20160372 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2020 (Stream)_20210225

Mitigation Project Information Upload
Type of Mitigation Project:* g Stream ❑Wetlands ❑ Buffer ❑ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or New 0 Yes !3 No
Site?*
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Lindsay Crocker Email Address:* [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing 20160372 Existing 1
(DWR)ID#:* (nurrbersonty...nodash) Version:* (nurrbersony)
Project Name:* Stony Fork
Project Type:* O DMS O Mitigation Bank
County:* Johnston
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Stony_Fork_97085_MY2_2020.pdf 29.94MB
Rease upload only one Ft7F of the corrplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature:* Cq
oeffddgeie
Date 02/25/2021

Monitoring Report MY02
Stony Fork Restoration Site
Upper Neuse River Basin - 03020201
Monitoring Year 02
DMS Contract 6830
DMS Project Number 97085
DWR#: 2016-0372
USACE Action ID: 2016-00875
Johnston County, North Carolina
41
_ ;
'-'•%,' ' '' r ,VW - _ ?,* *,1 1.„ L , ' ^ ',, '1,
-4:= ,1,',410`
k` - , i R f k
R y R
_ 1 I
1 .
I
Prepared for:
NCDMS, 1652 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1652
Monitoring Data Collected: 2020
Date Submitted: January 2021

Monitoring and Design Firm
Prepared by:
111
KCI
TECHNOLOGIES
mop-
KCIETC
KCI ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSOCIATES OF NC TECHNOLOGIES AND CONSTRUCTION INC.
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
[phone]
Project Contact: Tim Morris
Email: tim.morris(a,kci.com
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 2020-MY02

KCI ASSOCIATES OF N ORTH C AROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

MEMORANDUM

Date: February 24, 2021
To: Lindsay Crocker, DMS Project Manager
From: Tim Morris, Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Subject: MY-02 Monitoring Report Comments
Stony Fork DMS #6830, Contract 006830
Neuse River Basin CU 030202018
Johnston County, North Carolina

Please find below our responses in italics to the MY-02 Monitoring Report comments from NCDMS
received on February 2, 2021 for the Stony Fork Restoration Site.

1. There was ATV encroachment and evidence of trails throughout portions of the easement, along
with visual evidence of ATV activity during the DMS site visit. This encroachment should be
eliminated by working with the landowner. Please reach out to DMS Property and/or Stewardship
if you need assistance with this effort, including suggestions for additional signage, etc. There
should be a formal letter or memo documenting notification to the landowner to ensure this is
handled in the future. Please provide that documentation to DMS.
KCI Response: KCI first noted the evidence of ATV encroachment on June 5, 2020. At this time,
the landowner was alerted of the issue. KCI monitored this area for continued trespass at each
site visit after it was first noted and as of December 8, 2020 no evidence of further trespass was
noted. At a site visit on February 9, 2021, fresh ATV tracks were noted entering the easement
from the end of Sherrill Farm Dr. The landowner has been informed of this encroachment and the
letter that was sent to him has been included at the end of the report.

2. Please also document the extent of the encroachment on the CCPV map and measure the area to
be reported on the visual assessment table 6 (#5 Easement Encroachment Areas).
KCI Response: The extent of the ATV encroachment was surveyed with a handheld GPS on
February 9, 2021 and the CCPV and visual assessment table have been updated to show the
encroachment.

3. Resubmit the buffer features, ensuring that they are organized as they are presented in the asset
table. Previous digital submissions of these features do not appear to match the square footage
reported in the asset table.
KCI Response: The correct buffer features have been submitted with the digital deliverables.

4. Digital review of SF3 does not match the asset table (691 ft vs. 624 ft) from the Mitigation Plan.
This possibly an issue with the crossing not being removed (as footnoted on the asset table).
Please segment this feature or provide the correct geometry for the SF3 that is equal to the
creditable stream length (624).

E NGINEERS • S CIENTISTS • S URVEYORS • C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
KCI Response: The submitted shapefile contained the section of stream that a restoration level of
work was performed on, but which did not generate any credit due to the limited buffer width.
These segments of the stream have been marked as "No Credit."
Sincerely,
Tim Morris
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Summary 1
Monitoring Results 2
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map 4
References 5
Appendix A— Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits 7
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History 8
Table 3. Project Contacts 9
Table 4. Project Information 10
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
CCPV 13
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment 18
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment 24
Photo Reference Points 25
Permanent Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos 29
Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos 32
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species 34
Appendix D — Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary 38
Table 9. Cross-section Morphology Data Table 46
Cross-section Plots 49
Pebble Counts 65
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Bankfull Verification and Precipitation Plot 74
Table 10. Verification of Stream Flow 75
Table 11. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment 75
Stream Flow Verification and Precipitation Plots 77
Appendix F — Additional Information
Notice of Easement Violation 81
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 2020-MY02

PROJECT SUMMARY
The Stony Fork Restoration Site (SFRS) was completed in May 2019 and restored a total of 6,810 linear
feet of stream and 949,747 square feet of riparian buffer under the Neuse Buffer Rule (NCAC Rule 15A
02B.029). The SFRS is a riparian system in the Upper Neuse River Basin (03020201 8-digit cataloging
unit) in Johnston County, North Carolina. The site's natural hydrologic regime had been substantially
modified through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream channels, impacted by land
clearing, and cleared of any riparian buffer. This completed project will restore impacted agricultural and
timber lands to a stable stream ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer and floodplain access.
The SFRS is protected by a 24.4 acre permanent conservation easement,held by the State of North Carolina.
The site is located approximately 5.5 miles north of Benson,NC. Specifically,the site is 0.2 mile west on
Elevation Road from its intersection with Federal Road(SR-1331).
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program(NCEEP)published the Neuse River Basin Priorities
in 2010. These were updated in for the Neuse 01 cataloging unit(CU) in 2015 due to extensive mitigation
needs and changes in watershed conditions since 2010. The project 14 digit CU (03020201150010) was
identified as a Targeted Local Watershed(TLW) in the updated priorities. The goals and priorities for the
SFRS are based on the information presented in the Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities: maintaining
and enhancing water quality,restoring hydrology, and improving fish and wildlife habitat(NCEEP, 2009).
The project will support the following basin priorities:
- Managing stormwater runoff
- Improving/restoring riparian buffers
- Reducing sediment loading
- Improving stream stability
The goals for the project are to:
- Restore channelized and agriculture impacted streams to stable C/Cb channels.
- Restore a forested riparian buffer to provide bank stability, filtration, and shading.
The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives:
- Relocate a channelized stream to its historic landscape position.
- Install cross-sections sized to the bankfull discharge.
- Create bedform diversity with pools,riffles, and habitat structures
- Plant the site with native trees and shrubs and an herbaceous seed mix.
Project planting and construction were completed in May 2019. The SFRS involved restoration and
establishment of a functioning stream ecosystem with 6,810 linear feet of stream restored by re-meandering
the stream and by tying the bankfull elevation to the historic floodplain where feasible. The entire site was
planted to establish a forested riparian buffer. The site was constructed as designed with no major
modifications from the design plan. The monitoring components were installed in May 2019. Four
automatica recording pressure transducer stream gauges that take a reading every 10 minutes were installed
in the upper third of Ti, T1-A, T2 and T3 to document flow within those reaches. Cameras were installed
in the vicinity of each of these gauges and set to record a short video once a day to provide additional
verification of flow.An additional automatic recording pressure transducer stream gauge was installed near
the bottom of the main stem(SF3)to record the occurrence of bankfull events. To determine the success of
the planted mitigation areas, seven 10 m x 10 m permanent vegetation monitoring plots were established.
An additional five 10 m x 10 m random vegetation monitoring plots were sampled as well. The locations
of the planted stems relative to the origin were recorded within the permanent plots and the species and
height of each planted stem were recorded for all plots. Any volunteers found within the plots were also
grouped into size categories by species, but separate from the planted stems. Twelve permanent photo
reference points were established and will be taken annually. Sixteen permanent cross-sections(eight riffle
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 1 2020-MY02

