20011743 Ver 1_Monitoring Report Year 7_20101101

wig' •.:�•-
rt
��rT. .fit �it�:1 w: $'r, . ..�h,_ , -:. , -r��., � � - - -• .. .. � .
•.!a. �� ..�) — ,c'. r- %fit \i, '-i. �1� _��"- -ir. �:.:�'_�q`�ii; f=- "�
.� ..f•_: a:i,ril;V.l,i _l':T= ,:;��7,u.s.- itw:1•S.t.J� • A .+! ".' _ i
.R^ _'i�.��•. ...�*.S{'�i-�'ti: ^fi'Y',_s1 :.�tRiF�•, �;
WS
:
..�" ,.: <,: `.�S�:,J:. 1:_�;, :Li,�,�,s •�- c•- ._� °:•: r1 -�t'S:�``a%( "�' •... - * =_
.:r: ~! s, : ; . ;. T r;•:�� Y. "` }" ..i �i t� ". %J�.:. < ',: ��,: :_rte..:, ..
y`` • A .,.. _== i= :'•i.. _ 'T ,L:"�;.:� ...1.::..�.;sS•, ?.. . ter ` ^' _ _
_ •: s;:i:�:4'� !t.. �i'S` '?<;3L: {'ir i:i: ,'.7: r'..:.;}.. Y: 3:•. �?``i.. �.T =�. ...s ::. - _�"�^
'a`�. >� �'�✓-: ;�`' _'�"};,': -C� �f•`.i _� = :.f.��-,;r''i'+�,',`T ��, ;_ � >1h:- ,',.r. ."• � "'�.':,�F.,s+f.- Ti;.��,:1;:;,v. �•���• � .- ..
_ µ• `,��1`�'- s,.�i��r_�: -'.r.- 'ti::�:ar� -: ,�,'��>i.,ral.,�iv' :t?- c.- �•,�.e.j.;�.�- �.0.e�t fi
• ?S..�f:7•:\�' 'ti:r�'�'e,:;. •t�t. '4i f •�`�.::� .I.:S:• na ^� ay:{3.... �: �k�i.y'i" r�= �'il�.
S,''X•f •- r:ii. .,^�' •ty'i•: - �•'�+ -:r.. �i` v_i•S.ii''.yv,ni.:iil . i .+C.�+:..
•..4:nr1-�. t = ,.:i:�.u..a.t;:` ..; a�: :. ` -i*- � +;._r�;:,i. . � u'�' 9�' �`'�.:._' Yi'`_:E",ai'
i.•...w:.....:�E.:. -.. s.i ,-�, _ ..t:r•� i';'e =iy �.y,r:.,•�, ?.'•Ny: rRlti�e :�.::��•- ,} � � ._S•%�r'':�'' .
., •• �,:.:•tfV'.si.:. .'fi::_ :r'' .r.' tip-,':.., �.. �!y,� `Ry ,y
t• � `�� .:�1,.,f, �� f. �„ . �..2i,.:i Xxrr -'.1!' R � - i; '• s.:t .- m
�\ F' 'y�� ,-:t :� �yi,. ...� .ri1•�;r•r.'':i!ci -•'=si ,�, e;. ..' `.1 �:_r� �' f
kl
=i n'F. `j` . r -:r ;.t � .. " .:::r•,•:�•., ;.'ii��! %r ",��';i"; }, rya V,..�7 •..,ice •^r -. � yi7 �Rr,l • _-
y .r Y; s=-t._ - .r _ _ _.' J {' "i;._s..',<�1'r.i?*:-:.'�`+ •�i Y, sue:
�✓'•:� •: e.�=_ = '7: -:lR. �•' Vii• ��1T. ���' Y 3•` P yY.,( -,i•
;2 I- ear.:. �.1:� 1'�•: -i•' t: .�' y
iS,`•'��_�;'�i.' •s. "c- . »...�•:!•�.: } -i � dic7:i-'i_; .:.�•.:.- ., <..ka. ;: •. i i� >.>r >,�T.
t _ •, f'. ••--'i is el.;'• -��:- 1� 4 -'•' '• <,-: }�k"ce.'
1, \;� ii`' ��'. :.F .+ i�� :..._'•`y,s:;r:.s,:l.�`....r.,. •-^'�r �''ti: �.::b?A+�rvir�' : i

