WQ0000020 Aville Arpt Correspondence 3-'15 - 12-'16

t 1�
Z '
George T.Hamrick
DUC Senior Vke PreAtent
L- Coal Combustion Products
FW
ENERGY
q 400 South Try`on Street ST06A
Charlotte,NC 28202
Phone:[phone]
Emalt geonfe ham9ck6duk"nergy com
December 15,2016
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Mr.G.Landon Davidson,P.G.
Regional Supervisor.-,Asheville Regional Office
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality(NCDEQ)-Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section.
2090 U.S.Highway 70
Swannanoa,North Carolina 28711
RE: Asheville Regional Airport
Coal Combustion Products structural Fill Permit No.WQ0000020
2016 Annual Report
Dear Mr. Davidson:
In accordance with Section V.2 of the Asheville Regional Airport Coal Combustion Products Structural Fill Permit No.WQ0000020,
please accept the attached 2016 Annual Inspection Report.
If you have any questiorisor need clarification regarding the information provided,feel free to contact Randy Hart at
[e-mail] or(980)373-5630 at your convenience.
RqspeS#ulIysub
yrgitte ,
George T.Hamrfck
Senior vice President
w/attachment: 2016 Asheville Regional Airport Structural Fill Annual Inspe'ctt'on Report(12-15-2016);;AVL Area 1&4 Design
Drawings(5-26-2016);NCDEQ litter($-16-2016)
Duke Energy cc;; Brian Wefsker John Toepfer,Mike Kafka,Matt Pickett,Dana Kooser;Tim H. Dale Sm)th,Gary Whisnant,Shannon
Todd,Erika Tuchbaum,Scott Saunders;Tina Woodward,Benjamin Branham,Michael A R ;sman, James:Wells;Jon
Kerin,Randy Hart,Filet 2016 Asheville Structural Fill Annual Report

{ i
Introduction
This document serves as the Annual Inspection Report(Report) required by Condition V.2. of NCDENR
(now NCDEQ) Permit No.WQ0000020 (Permit) issued to Duke Energy on September 2, 2015.
Pursuant to the Permit,an annual inspection report shall be submitted on or before December 31 of
each year. Quarterly inspections shall be performed that log observations pertaining to the integrity of
intermediary and permanent caps,structural integrity, erosion, condition of liner systems,stormwater
collection systems and 'condition of monitoring wells. Quarterly inspections shall contain the following,
at a minimum:
• Date and time of each report;
• Name and title of the inspectors;
• Observation results on structural integrity,erosion, liner systems, integrity of the cap system,
stormwater collection systems,condition of monitoring wells,settlement,subsidence,seepage,
and presence of woody vegetation;
• Description and photo documentation of any pertinent issues such as breach in liner system,
excavations within 3 feet of the liner system,erosion,development of depressions,slope.
movement,.damage to monitoring wells, and groundwater seepage;
• Any maintenance, repairs,or corrective actions taken;
• An annual engineer's certification of the evaluation on the structural integrity and stability of
the ash fill areas.
Annual Report Summary and Observations
In accordance with the Permit conditions and as outlined in the 2015 Annual Report, Duke Energy
performed regular inspections of the structural fill areas at the Asheville Regional Airport(Airport) in
2016. Duke Energy was issued a Notice of Violation No. NOV-2015-PC-0303 (NOV) on December 2,2015.
As part of the response to the NOV mentioned above,the following schedule was proposed in the 2015
Annual Report for completion of the permanent design, permitting,and construction of repairs-and
improvements to.Area I and Area IV.
• 60 days to complete permanent designs for Area I and review existing permanent
stormwater management plan for Area IV(March 1,2016)
• 45 days to complete necessary permitting with NCDEQ(April 15,2016)
• 60 days to complete construction activities on-site(June 15, 2016)
Duke Energy agreed to perform monthly inspections until all issues in the NOV were addressed.
Subsequently, quarterly inspections would resume per the permit. Repairs and maintenance of the
items in the NOV were deemed substantially complete-after the September monthly inspection.A
quarterly inspection,for Quarter 4,was performed in November.
1

Matt Pickett, a Lead Engineer for Duke Energy CCP Engineering, performed all monthly and quarterly
inspections. The areas inspected included Area I, Area III, and Area IV located at the Airport.
Figure 1 on the following page depicts the areas in relation to the Airport facilities: Area I on the
northeast corner of the property, Area III west of the runway to the north, and Area IV to the west of
the runway and to the south.
Area I & Area IV Improvement Plan
The Area I & Area IV Improvement Plan consisted of construction drawings and erosion and sediment
control measures developed by AVCON. Inc., the airport's engineering consultant, and Charah, the
airport's construction contractor. Duke Energy engineering reviewed the plans and provided comments
to ensure the plans would meet the requirements of the NOV. The plans were finalized March 1, 2016.
The plans were also forwarded to NCDEQ Division of Water Quality as a courtesy to show the repair plan
was progressing. The final sealed plans are included as Attachment 1 to this report.
AVCON submitted the plans to NCDEQ for Erosion and Sediment Control permitting in March 2016. The
Letter of Approval was received April 20, 2016. Charah began construction of the repairs for Area I on
April 21, 2016 and completed repairs on June 15, 2016. Area IV repairs were started in May 2016 and
completed June 30, 2016. Area IV repairs were delayed due to an ongoing construction project in the
vicinity of Area IV.
As part of the July inspection, Duke Energy walked the areas and inspected the repairs with
representatives of Charah and the airport. Duke Energy submitted a letter of completion for the
improvements plan on August 16, 2016. This letter is attached to this report as Attachment 2.
Duke Energy continued to do monthly inspections through September until the Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan was finalized by DEQ. Duke Energy initiated quarterly inspections thereafter.
2

r
} u✓F.. xi 4 � ��11I IY V� � I W f :
� s
a
E ..
v
ass
e
4 �
p • ,^,� Y
u.
.4
2
3
i
--------------
seaatl III poe liodny}o Maly leuaq-Z amFg
r

Area I
The Area I ash fill,completed in the fall of 2010, is an approximately 18-acre fill area on the north end of
the Airport located east of the runway. The fill area is designed to slope north at a 2.5%grade across
the top of the fill area. The outer slope of the fill was built to a 33%(31-1:1V)slope. A wetland area,
stormwater structures, and outfalls are located at the north toe of the Area I slope.
There is a 100-foot wide compacted soil core over the length of a 60-inch diameter stormwater pipe that
transects the ash fill. The pipe flows south to north and is part of drainage from the Airport runway
areas. The compacted soil core is to ensure that ash is not located within 50 feet of a stormwater pipe.
Area I is lined with geosynthetic clay liner(GCL) on the bottom. The cap system for the area is a
vegetated compacted soil cover. The top of the fill system with the 2.5%grade is constructed with a 6-
foot thick soil cap. The outer slopes are constructed with a 2-foot thick soil cap as designed. The detail
for the cap is shown in the figure below. The detail shown below is from the drawing set"Asheville
Regional Airport-Fly Ash Beneficial Use Project," issued by Charah, revised December 2007.
TOP OF FILL -8'
SIDE ELO.ES-27
(7)COMPACTED
SOIL CAP {/
ASH PLACEMENT
_ �• -. .. 64AX iXl[�cmd�ec
.. .CmEOSYEHETTC CLAY
LINER MATERIAL
MIN.
TYPICAL LINER SECTION
NTS
Figure 2-Typical cap and liner detail for Area I
Area I Observations
During the last two months of 2015,temporary measures were installed in Area I to divert water,
establish vegetation and prevent further erosion until a final repair plan could be developed.AVCON,
the airport's engineering consultant,was contracted to prepare a permanent repair plan by March 1,
2016 with approval and construction completed by June 15, 2016. Until the plan and repairs could be
completed,the temporary structures were maintained and inspected.
The photos below illustrate the measures taken to reduce erosion and establish vegetation in Area I
after the NOV was issued. Before the repair plan could be implemented,typical conditions as shown in
the photos existed relatively unchanged from January to April.
4

i
a
Photo 1-Area I showing erosion and sediment control measures taken to prevent erosion and establish vegetation.
(March 2016)
Photo 2 -Standing water and tire ruts noted at toe of Area I.(March 2016)
5

1• 1
p 4 f a'�-
.
r
� H
f^
g+
S' Y�
Photo 3-Area I erosion rill noted on western slope.(March 2016)
Photo 4-Slope drains not constructed properly on Area 1.(March 2016)
After clearing vegetation in later 2015, an apparent weep and scarp were noted on the north side of the
access road that forms the toe of the fill area. This area was to be addressed within the repair plan, by
removing unstable material and backfilling and re-grading the area.
6

Photos.5 and 6 below show the condition of the weep and scarp. The weep is a trickle flow. The scarp is
approximately 60 feet in length with depth ranging from eight inches to 18 inches.
r.
N'
f.
wi
i
Photo 5-Apparent weep noted during November.and December 2015 inspections.(April 2016)
Photo 6-Scarp noted during November and December 2015 inspections.(April 2016)
Several areas on the north slope of Area I were repaired by filling in ruts with soil and establishing
vegetation.The east slopes of the fill area have adequate vegetation, no visible erosion,and were in
7

r
good condition. Minor erosion was noted in areas along the south slope as well as some small animal
burrows that would be addressed. The top of the fill had a few minor erosion issues, an area of sparse
vegetation, and a small depression requiring attention. Duke Energy identified these areas in the
monthly.reports and provided a list of recommended repairs for each issue to the Airport.
Area I Corrective Actions
A permanent repair plan was approved by NCDEQ in April 2016.Charah began work on the repair plan in
May and completed the work in June.The plan for Area 1 included re-grading areas to divert
stormwater,install fill to ensure permitted cap thickness and repairing drainage structures.
The pictures below show examples of repair construction.
g
Photo 7-Repairs to the East Slope of Area 1.(May 2016)
8

WOr
Photo 8-Rip-rap channels installed and re-grading of Area 1.(June 2016)
Photo 9-Rip-rap channels and vegetation established in Area 1.(August 2016)
9

s
`#
try .
Photo 10-Rip-rap channels installed and re-grading of Area 1.(December 2016)
�a �� �k d "✓ ,� X b €� � 3 eye r ? � 3 �,,}
PI
" # i'�ar �,,�` ,nos ma. •t� ,� < 4 atx"sr a y3- fa >-0'�
-
r
-
w
Photo 11-Re-graded cover and established vegetation on East slope in Area 1.(December 2016)
10

Area III
The Area III ash fill is an approximately 29-acre ash fill located west of the runway on the northern
portion of the airport property.Area III completed construction in 2016.The area is constructed (from
bottom to top)with a compacted soil subgrade, geosynthetic clay liner,and 60-mil geomembrane liner
with leachate collection pipes on top of the liner. The leachate collection system gravity drains to the
Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County(District).
6 aFAMMY V1.11 M UOU C
r
t4
rt4WWrz
R'dLv
W ORtEiCi�i '�5�F_'SiFdS,,tli� �`
Figure 3-Typical bottom liner system detail for Area III
The cap for Area III is a flexible membrane with soil cover on top of it. The geomembrane in the cap
system is 40-mil textured HDPE. The cap thickness is six feet on top and two feet on the side slopes as
designed. The design details shown below are from the drawing set, "Asheville Regional Airport,
Engineered Fill -Area 3," issued for construction by Charah on March 15, 2013.
aft"�RT!»' 1:9f.WfFP6e)1..
�'" 3 Pen.4sC are2
. i i?!s�gtsrol'^ktst5
j4
Figure 4-Typical cap detail for Area III
Area III Observations
In the beginning of 2016,Area III had an open Erosion and Sediment Control (E&SC) permit held by the
Airport. Final phases of construction were still ongoing in the area.Area III was not included in the
Improvement Plan developed by AVCON.
Portions of Area III were overfilled in the summer of 2016 due to a construction project to extend a
runway at the airport.
11

The photos presented below show the typical issue with Area III was establishing vegetation. Minor
erosion was evident at times with areas of sparse vegetation. Construction traffic also impaired
vegetation growth.
TIZ
Photo 12-Area III with vegetation being established.(April 2016)
3
Pi
z
Photo 13-Area III used for materials staging for airport fill project.(June 2016)
12

Area III Corrective Actions
Area III did not have any issues identified for corrective action in the 2015 Annual Report. Duke Energy
continued to include the area in its-inspections, inspecting the cap for erosion and integrity issues.
The Area III fill project was completed and turned over to the responsibility of the Airport for future
maintenance in August 2016. Duke Energy will continue to include the area in its quarterly inspections.
Photo 14-Area 111 airport fill project.(October 2016)
Area IV
The Area IV ash.fill,substantially completed April 1,2015, is located to the west of the Airport
runway. The 28-acre fill area was constructed in three different phases: Phase I, Phase IA, and Phase
2. Area IV is constructed.(from bottom to top)with a compacted soil subgrade,geosynthetic clay liner,
and 60-mil geomembrane liner with leachate collection pipes on top of the liner. The leachate collection
system gravity drains to the District.
The cap system is similar to Area III noted above, but it was designed with a 30-mil geomembrane cap.
The soil thickness on the cap is six feet on top and two feet on the side slopes as designed.
13

' ��tcmmm rna�:.als 4tKat
. +MtRCiklD tfCt4G�'M,iT:� T8"
'' P •,
R G`TIOJ
Figure 5-Typical cap detail for Area IV
Area IV Observations
An inspection in October 2015 identified exposed geomembrane liner along the western slope (but not .
exposed ash),areas with over grown vegetation, and several areas of erosion on the slopes. The area
with the exposed cap was filled with soil and a sandbag diversion ring was installed to divert surface
water until a permanent grading plan is developed and implemented. Further inspections of the area in
November and December 2015 revealed the temporary measures were successful in diverting water
and avoiding further erosion.
Area IV was included in the AVCON Improvement plan to repair the deficiencies noted above.The areas
were inspected monthly,similar to Area I,to ensure the areas needing repair were not worsening.
The photos below show typical conditions in the area prior to being addressed with the repair plan
design and implementation.
r�
Photo 15-Rip-rap outlets with erosion and exposed geotextile fabric.(May 2016),
14

� F
4
rt
Photo 16-Temporary measures around exposed geomembrane.(April 2016)
NO,
v ✓�� au 'fir � a s�`4 r� to- �� ��9Y� #: �, �A- it?:,
h
Photo 17-Sparse vegetation and erosion rills noted on Area IV slope.(May 2016)
15

Photo 18-Standing water along toe of Area IV slope.(May 2015)
During the early part of 2016,Area IV was being utilized as a construction laydown area adjacent to the
new runway. The Airport held an E&SC permit for Area IV in relation to the construction activities for
the new runway.
Area IV Corrective Actions
A permanent repair plan was approved by NCDEQ in April 2016. Charah began work on the repair plan in
May and completed the work in June.The plan for Area IV included re-grading areas to divert
stormwater,establishing vegetation, and placement of fill to ensure permitted cap thickness.
Improvement Plans were developed by AVCON,the contractor for the Asheville Airport.The plans were
shared with NCDEQ-Asheville Regional Office in March 2016.An Erosion &Sediment Control Plan
approval was issued to start work May 13,2016. Charah completed construction in Area IV June 30,
2016.
A permanent repair plan was approved by NCDEQ in April 2016. Charah began work on the repair plan in
May and completed the work in June.The plan for Area IV included repairing the exposed
geomembrane,stormwater drainage improvement, and establishing permanent vegetation.
The pictures below show examples of repair construction.
16

a
5^ r
� e
1x
ay
Photo 19-View of repair to exposed geomembrane and
installation of erosion control features in Area IV.(June 2016)
a - *
Photo 20-View of re-graded slope and drainage improvements along toe of Area IV.(June 2016)
1
17

n. r"".— '�--�"�.,- a
Al
Photo 21-View of repair to exposed geomembrane and installation of erosion control features in Area IV.(December 2016)
"ON,
..; r
$r
Photo 22-View of re-graded slope and drainage improvements along crest of Area IV.(December 2016)
18

Final Observations
The structural fills at the Asheville Regional Airport are in overall good condition as documented in
regular inspections by Duke Energy in 2016.The Area I and Area IV Improvements were completed per
the design and meet the requirements as stated in the NOV.Ongoing inspections will ensure the
improvements continue functioning as designed and maintain the integrity of the fill structures.
After the improvement plan was implemented,the primary ongoing issue for all areas is establishing a
good stand of vegetation.As of the final Quarterly Report, dated November 2, 2016,the following table
lists issues to be monitored and recommended actions going into 2017.
AREA I
•lbs4vbtiAt
. ..
Standln Vilater Seep at doe of_eastern fell ContlriC�e to onFtor=
is ARE a�I ( '� � i i;�,eg' ''� a�`"r��'� � c-� w•. a � � �w
=u � tit t u � � Nr, ri Cnta# nfrnal grcf df ;�a�tunc
a iih a p r iy n wy @ aw '
N na g
U � ,ii pipe t p'J'' r'3,H i6�Mri' � �' 't i 'JU ��-t 9+d� �'.--s ..:.; ,,p'� a, `�
a a �pE4au , .• � a ar
3 lrros�ot rills on fh norms slope eastern{ Rt�;rr to rade attd�p" taf� ge}
x ¢^7 }§ x a s - ' 2a
AREA III
t
� rosion on,crest�of slope on west side of Return o grade and esta l f uege anon �
14,1A,: ^h3
AREA IV
• .
VE'
.� eam'a - �'P 1 e
s�c� �� f l ire c Aa itet -to grade and" stali'sh ueetaor ��9 01
2 AOmatbrrows 1 on south slopeatl wfth compactedso(and estab�sh ugetat�ott
n A3 ►nrsattlttvetslppe:ar�cl � strshancmaEata' iX�regat� sr «PN
In addition to monitoring the surface of the fills,the condition of the monitoring wells were observed
quarterly per the permit. Conditions of the wells were recorded regarding access, casing, caps, labeling,
locks, paint and well pad.All wells as of the final quarterly report are in satisfactory condition with no
issues outstanding.
s _ AREA I
_ .._...
g;,i MW-QUA at>sf 'd oil
IV Ir Ma atsfctr e u.
`C..va.avu r
4+
MW OQA ,' ii Safsfaofy ,"
I g�x
19

AREA III
-
$�fl' ''raga ' '4'` �!'" aSfCt04.
4'�°' _ -
q
�, OF tSftct0
2
"
$=U' , tkS ttt y
4.f f43h(`7 SatiSfctory,
AREA IV'
i
�� lt�W 1�¢l�}a� ° � � n.SattsfacYory •
pyp
kss �W-3j� y,r� 'S'�B}tEsn¢�3f>tC�}yry.
$atlSfatory
W=6 M-aactory
kd� M�8 �� ,Sattsfactory
CERTIFYING STAT h EI T
This Report is presented to meet the requirements of Permit No.WQ0000020 issued to Duke Energy on
September 2,2015. To the best of my knowledge,the information contained in this Report and
supporting documentation are accurate and complete.
I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer unde the laws of the state of North Carolina` �
Signature:, �_� �` ��'FE S��,�/,�,�'.
Printed Name .... ,.Cv Uf :/P✓r
SEAL -
Date:_ l Z� /�� - License NumberG j 26864
tn
Digitally signed by Scott R.Nordgren,P.E.
DN:cn=Scott R.Nordgren,P.E.,o=CCP
Scott R.
J'EEngineering,ou=Carolinas West,
Nordgren, P.- ' ail=sc M,C=dgren@duke-
energy,cu m,c=US
Date:2016.12.15 10:06:08-05'00'
20

ATTACHMENTS
1.Attachment 1: Final Repair Plan drawings, "Area 1 and Area 4 Improvements,"AVCON, Inc., March
2016.
2.Attachment 2: Letter of completion,Area I and Area IV Improvements, Duke Energy,August 16,2016
21

Attachment 1

Attachment 2

�'CC. ✓ a 3� k' ,:,, .3 F� '„s 3 "e f 1 £ y� -, �rK x ��r x -�s � ,� �;�- ( �f` ,
� ` 2 OP
a n# r 4i0 SlmmgtotFSfieet
' �z .. � ! Aatelgh NO 2760E �a
EIN * t i�al7m�ldless
`�
x,F
�7Ralergh
aIlk919 546 7863"a
August 16 2016 ` r
Y x 9'rtt F°` u s ! t F - ! ✓ ? '�" kris Y _
" Mr Eandon D6UldSon
` }NC DENR Ashev!116�Regional Offices
20901!S 70Nighstiay k t s
Swannanoa NC„28778 �'
RE '� " Coal�CombustlonlProducts StructuralAll perrnit'No1fI1Q0000020 `'
4 provemenea and4reaU Im onalArpAr^ ort ,t a n
a Dear MrDavitlson- � .
Ai
Tii TV'
This letter is to inform you that the lnipcAvements to Area I and AreaaY at the Asheville Regional Airport'
Were.comp eted�in earlyJtaly 201 The improvement plans weret ared witfi you in MarcF 2016
the work was completed under an Erosion&°Sedimentation Control FIanLetter of Approval issued`to
`4.„ r '' (,9'e.' £
tie Alrport,dated:Nlay 13,',2016 M '
if you have any question's or need any clarification regarding the:lnformation,provided, feel free to '
contact me gat Sohn toep uke eneray com at k 546 7863 at your convenience � � e
a ^'.- ..
Respectfully suBmitted, y -
M
L t
-
e
John`
Lead Engineer` f.,
� Enur�onmental Serrlces
r' 4'.°
CC. Brett Laverty DEQAsheville Regional Office
m
Matt Pickett ,Duke Energ
111—r Y
Scott Nordgren='duke Energy
Ed Sullivan Duke Energy x t t �, -� �
IJ
Michael A.<Reisman �AsF eville Regional"Air
°, Po:
rt
Effinger CFiarah 'Inc Erie ,
tfr
t

AREA 1 AND AREA 4 IMPROVEMENTS
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLI`NA
APRIL 2016
AVCON,INC. '
ENCINE®t5&PLINNWIS onn
OtEFK W.SRIE If]
AERIAL M A P VICINITY MAP
N.T.S. N.T.S.
sheville
tA�i o Digitally signed
REGIONAL AIRPORT `" by lames M.
I ,Qy�laose,P.E.
A' -E3aCLG'2016.05.26
''' � 15:22:45-04'00'

GENERAL NOTES UTILITY NOTES
1. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK THE CONTRACTOR 9H4L HAVE AN APPROVED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE WHICH 1, THECONTRACTOR SMALL REQUEST THE FAA TO 9TPNE ALL FAA FACILITES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK CONTRACTOR s h e v i l l e
SWlll BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTIR ICN PLARB AND BPECIFIDATIONA CONTRACTOR SHALL REVISE AND RESUBMIT SHAD.PROVIDE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES FOR AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL C09i FOR THIS SERVICE SHALL BE INDDEMPL TO THE
9CIEDULEAS DIRECTED BY OWNEIT—INEERANDAS WORKPROGRESSE9 ANDTHE SCHEDULE ISAFFECTEU. CONTRACT
] IN ADDITION TO THESE PAWS AND SPECIFICATIONS,ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTVMES FOR THIS PROJECT SWILL CONFORM TO THE 2 CONTRACTOR9WLLL REVIEWPLLARFlELD UTILITIES WITH THE FMMDARPORT STAFF PRIOR TO WORK REGIONAL AIRPORT
GUIDELINES SET FORTH IN FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIMSTRATION(FAA)AC 15015ST0.2-OPERATIONAL SAFETY ON AIRPORTS DURING
CONSTRUCTION--NRRENT EDITION(INCLUDED IN SPECIFICATIONS). 3. HH-ES SHOWN ON PLANS ME FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.CONTRACTOR SHALL RELD VERIFY ALL UTILITIES FOR
3, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POSSESS AND WMINUOUSLT MONITOR GROUND CONTROL FREQUENCY 121.1 ON THE JOB STETT ALL LOCATIONS PRIOR TOBEGINNNG WORK
TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS FROM EACH CROSSING LOCATION ESPECIALLY WHILE WORKING WITHIN THE RUNWAY 4. PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF EASTING CABLES AND UTIUTES-ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PROTECTED,AND DAMAGES
SAFETY AREA IRSL CONTRACTOR SHALL MONTOR CTAF AT MIGHT(WHEN ATOT IS-5E0)ON FREQUENCY 121.I. REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY AS SPEDRED IN SPECIAL PROVISION.
4. STRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN 251?OF THE CENTERLINE OF AR ACTIVE RUNWAY WITHOUT THE PRIOR B. CONTRACTOR SWILL BE RESPON5IBLE FOR RELD LOCATION AND VERI—ION OF AIL UTILITIES AND GABLES,INCLUDING FAA
APPROVKOFTHEOWNERIENGINEER NAVIGATONM AIDS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.VERIFICATION OFU MITES MUST BE BY MEAN OF WWDOI9 TEST HOLES PRIOR TO
5. DONSTRIICTION ACTIVITIES ME NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT OWNENENGINEER APPROVAL WITHIN A TAKIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA EXCAVATION. DAMAGE TO ANY OF THESE UTILITIES—BE REPAIRED IMMEDATELY BY THE OONTRACTOi AT THE
(TOFAL CONTRAC10R'9E%PENSEINAMANNERACCEPTABLETOBOMMEOWNEPoENGINEER DSMAGESINCURREDBYTHEARPORT.FA4 A�yCON,INVI CCU.
ARLI ES.ARCRAFT OPERATORS,OR DUETO DAMAGES BY THE CONTRACTOR 6—BE BORNEBY THE CONTRACTOR.
S. CONTRACT ORSSUPBORTENOENT9WYLBEONTRECONSTRUCTION6TEATALLTME9MMMWONNGHOJRSWHLEJOBISIN xwam xcic-
PROGRESS A SWILL BE DESIGNATED THE RESPONSIBLE CONiPACTOR9 REPRESENTATIVE WHO SHALL BE AVALABtE ON A
2AiWLJRBVSIe. - ....r.m
T. BEFORE USING A CONSTRUCTION A—SS POINT OR GATE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE
Q CONSTRUCTION£S3 WITH THE OWNEILENGINEER THE CONTRACTOR SHA L RESTORE ALL GRASSED AND PAVED AREAS '•.LARp DI IIdII 51 ned
(A—..E9
AEl WITHIN THE AIRPORT PROPERTY.OUTSIDE THE!LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION,WNICTI ARE DISTURBED BY DONSTRI—ION ACTIVITY �KN (�'•ys 9 Y 9
9,)WUL STAGING,STORAGE M.)TO THEIR PRE—NSTRUCTION MNDHIQK NO DIRECT PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR P A
THIS AS IT IS CONSIDERED A SUBSIDIARY OBLIGATION OF THE CONTRACTOR ? gl EAi''ST', � by James M.
B. ITEMS FOR CONTROL OF SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION SUCH AS VEHICLE DOMING,RADIOS,BARRI DEB.FLAGGERS ETC., J]1B1 ?"N4005e,P.E.
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.SMALL NOT BE PAD FOR DIRECTLY AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS A SUBSIDIARY DELIOATION OF INDEX OF DRAWINGS '.D°sdtL:`2016.05.26
THECONTPACTOR 3u 15:23:14-04'00'
w S. NO ODNSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL ENTER OR CROSS ANY ACTIVE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL AREA ADA)EXCEPT UPON Sheet Number Sheet Title �'""P
W AIRIPI--BY THE OWNERIEN-1-
10.AILCONTRACTORVEHICLES.INCLWINGWWLINGVEHICLESTHATAREAURgR TOOPERATE ONTHEARPORTWITHINTHE COVER SHEET ASHEVILLE
pE51GN4TED LIMITS OF CON9TRUCRON OR HAUL ROUTES AS DEFINED HEFEIN.9NALL DISPLAY IN FULL VIEW ABOVE THE VEHICLE
Z A SXS OR LARGER AVATION ORANGE AND WHITE CHECKERBOARD FLAD,EACH CHECKERBOARD BEING V SOJARE WHEN "I GUt-GENERALNOTESLEGENDSI—OFORAWING9 REGIONAL AIRPORT
OPERATING WRING PERIODS OF DARKNESS OR LIMITED VIABILITY,GONTRACTOR'9 VEHICLES BRAD.BE EQUIPPED WITH
FLASHING AMBER LIGMS.DURING SUCH PERIODS HAULING VEHICLES NOT SO EQUIPPED SOUL BE ESCORTED BY A VEHICLE SO G02 PROJECT LAYOUT HAUL ROUTES ASHEVILLE
EQUIPPED,ALSO.VEHICLES SHALL DISPLAY COMPANY NAME OR LOGO IDENTIFICATION MEDIA BY MAGNETIC SIGNS OR LOGO
lu PANTFDONVEL—. SAFETY AND SECURITY NOTES
NORTH AR
11.MAAMUM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SPEED ON ALL ARPORT PROPERTY SHALL BE 25 MPH.SPEEDING AND UNSAFE DRIVING GL4 SAFETY DETAILS
PRAC110E3 HALLNOTBEALLOWED.
S MEA CFt T FASTING WNIRIONS
12 WMNTRACTO RA R9 EMPLOYEES VEHCLE951WL-BE PMKFD IN OESIGWITEO AREAS WITHIN CONiRACTOR93TPLIM1G ARO510MGE `-�1`�����1- ,� ��)"-"�_
AREA—STINGOOIAITIONS
13.NO UNG WILL BE ALLOWED ON ARPORT PAVEMENTS EXCEPT AS AUTHDRUED BY OWNERENGINE£R.NMPACTOR TO gpEAt GRADNOMDORAWWE(SHEET 1 OF 3) ``''""''''����``•TT '\ l
,rpDl ROINITE ALL HAUL R WITH OUTES OWNERENGINEEK ARFIELD PAVEMENTS U ILS ED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR HULLING
MUST BE CONTINUALLY—NED AND DUST CONTROLLED VA WATER TRUCK MECIYNOGM-SWEEPER POWER BROOM.OR �-
p VADWM TRUCK DUST AND FW MUST BE MANIANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNERENGINEER DURING THE COMPLETE —4 AREA I GRADING AND DRANAGE(SHEET 2 OF 3) _I KBYPLM
gJPATON OF THE CONTRACT.
4
Y 14.
=NTH MEAN GRgBNGPNp ORANSGE(SHEET30F3)
4� UCNON EQUIPMENT TO BE PMItED ONLY WITHIN COAT -TORS STAGING AND STORAGE AREA,WHEN NOT IN 15E.OR
OUTSIDEOF ESTMLISHEDMOUR90F CONSTRUCTION MFAaGRADNGANo oRNNAGE(sHEErIOFa) - AREAL AND
15.ME CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINLOUSLY MONITOR AAD IMMEDIATELY REMOVE FROM ACTIVE AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT AREAS ANY AREA4GRADNGANDORNNAGE(SHEET20F4) AREA
1 FOREIGN OBJECT DEBRIS(FOG),WASTE AND LOOSE MATERIAL CAPARLE OF CAUSING DAMAGE TD ARCRAFT LANDING GEM,
W PNOPELLERSANDROTORS,OROFBEINGINGESTEDBYJETENGINE9.TECONTRACTORISRNANCALLYRE9FONSELERJRANY AREA—RADINGANDORNNAGE(SHEET3014) IMPROVEMENTS
pNMGE9 TO NRCRAFi DIE TO NEGLIGENCE IN FOD CONTROL
15.WRING HOURS OF REBTRCTED A BUTY OR DARIWERS OPEN TRENCHES,EXCAVATIONS AND STOCKPILED MATERAL AT THE AREA—RADNGANDORNNAGE(SHEEf 40F4)
STRULTION SITE SHALL BE PROMINENTLY MARKED WRH ORANGE FLAGS AND UGHTED WITH—RING RED UGHT9 UNITS
IACCEPTPBLETOTHEOWNENENGINEER). EGO! EROSIONANID3EDMENTCONTROL NDTE3(SHEET10F 21
Z IT.STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE CONSTRAINED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT MOVEMENT M A RESULT OF AIRCRAFT BAST OR EG02 EROSONAHD 5—CONTROL NOTES(SREETIOF 2) GENERAL NOTES,
< WIND MATERIAL SHALL SE STORED IN THE WNTPACTORS STAGING AND STORAGE AREA UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE
OWN NGINEER EGOS EROSION CONTROL DETAILS(SHEET I OF 2)
LEGEND B INDEX
IS.DURNG CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR BRAD.PROTECT ALL OUSTING ARPORT LIGHTING,MY DAMAGE TO THE EASING EG04 EROSION CONTRA DETAILS(SHEET 2 OF 2) OF DRAWINGS
S ARFORT LIGHTING SYSTEM'CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION —NATIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE
ON1VERIENGINEERANDREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR REPAIRED BY THEARPORTATTHE COST OF THE CONTRACTOR. Amnnon.
4Q0 1B.ALL WASTE MATERIALS.CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND DEMOLITION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE BY THE
ii CONTACTORORATMONSRELOCATIDNMPROV BYTHEOWNEWENGINEER.
20,MY PERMITS REOUIRED FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT BALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR ^^'^ •^
21.AJL ODNSTRUCTON SHALL COMPLY W MALLMPUCASLE GOVERNNG CODEBAND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME, SCALE:
,^o
22 LOCATIONS FOR STOCK PIUNG SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OWNEWENGINEER THE DONTRACTOft WILL NOT SE ALLOWED TO
STOCK PILE MATERIAL WITHIN THE RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA(ROFA)WHILE THE RUNWAY 19 ACTIVE CONTRACTOR SHA L MARE REVISAMS:
ALL PERSONNEL AWARE OF LIMITS OF OBJECT FREEMEAS. NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION
?3.THE RUNWAY OBJECT FREE MFA(ROFA)MD TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA(TOFA)—REMAIN CLEAR OF STDCI4PILE9 AND
0 —IVE OR UNATTENDED EQUIPMENT AT ALL MIME ALL TIMES.CONTRACTOR S ALL 1ER90NEL AWARE OF LIMITS OF OBJECT
REE.REM.
24.CONTRACTOR SHALL MANTNN ALL ACCE55 PATHS AROUND EACH ARE All 013TURSlNCE TOM EASING ACCESS PATH SNAIL
BEREPAREDATNDCOSTTOTHEOWNER
2:.CO/LLASH LIMITS SHOWN OXTHE PLANS ME MPROAMATE. \) r pLTYpR TT� DESIGNED BY: J.MM.
CJO�J� o �nj.O DRAWN BY: W.L.J.
W Z= CHECKED BY: 11AR
¢In y m APPROVED BY: J.NLM.
7
Y DATE: MARCH 2O16
STATE LICENSE N N.C.C-2450
BEFOR13YOUDIGI PROJECT NO. 2013.157.02
CONTACT ODM-CALL CENTER
`gam 1400-632--4949 SHEET NUMBER
G-01

\\�. :_...-w -Y.✓^"' ! / ".1 ` iROAD(NO ZBB) C— K
AREA, 4
`PRaELT HS -...- ( ..,,
_ --
., � I� I UTO PA�WNG 1 } &lam / cJ
; h e v i I I e
IIIT �� I '^. ti�s✓ *iELFARm I...�., x �� t 1
REGIONAL AIRPORT
11 INORTNGdh AMPf fSoIRH
V
kk'
Tv ���j@�- / R GftUNWAY 30
\ _
1
— — (,
4 A �4 ,.... ' .....--- -- C-I .....
11'� aVcwGn.rn.n ' 1 access ...,(
ul 1 9 POINT LOG LOQ i, .l
L9 F�clsnnc TEMPO _� ^---"-
5 1
mv0-
1�11
. � �- ,a„i, - per' �--►- rY...RAR ..... \ / Digitally signe
yI �, I}g 1 \ ;\� u v'.� �^;� .tn^:._-- _.._-_ ^►�__�_ _- 'sa ___ x°�£� by James M. d
Yfl NWA I
TEMPORARY RUNWAY 35 }•• '., t - E
E SLO
I FLOODWAY LOCPLIZER
I { I f ) L yP
aOUrE
r
" 4 EAA 1 c. 15 23:40-04 00'
I { I TI +Ip YEAR FLOOD PLAIN Pa0.1ECTLIMITS ILL
f 1�SmrAxFLDODP T f' i/ G b. ��/�-
\ 'Access ' ...!
POINT
v <,_ ASHEVILLE
r AREA / - 4 R°r REGIONAL AIRPORT
-t, ASHEVILLE
0 }}
�ARPORTPROPERTYLINE �- %'' r i1 NORTH CAROLINA
.. --
� � r
ACCESS&HAUL ROAD NOTES AREA 7 AND
g I. HAUL ROADS TO BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT—BE THOSE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS OR AREA 4
OTHERY4BE SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNERENGINEER IN GENERAL. THE IMPROVEMENTS
O EENTRACTDR SHALL HE EQUIPMENT AND HAULING TO HE AREAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
BEBRSSHALLBECLEMEDFROMHERDADW SY DIRECTEDBYTHEOWNERENGINEER
w 2 T POINTS TO THE PROJECT SITE ME SHOWN ON THE PUNS HE OWNER RESERVES
HE RIGHT TO CHANGE HAUL ROUTE ANDACCESS POINT AT ANY TIME.
o HE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL TURFED MD PgVEO MFA9 USED FOR HAUL ROADS TO
Q S HEIR ORIGINAL CONOITIDN,INCLUDING THE ESTABU9HMENT OF TURF.ALL COST FOR PROJECT LAYOUT
.HESTRUCTING,REMOVING AND RESTORING OF HAUL ROADS REQUIRED FOR THE COMPLETION DF
9HAU BE BORNE BY HE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO HEQWNER HAUL ROUTES
SC HE CONTRACTOR SHA L NOT PERMIT ANY UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL OR
TRAFRC GN HE SITE THE CONTRACTOR ffiWLL MAKE USE OF A G—GUARD AT ALL ACCESS
Q POINTS BEING USED BY HE CONTRACTOR OTHER—E THE GATES AT EACH ACCESS POINT ME .rrenm..
TO—N U—B..THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL TO AND
FIUCTION AREAS WITHIN HE SITE THE CONTRACTOR 19 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
MMEDAT-CLEANUP OF MY DEBRIS DEPOSITED AT THE PROJECT SITE MD ALONG MT ROAD AS
ARESU.TOF HIS—CCNSIRUCTIONTRAFFIC, Amo -,-
5. HE CONTRACTOR SWML ESTABLISH AND MANTAIN A UST OF CONTRACTOR AND
SUBOONTTIACTOR EMPLOYEES AND VEHICLES—ZED TO OPERATE GIN HE SITE.M SCALE: .
UPRATED LIST SHALL BE PRDADEDTO OWNERENGINEER MEERLY.
REVIS-3:
6. IT 9HA.L BE THE LOMRACTOR9 RE9PONSIBIUTY TO COORDINATE OFF-SITE ROUTES(STATE DATE ST OCRI-14
HPPROPIS,COUEMENCY—JJURISDICHONOVER MD
ANY CTED ROUTS.
PERMITS WITH THE
APPHOP T
O T. ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC — REMNN WITHIN HE DESIGNATED
CONSTRUCTION MFAS,TTgGINGMEA9MMOR HAIR ROUTES,
B HALL DEPINY IN HILL VIEW LOGOS CONSPICUOUSLY PLACED ON LEGEND
EACHIM OF HE VEHICLE ALL VEHICLES OPERATING IN HE ACl1VE ARSIOE OPERATION AREA
WA)gIWNO IpURS OF LOW VISIBILITY OR GPRHNES9 SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FLASHING
Q —DOME-TYPE LIGHT MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE VEHICLE,.THE FLASHING LIGHT SHALL BE OF CONTRACTOR's—INOMEA
UCH INTENSITY TO CONFORM TO AIRPORT
CODES FOR MAENMCE MD EMERGENCY
0
VEHICLE., DESIGNED BY: J.M.M.
z
Q 9. NO CONTRACTOR VEHICLES PRE TO CROSS ACRVE RUMWAYS—MD CRITICAL MEM,OR -------- PROJECT LIMITS
DRAWN BY: W.L.J.
TAIUWAYE FORMAL REASON
Q 1D.COIfTRALT00.TO SAFELY CONTROL TRAFFlC AROLND HAUL ROAD.CONTROL OF TPPFFIC ONSITE �� HAUL ROVTE CHECKED BY: J.MM.
S HALL eE IrvCIDEMAI TO PROJECT. APPROVED BY: J.MHL
6 —--
It.AT NO TIME SYSTEM
I5 THE CONTRACTOR OPERATE VECLE5 OR EDUIPMEM A ON THE RPORT AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE DATE: MARCH 2O16
ROAONAY SYSTEM OTHER 11VW THOSE ROADS IOENTIFlED ON THIS SHOT.
- 01 GLIOESLOPECRTICPLAREA
�s STATE LICENSE N.C.C-2460
_ North PROJECT NO. 2111,111,11
LOCALZERCRITICPLAREA 0' 260' 600' 100R'
GRAPHICS® SHEET NUMBER
G-02

SAFETY NOTES SECURITY NOTES S h eV I I I e
1. AIRPON OPERATIONS-THE LONTRPCTOR SHALL ACOW NT HISMER SUPERVISORS MRD EMPLOYEES WITH THE AIRPORT ACTVN S ANO OPERATIONS THAT ARE 1 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED HEREIN.THE CONIMLTOR SHALL DESIGNATE IN WRITING TO THE ENGINEER THE
INHERENT AT THIS AIRPORT AND SHAL CONDUCT HISRIER CONSTRUCRONACTIVITIES TO CONFORMTO ALL ROUTINE AND EMERGENCY AIRTRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS AND NAME OF HISMER'CONTRACTOR SECURITY OFFICER'.THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDED SECURITY OFFICER SHALL REPRESENT THE CONTRACTOR ON THE SECURITY REGIONAL AIRPORT
GUIDELINES ON SAFETY SPECIFED IN NOTE]BP U0W. REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT.
3. GROUND CONTROL-ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO CROSS ACTIVE RUNWAYS.—WAYS,LO(AU—S AND GUIDE ELOPE CRHICAL AREAS AND 3 CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL SECURITY ORIENTATION-THE CONTRACTOR SECURITY OFFICER SHALL BE RESPONSIRLE FOR BWEFING ALL CONTRACTOR AND
APPROACH CLEAR INCHES SHALL DO SO UNDER THE DIRECT CONTROL OF A FLAGMAN IN RADIO CONTACT WITH THE NPPORT GROUND CONTROLLER.THE FLAGMAN SUBCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL ON THESE REQUIREMENTS MD.FROM TIME TO TIME OTHER SECURITY PROVISIONS ADOPTED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ALL NEW
HALL BE TRAINED AND INSTRUCTED BY AIRPORT OPERATIONS IN THE REGULATION GOVERNING OPERATIONS ON THE AIRPORT OPERATIONS ARFANWIAND THE RADIO CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES SHNI BE BRIEFED ON THESE REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO WORKING IN THE CANSTRUCTONARFA
PROCEDURES ATTHEAIRFORL THEFLAGMENANDRADCOSSHALLBEFURNISHEOBY THFOR TRACTOR.IT SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD BY THE CONTRACTORTHATAIRPORT
TRAFFICON RUNWAYS,G WITH G AND D CO NS HAVE THE NGHT-0E-WAY AT ALL-ES OVER THE CONTRACTOR'S TRAFFIC,THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MONITOR I AGCESSTOTHESITE-CONTRACTOR'SACCESSTOTHESRESHALLBEASSHOWNONTHE PLRSORASDIRECTEDBYTHEENGINEER THECONTAMTORSHALLNOT
RADIO COMMUNICATIONS WITH GROUND CONTROL AT ALL TIMES WHILE HE TOWS WITHIN THE RUNWAY SAFETY AREA THE COMMON TRAFFIC ADVISORY FREQUENCY PERMIT ANY UNAUIHORRED CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL OR TRAFFIC IS THE SITE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAJ`FTC CONTROL TO AND FROM
131.1.GROUND CONTROL FREQUENCY IS 131.6.THETME PERIODS WHEN THE TOWER 19 CLOSED I1IDOPM•B:OOAMI. THE TARSUS CONSTRUCTION AREAS CONSTRUCTION
THE SITE.THE CONTRACTOR 19 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE S DATE N CLEAN-UP E ANY DEBRIS DEPOSITED ALONG THE AREA
DR
RECITE AS A RESULT OF HASHER DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
TRAFFIC.DIRECTIDNA_CONTRACTOR
SIGNING O THE ACCESS DATE AND ALONG THE DELIVERY ROUTE TO THE STORAGE AREA OR
3. PAVEMENT AIRMEES-NORUNR ADVISO IES TO AIRPORT
ORENAN S.A MINIMUM
FWROURSNOICEC REQUESTED CLOSINGERTO EN ABLE NECESSARY SITE SHALL RACTOR ANDSBTTHE ENGINEER.THE LONTPACTORSHML COORDINATE SITE ACCESS AND COOPERATE ON AU.SECURITY MEASURES WITH OTHER
NOTICES!OAIRMEH(NOTAM)ORADVISORESTOAIRPOMSERVICE OR TENANTS.AMINIMUM OF]3 HOURSNOTICEOFREOUESTED CLOSING SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE ONSITE CANRACNRSMID SUBCANTRALTORS. AVCONA FINLL�BT
OWNEP/ENGINEER
4 MATERWLTOELIVERY TOMES AD•ALLCOMRACiOR'SGNS TO DIRECTSFOROED.TRI TOTHESIIEUDE UBETHEACCECSPoIMS ENTEPWTEOONHEETGOR THE Wuwow-cvae
4. OPEN TRENCHES-Y ACTIVE WAY OR A.OPEN APP TENCHES IN EB WIU_OF 3 CLOSURE
WITHIN 350 FEET OF ACTIVE RUNWAY.
C WAY,OR AR ON. FBS.S TH OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THEOUA IMETER WAY SIGNS T ENTERING INTO
DELIVERED.!MIS WILL OPERATIONS
DELVERY TRUCKS FROM ENTERING INTO THE AIRPORT OR
m CENTEPLWE OF ANY ACTIVE TAKIWA.,AUTO APRON PAVEMENTS WILL REQUIRE CLOSURE OF THE AFFECTED RUNWAY.—WAY,OR APRON.UNLESS OTHERWISE TAKING SHORT-CUTS THROUGH THE PERIMTER WTE9 AUTO ENTERNOINTO AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS AREf51NAOVERTENTLY.
APPROVED 0Y THE OWNTEA).I NEER..PER AC OPEN THE-CURRENT EERIER,OPEN TRENCHES ARE PROACTIVE WITHIN THE RUNWAY SAFETY D THE CROP-OFF
-O THE '�•'�`�
TA%IQ SMETY AREA(TEA).GNED.U ON AND OPEN TRENCHES MAY BE PERMITTED UP TO THE EDGE OF RE M UIRES T PAVEMENTS PROVIDED THE NOTE
3 AB F E. 5 NTRACTO S AREA UmUS-THE LYRICS ST UCTIONL AND EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREAS PARRING AREA AND OTHER AREAS DEFINED CONTRACTOR REQUIRED FOR THE
l 1.
Lr ADEQUATELY BP)WGNEO SIGNED LGHTED NIPANE SATISFIES THE OrvNEWENGINEER ANY CLOSURE REQUIRES THE SAME PROVISIONS PS NOTE J ABDVE. CONTRACTOR'S EXCLUSUND VE THE PE DURING METER ONSTRSE AR AS SUI BE ABLE F E L BY ING AN LOM ,SIG AND AND WA MN THE ENGINEER E FORBOTHAGALL ERECT
y RUNWAYS CANNOT BE REOPENED UNTIL TRENCHESARE CLOSED. AND MAIMNN AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THESE AREAS SUITABLE FENCING AND GATES,SIGNAGE AND WARNING DEVICES VISIBLE FOR BOTH WYlNIGHT USE TO V�H�CggQYA.3• Dlgitdlly SIJDed
OEUNEATETHE PERIMETER OFALLSUCHARFAS.
Qe c .ys�5s
5. DEBRIS CONTROL-OEBIUS WASTE AND LOOSE MATER Y SHALL NOT CT PILOTED ON OM.T AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT AREAS.ANY H AT DEER ON ACTIVE AIRCRAFT I) James M.
MOVEMENT ION N SHALL CORRECTED REMOVED IMMEDIATELY BT THE CONTRACTOR'WITH A BROOM.THE ENSE OF TH EC MAY DIRECT THAT DEBRIS PROBLEMS DURING b. VEHICLE IG IN HE AEON-ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES A)DU DISPLAY IN FULL VIEW LOGOS CONSPICUOUSLY PLACED C EACH SITE Of THE VEHICLE.ALL VEHICLES -_ �%3 oose,P.E.
CONSTRUCTION A MANNER
ANNETOPREVTTHECOMNT AS A E LT OF AIRCRAFT
F OTHERS ATTHE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR- STOCKPILED MATERULL SHALL BE OPERATING INDONTOP OFTH VEHICLE.
AREA(AW)GHT SHN1.BE Of LOW VISIBILITY OR DARKNESS STPLL.BORT CODES FWITH ORAFLSHINGMIOERMERGTYPE
CONSTRANEO IRA MPNNERTO PREVENT MOVEMEMISARESULT OFAIRLMFT OPERATORS OR WIND. LIGHT MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE VEHICLE,THE FLARING LIGHT 6HALL BE OF SUCH IMMENSITY TO CONFORM TO AIRPORT CODES FOR hWNTEWINCE AND EMERGENCY 2,Q tB:2QI6A5.z6
Z VEHICLES .RSN.1A'-
b. INSPECTION BY OPERATIONS-PRIOR TO OPENING FOR AIRCRAFT USE,THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRPPNGE FOR INSPECTION,BY AIRPORT STAFF OF ANY RUNWAY. S;zQ;Qs-04'00'
TA%IWAY OR
APRON THAT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR WORK,OR THAT HAS BEEN USED FORA CROSSING POIMOft HAUL ROUTE BYTHE CONTRACTOR ] GAT GUAM CONTRACTOR HAVE ANALL NUUPIWTEO LIST TOF EMPLOYEES.ALHO HAVE CLACCES PWHONES ES SAHALIL REMAIN LOCKED ATALALTIMESWHE MY MANNED BTIMES WHILE THE DATE ORY AT s ARE GATE GUARD.
USED.THE
]. SAFETY GUIDELNES: DATE
i20D1B'AIRPORT SAFETY SFIFINSPECTON'-LURRFNTEOMON & CONTMCTORSHAU-PROVIDE A24-HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST FOR ALL KEY CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR PERSOHNELTHROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.
xi��5 7 2'•OPERA OD BA MONNR CO DUwNGCONST UCnON'-CURB TM MON ASHEVILLE
i 5Q521G5 PAINING.MARKING BLIGHTING OF VEHICLES USED ONAIRPORTS'-CURREMEDITION 9 ESTAMOFEACH WORK WEEK THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE TO ENGINEER A LIST OF EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL,INCLUDING SUBCONTRACTORS.
o ' REIFFO PLUT'R TQ ENTER THEAOA THELSTSHOULOINDIWTEANYLHANGESFROMPwORWEEHLYUST. REGIONALAIRPORT
Q B. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CLEAR ROUTES TO ALL AIRPORT OPERATIONS AREAS AND SAFETY AREAS AT ALL TIMES THROUGH THE CONSTRUCTION SITE
THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROTECT FOR AIRPORT SECURITY AND OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO INFORM ITS EMPLOYEES AUTO SUBCONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES THAT ANY SECURITY VIOIATONS MAY BUSIECT THEM TO ASHEVILLE
W ARREST S. IEMPORMTRUNWAY I>SS SAFTYAREA 15350 FEET FROM RUNWAY CENIERLNE.AND ALL TAKIWAY SAFETY AREAS ARE 59.5 FEET ERAS SHOWN ON PL FORA PUNISHABLE FEDERAL OFFENSE,IMMEDIATE AND PERMANENT REMOVAL FROM THE JOB.
ANS. NORTH CAROLINA
10.ME CONTRACTOR W RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL WORK SITE SAFETY ON THIS PROJECT:AND MEETWG ALL STATE.FEDERAL AND LOCAL SAFETY ,
SREQUIREMERTS. '-
11.ALL OCHT OR VEHICLESINCLUDING HAULING VEHICLES,THATAREAUTHORYED TO OPERATE ON THEAIRPORTwRHIN THE DESIGRATEDUIDSOF GO—RUCTION 1 , a \�1
N FULL VIEW ABOVE THE VEHICLE A J OR LARGER ORANGE AND WHITE CHECKERBOARD FLAG,EACH _ o'OR HAUL ROUTES AS DEFINED HEREIN,SHALL DSPIAY -
CHECKERSOARD COLOR BEING V SOLARE.WHEN OPERATING DURING PERIODS OF DARKNESS OR LINKED VISIBILITY,CONTRACTORS VEHICLES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH II I• I ""
ROTATING OR FLASHING AMBERLIGHTS.DURING SUCH PERIODS.HAULING VEHICLES NOT SO EOUNPED SHALL BE ESCORTED BY AVEHICLE SO EQUIPPED. l
12.OPER-FLISME WELDING OR TORCHCUITNG OPERATIONS PAE PROHIBITED UNLESS ADEQUATE FIRE AND SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ARE PROVIDED AND HAVE BEEN % KEYF_ ,
IN APPROVED BY THE OWNER
Y
13.AM ONMGE TO THE DHSNNGCONTRACTOR
AIRPORT LIGHTING SYSTEM CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS RE.SHNU.THE
BE IMMEDIATELY NOTED TO THE OWNE FOR ANY
—
REPAIRED UD WITH THE FOR AT HASHER OWN EXPENSE.IF THE AIRPORT COMPLETES THE pEPAIRS,THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COSTS AREA 1 AND
S 14.THE COMPACTOR SHALL PERFORM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AS NECESSARY TO MINIMYE ATTRACTION OF WILDLIFE WISED BY PONOING WATER,GRASS SEED, AREA 4
ETC.IF NECESSARY,CONTRACTOR6HALL PROVIDE PUMPS TO DEWATERAREAS OF PENDING: IMPROVEMENTS
15.ITEMS FOR CONTROL OF SAFETY AND SECURITY DURING CONSTRUCTION SUCH AS VEHICLE LIGHTING,WTE GUARDS.FLAGMEN,BARRICADES,FLAGS,LIGHTS,ESCORTS.
G TEMPORVRYGRADWG MEASURES.DIVERSION DITCHES.PUMPS.OUST CONTROLFOD CONTROL.TC.SHALL NOT BE PAID FOR DIRECTLY BUTTHALLBECONSIDENEDAS
ASUBEIOINRY OBLIGATION OF THE CONTPACTORCOVERED UNDER CONTRACT ITEMS.
1S.IN ORDER FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO OPERATE WITHIN AIRPORT PROPERTY,APPROPRIATE NOTICES TO AIRMEN(NOTAMS)MUST BE ISSUED BY THE AIRPORT.THESE
NOTICES PROVIDE INFORMATION ON CLOSED,­ED.OR HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS TO AIRMEN AND USERS OF THE NRPoRT.A]3-HOUR NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR
6 ISSUANCE OFTHE NOTAM.ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS MUST CAOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE OWNERAND ENGINEER FORNOTAM ISSUANCE SAFETY AND
IT AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS SHALL AT ALL TARES HAVE RIGHT-0E-WAY OVER ALL VEHICLES.EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY STRICT SECURITY NOTES
MEASURES TO PREVENT CONFLICT BETWEEN HISHER PERSONNEL AND AIRCRAFT ON ANY ACTIVE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT OR NORPAVEMENT AREAD.THE CONTRACTOR ,
$HALL ME NCLEAROFACTVERUNWAYS,TA]JWAYSANDAPRORS.
Q IS CONTRACTOR BRALL.AT ALL TIMES,CONTROL THE ON,NRPORT MOVEMENT AND ACTIVMES OF ITS EMPLOYEES,SUBCONTRACTORS,EQUIPMENT,AND MATERIAL •mmwn.
U SUPPLIERS..
C 10
.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND CONTROL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC WHEN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS REQUIRE TRAVERSING ANY AIRSIOE AREA ANY DIRT
ANNOR DEBRIS ON PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELYTOAVOIDANY BUILDUP ON PAYMENT. omo ,-
20.COMRACTORSR CONMOLALLCONTRUCTIONTRAFFICENTERINGTHEAIRPORTTOPREVMTLONFLLTSWITHAIRCR OPERATIONS.NOPRIVATEVEHICLESWLL
BEALLOWEDONTHEAIRPORTOUTBIDEOFTHESTAGINGAREA A SCALE;
21.—CONTRACTORENALLHAVEACCEESTOTHEAIRPORT ONLYATTHOSELOWTIONSDESIGNATEDONTHEPL SCRAPPROVEDBYTHEOWNEWENGINEERALLOTRER REVISIONS:
ACCEEDSHALLBEBYSPECVALREQUESTANDSUBIECT TOPPPROVALBYTHEOWNERIENGINEER DATE BY DESCRIPTION
W T3.CANPALTORSHALLENSURETw LIGNTOWERSFACEAWAYFROMTHEA IVERUNWAYANDRUNWAYAPPRWCHCDRRIOORATALLTIMES,
o> n.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ALL BROOMS AND VACUUM TRUCKS BE STAFFED AT ALL TIMES DURING OPERATIONS ACROSS ACTIVE PAYMENTS WITH PERSONNEL
OTHERTRANFLAGMEN.
QE
W
6
DESIGNED BY: J,NLM.
DRAWN BY: W.L.J.
CHECKED BY: J.NLNL
APPROVED BY: J.NLM.
DATE: MARCH 201E
STATE LICENSE# N.C.C4450
PROJECT NO. 2013.167.02
7
SHEET NUMBER
G-03

sheville
REG_)ONAL AIRPORT
RUNNAY TIRESHOLD.1ENO GF PAVEMENT
]:1(Rtl I B ar
L•
PRIMARY SURFACE
•H1(n:vl APPROAgI SLOPE-�
AV—jNN Cie
N— 2DD' xc
]:1(li:y TRANSTIONiL ,
11 S =I
1 ") REA RUNwnT 1 4WDT'+v Digitally signed
T: by James M.
P.E.
,�cm�1,i��L,1016.05.26
NOTES
1524:35-04'00'
I.— TOBUBMITAUSTOFEONPMENTANDCORRESPoroINGMANMUM
HEIGHTS,
ZANY EaVIPMENT OR OBJECTS PENETRATING THE PART TI IMAGINA4Y eURFACE9 25D 260 ASHEVILLE
Q SHALL BE COOROII—ED,IN ADVANCE,WITH THE AOR OBSTRUCTIONS
O PENETRIITIM3THE PARTTISURFACE86WLLLBEREMOVED.MARItED AND IOR REGIONALAIRPORT
wHreowaccoRnw EMHFAnDUIDELINESANDDETERM11-1-s. RUNWAY SAFETY AREA(RSA) ASHEVILLE
HT.� NORTH CAROLINA
h
- p0, H 1 MAX OBJECT HEIGHT
SLOPEVARIE9 £ J KEY-
- ftOFA RUNWAY TOFA £ TAAM'AT
AREA 1 AND
5 5ECNIONA-A I AREA
IMPROVEMENTS
w
RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA(ROFA) TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA(TOFA) SAFETY DETAILS
P'T L•�L' t� NT.B. RT.S
�A61111"M1
MAX OBJECT HEIGHT
vr-u m .m
SECTION B-B SCALE: ,
N.T.S. f
RUNWAY OR RUNWAY TSA F T/WWgy B PTNN
Y IS OE3OW
O FPAPARTT] L -
RVNWAY APPROACH SLOPE X
If
H
a 17 m 500 o.i5
0 59 SOv a.i5 DESIGNED I ..
•NOTE:FOR HOR120MAL APPROACH 9LOPE(H), I BY: J.M.M.
Q "sT—B(L).ANDFLAREPADO(A) 200' 2DD—�I LES. S9'��II
DRAWN SY: W.L.J.
RUNWAY OBSTACLE FREE ZONE(OFZ) TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA(TSA) CHECKED BY: J.N.M.
< FAR PART 77 IMAGINARY SURFACES _
NT.s. NT.3. N.T.S. APPROVED BY:
a
DATE: MARCH 2O16
4' STATE LICENSE# N.C.C-2450
V .PROJECT NO. 2013.157.02
SHEET NUMBER
G-04

t
1' �. / \ 1 ICJ 1 '.•^ _.,:..�'".-y ry%..,111 'tll� �I� �� I� ''" J , "'%'-� - sheville
^�— /..r^'+.. --..•' "'•rG +^"'''' f;C..•. Y\ I ( ;I tl�.,�l, /'l 1 %/i Jam. / ��. RE GIONAL AIRPORT
/. / �,• ..,,•�• .�- .%. �p ofu.TELuGrtBotC lA} i �I,7>I i// ,_.-- f.
"co vcon.INC
I
I"r 1 I�j}It t 11 , j I I l / I SN�Ml9 Digitallysigned
by James M.
:`Moose,P.E.
I —
7 I I i Ddt'I16.05.20
i ..,.1
15.25.37 04'00
r t
elf
�\ l itliili'illgil 11, \ \ \ \� \ . ' l ASHEVILLE
o I'r:4 TI 1„1 I'Ul i't l I t ' \ \ " REGIONAL AIRPORT
I
ASHEVILLE
NORTH CAROLINA
Vol, III II, Il 1p + I I
s I ' t� J Itl t�'I lllll'I I } I i I `� � •� ,,,,...� I-' , '. _- \I� ,! �� r�� ,• j\V a ,
rill {Ili I lli ICI {1 I \ 1 1 1 I •; ) eps�INGFENc�F. I j ,, ,",.. l�f I I'l� Ir v--� .Y-�'—"`�� s-�
� i,lll 91IIIII{I�IIII,jlllli� .1 1 I i '1 I I ! i' I 1 I I
«ETPL-
AREA 1 AND
1 \, \\\ AREA 4
\�Cit\\\\ \•\ �\ i 1 \ \ ' ( I � t\` IMPROVEMENTS
PROIUMATEUMR94OFCON.ASN }Ilt1 AREA 1
EXISTING
o +-�\/� ".t� 1 it r � t'l• .\.�� 'I� ,, i f... _leusn GA =� t-.- .__ `.- - _ i--_• \ 1 ,\. .�� CONDITIONS
OLD
_ �/�/ i / I r•• / I ��.-_ � 11, TOPOGRAPHCSURVETdGROLNDCONTROL PROVIDE SCALE: AS NOTED
D eT:
I
- /!' /'' / �' '• �tl } �APPROIVMATELIM T90FCOPL II9H Y 1 t I' I�/'�Y FJ/l. li IA / I / ��' , 1 j I I j AE ELE PNDR TW N-.1M5HENDRSOVLLEO9G NO. DATE RBETV ISpEN.S
C.—N
FNL 2 277- 7
,`+ i -10.I; �\ l 1 t { I 2. I-EDII15
o = k ' '/ •r•/ 1. i DESIGNED BY: J.M.M.
NI/
DRAWN BY: A.M.T.
¢ I - \\l .' / •^../ _ •"'_SI..,, `--..\ ' \ \ ,,'� r I " CHECKED BY: J.NLM.
__ `T ,.,., t _.�--� -✓ :1 .^ -_ / \ `:�� ' � 'I/ 'I tt� APPROVED BY: J.M.hL
1 t
1 tl -- '" r'x •'�. i 1 , �•' DATE: 'MARCH 2D15
� I tTER RD "`^^• � I 1 STATE LICENSE N N.C.C2450
Ap �.y E.JenNG FlRE HTOR/WL i 1 II/
[ I F ,f.-+- „-\ •-"*-,.'•e � / _�,j
rth PROJECT NO O 1013.151.02
I N
ry ! D• DD• 60• 20• SHEET NUMBER
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ^
V-O A 1

000heville
REGIONAL AIRPORT
I I Ij J_L L L I
W
T AVCON,INC.
.mSTINGM­SL01E­
%
4o QNOA a, b9ames M.
_1i;
Mp—EL)MI—F C—H
ASHEVILLE
w,7�-
REGIONAL AIRPORT
c ✓ ASHEVILLE
X
NORTH CAROLINA
m
n
my PLAN
F
-ur
- AREA 1 AND-----------
AREA 4
IMPROVEMENTS
IN N
AREA 4
EXISTING
Al CONDITIONS
SCALE: , AS NOTED
TOPOGRAPHIC S WEY&­MD­PF.­­
—E&S,P_
=��LNLWRWNVI ER­­TEG
0 E
NORTH-1-893
0 FAX 6­74
M11-15
DESIGNED BY: J.M.M.
DRAWN BY! A.M.T.
CHECKED BY: J.H.N.
APPROVED BY: J.NLK
DATE! MARCH I'll
STATE LICENSE# N.C.C-2460
North PROJECT NO, 2013,167.02
0' 30- 60' 120.
SHEET NUMBER
ry
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C-02
I