cross-sections and eight pool cross-sections)were also established and a detailed longitudinal profile of the
stream was taken. Wolman pebble counts were performed at all of the riffle cross-sections. The cross-
section measurements will be repeated in future monitoring years,but the longitudinal profile will only be
repeated if there are concerns about bed elevation adjustments. Reports will be submitted to DMS each
year.
Vegetative success criteria for the stream mitigation is 260 woody stems/acre after five years, and 210
woody stems/acre after seven years. Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5 and ten
feet in height at Year 7.Volunteer species must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons and must
be a species from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success. A single species may not
account for more than 50% of the required number of stems within any plot. A minimum of four bankfull
events must also be recorded during the monitoring period. All project streams must show a minimum of
30 continuous days of flow within a calendar year for three out of the first four years of monitoring. Bank
height ratios(BHR) should not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratios(ER) should be 2.2 or greater. BHR
and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not change more than 10%from the baseline condition
during any given monitoring interval(e.g. no more than 10%between years 1 and 2,2 and 3, 3 and 5, or 5
and 7).Visual assessments will also be used to identify problem areas.
Vegetative success criteria for the areas proposed for riparian buffer credit is 260 woody stems/acre at the
end of five years of monitoring.Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5.There should
be a minimum of four native hardwood tree species,with no species accounting for greater than 50%of the
stems. Volunteer species must be from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success.
MONITORING RESULTS
The second-year vegetation monitoring was conducted between September 2 and September 4, 2020. The
site averaged 573 planted stems/acre across all 12 plots. Eleven of the twelve plots had greater than 260
planted stems/acre. Including volunteers,the site averaged 782 total stems/acre. The plot that did not meet
the success criteria(Plot#5) is located near the bottom of Reach T2-1. Since this reach is an Enhancement
II reach,the work that was done here was much less extensive than other areas of the site and the majority
of the mature trees in this area were left intact. This area has canopy coverage and there are many mature
trees both in and around this plot.In general the site is well vegetated,with widespread herbaceous coverage
and healthy planted stems.
The stream gauge near the bottom of SF3 recorded eight bankfull events in 2020. All four stream flow
gauges recorded at least 30 consecutive days of flow.All four of the gauges recorded flow for the entirety
of the period that they recorded. This consisted of a period of 96 consecutive days from January 1 to April
5, and a period of 152 consecutive days from June 3 to November 1. The gap between April 5 and June 3
was caused by a gauge malfunction but based on the rainfall pattern and previous year's data it is likely that
the streams were all flowing during this period as well. The cameras on T 1 and T3 either were obscured or
malfunctioned throughout the majority of the year, but the camera on T 1 A recorded a maximum of 183
consecutive days of flow before being obscured by vegetation growth. The camera on T2 recorded a
maximum of 53 days before malfunctioning. Camera malfunctions have been repaired for MY03.
The second-year cross-section survey was completed between June 18 and 28, 2020 and found that the
dimensions of the stream are as designed, with some small variation as is typical for stream restoration
projects. Cross-section 9, located on T3, showed about six inches of aggradation. This reach received a
large amount of sediment input during 2020 from portions of the stream located upstream of the project
reaches.This section of the project will be monitored to ensure that this sediment washes through the system
in the coming monitoring years. The monitored cross-section data have been calculated by adjusting the
bankfull elevation to maintain the baseline bankfull area for each cross-section.
Stony Fork Restoration Site KC Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 2 2020-MY02

During a site visit on June 5,2020,ATV tracks entering the easement were noted.These tracks entered the
easement from the end of Sherrill Farm Dr., turned northeast for approximately 500 feet before turning
around and traveling along the northern edge of the easement until exiting the site along the relic farm road
that runs parallel to Sherrill Farm Dr.At this time,the landowner was alerted of the issue and KCI monitored
this area for continued trespass.As of December 8,2020 no evidence of further trespass was noted but at a
site visit on February 9,2021,fresh ATV tracks were noted. These tracks ran from the end of Sherrill Farm
Rd. to the relic farm road and did not turn northeast, as the original ones had. The landowner has been
issued a formal notice of violation, which is included in Appendix F—Additional Information. Please see
Appendix B—Visual Assessment Data for further information.
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 3 2020-MY02

v
NASH I
WAKE 1
WILSON \
-..1 Black Cree \
JOHNSTON ,/* �a \
�\e J ,\o�
HARNETT AYNE *
(Y
SAMPSON 40 L_
a)
ID
a)
u..
1
\ ,,,,
Sot
\ 301
I
. ------(
95
44166
BENSON
u
.TI
7 \ /i._ r / , ,
FIGURE 1. VICINITY MAP, STONY FORK RESTORATION SITE, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
. 41
Project Site Location Major Roads f Airports(none within a 5-mi radius) N 0 0.5 1
KC I . County Boundary Minor Roads Major Rivers and Streams Miles
ASSOCIATES OF NC Cities and Towns

REFERENCES
NCDEQ,Division of Mitigation Services.March 2015. 2015 Neuse 03020201 Priorities. Last
accessed at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=340a3 f58-336b-42bf-bab2-
fb663cbfd78d&groupId=60329
NCDENR,Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014.NCDENR,Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines.Last
accessedl/2016 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_1_id=60409&folderld=18877169
&name=DLFE-86604.pdf
NCDENR,Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
Guidelines. Last accessed 6/2015 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=60409&folderld=18877169
&name=DLFE-86606.pdf
NC Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2010.NC Wetland Assessment Method(NC WAM)
User Manual,version 4.1. Last accessed 11/2012 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=76f3 c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-
45 b7faf06f4c&groupld=3 83 64
Schafale,M.P. and A.S.Weakley. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Fourth Approximation.Natural Heritage Program,Division of Parks and Recreation,
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,NC.
Soil Survey Staff,Natural Resources Conservation Service,United States Department of
Agriculture. Soil Survey of Johnston County, North Carolina. 1994
Stony Fork Restoration Site KC Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 5 2020-MY02

APPENDIX A
Background Tables
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 6 2020-MY02

Table 1.Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Mitigation Credits
Riparian Non-riparian Nitrogen Phosphorous
Stream Wetland Wetland Buffer Nutrient Nutrient
Offset Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE R REMilir
Linear 6,405 405 450,285 sf 499,462 sf
Feet/Acres
Credits 6,405 181 425,434 59,904
TOTAL 6,586 480,338
CREDITS
Project Components
Project Restoration
Existing Approach MP As-built
Component Stationing/ -or- Mitigation
Footage/ (PI PII Restoration Restoration
-or- Location Ratio
Square Footage etc.) Restoration Footage* Footage
Reach ID Equivalent
SF1 10+00-21+55 1,235 PI/PII R 1,155 1,155 1:1
SF2 21+55—49+54 2,453 PI R 2,707** 2,714** 1:1
SF3 49+54—56+08 618 PI R 624** 624** 1:1
T1 100+00-105+10 365 PI/PII R 510 510 1:1
T1A 150+00-151+59 47 PI/PII R 159 159 1:1
12-1 200+00—203+34 327 N/A EII 334 334 2.5:1
T2-2 203+34—206+71 326 PI/PII R 337 337 1:1
12-3 206+71—215+26 780 PI/PII R 855 855 1:1
T3-1 300+00—300+71 72 PI/PII EI 71 71 1.5:1
T3-2 300+71—301+29 82 PI/PII R 58 58 1:1
Buffer
Restoration N/A 413,194 N/A R 413,194 413,194 100%
TOB to 100'
Buffer
Restoration N/A 37,091 N/A R 37,091 37,091 33%
101-200'
Buffer
Enhancement N/A 74,802 N/A E 74,802 74,802 50%
TOB to 100'
Buffer
Preservation N/A 424,660 N/A P 424,660 424,660 10%
TOB to 100'
*Mitigation Plan footage used for credit calculations.**Crossings have been removed from creditable linear footage for all project streams
Stony Fork Restoration Site KC I Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 7 2020-MY02

Component Summation
Stream Riparian Wetlands Non-Riparian
Restoration Level (linear feet) (Acres) Wetlands Buffer(square feet)
(Acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration _ 6,405 450,285
Enhancement 74,802
Enhancement I 71
Enhancement II 334
AILMAS
Creation
Preservation 424,660
175,029 allowable for credit
High Quality
1111
Preservation
TOTAL CREDITS 6,586 l 480,338
Table 2. Project Activity&Reporting History
Stony Fork Restoration Sites,DMS Project#97085
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or
Deliver
Mitigation Plan September 5,2018
Final Design-Construction Plans Oct. 15,2018
Construction Grading Completed May 3,2019
Planting Completed May 6 2019
Baseline Monitoring/Report May 2019 July 2018
Vegetation Monitoring May 9,2019111
Stream Survey May 15,2019
Year 1 Monitoring November 2019 January 2020
Vegetation Monitoring November 5,2019
Stream Survey November 11,2019
Year 2 Monitoring November 2020 January 2021
Vegetation Monitoring September 4,2020
Stream Survey June 29,2020
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 8 2020-MY02

Table 3.Project Contacts
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact: Mr.Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor Fluvial Solutions,Inc.
Stony Fork and T3 PO Box 28749
Raleigh,NC 27611
Contact: Mr.Peter Jelenevsky
Phone: [phone]
Construction Contractor KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction
Ti,T1A,and T2 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact: Mr.Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor Bruton Natural Systems,Inc.
PO Box 1197
Fremont,NC 27830
Contact: Mr.Charlie Bruton
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact:Mr.Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 9 2020-MY02

Table 4.Project Information
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Project Name Stony Fork Restoration Site
County Johnston County
Project Area(acres) 24.4 acres
Project Coordinates(lat.and long.) 35°26'55.0"N,78°31'18.5"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Coastal Plain
River Basin Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020201 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03020201150010
DWQ Sub-basin 03-04-04
Project Drainage Area(acres) 497 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of 5%
Impervious Area
Managed Herbaceous Cover 53%(262 ac),Mixed Hardwoods/Conifers 31%(150 ac),Low
CGIA Land Use Classification Density Developed 9%(42 ac),Medium Density Residential 5%(24 ac),
Transportation/Impervious 3%(13 ac)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters Stony Fork T1 and T1A T2 T3
Length of reach(linear feet) 3,141 412 1,433 154
Drainage area(acres) 497 12 150 29
Perennial,Intermittent,Ephemeral Perennial Intermittent Perennial Intermittent
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification C;NSW C;NSW C;NSW C;NSW
Stream Classification(exisiting) G4c G4 G4 G4
Stream Classifcation(proposed) C4 C4 C4 C4
Evolutionary trend(Simon) Channelized,Stage III Channelized,Stage III Channelized,Stage III Modified with
pond,Stage III
FEMA classification None None None None
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Size of Wetland(acres) 0.33(WA and WE) 0.06(WB) 0.14(WC and WF)
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Bottomland Hardwood Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Forest
Mapped Soil Series Gilead sandy loam Bibb sandy loam Bibb sandy loam
Drainage class Moderately Well Poorly Drained Poorly Drained
Drained
Soil Hydric Status Non-hydric Hydric Hydric
Source of Hydrology Surface Water Stream Floodplain Stream Floodplain
Restoration or Enhancement Method N/A N/A N/A
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 10 2020-MY02

Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section Yes Yes 404 permit
404
Waters of the United States — Section Yes Yes 401 permit
401
Endangered Species Act No N/A N/A
Historic Preservation Act No N/A N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/Coastal Area Management Act No N/A N/A
(CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No Yes
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 11 2020-MY02

APPENDIX B
Visual Assessment Data
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 12 2020-MY02

Stream Mitigation _ Project Easement �._ •� - , •r,,„il OW
R (6,405 If/6,405 SMCs) Easement Encroachment -. — '
ID �_ L. • *.
El (71 If/47 SMCs) - - - • Cross-Sections ^• ,II -
•
Ell (334 If/134 SMCs) �,`{ Photo Points l'� �_ �- ,
Buffer Mitigation • Flow Gauge -- 4• —
R 0-100' (413,194 sf/413,194 credits) Camera - I ' 2-2 �.• l
I x��r
R 101-200' (37,091 sf/12,240 credits) • Bankfull Gauge R . T2-1 ..�,.; / •
E (74,802 sf/37,401 credits) Vegetation Monitoring Plots - +pis* . np
P (424,660 sf/17,503 credits) Success Criteria Met — 0 �k M ©, T+ ,, h `+
Success Criteria Not Met I - IP
t c 77 , 1
-;;r, Sheet 4 I
I t - •
.rj1Y 1`- T2-3 • n 4 .
Y
- • � I SF3
- - 111 mot. I
,' ` __ ' _ - •
- Sheet 3
-= • .i
y
_„ _s-• - �
�� `
it .;--- - .- ••6' I .♦
fi' T1 T1A I �" �`- �"
s I _ _• n ,i `,
tie.
I°. ..„--- .
IPIP:
I �. Sheet 2
Sheet 1 lek ,- .
T3-1 /T3-2 ♦ ' -
SF2 ,r' '
•
I�♦ ,
l
e \Start SF1
I_Iii,dro .1
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW N Overview
iy 0 150 300 STONY FORK RESTORATION SITE Source:Google Earth,2018
ion C
Feet JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC

• Stream Mitigation II Project Easement
• - R (6,405 I f/6,405 SMCs) Easement Encroachment
r
• • El (71 If/47 SMCs) - - - . Cross-Sections
. Ell (334 If/134 SMCs) ' Photo Points
Y(_
" - .'` it T 1 A Buffer Mitigation • Flow Gauge
R 0-100' (413,194 sf/413,194 credits) Camera
.• . Ilk li 1 ,
•` _ •-%. '' � , *V R 101-200' (37,091 sf/12,240 credits) • Bankfull Gauge
♦ e�` r �. Vegetation MonitoringPlots
*.' xo E (74,802 sf/37,401 credits) 9
. ' 1 >t, ♦� 1.11
. N P (424,660 sf/17,503 credits) _ Success Criteria Met
ixv.1 ! �• •, • - _ - Success Criteria Not Met
li
wil ir det . . . a VI ":..11111)1 x
o
. '...15r,sp, 4e.
•
Ati: .-
e. vit k ,'
2 41:1113PIP !\ii,,,
e .
....
i-♦ pr
.• � � .... ♦ -14 ��� oO ice• • r�
r + 1 ,I _ t ;� 1, r „02. • R5 Ir r� " , ili, +
Po
• obi i •
1 fir -
irk
/111-4117,10111P‘
i -T..- jil
s . PII .:11. 4.4 %. -ie . . 1111110‘.. • •
it 44,4:* '4 -YIP •_,•# 8 . ...Balt -
.• . *17-Ntik,jp
- = A* .- %No. Atvit 4iss ,
. a c', • xp0 �'♦ • 0
1
• oo+sd. o R3 •�' Y N o
T3-1a o .�. , xkb
Z a .♦ 8 R2
x
ii>
♦
- P i .f
...• 40101111111010,-
_ 10 `♦ �• - • 1 3+
•
O ♦♦ t
\\\
I -
Start S F 1 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW N SHEET 1 of 4
0 50 100 STONY FORK RESTORATION SITE Source:Google Earth,2018
acumIt
� Feet JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC9

1 Stream Mitigation II Project Easement
�. • .. e R (6,405 If/6,405 SMCs) Easement Encroachment
e .- Jib
El (71 If/47 SMCs) - - - Cross Sections
~ Ell (334/f/134 SMCs) `{ Photo Points
..I - �'�... Buffer Mitigation • Flow Gauge
'f t�� R 0-100' (413,194 sf/413,194 credits) Camera
•
Ilk" R 101-200' (37,091 sf/12,240 credits) • Bankfull Gauge
. ` 00+1 . E (74,802 sf/37,401 credits) Vegetation Monitoring Plots
o P (424,660 sf/17,503 credits) _ Success Criteria Met
�, o - J Success Criteria Not Met
AMMO • ,- ° 11
J
a
4. J '! NI- •
a& 2111111rr 4, , -
dr /.h i4 . lr
C 1
J ." /f `
ot . ; 41• . ' _ ,.•'.! t..
%. '1 * Imo`. •
S e l w---
li
00
16., ,
x0
1
44,
- k...._ 111111411% .1
00 . ,:fl 111.1 01.16, .
i ;
L 4. • 1
00 .o
cbc:2 . e, Ny -4 .
+ __. , . „, ...,
,fix N .11-
• 1 00
• p x!
4.)11111411- Ole
o •
0 .
t 014
• , , 2
• �
¢. -� • `� �t —
4.. CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW N SHEET 2 of 4
6.
v • 0 50 100 STONY FORK RESTORATION SITE
k ` *' �+` r - • ` �� Feet JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC Source Google Earth,2018

^_
^_
T2-3
SF3
42+0041+0056+0055+0054+0053+0052+0051+0050+0048+0047+0046+0045+0044+0043+00214+0021 3 +00
2 1 2 +0 0211+00210+00209+0049+00215+00208+00207+0020 6 +0 0
6
5 75
6 816157
6
3
R4
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
Source: Google Earth, 2018
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW STONY FORK RESTORATION SITEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC ±0 10050Feet
Stream Mitigation
R (6,405 lf / 6,405 SMCs)
EI (71 lf / 47 SMCs)
EII (334 lf / 134 SMCs)
Buffer Mitigation
R 0-100'(413,194 sf / 413,194 credits)
R 101-200'(37,091 sf / 12,240 credits)
E (74,802 sf / 37,401 credits)
P (424,660 sf / 17,503 credits)
Project Easement
Easement Encroachment
Cross-Sections
^_Photo Points
Flow Gauge
Camera
Bankfull Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Met
SHEET 3 of 4
Stream Mitigation II Project Easement
, - - — R (6,405If/6,405 SMCs) Easement Encroachment
1r aiiik- - .
_. o El (71 If/47 SMCs) - - - . Cross-Sections
_ .` - • oo -2 Ell (334 If/134 SMCs) `{ Photo Points
•
2 • N_' • ,�xoo
o Buffer Mitigation • Flow Gauge
•� o - R 0-100' (413,194 sf/413,194 credits) Camera
o
O,LkO� NM - R 101-200' (37,091 sf/12,240 credits) • Bankfull Gauge
\'� ' 4 _ E (74,802 sf/37,401 credits) Vegetation Monitoring Plots
e .
• * , '�• �,a+ P (424,660 sf/17,503 credits)
_ Success Criteria Met
5 Success Criteria Not Met
...I, ,
2O4,(oO ,9+
thik;:a. .--: -...-,-
-
•
Srs`
. , .4 . i iiiii;
II �I - -% '28y.00 -t t
i .4
e.
, . ,
-
__ o
" 206+00 6 p
r •Pilill 0
ti
o p _
N p
• o N -• I '
•` • (
�``T2-3 •
NL .
• tit L
w ♦ l
p 1UNI MC f .212+00
,•
` - 213+00
• ,tom `. ,t
•
,, 1,W-L, . .11 l'i A -/ . 4 lir I-‘ %. 1 t 14 *,4 k. . 1r ,. . 0 . 0 Xett ',..., ,1
CTA lir 1 ' 11144 \'‘ \ . '' ile.m. . t?.*- r t; 0
aY N is 1 • , R4 ♦♦ oo .
IP
1041. -
illi
6 jois 7
` 11, CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW N SHEET 4 of 4
• `fir 0 50 100 STONY FORK RESTORATION SITE
• L r C Feet
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC Source Google Earth,2018