Executive Summary
The County Line Stream Restoration project falls within the USGS hydrologic unit 06010105
The project stream (County Line Creek) lies within a golf course and the watershed includes low
to medium density residential areas and forested areas Prior to restoration work, landowners
efforts to modify the channel through channelization and clearing riparian areas impaired the
ecological functions of the creek
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc (KHA) developed the plans for restoration using natural
channel design methods The original contractor implemented the plans and completed
construction of the restored channel in 2002 During the winter of 2007, maintenance work was
performed on sections of the lower 2,000 feet of the stream between stations 15 +00 and 35 +00
KHA performed Years 1 -7 monitoring, assessing the stream and riparian condition of the project
2010 was the third year of monitoring since the repair and the site is planned to be offered for
closure at the end of 2011
Vegetation monitoring was carried out in the fall of 2010 and included the assessment of 8
vegetation plots The mean stem counts exceeded 1,000 stems per acre, well above the requisite
260 stems per acre, and exhibited a native species count ranging from 3 to 10 stems per acre
The planting associated with the stream repair in 2007 and the supplemental planting in late 2008
(as a result of easement encroachment) created some discontinuity in densities for certain plots
For this reason, the relevant data histories for those plots may not begin until 2008 or 2009
These planting efforts involved the installation of larger, 3 year -old trees that possessed a larger
stem caliper and root mass Some invasive species were observed in vegetation quads 1, 4, 6 and
7 Quads 1, 6 and 7 had multi -flora rose while quad 4 contained privet, but did not appear to be a
significant problem Over the history of the project, landowners adjacent to the riparian buffer
have disturbed or destroyed sections of the vegetation KHA did not observe encroachment in
2010 KHA was informed that EEP staff engaged the new management of the golf course and
certain land owners to restate the easement requirements Bollards with signage marking the
boundary were installed and supplemental containerized plantings were added in winter 2008 to
previously impacted areas
The survey included three primary longitudinal profiles and six cross - sections, which have
demonstrated stability within their morphologic parameters The geomorphic topographic
survey encompassed areas between stations 03 +00 and 35 +00 The survey included three
primary longitudinal profiles and six cross - sections, which have indicated vertical and lateral
stability The stream assessment, which included a visual survey, indicated 99% of the projects
banks are stable and approximately 95% of the riffle /pool features exhibited expected habitat
characteristics
County Line Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 - Year 7 Con IOmlry+bm
� andAeeoael�,lne

TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIGURES
FIGURE 1
PROJECT SETTING
FIGURE 2
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW UPPER
FIGURE 3
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW MIDDLE
FIGURE 4
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW LOWER
PROJECT TABLES
TABLE I
PROJECT MITIGATION STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES TABLE
TABLE II
PROJECT ACTIVITY AND REPORTING HISTORY
TABLE III
PROJECT CONTACT TABLE
TABLE IV
PROJECT BACKGROUND TABLE
TABLE V
VERIFICATION OF BANKFULL EVENTS
TABLE VI
CATEGORICAL STREAM FEATURES VISUAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
TABLE VII
BASELINE MORPHOLOGY AND HYDRAULIC SUMMARY
TABLE VIII
MORPHOLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MONITORING SUMMARY
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A VEGETATION MONITORING DATA
APPENDIX B STREAM MONITORING DATA
County Line Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 —Year 7 i `�/ , eM AmmdK W-

FIGURES

County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 G Kn*-H-
and Assaieles, Inc.
` a
� •lrm
_C
a�G\�'�1
..�0
a
at✓, .TfeRiLisenbee l'l
J• Sr
7.
,`Y
-
• �GZ I I ,. tai-
•
'
, y�.
,� ,l 1�_- '��l
IS'
hes ut
o
0
Wes.
a� � -
Creasm. .
f� —
�F3ethe Ch a Fann'nt Bring,
•
Hig'h Vista
-
�� .. �. --. _-
�-
o
N U z'���
Reece
)FIE i8
iaJ U i /' C55
�Mc6oWe u
"
//
a
,F n.nZChdpLl' CD I�
Reece
- - '- ^_•�� -�� - .1
Haya5 M.II - INC rII� •l -• `• � - t
UFB
Deer
d.,e
d f9S2 !
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
•. 1ti.
,- j - -' '
�_ Feet
Title
Project Setting
Prepared For:
Project
County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 7 — 2010
Buncombe and Henderson Counties, North Carolina
�,
Date
Project Number
Figure
E,11
hil ell elit
311/11
175
1
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 G Kn*-H-
and Assaieles, Inc.

WAWrA LAM
L —A - O 1 O iaquianoN GL I) autZ f4—OD
SLI I WIN lioll IB ti j
aaq[nnN pa[old aleQ wAmsoog
eatlomo q:poN `saqunoo uosiopuag pue aquiooung
;aafold
�lj
OI OZ - L �A SuuoltuOW uoiivioisag urearIS (esin tPH) aaio aurl �unoa
:.Ioa palsdaid
a >
(diaN ouo oN3o Asaunoo Ieuad 90OZ) iaddn mo!A ueld suoplpuoo juaunD

I itle I Current Conditions Plan View Middle (2006 Aerial courtesy of NC One Map)
Prepared For:
Project County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 7 — 2010
Buncombe and Henderson Counties, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
v' I CI it 3/1/11 175 3
PP- �+�
County Line (17 5) November 2010 — Year � �a Assmales

Title Current Conditions Plan View Lower (2006 Aerial courtesy of NC One Map)
Prepared For:
Project County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration Monitoring Year 7 — 2010
�- Buncombe and Henderson Counties, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
I'll awl 3/1/11 175 4
County Line (175) November 2010 —Year 7 =�"

PROJECT TABLES
J

Table I Project Restoration Components
County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Project
�
u
Segment or
F
°
a
b c
Stationing
Comment
Reach ID
Q
Q
U w
x
G
W
Main
3 541
R
P2
3 541
If
3 442
If
0 +00 0
35+000
The creditable footage number is the total footage minus 99 feet
to account for crossings
Main
287
P
287
If
259
If
The creditable footage number is the total footage minus 28 feet
Ito
account for crossings
Trib
119
R
P2
119
if
109
if
The creditable footage number is the total footage minus 10 feet
to account for crossings
Tnb
52
P
52
if
52
if
Mitigation Unit Summaries
Stream
Riparian
Non Riparian
Total Wetland
Creditable
Wetland (Ac)
Wetland (Ac)
(Ac)
Buffer (Ac)
Comment
F ota e
8 2
--
--
--
--
Co my Line Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 Yea 7
C./1 aW Inc