R'noPrZ—Ri,'rENte
,I\t }I,II' sheville
REGIONAL AIRPORT
r l /• /. I { I V\
If
It
I fI \•l \ .kw\/ I i ( I}/.• i !' id'�wGt Digitally signed
,E'k 5 by James M.
(t''lltllla D e;2076.05.26
If 1 1} t }', i ( S 1. � 15:29:4z-040g-
;( Ili{�{tl1}Ii I } \. t 1 11 ! \ } ,,r Ii \L't
b$ r '� Illi • \ } \ Eh INGFENCE \ t // h.\ ASHEVILLE
l 'lll I{I�'il'dl \ } \ \ \ \ REGIONALAIRPORT
w �I�i '''t`�II �I;I{I }'�{I;1{ II t � I I I •t \ `, \ � \ /} ''/l , / �`I t
ASHEVILLE
NORTH CAROLINA
ILA
hI
/ f/ a' 111 111114'i,•,+}t1l 1 i ,\ \ I I;xl ! t { \}ill 'i my—
Co�\�� \�>\-\1 t •\ L, r Ia I t I. j \` `t `\ ` \ L{I I: T�. . AREAIAND
w\�1 \ \ \ 1 } !, AREA
`i IMPROVEMENTS
I �. �1 i.L.l Or�rrt)-,A`PV A 1 ` t_--.-';---.`. l t }V �V •v ,t I 1 \1111tt AREA 1GRADING
�-��•�� Z :, 1_ / I } i ___, -�. ��. 1 I(1• AND DRAINAGE
(SHEET1 OF3)
1
' SEDIMENT r /
N} ,croN.ASH LN
� 11I( NOTES """ �uouo.n..innmunr..a�nu
P MATEV
// 1.CON—TOR SHALL BENCH SLOPES INTO EYJSIING—D AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
SCALE:
°^•r^" � I, r,' I I ' ' / t VMTHOUT DISTURBING roP1 PSH .e u,AS NOTED
IT90F q19 E ' I 2CONTRACTOR R--L VERFY DEPTH OF COAL ASH PRIOR TO STARTING FULL GR NG It-
a+'A 1k I, RAPEZD! - I /) OPERATIONSFORRIPRAPLINEDTDAL-114STALIATON gEVI5pN5:
w �rf r:, /,J 99 t i i I p{ISIWG/GRgyEL R.PC I '1 ,} { '�II 19LT FENCE SHALL BE N.—PRIOR T09TPfiIING GRPDWG 0PERATON4 DATE BY DEscNPfpN
AC CONTRTOR SHALL M N M ZE IMPACTS TO AREAS OUTS DE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
s
> PR f NCE �� , 1` �' I I \ ( 1 WHEN INBTPLLINGR PRPP
O I'" `i h j ' ,\ l t i t 1 \�l 5 ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDING AMID MA—N IYEgATELY AFTER
}� t \ !. COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATIONS.
BCON11UNCTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED RLYIEW OF THE CONDTIONS OF THE
FOR—I IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT MAY NEED TO BE
REQUIRED FOR THIS
ADDRESSED OR REPNRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK
THE PROJECT.
MY REPAIRS REODRED AND REPAIR METHOD SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON
? ,'4� a \ M1 ,�., { •� `,I �� 1 �) \ ( // ('1 DESIGNED BY: J.M.M.
'} N�/ AA PACTIX25HALL CUMPLETEANA58U LT SURVEY ONALL WORK OOMPLETED
roNTPACTOq s�HPPLLL FlLL W'fMl9 EA I I .COAT
TIATTHFRE .L ='N"b OA`WATER SFORAREAt roNSTRUCDON SEOUENCESEE SHEET EC-
CHECKED
BY: A.M.T.
L\`\. r'- !111_ —� •1 V. I \ \ r l \ ) j l / I { CHECKED BY: J.M.M
.jt 0 `- ;.. -_- \ \ / •, I 'I} ,%' APPROVES BY: J.NLM.
DATE: MARCH 2O16
STATE LICENSER N.C.C4450
�`•�.� DUSTING FIRE HTDRMT I ,
(-_] I -!i( pDEfrG `/ .,,�. •"'a�.` ,/' /,_// NDrt6 PROJECT NO. 2013.167.02
ry _-, �"�;•--=/ '"- ` �'+:�tx �'T-�`e';- "l'\...''1/� D• 3D®D SHEET NUMBER
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEED.
C-03

00
000
, , �r ► sheville
If
\W \
\\t
\ \ \\ \+per y,,,,'�\ `, 3 • rl 3' FPPROpMATE LIM T90F COP1 d91V
AVCO INC.
� r I i_ \ \ \ \�l �\ \ \•., \ ..._,r--fit,. .{ I
S I *,. /f , \ .... ��+ I 1 ' / •`\ \\' I rCVS OIfLL WIrH wrCH 1 •__,�,....,_
, � v1/ � `: ,ROR°�,p l`1N� C I �t�-_1zZ :.../ \ - I I_ �7 � I i ( 1 —... :F'�•c�e*S,': by�JamesM
PCP} 6
/, ASHEVILLE
j- o<D / ' , 1 l+r �r I 'l'� �"' ---`-_{r— _ . '- � REGIONAL AIRPORT
/ BI / ij J i�I l:, R - / 1; 'Ii _ 1 ASHEVILLE
r6
o l}Will
j1tr�It+,� NORTH CAROLINA
a Y t
,
l r 111,
4 I ._J nEY PLAn� �.�� _ _ 2� ♦p/�/r r!/l� 3 N um/ i ' rtsgsmRaary a' cE
EYJ9rING GRAVELRO
AREA 1 AND
AREA
IMPROVEMENTS
I
AREA 1 GRADING
¢ '
I AND DRAINAGE
(SHEET 2 OF 3)
\W,
ill
ll \.• \\ i 1
—_.... •.\ 1�V, %rtill mNTRACrpR SHULFIILIry rMl9 utEn ER I \ SCALE: AS NOTED
{ , ` so TNATTHER.EISNOPONMNG Ar i�
•q I \+�.T, �,�'� / !/ � ) / I \ �`�b jij \ \ 1 1 Ren91on9:
BY oeseW—
F��
-
NOTES
o \ r
11 \ sr .� ;
9 INTO ETISi NG GROUND AS MUCH A9 p0991BLE D BY. J. .
NG FULL GRAwNG
1' DESIGNED M M
VrITHOUr DISTURBING[OlLL ASH
2 CONTRACTOR VER FY DEPTH OF COAL PSH PRIOR TO STMrI DRAWN BY: W.L.J.
OPEPATION9 FORR RIP RFP LINED TPAP¢OIML LATCH INSTPl1ATION
3.sILT FENCE S—BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO B—NG.—N.OPFAATION9. CHECKED BY. J.NLNL
6
Q 4--TOR VHEN _NSTALLINO RIP Ml IMP
BE MIZE MPACT9 TO AREILS OUTSIDE-ITS OF wURBAN�sT APPROVED BY: H 0 6
EDNG AND MATTED IMMEDWTELY DATE. I'
AFTER MRC
;K-� ry PEM1+ MPLETIONOFGRPDINO OPERAr1-B 9E
a,CONTRACTORCFDER MPLENTI1 1 REVIEWOF THE CONDTO BE OF —PES OR
FOR AREA 1 IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY PREN9 TH4T MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR STATE LICENSE k N.C.CZC50
REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORN REOUIN.FOR THIS PROJECT.ANY REPAIRS WON PROJECT NO. Y013.157.01
+y t'F-4E REOVIRFDAND REPAIR METHOD B—ED CUMENT-D.THE I—B.
].COMRACTOR SH4L COMPLEIEANASBUILT SURVEY OFALL WORNCOMPIETED. ® SHEET NUMBER
'J•. S.sILT FENCE TO BE REMOVEOONCEARFAIS 9rABILRED. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C-04

e '.."�SEDBILT'l—IM/
le
PoR-r
1,4
TIE INTO WSTNG9LOPE
AVCOe,INC.
f
ASHEVILLE
REGIONAL
ASHEVILLE
APPR—ELIMITSO—Ash!
o NORTH CAROLINA
I.I.L.F.—REANOE
La
Er
"YPLAN
III
il 1�11! it
AREA 1 AND
AREA 4
C, IMPROVEMENTS
Vill I I oo I!
AREA 1 GRADING
fj,,
AND DRAINAGE
(SHEET 3 OF 3)
EASTN�. E vain .mnno..
'it
I it
SCALE: AS NOTED
-TIE III ISOB—10.
C,
NOTES
< LCONTRACTOR SNA.L.BENCH—ES INTO IWSTI-GROUND AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE DESIGNED BY. J.M.M.
2 WITHOUT DISTURBING COAL P.SH
t 1CONTRAOTOR 11—VERIFY DEPTH OF COAL ASH PRIOR TO STARING FULL GRADING DRAWN BY: A.M.T.
<
O—ONSFOR RIPRAPLIN—RAP—DAL OTOHINST—ATON. CHECKED BY: j.IvLM.
3.SIFT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO STARING GRADING OPERATIONS.
APPROVED BY: j.K.M.
--TOR SI—L MINIMI-I—Ts TO AREAR�0—I-WITS OF OSTURRAiCE
itIl .ti TAUJIG RI DATE: MARCH 2016
1HE INS
ALL Dl—� S—BE SEEDING AND�IMMEDIATELY AFTER
Bc STATE LICENSE 9 N.C.C-2450
j l, CONTRAOTO S�L�PL�EA �DR�l�CF�ECOWMONSOF�ES�PIS
N North FOR AREA I IN TO I—IFT AN)'—TI-AT�NEED TO BE­SSED OR PROJECT NO. 2013.167.02
RREPARED ME OTHER INONA—RED FOR THIS PROJECT ANY REFAiNS
I, is, 3o. so. EQUIREDANDraEPNRMEreDDSHALLKOGwMENTEDONTHEPIANS.
SHEET NUMBER
—o`
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
C-05

--------------------
sheville
REGIONAL AIRPORT
ON—ORTSIGRAM
zvo AMlremumbF I FOOT-S,
I\ LIM-101,HFUR—M MINIMUM SLOPE OF
AYCON I NC
-dLkvI,-
.. ..... by James w-, Digitally signed
M.
E.
6.05.26
15:30:33-04'00'
LiftlSO—ASH .M.
BEE NOIE3
ASHEVILLE
REGIONAL AIRPORT
I'�
ASHEVILLE
NORTH CAROLINA
COMINVIT&H'TOGRADEDITCH MM-NAJEUMI 50-
A n
MYPEAN
x
AREA 1 AND
;- ------- AREA 4
IMPROVEMENTS
IJ-t
Af," op ACMESSAYE
EOM STORM DRAIN NETWORK
11 N 62954541 E AREA 4 GRADING
-4
END BS-.M 24-MY-OPILANTEIRANUMIN ;VHDPUFlPE
TE S AND DRAINAGE
SEENO lVI-OU-071. 1—OUT-3.00 7-0
- sa S N (SHEET 1 OF 4)
—,S—1 E-S.99
FIAREDENDSECTION PEAREDENDBECITION UPHDPEPIPE
11PIWOU—M 8 28 LF @ 3—
NS�1?�L P . ... ........
I-I.T.—STIJUSEANDES Z--- IL—..7 ..E,.S ,. MN— M N. ,4 .80 E N4 — S-5TO.94 PIPE
N,=—=. ll==_
3-1.0—DRAINBASIN 2—LOPILANT—NDARIN IVH.,.I
IWI-OUT-207— lVI—SIU—SES. 11.7.
—.735.51I E:944,— 110 M.EDS.442Z E.W4,115.90 -TO-
NOTES FLARED ENDSECTION HARED END SECTION IVHEPEPTPE SCALE: AS NOTED
18-1-1-20BAUS 321F03.13%
1.CONTRACTOR SHME MARE ANY REQUIRED GRADING ADJUSTMENT ON THE UPPER—ON OF AREA 4 IN MOSER TO RESDUCE 13, S-1 1.S-12.AND Ass TMIW EMPESHALLBERROLOCATEUMORTOINSTALIATION.EARESHALLSE—ALONS REVISIONS:
EDNE—ONQFYYAIYFL THEYOPOFBILOPEANDBE-INDTHERETAINING— s5 —..S3-P.944,r4209 5-11 N:-.—..—,Yl— —110 SAY. BY B.—KIN
Z OWE GRADING ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND OBTLIFIBED AM FULLY VESEIATEO OIRE 'Y 14. MY EXTRASTONE FROM AREA4 E—BE PLAEEDNTHIN THE AREAOF THE RIP RAPAT-2. -WL PLASTDRAINDASIN 11NDPEFL-AREDEND IVHDPEPIPE Zo--
AND SLOPE URANS�BE NTMND7 M�RE
UPSTR OF THE SLOPE DRANS.—BERM AREAS DISTURBED BY THIS I= --207-
8 15. THE IV HOPE PIPE BETWEEN�l I AND S-12—E INSTALLED SUCH THAT THE I-AST SO FEET SHALL,BEA MINIMUM SLOPE AS
0 HAU-BEIMMEDIATELY SEEDEDANDMATITED, 11 TIN OUT-2191.50
3 THEIDUSTING l�B�NTHE S�E�G�L��LMRE��Ll�MTOBEAMINIMUMOF1.IFE�NTH TOSSIBLEINON-FTOREDUCEVEILOSITY FROM&12 N: E:S,M 111T.— —
UP,.,
FLARED END -1 N:SMSS..E:SYS-.13 IRS EFEPIIE
WTH3,1SUDESLOPEBANDMATTE—EF—LENGTH. IV'INV.IN=2MB.M 1WHOPEFI-AREDEND UFQ SLOPE —
1.THE-11-DITCH BETWEEN THE--I AND GRAVEL ROAD SHALL IERII-11-D-IEAIIIM-IFI FOOT DEEP BECTION NFHES
—3.1 SLIM S,0PESAND MATTE—E NI-L LENGTH 18-1W.—DWS000
S. CONSTRUCTION THAT WE.IMPAETTHE EASTING PERIMETER ROAD SHALL SESCOBEINATED WITH THEONNER PRIORTO
STARRNGWORK
DESIGNED BY; J.M.M.
B.THE EXHIIIING GRAVEL ROAD SHALL REMIAN A MINIMUM OF IS MET WIDE IN AREAS MERE THE R—WILL BE IMPACTED BY
CONSTRUCTION,THE WIDTH OF THE READ SHALL NOT BE LESS TIBIA 15 FOOT WIDE—PRIOR APPROYAL.FROM THE DRAWN BY: W.L.J.
ER.
WNTRACT ��� � � � MM��SRMTOALINORON �M�S� � �NGMENDSEM CHECKED BY:
5! a HOPE PIPE SHAU.BE ADS N-12 WITH—LOADING OR APPROVED EQUAL DRAIN WINS—BE ADS READ AND HG~ APPROVED BY:
STRUCTURES WITH H,IIE LOADING GRATES OR APPROVED EQUAL.
MARCH 2016
FIELD—IONS OF THE—EL ROAD AND—THEMER PIPE SHALL HAVE FEET OF COVER UNDER THE 9.STRUCTURE D PIPE LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROPINATEL
STATE LICENSE 0 N.C.C44 0
10 CONTRACTOR S—EO.—E A DETTALED F.I—THE-..IT..OF THE—lES IN—TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT MAY MISSED TO BE ADDRESSED OR REPARED ALONG MTH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT.ANY REPAIRS North PROJECT 2013.157.02
a2 REQUIREDAND REPAIR METHOD S—BE—M—ON THE PLANS. 0' 30- 60' 120-
9 11.MNTPALTORSWILLCWMETEM U[USURVE MO LWORKCOMPLUED. SHEET NUMBER
6: 12 FORAR—CONSTRUCTION—WESEESHEET GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I C-06

>1
sheville
REGIONAL AIRPORT
- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
10 cZo
Digitally signed
1-N% by James M.
j&% :'Moose,P.E.
-DaIL:2,016.05.26
15:31:08-04'00'
IVI `- ASHEVILLE
REGiONALAIRPORT
ASHEVILLE
10 NORTH CAROLINA
..... ....... ........
L—j —PLM
h",
AREA I AND
N
AREA 4
IMPROVEMENTS
\x
AREA 4 GRADING
AND DRAINAGE
APPIR-1-1—Of—H
(SHEET 2 OF 4)
North GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SCALE:s AS NOTED
NOTES REVISPNS:
GRADING AD.ILSTMENT ON THE 21 ME BY DE—MION
E— MY FE.— UPPER SECTION OF AREA 4 IN
Do
0 2.OFIEGRIBING—STIMENT—EGLENCOMPLETED D�DMRBM�MEF�YVEG�DU�CTLYUPWR�-",:-
THE SLOPE DRAINS.THE BERM AND SLOPE DRAINS SHALL BE REMOVED.MY MEAS DSTURBED BY THIS WORK—BE
IMMEDIBTELYSEEDED-E—D.
x"
].THE EXISTING DTCH I—THE 111E AND GWIVI ROAD SHALL BE REESTABLISHED TO BE I MIMMUM IF IJ FEET VYTI WITH `N
3.1 SLIDE 1UQFES AND MATTED THE FULL LENGTH.
4.TH—STIND—BETWEENTHES EMDG��S BER��LISHMTQBEAMINMW�l�TM NTH3�I
DONT-M RTIGRBEBUTCH S
LIDESILOPESMOMPT-TEDTHEFUILL—TH. TOAMI
-M MN`".-FILD ME 0 F.
5.MY EP
CONEMUDIN N THAT WILL IMPACT THE EXISTING PERIMETER—SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER PRIDR TO
WITH AMINIpnIM DESIGNED BY J.M.M.
A-- IlM-y—To.,I.
DRAWN BY: A.M.T.
THE—GR-EL ROAD 91—REMNN A MINIMUM OF 18 MET WIDE.IN—WHERE THE ROAD WILL BE IMP—IED BY
DONSTRUoTION.THE WROTH OFTHE—S—NOT BE LESSTHAN 15 FOOT WIDE WITHOUT PFIORMPROVBI-FROM THE OWNUR. CHECKED BY: J.M.M.
T.COWR—[OREH—REGWEMEATOCRFATEASWELLINORDERTOD NMEATOMSTINGF MENDSEMiGN. N
APPROVED BY: J.MLML
I.HOPE PIPE—BE BOS M2 WITH W25 LOPDIrvG OR APPROVED So—DRAIN WINS SHALL BE ADS ROAD Me H.—Al,
STRUITUREEVITTHH—POGI—ES—PROVEDS— DATE: MARCH 2016
B. STRUCITUREM—ELD—IONSSHOW—APP—E.F—L—ONS—BE—D FIEUDIONSIT N IONSANDRELD Lo
CATIONSOFTHEGI—EUROADAN—HORTRUNIH.PIPES—KIWETWOMETOFEIVERUNDERTREG—RD-
STATE LICENSE N N.C..�450
X
IS—R—COMPLETE A­0 REVIEW OF THE COND TIONE OF THE SLOPES IN—TO IDEWIFY MY MEBS THAT PROJECT No. 2013.157.02
MY NEED To BE BED ESSED OR REPXRED THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT MY REPAIRS REQUIRED
SHEET NUMBER
MD REPV4R METHOD SHN-1.BE DOCUMENTED ON THE PIUMs.
pp 11.001�—COMPLETEM—SURVEY ON—WORK CIMPUBTED. x,
12 FORM—CONSTRUCTIONSEDUENCESEESNEET L-2. C-07

% ..........
.........
BB
heville
REGIONAL AIRPORT
S-
a
A
\W\V,
-6
-7�
77� m
Digitallysigned
4"m"
q by James M.
0W "Moose,P.E.
1)SW-2016.05.26
'
SEE NOTE
15:31:4-04'00
S-
/*
ASHEVILLE
REGIONAL AIRPORT
ASHEVILLE
0 NORTH CAROLINA
LIMITSO—STUREPTCE
REMOVE DBSTING RCP TO INS
Pj T—PROPOSED PIPE AND INLET
STORM DRAIN NETWORK
—,J —PLAN
—E.ENDGECTI.N FLARED INDRECTION IS-HOPE PIPE
18 INV,OUT-207— ---B. "N'T,@ S.— AREA 1 AND
N,Sn'—B—.ot— 54 N IKE,—I E:—.— "'.XPIPE : AREA 4
—ENDIICTION 2_11 PLASTDNANBASIN I... IMPROVEMENTS
11 1-2.3.07 ze UF@SL7-
5; PL E2975333 E N4,657.94 S-STOS-G
314—CRAIN—N FI-ARED END SECTION W HOPE PIPE
IS...I.T.—SO 18" 01-T-MTSC 27 UP @ 3.—
Sa K a19J—B 944.6-2 ... AREA 4 GRADING
FLARED END SECTION la—PIPE AND DRAINAGE
18 INV.IN=20GRES 32LF63.13% (SHEET 3 OF 4)
K—S-23 E 944j-39
N-NYL P—N—N
.2 INV,OUT=—00
NOTES SCALE: AS NOTED
1. 00—P—L MARE ANY REQUIRED GRADING ADJUSTMENT ON THE UPPER SECTION OF AREA 4 IN ORDER TO REDLICE
CONCENTRATION OF—ER. REYTI.-
ED 2.OWE GRADING ADJUSTMENTS HPUE BEEN COMPLETED AND ANY DISTURBED—B ARE FULLY VEGETATED EIRECTILY UPSTREAM OATEr BY RU`TION
OF THE SLOPE DRANS,THE BERM-D S—ORNN9 SHML BE REMOVED,ANY—DSTURSED BY THIS YYDRK—BE
IMME—SEEDEDANDMATTED.
o 3. THE EXISTING SITCH BETWEEN THE SLOPE AND GRAVEL ROAD SHALL BE—STASUSHED TO BE A MNIMUM OF 1.1 FEET—WITH
3 1 SLIDE SLOPES AND MATTED THE FULL LENGTH.
4.THE EXISTING OTCH BETINEEN THE SLOPE AND G—ROAD S—BE REESWUSHED TO BE A MIMMUK OF 1 POST DEEP—3 1
YL DE SLOPES AND MATTED THE FUEL LENGTH.COYTTYRCTOR SHAU-INSYPIL DITCH SUCH THP,T THE Y—TERN EDGE OF THE SIT CH
IS SUGHTLY HIGHER THAN THEE IN ORDER TO A-LEVIATE ANY—FROM SPLASHING INTO THE RO-EDGE E—D BE A
MINIMUM OF"AUC`VE ELEVATION OF—RN DITCH EDGEAND
s.ANY CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL IMPACT THE—TING PERIMETER ROAD 5—BE COORD(NATED WITH THE E—EN PRIOR TO DESIGNED BY: J.M.M.
STPATNG WORK
T T
HE EG3YNG G VEL Ro-�REI-N A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET—IN­3 ROAD—BE IMPACHED BY DRAWN BY: A.M.T.
CON I
CONSZCTICTI.THE—HO—E——NOT BE LESS—11—­VVITH.UT INIORAH.—...THE-NEK
< COMPACTOR—REGRADE AREA CRI—EA—ELL IN ORDER TO ORSSNAREAT—SING FLARED ENDSECDONL CHECKED BY: j.NLNL
B.HOPE PIPE 9HPLL BE ADS N-12 WITH-5—OR APPROVED—DRPIN BASINS SHALL BE ADS RESV)AND HI— APPROVED BY: J.M.M.
STRUCTURESITHH-- —CNGESORAPPROVEDEOUPL.9.STRUCTLIFEAH-1 EI.CCATIOM—AREAPP—INATE.FINUS.—ION —SEBASSIDONFIELDCONS—FIELD DATE: 1 MARCH 2016
LO-TIQNSOFTHEGRAVELROND—CHORTRENCH.PIPE—HAVE—FEETOP COVERIPOERTHEGIRRVELACPD,
jIl MAY COMPACTOR SHAIl COMPETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDTIONS OF THE SLOPES INORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT STATE LICENSE# N.C.C4NI50
NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR—RED—WITH THE OTHER—REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT.ANY REPNRS REQUIRED N,rth PROJECT NO. 2913.167.02
AND REPAIR METHOD—BESECUMENTED-THEPLANS.
11 CONTRACTOR.—COM11—AN-1 SUP—.N.L-RKCDMP— a, 15• 3131 Go
• SHEET NUMBER
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET C-08

COMIRACTOR TO GPAOE DITCH �.I..` "
TO A MINIMUM OFt FOOT DEEP �\ 00
WITHAMINIMUMIT-0—Fs h evi I l e
1
�,. / ;,: -i;.;,. '.-�'•;��,'. REGIONAL AIRPORT
/ \ / c•r/ /rr I f•/ !.i r r;! '„^ ��'` '` AIcDNpTnc.
\ ' ✓ \C / e>:wgnrv�R Pt Na70BE ^' :jr"'��5 2 ti�cAaO� Digitally signed
o�1�
r r -/ / r ,J' •7P,':;. / .✓+ xt by James M.
- \ '/ !,/'�„/..� :/ /2\D�r /r. •�.• �, r.% .i ce f -E6eU' e'Moose016.05.26
S ;• ! :'- / �,/ // rr :�pGr.';,, / rrr ' i ���'' ''\ �...�,7 ''�'•y SY1R'
153220-04'00'
WUFif2 ASHEVILLE
REGIONAL AIRPORT
--
rzDT* - z5 ASHEVILLE
o ,.,. i - r �' -'.j - - NORTH CAROLINA
Ir
N
NETPLgN
X, �?"/.: �'.. % •,,. ::'! ... i 6EENOTE7
AREA IAND
•^ r. rr.•' l.ir.•� r'w`: !r,''• a �r,.r"'�
,..�'., is -''./'�- AREAS
r - IMPROVEMENTS
/' ., /. / •� _ / �APP0.0AMATELMIT9 GF COALASH �,
/ '..• z�/ i �. '' .�'' STORM DRAIN NETWORK
/..r 34"NYLOPUaaE OR3-89IN 9-9 24"�NYLOPIA9T 90TW IBARN
'i. �•. �. a r r,,. `-� AREA 4GRADING
// r / \_ / /•' ,B•wv.our ror3w 10•INV.our z935w
_ 20 i - /�eN T,E4 r/ :r 5-s / �: AND DRAINAGE
!r ::- /•�. /!',; j/ ,- / "°\ " 38 N Bz9533.,z E 344Tzz.5z s•, N.6-z944zzz E,—.5.B0 (SHEET 4 OF 4)
FIAREDENOSECTON FIAREOEMXSECTION
r. ,
S /r " SJI, r/lu rr,.+•'. '.��' �.'/ / i'�'• 10"WV IN=]O60W 0 1B"INV.w=71IBB00
RAZ , / B., 1.0E-A E DRANBASIN .11 M.I.EI.EFLARED END6,13
r! :� .•':i" '.�'.� i�••^,r ',;:r /I�/ j' — —-_... •,•� ,5"wv ouT-roT3.w sECTIGN
-�: 7C ,�,:_ &02E 53651 E944B.Bl 1B"INV.Wr 210L50
,//' /• /",-.!•,.�,. /�'� FIAREDENOSECTON B-12 N.6290B249 E94528l33 'minima nRi un��,w eC1�'T
�,• / !.r' %.•' /'.-•r f.. 1 SCALE: AS NOTED
/ / /•' tls S-7 \ - - r;� 1B'INV,O.—Gi.. e•HWEFLAREDEND
'/. sE€n TES '/�/. i�`t �- ,/•j'•4C �iQ\\ ""` / „,. term.our=rorfiaD R6vISAHS:
w !.
� �'�\\`\\ '• / N0. OgTE BY .....PTNH
e5TO S8
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAYE MY REQUIRED GRADING AWUSTMENT ON THE UPPEM SECTION OF AREA 4 IN ORDER TO REDUCE ELF®3��E
rc ..'��/. /C14 Sg\'•. \� ��` .,r mrvcENTPAnonaF WATER
ONCE GRADING ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ANY DISTURBED AREAS ARE FULLY VEGETATED DIRECTLY UPSTREAM -To-
IF"://,. TE SL SLOPE DRAINS SHALL BE REMOVED. -1 AREAS DISTURBED BY THIS WORK SHALL BE 10"—LIE
".''r^,', "I ."'::.I�i••"„' .,\\•,Y \i,\\., '` •�•.1� IMMEOWTELLYS SEEDED AND MANED 3z IF®3.13%
w ^I '.•'r/ �/' /. \ H `\ \`I 3` THE EA9nNG DITCH BETWEEN THE BLOPE AND GRAVEL ROAD S—BE REESTABLISHED TO BE A MIMMUM OF 1.1 FEET WITH WITH
3:1 SLIDE SLOPESPND MATTEDTHENLL LENGTH EPIPE
O �. "�, ,,`.'�1••` ` -�/ 4.THE EAGTNG DITCH BETWEEN THE SLOPE AND GRAVEL ROAD—BE REESTABLISHED TO BE A MINIMUM OF I FOOT DEEP WITH 3:, 77 LF®350% DESIGNED BY: J.M.M.
SLIDE BLOPES AND MATTED THE FULL LENGTH CONIPACTOR SHALL INSTALL DITCH SUCH THAT THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE DTCX
19 SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN THE ROAD IN ORDER TO ALLEVIATE ANY WATER FROM BVLA5HNG INTO THE ROAD.EDGE SHOULD BE A .11 DRAWN BY: A.M.T.
MNIMUM OF 6'ABOVE ELEVATION OF WESTERN DITCH EDGE AND
ROAD.PNY CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL IMPACT THE EASING
10"HDPE PIPE
PERIMETFA ROAD BHPLL BE COOROINgiEO WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO STARTING WORK 109LF®SLOPE VgRIE3 CHECKED BY: J.MM
. THE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD SHALL REMAN A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET MODE IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD WILL BE IMPACTED BY
/' "-,%.'% "• ' APPROVED�BY. J.MM
Q j.." B "�. w "/.."': ._,/ CONSTRUCTION.THEWIDTHOFTERGADSWLLLNOTBELESSTWW 15 FOOT WIDEWITHOUT PRIDRAPPROVK FROM THEOWNER
N ��"•' 'j a.HOPE PIPE SHALL BE ADS NA2 WITH H-25 LOADING OR APPROVED E—DRAIN BASINS SHALL BE ADS ROAD AND HGHWAY DATE: MARCH 2D16
sTfluClURE9 WITH W25 LOADING GRATES OR APPROVED EQUAL
.COUCTI-RORSHPLPELORADEAREATOCRFATEASWEMATE ER TODRANARFS FASTING FLPNFIENDS lOILDTIO Q STATE LICENSE u N.C.C•2450
......
. B. aTRUCTURE ANDPIPELOCATIONS SHOWNAREPPPPO%IMATE—LOCE—FET BEBASEDONFIELDCONDITIONS PNOFIELD
n '�"✓-� Pam' YA` �� lam' " � ( ` LOUTIONSOF TXE GRAVEL ftOPDANOMICHOR TRENCH PIPE SHALL H4VETWOFEET OF COVER UNDER THEGRAVEI RDAD. NoRh PROJECT NO. 2071.757.02
!TRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED flEWEW OF THE COrvpTON3 OF THE SLOPES IN 00.0E0.To IOENTFT ANY g0.EA9 THAT 0' 15' 3B• 6D'
' ^� I!V^y rl .Jldlp•^" NEED TO BE ACORESSED OR REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTIER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECr.MY REPAIRS—RED ® SHEET NUMBER
B. Y
Aro REPAR METHOD SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON THE PLANS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 10,CONTPACTORSHALLOOMPLETEANASBUILTSURVEY ONALL WCRHCOMPLETED. C-O Vo
1

SITE WORK,GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE LATE WINTER/ PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE-MIXTURE 1-
1. THE CONRNCIOR SHALE.BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING VISITED THE SITE AND RAVING EARLY SPRING MIXTURE SEED IMF TORE SPECIES RATE J�ACRE) S h e V i l l e
FAMILWMZED HIMSELF WITH THE EASTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING MS BID. J G v
2. THE CONTRACTOR S UTILIZE A NORTH CA M LICENSED SURVEYOR FOR SE GMULTURE SPECIES RAT:(!&ACRE) SERCFA LESPEOEZA 1p REGIONAL AIRPORT
_ EON ILOREAN I,E9PEDETA
CONSTRUCTION RELATED TAR TMOUIREMENTB gHlhVAL LLESPEMZA RYEjiW REDTI. 15
(MBE IN 5S PIEDMONTAND KEMUCKY BLUEGRASS
3. THE ENRRE AREA WITHIN THE UNITS OF GRADING SHUV.L BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH COASTAL PLAIN KCREAN IN MOUNTNNS)
SUFFICIENT TO REMOVE ALL VEGETABLE MATTER,MUCK RUBBISH,AND OTHER UNSUITABLE 6EEDIM NOTE:
MgTERMJ.. OMIT ANNUAL LEMPEDM WHEN DURATION OF TEMPORARY COVER IS NOT TO EXTEND BEYOND AFTERAUG,1,USE UNSCAR RED SEED FOR SERICEALESPEDEZA LLJ
DUNE. NEURSEPILANTS
4 THE COMPACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL USTURSED AREAS AND BETWEEN MAY II ANq 9EPT.30,ADO 10 LUACHE GERMAN MILLET OR I5 LB(ACRE 9VDPNGRA99.
DEWMTERAS NECESSARY. SEECING pATEB. PETW i0 MAT 11 OR AFTER SEAT.30,ADD 40 LB'ACRE RYE(GNNM.IT MAT BE BENEFlNLL TO
OUNTNM ABOVE 2,500 FEET: FE815-MAT 15 PLANT THE GRASSES IN LATE SUMMER AND OVERSEE.THE LESPEDETA91N N-CH.
5 ALL OMURBED AREAS,INOWINO THE CONTRACTOR6 STAGING AREA HAUL ROUTES, MOUMNN9 BELOW 2.500 FEET: FEB1-MAT1
GRADING
LIMITS ETC.,SHALL.BE RESIGNED TO A SMOOTH LINE AND GRADE WITH POSITIVE HEDMCM: JAN 1 MAY
1 SEEDING DATES
DRATAGE TILE CONTRACTOR s1YLLL SEED AND MUCH ALL DSTURSED AREAS THERE WALL CQASTAL PLAIN. DEC.1-AM.1 SE pO351BLE �VCwDapIN A.
BBE NO MEASUREMENT FOR PAY MENT OF SEEDNG AND MULCHING REQUIRED FOR AREAS BELOW 2500 FT: ALG.I5SEP.1 JUL25S
UISDE 11MIT90F O9NRBANCE g3tURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR SOILPMENDMEM9 y10
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY ,000 LUACRE GROUND MAR f-R 1 MAR,I.Mq 15
fl THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO TRANSPORT AND STORE ALL EQUIPMENT AND AGMCVLN LIMESro EANDT50LB REI0l0.IDFERPLMER 2 ASOVE2500 FT: NL25AUG.15 JUL ISJWG.
MATERVLL9 T A MANNER WHICH WILL NOT DPAIRE ANT EICONT PAVEMENT,BUILDINGS,9,
SIGNS,LIGHTS,ETC.AN
Y DAI4AGE WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO MULCH 30 MPA 20APR.20 MPR.5�NIAY 15 _
THE OWNER THE CONTRACTOR B—L KEEP ACCESS ROUTES CLEAN AND FREE OF LOOSE APPLY A000 IBIACRE STRAW:ANCHOR STRAW BY TACING WITH ASPHALT,NETTING OR A SOILAMEMMEMS �-GR DI (tali 51 ned
DEBRIS FROM CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A q K WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A 1�' O<4". 9 y 9
FOR HOLY DEALING ALL DEBRIS FROM PAVEMENTS TRAVERSED BY CONSTRUCTION MULLHANCHORWGTOOL APPLYLITUANDIMETONE ANDCORO ACCORDING Il TESTS,OUZM. I5LOS'100060,FT,GROUND Qer(= by James M.
EOUPMDJT. AGMOULTURALLME9TONEPND 1000 LBIgCHE S10.10 FERTILIZER <
MNHTENAWE MULC 090 H '.`MOOse,P.E.
REFERTIUM IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE RESEED,RLTOMLQE AND MULCH PLY T LBI M SO N NAL AN FT.GRAIN STRAW OR EGUUJT COVER OF OTHER SUITABLE -,D,ltlte�ZUtG,OS.26
IMMEDATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE MULCH ANCHOR MULCH BY FACING WITH ASPHALT,ROVING OR NETTING.NETTING IS THE SA
PREFERRED ANCHORING METHOD ON STEEP SLOPES, Its'•.,�SLL 15:32:6-04'OO�
CE
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES MNMOOW NO MORE MAN ONCE AYEAR.REFERT IN THE SECOND YEAR UINU=SS GROWTH 13
ME O FULLYADEQUATE RESEED,FERTII MD MULCH DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY.
1.THE roNIRACtOfi SIULLL PROVIDE SILT FENCE AND00.CONTROL OEVILE9,AS MAY BE TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE-SUMMER MIXTURE ASHEVILLE
REDUIRFD,TOCONTROLSOILER09IONDJRINGCONSTRUCTION,KDISTUMEDMEASSHALL
O BECLEANED,GRMEDANDSTABILIZED NTH GRASSING IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCNON REGIONALAIRPORT
SEEDINGMDTURE SPECIES RATE(IILALgE)
0 2,EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BELOW.3IPBILIZATON MFA9URE9 A—RE IMMTED PS SOON PB LLSPEDETA B ASHEVILLE
PRACTICABLE IN PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY
OO OR PERMANENTLY CEASEp.BUT IN NO CASE MORE TMAN 14 DAYS AFTER A CONSTRUCTION ENT PIEDMONTAND MMNTNNS,ASM1 -STEMMED SULffiI—R —BE SUB.—DATA MAINTENANCE PLAN NORTH CAROLINA
K MTVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. RATE OF 50 LB9IADRE
1 PAID SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED FOR 9TAMUTY AND _
CONTRACTORS TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL-TEMPORARY DRAINS,SILT FENCING.AND SEEDING DATES EROSNONO
S 3DRAINAGE GIC S.ETC HOT SHOWN ON THE PLAWE OR NOTED HEMK SHALL BE INSTALLED MOUNTAINS MAY 15- 15 OPERATO LOWING EACH RAIM=AL EVENT MUM NO LESS MAN ONCE EVERY
BY THE CONTRACTOR TO INTERCEPT OR OVERT SURFACE WATER RUNOFF WHICH MAY AFFECT ME.MOM MAY 1-AUG41
N THE WORK TIESEDRAJNS AND DITCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY TIE COMPACTOR COASTAL PLAIN: APR 15- 2 ANY NFfOED REPNR991Nlt BE MADE IMMEDVlTELT lO ENSURE CONTINUED FUNCTION OFALL
THROUGHOUT TIE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT,UPON COMPLETION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL P ICESASCESIGNED.
RESTORETHESITETOITSORIGINALCONTITION. SOILAMENOMEMS
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOLI. TESTS, OR APPLY . ALL SEEDED NRPA9 SE-PULL BE RESEEDED,FEMILIZED,AND MULCHED AS NECESSARY TO
PDMCULTURAL UME9TONEPNDTSD LBIACREf0.10.10 FERTLZER. 2 ESTABLISH SUITABLE GROUND COVER,ACCORGEM TO THE SEEDM3 AND
SPEQN DNS ARE PROVIDED AS OURJNE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY ,000 Le�ACRE GROUND SPECIFICATIONS.
MULCHING J'/ MY PLAN
RJ WATER.CIIEMICAL9.VEGETATION OR OTHER MATERIALS TO PREVENT THE OCCURRENCE OF
)_ OUST WHICH WILL BE OBJECTIONABLE TO THE OPERATIONSNSERS OF TIE AIRPORT AS MLLCpppLY 4.000 IBIACRE STRAW.ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT,NETTING OR A 4. SEDIMENT SfVLL1 BE REMOVED FROM ALL TRAPS ANCOR BASINS ONCE ONE HALF OF THE
LI TH ZY OUNED IN E PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS,NO SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE, rygNOpRING TOOL Ag3K WITH BLADES SET NFATLLT STRAIGHT CAN BE USED ASq STORAGEVOLUMEHASBEENUSED.
CONTRACTOR SHAU.AL90 BE OBLIGATED TO DRECUNTNUE OPERATIONS WHICH VI.WTE MtH AWLEGRINo root AREA 1 AND
EASING LAWSAND REGULATIONS. THE ROCK WEIRS SHALL BE CLEANED ANCOR REPLACED WITH CLEAN MOO ONCE SEDMEM
S S.CON RAC O SHALL UMIT AREAS OF DSNRBANCE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE DURING THE NAHRENAHCE 5 BUILDUP PREVENTS PROPER DRAINAGE FROM ME MAP. , AREA 4
COURSE OF THE PROJECT,AND ETASILQE AREAS AS WORK IS CGMPLETEO. ND SEPARATE REFERTILME IF GROWTH 15 NOT ALLY ADEQUATE. RESEED,REFERTILIZE AND MULCH CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM R NE REVIEW OF THE SILT FENCES TO ENSURE PROPER IMPROVEMENTS
US MEASUREMENT WILL BE MADE FOR PAYMENT FOR AREAS REOUIMNG SEEDING AND MULCHING IMMEDIATELY FOLLGWINC EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE 5 FIAVCTiON.FENCES TO BE CLEMREOONCE SEDIMENTDEPM REACHES 6-.
OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUC ION,THIS WORK SHALL BE PAID AT THE CONTRACTORS
j EXPENSE. BE T MALL ADDITIONAL.MNNIENAIHCE.AS REOUIREO BY NCpEQ AND THE ENGINEER,S
S.ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL.BE INSPECTED BY TIE CONTRACTOR DOE DIRECTED.
v EVERY SEVEN)DAYS OR AFTER EACH RAINFALL OCCURRENCE
I.H. AT EXCEEDS ONNWF(1 Q) EROSION AND
DAMAGED OR INEFFECTVE MS,CE9 SHALL BE REPAIRED OR a REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY ME CONTRACTOR.NO SEPARATEPAYMENTWELLBEMADE. TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE-FALL MIXTURE SEDIMENT
T.ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SMALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED WRING ALL PHASES OF CONTROL NOTES
UCHON UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ANDALL USTURSED
$ �HAVE BEEN 9TABILMED. ADDITIONAL CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE RECUIRED OUMNG SEEDINGMONRESPECIES RATEnaIALRE) (SHEET 1 OF 2)
ONSTRUC.ON IN ORDER TO CONTROL EROSION MUM OFFSHE SEDMIENTATIOK AIL RYE 120
C TEMPORARY CONTROL DEVICES SMALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND �>renAAA
U THE SITE IS STABILIZED UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER 6EEUNc.ATES
OCm_oNT AUG.15-CEC.15
S 0.THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE
E NECESSARY ACTION TO MINI THE TRACIND OF MUD ONTO oMOM: AVG.15-pEC.30
THE PAVED ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION AREAS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DAILY REMOVE COASTAL PLAIN: RUG.15-GEC.SO wma ,w
MUD90IL FROM PAVEMENT,OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER
COI
LAMENDMEM8
9.REMOVPLOFA SEDMENTAN MMIONCO MMFASURESH LBEASDRECIFDBYNCDEO FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS, OR APPLY 2000 L&ACRE GROUND SCALE:;
MOD EENGINEERNOMEASURESHALLMREMOVEDUNTILDIRECTEDTOTHECONTRACTORIN AGMCUMN LIMESTONEAND1B00L&ACRE1410.10FMTLLITER
WRITING. SINS:
MULCH DATE, BY1 MPTIX
f APPLY 4LOW LDIACRE STRAW.ANCHOR STRAW BY TACW W WITH ASPHALT.NETTING OR A
MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A
j MULCHANCHOMNGTOOL
O
MATTING NOTES MAIMEENAN E
AIRENI R ARCH.IF
1 DAMAGEDNECESSARY
T EXTEND
TE MRARESS WITH 50OND DUNE OF
NITROGEN IN MARCH.IF IT IS NECESSARY TO OUEXTEND TEMPORARY COVER BEYOND JUTE 15
ALL DISTURBED s WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE 9EEDEp PER THE PWJ$AM SEE.WITH 50 LATE
FE RE NOREAN EARLY
MAANSIRCH.LESPEDEZA OR KOBE(PIE➢MOM PAID
W 1 SPECIFICATIONS. COg5TP1 PLAINT IN LATE FEBRVARY OR EARLY MARCH
4 2. ALL USTURBED PAEA9 WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE MULCHED PER THE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT THE AREAS THAT SHALL BE FATTED. DESIGNED BY: J.M,M.
Q 3, THE FOLLOWIHGAREAS SHNL BE MATTED:
DROWN BY: W.L.J.
A­DE­DITCHESASINDCATED IN THEPIAN9PN0 DETAILS
Q RANYSLOPEEQUALTOORGRFATERTIYWA4:ISLOPE: CHECKED Sr. J.M.NL
5J C.ANY BERM ABOVEASLOPE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAHA3.1 SLOPE:
APPROVED BY: J.M.M.
O.PNY PfiEAREWIREO BY THE OWNER 00.ENGINEER.
4. MATTINO9WYL BE NRLEX II ORAPPROVEDEWPL DATE: MARCH 2O16
STATE LICENSE N N.C.C-2450
PROJECT NO, 2013.157.02
IN
SHEET NUMBER
7
EC-01

. ^ I
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AS OUTLINED IN THESE PLANS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE PRIOR APPROVM FROM THE ENGINEER BEFORE MAKING MY AugmtA,]Ml
DEVIATIONS TO CONSIRUCTION SEQUENCE
Major Elements of DWQ Construction General Permit S h evi I I e
2 P STARLING ANY WORK INCLUDING GRADING,(MEN HIM EROSION MID SEDIMENT THE
CCOOINTRO�INSTALLATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE HIMSELF PROFICIENT IN THE REGIONAL AIRPORT
NSTRLJCTON SEDUENCING OF THE PROJECT, dnNtnm4ao SB11 Ne S,'m II MthoMRTUy-rm'bed Nnnh/:arolba DVieioO pf Wq4(;rarity(DW4J COnFWCdnn
3. THE CONFRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL HOLD A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH QmmWYmml(NGO01)wi,h mgp6nuplqud 9.,lh eel=mcA416d drBkrffmtl'I(tgpNm- pgmil('MF^'U AOgmL 2,
NCDEO FRIOR TO STARTING WORK 2011).6ineeW surOmmy]ulbelov Pumatgonlsin ddauln Orevuy Obargee.deewmplebP M1Ahoxldbcwcdb m•um full
pl mtN Su hnp,iipvttal<aeM erpfw tr N d5ajrcr`r tTp
a CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLEHAS FOR MAINTAINING POSITIVE INCLUDES
E THI NAGS UT
To Th N �wm nebePo 1rmR d.HN IF2idMm
THE SITE AND ACROSS PROJECT PHASES.THE POSITIVE DRNNAGE INCLUDES HRCU GE TO
THE APPROPRIATE EROSIONANDSEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE 1}Grauau FLLdRl�aggn a °'. PPb 6mrad nabd roll -0,laa Mx.m.
Onus liw T'Claw.odralq dmINC
;W dv Sedan tAc{iwJmn,
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL CO—AN M-BUILT SURVEY ON ALL WORK COMPLETED. 6Ne. . Smblllraaon 61a61Watk.Time H Pw PI gmmdgwb,, C'I dal D dyn dN"raw
_ ]lercrl Lion TlmvlM1eme F}•me Eau tbm �A'q"°re'.°I' dp'wWu''^"kwwh Pu"'la'1`pwy D^°Sq _AICIW,INe
e. THE CONTRACTOR SNARL FOLLOWING THE FOLLOANG CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR THE Parirm;Mr L4m." "' ""' -'-"' 4TpG tluD ionpdfipAh rd.yedpamh- wmwin
PROJECT: swAcr,ditcw} I., Nom aNaacm UfagmpWcq wr}tiA ld,wdrAa.ve Pivm,70eyq, aam xcauev cuu•a•mn..vwLvm
mN�i a orr�amnwo
.E.— • High Q. Iy
,V—r3QW) 7ifal None `^v
1. PRIORTOSTMTNOWMR Mro A RBHALLttI TNCDEOFORNDTIFMATON OF 2�Ce N pmN r4q d hq hea dm A�CMq�'r. Digitallysigned
COMMENCEMENTOFWOFK Ifu James M.
2 ONCETHEWORKHASECEN COMPLETEDANOTHE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIBED,TiE • "MPOFtaper Ida} 1 length dan Dcd, 4d an.gfgrdcvroU m6 an.A and Ndcr
CONTRACTOR SWILL NOTIFY-.so. Ihan3:1 eepe S 2,I, lheloc qd.$D Imm Mnmldr aMalmaw �` -(M006er P.E.
14 a• (lowed N ,cm N a1 - B bl 'i.
AREA1 7A,,X,f Alo{uv Bann wxm .ccpu eutml ado B.m•!mm t°�y, -DatE:3016.05.26
A CONTRACTOR I—L INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SfDWN ON THE—PRIOR TO Sloppy 3:l.r Id Y• gmxabvA 9S feet dau4+-�mC mdcu P,o FUP M al{< FP'
15:33:40 0400'
STARTING GRADING OPERATIONS. "Baa.t vLlµgth mmlable.
nv�.
(Z� B, CONTRACT ORSHALLCOMPLEfEADETAIIEDREAMOFTHECONgTONSOFTHE Nnw C Mmn dal mmLbq wnVolled a�md wNtii wida
p SLOPES IN DIDER TO IDENRFY MY AREAS THAT MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED • NINMramm da awamn tlmd0.PrbWIL
Mi ORREPPIREDALONG WITH THE OTHERVA—REGOIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, viiW elopm Bailer ld da)• tcawAlf
Z G NWNCTORONTHSNALL BEGIN
GINENTEN ENTOPYMTHPHASE1TIONSTOCOMPLETEGRACINO Lwad:1 perimCmmN : ASHEVILLE
II WZ.rrca _)nr a,.orva;>F.a r.niuew wt,
a a N mybsgp smq�mwroluLgwmwro a REGIONAL AIRPORT
D. C NM ORSHALLINSr TRAPEZOIDALRIPFAPmTCHASSHOWNONF S. broea,,,rre d,c otl¢„pm,p�er emdn;m,anan.kaemnPiianu . xequiranc+LL Ilro aaae ss}n Pro wn PWPPS ASHEVILLE
O E ASMEASMECOMPLETE., Yffi LBESEEDEDMDMATTEDIMMEDWTELY. un}aesivlble.`(Scsti®llB(d}(bfl . Tlw pemdlillow.nduuion lmm du:lDaeremlv4numil'
o Inq.Dhpmm.OfDWQdclgl ,,*Ln Bhlr pewide NORTH CAROLINA
AREA
A --ER
W A CENTRB-OFEB INONDER TO
MY
THAT
NEED
EToCONDITIONSEADDOFTHE I
ry SLOPES IN OIDQe TQ IDENTIFY ANT AREAS THAT MAY NEED TO BE AWRESSED
OR REP ORSONGWITHTHEOTHERWDRK FEOURFDFORTHISPROJECT.
B. CONTRIn ORDER To EN HML THE s 1E DOES NOr�Au.ow w CONCENTRATION o Wows.As
C. THEAILE418 COMPLETED.IT SHALL BE SOLVED MD MATTED ACCORENGLY. v '
CONTRACTOR SHALL M-E REQUITED GRADING AND DRUNAGE IMPROVEMENTS' (,
AT THE BOTTOM OFTHE SLOPEAM1O AT IHEGMVEt ROPD.AS THE WORKIS I NEYPIAN
MPLETED,TT SIVeLL BE SEEDED MDMATTEDACCORDNGLY.
D. ETCEKLDISTURBEDMEP9 DESCWBEDABOVE HAVE BEENCOMPIETED,
MATTED,AND HAVEA GOOD STAND OF VEGELAT10N,THE SLOPE DRAINSMD Augustde 2M1
sDCL4FeD BERM SHALL BE REMovED.Am AREAS DISTURBm Duwnc rFus AREA 1 AND
r�wRK SHALL BE BEEDEDANDMATTED—RONCLY. Major Elements of DWQ Construction General Permit-Continued
g AREA 4
IMPROVEMENTS
BY
4)7dipdgllolad; 6}Copdilpmvt'.Plwon&Sedm,mt.iim CNnu.l PbvF',':
EROSION AND
Gam.wccWyimpcsaan requiremwle aLbai�iali a TSgO�IYMB,OILS fmq,NPI pOI I,,I SEDIMENT
S—, I.g..gc&impeeu®a0w 0.3^rune—I D:sigaacon pn theplmlq whetpbas tw WnL wrnply wi,the
• amEttt-wrlUdvwNngNmmeNeprdmNPDES,—Nmn CONTROL NOTES
g 1n p�ngnM,—,W.d&H.8-am,wbIuIi— !°- (SHEET 2 OF 2)
0
O fiom."
� • Imp<c..n.v TcpmQ vw,l bu avaiUblo Ontiie durlvg 71.HWding WastegHandliu8 - •n••.••
Sdavi nom.mde®. pu;iHc cxempEo • •° _,
• ttccmds mnel be kept forlyeam oMaeNlabl.upon NO pv,i.e liyWdw mprewFq dra,n w.mR -
rgq.geli Ddiwlal arem for acmulaim5 canapOcii.Aavd oihcr
a FTeumviwuy-avaGtilc recptde may66.db,eL.md w�lgq faaLed,sD^-fiw,.mrm atim pllaea wm.w,IgFa SCALE m•
wdurccNiin clmdiamu rto mxnnable Wlvnaliara navailaN a ,a
Hannm makvN alackp,Ine Ieutcd 6D'Gvm Hetm B5VI51ON5:
Ami uW Orcxmable altema.vga malabia,
I BY OEseRIPTroN
f '•�°imPkmevw4aordn9dlFmnx CuoufuanW:u
Ca,CTGie taukaN•muel lx adntioBrd lauvamlca.lacL
p • Pbjttn permlMed,mM l6AP—i—pcTroitcml w ,wC waten,.wellavd,,mb.H2m-
w.avve 1vtoBow nm 1ae.�oualy-pNmmlred cov&arms:
f
f.OmplcleaPpUcaamn rcuivcd pam mAOgmL3;ml1 6}sedimguL Hge)os
apn kD PamtIPN AfappmvcU appJi'gNkp - "" it .
• Apb p �Sn�AUg-2r2011m.etgnvipiy • OW cWrca mwt. Lhdmw fiom baiiv nwPacq
AP uN—dmi B-0",1 V..I um-
• Vvl Orly DW(1.applpvcdllacFWdrN:. DESIGNED BY: J.MM.
DRAWN BY: IN LA
•Inprdu6rthe E85CAmrouoejY W m.smmaM1heCuom.gbnCenuol lemtit'hmwP:EegfyueeswhaelhagmmtluadlizaEonregrvemum IF,,-SM Q 'laaV�Nfio,uwe.Auedw.vra4wwLmra rcgmFuv:mae{yly. CHECKED BY: J.M.M.
APPROVED BY: 1II.M.
DATE: MARCH 2O16
Docmaw(preyargd,by aF.Flivigiorgf\Cacer Qpalily 2
STATE LICENSE N.C.C3450
PROJECT NO. 2DT3,167.02
7
ry SHEET NUMBER
(EC-02

RIPRAP CHART y
STR.NO. OUTLET DESCRIPTION PIPE SIZE(IN) RIPRAPCLASB RIPRAP DEPTH(D)(IN) Le(FT) WEFT)
S-2 FLARED END SECTION 1B B 18 9 10.5 `ems�VAR1E5 y J � Xm'! ev1NAL AIRPORT
S4 FLARED END SECTION 1B B 18 9 1D.5 15'
S-8 FLAREDENDSECTION 1S B 18 9 105
S-B FLARED END SECTION 18 B 18 B 10.5
.10 FLARED END SECTION 18 B 1 8 10.5
TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH DETAIL
N.T.S.
5-12 FLARED END SECTION 18 B 15 1B 18.5 pVCON,INC.
RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION RIP
W.SB' �� a
NTs FILTERSTONE
La CAROZ,q Digitallysigned
La by James M.
Dal se P.E.
n llli .I 1� 1B• e9t6.os.26
(T J P- 1•I ,.Yi 15:34:26-0400'
TE3 _ _ •''".. 4�.. IH1 7tli II IJ
r SECTION A-A FarER aLANKEr J SECTION A-A ASHEVILLE 7Y i T._,�.y i T���) cilY -3jl lil �-a- -�T4�1�
PIPEOURETTOFLATATNEANO RPEOURETTO I%1 REGIONAL AIRPORT
WELLOEFlNEDCWWNEL -FINEDCH4MIEL
o ASHEVILLE
e " s. ONE WT NORTH CAROLINA
1, SILT FENCE ST ET SHALL BE INSTALLED gLONG PERIMETER OF THE
GRADING LIMITS AT 100 FOOT IMERVNS,LOW SPOTS PND AS ORDERED BY THE
W ENGINI-D-RAGEAREAS OFOIJRETSSHI U DBEMIMMIZEDASPRACTMAL, ---; :-^--""-'-
S NORTBNOMJD FISTING TOCENTEROF
PIPEENO Wes.-
� z THE COST STONE SWILL BE INCIOENTMTO SILT FENCE "._-;S:=��..'.�'�
ry- NOTES:
LO 1. Le I9WSLENCTHOFTHERPRAPAPRON J
" 2. 1.TIMES THE MAJUMLJM STONE DI-ETER BUT NOT LESS SILT FENCE STONE OUTLET DETAIL •/ KEYPLAN
3 d CL NTs.
3, IN A WELL 11141 CP 11,-END THE IRON UP THE AREA 1 AND
CHANNEL BANILS TORN ELEVATON OF 6-ABOVE THE MAXIMUM
gTAILYMTER DEPTHORTOWETOPOFTHE RMlCHEVER I AREA
ISLES9
IMPROVEMENTS
4. AFLTER BIPNKET,OR HLTER FABRIC.SHOULD BE IfSTMLEO
PLAN BETWEENTHERIPRAPANDSOILFOBNDg 1
STEEL P09T SILT FENCE NOTES:
WERE MESH
FlLTER FABRIC 1. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS SH, BE REMOVED WHEN THE DEPOSITS REACH
Q APPRQAMATELY I-F THE HEIGHT OF THE FABRIO, SHOULD THE RUER EROSION CONTROL
FABRIC COLLAPSE TEAR DECOMPOSE, DETERIORATE OR BECOME
rc RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS INEFFECTIVE.IT SHUL BE REPI—D IMMELTATELY. DETAILS(SHEET 1 OF 2)
0 n£� �N1 _fr..;.r;I- EASING ]. USE A SYNRETC FILTER FPBRC OF AT LEAST 95%BY WEIGHT OF
ENSURE THAT THE SLIBGRAOE FOR THE FILTER AND RIPRAP FOLLOrYS THE REQUIRED LINES MO GRADES SHOWN IN THE PUW. �� GROUND POLYOLEFEN9 OR POLYESTER NNFORMWG TO ASTM D 6"I D SHOULD
*i.�.. UNE CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABIU S PROVIDE A
COMPACT ANY FELL REWIRED IN THE SUBGRADE TO THE DENSRT OF THE SURROUNDING UNCISRFSW MATERIPL LOW - _::1[`i - MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS EXPECTED USABLE COIJSTRUCNON LIFE AT A �+R•no.
AREASINTHESUBGRPDEONUNDIMROWSOILMAY OBEFILLEOBYINCREPSINGTHERIPPAPTHN WIS. o\ 0 •\ ` TEMPEWINREPHNGEOFO•FTO10]-F. _
Z THERPRPPANDGRAVELFILTERMUMT NF MTOTHESPEQnWGRPDINGLIMIT SB MONTHEPUW9.
0. FOR REINFORCEMENT OF 9TPNDARD 3RLENGTH FILTER FPBRI0,.USE MIN 14
• 4•� CH FABRICAs3HOVYNAND GOUGE WERE FENCE WITH MAX.MESH SPACING OF 6 INCHES, omeumn-mA n'-
& -I CLOTH,WHEN USED MUST MEET DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND BE PROPERLY PROTECTED FROM PUNCMNG OR COMPACTS 11-LABOVEIT
TEARING WRING IN9iAL1.AD A REP ALL
MJY DAMAGE BY REMOVING O O MI AP AND NIIMUM F I FT.I PIECE OF BE IS IF EXTRA STRENGTH FABRC 19 11TIU LASTM D 4141),WIRE MESH Is SCALE: -o -
ICLOTH-ER OVER THE D.E.PAEA ALL COMJECTIND JOINTS SHOULD OVERLAP A MINIMUM OF 1 FT.IF THE OAMPDE IS 4 OPTIONAL
EXTENSIVE,REPLACETHE EHTRE FLIER CLOTH SECTION REVISAH
4. RPP IP BEPLACEDBT EWIPMEM.CARESHOULDBET NTOAVOIDDAJNIGWGTH MFl RFABRIC. 5, TS SH4L BE 133 L F STEEL WITH MIN.LENGTH OF 5 FEET AND BY .-FEEPTNN
VMAX.STANDARDSTRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE PROJECTIONSTD FACILITATE 61INCTHEFABRIC. 21
S. THEMIWMUM THIOM-CFTHERNRAPSHOULDBE I,5TIMESTHE I-IMUM STONEDI-ETER. 6'MAXEXTRA9TRENGTHFABRCWRHOUT WIRE FENCE B
Op ANCHORFABRICTOWIRE ING ATTAW WERE MESH TO P09T WITH MINA WIREOR PLASTIC TIES.
6. RPRAP MAY BE FIELD STONE OR ROUGH oVAPRY STONE.IT SHOULD BE HARD.ANGIMR.HIGHLY WFATHERJ1E915TAM MET, MEWWTHPIABTICTIES MESHANO FABRIC T, AT TAW FILTER FABRIC TO EACH POST WITH MIR 3 WERE OR PIASTC TIES
WELL GRPDED. IDWAY BETWEEN PoSTS ATTACHMEMTOPoSTS
W IT W N THE TOP a INCHES OF THE FABRIC.
T. CONSTRUCT THEAWLONGRAOEATWOWNONPLA WRHNOOVERFALLATTHEENO.MAKETHETOPOFTHERPRIPATIHE
DOWNSTREAM ENO LEVEL WITH THE RECEMRG AREA OR SLIGHRY BELOW IT. B OFTRES-RTOAVOIDJOINOTS,WHENJIOIMSPRRENELL C SUT SPROT,SE RELY
Q B. ENSURE THAT THE APRON IS PROPERLY ALIGNED WITH THE RECEIVING STREAM MD PREFERABLY STRAIGHT THROUGHOUT ITS FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC ONLY TO A SVFPoRT POST WHH 4 FEET MIR
LENGTH IFA WRVS IS INEEDEDTO ITT SITE CONOTIONS,PLACE IT IN THE UPPER SECTION OF THEAPRON. OVERLAP TO THE NE%T P09T.
DESIGNED BY: J.H.M.
Q B. OUTLET
STRUCTURES
AFTER AFTER
STq&O E ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH VEGETATION.MAIMEWWCE INSPECT RPR IF 9. BRING MEA OGRAMNQ G I NDE AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS MID
OURET STRUCTURES PETER HEAVY RAN9 TO SEE IF MY EROSION AROUND OR BELOW THERPRAP HA9 TAKEN PUCE OR IF BRING SBTOGRAPEANDSTPBILIZE IT AFTER THE COMRIBIJTIN(B DP/UNAGE DRAWN BY: W.L.J.
UI STONES HAVE BEEN DISLODGED.MMECATELY MNIEALL NEEDED REPAIRS TO PREVENTFURWER DAMAGE >i�j,/�•/ c AREAHA9 BEEN PROPERLY 9TABILJZED.
Q -WERE FLIER FPBfiIC 1 THE USE OF SILT FENCE W ENCOMPASS DR ENCIRCLE DRNNAGE MLETS AND CHECI(ED BY: J.h1M
0.EXISTING RAREO ENO SECTIONS SHOWN ON THE PLM'S SHALL HAVE THE EASING CURET OR INLET PROTECTION -WRE9H FL NOTE]) STRUCTURES IS PROHIBITED. My
QAMAGED USED BY THE USE OF SILT
S' MAIMMNED THROUGHOUT THE EMIRS WPATION OF THE PROJECT.AT THE BEGINNING OF WE PROJECT,IF THE EXISTING � BESCG SS � APPROVED BY: J.MNL
Q OUTLET OR INLET PROTECTION IS fN SATISFACTORY CONMPON;THE OUTLET ABO INLET PROTECTION SW L BE MONITORED. 6 SO.IN FENCE NOT SPEQFlCPLLY ALLOWED SHALL BE REPMRED BY THE QCRTRACTOR
IF THE EXSTING OUTLET OR INLET PROTECTION IS NOT IN SATSl A WRY CO TON OR NEEDS TO BE P WSSED TO MEET AT NO COST TO THE OWNER DATE: MARCH 2016
NEQ BEWIREMEM9,THE CONTRACTOR SALLH PDD THERE
W QUIRED RPPAP TO MEET THE REOMREMENTS. ELEVATION '
11.AT NO TIME SHALL SILT FENCE BE PLACED WITRIN CONCENTPATED FLOW,
EXISTING OR PROPOSED DITWES,OR MMPoRARY DITWES PND WNVEYANCE
MEASURES, STATE LICENBEp N.C.CZ460
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE PROJECT NO. 2013.757.02
RT.. SHEET NUMBER
'EC-03
I

- I
sheville
REGIONAL AIRPORT
bNE C MIN. ONBTRU TION
AFTERCONSTRUCDON
HOLD-DOWN STPNE6 1 I.E'MIN MVL �YCwONpINC.
GROLIND TwNant
� LINE mamcvvim� .a'.w.onv xc�.».
1 o,gem
�"�jMO./1\ \
"' III III I EO MULGHcwwNEL
AFT Digitally signed
ERGGGING \�\
IB —\ sE :\\.. s.m mPa �'- by James M.
sPAcwG _r L-
P1ASlICCORRUGATEDRPE r C Uoose,P.E.
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH 1.t •Datc,-2016.05.26
T N.T.S.
—LET w,,,,u: ° 15:35:34-04'00'
(� sTASILIZE
ji �7 r •�
=III=
( pSHEVILLE
REGIONAL AIRPORT
gr (, I= I�—r ASHEVILLE
w Jf _Sy �T NORTH CAROLINA
6 LEVEL 6ECRON ( -- l..�c'=,^T
g r „
NEYPUW
NOTES; TEMPORARr cuss D EWDslon
COMROL STOf�TMICKNEss 1E-
1 WNER SUPPLIED HOPE PIPE FOR SLOPE ORNN9191S".ANY NEW
SLOPE ORNN TO EE SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE 1". AREA1 AND
La Size AREA 4
LL 2. COMPACTOR SHALL FOLLOW NO—REQUIREMENTS FOR SLOPE
W DWNNINSTALIARONPRDCEWREB.6LOPEOW1Nb11PLLBEINSTPLLEO ..� �� r IMPROVEMENTS
CONTI MPILY A9 THE NOT COMPLETE
AND SLOPE HEIGHT E BFi19ES DP Qnf V(N) *3� J
COMPACTOR eHll1 NOT COMPLETE ENNRE SLOPE BEFORE
� INSTALLING ELOPE DRNN9. 12 FLOW 9x Do �� y ����
CONTRACTOR SHALL TEMFORARILY DWUN SURFACE WATER TO SLOPE k
I. , DPNNS.ANTTEMPOWWYGIP INGFORTHISEH LBEITWIOENTALTO
THE PROJECT. s EROSION CONTROL
<. AS THE PHASED E BLO ARON OF THE SLOPE DRNNT D NTH.THE
�TEMPOWWY
ual ENTPIWCE A THE SLOPE DRNNS 91Wll BE PROTECTED WITH COW LOPE DRNN ~` �j DETAILS(SHEET Z OF 2)
LOGS OR ANPPPROVED EQNVALENi.
o La
Q - mm�non.
s TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN OUTLET PROTECTION
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN DETAIL ^^^ -•
N.T.A
NTA r
SCALE::
H
REVIS NS:
NO. DATE BY "RI-11
O
E
DESIGNED BY. J.NI.M.
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY: J.M,M
APPROVED BY: J.M.M.
DATE: MARCH 2OT6
STATE LICENSE# N.C.C3490
T'oy PROJECT NO- 2013.167.02
SHEET NUMBER
EC-04

DUKE . 410 S.Wilmington Street.
Raleigh,NC 27601
ENERGY®
- . Mailing Address
Mail Code NC 14..
Raleigh,NC27601
919-546-7863
919-546-6302(fax)
October 6, 2016
Mr. Brett Laverty
Department of Environmental Quality
Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S. Highway70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Subject: Asheville Regional Airport Coal Ash Structural Fill Projects
Inspection Findings Letter Report(5 Day Report)
Permit No.WQ0000020, Buncombe County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Laverty:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC.:(Duke Energy) completed an inspection o:fthe Asheville RegionalAirport coal
ash.structural fills (Areal, Area III and Area IV) on September 30, 2016 as required by the above-
referenced permit. Those on the inspection.were Matt Pickett:and Teresa Williams:(Duke Energy),John
Coon and Michael Reisman (Asheville Airport) along with yourself. During the inspection, two animal
burrows were observed on the north slope of Area'I and one on the south slope.of Area IV. One of the
animal burrows observed in Area I was deep enough to expose:a shovel full of ash. The Asheville Airport
filled the burrows on Dctober 6; 2016 and will utilize their contractor to trap and relocate the rodent(s)
in the.:near:future. If you have any questions on the enclosed information, please contact me at
ioh'[e-mail] or at 919-546-7863 at your convenience.
;Respe submitt d,
John Toepfer, P.E.
Lead Engineer
Waste and Groundwater Programs
RECEIVED
cc: . Ms.Teresa Williams—Duke Energy Division of WaWRewuroW
Mr. Matt Pickett—Duke Energy
Me.Ed Sullivan—Duke Energy OCT 14 2016
Mr. Michael-Reisman—Asheville Airport Water Oualfty Reglonal Operations
Asheville Regional Airport Asheville Regional Office
61 Terminal Drive,Suite 1 .
Fletcher, NC 28732

405
DUIKE 4 10Ral Wilmington Street
Raleiggh,NC 27601
ENERGY, Mailing Address
Mail Code NC 15
Raleigh,NC 27601
919-546-7863
919-546-6302(fax)
August 16, 2016
Mr. Landon Davidson
NC DENR Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S.70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
RE: Coal Combustion Products Structural Fill Permit No.WQ0000020
Area I and Area IV Improvements—Asheville Regional Airport
Dear Mr. Davidson:
This letter is to inform you that the improvements to Area I and Area IV at the Asheville Regional Airport
were completed in early July 2016. The improvement plans were shared with you in March 2016 and
the work was completed under an Erosion &Sedimentation Control Plan Letter of Approval issued to
the Airport dated May 13,2016.
If you have any questions or need any clarification regarding the information provided, feel free to
contact me at [e-mail] or at 919-546-7863 at your convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
John oepfer,PP Y.
Lead Engineer
Environmental Services
cc: Brett Laverty—DEQ Asheville Regional Office
Matt Pickett—Duke Energy
Scott Nordgren—Duke Energy
Ed Sullivan—Duke Energy
Michael A. Reisman—Asheville Regional Airport
Eric Effinger—Charah, Inc.
F0�7pqion
Water C2__.
�SticviUc Regic�___a`ticl' f

S.WilmingtonS t
ee
DUKE = Raleigh,
Street
Raleigh,NC 27601
ENERGY® Mailing Address
Mail Code NC 15
Raleigh,NC 27601 .
919-546-7863
919Z46-6302(fax),
March 28, 2016
Brett Laverty RECE[1f7: 1:
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Divisfor,ofvJr�terR
Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S. Highway70. --MAR_ 3 1
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Subject: Duke Energy Progress, LLC(DEP) Water Ouality F?egional Operations
Asheville Airport Structural Fill Asneviiie Regional office
Permit WQQ000020
Dear Mr. Laverty:,
This letter is in response to your letter of September 4, 2015 which provided comments and direction
based on an April 6,2015 inspection of the subject project. .
Division Comment—The Division is requiring, pursuant to section V.in the subject permit;that
vegetation near the.toe of the structural fill be.managed in a way that does not impede site inspections.
DEP Response-The vegetation management was completed in late in 2015.
Division Comment—Staff also observed the presence of woody vegetation on the North slope of Area 1 .
CCB structural fill'. =--. You are required to assess this area:to determine if further site maintenance is ..
needed.
DEP Response,—The vegetation management was completed in late in 2015
Division.Comment—Please;provide a response that.addresses the cadse(s).of.the groundwater
exceedances [iron;manganese, and one mercury value in 2011] (including the presence of thallium) and
the viability of MW-4A as a background monitoring well.
DEP Response.—
Viability of Well
Background monitoring well MW-4A, located south and topographically uphill from Structural
Fill Area I at the Asheville Regional Airport, was installed on October 7,2009. This well has been
sampled semi-annually since its installation, typically in April and November of each year.
Groundwater elevations collected from monitoring wells within Area 1, as well as from adjacent
Area 3, indicate that MW-4A is located hydraulically up-gradient from both structural fill areas
(refer to Figures 1 &2 attached). Groundwater flow in the vicinity of Area I is towards the north-
`northeast.direction with an estimated gradient of 0.02 ft/ft. Water elevations from Area 3 wells
indicate a north-northwest trending flow with an estimated gradient of:0.04 ft/ft. The water
level elevation data support that MW-4A is:located in an appropriate background well location,

Asheville Airport Structural Fill Page 2 of 4
Response to DWR March 2016
positioned hydraulically up-gradient from the fill areas. These generalized flow directions are as
expected; with the French Broad River north and west of the structural fill areas. Additionally,
there are no CCB structural fill areas located up-gradient of MW-4A. Therefore, MW-4A is viable
as a background monitoring well for the structural fill activity.
Iron and Manganese
In regard to exceedances of groundwater standards, the background iron and manganese
concentrations have varied over time with concentrations typically being considerably greater
than the groundwater standards. The most recent(November 2015)iron concentration was
3,590 µg/L and the manganese concentration was 894 µg/L.
The Asheville Plant compliance background well, CB-1, also indicates exceedances for iron and
manganese with an upper range for iron as high as 2,870 µg/L to 17,800'µg/L(depending upon
the turbidity)and manganese has been as high as 293 µg/L. Additionally, as part of the
Comprehensive Site Assessment and Corrective Action Plan for the plant site, additional
background wells have been more recently installed and sampled. It is typical to encounter iron
and manganese values above the respective standards in these wells. Therefore, the current
Asheville airport background data appear to be similar to the background data for the plant site.
However, it is noted that the dissolved oxygen (DO)and redox conditions have gradually
changed overtime for MW-4A. The change in DO and redox conditions may contribute to the
iron and manganese values. It is possible that a combination of the age of the well and the low
flow sample.technique has allowed an accumulation of iron bacteria to form around the well
creating an apparent changeover time. Well redevelopment is recommended as a first step in
determining the potential cause for the possible change in geochemical conditions surrounding
the well.
Mercur
The detection of mercury in exceedance of the NCAC 02L standard of 1.0 ug/L occurred once in
April 2011 (at 1.5 ug/L). For the ten sampling events since that time, mercury has not been
reported above the reporting limit of 0.20 µg/L. A noteworthy event was the April 2013 analysis,
which did not report mercury above the reporting limit of 0.05 µg/L. It should also be noted that
the turbidity of the sample collected in April 2011 was 12.1 NTU, the highest of the samples
collected from MW-4A, and may have contributed to the observed concentration of mercury.
Thallium
Three samples in the history of MW--4A reported detections of thallium. All of these values were
below the Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration (IMAC)of 0.2 ug/L, and just above the
usual reporting limit of 0.1 µg/L. Thallium has been detected at 1.8 mg/kg in background soils
associated with the Asheville Plant. This concentration is above the soil risk screening level for
protection of groundwater and may contribute to occasional detectable concentrations of
thallium in groundwater. Based on this information, low level detections of thallium can be
representative of natural conditions in groundwater in the area.

