaw dlAe AJe R. Rkldsa('a�M. Rs

577
576 —
41-2
574
573
Z
O
F
572
W
.a
W 571
570
569
568
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O YR -3 Structures
AYR -3 WS
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2010 (Year -3) Monitoring
r —
\
i
1 I
I 1 1
l I / ► i
567
10500 10600 10700 STATION (feet) 10800 10900
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally on average 10 feet. Structures were used as a guide. Year-3 water surface was sporadic due to
low / absent flow; therefore, when connecting water surface data points the dashed line is plotted below ground surface in some locations.
11000
®EcoEngineedng
Adnwm Nile M�NiR 11c \Alm l'�+�{y,'. tit

572
571
570
569
568
Z
O
a 567
W
W 566
565
564
563
l \
Lt�
1
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O YR -3 Structures
— AYR -3 WS
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2010 (Year -3) Monitoring
1
iFJP1, VAMY,
%— --
562
11000 11100 11200 11300 11400
STATION (feet)
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally on average 10 feet. Structures were used as a guide. Year -3 water surface was sporadic due to
low / absent flow; therefore, when connecting water surface data points the dashed line is plotted below ground surface in some locations.
11500
EcoEngineering
Alh -IfTe Man R. raoia l'n1sT. kw

567
565
563
Z
0
F
561
W
..1
W
559
557
555
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2010 (Year -3) Monitoring
r
l�
1 �\
--� 1
I _ �
\ 1
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O YR -3 Structures
— —YR -3 WS
11500 11600 11700 STATION (feet) 11800 11900 12000
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally on average 10 feet. Structures were used as a guide. Year-3 water surface was sporadic due to
low / absent flow; therefore, when connecting water surface data points the dashed line is plotted below ground surface in some locations.
®EcoEngineedng
1 d.. �.ww Mire A�NI R Rh ��b +u (• +Rr�, lac.

563
562
561
560
Z
0
e 559
w
.a
w
558
557
556
UT to Sandy Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2010 (Year -3) Monitoring
1\
- - --
� � I
I I I
1 I 1 1 I
— — — YR -0 TW Profile 2/29/08
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A YR -2 Structures
YR -3 TW 6/30/10
O YR -3 Structures
—YR -3 WS
555
12000 12100 12200 STATION (feet) 12300 12400
Note: Due to slight differences in thalweg length, longitudinal profile was adjusted horizontally on average 10 feet. Structures were used as a guide. Year-3 water surface was sporadic due to
low / absent flow; therefore, when connecting water surface data points the dashed line is plotted below ground surface in some locations.
12500
®EcoEngineedng
A�.,+wn NThe Mw� R AF• {Jr�r l'�,, Ik

578
576
574
I
572
w
z
0
F 570
Q
a
w 568
566
564
562 4—
20000
UT to Sandy Creek - Tributary
Longitudinal Profile
2010 (Year -3) Monitoring
I
— — — YR -0 TW -
YR -1 TW 10/1/08
O YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9/9/09
A YR -2 Structures
— -- YR -3 TW 6/30/10
YR -3 Structures
AYR -3 WS
I
I_
20050 20100 20150 20200 20250 20300 20350 20400
STATION (feet)
®EcoEngineedng
AtiHSs o(M for R Mtl1b�m Cagry, lec.

