20070111 Ver 1_Application_20070119

~~~~.
~/~~~~~~
~Ty µ~~o
~5''~'~9J <. rl.
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA ~~`~'~~~,~~.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPET'1'
GOVERNOR SECRETARY'
January 17, 2007
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
o7oiii
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Proposed widening of SR 1004 (Old Oxford Road), an approximate
1.0 mile section, from SR 1632 (Red Mill Road) north to the end of the
Merck & Co. Inc property within Treyburn Corporate Park in Durham
County. WBS Element 39986.3.2
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen 1.0 mile
of SR 1004 (Old Oxford Highway) from SR 1632 (Red Mill Road) north to the. Merck &
Co. [nc. (Merck) northern property line within Treyburn Corporate Park in Durham
Cou~lty. This widening (scheduled for this Spring) will provide turn lanes to facilitate two
entrances into Merck's vaccine manufacturing plant positioned west of SR 1004 and will
allow for safer travel in this area as through traffic will not have to stop while employees
and trucking traffic access this plant.
This project will involve minimal impacts to adjacent wetlands (Figures 1-4). No streams
or open water will be affected by this project as there are no stream crossings within the
protect limits. Although this project is located within the Neuse River Basin (HUC
03020201), no protected riparian buffers will be impacted as they are no mapped features
requiring buffer protection along this 1.0 mile section of SR 1004.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Site 1: Wetland
Construction at this site involving the extension of a dry line cross line and the widening
of roadway will impact an adjacent herbaceous wetland (Photograph 1). This wetland
originates within a tail ditch and continues through an old power line right-of--way. Please
note that this wetland is not associated with any stream. This area holds storm water and
the water seen in Photograph 1 was taken after recent rains. Permanent impacts at the site
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

2
associated with clearing the site and then widening the roadway will include a total of
597ft' (0.0137 ac) of fill in wetlands and 496ft2 (0.0114 ac) of mechanized clearing in
wetlands (see Appendix One for USACE Wetland Delineation Forms/NCDWQ Rating
Forms). No surface water impacts are proposed at this site. See Figure 3, Construction
Plan for a view of impact areas.
Site 2: Wetland
Construction of this site involving widening the roadway will impact an adjacent
herbaceous wetland (Photograph 2). This wetland is within an old power line right-of-
way adjacent to Merck's south entrance. Please note that this wetland is not associated
with any stream. Permanent impacts at the site associated with clearing the site and then
building this wider roadway will include a total of 712ft'` (0.0163 ac) of fill in wetlands
and 917ft2 (0.0211 ac) of mechanized clearing in wetlands (see Appendix One for
USACE Wetland Delineation Forms/NCDWQ Rating Forms). No surface water impacts
are proposed at this site. See Figure 4, Construction Plan for a view of impact areas.
Riparian Buffer Impacts
Although this project is located within the Neuse River Basin, no protected buffer
impacts are proposed. The proposed project limits along this section of SR 1004 does not
involve any stream crossings nor do any mapped features requiring riparian buffer exist.
Therefore, construction will be completed without impacts to protected riparian buffers.
Waters of the U.S./Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands and surface waters not affected by the project will be protected
from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of
construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
Minimization: The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at jurisdictional
sites. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices
for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts to these sites.
Compensatory Miti ation: All compensatory mitigation requirements will be left to the
discretion of the regulatory review agencies.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the ESA. As of January 2007, there are three federally protected species
listed for Durham County. They include bald eagle (Haliaeetus let~cocephalirs), smooth
coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), and Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii). The young
dense mixed stands along this section of SR 1004 are not suitable of supporting foraging
habitat for the bald eagle. The roadway shoulders and adjacent property along this section

3
of SR 1004 is regularly maintained, eliminating the possibility for smooth coneflower or
Michaux's sumac to exist in this area. Additionally, a review of the Natural Heritage
Program database (last updated Fall 2006) revealed no occurrences of protected species
within the project area. Therefore, based on lack of suitable habitat observed during the
12/07/06 and 01/04/07 site visits and the NHP database review, biological conclusions of
No Effect have been rendered for each of these species.
Historical Compliance
Please note that we propose no impacts to historic features, structures, or properties but
have requested concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office as this project is
just south of the National Register property `Stagville' and within the Bennehan-
Cameron Historic District. Other than NCDOT right of way, the only property affected
by this proposed project will be Merck's property as described.
Summary
The only jurisdictional impacts associated with this project total 0.0625 ac of impacts to
an herbaceous wetland within an old power line right-of--way. No open water, surface
water, or riparian buffer impacts are proposed.
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 14 and NCDENR-DWQ Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC)
No. 3404 for above-described activities. An automated payment procedure has been
implemented between the NCDOT and NCDWQ. This procedure will enable the
Division to apply for the 401 WQC without submitting a check for this permit
application. This procedure will provide payment to the NCDWQ by charging the permit
application fee of $200.00 directly to the appropriate NCDOT WBS Element 39986.3.2.
A pre-construction notification is attached with this request. If you have any questions or
need additional information, please contact Ms. Heather Montague at [phone].
Sincerely,
~~~`-
J.W. Bowman, P.E.
Division Engineer
cc: Mr. Rob Ridings, NCDWQ Transportation Permitting Unit
Ms. Tasha Johnson, P.E., NCDOT DIV 5 District 2 Engineer
Mr. Mike Kneis, P.E., NCDOT DIV 5 Project Manager
Mr. Donald Pearson, NCDOT DIV 5 Roadside Environmental Field Ops