Asheville Airport Structural Fill Page 3 of 4
Response to DWR March 2016
Division Comment—You are required to sample this discharge [French drain culvert underlying Area 3
fill area]for the same water quality parameters as nearby groundwater monitoring wells. An estimate
of the flow rate from the culvert is also required.
DEP Response—A sample from the culvert designated Area 3 FD(Figure 1)was collected on
October 7,2015. A summary of the results are presented in Table 1. The laboratory analytical
report is appended.
A flow measurement was attempted however, due to configuration of the drainage culvert, a
representative flow rate was unable to be obtained in the field. Cross-section measurements of
the culvert and depth of flow were taken at the time of sampling. These measurements were
used along with an assumed slope of pipe(0.0003 ft/ft)and estimated Manning coefficient(n=
0.012 for smooth concrete)to calculate an estimated flow of 9 gallons per minute(gpm). Based
on observations of the structure, this value is overestimated due to a shallow sump at the end of
the culvert affecting the measured depth of water.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 919-546-7863.
Since ly#r,
Ph Toe
Lead Engineer
cc: Ed Sullivan—Duke Energy
Kathy Webb-SynTerra
JT:jrt
Attachments

Asheville Airport Structural Fill Page 4 of 4
Response to DWR March 2016
Table 1
Total Dissolved
PARAMETER Concentration Concentration
Alkalinity (mg/L) 34.4 NS
Aluminum (µg/L) <100 <100
Antimony(µg/L) <0.50 <0.50
Arsenic(µg/L) <0.50 <0.50
Barium (µg/L) 19.7 18.1
Beryllium (µg/L) <0.20 <0.20
Bicarbonate (mg/L) 34.4 NS
Boron (µg/L) <50.0 <50.0
Carbonate (mg/L) <5.0 NS
Cadmium (µg/L) <0.080 <0.080
Calcium (mg/L) 9.31 8.99
Chloride (mg/L) 2.9 NS
Chromium (µg/L) <5.0 <5.0
Cobalt(µg/L) 14.7 13.3
Copper(µg/L) <5.0 <5.0
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 6.98 'NA
Iron (µg/L) 3310 2090
Lead (µg/L) <0.10 <0.10
Magnesium (mg/L) 1.52 1.50
Manganese (µg/L) 3580 3480
Mercury(µg/L) <0.20 NS
Molybdenum (µg/L) <0.50 <0.50
Nickel (µg/L) <5.0 <5.0
ORP (mV) 21.1 NA
Potassium (mg/L) <5.00 <5.00
Selenium (µg/L) <0.50 <0.50
Sodium (mg/L) <5.00 <5.00
Specific Conductance(µS/cm) 93.8 NA
Strontium (µg/L) 27.3 26.0
Sulfate (mg/L) 1.7 NS
Thallium (µg/L) <0.10 <0.10
TDS(mg/L) 49.0 NS
TSS(mg/L) 5.8 NS
Vanadium (µg/L) <1.0 <1.0
Zinc(µg/L) <10.0 <10.0
pH(SU) 6.8 NA
NS-Not Sampled
NA-Not Applicable

SEEP & SURFACE WATEK'zAMPLING DUKE EN..-. GY PROGRESS, INC
ASHEVILLE AIRPORT STRUCTURAL FILL
SAMPLING LOG
FIELD PERSONNEL:
syn TQrr WEATHER: 0 SUNNY OVERCAST [I RAIN TEMPERATURE(APPROX):a
148RiverSut rtehet Suite22906
NOTES.Greenvflle,So Carolina 201
64 421.9999-[phone] Fax
www.s,ynTeiracorp.cqrn
SAMPLE LOCATION ID FT) V4j1L
WATER BODY ID:
AV.STREAM WIDTH: J (FT)
AV.STREAM DEPTH: (FT) SAMPLE DATE:
WATER DEPTH: SAMPLE TIME:
. ....013 0
SAMPLE METHOD; irect Grab [I Syringe 0 Peristaltic Pump 0 Bailer ❑
TEMPERATURE DO CONDUCTANCE PH ORP* TURBIDITY*
TIME NOTES
Celsius) (mg/L) ii's/crn) (su) (MY) (NTU)
------------------
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION
6 P: tj
0
z
0
E E E
0
m
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED z Q z
Others-See COC
TDS,TSS
Sulfate,Chloride,Fluoride 1 x
Metals
COD
FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE y 'EIS NO - e
COMMENTS SKETCH xC
3'
A 0)
0�A
Associated niiddaylend-of-day DOj conductivity,pH within range?(See calibration sheet for this SaMpte dote)Cl YES 0 NO.If NO,which
parameter... NOTE.that reported data-should be considered as flagged accordingly:
SynTerra is.not NC-certified for these,parameters.Data collected for information purposes only
P:Muke Energy Progress.1 026\1 0.NC SitesISOPS,SAMPLING LOGS,FLOW LOGSkSurface Water-Seep Sampling Log TEMPLATE.doc

2015 SURFACE WATER K_._ITORING DUKE EN,,X, GY PROGRESS, INC
ASHEVILLE AIRPORT STRUCTURAL FILL ('
SURFACE WATER FLOW RATE LOG y
FIELD PERSONNEL:
y Ter WEATHER: ❑ SUNNY OVERCAST ❑ RAIN TEMPERATURE(APPROX): V 3�
148 River Street,Suite 220 NOTES' ///"'
Greenville,South Carolina 29601 if
[phone]•[phone] Fax
www.synTerracorp.com
SAMPLE LOCATION ID: ,ee, DATE: J p•-?,�5
WATER BODY ID: START TIME: V-(5
MEASURING DEVICE: r� �>!"K;✓ END TIME: U S
STREAM WIDTH: .t X 1,25lt
VOLUME TIME
(mL / L) (MIN / SEC)
COMMENTS/SKETCH:
044?4s se l ��w-F�5
P:CDuke Energy Progress.1026\10.NCSites=Ps,SAMPLING LOGS,FLOW LOGSISurface Water Flow Log-Timed Method TEMPLATE.doc

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
® 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
aceAnalytical Huntersville,NC 28078
..pacelabs_com [phone]
October 15, 2015
Program Manager
Duke Energy
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Bldg. 7405 MG30A2
Huntersville, NC 28078
RE: Project: DEP ASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Dear Program Manager:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 07, 2015.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Cam=
Chris Bishop for
Kevin Herring
[e-mail]
HORIZON Database Administrator
Enclosures
cc: Program Manager,Duke Energy
Todd Plating,Synterra
Rodney Wike,Duke Energy
Brian Wilker,Synterra
A�CRFO
w,p ,
f? REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
StThis report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 1 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
® 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
aceAnalytical Huntersville,NC 28078
www.pacelsibscom [phone]
tf
I
CERTIFICATIONS
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Minnesota Certification IDs
1700 Elm Street SE Suite 200,Minneapolis,MN 55414 Minnesota Certification#:027-053-137
A21-A Certification M 2926.01 Mississippi Certification M Pace
Alaska Certification M UST-078 Montana Certification#:MT0092
Alaska Certification#MN00064 Nevada Certification#:MN_00064
Alabama Certification#40770 Nebraska Certification M Pace
Arizona Certification#:AZ-0014 New Jersey Certification M MN-002
Arkansas Certification M 88-0680 New York Certification#:11647
California Certification M 01155CA North Carolina Certification M 530
Colorado Certification#Pace North Carolina State Public Health M 27700
Connecticut Certification M PH-0256 North Dakota Certification M R-036
EPA Region 8 Certification#:8TMS-L Ohio EPA#:4150
Florida/NELAP Certification M E87605 Ohio VAP Certification M CL101
Guam Certification#:14-008r Oklahoma Certification M 9507
Georgia Certification M 959 Oregon Certification M MN200001
Georgia EPD#:Pace Oregon Certification M MN300001
Idaho Certification M MN00064 Pennsylvania Certification#:68-00563
Hawaii Certification#MN00064 Puerto Rico Certification
Illinois Certification M 200011 Saipan(CNMI)#:MP0003
Indiana Certification#C-MN-01 South Carolina#:74003001
Iowa Certification#:368 Texas Certification M T104704192
Kansas Certification#:E-10167 Tennessee Certification M 02818
Kentucky Dept of Envi.Protection-DW#90062 Utah Certification#:MN000642013-4
Kentucky Dept of Envi.Protection-WW#:90062 Virginia DGS Certification M 251
Louisiana DEQ Certification#:3086 Washington Certification#:C486
Louisiana DHH#:LA140001 West Virginia Certification M 382
Maine Certification M 2013011 West Virginia DHHR#:9952C
Maryland Certification#:322 Wisconsin Certification#:999407970
Michigan DEPH Certification M 9909
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Drive,Asheville,NC 28804 North Carolina Wastewater Certification#:40
Florida/NELAP Certification M E87648 South Carolina Certification#:99030001
Massachusetts Certification M M-NC030 West Virginia Certification M 356
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification#:37712 Virginia/VELAP Certification#:460222
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 2 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
�Cen�,�( !n�' 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
!ie.M (�.c Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacela6scom [phone]
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
92270791001 AREA 3 FD Water 10/07/15 09:30 10/07/15 11:07
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 3 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
/+Q 17
e 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnapioal Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacelabs.eom [phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Analytes
Lab ID Sample ID Method Analysts Reported Laboratory
92270791001 AREA 3FD EPA200.7 JMW 14 PASI-A
EPA200.7 JMW 14 PASI-A
EPA200.8 RJS 10 PASI-M
EPA200.8 RJS 10 PASI-M
EPA245.1 SH1 1 PASI-A
EPA 120A MLS 1 PASI-A
SM 2320B MLS 3 PASI-A
SM 2540C SAM 1 PASI-A
SM 2540D MJP 1 PASI-A
SM 4500-0 G TEP 1 PASI-A
EPA 9040 MLS 1 PASI-A
EPA 300.0 MDW 2 PASI-A
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This.report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services;Inc.. Page 4 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
QQ J��.M, I 0 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
�CGf1Ilt�L cal Huntersville,NC 28078
tvwwRacela¢scom [phone]
SUMMARY OF DETECTION
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID
Method Parameters Result Units Report Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
92270791001 AREA 3 FD
EPA 200.7 Barium 19.7 ug/L 5.0 10/14/15 03:36
EPA 200.7 Calcium 9310 ug/L 100 10/14/15 03:36
EPA 200.7 Iron 3310 ug/L 50.0 10/14/15 03:36
EPA 200.7 Magnesium 1520 ug/L 100 10/14/15 03:36
EPA 200.7 Manganese 3580 ug/L 5.0 10/14/15 03:36
EPA 200.7 Strontium 27.3 ug/L 5.0 10/14/15 03:36
EPA 200.7 Barium,Dissolved 18.1 ug/L 5.0 10/14/15 07:17
EPA 200.7 Calcium,Dissolved 8990 ug/L 100 10/14/15 07:17
EPA 200.7 Iron,Dissolved 2090 ug/L 50.0 10/14/15 07:17
EPA 200.7 Magnesium,Dissolved 1500 ug/L 100 10/14/15 07:17
EPA 200.7 Manganese,Dissolved 3480 ug/L 5.0 10/14/15 07:17
EPA 200.7 Strontium,Dissolved 26.0 ug/L 5.0 10/14/15 07:17
EPA 200.8 Cobalt 14.7 ug/L 0.50 10/13/15 02:16
EPA 200.8 Cobalt,Dissolved 13.3 ug/L 0.50 10/13/15 22:37
EPA 120.1 Specific Conductance 78.9 umhos/cm 10.0 10/13/15 10:43
SM 2320B Alkalinity,Bicarbonate(CaCO3) 34.4 mg/L 5.0 10/13/15 19:20
SM 2320B Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3 34.4 mg/L 6.0 10/13/15 19:20
SM 2540C Total Dissolved Solids 49.0 mg/L 25.0 10/13/15 14:10
SM 2540D Total Suspended Solids 5.8 mg/L 2.5 10/09/15 11:30
SM 4500-0 G Oxygen,Dissolved 6.3 mg/L 0.10 10/09/15 12:59 H6
EPA 9040 pH 6.8 Std.Units 0.10 10/11/15 14:50 H6
EPA 300.0 Chloride 2.9 mg/L 1.0 10/11/15 13:00
EPA 300.0 Sulfate 1.7 mg/L 1.0 10/11/15 13:00
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 5 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
axAnalytical Huntersville,NC 28078
www.pacelibs.com [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: EPA 200.7
Description: 200.7 MET ICP
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for EPA 200.7. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Sample Preparation:
The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 200.7 with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations(including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
QC Batch:MPRP/19750
A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate(MS/MSD)were performed on the following sample(s): 92270715001,92270724003
M1:Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample(LCS)recovery.
•MS (Lab ID:1578434)
•Calcium
•Sodium
•MSD (Lab ID:1578341)
•Calcium
•MSD (Lab ID:1578435)
•Sodium
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 6 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
+ e 9800 Suite 100 Huntersv Ile,NC aceAnalytcal
www.pacelabs com [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: EPA 200.7
Description: 200.7 MET ICP,Dissolved
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for EPA 200.7. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Sample Preparation:
The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 200.7 with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations(including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
QC Batch:MPRP/19792
A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate(MS/MSD)were performed on the following sample(s): 92269786013,92271184002
M1:Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample(LCS)recovery.
•MS (Lab ID:1581374)
•Calcium,Dissolved
•Potassium,Dissolved
•Sodium,Dissolved
•MSD (Lab ID:1581375)
•Sodium,Dissolved
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 7 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalXical Huntersville,NC 28078
www.pacelabs.com [phone]
t
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: EPA 200.8
Description: 200.8 MET ICPMS
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for EPA 200.8. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Sample Preparation:
The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 200.8 with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations(including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Internal Standards:
All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 8 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
a^Q n�,�j 'n�� 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Mi Huntersville,NC 28078
www,.pacelab&com [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: EPA 200.8
Description: 200.8 MET ICPMS,Dissolved
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for EPA 200.8. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Sample Preparation:
The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 200.8 with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations(including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Internal Standards:
All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 9 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
Q p., I ® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aCG/1!/m1I1CI Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacelabs.com. [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: EPA 245.1
Description: 245.1 Mercury
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for EPA 245.1. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Sample Preparation:
The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 245.1 with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations(including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 10 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
ane/I ql 'r�' 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
trG`fil( y•V Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacelaps,Cgm [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: EPA 120.1
Description: 120.1 Specific Conductance
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for EPA 120.1. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Duplicate Sample:
All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 11 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
`D 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnaiXical Huntersville,NC 28078
www.pacelabsgom [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: SM 2320B
Description: 2320B Alkalinity
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for SM 2320B. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
QC Batch:WET/40775
A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate(MS/MSD)were performed on the following sample(s): 92271113002,92271184002
MI:Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample(LCS)recovery.
•MS (Lab ID:1580162)
•Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3
•MS (Lab ID:1580164)
•Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3
•MSD (Lab ID:1580163)
•Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3
•MSD (Lab ID:1580165)
•Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 12 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceAnalytical® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacelaps.cora [phone]
i
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: SM 2540C
Description: 2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for SM 2540C. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Duplicate Sample:
All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 13 of 39

Pace Analytical Services„Inc.
ace_Analytical a 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacelab com [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: SM 2540D
Description: 2540D Total Suspended Solids
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for SM 2540D. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below:
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Duplicate Sample:
All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 14 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
CZCP/11lC11�� [�� 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
V VG• Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpgcelateoom [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: SM 4500-0 G
Description: 4500 OG Oxygen,Dissolved
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for SM 4500-0 G. All samples were received in acceptable condition with,any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
H6:Analysis initiated outside of the 15 minute EPA recommended holding time.
•AREA 3 FD (Lab ID:92270791001)
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Duplicate Sample:
All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
Analyte Comments:
QC Batch:WET/40740
•AREA 3 FD (Lab ID:92270791001)
•Oxygen,Dissolved
•DUP (Lab ID:1579080)
•Oxygen,Dissolved
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 15 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceAnalytical 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacelabs.com [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: EPA 9040
Description: 9040 pH
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for EPA 9040. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SCUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
H6:Analysis initiated outside of the 15 minute EPA recommended holding time.
•AREA 3 FD (Lab ID:92270791001)
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Duplicate Sample:
All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 16 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalytical Huntersville,NC 28078
—..pacelaftc_cm [phone]
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Method: EPA 300.0
Description: 300.0 IC Anions 28 Days,LL
Client: Duke Energy
Date: October 15,2015
General Information:
1 sample was analyzed for EPA 300.0. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions,noted below or on the
chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form(SOUR)attached at the end of this report.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations(including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank,where applicable,with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
This data package has been reviewed for quality and completeness and is approved for release.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 17 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalXical Huntersville,NC 28078
wmpacelabs.ccm [phone]
i
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Sample: AREA 3 FD Lab ID: 92270791001 Collected: 10/07/15 09:30 Received: 10/07/15 11:07 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Aluminum ND ug/L 100 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7429-90-5
Barium 19.7 ug/L 5.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-39-3
Boron ND ug/L 50.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-42-8
Calcium 9310 ug/L 100 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-70-2
Chromium ND ug/L 5.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-47-3
Copper ND ug/L 5.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15,03:36 7440-50-8
Iron 3310 ug/L 50.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7439-89-6
Magnesium 1520 ug/L 100 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7439-95-4
Manganese 3580 ug/L 5.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7439-96-5
Nickel ND ug/L 5.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-02-0
Potassium ND ug/L 5000 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-09-7
Sodium ND ug/L 5000 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-23-5
Strontium 27.3 ug/L 5.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-24-6
Zinc ND ug/L 10.0 1 10/08/15 19:00 10/14/15 03:36 7440-66-6
200.7 MET ICP,Dissolved Analytical Method:EPA 200.7 Preparation Method:EPA 200.7
Aluminum,Dissolved ND ug/L 100 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7429-90-5
Barium,Dissolved 18.1 ug/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-39-3
Boron,Dissolved ND ug/L 50.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-42-8
Calcium,Dissolved 8990 ug/L 100 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-70-2
Chromium,Dissolved ND ug/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-47-3
Copper,Dissolved ND ug/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-50-8
Iron,Dissolved 2090 ug/L 50.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7439-89-6
Magnesium,Dissolved 1500 ug/L 100 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7439-95-4
Manganese,Dissolved 3480 ug/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7439-96-5
Nickel,Dissolved ND ug/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-02-0
Potassium,Dissolved ND ug/L 5000 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-09-7
Sodium,Dissolved ND ug/L 5000 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-23-5
Strontium,Dissolved 26.0 ug/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-24-6
Zinc,Dissolved ND ug/L 10.0 1 10/13/15 18:02 10/14/15 07:17 7440-66-6
200.8 MET ICPMS Analytical Method:EPA200.8 Preparation Method:EPA200.8
Antimony ND ug/L 0.50 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7440-36-0
Arsenic ND ug/L 0.50 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7440-38-2
Beryllium ND ug/L 0.20 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7440-41-7
Cadmium ND ug/L 0.080 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7440-43-9
Cobalt 14.7 ug/L 0.50 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7440-48-4
Lead ND ug/L 0.10 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7439-92-1
Molybdenum ND ug/L 0.50 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7439-98-7
Selenium ND ug/L 0.50 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7782-49-2
Thallium ND ug/L 0.10 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7440-28-0
Vanadium ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/11/15 17:59 10/13/15 02:16 7440-62-2
200.8 MET ICPMS,Dissolved Analytical Method:EPA 200.8 Preparation Method:EPA 200.8
Antimony,Dissolved ND ug/L 0.50 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7440-36-0
Arsenic,Dissolved ND ug/L 0.50 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7440-38-2
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 18 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
'® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalytical Huntersville,NC 28078
"paoelabs.pm [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Sample: AREA 3 FD Lab ID: 92270791001 Collected: 10/07/15 09:30 Received: 10/07/15 11:07 , Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
200.8 MET ICPMS,Dissolved Analytical Method:EPA 200.8 Preparation Method:EPA 200.8
Beryllium,Dissolved ND ug/L 0.20 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7440-41-7
Cadmium,Dissolved ND ug/L 0.080 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7440-43-9
Cobalt,Dissolved 13.3 ug/L 0.50 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7440-48-4
Lead,Dissolved ND ug/L 0.10 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7439-92-1
Molybdenum,Dissolved ND ug/L 0.50 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7439-98-7
Selenium,Dissolved ND ug/L 0.50 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7782-49-2
Thallium,Dissolved ND ug/L 0.10 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7440-28-0
Vanadium,Dissolved ND ug/L 1.0 1 10/12/15 14:30 10/13/15 22:37 7440-62-2
245.1 Mercury Analytical Method:EPA 245.1 Preparation Method:EPA 245.1
Mercury ND ug/L 0.20 1 10/09/1513:30 10/1311514:10 7439-97-6
120.1 Specific Conductance Analytical Method:EPA 120.1
Specific Conductance 78.9 umhos/cm 10.0 1 10/13/15 10:43
2320B Alkalinity Analytical Method:SM 2320B
Alkalinity,Bicarbonate(CaCO3) 34.4 mg/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 19:20
Alkalinity,Carbonate(CaCO3) ND mg/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 19:20
Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3 34.4 mg/L 5.0 1 10/13/15 19:20
2540C Total Dissolved Solids Analytical Method:SM 2540C
Total Dissolved Solids 49.0 mg/L 25.0 1 10/13/15 14:10
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method:SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids 5.8 mg/L 2.5 1 10/09/15 11:30
4500 OG Oxygen,Dissolved Analytical Method:SM 4500-0 G
Oxygen,Dissolved 6.3 mg/L 0.10 1 10/09/15 12:59 7782-44-7 H6
9040 pH Analytical Method:EPA 9040
pH 6.8 Std.Units 0.10 1 10/11/15 14:50 H6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days,LL Analytical Method:EPA 300.0
Chloride 2.9 mg/L 1.0 1 10/11/1513:00 16887-00-6
Sulfate 1.7 mg/L 1.0 1 10/11/1513:00 14808-79-8
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 19 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800
IRCI lytical® Huntersv Ile,NC128078
wwwpacelabs oom [phone]
I
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: MERP/8506 Analysis Method: EPA 245.1
QC Batch Method: EPA 245.1 Analysis Description: 245.1 Mercury
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 1578875 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Mercury ug/L ND 0.20 10/13/1513:03
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1578876
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Mercury ug/L 2.5 2.6 104 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1578877 1578878
MS MSD
92270390006 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qua]
Mercury ug/L ND 2.5 2.5 2.8 2.6 110 103 70-130 6 20
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1578879 1578880
MS MSD
92270390007 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qua[
Mercury ug/L ND 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.7 104 105 70-130 1 20
Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 20 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceMaiXical @ 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite100
Huntersviile,NC 28078078
wvAy.Pacelabs com [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: MPRP/19750 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 1578155 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L ND 100 10/14/15 02:33
Barium ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 02:33
Boron ug/L ND 50.0 10/14/15 02:33
Calcium ug/L ND 100 10/14/15 02:33
Chromium ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 02:33
Copper ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 02:33
Iron ug/L ND 50.0 10/14/15 02:33
Magnesium ug/L ND 100 10/14/15 02:33
Manganese ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 02:33
Nickel ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 02:33
Potassium ug/L ND 5000 10/14/15 02:33
Sodium ug/L ND 5000 10/14/15 02:33
Strontium ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 02:33
Zinc ug/L ND 10.0 10/14/15 02:33
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1578156
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Aluminum ug/L 5000 4860 97 85-115
Barium ug/L 500 476 95 85-115
Boron ug/L 500 458 92 85-115
Calcium ug/L 5000 4650 93 85-115
Chromium ug/L 500 490 98 85-115
Copper ug/L 500 496 99 85-115
Iron ug/L 5000 4700 94 85-115
Magnesium ug/L 5000 4880 98 85-115
Manganese ug/L 500 494 99 85-115
Nickel ug/L 500 477 95 85-115
Potassium ug/L 5000 4770J 95 85-115
Sodium ug/L 5000 4870J 97 85-115
Strontium ug/L 500 480 96 85-115
Zinc ug/L 500 465 93 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1578340 1578341
MS MSD
92270724003 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Aluminum ug/L ND 5000 5000 5370 4860 107 96 70-130 10 20
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 21 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
Q/�,, ® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
1-4afti tical Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpatiela¢scom [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1578340 1578341
MS MSD
92270724003 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Barium ug/L 12.8 500 500 535 484 104 94 70-130 10 20
Boron ug/L 51.7 500 500 558 505 101 91 70-130 10 20
Calcium ug/L 8510 5000 5000 12500 12000 80 69 70-130 4 20 M1
Chromium ug/L ND 500 500 542 485 108 97 70-130 11 20
Copper ug/L 61.0 500 500 601 544 108 97 70-130 10 20
Iron ug/L 63.6 5000 5000 5210 4700 103 93 70-130 10 20'
Magnesium ug/L 2100 5000 5000 7360 6750 105 93 70-130 9 20
Manganese ug/L 37.3 500 500 565 510 106 95 70-130 10 20
Nickel ug/L ND 500 500 524 469 105 94 70-130 11 20
Potassium ug/L ND 5000 5000 7130 6570 104 92 70-130 8 20
Sodium ug/L 8470 5000 5000 13600 12900 102 89 70-130 5 20
Strontium ug/L 38.9 500 500 - 564 511 105 94 70-130 10 20
Zinc ug/L ND 500 500 521 467 103 92 70-130 11 20
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1578434 1578435
MS MSD
92270715001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Aluminum ug/L ND 5000 5000 4980 4900 99 97 70-130 2 20
Barium ug/L ND 500 500 461 453 92 91 70-130 2 20
Boron ug/L 54.3 500 500 529 528 95 95 70-130 0 20
Calcium ug/L 57600 5000 5000 60100 62300 51 95 70-130 4 20 M1
Chromium ug/L ND 500 500 492 483 98 96 70-130 2 20
Copper ug/L 11.0 500 500 526 517 103 101 70-130 2 20
Iron ug/L 122 5000 5000 4640 4530 90 88 70-130 2 20
Magnesium ug/L 20900 5000 5000 24700 25200 76 87 70-130 2 20
Manganese ug/L 16.7 500 500 503 493 97 95 70-130 2 20
Nickel ug/L ND 500 500 456 450 90 89 70-130 1 20
Potassium ug/L 42300 5000 5000 46200 47700 78 108 70-130 3 20
Sodium ug/L 802000 5000 5000 785000 804000 -336 38 70-130 2 20 M1
Strontium ug/L 215 500 500 691 690 95 95 70-130 0 20
Zinc ug/L 126 500 500 590 587 93 92 70-130 1 20
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 22 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnaOcal Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwp&cela6s.com [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: MPRP/19792 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET Dissolved
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 1581370 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Aluminum,Dissolved ug/L ND 100 10/14/15 06:32
Barium,Dissolved ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 06:32
Boron,Dissolved ug/L ND 50.0 10/14/15 06:32
Calcium,Dissolved ug/L ND 100 10/14/15 06:32
Chromium,Dissolved ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 06:32
Copper,Dissolved ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 06:32
Iron,Dissolved ug/L ND 50.0 10/14/15 06:32
Magnesium,Dissolved ug/L ND 100 10/14/15 06:32
Manganese,Dissolved ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 06:32
Nickel,Dissolved ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 06:32
Potassium,Dissolved ug/L ND 5000 10/14/16 06:32
Sodium,Dissolved ug/L ND 5000 10/14/15 06:32
Strontium,Dissolved ug/L ND 5.0 10/14/15 06:32
Zinc,Dissolved ug/L ND 10.0 10/14/15 06:32
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1581371
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Aluminum,Dissolved ug/L 5000 5200 104 85-115
Barium,Dissolved ug/L 500 506 101 85-115
Boron,Dissolved ug/L 500 494 99 85-115
Calcium,Dissolved ug/L 5000 4970 99 85-115
Chromium,Dissolved ug/L 500 529 106 85-115
Copper,Dissolved ug/L 500 519 104 85-115
Iron,Dissolved ug/L 5000 5010 100 85-115
Magnesium,Dissolved ug/L 5000 5270 105 85-115
Manganese,Dissolved ug/L 500 534 107 85-115
Nickel,Dissolved ug/L 500 506 101 85-115
Potassium,Dissolved ug/L 5000 5090 102 85-115
Sodium,Dissolved ug/L 5000 5260 105 85-115
Strontium,Dissolved ug/L 500 514 103 85-115
Zinc,Dissolved ug/L 500 501 100 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1581372 1581373
MS MSD
92269786013 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Aluminum,Dissolved ug/L ND 5000 5000 4960 4980 99 100 70-130 0 20
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 23 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
" 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
IreAnalytical lHuntersville,NC 28078
www.pacelapscom [phone]
t
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1581372 1581373
MS MSD
92269786013 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Cone. Cone. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Barium,Dissolved ug/L 0.015 500 500 491 493 95 95 70-130 0 20
mg/L
Boron,Dissolved ug/L ND 500 500 488 495 96 98 70-130 1 20
Calcium,Dissolved ug/L 17.2 mg/L 5000 5000 21600 21600 89 88 70-130 0 20
Chromium,Dissolved ug/L ND 500 500 504 510 101 102 70-130 1 20
Copper,Dissolved ug/L ND 500 500 490 499 98 100 70-130 2 20
Iron,Dissolved ug/L ND 5000 5000 4730 4740 94 95 70-130 0 20
Magnesium,Dissolved ug/L 3.6 mg/L 5000 5000 8580 8690 99 101 70-130 1 20
Manganese,Dissolved ug/L 0.020 500 500 527 534 101 103 70-130 1 20
mg/L
Nickel,Dissolved ug/L ND 500 500 477 481 95 96 70-130 1 20
Potassium,Dissolved ug/L ND 5000 5000 6430 6440 97 97 70-130 0 20
Sodium,Dissolved ug/L 8.7 mg/L 5000 5000 13600 13600 97 97 70-130 0 20
Strontium,Dissolved ug/L 1.1 mg/L 500 500 1580 1580 95 96 70-130 0 20
Zinc,Dissolved ug/L 0.0026J 500 500 492 495 98 99 70-130 1 20
mg/L
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1581374 1581375
MS MSD
92271184002 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Cone. Cone. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Aluminum,Dissolved ug/L 0.65 mg/L 5000 5000 5670 5250 100 92 70-130 8 20
Barium,Dissolved ug/L 0.39 mg/L 500 500 868 839 95 89 70-130 3 20
Boron,Dissolved ug/L ND 500 500 537 515 103 99 70-130 4 20
Calcium,Dissolved ug/L 126 mg/L 5000 5000 127000 130000 32 86 70-130 2 20 M1
Chromium,Dissolved ug/L 0.0042J 500 500 513 489 102 97 70-130 5 20
mg/L
Copper,Dissolved ug/L 0.14 mg/L 500 500 660 642 104 100 70-130 3 20
Iron,Dissolved ug/L 0.080 5000 5000 4800 4400 95 86 70-130 9 20
mg/L
Magnesium,Dissolved ug/L ND 5000 5000 4860 4630 97 92 70-130 5 20
Manganese,Dissolved ug/L ND 500 500 505 484 101 96 70-130 4 20
Nickel,Dissolved ug/L ND 500 500 470 511 94 102 70-130 8 20
Potassium,Dissolved ug/L 306 mg/L 5000 5000 306000 310000 -16 80 70-130 2 20 M1
Sodium,Dissolved ug/L 255 mg/L 5000 5000 256000 262000 24 132 70-130 2 20 M1
Strontium,Dissolved ug/L 9.4 mg/L 500 500 9760 9960 75 115 70-130 2 20
Zinc,Dissolved ug/L 0.027 500 500 511 552 97 105 70-130 8 20
mg/L
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 24 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalytical 9800 Huntersville,NC 28078
www.pacelabsxorn [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: MPRP/58623 Analysis Method: EPA 200.8
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.8 Analysis Description: 200.8 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 2103880 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Antimony ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 01:46
Arsenic ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 01:46
Beryllium ug/L ND 0.20 10/13/15 01:46
Cadmium ug/L ND 0.080 10/13/15 01:46
Cobalt ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 01:46
Lead ug/L ND 0.10 10/13/15 01:46
Molybdenum ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 01:46
Selenium ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 01:46
Thallium ug/L ND 0.10 10/13/15 01:46
Vanadium ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/15 01:46
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2103881
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Cone. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Antimony ug/L 80 76.6 96 85-115
Arsenic ug/L 80 74.8 93 85-115
Beryllium ug/L 80 75.3 94 85-115
Cadmium ug/L 80 76.0 95 85-115
Cobalt ug/L 80 76.6 96 85-115
Lead ug/L 80 76.9 96 85-115
Molybdenum ug/L 80 77.2 97 85-115
Selenium ug/L 80 76.8 96 85-115
Thallium ug/L 80 77.5 97 85-115
Vanadium ug/L 80 79.4 99 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2103882 2103883
MS MSD
92270791001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Cone. Cone. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Antimony ug/L ND 80 80 76.8 76.0 96 95 70-130 1 20
Arsenic ug/L ND 80 80 74.2 74.0 92 92 70-130 0 20
Beryllium ug/L ND 80 80 77.6 74.4 97 93 70-130 4 20
Cadmium ug/L ND 80 80 76.2 75.6 95 94 70-130 1 20
Cobalt ug/L 14.7 80 80 91.7 91.2 96 96 70-130 1 20
Lead ug/L ND 80 80 77.4 76.2 97 95 70-130 2 20
Molybdenum ug/L ND 80 80 77.4 77.3 97 97 70-130 0 20
Selenium ug/L ND 80 80 76.6 75.5 96 94 70-130 1 20
Thallium ug/L ND 80 80 78.1 76.9 98 96 70-130 2 20
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 25 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aAnalical® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
ce Huntersville,NG28078
wwwpacelala.ccm [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2103882 2103883
MS MSD
92270791001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Vanadium ug/L ND 80 80 79.6 79.0 99 99 70-130 1 20
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 26 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
drQ n_�I 'n�' 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Vem yti Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpaoela¢s..cam [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: MPRP/58629 Analysis Method: EPA 200.8
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.8 Analysis Description: 200.8 MET Dissolved
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 2103916 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Antimony,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 22:09
Arsenic,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 22:09
Beryllium,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.20 10/13/15 22:09
Cadmium,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.080 10/13/15 22:09
Cobalt,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 22:09
Lead,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.10 10/13/15 22:09
Molybdenum,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 22:09
Selenium,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.50 10/13/15 22:09
Thallium,Dissolved ug/L ND 0.10 10/13/15 22:09
Vanadium,Dissolved ug/L ND 1.0 10/13/15 22:09
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 2103917
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Antimony,Dissolved ug/L 80 70.3 88 85-115
Arsenic,Dissolved ug/L 80 69.6 87 85-115
Beryllium,Dissolved ug/L 80 72.5 91 85-115
Cadmium,Dissolved ug/L 80 69.1 86 85-115
Cobalt,Dissolved ug/L 80 70.0 87 85-115
Lead,Dissolved ug/L 80 69.9 87 85-115
Molybdenum,Dissolved ug/L 80 68.5 86 85-115
Selenium,Dissolved ug/L 80 70.8 89 85-115
Thallium,Dissolved ug/L 80 68.9 86 85-115
Vanadium,Dissolved ug/L 80 71.4 89 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE 8 MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2103918 2103919
MS MSD
92270791001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Antimony,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 79.5 74.3 99 93 70-130 7 20
Arsenic,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 78.6 74.1 98 92 70-130 6 20
Beryllium,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 80.1 79.3 100 99 70-130 1 20
Cadmium,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 78.6 74.2 98 93 70-130 6 20
Cobalt,Dissolved ug/L 13.3 80 80 93.8 88.8 101 94 70-130 5 20
Lead,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 79.2 75.0 99 94 70-130 5 20
Molybdenum,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 77.2 73.6 96 92 70-130 5 20
Selenium,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 80.4 77.8 100 97 70-130 3 20
Thallium,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 80.3 75.2 100 94 70-130 7 20
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 27 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalytcal Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacela4cpm [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
'Pace Project No.: 92270791
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 2103918 2103919
MS MSD
92270791001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Vanadium,Dissolved ug/L ND 80 80 81.6 76.1 102 95 70-130 7 20
Results.presented on this pageare In the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 28 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aCoAnalXical Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacetabs.Fom [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: WET/40799 Analysis Method: EPA 120.1
QC Batch Method: EPA 120.1 Analysis Description: 120.1 Specific Conductance
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 1580977 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Specific Conductance umhos/cm ND 10.0 10/13/15 10:43
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1580978
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Specific Conductance umhos/cm 1410 1440 102 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1580979
92270312001 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Specific Conductance umhos/cm 704 708 1 10
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1580980
92270758003 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Specific Conductance umhos/cm 274 275 0 10
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:1'0/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 29 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
a1111 ceAnalytical Huntersville,NC 28078
www.pacelabs.com [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: WET/40775 Analysis Method: SM 2320B
QC Batch Method: SM 2320B Analysis Description: 2320E Alkalinity
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 1580160 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Alkalinity,Carbonate(CaCO3) mg/L ND 5.0 10/13/15 16:23
Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3 mg/L ND 5.0 10/13/15 16:23
Alkalinity,Bicarbonate(CaCO3) mg/L ND 5.0 10/13/15 16:23
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1580161
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3 mg/L 50 50.6 101 90-110
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1580162 1580163
MS MSD
92271113002 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qua[
Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3 mg/L 226 50 50 256 259 60 65 90-110 1 4 M1
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1580164 1580165
MS MSD
92271184002 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Alkalinity,Total as CaCO3 mg/L 1060 50 50 1570 1550 1010 980 90-110 1 4 M1
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 30 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalytcal Huntersville,NC 28078
—paoalabs.Com _ [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: WET/40788 Analysis Method: SM 2540C
QC Batch Method: SM 2540C Analysis Description: 2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 1580725 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L ND 25.0 10/13/15 14:09
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1580726
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 250 246 98 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1580727
92271240004 Dup _ Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 382 374 2 5
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1580773 ,
92270968001 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L ND ND 5
Results presented on this page are Inthe units indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 31 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
aceAnalytical Huntersville,NC 28078
www.Pacalabs.com [phone]
f
a
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: -92270791
QC Batch: WET/40730 Analysis Method: SM 2540D
QC Batch Method: SM 2540D Analysis Description: 2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 1578803 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND 2.5 10/09/15 11:27
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1578804
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 250 242 97 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1578805
92270696003 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND ND 5
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1578806
92270767002 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND ND 5
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 32 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800® Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalXical Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacefabscom [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: WET/40740 Analysis Method: SM 4500-0 G
QC Batch Method: SM 4500-0 G Analysis Description: 45000G Oxygen,Dissolved
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1579080
92270791001 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
Oxygen,Dissolved mg/L 6.3 6.2 0 10 H6
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 33 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
g 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
�ce,/� I 1Xiol Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacela6s.Com [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: WET/40770 Analysis Method: EPA 9040
QC Batch Method: EPA 9040 Analysis Description: 9040 pH
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1580078
92270982001 Dup Max
Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers
pH Sid.Units 9.1 9.1 0 9 H6
Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 34 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
�VG q,,,�r 'n�' 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
ceM lXjo Huntersville,NC 28078
"'x' wwwpacatabs.com [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
QC Batch: WETA/24913 Analysis Method: EPA 300.0
QC Batch Method: EPA 300.0 Analysis Description: 300.0 IC Anions;Low Level
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
METHOD BLANK: 1579990 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92270791001
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Chloride mg/L ND 1.0 10/11/1513:00
Sulfate mg/L ND 1.0 10/11/1513:00
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1579991
Spike LCS LCS %Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result %Rec Limits Qualifiers
Chloride mg/L 20 20.5 103 90-110
Sulfate mg/L 20 20.2 101 90-110
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1579992 1579993
MS MSD
92269238007 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Chloride mg/L ND 20 20 19.9 19.8 98 98 90-110 0 10
Sulfate mg/L ND, 20 20 19.5 19.5 98 97 90-110 0 10
MATRIX SPIKE&MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1579994 1579995
MS MSD
92269253005 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD %Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result %Rec %Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Chloride mg/L ND 20 20 19.9 19.9 98 98 90-110 0 10
Sulfate mg/L ND 20 20 19.6 19.5 98 98 90-110 0 10
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the"Units"column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 35 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalytical Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacelabs.com [phone]
1
QUALIFIERS
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
DEFINITIONS
DF-Dilution Factor,if reported,represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND-Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J-Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL-Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL-Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL-Reporting Limit.
S-Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270.The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines,unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate%recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D)-Laboratory Control Sample(Duplicate)
MS(D)-Matrix Spike(Duplicate)
DUP-Sample Duplicate
RPD-Relative Percent Difference
NC-Not Calculable.
SG-Silica Gel-Clean-Up
U-Indicates the compound was analyzed for,but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether,Styrene,and Vinyl chloride.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA
Method 8260.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited.Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI-The NELAC Institute.
LABORATORIES
PASI-A Pace Analytical Services-Asheville
PASI-M Pace Analytical Services-Minneapolis
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
H6 Analysis initiated outside of the 15 minute EPA recommended holding time.
M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample(LCS)recovery.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 36 of 39

Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
aceAnalytical® 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville,NC 28078
wwwpacelabs.com [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: DEPASHEVILLE 1026.02
Pace Project No.: 92270791
Analytical
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method Batch
92270791001 AREA 3 FD EPA 200.7 MPRP/19750 EPA 200.7 ICP/17805
92270791001 AREA 3 FD EPA 200.7 MPRP/19792 EPA 200.7 ICP/17846
92270791001 AREA 3 FD EPA 200.8 MPRP/58623 EPA 200.8 ICPM/26897
92270791001 AREA 3 FD EPA 200.8 MPRP/58629 EPA 200.8 ICPM/26923
92270791001 AREA 3 FD EPA 245.1 MERP/8506 EPA 245.1 MERC/8172
92270791001 AREA 3 FD EPA 120.1 WET/40799
92270791001 AREA 3 FD SM 2320B WET/40775
92270791001 AREA 3 FD SM 2540C WET/40788
92270791001 AREA 3 FD SM 2540D WET/40730
92270791001 AREA 3 FD SM 4500-0 G WET/40740
92270791001 AREA 3 FD EPA 9040 WET/40770
92270791001 AREA 3 FD EPA 300.0 WETA/24913
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
Date:10/15/2015 05:53 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.. Page 37 of 39

Dc ant Name &4rr pie'Condition Upon Dc :nt Revised;May 16,2015 i
Al Receipt(SCURj Pa a I-of 2*
.. wuvtiy.ra'ecolnis.cgno:, ..- - - .�•~ . +.
poc`utrient No•,''� Issl ing Atithorit es: ;
F-ASV-CS=003-rev.,14 Pace Asheville Qualify Office' .
Client Na r"I Irv: Page.2 of 2 is for Internal Use Only
Courier(Ciro.le): Fed Ex UPS USPS Client Commercial, Pace Other . s
Custody Seal on Cooler/Box Present: 0 ,yos "n6 Seals intact: [l :yes 0 nc
{ � .4
Packing Material: 0 Bubble W_ _ Bubble Bags None _ Other ,._.
Therniortleter Used;IR untl3.13026 963 Type of Ice: Wet Blue Node 1fj Samples on ice,cooling process has begun
IR,Gun its€SN:140290366 ' er:
Temp Correction Factior; Add/Subtract 0 C
Corrected Cooler Temp.: �. C I31ologlcal Tissue Is' rozon.-,'Yes I 0 NIA
Date and Initials qf pprson ex i 4iing }
contents: 0 S
Temp should be above freezing to 6°0 Commontsc, i
Chain of Custody Present; Yes-,C]No ' ONiA_ 1,
IChain of Custody,Filled Out:, a"s :ONO, ONIA 2,
Chain of Custody Relinquished: Yes ONO 'CINIA 3.
Sampler Name.&Signature on COC: Yes ONO I3NIti 4.
Samples Arrived within Flold Time: Yes 13No C]wn S. ;
5horg I foiti Time Analysts(<72hr): . - OYes No i7NIA 6._,
:
IRush Turn Around Tlme Requested: Oyes . No ON/A 7,
Sufficient Volume:. JAS',ONo ONA 8.• , i
Correct Containers Used: XJYes ONO .OtgA 9. >
-Pace Containers Used: (( Yes,ONO ❑NIA
Containers Intact, Yes LINO •ONIA 10:.
Filtered volume'received for Dissolved tests Yes. ONO ONIA 11.
Sample.Labels match COO: yes ©No ❑NIA 12:
-Includes datel'tirne/ID/Analysis Matrix:
ClI oontainers,needing preservation have been checked.
Yes ❑No ONIA 13.
lli conlainers needing preservailon are found to be In i
compliance.wHh EPA recommendation. ,dyes L7No fON/A i
oxcoprions;VOA, conform,Toc,`O&G,W1-DR0(�12ter) Oyes . Klo
Samples'checked for dechlorination OYes, QNo 01A 14,
t eadspace in VOA Vials(>6mm): Dyes Elko 16.
Trip Blank Present: ❑Yes ONO �2SNIA 16,
)'rip BlankCustody Seals,Present Dyes ONO QMIA
Pace Trip Blank Lot#(if purchased),
liont Notification/-Resolution: Field Data t e.quired? Y / N -
Person Contacted: Date/Time,
Comments'/Resolution:
t
t:CURF Reviews bate: /Oh./S-
W0 ® 1922,70791
8RF.Rioview Daio:
Note: Whenever theNi discrepancy affecting North Carolina
Note: Whenever the Ni II'II� ')I I I I III'II 'II
compliance samples,a copy of this form will be,sent to the North 92270791
Carolina DEHNR Certification Office( .e out of hold,Incorrect
preservative,out of temp,incorrect containers)
i '
Page 38 of 36 $ `

'OF-7CUSTODY[Anal tic 2 .1
Dy nne
�TheC�hain-of-Cuslody-is.a.LAGALWCViV.Et4,T.,A]I rei6,yantfields must be,corKpleted accurately
ce)
CD
Section A Section Section q
Rectulked Client Information. Requiro'd Pr6ject-Inl6rmation., Invoice Information:
ny:
N Attention:
Address
Copy
TO.
COmPaqyNamc.,
NPDES" T GROUN
D r-7 QRINKJNGWATr=R
P,urchase.OrderNo
Pace Quota
f ACP UST A i
OTHEK
Referencr.
Sit LO
?bone.* Narpm.
Al:,,
.A, 64L Manager'
Requestad DuctData[TAT..- Project Numb Ipace
SectionlD
COLLECTED 'pMseplatives
_IKI J, k�
W.:lDrinkir`4 z
VVV .8
0
WasteVater WW, 4, cowOSIFE�, composms,
-_=GRAS
Product P !ZTAR,
SL
�Al Oil OL:
PMU3T Wipe'
Air,. AR 7 LIJ
w-
ZT0
-,:DATE 'a
'DATE�,� TIME 3- ME'! Di:c z z 15�
iiW Ar Pace Project NolLab].D
tz rls�sue
Jt,� (t JS 0, %
Othei�
73
U 0 016
0� 1. 0
Z*� &!
Tf
7, F
4
7, L
A
'-210
ADOi IAL COMMENTS T-T-1
7
7—
DATE 71ME ;AC TER FILIALIO
-TIME SAI MPLE CONDMONS,
AL �SAMgLER NA ME AND
�07 11-11,1G.IN , SIGNATURE
C0
PRINT Name ol`SAMPLERd .
',SlGNATUREo fSAMP'LE DATE Signed
(MM/DDAY):
/0 _OA5
Y. fq?inq,totap

-�,s' .,� t "t ,. k J, •ik �' `��`�� ,� $e �,t �i �°�.""�v'A'`
-_ y e •" '1 g •y'4
N9 a
55 a
f•ss�- r.1t. ,a t- �c `, a a
�e I�tf" sV ,,; k.,a � �� a,^ J, �a""�g•. .. V �cra�. 1� �,,e. ' -,tkY„M. �,-'..
t'it. ® a n4 A F
Mr f•�,ee.,1 ,�}J§`)�i� a6, � �;�• �Jti " q �g Y'`�g :F S. 1'fi't�''a 1?S'�' �j.
WIN,
f„"Tflfi4 yy;:� �,a y � `�.,8 §ql�� d n °�+• .L �' �'S {72� "h7 i`�1IW��..
b
1 � j
.DLO •_ J. �_ �� � t � x .. �-,.MJ � •a
,. _ ` �1`��
na
t�: � ,,' ,. _. ;: x.. `-•rC"� .y^:M# ` a�;r�""Xc, � YL-'g' R'";3 � �t✓�+. .q � �"'' " "'`� �`M1" � � "r"�W"i t
{sr,
Fix
G �o MW5-A4 MW5D-A4 a 4., xs Z w p�_� s';are " ' �aGG_+p �,���°� r+� .$ �2. €m �' t �" �' :a�a �.a�� .: 4 d8�<:.. `a an :"� f,1 q �� •g•
�.,.
., .t 5' � `o`p ,. � '�.^�,.;:.` ..+'��.;,;? ,. � '�+,„.ACCESS THALLE CONSTRUCTION F .•�Jz .. � ., .,�-`s Y " s ua#..»: � �l�l�: �,.
nfivu
p� c g�
4
v
e-
_
' ,�*4sR S �'I,E MYY�.�A'4 ��.. �9•�SfS'I ��°1���%tl F• '�.3,'�� ��� Neat^
LEGEND
--- PROPERTY LINE F MW9 Ad + �t �
t
® � COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY II ENTIN ONDa� T"
\` 2 x
®®® REVIEW BOUNDARY ��
0WSr AREA 1 MONITORING WELL -
M2= 3 AREA 3 MONITORING WELL
ff
.e
MW9=A4 AREA MONITORING WELL GRAPHIC SCALE
m MW-3 MONITORING WELL NOT SAMPLED 400 0 400 800 FIGURE 1
148 IN FEET 220 AREA 3 FD LOCATION MAP
AREA 1 SURFACE WATER GREERIVERLE,SOUTH CAR LIN
GREENVILLE,SOUTHCAROLINA29601 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
NEW PROPERTYLINE ref.dwOBTAINED FROM CNARANDRAWING wHONE 864-421-9999 ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
15701xbasearea2-zrefdwg RECEIVED ON DUNE 23,2015.COMPLIANCE AND W W W.syntefracofp.cOm
PROPERTY
BOUNDARIES FORARED AWING. 4 REVISED BASED ON THENEW ���i C3 ARDEN NORTH CAROLINA
PROPERTY LINE FROM ORCHARAHARE DRAWING. DRAWN BY:JOHN CHASTAIN DATE:7/1T/zoJb
SOURCE: PROJECT MANAGER:KATHY WEBB
OCTOBER 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM NRGS GEOSPTIAL DATA synLAYOUT:FIG 1(OVERVIEW)
GATEWAY AT http://datagateway.nres.usda.gov/ 01/12/20169:25 AM P:Duke Energy Progress.102602.ASHEVILLE PLAN 25.2015 Well Samlin Area l Structural Flll$W3-Al 015 ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT STRUCTUR

a ACCESS CHARAH '
"m s. C v TRAILER OFF PINNER RD P� +� ���� CHARAH TRAILER f *I g VIA GLENN BRIDGE RD 2
l M
Ju
s
FRENC�B CHARAH TRACER \ ;, ,
1 a y
CHARAH GATE CHECK POINT - �ws
u nm ^
t�
W PONDS
Z
P
�w(' • �y
x
`
� r
T
^

410 S.Wilmington Street.
DUKE Raleigh,NC 27601
ENERGY® Mailing Address
Mail Code NC 15
Raleigh,NC27601
919-546-7863
March 22, 2016 919-546-6302(lax)
Mr. Landon Davidson
NC DENR Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S.70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
RE: Coal Combustion Products Structural Fill Permit No.WQ0000020
Area I and Area IV Improvements—Asheville Regional Airport
Dear Mr. Davidson:
Enclosed are the construction drawings depicting improvements to Area I and Area IV coal combustion
products structural fill located at the Asheville Regional Airport. Per the 2015 Annual Inspection Report
submitted to you,these improvements are slated to be completed by mid-June 2016. The enclosed
drawings will shortly be submitted to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)to
receive an Erosion &Sedimentation Control (E&SC) permit. Once the E&SC permit is received,work will
commence shortly thereafter. The E&SC permit is the only permit required to complete the
improvements to Area I and Area IV.
If you have any questions or need any clarification regarding the information provided, feel'free to
contact me at [e-mail] or at 919-546-7863 at your convenience.
Respectfusubmitted
J pfei, P. RECEIVED
4sio+�W WawAwourra
Lead Engineer
Environmental Services
cc: Matt Pickett—Duke.Energy
Scott Nordgren—Duke Energy Wateor M hft"09lonaloperatfons
Ed Sullivan—Duke Energy Asheville Regional office
Michael A. Reisman—Asheville Regional Airport
Eric Effinger—Charah, Inc.
enc: Area I and Area IV Improvements,AVCON, Inc.,.Project No. 2013.157.02

Ak 1 ® 1 0
i ,
V ...r�,....^.�..+*;^-s_�%•a".,`.s-•,-.�'^' ''- ,i�f �l �,Y.,a''6;4...�.;.t.--.. .. �"T F �_. _ r+'yrc.'.
I mar
�+,�•---•--,----�,`.. ._._ . s���x -,;z:°..1"�,..�' � ..ate. +�.�' ;-. ti—��.� .^�`
A =ON �
1 • •

GENERAL NOTES UTILITY NOTES
1. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AN APPROVED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE WHICH 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST THE FAA TO STAKE ALL FAA FACILITIES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.CONTRACTOR
SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVISE AND RESUBMIT SHALL PROVIDE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES FOR AIRFIELD ELECTRICAL.COST FOR THIS SERVICE SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE
SCHEDULE AS DIRECTED BY OWNER/ENGINEER AND AS WORK PROGRESSES AND THE SCHEDULE IS AFFECTED. CONTRACT.
2. IN ADDITION TO THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS,ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2, CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL AIRFIELD UTILITIES WITH THE FAA AND AIRPORT STAFF PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.
GUIDELINES SET FORTH IN FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION(FAA)AC 150/5370-2"OPERATIONAL SAFETY ON AIRPORTS DURING
CONSTRUCTION"-CURRENT EDITION(INCLUDED IN SPECIFICATIONS). 3. UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL UTILITIES FOR
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POSSESS AND CONTINUOUSLY MONITOR GROUND CONTROL FREQUENCY 121.1 ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.
TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS FROM EACH CROSSING LOCATION ESPECIALLY WHILE WORKING WITHIN THE RUNWAY 4. PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF EXISTING CABLES AND UTILITIES-ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE PROTECTED,AND DAMAGES
SAFETY AREA(RSA).CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR CTAF AT NIGHT(WHEN ATCT IS CLOSED)ON FREQUENCY 121.1. REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY AS SPECIFIED IN SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
-- 4. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHIN 250'OF THE CENTERLINE OF AN ACTIVE RUNWAY WITHOUT THE PRIOR 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD LOCATION AND VERIFICATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND CABLES,INCLUDING FAA
f.: APPROVAL OF THE OWNERIENGINEER.
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. VERIFICATION OF UTILITIES MUST BE BY MEAN OF HAND-DUG TEST HOLES PRIOR TO
^' '" �t•- EXCAVATION. DAMAGE TO ANY OF THESE UTILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE
5. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT OWNER/ENGINEER APPROVAL WITHIN A TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO BOTH THE OWNER/ENGINEER. DAMAGES INCURRED BY THE AIRPORT,FAA,
(TOFA). AIRLINES,AIRCRAFT OPERATORS,OR DUE TO DAMAGES BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR.
6. CONTRACTOR'S SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING WORKING HOURS WHILE JOB IS IN
PROGRESS AND SHALL BE DESIGNATED THE RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE WHO SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON A
(i 24-HOUR BASIS.
7. BEFORE USING A CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINT OR GATE, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WITH THE OWNER/ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL GRASSED AND PAVED AREAS
WITHIN THE AIRPORT PROPERTY,OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION,WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
(ACCESS,HAUL,STAGING,STORAGE,ETC.)TO THEIR PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITION. NO DIRECT PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR
THIS AS IT IS CONSIDERED A SUBSIDIARY OBLIGATION OF THE CONTRACTOR. p/�.-• a-__ 8. ITEMS FOR CONTROL OF SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION SUCH AS VEHICLE LIGHTING,RADIOS,BARRICADES,FLAGGERS,ETC., INDEX OF DRAWINGS
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,SHALL NOT BE PAID FOR DIRECTLY AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS A SUBSIDIARY OBLIGATION OF
THE CONTRACTOR. Sheet
9. NO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL ENTER OR CROSS ANY ACTIVE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL AREA (AOA) EXCEPT UPON Number Sheet Title
AUTHORIZATION BY THE OWNERIENGINEER.
G-00 COVER SHEET
10. ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES,INCLUDING HAULING VEHICLES,THAT ARE AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE ON THE AIRPORT WITHIN THE
DESIGNATED LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION OR HAUL ROUTES AS DEFINED HEREIN,SHALL DISPLAY IN FULL VIEW ABOVE THE VEHICLE G-01 GENERAL NOTES,LEGEND&INDEX OF DRAWINGS
A 3'X3'OR LARGER AVIATION ORANGE AND WHITE CHECKERBOARD FLAG, EACH CHECKERBOARD BEING 1'SQUARE. WHEN
OPERATING DURING PERIODS OF DARKNESS OR LIMITED VISIBILITY, CONTRACTOR'S VEHICLES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH G-02 PROJECT LAYOUT 8 HAUL ROUTES
FLASHING AMBER LIGHTS. DURING SUCH PERIODS,HAULING VEHICLES NOT SO EQUIPPED SHALL BE ESCORTED BY A VEHICLE SO
EQUIPPED.ALSO,VEHICLES SHALL DISPLAY COMPANY NAME OR LOGO IDENTIFICATION MEDIA BY MAGNETIC SIGNS OR LOGO
PAINTED ON VEHICLE. G-03 SAFETY AND SECURITY NOTES
11. MAXIMUM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SPEED ON ALL AIRPORT PROPERTY SHALL BE 25 MPH.SPEEDING AND UNSAFE DRIVING G-04 SAFTEY DETAILS
PRACTICES SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED.
C-01 AREA 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS
m 12. CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES'VEHICLES SHALL BE PARKED IN DESIGNATED AREAS WITHIN CONTRACTOR'S STAGING AND STORAGE
AREA, C-02 AREA 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS
13. NO HAULING WILL BE ALLOWED ON AIRPORT PAVEMENTS EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY OWNER/ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR TO
C-03 AREA 1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE(SHEET 1 OF 3)
COORDINATE ALL HAUL ROUTES WITH OWNER/ENGINEER. AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS UTILIZED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR HAULING
❑ MUST BE CONTINUALLY MAINTAINED AND DUST CONTROLLED VIA WATER TRUCK,MECHANICAL SWEEPER POWER BROOM,OR
❑ C-O4 AREA 1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE(SHEET 2 OF 3)
VACUUM TRUCK. DUST AND FOD MUST BE MAINTAINED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER/ENGINEER,DURING THE COMPLETE
Z
L DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.
0 C-05 AREA 1 GRADING AND DDRAINAGE(SHEET 3 OF 3)
LLI 14. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TO BE PARKED ONLY WITHIN CONTRACTOR'S STAGING AND STORAGE AREA WHEN NOT IN USE,OR
°b OUTSIDE OF ESTABLISHED HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION. C-06 AREA 4 GRADING AND DRAINAGE(SHEET 1 OF 4)
U)
FL.. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUOUSLY MONITOR AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVE FROM ACTIVE AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT AREAS ANY C-07 AREA 4 GRADING AND DRAINAGE(SHEET 3 OF 4)
O FOREIGN OBJECT DEBRIS(FOD),WASTE AND LOOSE MATERIAL CAPABLE OF CAUSING DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT LANDING GEAR,
Z PROPELLERS AND ROTORS,OR OF BEING INGESTED BY JET ENGINES. THE CONTRACTOR IS FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY C-08 AREA 4 GRADING AND DRAINAGE(SHEET 2 OF 4)
DAMAGES TO AIRCRAFT DUE TO NEGLIGENCE IN FOD CONTROL.
C-09 AREA 4 GRADING AND DRAINAGE(SHEET 4 OF 4)
L 16. DURING HOURS OF RESTRICTED VISIBILITY OR DARKNESS OPEN TRENCHES,EXCAVATIONS,AND STOCKPILED MATERIAL AT THE
W CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE PROMINENTLY MARKED WITH ORANGE FLAGS AND LIGHTED WITH FLASHING RED LIGHTS UNITS EG-01 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES(SHEET 1 OF 2) ,
C7 (ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER/ENGINEER).
0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES(SHEET 2 OF 2)
17. STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE CONSTRAINED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT MOVEMENT AS A RESULT OF AIRCRAFT BLAST OR EC-02
WIND.MATERIAL SHALL BE STORED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S STAGING AND STORAGE AREA UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE EC-03 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
OWNER/ENGINEER.
p 18. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING AIRPORT LIGHTING.ANY DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING
AIRPORT LIGHTING SYSTEM CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE
❑ OWNER/ENGINEER AND REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR REPAIRED BY THE AIRPORT AT THE COST OF THE CONTRACTOR.
Q
U 19. ALL WASTE MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND DEMOLITION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE BY THE
CONTRACTOR OR AT AN ON-SITE LOCATION APPROVED BY THE OWNER/ENGINEER. INFO
N F°I
O
- r 20. ANY PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 01'
o6 21. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. Si
0
v 22. LOCATIONS FOR STOCK PILING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER/ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO
STOCK PILE MATERIAL WITHIN THE RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA(ROFA)WHILE THE RUNWAY IS ACTIVE.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE
Z ALL PERSONNEL AWARE OF LIMITS OF OBJECT FREE AREAS. Ni
L
W 23. THE RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA(ROFA)AND TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA(TOFA)SHALL REMAIN CLEAR OF STOCKPILES AND
>O INACTIVE OR UNATTENDED EQUIPMENT AT ALL TIMES.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALL PERSONNEL AWARE OF LIMITS OF OBJECT
0 FREE AREAS.
EL
24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL ACCESS PATHS AROUND EACH SITE.ALL DISTURBANCE TO AN EXISTING ACCESS PATH SHALL —
c BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
O 25. COAL ASH LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. G)���� L I T YT Fco,
,o
DI
w CJO��J� o FCj DI
Q -I Ld % Z = CI
o D m A[
Z
N y D)
O
r
Sl
o BEFORE YOU DIGI PF
CONTACT ONE.-CALL CENTER
- 1-800-632-4949

010
AIRPORT ROAD(NC 280)_ ._ /- s ` L l� '�•}.' ..
AREA 1
PROJECT LIMITS _ __ -` ..•D\ = � �.✓ ( :i ���.. Q \
..
\� Sri — 60` --�_. ___ ° ° ✓ � \�� \ �'
t �' �,p o o a
i"" _:/ e --7 — 4° acr•r.:. a'�. 'U .. \= / 6� .:CJ ..,��
p
.. ` �o a �.�E FARM "SOUTH GA RAMP, \\ ®_..
� � NORTHGA RAMP
1
7 El
EXISTING RUNWAY 34
NMALSR
:: \\ - mot' :: 1 ... _`\ : __—._•` _�.----'�-�^—•----- ......... - _ �\
61
--
�-
_ x x x x x f x x
II ACCESS tII
I II J
.. POINT .. ...
EXISTING TEMPORARY RUNWAY I7-35
II m
— — —
LOC LO
z.II — —
lss
.. V TEMPORARY RUNWAY 35 :._.I ..
. A I L`! _ - �_
_—LUC___. .. - ..
l TEMPORARY R-�UNwFAY 38
11. FLOOD LOCALIZER y ._:.�/� — — _— _ _ "1g'►�--�4--�� i ' .'.P.A-13!—RIV—E-/- _
.. .
n
I / HAUL ROUTE o dl
UTE
1)D\ O\.✓ L V .. ~`FJ�> .\ \ API AREA4 / c
I ( I 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN / / ;,\ : PROJECT LIMITS: ..
Dv
500 YEAR.FLOOD PLAItJ—,, n�. / / S .. ACCESS / .. .. ..
POINT /
q.
erts-� BORROW. \
/i - .pp AREA _
'AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE
.. .. .. / \
1
IL
w.
ACCESS &HAUL ROAD NOTES
1.: HAUL ROADS TO BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE THOSE INDICATED ON THE DRAIMNGS OR
..] OTHERWISE: SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED'BY.:THE OWNER/ENGINEER. .IN :GENERAL, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE EQUIPMENT AND HAULING TO THE AREAS UNDER:CONSTRUCTION.
W DEBRIS SHALL BE CLEANED FROM THE ROADWAYS AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER/ENGINEER,
" 2. THE ACCESS POINTS TO THE:PROJECT SITE ARE SHOWN ON THE:PLANS.THE OWNER RESERVES
- : THE RIGHT TO CHANGE HAUL ROUTE AND ACCESS POINT AT ANYTIME: -
. � 3.: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL TURFED AND PAVED AREAS USED FOR HAUL ROADS TO
_ THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION, INCLUDING.THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TURF. ALL COST FOR
•• h CONSTRUCTING,REMOVING AND RESTORING OF HAUL ROADS REQUIRED FOR THE COMPLETION OF
°,j THE WORK SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO.THE OWNER.
o .: .. ..
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PERMIT ANY UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL OR _
• 0 TRAFFIC ON THE SITE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE USE OF A GATE GUARD AT ALL ACCESS
0 POINTS:BEING USED BY THE CONTRACTOR,OTHERWISE THE GATES AT EACH ACCESS POINT ARE
Q TO REMAIN LOCKED.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL TO AND
.. U
FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AREAS WITHIN THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE liF
'c IMMEDIATE CLEANUP OF ANY DEBRIS DEPOSITED AT THE PROJECT SITE AND ALONG ANY ROAD AS
A RESULT OF HIS/HER CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC.
oi,
. .. .. .. m .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ..
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 'ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A LIST OF CONTRACTOR AND
:. .. :. OPERATE ON THE SITE. AN Si..
. SUBCONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES AND VEHICLES AUTHORIZED TO O
UPDATED LIST SHALL BE PROVIDED TO OWNERIENGINEER WEEKLY. .. -
'Z 6. IT.SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE.OFF-SITE-ROUTES (STATE ... NI
HIGHWAYS,COUNTY ROADS OR CITY STREETS),AND.OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED'PERMITS WITH THE. _
W APPROPRIATE AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE AFFECTED ROUTE.
.. .. _ —
O 7. ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC SHALL REMAIN WITHIN THE DESIGNATED
a
CONSTRUCTION AREAS,STAGING AREAS AND/OR HAUL ROUTES. "
8 PLACED ON /+ ..
•P ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES SHALL DISPLAY FULL VIEW LOGOS CONSPICUOUSLY: LEGEND
Q EACH SIDE OF THE VEHICLE. ALL VEHICLES OPERATING IN THE ACTIVE AIRSIDE OPERATION AREA
W (AOA)DURING HOURS OF LOW VISIBILITY OR DARKNESS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FLASHING _
Q PE LIGHT MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE VEHICLE;THE FLASHING LIGHT SHALL BE OF
CONTRACTOR'S STAGING
INTENSITY ON TO AIRPORT COD TENANCE AND EMERGENCY
... p .. ..
AMBER DOME-TY
SUCH INTEN TO FORM RPOR CODES ENCY �
.. .. :. Z � :. VEHICLES. � � DI
.. .. .. .. � .. AREA .
Q. _—______ ECT
9. NO CONTRACTOR VEHICLES ARE;TO CROSS ACTIVE RUNWAYS, NAVAID CRITI,CAL.AREAS, OR .. PROJ LIMITS
W - TAXIWAYS FOR ANY REASON.
DI
4 - 10. CONTRACTOR TO SAFELY.CONTROL TRAFFIC AROUND HAUL ROAD.CONTROL OF TRAFFIC'ONSITE .4-0. .HAUL ROUTE CI
.. SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO PROJECT. Al
Q AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE,
11. AT NO TIME SHALL THE CONTRACTOR OPERATE VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT ON THE AIRPORT
p ROADWAY SYSTEM OTHER THAN THOSE ROADS IDENTIFIED ON THIS SHEET. Dj
.. .. .. .. .. S� D S1
GLIDESLOPE CRITICAL AREA
b N h PF
oc _:o..
.. .:: .. .. .: - LOC
' L L ZER C gLAREA 0' 250' 500'. ..'1000'
ap GRAP.H16 SCALE IN FEET .