E
O
3 YEAR, 2010 SURVEY DATA PROJECT NAME
UT TO SANDY CREEK
MEDIAN
AVG
MAX
Riffle slopes measured =
TASK
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
3 81%
6 10%
FEATURE /FACET SLOPE
Run slopes measured =
REACHES
UT to Sandy Creek and Minor
Tributary
O
LENGTH, AND SPACING AND
DATE 06/28/2010
to 06/30/2010
14
68
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE DATA
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
MIN
MEDIAN
UT to Sandy
Creek Reach I
Riffle slopes measured =
O
Overall water surface slope =
10%
164%
DESIGN
AVG
Overall water surface slope =
WS sta start=
30%
2006126 ft
314%
DESIGN
Riffle
Run
Riffle
04%
OPools
WS sta start=
10032 26 ft
61
Run
153
0
WS sta end=
11403 56 ft
p -p spacmg
62
ELEV Start=
578 89 ft msl
Length Slope
ELEV End=
565 70 ft msl
UT to Sandy Creek I
O
Results
RIFFLE 10051
41 120%
n =
13
n=
MIN
MEDIAN AVG
MAX
26 121%
13 122%
Riffle slopes measured =
13
037%
122% 257%
1237%
O
Run slopes measured =
6
078%
1335% 1191%
1847%
Pools measured =
20
15
64 71
193
O
Overall water surface slope =
UT to Sandy
06%
Creek Reach II
DESIGN
AVG
Riffle
04%
WS sta start=
1142748 ft
Run
-
O
WS sta end=
12352 16 ft
p p spacing
62
ELEV Start=
565 70 ft msl
ELEV End=
559 69 ft msl
1
1
r
Results
1
Sandy Creek 3 -Year Momtormg Data Sheet 1 of 3
n=
MIN
MEDIAN
AVG
MAX
Riffle slopes measured =
6
069%
3 81%
6 10%
1440%
Run slopes measured =
3
2 11 %
1480%
1412%
2544%
Pools measured =
12
14
68
73
173
MIN
MEDIAN
AVG
MAX
Riffle slopes measured =
2
UT to Sandy
Creek Reach III
164%
166%
Overall water surface slope =
WS sta start=
30%
2006126 ft
314%
DESIGN
Riffle
Run
1065%
AVG
17%
1
Sandy Creek 3 -Year Momtormg Data Sheet 1 of 3
WS sta end =
2013137 ft
p p spacmg
46
O
ELEV Start=
572 11 ft msl
ELEV End=
569 99 ft msl
Results
0
n =
MIN
MEDIAN
AVG
MAX
Riffle slopes measured =
2
162%
164%
164%
166%
Run slopes measured =
5
314%
937%
1065%
1855%
OPools
measured =
3
61
153
153
245
All data reported in units of feet unless otherwise specified
Feature Station
Length Slope
0
UT to Sandy Creek I
RIFFLE 10051
41 120%
n =
13
O
RIFFLE 10133
RIFFLE 10198
26 121%
13 122%
MIN =
MEDIAN =
037%
122%
RIFFLE 10252
55 060%
AVG =
257%
RIFFLE 10343
14 037%
MAX =
1237%
ORIFFLE
10751
28 239%
1
Sandy Creek 3 -Year Momtormg Data Sheet 1 of 3

RIFFLE
10904
25
1237%
RIFFLE
11004
26
355%
RIFFLE
11100
17
430%
RIFFLE
11157
16
113%
RIFFLE
11271
31
252%
RIFFLE
11361
11
192%
RIFFLE
11404
23
060%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy Creek II
RIFFLE
11854
2
1440%
n =
6
RIFFLE
11876
9
610%
MIN =
069%
RIFFLE
12027
45
069%
MEDIAN =
3 81 %
RIFFLE
12232
10
1300%
AVG =
610%
RIFFLE
12269
24
092%
MAX =
1440%
RIFFLE
12340
13
1 51 %
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy
Creek III
RIFFLE
20116
9
162%
n =
2
RIFFLE
20289
29
166%
MIN =
162%
MEDIAN =
164%
AVG =
164%
MAX =
166%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy Creek I
RUN
11177
8
078%
n =
6
RUN
11199
23
1184%
MIN =
078%
RUN
10211
16
1666%
MEDIAN =
1335%
RUN
11030
17
883%
AVG =
1191%
RUN
11117
9
1847%
MAX =
1847%
RUN
11372
7
1486%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy
Creek II
RUN
11856
7
2544%
n =
3
RUN
12072
14
1480%
MIN =
211%
RUN
12151
56
2 11%
MEDIAN =
1480%
AVG =
1412%
MAX =
2544%
Feature
Station
Length
Slope
UT to Sandy
Creek III
RUN
20106
20
937%
n =
5
RUN
20187
15
760%
MIN =
3 14%
RUN
20235
12
1458%
MEDIAN =
937%
RUN
20319
15
314%
AVG =
1065%
RUN
20365
6
1855%
MAX =
1855%
Feature
Station
Length p -p
spacing
UT to Sandy
Creek I
POOL
10038
13
n =
20
POOL
10102
23
64
MIN =
15 (p p spacing)
POOL
10227
30
125
MEDIAN =
64
POOL
10324
25
97
AVG =
71
POOL
10517
59
193
MAX =
193
POOL
10602
27
85
POOL
10700
14
98
POOL
10716
35
16
Sandy Creek 3 -Year Monitoring Data Sheet 2 of 3