Photograph 1. Site 1 Wetland, looking west from existing cross line.. No stream just standing water.
Photograph 2. Site 2 Wetland, looking south through old power line right-of--way.
SR 1004 (Old Oxford Road proposed widening in Durham County

~ - Wlllardvi~le~~;'~ ~~ ~ \~-~/ `~ , t` `l``-~C~~ ' ~' -, . ~~~. '~ i,~ :;f ~' ~. ~t=1,,~~ .fC~ll•2v~~ ~ %
y'~` ~~ ~: ` ~ ~~ ~ ~ `~/
~"
- ,~. ~ , - .~~ `~ a~ ~ ~' n t , r ~.
-, u _
-. _
Y~-...
x /~ ~ ' 1
~ ~.!t t ~ ~ .~+'+615 x ~ ~~~ ~ ~f ~ ~ 1
~.-~ , ~ ~ i ~ ~--° ~ ~yy ~0 -~ ~
~~ II C ~9 t ~~-~-~~~ ~~_ ~c~- ),C} - '~ i 1
;~ ~ ~ ~', t 1 t ~,~. ',~~f 1 -
•. .
J ~. ~ 1 ~---~~I"'~ ,ul r, t i9tld l
'~, i
~~
y` -
- ,,
,. .. ~~ _
'~ ~ ~ ~
r - .-- '.,,,,,, ~ - .
~_"11- ~ ~_ ~ ~i'. ~` ---_ -~ yf' , r^r~- .., ;fie t ' `~ ~'
. \ , ( a
~~ ~ ~ ~~/! °~1~',~ /n ~~.. w~l~-fir ~Ip~i ~~~ ~ ~+''~ ~r ~` t, f
~.
". ~L~ i ~ A , ~ _ ~, ~~ - ,
%~~ ~.> ~, ~; ~ ~ ~, .~ ~ C~ s a
`,. ,~ , End Project "'` `~. ~n -~ , ~ of .~
..
.~_ , .
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ -
f _ ~. ,. -
,-
~ i , ~ i~ J !' '~
` o ~
r ~~ ~ F SITE ~'~ f.^ '~ ~ ~ ,~.
`==~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ SITE 2 r' ~ ~ ~
/ya • ~
_ ~_ ll ~ ,,.,_,~ ~,~~ airs ~ ~' ~ e ~~~:~~..' ~r
..
,.
_.
:.
'3~ ~ ~- ~~
Fig` ,~ ~ ~ i~'~~ T ~ "~ f
~. ~ r. ,i~
_, f r ~d
~~
- ,
~~. ~ fir" t „ ,.Z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~`-~<
Y.o '
~,
_.
7;"
=~ ~' ~
F ~ ~~,
~.~. ~.~-~,~~ ~ ,~~,,,~ ~- s- Begin Project-='~- ~~. ,, _ ~~~
. „
.. _ '~
y,,. _ r i
~~
J r,
~ -.
,
• .~CiJ'
N
~ ~ T %~
~,. .. ~ /~
LJ' ~~ .., ~ - -- Ii:i1'
~ .~ J . r ~,
F I ~ r '~ ~ 1
`/ j
~~ ~ ~ + ~ ,~ ~~ M ~~
~` r uEIR. ,~- " ~
~ ~\.,. i~ ... ~~ ~ ~. 1 ^~,
Co h
pyng t (C)1998, Maptech, Inc.