SAFETY NOTES SECURITY NOTES
1. AIRPORT OPERATIONS-THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACQUAINT HIS/HER SUPERVISORS AND EMPLOYEES WITH THE AIRPORT ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS THAT ARE 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE IN WRITING TO THE ENGINEER THE
INHERENT AT THIS AIRPORT AND SHALL CONDUCT HIS/HER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO CONFORM TO ALL ROUTINE AND EMERGENCY AIR TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS AND NAME OF HIS/HER'CONTRACTOR SECURITY OFFICER'. THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDED SECURITY OFFICER SHALL REPRESENT THE CONTRACTOR ON THE SECURITY
GUIDELINES ON SAFETY SPECIFIED IN NOTE 7 BELOW. REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT.
2. GROUND CONTROL-ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO CROSS ACTIVE RUNWAYS,TAXIWAYS,LOCALIZERS AND GLIDE SLOPE CRITICAL AREAS AND 2. CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL SECURITY ORIENTATION - THE CONTRACTOR SECURITY OFFICER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRIEFING ALL CONTRACTOR AND
APPROACH CLEAR ZONES SHALL DO SO UNDER THE DIRECT CONTROL OF A FLAGMAN IN RADIO CONTACT WITH THE AIRPORT GROUND CONTROLLER. THE FLAGMAN SUBCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL ON THESE REQUIREMENTS AND, FROM TIME TO TIME, OTHER SECURITY PROVISIONS ADOPTED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ALL NEW
SHALL BE TRAINED AND INSTRUCTED BY AIRPORT OPERATIONS IN THE REGULATION GOVERNING OPERATIONS ON THE AIRPORT OPERATIONS AREA(ADA)AND THE RADIO CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES SHALL BE BRIEFED ON THESE REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO WORKING IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA
PROCEDURES AT THE AIRPORT. THE FLAGMEN AND RADIOS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR.FF SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD BY THE CONTRACTOR THAT AIRPORT
TRAFFIC ON RUNWAYS,TAXIWAYS AND APRONS HAVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT ALL TIMES OVER THE CONTRACTOR'S TRAFFIC.-THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MONITOR 3. ACCESS TO THE SITE-CONTRACTOR'S ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT
RADIO COMMUNICATIONS WITH GROUND CONTROL AT ALL TIMES WHILE WORKING WITHIN THE RUNWAY SAFETY AREA THE COMMON TRAFFIC ADVISORY FREQUENCY PERMIT ANY UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL OR TRAFFIC ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL TO AND FROM
121.1.GROUND CONTROL FREQUENCY IS 121.9.THE TIME PERIODS WHEN THE TOWER IS CLOSED(11:00PM-6:30AM). THE VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION AREAS ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMMEDIATE CLEAN-UP OF ANY DEBRIS DEPOSITED ALONG THE ACCESS
ROUTE AS A RESULT OF HIS/HER CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. DIRECTIONAL SIGNING AT THE ACCESS GATE AND ALONG THE DELIVERY ROUTE TO THE STORAGE AREA OR
3. PAVEMENT CLOSURES-NO RUNWAY,TAXIWAY,APRON OR AIRPORT ROADWAY SHALL BE CLOSED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE OWNERIENGINEER TO ENABLE NECESSARY WORK SITE SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SITE ACCESS AND COOPERATE ON ALL SECURITY MEASURES WITH OTHER
NOTICES TO AIRMEN(NOTAM)OR ADVISORIES TO AIRPORT SERVICE OR TENANTS.A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS NOTICE OF REQUESTED CLOSING SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE ON-SITE CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS.
OWNERIENGINEER.
4. MATERIALS DELIVERY TO THE SITE-ALL CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL ORDERS FOR DELIVERY TO THE SITE WILL USE THE ACCESS POINTS AS INDICATED ON SHEET G-04.THE
4. OPEN TRENCHES-ANY CONSTRUCTION OR OPEN TRENCHES IN EXCESS OF 3 INCHES WITHIN 250 FEET OF ACTIVE RUNWAY CENTERLINES OR WTHIN 85.5 FEET OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE ROADWAY SIGNS TO DIRECT DELIVERIES.THIS WILL PRECLUDE DELIVERY TRUCKS FROM ENTERING INTO THE AIRPORT OR
CENTERLINE OF ANY ACTIVE TAXIWAYS AND APRON PAVEMENTS WILL REQUIRE CLOSURE OF THE AFFECTED RUNWAY,TAXIWAY,OR APRON,UNLESS OTHERWISE TAKING SHORT-CUTS THROUGH THE PERIMETER GATES AND ENTERING INTO AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS AREAS INADVERTENTLY.
APPROVED BY THE OWNERIENGINEER. PER AC 150/5370-2-CURRENT EDITION,OPEN TRENCHES ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE RUNWAY SAFETY AREA(RSA)OR THE
TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA(TSA),EXCAVATION AND OPEN TRENCHES MAY BE PERMITTED UP TO THE EDGE OF ACTIVE TAXIWAY PAVEMENTS PROVIDED THE DROP-OFF IS 5. CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS-THE LIMITS OF MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREAS,PARKING AREA AND OTHER AREAS DEFINED AS REQUIRED FOR THE
ADEQUATELY BARRICADED,SIGNED,LIGHTED,MARKED AND SATISFIES THE OWNERIENGINEER. ANY CLOSURE REQUIRES THE SAME PROVISIONS AS NOTE 3 ABOVE. CONTRACTOR'S EXCLUSIVE USE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STAKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT
RUNWAYS CANNOT BE REOPENED UNTIL TRENCHES ARE CLOSED. AND MAINTAIN AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THESE AREAS SUITABLE FENCING AND GATES,SIGNAGE AND WARNING DEVICES VISIBLE FOR BOTH DAYINIGHT USE TO
DELINEATE THE PERIMETER OF ALL SUCH AREAS.
S. DEBRIS CONTROL-DEBRIS,WASTE AND LOOSE MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON ACTIVE AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT AREAS.ANY MATERIAL ON ACTIVE AIRCRAFT
MOVEMENT AREAS SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH A BROOM.THE OWNERIENGINEER MAY DIRECT THAT DEBRIS PROBLEMS DURING 6. VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION-ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES SHALL DISPLAY IN FULL VIEW LOGOS CONSPICUOUSLY PLACED ON EACH S1DE OF THE VEHICLE. ALL VEHICLES
CONSTRUCTION NOT CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR BE CORRECTED BY OTHERS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE OPERATING IN THE ACTIVE AIRSIDE OPERATION AREA(ADA)DURING HOURS OF LOW VISIBILITY OR DARKNESS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A FLASHING AMBER DOME-TYPE
CONSTRAINED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT MOVEMENT AS A RESULT OF AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS OR WIND. LIGHT MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE VEHICLE,THE FLASHING LIGHT SHALL BE OF SUCH INTENSITY TO CONFORM TO AIRPORT CODES FOR MAINTENANCE AND EMERGENCY
VEHICLES.
6. INSPECTION BY OPERATIONS-PRIOR TO OPENING FOR AIRCRAFT USE,THE CONTRACTOR WILL ARRANGE FOR INSPECTION,BY AIRPORT STAFF OF ANY RUNWAY,
TAXIWAY OR APRON THAT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR WORK,OR THAT HAS BEEN USED FOR A CROSSING POINT OR HAUL ROUTE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE GATE GUARDS WHO HAVE CELLULAR PHONES AT THE ACCESS GATES AT ALL TIMES WHILE THE GATE OR GATES ARE BEING USED.THE
GATE GUARD MUST HAVE AN UPDATED LIST OF EMPLOYEES.ALL ACCESS GATES SHALL REMAIN LOCKED AT ALL TIMES WHEN NOT MANNED BY A GATE GUARD.
7. SAFETY GUIDELINES:
15015200-18'AIRPORT SAFETY SELF INSPECTION'-CURRENT EDITION 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST FOR ALL KEY CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
15015370-2'OPERATIONAL SAFETY ON AIRPORTS DURING CONSTRUCTION'-CURRENT EDITION
15015210-5'PAINTING,MARKING&LIGHTING OF VEHICLES USED ON AIRPORTS--CURRENT EDITION 9. BEFORE THE START OF EACH WORK WEEK THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE TO ENGINEER A LIST OF EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL,INCLUDING SUBCONTRACTORS,
THAT PLAN TO ENTER THE ADA.THE LIST SHOULD INDICATE ANY CHANGES FROM PRIOR WEEKLY LISTS.
B. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CLEAR ROUTES TO ALL AIRPORT OPERATIONS AREAS AND SAFETY AREAS AT ALL TIMES THROUGH THE CONSTRUCTION SITE
THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT FOR AIRPORT SECURITY AND OPERATIONS AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO INFORM ITS EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES THAT ANY SECURITY VIOLATIONS MAY SUBJECT THEM TO
ARREST FOR A PUNISHABLE FEDERAL OFFENSE,IMMEDIATE AND PERMANENT REMOVAL FROM THE JOB.
9. TEMPORARY RUNWAY 17-35 SAFETY AREA IS 250 FEET FROM RUNWAY CENTERLINE,AND ALL TAXIWAY SAFETY AREAS ARE 59.5 FEET OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
0
10. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL; WORK SITE SAFETY ON THIS PROJECT;AND MEETING ALL STATE, FEDERAL AND LOCAL SAFETY
N REQUIREMENTS.
N
11. ALL CONTRACTOR VEHICLES,INCLUDING HAULING VEHICLES,THAT ARE AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE ON THE AIRPORT WITHIN THE DESIGNATED LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
OR HAUL ROUTES AS DEFINED HEREIN,SHALL DISPLAY IN FULL VIEW ABOVE THE VEHICLE A TXT OR LARGER ORANGE AND WHITE CHECKERBOARD FLAG,EACH
❑ CHECKERBOARD COLOR BEING 1'SQUARE.WHEN OPERATING DURING PERIODS OF DARKNESS OR LIMITED VISIBILITY,CONTRACTORS VEHICLES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH
vi ROTATING OR FLASHING AMBER LIGHTS.DURING SUCH PERIODS,HAULING VEHICLES NOT SO EQUIPPED SHALL BE ESCORTED BY A VEHICLE SO EQUIPPED.
w
p 12. OPEN-FLAME WELDING OR TORCH-CUTTING OPERATIONS ARE PROHIBITED UNLESS ADEQUATE FIRE AND SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ARE PROVIDED AND HAVE BEEN
}z} APPROVED BY THE OWNER.
~-a, 13. ANY DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING AIRPORT LIGHTING SYSTEM CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY NOTED TO THE OWNER/ENGINEER AND
REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER OWN EXPENSE.IF THE AIRPORT COMPLETES THE REPAIRS,THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COSTS
u ASSOCIATED WITH THE REPAIRS.
U 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE ATTRACTION OF WILDLIFE CAUSED BY PONDING WATER,GRASS SEED,
❑
Z ETC.IF NECESSARY,CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PUMPS TO DEWATER AREAS OF PONDING.
¢
15. ITEMS FOR CONTROL OF SAFETY AND SECURITY DURING CONSTRUCTION SUCH AS VEHICLE LIGHTING,GATE GUARDS,FLAGMEN,BARRICADES,FLAGS,LIGHTS,ESCORTS,
w TEMPORARY GRADING MEASURES,DIVERSION DITCHES,PUMPS,DUST CONTROL,FOD CONTROL,ETC.SHALL NOT BE PAID FOR DIRECTLY BUT SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS
Q A SUBSIDIARY OBLIGATION OF THE CONTRACTOR COVERED UNDER CONTRACT ITEMS.
U
16. IN ORDER FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO OPERATE WITHIN AIRPORT PROPERTY,APPROPRIATE NOTICES TO AIRMEN(NOTAM'S)MUST BE ISSUED BY THE AIRPORT.THESE
o NOTICES PROVIDE INFORMATION ON CLOSED,LIMITED,OR HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS TO AIRMEN AND USERS OF THE AIRPORT.A 72-HOUR NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR
r ISSUANCE OF THE NOTAM.ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS MUST CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR NOTAM ISSUANCE.
N
17. AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS SHALL AT ALL TIMES HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER ALL VEHICLES,EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY STRICT
o MEASURES TO PREVENT CONFLICT BETWEEN HIS/HER PERSONNEL AND AIRCRAFT ON ANY ACTIVE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT OR NON-PAVEMENT AREAS.THE CONTRACTOR
cy SHALL REMAIN CLEAR OF ACTIVE RUNWAYS,TAXIWAYS AND APRONS.
Q 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL,AT ALL TIMES,CONTROL THE ON-AIRPORT MOVEMENT AND ACTIVITIES OF ITS EMPLOYEES,SUBCONTRACTORS,EQUIPMENT,AND MATERIAL
U SUPPLIERS.
p 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND CONTROL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC WHEN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS REQUIRE TRAVERSING ANY AIRSIDE AREA ANY DIRT 'FO1
AND/OR DEBRIS ON PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY TO AVOID ANY BUILDUP ON PAVEMENT. oie
ai 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ENTERING THE AIRPORT TO PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS.NO PRIVATE VEHICLES WILL
o BE ALLOWED ON THE AIRPORT OUTSIDE OF THE STAGING AREA. S,
U) 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE AIRPORT ONLY AT THOSE LOCATIONS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS OR APPROVED BY THE OWNERIENGINEER.ALL OTHER
z ACCESS SHALL BE BY SPECIAL REQUEST AND SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNER/ENGINEER. NI
w
2 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LIGHT TOWERS FACE AWAY FROM THE ACTIVE RUNWAY AND RUNWAY APPROACH CORRIDOR AT ALL TIMES.
w
0 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ALL BROOMS AND VACUUM TRUCKS BE STAFFED AT ALL TIMES DURING OPERATIONS ACROSS ACTIVE PAVEMENTS WITH PERSONNEL
a OTHER THAN FLAGMEN.
v
¢
w
¢
z
DI
DI
of CI
j Al
N D/
O
ri
N
Sl
M
b PF
m
0
a

) 1
RUNWAY THRESHOLD,END OF PAVEMENT
7:1
B 1
7:1 h:v) x r
PRIMARY SURFACE
H:1(h:v)APPROACH SLOPE
RUNWAY 200'
L'
7:1 lh-w) TRANSITIONAL
SURFACE
L
7:7 h:vJ
• B RSA RUNWAY
NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT A LIST OF EQUIPMENT AND CORRESPONDING MAXIMUM
HEIGHTS.
2.ANY EQUIPMENT OR OBJECTS PENETRATING THE PART 77 IMAGINARY SURFACES L250' 250'---J
SHALL BE COORDINATED, IN ADVANCE, WITH THE AOR. OBSTRUCTIONS
PENETRATING THE PART 77 SURFACES SHALL BE REMOVED,MARKED AND/OR �+
LIGHTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAA GUIDELINES AND DETERMINATIONS. RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA)
N.T.S.
P � ON SVOpE � 1-
`O pP DP �t MAX OBJECT HEIGHT
N 200'—�- -{
• H
N
(y SLOPEVARIES 0%
3 ROFA RUNWAY TOFA TAXIWAY
SECTION A-A
F N.T.S.
W
}O
w
LL
C4 L400' 400'----� 93' 93'
0
r
RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (ROFA) TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA(TOFA)
s
L`�L' T:� N.T.S. N.T.S.
❑
MAX OBJECT HEIGHT o% o%
NF
(y FO
O
N
6 SECTION B-B —
o
y
z
Z NI
LU RUNWAY OFZ RUNWAY TSA rL TAXIWAY —
W
> FAR PART 77
O RUNWAY APPROACH SLOPE L X _
a (H)
17 20 500 0.15
4 35 50 500 0.15
❑ 'NOTE: FOR HORIZONTAL APPROACH SLOPE(H), DI
Q DISTANCE(L),AND FLARE RATIO(X) L200' 200'-A 59' 59'
DI
UJ
FAR PART 77•IMAGINARY SURFACES RUNWAY OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (OFZ) TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA (TSA) CI
N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. Al
Q
D
N I
O
I� —
Sl
' o PF
co
0
a:

r
gpPF�OXIMATE L�IT�OF
—j MpUr D \ I I l /�/ �y J r• �/ / /
DIRT'
h�
�i � Il ll INN
i/���I�I�III�JIIIIIIJI►Illlil
iil>�' � II Illlllllllhll II III 1 1 1 �i I v I I I / � / 1 I I
,rl/� III II IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111 IIII I \ I I 1 / 1 1 � — ! I 1 I 1� _ -
-
Jr 'Ill \/II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I II II
,AwV, 11 11 Illllll Illllllllllll 1
I IIIIIII hill II I I I / I I
- / II II III II IIII ' \ \ IllIN -
I( I
II //)I II t1 IIII IIIIII III 1 1 11 1 l I / I EXISTING FENCE
III////IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillll \ \ 11 I I J I
� / IIII II ; \" I\h;�\\�\��\'�
1111��1\ \\
\1V\co
APPROXIMATE LIMITBpF COAL Ai
N 1 Y I \II11 I l
cd
T y EXISTING'G/NE-
OLD
U L1i'r1A SEDIMENT
BASIN
o � //Ill/llllllllllIll/l�!
(Illiillli�i,K//" a I —
EXISTI G GRAVEL ROD
P J 1 1 1 I TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY&GROUND CONTROL PROVIDED BY:co
Si
_ ____✓��`�ii��/�/rl/' /ll�/l�! !/!� I J I ! ! l / l I I I /� — \ 1 \— —i-� I/
^,� ✓�~'�—~1—�/�✓/ j/�/l�///////////v///l////��>!!/!!/!II/ 1I! 1I1 !!! !I! II! Il Il I III I1 APPROrXIMATE LIMITS OF COAL t1 H
1\l 1I1\ II 3II`IIIIL 1I� WNCPEBS,PLLC
—N 1095 HENDERSONVILLE ROAD,SUITE G
L
LLI
OFC.828-277-5074/� FAX.[phone]W ASHEVILE,NORTH CAROLINA 28803/ 9
/ DATED 110-75
EL
\Nm
Z �— \\LU
\�
��� DI
\\ CI
At
o,
--� Mb.S y_J— �7�/x AFR617FTERRO ^ ` \�\` / / ` -" I I/ I � 1 S1
AD \� ��. � EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ` 1�J� North PF
a
—� GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

1
//
EXISTING TRIPLE SLOPE Dt6A N
51
\\��\��\.c --�' / / �_•__ __-_ --� — --� / /�/,i//i//�///%/ iii�/i i�/-
\
APPROXIMATE�MRS OF COAL ASH
\\ � \� / '" / / �'i%�/,�-✓i i/�i��/ice//i/is/ � �✓/' /�/ //� ---
F,�
APPROXIMATE LI ITS!OF O - /
i5=�.-
��\\\\:z���\\
x \\�\\•\\�\\\\\�\\ / /iiii/i////ii ///////////i iii //i // _ / � /i
\\ \\\\ \-, ��: � /i/i/�"ii/i✓i i%/i i/i i iii"n /i /
Z •� \�� --i / / / / //// % / \ ACCESS GATE
w \ •' ��;- �\�-� ,- i///j/i i/j / / NG
o ��.�',--- �- -i i/// i // / // BPS/� % %/ 7�-✓//i
N EXISTING SLOFNc6 Si
pRAIN
cli
s
f
Z \ /�-/ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 8 GROUND CONTROL PROVIDED BY:ul NI
W � '� WNCPEBS,PLLC
> 1095 HENDERSONVILLE ROAD,SUITE G —
ASHEVILLE,NORTH CAROLINA 28803 —
a
OFC.828-277-5074
FAX.[phone] _
DATED 11-10-15
Q
W
Q
cl
Z DI
DI
Q
¢
Cl
j Al
N � DI
0
Sl
o North PF
0' 30' 60' 120'
0
o GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

RrROPQSED SI TJFENCE ! r 7 / �-
�.Z : � _ — — —�'� /.,I � I1 I ► IIII//////r/� ) 11! / /:iii� �,=— / %��
//%~II I/� I J
\ I I I lI/)/
�j I///� /- / -J� r / 1 I ��� II //MOUND I I l
��ii r / / / i i / r 1 ► ^• \\ 1 1 — ) I Ill / 1 l —, \ — � /
j/�j>�� %jv%1 —
�\��
�
� IIIIIII'lll�ll
\I�Iplllll�Illllljlllillllll�l 111 1 �. 1 1 11 � 1 \ `I 1 i I �� �. /���� 1 1 1 1 � I � , I
`
lI I' I II II IIIII I I 1 1 I / / I I 11111 111i1111111111111111111 I I I I I I \ \ I I �`= 1 \ — I I I I I( � ,.� J
/r IIIIIII it Ill i llllllll l IIIII I l 1 \ I I I I \ I /� 1� / / 1 1 ) I II111 �,,E)\\�L
.TING FENCE
dII \/I\ IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII I I 1 \ \ — — I I /
ill\ II IIII IIIIIIIIIjllllilllllll 11 I I I I I I `\ \� \\ \ Y1
I II/ //IIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIjIIIIII 1 1 11 1 1 t I I ,�, I I -� I I I � � �— I I 1 1 �
I I /I/ I IIII I IIIII \ I I 1 I I '
I IIII IIII
�!` \I\ !
\�� I w \
/�iii ijQf 11 1�\ \\ \\
\\ �
W
o
\ \ \ \
\ 1 i I I I �, \\\\
TRAPEZOIDAL DIT j WI H
� SS B RIP-RAP
c
;
'—E—�STI._NG G�0'
XI =-6E'
OLD
M:'{tA ` I SENT �illl)I�IIIIIillll(I/II ,l t !��'`�. ;,` \ I r -_-__
BASIN ___
l//IIII�I11j11111�11111111/ �/� ///// I I / / \_ I 1 I I — �--_�;__ __�= ��1 I ` NOTES Fo
_ `=�_JJIIII II /Il l r/ l _
o J �ll I/IIII/� / I I / / 1 � 1 I -yam. \\'`--- \ \ \ 1 I I I ' WITHOUT DISTURBING COAL ASHOPES INTO EXISTING GROUND AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTH OF COAL ASH PRIOR TO STARTING FULL GRADING S
Z 1 ~_— OPERATIONS FOR RIP RAP LINED TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH INSTALLATION.
/ 1 II I
_ --. _��� � / /I 1 EXISTING NG OPERATIONS.
GRAVEL ROAD I 1 1 I I I I I 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE INSTALLEDSILT FENCE SHALL BE PRIOR
OTO AREAS OU STARTING TSDIE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE NI
> PROPLtSIF_i°ENCE n� j I I f I /� I �, I 1 I I 4 WHEN INSTALLING RIP RAP. —
5.ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDING AND MATTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EL
I l COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATIONS.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE —
/ -, " / 1 \l SLOPES FOR AREA IIN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT MAY NEED TO BE
ADDRESSED OR REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS —
\(�,,�� PROJECT. ANY REPAIRS REQUIRED AND REPAIR METHOD SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON
-_Y THE PLANS. DI
Q Al�\\\l\aN \ \ // / \ 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY ON ALL WORK COMPLETED. DI
S EA
\ SO THAT THERE IS NO PONCONTRACTOR StiALL FILL N N I O WATER /
Al
S1
56 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT I I
North PF
0' 30' 60• 1 20'
a
�� GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

r I-
\\
%III `� \\`\\\� v`\\\�._\\\� '\ '• �\ � \\ `� �\ 1 1 � � \
N MA
TAPEZO�DAL DI�4CH WITH
/• v �`— -__—_```�.`.:`�- .�����'� '\ ` CLASS B IP-RA
II
�I111� I I 160" RCP/
EXISTING GATE
\ / •-_.._ .,,_,,,., ____- -,\\ � � II III / / /���' ---�----___ --,---________ I
OLD
mw I P, SEDIMENT
BASIN
j__ -_..
,.� 11/11 1 l//l l llr ll l//l//111 ---
� _. ll l 1 lull /l l/lll
N
EXISTING GRAVEL ROD /
A,
U `ROPPSE:sILLFE[LCE
-2130,
s
F01
DIE
��\�1, ` \\\\` �\ •� // , / / / / \ \ \ CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL IN THIS AREA \ / Si
SO THAT THER\ IN IS NO PONDG QF WATER F
LLI
uJ
Of
EL
LU
Z '` -- P ''��_ NOTES DI
I.CONTRACTOR SHALL BENCH SLOPES INTO EXISTING GROUND AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
IQ �/� WITHOUT DISTURBING COAL ASH. DI
ly 4 MI�•5 �C�/ 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTH OF COAL ASH PRIOR TO STARTING FULL GRADING CI
' 'l OPERATIONS FOR RIP RAP LINED TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH INSTALLATION.
3.SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO STARTING GRADING OPERATIONS. At
7(. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO AREAS OUTSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Di
N / _ WHEN INSTALLING RIP RAP.
5.ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDING AND MATTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER
crj \ ��x_J-�X COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATIONS. S1
X x 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE SLOPES North PF
FOR AREA 1.IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR o 0' 15' 30' 60'�—
REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ANY REPAIRS
REQUIRED AND REPAIR METHOD SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON THE PLANS.
EL
7.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY OF ALL WORK COMPLETED. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

PROPOSED SILT FENCES I ` \ -
.- 2.Ile
/
lil \ IIIII/l l/lljl/1/ill/�l�/ll� I I I I II I I r` \ i I I I I I ` 1
J ail 111111 �/// l ll 1 ll/ill� I I I I I i
I I I
IIIIIII lilt/Ill/I /I//IIII
\hlllliil Jill lilll�lilllllllll�l
// 211
I� NI I I`vl I INI I I IN III i 1 \ \ \ \
1 I f
cl
LLI
o
//%r- - - 1 III IIIIIII illy IIIII I�1 1 1 1 1 I 1 N 1 I \ 1 I � ,
o �%//%/ IIIlillllllitllllllillll11111111111111 11 11 I I I I I I 1 \\ \\ i I I II //
/ i �I 111111111111 i I 1 i
lsll/� I IIII l IIII I I I I 111� r I i I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 /
N �/�i/ri Illi�lllll \ rlllll I I► lilrl II\ 1 1 r \ 1 \ I I I � \ I
M /� IIII //11I I 1111 I I I I I rl II I111 1111 I II 1 11 1 1\ \ I \ \ \
EXISTIN FENCE mF,
Foi
04
ca
—
I —
W
�111 IIII I II I I II III II Il Ilr 1111111111 I I I I I I I 1\ \�- \ \ II ! { \\ — N
a.
IIII` I / 11 \ I{II1111111II I II IIIIIII / / I I I I I \ \ __ t \ —
I
III \ � I I it illllil' I1111 II � � I I l `' \ —
ICI t o I
I I I
I II III I I I I I I r/ I NOTES DI
I III 11 I II i I I
U I FO�,�i I N 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I{ \ \ \ r I \ \ \ ` \ 1 I 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL BENCH SLOPES INTO EXISTING GROUND AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
111 Jill I I I I 11 / 1 ` WITHOUT DISTURBING COAL ASH. DI
W1, 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTH OF COAL ASH PRIOR TO STARTING FULL GRADING
I I III I I I I I I I I OPERATIONS FOR RIP RAP LINED TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH INSTALLATION. CI
IIIII IIII I II lill {I ill� Il 1 1 1 i t 1 \
3.SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO STARTING GRADING OPERATIONS.
'I I At
I.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO AREAS OUTSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
WHEN INSTALLING RIP RAP. D/
6.ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDING AND MATTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER
COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATIONS. S1
,.j rr I { IIII I I , III 1 111 I r 11 1 r North CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE SLOPES Pf
1 \ \ \ FOR AREA 1 IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR
0' 15' 30' 60' REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ANY REPAIRS
o IIII \ REQUIRED AND REPAIR METHOD SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON THE PLANS.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET T.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY ON ALL WORK COMPLETED.
a

2120
SEE TE3
\ \\
O �\�\ \\\�: \\ / // �///////// ////�// // j //// SEE NOTE6
bwag
co
/ IT
❑ \ \\\ -`� :7-�///�/�/i/ice /i
_ STORM DRAIN NETWORK
❑ \ \ �i/i/ / //i/ / /ice �i �\ �J///
tr � ��`` \ �// / �/% -71 ACCESS GATE -
a
c"I
/ 65E /''Oj/j j �- // �1 FLARED END SECTION 26 FLARED END SECTION52 '18"HDPE PIPE
18"INV.OUT=2075.00 18"INV.IN=2068.00 176 LF@3.98%
M
SEE NOTES �� o� /
` � /�/ j� S-2 N;629,739.90 E:944,614.64 S-7 N:629,545.41 E:944,837.27 S-3 TO S3
FLARED END SECTION 24"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN 18"HDPE PIPE
18"INV.IN=2068.00 18"INV.OUT=2073.00 28 LF@3.76%
r � __ 5-3 N:629,753.98 E:944,657.04 S-8 N:629,536.51 E:944,806.99 S-5 TO S-6
No + ~ — �i� L�'-= i ���/ \' -i \ /iNjO 30'NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN FLARED END SECTION 1 B"HDPE PIPE IMF
i
18"INV.OUT=2073.00 18"INV.OUT=2068.00 27 LF @ 3.76% DI'
�,j REMOVE EXISTING 24'RCP TO /� \ L L ,// S-4 N:629,735.56 E:944,635.72 S-9 N:629,426.80 E:944,941.29 S-7 TO 5-8
o \INSTALL PROPOSED PIPE AND INLET FLARED/ i FLARED END SECTION 24"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN 18"HDPE PIPE S,
-� 18"INV.IN=2068.00 18"INV.OUT=2069.00 32 LF @3.13%
H
Z 7� S-5 N:629,653.23 E:944,742.89 S-10 N:629,442.22 E:944,865.90 S-9 TO S-10UJ NI
W /NOTES 24"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN FLARED END SECTION 18"HDPE PIPE -
\�� 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ANY REQUIRED GRADING ADJUSTMENT ON THE UPPER SECTION OF AREA 4 IN ORDER TO REDUCE 18"INV.OUT=2073.00 18"INV.IN=2066.00 77 LF @ 3.90
U CONCENTRATION OF WATER.
0- 2. ONCE GRADING ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ANY DISTURBED AREAS ARE FULLY VEGETATED DIRECTLY
UPSTREAM OF THE SLOPE DRAINS,THE BERM AND SLOPE DRAINS SHALL BE REMOVED. ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THIS WORK _
SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY SEEDED AND MATTED.
W 3. THE EXISTING DITCH BETWEEN THE SLOPE AND GRAVEL ROAD SHALL BE REESTABLISHED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT DEEP '
WITH 3:1 SIDE SLOPES.THE DITCH SHALL BE SEEDED AND MATTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION.
❑ 4. ANY CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL IMPACT THE EXISTING PERIMETER ROAD SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER PRIOR'TO
Z STARTING WORK. DI
Q -
5. THE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD SHALL REMAIN A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET WIDE IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD IS NOT IMPACTED BY pl
W CONSTRUCTION.IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD WILL BE IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION,THE WIDTH OF THE ROAD SHALL NOT BE A
Q MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT WIDE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. Cl
> 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE AREA TO CREATE A SWELL IN ORDER TO DRAIN AREA TO EXISTING FLARED END SECTION. Al
Q 7. HDPE PIPE SHALL BE ADS N-12 WITH H-25 LOADING OR APPROVED EQUAL. DRAIN BASINS SHALL BE ADS ROAD AND HIGHWAY
N DJ
STRUCTURES WITH H-25 LOADING GRATES OR APPROVED EQUAL. Q
8. STRUCTURE AND PIPE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS AND
FIELD LOCATIONS OF THE GRAVEL ROAD AND ANCHOR TRENCH. PIPE SHALL HAVE TWO FEET OF COVER UNDER THE GRAVEL
m ROAD. Sl
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE SLOPES IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS North PF
THAT MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT.ANY REPAIRS 0' 30' 60' 120'
0
REQUIRED AND REPAIR METHOD SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON THE PLANS.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY ON ALL WORK COMPLETED.
o GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

10
25
/
II /
/
—2120
�•\\�\\\\�`\ / / /�� N III /
N
w
o
EL
SEE NOTE J
ry 'FCI
=:
of NorthDI
co
wGRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
LU NOTES \ \�\ .`\\ \\. - \\\\ ✓ / /
O 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ANY REQUIRED GRADING ADJUSTMENT ON THE UPPER SECTION OF AREA 4 IN ORDER TO REDUCE��• \\ \\\ \`\\ / / / / //
It CONCENTRATION OF WATER.
2. ONCE GRADING ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ANY DISTURBED AREAS ARE FULLY VEGETATED DIRECTLY UPSTREAM\ \` \\\;\\\\�•� \\ 1�5 '`�// / _
-T OF THE SLOPE DRAINS,THE BERM AND SLOPE DRAINS SHALL BE REMOVED. ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THIS WORK SHALL BE,
LU
DIATELY SEEDED AND MATTED.
of 3. HEEEXISTING DUTCH BETWEEN THE SLOPE AND GRAVEL ROAD SHALL BE REESTABLISHED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT DEEP WITH 3:1
SIDE SLOPES.THE DITCH SHALL BE SEEDED AND MATTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION. \\\\\\�\\\\\\ \\\\ `� \ / / / / / "/ /
Q 4. ANY CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL IMPACT THE EXISTING PERIMETER ROAD SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO\'`
ING \\`\ DI
W 5. THEREXIST NGRK.GRAVEL ROAD SHALL REMAIN A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET WIDE IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD IS NOT IMPACTED BY / / DI
CONSTRUCTION. IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD WILL BE IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION,THE WIDTH OF THE ROAD SHALL NOT BE A\\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ / / CI
MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT WIDE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. \\\'\\�\\\\\\\\\\\ `\\- / / / /// //
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE AREA TO CREATE A SWELL IN ORDER TO DRAIN AREA TO EXISTING FLARED END SECTION. \\20�9`\\\\ \ \\\\ / / Al
N 7. HDPE PIPE SHALL BE ADS N-12 WITH H-26 LOADING OR APPROVED EQUAL. DRAIN BASINS SHALL BE ADS ROAD AND HIGHWAY r\\s \\\\\\\\``\ DI
STRUCTURES WITH H-25 LOADING GRATES OR APPROVED EQUAL.
8. STRUCTURE AND PIPE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS AND FIELD I` —
ai LOCATIONS OF THE GRAVEL ROAD AND ANCHOR TRENCH.PIPE SHALL HAVE TWO FEET OF COVER UNDER THE GRAVEL ROAD. / \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\� \\\\\ / �- / , j .// /j/ j j / j /j Sl
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE SLOPES IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT \\\ \ \\'\\\\\\\\\\\ �- \ / / / / j // / j / / PNE D TO BE ADDRESSED MAY
p L REQ BE PAIRED ALONG V41TH THE DOCUMENTEDON THE PLANS.
WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ANY REPAIRS
UIRED AND REPAIR ME HOD SHAL
a
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY ON ALL WORK COMPLETED. \2n\���\\ \\•\ \\\ \\\\\\ \\� \\\ / / / / ///� /� i / / /� / / •- ! / '

��\�, \�•• �\.�-� ���� "�.�• ���_ r- � -- -- / / /i / / / i / / / / /iii / // // // / / f/ / // �` / �/'61�i \ \
, • � � �� / / � / / / /j / / / / / / / f/ / / / / / //ii
v\\\\
�2p��_\�
�� \ ``\.\��=—•-_1- l''J �-j/ ////i �. ��i / / /��/ 0�5/� � /�/ �,��st�NGs //����' i/i/�f.� ��.
\�- /,-��\\\;'•- � �""_ i � i i %i/iii / / �\�� /ii//"�' / ���' /� �� � \
SEE NOTES -�• \•\_�y`` I i ��/G i �% // //// / \ ��"��// / l / /
\ L L -- - - - - - - - -
+ — — — — — — — — —
\}- REMOVE EXISTING 24'RCP TO
INSTALL PROPOSED PIPE AND INLET
STORM DRAIN NETWORK
f
S-1 N:629,899.09 E:944,540.26 S-6 N:629.635.12 E:944,722.52 3-1 TO S-2
FLARED END SECTION FLARED END SECTION 18"HDPE PIPE
18"INV.OUT=2075.00 18"INV.IN=2068.00 176 LF @ 3.98%
S-2 N:629,739.90 E:944,614.64 S-7 N:629,545.41 E:944,837.27 S-3 TO S4
FLARED END SECTION 24"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN 18"HDPE PIPE
W 18"INV.IN=2068.00 18"INV.OUT=2073.00 28 LF @ 3.76%
to
d S-3 N:629,753.98 E:944,657.04 S-8 N:629,536.51 E:944,806.99 S-5 TO S-6
30"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN FLARED END SECTION
18"HDPE PIPE
d 18"INV.OUT=2073.00 18"INV.OUT=2068.00 27 LF @ 3.76%
o S-4 N:629,735.56 E:944,635.72 S-7 TO S-8
FLARED END SECTION 18"HDPE PIPE
- 18'INV.IN=2068.00 32 LF @3.13
�7
S-5 N:629.653.23 E:944,742.89
24"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN
Q 18"INV.OUT=2073.00
U
NP
N
FO:
Cl
oie
S'
E
U)
!n
H
LU Ni
W
2
Uj
NOTES
0
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ANY REQUIRED GRADING ADJUSTMENT ON THE UPPER SECTION OF AREA 41N ORDER TO REDUCE
CONCENTRATION OF WATER. —
2. ONCE GRADING ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ANY DISTURBED AREAS ARE FULLY VEGETATED DIRECTLY UPSTREAM
G OF THE SLOPE DRAINS,THE BERM AND SLOPE DRAINS SHALL BE REMOVED. ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THIS WORK SHALL BE
W IMMEDIATELY SEEDED AND MATTED.
of
Q 3. THE EXISTING DITCH BETWEEN THE SLOPE AND GRAVEL ROAD SHALL BE REESTABLISHED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT DEEP WITH 3:1
0 SIDE SLOPES.THE DITCH SHALL BE SEEDED AND MATTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION. DI
Z
Q 4. ANY CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL IMPACT THE EXISTING PERIMETER ROAD SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO DI
Q STARTING WORK.
W 5. THE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD SHALL REMAIN A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET WIDE IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD IS NOT IMPACTED BY CI
<Q CONSTRUCTION. IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD WILL BE IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION,THE WIDTH OF THE ROAD SHALL NOT BE A
MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT WIDE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. Al
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE AREA TO CREATE A SWELL IN ORDER TO DRAIN AREA TO EXISTING FLARED END SECTION.
N D,7. HOPE PIPE SHALL BE ADS N-12 WITH H-25 LOADING OR APPROVED EQUAL. DRAIN BASINS SHALL BE ADS ROAD AND HIGHWAY
O
- � STRUCTURES WITH H-25 LOADING GRATES OR APPROVED EQUAL. _
8. STRUCTURE AND PIPE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS AND FIELD Sl
c6 PE SHALL P
LOCATIONS OF THE GRAVEL ROAD AND ANCHOR TRENCH. I HAVE TWO FEET OF COVER UNDER THE GRAVEL ROAD.
E North PF
M 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE SLOPES IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT O' 15' 30' ti0'
MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ANY REPAIRS REQUIRED
AND REPAIR METHOD SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON THE PLANS.
0. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY ON ALL WORK COMPLETED.

// / / /2 • / / / I r "� - - �
110- /
/ 2
'�o / 217.
,-
/
� -
/
SEE NOTE 6
uJ / / / // / / / /5i / i / / / / � // / / / /j/ //j / / ii / / /// ��•L� / / � �
po
Nip
s, /
fo"cli
STORM DRAIN NETWORK
o / / _ii//i
S-5 N:629,653.23 E:944,742.89 5-8 N:629,536.51 E:944,80fi.99 S-S TO S-6
/ /�" /� / / ✓ / /� '// / / 18"INVL OUTS=207 OION BASIN 181NVDOUT END=2068I00 27 F @ 3.76%
S-6 N:629,635.12 E:944,722.52 S-9 N:629,426.80 E:944,941.29 S-7 TO S-8
FLARED END SECTION 24"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN 18"HDPE PIPE
ci i // / / / /// /// // / // // / // - ,` / // // 18'INV.IN=2068.00 18"INV.OUT=20fi9.00 32 LF @3.13%
5-7 Si
S-7 N:629,545.41 E:944,837.27 S-10 N:629,442.22 E:944,865.90 S-9 TO S-10
Z i //i////j/ j // �2 / j//j� jj� / S�,n�\� / / /7� /j/ 24"NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN FLARED END SECTION 18"HDPE PIPE
W // �
(( / / / // 18"INV.OUT=2073.00 18"INV.IN=2066.00 77 LF@3.90% NI
LU
/ / // /� / / /j / / // � \ 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ANY REQUIRED GRADING ADJUSTMENT ON THE UPPER SECTION OF AREA 4 IN ORDER TO REDUCE —
ii r f / i'/ \\\\\ CONCENTRATION OF WATER. _
2. ONCE
w i /// `� `\�`.O '� OF THE SLOIPE DRAINS,MTHNE BERM AND SLOPE DRAINS SHALL HALL BE(REMOVED. ANY AREAS DISTURBED ABYDTHISE UPSTREAM WORK SHALL BE
cl! / / / /�// / \\\�\ \\\\\\\ I �j I \ IMMEDIATELY SEEDED AND MATTED.
ACCESS GATE
Z /// ///, / f// 3. THE EXISTING DITCH BETWEEN THE SLOPE AND GRAVEL ROAD SHALL BE REESTABLISHED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT DEEP WITH 3:1
/ \ / SIDE SLOPES.THE DITCH SHALL BE SEEDED AND MATTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION. CI
S-6 4. ANY CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL IMPACT THE EXISTING PERIMETER ROAD SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO DI
W / STARTING WORK.
ct� / //// /// /j / /.L°�Io/ // f / i / 5. THE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD SHALL REMAIN A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET WIDE IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD IS NOT IMPACTED BY Cl
Q j ///-� /// // / /� // / /' / CONSTRUCTION. IN AREAS WHERE THE ROAD WILL BE IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION,THE WIDTH OF THE ROAD SHALL NOT BE A
MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT WIDE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. Al
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGRADE AREA TO CREATE A SWELL IN ORDER TO DRAIN AREA TO EXISTING FLARED END SECTION. D7
7. HOPE PIPE SHALL BE ADS N-12 WITH H-25 LOADING OR APPROVED EQUAL. DRAIN BASINS SHALL BE ADS ROAD AND HIGHWAY
STRUCTURES WITH H-25 LOADING GRATES OR APPROVED EQUAL.
vs
S. STRUCTURE AND PIPE LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS AND FIELD Sl
LOCATIONS OF THE GRAVEL ROAD AND ANCHOR TRENCH.PIPE SHALL HAVE TWO FEET OF COVER UNDER THE GRAVEL ROAD. North PF
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE SLOPES IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT 0' 15' 30' 60'
MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ANY REPAIRS
//��/ /'S ✓ _ i�Lo 1 REQUIRED AND REPAIR METHOD SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON THE PLANS.
O_ 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY ON ALL WORK COMPLETED. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET

SITE WORK, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE LATE WINTER/ PERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE-MIXTURE
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING VISITED THE SITE AND HAVING EARLY SPRING MIXTURE SEEDING MIXTURE SPECIES RATE(LB/ACRE)
FAMILIARIZED HIMSELF WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING HIS BID. TALL FESCUE 100
SEEDING MIXTURE SPECIES RATE(LB/ACRE) SERICEA LESPEDEZA. 20
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE A NORTH CAROLINA LICENSED SURVEYOR FOR KOREAN LESPEDEZA 10
CONSTRUCTION RELATED STAKE-OUT REQUIREMENTS. ANNUAL(GRAIN)
IESPEDEZA 150 KENTUC 10
(KOBE IN 50 PIEDMONT AND KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 5
3. THE ENTIRE AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF GRADING SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH COASTAL PLAIN,KOREAN IN MOUNTAINS)
SUFFICIENT TO REMOVE ALL VEGETABLE MATTER,MUCK,RUBBISH,AND OTHER UNSUITABLE SEEDING NOTE:
MATERIAL. OMIT ANNUAL LESPEDEZA WHEN DURATION OF TEMPORARY COVER IS NOT TO EXTEND BEYOND AFTER AUG.1,USE UNSCARIFIED SEED FOR SERICEA LESPEDEZA.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND JUNE. NURSE PLANTS
DE
WATER AS NECESSARY. SEEDING DATES: BETWEEN MAY 11 AND SEPT.30,ADD 10 LB/ACRE GERMAN MILLET OR 15 LB/ACRE SUDANGRASS.
MOUNTAINS ABOVE 2,500 FEET: FEB 15-MAY 15 PRIOR TO MAY 11 OR AFTER SEPT.30,ADD 40 LB/ACRE RYE(GRAIN):IT MAY BE BENEFICIAL TO
S. ALL DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING THE CONTRACTORS STAGING AREA, HAUL ROUTES, PLANT THE GRASSES IN LATE SUMMER AND OVERSEED THE LESPEDEZAS IN MARCH.
MOUNTAINS BELOW 2,500 FEET: FEB 1 MAY 1-
GRADING LIMITS,ETC.,SHALL BE RESTORED TO A SMOOTH LINE AND GRADE WITH POSITIVE PIEDMONT: JAN 1-MAY 1 SEEDING DATES
DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS. THERE WILL COASTAL PLAIN: DEC.1-APR.1 BEST POSSIBLE
BE NO MEASUREMENT FOR PAYMENT OF SEEDING AND MULCHING REQUIRED FOR AREAS BELOW 2500 FT: AUG.15-SEP.i JUL.25-SEP.15
OUTSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SOIL AMENDMENTS
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS, OR APPLY 2,000 LB/ACRE GROUND MAR.1-APR. 1 MAR.1-MAY 10
6. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO TRANSPORT AND STORE ALL EQUIPMENT AND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/ACRE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER.
MATERIALS IN A MANNER WHICH WILL NOT DAMAGE ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, BUILDINGS, ABOVE 2500 FT: JUL.25-AUG.15 JUL.15-AUG.
SIGNS,LIGHTS,ETC. ANY DAMAGE WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO MULCH 30 MAR.20-APR.20 MAR.5-MAY 15
THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ACCESS ROUTES CLEAN AND FREE OF LOOSE APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW.ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT,NETTING OR A
NTS
DEBRIS FROM CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A SO APPLY LIME AN AMENDME AND FERTILIZER ACCORDING
FOR DAILY CLEARING ALL DEBRIS FROM PAVEMENTS TRAVERSED BY CONSTRUCTION MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A SOIL TESTER OR APPLY 75LBS/1,000 SQ.FT.GROUND
EQUIPMENT. AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 1,000 LB/ACC RE 5-10-10 FERTILIZER.
MAINTENANCE MULCH
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE AND MULCH APPLY 70-90 LB/1000 SQ.FT.GRAIN STRAW OR EQUIVALENT COVER OF ANOTHER SUITABLE
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE. MULCH. ANCHOR MULCH BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT,ROVING OR NETTING. NETTING IS THE
PREFERRED ANCHORING METHOD ON STEEP SLOPES.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES MAINTENANCE
AMOW NO MORE THAN ONCE A YEAR. REFERTILIZE IN THE SECOND YEAR UNLESS GROWTH IS
FULLY ADEQUATE.RESEED,FERTILIZE AND MULCH DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY.
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SILT FENCE AND/OR CONTROL DEVICES, MAY TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE -SUMMER MIXTURE
REQUIRED,TO CONTROL SOIL EROSION DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALLLL
BE CLEANED,GRADED AND STABILIZED WITH GRASSING IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
SEEDING MIXTURE SPECIES RATE(LB/ACRE)
2.EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BELOW,STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS LESPEDEZA 40
PRACTICABLE IN PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY
OR PERMANENTLY CEASED,BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 14 DAYS AFTER A CONSTRUCTION IN THE PIEDMONT AND MOUNTAINS,A SMALL-STEMMED SUDANGRASS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT A MAINTENANCE PLAN
ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. RATE OF 50 LBSIACRE.
3.CONTRACTOR'S TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL-TEMPORARY DRAINS, SILT FENCING, AND SEEDING DATES: 1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND
DRAINAGE DITCHES,ETC.,NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS,OR NOTED HEREIN,SHALL BE INSTALLED MOUNTAINS: MAY 15-AUG.15 OPERATION FOLLOWING EACH RAINFALL EVENT AND/OR NO LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK.
BY THE CONTRACTOR TO INTERCEPT OR DIVERT SURFACE WATER RUNOFF WHICH MAY AFFECT PIEDMONT: MAY 1-AUG.1
THE WORK. THESE DRAINS AND DITCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR COASTAL PLAIN: APR.15-AUG.1 2. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO ENSURE CONTINUED FUNCTION OF ALL
THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.UPON COMPLETION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED. I
SOIL AMENDMENTS
RESTORE THE SITE TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION. 3: ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE RE-SEEDED, FERTILIZED,AND MULCHED AS NECESSARY TO
o FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS 50 SOIL TESTS, F R APPLY 2,000 LB/ACRE GROUND
cv ESTABLISH SUITABLE GROUND COVER, ACCORDING TO THE SEEDING AND MULCHING
4.SPECIFICATIONS ARE PROVIDED AS OUTLINE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/ACRE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER.
m SPECIFICATIONS.
WATER,CHEMICALS,VEGETATION OR OTHER MATERIALS TO PREVENT THE OCCURRENCE OF
DUST WHICH WILL BE OBJECTIONABLE TO THE OPERATIONS/USERS OF THE AIRPORT AS MULCH
O OUTLINED IN THE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS, NO SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW.ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT,NETTING OR A 4. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL TRAPS AND/OR BASINS ONCE ONE HALF OF THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE OBLIGATED TO DISCONTINUE OPERATIONS WHICH VIOLATE MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A STORAGE VOLUME HAS BEEN USED.
MULCH ANCHORING TOOL.
Uj EXISTING LAWS AND REGULATIONS. 5. THE ROCK WEIRS SHALL BE CLEANED AND/OR REPLACED WITH CLEAN ROCK ONCE SEDIMENT
LU
F- MAINTENANCE BUILD UP PREVENTS PROPER DRAINAGE FROM THE TRAP.
5.CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT AREAS OF DISTURBANCE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE DURING THE
Z COURSE OF THE PROJECT,AND STABILIZE AREAS AS WORK IS COMPLETED. NO SEPARATE REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE AND MULCH
Z MEASUREMENT WILL BE MADE FOR PAYMENT FOR AREAS REQUIRING SEEDING AND MULCHING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE. 6. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM ROUTINE REVIEW OF THE SILT FENCES TO ENSURE PROPER
O OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION,THIS WORK SHALL BE PAID AT THE CONTRACTORS FUNCTION.FENCES TO BE CLEANED ONCE SEDIMENT DEPTH REACHES 6".
/n EXPENSE. 7. ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE, AS REQUIRED BY NCDEQ AND THE ENGINEER, SHALL BE
O
of 6.ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR COMPLETED AS DIRECTED.
W
EVERY SEVEN(7)DAYS OR AFTER EACH RAINFALL OCCURRENCE THAT EXCEEDS ONE-HALF(112)
N INCH.DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS NECESSARY SEEDING
BYTHECONTRACTOR,NO SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. TEMPORARY SCHEDULE-FALL MIXTURE
N
7.ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING ALL PHASES OF
o CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND ALL DISTURBED '
c� AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. ADDITIONAL CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING SEEDING MIXTURE SPECIES RATE(LB/ACRE)
0 CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO CONTROL EROSION AND/OR OFFSITE SEDIMENTATION. ALL RYE 120
TEMPORARY CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND
U THE SITE IS STABILIZED UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER. SEEDING DATES:
MOUNTAINS: AUG.15-DEC.15 IHF
p 8.THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE NECESSARY ACTION TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF MUD ONTO PIEDMONT: AUG.15-DEC.30 Foi
r� THE PAVED ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DAILY REMOVE COASTALPLAIN: AUG.15-DEC.30
MUD/SOIL FROM PAVEMENT,OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER
SOIL AMENDMENTS
0 9.REMOVAL OF A SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY NCDEQ FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS, OR APPLY 2,000 LB/ACRE GROUND S,
AND THE ENGINEER.NO MEASURE SHALL BE REMOVED UNTIL DIRECTED TO THE CONTRACTOR IN AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 1,000 LB/ACRE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER.
O WRITING.
~ MULCH
W APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW.ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT,NETTING OR A N1
2 MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A
LU
MULCH ANCHORING TOOL.
O
of
CL
MATTING NOTES MAINTENANCE
REPAIR AND REFERTILIZE DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY.TOPDRESS WITH 50 LBS/ACRE OF
NITROGEN IN MARCH.IF IT IS NECESSARY TO EXTEND TEMPORARY COVER BEYOND JUNE 15,
Q 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE SEEDED PER THE PLANS AND OVERSEED WITH 50 LBS/ACRE KOREAN(MOUNTAINS)LESPEDEZA OR KOBE(PIEDMONT AND
"I SIX p
COASTAL PLAIN)IN LATE FEBRUARY OR EARLY MARCH.
Q 2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE MULCHED PER THE PLANS AND
z SP
Z ECIFICATIONS EXCEPT THE AREAS THAT SHALL BE MATTED. DI
4 3. THE FOLLOWING AREAS SHALL BE MATTED:
DI
LU Q A.ALL DEFINED DITCHES AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS AND DETAILS;
Q B.ANY SLOPE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN A 3:1 SLOPE; CF
C.ANY BERM ABOVE A SLOPE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN A 3:1 SLOPE; AF
a D.ANY AREA REQUIRED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER.
N 4. PERMANENT MATTING SHALL BE TENSAR SC-250 OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR 2:1 SLOPES.ALL D/
O
� OTHER MATTING SHALL BE CURLEX II OR APPROVED EQUAL.
M
Sl
o PF
m
o
a

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AS OUTLINED IN THESE PLANS. .
- THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM.THE ENGINEER BEFORE MAKING ANY Aug6st4,2011
DEVIATIONS TO CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
Major Elements of DWQ Construction General_ Permit
2. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK INCLUDING GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE HIMSELF PROFICIENT IN THE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING OF THE PROJECT.
• : This dociunenl contains the major elements:of She ieoently-revised North Carolitta.Division of Water Quality(DWQ)Constniction
3. THE CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL HOLD A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH General,P91mifChZCG01)with ernphasisplaced on those elements that differ.from_the Previous permit(expiration on.August,2,
- NCDEQ PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. 2011). Since the summary list below cannot contain details ofevery change,%th'e.eomplete Permit should be used to assure full
ieeplementatiori. See:http://.portal.ricdenr.6rg(web/wq/ws/su/construction .
4..CONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT
-THE SITE AND ACROSS PROJECT PHASES. THE POSITIVE DRAINAGE INCLUDES DRAINAGE TO •• The major change in the Permit frgm the previous one is the shorter
THE APPROPRIATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE. -Ground Stabilization" times to:apply ground stabilization such as mulch;wheatsuaw;or
grasses.'The NC laws and rules relating to the Sediment Act require,
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL 60MPLETE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY ON ALL WORK COMPLETED. - Site Area Stabilization,• Stabilization Time inmost places;Bround stabilization within2l days:Based on the new
Description... .Time Frame Frame EXce th.:. EPA requirements and 9=months'work with a permit advisory group,
CT.AG.the Division and EPA-developed permit,now contains
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOWING THE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR THE Perimeter dikes,:- requiremcntsforgmandcoverwithin 14,andinsomeplaces,7days.
PROJECT: swales,ditches: 7 days None
and slopes
AREA1 • High Quality 2) Building Wastes Handling
A. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN,ON THE PLANS. Haler(HQW) 7 days None --• - '
B. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE Zones - • No paint or liquid wastes in Stream or storm drains
SLOPES IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR If slopes are 101.6r
REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. • Slopes steeper 7 days less in length and,are • Dedicated areas for de construction and other
C. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEGIN EMBANKMENT OPERATIONS TO COMPLETE GRADING than 3:1 not steeper than2:I_ wastes must be Iocated,50'from storm drains and streams
SHOWN ON THE PLANS, 14 days are allowed unless no reasonable altematives'abailable.
D. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TRAPEZOIDAL RIP RAP DITCH AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 7-daps fer.slopes • Ewen-material stockpiles most be located 50'from storm
E. AS AREAS ARE COMPLETED,THEY SHALL BE SEEDED AND MATTED IMMEDIATELY. - Slopes 3:1 or 14 days greater than 50 feet :drains and streams unless no reasonable altemativcs
flatter in length... •available.
None y Concrete materials must be controlled to avoid contact with
All other alas' surface waters,wetlands'or buffers:
AREA 4 with slopes flatter 14 days (except for
A. CONTRACTOR SHALL.COMPLETE A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE perim
than eters and
... ... 4:1.
SLOPES IN ORDER 70 IDENTIFY ANY AREAS THAT MAY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OR .. .H N Zones) ) Discharges to Federally-listed Raters
REPAIRED ALONG WITH THE OTHER WORK REQUIRED.FOR THIS PROJECT. 4�'Fxtensions of the may be approvedby the is¢m itting authority
B. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEGIN GRADING OPERATIONS WITHIN THE TOP AREA IN ORDER TO based on weatheror other site-specific conditions that make,compliance • •Requirements are the same as in previous permit:
ENSURE THE SITE DOES NOT ALLOW CONCENTRATION OF FLOWS.AS THE AREA IS impracticable."(Section 11[:B(2)(b)I • 'Me permit allows reduction from the 20 acre minimum if.
•' COMPLETED,IT SHALL BE SEEDED AND MATTED ACCORDINGLY.
O. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE REQUIRED GRADING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE the Director of DWQ determines"lint other Bh•Il's provide
- BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE AND AT THE GRAVEL ROAD. AS THE WORK IS COMPLETED,IT equivalent protection,
SHALL BE SEEDED AND MATTED ACCORDINGLY. - 2
D. ONCE ALL DISTURBED AREAS DESCRIBED ABOVE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED,MATTED,AND : l
HAVE A GOOD STAND OF VEGETATION,THE SLOPE DRAINS AND ASSOCIATED BERM-
SHALL BE REMOVED. ANY AREAS DISTURBED DURING THIS WORK SHALL BE SEEDED
AND MATTED ACCORDINGLY. .
.. 0'
N
a
_ ..
o August4,2011
w Major Elements of DWQ Construction General Permit-Continued
0
z
z
0
w
4) Inspections. "' 6) Conditions ki;Eedsioh&Sedimentation Control Plads•
fir .. _ -
a Same weekly inspection requirements Desi8�tion on the plans where the 7 and 14-day gro nd
0 .. stabilization requirements oftbeNPDES.permit apply
Designation on the plans where basins that comply with the
�
Same rain gauge&inspections'afier.0:5"-iaiti event+i surface-withdrawal requirements of the NF'DES permit are
• -Inspeciions-are only required during"normal business- located.'
hours" .
v • Inspection reports must be'available on-site during 7) Building\ fiites fiandling
- business hours unless a site-specific:cxemption is '-• - INF,
..a loved FO1
o ... No paint or liquid wastes in stream or.storm drains -
N .- •.'Records must be kept for 3 years and available upon
. .. request. :.: Dedicated areas for demolition,construction and other
C, • Electronically-available records maybe substituted: wastes located9p'from storm drains and streams unless S�.
" under certain conditions. ire
no reasonable alfUnati s are available. : -
F.. - - - • _Earthen-material stockpiles located 50'.from storm _
Z N1
:. .. W ..
!in plem n o m ,• Concrete materials must beconiroll d to a contact
`entatio fNewPeritConditions
p. • Projects permitted under the previous permit can "
a e.
avoid
> � � - with surface waters,.wetlands,or buffers. —
IX continue to follow the previously-permtimed conditions;
a. .- ,-.
• Complete applications received prior to August 3,2011 '8) Sed'unept Basins ,, - —
follow conditions of approved apphcation.
Q .dam d Outletstmemres mast withdraw,from basin surface
LU Applications received after August 2,.2011 must comply
Q with neWpermit conditions. unless.drainage area is less than,t acre.
. .. z ... • Use only DWQ-approved flocculants. D
... i
DI
Q •.In order for the E&SC Plan to satisfy the conditiens.of the Construction General peunt,it must identify areas where the ground stabilization requirements apply and the
W
Of - Im on'of tfid basins wbere the surface-withdrawal requ'ucrirents apply. Cl
AI
.. N _ Di
C! ..
Document prepared bylhe,Division'of Water Quality 2
sl
vi
PF
o .. - ..
ci ..
ro
o: - .. ...