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Reach ID SF1
Assessed Length 1,155
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
flow laterally(not to include point bars)
(Riffle and Run units) 2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 18 18 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 17 17 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 17 17 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 17 17 100%
4.Thalweg Position
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 17 17 100%
MID i
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 5 5 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 5 5 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 5 5 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 5 5 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining.Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull °
4.Habitat Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 5 5 100/o
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 18 2020-MY02

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Reach ID SF2
Assessed Length 2,802
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1.Vertical Stability 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect 0 0 100%
flow laterally(not to include point bars)
(Riffle and Run units) 2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 36 36 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 35 35 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 35 35 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 35 35 100%
4.Thalweg Position
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 35 35 100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100%
_ scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 8 8 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 8 8 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 8 8 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 8 8 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 19 2020-MY02

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Reach ID SF3
Assessed Length 618
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect °
1.Vertical Stability flow laterally(not to include point bars) 0 0 100/o
(Riffle and Run units) 2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 9 9 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 8 8 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 8 8 ■ 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 8 8 100%
4.Thalweg Position
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 8 8 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 1 1 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 1 1 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 1 1 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 1 1 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining.Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 1 1 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 20 2020-MY02

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Reach ID T1
Assessed Length 365
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect °
1.Vertical Stability flow laterally(not to include point bars) 0 0 100/o
(Riffle and Run units) 2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 13 13 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 12 12 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 12 12 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 12 12 100%
4.Thalweg Position
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 12 12 100%
2.Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
1.Scoured/Eroding 0 0 100%
_ scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 4 4 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 4 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 4 4 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull 4 4 100%
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 21 2020-MY02

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Reach ID T2
Assessed Length 1,433
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect I o
1.Vertical Stability 0 0 100/o flow laterally(not to include point bars)
(Riffle and Run units) 2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 27 27 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 26 26 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 26 26 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 26 26 100%
4.Thalweg Position
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 26 26 100%
1
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
_ scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 7 7 100%
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 7 7 100%
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 7 7 100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection 7 7 100%
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining—Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull °
4.Habitat Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow. 7 7 100/o
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 22 2020-MY02

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Reach ID T3
Assessed Length 154
Number Stable, Number of Amount of %Stable,
Major Channel Channel Performing as Total Number Unstable Unstable Performing as
Category Sub-Category Metric Intended in As-built Segments Footage Intended
1.Bed 1. Aggradation-Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect u
1.Vertical Stability flow laterally(not to include point bars) 0 0 100/o
(Riffle and Run units) 2. Degradation-Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2.Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate-Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
3.Meander Pool 1. Depth Sufficient(Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull Depth>1.6) 2 2 100%
Condition 2. Length appropriate(>30%of centerline distance between tail of 2 2 ■ 100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
1.Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run) 2 2 100%
4.Thalweg Position
2.Thalweg centering at downstream of meander(Glide) 2 2 100%
2.Bank 1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or 0 0 100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2.Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
3.Mass Wasting Bank slumping,calving,or collapse 0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
3.Engineered 1.Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. N/A N/A N/A
Structures
2.Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. N/A N/A N/A
2a.Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. N/A N/A N/A
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3.Bank Protection N/A N/A N/A
15%.(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4.Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining.Max Pool Depth:Mean Bankfull N/A N/A N/A
Depth ratio>1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 23 2020-MY02

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Planted Acreage 24.4
Mapping Number of Combined %of Planted
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold CCPV Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
1. Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous 0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
material.
2. Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels 0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
based on MY3,4,or 5 stem count criteria.
Total 0 0.00 0.0%
3.Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are 0.25 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
obviously small given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total 0 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage 9.5
Mapping Number of Combined %of Easement
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold CCPV Depiction Polygons Acreage Acreage
4.Invasive Areas of Concern Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons 1000 SF Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
at ma, scale .
5.Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points(if too small to render as polygons none Pattern and Color 1 0.05 0.5%
at map scale).
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 24 2020-MY02

Photo Reference Photos
f ��*L-..,3:'r.„,...- ._�'
- j
v
-, 4 a ems '' S
4 i 7 y 1k _ 'rr .' �5
I'F t
k X " fit
..1'.PP %'tf . {Y$ AA \�PkY •� -l , `A- - ,
tf
•
<t ril, PS Wi yf ✓ , ,
. '` ff
PP1U—MY-00—5/15/19 PP1U—MY-02— 12/8/20
4 j
gip.
. ,-
hlr
Li. . • ..,: , ... , .
,._, ..
. . . ._
,..... ,
.,.
a ..,
PP1D—MY-00—5/15/19 PPID—MY-02— 12/8/20
•
•
�� 9,,
;�
I� S�� a
���� i� 1 yI 1 o �,r��l`�{ � 'fit' Ip�sl. � %Ft .. \ \\ � �4� i� i f.�A� k s
III 1 kNi 4 pe^ �J'f; +r .fie., ;� T'` ' 4' i p ' �
k { 1^1.11f.'.1��ail �fR ; �f�' � l '1 �i•'� "° •
;t
} ,, ,-•� �%' 'p `tea , /r
PP2U—MY-00—5/15/19 PP{23U—MY-02— 12/8/20
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 25 2020-MY02

•
i3'II1!! *a' Q
' • ."
•
PP2D MY-00—5/15/19 PP2D—MY-02— 12/8/20
. =. —;..'-"iitc-: riClitk f,',r'-P''' ''''';'''-
y
z ref
PP3U—MY-00—5/15/19 PP3U—MY-02— 12/8/20
2
�M i,�,i b_o,.e
P!
•
O'
: 51.
PP3D—MY-00—5/15/19 PP3D—MY-02— 12/8/20
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 26 2020-MY02

` E
1�'•. ,b
,
.
•
m' E
„ ., r L,'j i7
PP4U M Y 00 5/15/19 PP4U—MY-02— 12/8/20
TT-Att •_;41 7 , ;1
r
.3,.
•
'pi` ;,..— b �R.• .4,..'Ln si t"
. ri 4i�"S�c.:ti
PP4D—MY-00 5/15/19 PP4D—MY-02— 12/8/20
.. i.f. .
" s
a
, zg : . . ...,• n,-,..,,,,
f p
it
f.
�• �Pw e " ,6 , l' er , ,� '4— 'Fr! Srr,: r t y ,: t �t •
•
u sly .� of
PP5U—MY-00—5/15/19 PP5U—MY-02— 12/8/20
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 27 2020-MY02

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 28 2020-MY02

PP5D – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP5D – MY-02 – 12/8/20

PP6U – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP6U – MY-02 – 12/8/20

PP6D – MY-00 – 5/15/19 PP6D – MY-02 – 12/8/20

Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 97085 29 2020-MY02

Permanent Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 1 – MY-02 – 9/2/20
Vegetation Plot 2 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 2 – MY-02 – 9/2/20

Vegetation Plot 3 – MY-00 – 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 3 – MY-02 – 9/2/20
•-VA::'P:intio. . •
-
t � yr. ,� T��`+�.?;� • � °"
i •
C
y
A
•
I Y3 [ T 6 my °•
}
Vegetation Plot 4—MY-00—5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 4 MY-02 9/2/20
AFC' •"-':'''''''''- A' .ki • • ., r. . • ', '••• .•••
.eat +b j - •e* .„'�` r •f 4
t
M
Vegetation Plot 5—MY-00—5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 5—MY-02—9/2/20
.:, ��» vie „wi -
tea:11,/-"iY•f# -
� T
,
b
.-:::‘.,151,64-,.._,-0., :r.-,:..'.7-4.;,-.:e...-7;...-4.,ear.,r..0:_;...: :„,...-;....,......:. ,
c " +ate a
04
Vegetation Plot 6 MY-00 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 6 MY-02 9/2/20
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 30 2020-MY02

•
4 . " ' .,•:".-'-- fi'''':.: `,._. '1:,. ','...; i;t,'-''...'..'.': ... - -
..- - � '
b
•~ ? iF H +. 2. ~ : h ti' 9A a§iEf f S ',-*,-:,:,.i4,5J- T,i
Ay{
d t�
'�° I r 4it' ''"y' 'ea 4?. F j' . .d'
Vegetation Plot 7 MY 00 5/15/19 Vegetation Plot 7—MY-02—9/2/20
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 31 2020-MY02

Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
s
ii
! Y � !
'� 5 r a� ;k_SAX ,87d � k '" df � fa't 3h " . - t
.4,,_:,:L..,_,,,,,,:,,,,,t,___,-;4.-?„,,,,,,,A,,,, k ft,„:.,,,,,Lr",&..,..,,,,..r...,,,...,:.-",,mi.,:„4-.1—',..:,,t?,—,.::::;;":,.,...„":,;,,,,,,‘;,!...„..i.....„4:-,,,,,,,,...;,0_,,,,,,,,,,,..:tii-,-::::,;--;„:1,4:,-,.,,,,,r,;:
.s.,..,, r,'-',27,'i-5':'.---..r.7-4..',.'- :-..‘t, -4".".t.:.4--, ,re,;"
•
Vegetation Plot R1 —MY-02—9/4/20 Vegetati Plc; R2—MY-02—9/4/20
e on
E , ,y.
, �. ' k G.✓s--,, w rt �� ?'f': .`Cf �' k'''' 4'''alb y , ✓ ,
.Z.FI.:fogy '-' -_z
3 .. Y a' S it
Vegetation Plot R3—MY-02—•
9/4/20 Vegetation Plot R4—MY-02—9/4/20
.. J.
�. xr.
> , ,.'
t ` �J
K a'4 ' �� FMf 5 • l ,.
N
a
A..:
- - f7 k.. 'x ,
rp. r
Vegetation Plot R5—MY-02—9/4/20
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 32 2020-MY02