HeC DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLIf
2 040 000 FEET
YJn Hr~~"t~'eC ~ s s ~ ~ • s~: IrC Ir6 • 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ r GeB
~APC ~.e\. '~ ~ AP~'.,•5 ~0 3'Y ~ a ~ ..C~.e.t e ~ A ~He~~~ f(~~ MfC ~i~M ;1l
..p ::- ~`' ~ ~.~ _ Q, y + 7~ , ~'"~ _ '- Mf6 ~~.
K yam. a •\-
I '~~.t1 Ar YS-'~si ~['. '~ ~\ -Y 0 r0 l ~x., S., ,~ •3 Mf8 .~~1.
~ ~y d ' j r `~~r~ ., s ~'f~B ~ ,r.!k ,r. '?*+' ~ Gr6 ~.5~,} i.Y ,~{
' ~ ~ - 4` i f ¢i r • •~4 sat` • Q. .~T .w41'C 0 ~?,~ r ' j ~ j i
W .. ~ .. r ' ~ ~ t ,« ~, '.i • `y ~ R!' "4^ ~~:: ~ ~'\ WSB i' d ,(
0~3 • ,a~, "~:4 jZ .~,. .erg .~c.~yr +_ rc~, ~ ~, rA~,:t s,, ' ~ ;•=• ~e ;- ,~, ..~.•,~s .- ._
~H~ .. r 4-= ~" ~ ~ ~~ ~- ! AIB
'k ~ Q ._ B
-' a ~•#~r-."9+C+ .~~? :' -' ".. a. `T_r r,*-~Iz~ "+ 't'{" 1,,~, '4 ~ -ate Cc
T
r ~. ti}~i v °`'. :sz , ~ vii,,, t ~t ~ t ' r~~ r :, 0,. "' r p ~'• ~ ~~ \ 1 56- ~MfB- -
,. F~ + ~ADG wi• ' A{ ~*J ~ E •, . i~ ~ . f a Q • ~ i 1 \ y
k~ -L,a~S~''"~~: ,.~, ~ ~' ~ „yz pti j fi; i Se ~ = s ~ Sw
~~{~w• ~~ t.. A 2 ,r'7. $ l ~ ~ ~v• .rte ~ ~~
'~'r. 'i ~. Y~f:~.~~b~\ - ti.• r,~. -~ MfC f. ~ ~"~ .41G x\~ "~".•' ~ ,.. 3T 14 ~•' + SB .
°i ~~ ~. ~' ~r ~ y ~"t,, .~ •J MfB ~~~ ~• ,F ~' ~ 1 `i+, ~ 1 %" ` 1 err".'!
• ~ ' • irk a x " -" ~7 as {y "2 ;' 'G
,~ .st .~ # ~ w Y ,~. + •, ~' •" ^ Gr6 1 ~ ~.. '~• ~ ~Jf GrB '
..
~• •-.E ~° ~,., ,~~• ~ Mf8 ~` •r a Sr`.: ~ \ ,. •
~~
• ~ 'i :~~~ ,~ : ~ .`~ f ~"' .. ~ ~ ,End Project ~ ~ ; yy_ ~,'
._ . •
•
. .- -
HrC ~' t **.', ,~ 2 y
q Y -L~ r
GIF . ~ ~e,~'+z ~ -., *~ ~• X01 .,.Wn ~ •~ ~r~ ~ a `..,~i
n _'_' ~ _ ~
~ ~k='' ~ ~~ _ Chi - AlB ,r may. '. y ~-• yam,.
~'' f~"+'~~ ,~ ~ $.. ~. ,~~,~`~' •. _ ~'~_ ~~~~ "' ,r SITE 1
~ ~ Ali;,. ti~\ ,"Gp. ~az• } 4 ~L. ~ ,~~~ -a131~~~
r` _ ~ „t ~.. ,. ~ ~. .. ~ y ,.~ ~ ~ :~ ~ -.., SITE 2 ,
~-~' tea, i ti ~ ~`.~i' + ~ Ch ~, CP ''` ~" ~''Zh ~ 1' ~a c .-
1 _ ~ ~ t -:~ .:. y. 5.., 11 ,l s ~~ ~ . . ~ ~.•~
~ *f 1.
~• ,r ~Q. . Aj~fQ, ~ ~, .
~ L.~q , /~~~ 1G !9 +ef r' ^~ # / ' r "~.t ~,s +f C ~ ~ r:1Ll.°1yc~
•R 7 ~~ '` ~r~ F C ~ ` {,i C ? -~r~ T Mf aim' 4 '~U• 4` ~t •~~ ~ •^~-..w~
f•.`~WsB Cr8 ~ ' r' ~' '~'~l e~ .off' ~ ':r ~' r fp;~, /•i 1"y• ~ ~ '°~+¢~~•~~~ ~ i _ f
Mfe ,~
1 ~•- Mf6 ~ ;~' '~.' 'r ' ~. ! ~ 2
~i `~'~ ~•. w-• } ~ c • ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ 'fit -
r m ! M fRf !~ .. ~M- ~` Ro ~ , `>~ _ ~ . ~ i~ // ' 1(3 %• •"t j~i~. ~ `.t ~'~} ~n ~ . ` -
.1
N
Project Study Area
SR 1004 Old Oxford Road
Durham County
USDA-SCS (1971)
Figure 2 1:15,840
•~ - r}
,cp. ~ ,~ ~. -~fo ~~.~~,~~• ~.,xr~Begin Project ~~~ ~ ~ t~~.~k
>, *a rt'~t ,~,'t tt.'' //Mf8' ~, ~ "~ - ;..,~ •~~ ~t1+4,:,