RIPRAP CHART
STR.NO. OUTLET DESCRIPTION PIPE SIZE(IN) RIPRAP CLASS RIPRAP DEPTH(D)(IN) La(FT) W(FT)
VARIES
S-2 FLARED END SECTION 18 B 18 9 10.5
S-4 FLARED END SECTION 18 B 18 9 10.5 RIP-RAP
0 0
S-6 FLARED END SECTION 18 B 18 9 10.5
S-8 FLARED END SECTION 18 B 18 9 10.5
S-10 FLARED END SECTION 18 B 18 9 10.5 TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH DETAIL
N.T.S.
RAP-CLASS B,
RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION FAQ DWI H#57
N.T.S. 4'MAX FILTER STONE
RIPRAP OUTLET PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS a
1. ENSURE THAT THE SUBGRADE FOR THE FILTER AND RIPRAP FOLLOWS THE REQUIRED LINES AND GRADES SHOWN IN THE PLAN. o� -
COMPACT ANY FILL REQUIRED IN THE SUBGRADE TO THE DENSITY OF THE SURROUNDING UNDISTURBED MATERIAL.LOW is P" _ o
AREAS IN THE SUBGRADE ON UNDISTURBED SOIL MAY ALSO BE FILLED BY INCREASING THE RIPRAP THICKNESS. 4 1' 5"
TS
1 -�
2. THE RIPRAP AND GRAVEL FILTER MUST CONFORM TO THE SPECIFIED GRADING LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
„ o
3. FILTER CLOTH,WHEN USED, MUST MEET DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND BE PROPERLY PROTECTED FROM PUNCHING OR
TEARING DURING INSTALLATION. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE BY REMOVING THE RIPRAP AND PLACING ANOTHER PIECE OF FILTER " = d
CLOTH OVER THE DAMAGED AREA ALL CONNECTING JOINTS SHOULD OVERLAP A MINIMUM OF i FT.IF THE DAMAGE IS 1=(j.° I- I T- _
EXTENSIVE,REPLACE THE ENTIRE FILTER CLOTH. =IT i --� I"4'I_
4. RIPRAP MAY BE PLACED BY EQUIPMENT.CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGING THE FILTER FABRIC.
5. THE MINIMUM THICKNESS OF THE RIPRAP SHOULD BE 1.5 TIMES THE MAXIMUM STONE DIAMETER.
6. RIPRAP MAY BE FIELD STONE OR ROUGH QUARRY STONE.IT SHOULD BE HARD,ANGULAR,HIGHLY WEATHER-RESISTANT AND NOTES:
WELL GRADED.
1. SILT FENCE STONE OUTLET SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG PERIMETER OF THE
7. CONSTRUCT THE APRON GRADE AS SHOWN ON PLAN WITH NO OVERFALL AT THE END. MAKE THE TOP OF THE RIPRAP AT THE GRADING LIMITS AT 100 FOOT INTERVALS,LOW SPOTS AND AS ORDERED BY THE
DOWNSTREAM END LEVEL WITH THE RECEIVING AREA OR SLIGHTLY BELOW IT. ENGINEER.DRAINAGE AREAS OF OUTLETS SHOULD BE MINIMIZED AS PRACTICAL. -.
8. ENSURE THAT THE APRON IS PROPERLY ALIGNED WITH THE RECEIVING STREAM AND PREFERABLY STRAIGHT THROUGHOUT ITS 2. THE COST OF STONE SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO SILT FENCE.
LENGTH.IF A CURVE IS NEEDED TO FIT SITE CONDITIONS,PLACE IT IN THE UPPER SECTION OF THE APRON.
p 9. IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION,STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH VEGETATION.MAINTENANCE INSPECT RIPRAP
N OUTLET STRUCTURES AFTER HEAVY RAINS TO SEE IF ANY EROSION AROUND OR BELOW THE RIPRAP HAS TAKEN PLACE OR IF
N STONES HAVE BEEN DISLODGED.IMMEDIATELY MAKE ALL NEEDED REPAIRS TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE.
r)
C7 10. EXISTING FLARED END SECTIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL HAVE HE EXISTING OUTLET OR INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE STONE OUTLET DETAIL
�i MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROJECT,IF THE EXISTING
q OUTLET OR INLET PROTECTION IS IN SATISFACTORY CONDITION,THE OUTLET AND INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONITORED. N.T.S.
to IF THE EXISTING OUTLET OR INLET PROTECTION IS NOT IN SATISFACTORY CONDITION OR NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED TO MEET
J
Q NCDEQ REQUIREMENTS,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADD THE REQUIRED RIPRAP TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.
H
W
Z
O
t/) PUBLIC STREET!
EXISTING STEEL POST
W 50'MINIMUM PAVEMENT SILT FENCE NOTES:
WIRE MESH
ii_ 1. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE DEPOSITS REACH
o77 FILTERFABRIC APPROXIMATELY HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE FABRIC. SHOULD THE FILTER
-I I 1-1 I 1=1 I I-1 11= =_III-I I - I- L- -III-�I I' OPg FABRIC COLLAPSE, TEAR, DECOMPOSE, DETERIORATE OR BECOME
I= -III_ c o FILLSV_ INEFFECTIVE,IT SHALL BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY.
p 6"MINIMUM THICKNESS _-�
cy FILTER FABRIC UNDER STONE 4 4 �V0144 TF=��II EXISTING 2. USE A SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC OF AT LEAST 95% BY WEIGHT OF
❑ ,tOy _jF GROUND POLYOLEFINS OR POLYESTER CONFORMING TO ASTM D 6461 AND SHOULD
❑ EXISTING GROUND LINE CONTAIN ULTRAVIOLET RAY INHIBITORS AND STABILIZERS TO PROVIDE A
„7II_
MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS EXPECTED USABLE CONSTRUCTION LIFE AT A
N 50'MINIMUM v,\"��\\\\ �=�\ »�m..\\/����\✓���C\�/\�/.�//.�/.\//.�//.�/%�
TEMPERATURE RANGE OF 0°F TO 102°F. OFF
O FOi
3. FOR REINFORCEMENT OF STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC,USE MIN.14
4^� ANCHOR FABRIC AS SHOWN AND GAUGE WIRE FENCE WITH MAX.MESH SPACING OF 6 INCHES.
COMPACT BACKFILL ABOVE IT
CIS
0 g 4. IF EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC IS UTILIZED (ASTM D 4641), WIRE MESH IS S'
18'MIN. ) v PUBLIC SECTION EXISTING PAVEMENT OPTIONAL.
/
Z 5. POSTS SHALL BE 1.33 LBILF STEEL WITH MIN. LENGTH OF 5 FEET AND
W e 8'MAX.STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC WITH WIRE FENCE PROJECTIONS TO FACILITATE FASTENING THE FABRIC. NI
6'MAX.EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC WITHOUT WIRE FENCE
j 6. ATTACH WIRE MESH TO POST WITH MIN.4 WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES.
0 ANCHOR FABRIC TO WIRE SEE NOTES REGARDING
_ MESH WITH PLASTIC TIES MESH AND FABRIC 7. ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EACH POST WITH MIN.3 WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES -
0_ 1. A STABILIZED PAD OF RAILROAD BALLAST SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE TRAFFIC WILL ENTER OR MIDWAY BETWEEN POSTS ATTACHMENT TO POSTS
LEAVE A CONSTRUCTION SITE ON TO A PUBLIC STREET. WITHIN THE TOP 8 INCHES OF THE FABRIC. -
8. CONSTRUCT FILTER FABRIC FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH
2. STONE TO BE 2"-3"STONE. OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID JOINTS.WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY,SECURELY
4 3. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FASTEN THE FILTER FABRIC ONLY TO A SUPPORT POST WITH 4 FEET MIN.
❑ OVERLAP TO THE NEXT POST.
FLOWING OF SEDIMENT.STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY
DI
Q MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 9. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND
Q 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS MUST BE \ l"�� BRING AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE DI
/ /\ \\j\\jy'}%\y\\\j\�j\^\`\�^/•���j�y\jam/ /\\f=�`� �y\ \y\/ AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
w REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. �/h,(�//Y%`/h/n//=/�/.//✓,r' ,./✓/� CI
Q MAX.WIRE FILTER FABRIC �N 10. THE USE OF SILT FENCE TO ENCOMPASS OR ENCIRCLE DRAINAGE INLETS AND
J 5. WHEN NECESSARY,WHEELS MUST BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTERING A FABRIC MESH (SEE NOTE 2) R"o AI
PUBLIC STREET.WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED,IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH OPENING SIZE iv ina STRUCTURES IS PROHIBITED. ANY DAMAGED CAUSED BY THE USE OF SILT
Q CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. =36 SQ.IN. FENCE NOT SPECIFICALLY ALLOWED SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR
AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. D!
N
6. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI 500 OR EQUAL. FABRIC IS INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION 11. AT NO TIME SHALL SILT FENCE BE PLACED WITHIN CONCENTRATED FLOW, _
ENTRANCE. EXISTING OR PROPOSED DITCHES,OR TEMPORARY DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE
S1
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL DI TEMPORARY SILT FENCE PF
0
N.T.S.
o:

I
I
a
_;A PAT MCCRORY
,;. Governor
•r
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
^ Secretary
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
i
Director
February 25, 2016
Harry K. Sideris—SVP, Environmental, Health &Safety
Duke Energy
526 South Church Street, ECUP
Charlotte, NC 28202
Subject: Incident Closure
NOV-2015-PC-0303
Permit No. WQ0000020
Duke Energy Progress Inc.
Coal Combustion Products Structural Fill Projects
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Sideris,
The Asheville Regional Office (ARO) received your December 18,2015 letter response to a
recent Notice of Violation (NOV-2015-PC-0303) involving violations of permit WQ0000020.aV .
the Asheville Regional Airport Coal Combustion Prod ucts"(CCP)`Structural Fill Project:-More.
specifically, site inspections conducted by Duke Energy on October 29, 2015 noted an erosion-
induced breach of the soil cap and subsequent CCP exposure at Area 1 and an erosion-induced
breach of the soil cap and subsequent exposure of the plastic (HDPE) liner at Area 4.The
violations cited in the NOV include a failure to notify in accordance with permit condition
IV.12.e and a failure to properly maintain and operate a CCP structural fill facility in accordance
with permit condition.111.1.
According to permit condition IV.12.e,the Permittee is responsible for contacting the ARO, as
soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following the
occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of a breach and/or severe erosion of the liner
systems. Any erosion of the soil cap that results in the exposure of the HDPE liner, GCL liner,
and/or CCP is a non-compliant condition and is required to be reported under permit conditions
IV12.
ARO staff conducted site inspections on November 2, 2015 and November 5, 2015 and
observed your response to the non-compliance issues affecting Area 1 and Area 4.
Your written,response,the annual inspection report, and the temporary stabilization efforts
have been reviewed and evaluated. We appreciate your response to the NOV. It is our
understanding that a stormwater management plan for the entire Asheville Airport CCP
structural fill project is currently under review and implementation of that plan will likely begin
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality.I Water Resources
2090 U.S.Hwy.70,Swannanoa,North Carolina 28778
828-296-4500

-Harry Sideris
February 25,2016 -
Page 2 of 2
in June 2016. Please provide a copy or summary of the final repair plan when it becomes
available.
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality is committed to protecting North
Carolina's environment and natural resources.' It strives to foster a collaborate stewardship
among the citizens, regulators and the business community with the goal of maintaining and
enhancing North Carolina's environment and natural resources for the benefit and enjoyment
of everyone living in and visiting our great state.
Your attention and cooperation is greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions
regarding this matter or other water quality issues or concerns, please contact Brett Laverty at
[phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
G. Landon Davidson, P.G., Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations, NCDEQ
Asheville Regional Office
cc:d-amm1NQvAsheviil0Filesstl%, i
MSC 1617—Central Files—Basement j
WQ Enforcement/Non Discharge
Michael Reisman—Asheville Airport(via email) ;
John Toepfer—Duke Energy(via email) 1
j
1
1
J
. 1
i
j
i
{

RECEIVED
DUKE Division of Water Resources Harry K.Sideris
■ Senior:Vice President
ENERGY, Environmental,Health&Safety
J A N - 4 2016 526 S.Church street
Mail Code:EC3XP
Charlotte,NC 28202
_
Water Quality Regional Operations [phone]
i Asheville Regional Office
December 31, 2015
VIA E-MAIL AND UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
G. Landon Davidson, P.G., Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations,NCDEQ
Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa,NC 28778
landon.davidsorignedenngov
Re: Coal Combustion Products Structural Fill Permit No. WQ0000020
2015 Annual Inspection Report
Dear Mr. Davidson:
As indicated in Duke Energy Progress, LLC's (Duke Energy) response to Notice of Violation
No. NOV-2015-PC-0303 (NOV) dated December 18, 2015, enclosed is the 2015 Annual
Inspection Report (Annual Report) required by Section V.2. of Coal Combustion Products
Structural Fill Permit No. WQ 0000020 issued by the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) on September 2, 2015. Part 1 of the Annual Report includes,
among other things, (a) the dates and times of inspections; (b) the names and titles of persons
who conducted the inspections; (c) observation results on structural integrity, erosion, liner
systems, integrity of the cap systems, stormwater collection systems, condition of monitoring
wells, settlement, subsidence, seepage, and presence of woody vegetation; (d) descriptions and
photographs of any pertinent issues that may have been identified; (e) any maintenance, repairs,
or corrective action that may have been undertaken; and (f) an engineer's certification of the
evaluation on the structural integrity and stability of the ash fill areas. Part 2 of the Annual
Report specifically responds to information requested by DEQ in the NOV regarding the
inspection and repair of all fill areas identified in the NOV, including specifically:
• Verification and evaluation of soil cover thickness along.the slope face area of Area IV;
• Verification and evaluation of soil cap thickness along the slope face area of Area 1, as
well as all recent repair areas;

� r
• A description of all plan jed temporary and long-term remedial efforts to address issues
identified in the NOV, including an explanation of measures that will be undertaken to
mitigate structural fill cap:;and cover erosion; and y
• A schedule for designing and implementing long-term stormwater management solutions
for Areas I and IV.
Please let.me know if you have any questions regarding the enclosed reports.
Respectfully,
f
Harry Sideris
Senior Vice President,Environmental, Health & Safety
2

�BOUNDARY
LEGENT�— a ui
COMPLIA UNDAR \
— _ LIMITS OF
-- IN
PROPERTY BOU / - /
- - - - - R
00
M EXISTING M RING NELLS
R*TA4.9 OPOSEDIMONITORIN WELLS` '°
N UNNA0 ca `THE fo N
COJf muNDnm. 1 3'JL
• B>x�xo�sw Ism R EWB_�__—w.m '�� / �::'�'u.-�;
1 9 FILL)7YP.)
Pa)ECT Ems,_ '/,
LOIT` ��J Oi ., .�" �'" �j• nom
.a, F MI OF COB FILL TYP. E ® RmD Iw
Bxe / IPHAS Il R l EVIEWBOUNDARY)TVP.) I� V E` ) ) '/ G OUN J�WATER SURFACE / ' �
/ CONTOURS / / I W
C.M M.)PLUiNCE BOUNDARV(
e z
' N
g w✓ a o �_ ryo/ z. � I I .�jl J
OWL
S - No
LIMITS OF CB FILL ITYP.)�
(Pi, E2)
5s 4%rn'xFi-iw�n��enTnxi;x �• / ,;� u.�m:.aorzwoovuw I Qti
COMPLIANCE UND ITYP.I I W H as
BsrtmrNum ® d 116
mZ
STOP a�
P�� ,IO% ni oF,unrsdnuNK \• ��," //\�\4 1. RESEARCH OF WELL REGORGE INDICATE THAT THERE ARE 1� Q W O
i i enaA9 za�A ffi wpm \\ NO PUBLIC ORPRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS THIN xc aiE ou • �i
5 100'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY.
THIS PLAN INDICATES THE COB UNITS PROPOSED AS Z
S d�
Solmmm BUFFER LIMITS nrvxl \\ PHASE 2 OF THE NGINEERED FILL SCHEDULED FOR THIS i
(31.7'mou w1Fo \ PH
ASES
D IA ARE UNDERWAY
E COMPLIANCE BOUNDARIES E FOR THESE
PHASES HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED TO INCORPORATE THE ZLIMITS OF
�\� F •� F HASE 2 AS SHOWN. THAT AND RENEW BOUNDARIES FOR PHA W Cf C9
PHASES I a
COMPUNCE
ARE
ABANDONED WILTH IE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AND IA THAT WITHIN THE LIMITS FORNTH SE PL N. SCALE 1' ]OD'
3. GROUNDWATER DUALITY MONITORING SHALL BE
PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE PATH PERMIT NO. ISSUE DAM, 30 2011
COOAALL COMBUSTION BYPRODUCTS AS ENGINEERED FlLLOOoOl CRANING PERMISSION FOR THE REUSE F xo BNrz Nesainw ���
\ PROGRESS DRAW
FOR:
OR CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
FORR IEW PURPOSES ONLY

DENR ARO
December 1,2011
bcc: Barbara A.Coppola-TPP9
Fred Holt—PEB4
Dan Kemp—PEB17
Shannon Langley-PEB4
Laurie Moorhead—Asheville Plant
Rob Reynolds—TPP9
John Toepfer—PEB4
Cha.rah,Inc.—M.Winfree
Asheville Airport—.M. Reisman
4

Introduction
This document serves as the Annual Inspection Report(Report)required by Condition V.2. of NCDENR
(now NCDEQ) Permit No.WQ0006020(Permit) issued to Duke Energy on September 2, 2015. In
addition,this Report contains information as required by Notice of Violation No.NOV-2015-PC-0303
(NOV) issued to Duke Energy on December 2;2015. Part 1 of this Report provides the information
required under Permit Condition V.2.,and Part 2 addresses the additional reporting requirements set
forth in the NOV.
Part 1 - 2015 Annual Report
Pursuant to the Permit,.an annual inspection report shall be submitted on or before December 31 of
each year., The annual inspection report shall contain inspection logs for each quarterly inspection
performed throughout the year. The Report shall.describes
• Date and time.of each report;
• Name and title of the inspectors;
• Observation results on structural integrity, erosion, liner systems, integrity of the cap system,
stormwater collection systems,condition of monitoring wells,settlement,subsidence,seepage,
and presence of woody vegetation;
• Description and photo documentation of any pertinent issues such as breach in liner system,
excavations within 3 feet of the liner system,erosion,development of depressions,slope
movement,damage to monitoring wells,and groundwater seepage;
• Any maintenance, repairs,or corrective actions taken;
• An annual engineer's certification of the evaluation on the structural integrity and stability of
the ash.fill areas.
Annual)Report Summary and Observations
In accordance with the Permit conditions, Duke Energy performed three`inspections of the structural fill
areas at the Asheville Regional Airport(Airport) in October, November,and December 2015. Chuck
Cranford,ABSAT Project Manager,completed the October inspection on October 22 and 29. The
inspections took place in the morning between 8:00 a.m.to 12:00 p.m. Matt Pickett, a Senior Engineer
for Duke Energy CCP Engineering, performed the November and December monthly inspections.on
November 17 and December 2, respectively. These inspections also.took place in the morning between
8:00 a.m.to 12:00 p.m. The areas inspected included Area I,Areajlll,and Area IV located at the Airport.
Figure 1 on the following page depicts the areas in relation to the Airport facilities:Areal on the
northeast corner of the property,Area III west of the runway to the north, and Area IV to the west of
the runway and to the south.
1

Figure l-AerialView of Airport and Fill Areas
t
#�#N`
IN
Q 1_2
ti t c
gg
a
E �
v
ti
y
saw"
z

AREA I
The Area Cash fill,completed in:the fall of 2010, is an approximately 18-acre,fill area on the north end of
the Airport located east of the runway. The fill area is designed to slope north at a 2.5%grade across
the top of the fill area. The outer slope of the fill was built to a 33%(3HAV)slope. A wetland area,
stormwater structures,and outfalls are located at the north toe of the Area slope.
There is a 100-foot wide compacted soil core over the length of a 60-inch diameter stormwater pipe that
transects the ash fill. The pipe flows south to north and is part of drainage from the Airport runway
areas. The compacted soil core is to ensure that ash is not located within 50 feet of a stormwater, pipe.
Area I is lined with geosVnthetic clay liner(GCL) on the bottom.'The cap system for the area is a
vegetated-compacted soil cover.. The top of the fill system with the 2.5%grade is constructed with a 6-
foot thick soil cap. The outer slopes are.constructed with a 2-foot thick soil cap as designed. The detail
for the cap is shown in the figure below. The detail shown below is from the drawing set"Asheville
Regional Airport-Fly Ash Beneficial Use Project," issued by Charah, revised December 2007.
.. (`)TOPOFRLL._g+ ... '
SIDESLOPES-7
. (`)COMPACTED -
. SO6L CAP `/ ..
`ASHPzwr
LACEMENT .
. LL AV1X 1X10�cm1 .
GEOSYTHETIC CLAY
LINER WTERtAL
TYPICAL LINER SECTION
- N.T.S. .. ..
Figure 2-Typical.cap and liner detail for Area I'
Area I Observations
The October 2015 inspection identified exposed ash at the cap in the northwest corner,areas with over
grown vegetation, and several areas of minor erosion on the slopes, The exposed ash in Area I was
excavated and removed from the site and compacted soil was placed to restore cover. Additional
temporary erosion control measures were put in place in the area, including silt fencing, reseeding; and
a series of berms and pumps to divert water until a permanent grading plan could.be developed and
executed. Further inspections of the area in November and December revealed these temporary
measures were-successful in diverting water and avoiding further erosion.
The photos below illustrate the measures taken to confirm cap thickness, reduce erosion,-and establish
vegetation in Area I. The areas were stripped of vegetation as shown in Photo 1. Exposed ash was
excavated and placed in on-site roll-off containers. The roll-off containers were transported by
Mountain Environmental for eventual disposal at a lined solid waste facility in Enoree,South Carolina.
Bills of.lading are available for review. The excavated areas were brought to grade with soil and
compacted as shown in Photo 2. Photo 2 shows the soil placement and the temporary erosion
measures taken immediately after the conditions were found. Photo 3 shows Area I two weeks after
3

Photo 2 was taken. Flow diversion berms were constructed across the area. The area was reseeded and
straw matting was installed to further reduce erosion. '
Photo 1-Area I showing standing water and area with exposed ash.(October 2015)
Photo 2-.Exposed ash was removed,soil fill was brought to Area I,placed,and compacted..Note photo taken after rain
event.(November 2015)
4

Photo 3-Area I with erosion control measures in place.(November 2015)
The areas of heavy vegetation noted in the October inspection were cleared for subsequent inspections.
�
r �t, ,
b ;
R'
Photo 4-Initial inspection of Area I slope noted that woody vegetation impaired visual.inspection.(October 2015)
5

Photo.5-Area I slope with woody vegetation removed and repairs to slope in place.(November 2015)
As a result of this.clearing,an apparent weep and scarp were noted on the north side of the access road
that forms the toe of the fill area. Further geotechnical analysis ofthis area is warranted to determine
the cause of these items as well as determine if stability factors are acceptable. Duke Energy will work
with the Airport to undertake a geotechnical investigation of this area in the first quarter of 2016.
Photos 6 and 7 below show the condition of the weep and scarp. The weep is a trickle flow. The scarp is
approximately 60 feet in length with depth ranging from eight inches to 18 inches.
a
Photo 6-Apparent weep noted during_November and December inspections after vegetation had been cleared:
(December 2015)
6

0
Photo 7-'Scarp noted during November and December'inspections after vegetation had-been.cleared.
(December 2015)
Several areas on the north slope,of Area I have been repaired by filling in ruts,with soil and establishing
vegetation.The east slopes of the fill area have a adequate vegetation, no visible erosion,and are in good
condition. Minor erosion was noted in areas along the south slope as well as some small animal
burrows that need to be addressed. The top of the fill has a few minor erosion issues, an area of sparse
vegetation, and a small depression requiring attention. Duke Energy has identified these areas in the
monthly reports and provided a list of recommended repairs for each issue to the Airport.
Area I Corrective Actions-
Duke Energy has been conducting monthly inspections for the final three-months of the year in addition
to the prescribed quarterly inspection required under the Permit. Duke Energy will continue with
monthly inspections until the final repair plan is developed and constructed. .
Duke Energy is working with Charah and AVCON,the Airport's consulting engineers,to develop a final
repair plan to address the issues noted above and identified in the monthly inspections and NOV.
The following schedule is proposed for completion of the permanent design, permitting, and
construction.
• 60 days to complete permanent designs for Area I and review existing permanent
stormwater management plan for Area IV(March 1;2016)
• 45 days to complete necessary permitting with NCDEQ(April 15, 2016)
• 60 days to complete construction activities on-site(June 15,2016)
Upon completion of the permanent repairs, Duke Energy will return to quarterly inspections of Area I.
7

AREA III
The Area III ash fill, currently completing construction, is an approximately 29-acre ash fill located west
of,the runway on the northern portion of the airport property. Area III is constructed (from bottom to
top)with a compacted soil subgrade,geosynthetic clay liner, and 60-mil geomembrane liner with
leachate collection pipes on top of the liner. The leachate collection system gravity drains to the
Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County(District). Leachate flow has consistently been
observed at 6-7 gallons per minute. The cap for Area III is a flexible membrane with soil cover on top of
it. The geomembrane in the cap system is 40-mil textured HDPE. The cap thickness is six feet on top
and two feet on the side slopes as designed. The design details shown below are from the drawing set,
"Asheville Regional Airport, Engineered Fill-Area 3," issued for construction by Charah on March 15,
2013.
—a rIm BUM uia
n OX; �""
at EUM ME OR
7 m 1LINE SEGTTGN & SUBGRAOE
KOM
M ua ax evMMR �tt �nrec t°�ai Mz tAm m w V.vif.it°n°'
FW wsTwnnw sr�unutwns
Figure 3-Typical bottom liner system detail for Area III
Si u%R -t.-.--Dt3 uEA HG4 w 5.iP6 HYl ¢
t Yim amt z(7aE
mmur,�
-=a�mum iat uay
'Gc ro ttm+m uu p,smlm rsit)
Figure 4-Typical cap detail for Area.111
Area III Observations
As of the December 2015 inspection,Area III has an open Erosion and Sediment Control (E&SC) permit
held by the Airport. Final phases of construction are still ongoing in the area. The photos presented
below show that vegetation is just being established on the top of the north end of the fill and along
much of the north and west slopes. The Airport has constructed a runway on the top portion of the fill.
Other than a few minor erosion areas associated with establishing vegetation,the slopes of this area are
in good condition.
8

f
Photo 8-Area III with vegetation being established.(December 2015)
Photo 9-Overview of top of Area III with runway in background and E&Sc measures in place.(December 2015)
Area III Corrective Actions
Area III does not have any issues identified for corrective action. Duke Energy will continue to include
the area in its inspections.
Area III is currently being completed and will be turned over to the responsibility of the Airport for-
future maintenance:
9

AREA IV
The Area IV ash:fill,substantially completed April 1, 2015, is located to the west of the Airport
runway. The 28-acre fill area was constructed in three different-phases: Phase I, Phase IA,and Phase
2. Area IV is constructed (from bottom to top)with a compacted soil subgrade,geosynthetic clay liner,
and 60-mil geomembrane liner with leachate collection pipes on top of the liner. The leachate collection
system gravity drains to the District. Leachate.flow has consistently.been observed at 4-5 gallons per
minute.
The cap system is similar to Area III noted above, but it was designed with a 30-mil geomembrane cap.
The soil thickness.on the cap is six feet on.top and two feet on the:side slopes as designed.;.
' �[wu Ca41+8RrJ1z ra e[caws tmA
. - :IPtnA%N tv0 4IDrp R4 KL[tAtM' .
. .. 1'dr®49Ar.WLOI W 61ltlq
L AMIOXD Yt91m9 WY tt R
M[4 0 10
. tOrt1¢tY tYAnW OICUM; Il16
. .- _ - 9X U$t�^'_.'^�'^^....T•—C ^—"E[4 UtlL IIU1U ..
_ CGY.wi(a OIL
9 XSi
- Ai4 QY[ieID IUfL WCt...... ..
. (�O�IMEL INN R-Som).w UNPtID @IAt�
� �QI;OSURE'CAP SEC11�N
Figure 5=Typical cap detail for Area IV
Area IV Observations
The October 2015 inspection identified exposed geomembrane liner along the western slope (but not
exposed ash), areas with over grown vegetation, and several areas of erosion:on the slopes. The area
with the exposed cap was filled with soil and a sandbag diversion ring was installed to divert surface
water until a permanent grading plan,is developed and implemented. Further inspections of the area in
November and.December 2015 revealed the temporary measures were successful in diverting water
and avoiding.further erosion.
Photo 10-October inspections noted area with exposed geomembrane liner.(October 2015)
10

x
Photo 11-Temporary measures around exposed geomembrane.(November 2015)
Area IV is currently being utilized as.a construction laydown area adjacent to the new runway. The
Airport holds an E&SC permit for Area IV in relation to the construction activities for the new runway.
Several minor erosion areas along the western slope were identified. There are several slope drains
with erosion:around the rip rap at the drain discharge and:several erosion channels north of the : .
retaining wall. The entire slope is covered with vegetation over twenty-four inches tall that limits
inspection. Duke Energy has identified these areas in.the monthly reports and provided a list of
recommended repairs for each issue to the Airport.
Area IV Corrective Actions
Duke Energy conducted monthly inspections for the final three months of the year in addition to the
prescribed quarterly inspection required under the Permit. Duke Energy will continue with monthly
inspections until the final repair plan is developed and constructed:
Duke Energy is working with Charah and AVCON,the Airport's consulting engineers,to develop a final
repair plan to address the exposed geomembrane noted above and the issues identified in the NOV.
The following schedule is proposed for completion of the permanent design, permitting, and
construction. ;
• 60 days to complete permanent designs for Area I and review existing permanent
stormwater management plan for Area IV(March 1, 2016)
• 45 days to complete necessary permitting with NCDEQ(April 15, 2016.)
• 60 days to complete construction activities on-site(June 15, 2016)
11 , :

CERTIFYING STATEMENT
EMENT
This Report is presented to meet the requirements of Permit No.WQ0000020 issued to Duke Energy on
September 2,2015. To the best of my knowledge,the information contained in this Report and
supporting documentation are accurate and complete.
I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineers under the laws of the state of North Carolina. „1111
Oe of SS p Signature:
Printed Name: SEAL
26864
Date: IZ ho ( I 5 License Number:
O
'''j A: NO N'01" .
12

Part 2 - Annual Report Additional Information Required by NOV
Pursuant to the NOV, NCDEQ required a response to certain items in this Report: Each of NCDEQ's
requests for information.are set forth in italics with Duke Energy's response following.
1. Duke subcontractors indicate that a soil cap thickness of 4 ft. was. present on the slopes of .
Area IV upon completion of the cell. The Division is requiring verification of soil cap
thicknesses along the entire slope face of Area IV. Any discrepancies between the soil cap
thickness as designed and constructed and the existing soil cap thickness shall be explained.
There are no discrepancies:in the design of the soil cap for the Area.IV structural fill project. The design
for Area IV provides fora soil cap thickness across the surface of six(6)feet and a minimum of two (2)
feet on the side slopes. As built surveying was performed by WNC Engineering and Surveying and
confirmed all infrastructure locations,separation, and soil cap thicknesses. Copies of GeoTrack
Technologies'Construction Quality Assurance certifications are available upon request. NCDEQ was
notified of this cap configurati6riln a letter dated.December 1,2011 (see Attachment"1").
2. Conceptual design plans for Area I indicate a soil cap thickness of 4 ft. on slopes and 6 ft.or the
crown of the structural fill: The Division is requiring verification of soil cap thicknesses along.the
entire slope face of Area I as well as all recent repair area. Any discrepancies between the
soil cap thickness as designed and constructed and the existing soil cap thickness shall be
explained. Refer to 3.d. below.
There are no discrepancies in the design of the soil cap for the Area I structural fill project. Area I was
designed with a soil cap system of six(6)feet of soil across the surface with two(2)feet of soil along the
side slopes. (See letter from Progress Energy to NCDEQ dated December 23,2008 discussing the soil cap
thickness at Attachment"2.") Charah conducted hand auger borings and a field run survey during the
week of 12/14/2015 to evaluate in-situ soil cap conditions along the slope of Area I and determined that
minor soil losses have occurred since the project was closed in November 2010. These losses are
concentrated in the northwest corner of the structural fill,which coincides with the areas noted in the
recent.inspection completed by NCDEQ and subsequently temporarily stabilized by Charah.
3. Describe all remedial efforts, temporary and long-term,planned to address the Area I breach
and Area IV soil cap erosion. This description shall include specifics with regard to:
Temporary remedial actions have been taken to address erosion.in Areas I.and IV. For Area I, remedial
actions have included constructing temporary stormwater diversion berms, installing silt fencing, re-
grading areas, and establishing vegetation on disturbed surfaces. For Area IV,the area where the cap
geomembrane was exposed has been stabilized with a temporary cover ballasted by sand bags and
riprap. These actions are described in detail with photos in Part 1 of this Report.
The permanent.repair plan is under development by Charah and the Airport's consultant,AVCON.
Regarding the specific items noted in the NOV,the responses are described below:
13 _ ..

a. Removal of the 6"slope drain in Area I;
Removal of the 6" slope drain will be addressed in the Final Repair plan.
b. How the erosive conditions located at two slope drains on Area IV will be stabilized and
repaired;
Rills and erosive conditions will be repaired and monitored until the permanent design configuration for,
Area IV is in place. Previously,geomembrane material was placed at the outlet of these slope drains
and covered with rip rap to protect the integrity of the geomembrane cap system below. This system
will be maintained until final removal of the temporary slope drains.
c. The long-term stormwater management design at Area IV, including any required changes to
slope drains and road ditches;
Upon completion of the ongoing temporary runway construction project,slope drains will be removed
and road ditches placed into their permanent configuration. Stormwater and sediment basin volume
calculations were completed with the original design for these improvements and will be adequate
without additional measures or design changes. Information can be submitted with the Area IV
permanent E&SC design package to support this original design.
d. The presence of CCP on the surface of the Area I slope in a second area located away from the
stormwater channel;
The CCP noted in this item was investigated and confirmed to be a result of the ongoing repair activities
and equipment performing work on-site as opposed to degradation of the soil cap. Hand auger soil
borings in the area confirmed appropriate cap thicknesses.
e. The treatment and maintenance of observed rills and cavities on the slope face of Areal,
Temporary stabilization measures were completed on November 5, 2015. Duke Energy has also
implemented temporary monthly inspections,which are above and beyond the quarterly inspections
required under the Permit. These monthly inspections will continue until the permanent repairs have
been completed.
Erosion rills and gullies were re-graded and stabilized. In areas where the cap had eroded and the
required thickness was not met,soil material was brought in and placed to meet required cap
thicknesses.The final repair plan will address grades in these areas and permanent surface stabilization
procedures to allow for proper drainage in the future. The photos provided in Area I observations of
this Report show examples of the measures taken to date to stabilize the surface.
f. Approximately 12 cubic yards of mixed CCP and soil cap material were removed from the repair
area in Area I. Please provide information and related documentation of the disposal method;
CCP-impacted materials from the slope and toe areas of Area I were taken for disposal off-site. These.
materials(approximately 12 cubic yards)were hauled by a registered environmental disposal company
14

(Mountain Environmental)and properly disposed of in a permitted solid waste facility in Enoree,South
Carolina. Waste manifests can be made available upon request.
g. The maintenance of Area I and Area IV grass cover both on the slope face and structural fill
deck;
The final repair plan will address the vegetation requirements for these areas. In conjunction with the
final repair plan being implemented and the new inspection frequency by Duke Energy,areas will
documented and discrepancies noted.
h. Access paths shall be maintained below Area I to allow inspection of..toe slope area, wetland
areas, all monitoring wells(including those not in the current monitoring schedule),stormwater
outlets, and streams. These access paths will be necessary for adequate inspection in
accordance with permit condition V2.
Maintenance of the Airport property is the responsibility of the Airport-and will continue as such.
Regular inspections as outlined in the Permit and further defined in Duke Energy's Operations and
Maintenance Plan dated October 23, 2015 will ensure such maintenance takes place and any minor
deficiencies are corrected promptly.
4. A schedule indicating when a long-term stormwater solution will be implemented at Area/and
what efforts are currently underway with regard to the design and implementation of a
permanent stormwater management plan for Area IV.
The Area I and Area IV investigations have been completed as noted above and conceptualization of the
permanent repairs is underway. The following schedule is proposed for completion of the permanent
design, permitting,and construction.
• 60 days to complete permanent designs for Area I and review existing permanent
stormwater management plan for Area IV(March 1, 2016)
• 45 days to complete necessary permitting with NCDEQ(April 15, 2016)
• 60 days to complete construction activities on-site(June 15, 2016)
15

Referenced Letters
1.Attachment"1": Letter dated December 1, 2011 notifying NCDEQ of cap configuration
2.Attachment"2": Reference letter from Progress Energy to NCDEQ dated December 23, 2008
discussing the soil cap thickness
16

ProgressE. ,nergy
December 23;:2008
Mr.G.Landon Davidson
Regional Supervisor Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
2090 US.70 Highway
Swanrlanoa; NC 28778
RE: Asheville Steam Electric Plant Coal.Ash Structural Fill Project
Request for Waiver.of 50 Foot Setback
Ash'Distribution Program;Permit WQ0000020
Dear Mr.Davidson:
We appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and your staff on December 15,2008
regarding the subject Iproject. As we discussed at the meeting,Carolina Power&Light Company
d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.is partnering with the Asheville Regional Airport Authority
(Airport)on the North General Expansion Project. The Airport has secured permits from the
-Corps of Engineers-and the Division of Water Quality to permanently impact 1,535 linear feet of
perennial streams, 138 linear feet of intermittent streams and 0.359 acres of wetlands to
develop the North General Expansion Project. The design(see attached drawings)calls for the
existing stream.to be routed through a 60-inch concrete reinforced pipe approximately 1,600
feet in length installed beneath the fill. Asia part of this development,our Asheville Steam
Electric Plant coal ash will be utilized in select portions of the project as structural fill.
As detailed in the attached drawings,the project design will utilize porous material within the
perennial streams,intermittent streams and wetlands in addition to serving as bedding beneath
the 60-inch concrete reinforced pipe. This will allow any water upwelling to flow parallel to the
concrete reinforced pipe.The remainder of the project footprint will be filled with clean soils to
a depth of at least two feet above the top of the 60-inch concrete reinforced pipe. Over this
clean fill, a geosynthetic clay liner(GCL)will be placed. Only above the GCL will coal ash be
utilized as structural fill. The coal ash side slopes will be covered by a minimum of two feet of
clean soils and seeded. The top of the coal ash fill will be covered by six feet of clean soils and
seeded,above which pavement, hangars and other ancillary development will be placed. No
construction is anticipated to encounter the ash fill.
It is our understanding that the water flowing within this 60-inch concrete reinforced pipe is
considered Waters of the State. Our above referenced.Ash Distribution Program Permit and the,
Airport's 401 water quality certification state that coal ash can be used as structural fill within 50
feet of surface waters with prior approval from the Aquifer Protection Section of the
appropriate Division Regional office.
As the coal ash fill is proposed to be encapsulated between clean.soils and a GCL liner,.we
believe that the surface waters within the 60-inch concrete reinforced pipe are adequately
protected. We therefore request your approval to use coal ash as structural fill in accordance
Progress Energy Service Company,LLC
i?0.Box 1551
Raleigh,NC 27602

ATTACHMENT"2"

with the,details of the attached drawings. We,welcome any questions or discussions you have
in order to expedite our request and ensure the best possible design to protect surface and
ground waters. Please contact'Ms. Laurie Moorhead at 828-687-5240 for further questions and
discussions.
Sincerely,
Alan E.Madewell
Manager
Environmental Energy Supply—Carolinas
AM:jrt
Attachments
cc/att: Roger Edwards Asheville Regional Office Surface Water Protection Section
Ian McMillan—Raleigh Parkview Building/Wetlands
Cynd:i Karoly-Parkview Building/Wetlands
John Dorney-Parkview Building/Wetlands
John Toepfer_PEB4
Laurie Moorhead—Asheville Plant
Shannon Langley_PEB4
Dan Mottola—PEB10
Dave Edwards—'Asheville Airport

-progress Energy
December 1,2011
Mr.Brett Laverty.
Hydrogeologist
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S.10 Highway
Swannanoa,NC 29119-8211
RE: Asheville Structural Fill Project
Asheville:Airport-Area IV
Carolina Power&Light Company d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas,Inc._
Ash Distribution Program Permit No.WQ0000020
Dear Mr.Laverty:
Carolina Power& light Company d%b/a Progress.Energy Carolinas, Inc. (PEC) received your letter
:dated October 3,2011 which requested certain information regarding Phase If of Area IV structural
fill at the Asheville Airport. This letter responds to that.request(DENR request in italics):
1. According to 15A NCAC 02T.1204 (d), information shall be provided to the. Division of
Water Quality,that describes and explains site specific engineering or,institutional controls
proposed to prevent adverse impacts to public health and the environment. Submit a
project narrative for Phase H. that includes a general overview, timeline,footprint(acreage),
environmental impact statement and completed Phase 11 engineering construction plans.
Please.note the Division (APS) would like the opportunity to review and comment on the
Phase 11 construction design.
The Asheville Airport Area IV structural fill projects divided into three distinct phases; Phase I,
Phase.IA and Phase II. The overall fill footprint totals approximately 52.9 acres and will contain
more than 2 million cubic yards of coal combustion byproducts(fly ash and bottom ash). Phase
ll,itself is approximately 22.7 acres in size and will accommodate approximately I.A.million tons
of coal combustion byproducts as fill('777,000 cubic yards).
Phase VIA is anticipated to be complete by May 2012. Construction of Phase If'improvements
will begin in late 2011/early 2012 with coat combustion byproducts placement beginning in late
February 2012. Coal combustion byproducts placement in Phase it will continue to project
completion anticipated in July 2013.
The project design for Phase II is the same as incorporated into Phase 1/IA. There will be a 60 mil
HDPE geomembrane used as a liner beneath the coal combustion byproducts fill. Above the
liner isa.leachate collection system. The coal combustion byproducts fill will be covered by a 30
mil HDPE geomembrane and then by native soils ranging from 2 feet thick on sideslbpes to 6
feet thick in flat areas.
Progress Energy service Company,LLC
F. Box t cg=.
Uiinfi,N IC 27602

ATTACHMENT' '

DEMR ARO
December 1,2011
The enclosed compact disc.contains the Environmental Assessment(EA)completed by the Asheville
Airport and the Phase II engineering construction plans. Also enclosed are two hard copies of the
Phase 11 engineering construction plans peryour request.
2. -Verify that the Phase 11 meets all applicable setbacks established,in:15A NCAC 02T.12p6..
These include setbacks from water supply wells.streams_(including those culve_ reed), and
seasonal high water table.
All setbacks have been met. Please see the.enclosed Hydrogeologic Assessment Report Asheville
Regional Airport;Area IV completed by Silar Services, Inc. along.with the engineering construction
plans for setbacks from the seasonal high groundwater table. The Airport has completed the
necessary permitting to'take-small areas of wetlands.&streams within.Phase II. There will be no
culvert as within fill Areal and therefore,no impact to the setback requirements for surface waters.
Please refer to Appendix B & H of the-enclosed Environmental Assessment for :the permitting
efforts completed by the Airport. The enclosed engineering construction plans show the closest
groundwater well is over 300 feet from the edge of fill for Area IV.
3. Submit a current list of project personnel and their contact information.
Scott Sewell,Vice President of-Operations,Charah, Inc.
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail] .
Matt Winfree, Regional Manager,Charah, Inc.
Phone: (336.)599=0296
Email: mwinfree0charah.com
Rob Reynolds,Senior Coal Procurement Agent, PEC
Phone: [phone]
Email: robert.d.revnolds0ognmail.com
Laurie Moorhead,Senior Environmental'Specialist,Asheville Plant,PEC
Phone,[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Alan E.Madewell, Manager Environmental Energy Supply Carolinas,_ PEC
Phone: [phone]
Email: 'alan.madeweI19pkhmail.com
Michael A.Reisman, Deputy Airport Director, Development&operations
Phone:[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
4. If soils within the Asheville City gun range ;are.to be disturbed during Phase Il then an
environmental assessment should be completed prior.to construction. The Division is
concerned:that lead contamination could be present:wifhin the footprint of the-gun range.
Contaminated soils are not recommended for use as a cover material. Please provide-a
narrative on the condition of the gun ranger
2,

DENR.ARO
December 1,2011
The City of Asheville owns the firing range and has agreed to vacate the firing range in early 2012.
The City of Asheville has committed to work through NC DENR to remediate the firing range to
`clean closure'. Please refer to Appendix B of the enclosed Environmental Assessment to a letter
dated.March 28,2011 from Jeffrey B.Richardson,Assistant City Manager for the City of Asheville.
PEC will work with:Charah and the Airport to ensure no `impacted'soils are used as cover within
Area IV fill project. Per DENR Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals.
Table dated August 2011, the lowest established level for lead is for Protection of Groundwater at
270 mg/kg. No soils with lead concentrations at or above 270 mg/kg will be used,as.cover soils in
Area IV fill project.
PEC proposed an alternative location for background well for Area IV. The attached figure (E-1)
shows the proposed background well location. PEc proposes to install this background well along
with.well PMW-9 upon your concurrence. These two wells along with review boundary wells MW-
2,MW-5(formerly known as PZ-4),MW-6 and MW-7 would complete the monitoring well network
for Area IV. The wells will be sampled in April and November for pH, temperature, water level,
specific .conductivity, total dissolved solids, antimony, arsenic, barium, boron, cadmium,
chloride, chromium, copper, iron, lead; manganese, mercury, nickel, nitrate, selenium,sulfate,
thallium and zinc.
If you:have any questions,please contact Me.John Toepfer at 919-54&7863.
Sincerely
Alan E. Madewell
Manager—Environmental Energy Supply-Carolinas
AEM:jt
Enc: Compact Disc containing:
• Dept.of Transportation Finding.of No Significant Impact(FONSI)/Record of
Decision,August 19,2011
a Environmental Assessment for Asheville Regional Airport Runway
Reconstruction and New Parallel Taxiway, prepared by The!PA Group,August
201..1(4 pdf files)
• Engineering Construction Plans for Engineered Fill Area IV, Phase 11, Franklin S.
Craig, P.E.Consulting Engineer, Issued for Construction September 22,2011, 15
sheets
• Hydrogeologic Assessment Report Asheville Regional Airport Area IV, prepared
by Silar Services, Inc.,April 2011
c Proposed Background Well(Figure_E-1)
3

DUKE Harry K.Sideris
Senior Vice President
ENERGY Environmental,Health&Safety
526 S.Church Street
-Mail Code..EC3XP
Charlotte,NC 28202
[phone]
December 18, 2015
RECEIVED
Division of Water Resources
G. Landon Davidson, R.G., Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations, NCDEQ DEC 2 1 2015
Asheville Regional Office -
2090 U.S. 70 Highway Wafer Ouallty Regional Operations
Swannanoa, NC 28778 Asheville Regional Office
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2015-PC-0303
Permit No. WQ0000020
Duke Energy Progress, Inc.-
Coal Combustion Prod ucts.Structu ral Fill Projects
Buncombe County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Davidson:
This letter responds to the Notice of Violation (NOV) issued by your office on December 2, 2015
with respect to conditions identified at a structural fill located at the Asheville Regional Airport,,
(Airport)- and covered by, Structural -Fill Permit WQ 0000020 issued by the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to Duke Energy Progress, LLC (Duke Energy) on
September 2, 2015. Attached is a plan of the Airport and permitted fill showing the locations of
Areas I, III, and IV.
During the course of conducting the inaugural- quarterly inspection as. required .by:the above-
referenced permit of the fill. area at. the Airport,on October 29, 2015, two areas. of erosion-
affected conditions were identified, one in Area-14nvolving erosion of the soil cap and another in
Area. IV involving erosion of the soil cover above the HDPE cap. Although the erosion
conditions did not jeopardize the integrity or stability of the fill, and the liner system remained
intact, Duke Energy promptly advised the structural fill contractor (Charah) of the situation,
which then notified-Airport.personnel. Charah provided recommendations regarding erosion
remedial measures, and field activities to correct the eroded areas commenced on October
30th. Duke Energy.reported the identified conditions directly to.DEQ on November 2, 2015.
At this time; erosion conditions have been corrected and the fill areas are structurally stable.--
The following discussion constitutes both a formal response to the NOV and addresses your
request for information set forth in the notice.
Violation 1 —This violation is based on the elapsed time between discovery of the eroded areas
at Area I and Area' IV on Thursday, October 29, 2015, and the point in time at which these
conditions were reported to the Asheville Regional Office of DEQ on Monday, November 2,

2015. The violation is based on alleged noncompliance with Section IV.12.e. of the permit,
which provision requires notification as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or
on the next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of an occurrence involving
"breech [sic] of the liner system,... [or] severe erosion...." Based on the observations made by
field personnel, including representatives from DEQ, no breach of the liner system occurred.
While the soil cap over the compacted ash in Area I was eroded exposing the ash, the liner
system was not breached. The NOV provides that "stormwater had flowed, creating erosive
rills" "exposing CPP" underneath the soil cap, confirming that no breach of the Area I liner in fact
occurred. DEQ's only reference to a "liner" is contained in its discussion of Area IV, wherein the
agency states that"[a]n area at the slope toe of Area 4 had eroded the soil cap and exposed the
HDPE liner in the erosive cavity. Two areas at the termini of slope drains at Area 4 indicated
advanced soil cap erosion that could compromise the liner." Although, in two instances, the
above-quoted language mistakingly refers to "liner" when DEQ's intent is presumably to refer to
the area's "cap," the NOV nevertheless makes clear that no breach to Area IV's "liner system"
occurred. Thus, because there was erosion of only the soil cap at Area I and of the soil cover
above the membrane cap for Area IV, no "bre[a]ch of the liner system" occurred and, therefore,
there was no duty to notify DEQ. Moreover, in neither case was the integrity of the fill in
jeopardy, and in both cases fill stability was maintained and the liner system remained intact
such that there was no movement of ash outside of the footprint of the structural fill and no ash
reached surface waters.
With respect to degree, while some erosion did occur, this erosion cannot be characterized as
"severe," which is the standard set forth in the permit. Because "severe" is not defined in the
permit, statute, or implementing regulations, the term should be given its common meaning
when considering whether a violation occurred under the permit. Merriam-Webster defines
"severe" as `of a great degree." Similarly, Oxford University Press gives"severe" the following
meaning: "very great; intense." Visual observations of the erosion conditions at both locations
did not prompt a conclusion that they were of a great degree or intense. To the contrary, visual
observations confirmed that the erosion was no greater than mild or moderate. Given the fact
that (i) this inspection was the first mandated by the new fill permit; (ii) Section IV.12.e. fails to
provide any objective definition of"severe erosion" and, in fact, in this case the erosion would be
most accurately characterized as mild or moderate; (iii) the liner system remained intact and the
conditions identified did not threaten the integrity of the two fill areas; and (iv) the conditions
were expeditiously addressed, Section IV.12.e of the permit was not violated. Any
determination of violation by DEQ would not be "proportional to the degree of potential harm"—a
principle expressly embraced by the agency's Principles of Enforcement. Any notification made
with respect to this event would most appropriately be characterized as a courtesy contact, not
a notification required under Section IV.12.e of the permit.

Violation 2 — This violation is based on an alleged failure to properly maintain the permitted
facility. Without extensive consideration of the question of responsibility for implementing or
complying with this portion of the permit, it is appropriate to reflect on those conditions existing
at the time of the inspection. Following the November 2nd notification by Duke Energy
representatives to DEQ of the conditions identified during the October 29th inspection, DEQ
visited the site on November 2nd and again on November 5th. During the inspections, DEQ
confirmed that the erosion identified in Area I had not resulted in movement of ash outside the
footprint of the structural fill or into surface waters. This fact is reflected in the NOV where DEQ
acknowledges "Division staff did not observe any migration of CCP offsite during the November
2, 2015 and November 5, 2015 site visits. CPP was not observed in the vicinity of the soil cap
erosive at Area 4." Inspection of erosion conditions at Area IV confirmed that the liner system
containing the fill was intact, as was the overlying membrane cap; no ash had been exposed to
the environment. Based on the facts recited, there was not a citable failure to maintain and
operate the structural fill facility. While the balance of Section III of the per" it is prescriptive and
quantitative, Section 111.1. offers limited insight for demonstrating ;compliance. Proper
maintenance and operation can be verified in a number of ways, including timing and the
degree of response to identified conditions.
It is apparent that the parties engaged in the development and maintenance of this structural fill
project responded promptly and comprehensively when they became aware of the conditions for
which this NOV was issued. Confirming the circumstances and steps undertaken in compliance
with the Structural Fill Permit:
• Quarterly inspection of the permitted areas at the Airport was timely conducted in strict
accordance with the terms of the permit;
• The identified conditions at Area I and Area IV were promptly communicated to the
parties for disposition;
• The parties promptly undertook appropriate measures to mitigate impacts of erosion
and to repair the cover over the structural fill;
• Because the erosion conditions were not "severe," the notification time requirements in
Section IV.12.e. of the Structural Fill Permit cited in the NOV do not apply. Given the
subjective nature of the term in the permit requiring notice, Duke Energy nevertheless
notified Charah and the Airport and provided a courtesy notification to DEQ;
• No material was released beyond the footprint of Area I, and no material was exposed
at Area IV. Moreover, no coal combustion products were observed in the vicinity of the
soil cap erosive cavity at Area IV. Accordingly, there was no effect on the environment
or public health; and
• The conditions in no way resulted from a negligent, reckless, willful, or intentional act
or omission.

In summary, the circumstances giving rise to the conditions for which the NOV was issued do
not-support issuance. of an NOV. Moreover, they were limited in scope, minimal in ,nature, and
were (or are being) rectified promptly. We believe the response to the field conditions reflect
Duke Energy's-firm commitment to environmental compliance and should be taken into account
'in subsequent DEQ.actions;.if any, with respect to this matter. As requested in the.NOV, Duke
Energy will provide complete documentation-of the inspection and repair of all fill areas in the
annual report required under the permit.
Respectfully;
Sw"
Harry Sideris.
Senior Vice President, Environmental, Health & Safety

n
���»
- µ0A°RNER � 3
t
»• i
� t
3
W P
✓, � t +. } rills. T' �"��
e 1 a ,� ,�. ♦ m. is S'"•`•' .fi" "^�'P.^TM—at sir. y'k'4
t0^�"' 114 s+.»d
s
nil
e NA
t R
p 3 m R+ 80RROW
x�•Y s �t",�i�'
Yt �Ea4 �
x m � '£� tip '�'" "�n w � h ; �•` t i � ,�` i�x ,� ;�.
-------------- �,' " f a } mad
}
Yi
k
y�S' �$�� y�S� U"S "���in� a � S �r�� �' J'" Ta4n Lk•
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT '
t i
a Q4 y
"` tom*s�, -•r'= '` ��t r�e�. v ��y,te,'�d'�2' � Y "' +�� L�� �� Y''�g a
` x�
�y
al
k 'i'Y` OCO FgryNI � ,3'P1v is .t°`�r+ t � �� ��h `�f ,� t..i.�"+-..•�';
FR lia14.1
9 `
a t
�.�+ � . ^�"t3 ,.• :,� .�� '�, rim. "`.� �'i l." �' ��.

PAT MCCRORY
L
.�
f i Governor..
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART' -
Secretary
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN„
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY _
Director
December 2, 2015
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7014 0510 0000 4466 8123
Mr.,Harry K. Sideris—SVP, Environmental, Health &Safety
Duke Energy
526,Sbuth Church Street, ECUP
Charlotte, N.C. 28202
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION _
NO. 2015-PC-0303._
Permit No WQ00.00020
Duke,Energy Progress,,Inc. .,
Coal Combustion'Products Structural Fill Projects
BuncombeCounty;;N.C.
Dear Mr, Sideris,
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental Management
Commission of the Department of Environmental Quality to protect and preserve the water and air,
resources of the State; The Division of Water.Resources;(Division),has.the delegated authority to enforce
adopted.po lotion control rules. This Notice of Violation is a standard notification.intended to advise you of
_ ._ . ._ ... .. _ .._.._ s -
the legal requirements under.Nortth•Caro,lina-law;and:is being issued:foryio ations of the subject„-permit.
On November 2, 2015, the Asheville Region a[,Office of.the Division, received notification via phone from
Duke Energy-Progress, Inc.,.(Duke)that,two areas of the subject coal combustion product(CCP)-fill site were.
observed to.�be,compromised. Observations=made by Du,ke_,during the required quarterly inspections on j
October 29,2015 noted an erosion:induced breach at Area 1 pnd:erospn-winduced removal of the soil cap at
Area 4. CCP.was•exposed at Area:1-while„erosion-at,,Area 4,removed,the soil cap,layer exposing the upper,
high,density polyethylene (HDPE)layer of the liner.
{
Division staff inspected the facility on November 2, 2015-;a.nd,.November 5, 2015 and noted.the following
violations of permit WQ0000020
is
Violation 1—Failure to-notify in accordance with permit condition IV.12. e
The subject permit condition requires notification as soon as possible, but in no case.more than 24 hours
or on the.next working,day following the:occurr"ence.or first knowledge of the occurrences of any -
of the followin IV.12.e.,An =incide_nt mvolvin breech_:sicj of th e.liners stem,or severe erosion. -CCP k
g�. Y g _ I , Y i
was observed by Duke staff on`October- 29, 2014 at Area 1, where stormwater had.flowed, creating z
erosive rills exposing CCP. An area at the`slope.toe of Area 4 had eroded the soil cap and exposed the i
.. I
E
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
2090 U.S:Hwy.70,Swannanoa,N.C.28778 '
828 296 4500

Duke`E.nergy Progress, Inc., 1
'December 2, 2015
Page 2 of 3
HDPE liner-in the erosive cavity. Two areas at the termini of slope drains at Area 4 indicated advanced
soil cap-erosion that;could compromise the liner. No CCP was observed to have breached the upper
HDPE]ayer of the-liner system at this location of Area 4.The Division-was notified of these conditions on -
November 2, 2015. z,
Required Corrective Action:
Provide notification and reporting pursuant to the subject permit.
Violation 2—Failure to properly maintain and operate CCP structural fill facility, 111.1.
The above-referenced conditions, observed during .the inspections, indicate a failure t.to properly .
maintain the subject facility.
Required.Response:
The Division is requiring Duke to provide complete documentation of the inspection and repair of all fill
Areas in the annual.report. The annual-report is to be submitted in accordance with permit condition
V.2.The report shall address, but not be' limited,to,the items listed in Section V.2. of the subject.permit
and.specifically'address the following:'l
I. Duke subcontractors indicate thata soil'ca'p thickness of 4 ft. was present on the slopes _
I
of Area 4 upon completion of the cell. The Division is requiring verification of soil cap'
thicknesses along the entire slope face of Area 4. Any.discrepancies between the soil cap
thickness a"s `de'signed 'and 'constructed' and` th'e existing soil cap'thickness. shall be
explained
'2. Conceptual,design plans'for Area 1 ind'icate�a'soil cap"thicknessbf 4 ft. on slopes and.-6 ft. '
for the=cr'own_:of-crown -structuf6l`..fill �The__DiV.ision-is_re "uirm _-ver_ificatiori._of-soil_-ca
q g p —
°'tliicknesses along"the e'ntir"e slope face-of Area 16 as'well'ias all'recent repair An
p y`
discrepancies between the soil cap thickness as designed and constructed and the existing
soil cap thickness shall be explained Refer to 3d below:
3. Describe all rem edial`effo`r--ts, temporary and'iong=te rm.
; planned to atldressthe Area 1
i
breach and Area 4'soil cap erosion.This, esc"riptio shall include specifics`with regard to
a.'' Removal of th-e b" slope'-dram atYArea 1;
=b: Howthe--erosive conditi'ohs`located at',two slope drains on-Area 4-will be�stabilized`
and-repaired;
c. The long-term stormwater management design at Area 4, including any required
`chan'g's to slope drainssand road ditches;
d. The presence of CCP on the surface of the Area 1 slope in a secorid area''located
away from the stormwater. channel
e. The treatment and'maintenance"of observed rills and cavities-on the slope face of
=' Area'4
--J. 'Approximately`12 cubic yards-of mixed CCP and soil cap material were removed
from the repair-,area in Area ..1. : Please provide -information and: related
documentation of the disposA[Mothod; F
I
. . k

.puke Enemy Progress, Inc.
• December 2, 2015
Page 3 of 3 -
- -_--- --g.- The maintenance.of Area 1 and Area 4 grass cover both on the slope face and
structural fill deck; and,
h. Access paths shall be'maintained below.Areal to allow inspection of:-toe-slope
area, wetland areas, all monitoring wells (including those not in the current
monitoring schedule), stormwater outlets, and streams. These access paths will
be necessary for adequate inspection in accordance with permit condition V.2.
4. A schedule indicating when a long-term stormwater solution will be implemented at'Area
1 and what efforts are currently underway with regard to the design and implementation
of a permanent stormwater management plan for Area 4.
Division staff did not observe any migration of CCP offsite'during the November 2, 2015 and November
5, 2015 site visits. CCP was not observed in the vicinity of the soil cap erosive cavity at Area 4.
A written response addressing the above-referenced violations shall be received by the Division no
later than December 31, 2015. Fines may be imposed pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a) of not more than
$25,000 per violation for any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,conditions',
or requirements of a permit issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1. If any failure to act is continuous,
penalties may be assessed not to exceed a maximum penalty of $25,000 per day per'violation under.
,NCGS 143-215.6A(b) so long as the violation contHues,-unless otherwise stipulated.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Brett Laverty or me at
828/296-4500.
i
Sincerely, .
i
G. Landon Davidson, P.G., Regional Supervisor
E
Water Quality Regional Operations, NCDEQ €
Asheville Regional Office `
�.�►WlaAsheui -ile -
MSC 1617-Central Files-Basement t
WQ Enforcement/NonDischarge
Michael Reisman—Asheville Airport(via email) "
John Toepher—Duke Energy(via email) r
k
t
9

Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
December 2, 2015
Page 3 of 3
`%V0

. . CV-,Tr;FVKK4I*jMM4PM. IMIM
i A " try ? ` w�c" �``�`` '"� �$A�,}', �♦'- �-.
yvl"`� ' _ ' • w ..xr K �:t r yam : ��5�k-
t �ti Y• ' �'' � -` '""" * � "ice\, - ;r
S S � � , i�..�... �-/' r � M '- yr^ b ."; - �•`.
Y RI ir Area
.— ,.,Exposed Coal Ash �``° �a
�u: >{ � Y• 'y,, J! '�y q. -1 ` ' _ .Sub a"ce:Drainage '�:�:..
L '"
31
1 1 J=+
It
6044
� 1f
-y

.rN -
-
�
=a s
.,+,+• _ -Al
Y - ,
- _ ,.+-y " _ -+�..•,•+..: .fir _ - �t�-% _ .rc
•r
n
_� ..-. ,.,:ilk/"•. _� _ - __ ,�� --,- ,
` r
�P� � r 1 , �"��! dpd I .'.-� !� u jT I,IeVy\ I��' � {�0.�at_'�+` �{�1�"�r{��• ,�-
Ab
Affi--F
Yf
p�
It •� �� ���/l '�PI J � ia: 1 '� 9�•� 1 '�pilsm �N :Y'"A' , ��'Qa�;°�,,rf'�4 �±�Z=� j�`i`` g$'' :r ��� y,. � ..
4 rb�`g ti4 � � 1 d10 ®�j`'.'Y�� $�V r0 � i9 � �� I o' ° •.`;V � � a •�"�y\ ` . ,f` - � 'y
y�'G� =r �. �ra1/��� ► d ifIF''. v/ �r�; � � � ry ,' _ 'y`raiL '� `� .y. 1 �. -s

—•.Asa o
" '` � _ �� -ems„"•• .�,_• @�IU c� llk:
_"� Ala. '� '' ��' ➢ �.
- ,'t'iR - �.- .,•f \rye '�'�rt s �ryi ,�',��.'"q�:'' �ri..,�+'' .," }te"lt•'�' � � 'e*{.^.. - 'f�yz.,i„ayt ^r s
Nw
• �• � n ' �� .ty tit � —• .'�, � �... ,.