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Plot Data
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 33 2020-MY02

Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Current Plot Data(MY02 2020)
Plot 01 Plot 02 Plot 03 Plot 04 Plot 05 Plot 06 Plot 7
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted _Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Elm(Ulm us americana) _ 2
American Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) _
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 5_ 5 7 8 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 2
Bald Cypress(Taxodium distichum) 1 1 4 4
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 1 I 3
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) 3
Green Ash(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 2 2 4 4 4 4 1 1
Loblolly Pine(Pinus taeda) 12 3 8
Oak(Quercus sp.) _
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
Red M ap le(Acer rubrum) 1 1 2
Red Oak(Quercus rubra) _
River Birch(Betula nigra) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
Silky Dogwood(Cornus amomum) _ 5 5 1 1 I 1
Sugar Berry (Celtis laevigata) _
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 2 2 1 1 1_ 1 1 1
Sweet Bay (Magnolia virginiana) 1
Sweet Gum(Liquidambar styracua) 1 _
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
Water Oak(Quercus nigra)
Wax Myrtle(Myrica cerifera) 1 _
White Oak(Quercus alba) 1 1 1 1 I
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 1 1 1 1 3 3 6 6 3 3 2 2
Unknown _
Stem count 14 29 15 21 11 11 16 28 4 11 13 16 14 14
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 7 10 5 8 6 6 6 10 _ 4 8 0 0 0 0
Stems per ACRE 567 1,174 607 850 445 445 647 1,133 162 445 526 647 567 567
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 34 2020-MY02

Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Current Plot Data(MY02 2020)
Plot Rl Plot R2 Plot R3 Plot R4 Plot R5
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted )Total Planted Total
American Elm(Ulmus americana) 1
American Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 2 2
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 2 2 5 5 6 6 8 8 1 1
Bald Cypress(Taxodium distichum) _ _ _
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 2 2
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) _ _ _
Green Ash(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 2 2 6 6 7 7 5 5
Loblolly Pine(Pinus taeda) 7
Oak(Quercus sp.)
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 2 2
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) _ _ _ 1
Red Oak(Quercus rubra)
River Birch(Betula nigra) _ 6 6_ 2 2 7 7 4 4
Silky Dogwood(Corpus amomum) 3 3
Sugar Berry(Celtic laevigata) _ _ _
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii)
Sweet Bay (Magnolia virginiana) _
Sweet Gum(Liquidambar styracua) _ 1 3 6
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 3 3
Water Oak(Quercus nigra)
Wax Myrtle(Myrica cerifera)
White Oak(Quercus alba) I I 2 2
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 3 3 2 2 2 2
Unknown _
Stem count 12 13 _ 22 25 17 30 _ 22 23 10 11
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 _ 0.025 _ 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count 6 _ 7 5 6 4 6 4 5 4 5
Stems per ACRE 486 526 890 1,012 688 1,214 890 931 405 445
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 35 2020-MY02

Table 7. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Annual Means
MY02(2020) MY01(2019) MY00(2019)
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Elm(Ulmus americana) 3_
American Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 2 2 4 4 _
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 43 44 40 40 9 9
Bald Cypress(Taxodium distichum) 5 5 7 7 1 1
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 2 6 2
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 3 1 1 2 2
Green Ash(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 31 31 25 25 29 29
Loblolly Pine(Pinus taeda) 30 2 2
Oak(Quercus sp.) 1 1 18 18
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 11 11 7 7 3 3
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 5 4 11 2
Red Oak(Quercus rubra) 2 2
River Birch(Betula nigra) 27 27 17 17 2 2
Silky Dogwood(Cornus amomum) 10 10 8 8 10 10
Sugar Berry (Celtis laevigata) 2 2
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 5 5 7 7 7 7
Sweet Bay(Magnolia virginiana) 1 1 1
Sweet Gum(Liquidambar styracua) 11 2 8
Tulip Poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 6 8 14 20 14 14
Water Oak(Quercus nigra) 1 1
Wax Myrtle(Myrica cerifera) 1
White Oak(Quercus alba) 5 6 12 15 1 4
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 23 23 30 30 3 3
Unknown 4 4 199 199
Stem count 170 232 187 212 301 307
size(ares) 12 12 12
size(ACRES) 0.300 0.300 0.300
Species count 12 19 18 20 15 17
Stems per ACRE 773 623 707 1,003 1,023
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 36 2020-MY02

APPENDIX D
Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 37 2020-MY02

Table 8a. SF1 Data Summary
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 7.2 14.8-18.8 9.7 9.3 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 8.7 >50 100 >80 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.9 1.3-1.8 0.7 0.8 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2 1.9-2.4 1.1 1.2 1
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 6.4 25 7.0 7.0 1
Width/Depth Ratio 8.1 9.0-14.0 13.5 12.2 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 >2.5 10.3 8.7 1
Bank Height Ratio 2.9 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 60 30-55 30-55
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 16-87 20-29 20-29
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 3.5-12.9 9.6-13.6 9.6-13.6
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 66-191 93-132 93-132
Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.1-5.7 3.1-5.7
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) i Ila 23.40 31.55 40.95 17
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.009 0.013-0.035 0.009-0.015 0.0031 0.0141 0.0137 17
Pool Length(ft) * 14-33 21-46 12.47 28.73 41.34 17
Pool Spacing(ft) * 2.7-7.1 5.6-7.3 44.28 68.72 142.01 17
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 3/40/57/0/0/0 0/4/90/7/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.15/1.2/2.2/7.5/11/-0.4/7.1 Gravel Gravel 9.4/16/22/33/53/70
Channel length(ft) 1235 1155 1155
Drainage Area(SM) 0.27 1.49 0.27 0.27
Rosgen Classification G4c C4 C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.009 0.005 0.009 0.01
':no data shown for pools,radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 38 2020-MY02

Table 8b. SF2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 5.0-10.0 14.8-18.8 11.3 12.2 12.4 12.6 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 7.4-14.5 >50 100 53.3 67.0 80.7 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.0-1.4 1.3-1.8 0.8 0.9 0.95 1.0 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.3-2.2 1.9-2.4 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 6.9-8.9 25 9.4 10.6 11.6 12.5 2
Width/Depth Ratio 3.7-11.2 9.0-14.0 13.5 12.8 13.5 14.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.4-1.5 >2.5 8.8 4.2 5.4 6.6 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.6-2.1 1.0-1.2 1.0 1 1 1 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 60 37-65 37-65
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 16-87 22-33 22-33
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 3.5-12.9 9.3-13.1 9.3-13.1
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 66-191 105-148 105-148
Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.3-5.8 3.3-5.8
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 17.58 39.07 86.38 36
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.003-0.008 0.013-0.035 0.009-0.015 0.0021 0.0118 0.0256 36
Pool Length(ft) * 14-33 24-52 12.51 28.83 52.39 34
Pool Spacing(ft) * 2.7-7.1 5.2-7.4 43.01 81.44 178.86 34
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 20.3/30/49.8/0/0/0 5/8/54/33/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.33/0.61/1.2/6.2/9.8/0.3/5.5 Gravel Gravel 5.9/31/45/61/98.5/140
Channel length(ft) 2453 2802 2802
Drainage Area(SM) 0.41 1.49 0.41 0.41
Rosgen Classification G4c-G5c C4 C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.008 0.005 0.008 0.008
*:no data shown for pools,radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 39 2020-MY02

Table 8c. SF3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 10.5 14.8-18.8 12.6 11.6 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 14.4 >50 100 92.4 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.2 1.3-1.8 0.9 1.1 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.3 1.9-2.4 1.4 1.7 1
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 12.5 25 11.8 12.9 1
Width/Depth Ratio 8.9 9.0-14.0 13.5 10.4 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.4 >2.5 7.9 8.0 1
Bank Height Ratio 2.0 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 60 46-77 46-77
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 16-87 28-35 28-35
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 3.5-12.9 11.7-14 11.7-14
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 66-191 148-176 148-176
Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.7-6.1 3.7-6.1
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 7.4 35.2 52.4 7
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.006 0.013-0.035 0.01 0.0032 0.0075 0.0175 7
Pool Length(ft) * 14-33 35-62 12.4 33.9 39.7 7
Pool Spacing(ft) * 2.7-7.1 6.7-8.0 92.0 103.1 114.4 7
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 10/0/0/0/0/0 21/21/40/18/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 1.1/6.0/8.3/12/15/-0.7/3.3 Gravel Gravel 0.06/0.77/16/29/70/120
Channel length(ft) 618 654 654
Drainage Area(SM) 0.84 1.49 0.84 0.84
Rosgen Classification G4c C4 C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.006 0.005 0.008 0.006
:no data shown for pools,radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 40 2020-MY02