'1
I,
Fj
POOL
10795
28
78
POOL
10851
54
57
POOL
10937
14
86
POOL
10953
8
15
POOL
10978
26
25
POOL
11047
25
69
POOL
11072
30
26
POOL
11127
33
54
POOL
11185
26
59
POOL
11222
52
37
POOL
11325
25
103
POOL
11379
23
54
Feature
Station
Length p -p
spacing
UT to Sandy
Creek II
POOL
11449
103
70
n =
12
POOL
11563
55
114
MIN =
14 (p p spacing)
POOL
11629
18
66
MEDIAN =
68
POOL
11702
67
73
AVG =
73
POOL
11809
14
106
MAX =
173
POOL
11835
29
26
POOL
11863
16
28
POOL
11899
12
36
POOL
11913
11
14
POOL
12087
16
173
POOL
12208
81
121
POOL
12250
16
42
Feature
Station
Length p -p
spacing
UT to Sandy Creek III
POOL
20065
11
n =
3
POOL
20126
7
61
MIN =
61 (p p spacing)
POOL
20371
9
245
MEDIAN =
153
AVG =
153
MAX =
245
Sandy Creek 3 -Year Momtormg Data Sheet 3 of 3

Histogram
30
25 —
T 20
15
10
0
5
0
0000, �0 N O NO 0� O� N�O
O•
Particle Size (mm)
very fine sand
0.062
0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
medium sand
0.25
0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
very coarse sand
1
2
very fine gravel
2
4
fine gravel
4
6
fine gravel
6
8
medium gravel
8
11
medium gravel
11
16
coarse gravel
16
22
coarse gravel
22
32
very coarse gravel
32
45
very coarse gravel
45
64
small cobble
64
90
medium cobble
90
128
large cobble
128
180
very large cobble
180
256
small boulder
256
362
small boulder
362
512
medium boulder
512
1024
large boulder
1024
2048
very large boulder
2048
4096
bedrock
Total Particle Count:
100% -
90%
80% -
t 70%
~ 60%
iL- 50%
w 40%
v
d 30%
20%
10%
0%
UT Sand
Note:
■Year 1
■ Year 2
DYear 3
EEP PROJECT ID: 403
CROSS - SECTION: I FEATURE: RIFFLE
Ecosystem
PROJECT UT to SANDY CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH UT to SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/28/20I0
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Riffle Pebble Count, UT Sandy
0.01 0.1 1
Particle Size (mm)
Size percent less than mm
D16 I D35 I D50 I D84 I D95
11001 0.250 1 16.95 1 24.4 1 54 1 77
10 100 1000 10000
—1— Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item
Percent by substrate type
Yclay sand gravel cobble boulder bedrock
0% 1 27% 63% 10% 0% 0%

Histogram
N D< <b NO `L Opp g
N�cb X00 ���, Og
Particle Size (mm)
Material
30
silt/clay
0
25
very fine sand
0.062
0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
medium sand
0.25
20
coarse sand
0.5
1
very coarse sand
1
15
very fine gravel
2
10
fine gravel
0
5
fine gravel
6
0
medium gravel
6
11
medium gravel
p "
16
O�
O •
Histogram
N D< <b NO `L Opp g
N�cb X00 ���, Og
Particle Size (mm)
Material
Size Range mm
silt/clay
0
0.062
very fine sand
0.062
0.13
fine sand
0.13
0.25
medium sand
0.25
0.5
coarse sand
0.5
1
very coarse sand
1
2
very fine gravel
2
4
fine gravel
4
6
fine gravel
6
8
medium gravel
6
11
medium gravel
11
16
coarse gravel
16
22
coarse gravel
22
32
very coarse gravel
32
45
very coarse gravel
45
64
small cobble
64
90
medium cobble
90
128
large cobble
128
180
very large cobble
180
256
256
362
small boulder
small boulder
362
512
medium boulder
512
1024
large boulder
1024
2048
very large boulder
2046
4096
bedrock
100%
90%
80%
cc; 70%
~ 60%
c
iz 50%
40%
d 30%
20%
10%
0%
nd
Note:
EEP PROJECT ID: 403
CROSS - SECTION: 3 FEATURE: RIFFLE
&..system
PkoY mAh%
PROJECT UT to SANDY CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH UT to SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/28/2010
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Riffle Pebble Count, UT Sandy
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item
Size ercent less than mm Percent by substrate type
D16 I D35 1 050 D84 D95 silt/clay sand gravel I cobble I boulder bedrock
100 #aN /A 0.09 0.1 0 36 23% 71% 3 °!° 0°f0