'I
jt5:
,
,"J,. d - t r,:` ;s.rk 7 �:i ,.vice.'_ s"�•
� e ., ,. ,.�'� ,..., . .,•X ,`'�c-, a '•r:::.rt+ ,7a,1 a „k: f k.y_t Ull
ifs.• �r-. -,, _
5
�,• ,.. s.3Y mK;,: .';t4 -. .1'",r„ ,,.0 .. ,,,.. ,"�,.hpe..v •, , ,•• - r'yl3
,,. ,.,: a.. • .r,, x.•,`a #l,=" ,.5:_'-. �,1...s. , i >, R i 'p'F ,7r. re'' k11 C rZ-. ,✓-�:, ..� �.C,wr-`. - -
` ...t .. a� r ti• ,; 5,t��,r f
vY111vv {
q .....,a ,,, .m'.._•,• „ ry.�,' + Ti-,. ''y. .. �j• '.. '!. i TI,� ,.. .: •�` ::.3 Ir B*�„li � ..:3t: ;';l k Y-:f�' �c 1�,.- G ;:� 2.i-r=:' - -- _r�.:S,�j`�
.�: .r,: a"�ai_...'r`+ ,�E<8 °.»` ; .•', ,.rtl ±.,.� ... ,_ :,..-. , l s. z ��r + �=i.a... r .•-�''�(�-x �.,.'r„� "-s�� __ _ 'r'.'?'_
k
.: rx a •�'..,...-#, . '..,� ,;:..,• '�,.�$ ..... ... ......:..y, -. ,,..,,,.y ..,.,E .; .. ,r'"5 y c _S;� r..� �.:';- i -C-� c'.� .�`?;� -
`> _,, - ,b,:,f ........ ... .....+iif r,...,.g, ,,� ."°',...-,.._ "..._,>. ,. :., . ... `�. _. U ,y^k �-•< ."k':,�, t�k �.'Th, '=f. b+r� � a ',�;� 1�
,.• , ..y ; ,� -� ,. r,.,.. ...;.„ .:.,;, r t - .?, � ,...,.,.,W .i�..� -&y a ,} "7 yYr M- Ia:,:.:: #�3:e 4 r- r?.>S-'� �Y�-.,;�`r�,t••...f;_ .w.- ;.,dv ,r.. ..r,. , .,,.� ,, ,, „.> r-, „ .,.... ,,y'R. ,...., I L.. e,.. ,,. <, ,• �r a rowF'=f5 ,,�„., q.,'::, � "�• ?'�-'-"+'�', _
1
•a � ,,.;', , , .,.. ... ... .wz, .. ,,,Iko a._'.,,� '.: ,�,P _ ,.. , . _ , ,., ro r ':au .x-. a, a� p z:.. x, :! sl,.. �;r.s' a.%►./ -i -.... r. � ,,, i..•,- 'nf� _,�.:_. .,i1 -e ,... _ .. , .-n.. . .?, e•.. +e ., v, 5 •'( `F Y, y... �[ -,.�'S' +'eG, ,!�.;.�..
.,.
'.y)• aR --:,w ,, _:., t,., ._,.:. ,x._.,•, �;:,,. ..::+, ., .- t ..,., � ,,e=t ri s� p,�w-, /�, 4 ..±; <,,,,e,.,x .�.:a, _ 5?....- ,....,r,-., .... - :,t. .•r,. ti .-. :-. - i?, .c... .,, 7 -..,.+'s,..• �� �"A;s£ -u"�'�,, l[ f,�'s. 'd'w ti,� +%•
•-
J-•,xw i � -I, „r "' ;,<..._ ,.�,, �:,r. -';'t y-t`r _ ..b � �. 4s, 7` _£� ,t't„ .-��� �� ..;Z t� - _
, „gR,,=. -•,._ _ .,- , _� .;� .<�//.In}`'.`,.*,�.a . «•�; `�ri �s- :� �A p5 4 rt �-,»^ �°, ,,,,--chr`�-�tF,B:-�-a: '<..z,- •r-'c... 4 -rz. _'- ': ...�,_ 0. >-a `1 -„. b
. - �r� +.L.ir,••w, :cY':.-,. - ..:. -'r1„a• :za _
V_.+.v: ;.t r. .. .,= :c.... >�-• M,. .,"1, 4..:h.,a^ :._c 3 :�. � ��� +7+,Q•��`"S�
a�`P `=,a ?:" 'tn �7C,fk^,. �%`= ..'�r���`-r _:►-. '-:.t
t...�'-.., -. M:' «' -•'S?< ,-��,�-:'cis.. ...e:•� -r.�,_s F ,,, by.Yrr�,,'v"�.{,
., ., ` •• - <,....,. �,� '+�_ .P,.a..a..Y.�fi i-. ti„•. � -� t ., ,.-�& .Lm'">.* �_ >`, lfrr'• N,sy:•��Z, .�`'''�L$L- _
-
�,',.;�, -i,�-; :.. .. w ��„-, ..ry F Y ;._ .�-;-:.y +•,..' ,.1."a,}, ,..-�,G.�C.. fb �"��'� � -1`" ay •�'S�3�+'-X'- �r .j,,,�- ..Y "'� �'�=k.
.a •. �_ .� ., F.::t,a„> '�="� �- �+C;::� •-'�•.-=_i�°f1' t..?:C;4a ':2 yp,:¢�. .,sCS,
•r.- .,.r ,.�'-, tp2'r -33'K. •1 �s�.;:-,. ., �'�c,_-j.�`r,•n,U�_ r ,y.�>� L - � - _'h� _ aw - '_ .,eW -_ ^s"3- _
_
a `p,. � !s 9`qv ,31 Z- r •-, •4� sx_"'� d � ,: ,n"a. < "�+� of )^G`"��c..� �, a :4 =�` S-a �. ����'^
M
!,..-f.�,� ,
• �* .�
l4w
?c ;, ' �
�x , w
a;�° 't' w'r��-s>�'i'°+F�,•.:`4�.�..�� znt�-�®
d ,�- ,.� i � ,r --�.,-*r.� �E+��' Erb >, ,. ;•; t° -�.`
�' a �"�'`.". ��r� 2�+',e-� :�•"`'2v.,. �v� „x '''wFr=� �• � �� ' ..a �:. _r ,�,-ns„_ J ;:� :,,t'-- -: r:#,�, w.. ti
}.`a, t t '",}'.: `�S'i-.J..s7 v:ia" .�� -,.;�5• a,��'��a� r la �T.� :�.� s+.:. e'�.�y,,- ,e, -_ +Y•a -.i. ..�-r. '�-"e'-•F :�`•`�?"�.r:�"' - r\ _-_
- - r �� - i 'i r�4xv-_.V�,",ga• '`� �y iva . .ii 'C. �-,U- i �..� .�,� fi"f�`�t' -. "'r:r i•.T �.:►._ `�,:,._„� ,r�,.� .,t•
4'I "�{''-a/ �.,. '.I >
,.h ..y:.''� -r:,,e. "t;s. :q,• 3, ka yay15:..�M'
_. +� ,�. � Q -• + , "'a�..t. - - r - 1„i�.':'v6.✓,�•r.`. vie ��-�+�,•Y�:i•� �f.- f�'.. � , °{ke v-.�� � '' "�3r'1;>s"�,.`r�': '.yiS"`"t. -_`", -5.. �.!' ' -
�, i�r=-:ig y
+�r. �-„„y� - 'tt � '+�-"ytc,c',;v4: .i. t �, ••,•-x ,:3r e-.:>._ I.• 1,'..`a .� :,,.--: 'm, ��yr�:, - -
,.-,_ �{�• .- _c ,_, i�. . ,.-a �4 'Z"j'k €'..,..J. :{ fir• \�,.ti�z co� ! .r. C fY" � ra �y �:�..,.„ �-.�^ - ..
.p - � ��`7,y. �u ,,.,�', t,t`,,, �rh � 6 �-�-- t--•.� � s�_. y •�aa�l �, :r`t y'-�a� "�` } - :.�--^.='3h+�_ - '� a,.�, �.`_��7
g
':�!. `: �-r,.. � -• ,- '':i-p�;�`�i.' - "P ,. :_ t.a :s fi.r � -F.7•kfi3 d3^:•--+s � - _ice" - t • . `.{:. ��:`�
._,... -•- ._ _.. n•��`+•�-` :riCs� ..gAz U� i., �:, s ��� 3�^'� - -. 1 - .-��,, E_ - �r.c�"•,^� �`� - -
-; cam. ._� t• t - ..� ,,,. •�4'M
•
r y: s*+". - •"�� \\ .- ?? F' � '`'3i�tc�n •�`I`-,.'.` a :a 'q°F'``� _-�✓ - ! 'S s... f/ t' ` _ _ _ - r.r -
ti•�� —
'FR�-._c��c+,�•e-,.._ "rr �_'R\; '�� __- S`.- 1! f r ,.. .3 ��F ;y J..1 x t y- '�'� r ! r\Y "•r S, -.�� :. s_ 3 .
'��.'z �,, •s 1 117 N^�.` � '.r l.� f� .`� _. ';.Z- '�45k "�'± ,cy. .`�'-'�',.
t �'-T•- = �•-o-�a.- -•Q�"'� * ea.., -
fti � H c
% ��� �a rq� 1�= � '#
± � irr-.S.V��f �.•' _ _ -��-• '��.''�
�Y"t.-•p 7_,- 7' .,M Jr:
�;�;tiJ �,._)\.._ -z�•.�'^?� f}9/t"•- :__-�', ,.: �., .�,.. i- � z 1vr.�. _s,.c - Y,.,�,1yy
_;`-«�,. ..:�� r.-E,:.:,- �,� �,�,•.',--. ,-�'.� ',3a,r r ��,,�31'4c�r�. a ""-'b ��Sc�rJP/.� x..ef'��f ,�,.#j:•,,. a.,-- �h �- f�:, -"�'•-^�'.�,-'. cs
�L �\� ',, r:, u�3:L4':1c.3't..�"�- a�`,•`-.. �--. ;Y_ �, �, q ,:�l..i�':;+'`c5..y.B+,..f_;e ��"'- '�Ni��.�:'1��%�C��M- -'-��: - _. £._i,f - �'-_•:,.cc,._ _
:esr-'f .�.�' -SS55�r,�`=x-„_,. = t,',.c ..:- :x' �` e 4• �c .4�i -'�-�^�..,
:..."•o,c.. .�/.!"..: z:.. .r--o :..,,r.., .,7r�ir*a.. c +->. �„ �`` c^ : V c "v:_ - IJ _
. �. ��
...-.,`- 'f�'1,'J _'-,: lf �,,.. .o-a-s ,.,..... �.x"-R •-k_.: -�--r-. : ..>z' ,� �.. E�?t.�-5: l,r-,..�. r',F�.�at'e_'..,v._= �.�, � ,-„3 �,,. -., �?. •�,:.
- F-! ' 'v ..?•'�• -'>, .f. .s S..
,�.r.. 4y '+: �� �n.,r...P,c-r,--= �=+-:-: �7 •,,�-.:`iJ �.. :.`"o - - .f3T. �'�:L= -\-];�. 4 �t �.t., a •,. -•�, ,�,., -'z,�� -
?g„y- z ti..�', .h _ ;<.. ,rya rr c" t:t ,_ •�, t �e.4�a5 G r' sew•y- iGr:, �_
_ '/:-� -��\ �#�i ' "�"��ie�:i'£-` 4.f�t.fi?� "°°'` S�r�•{?b•,r ��,,�-�'`� .i. Wit- - ...
�.:.}vre„R"r ,.,.-,x:,.�rn� -' G"� �_. �,.�.�- '�- �.` .•�� _ ti;;d._, t�±a;.'!1 .�-'V�. �
-i'-'-' +. .::-aztf ,,:. �. _�. _;;u•"cY `ctz t-:;: ..-r,ry. r,��'yv" 6 ia.,..-o,.�'s
b::x-tj&u',r +y ti�i�i,t?�`�.r =7, .;q• ?�•."°n� '• K y.,-. �n..��-, �41.,;YS.t`�-,
..__ .,;:�.;�r.'"} .. ,�F �i:S,N-..,.. •d ,�.�F7• - .a. _ ��,`,.�•G�. '-`!4 _ -1 +�•-, � �-n-x,.
...y fir,. �"' .-?� � .�� r-, ry� •�.Jf ,:r'_,l'- - ,�-�,.,•-.r, a.. �r,;- '�-„a �^� -,�-, _ ,,,;�:-tom.- s�-s x
.;. �r�,,r aa-•-�=r;' -
-_ :,- -- _ y.>: :fy ,;,�'r ✓,. �`'+r ,x. .r-.-.., •may `"` h- -,�'`=-
::f- 'E.�.,_•r x.-n.,�:aq,,, - .
✓•', -ly, , a>`-.4 d"-... k�'•. n_. �: � ,. mr.r. i.. ry," 7�. rrF--. _ `:-.,;. r�`� --n:' �,-
t
�y,="�''�:.Yr- 1� i`,�.(':;�rr_�,-y- a .. �r=u•;'.:s�-'.� -.'--„� � g�•r :S" t ��._ L - � �C. a. /./"�,S!•1 �•- Y. ;,tc•-'°:�-Z� �� r=- 'yr. '*.'-_�,?a,--'-'„`'.`. .�#.;.
,�� . - ��,.'��- "�;-,..;;�-="1�- .�h�as.�,_,. _�.,. �. y,,l ��"�.=-ra°S ��o>.-:t r:.�, 3� `_� ;�� '-ti- •►+✓am��:- � :?,,.t,_ ;�a l
,.... ?3'1<""" .,.�lJ�.�, ,� t.. :.,r%,'��-'''�#,... �,__e>�� <s.,. - ,✓�" ••:..•-:- �� 7- r'•'c�i�- - ,�,:tT 't+��.3. �� �_ `�2<�,;�...,.�',,,.;r1;.r
e.-r�'-a�+`zs>��r-�;.�, ..-v�'� � L,� ._;;f> ., _-�• "y ail �'rf _---*+�al'1�1i�''�. - =�'"'"� •�?` "3.= ''-,`;•e ���.
Lv_:-"'-`-•e.. .'�'-; ^.;r..,d". --='rs'{`� cr Jam_-.>�,,.e¢^c�, -,�, .,�, _ 1s>-` l aye? �-_ r-at!�' �-,., ,t, �., �t- �,x, .s�'S ,. "F 1- -.c�a. ...,fig.
__�.-a;:r �:s'.?(�•� '-. y-.:...-.,. ...a�fi-`.",.x !.:"'_ '�-�^ta> _ �'�:: - a.. y"_, - �`..,, ,,�.+n etc' .Fu- _ "U� i. '\,
�,..rr'.F t..,..��--_. •��_-r^;,y�r�- .u?'Y -,.���-akr :.- _ 1 k. iiY+�"ST o"$' �..�;�� 'a _ f �•s �•,c-. y+� A��-, t-..-.' _.(..." ,ti
y -
�..-,.. '?-• ./'c`_-, .-`�..(r;,d r._ .4..,•3�./.�,(`r':.� ,.::,.�,.-_ $-3.i_ .y c'1,�.r.,. «t�j _+� A=� 4'... �r •r iS'., 'i� �'C ".4 7
1
A.z.
I •_r: f.� :Yr-
�'.s�y`". t _:i•:!i.. ^ry,,_lo. ".,vy;�„ '.,.47T;-`. - : �"'-c. rfo -f+� ')' "' ,•-y--_ ,7;� .•?` E� -
I_cy�`� r. rr,3;1-, _ ")c 4 -„ ..,;�-.x�r,, ; . :t=.Mr.. - fir, .y- �� - x-:�/ r': �� ��.G��_'+-.�-'----', o` - r-�,!: '^•�' �" `+- _ -
�:�r �_`'.•-�, ,ri_> <. ,.�.:.Y•, ,...l'.. �{;.�. � ,rf J�_ - G�„ 7 1 �1� ..c,e.�.�,- �L'� tee % c - I - •s �-c,c^Mi�',��-h..r `„, _
�,�= F irs k�r-�'`��•����`'F✓, �`t+"x �!'� � „r ✓ .,,.+`�l .4;i',. L _ - `•.. �::t 5`�`T'�e "1'�`J .z,�• — 3
.n a �.:_�'✓�+t..�/ _«.✓ .t.. � ",�`:y.r�i '� ,r fTi '� SR.7 '4� ,-y--;-" „s�Y'"a�ti•.�C`.+�``JFzvi. •.k.t y`�'•'��-=i _�;.
� ,.. � ;P�".:.TS"-'�t C{� H��-=�r,Y.r7''�-'f.. � .r-, - 'l ".*, l; �'-:��Z�!ti' afi �r'rm� I ,,,�v :i_ ,�,4, �S 4t _, � ;.v'�`;_Y.• c� �1 �.t �,.
. 6,- ,-'rJ _.� -c�'a _'\ ...%' t Y� -,r,tt! _ •! ,�'�''{{ � `Y`H't� r - 3;�`-•` s ``�:' - _ i'X'\( +.� ?,^='_a�;•.
`..7 - r'yz../ .. �ii��Pn4� 'r^-Y't,�{•`�J-` �*` -- F 'Ji-.1 c }7 r �' �,ac ''{{jj ,t�a •I�,t'S. t \ \ i4.,_ S`"" ,t N
,.r.P•.,,� .�-S tH•. �a. J� ,/'�i� _ eY; `h-" \�;!- _'£ "..si 4 a1
- ,�. •.�. ,t ,> i .,� ':+ F' �' �fi� `� �'= .� �`s - "� -"'° _ -,y.� r -�
r.. y�"+V 'r ^ " -c r� !ty +• ,y" .. "'.e. -. �'•'� 1�� 5.,- �:..`•-;4_-`�..•,,, _ :'�
.� -yv�;'1;,, Jh �_� .+..='.�, :. -• �c�1�.,••- fin.+' Y"'£`r',�f7a_.a ^:.��`�-c ` --jr:• E'; T i `�Rti'`�':=, `t
� --� ter,. d ��r•.LL��r �� `4,� •�a,...� ^ _f .fit - ..�...�.- �y. �I, .ff•'- t `Y., -- �.�..t' a y�.;,,
-
� 3
\.'
f' � � "z+., ,;" .• ,,,j x /y, .-3.�� ✓.:r` ,V __y ,.� t,.}s�•����� ,-'': o\, -�,"-'I.'•---�, <'4r" c''s�- 1�' �``at� r_ .\i;` . ' ��:�

r' t ,ix
Yam"i_ •����
INA
_
-
•
-
I
o '
1 1
i
mjt _ -
Nlt �
:r �r�• j Yr r S
n
'�-/ � v„ I � Jj�t ! � '4r4\`�•ryu"-'hv 1i`�-�k..: .��=f �J �.{w"�`� r, y �-T-�j- �.,�:- _
p � :s ��v ia✓q.ti�Gr�� �r�a.. '�� '� �R�T�Y' p# .f jqe
. a s, f°h�}A a -. qlv t ���� ""��ryV v l�s�� a.-•'��-Jt"�-�- zri �, .�. �t�
`i�% ♦r '� `CL`��� ,�Da� �"`0 t"d�lYd ',t�y.;� i,`-'� .x"W. `�''{�• �3.s � ,_�'�.
Y� w. a.:3r°^i -- V 1 1' 1E" t •c3'` " ,�' � "�3. :�``�� at' ..�•,.tx
INA
. r � S � � r/,!�%erg `".�D'F., �gi�.. ._ .3',r ..3ti� � � 'n�i�,�t � _r wry--�- '� •py, R
�\F tN C • + nag, iVa Mti�'? i,' a. ;��,-v� ..t,,,.� � ':�Gr,,,•_,,
�._ r •.vt. .P 1 '. �,�E. iF'' ws II�.� '. Y,C,.y '�... .,y3 �Q �> 1't ��r�ScS rem `"ti "y,.'�4''i::-�"°�'S.g1'1 ti4 'L'��"•`„` y-l'«' " - "-tr
"� �IF..y `p ,,f•'�. 5 i r..e��,,r06F�����!' �0� 7�•' 'C,>_.:;�•.'�,b'r'rj� .:. Elg.-a +.�t.: �ti. .Gy. q .:,#'�.a =•.gat.
NOR.Tim..�,��.a�S"S."t.�SA 7:4f,�t�. �@' • .X.._, `�.
,-t �• r A ''f r �+°r's e„- •..F a.-�? �,�'�' r �..�<��� 5_
r E ? r- ,�l. ,r}7 irk--° j -y,'s t�,K'r'.`.•` •-='.:fib• k,;�S.:s�;q f',�'`;SgS'� a.., }' 4 .. z£;,.r, .�`'„_r T'�'-c '�?� .•=-i_. ��'`
O
v��l''(tl'.'.
�r 4t: ',•S'" 9"�:ISY`f ��r % -� ,r,F c`Vt �:;�' '� i ' ? "i-•5 -
-,•1 .✓!• kA a `:- -.LJt� _,r'-,�.:: f". '"�xs - ✓...:ks `:c•-`�R+cS
`b,',rte� -Ji-;+p•,�... �;„rr .wv`".! <ro�1.S ri- t-�y,.
r '� ;°v' L Y Wit' '•;�ty - a z ;� mot �{ - �.L r v r
„
�r=a .r� �` }A Jr '` 4, .Crtia$1.- �fr- dr -• ._�. �e '��',{n" .'Z.v_r3w'�a '.�"�tC.- J r;•V.'` �.'CY-:?,'�`"���;`y ^� ?SV rr'-�.. — L" i;� \�A t
E 'F"'' •.et �rSYl,i1�'n; ":fiyl'"l�s >b�' x �..v,,.�Jit � 5���. j, ,"�:,i. "s_�,J, �._,-9, -�Y E,-...rF- 4 tak;�'`- .`�! 'e�' -�'� y'_�.
,:}�J, .r � � � .r�^''� �<- �i. ",,r�1 'y-+.v �=,,.,^•�� ".Y, '�n"r�.-'�,„ +�..:•'.�f` �&t!:1i?�r.`'`'fs�'...<.. `:-,s. �,.� ''�sl�fi a„T, ,."� lt a,?.
it�-A «� :y� $. «Yl`• w'��'r.Y'. r_ y, nt ti "� 7„ "t!+� :�u': '•� �.y�"�.<._ �; .:v� �+_. _ � '� _
a.3. c. Y;;, _t..r rt'K r ; .,.1'• .u; ,H:f]"`�.M' •'�,.:: ,;,`V.i,-y.•.,'-t �.`#�,.k ;4�d.. ,,C'w -14i} c °E%'s1r..�•-'s
,
• ' .J
�4 ,'�^�. � .:.1. .��:M. .r �..:T(•V'y ,r'_ �,,,...•:. J��.. ��Cy�,�..�: '�.p� 3Y.,f yr�, ..��atu Y�',hJ �dlr' ' .�, �4•":-,•�r-1°- ...�n" iq'v,L.:N" - .>\ - mac:.
c >,� t •�: r _rx.• r��'-'�. '$4., .a; Y r:x y;,'c%x ar �!S r �. .�.. ,s: �.\,"' -�•. "x 4i:-+.'�'.-'1`
Qa. .Yf .�• + w' ?x �:R., •r. ,-1'•' "" n�i ��fr. '>LTA nY,,: .'\, ;• r� -`lS' ' .' .,4``'- 1p^ -'i;X �'l;' ,i a' ^" -
::�� 9..•'^'jf ve �'rk.,r- ,h.� .iFis.' ,+lr,;., .� I. ./'"�l�a 4 ..t;
.^°5' `',-'.--�:,, f.. S v" - r+,. ...�?r yJ'a `v.,�r �•,: `�. .-+•f'"S-tts 't ,d. `"T r.�.'.,f?'. ? arj:- t`4,,t.. Q} .C_ _,gu,rk_,•.44 -� - .{'
s ,t,,�.`,rr-. Y--''^r'v r, {� -r•:t}'` 4,jam -`1{� _=�''o � ",�" iv' \;._ �"t' i.:. • '. - - ?xx.:� .h-� '
'�'':'I:tf-� .r_.•,,,�- s�• f:•=�- 'af`�r '4 a:Y��'''Yl�,,,'r ..., -a r..:.m-1 -ti - `J1 + r _�''"iv �' u, �i ,.E; -
_ -'�",.i„%� _�i->,'t^:�;�,�, �'A+�1,!`.. r�� .'7 ..•.;. ua s�^,,�f,: .��" �- '� �.'�r,j.C ,� _'�`i.�"a`7 ,�1 �,y,_ s:� p. -
f' ,•!,-/,.-,:a�y��f"ts]+'�q.�„ :•: ¢f =- i^�".� -_ 4 �I -.j�a� - ,r .o .,'`.r �"t+! •�.-..,z,.a':au«%�. i .�. -\ll- - -
c 'T"r+,r(6r':�/-�Y".�Y
_, �S'£...,:?y(t)r rr r 1-��t 1-<%M.`- ``` ..�' r, '. ,."J. y�',..,.,x. ,-'�«r� .,,' _�< f o+-._ 'V � - x•m-.
d.�L �'1+'"xrF.,6..
� v;�r:'r-1� 7(�:"�, .\ .q 'rl..�' '+,`�" *�`A .�4 �,� _•a.�..w�`('�.+, -� _.� .i t \,' ,.• }
•e:
,�,:: .rt.v :�.r t'a....�.:.ram';-`-.`� -ys.;,d F, -�-y-�F,,,],n-•ft ��;� tt..���
7
^.. - fl .-s ,-•r Y .s- L;J r"-u.�,.r •Ji a� ..,:i'- � +r- .L. S> s.,d `\a, _ �.•''�`'. .-��3V� v .e. ,,�.�1� � '«ray _. -
:. .,a..=' lj..�:i'` �,�,r',?3r." .,` "I•* �"'�,-, -r t,�J,?✓J� :E� Eti�y=�:`y�� '.-aarwy't.. -,,,�,i _ �,►j'"`iN �;'ra= -mot''ir`,�� is `�� �',;,c `
�_
• •"�'.v' t<'�r r �.�: 1.; "•;, .s ,�t _ � �''''�` ���`jz�``,�:'tC•�J -� L"$:�
';� � `� ��Y-- � i�r» L r err"..w i• Y'a'T�t'*r 'i.1;,. ,lr?'.v r.>t , r t' r`�'�.-T: `t .nt^'..�:t=•i -:"�'�(„ :: �tii_, ...��....�.",v�.� "lA. ,-�-c t, •�
x)'..�. .J• 5. .. I,_.,.^. /s! t .N- -`i'�Z,i.' :tca ..{ .1TJ k., ,� 'k ,t ��. :'°srrl-. Y': vt 'y. �c; ,,�.-,+gti,.,o. �-y� .Y�_s.�^,,...rr -.t�fa,.tY,y-.x:;/• �-`},1�., ;&:-r!, ;,<f�,,,,,.1-..�, u � ... t� �{' .J�: - '�2�i,.� ,r,•-,. ��,,,a •t' r�ti+�e �+-�t�
-.,. a,. .,,! >I-r.;� v i. l-�;<. ,:U x' .' .j}cx�. =`+, .,.�-.�'!N"t`'. •.. ^'>'v+
-'`�`;=t -�;': _s:�,. ,r p,,, _ -� ;,.iY; �,�`� ra�^l�� v- -•�,�'' ,��._y-4, �a�Sr,• - 7 t�ryS.y,,yy��
's... i�fr. ,,y.. a r✓'. :,1 rr*F�^F;a.��c�.l. -..�. �. �1;�f^:y J. .� 'R,�£' �'y�"i. s�. ,.�.,j� •'�'.,C'� r,) �1y4'��� d •�;�'•,.'s�-ayf - •V,+� _ •':?
j��r1��4
t;1y,r- �I y ', .� +`,,'.y,•{+yr .. .1 sn <-� /+ 4��4��. _ 303" � •�'At7' :,;z tt..,_-. ` a - '_63' 'i�+C•;"ta �...�4'+`
..r ie%ti's. „w�C��'� Y�� �:A,lf�',�'r'� .r. t^ Yrt ��@-�- ...•��+.fi'tt��' y. t.: ,'� Y �,(J �.�,y,..V. Le-Y��`. "..+_.,�, ,;`i,r �'G` � T.,
,.�:-.4� ;, �� ,i'-,rr�i s Kai �n„t, � t� "s�.,.tr.�: �`�,. rr 1 'P; � �r��`+.\ 6s'`?r-- ,r?'�',.,��h.1, � - ��- _.F'a",?_.a�ti•�•�i
��;-' •G?v, j �.I,., ,ti/� ,� t. ,53. l��r. � .r.r7,`r�-_ .i:�•�' .ti�'fr...�- ,t,-, "' �e ''���^y,. - - �,`:�i `���. � .'�. _=.`1� .. a� '1�L� ,;`i.
r,:. ,_'=..,_ „>3.a'f..,,�f>.�.`;�'?•;v,,,"�� 3���"..f��� ar�'P� - ,,;{�%a 9Sc+.,. ;�' r>.�t :� r s r."�,� -.
•!.}. .c ,rJ,J ,r a .?Frr #-�5. •; t ��.r `�. .f _ ,horn ,.R, �a �..� �•=ham �: '4 ���c
�'''� c ..�+ �t, :�Ls•,,�,PJ?f�f.;Hr �' J ��,r it;,. �' t}�. t .ysZY ;y,: '�itl`ri � �s9`�� -ti .y t` - +�ti*'•, ,`, _a.'1=^.
ri`y% _ = r,.r..�r/•-.r 4<i..r r6, w�' `,i'r=h �,tR... :r,3tA "; `'',,,,y.k.. l ,p.• •o:'�.,^^ ,t ,A t.,^,�F „ .;. wF,
': =..�. ya ,l� �r.r+iy'v. .F•. +T:. �,.�!?:-.l!. .��,',.ts rJJeW Cu.F,:•.4 t. .,v ��1 .t�Q'a- .3 � ' +.:_ c� "F. :� Lam,: t4
`err_f• /.v"r'. It, �_ '3�-�.F t'P�.�I:;Ji j � � '�i�7!�'l 'r(.:.�! .tlr�; F rtr...•�„a 2 '4.�i�;�+4iySy�� '�3�5+�"�� �}ta4;•vn Sz't'l�:" '4,ti.,"4.'<'!.y _ c.' �n�..
' - - �I ,e,.rr f i, ��: KJ � sty .� �. rf't ���.' ,M�"•Ct-'Vi 5, JP:•.'rSC'4?�,,.,7,. 'S' 'xtl,^l�t,�.'�r1� ,,t, t"'�-•'2r;�1, r�"-'!h:.:.r ��,<.-� .-c"" -
� - 1;..:, d -. 1_i:���,� _�:�v��,7".v �•''�.:, rJ� `la`'-�"�����{'' � l�t���' 'tk�,te>���'`�e. _`V, - -- --` �_-_ �� - -
-

— l
Laverty, Brett
From: Michael A. Reisman <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:47 PM
To: Davidson, Landon; Laverty, Brett
Subject: Airport
Landon—As a follow up to your visit and our discussions this morning, I wanted to ask if you can provide me with the
guidance or policy that defines what a breach is. In briefing Lew on your visit from this morning, it occurred to us that
since we are the only location in the state utilizing a liner system of this nature,there is likely no official information or
guidance that defines what is considered an actual breach. As noted this morning,we would of course argue that the
encapsulated liner system was not breached, as it remains intact. How the soil cap that is placed on top of it can be
defined as part of the liner system, leading to the determination that a breach occurred just because the cap liner is
partially exposed, is a bit confusing to us.
Furthermore,since this is the only example of such a liner system being used, if there is no official policy or guidance
that defines a breach, or other impacts to the liner system,that it may be warranted that we meet with those in Raleigh
that are making decisions about conditions at AVL in order to better define and determine what a reasonable standard
of maintenance and upkeep are for this system. As time goes on and DEQ representatives may change over time, it will
be increasingly important to ensure that a single standard is being used by all that survives the occasional rotation of
personnel who have oversight responsibilities for a system of this nature. We are not aware that this presently exists.
I appreciate your time this morning. We will obviously continue to respond as needed and as discussed this morning,
_ but if you can provide this information it would be helpful. Also, if you can provide a point of contact in Raleigh that we
can speak with concerning long term standards for upkeep and maintenance it would be appreciated as well.
Michael A. Reisman, A.A.E.
Deputy Executive Director,
Development& Operations
Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority
E-mail: mreismanPflyavl.com
Office: 828-654-3253
Mobile: [phone]
hevil e
�9cea9q a�aeMvasY
WARNING: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law"NCGS.Ch.132"and may be
disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official. All e-mail sent to or from The Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority(AVL) business e-mail
system is subject to archiving,monitoring and/or review by AVL personnel.This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. If you are not the named addressee,you are not authorized to read, print,retain copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone[phone])or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of
this message.
1

Laverty, Brett
.--..Fro-m: Michael A_ . Reisman <mreisman@flyavl com>
t: Monday, November 23, 201 Sent: '8:42 AM
To: Toepfer, John; Sherman Stark; Kevan Smith; Mike Miller; Lew Bleiweis
Cc: Pickett, Matt; Cranford, Chuck; Williams, Teresa; Sullivan, Ed M; Dow, Paul-charah;
Nordgren, Scott R.; Sugg, Steadman; Laverty, Brett; Michael Johnson
([e-mail]); Eric D. Effinger, P.E., PMP; Moose, James
(J Moose @avcon inc.com); Rita Yanz
Subject: RE: Duke Energy Inspection Forms-Asheville Airport
John:
We will need to set up a date and time to meet with all appropriate personnel from both of our organizations
concerning future inspections on site and other issues. First and foremost,the airport's temporary runway will become
active on December 10`h. When this occurs, access to Area 3 and 4 will be completely off limits to Duke and Charah
without an airport escort. As it is typically difficult to re-train personnel who are accustomed to entering a site over time
that the rules have changed,we will likely remove Duke Energy's access to the site for a period of time until we can re-
train the proper personnel,and verify through our required training program that a limited number of personnel have
been property trained to operate inside the fence line in accordance with the regulations.
Second,we need to have a detailed conversation about the 0&M plan. This was submitted to the State without our
knowledge or an opportunity to review. Given that Duke included requirements-for the airport to follow,this should
have been discussed with us first, as it now appears that Duke is expecting the airport to comply with the requirements
of a document that until just recently we have not been privy to. While we acknowledge a certain responsibility in terms
of this, it is obviously not reasonable to assume that we can comply with the requirements of a document which were
not provided to us, and which we were not consulted on.
Please contact Rita Yanz in our office at 654-3252,or [e-mail] to coordinate a meeting to discuss these items.
Mike Reisman
From:Toepfer,John [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 6:00 AM
To: Michael A. Reisman<[e-mail]>
Cc: Pickett, Matt<[e-mail]>; Cranford, Chuck<[e-mail]>; Williams,
Teresa<[e-mail]>;Sullivan, Ed M <[e-mail]>; Dow, Paul -charah
<[e-mail]>; Nordgren,Scott R. <Scott.Nordgren @d uke-energy.com>
Subject: Duke Energy Inspection Forms-Asheville Airport
Michael—attached are Duke Energy's inspection forms from the structural fill inspections in October and
November. With the actions from the October inspection,the attached should not be a surprise. The November
inspections from November 17, 2015 identify minor animal burrowing holes &erosion. The items have been staked in
the field to assist in locating. Duke Energy will look to the airport to complete minor repairs of the items observed in
November. We can meet with you and/or your contractor at your convenience to discuss repairs. Please let me know of
any questions. thanks
John R. Toepfer, P.E.
Duke Energy
Lead Engineer
1

410 S. Wilmington Street/NC15
Raleigh, NC 27601
919-546-7863 phone
919-632-3714 cell
919-546-6302 fax
2

410 S.Wilmington Street.
DUKE RECEIVED Raleigh,NC 27601
ENERGY® Division of Water Resources
Mailing Address
Mail Code NC 14.
N O V - 9 2015 Raleigh,NC 27601
919-546-7863
919-546-6302(fax)
November 6, 2015 Water Ovalitty Regional Operations
Mr. Brett Laverty
Department of Environmental Quality
Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Subject: Asheville Regional Airport Coal Ash Structural Fill Projects
Inspection Findings Letter Report(5 Day Report)
Permit No. WQ0000020,September 2, 2015
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Laverty:
Duke Energy Progress, :LLC. (Duke Energy) completed the first inspection of the Asheville Regional
Airport coal ash structural fills (Area 1, Area _III and Area IV) on October 29, 2015 as required by the
above-referenced permit. The inspection was completed shortly after heavy rains earlier in the week
and Duke Energy personnel observed an erosion gully in the northwest part of Area I fill. The gully
caused portions of the soil cap to be displaced, exposing a small amount of coal ash. Ash was observed
for a short distance downslope from the gully. Continued inspection revealed ash was contained in the
structural fill footprint and did not migrate further than that observed, nor did ash reach surface waters.
During the inspection:of the middle west part of Area IV fill, soil sloughing and erosion from the recent
rains led to exposure of approximate 30 square feet of geomembrane cap. Duke Energy personnel
shared these findings with Asheville Regional Airport-officials and their contractors. Work began on
October 30, 2015 and continued over the weekend (October 31 through November 2) to complete
repairs to the soil cap of Area I fill. Those repairs, along with implementation of additional erosion
control measures, consisted of:
• Removal of vegetation overgrowth of the impacted area to facilitate thorough inspection and
repairs
• Regrading the impacted area to stabilize and facilitate proper drainage
• Removal of soil containing ash and placement into a dumpster for off-site removal via manifest
• Placement of soil over the regraded area to establish a sufficient,stable soil cap
• Installation of erosion control matting in all disturbed areas
• Installation of silt fence and soil berms with reinforced stabilized outlets
I reported the findings from the inspection of Area I and Area IV fills to you by phone on November 2,
2015. 1 understand you.visited the Airport later that day and observed the repairs to Area I fill were
completed. Per your follow-up visit to the Airport on November 5, 2015, you learned that Area IV
exposed geomembrane cap will be temporarily covered and protected until necessary permanent
assessment and repairs, can be completed. You learned that most of Area IV fill and other nearby
locations at the Airport are under construction by the Airport's taxiway project.

Laverty Letter
November 6,2015
More detail of the October 2015 inspection findings along with additional improvements requested
during your visit to the Airport on November 5, 2015 will be submitted to the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) as part of the annual report required by the above-referenced permit
condition V.2.
Duke Energy is submitting this letter at your request to provide a written summary of our observations
and communications with DEQ. However,it is Duke Energy's positon that a 5 day report is not required
by our permit under these circumstances. In particular, a report is not required by condition IV.B.
because it does not involve an emergency situation. That said, we intend to continue to provide you
with information you need to evaluate the resolution of this issue. If you have any questions on the
enclosed information, please contact me at [e-mail] or at 919-546-7863 at your
convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
JoPnTpfer, P.E.
Lead Engineer
Waste and Groundwater Programs
cc: Ms.Teresa Williams—Duke Energy
Mr. Chuck Cranford—Duke Energy
Mr. Ed Sullivan—Duke Energy
Mr. Richard Baker—Duke Energy
Mr. Paul Dow—Charah, Inc.
Mr. Michael Reisman—Asheville Airport
Asheville Regional Airport
61 Terminal Drive,Suite 1
Fletcher, NC 28732
2

DUKE 410 Wilmington Street.Raleigh,
ENERGY, Mailing
h,NC 27601
Mailing Address
Mail Code NC 14.
Raleigh,NC 27601
919-546-7863
919-546-6302(fax)
October 23,2015
Ms.Chonticha McDaniel
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
RE: Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Permit No.WQ0000020 dated September 2,.2015
Asheville Airport Coal Combustion Products Structural Fill Projects
Dear Ms.McDaniel:
Duke Energy Progress,I.I.C.(DEP)encloses herein two copies of the Operation and Maintenance Plan
along with two copies of 11 x 17 figures for each area of structural fill completed at the Asheville
Airport. This information is submitted to fulfill Conditions 1.2.and 1.3.of the above-referenced permit.
Please note that DEP plans to submit a request for permit modification to you in early November 2015
to update Attachment B of the above-referenced permit. DEP received Asheville Regional Office
approval to replace a background groundwater monitoring well for fill Area IV. This well was recently
installed (MW1AR-A4)and developed but not all appropriate paperwork has been received. Well
MW1AR-A4 will be sampled in November 2015 and existing background well MW1A-A4 will be
abandoned and not sampled in November 2015.
If you have any questions or need any clarification regarding the information provided,feel free to
contact me at or at 919-546-7863 at your convenience.
Since ,
n Toepf r,P.E.
Lead Engineer
Environmental Services
cc: Ed Sullivan—Duke Energy
Matt Pickett—Duke Energy
Teresa Williams—Duke Energy
Norman Divers—Charah, Inc.
enc: Operation and Maintenance Plan
Figure for Area I,Area III and Area IV Msheviffe
VED
r Resourea
OCT201
nal Operations
nal Office

O&M Plan Revision 0
October 2015
Operations and Maintenance Plan Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T.1208
15A NCAC 02T.1208 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
An Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be maintained for all CCP management programs. The
plan shall:
(1)describe the operation of the program and any associated wastewater treatment systems and
equipment in sufficient detail to show what operations are necessary for the program to function
and by whom the functions are to be conducted;(Operational Functions)
The ash basins (wastewater treatment units)at the Asheville Plant operate under an existing NPDES
permit. This permit describes the operation of the ash basins and these ash basins are maintained
in operating order by Asheville Plant personnel. To facilitate removal of ash from the ash basins for
transport off-site, ash is removed from the ash basins and stacked in upland areas of the basins. The
stacking allows excess water to drain from the ash. After a period of time to dewater,ash is placed
into dump trucks which are then covered for transport off-site via truck. Prior to leaving the Plant,
the trucks travel through a wheel wash system.
Area I,Area IV and Area III CCP fills at the Asheville Airport operate under or had operated under an
Erosion &Sediment Control (E&SC) permit held by the Asheville Airport. The E&SC permit is in
operation until there is sufficient vegetative cover over the constructed areas. While the E&SC
permit is in operation,there are required inspections of the construction areas, including after
certain sized rain events. These inspections will be completed by the Asheville Airport or the
Asheville Airport's contractor.
Once the E&SC permit expires or is substantially fulfilled for Area III, Duke Energy Progress, LLC
(Duke Energy Progress) will complete quarterly inspections of the three structural fill areas. These
inspections will evaluate the structural fill for the vegetative caps, visible evidence of subsidence,
erosion or seepage, drainage pathways, storm water collection systems and condition of the
groundwater monitoring wells. Duke Energy Progress will keep records of these inspections along
with any pertinent photographs. If these inspections observe any exposed liners or coal ash, Duke
Energy Progress will immediately notify the Asheville Airport.
The Asheville Airport, as the land owner, is required per 15A NCAC 04B .0113 to install and/or
maintain all necessary permanent erosion and sediment control measures. The Asheville Airport
will complete any repairs necessary to the structural fill areas whereas Duke Energy Progress will
complete any repairs as necessary to the groundwater monitoring wells. The Asheville Airport will
periodically mow the three structural fill areas to prevent intrusion from woody vegetation.
Area I structural fill is proposed to be developed with future hangars and pavement while Area IV
and Area III structural fills are proposed to be developed by a future taxiway. The Asheville Airport
will notify Duke Energ r—Progress prior to beginning any construction in areas underlain by CCPs. The
�""`°"_KA ieville Airport will also notify Duke Energy Progress if any liner or CCPs are encountered during,
I & tructioi'in areias underlain by CCPs. The top of CCPs have been delineated by as-built surveys
t and will be provided by the Asheville Airport to construction contractors to prevent excavation into
i thePs Bung'o'nstructionlactivities.
s r

� 1
O&M Plan Revision 0
October 2015
r
Separate from the inspections noted above, Duke Energy Progress completes monthly inspections of
the three fill areas. Once Area III fill is completed (i.e. E&SC permit closed Or substantially fulfilled),
these inspections will revert to quarterly. These monthly/quarterly inspections completed by Duke
Energy Progress will be utilized to submit the annual report as required by Condition V.2.of permit
WQ0000020(dated September 2,2015).
(2) describe anticipated maintenance of wastewater treatment systems and equipment that are
associated with the program;(Maintenance Schedules)
The ash basins (wastewater treatment units)at the Asheville Plant are maintained by Asheville Plant
personnel to operate within the NPDES permit limits. There are no wastewater treatment systems
at the Asheville Airport associated-with the three structural fill areas. As stated above,the Asheville
Airport holds the E&SC permits while construction is underway and required by regulation to
maintain the construction areas once the E&SC permits have been closed.
Charah, Inc. holds a discharge permit with the Asheville Metropolitan Sewerage District(MSD)for
the discharge of leachate for Area IV(Phases 1&2) and Area III. Once the ash is capped by the
geomembrane and the membrane is covered with soils, leachate generation greatly diminishes. In
fact, it is anticipated that by August 2018,all leachate discharges to the MSD will cease. In the
meantime,Charah provides all required leachate volumes and analysis directly to MSD in
compliance with their permit.
(3) include provisions for safety measures including restriction of access to the site and equipment,
as appropriate;(Safety Measures)
The Asheville Plant ash basins are fenced to prevent unauthorized access. The Asheville Airport
property is also fenced to prevent unauthorized access.
(4)include spill control provisions including:
(a)response to spills including control, containment, and remediation and
(b)contact information for program personnel, emergency responders, and regulatory agencies;
(Spill Response Plan)
Transport of ash from the Asheville Plant to the Asheville Airport has ceased. As such,there is no
need for spill control regarding transport of ash for structural fill at the Asheville Airport.
The proper operation of the ash basins (wastewater treatment units) prevent the spillage of ash at
the Asheville Plant while E&SC permits at the Asheville Airport prevent the spillage of ash off the
Asheville Airport site. However,for completeness,the following contacts are provided:
Duke Energy
Matt Pickett—CCP System Owner Asheville Plant
-Office: 828 650-7128
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
2

O&M Plan Revision 0
October 2015
Teresa Williams—Lead Environmental Specialist Asheville Plant
Office: 828 687-5240
Mobile: [phone]
Email:[e-mail]
John Toepfer—Lead Engineer Waste and Groundwater Programs
Office: 919-546-7863
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Asheville Airport
Michael A. Reisman—Deputy Executive Director, Development&Operations
Office: 828-684-2226,ext. 13253
Email: [e-mail]
Charah. Inc.
Norman Divers—Engineering& Environmental Manager
Office: 764-731-2300
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Eric D. Effinger—Senior Project Manager
Office: 502-245-1353
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Brett Laverty—Water Quality Regional Operations
Office: 828-296-4681
Email: [e-mail]
(5)describe the sampling and analysis protocol used to ensure that the program complies with this
Section and any issued permits. (Sampling and Monitoring Plan)
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality requires groundwater monitoring and
surface water monitoring at the three structural fills at the Asheville Airport as outlined in permit
WQ0000020(dated September 2, 2015). Duke Energy Progress samples the groundwater
monitoring wells two times per year(April & November) along with the two surface water sampling
locations near Area I fill for the parameter list specified in the above-referenced permit. The results
are required to be submitted to the State on form GW59CCR along with the laboratory results.
Duke Energy Progress utilizes the low flow sampling methodology and groundwater sampled will be
submitted to a North Carolina certified laboratory for analysis.
Duke Energy Progress has submitted the low flow sampling methodology to the State in the past
and it is included here for reference.
3

f
I
Low Flow Sampling Plan
DUKE Duke Energy`
ENERGY. , Facilities
Ash Basin Groundwater Assessment Program
North Carolina
June 10,2015

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
Table of Contents (DUKE
ENERGY,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LowFlow Sampling Plan .......................................................................................................1
1.0 PURPOSE.....................................................................................................:.........................1
2.0 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................................1
3.0 PROCEDURES..............:........................................................................................................2
3.1 Pre-Job Preparation.............................................................................................................2
3.2 Water-Level Measurements.................................................:...............................................3
3.3 Well Purging ........................................................................................................................4
3.3.1 Low-Flow Well Purging............................................................................................4
3.3.2 Volume-Averaging Well Purging..............................................................................8
3.4 Sampling.....................................................:.................................................................10
3.4.1 Low-Flow Sampling...............................................................................................10
3.4.2 Sampling after Volume-Averaging Purge...............................................................11
3.5 Sample Handling, Packing,-and Shipping ...................
3.5.1 Handling ...............................................................................:................................11
3.5.2 Sample Labels.......................................................................................................11
3.5.3 Chain-of-Custody Record......................................................................................12
3.6 Field Quality Control Samples .................................................._................._..................12
3.7 Field Logbook Documentation........................................................................................13
3.8 Decontamination and Waste Management...................................................................14
4.0 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................14
APPENDIX A—Decontamination of Equipment SOP...................................................................15
1.0 Purpose &Application......................................................................................................16
2.0 Equipment& Materials.:.........................................................................................................16
3.0 Procedure ..........................................................................................................:..................16
3.1 Decontamination of Non-Disposable Sampling Equipment..........................................16
3.2 Decontamination of Field Instrumentation....................................................................16
3.3 Decontamination of Groundwater Sampling Equipment...............................................17
3.4 Materials from Decontamination Activities....................................................................17
APPENDIX B—Sampling Equipment Check List—Table 1..........................................................18
APPENDIX C—Field Logbook/Data Sheets...................._......._........................_...........................20

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
1.0 PURPOSE f�Dum
V'ENERGY
1 .0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this low flow sampling plan is to establish a.standard operating
procedure (SOP) to describe collection procedures for groundwater samples from
monitoring wells using low-flow purging and sampling techniques or by the volume-
averaged purging and sampling method at Duke Energy Ash Basin Groundwater
Assessment Program facilities.
2.0 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Potential hazards associated with the planned tasks shall be thoroughly evaluated prior
to conducting field activities. The Ready-To-Work Plan developed for each facility
provides, among other items, a description of potential hazards and associated safety .
and control measures.
Sampling personnel must wear powder-free nitrile gloves or equivalent while
performing the procedures described in this SOP. Specifically, gloves must be worn
while preparing sample bottles, preparing and decontaminating sampling equipment,
collecting samples, and packing samples. At a minimum, gloves must be changed
prior to the collection of each sample, or as necessary to prevent the possibility of
cross-contamination with the sample, the sample bottles, or the sampling equipment,
Field sampling equipment shall be decontaminated in accordance with the
Decontamination of Equipment SOP (Appendix A) prior to use. Although sampling
should typically be conducted from least to most impacted location, field logistics may
necessitate other sample collection priorities. When sampling does not proceed from
least to most impacted location., precautions must be taken to ensure that appropriate
levels of decontamination are achieved.
An example of equipment needed to properly conduct low-flow purging and sampling or
volume- averaged groundwater purging and sampling is listed on the example checklist
in Table 1 (Appendix B).
If a portable generator is used to power the purge pump, it shall be attempted to be
located downwind of the well being sampling to avoid cross-contamination of the sample
with exhaust from the generator motor.
1

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES (,DUKE
'*'ENERGY,
3.0 PROCEDURES
The following sections describe the general operating procedures and methods
associated with groundwater sampling. Any variation in these procedures must be
approved by the Project Manager (PM) and Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
Lead and must be fully documented. Field work cannot progress until deviations are
approved or resolved.
3.1 Pre-Job Preparation
The information listed below may be reviewed prior to sampling activities, if available,
and can be beneficial on-site for reference in the field as necessary:
• A list of the monitoring wells to be sampled;
• Information describing well location, using site-specific or topographic maps or
Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates and descriptions tied directly to
prominent field markers;
• A list of the analytical requirements for each sampling location;
• Boring logs and well construction details, if available;
• Survey data that identify the documented point of reference (V-notch or other
mark on well casing) for the collection of depth-to-groundwater.and total well
depth measurements;
• Previous depth-to-groundwater measurements;
• Previous pump placement.depths (dedicated pumps as well as portable pumps)
for each sampling location, if available;
• Previous pump settings and pumping and drawdown rates, if'available; and
• Previous analytical results for each monitoring well, if known.
The information above is useful when determining the sampling order, pump intake
depth, and purge and recharge rates, and can facilitate troubleshooting.
The following activities should be completed prior to.mobilizing to the site:
• Obtain equipment necessary for completing the sampling activities (see the
example checklist in Table 1).
• Ensure appropriate laboratory-provided bottles are available for both the required
analyses and for QC samples and that there has been thorough coordination with
the analytical laboratory.
2

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES (DUKE
ENERGY:
• Obtain site-specific maps or GPS coordinates showing clearly marked
monitoring well locations or groundwater sample points.
• 'Review the project work control documents such as the Ready-To-Work Plan,
and appropriate SOPs in an effort to determine project-specific sampling
requirements, procedures, and goals.
• Verify that legal right-of-entry has been obtained and site access has been
granted, where required.'
• Instruct the field team to avoid discussing project data with the public and to'refer
questions to the Project Manager.
3.2 Water-Level Measurements
Prior to pump placement, an initial depth-to-water level and total well depth should be
measured. For monitoring wells screened across the water table, this measurement
shall be used to determine the required depth to the pump intake (typically, approximately
the mid-point of the saturated screen length for low-flow purging and sampling). The
procedure for measuring water levels may include the following:
1) 'Inspect the well head area for evidence of damage or disturbance. Record
notable observations in the field logbook.
2) Carefully open the protective outer cover of the monitoring well noting the
presence of bee hives and/or spiders, as these animals are frequently found
inside well covers. Remove any debris that has accumulated around the riser .
near the well plug. If water is present above the top of the riser and well plug,
remove the water prior to opening the well plug. Do not open the well until the
water above the well head has been removed.
3) If practical, well plugs shall be left open for approximately five minutes to allow
the static water level to equilibrate before measuring the water level (if well plugs
are vented, then a waiting period is not applicable).
4) Using an electronic water-level indicator accurate to 0.01 feet, determine the
distance between the established point of reference (usually a V-notch or
indelible mark on the well riser) and the surface of the standing water present in
the well. Record these data in the field logbook. Repeat this measurement until
two successive readings agree to within 0.01 feet.
5) Using an electronic water-level indicator accurate to 0.01 feet, determine the
distance between the established point of reference (usually a V-notch or
indelible mark on the well riser) and the bottom of the well. Note that there
should not be considerable slack in the water-level indicator cable. Record
these data in the field logbook. Repeat this measurement until two successive
readings agree to within 0.01 feet.
6) If the monitoring well has the potential to contain non-aqueous phase liquids
(NAPLs), probe the well for these materials using an optical interface probe.
These wells will be attempted to be identified by the Project Manager prior to
3

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES f�,DUKE
�e'ENERGY
mobilizing to the well. If NAPL is present, consult the Project Manager for
direction on collecting samples for analysis. In general, do not collect
groundwater samples from monitoring wells.containing NAPL.
7) Decontaminate the water-level indicator(and interface probe, if applicable)
and return the indicator to its clean protective casing.
3.3 Well Purging
Wells must be purged prior to sampling to ensure that representative groundwater is
obtained from the water-bearing unit. If the well has been previously sampled in
accordance with this sampling plan, then the depth to the pump intake and the pumping
rates should be duplicated to the extent possible during subsequent sampling events.
Section 3.3.1 provides a description of low-flow well purging, and Section 3.3.2 provides
a description of volume-averaging well purging (in the case it's needed).
3.3.1 Low-Flow Well Purging
Adjustable-rate peristaltic, bladder and electric submersible pumps are preferred for use
during low-flow purging and sampling activities. Since purging and sampling are joined
together as one continuous operation, care will be given to pump selection as it applies
to the specific well conditions and analytes to be tested. Note that a ball valve (or similar
valve constructed of polyethylene) may need to be installed to reduce the flow rate to the
required level. The low-flow purging and sampling guidance is provided below:
1) Using the specific details of well construction and current water-level
measurement, determine the pump intake set depth (typically the approximate
mid-point of the saturated well screen or other target sample collection depth
adjacent to specific high-yield zones).
2) Attach tubing and supporting rope (if applicable) to the pump and very slowly
lower the unit until the pump intake depth is reached. Measure the length of
supporting rope required, taking into account the pump length,to attain the
required depth. Record the depth to the pump intake in the field logbook.
Notes: 1 ) Sampling shall use new certified-clean disposable tubing. 2)
Rope shall be clean, unused, dedicated nylon rope. If a pump is to remain
in a well as part of a separate monitoring program, then the rope shall be
suspended within the well above the water column for future use. If the
pump is removed after sample collection, the rope shall be disposed.
3) After allowing time for the water level to equilibrate, slowly lower the electronic
water-level probe into the well until the probe contacts the groundwater. Record
.the water level in the field logbook.
4

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES (a DUKE
V*ENERGY
4) If the well has been previously sampled using low-flow purging and sampling
methods, begin purging at the rate known to induce minimal drawdown:
Frequently check the drawdown rate to verify that minimum drawdown is being
maintained. If results from the previous sampling event are not known, begin
purging the well at the minimum pumping rate of approximately 100 milliliters per
minute (mL/min) (EPA, July 1996). Slowly increase the pumping rate to a level
that does not cause the well to drawdown more than about 0.3 feet, if possible.
Never increase the pumping rate to a level in excess of 500 mUmin
(approximately 0.13 gallon per minute [gpm]). Record the stabilized flow rate,
drawdown, and time on the field data sheets.
5) If the drawdown does not stabilize at 100 mL/min (0.026 gpm), continue pumping.
However, in general, do not draw down the water level more than approximately
25% of the distance between the static water level and pump intake depth
(American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM], 2011). If the recharge rate
of the well is lower than the minimum pumping rate but the drawdown is less
than 25% of the distance between the static water level and pump intake depth
after three volumes of well water are removed, then collect samples at this point
even though indicator field parameters have not stabilized (EPA, July 1996).
Commence sampling as soon as the water level.has recovered sufficiently to
collect the required sample volumes. Otherwise, the Volume-Averaging Well
Purging method should be considered.Allow the pump to remain undisturbed in
the well during this recovery period to,minimize the turbidity of the water samples.
Fully document the pump settings, pumping rate,.drawdown, and field parameter
readings on the Well Sampling/MicroPurge (Low Flow) Log in the field logbook.
Note: For wells that either have very slow recharge rates, that draw down
excessively (more than 25% of the distance between the static water level and
pump intake depth) at the minimum pumping rate (100 mL/min or 0.026 gpm), or
require a higher pumping rate (greater than 500 mL/min or 0.13 gpm) to maintain
purging, the procedures described above may not apply. For these "special case"
wells, the Field Team Leader shall seek guidance from the Project Manager about
the appropriate purging and sampling methodologies to be employed (such as
volume-averaged purging and sampling described in Section 3.3.2).
6) Once an acceptable flow rate has been established, begin monitoring designated
indicator field parameters. Indicator parameters are pH, specific conductance,
dissolved oxygen (DO), and turbidity. Although not considered purge stabilization
parameters, temperature and oxidation reduction potential (ORP) will be
recorded during purging. Base the frequency of the measurements on the time
required to completely evacuate one volume of the flow through the cell to ensure
that independent measurements are made. For example, a 500-mL cell in a
system pumped at a rate of 100 mUmin is evacuated in five minutes; accordingly,
measurements are made and recorded on'the field data form (Appendix C)
approximately five minutes apart.
Indicator parameters have stabilized when three consecutive readings, taken
at three to five-minute intervals, meet the following criteria (EPA, March
2013):
5

Duke Energy Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan '
3.0 PROCEDURES (gDUKE
IF'ENERGY,
• pH ± 0.1 standard unit
• Specific Conductance ± 5% in pS/cm
• DO ± 0.2 mg/L or 10% saturation
• Turbidity less than 10 NTUs
The target for monitoring turbidity is readings less than ten nephelometric
turbidity units (NTUs). In some instances, turbidity levels may exceed the
desired turbidity level due to natural aquifer conditions (EPA, April 1996).
When these conditions are encountered, the following guidelines shall be
considered.
• If turbidity readings are slightly above 10 NTU, but trending downward,
purging and monitoring shall continue.
• If turbidity readings-are greater than 10 NTU and have stabilized to within
10% during three successive readings, attempt to contact the Project
Manager prior to collecting the groundwater sample.
• If turbidity readings are greater than 10 NTU and are not stable, well sampling
shall be based upon stabilization of more critical indicator parameters (such as
dissolved oxygen)without attainment of the targeted turbidity. Attempt to
contact the Project Manger if this condition is encountered prior to collecting
the groundwater sample.
• If after 5 well volumes or two hours of purging (whichever is achieved first),
critical indicator field parameters have not stabilized, discontinue purging and
collect samples. Fully document efforts used to stabilize the parameters
(such as modified pumping rates).
Note: While every effort should be taken to ensure that indicator parameters
stabilize, some indicator parameters are more critical with respect to certain
contaminant types. It is important to identify which indicator parameters are most
important to the project prior to commencement of field activities so that
unnecessarily protracted purge times can be avoided. For example, the critical
indicator parameter associated with metals is turbidity. While it is desirable to
sample wells when turbidity measurements are less than 5 NTU, Duke Energy
recognizes that these values may not be attainable. Duke Energy, and its sub-
consultants, have taken multiple steps (e.g., use of pre-packed screens, carefully
selected sand pack, etc.) to alleviate the potential for elevated turbidity in newly
installed wells. However, even with these conservative and targeted well
installation specifications, other naturally occurring conditions (e.g., iron
fluctuation) may prevent sampling of wells at turbidity values less than 5 NTU.
Following sample collection and laboratory data evaluation, Duke Energy may
review these data with respect to turbidity values to determine if additional well
development is needed or if well construction has affected groundwater
conditions. It may be necessary to redevelop wells from time to time to minimize
6

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES DUKE
ENERGY:
sample turbidity. Fine silt and clay can collect at the base of a well over time.
The effect on future sampling events can be reduced by lowering the tubing or
pump to the bottom of the well (after all the groundwater samples have been
collected) and pumping until the purge water from the bottom of the'well screen
is clear.
Note: If purging of a well does not result in turbidity measurements of 10 NTU or
less, the field sampler shall alert the Project Manager. The sampling team will
assess options to reduce the turbidity as soon as possible.
There are a variety of water-quality meters available that measure the water
quality parameters identified above. A multi-parameter meter capable of
measuring each of the water quality parameters,referenced previously (except for
turbidity) in one flow-through cell is required. Turbidity shall be measured using
a separate turbidity meter or prior to flow into the flow through cell using an
inline T-valve, if using one multi-meter during purging. The water quality meter
(and turbidity meter) shall be calibrated as per manufacturer's instructions.
Calibration procedures shall be documented in the project field logbook including
calibration solutions used, expiration date(s), lot numbers, and calibration results.
7

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES DUKE
ENERGY..
3.3.2 Volume-Averaging Well Purging
For wells that either have very slow recharge rates, that draw down excessively at the
minimum pumping rate (100 mUmin or 0.026 gpm), or require a higher pumping rate
(greater than 500 mL/min or 0.13 gpm) to maintain purging (i.e., low-flow well purging
and sampling is not appropriate), the volume-averaging well purging and sampling
method may be used. The Field Team Leader shall seek approval from the Project
Manager before utilizing the volume-averaging method instead of the low-flow method.
3.3.2.1 CALCULATE PURGE VOLUMES
Based on the depth-to-water(DTW) and total depth (TD) measurements, the volume
of standing water in the well must be calculated using the following procedures.
1) Subtract DTW from TD to calculate the length of the standing water column (L,,).
in the well.
TD —DTW = Lwc
2) Multiply the length of the standing water column by the volume calculation
(gallon per linear foot of depth) based on the inner casing diameter(see
example list below)to determine the total standing water volume; this represents
one well volume.
Vlt, = LWc x 2,rr2
1-inch well = 0.041 gallon per linear foot
2-inch well = 0.163 gallon per linear foot
4-inch well = 0.653 gallon per linear foot
6-inch well = 1.469 gallons per linear foot
8-inch well = 2.611 gallons per linear foot
3) Multiply the well volume calculated in the previous step by three and five to obtain
the approximate respective total purge volume (the target purge volume is
between three and five standing well volumes). For wells with multiple casing
diameters (such as open bedrock holes), calculate the volume for each segment.
Take the sum of the values and multiply by three and five to determine the
minimum and maximum purge volumes, respectively.
4) Fully document the volume calculation in the field logbook or on the Groundwater
Sampling Field Sheets.
8

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES &DUKE
lC'ENERGY
3.3.2.2 PURGE THE MONITORING WELL
Determine the appropriate pump to be used for purging—the preferred and most
commonly used methods involve the use of a surface centrifugal or peristaltic pump
whenever the head difference between the sampling location and the water level is less
than the limit of suction and the volume to be removed is reasonably small. Where the
Water level is below the limit of suction or there is a large volume of water to be purged,
use the variable speed electric submersible pump as the pump of choice (EPA, 2013).
In some cases (shallow wells with small purge volumes), purging with a bladder pump
.may be appropriate. Once the proper pump has been selected:
1) Set the pump immediately above the top of the well screen or approximately three
to five feet below the top of the water table (EPA, 2013).
2) Lower the pump if the water level drops during purging.
Note: Use new certified-clean disposable tubing for purging and sampling.
Note: Although volume-averaged sampling involves purging a specified volume of
water(such as three to five well volumes) rather than basing purge completion on
the stabilization of water quality indicator parameters, measuring and recording
water-quality indicator parameters during purging provides information that can be
used for assessment and remedial decision-making purposes. Indicator
parameters are pH, specific conductance, DO, and turbidity as described in
Section 3.3.1. Temperature and ORP will also be recorded during purging.
3) During well purging, monitor the discharge rate using a graduated cylinder or
other measuring device, water-quality indicator parameters (if desired), and DTW
as follows:
• Initially,within approximately three minutes of startup,
• Approximately after each well volume is purged, and then
• Before purge completion.
4) Record pump discharge rates (mL/min or gpm) and pump settings in the field
logbook. Also, record any changes in the pump settings and the time at which
the changes were made.
5) Maintain low pumping rates to avoid overpumping or pumping the well to dryness,
if possible. If necessary, adjust pumping rates, pump set depth, or extend
pumping times to remove the desired volume of water.
6) Upon reaching the desired purge water volume, turn off the purge pump. Do not
allow the water contained in the pump tubing to drain back into the well when the
pump is turned off. Use an inline check valve or similar device, or if using a
peristaltic pump, remove the tubing from the well prior to turning off the pump. It is
9