'~ ~
N
~ ~ ~
~+° ~
~ m
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~•
~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~.
~ ~ ~ ~

-N ~ ~ -~I

~ y ~
~
~ ~
~
m ~
~
3 '
'
~
~
~I '~ 3'
O ;
V
7'1 ~ ~
'
N~
~i
O;
~

+,
C ~
l i
pi
>~
'
m
E
m
~ '
> m
~ E p, '
m C
`~ ~ L '
'
o ~ v~
me
m
v' ~. v c~ v

w
° c
v vm
m +- m 3 ;
~ ~ m N
C ~ 3 CC
+- ~' ~ °'-
r
v 3 p
X m ~ m
W Z ~ ~
~ i
v v
m ~ ~ ~~
~
~ w
~ w
3
~~.
Z X m :~
w Z ;
I
I I
o
~ i

I ~' ; i
I
I
I ; I
~

I I
I
t I
I ~ I
> o
m to ~ a I
~~ a ; ~
} -° W I
~
m I} " I
L x , W
Um

CD ~ I
I I
N+ I I
I
I I
i I
I

I o
T
I

I
_,
~~ I

I
I I
v I I

a

v I I

m I I

Z I
I
I
I
I ;
I I
I
I
I
i
I
;
I
I
i
I
I o; I
I
I
I
I
I °+ I
I ~;
I ~
I
I ~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
,I
Io ~ o