Histogram
UV -- _ -- - -- - - -- ■Year 1
o 40 ■Year 2
C 30 ❑ Year 3
FY �
20
0
10
0
&
O� O•
'b Nb �� (�K N��
Particle Size (mm)
EEP PROJECT ID: 403
CROSS - SECTION: 5 FEATURE: RIFFLE
r
Ecosystem
PROJECT UT to SANDY CREEK
TASK PEBBLE COUNT
REACH UT to SANDY CREEK
DATE 06/28/2010 to 06/28/2010
CREW BUCHHOLZ/PARRISH/PICKENS
Material
Size Range mm Count
UT Sandy
silt/clay
0 0.062
1 - --
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
0.062 0.13 i
0.13 0.25
0.25 0.5
0.5 1
1 2
Note:
- --
Riffle Pebble Count, UT Sandy
100% - - --
90%
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravell
2 4
4 6
6 8
8 11
11 16
16 22
22 32
32 45
45 64
80� %
°
c 70%
~ 60%
ii 50%
{'
qp °!,
°I°
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
64 90
90 128
128 180
160 256
30
20%
10%
; y
small boulder
small boulder.
medium boulder
large boulder
very large boulder
256 362
362 512
512 1024
1024 2048
2048 4096
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) Cumulative Percent ♦ Percent Item
Size percent less than 'mm
Percent b substrate type
bedrock
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt/cla
sand
ravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100
#NIA
#N /A
0.1
0
80
40%
50%
r 3%
r 7%
1 0%
1 0%

i
i
i
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
II
0
0
APPENDIX E
Wetland Assessment
(Omitted, Not Applicable)

iii
0
l�
ri
1
Ll
APPENDIX F
Project Photo Stations

PHOTOGRAPH I: RIP -RAP. HEAD OF UT -I.
PHOTOGRAPH 2: GR056 VANE. 5TA: 100 +12.
PROJECT No. EEP- 08030
UT to SANDY CREEK
®PILENAYE:
EEP08030X.DWG
Ej SM T10N
A divi�im of T
d SCALE:
a N TS
,
���C05GS�lll
1 W l�LZ
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE
M. 06— %— ��'1,.�-
n7�f�yt
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
05
(9/09)H36115000 ZIP

PHOTOGRAPH 3: GROSS VANE. STA: 100 + -13.
PHOTOGRAPH 4: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. STA: IOI +Ocl.
reaecr No. EEP -08030
ells""ME: EEP08030X.DW
V, t7 scAL6: N TS
a
DATE: 06-07-10
UT to SANDY CREEK
RESTORATION
elll MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
ill A T111 1 RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
JNEcoEngineering
A division of TLc John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 301 -5000

PI IOTOORAI'11 5: GRO55 VANE. STA: 101+40.
PHOTOGRAPH 6: GON5TRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 102 +25.
PROJECT' No. EEP -08030 OJT to SANDY CREEK ®EcoEngineering
nLeNAUe: EEP08030X.DWG REMOR p flON
j`(", j j A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
E
SCALE: N TS rl `
4tClII MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE: } � °U I . " I P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
07 —01 —t0 ;���i.,iltl RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (s19) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH T GR055 VANE. 5TA: 102 +85.
PHOTOGRAPH 8: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 103 +15.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030
1 11LENAbE: EE P08030X. D WG I
> I SCALE: NITS
a
DATE: 07 -01 -10
rUT to SANDY CREEK
IA RESTORATION
is Stelll MowoRING PHOTOGRAPHS
i l RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC
[alEcoEngineering
A division of The John It McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH G: RIP -RAP FOP, WETLAND AREA.
PHOTOGRAPH 10: GON5TRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 103 +88.
PROJECT N0. EEP- 08030
UT to SANDY CREEK
�"� " ""'E EEP08030X.DWG
D��OR /t Fn0
[�JftoEngineering
A divieioo of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
d SCALE:
Nrs
(jSVS��111
j` j \L , j v
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE:
07 -01 -10
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