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES ja,DUKE
ENERGY,
preferred preferred to collect samples within two hours of purging, but acceptable for
collection up to 24 hours of purging. Do not collect samples after 24 hours of
purging.
Note: The removal of three to five well volumes may not be practical in wells
with slow recovery rates. If a well is pumped to near dryness at a rate less than
1.9 L/min (0.5 gpm), the well shall be allowed to completely recover prior to
sampling. If necessary, the two-hour limit may be exceeded to allow for sufficient
recovery, but samples should be collected within 24 hours of purge completion.
3.4 Sampling
3.4.1 Low-Flow Sampling
Following are the procedures for the collection of low-flow groundwater samples.
These procedures apply to sample collection for unfiltered and filtered samples
using a 0.45 micron filter. See Appendix A for use of 0.1 micron filtered samples.
1) Record the final pump settings in the field logbook prior to sample collection:
2) Measure and record the indicator parameter readings prior to sample collection
on both the stabilization form and in the field logbook.
3) Record comments pertinent to the appearance (color, floc, turbid) and obvious
odors (such as sulfur odor or petroleum hydrocarbons odor) associated with the
water.
4) Arrange and label necessary sample bottles and ensure that preservatives are
added, as required. Include a unique sample number, time and date of sampling,
the initials of the sampler, and the requested analysis on the label. Additionally,
provide information pertinent to the preservation materials or chemicals used in
the sample.
5) Collect samples directly from pump tubing prior to the flow-through cell or via the
in-line T-valve used for turbidity measurements (as described Section 3.3.1 (6)
above). Ensure that the sampling tubing remains filled during sampling and
attempt to prevent water from descending back into the well. Minimize turbulence
when filling sample containers, by allowing the liquid to run gently down the inside
of the bottle. Fill the labeled sample bottles in the following order:
• Metals and Radionuclides,
• Filtered Metals and Radionuclides, if required, and then
• .Other water-quality parameters.
6) Seal each sample and place.the sample on ice in a cooler to maintain sample
temperature preservation requirements.
10

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES ( DUKE
`�"ENERGY
7) Note the sample Identification and sample collection time in field logbook and on
Chain-of-Custody form.
8) Once sampling is complete, retrieve the sample pump and associated sampling
equipment and decontaminate in accordance with procedures outlined in the
Decontamination of Equipment SOP (Appendix A).
9) Close and secure the well. Clean up and remove debris left from the sampling
event. Be sure that investigation-derived wastes are properly containerized and
labeled, if applicable.
10)Review sampling records for completeness. Add additional notes as necessary.
3.4.2 Sampling after Volume-Averaging Purge
The procedures described below are for the collection of groundwater samples after a
volume-averaged purge has been conducted. Volume- averaging purge methods.are
described in Section 3.3.2.
1) If sampling with a pump, care shall be taken to minimize purge water
descending back into the well through the pump tubing. Minimize turbulence
when filling sample containers by allowing the liquid to run gently down the
inside of the bottle. Fill the labeled sample bottles in the following order:
• Metals and Radionuclides,
• Filtered Metals and Radionuclides, if required, and then
• Other water-quality parameters.
2) If sampling with a bailer, slowly lower a clean, disposable bailer through the
fluid surface. Retrieve the bailer and fill the sample bottles as described
above. Care shall be taken to minimize disturbing the sample during
collection.
3.5 Sample dandling, Packing, and Shipping
Samples shall be marked, labeled, packaged, and shipped in accordance with the sections
outline below.
3.6.1 Handling
The samples will be stored in coolers for transport to the site. Collected samples will be
placed on ice in the sampling coolers for pickup or transport to the laboratory for
analysis.
3.6.2 Sample Labels
All sample containers will be new, laboratory cleaned and certified bottles. The bottles
will be properly labeled for identification and will include the following information:
• Project Site/ID
11

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES f DUKE
`i'ENERGY,
• Sample identifier (Well ID)
• Name or initials of sampler(s)
• Date and time of collection
• Analysis parameter(s)/method
• Preservative
3.6.3 Chain-of-Custody Record
Sample transport and handling will be strictly controlled to prevent sample
contamination. Chain-of-Custody control for all samples will consist of the following:
• Sample containers will be securely placed in coolers (iced) and will remain
under the supervision of project personnel until transfer of the samples to the
laboratory for analysis has occurred.
• Upon delivery to the laboratory, the laboratory director or his designee will sign
the Chain-of-Custody control forms and formally receive the samples. The
laboratory will ensure that proper refrigeration of the samples is maintained.
The Chain-of-Custody document contains information which may include:
• Client name
• Client project name
• Client contact
• Client address
• Client phone/fax number
• Sampler(s) name and signature
• Signature of person involved in the chain of possession
• Inclusive dates of possession
• Sample identification
• Sample number
• Date & time of collection
• Matrix
• Type of container and preservative
• Number of containers
• Sample type - grab or composite
• Analysis parameter(s)/ method
• Internal temperature of shipping container upon opening in the laboratory
3.6 Field Quality Control Samples
Field quality control involves the routine collection and analysis of QC blanks to verify that
the sample collection and handling processes have not impaired the quality of the
samples.
12

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
3.0 PROCEDURES d DUKE
ENERGY,
• Equipment Blank—The equipment blank is a sample of deionized water, which
is taken to the field and used as rinse water for sampling equipment. The
equipment blank is prepared like the actual samples and returned to the
laboratory for identical analysis. An equipment blank is used to determine if
certain field sampling or cleaning procedures result in cross-contamination of site
samples or if atmospheric contamination has occurred. One equipment blank
sample will be prepared per day or per 20 groundwater samples, whichever is
more frequent.
Field and laboratory QA/QC also involves the routine collection and analysis of
duplicate field samples. These samples are collected at a minimum rate of
approximately one per 20 groundwater samples per sample event. A field duplicate is a
replicate sample prepared at the sampling locations from equal portions of all sample
aliquots combined to make the sample. Both the field duplicate and the sample are
collected at the same time, in the same container type, preserved in the same way, and
analyzed by the same laboratory as a measure of sampling and analytical precision.
3.7 Field Logbook Documentation
Field logbooks shall be maintained by the Field Team Leader to record daily activities.
The field logbook may include the following information for each well:
• Well identification number
• Well depth
• Static water level depth
• Presence of immiscible layers (yes — no)
• Estimated well yield, if known
• Purge volume and purge pumping rate
• Time well purge began and ended
• Well evacuation procedure and equipment
• Field analysis data
• Climatic conditions including air temperature
• Field observations on sampling event
• Well location
• Name of collector(s)
• Date and time of sample collection
• Sampling procedure
• Sampling equipment
• Types of sample containers used and sample identification numbers
• Preservative used
13

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plan
4.0 REFERENCES `+gDUKE
ENERGY
The Field Team Leader shall review the field logbook entries for completeness and
accuracy. The Field Team Leader is responsible for completion of the required data
collection forms. Example field logs are in Appendix C.
3.8 Decontamination and Waste Management
Sampling equipment decontamination shall be performed in a manner consistent with
the Decontamination of Equipment SOP (Appendix A). Decontamination procedures
shall be documented in the field logbook. Investigation-derived wastes produced
during sampling or decontamination shall be managed in accordance with State and
Station-specific rules for disposal of wastes.
4.0 REFERENCES
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard Practice for Low-Flow
Purging and Sampling for Wells and Devices Used for Ground-Water Quality
Investigations, D 6771-02. 2011.
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste - Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846), Third
Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Update I, 11, IIA, 1113, III, IIIA, IVA and
IVB.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and
Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Ground Water Issue,
"Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown Sampling Procedures). Document Number EPA/540/S-
95/504," April 1996.
U.S. EPA. Region 4, Groundwater Sampling Operating Procedure. Document Number
SESDPROC-301-R3, November 2013.
U.S. EPA. Region I, Low Stress (Low Flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure for the
Collection of Ground Water Samples from Monitoring Wells, Revision 2, July 1996.
14

Duke Energy Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
Decontamination of Equipment SOP f DUKE
��ENERGY,
Decontamination of
Equipment SOP
15

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
Purpose&Application f DUKE
`e"ENERGY:
1 .0 Purpose & Application
This procedure describes techniques meant to produce acceptable decontamination of
equipment used in field investigation and sampling activities. Variations from this SOP
should be approved by the Project Manager prior to implementation and a description of
the variance documented in the field logbook.
2.0 Equipment & Materials
• Decontamination water,
• Alconox detergent or equivalent non-phosphate detergent
• Test tube brush or equivalent
• 5-gallon bucket(s)
• Aluminum foil
• Pump
3.0 Procedure
3.1 Decontamination of Non-Disposable Sampling Equipment
Decontamination of non-disposable sampling equipment used to collect samples for
chemical analyses will be conducted prior to each sampling as described below. Larger
items may be decontaminated at the decontamination pad. Smaller items may be
decontaminated over 5-gallon buckets. Wastewater will be disposed in accordance with
applicable State and Station-specific requirements.
1. Alconox detergent or equivalent and water will be used to scrub the equipment.
2. Equipment will be first rinsed with water and then rinsed with distilled/deionized
water.
3. Equipment will be air dried on plastic sheeting.
4. After drying, exposed ends of equipment will be wrapped or covered with
aluminum foil for,transport and handling.
3.2 Decontamination of Field Instrumentation
Field instrumentation (such as interface probes, water quality meters, etc.) will be
decontaminated between sample locations by rinsing with deionized or distilled water. If
visible contamination still exists on the equipment after the rinse, an Alconox (or
equivalent) detergent scrub will be added and the probe thoroughly rinsed again.
Decontamination of probes and.meters will take place in a 5-gallon bucket. The
decontamination water will be handled and disposed in accordance with applicable
State and Station-specific requirements.
16

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
3.0 Procedure (NDUKE
`-'ENERGY
3.3 Decontamination of Groundwater Sampling Equipment
Non-disposable groundwater sampling equipment, including the pump, support cable
and electrical wires in contact with the sample will be thoroughly decontaminated as
described below:
1. As a pre-rinse, the pump will be operated in a deep basin containing 8 to 10
gallons of water. Other equipment will be flushed with water.
2. The pump will be washed by operating it in a deep basin containing phosphate-
free detergent solution, such as Alconox, and other equipment will be flushed
with a fresh detergent solution. Detergent will be used sparingly, as needed.
3. Afterwards, the pump will be rinsed by operating it in a deep basin of water and
other equipment will be flushed with water.
4. The pump will then be disassembled and washed in a deep basin containing
non-phosphate detergent solution. All pump parts will be scrubbed with a test
tube brush or equivalent.
5. Pump parts will be first rinsed with water and then rinsed with distilled/deionized
water.
6. For a bladder pump, the disposable bladder will be replaced with a new one for
each well and the pump reassembled.
7. The decontamination water will be disposed of properly.
3.4 Materials from Decontamination Activities
All wastewater and PPE generated from decontamination activities will be handled and
disposed in accordance with applicable State and Station-specific requirements.
17

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
Sampling Equipment Check List—Table 1 If DUKE
V"ENERGY,
Sampling Equipment
Check List — Table 1
18

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
Sampling Equipment Check List—Table 1 j DUKE
ENERGY,
Table 1: Suggested Groundwater Sampling Equipment&Material Checklist
Item Description Checkd
Health&Safety
Nitrile gloves
Hard hat
Steel-toed boots
Hearing protection
Field first-aid kit
Fire Extinguisher
Eyewash
Safety glasses
Respirator and cartridges(if necessary)
SaranexTM/Tyvek@ suits and booties(if necessary)
Paperwork
Health and Safety Plan
Project work control documents
Well construction data, location map, field data from previous sampling events
Chain-of-custody forms and custody seals
Field logbook
Measuring Equipment .
Flow measurement supplies (for example, graduated cylinder and stop watch)
Electronic water-level indicator capable of detecting non-aqueous phase liquid
Sampling Equipment
GPS device
Monitoring well keys
Tools for well access(for example, socket set, wrench, screw driver, T-wrench)
Laboratory-supplied certified-clean bottles, preserved by laboratory(if necessary)
Appropriate trip blanks and high-quality blank water
Sample filtration device and filters
Submersible pump, peristaltic pump, or other appropriate pump
Appropriate sample and air line tubing (Silastic®,Teflon®, Tygone, or equivalent)
Stainless steel clamps to attach sample lines to pump
Pump controller and power supply
Oil-less air compressor, air line leads, and end fittings (if using bladder pump)
In-line groundwater parameter monitoring device(for example, YSI-556 Multi-
Parameter or Horiba U-52 water quality meter)
Turbidity meter
Bailer
Calibration standards for monitoring devices
19

Duke Energy Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
Field Logbook/Data Sheets ,f-,,DUKE
ILI'ENERGY.
Field Logbook/Data
t -
Sheets
I .
20

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
Field Logbook/Data Sheets DUrE
ENERGY;
;Groundwater Potentiometric Level Measurement Log KE
Ef�1®UKE
ell a her m ©eptt a eorQ ent �o!ea i mn e
a o fn rf i
12e r
Field Personnel: Checked By:
*-Measurements are referenced from the top of the PVC inner casing(TOC)for each respective monitoring well. TOCs
shall be surveyed by a Professional Land Surveyor and referenced to NAVD88.
21

Duke Energy Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
Field Logbook/Data Sheets a<i,DUKE
ENERGY:
Well Sampling/MicroPurge Log DUKE' ENERGY.
Project Name: Sheet: of
Well Number: Date:
Well Diameter:
Top of Casing Elevation(ft,MSL): Pump Intake Depth(ft):
Total Well Depth(ft): Recharge Rate(sec):
Initial Depth to Water(ft): Discharge Rate(sec):
Water Column Thickness(ft): Controller Settings:
Water Column Elevation(ft,MSL): Purging Time Initiated:
1 Well Volume(gal): Purging Time Completed:
3 Well Volumes(gal): Total Gallons Purged:
, r
Volume Flow Rate Depth to Temperature pH Specific Dissolved ORP Turbidity
Time Purged (mL/min) Water(ft) (°C) (s.u.) Conductance Oxygen (mV) (NTU) Comments
(gallons). (MS/cm) (mg/L)
Stabilization Min.1 Well +10 <5xruor+10
Criteria Volume +30C +0.1 +3% +10% mV r r>s xru
KOM
P
Sample Collection Parameter Container Preservative
Number Time
22

Duke Energy I Low Flow Groundwater Sampling Plar
Field Logbook/Data Sheets ,f-,DUKE
ENERGY,
DAILY FIELD REPORT f DUKE
ENERGY._
Project Name:
Field Manager:
Field Personnel:
Date:
Weather:
boy ours q °pm,.nt e. i 1
•eld r bservato s.
Submitted by: lReviewed by:
23

gp I
' ,�.�_\1�11���1_ " -, ,RNH—d-, c ;mac
rg,
V 1K" .
�Rl
.j
vlb,
47 �i
gg
19 MR-
�gj iE]s­ AE
F
WETLANDS
R;
:Z� 1�i 4
y;L
21jr
t
-AEi
4
Vk
RgR
x
M
jp
5_ I
L:
-1 •\V
y,
1. ----F;— " '. N
F
-Al-L MWIA 6
A
7!-- 1 gg'!
C�s
rle
yW,
JL
=NZ-1
v v,
3i
M,
I Ww
- a„l� Z.
n;
,7
DOW-
g,
z
Ix J1.
v
4: A;- i;,-;,
v
A� t
5F.,'+C'a ?� .:� 1-' 1 i, -J .i: �fu k �j l \ 's„•yr:r�'� 7 /T .;� \�, 4� -7
jk
%o� r. W"1w
-"A A
Vi t 5.
41 lt
"N'
40,
Ii
Ti
gg
�x g
9�ft- -Z 7,
f
-A 4 LIt
7
A%
04,
4�
LEGEND
A Q� MONITORING WELL
SURFACE WATER
's, 2
COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCT LIMITS
x
REVIEW BOUNDARY
_7ax
COMPLIANCE BOUND
ARY
yt
PROPERTY LINE (APPROXIMATE)
lI
<
A\ SOURCE:
:- NOVEMBER 7,2013 AERIAL IMAGE OBTAINED FROM GOGGLE EARTH PRO
swoop WELL LOCATIONS,COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCTS LIMITS,REVIEW BOUNDARYAND
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY TAKEN FROM S&ME DRAWING TITLED"GROUNDWATER FLOW
MAP STRUCTURAL FILL',DATED 12-16-2010.
I Ali'sF"ll
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 200 100 0
IN`
_c:kl,
4, , DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
V IN FEET
148 RIVER STREET,SUITE 220 STRUCTURAL FILL -AREA I
GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA 29601
WELL LOCATION MAP
PHONE [phone]
ynterracorp.com ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
ynTerra DRAWN BY*S ARLEDGE DATE 06/23/2015 ARDEN, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER.KATHY WEBB
.
WIL\ s LAYOUT.FIG 2(STRUCRURAL FILL 1)
.1/2�/2.15 . AM n P:\Duke Ene Progress.1026\02.ASH EVILLE PLANT\00.COMBINED MW AT STRUCTURAL FILLS\2015 ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT STRUCTURAL F

r t ISTORMVAMPLEDATEROBER201/
tr_ [ / '�c* ,� '�* ,+�„s. �'`* •\\ TFAL 9
yr 'd1!'"d ;Ir \
�\
' ?' I
r If
a a . MWa76 A3' c n
� •; ``�.-`may. .:. � S'��* �D�, \ ///�\ 1�" � -_ t •�""�r' __. I
Alt;
;
1
0000
1. � �/!
lop
t i4d too
Lly -A
PONDS, 0%one,40p ago
Tw
,
Ilk
s-K
v fi DETENTION POND 1 DR
, - L '� \ tt -:\ 1a■
nnwliaL31 AREA
r °
__ \
'a MIN3"c
�Ae3
-__-
ro
doom
\ EA�3' \ ® `.ems /
I
4�, A
(ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
T�
•BORROW PITS \ \\
,
,
w
I #
400
dOo
.00
LEGEND
MW6A63' MONITORING WELL(SAMPLED)
s MW-8 MONITORING WELL(NOT SAMPLED)
COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCT LIMITS
REVIEW BOUNDARY
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY }�
---- PROPERTY LINE(APPROXIMATE) .
SOURCES:
2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM NRCS GEOSPTIAL DATA GATEWAY AT GRAPHIC SCALE
httpALLW WELLS
RVEYEDEXCEP M 175 0 175 350 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
ALL WELLS SURVEYED EXCEPT MW-3 BY WNC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS&
SURVEYORS ON APRIL 19,2012. IN FEET STRUCTURAL FILL AREA 3
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY,REVIEW BOUNDARY,AND LIMITS OF COB FILL BASED 148 RIVER STREET,SUITE 220 WELL LOCATION MAP
ON DRAWING BY FRANKLIN S.CRAIG,P.E.OF GASTONIA,NORTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA 29601
JUNTITLE30,EA 2014-ALL PHASES ENGINEERED FILL DESIGN,SHEET E-1,DATED VIP PHONE [phone] ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
NEW PROPERTY
2011 www.synterracorp.com
RECEIVED
ON
,2015EDFROM CHARAH DRAWING BOUNDARIES
3 - synTerra ARDEN, NORTH CAROLINA
RECEIVED ON JUNE 23,2015.COMPLIANCE AND REVIEW BOUNDARIES FOR AREA 3 DRAWN BY:JOHN CHASTAIN DATE:10/6/2015
AND AREA 4 REVISED BASED ON THE NEW PROPERTY LINE FROM CHARAH DRAWING. PROJECT MANAGER:KATHY WEBB
NEW MWIAR-A4 WELL SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BV WNC-PE&S,PLLC E-MAIL LAYOUT'FIG 3(STRUCTURAL FILL III)
DATED OCTOBER 2,2015. 102 201511:31AM P:Duke Ener Pro ress.102602.ASHEVILLE PLAN OO.COMBINED MW AT STRUCTURAL FILLS 2015 ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT STRUCTURAL FILLS.dW

Ole
MW1 AR-A4 a It)
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
Mw-1®
\ ` 3 Y � T
Mw_-a
! ;
`®
NOT- 1 _ \� �� \�\ AREA 4
MW5-A4 ` t
� it
-" \
;ACCESS THALLE CONSTRUCTION_I 1
OFF FERNCLIFF DR_ � \`\ zt\
j
\ 1 1
'
\ o
.01
44, -
MW7-A4
\,
%
`O
Y' \
\Ley `�� , ` AW9-A41 son
400 4WD
goo
%
LEGEND '
�TENTION POND� i
MW9-A4 MONITORING WELL(SAMPLED) snow --
MW--8 MONITORING WELL(NOT SAMPLED) `�
COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCT LIMITS
REVIEW BOUNDARY
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARYy
---- PROPERTY LINE(APPROXIMATE)
SOURCES:
2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM NRCS GEOSPTIAL DATA GATEWAY AT GRAPHIC SCALE
http://datagateway.nres.usda.90v/ 150 o 150 300 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
ALL WELLS SURVEYED EXCEPT MW-3 BY WNC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS&
SURVEYORS ON APRIL 19,2012. IN FEET STRUCTURAL FILL -AREA 4
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY,REVIEW BOUNDARY,AND LIMITS OF CCB FILL BASED 148 RIVER STREET,SUITE 220 'WELL LOCATION MAP
ON DRAWING BY FRANKLIN S.CRAIG,P.E.OF GASTONIA,NORTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA 29601
TITLED AREA k4-ALL PHASES ENGINEERED FILL DESIGN,SHEET E-1,DATED PHONE [phone]
JUNE 30,2011. www.synterracorp.com ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
RECEIVED
ON
NE23,LINE 015.CAINED FROM CHARAH DRAWING BOUNDARIES
Terra ARDEN NORTH CAROLINA
RECEIVED ON JUNE D BASED
COMPLIANCEAND REVIEW BOUNDARIES FOR AREA3 DRAWN BY.IOHN CHASTAIN DATE'10/6/2015
AND AREA 4 REVISED BASED ON THE NEW PROPERTY LINE FROM CHARAH DRAWING. PROJECT MANAGER KATHY WEBB �
NEW MWIAR-A4 WELL SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY WNC-PE&S,PLLC E-MAIL LAYOUT.FIG a(STRUCTURAL FILL IV)
DATED OCTOBER 2,2015. 102 201511:28AM P:Duke Ener Pra ess.102602.ASHEVILLEPLANT\00.COMBINEDMW AT STRUCTURAL FILLS\2015 ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT STRUCTURAL FILLS.dw

Ali4�7-
r 51
-
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
September 4, 2015
John Toepfer, P.E.
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
410 S. Wilmington Street/NC14
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Asheville Airport Coal Combustion Byproduct (CCB)
Permit: WQ000o020
Structural Fill Project—Areas 1 & 3
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Toepfer,
This correspondence is imresponse to recent site visits to the CCB structural fill projects at the
Asheville Regional Airport.The Division noted groundwater seepage and the growth of woody
vegetation at Area 1 CCB structural fill. This letter is also intended to provide guidance with
regard to the performance of background monitoring well MW-4A, and the French drain outfall
for Area 3 CCB structural fill.
On April 6, 2015, Division staff accompanied consultants with SynTerra Corporation as they
collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells associated with the Area 1 CCB structural
fill. It was at this time that groundwater seepage was observed along the toe of the structural
fill. Further reconnaissance of the area proved difficult because of the thick vegetation that has
grown up since the end of construction in 2010.The Division is requiring, pursuant to section V.
in the subject permit, that vegetation near the toe of the structural.fill be managed►in:away
that does not impede site inspections. Once the vegetation has been addressed, the Division
will organize a joint inspection to assess the groundwater seepage and determine a plan
forward for assessment.
Staff also observed the presence of woody vegetation on the North slope of Area 1 CCB
structural fill (see attached map). Our concern with woody vegetation near the structural fill is
the potential for roots to weaken or compromise the integrity of the clay cap. You are required
to assess this area to determine if further site maintenance is needed.
The latest analytical results (April 2015)for background monitoring well MW-4A highlights a
continuing trend of iron and manganese concentrations that exceed the state's groundwater
standards,-15A NCAC 02L.0202. It is important to point out that iron and manganese
concentrations are consistently higher at the background well as compared to the monitoring
North Carolina Division of Water Resources—Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S.Highway 70.Swannanoa,N.C. 28778
Phone[phone]
FAX [phone]
Internet hftp:/fportal.ncdenr.org/weblwq/
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

John Toepfer
September 4,2015
Page 2of2
wells immediately down gradient. A review of the field turbidity data does not appear to
indicate significant interference from suspended particles in the well bore. In addition,there
was an exceedance of the groundwater standard for mercury in 2011 as well as thallium
detections in 2012 and 2015. Please provide a response that addresses the cause(s) of the
groundwater exceedances (including the presence of thallium) and the viability of MW-4A as a
background monitoring well.
On May 15, 2014, our staff met with Duke Energy and Charah personnel at the Asheville
Regional Airport. One of the areas we toured was a cement culvert that is discharging water
__ with_appr_eciable_amounts_of-oxidized-iron-(see_attached-map-and-ph.oto)..-I.t-is-o.ur
understanding that water in this culvert represents baseflow from the French drain underlying
Area 3 CCB structural fill. You are required to sample this discharge for the same water quality
parameters as nearby groundwater monitoring wells. An estimate of the flow rate from the
culvert is also required.
Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions or concerns. I can be reached at
[phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Brett Laverty
Water Q I' Regional Operations
Asheville Regional Office
c.° fixi 1 0,le
Norman Divers—Charah Inc.
Chonticha McDaniels—NCDENR DWR

ylc-
4 �
_ � f
'Area'
'3:CCB French DrainO.utfall
_
44
VIA
Y i ` .A` "3 .i. ), �'ky. '1\ yp{` .b a.' + �' ASS.. �� r + ��1 •1 L i' �'
a.f. 'Yi+ # +.! :fit � i 1 t 'y;' •� {�rir- ��, :1' �'L
. w
- _ Wody Vegetation Assessment'Area . `~
t a�1 �.' * 'fl;y .Y`� ).' >i �p's S �\�\�`". r, jl... + I} h. ' y^.�-�'" "�. •, `� �5,,. k.
Y '
�
��t ��ry'v .

Photo 1: Cement culvert discharging baseflow from Area 3 CCB structural fill.
'�t^YW firs t tt�n �•. -t�i+�" / v f .r' �•i7r i`�t t z�. .'
3.3n' n�v =t� .r-?ivy•.;1' 'vttf-
� !9 �'' F�i ���}«&`7
t ," .�Batt'.q;d r�' +�,y�ia�-., �*�• ?n,,St ly'��ti�C}u�y�v 3� �s�Y''�I.'������ q '� G� F �j� � �j;�'q '` l•�i
`pa��'� a"� z ��'*�a``�tti �, �zw431'ly.rlt •"t ''fir`' � 'y� �.'� r f `�`J„ .r'
.R W
A
' J t, I/ ��t4•� Y'
A
x"�t} 1gLF.i' .
x° t-0.�
gR
y t ti 3
:'sty C+C..me•,,°`. v }� 75f�,-z ? '��`�*'` y$ ( .,K
"-
7 ay a v f:
f 7 r a��
G r fV � ��t'�,iy '�-', - � ���� i •�4�'��'�f�t _���"'�� Ay�Fe�i` .r�,kS`� k N � Ii�y
{� ', ?���-„f��r�x'-,"�i_:.*.�'���, �x y��vr����y�sy.f��..3Fw 'r { .�`� q ��.��o����✓x" ��+�,^ ``A

HIC
North Carolina Department of Environrhent and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R, van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
September 2,2015 ,
MR.HARRY K..SIDERIS—SVP,ENviRONMENTAL,HEALTH&,SAFET.Y
DUKE.ENERGY
.526 SOUTH CHURCH STREET,EC3XP
CHARLOTTE,NO,2`8202
Subject: Pennit'No.WQ0000020
Asheville Regional.Airport
Coal Combustion Products
Structural Fill Projects
Buncombe County.
-Pear Mr, Sideris:
In accordance with your permit renewal request.received August 7,'201.4, we are forwarding
herewith Permit No. WQ0000020 dated September. 2, 2015, to`Duke Energy.Progress, Inc, for,the
continued operation and monitoring of the subject structural fill project.
This permit shall be effective from the date'of issuance until.August 31;2020,,shall void Permit
No. WQ0000020 issued February 17, 2006, and shall be subject to the:conditions and limitations .as,
specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the groundwater monitoring,requirements listed in
Attachments C for they may differ from the.previous permit issuance. Failure to establish an,adequate .
system for collecting and maintaining the required operational information;shall.result in non-compliance
problems.
Please note that on September 20, 2014,: Senate gill 720'= Coal Ash Management Act of
2014.became law (attached SL.2014422). Accordingly, this act superseded.the"02T.requirements
for structural fill,which would include use as a base or subbase under a,paved road, parking-lot,
sidewalk,or similar structure; therefore, any future CCP structural fill projects must comply with
this new law and all required permit application or documentation shall be submitted to the,..
Division of Waste Management.However, the following activities are still deemed permitted under 1.5A
NCAC 02T.1203:
Use of CCPs as fuel for combustion in boilers,furnaces,etc.for°energy recovery,.
Use of CCPs as material for manufacturing concrete products,, asphalt products, brick
products, lightweight aggregate roofing materials, insulation products, plastics, paints,
. bowling balls, cosmetics and other manufactured products in-which the ash are encapsulated:
in the manufactured product.
Use or disposal of CCPs in a solid waste facility permitted by the Division of Waste
Management that is approved to receive the CCPs..
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
DERR
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North`Carolina 27699-1617
Phone:[phone]Internef h1tDI/Portal.nedenr.orplwebfwp
An Equal OpportunitylAifrrmaliveAction Employer—-Made in'partwith recycled paper

S
Mr.Harry-K.Sideris
September2,=2015
Page 2 of 2
,0 Use-of CCPs as material for traction control during snow.and .ice events, provided that the
CCPs;do not exceed the leachate concentrations of concern as stipulated;in 1.5A NCAC 02T
4 Use of CCPs as a substitute for blasting grit, roofing granules, and filter cloth precoat for.
residuals.dewate'ring, provided that the CCPs do not exceed the leachate concentrations of
concern as stipulated.in.1 5A NCAC 02T.1205(a).
o Use of CCPs in,flowable fill forbackfill of trenches for potable water mains as approved-by
the Division of Environmental Health, sanitary sewers, storm drainage structures, and other
trenching uses'provided that"the CCPs do not exceed the leachate concentrations of concern
as stipulated in 15A NCAC 02T.1205(a).
o Use of CCPs as a raw product for the stabilization of residuals.
4 Land application sites onto,which CCPs are land applied, provided that the CCPs meet-the,
pollutant,limits'as stipulated in 15A NCAC 02T .1205(a).and the land application activities.
meet all applicable_conditions stipulated in 15A NCAC 02T.1108(b)(1)and 02T.11.09(b)(1).
If any parts, requirements or limitations contained in.this permit are unacceptable, the Pennittee
has the right toxequest an,adjudicatory hearing upon written.request within 30 days following receipt of
this permit. This request shall be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings at 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made, this permit shall be final and.
binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matter,please.contact Chontieha McDaniel at
(919) $07-6337 or cl oiiticha:[e-mail].
/Sincerely, _
S.Jay.Ziip erman,P,G.,Director
cc.: Buncombe_County Health Department
John,Toepfer,.RE., Senior Environmental Specialist—Duke Energy Progress(Electronic Copy)
Asheville Regional,Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section(Electronic Copy)
Digital Permit Archive(Electronic Copy.)
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES'
RALEIGH
COAL,COMBUSTION PRODUCTS(CCP)STRUCTURAL FILL PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143;General Statutes of Norh,Carolina as
amended,and other applicable Laws,Rules,and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Duke Energy Progress* Inico
Buncombe County
FOR THE
continued operation and monitoring of a coal.combustion products(CCPs)management for Duke Energy
Progress,_Inc..and consisting of the structural fill of CCP residuals generated from a wastewater treatment
facility listed in Attachment A to the approved Asheville Regional Airport.sites-listed in Attachment B
and regulated under 15A NCAC 02T .1200, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters,pursuant to
the application received August 7, 2014, and in conformity with other supporting-data subsequently filed
and approved by.the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and considered,a part of this
permit:
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until August'31, 2020, shall void Permit No.
WQ0000020 issued February 17, 2006, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and.
limitations:
I. SCHEDULES
11. No later than six months prior to the expiration of this permit, the Permittee shall request renewal of .
this;.permit in writing. Upon receipt of the request, the Division will review the'adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will.renew the permit for such period of time and under .
such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate. Please note Rule 15A NCAC 02T
,0105(d) requires an updated site map including sites approved for structural fill to be submitted with
the permit renewal application. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)(2),02T.105(d),02T.0109]
2. Within 60 days of this permit issuance, the Permittee shall submit two copies of an 11X_17-inch site
map that includes the following information for each structural-fill site listed under the Attachment B: .
a. The location of major components of the waste disposal system.
b. The location and identity of each monitoring well.
c. The location of property boundaries.
d. The location of compliance and review boundaries.
The map and any supporting documentation shall be sent to the Division of Water Resources,Aquifer
Protection Section,.1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 276994 636
[15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)(2),02C_0105(f)]
WQ0000020 Version 3.0 Shell Version 13.0801 Page 1 of 8

3. The permittee shall submit the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan as required in Condition
HI2,to the Division;within 60 days of this permit issuance. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)(2)]
IL_ PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The subject CCP structural fill facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so
there is no discharge to surface waters, nor any contravention of groundwater or surface water
standards. In the event the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance
conditions due to improper operation and maintenance, the Permittee shall contact the Asheville .
regional office supervisor,and take any immediate corrective actions. [G.S. 143-215.1]
2. This permit shall not relieve the Permittee of their responsibility for damages to groundwater or,
surface water resulting from the operation of the CCP structural fill facilities. [15A NCAC 02B..0200,
02L;0100]
3. Only CCPs generated by the facility listed in Attachment A are approved for structural fill in
accordance with this permit. [G.S. 143-215.1]
.4. Only the sites listed in Attachment B are approved for structural fill. [G.S. 143-215.1]
5. Concentration of pollutant during the performance of a Toxicity Characteristic Leaching.Procedure
(TCLP).of the CCP used at the structural fill sites shall not exceed the following limits:
Parameter Leachate Concentration of Concern
(milligrams per liter)
Arsenic 5.0
Barium 100.0
Cadmium 1.0
Chromium 5.0
Lead 5.0
Mercury 0.2
Selenium 1.0
Silver 5.0
[15A NCAC 02T.1205(a)]
6. Pollutant concentrations,in CCP used at the structural fill sites shall not exceed the following Ceiling
Concentrations or Monthly Average Concentrations(i.e.,dry weight basis):
Ceiling Concentration Monthly Average
Parameter (milligram per kilogram) Concentration
(milligrams per kilogram)
Arsenic 75 41
'Cadmium 85 39
Copper 4,300 1,500
Lead 840 300
Mercury 57 17
Molybdenum 75 75
Nickel 420 420
Selenium 1.00 100
Zinc 7,500 2,800
[15A NCAC 02T.1205(b)and(c)]
WQ0000020 Version 3.0 Shell Version 130801 Page 2 of 8

7. The compliance boundary for all structural.._fill sites listed in Attachment B' shall be specified in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(b): These sites were individually. permitted on or,after
December.30, 1983; therefore, the compliance boundary is established.at either 250 feet from the:
CCP fill area boundary, or,50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is`closest to the-CCP fill
area boundary. An exceedance of groundwater standards at'or beyond,the.compliance boundary is
subject to 'remediation action according to 15A. NCAC O2L .0166(d)(2) .as well !as eriforcement'
actions in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 14341S:6A through, 143-215.6C. Any
approved relocation of the COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY will be.,noted in Attachment. B. [15A
NCAC 02L.0107(a)]
8. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .01.08, the review boundary for all structural fill sites listed in
Attachment B shall be established midway between the compliance-boundary and the CCP fill-area .
boundary. Any exceedance of groundwater standards at the<review boundary shall require action in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02L.0106. [15A NCAC 02L.0108]
7. All wells constructed for.purposes of groundwater monitoring shall be constructed in accordance with
15A NCAC 02C .0108 (Standards of Construction for Wells Other than Water Supply);and any other
jurisdictional laws and regulations pertaining to well construction. [15A NCAC 02C-.0108]
8: Except as provided for in 15A NCAC 02L .Q107(g),the Pennittee 'shall ensure any landowner who is
.not the Pennittee and owns land within the compliance boundary shall execute and file with the
appropriate County Register of Deeds an easement running with the land,containing the following
Items:
a) A notice of the permit and number or other description as allowed in 15A NCAC 02L..0107(9(1);
b) Prohibits construction and operation of water supply wells,within the compliance.boundary; and
c) Reserves the right of the Permittee and the State to enter the property within,.the compliance .
boundary for purposes related to the permit.
The Director may terminate the easement when its purpose has been:falfilled or is no longer needed.
.[15A NCAC 02L.0107(f)]
III. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The CCP structural fill facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times. The program.
shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non-discharge system to prevent any contravention
of surface water or groundwater standards. [15A NCAC 02T .1207]
2. The Permittee shall maintain an Operation and Maintenance Plan (0&M Plan) pursuant to. 15A
NCAC 02T.1208.The O&M Plan, at the minimum, shall.include:
a) Operational functions -
b) Maintenance schedules
c) Safety measures
d) Spill response plan
e)" Sampling and monitoring plan
[15A NCAC 02T.12081
WQ0000020 Version3.0 Shell Version 130801 Page 3 of 8

3. For the storage areas of CCPs and sites where CCPs are used for structural fill and bedding,where the
bedding is applied at a depth greater than 2 feet underneath the structure, the following.minimum
setbacks(i.e.,in feet)shall be adhered to:
a. Private or public water supply sources: 100 feet
b. Surface waters (streams — intermittent and perennial, lakes, perennial water bodies, and
wetlands): 50 feet
c. Wells`with exception to monitoring,wells: 100 feet
d. Seasonal high water table: 2 feet
All distances are horizontal distances except for the distance from a seasonal high water table which
is a measured as-a vertical distance.
[15A NCAC 02T.1206]
IV. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any'Division requiied,monitoring(including.groundwater,plant tissue,soil,slope structural integrity,
cap maintenance, permanent cap completion,, leachate collection, surface water analyses, etc.)
necessary to ensure groundwater and.surface water protection shall be established, and an acceptable -
sample.reporting schedule shall be followed. Monitoring requirements for permitted structural fill
sites can be found in attachment C. [15A NCAC 02T.01.08(c)]
2. CCPs shall be analyzed for toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) at the frequency`
specified in Attachment A;and the Permittee shall maintain these results fora.minimum of five years.
Any exceptions from the requirements in this condition shall be specified in Attachment A. The
TCLP analysis shall include the following parameters:
Arsenic(5.0) Chromium(5.0) Selenium(1.0)
Barium(100.0) Lead(5.0) Silver(5.0)
Cadmium(10) Mercury(0.2)
[15ANCAC 02T.:1205(a)]
3. An analysis shall be conducted on CCP from each source generating facility at the frequency
specified in Attachment A, and the Permittee shall maintain the results for a minimum of five years.
The analysis shall.include the following parameters:
Arsenic Lead Nickel
Cadmium Mercury Selenium
Copper Molybdenum Zinc
[15A NCAC 62T...12050)].
4, ,Laboratory parameter analyses shall be performed on the CCP as they are distributed,,and shall be in
accordance with the monitoring requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0505. [15A NCAC 02B :0505,
02T-.0105(m)]
WQ0000020 Version 3.0 Shell Version 130801 Page 4 of,

5 The:Periiiittee shall maintain records tracking ail CCP..,distribution activities. At a minurium, these
records shall include the following;
a. Sou rce..of CCP; ,
.....
b. Receiver of CCP.
c .: Intended use of CCP;and
d. Date and Volume of CCP distributed.
[15ANCAC"02T.0109(a)]
6. The Pennittee shall maintain records of monitoring results to.demonstrate compliance with specific
requirements as stipulated under' l 5,A:NCAC 02T .1203 for:CCP distributed for deemed permitted
activities.
7., Three copies of"an annual report shall be submitted on 6i before March 1 (,:.The annual report shalI
include suima7y of sampling, analytical results, and record keepuig.as required in Conditions 1V.1
through TVA The annual report shall be submitted to:the.following address:
Division of Water.Resources
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699=1617
[15A:NCAC 02T.111l(a)]
8. Any emergency requiring immediate reporting(e.g., discharges to surface waters,,,imminent,failure of
a storage structure, etc.) outside normal business hours shall be reported to the.Division's Emergency
Response 'personnel at telephone number [phone], (800) '858-0368, or (91.9);733-3300..
Persons reporting.such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written;report in letter..forin`within
five days following first knowledge.of the occurrence.. This report shall outline;the actions taken or
proposed to be taken to ensure that the. problem does not recur. [15A NCAC:,02T ,01050) _02T
.0108(b)(1)]
9. .:monitoring wells at.each structural fill site listed under, Attachment B shall be-sampled at "the
frequencies and"for the parameters specified in Attachment C. All-mapin well construction foniis
well abandonment forms and monitoring data shall refer to the permit number and the well:
nomenclature as provided in Attachment B.[15A NCAC 02T.0105(m)] .
10.For initial sampling of monitoring wells,'the Permittee shall`submit;a'`Compliance Monitoring Form :
(GW-59CCR) and a Well Construction Record Form (GW4) listing this permit, number and 'the
appropriate monitoring well identification number. Initial Compliance Monitoring. Forms (GW-
'59CCR)without copies of the WeU Construction Record Forms(GW-I) are deemed:.,incomplete, and
may be returned to the Permittee without being processed: [I5ANCAC 02T;0105(m)]
1 L.Two copies of the monitoring well sampling and analysis results.shall be submitted on.a Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59CCR), along with attached copies of laboraiory'analyses-, on or before the.
last working day of the month following the sampling month. The'Compliance Monitoring.Form .
(OW-59CCR) shall include this permit number and the appropriate_well identification number. :All';
information shall be submitted to the following,address:
Division of Water Resources
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina.27699-161 T.
[15A NCAC 02T.01-05(m)]
WQ0000020 Version 3.0 Shell Version 130801
.. Page:S of 8..

'12. Noncompliance and Incident Notification
The'Permittee shall report by telephone,to the Asheville Regional Office, as:.soon as.possible, butt in.
no.case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge
of the occurrence of.any.of the.following:
A. :Any failure of the CCP structural fill facilities resulting in a,release of material to surface waters. .
b. :Any time self-monitoring indicates the facility has gone out of compliance with its permit.
limitations:
c. Any spill or"discharge from a vehicle or piping system during residuals transportation.
d.. Any,groundwater standard violation detected at a compliance boundary.
,e. Any;incident in��olving breech.of the liner,system,excavations within 3 feet of the liner systeim,
severe erosion, slope failure, changes in leachate.quantity or quality, and damage to groundwater,
monitoring wells
[15A.NCAC 02T.0105(1),02T.0108(b)(1)]
V. INSPECTIONS
l: The Permittee shall provide adequate inspection and maintenance to ensure proper operation of ahe
subject structural fill facilities and shall be in accordance with the approved O&M Plan._inspection
and,maintenance of approved:.structural fill .sites shall include, but not be limited to, integrity of
intermediary and permanent caps, structural integrity, erosion, lifter systems, stormwater collection
systems,condition of monitoring wells,etc. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)]
2_ The post-closure inspection shall .be conducted quarterly on all structural fill sites 'listed' under
Attachment B.The:Permittee shall maintain an inspection log and report that include,,at a minimum:,
A. Date and tune of inspection;
b. Name-and title of person,who conducted.the inspection;
c.1.Observation-results on structural integrity, erosion, liner systems, integrity of the cap system,
stormwater collection systems, condition of monitoring wells; settlement, subsidence, seepage,
and-presence of woody vegetation;
d., Description and photo documentation of any pertinent issues such as a breech in the liner system.,
excavations within. 3 feet of the. liner system, erosion, development of depressions, slope
movement,•damage to monitoring wells, and groundwater seepage;
e: Any maintenance,repairs,or corrective actions taken;
f An.annual engineer's:certification.of the evaluation on the structural integrity and stability of the
ash fill areas.
An annuaC inspection report;containing items a. through f, shall be submitted to the Asheville
Regional:office-on or before December.31'�
j15A;NCAG 02T,.9108(b)]
3:. Any duly authorized Division representative may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and.inspect
.any`p'roperty, premises, or place on or related tothe structural fill sites permitted herein at,any
reasonable time for the purpose of deterrnining�compliance with this-permit; may,inspect*or copy any.
records required to be.maintained under.the terms-and conditions of this permit; and may collect
groundwater; surfact�water or leachate,samples. [G:S. 143-215.3(a)(2)]
W.,Q0000020"Version 3;0 Shell Version 130801 Page 6 of.8

VI. Gi'elYER LICONDrHOl` .
1,. Failure to comply with the conditions and limitations contained herein may subject.the Permittee to.
ail.enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North :Carolina .General Statutes 143
215.6A,to 143-215:6C. [G.S. 143 215.6A to 143-11516C]
,2:, This peimit shall become voidable if the-CCP management are not carried,out in accordance with the
conditions of this permit, [15A NCAC 02T.011.0]
3':, This permit is effective only with respect to the-nature and volume of CCP described in the permit
application and'other supporting documentation.[G.S. 143=215.11.
4 The issuance of.this permit does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and'all statutes,
rules,,regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by other jurisdictional government-agencies
(e.g.,,local, state, and federal) Of particular conceni to-the Division a-re applicable,river.buffer rules
in 15A NCAC 02B .0200 erosion and sedimentation control requirements in i5A.NCAC'Chapter 4
andunder the Division's General Permit NCGOI"0000, anyrequ rements pertaiiiing to wetlands under
15A NTCAC 029 .0200 and 02H ,0500; and documentation of compliance;with Article 21,,Part:6:of"
-Chapter 143.ofthe General`Statutes.{15A NCAC 02T.0105(c)(6)]
5: In the event the�approved structural fill sites change.pwn6rsb1-p1 or the Permittee:changes'their..iian e, a
formal permit modification request shall be submitted to the Division. This requesi shall'be made in
writing, and shall include appropriate documentation from the parties involved and other`supporting
documentation as necessary. The Permittee of record shall remain:fully responsible for maintaining:
and operating the:structural fill.sites permitted herein until a permit is issued to the new owner. [15A
NCAC 02T':0104]
6. The Permittee shall maintain this permit until all permitted facilities'herein are properly closed or
permitted under another pen-nit issued.by the appropriate permitting authority pursuant to 15A NCAC.
02T 01050). [15A NCAC 02T.01050)]
7 This permit is subject to revocation or unilateral modification upon:60 days notice from:;the.Divisiori
Director,.in whole or part for the requirements listed in 15A NCAC. 02T .0110. [15A NCAC 02T
.0.110]
8; Unless the Division Director grants a variance, expansion :of the' permitted .residtiads,.program
contained herein shall not be granted if the Permittee exemplifies any of the.criteria in 1;5A NCAC
02T-:0120(b): [15A NCAC 02T.0120]
9.. The Permittee shall pay the annual fee within 30 days.afier.beings billed by the-Division:. Failure to
pay the annual fee accordingly shall be cause for the Division to revoke this permit pursuant to,1 SA:
NCAC 02T,0105(e)(3). [15A NCAC 02T.0105(e)(3)]
Permit issuedthis the 2"'d day of September 2015`
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION(aw" "-_-,r-6,e.-,---- '
f
S.JaylZ✓lnnhdrman,P.G.,Director
Division of`Water.Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0000020
WQ0000020 Version 3.0 Shell Version.130801 Page 7 of 8

THIS PAGE BLANK
W00000020 Version 3.0 Shell Version 13.0801 Page 8 of 8

A I TAC&I EIVT A ApprovedResidual Sources Cet=ti-hicatiori Date;.September,2,2015 -
Dukel ergy Progress,Tue. Permit Number: W-Q0000020 Versions 3.0
CCPs Sburee-Generating Facilities
Monitoring Frequency
q Y Monitoring Frequency .
Owner Facility Name County Permit Number far Non-hazardous for Metals Z
Characteristics
Duke Energy Progress,Inc Asheville Steam Electric=Power Plant Buncombe NCO000396 Annually Once Per Month
1. TCLP Analysis as stipulated under permit Condition 1V.2 and will not be- equired once Area III is complete.
2. Testing of metals as stipulated under pen-nit Condition IV.3 and will not be required once Area III is complete.
Page I of 2.

ATTACHMENT X-Approved Residual Sources - Certifcatiou Date: September 2;2015.
Duke Energy Progress,Inc. Permit Number: NY90000020 Version:10
:THIS PAGE BLS
Page 2 oft -.

ATTACHMENT B,-Approved Structural.Fi11 Sitesertifeation Date: September l,2015
Duke-Energy Progr.,ess,Inc. Permit leIumber: WQ0000024. Version.30.
Total
Source-Generating Distribution Recipient'of the Site Location Groundwater and
Site Structural Fill Project County Surface,Water Project Status
,Facility Amount ash -
(tons) Monitoring
Latitude Longitude
MWIA=Al
Area 1 -Asheville MW2A-Al
Asheville Steam Charah.Ine./
1 Electric Power Plant Regional Airport General Buncombe 732,408. - Asheville Airport 35.445561 -8.1541978 MW4A-Al. Completed'-
Aviation,Expansion, MW5-Al
(ponded ash)a Asheville Authority S.W1- Ale
SW2-Alp
MW 1;-A3
Asheville Steam Area 3-Asheville MW2-A3
Charah Inc./
Regional Airport General b MW3.-A3
2 Electric PowerPlant Buncombe 1,000,QQ0 Asheville Airport 35.443409 -82.547168. In pogress e'd
Aviation Expansion, MW4 A3
tPonded-ash)a Authority .
Asheville MW5-A3'
MW6-A3
.MW1A-A4 .
Area 4=Asheville 1VIW2-A4
Asheville Steam - Charah inc] MW5-A4
Re 'onal.Ai ort General b ,
3 Electric Power Plant Buncombe 2,0.00,000 Asheville;Airport 35.428536 82 541947 MW5D-A4 Cotripleted
Aviation Expansion,
(ponded.ash)a Authority MW6-A4
A hevzlle
MW7-A4
MW9 A4
a ThiseStructural:fill facility was permitted under Section-W.l of the previous permit dated February 17,2006.
b,Estimated coal ash tonnage .: . .
Project`status as of Septernber 2;2015 -.
d Please.be advised that expansion to Area 3 site and Area 2 will require an individual.peiinitifiom the Division of Waste`Management firaccordance with SL:2o14 122.
e`Surface water sampling(piped stream that flows,underneath,the fill area)shall be,conductedv the culvert'§ou€fall{SW I coordin4tes;.35 44,7233,-82;5.43005):and an upstream
location(SW2)for the same,frequency and parameters(excludirig water level}as the,groundwater monitoring in Atfachznent'C:.
�' pP g P 14 the event &6 site.condition(utilizahon of an of the.a roved:structural fill sites char a ex. develo menu occurs atop the field, etc.), the`Pernm�t$ee
shall provide a written,nohfication to the Wision fag. 143-215.11,
Pagel of 2.

. _ .
ATTACHMENT B .Approved Structural;Fil1 Sites Certification Date September 2,21.,0;15
Duke Energy Progress,1.Inc „ . Pearm Number WQ000I.0020 Version.1I
0
_. . .
. _ ..
_- ....
- ... ... ._._.
- __- . . .. ....
_..
. .......
...
THTS;PAGE BLANK
. . :. _ . .
Page 2 of 2

ATTACkIMEIeiJC C-Grpuridwater Moinitoairig;Rnd Limnatations for all monitoring wells Permit Number::WQ0000020 'VersiOU0 0
bake Energy.Progress;Inc:
GROUNDWATER CHARAGTEI2TSTICS'• MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PCS'Cede- Parameter Description: Frequency Measurement" Sample Type Faou totes
O410 Alkalinity Total(as Ca603) 2 X year, Grab
01.105 Aluminum,Total(as Al) '2 X year. Grab'
01097 Antimony,Total(as Sb) 2 X year Grab
01062 Arsenic,Total(as As) 2 X year Grab
01007 Barium,Total(as Ba) 2 X year Grab
01012 Beryllium,Total(as Be) 2 X year Grab
00440 Bicarbonate Ion(as HCO3). 2 X'year Grab
0.1022 Boron;Totaf(as B) 2 X year Grab
00445 Carbonate Ion(as CO3) 2 X year Grab
01027. Cadmium,Total(as Cd) 2 X year, Grab.
00916 Calcium,Total(as Ca) 2 X year Grab
00940 Chloride(as Cl) 2 X yoar Grab
01034 Chromium,Total(as Cr). 2 X year Grab.. -
6101,- Cobalt 2 X.year
Grab::
01042 Copper,Total(as Cu) 2 X; eax. . Grab,
00300 D0,Oxygen,Dissolved' 2 X.year Grab -
01045 Iron,Total.(as Fe)_ 2 3 :year Grab
OlOSl' .'Lead,.Total(as Pb). 2 X year, Grab,
00927 Ivlagnesutn,Total(as Mg) 2 X year' Grab
0.1.055 2 X
Manganese,Total.(as:Mn)
ear Grab
Y
Nerc ,- Total ag 2 Grab.
X
01"062 Molybdenum,Total'(as'Mo) 2 X year 'Grab,
01067: ckel,Total(as:Ni). - 2 7C year Grab
Ni
46480.. Oxidation Reduction Potential(ORP,Redox,Eh) 21 X year Grab :.
..Paged oft .

ATTACI-IMENT C-Groundwater Monitoring and.Limitations for all monitoring wells Permit Number: WQ000.0020 Version:3.0
Duke.Energy Progress,Inc.
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
PCS Code Par€ineter Description Frequency Measurement Sample.Type lFootnotes
00400
PH..., _ 2?C year Grab , 1'
00937 Potassium,Total(as K) 2'-X year Grab
011..47 Selenium,Total(as$e) 2.X year. Grab .
00929. Sodium Total(as Na) 2 X year Grab
70300 Solids,Total Dissolved-180'Deg.'C 2;X year Grab
'00530 Solids,Total Suspended 2 X year Grab
60095. Sp'ecifi,c Conductance 2 X:year Grab
01,082. Strontium;Total(as Sr) - -2`X'year Grab
009,45 Sulfate,,Total(as SO4) 2 X year Grab
02059 Thallium,Total(As TI) 2'X year Grab
07087 Vanadium,Total:(as.V) 2 X year Grab
82546 Water level,distance from measuring point 2'X year Calculated 1,2
01092 Zinc,Total(as Zn) 2 X year Grab -
1. The measurement of water levels shall be made prior to purging the wells.The depth to:water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed.point on the top of the casing. The measurement
of pH shall be made after purging and prior'to sampling for the remaining parameters. ,
2. The measuring points(top of well casing)of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to provide,the relative elevation of the measuring point for each monitoring well. The.measuring points(top
of casing)of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed relative to a common datum.
Page-2 of 2
e.

� -Ar � • .
Ir �
CDEN ,�R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
.Governor Secretary
August 27, 2015
John Toepfer, P.E.
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
410 S. Wilmington Street/NC14
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Replacement of monitoring well MW-1A
Asheville Airport CCB Structural Fill Project
Buncombe County
Dear Mr.Toepfer,
I recently received your correspondence of August 18, 2015 requesting the replacement of
background monitoring well MW-1A. It is my understanding that the current well location is
being impacted by the Airport's taxiway construction project. The Asheville Regional Office
approves the relocation.of the background monitoring well and renaming it MW-1AR.
The Asheville Regional Office may send an inspector to observe the construction of the
monitoring well. Please provide me with a field date at your earliest convenience. Let me know
if you any additional questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Brett Lavert
Water Quality Regional Operations
Asheville Regional Office
c fu
Norman Divers—Charah,INC.
Chonticha McDaniel—NCDENR DWR
North Carolina Division of Water Resources—Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S.Highway 70,Swannanoa,N.C. 28778
Phone[phone]
FAX [phone]
Internet: hftp://portal.ncdenr.org/webiwq/
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

y
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD For Internal Use.ONLY:
This form can be used for single or multiple wells r�
1.Well Contractor Information:
AE DrillingServices 14,WATER ZONES
FROM TO
WellCorarsmorName 22 ft 60 f- DEscRIPRON
Saprolite.'
Tommy Barnette ft fr.
NC Well Contractor Cenifioation Number 19.OUTER CASING ifor multi-cased tells)OR LINER if applicable)
. - NRObt TO DtkMET£R -THICKNESSI MATERIAL
2277 et fL in.
Company Name 16.INNER CASING OR TUIIING eafbermal closed-log
UVM010038Q FROM TO D1Ah1ETER THICKNESS lIfATERIAL
2.Well Construction Permit#: 0 ft. 50:2 fr. 2 In' I Sch 40 PVC.
List all applicable,-ell permits(i.e.County State,Variance,Injection,etc..
ft.
3.Well Use(check well use): 17,SCREEN
Water Supply Well: 150.2
OM EfL
DIAMETER SLOTSIZE TRIMNESS 1VIATERUL
❑Agricultural ❑Nfunicipal/Public fL 2 ia' 0.010inch Sch 40 PVC
❑Geothermal Hearin Coolie Su I') ❑ResidentialWaterSu 1 single ftft. €n.
( P>t g PP) Supply(single))
❑Industrial/Coinniercial ❑Residential Water Supply(shared) 18,GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL £tiIPLACEMENT METHOD&AMOUNT
❑Irri ation 0 fr. 48 ft Cement Groul Pumped through Tremle
blocs-Water Supply Well:
Ea ft
Qivtonitoring ❑Recovery
Injection Well: ft ft.
❑Aquifer Recharge OGroundwater Reined iation 19.SANDiGRAVEL.PAC K If a liable
PROM TO MATERIAL £MPLACEMENTME'11101)
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Salinity 13anier 48 fa 60.2 ft• Sand Tremle
OAquifer Test OStormwater Drainage
ft ft.
❑Experimental Technology ❑Subsidence Control
21L DRTLLt1VG LOG nttach additional sheets if reeeessar
OGeothermai(Closed Loop) ❑Tracer FROM TO DESCRIPTION color,hard-,saillrock typy,grain size,etc.
❑Geothennal(Heating/Cooling Return) 00ther(ex lain under#21 Remarks) 0 fL 2 ft. Fill-Silty Sand
9/1$/15 MVI�-�AR 2 rt, 17 ft. Residuum-Sandy Silt
4.Date Well(s)Completed: Well ID#
7 ft• 144 fr Residuum-Silty Sand
5a.Well Location: 44 ft- 16p,2 fa Partially Weathered Rock-Silty Sand
Asheville Airport, Area 4 ft. ra
Facility/Ovener-Name Facility ID4(if applicable) ft. ft.
61 Terminal Drive, Fletcher, NC 28732
ff. ft, r f1 t4T
Physical Address,City,and Zip ZI.REMARKS 6 U. � � I5
Buncombe 9643416572
County Parcel Mentification No.(PIN) tt i:t?ss::-:::r' ;•i°:
5b.Latitude and Longitude to degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: 22.Certification:
(ifwell field,one]at/ton;is sufficient)
35.43326 N 82.54355 w 10/02/2015
Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
6.Is(are)thewell(s): ❑Permancnt or ❑Temporary By signing this form,1 hereby.certi&that the wefl(s)wav(were)constructed in accordance
with ISA MCAC 01C.0100 or 15A NCAC 02C.0200 Well Consowerton Standards and that a
7-Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or KINo copy of this record has been provided to the rrell owner.
If this is a repair,fill out known well construction itiformation and explain the nature of fire
repair under 421 remarks section or oo the back of fhlsform. 23.Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
8.Number of wells constructed: 1 construction details. You inay also attach additional pages if necessary.
For multiple injection or non-worersupp,},-dells OVLY with fbe some construction,you can
submironeforni SUBMITTAL
9.Total well depth below land surface: 60•2 (ft.) 24a. For Ail 30 days of complttr�un�of��`
For multiple ivells list all depths ifdierenf(example-3 et 200'and 2@100') construction t0 tl°lz
t7
22.82 Div€sla stater Resourc
10,Static water lever below top of casing; (ft,) -
1`e'alerlevel isabo-e casrn,use"+" if) ttk' I Service f[g+1!1 'I 4� 16L7
s aier esources !
!
11.Borehole diameter:_ $ (in.) 24b.For In ec iota: 1 ONLY: In eddition to sending the form to the d i d4s- n
Hollow-stem auger 24 aabove. elsg s . a copy of this form within 30 days of cOtrGgI ti r Il
12,Well construction method: construction toth ,,qJl wing: OCT 2 7 2015 a
(i.e.auger,rotary,cable,direct puss:,ew.)
Division of Resources,Underground Injection Conirol Prog arit,'s
FOR WATER SUPPLY)NE1.L8 ONLY:
1636` it Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 -
g
13a.Yield(gpm) Method of test:
24c.Fonwater Sit 1��v& IgSPML&Regional OPerations
_ e ;
Also submit qnc co azrt 1 F'eq
imof tinn of
well consitucti i-e4.to the countym healih deparnent-a. i
13b.Disinfection type: Amoaat: 1,2
constructed. �• s
`'
Foam GW-€ Norris Carolina Depanrnew of Enviroament and Nenual Resources-N-sion of Watt+Re-ources�

RECEIVED I -
Division of Water Resources
BORING RECORD E: NOV - 5 2015 k
a ¢^fly
EOTRACKf
Water Quality Regional Operations
M17T-echnologies, Inc. Y>' Asheville Regional Ofiice `
Asheville Regional Airport,Area 4 6
Buncombe County, worth Carolina BORING No 1`
Boring Locatlol� AIR631447 9/E944679.9 •`t`'"" "� "I
Date Drilled: 9/17/15 Ground Elevation:2133.8 ft Notes
A/E Drilling -CME 750
Drilling Method: HSA Hammer Type:Automatic
Water Level: 22.82 at 24 Hrs Boring Diameter: 8 in
_
° 2 (U a� o STD.PENETRATION TEST DATA
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION L o Q T =
n a c (blows/ft)
_ p m-1 m Q" R o co io >
uJ C� cq U) a
0.0 Z N M Z 5 10 20 40 70
Fill-Reddish Brown Silty Fine to Medium
Sand(SM)
2.0
2131.3 Residuum-Very Stiff Yellowish Brown
Slightly Micaceous Fine Sandy Silt(ML) 3.5
SS-1 4 9 9 18
2128.8
7.0
2126.3 Dense Gray,Yellowish Brown and Black
Micaceous to Very Micaceous Silty Fine to 8 5
Medium Sand(SM)
SS-2 11 12 23 35
2123.8
2121.3
13.5
SS-3 10 15 20 35
2118.8
2116.3
18.5
SS-4 17 11 20 31
2113.8
22.0
2111.3 Dense White,Gray and Brown Wet Silty
-Fine to Coarse Sand(SM) 23.5
SS-5 20 20 25 45
F 2108.8
0
c�
Y
27.0
0 2106.3 Dense to Very Dense Gray,Brown and
LU, Black Moist Micaceous to Very Micaceous 28.5
Silty Fine to Medium Sand(SM)
a'
SS-6 5 20 36 56
a 2103.8
3
2101.3
0
33.5
SS-7 10 15 28 43
0
LEGEND Continued Next Page
SAMPLER TYPE DRILLING METHOD
z SS Split Spoon NQ- Rock Core, 1-7/8" HSA- Hollow Stem Auger RW -Rotary Wash
o ST Shelby Tube CU-Cuttings CFA-Continuous Flight Augers RC - Rack Core
m AWG-Rock Core, 1-1/8,, CT-Continuous Tube DC - Driving Casing