; f
a
a
~
I ~
w I
W
. } ~ }

x
I
x
I

Iw
I w

I
I
I I
I
I I
0
O
~ ~
,~
a
w
o
M
'G o ~
u ~., C
V .-r
.~O
~b~
U ~ M
~
i o ~ ~:

,,.,, o A a~
~a
~
~

C
m
E ,~
~ C
> ~
o E
d ~
~ ~
o ~
m ~ ~
~' o c
~ v
w m {-
p~ ~ m
C ~ 3
w
~- c
~ 3 '-
X m ,=
W Z ~
i ~
~ ~
v o
m ~ v
+- w w
O .+- 3
Z X m
W Z
~ ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MSout Ent ance• i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I>
la
I~
.. I }
' Ix
Iw
~ ; I
C ~ I
L I I.
v~
mC I
vv ; ~; I
~+ '. I
m
N3 ''~ I
C C I
v'- ~ I
r I
U ~I I
m
~ ~ I
~ ~ I
~ I
~ ~ I
~: ~ '• i
~ ~' I
~ ~ I
N i
~ ~ ~ I
o -31 ai .. I
• I
~ m I
~ ~I 3 ~ I
'~I '~ ~ ~
i
i I
~ '~I ~ ~
~I ~ v ~
~ a I
~ '
v
w I
3 I
a~
~ Z I
m I
I
i ~
D I
T I
I
' I
,
~ ~
,
i
r
1
1 I
o'
N'
+j-
i
i
i
i
i
O '
O ,
~'
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>,
0
al
al
+I
x~
w
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Q
\
~ O
cz, a .. o
0
M
~ O ~
O
~OV
~~ ~
U ~ ~
'~
~o~ ~

ai~A _~
w
~a
~~

~ff1Ce USe Only: Form Version March o5
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 1 1
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
L Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division 5, J. W. Bowman
Mailing Address: 2612 N. Duke St. Durham, NC 27704
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: wbowman cr dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topol,~raphic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Proposed widening of SR 1004 (Old Oxford Road an approximate
l .0 mile section, from SR 1632 (Red Mill Road) north to the end of the Merck & Co Inc
property within Treyburn Corporate Park in Durham County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): WBS 39986.3.2
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):_ From Hwy 501
(Roxboro Road) on the NE side of Durham take SR 1004 (Old Oxford Road) north towards
Granville County The proposed wideningproject is approximately 5 0 miles out of town
along the Merck & Co. Inc. property for their vaccine manufacturing plant
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): Site 1- 36.1092 °N 78.8414 °W
Site 2- 36.1101 °N 78.8419 "W
6. Property size (acres): 5.0 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 8

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Land use is generally wooded and some agricultural areas.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This
project involves the proposed widenin~of SR 1004 with turn lanes to facilitate two entrances
into Merck's vaccine manufacturing_plant positioned west of SR 1004 and will allow for
safer travel in this area as through traffic will not have to stop while employees and trucking
traffic access this plant. Equipment may include excavator, backhoe, bulldozer, grader, and
pavingequipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: SR 1004 will be widened and turn lanes added to
facilitate two entrances into Merck's property thereby increasing the safety of the roadway.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed widening of SR 1004 will
involve dry cross line extensions, clearing and rg_ading activities for construction. This will
result in permanent impacts at two herbaceous wetland areas located within an old power line
Page 3 of 8

right-of-way which is positioned parallel to the project Please note that no stream crossin Ts~, exist
wtthin the protect limits. Therefore no impacts to open waters streams or protected riparian
buffers are proposed.
Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation,- flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
Set)aratelV list lmnacts due t[l hnth ctnt~t~irP and flnnrlina
Wetland Im act
P
Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of