Table 8d. T1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data(SF) Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 3.4 14.8-18.8 5.0 4.2 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 4.5 >50 50 45.0 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 1.3-1.8 0.4 0.2 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.4 1.9-2.4 0.6 0.5 1
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 0.9 25 1.9 0.9 1
Width/Depth Ratio 12.7 9.0-14.0 13.5 18.6 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 >2.5 10 10.8 1
Bank Height Ratio 4.5 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 60 23-37 23-37
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 16-87 11-17 11-17
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 3.5-12.9 11.6-14.4 11.6-14.4
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 66-191 58-72 58-72
Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 4.6-7.4 4.6-7.4
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) W. 4.53 18.2 29.1 11
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.035 0.013-0.035 0.014-0.04 0.00 0.024 0.045 11
Pool Length(ft) * 14-33 11-29 7.29 40.2 65.6 11
Pool Spacing(ft) * 2.7-7.1 6.2-8.8 35.7 45.7 60.3 11
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% IIMEr111 10/3/21/66/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) Silt-Clay Gravel Gravel 37/65/78/94/130/170
Channel length(ft) 365 MIill 510 510
Drainage Area(SM) 0.02 1.49 0.02 0.02
Rosgen Classification G5 7C4 C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.035 0.005 0.020 0.019
':no data shown for pools,radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 41 2020-MY02

Table 8e. T2-1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.5-5.7 14.8-18.8 5.0
Floodprone Width(ft) 5.7-30.7 >50 50
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8-1.7 1.3-1.8 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2-2.1 1.9-2.4 0.6
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 3.6-9.4 25 1.9
Width/Depth Ratio 3.4-5.4 9.0-14.0 13.5
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3-5.4 >2.5 10
MOW_
Bank Height Ratio 1.5-4.1 1.0-1.2 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 60 I 25-40 25-40
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 16-87 12-15 12-15
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 3.5-12.9 14 14
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 66-191 70 70
Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 5.0-8.0 5.0-8.0
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 'EMr =!'
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.009-0.020 0.013-0.035 0.016
Pool Length(ft) * 14-33 6-16
Pool Spacing(ft) * 2.7-7.1 6.4-8.0 W_
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) Silt-Clay Gravel Gravel
Channel length(ft) 327 334 334
Drainage Area(SM) 0.23 1.49 0.04 0.04
Rosgen Classification G5c C4 C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.014 0.005 0.012
:no data shown for pools,radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 42 2020-MY02

Table 8f. T2-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.5-5.7 14.8-18.8 7.6 9.7 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 5.7-30.7 >50 50 43.4 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8-1.7 1.3-1.8 0.6 0.6 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2-2.1 1.9-2.4 0.8 1.0 1
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 3.6-9.4 25 4.3 5.8 1
Width/Depth Ratio 3.4-5.4 9.0-14.0 13.4 16.4 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3-5.4 >2.5 6.6 4.5 1
Bank Height Ratio 1.5-4.1 I 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 60 28-45 28-45
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 16-87 16-23 16-23
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 3.5-12.9 11.2-11.8 11.2-11.8
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 66-191 85-90 85-90
Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.7-5.9 3.7-5.9
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) MMIL '10- 20.0 29.0 56.7 6
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.009-0.020 0.013-0.035 0.014 0.01 0.018 0.028 6
Pool Length(ft) * 14-33 14-24 10.8 17.6 22.8 6
Pool Spacing(ft) * 2.7-7.1 5.7-6.6 47.0 48.8 51.2 6
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% _ 6/45/15/33/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) Silt-Clay Gravel Gravel 26/35/42/51/74/110
Channel length(ft) 326 - 337 337
Drainage Area(SM) 0.23 1.49 0.15 0.15
Rosgen Classification G5c C4 C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.014 0.005 0.012 0.011
':no data shown for pools,radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 43 2020-MY02

Table 8g. T2-3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.5-5.7 14.8-18.8 9.0 8.6 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 5.7-30.7 >50 50 80.9 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8-1.7 1.3-1.8 0.6 0.7 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2-2.1 1.9-2.4 1.0 1.2 1
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 3.6-9.4 25 5.8 6.0 1
Width/Depth Ratio 3.4-5.4 9.0-14.0 13.9 12.3 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3-5.4 >2.5 5.6 9.4 1
Bank Height Ratio 1.5-4.1 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) * 60 I 32-45 32-45
Radius of Curvature(ft) * 16-87 18-23 18-23
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) * 3.5-12.9 10.2-11.1 10.2-11.1
Meander Wavelength(ft) * 66-191 92-100 92-100
Meander Width Ratio * 4.1 3.6-6.0 3.6-6.0
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) !!' 25.8 33.6 38.9 15
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) 0.009-0.020 0.013-0.035 0.012-0.015 0.002 0.014 0.024 15
Pool Length(ft) * 14-33 12-34 8.48 35.6 91.4 14
Pool Spacing(ft) * 2.7-7.1 5.1-7.0 45.7 57.3 77.4 14
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 4/7/65/24/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) 0.031/0.13/0.21/2.0/6.1/0.1/8 Gravel Gravel 18/35/45/77/120
Channel length(ft) 780 855 855
Drainage Area(SM) 0.23 1.49 0.23 0.23
Rosgen Classification G5c C4 C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.014 0.005 0.011 0.011
':no data shown for pools,radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to channelization/lack of bed diversity
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 44 2020-MY02

Table 8h. T3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es)Data Design As-built
Dimension-Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.2-4.8 14.8 5.0 5.2 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 5.0-5.9 >50 50 38.0 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4-0.6 1.3-1.8 0.4 0.4 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.6-0.7 1.9-2.4 0.6 0.7 1
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(ft2) 1.9-2.6 25 1.9 2.1 1
Width/Depth Ratio 6.9-12.6 9.0-14.0 13.5 13.0 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 >2.5 10 7.2 1
Bank Height Ratio 3.2-3.4 1.0-1.2 1.0 1.0 1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth(ft) ** 60 16-26 16-26
Radius of Curvature(ft) ** 16-87 11-14 11-14
Rc:Bankfull width(ft/ft) ** 3.5-12.9 8.6-9.4 8.6-9.4
Meander Wavelength(ft) ** 66-191 43-47 43-47
Meander Width Ratio ** 4.1 3.2-5.2 3.2-5.2
Profile
Riffle Length(ft) 34.3 36.9 39.5 2
Riffle Slope(ft/ft) ** 0.013-0.035 0.0025 0.006 0.0098 0.014 2
Pool Length(ft) ** 14-33 7-15 38.43 1
Pool Spacing(ft) ** 2.7-7.1 4.2-5.4
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% 8/67/25/0/0/0 9/15/58/19/0/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm) N/A Gravel Gravel 0.3/8.2/18/35/72/140
Channel length(ft) 154 129 129
Drainage Area(SM) 0.05 1.49 0.02 0.02
Rosgen Classification G4 C4 C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.007 0.005 0.0016 0.005
":channel affected by former pond
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 45 2020-MY02

Table 9. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Cross-Section 1(Pool) Cross-Section 2(Riffle) Cross-Section 3(Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate Station 13+58,SF Station 13+85,SF Station 22+44,SF
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 206.8 206.7 206.7 206.6 206.6 206.6 192.5 192.5 192.4
Bankfull Width(ft) 12.6 11.7 11.6 9.3 11.0 10.2 12.6 11.9 12.5
Floodprone Width(ft) - - - >80 >80 >80 53.3 53.2 50.1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.5
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 11.5 11.5 11.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.5 12.5 12.5
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 11.5 11.9 12.1 7.0 7.1 6.8 12.5 13.2 13.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio - - - 12.2 17.3 14.8 4 12.8 11.4 12.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio - - - 8.7 7.2 8.0 4.2 4.5 4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio - - - 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
d50(mm) - - - 22 32 24 I 38 46 20
Cross-Section 4(Pool) Cross-Section 5(Riffle) Cross-Section 6(Pool)
Station 26+17,SF Station 35+12,SF Station 41+94,SF
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 192.0 191.9 191.9 182.1 182.2 182.2 181.7 181.8 181.7
Bankfull Width(ft) 12.5 13.0 12.4 I 12.2 13.6 13.2 12.0 13.1 11.5
Floodprone Width(ft) - - - >80 >80 >80 - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.3
_MNPi-
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.4 1.3 1.3 2.4 2.4 2.5
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 13.6 13.6 13.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 14.5 14.5 14.5
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 13.6 14.5 15.2 10.6 10.1 9.3 14.5 14.3 15.2 Im
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio - - - 14.1 17.4 16.4 - - -
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio - - - 6.6 5.9 6.1 - - -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio - - - 1.0 1.0 1.0 - - -
d50(mm) - - - 52 44 25 - - -
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 46 2020-MY02