a
PHOTOGRAPH II: GROSSING. 5TA: 104 +23.
PHOTOGRAPH 12: GR055 VANE. 5TA: 104 +75.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 r UT to SANDY CREEK
flLKNA "E: EEP08030X.DWG r DEMD ATION
scAte: NTS jw jell 1�
S��111 MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
DATE:
07-01-10 .11 '::11 'l RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
®ftoEngineering
A division of The John R. Mc.Adsm Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 15: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 105 +62.
PHOTOGRAPH 14: "A° VANE. 5TA: 106 +60.
PROJECT No. EEP- 08030
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
SCALE: N TS
DATE: 07-01- 10- li'..'��yi,';,
CJT to SANDY CREEK
RESTORATION
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
aEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 15: RIP -RAP.
PHOTOGRAPH I6: GR055 VANE. 5TA: 107 +4q.
Amiq PROJECT No. EEP -08030
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
SCALE: NTS
a
DATE: 07-01-10
UT to SANDY CREEK
a w„ RESTORATION
l' osl'.46 6 MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
t RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
®EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAd ma Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 381 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 17: GR055 VANE. 5TA: 108 +11.
PHOTOGRAPH 18: GON5TRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 108 +77.
09 PROJECT No. EEP -08030
r�
UT to SANDY CREEK
E�jEcoEngineering
FILE " "NE: EEP08030X.DWG
REKOD APnON
jji, j jam,
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
p SCALE:
NTS
a
5e111
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DA7E
o� -o� -io
1E t.il
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH Icl: "A" VANE. STA: I0q +14.
PHOTOGRAPH 20: GONSTRUGTEO RIFFLE. 5TA:10q +58.
PRaecr ND. EEP- 08030 UT to SANDY CREEK [JEcoEngineerin
9`
v1LENAUe: EEP08030X.DWG R SMRApnO�T
1 \l % 111 A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
SCALE: I
NTS ' s stdII MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK,
DATE: ., P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4-4
005
07 -01 -10 3 ll. t�l i- +�ti - +1' RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) asl —saoo

PHOTOGRAPH 21: GR055 VANE. 5TA: 110 +26.
PHOTOGRAPH 22: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 110 +58.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK [JEcoEngineering'
FIIE " "de: EEP08030X.DWG �R /�/j� ON 4i
r jam, j l j `j A division of The John R. McAdams Cam�pany, 9. Inc
t7 SCALE: N TS I r )Y �em MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 0% -0)-1O I' RANDOLPH COU1N'lY, NC (sls) 381 -5000

e
PHOTOGRAPH 23: GRO551NG, 5TA: III +32,
PHOTOGRAPH 24: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: III +bb.
PROtECI' "o. EEP- 08030
UT to SANDY CREEK
E�JftoEngineering
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
R/A� N
�0 � TI O �
A division of The John R McAdams Compmy. Inc.
�' Sc "�
y N TS
1{ StC[ll
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
DATE: O7 -0� -�0
- �•� {�L�DO�H
�.QU.Y. NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 25: GON51 F�TGTEP RIFFLE. 5TA: 112 +15.
PHOTOGRAPH 26: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 112 +10.
PROJECT No. EEP- 08030 UT to SANDY CREEK ®EcoEngineering'
—NAME: EEP08030X.DWG �D /��Oj�T A division ofTbe John IL McAdam� Company, Inc.
d SCALE: y [ry}(p� nn l�Cl l�
a N TS Oljb7lllTj mowroRING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
DATE. 07 -01-10 I� `�lll�ll �ND��H COUY. NC (0109) 361'5000 ZIP 27709 -4005 ,