Site Number
Type of Impact
(e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(es/no) (linear feet)
Site 1 Fill Herbaceous N/A 1,000 0.0137
Mechanized Clearing Herbaceous N/A 1,000 0.0114
Site 2 Fill Herbaceous N/A 1,200 O.O163
Mechanized Clearing Herbaceous N/A 1,200 0.021 I
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0625
~. I,tst the total acreage (esttmated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0625 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
NA NA NA NA NA NONE NONE
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) NONE NONE
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not litnited to
fill, excavation, dred:?ina. flooding. drainage. hulkheads_ etc_
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) T e of Im act
~ p lake, ond, estua bound, ba
( p ry' ' y' Im act
p
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
5. List the cumulative imnact to all Waters ~f the U_S. resulting fmm the nrniect~
Stream Impact (acres): NONE
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0625
Open Water Impact (acres): NONE
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0625
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): NONE
Page 4 of 8

6. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
7. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections.. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Avoidance measures were
taken during the planning stages and minimization measures were incorporated as part of the
design. Complete avoidance of proposed impacts is not feasible but have been kept to a
minimum.
V[II. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Pernits, published in the Federal Register on January I5, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
Page 5 of 8

but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h?o.enr.statc.nc.us/ncwetlands/Strm~ide html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
All compensatory mitigation requirements will be left to the discretion of the regulatory
review a encies.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator. at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
Page 6 of 8

3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Site 1
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone I extends out 3U feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 2U feet from the edge of Zone I .
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 1 SA NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stonnwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. No mapped streams exist within the proposed
oroiect limits. Therefore there are no impacts to protected riparian buffers requiring Stormwater
mana e~ ment.
Page 7 of 8