Table 9. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Cross-Section 7(Riffle) Cross-Section 8(Pool) Cross-Section 9(Pool)
Station 42+58,SF Station 57+19,SF Station 57+44,T3
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+' Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 176.0 176.0 176.0 175.3 175.2 175.2 207.0 206.9 207.3
Bankfull Width(ft) 11.6 13.4 14.2 13.5 14.5 15.7 5.5 5.9 8.2
Floodprone Width(ft) >90 >90 >90 - - - - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.5 1.4 1.3 0.7 0.6 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.7 2.7 2.5 1.1 1.1 0.8
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 12.8 12.8 12.8 20.7 20.7 20.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 12.8 13.2 13.3 20.7 21.4 21.5 3.7 4.0 2.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.4 14.0 15.7 - - - - - -
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 8.0 6.8 6.5 - - - - - -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 - - - - - -
d50(mm) 16 29 41 - - - - - -
Cross-Section 10(Riffle) Cross-Section 11(Riffle) Cross-Section 12(Pool)
Station 96+69,T3 Station 99+07,Tl Station 99+25,Tl
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base I MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 207.1 207.1 207.2 198.4 198.3 198.3 198.4 198.3 198.3
Bankfull Width(ft) 6.2 5.5 5.4 6.0 5.8 5.7 7.5 7.3 7.4
Floodprone Width(ft) 38.0 39.4 41.5 >60 >60 >60 - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 12 1.2 1.1
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.8 4.8 4.8
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 2.2 2.1 1.8 2.0 2.6 2.6 4.8 5.5 5.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 17.7 13.7 13.4 18.3 17.1 16.0 - - -
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 6.1 7.2 7.7 10.9 10.9 11.2 - - -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 - - -
d50(mm) 18 20 3 78 75 57 - - -
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 47 2020-MY02

Table 9. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Stony Fork Stream Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Cross-Section 13(Pool) Cross-Section 14(Riffle) Cross-Section 15(Pool)
Station 252+25,T2 Station 225+97,T2 Station 226+04,T2
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 Iv1Y4 MY5 MY'- Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MI74 MY5 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 188.4 188.4 188.2 187.9 187.9 188.0 180.9 180.8 180.7
Bankfull Width(ft) 11.3 12.7 9.5 9.7 11.8 11.1 11.8 11.7 10.9
Floodprone Width(ft) - - - 43.4 46.8 47.2 - - -
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 _ 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.8 1.9 1.8
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 9.3 9.3 9.3 5.8 5.8 5.8 11.2 11.2 11.2
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 9.3 8.7 11.0 5.8 5.3 4.4 - 11.2 11.8 12.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio - - - 16.4 24.0 21.4 - - -
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio - - - 4.5 4.0 4.2 - - -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.8 0.9 - - -
d50(mm) - - - 42 16 1.4 I - - -
Cross-Section 16(Riffle)
Station 252+25,T2
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+1
Bankfull Elevation(ft)based on AB BKF area 180.7 180.7 180.8
Bankfull Width(ft) 8.6 9.9 10.0
Floodprone Width(ft) >80 >80 >80
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.7 0.6 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.2 1.1 1.0
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF area 6.0 6.0 6.0
Cross-Sectional Area(ft2)based on AB BKF elevation 6.0 5.8 5.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.3 16.3 16.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 9.4 8.3 7.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 0.9
d50(nun) 45 44 37
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 R 2020-MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River -+ :j. •�-
IkI �' c rr
Site: Stony Fork .
XS ID XS1 ,,Ai ti xr , J"t
•
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.28 .h _
r
Date: 2020 ...
FielddT.Se Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez • y�e,-. +' .:y. '
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA •
0.0 208.48 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 206.70 -
4.8 207.89 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 11.5 • ,
11.4 207.36 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 12.1
20.4 207.20 Bankfull Width: 11.6 =
28.0 206.91 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- -1
37.9 207.12 Flood Prone Width: _ --- y. ' t
"
45.1 206.89 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.1 - r 4
49.1 206.63 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 .5_
49.9 206.54 W/D Ratio: ---
50.3 206.53 Entrenchment Ratio: --- i .
51.1 206.40 Bank Height Ratio: ---
51.6 206.15 Thalweg Elevation: 204.6 ` n •
-
52.4 205.51
53.5 204.63
54.6 204.57 Stony Fork,XS1,Pool,SF
56.2 204.82 209
56.2 204.95
57.7 205.58 208
58.0 206.15
58.4 206.25
58.8 206.36 207
59.7 206.75
60.8 206.85 t
62.9 206.88 0 206
64.3 207.44
66.7 207.69
73.1 207.45 W 205
79.8 206.91
88.3 206.53
88.3 206.96 204
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Station(feet)
--Bankfull -MY00 -MY01 -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River
Site: Stony Fork _ •
XSID XS2
r Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.28
Date: 6/18/2020 _ -- .• -
t;.. .s. ' 'S, r ..
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez .r•$'F -; ,''4- r; rC, « '
•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA j4F. ` +s.:-.`=.-� j, ---`-�lr..' %_' :n r _-•
0.0 208.30 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 206.60 - r � �f �� _-:x%'�{a�1,,-- `'�•'f.�`" ; ''
0.3 207.95 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 7.0 �'w' •i ". d.i?_
6.7 207.66 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 6.8 '.. ' _ =;.k - `_' ; '• - s'.
13.7 207.26 Bankfull Width: 10.2 ; -1 • • . "�1..
20.5 206.79 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 207.9 .' ---- +`` �•-s, "•
27.5 206.60 Flood Prone Width: _ 82.0 1 - `�-v Y
r
33.8 206.60 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3
39.7 206.83 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 ~:
42.5 206.63 W/D Ratio: 14.8 ' -
• '_:
43.6 206.63 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.0 •
44.6 206.41 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 A.
45.8 206.11 Thalweg Elevation: 205.3
46.5 205.90
47.4 205.53
48.3 205.39 Stony Fork,XS2,Riffle,SF
48.7 205.31 209 -
49.0 205.40 209
50.4 205.46
50.9 205.56 208
51.1 205.86
52.1 206.10 208 _
53.2 206.39
53.9 206.57 t 207 \\
56.3 206.55 0 _ -�
60.0 206.52 207 \ /-
65.9 206.62
72.2 206.75 W 206 _ \ /
\
83.7 206.66 206 A',f
83.7 207.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area MY00 MYOI -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River
Site: Stony Fork .`••s-'
XS ID XS3
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46
Date: 6/18/2020 L _: x f {
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez F ly �'' x' + gym.il
Sl t R 'r^°}f
•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA qqJ r L.
_ M ^max '
0.0 195.53 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 192.41 • • },�;_, " ,
4.0 195.33 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 12.5 rfr t t
11.1 194.91 Total Cross-Sectional Area:
13.8 ?' w 1= `
14.3 194.59 Bankfull Width: 12.5 g = - '' .'
18.9 193.54 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 193.9 - `i y+ ;": .
21.8 193.26 Flood Prone Width: 50.1 'q�" '
26.2 193.00 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.5 �; "�+ t••;a. •:'t: '
31.0 192.66 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 y, - .
34.6 192.56 W/D Ratio: 12.6
36.9 192.46 Entrenchment Ratio: 4.0 1 , ,
37.9 192.51 Bank Height Ratio: 10. "k 1�'4 -
39.1 191.94 Thalweg Elevation: 190.9 '•r= s:'.; . pc.., v L. Y x , ._.
40.6 191.43
41.2 191.39
42.3 191.05 Stony Fork,XS3,Riffle,SF
43.6 190.90 196 --
44.7 190.92 i
45.2 190.91 195
45.6 190.93
46.7 190.99 194 -
48.0 191.43 --
49.1 191.90
50.8 192.48 t 193
53.4 192.57 s
o •
56.5 192.63 192
\.,40, /
60.4 192.78
63.6 193.25 W
69.2 194.25 191 -_
70.8 194.24
70.9 194.54 190 -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MYOI -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River
Site: Stony Fork .
XS ID XS4 51••.-
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46
.� ' .
Date: 6/18/2020 .•
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez --. -
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA •=
0.0 195.27 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 191.88 P :.° _ -.:_ -
4. "":- •
0.3 194.88 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 13.6 r-•,. -'
5.0 194.52 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 15.2 `4 .- , ••
9.1 194.34 Bankfull Width: 12.4 �•j• I- • • �u!y
14.1 193.61 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- -
18.4 192.88 Flood Prone Width: _ ---
22.3 192.42 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.1 -
23.7 192.21 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.1
24.8 192.29 W/D Ratio: ---
26.0 191.88 Entrenchment Ratio: ---
26.7 191.24 Bank Height Ratio: --- -
27.0 190.47 Thalweg Elevation: 189.8
28.3 190.21
29.1 189.81
30.1 189.79 Stony Fork,XS4,Pool,SF
31.9 189.92 196 --
32.7 190.59
33.7 191.18 195
36.2 191.55
38.6 191.91 194
44.6 192.10
51.4 192.19 193
m
58.4 192.70 t
66.0 193.45 0 192 ,_ •
66.1 193.84
o.) 191
W
190
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station(feet)
----Bankfull -MY00 -MY01 -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River •
'
Site: Stony Fork - fg
XS ID XSS '�'
•
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.46 t l-
Date: 6/18/2020 _rri ,+' , •_vr:- .. '.�4''>
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez - '
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA -
0.0 183.14 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 182.23 "'• n
0.2 182.51 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 10.6 si
5.5 182.31 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 9.3 .
14.0 182.42 Bankfull Width: 13.2 . - •? �s�'i.--'..-:..,.,- : '
23.0 182.75 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 183.6 +.. !� Y'S , Y
28.2 182.47 Flood Prone Width: _ 80.7 r ar�'!�- " � °•,nn " `' .;.', .`:
30.4 182.34 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 _ .t Y f es i v .
31.1 182.25 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 cli-'' 4 f !T 3 rY �' t
32.1 181.96 W/DRto: 16.4 j'r ey %-''•.. 4" - '- .
` �'ca :f
33.1 181.65 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.1 �- _:r :. A,,,,":".4 .- ,�ry `-
34.2 181.24 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 -; ,yr
35.4 180.90 Thalweg Elevation: 180.9 :',diy ‘ a4d .:k. _ _.
36.0 181.04
36.9 180.94
37.5 180.98 Stony Fork,XS5,Riffle,SF
38.6 181.02 184
39.7 181.08 _
41.8 181.64
43.4 182.07 183
44.8 182.31
43.8 182.31
57.3 182.60 ---
65.4 182.56 t 182
75.0 182.48 s
0
79.5 182.70
80.7 183.28 ° 181
W
180 1 '
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MYOI -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River : t
Site: Stony Fork w a _ Y- Si• e"
XS ID XS6 i =
Drainage Area(sq mi): A 0.46 r a :., ,
Date: 6/18/2020 • . v ;
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez .1` f~` +�
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA t . e T
0.0 183.40 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 181.68 r,
0.2 183.22 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 14.5 }tigj` a.-LA'
w 1 .
3.4 182.72 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 15.2 �`
6.1 182.76 Bankfull Width: 11.5 ~
11.2 182.07 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- F"; _ '._ ... •
17.1 181.95 Flood Prone Width: _ --- w':1 r:.j;; :.
19.6 181.80 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.5 ".%
20.9 181.89 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.3y f , ,
21.9 181.68 W/D Ratio: --- N.:.•7 i r`'_:' ,{ .,,,,. .: -.: 4; 4 -ca
22.4 181.49 Entrenchment Ratio: --- • is c
23.3 180.93 Bank Height Ratio: --- r tT.24.4 179.72 Thalweg Elevation: 179.2
25.9 179.20
26.9 179.35
28.5 179.92 Stony Fork,XS6,Pool,SF
29.7 180.47 184 --
30.9 181.23
32.9 181.40 183
33.9 181.87
34.5 181.93 182
37.7 181.88 = ____________
44.9 181.74
52.5 181.99 t 181 -
58.9 182.34 s
0
69.6 182.47 a 180
78.0 182.66
81.1 183.18 W
179
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Station(feet)
--Bankfull -MY00 -MY01 -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River } ;' r, ; 4 " '
Site: Stony Fork '- -• _t, ,_ { , r,
XSID XS7 •• �k., ►+ ` 1x. ..
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.83 4 it ;
�gg • �; f t
Date: 6/29/2020 iF.
r rt
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez +� a . -.
.•.(&''1 ..
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 177.93 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 175.99
5.0 176.69 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 12.8 et •
i m.-
10.5 176.44 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 13.3 - _ • • ::r-_•�� ;;'+zed-. t:
17.4 176.27 Bankfull Width: 14.2 '' ^ '•
24.9 176.00 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 177.8 P .a " iY`' ;'7R_'4"
30.5 176.08 Flood Prone Width: 92.2 - h; Z' ="` 4` -
,.
38.2 176.20 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.8 ' ''. .. '. . f a'_r
39.6 175.90 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 '" •'r ,-- ~'. : ` `"`
rn- •.•::,. .-..
41.0 175.46 W/D Ratio: 15.7 _-..-• '•• •
41.8 175.18 Entrenchment Ratio: 6.5 'k 1s t'• +,-.••1 - '
42.5 174.93 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Y ,..C-Cs ),,„ 1, •
. :
43.2 174.54 ThalwegElevation: 174.2 � ry�.�,. ""'•• {I;
44.1 174.32
45.4 174.21
46.5 174.46 Stony Fork,XS7,Riffle,SF
47.0 174.54 179
47.5 174.60
48.1 174.80 178 -
49.0 175.09
50.5 175.47
52.1 175.87 177
53.7 176.02
56.9 176.00 t
60.6 175.86 0 176 -
66.0 176.02 'j
71.2 176.04
76.5 176.19 W 175
81.6 176.47
87.6 176.76
92.5 177.01 174
92.8 177.15 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MYOI -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River . ' ...... - 3" - ii .: -
I f.41r, 1 ' ' :
Site: Stony Fork t z
XS ID XS8 " • , - t t
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.83
Date: 6/29/2020 sib
Field Crew: IMMII T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez ' •; •;", y� ',' •-_•' . r• ,l•
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA II
,` �? 1,i 'r- , '"' 1�• , o id
0.0 176.54 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 175.21 .t-•Y ,' et' , • •
0.1 175.98 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 20.7 4 _
?;K_-,
3.9 175.69 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 21.5 E r` I _ !
10.8 175.61 Bankfull Width: 15.7 n
18.4 175.61 Flood Prone Area Elevation: :• .- 'c2 ' bil# -.:
24.9 175.56 Flood Prone Width: _ --- r=' dr
' - _
31.1 175.55 Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.5 -
35.4 175.40 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.3 ...sr_
38.3 175.24 W/D Ratio: --- a tb'�s. "
40.9 175.19 Entrenchment Ratio: --- A •L
42.3 175.20 Bank Height Ratio: --- t
43.9 174.89 Thalweg Elevation: 172.7 y'
45.5 174.39
46.4 174.26
47.3 173.91 Stony Fork,XS8,Pool,SF
48.0 173.82 179
48.7 173.29
49.7 172.85 178
50.9 172.75
52.2 172.71 177
53.0 172.72
54.0 173.07 176
54.6 173.55
55.0 174.20 0 : : !
56.3 174.70 '�58.1 175.24
59.4 175.47 W
63.0 175.37 173
67.3 175.43 -
71.0 175.87 172
73.6 175.97 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
75.8 176.24
78.4 176.53 Station(feet)
80.9 176.78 ----Bankfull -MY00 -MY01 -MY02
81.0 177.63