d
PHOTOGRAPH 2-1: "A" VANE. 5TA: 113 +p0.
PHOTOGRAPH 28: GR055 VANE, 5TA: 115 +15.
PROJECT No. EEP- 08030 UT to SANDY CREEK
PR.ENANE: EEP08030X.DWG " RESTORATION
SCALE: N Ts �Q�] MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
DATE: I� RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC
07 -01 -10
AftoEngineering'
A division of The John R" McAdams Company, loc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 2q: "A" VANE. 5TA: 116 +2q.
PHOTOGRAPH 30: "A" VANE. 5TA: I1l +58.
PROJWT No. EEP -08030
1 FILVIAM& EEP08030X.DWG1
tzi
a ' SCAU. N TS
z
DATE: 07 -01 -10
UT to SANDY CREEK
RESTORATION
L'!CfAV;ACill MONTPORING PHOTOGRAPHS
ill -1 id{ lk' RANDOLPH COVE, NC
F4]EcoEngineering
A divirioo of The John R_ McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 31: "A" VANE. 5TA: 118 +46.
PHOTOGRAPH 32: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: IIG +0T
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 N- UT to SANDY CREEK [aEcoEngineering'
p"LE" " "E EEP08030X.DWG Dom, STOD A'nON
j\lj j\L'i 11 lr A division of The John IL McAdams C npeny, Inc.
E Sc "�� 4 SOCHI MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS N TS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE: �YII'(I P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
07 -01 -10 I1 �1j* t'T. RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 381 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 33: GONSTRUGTED RIFFLE. 5TA: 120 +25.
PHOTOGRAPH 34: RIP -RAP, WETLAND DRAINAGE.
PROJECT NO EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK FlEcoEngineering'
"LEN "'°E: E E P08030 X. D WG A division of The John R. McAdams Company. Inc.
SCALE: p R;�;STORATION
NTS j $((�('[(j�1 MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE: 07 -01 -10 I ��� �I�1• i`- ���`'`� P.O. R36 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC (919) 36t -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 35: RIP -RAP. HELTAND DRAINAGE.
PHOTOGRAPH 36: GROSS VANE. STA. 122+00.
51 PROJECT No. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
RESTOR nON
y SCALE: N TS
,l USti'titl'l) l MODIMI IG PHOTOGRAPHS
DATE: 07-01-10 RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
FI]EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company. Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 3-1: RIP -RAP. HEAD OF UT 2.
PHOTOGRAPH 38: OR055 VANE. STAB 200 +51.
11M 030 �~ UT to SANDY CREEK FjftoEngineering
X.DWG RESMRATION
� 1 LJ 1�J A division of The John R McAdams C000peny, Inc.
NITS 1'� ( Sti t('� �] MONiToRING PHONOGRAPHS
( '` RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27700 -4005
10 ' RANDOLPHCOUNTY, NC (010) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 3G: GROSS VANE, STA: 201 +16.
PHOTOGRAPH 40: GRO55 VANE. STA: 202 +64.
PROJECT N0. EEP -08030
FILENAKE: EEP08030X.DWG1
SCALE` N TS
a
DATE: 07-01-10
UT to SANDY CREEK
�,�,, r14 RESTORATION
0Mtem. mowmRING PHOTOGRAPHS
RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC
®ftoEngineering
A division of The John R_ McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 41: GRO55 VANE, 5TA: 203 +15.
PHOTOGRAPH 42: GRO55 VANE. 5TA: 203 +55.
PROJECT No. EEP- 08030
�,�
steCll
l'1
FI'ENA °E EEP08030X.DWG
SCALE:
N TS
oATe: 07 -01 -10
'to SANDY CREEK [IlEcoEngineering
RESTORATION A divieioo of The John R. McAdam Company, Inc.
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS I RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 901 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH -13: GR055 5EGTION I LOOKING UPSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 44: GRO55 SECTION I LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
Peaecr No. EEP- 08030 I.- UT to SANDY CREEK [4ftoEngineering'
F"ENAm": EEP08030X.DWG lxEdS R 'n0N
j�j�71 <Jj�L"] A division of nw John R_ McAdams Company, Inc.
�o SCALE: N TS tam_ MONITORWG PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
M P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: D7— D.� -1Q 1'('?]j('�!- RANDOLPH COUN'T'Y. NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 45: GRO55 5EGTION I LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 46: OR055 5EGTION I LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PROJECT No. EEP- 08030 ~- UT to SANDY CREEK [JEcoEngineerin 9 '
FI'ENAAfe: EEP08030X.DWG TIO*T
RESTOR j�Cl jV A division of The John A. McAdmme Company, Inc.
scAl.e: N TS ��
E pSYSM11 MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
t .. P.O. BOX 19005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 07 -01 -10 1 ,11 :ci11 i ill 11 RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 361 -5000