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will not generate wastewater
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. if no, please provide a short narrative description:
This roadway widening and turn lane work will not result in additional development has it is
designed to facilitate an existing facility.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
!'V, L
~~~ 707
~°` "Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

Appendix One
(USAGE Wetland Delineation forms/
DWQ rating sheets)

DATA FORM (N~ ~~~
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlar~d~ betermination Manual)
Project 1 Site: sk /00~ ~o/~ Off rd Roas~ w~deh~'ry Date: ~ y o ~
Applicant (Owner: /1/C T .D/V .5' TW c3ourhart County• Dr~r Rirt
•
Investigator: /-'lan K State:
NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes / No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No / Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No / Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Can21L Sp f~ F/~ 9.
2. T~r~c~w, sP ~ oBL. 10.
3. Sn,.le.K sA WV FRC 11.
4. ~ 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). ~ooyo
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified asFAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
w~~-la-~ ~e c~-a-hcs-~ p~est~~r
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge .
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other ~ Inundated
/Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available -water Marks
Drift Llnes
~
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands --
Depth of Surface Water: O (in.)
Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~ ~
--18 (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: ,,
2 (in.) Local Soii Survey Data
_~ FAC-Neutral Test
. _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~e~la...-~' ~~ ~lvo~OV 1 1~~2 Sc V~~

sobs ~ ~; ~c / We ~a~
Map Unit Name , ,
(Series and Phase): G~»v-7(,~ ~,,.~., ~~~,.. ~ Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
-
0-2 /AYR ~~i -
Z - lot /0 y'R G/~ o R 5 ~c w disfirx-~'
JaM c~y la ww~
Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol ,_ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
___ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
__ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
/Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
r
{}~.ric s~ ~ I s pre sw.,~
wt I LAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ~/ No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No Within a Wetland? Yes / No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ~ No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Th ~ S a r~q is a pJe ~~'' d

DATA FORM ~~ ~~ 2
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION l~,~ly~
(1987 COE Wetlal5ds Determination Manual)
Project 1 Site: SR /ODy~ (b/c/ Ox~d 1Qaad~ Wi ~c~firlq Date: / 07
Applicant /Owner: n/GDoT Dr/ 5 ? W ~3ow~.~/~ County: ~. Iwrt~
Investigator: -1-~er Maw a State: ~t/c
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes / No Community ID:
is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No [/ Transact ID:
is the area a potential problem area? Yes No_~/ Piot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ca~x sP ~ ~ 9.
2. Tu ca.r ~J oar 10.
3. sn~,. x s u y ~C 11.
4. ~ 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). /OO%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
wtTla.-a~ V~[ ~~a~~• fir{ sG~
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other ~ Inundated
_~/Saturated in Upper 12"
- No Recorded Data Available _ water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: O (in.) Secondary Indicators:
•.
Depth to Free Water in Pit: "'/ 8 (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: Z (in.) ~ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~,/cHw,d hyd~olo9y Frer~n-~'

SOILS

Map Unit Name , ,
(Series and Phase): 6--rv-y~7~( ~ G~• y+- Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
inches Horizon (Munseil Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moistl AbundancelContrast Structure. etc.
0-2 ~ rR a _
Z-I o+ IoYR~_ o ~ 5 8 ~ ~I ~iYfG~ _ /v~~'rl
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
.__ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ educing Conditions
~ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
.
leyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
RemarlCS:
~~lQ~/%C Jo r~'s pfd Soh
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes / No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~ No Within a Wetland? Yes / No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ~/ No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
~l i f lLtQct l.S !,~ ~,JG ~~

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlatlds Determination Manual)
- S- ~ 1
U~ola-~
Project 1 Site: SK /Av~ (o/~ Dx~o,-~_/ ~Poad1 ~/~d~n~~-q Date: ~ o
Applicant /Owner: NCDpT t71J 5+ .J, W Bowwwn
Investigator: I+eat~hc oh
t
na County: __ Du.rhwry~
,
,
. State• NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes / ivo Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes ivo /
- Transact ID:
is the area a potential problem area? Yes Nom Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. QK~rckS a~ba _~ FRCU 9.
2. car tkbrv~y~n '` FAQ 10,
3. ~CX oPaca. T FRCS 11.
4. ~ Iwo rk.bra- 'T ~RCU 12.
5._ Oxyd ev-druw. or 6orcwnn T 13.
6.Ti~h;nerv~s .r~r~~~nc~~a _~_ r-~ey_ 14.
7. 15.
$• 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 0,1°0 _
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species arelare not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
non - w e~a~-d ~-o~~`u"" ~ s~-~-~'
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge .
- Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_Water-Stained leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
L
1(1a ~~~ro~oq`I PreSt.~"1

SOILS
s~ ~ ~a,~
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase):_ ~ra,r-y-~~(~ scW,~ly ,
/aah•. Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Pro1'tle Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon {Munseil Moistl (Munsell Moistl AbundancelContrast Structure. etc.