i
i
Table II Project Activity and Reporting History
County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Scheduled
Data Collection
Actual Completion or
Activity or Report
Comments
Completion
Complete
Delivery
Restoration Plan
2002
11/2001
Final Design — 90%
2002
Construction
2002
8/2002
Maintenance /
2007
Repairs
Supplemental
Winter 2008
Plantings
Temporary S &E mix
applied to entire
project area
Permanent seed mix
applied
Contamerized and
B &B plantings for
2002
reach/segments 1 &2
Mitigation Plan / As
Performed by Kimley Horn and
built (Year 0
2002
10/2002
s
Associates
Monitoring —
Performed by Kimley Horn and
Year 1 monitoring
2003
Oct 05
12/2003
Associates
Year 2 Monitoring
2004
Oct 06
12/2004
Performed by N C State University
Performed by Soil and Environmental
Year 3 Monitoring
2005
12/2005
Consultants
Performed by Kimley Horn and
Year 4 Monitoring
2007
Nov 07
12/2007
Associates
Performed by Kimley Horn and
Year 5 Monitoring
2008
Dec 08
02/2009
Associates
Performed by Kimley Horn and
Year 6 Monitoring
2009
Nov 09
11/2009
Associates
Performed by Kimley Horn and
Year 7 Monitoring
2010
Nov 10
11/2010
Associates
County Line Creek Monitonng Report (175) 2010 Year 7
Way Hom
2lld Asswates, IIIC

Table III Protect Contact Table
County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Designer
3001 Weston Parkway
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
Cary NC 27513
Primary Designer POC
Will Wilhelm P E
Construction Contractor
6106 Corporate Park Drive
Shamrock Environmental Corp
Brown Summit NC 27214
Primary Contractor POC
Greg Kiser
Construction Contractor Maintenance
126 Circle G Lane
Land Mechanic Designs Inc
Willow Springs NC 27592
Primary Contractor POC
Planting Contractor
Planting contractor POC
Seeding Contractor
Planting contractor POC
Seed Mix Sources
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Monitoring Performers
3001 Weston Parkway
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
Cary NC 27513
Stream Monitoring POC
Daren Part P E
[phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
I Daren Part P E
[phone]
County Line Creek Monitonng Report (175) 2010 Year 7
C]_FJ Kimley Horn
and Associates, Inc

r-
r
Table IV Protect Background Table
County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Protect County
Henderson/Buncombe
Drainage Area
0 35 sq miles
Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %)
0 1
Stream Order
1 st /2nd
Physio ra hic Region
Mountain
Ecore ion
Blue Ridge Belt
Ros en Classification of As built
B4 /C4
Cowardin Classification
N/A
Dominant soil types
Codor-us Hayesvtlle Delanco
Reference site ID
N/A
USGS RUC for Project and Reference
6010105
NCDWQ Sub basin for Protect and
Reference
043 2002
NCDWQ classification for Project and
Reference
N/A
Any portion of any project segment 303d
hsted?
No
Any portion of any protect segment
upstream of a 303d listed segment9
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
N/A
of project easement fenced
0%
County Line Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 Year 7 C2=Fl Kimley Hom
aW Aw=tw, Inc

Table V Verification of Bankfull Events
Co nty Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo #
Collection
Bankfull wrackhnes were not observed and the crest
10/20/2009
N/A
N/A
gauge did not indicate bkf event occurrence
Bankfull wracklines were observed indications that
11/12/2009
Oct Nov 2009
N/A
there had been a bankfull event
7/7/2010
N/A
Crest Gage indicated a 175 bankfull event
County Line Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 Year 7
Kunley Hom
and Assmates, Inc

Table VI Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Reach 1
Feature
Initial
MY 01
MY 02
MY 03
MY 04
MY 05
MY 06
MY 07
A Riffles
87%
94%
94%
95%
95%
B Pools
95%
93%
93%
93%
93%
C Thalwcg
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
D Meanders
78%
96%
96%
96%
96%
E Bed General
82%
100%
99%
99%
99%
F Bank Condition
92%
100%
100%
99%
99%
G Vanes / J Hooks etc
88%
93%
93%
95%
95%
H Wads and Boulders
52%
78%
78%
90%
90%
County Line Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 Year 7
jZ_Fj Wey Hom
_ and Awc ate3 Inc

Table VII Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Reach 1
Parameter
USGS Gage Data
Regional Curve
Pre Existing Condition
Project Reference
Stream (Onsite)
Project Reference
Stream (Raccoon
Creek)
Design
As built
Units
Mtn
Max
Med
Mm
Max
Med
M
Max
Med
Mtn
Max
Med
Mtn
Max
Med
Mm
Max
Med
Mm
Max
Med
Dimension
BF Width
ft
129
3
8
6
61
86
154
159
157
6
9
89
Floodpro e W dth
ft
19
73
40
9
18
100
>20 0
190
BF Cross Sectional Area
ft
106
8
ll
10
3 3
5 1
23 8
23 8
23 8
3 3
5 1
4 3
BF Mean Depth
ft
08
1
33
2
05
06
15
15
15
05
06
05
BF Max Depth
It
1
08
1 2 1
24
27
1 26
08
1 2
1 1
Width/Depth Ratio
1
8
27
113
144
10
10 7
103
12
15
18 5
Entrenchment Rat o
3
12
67
1 5
2 1
64
>2 2
2 1
B nk Height Ratio
I
1
1 3
Wetted Penmete
ft
Hydraulic radius
ft
Patter
Cha net Beltw dth
ft
1 15
60
30
1
52
18+
Radius of Curvature
It
85
15 8
122
18
Meande Wa elength
ft
60
135
90
32
48
41
30
84
494
18
98
Meander Width ratio
3
10
5
3 3
34
3 3
2+
P oille
Riffle length
ft
Riffle slope
ft/ft
001
0 1
004
001
0 023
002
0 063
0 115
0 085
004
1 0 1
0 045
Pool length
ft
Pool spat ng
ft
8 5
36
42
163
102
9
48
30
503
Substrate
d50
nun
11 6
314
348
08
d84
rim
63
62
86
64
Additional Reach Pa ameters
Valley Length
ft
Channel Length
ft
S nuos ty
1 1
1
1 3
1 1 1 2
Water Surface Slope
ft/ft
BF slope
ft/ft
0 039
0 007
007
0 O1
0 039
Rosgen Classification
Incised E F G
B4
E5c
B4
B4 /C4
Habitat Index
Mac obentbos
Substrate collected at each cross section
C ty L C kM t 9 R p a(175)2010Y 7
aM AS80=w iw:

' 1 I ) r I '1
AB dMYIM if XS Ritfl 1 p h pp dXS3 R fl I p th I
we in a M— ( ) a
m =kit k
©0000
®0�
®�0
®�00m
000
®0m®
..
©000000000000�000�00000mm
0000
®0000
®0000
®
®0
®000
®0®
00��00v0000�0�00000�0��mm
•
0������0�m00
®0�00��0��0�0
AB dMYIM if XS Ritfl 1 p h pp dXS3 R fl I p th I
we in a M— ( ) a
m =kit k

J
r
APPENDIX A
VEGETATION MONITORING DATA

Table Al Vegetative Problem Areas
County Line Creek Hi h Vista Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175
Feature /Issue
Station # / Range
Side
Probable Cause
Photo #
Bare Bank
Bare Bench
Varying Degrees of
Encroachment
Invasive/Exotic Populations
225
275
Left
Small population of Multiflora Rose
VP 1
700
800
Left
Small population of Chinese Privet
1 510
1 600
Left
Small population of Clunese Privet
VP2
2 100
2200
Right
Small population of Multiflora Rose
2 500
2 550
Left
Small population of Chinese Privet
2 800
2 850
Left
Small population of Multiflora Rose
County Line Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 Year 7 ❑�� W8y Hom
aW ASSmtes, Inc

M
i
N t Th pt t g assoc aced w th the stream repat plus the supplemental planting to lat 2008 associated with recent enero chme t areas re red some dtscontmu ty densities f c rt
plots and for this reaso the rele ant d t h ston s for thos plots in y not b g unt 12008 2009 Th s pl t g IT rts v Ived th t II t of larg 3 y ar old tr th t possess d
a larger stem caliper nd oot mass
County L ne Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 Year 7
CC/1= hx
Ham
�m•mmm
®v
©oom000mmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmm
®moommmmmmommmo
©mmmm
tmsP
mmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmmmmmmmm
PI
m
®mm�m0000mmmmoo
©ommmmmm
N t Th pt t g assoc aced w th the stream repat plus the supplemental planting to lat 2008 associated with recent enero chme t areas re red some dtscontmu ty densities f c rt
plots and for this reaso the rele ant d t h ston s for thos plots in y not b g unt 12008 2009 Th s pl t g IT rts v Ived th t II t of larg 3 y ar old tr th t possess d
a larger stem caliper nd oot mass
County L ne Creek Monitoring Report (175) 2010 Year 7
CC/1= hx

vQ 10
vQ 2 (2010)
County Line (175) March 2011 - Year 7 rl m n = inc

VQ 3 (2010)
VQ 4 (2010)
County Line (175) March 2011 —Year 7 l 2 " and KMey+ Assoaam ates, Inc.

VQ 5 (2010)
VQ 6 (2010)
County Line (175) March 2011 - Year 7 G =n r kit

VQ 7 (2010)
vQ 8 (20 1 0)
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 = =�, Inc