d1k wow
I�
�,�*
:
i
�
;mod r
° r
kill
( t
4 ►i ,
•�'ti , v
�f
PHOTOGRAPH 4-7: GRO55 5EGTION I LOOKING AT THE 5UE35TRATE GOMP051TION.
PHOTOGRAPH 48: GR055 5EGETION 2 LOOKING UP5TREAM.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 �N' UT to SANDY CREEK E�jEcoEngineering
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG RFMOR /[►TON
�+ j`rj j�� A division of'ihe John R McAdams Company, Inc.
SCALE: L' C(1SGStel11 MONTPURING PHONOGRAPHS
a NTS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
/ P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
OATS: 07 -01 -10 RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 901 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 49: CRO55 SECTION 2 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 50: CR055 SECTION 2 LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
PROJECT NO. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK
FILENAME: EEP0803OX.DWG RESrORAPnON
SCALE: NTS 1 j� 11 l�l
Ill MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
DATE: 07-01-10 i RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC
®A The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 51. GRO55 5EGTION 2 LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 52: GRO55 5EGTION 2 LOOKING AT THE 5055TRATE GOMP051TION.
PROJECT "o. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK E�jftoEngineering
PILE "axe: EEP08030X.DWG R MORATION
1lL/171 A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
oil SCALE: NTS QS�,`tC�lj MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 07 -01 -10 i D OLPH COUNTY.- NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 53: GROSS SECCTOON 3 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 54: GROS6 SECTION 3 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
Peoiecr No. EEP— 08030 to SANDY CREEK
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
RESTORATION
sC"'E° N rs
SO CHI MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
DATE: 07-01-10 J. l _ i �� i RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
AEcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 55: GR055 5EGTION 3 LOOKING AT THE BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 56: GR055 5EGTION 3 LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 LTr to SANDY CREEK [aftoEngineering'
v11.ENANE: EEP08030 X. D WG RESMRATION A division of The John R McAdmu ConVany, Inc.
SCALE: , 1 v
N TS sj'tejm!s MONTPORwG/�PH�OTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
DATE: O % -0� -10 l ia] '`'�I1.1�� �)(.�H l.�Ul�ll1. N�. (919)836115000 ZIP 27709 -4005

PHOTOGRAPH 51: GRO55 5EGTION 3 LOOKING AT THE 51JB5TRATE GOMP051TION.
PHOTOGRAPH 58: GRO55 5EGTION 4 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 ��- UT to SANDY CREEK �EcoEngineering'I
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG R KOR eTION
l \vL/ 1�C11 1 1 �I A division of Tlx John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
9 SCALE: N TS 1
tj ',l OS� titelll MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
f P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 07-01-10 )
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 901 -5000 �

PHOTOGRAPH 5q: OR055 SECTION 4 LOOKING POWNSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 60: GROSS SECTION 4 LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
09 PROJECT No. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK
FILENAN' EEP08030X.DWG RESTORA�ON
v SCALE: N TS "U11,11 j� j �J 11 tel ll MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
DATE: 07 -01-10 „„,y,. RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
ElEcoEngineering
A division of The John IL McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH bl: GRO55 5EGTION 4 LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 62: GRO55 5EGTION 4 LOOKING AT THE 5005TRATE GOMPOSITION.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030 rlUT to SANDY CREEK AEcoEngineering FILENAM' EEP0803OX.DWG D'I�, MR TIO�►j 11(11.7 I\("1 lr A division of 1'he loLn R McAdams Company, Inc. scAl.E: N TS (y
_A �)51+Ste111 MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 07-01-10 A OLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 63: GRO55 5EGTION 5 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH 64: GRO55 5EGTION 5 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PROJECT ND. EEP -08030
FILENAME: EEP08030X.Mh
b SCALE:
a N TS
DATE: 07 -01 -10
�►'" UT to SANDY CREEK
RESTORATION
{'OSVSt011 MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
,t j j lc h RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC
®EcoEngineering
A division of The John A. McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 65: GR055 5EGTION 5 LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 66: GRO55 5EGTION 5 LOOKING AT THE RIGHT BANK.
PROJECT No. EEP- 08030 UT to SANDY CREEK [4ftoEngineering'
IRiENAUE:EEP08030X.DWG R &MDApflON A division ofT6e John R. McAdeme Company, Inc.
Y SCALE: N TS Stem MoN roRING PHOTOGRAPHS
lAri {{ yy44{{11ll RESEARCH ZIP 27709-4005
DATE: 07 -01 -10 �1�, :'�.1 ,l' 1 E1.�l l RANDOLPH COUN W, NC (919) 361 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 6l: GROSS SECTION 5 LOOKING AT THE SUBSTRATE GOMP051TION.
PHOTOGRAPH 68. GRO55 5EGTION 6 LOOKING UPSTREAM.
PROJECT N0. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK �EcoEngineering
�'E'' " "E' EEP08030X.DWG REMD / TIOj�T
l�Ll 11 1 V A divisor of 7Le John R McAdams Company, Inc.
v SCALE: N TS
',COStiStO ll MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH 4005 ZIP PARK, —4
� P_0. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 07 -01 -10 RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC (919) 301 -5000
rm�.a. v