D _2 .$ R 3 Z
Z ~D-f 2, S rie 5 ~ry Scr~r.ci~/
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
__ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remar~CS:
110 h ~ ~~Z S ti , is (~~-t ~c..~
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ~ Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? ~ Yes No •~ Within a Wetland? Yes_ No_/
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No /
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Th;s area .s nod' Q ~/~ ~/ahd

DATA FORM tJ~~~
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manuall -
Project 1 Site: -sK /Av4~ Ofd DK~o, ~Poad Wid~h~~9 Date: / o
ApplicantlOwner:_ /JCDDr ~~ _S,, J. W.Bawr+,ah County: D~,~.t.hwnn
Investigator: I+e.at~hc oh, tea- State: /VC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes / No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No / Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No / Piot ID:
(explain on reverse ifneeded) -- _
VEGETATION -- - ---
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. QKGfrks a~(xi ~_ F~CU 9.
2. ~cer rubrv~vy~ ''r FAG 10.
3. ~/CX o~aca. T FPtC..~ 11.
4. t~v~~rw~ r kbra ''f NACU 12.
5. O~c~de~ndruw~ arborew~n '~ -- 13.
6. Tuv~i AeY kS ~/ i Y A,V~i wv~ a _~ FpCV" 14.
T. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 4,1°0
.Remarks: .Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than SO% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Sp
ecies that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
e
t1o r1 - W rrKa~-d' '~'n`TU..-, ~ e~
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge , .
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other.: -Inundated
_ -Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
- _ Drift Lines
Field Observations: ._ Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in•) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
,_ Local Soii Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~a ti1~c~~o~o,gN P~eS~-~

~~-
SOILS
S~~ ~ f/~~i~~rd
- ~
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ~r~v-/(,c s~,cly ,
/aair• Drainage Ciass:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth ` Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
D - 2 .5 R 3 ~.
.-
Z-~O-f 2,S yR 5~ cry Sa~s~d/
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_._ Suifidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
__ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
,~
n an k..t ~,nZ S ti .~.s .~ ~..~
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ~ Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No •~ Within a Wetland? Yes_ No_/
Hydric Soiis Present? Yes No /
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual

s~ ,
Project Name S~ /D0~} ~ol~ ~x-rvrc~ JQca~)w-c`{~n-~- Nearest Road s~ ~~~
County ~ w+~^'1 V-'etland Areas ac;es Wetland Width ~ sO feet
Name of evaluator a-f~-u /~on~aj ~~ _ Date ~ y v
Wetland Location
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, up:Iope, or radius)
on pond or lake
on perennial stream /forested/natural vegetation $~
on intermittent stream agriculture, urban/suburban ...L_
within interstream divide /impervious surface S
mother a~ ~ d.' ww!-~e R-~
Dominant vegetation
Soil series 6r~ (6rarty~lft ,SaMC~., /oa~n~ (1)' ~X~_
predominantly organic -humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral -non-sandy
/predominantly sandy
(2) Tn`~ s s1°
(3) ~m ~ l°~ Sp
IIydraulic factors
steep topography
/ditched or channelized
total wetland width Z 100 feet
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
~ intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of floodin¢ or surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
Bottomland hardwood forest .Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest ~ Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay , h~~~~-way
Bog forest - /Other ~~~~'%~~~~~~jP*~ ~~ne r~
______ *the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream charnels
----------------------------------------------------------
wciQht

R
Water storage Z- x 4.00 = >::~>... «;~:>::
.;'>;:::.:

A
BanlJShoreline stabilization Q
x
4.00 = '~`~ ~y
~~-< =r::~,'
T .Pollutant. removal * x 5.00 = ~ `>~..:n><~
I Wildlife habitat 1 x 2.00 = ~>~`~~<
N Aquatic Gfe value
x
~
4.00 =
~:.»:.>:~if~<.
~;'~~~~~

G
Recreation/Education
~ D x
1.00 = :«;;.,~
4~~::°>~'
Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
upslo~ei or radius--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------___.

s,~,~ z
Project Name SR ~~ ('Olaf o~rGt`' /QoiaQ'')//i~G~+~~'`~ Nearest Road S2 ~~`+'~
County ~ ~^~"ti ~ Wetland Area ~ o•°~ ac;es Wetland Width ~ ~o feet
~iyl~
Name of evaluator ~heQ'~-cr ~°^~`~ Date ~-
Wetland Location
on pond or lake '
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
./otheC °pltr 1~1e ~i hf =cl-K/ay
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, up:lope, or iadius)
/forested/natural vegetation $D
agriculture, urban/suburban ~~
/ impervious surface 5
Dominant vegetation
Sail series 6rl3 (`6rc~v/~~ v /oarri I (1) • ~'~X ~o
_ predominantly organic -,,humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral -non-sandy
~edominantly sandy
(2) ) u r-c.~ S ~
(3) Sirtr7p~ Sj0
IIydraulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width 2100 feet
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
/tntermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
• Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna -
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh -
Swamp forest - Bog/fen •
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay /~
Bog forest - /Other power %e.r~kf ol'2~/a~/
-_____ *the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish mazshes or stream charnels /
weight
R Water storage Z- x 4.00 = »>:>~'~~`_
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization c' x 4.00 = ~~~~ ~' ~~~>
T
1
Pollutant removal
* x 5.00 =
~~~~~~ ...<.
~ ~ Wildlife habitat x 2.00 = ~>~~t`=
N Aquatic life value x 4.00 = ~~~~~~~~>
G Recreation/Education ~ x 1.00 = <b~.::.<:<>
Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
_ upslo~e: or radius_ --------=---------------------------------------------