APPENDIX B
STREAM MONITORING DATA

Table BI Stream Problem Areas
Con tv Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Featu a Issue Station # / Range Side Descri t on Suspected Cause Photo number
2010 Assessment
Degradation
0+80
0+90
Cente
Headc t Loc hzed
E cessive shear stress
8 +65
8 +78
Center
Headcut Local ed
Excessive shear stress
Bank scour
9 +25
9 +40
Lcft
Outer bend sco r
Excessive shear stress
16+05
10+15
Left
0 ter be d scour
E cess a shear stress
10+50
10+55
Center
Bank Scour
E cess[ a shear stress
36+92
37 +16
Left
Outer bend scour
Excess a shear stress
2009 Assessment
Degradatio
0 +80
0+90
Center
Headcut Locah ed
Excessive shear stress
8 +65
8 +78
Center
Headcut Local ed
Excessive shear stress
9 +25
9+40
Left
Outer bend scour
E cess ve shear st ess
Bank
10+05
10 +15
Left
0 ter be d scour
E cess a shear stress
scour
10+50
10+55
Center
Bank Scour
Excessive shear stress
36 +92
37 +16
Left
Outer bends o
Excessive shear stress
2008 Assessment
Degradation
1 0 +25
10+50
Cente
Bed De adato
12 +50
13 +10
Cente
Bed Degradat on
Bank scour
10+00
10+15
Left
Bank Scour
2007 Assessment
Degradation
8 +75
Center
Headcut Local ed
Excessive shear stress
SPI
12 +50
Center
Headcut Localized
E cess ve shear stress
SP2
Bank
10+50
10+55
Left
Outer bend scow
Excessive shear stress
SP3
scour
11 +50
11 +70
R In
Bank scou
Excessive shear stress
SP4
Engmee ed structures
—back or rm scour
Etc
22 +91
Cente
Arm scour and missing heade ock Located on
adjacent tributary
Excessive shea stress
SP5
2005 Assessment
31 +59
31 +72
High veloc /e cess shear
29+68
Structure scou
27 +50
26 +92
H velocity/excess shear
Ba kscour
27 +28
See rat rootwad
15 up UT
23 +78
H gh velocity/excess shear
13 +12
Scour at structure
34 +75
Rock sh ft at ape of vane
34 +00
Large d op over structu e
29+68
Rootwad scour (span channel)
Engineered structures
— back or arm scou
Etc
28 +94
Large d op over structure
27 +28
Scour at rootwad
13 +12
See r at structu e
4 +27
Large drop over structu a scou at structu e
1+80
Water flowing under vane
2004 Assessment
360
1 310
Structure Fadu e
2,040
2 790
2,810
2,860
3,360
3,470
Bank Erosio
1 145
3 300
CmtyL C kM mgRp (175) 0107 ar7
o n 8(Id BIBS, �IIG

Table BII Visual Morphological Stablhty Assessment
County Line Creek (High Vista) Stream Restoration (EEP No 00175)
Feature Category
Metric (per As bwlt and reference baselines)
(# Stable) Number
Performing as
Intended
Total number per
As built
Total Number / feet in
unstable state
/ Perform in
Stable Condition
Feature Perform
Mean or Total
A Riffles
1
Present'
36
36
NA
100/
94%
2
Armor stable (e g no displacement)'
36
36
NA
100/
3
Facet grade appears stable'
32
36
NA
89/
4
Minimal evidence of embeddinWfinmg'
36
36
NA
100/
5
Length appropriate'
30
36
NA
83/
B Pools
1
Present' (e g not subject to severe aggrad or migrat 9)
35
35
NA
100/
93%
2
Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D Mean Bkf >1 69)
32
35
NA
91/
3
Length appropriate'
31
35
NA
89/
C Thalweg
1
Upstream of meander bend (run /inflection) centering'
30
30
NA
100/
o
2
Downstream of meander (ghde/mflection) centering'
30
30
NA
100/
100 /0
D Meanders
1
Outer bend in state of limited /controlled erosion'
29
30
NA
97/
2
Of those eroding # w /concomitant point bar formation'
1
1
NA
100/
3
Apparent Re within spec'
26
30
NA
87/
gg%
4
Sufficient floodplam access and rebel'
30
30
NA
100/
1
General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
0
/
0
100/
E Bed General
2
Channel bed degradation — areas of increasing down cutting or head cutting'
3
/
85
98/
99%
F Bank
2
Actively eroding wasting or slumping bank
2
25
100/
100%
G Vanes
1
Free of back or arm scour'
44
45
NA
98/
gq%
2
Height appropriate'
41
45
NA
91/
3
Angle and geometry appear appropriate'
42
45
NA
93/
4
Free of piping or other structural failures'
43
45
NA
96/
H Wads/ Boulders
I
Free of scour'
7
9
NA
71/
2
IFooting stable
9
9
NA
100/
$g %
-1— —1-1-1— --j—, way "" ­
H As —Built number = number assessed some structures not readily visible Banks in these areas were stable
County Line C e k Monitoring Report (175) 2010 Y u7 " f n
aW Assooft Im

PS 1 (2010)
PS 2 (2010)
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 C=F, K.
and *Aw ies inc

PS 3 (2010)
PS 4 (2010)
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 r=F, Aida; tiara
and Associates. Inc.

PS 5 (2010)
PS 6 (2010)
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 G = F, +
� arw ice. Inc,

PS 7 (2010)
PS 8 (2010)
County Line (175) March 2011 - Year 7 GZn o-c

PS 9 (2010)
PS 10 (2010)
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 G � armd Ass'om t
es, Inc.

PS 11 (2010)
SP 1: Crest Gage
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 G =F, a"MAs -Flom
� aM Assadales, Inc.

2192
2190
–
COUNTY LINE STREAM THALWEG PROFILE 2010 -UPPER
-
�
- -
-
- Water Surface Slope
y=- 0.0531x +2290.8
— _
- - - --
- - -
-
- - --
-
- - - --
-
- -I
-
-
-
- - --
2188
_
-
-
-
-
f
- -
-
-
-
-
_ -
-
-
--
-
Bankfu 11 Slope
y = - 0.0500 + 2285.7
-
-
.�
--
2186
-
-
-
-
--
•� 2184
-
i
-
--
2182
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-,
I
-
--
- -
WiLl-,
2180
-
- -
2178
-
- -
-
- -
- -- - -
--
-
-
-
-
-
- -
X -1
- -
--
-
- --
_
--
- 7-S -2
1875 1925
1975 2025
Station (ft)
2075 2125
- - 2007 BED ELEVATION
2010 BED ELEVATION
o BANKFULL
- - 2009 BED ELEVATION
- - - - 2010 WATER SURFACE
- - 2008 BED ELEVATION
Legend
— Stream Channel Profile - AB Centerline
Stream Channel Profile - Thalweg 2010
Monitoring Cross Section
Structures
Log Vane
Rock A -Vane
Rock Cross -Vane
�51
k
County Line (175) March 2011 –Year 7 r =�es Inc.