Y
PHOTOGRAPH 6q: GRO55 SECTION 6 LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PHOTOGRAPH _70: GRO55 SECTION 6 LOOKING AT THE LEFT BANK.
PROJECT NO. EEP -08030 UT to SANDY CREEK aEcoEngineering
SCALE: Axe: EEP08030X. DWG RESTORATION
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
SCALE:
NTS L+C()StiStt,��1 MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE: P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
07 -01-10
RANDOLPHCOUNTY, NC (919) 901 -5000

�"t�`�tij•�' "ems .>!,� � t, _.,;s,;,y ",�,,;t„� `^ ` ,
3.
"lit
life
R 1��` 7.� `ir tl yj ; "• °' f F� A 9 ,•ji.��:'� '��J.. � �r A.•r
J: • gib, �'1� � "�� ��� �'•
a , y
PHOT06RAPH 71: GRO55 5EGTION 6 LOOKING AT THE R16HT BANK.
PHOTOGRAPH 72: GR055 SECTION b LOOKING AT THE 50135TRATE GOMP051TION.
PROJECT
LENAm No. 08030 030 UT to SANDY CREEK = EcoEngineering
e1LeNAae: EEP08030X.DWG
SCALE: y
RESTORATION A division of The John R. McAdsmc Co,npaoy, Inc.
NTS �t�'��l MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
DATE: 07 -01-10 RANDOLPH COUNW, NC (9119)B361,5000 ZIP 27709 -9005

PHOTOGRAPH l3: VEGETATION PLOT 1 15 LOCATED IN A PLANNED LOW- HEIGHT
PLANTING ZONE. THIS PLOT WILL NOT BE RE- SAMPLED IN THE FUTURE.
PHOTOGRAPH l4: VEGETATION PLOT 2 IS LOCATED IN A PLANNED LOW - HEIGHT
PLANTING ZONE. THIS PLOT HILL NOT BE RE- SAMPLED IN THE FUTURE.
PROJECT No. EEP -08030
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
SCALE:
NTS '_,�tisystettt
DATE: 06 -07 -10
UT to SANDY CREEK
RESTORATION
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
I EcoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(9 19) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH -15: VEGETATION PLOT 3 15 LOCATED IN A PLANNED LOH- HEIGHT
PLANTING ZONE. TH15 PLOT HILL NOT DE RE- SAMPLED IN THE FUTURE.
PHOTOGRAPH Wb: VEGETATION PLOT 4.
aecT "o. EEP -08030
UT to SANDY CREEK
ENAME: EEP08030X.DWG
f
r�
�rj � ePHON
1llUL:%/ 1�L1
AEcoEngineering
A division of 1Le John R McAdams Com�aoy, Inc.
ALE: NTS
a
_�COWSM11
MOwmiNG PHO'T'OGRAPHS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE
TE:
0 HO 14005 P 27 09N4005
06 -07-10
rtUlAfwY
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
(919) 301 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH 7-7: VEGETATION PLOT 5,
PHOTOGRAPH 76: VEGETATION PLOT b.
PROJECT No. EEP- 08030 UT to SANDY CREEK [4ftoEngineering'
FILENAME: EEP08030X.DWG R SMR TIO�T
Li�..71 �.! l�Ll 1 r A division of The John R McAdams Company, Inc.
SCALE:
SyS�elil , MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
N TS( RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
DATE: 06 -07 -10 ��� `���- =�i� RANDOLPH COUNTY. NC (919) 381 -5000

PHOTOGRAPH -1G: VIEW OF FLOOPPLAIN LOOKING DOWNSTREAM.
PRaecr No. EEP- 08030
FILENAME: EEP08030X.OWG r4
�a
SCALE: NTS 1{'cos item
DATE: 07 -01 -10
UT to SANDY CREEK
RESTORATION
MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NC
®ftoEngineering
A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
P.O. BOX 14005 ZIP 27709 -4005
(919) 361 -5000