HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120222 Ver 1_Email_20120306FW Br 78 in Caswell and Br 87 in Rockingham
FW Br 78 in Caswell and Br 87 in Rockingham
Euless, Amy
Page 1 of 3
Sent Tuesday March 06 2012 12 23 PM
To Carrillo Sonia
Attachments BD 5107K_WET_Impact_Summary As (132 KB) bd 5107k SWMP pdf (33 KB) bd 5107f revised permit sk —1 pdf (98
KB) bd 5107f SWMP pdf (34 KB)
WIII you add this Information as additional Information requested and received to the following
projects
Bridge No 87 in Rockingham #12 0222
Bridge No 84 on SR 1315 in Caswell #12 0221 (courtesy copy)
What I requested Is in the first email below You II have to look at the info to see what goes
with each project Thanks
From Parker, Jerry A
Sent Friday, March 02, 2012 3 26 PM
To Euliss, Amy
Subject FW Br 78 in Caswell and Br 87 in Rockingham
Amy
Per our conversation
Jerry
From Fuh, David [mailto dfuh @flohut com]
Sent Friday, March 02, 2012 1 33 PM
To Parker, Jerry A
Cc Tim Jordan, Turner, Herb
Subject RE Br 78 in Caswell and Br 87 in Rockingham
Jerry,
Here is response to comments, see red below
PI discuss with DWQ as to our response to comments
thanks
David Fuh, PhD, PE
From Parker, Jerry A [mailto Jparker ncdot gov]
Sent Thursday, March 01, 2012 9 56 AM
To Fuh, David
Subject FW Br 78 in Caswell and Br 87 in Rockingham
David
Per our conversation
https //mail nc gov /owa/9ae= Item &t =IPM Note &id= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJHI4 %2bm 3/7/2012
FW Br 78 in Caswell and Br 87 in Rockingham Page 2 of 3
Jerry Parker
From Euliss Amy
Sent Wednesday, February 29, 2012 11 12 AM
To Parker, Jerry A
Cc Thomas L Brown @usace army mil
Subject Br 78 in Caswell and Br 87 in Rockingham
Jerry
I need the following additional information for the above referenced bridge projects
Br No 78 in Caswell County
1 The plans show bank stabilization extending below the OHW (ordinary high water mark
see detail B and the cross section) However the impact totals do not account for bank
stabilization Please account for bank stabilization in the impact tables and in the
project description Please be advised that if the limits of the bank stabilization extend
beyond 40 you will need written authorization from DWQ
R We will install temporary causeway with CL II rip rap to build proposed bent After
construction of the bent rip rap for causeway on the temporary stream impact area
will be removed and the rip rap on the bank area will be retained and converted to
bank stabilization The Impact should not account for bank stabilization twice
Therefore we do not show bank stabilization (A =0 01 Ac L =38 ) on impact summary
We add a note on impact summary to explain this see attached Also we add this
explanation in the project description on page 5 of our stormwater management plan
see attached
2 Please describe what you are going to do with the stormwater from the bridge Will
there be deck drains over the water2
R management of storm water from bridge was indicated on page 5 of our
stormwater management plan see attached No deck drains over water see
page 5 of our stormwater management plan
Br No 87 in Rockingham County
1 The plans do not show a jurisdictional intermittent stream in the NW bridge quadrant
Also there is a jurisdictional intermittent stream that crosses under the road from the
wetland to the this intermittent stream Finally there is a perennial stream in the NE
quadrant of the bridge Please update the plans to show these streams
R the streams and associated buffers have been shown on attached pdf revised
permit sketch
2 Look on the maps and determine if these additional streams are on the maps and if so
account for any impacts to the buffer including parallel impacts if necessary
R we will show additional parallel impact at NW quadrant see attached pdf Yellow is
in zone 1 green is in zone 2
3 Please show all of the utility relocations that involve impacts to streams buffers
wetlands and the mitigation site on the plans
R only aerial power line relocation is involved see attached pdf The coordination has
not been finalized yet Stream and wetland impact is not expected After relocation
plan finalized we will show impact (may be additional parallel or mitigation stie impact)
on the plans
4 Please provide diffuse flow prior to discharging stormwater into the buffer If this is
unnecessary because you are utilizing existing ditches then please explain this in the
haps / /mail nc gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &id= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJH14 %2bm 3/7/2012
FW Br 78 in Caswell and Br 87 in Rockingham
Page 3 of 3
permit application
R The proposed roadway is in fill section and there are no proposed ditches at
all 4 quadrants of the bridge Existing ditch is at SE quadrant This ditch ends
before zone 2 and become sheet flow before entering zone 2 We will retain this
ditch Therefore diffuse flow will be provided prior to discharge stormwater into
the buffer at all 4 quadrants See page 5 of attached SWMP
5 Please clearly show the limits of the mitigation site on the NE and NW bridge
quadrants It should be very obvious on the plans that the contractor cannot get Into
these areas for any reason
R approximate conservation easement line is shown in the attached pdf We
will confirm and finalize the limits and show on the plans
6 Please verify that erosion control measures do not Impact the additional streams and
the wetland The jurisdictional features mentioned above should be on the erosion
control plans too
R all erosion control measures are within existing right of way and do not impact
the additional streams and the wetland We will show these jurisdictional feature
mentioned above on our erosion control plans
As a final note per your NPDES permit all projects require a written post construction
stormwater management plan Neither of these have one Please provide one for each
project
R the written post construction stormwater management plan is no longer used by
NCDOT Hydraulics Unit Instead the new format is used see attached SWMP The
written part of description is shown on page 5 of SWMP
If I don t get this information by next Friday I will have to put the permits on hold
Thanks
Amy
Please note my new email address amy euliss @ncdenr gov
Amy Euliss
NC DENR Winston Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality Surface Water Protection
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem NC 27107
Voice (336) 771 5000
FAX (336) 771 4630
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N C Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
https //mail nc gov /owa/ ?ae= Item &t =IPM Note &td= RgAAAADMSzLcd9W2TJHI4 %2bm 3/7/2012