2194
--
-
-- - Water Surface Elevation XS1 -2010
t Bankfull Elevation XS1 -2010
2193
- -- -- -
�•� Bed Elevation XS1 -2010
2192
—�
Bed Elevation XS1 -2009
- - + --
Bed Elevation X51 -2008
:Z
2191
- -•-
Bed Elevation XS1 -2007
-
i
c
0
2190
- --
0
—
100
W
100
90
./ %•'9� u12010
90
2189
- — --
80
�,•' MM9
uliaw
80
q• ♦
•
/ • 1
70
, ' M mm
70
G
60
-- ------- ml 2010
60 a
2188
-
u
U
50
; ;. ♦i
i ♦
'
-�
; ;
♦ ♦ ------- mi2m
♦�
50 m
5
.`
','
40
I I
- - - - - -- *12008
40
—
'
- - ---'
- - -- —' - -- --
r
-- ----- MI 2W7
U
30
'
--- - - -- MI 2M
30
2187
-
—
,f' :
zo
20
ON
10
10
0
0
218pC
6
N ul Vl O O N Zr
lO N N ll1 'y O N
n 00 M 1p l0 N ut T O W O w N N T 00 00
M V lD 01 00 IA l0 N N O a
O
u
N m 111 O O O
.0 1 M v� 0000 O rvO ^
0
20
40
�
ti N 001 N V
m ry m ti N
U1 O
Station (ft)
ti
Particle Size (mm)
ID
YEAR
PHASE FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE dS0 (mm) d84
(mm)
XS1
2003
MY1 RIFFLE
7.94
2.90 0.37
XS1
2004
MY2 1.48
16
XS1
2004
MY2 RIFFLE
11.92
3.43 0.29
XS1
2007
MY4 2.16 22.6
XS1
2005
MY3 RIFFLE
6.77
2.80 0.41
XS1
2007
MY4 RIFFLE
9.83
2.43 0.25
XS1
2008
MY5 0.07 19.32
XS1
2008
MY5 RIFFLE
9.74
2.28 0.23
XS1
2009
MY6 22.6
64
XS1
2009
MY6 RIFFLE
8.73
1.90 0.22
X51
2010
MY7 0.06
16
X51
2010
MY7 RIFFLE
3.59
2.08 0.58
County Line (175) March 2011 -Year 7 COI ,:=wl

2188
- - - - --
�
2187
i
—
_
2
Z'r
2186
Z ,
2185
—
-- -- - -- -
- - --
— --
c
1
�
,
•
2184
—
>
I
W
W.
- - - --
100
_
100
j
%522010
2183
—
— -- --
•,
%522009
t
1'
80
zs2zooa
80
—+k— Water Surface Elevation XS2 -2010
70
RS2Z007
70
z52(5)2o
2182
Bankfull Elevation XS2 -2010
2
60
,�
..
; M(W)2004 60
//
Y
50
'
' — ------ zsuo2°
%522009
50
c
_.
■� Bed Elevation XS2 -2010
40
,I
■
■ ,
- - - - - -- %52200e
40
,
,
i
V
30
— zs22oo7
30
2181
-I
—+— Bed Elevation XS2 -2009
■ 2
zs2 sw200%
;
20
;`
—
20
,
- - - -- -- XS2 1w12ooa
r s
to
—
to
-r
--• -- Bed Elevation XS2 -2008
0
0
2180
Bed Elevation XS2 -2005
N 1!1 V1 O O N V' n oo
ry n o r n
M ID lD N U1 0 0 oo O w N m V oo o0
", N" q O T
0
20
ry N N 1011, ~ O 111
n
w D ry M R w T N 6 t6 rN V ^
N N m ry
Station
(ft)
Bed Elevation XS2 -2004
Particle Size (mm) ~
ID
YEAR PHASE
FACET TYPE
Wbkf Abkf Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE dS0 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS2
2003 MY1
POOL
6.62 11.98 1.81
XS2
2004(S)
MY2 1.96
22.6
XS2
2004 MY2
POOL
5.28 3.04 0.58
XS2
2004 (W)
MY2 0.23
9.84
XS2
2005 MY3
POOL
7.06 3.50 0.50
XS2
2007
MY4 1.07
13.45
X52
2007
MY4
POOL
5.11 8.51 1.67
XS2
2008 MY5
POOL
6.88 4.37 0.64
XS2
2008
MY5 8
72.57
XS2
2009 MY6
POOL
7.85 5.48 0.70
XS2
2009
MY6 16
32
XS2
2010 MY7
POOL
8.11 6.68 0.82
XS2
2010
MY7 5.7
64
County Line (175) March 2011 - Year 7 Cmn =W

2168
2167
2166
2165
44
2164
0
2163
W
2162
2161
2160
2159
2500
=all A
COUNTY LINE STREAM THALWEG PROFILE 2010 - MIDDLE W
Water Surface Slope 11
MEN I
A=mW,227x + 2224.3 1'
SOON! y
y = -0.0239x 2228.2
MEMNON
111111 1
31. 1
1611— 1
1 M
MEMO I
IN=
111 A
A 3
I I
mosim 1
111111 1
101MA-MmMe M
MEN
INNIS M
MENOMONIE I
Immimmsh"m 1
11110111
�momm o
INS n
MEN,
oil I
no
2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800
Station (ft)
— — 2007 BED ELEVATION 13 BANKFULL - - - - 2010 WATER SURFACE
2010 BED ELEVATION — • — • 2009 BED ELEVATION — • • — 2008 BED ELEVATION
2850
County Line (175) March 2011 —Year 7 r-EF1 1"
� ar�d assod�aies, ux