I.
RECEIVED
f J Division of Water Resources
BORING RECO M
NOV - 5 2015
Technologies, Inc.
Asheville Regional Airport,Area 4 BORING No. M; 0"I Aid Water Quality Regional Operations
Buncombe County,North Carolina Asheville Re Iona;Office
Boring Locatiob,—6`; . / 4�7 �3---
Date Drilled: 9/17/15 Ground Elevation: 2133.8 ft
-A/E�Drilling•.-CME•�M7,50:�;;,..:,:w�;=.a»:,r. .
Drilling Method: HSA Hammer Type:Automatic
Water Level: 22.82 at 24 Hrs Boring Diameter: 8 in
o m L d Q m STD.PENETRATION TEST DATA
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a o E E IT s _ � (blows/ft)
W m- M m o co >
w C) (n Z N -2 z 5 10 20 40 70
N 07
2096.3
38.5
SS-8 6 17 17 34
2093.8
2091.3
43.5
44.0
Partially Weathered Rock-Sampled as SS-9 10, 50/5" 50/5"
2088.8 Very Dense Light Gray and Light Brown °
Slightly Micaceous Silty Fine to Medium °
Sand(PWR) °
°
2086.3 °
48.5
°
° SS-10 40 50/3" 50/3"
2083.8
2081.3 '
53.5
SS-11 20 50/3" 50/3..
2078.8
°
°
2076.3
2 58.5
0
SS-12 20 25 50/2"50/3"
0
2073.8 60.2
o Auger Refusal-Boring Terminated at 60.2
Y Feet
0 2071.3
W
c�
a
2068.8
2066.3
c�
z
0
m
0
o LEGEND
0
W SAMPLER TYPE DRILLING METHOD
z SS Split Spoon NQ- Rock Core,1-7/8" HSA-Hollow Stem Auger RW -Rotary Wash
ST Shelby Tube CU-Cuttings CFA-Continuous Flight Augers RC - Rock Core
m AWG- Rock Core, 1-1/8" CT-Continuous Tube DC Driving Casing

r
i j
WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD ForintemalUs.-ONLY.
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1.Well Contractor Information:
M'Flsi ASANDONIvi1;A'T DETAILS
Marty King 7a.Number of wells being abandoned:
Well Contractor Name(or well owner personally abandoning wall on his/her property) For Inu111ple h0clion oe non-water supply hells ONLY n'itt, dre acme
3290
canatracrfonabandonmeal,you can subinh one form.
,
NC Well Contractor Cacti$cation Numbs 7b.Approximate volume of water remaining fit well($); 9 (gal.)
AE Drilling Services I FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
Comparry Name
2.Well Construction Permit&
WM0104294 7e.Type of disinfectant used.- '
Lfsr all applicable well pernrks(i.e.County,State,Variance,Injection,etc)iflmown
7d.Amount of disinfectant used:
3.Well use(check well use);
Water Supply Wellr 7e.Sealing materials used(check all that apply):
❑Agricultural ❑Municipal/Public m Neat Cement Grout 1�Bentonite Chips or Pellets
❑Geothermal(Heating/Cooling Supply) OResidential Water Supply(single) 0 Sand Cement Grout ❑Dry Clay
❑Industrial/Commercial C1Residential Water Supply(shared) p Concrete Grout ❑Drill Cuttings
MIrrigation ❑Specialty Grout ❑Gravel
Non-Water Supply Well: Cl Bentonite Slurry ❑Other(explain under 7g)
MMonitoring ❑Recovery
Igjectiou Well: 7f,Far'eaeh material selected above,provide amount or materials used:
❑Aquifer Recharge ❑GroundwaterRemediation 14 geillons neat cement grout
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery OSalinity Barrier
❑Aquifer Test OStormwater Drainage
OExperhnetttal Technology ❑Subsidence Control 7g.Provide a brief description of the abandonment procedure:
C1Geothermal(Closed Loop). ❑Tracer Cement grout was pumped through a tremfe hose that was extended to the base
❑Geothermal eatin ooling Return) 110her(explain under 7a
of the weiL The tremle hose was removed while pumping,after the grout surface
4.Date well(s)abandoned: 10/27/15 reached the ground surface. The surface hardware,Including concrete pad and
Sa:Well location: manhole casing were removed and filled with grout.
Asheville Regional Airport
Facility/Owner Name Facility Ma(irapplicable) g•Certification:
61 'terminal Drive, Fletcher, NC 28732 11/12/2015
Physical Address,City,and Zip Signature afeertifed e0 Contractor or It Owner Date
Buncombe 964352197000000 ;.:., .._..._._.r..,.....>,,..:
Etp signing this farm f iieretiy cene that the wetf(s)w.as(gere).abandoned in
County Parcel identification No,(PIN) accordance with 15A NCAC 02C';0100 or.2C.0011 Well Conso4tction Standards
and that a copy 4,th4s.tecordhas..beeir provided to the well owner]c1a
3b.Latitude and longitude in de rees/minutes/secoods or decimal de ees:- rt'
(ifwoll field,one latiioug is suillcicat) - 1—
9.Site diagram or:8d itional well det�s- o�rc
35.43306 N 82,54278 You may use the buck af.this pegAtYiid �f� lbr��ive�l sill
abandonment detail.`$;; ou may also attach additional pages if nec
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF WRL•L(S)BEING A13ANDMD SCBIIMITTAL MSTR AN5 J A N - 201 G '
Attach well conslrucvon records)If available. For inrrfnple ttJeerfon or non-under supply 7K
wQllsONLYtrlrhthesontoconstrucdoWabandonment,you can.submiiomform. 19a. Far All Wells;`', ubmit this form within 30 days of co1
6a,Well ID#. MWAA abandonmenttojlh�f311 wing.Divislai)$4 1617<(Hfa ServiceeiN'26496
6b.Total well depth: (ft-)„ _. -
F 10b,For lnieetiai�Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 10a- a
6 above,also submit one copy of this farm within 30 days of complelion,tt�wal( :?.
6e Borehole diameter: (in,) abandonment to thte fo)lowrri$
29 Division of Water Resources,Underground Injection Control Program,
6d.Water level below ground surface: (ft) 1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27499.1636
loc.For Water Sunnly&Injection Weli: In addition to sending the form to
6e.Outer casing length(Uhnown)t (ft.) the address(es) above, also submit one copbri fo thin 30 days of
completion of well abandonment to the countyreai e t @county
6t:Inner casing/tubing length(it known):, 74 ({t,) where abardaned.
DEC 2 1.•��q�
Sg,Screen length(if known): 10 (ft)
InforMplUon Proo -,r:f�
Fonn GW-30 North Coroliaa Department ofEnvironmem and Natural Resources-Division or Water Resources DWQ/F Revised August 2013 `

„ �410 S.Wilmington Street.
DUKE Raleigh,NC 27601
ENERGY, Mailing Address
Mail Code NC 14.
Raleigh,NC 27601
919-546-7863
919-546-6302(fax)
August 18,2015
Mr. Brett Laverty
NC DENR Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S.70 Highway
Swannanoa,NC 28778
RE: Asheville Steam Electric Plant—Asheville Airport Fill
Duke Energy Progress, LLC.—Permit WQ0000020
Proposed New Background Groundwater Monitoring Well for Areas 3&4
Dear Mr.Laverty:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC. (DEP) requests your concurrence in the relocation of the background
groundwater monitoring well for Areas 3 &4 at the Asheville Airport fill project underway per the DEP
permit WQ0000020. The Asheville Airport has acquired additional property since the existing
background monitoring well was installed. The taxiway construction project underway at the Asheville
Airport necessitates the existing-groundwater monitoring well be relocated. Per the enclosed figure,
DEP proposes to move the background well approximately 220 feet to the west and name that well
MW-1AR. Existing background well MW-1A will be abandoned once the new well is installed and
developed. We would appreciate your concurrence in the next few weeks as we would like the new
background well installed and ready to sample during the next sampling event in November 2015.
If you have any questions or need any clarification regarding the information provided,feel free to
contact me at [e-mail] or at 919-546-7863 at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by lohn Toepfer
” cn�lohn Toep(er,o,ou,
John Toe pf e remail=john.toepfer@duke energycom,
fl Date:2015.08.1809:31:31-0600'
John Toepfer, P.E.
Lead Engineer
Waste &Groundwater Programs
cc: Ed Sullivan—Duke Energy Norman Divers—Charah, Inc.
Teresa Williams—Duke Energy MichaellReisman —Asheville Airport
Phillip Banks—Duke Energy Chonticha McDaniel-DENR
Kathy Webb—SynTerra Corporation
enc: Figure-Relocated Monitoring Well MW-1A
RECEIVED
19vision of Water Resource,$
i
AUG 1 8 2015
I Water Quality Regional Operations
Asheville Reaional Office

• x III -:, t z! %"p� - Top of Gsing
0041$ f, .WellID Nonhinp asSitt9 6RVaflo-
a
1AW4A 63146282 944901.02
MW-2 829920.28 944436,90 2076.56
a. y
!AW-5 629395.45 344832.59' 2469;31
u
7AWSD 629386.39 94484205 2071-47
t ,
.;. 1AW7 62896Z08 945202-85 2074.07
_ MW-7 6284.89B7 9455t207 ?477.37
" t 7AW-9 827830-32 945832-12 2069.01
- 'f0 K, ` ay *TOC FOR MW 1A WAS ADJUSTED DURING GRADING OPERATION
PROPOSED NEW MW=1A r .�; ;�zr ATTHE AIRPORT.INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DAVID WILSON OF
LOCATION GEOTRACK TECHNOLOGIES,INC,ON MAY 12,2015.
MW-SAIS THE BACKGROUND WELL FOR AREA4 AND AREA 3.
Via. � �t � � � _ : �� +��• R
t- �
�5 t i
4 i k
MW f4 �` aoGERo
� .�` �- ASHEVILLE REGI_ONALAIRPORT
a/
W4
-
1
F �
a � 'a
! IWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA!Mw�'�Mw�D �r�
� 1 � ,-"_ � ��(AGRICULTURALCENTER
s
r, OFF FER_NCLIFF DR f' ';., e a
IN
RETAINING r L }
_ MW"6 ,r WALL F
°$ar 51­-
r xY.y =y i
I
r
MW-8., e 111
"
LEGEND =o Sjo'"
* MW-_7 MONITORING WELL(SAMPLED)
SOURCES:
9MW--8 MONITORING WELL(NOT SAMPLED) 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM NRCSGEOSPTIAL DATA GATEWAY AT'
http://datagateway.nres.usda.gov/ t
ALL WELLS SURVEYED EXCEPT MW-3 BY WNC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS& `�'� .ASHEVILLE
COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCT LIMITS ,
SURVEYORS ON APRIL19,2012. REGIONAL
® REVIEW BOUNDARY n AIRPORT
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY,REVIEW BOUNDARY,AND LIMITS OF CCB FILL BASED �,,,,�,
s® COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY ON DRAWING BY FRANKLIN S.CRAIG.P.E.OF GASTONIA,NORTH CAROLINA
TITLED AREA 84-ALL PHASES ENGINEERED FILL DESIGN,SHEET E-1,DATED
---- PROPERTY LINE(APPROXIMATE) JUNE3o,zo11.
GRAPHIC SCALE
300 0 300 600 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
IN FEET STRUCTURAL FILL-AREA 4
148 RIVER STREET,SUITE 220
GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA 29601 RELOCATED MONITORING WELL MWAA
PHONE864�21
www.synterraco rp.com ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
.com
Terra DRAWN BY:JOHNCHASTAIN DATE:08/16/2015 ARDEN, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT MANAGER:KATHY WEBB
synLAYOUT:STRUCTURAL FILL IV RELOCTAED MW-1A
08/17/20153:52 PM P:Duke EneWv Pr ress.102602.ASHEVILLE PLAN OO.COMBINED MW AT STRUCTURAL FILLS HEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT RELOCATED MW-A.dw

RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
May 29FE
2015
CEfVED
n of water Resources
DWR# 15-0088
uncombe County
N _ 3 2015
Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority
Attn: Mr. Lew Bleiweis iity Regional Operations
61 Terminal Drive, Ste 1 „_ �e.,:onal Office
Fletcher, NC 28732
Subject: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Asheville Regional Airport—East Side Improvement Project ,
Dear Mr. Bleiweis::
On January 21, 2015,the Division of Water Resources (Division) received your application dated
December 29, 2014 requesting a 401 Individual Water Quality Certification from the Division for
the subject project. The Division received the Public Notice issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers on February 6, 2015 and subsequent information on April 21, 2015. The Division has
determined that your application is incomplete and cannot be processed.The application is on-
hold until all of the following information is received:
1. During our initial review of the application, Division staff recognized that the proposed
project did not meet the 3007horizontal-foot setback from private dwellings within the
Hidden Creek Village subdivision located near the eastern project boundary as required
by G.S. 130A-309.220(c)(2) [Coal Ash Management Act of 2014 (CAMA-2014)].
Previously, NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Office of General
Counsel advised the Division that the proposed project was grandfathered and not
subject to CAMA-2014. It is now the Division's understanding that the project will be
conducted in compliance with CAMA-2014 and therefore must be modified to comply
with those requirements. Please provide a revised project plan that complies with the
300-horizontal-foot-setback from private dwellings, and all other applicable
requirements in CAMA-2014.
Pursuant to Title 15A NCAC 02H .0502(e), the applicant shall furnish all of the above requested
information for the proper consideration of the application. If all of the requested information
is not received in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter,the Division will be
unable to approve the application and it will be returned. The return of this project will
Division of Water Resources—401&Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N Salisbury St,Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone]
Internet:www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper

Greater le Regional Airport Authority
DWR#15-0088
Request for Additional Information
Page 2 of 2
necessitate reapplication to the Division for approval, including a complete application package
and the appropriate fee.
Send three (3) copies of all of the above requested information to the 401 & Buffer Permitting
Unit, 1617 Mail Service,Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under the Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
for this activity and any work.done within waters of the state may be a violation of North
Carolina General Statutes and Administrative Code.
Contact Zan Price at 828-296-4500 or [e-mail] or Jennifer Burdette at 919-807-
6364 or if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins,Supervi r
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
cc: Clement Riddle, ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc., 224 South Grove St.,
Ste F, Hendersonville, NC 28792
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
,%DWR=A110=401_file)
,DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit file
Filename: 150088Ash evil leRegionalAirport-EastSidelmp(Buncombe)_401_IC_Hold2.docx

^ fj`` ti �����' �.SELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
I
Mort atoljn e�artment of Environment a d-'Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality 2 J 3 91
,� ,1 , ce �.; t•w � r
�? �5`° �9
t
C®1�'TRA�T � ERTI)HICA 1Oi+ts# 22G 5 F
1.WELL CONTRACt\OR a. ,P\V e<a d. TOP of CASING IS_ 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface'
Tim Brown °r ;�� .
rQ . ,c`�� :. � . , Top of casing terminated aUor below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individual), ame PP a�9�/ _� .f a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
nologies Ir
c/o GeoTrack Techwin (gpm): METHOD OF TEST
c . U. -�--- :e. YIELD
Well Contractor CompahY lVam ��•� p.�C`i/ - '
3620 Pelham Road / &� f. DISINFECTION:Type Amount
Street Address / ri -
`� , ,.=' �: : g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Greenville �'S F-�� '� `".,=p�S'C 29615 :Top Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town +r ' z.. State Zip Code
�.• :Top Bottom Top Bottom
8( 64 ) 329-0013 :Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: : 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WM0100356 :Top 0 Bottom 35 Ft. 2° S 40 ' PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) :Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID*(if applicable)82-4 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring I(Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 33 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation[] Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-19-14 :Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: : 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Aimort Area 2 :Top 35 Bottom 50 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code) :TOp Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
[]Slope Aalley []Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °27 2.0000 DMS OR DID Top
Size Material
LONGITUDE 82 32 � a2.0000 :Top 32 Bottom 50 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
"DMS OR DD ;Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: OPS Efropographic map :Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) : 11. DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) : Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Rea. Alrnnrt 0 / 24 Saprolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 24 / 50 Dense Silty Sand
61 Terminal Drive /
Street Address
Fletcher
City or Town State Zip Code /
Mr-M. Reisman /
Contact Name / �tflrp:�,wt 7Rf1td
Mailing Address / VtttRL'6'Cw4-,nlil•g7Rf1!":s fi^,ihir;?,11MIT
/ S w .
City or Town State Zip Code
: 12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C.WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 50 RECORD FPS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
/ G` ,
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO AnyR `CERTIFIED WELL -DATE�/ /(f
SI NATURE 0 CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 37.85 FT. Tim Brown
"+"if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit Within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality- Information Processing, Form GW-1b
Rev.2/09
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-161,Phone :[phone]

STArf
�� P'�„ r^•: ":1 Y� liq f1�1.�1C1L1'�
�:r- 1�L WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
orth i5ho' )ia 7epartment of Environn elit add Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality
�c f� CE 22�9 2`3 9
'k,.`1ti1�dA•-�r �irt.t, VRLL CONT eft R' i CATION# 2
1.WELL`CONT`l CT. G�
d6 TOP OF CASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface"
Tim Brown ' '.` cati�Ons 'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individ�ial)Name a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o Geol"rack Teahnolo iea.,�i'I�-'C�.e���.�,;:-�•.
Well Contractor Cm� lgP )YIELD m: METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Rd f. DISINFECTION:Type Amount
Street Address
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Greenville SC 29615 :Top Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town ",i``f"'' State Zip Code
:Top Bottom Top Bottom
8( 64 ) 329-0013 :Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
2.WELL INFORMATION: Thickness/7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top 0 Bottom 35 Ft. 211 S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) :Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID*(if applicable)A2-5 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring N(Municipal/Public❑ : 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ : Top 0 Bottom 33 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 11-18-14 ; Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 Top 35 Bottom 50 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Bunco
miJe Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope C(/alley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °26 47.0000 "DMS OR DID Top
Size Material
LONGITUDE 82 ° s2 ss.0000 : Top 32 Bottom 50 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
"DMS OR DD :Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: W3PS ❑Topographic map : Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) : 11. DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville R .n Alrnr)rt 0 / 50 Saorolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) /
61 Terminal Drive /
Street Address /
Fletcher NC 2= / 311:43p—<0�10.+—: av:
City or Town State Zip Code / ij -1,C U _�V C
Mr-M. Reisman /
Contact Name /
Mailing Address
/ t�#1``L�4tAir'�ft�PS,��rktr.•'�E.iv7o�4�>;S'`da':l'Y
City or Town State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH:-5O : RECORD H�EEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO '"��7 if`s '� ��
NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing:26.62 FT. Tlm Brown
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit Within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality- Information Processing, Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161, Phone :[phone] Rev.2/09

IG WELL iJ CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North"Carolinar�eS0Y tulle elf ENronment nd Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality
e< 21
1LaOV�)EbAC i[®fl3 CERTaF)[C�)<f® I# 2289
1.WELL CONTRACTOR::.: rZO�
Tim brown 2, 'T.OP OF CASING IS_0.1 FT.Above Land Surface*
-,*Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individual)Name
to variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
C/o GeoTrack Techn�Olo ies Inc. or��°°f��a�
Well Contractor Compaq y'Nave o<�ua��fiyP�,P��oo ; g ;DISINFECTION:T METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Road \ ,��.� rF„-Vke - yPe Amount
Street Address a t
Greenville 4 ` ' ' g• WATER ZONES(depth):
«"'�� SC.., 29615 :Top
City or Town „ Bottom Top Bottom
State
Zip Code :Top Bottom To
.�Y
" p Bottom
(864 ) 329-0013
Area code Phone number � ' Top Bottom Top Bottom
2.WELL INFORMATION: Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO1 00356 :Top 0 Bottom 30 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) ;Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable)A2-6 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring V Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 28 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremle
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-19-14 :Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION:
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 30 Bottom 40 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
:Top Bottom Ft, in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC f LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope &�/alley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other ; 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °25 42.0000 DMS OR DD Depth Size Material
Top 28 Bottom 40 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
LONGITUDE 82 32 39.0000 DMS OR DD
Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: IZGPS []Topographic map :Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS)
S.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located. : 11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Rea Airnart 0 / 40 Saprolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) : /
germinal Drive /
Street Address /
Fletc h r7 ,
City or Town i'� * l
State Zip Code / � ate.•
Mr_M. Reisman
Contact Name / —aa
'�—y;§ we L
Mailing Address
City or Town State Zip Code
: 12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 40 : RECORD ..B-EN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
,.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NOW /�� �` �'
. T.
SIGNATURE OF C RTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 16.45 FT.
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) Tim Brown
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit Within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161, Phone :[phone] Rev.2/09

�SIMENTT1,4L WELL,CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Noith Carolina Departments Environment a d�Ndtural Resources-Division of Water Quality 2,5394
0 pJt�25 ,.1
I L -Tn k�-VO t CERTIFICA YON# 2289
H:.:.-...: �.
1.WELL CONTRACTOR:. cc
Tim Brown �.'a ? DNSTOP OF CASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface'
Well Contractor(Individual): ame J \'k "•.,;, `Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
c/o GeoTrack Tech to ies Inc. nec�L�°"S
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
Well Contractor Company`Na e n IELD(gpm): METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Road
ua�� a�e9`°�e�0i ° °"cf DISINFECTION:TYPe Amount
Street Address 1 fat ' gvu
Greenville
P'� I":g•`WATER ZONES(depth):
SC � 296T5 :Top Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town "State , ZipCode
Top Bottom Top Bottom
8( 64 ) 329-0013 - :Top Bottom rop Bottom
Area code Phone number
2.WELL INFORMATION: Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top 0 Bottom 35 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID*(if applicable)A2-7 ;Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring N(Municipal/Public❑ ; 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 33 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-19-14 :Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION:
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 35 Bottom 50 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community, ubdi Svision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ffi�/alley ❑Flat []Ridge ❑Other ; 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °26 39.0000 DMS OR DD Depth Size Material
Top 33 Bottom 50 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
LONGITUDE 82 3z 37.000o DMS OR DD
Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: WPS Qropographic map :Top Bottom Ft.(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not rising GPS)
LOG
S.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) . 11.To RILLIN B Bottom
P Formation Description
Asheville 0 / 50 Saprolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) /
_61 Terminal Drive
Street Address
Fletcher
City or Town State Zip Code / e0 ZO 14
Mr.M. Reisman / n
Contact Name )� � rerttl
IVIV ,IT(; ��s(ft(f,i 4111P
Mailing Address /
City or Town State Zip Code /
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number :
6.WELL DETAILS: :I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: RECOR,D�H&S.F0fN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO :` Ir
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 17.69 FT.
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) Tlm Brown
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-161, Phone : [phone] Rev.2/09

•.�C.,`i.�1.• •, fib; ., _�
(1 v AESIDENTIM' WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
z�North Carolina Departm lit-of i nvironnie)t and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality
,C®1� leP6E
RTIFI DTI®N# 2289 R 53 9 5
1.WELL CONTRACTOR. pv000gW
d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface*
Tim Brown ? *Top of casing terminated attor below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individu 1)Name 7 A a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o GeoTrack Tecrmolooies �nc �S ..,YIELD m
Well Contractor Corppany Name ;., (gp ) METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Road Ve41 na�0 "e f. DISINFECTION:Type Amount
Street Address '>, " F� a _~ : "
Greenville Wa evdtc�;;;` ?' ! g WATER ZONES(depth):
r s!SC 29615 :Top Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town ' State Zip Code
Top Bottom Top_Bottom
8( 64 ) 329-0013 :Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number 1.
Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: :7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top 0 Bottom 35 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID*(if applicable)A2-8 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring d'Municipal/Public❑ : 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 33 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 11-14-14 ;Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: 9, SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material '
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 35 Bottoms_Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope BAlley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other ; 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °26 49.0000 DMS OR DD Depth Size Material
Top 33 Bottom 50 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
LONGITUDE 82 32 42.0000 DMS OR DD : Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: Vj3PS oTopographic map Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) 11. DRILLING LOG
S.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Ri-n Airport 0 / 24 Saprolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 24 / 50 PWR-Silty Sand
61 Terminal nri va /
Street Address /
Fletnh .r If 28=
City or Town State Zip Code
Mr-M. Reisman /Contact Name / DEC
Mailing Address /
y =gypn�;�i,Slltl�
/ r PPJJ,!J 1oi f� S51�it i j�►1T
City or Town State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 50 RECORD�/HAS N P 0VIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO[/ l
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing:. 2618 FT. .—Tim grown
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - information Processing, Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-161, Phone :[phone] Rev.2/09

sTArF',r
h
iW&IDENT'ML1'WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Nort �CaroTriia begat bnent of En "'e n't nd'Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality f� J 3
WELL CAN . CTgk>f� Tl®iall# 2289
96
1.WELL CONTRACTO ,. w N\s\o� TQp OF CASING IS O. FT.Above Land Surface
Tim Brown t O t 's*Top of casing terminated attor below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individti1)�Y ame a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o GeoTrack T c `rt to ies I e. 1EL m METHOD OF TEST
Well Contractor Compa ySNa a t�on5 .(gp )'
3620 Pelham Ro a\OPeCa S1Nr CTION:Type Amount
Street Address a�
Greenville ; afer— otla\�eg�o� +~L;`- g" W4�E 2 ZONES(depth):
�.
�, 29 1�5- �,, ,9p-"" Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town , ,.a fate }Z1f`Co�le,
;Top Bottom Top Bottom
8( 64 ) 329-0013
,. .Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top 0 Bottom 30 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) : Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable)A2-9 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring 5(Municipal/Public❑ ; 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 18 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremle
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-18-14 ;Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 : Top 20 Bottom 30 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code) ;Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe : Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope VValley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other : 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 0 26 55.0000 DMS OR DD Depth Size Material
LONGITUDE 82 32 a5.0oo0 :Top 18 Bottom 30 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
"DMS OR DD ;Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: IZGPS propographic map :Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form ifnot using GPS) : 11. DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Ren. Airnnrt 0 / 30 Saprolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) /
61 Terminal Drive
Street Address
Fletcher NC'_----2R7
City or Town State Zip Code / DE
Mr.M. Reisman / r
Contact Name / 3VVR 6r;Ina.
/8O m)f�&RQflt G�
Mailing Address
City or Town State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 30 : RECORD lAS-BEEN PROVIDED TOTHE;.WELL OWNER. r�
J"G'Ll��
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES D NO : C/SIGNATURE OF CERTI IED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 14.04 FT. :�I 111 Brown
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit Within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality- Information Processing, Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-161,Phone : [phone] Rev.2/09

1N" NiDENTML WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
/ �cr° North Carohlta Departmept of E vrr liment d Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality .�
/ELL Cb� �rTIFI(CA IOi�':# 2289 ,.. .�
of atiPr R ,
97
1.WELL CONTRACTO�t:t� pivis�o�
Tim Brown :;; TOP OF CASING IS�.1 FT.Above Land Surface*
D(1 3 t,'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individ�Ial)i me L w a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o GeoTrack Tee hn to ies Irt t,
Well Contractor Compa y fV e 0 ecafsong e. IL(gpm): METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Roa '` ,ona� p. isit� EcrloN:Type_
e9 niilce s r Amount
Street Address ter(qua peg `"
l Wa ti�e-,�� `:g WATER ZONES(depth):
Greenville 1 Ps� y 5-
:Top r Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town State - Z1p Code
Lx Top Bottom Top Bottom
8( 64 ) 329-0013 ^,ct,;;;u=�- ;Top Bottom
Area code Phone number ,, �^ Top Bottom
2.WELL INFORMATION: Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WM0100356 :Top 0 Bottom 47 Ft. 2" 340 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) :Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable)A2-10 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring W Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 45 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-14-14 ;Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION:
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 47 Bottom 62 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope Valley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °27 0.0000 DMS OR DD Depth Size Material
LONGITUDE 82 32 as.0000 :Top 45 Bottom 62 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
DMS OR DD :Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: IGPS Qropographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to Top Bottom Ft.
this form if not using GPS)
OG
S.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) 1 To RILLINBotttom P Formation Description
Ashevillee Ren Airn�rt 0 / 62 Saprolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) /
Terminal Crive /
Street Address /
City or Town State Zip Code /
ME M. Reisman �� }
Contact Name /
/ tiFs tics+ll IN Address / IN tliy3y!! ! !'I (JI`,°;itti fti(; (�)I I
City or Town State Zip Code /
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: 100 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH:-.62 RECORD EN P OVIDEO TO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO 5/
Stl;i-YATU E F ERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
r
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 41,08 FT.
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) Jlrrl Brown
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, INC 27699-161, Phone :[phone] Rev.2/09

s s STATE
3
®1 P�LESIDEN C�AIl. SELL c®ors r�auc rl�� RECORD
G'arolina DegBrtm vironment an• l� tural Resources-Division of Water Quality
398
1.WELL CONTRACTOR: C tTOP OF CASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface*
Tim Brown 1 2 201 *Top of casing terminated attor below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individual).• ame a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o GeoTrack Teckan to ies Inc.
Well Contractor Comp�nj'RIa e Re tonal OPe 1Ons : e YIELD(gpm): METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Rood Water Quality g
Ra;onal Ofr+ce ; f. DISINFECTION:Type Amount
Street Address
t g. WATER ZONES(depth):
F - _ ..�_ r y' t
Greenville SSG '296:15 . ;^Top- Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town ;: Siata =-Zip Code : Top Bottom Top Bottom
Gr,,.
8( 64 ) 329-0013 : Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: : 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WM0100356 : Top 0 Bottom 45 Ft. 21' S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) : Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID*(If applicable)A2-1 1 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring Y Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 43 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) : Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-12-14 ; Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: : 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville AlrOort Area 2 : Top 45 Bottom 60 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code) ;Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in. _
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope C(/alley ❑Flat []Ridge ❑Other 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °27 4.0000 "DMS OR DD Depth Size Material
Top 43 Bottom 60 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
LONGITUDE 82 ° 32 51.0000 "DMS OR DD -
— :Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: WPS Qropographic map :Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS)
11. DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Rea, Airport 0 1 53 Saprolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 53 / 60 PWR-Silty Sand
61 Terminal Drive
Street Address /
Fletcher I 25= /
City or Town State Zip Code /
Mr.M. Reisman
Contact Name
DEC 2e;4
Mailing Address /
City or Town State Zip Code ; 12.REMARKS: ONFORMAT1%,p�,66Fj' J` tf'I°
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C•WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORDd6S-8EEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
a. TOTAL DEPTH:_ 60
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NOW : SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 41.47 FT.
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) : Tim Brown
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Form /09 b
Y P � - Information Processing, Rev.2/09
1617 lWail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-161,Phone: [phone]

-WELL,CONSTRUCT__.. RECORD
Nosh Cat'olna Depart�np- nvironment aid Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality
0,LIR, a OR'f``l 1tTIFICQaTIOI�I# 2��9 J 3 9 9
pwisiop of
1.WELL CONTRACTOR't :d. TOP OF CASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface*
Tim Brown �" `��� *Top of casing terminated attar below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individual), ame a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o GeoTrack TetM loclies. Inc. ns : e. YIELD(gpm): METHOD OF TEST
Well Contractor Comp;ny Na e pp
e
3620 Pelham Ro &,,+ uality Reg^�nnal Office .y DISINFECTION:Type Amount
Street Address r ` evt to -
1 '" ` 9• .WATER ZONES(depth):
Greenville w SC T 296.15 o :�Yop " Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town ' State Zip Code : Top Bottom Top Bottom
864 329-0013 l • '`''f
�) . `"�y''••'°'�`" • Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: : 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WM0100356 :Top 0 Bottom 20 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) :Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID*(if applicable)82-12 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring l(Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection p :Top 0 Bottom 18 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-12-14 ;Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION. : 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 20 Bottom 30 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code) :Tpp Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope Aalley []Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °27 3.0000 "DMS OR DID Depth Size Material
LONGITUDE 82 ° 3z a7.0000 :Top 18 Bottom 30 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
"DMS OR DID :Top Bottom Ft.-
Latitude/longitude source: MPS aopographic map :Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) ' 11. DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Rea. Airoort 0 / 14 Saprolite- Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 14 / 30 PWR-Silty Sand
81 Terminal Drive /
Street Address /
Fletcher N0 ?RT7 9
City or Town State Zip Code V It—CIT
Mr-M. Reisman / ncQ
Contact Name l :3 F1 604
Mailing Address
City or Town State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 3O RECORD)HA -BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO
SICK ATUR OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE /
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 14.21 FT. Tim Brawn
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit Within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Form Rev.2/09/09
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161,Phone :[phone]

Srnr` - x ,rk=*zit
ow
-Lim
ELL c®NsTRucT>—. RECORD
W ( �� tsifli aiq•(ua�DeparlmetiZ 01•E ;ment and N turaltResources-Division of Water Quality
289
CATIO
,, •- .:=:_ `'�'! Division°t a 1 ?
1.WELL CONTRACTOR: ?. : d T P ORCASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface'
Tim Brown r `) Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individual)' tajer , ;aviriance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o GeoTrack Tech ol'�' S. Inc. ' t
SYIE rpm): METHOD OF TEST
Well Contractor Company Nam,„ ra+opal or t I LION Type Amount
3620 Pelham Road i��yti o1}Ct Yp
Street Address t Wa2 Vttt
v he - g WA'TE ZONES(depth):
Greenville 29615 Top�x' '""' Bottom Top Bottom
Cityor Town r jM" "' a�'"
v State ° :Top Bottom Top Bottom '
8( 64 ) 329-0013 ''" :Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight ' Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top 0 Bottom 35 Ft. 2° S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable)A2-13 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)'Monitoring Y Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 33 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-1 1-14 ; Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: : 9, SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 35 Bottom 45 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code) ;Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope &galley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
LATITUDE 35 °27 6.0000 DMS OR DD
Top 33 Bottom 45 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
LONGITUDE 82 ° 32 49.0000 "DMS OR DID— :Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: W3PS propographic map Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) 11. DRILLING LOG
S.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Rea. Airport 0 / 33 Sagrolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 33 / 45 PWR-Silty Sand
61 Terminal Drive /
Street Address /
Fletcher 128= / rr
City or Town State Zip Code
Mr.M. Reisman /
Contact Name / DEC0 2014
Mailing Address
City or Town State Zip Code : 12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
a. TOTAL DEPTH:_45 �,
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NO � �� "6' j 2 c
SIG ATURE�O CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 25.89 FT.
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) Tom Brown PRINTED NAMENAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Wafter Quality Form /09
Y P ty - Information Processing, Rev.2/09
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161,Phone :[phone]

5' f,. �lLJI.I'1L1V 1L1 r
VI 1 i
�A VdELL CONSTRUCT.— RECORD
lij
NortlY CarQftaep'artment ft3vi nment tidNatural Resources-Division of Water Quality
{ C= 5�`.
.r"v t f �' -1 ] 1 0-L
C aWig dERTIFIC TI(N# 2289 `-1, 2 V
t,s?3y Division
1.WELL CONTRACTOR>�;'. : a
Tim Br TOP OF CASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface*
! <
_ "Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(IndI�IdU7) Name P '4 a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o GeoTrack Tech olo iies Inc. : ea YISELD(gpm): METHOD OF TEST
Well Contractor Com' any., ame
3620 Pelham Road �ality Regional�perattons Type Amount
i nfEice I :'`DISINFECTION:T e
Street Address
Kew.
Greenville Asheville�--,- „ �•:.. -_. �g, .WATER ZONES(depth): _
SG 29615 Top Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town t y S#ate ZIp' ode "
r, e et6`Ce r ,,,. Top Bottom Top Bottom
864 329-0013 Z r b ` 'if'�
(--) �Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: : 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WM0100356 : Top 0 Bottom 30 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable)A2-14 Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring (Municipal/Public❑ : 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 28 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-1 1-14 Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 30 Bottom 40 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope eR} Ialley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other ; 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °27 7.0000 "DMS OR DD Depth Size Material
LONGITUDE 82 ° sz 58.0000 :Top 28 Bottom 40 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
DMS OR DD :Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: MPS QI-opographic map :Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) : 11. DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Rea. Airnort 0 / 27 Saprolite- Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 27 / 40 PWR-Silty Sand
61 Terminal Drive /
Street Address /
Fletcher
City or Town State Zip Code
Mr-M. Reisman
Contact Name / 2914
Mailing Address / DWR/ SFr ic:lo
_ INFO
City or Town State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 40 RECORD HAS BEN PROVIDEDTO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO 27 Zf �f SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 18.42 FT. Tim Brown
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division Of lNater Quality - Information Processing, Form b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161, Phone : [phone] Rev.2/09
09

LL CONSTRUCTturq RECORD
' North Ci f6lin a,DepartmAttf is f inent and tural Resources-Division of Water Quality
�FLS1p
�� 1V9Jices S l"
WJEL, NT
" TIFICATI N;i# 2289 2040
pivis.0 u'�1
I.WELL CONTRACTOR: d. OP;OiF CASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface`
i _.'; G
Tim Brown e 2��`f *Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individual)Nam, a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
C/o GeoTrack Technolb) ies Inc. S
Well Contractor Company Name'; Reg) r 2tto'� YIE D(gpm): METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Road s , eT Quattfi/ Qpg�ona}Oifi�c - •_DISINFECTION:Type Amount
Street Address /sr } g WAVER ZONES(depth):
Greenville SC 2961"5 rop ' Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town �' :� `=-Sb16 .,,-Zip Code
Top Bottom Top Bottom
864 329-0013
�) Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
Thickness/
2.WELL INFORMATION: :7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top 0 Bottom 46 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) :Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable)A2-1 rJ Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring[(Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 44 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-13-14 ;Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: : 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 46 Bottom 61 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in,
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope r(/alley ❑Flat ❑Ridge []Other ; 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °27 5.0000 DMS OR DID . Depth Size Material
LONGITUDE 82 ° 32 1 44.0000 :Top 44 Bottom 61 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
"DMS OR DD :Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: WW 3PS Qropographic map :Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) : 11. DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Ashevjll " Rea Ajrnort 0 / 52 Saprollte Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(If applicable) 52 / 61 �t
l � �1fVR Silky.=Sand}
61 Terminal Drive
Street Address / C
FIPtcber N 2�i= / 3
C'
City or Town State Zip Code / l`1 1-4 Rw" ion!
Mr-M- Reisman / ::9j # I;�tilr�l"cl�,il4iri�llT
Contact Name /
Mailing Address /
City or Town State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 61 ; RECORD HH- Ste.EEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER. C�
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO I/ 7�� t��� 9
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 1135 FT. Tlm Brown
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of Completion to: Division of Water Quality- Information Processing, Form Rev.2/09/09
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, INC 27699-161,Phone :[phone]

iT�
1.Y:a 1���DENTHAIL- �L ®rv������1®�r REc®RD
�c North Carolina Department of Environment a1ic1+1atLiral Resources-Division of Water Quality . 25
a�! 9
��—
LL'CO > ERTIFICA goy',# 2289
1.WELL CONTRACTOR: pivision of VJater Resources R
Tim Brown k TOP OF CASING IS S?.1 FT.Above Land Surface*
Well Contractor(Individual'�N me p i,"Top of casing terminated attor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
C/O GeoTrack Tec I to ies Ingo 10 1 2 1 ,
Well Contractor Company Na e : e. YIELD Wpm): METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Road r p eraftons f. ISINFECTION:Type Amount
Street Address Water C2ua1"�' s �P
Greenville "( As�e �g1O�`I 0'tg' WATER ZONES(depth):
City or Town Top Bottom Top Bottom
State .• Zip Code
- ;.Top-, Bottom Top Bottom
(864 ) 329-0013 Top Bottom-Area code Phone number I. _ Top Bottom
2.WELL INFORMATION: Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top O Bottom 20 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) :Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID*(if applicable)A2-2 ;Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring Ed Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material
Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 18 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 11-12-14 ;Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION:
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 ;Top 20 Bottom 30 Ft. 2.0 in. 0
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code) 0.01 in. PVC
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY:fletcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope BlValley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 127 '3.0000 DMS OR pp Depth Size Material
LONGITUDE 81 ° 32 42.0000 :Top 18 Bottom 30 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
"DMS OR �pp :Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: VGPS a0pographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to Top Bottom Ft.
this form if not using GPS)
LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) 1 To RILLINBot Bottom. p Formation Description
A�hP me Ri=n Airn�rt 0.0 / 30 Saarolite-Silty Sand
Faculty Name Facility ID#(if applicable) /
61 Terminal nrivP /
Street AddressFletcher
City or Town State' Zip Code /
n n n
r-M- R P.I S m a n
Contact Name
Mailing Address / eci,in a i�tt
City or Town /
State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH:_30 ;RECORD HAS E-E
�" N PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
� 1 1
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO
SIG ATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing:.�3� FT.
(Use"+"if Above Top of Casing) Tim brown
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit Within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161, Phone :[phone] Rev.2/09

WA ma;�����EI�IT'�9IL w�iJL C®�rST�aucr><O�,RECORD
d ro. rl n n C
coMrt7h Cq>oli�ra Departt� tit.of+Sil ' .i}nrei� an Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality
ft
'i�"'gk'g�f� ON,� 2289 12J 9Water FR o
p
1.WELL CONTRACTOR:. sµ TOPi OF CASING IS 0.1 FT.Above Land Surface'
Tim Brown I !;'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individ aiy( me 1 A� yea variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
c/o GeoTrack Te httb o ies Inc.
e. IELD(gpm): METHOD OF TEST
Well Contractor Compa N, e s
3620 Pelham Roa '�a ,�egio�a+operettOn;f. i3INFECTION:Type Amount
Street Address a Water a°10
a Ashevtlte P 9 _WATER ZONES(depth):
Greenville -f. r' r` . 2��1 Tp ,z�` Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town �, 'r ?r a�tate ods1' `"rbt
Top Bottom Top Bottom
8( 64 ) 329-0013 � g;{ ;Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
2.WELL INFORMATION: Thickness/
:7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top 0 Bottom 30 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) :Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID*(if applicable)A2-3 ;Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring 5(Municipal/Public❑ : 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 28 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremle
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-1 1-14 :Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: .9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 30 Bottom 45 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY:Betcher COUNTY Buncombe :Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope alley ❑Flat []Ridge []Other ; 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 zs ,58.0000 DMS OR DD Depth Size Material
LONGITUDE 81 32 a3.0000 :Top 28 Bottom 45 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
"DMS OR DD :Top Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: 03PS propographic map :Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) 11.DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
—Asheville Rea. Airport 0 / 43 SaDrolite-Silty Sand
Facility Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 43 / 45 PWR-Silty Sand
61 Terminal Drive /
Street Address
Fletcher
City or Town State Zip Code
iD + 14
Mr.M. Reisman /
Contact Name
;S",ItJG'UN i
Mailing Address
City or Town State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 45 : RECORvD,HAS�BI=EN`11RO�V1 ED TO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO /i•-1d�dF C��G�- /� —/ ¢
SIGrTATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE /
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing:_2120 FT. Tlm Brown
"+"if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit Within 30 days of Completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Form GW-1b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-161,Phone :[phone] Rev.2/09

srArE
g1"A�TT'nf �VELL CONSTRUCTION RECOR �
.�: plc rNoith Garolm388
aDepaitment;of Env tome any Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality J
1.WELL CONTRACTOR: j ; piv"`on of W eso
t TOP OF CASING IS O.1 FT.Above Land Surface'
Tim drown `Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
Well Contractor(Individual)-'N me ` , t a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
C/o GeoTrack Techn' to ies I�fc. : YIELD
Well Contractor Compa6y'N" a e. (gpm): METHOD OF TEST
3620 Pelham Road Pgional Cpera{tons;f ISIRiFECTION:Type Amount
uo. s.nP d
Street Address Water '1 to lal2r't000 Y
Greenville la hey y 9. WATER ZONES(depth):
—'`� ;''29615 Top Bottom Top Bottom
City or Town t },` State ZI F ''' "
C:d, �p4 �. e.kq } ;Top Bottom Top Bottom
8( 64 ) 329-0013 ;Top Bottom Top Bottom
Area code Phone number
2.WELL INFORMATION: Thickness/;7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#WMO100356 :Top 0 Bottom 30 Ft. 2" S 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) :Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID#(if applicable)A2-1 ;Top Bottom Ft.
3.WELL USE(Check One Box)Monitoring N(Municipal/Public❑ 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery❑ Injection❑ :Top 0 Bottom 28 Ft. Cement/Bent. Tremie
Irrigation❑ Other❑ (list use) :Top Bottom Ft.
DATE DRILLED 1 1-1 1-14 :Top Bottom Ft.
4.WELL LOCATION: ; 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Asheville Airport Area 2 :Top 30 Bottom 40 Ft. 2.0 in. 0.010 in. PVC
(Street Name,Numbers,Community,Subdivision,Lot No.,Parcel,Zip Code)
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
CITY: Fletcher COUNTY Buncombe : Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC/LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope WValley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other : 10.SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 35 °27 7.0000 DMS OR DID Depth Size Material
Top 2$ Bottom 40 Ft. 20-40 Fine Silica Sand
LONGITUDE 81 ° 32 41.0000 DMS OR DD p
To Bottom Ft.
Latitude/longitude source: 67GPS (]Topographic map : Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS) : 11. DRILLING LOG
5.FACILITY(Name of the business where the well is located.) Top Bottom Formation Description
Asheville Rest Airl 0.0 / 3 Fill-Sandy Silt
Faculty Name Facility ID#(if applicable) 3 / 40 Saorolite-Silty Sand/Sandy Silt
61 Terminal Oxhie /
Street Address
Fletcher
City or Town State Zip Code / L
_Mr-M- Reisman /
Contact Name / ''1OP 3f At
Mailing Address /
City or Town State Zip Code
12.REMARKS:
Area code Phone number
6.WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C,WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,AND THAT A,COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 40 RECO,RRD,HAS-BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES❑ NO[
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 22.71 FT.
(Use"+°if Above Top of Casing) Tim Brown
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Wager Quality- Information Processing, Form GW-1 b
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-161,Phone : [phone] Rev.2/09

A
HCDENR.
t
. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
April 21, 2015
John R.Toepfer; P.E.
Duke Energy Progress
410 S.Wilmington Street/PEB14
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Inspection Report on Asheville Airport CCB Structural Fill Project
Dear Mr.Toepfer,
I recently accompanied the consultants with SynTerra Corp.as they sampled the
groundwater monitoring wells associated with the coal combustion by-products (CCB)
structural fill project at the Asheville Regional Airport. The purpose-of this letter is to
highlight a number of observations I made during my week-long site visit (April 6-9,
2015). My comments are provided in the bulleted items below:
• I would like to point out that a number of monitoring wells initially exhibited
moderate to high levels of turbidity. Consultants John Chastin and Kyle Donovan
employed excellent field technique and worked diligently to keep turbidity levels
below 10 NTU's prior to sampling. I collected subsequent split samples at all 18
monitoring wells, which will be analyzed by our Division's analytical laboratory for
23 different metals.The analytical data sheets will be forwarded to you as they
become available
• I observed groundwater seepage and copious amounts of iron precipitate near the
toe of the Area 1 CCB structural fill. I would like to schedule a time to conduct a
closer inspection of the site.
• I observed iron-rich water discharging from a cement culvert (34.449832, -
82:546372) that I-believe is connected to a French drain beneath Area 3 CCB
structural fill. I would like to schedule a time to collect a water quality sample at this
location.
• While collecting samples at background monitoring well MW1A, an inspector with
RS&H approached us and asked if we were aware that the monitoring well was in
the middle of the future.airport taxiway.Are there plans to relocate this monitoring
well?
2090 U.S.Hwy,70,Swannanoa,North Carolina 28778
Phone:[phone] Internet:www.ncdenr,gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper

John R.Toepfer
April 21,2015
Page 2 of 2
• I recently sampled (February 24, 2015) a private water supply well (63
Mountainview Drive) that is located adjacent to Area 3 CCB structural fill.The
homeowner complained that turbid storm runoff from the structural fill project has
flooded his property and garage area several times in the past. I was encouraged by
the homeowner to inspect the property any time after a precipitation event. On the
afternoon of April 7, 2015,there was a significant down pour at the Asheville
Airport. I briefly stopped by the residence on my way back to the office. I did not
observe any evidence of storm runoff entering the property from the structural fill
project.
Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions or concerns. I can be reached
at [phone] or brett.lavertyCa)ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely, -
e /
i
Brett Lav, rty
Water Q,ality gionaI Operat ns
Asheville Regional Office
c�c: fide
Norman Divers-Charah Inc.
Todd Palmer-Charah Inc.
Michael Reisman-Asheville Airport
Laurie Moorhead-Duke Energy

A
AIVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R.van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
March 62 2015
Charles Price,President and CEO
Charah,Inc.
12601 Plantside Drive
Louisville,KY 40200
Re: Charah,Inc.—Asheville Regional Airport Project
Dear Mr.Price:
Thank you for your March 5, 2015 letter addressed to North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources("DEW')Chief Deputy Secretary John Evans.
As stated in your letter, and in previous conversations with Charah, Inc. representatives, 'DENR
understands that Charah and the Asheville Regional Airport Authority ("ARAA") entered into a
structural fill agreement ("Agreement") for the placement of coal ash at a specific site ("Project Site").
The Project Site is identified on a map attached to the Agreement. DENR further understands that
Charah and ARAA are now interested in moving forward with the placement coal ash in"area 2"of the
Project Site.
Our office has reviewed the Agreement entered in 2007,the two amendments to the Agreement entered
in 2009,and the map attached to the Agreement. We have also reviewed the relevant portions of North
Carolina's Coal Ash Management Act ("CAMA"), see N.C. Gen. Stat. § 130A-309.201 et seq.,
including Section 3.(f) of Session Law 2014-122. As you state in your letter, S.L. 2014-122 Section
3.(f) provides that CAMA "applies to the use of coal combustion products as structural fill contracted
for on or after"the effective date of CAMA.
The Agreement includes provisions for the placement of coal ash in area 2 of the Project Site. The
Agreement was entered in 2007 and amended in 2009,well before CAMA's effective date of 2014. For
these reasons, the use of coal combustion products as structural fill in area 2 of the Project Site is not
subject to CAMA requirements contained in Subpart 3 of Part 21 of Article 9 of the General Statutes.
If you would like to discuss this matter further,please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Sam M. yes
General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone:[phone] Internet:www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper

ENR.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resoia'rces
Pat McCrory,: Donald R, van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
March;3,,201.5,
Mr..Mitclell G :Diggs-Vice President
Duke.Energy.P.rogress,
Environmental Services
526.South.Church Street,EC.13K
Charlotte;.N&228202
Subject:, Permit No.W00000O2O
Asheville Regional Airport
Coal Combustion Products
Structural'Fll lProjects
Buncombe County
Dear'lV1r.Griggs:
Division of Water Resources' staff has reviewed the permit renewal request packagereceived`August 7,
2014. However;,additional information.is required Before the review,may be,cornpleted.. Specifically;
information concerning proposed fill Area 2 at the Asheville Regional,Airport is,being requested-. Please
address the items on the attached pages no`later than the close of business on March 31,20'l5.
In addition to the.request for additii'onal,informat on, a draft permit-that,includes coverage of Area,2 is
attached for your review and comment. As noted in an April 21, 2009 .letter to 1Gir: John & Keenan
(attached),'and in a November"14,2013 letter"to Mr:.David•Mitchell.(attached),the�Divisionhas Jndicated
that the.,current permit.contains languagel that is inconsistent with current North.Carolina,Administrative
Code. The Division intends to include.with the next'issued permit an accounting of all the,structural fill
sites and incorppratiori of the requirements of 15A-NCAC 02T J204. The attached permit re fleets,
the:
intended-changes discussed in previous correspondence:;Please be advised that construction of Area 2,
.shall not begin until such time'that the fequirements of 15A NCAC 02T .1204 have been met and the
proppsed Area 2 project is covered(approved)under.the renewed.permit-._
In addition, per 45A NCAC 02T ,0108, the Division is considering holding a public meeting to seek
comment on the.subject:permit, and.therein Area 2,prior to completing.the review of the application. in,
the event that a meeting,is,held;:the'application shall.be considered ass incomplete until the close of-the
neetng'record.-
.Please,be aware that you are responsible"for-meeting all requirements set forth in-North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any over's glit9 that occurred in the review of the subject application,package are-still'the'
,Applicant`s responsibility. -In addition;,any omissions made in responding to the outstanding items,.or
failure to'provide the.additional iriforination on or before the above requested :date may result in your
appl>cation beuig returned as incomplete.
Please reference the subject application number,wheri providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional do off shad,be signed, sealed. and dated (where needed), with three copies
submitted to my attention at.the.address below::
Non-DischargeftmrtUng.Unit-
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,Nohh"Carolfna'276994617
Phone;"919.807-64641 Intemet;fitfoaloortaI.ncdeneordhVeblwd
An Equal Opportunity)Affirmative Actfon Employer—Made lo part With recyded`paor

-Mr.Griggs.
'March 3;;,2'0,15
Page.?of4
I£'yo have aciy:quest oris regarding this request,please d'o not lies.itate:to contact me at(919..) 807-6337 or
[e-mail]. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely;
Qh nticha'MdDaniel,
Division of WatevResources
.Attachments: April 21,.2009 letter to Mr:John S-.'Keenan,
June'16,2614`Letter to Mn John Toepfer
November 14,2013,letter to,1Vlr.David Mitchell
cc:" Asheville Regional.Office,Water Quality-Regional Opemil'ons Section(Electronic..Copy),
Mx.John.Toepfer,`Duke Energy Progress(Electronic Copy)
Permit Application File WQ0000020

i •
Mr.Griggs
March 1;;2015
Page'3 of
Require.AdditionalInforinaiion for Permit:Renewal WQ0000020
1. Provide,documentation,that.the structural fill site at Area 2 of the Asheville Regional Airport,was
contracted prior to September N"',201.4. The;documentation must explicitly indicate the contracting
Of Area 2'after the Division received written notification.in October'2009'that Area 2 would not.be
used-for structural fill. Session Law 201442,2=establishes statutory requir.dments'for coal combustion
residuals (CCR),and became"law on Septeriiber 201', 2014. SECTION 3.(fj limits the application of
'the law to the use of coal combustion pioducts,as structural fill contracted for on or after September
20`h;2014.
2. Subunit two copies of.an 11XI7-inch site map 'that includes,the following information for each
structural full site listed under the Attachment B of the Draft permit: .
a. The location of major components of.-the waste,disposal system,.
b. The-location and identity of each,monitoring:well.
c. The lbeatfori of propertyboundaries,
d. The location of.'compliance.and•review boundaries:
I
Note t}at.the•draft permit-. vfdes Duke-with 44'400itiorial 66 days:to provide this information_after I
permit:issuance. As response1. to this information request,provide either,the..information.requested-or
acknowledge that the information will be sent within 60 days ofpennit issuance:.
Submit the Operation and Maintenance(O&M)'plari.as.required by 15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)(2).
Note that the draf.permit provides Duke with'an additional 60-days-to provide this'information,after
permit issuance. As response to this u ormation request,provide either the;information.requested or
acknowledge that the informationwill be sent within 60 days,ofpermit issuance:
4. Provide documentation_ addressing.all the•outstanding.items (i.e., groundwater modeling, leaching
results) related to Area 3 as required by the Division June 16;.2014 letter to Mr: John Toepfer'(see
attached).
-5. Provided. Session:Law 2014-122 is`riot applicable'to Area 2 of the Asheville Regional Airports the site
would-be subject-to the requirements of current. administrative code 15. A N(AC 02T. Per 15A.
NCAG 02T,1204 Application Requirements, provide the following information on-tine structural fill.
site'at Area 2 of the Asheville Regional.Airport,priorto initiating ash fill activities:
1) Site plans. As required by, O.S. V9C, :a:professional land sittveyor shall provide location
information, on boundaries•=and physical features not, under. the, ,purview, of other, licensed:
professions. Site plans.or maps shall be=provided'to-the Division by the applicant depicting the
location,,orentatron,and relatlop§hip,of the.CCPs use site's features,including:
a. a scaled_map ofthe site,with topographic contour intervals not exceeding_10 feet or 25'percent
of total site-relief and showing all site-related structures and fences Witlitii;the site;
b. the location 'of all wells (including- usage and, construction: details if available), streams
(ephemeral, intermittent; and .peremual),, springs; lakes, ponds, and "other surface drainage
features within 606 feet of the CCPs use boundary and. delineation of the. review and
compliance boundaries;:
CA setbacks as required by Rule.1206 of this Section;and
d, site property boundaries within 540'feet,of the C;CPs use bouindary.
2) 'Information that describes and explains site-specific engineering or, institutional controls
proposed to prevent,adverse impacts to public health and the environment.

,-Mr..Gfiggs
March 3,2015
P-A-kb 4 6f4"
,3Y Property OwiieTshp.POcumentAtion Ofthp site i where the CC P9 are to be used'.
_.
a. legal documentation of-ownership(i.e.,contract,deed or article of incorporation);
bl. written notarized intent to p-drqliA$e agreement signed by both'partfe,s, accompanied,by A pidt
or survey map,* or
c. easements specifically indicating the intended use of the prqpeqy,as well as q plat-or survey
map, Easements shall,adhere to the requirements,of 15A NCAC Q2L..0 10-7.

DUKE Duke Energy Carollnas
ENERGY® 410 Ra Raleigh,Wilmington
27601
CAROLINAS
all, US ED
March 2,2015 DIVISion of Water Resources
MAR - 3 2015
Mr. Brett Laverty
Water Quality Regional Operations Section water Quality Regional orations
Asheville Regional Office Asheville rz�,,tonal or,,ce
2090 U.S.Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
RE: Duke Energy Progress
Asheville Airport Engineered Fill Project Area 3 Development
Response to NCDENR letter of June 16,2014
Dear Mr. Laverty:
This letter is in response to your letter of June 16,2014 in which you provided additional
comments to our February 18,2014 Response to Comments letter.
Below we have referenced the comment made, followed by our response for your review and
consideration.
Letter dated June 16,2014:
1. In your letter,you state that all future water-quality data pertaining to leachate or CCB i
contact water within the open cells will be submitted beginning with the April 2014
groundwater monitoring results. Please submit all past and future water quality data
pertaining to the contact water within CCB structural fill areas 3 and 4.
Response: By letter of June 24,2014 we transmitted to your office the April 2014 semi-annual
groundwater monitoring results for Areas I, III,and IV. The transmittal letter included volumes
of leachate directed to the Buncombe County Metropolitan Sewerage District(MSD)during the
period of February 2014 through May 2014.
Our report that provides the November 2014 semi-annual groundwater monitoring data also
provides leachate flow summaries and the Industrial Self-Monitoring Reports for June 2014
through November 2014 that were submitted to the MSD by Charah,Inc.
Recognizing your request to receive water quality information about the leachate directed to the
MSD and also recognizing that we are not the industrial user permit holder for the discharge of
leachate to the MSD,we contacted the MSD,Industrial Waste Section and asked that they contact
you so that you will be able to receive the information directly from the MSD at your
convenience. If this'arrangement proves unsuitable please let us know and we will endeavor to
make other arrangements for access to this information.
www.duke-energy.com

2. In your letter,you state that it is well documented in the scientific literature that chloride
can be responsible for a false positive result for thallium. Based on conversations with
our own DWR laboratory, chloride levels must be significantly elevated before any
polyatomic interference can take place. Do you have additional evidence that suggests
chloride concentrations as low as 3 mg/7 may be a source of analytical interference with
regards to thallium? Please submit any pertinent scientific literature that supports your
position.
Response: The DWR comment letter dated August 6,2013 requested an explanation of the
thallium value derived at monitoring well 6. We provided a response dated September 16,2013
in which we stated that the well and the.analytical results from the well were produced in order
to characterize the site conditions(pre-exposure or background)prior to placement of the ash in
Area III and the well has since been abandoned. Our comments anecdotally mentioned that the
analytical laboratory(Prism/Pace),when consulted about the thallium value,indicated that
chloride can interfere with a thallium analysis. This, as a point of technicality,is true since the
methodology for the EPA Method 6010C provides for recognition of various spectral
interferences. The methodology also provides for procedures for compensating for these
interferences.
By letter of October 23, 2013 the DWR provided comments on our September[1]6,2013 letter.
This letter stated that the laboratory suggested that chloride can interfere with a thallium
determination. The letter stated there was an implication that this interference can result in a
false positive value and went on to ask for additional documentation and explanation regarding
thallium values.
By letter dated February 18,2014 we responded to the DWR's October 23,2013 letter. In regard
to the thallium value our letter indicated that we could not discredit the particular value but that it
was not.unreasonable that the value could be biased high. We also stated that it is well
documented that chloride can cause false positive results particularly with method 6010C.
By letter of June 16,2014,the DWR asked that we submit scientific literature that supports our
position. Our position is that the thallium value was derived in a pre-existing,pre-ash fill
timeframe,and appears atypical when compared to the groundwater data produced before and
after that one value. (All historical thallium results both before and after the February 2013
sampling were produced using EPA 6020,ICP/MS,with results being at or below 0.2 ug/l.) In
our previous letters we should have referred to the analytical methodology,(EPA 6010,ICP-
AES)used for this analysis, as being more susceptible to spectral interferences than EPA 6020,
ICP/MS. The vendor reported the 0.074 mg/1 based on a single wavelength. It is a good
laboratory practice to confirm ICP results using either a second wavelength or confirm the ICP-
AES value by ICP/MS. Confirmation by a second wavelength or analysis by ICP/MS
(EPA6020)was not performed. Because confirmation of the ICP-AES was not performed,it is
unclear if these interferences were present,recognized and compensated for in the derivation of
the thallium value.
Page 2

In further regard to the thallium value,it is unusual to have a value of 0.074 mg/L in a
groundwater background scenario or even in an impacted area scenario. It is not,however,
necessarily unusual to have isolated analytical values for low level metals that are or appear to be
inaccurate.
3. According to 1 SA NCAC 02T.1204(d)(2), new and expanding[CCB]structural fill sites
must describe and explain site speck engineering or institutional controls proposed '
to prevent adverse impacts to public health and the environment. The composite liner
system for CCB areas 3 and 4 is designed to significantly restrict infiltrating
precipitation and limit the release of CCB leachate. The composite liner system, while
restrictive, cannot be considered entirely impervious. Therefore, limited solute
transport modeling was conducted by GTI to demonstrate the performance of the
composite liner system and its ability to protect groundwater quality at nearby
regulatory and water supply receptors.
The ARO previously provided comments regarding Geotrack Technologies Inc. (GTI)
groundwater modeling results where the 90%concentrations for several analytes
were higher at the compliance boundary than the review boundary for three different
modeled geometries. The ARO requested a more detailed description of the IWEM
model's 'prediction error"or alternatively,further analysis that includes a greater
number of Monte Carlo realizations. GTI responded by performing additional ground
water modeling(January 30, 2014) to reflect conditions more specific to the area. The
modeled geometry included receptors at the review boundary(62 feet), compliance
boundary(165 feet), and an offsite water supply well(240 feet). Please note that the
distance given for the modeled review boundary is not midway between the waste and
compliance boundaries as defined by ISA NCAC 02L.0108.
The conceptual model of groundwater flow in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont regions of
North Carolina is essentially a two-part system consisting of regolith or weathered
rock and the underlying fractured bedrock In many locations, the regolith includes a
transition zone above the fractured bedrock consisting of coarse fragments of partially
weathered bedrock.According to technical documents, the IWEM model is designed for
relatively simple groundwater flow systems in which flow is dominated by a regional
gradient. The model may not be appropriate for sites associated with fractured
bedrock, heterogeneous aquifers, non-uniform thickness of water bearing zones, or
sites with signfcantseasonal variations in water table elevation.Please provide a
detailed discussion as to why the IWEM model is appropriate for this location.
In the "no liner"scenario, GTI does not adequately address potential problems with the
model's performance. In one instance, there is a slight increase in modeled
concentrations for arsenic and barium from the compliance boundary to the water
supply receptor. GTI responds by saying the no liner scenario is unrealistic for this site
and that predicted arsenic and barium concentrations follow a more logical reduction
in the other two liner scenarios. The suggestion of ignoring one set of modeling results
for another is not a viable answer.Another observation is an almost complete lack of
attenuation for any constituent in the "no liner"scenario.It is our understanding that
Page 3

the greatest influx of CCB leachate to the unsaturated/saturated zone modules occurs
in the "no liner"scenario. It seems unrealistic that little to no depletion of the leachate
constituents occur as a result of dispersion, diffusion, or sorption processes.
In the "clay liner"scenario, the modeled concentration for chromium increases from
the review to the compliance boundary. Similarly, the modeled concentrations for
boron, iron, and sulfate increase from the review to the compliance boundary in the
"composite liner"scenario. In both scenarios, GTI ignores problematic trends based
solely on the fact that the predicted concentrations are below analytical detection.
After it has been demonstrated that the model is producing consistently reliable
results, it is suggested that sensitivity analvses be conducted to determine which
variables are the most critical to the modeled solute transport.
An attempt was made by GTI to address performance issues with the IWEM model.
They suggest that default infiltration rates combined with the relatively low subsurface
hydraulic conductivities result in theoretical ground water mounding.According to
their interpretation, this mounding dilutes modeled concentrations near the CCB fill
and less so as the mounding dissipates with distance.According to technical
documents, the unsaturated zone(1 D)and saturated zone (3-D)modules are separate
domains computationally linked through continuity of flow and constituent
concentration across the water table directly underneath the waste management unit
(WMU). Groundwater mounding due to high infiltration rates may occur in the
unsaturated zone module and is represented by increased head values at the top of the
aquifer. The actual saturated zone module is based on the assumption of a constant
.saturated thickness and the only direct effect of ground-water mounding is to increase
simulated ground-water velocities. In other words, the module does not simulate the
actual physical increase in the thickness of the saturated zone.
GTI concludes by saying, "while the results indicate ffor the composite liner scenario]
small increases in concentrations of certain compounds with distance from the fill, all
of the computed concentrations can be considered essentially zero"and"thus, we
conclude that the modeling demonstrates that the proposed liner system is protective
of the environment."According to technical documents, the mass of constituents
leached from the WW is directly proportional to the infiltration rate of the various
liner scenarios. There is no discussion as to the fate of leachate mass once it enters the
unsaturated/saturated zone modules.
Modeling is an important component of the project given the close proximity of
receptors to the CCB waste boundary. To this end, the Division would like to see a more
robust conceptual model, a model that is producing consistently reliable results, and a
sensitivity analysis of key variable affecting the predictive results.Along with this, the
Division would like to see a description of the model limitations and any associated
implications regarding its use for the Asheville Airport CCB structural fill project.
Page 4

Response:.,
In response to comments made by NCDENR in their letter dated June 16,2014,additional and
alternative ground water modeling for the Area 3 structural fill has been conducted.The
modeling report is attached. The results indicate that the modeled concentrations for each
constituent at each receptor are below the respective 2L standards.
We trust the above responses provide the DWR with the information requested. If you require
any additional information or have any further questions,please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
John R.Toepfer,PE
Lead Engineer
Attachments: GeoTrack Technologies,Inc.Alternative Groundwater Modeling Report
cc: Tim Smart,PE—Duke Energy.
Laurie Moorhead—Duke Energy
Jay Perkins—Duke Energy
Norman Divers—Charah, Inc.
Ed Sullivan—Duke Energy
Michael Reisman-Ashville Airport
Asheville Regional Airport
61 Terminal Drive, Suite 1
Fletcher,NC 28732
Page 5

. -: QOMPLETE THIS SECTIO RY
-J
Complete_items 1.,2,and 3.__ __ _ ____I A�Sia tufd uvu �`f(� i[3 Agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality X ❑Addressee
Division of Water Resources B. Received by(Printed Name) C. D e o Delivery
Water Quality Regional Operations Section 15
2090 U.S.Highway 70,Swannanoa, NC 28778
D. Is delivery address different frorrtitem 1? lf3 Yes
If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No
carry K.Sideris,Senior Vice President I
nvironmental,Health&Safety
)uke Energy
i26 South Church Street,EC3XP
:harlotte,NC 28202
II I Ilil l I'll III I I l I l I I llll��III Illlll I I ll I III 3. Service 0 Adult Signature 0 e 13
❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑Registered Mail Restrict(
9590 9403 0672 5196 9699 00 ertified Mail® Delivery
ertified Mail Restricted Delivery �Retum Rece(pt for
❑Collect on Delivery Merchandise
n—Af-'."nii, .ln--Iransfe�from SeMce11660 `' ' tt t ❑Collect on Delivery:Restricted Delivery: ❑Signature ConflrmationT
7 014 5]t p ( ; !—� i ❑;Insured Mail 4 i j 1`4 1 1 } 1❑Signature Festricted Delivery
Confirmation
0110 414 b 6 11$12 31 ❑Insured Mail Restricted Del(Jery' ry
(over$500)
�c Fnrm RR11" Gnrii 9M-r;acne zran_no_nnn_onGn AjAt n A) A^- A?n 2 ,

1
UNITED STATESCF L)S IF First-Class,Mail
q_ Postage&Fees Paid
USPS
_ ,-aF.� _ mit No.G-10
• Sender: lease print your name, address, and IP 4® in this box•
D C
rn
BRETT LAVERTY --J
NCDENR-DWR-WQROS �`° o ITl
2090 U.S.HIGHWAY 70
SWANNANOA NC 28778 G w M
- - --- ---- ----- ---- - - -,.I d- O m—
w CD i'n
00 O o
r m
USPS TRACKING# �- r
0
fl��t t
;zF�rl: :l0 90� rl , bi �� Ido�,,,,,,�i�,,,,1!'!�I=IIIl,►lllllt