2169
i
xss 2oto
� �
� �
� X552009
� X55 2008
I
,.' -
- - - - - -- xss zoio
i
- - - - - -- XSS 2009
. � -
-
t
2168
-
2167
-
- - --
- - - --
j
f
i
r
•,\•
2166
--
,z
-
o
(U
w 2165
•
100
100
90
90
80
80
Water Surface Elevation XSS -2010
70
70
2164
Bankfull Elevation XS5 -2010
c
60
d
;
0
60
�` ... Bed Elevation X55 -2010
50
50
m
IL
40
40
u
2163
- - -- -
- - --
- - -- �.r
-- — ♦— Bed Elevation XS5 -2009
30
30
M'
20
20
- -• --
Bed Elevation XS5 -2008
10
10
0
0
ip N N O N V
'- O N
ui W M -w � M O w m N W- 'D .�-i N y O DO
✓1 I� �--� N
2162
-' -Bed Elevation X55 -2007
O ,.y
V VI Vl O ti
'-I rl N M I O O O
O vl �p M V t O 0o O 6 N '� N N
0
20
40
60
oo w pl 00 1I1 lD V
a0°�
N M N O
Station (ft)
Particle Size (mm) ~
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE dS0 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS5
2007
MY4
RIFFLE
5.24
2.21
0.42
XS5
2008
MY5 <0.062 0.09
XS5
2008
MY5
RIFFLE
4.73
0.81
0.17
XS5
2009
MY6 <0.062 0.125
XS5
2009
MY6
RIFFLE
7.75
4.05
0.52
XS5
2010
MY7
RIFFLE
4.77
2.14
0.45
XS5
2010
MY7 <0.062 0.062
County Line (175) March 2011 -Year 7
m
�Aebrnrs, Yic
i
xss 2oto
� �
� �
� X552009
� X55 2008
,.' -
- - - - - -- xss zoio
i
- - - - - -- XSS 2009
. � -
- - - - - -- X55 2008
i�
�Aebrnrs, Yic

2160
2155
- 2150
G
O
W 2145
2140
2135
2950
3000 3050 3100 3150 3200 3250 3300 3350 3400 3450 3500
Station (ft)
— • - — 2007 BED ELEVATION o BANKFULL 2010 BED ELEVATION
- - - - 2010 WATER SURFACE - - - - 2009 BED ELEVATION — — 2008 BED ELEVATION
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 "MY+
m F tdArori� Maga
o_
COUNTY LINE STREAM THALWEG PROFILE 2010 -LOWER
Water Surface Slope
y = - 0.0242x + 2227.5
Bankfull Slope
_
_
! -
E3 b
0243x+ 2228.6
i
-
-
- i
--
-
13
r
o
[_
t
-
-
-
-
— - XS -3
-
- - --
XS -�
-
3000 3050 3100 3150 3200 3250 3300 3350 3400 3450 3500
Station (ft)
— • - — 2007 BED ELEVATION o BANKFULL 2010 BED ELEVATION
- - - - 2010 WATER SURFACE - - - - 2009 BED ELEVATION — — 2008 BED ELEVATION
County Line (175) March 2011 — Year 7 "MY+
m F tdArori� Maga

2152
2151
P AIR
w
�, 2149
c
0
m
a,
W
2148
2147
2146
W Water Surface Elevation XS3 -
2010
t Bankfull Elevation XS3 -2010
.•. Bed Elevation XS3 -2010
-�- Bed Elevation XS3 -2009
- - - Bed Elevation XS3 -2008
-•- Bed Elevation XS3 -2007
5 I
I
r.�
f -T
I/
r �
� r
I/
/
Nr
2145
100
LUU
.1.
- - -- - - --
0
% 30
20
40
90
Station (ft)
90
ID
i
PHASE
FACET TYPE Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
XS3
2003
MY1
POOL
16.50
10.33
0.63
XS3
2004
MY2
POOL
11.75
13.43
1.14
XS3
2005
MY3
POOL
13.79
13.81
1.00
XS3
2007
MY4
POOL
7.34
3.06
0.42
XS3
2008
MY5
POOL
5.66
1.99
0.35
XS3
2009
MY6
POOL
8.18
4.21
0.51
XS3
2010
MY7
POOL
5.76
3.81
0.66
N
O
1 i i i
�
I
'am-+
1.7
I
1 ' / - -♦
-:
- - - - - -- %532010
2145
100
LUU
0
% 30
20
40
90
Station (ft)
90
ID
YEAR
PHASE
FACET TYPE Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
XS3
2003
MY1
POOL
16.50
10.33
0.63
XS3
2004
MY2
POOL
11.75
13.43
1.14
XS3
2005
MY3
POOL
13.79
13.81
1.00
XS3
2007
MY4
POOL
7.34
3.06
0.42
XS3
2008
MY5
POOL
5.66
1.99
0.35
XS3
2009
MY6
POOL
8.18
4.21
0.51
XS3
2010
MY7
POOL
5.76
3.81
0.66
County Line (175) March 2011 - Year 7
N V1 O O N O 1\ w M 10 10 N 0 V O 00 O w N N O 00 00
5D N N V1 N M V 10 m N 00 to l0 .ti N V O
O N r1 N u1 t\ N N '-I 1l N M VI O O O
N M N tD N 1f1 V
N N N N~ 013 � 1D N M r l O 00 O l0 N N^
10 N N O5 N w N l0 N O
O 1 N N M Yl O
N
Particle Size (mm)
ID YEAR PHASE d50 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS3 2004(S) MY2 0.30 7.15
XS3 2004 (W) MY2 0.09 0.22
XS3 2007 MY4 3.17 35.6
XS3 2008 MY5 0.25 11.66
XS3 2009 MY6 11.3 45
XS3 2010 MY7 0.5 11.3
LE" :4A"."W kr-
100
LUU
% 30
133333333333333 %352010
90
90
80
1
3333333333333333 Ns3 zoos
80
/
1
%5 32001
70
70
/
1
I
1 I
/
%53(5)2000
60
60
O
1 •• - - - -./
/
N53)W)200N
N
O
1 i i i
i
'am-+
1.7
rJ(]
1 ' / - -♦
-:
- - - - - -- %532010
50
A
d75
1
- - - ---- %532009
E
t=
40
1 ,/ _
40
N
"I •
1
- - - - - -- %532009
U
/
30
------- M32 W1
30
I
- - - - - -- 115315)2001
20
20
�
i I
N53(W)2000
�
10
10
0
0
N V1 O O N O 1\ w M 10 10 N 0 V O 00 O w N N O 00 00
5D N N V1 N M V 10 m N 00 to l0 .ti N V O
O N r1 N u1 t\ N N '-I 1l N M VI O O O
N M N tD N 1f1 V
N N N N~ 013 � 1D N M r l O 00 O l0 N N^
10 N N O5 N w N l0 N O
O 1 N N M Yl O
N
Particle Size (mm)
ID YEAR PHASE d50 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS3 2004(S) MY2 0.30 7.15
XS3 2004 (W) MY2 0.09 0.22
XS3 2007 MY4 3.17 35.6
XS3 2008 MY5 0.25 11.66
XS3 2009 MY6 11.3 45
XS3 2010 MY7 0.5 11.3
LE" :4A"."W kr-

2151
.� Water Surface Elevation XS4 -2010
2150
t Bankfull Elevation X54 -2010
2149
t Bed Elevation X54 - 2009
- - �- - Bed Elevation XS4 -2008
�
2148
- -•- -Bed Elevation XS4 -2007
2147
�•� Bed Elevatio X54- 2010
•"
�`
2146
c
0
m
4
'
>
w 2145
100
.
i� -
100
90
- M42010
90
:r
� � xss 2o0s
-
2144
I
r
70
• ; � xs•20m
70
�r
2143
3
so
, : .
rSr(wp2
60
w
0
W50
-�
' - - - - - -- r 2010
50
10
, ,
------- Z4 2009
E
2142
m
m
40
•
- - - - - -- x 2ma
40
0
u
r
30
------- u tam
30
Z.
20
L
------- ue(s)zooe
20
2141
- - - - - -- XS4 (W)2004
10
10
0 0
2140
N u V o o N d w
Ny N
m O D N V V O w O lO N N O w w
O
V N Oil ~ V N
ti N M d' O w 0 1L1 N n
0
20
40
N N
0�
00
N m.N
-I�NMNO
Station
(ft)
Particle Size (mm) ~
ID
YEAR PHASE FACET TYPE
Wbkf
Abkf
Dbkf
ID
YEAR
PHASE d50 (mm) d84 (mm)
XS4
2003 MY1 POOL
9.57
13.90
1.45
XS4
2004(S)
MY2 0.16 2.91
XS4
2004 MY2 POOL
10.85
20.11
1.85
XS4
2004 (W)
MY2 3.31 28.50
XS4
2005 MY3 POOL
11.85
13.61
1.15
XS4
2007 MY4 POOL
12.25
8.44
0.69
X54
2007
MY4 3.56 32.00
XS4
2008 MY5 POOL
11.91
7.56
0.63
XS4
2008
MY5 16.00 39.26
XS4
2009 MY6 POOL
14.78
25.35
1.71
XS4
2009
MY6 0.5
16
XS4
2010 MY7 POOL
11.31
10.32
0.91
XS4
2010
MY7 16
32
County Line (175) March 2011 —Year 7 Con ==kr-

2271
- - --
-- - - - - --
- —
w Water Surface Elevation XS6 -2010
+Bankfull Elevation XS6 -2010
2270
—• —Bed Elevation 2010
I
-
Bed Elevation XS6 -2009
—+— Bed Elevation XS6 -AB
2269
- - --
I
2268
>
a
-- - --
/
W
• .................
2267
--
- - - -- --
1
2266
—
— - - - - - --
2265
i
0
20
40
Station
(ft)
Legend
— Stream Channel Profile -AB Centerline Channel Structures Function
• Monitoring Cross - Section O Not Assessed
ID YEAR PHASE FACET TYPE Wbkf Abkf Dbkf
XS6 2003 AB RIFFLE 10.1 2.73 0.27
XS6
2009 MY6 RIFFLE 8.6
2.78
0.32
Structures
�
• Missing
• Failing
XS6
2010 MY7 RIFFLE 9.4
4.48
0.48
Log Vane
Poor
Q Rock A -Vane
O Fair
'%f Rock Cross -Vane
® Good
• Excellent
County Line (175) March 2011 -Year 7 rdAMOdres,
Con =+w�
Con