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River V ;a;
Site: Stony Fork .t - ' �;1 :�.
XS ID XS9 - {' •
, s • .. - ry .
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.04 _ -i..,' •:;',t.-..: . : :, 1 r., rt ; !s =r^
; `,a" ' •.'` •
Date: 6/18/2020 �: ' d{�
Field Crew: T.Seelin er,A.Gutierrez ; 'n� ..- ��4 '�'',� �' �}
B '.) .. r,, 4,47 j' a Y`
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA = :f ..,„ r'i -- • ' ^ ,,
-.' ,;y f
0.0 210.78 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 207.26 at; 'i ..'. -
0.0 210.18 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 3.7 • •.g
6.9 210.06 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.0 _ -- . - I. ' 4 ,
10.2 209.83 Bankfull Width: 8.2 �F• -''•'' . :,-..e -:
12.9 208.84 Flood Prone Area Elevation: _ --- r; ' ,l!• .. Y _ ^: !_
•18.8 207.42 Flood Prone Width: --- .4.,4` 0' . ;; .a ;
22.7 207.30 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 -
24.6 207.18 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 _; r . te • �•. r - e •-
26.0 207.03 W/D Ratio: d r'�. �• * 1
26.4 207.01 Entrenchment Ratio:
..# rr. . •
26.6 206.95 Bank Height Ratio: --- " t fe.i`tw
26.9 206.72 Thalweg Elevation: 206.4
27.7 206.43
28.4 206.48
29.2 206.46 Stony Fork,XS9,Pool,T3
30.6 206.50 212 -
31.0 206.98
31.6 207.18 211
32.4 207.08
36.5 207.08 210 -_ -
41.9 207.16
45.6 207.50 209
o,
50.0 207.93
o
57.2 208.67 n 208
0
60.4 208.85 �/
60.7 209.33 207
W \
Li..--
206
205
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station(feet)
--Bankfull -MY00 -MY01 -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River - , ✓: ,,-s.'• `i' kE
Site: Stony Fork s • )• ,r.C.' `- � �. r , '.i
XS ID XS10 ; �r44" {r i j�'.:c+'Ta2'/ a y.
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.04 :i t �a .. q..r ,
Date: 6/18/2020 , p _ -!•,
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez �:: .•a;;, ' L1 .,
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA k;' 'J s
0.0 209.78 Bankfull Elevation ft -Based on AB-Bankfull Area 207.17 • F:' 6. �s . r .
0.0 209.22 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.2 �< i: 'z%�[`•• 'I' .
6.0 208.71 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 1.8 1 k9 f' _ ti
J .ram ... '`1,` :-:. '.'.
12.4 208.29 Bankfull Width: 5.4 _ Y
17.3 207.99 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 207.9 }� a r
21.3 207.81 Flood Prone Width: 41.5 %a� .r a. f:': ' i `:
'i +... ,' 'r. s
26.0 207.65 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 1 . 'r _ C•
32.3 207.49 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 • , E . • :3 1 n r
38.6 207.42 W/D Ratio: 13.4 ;'
40.9 20Z26 Entrenchment Ratio: 7.7 4,.- . � { _ : •
•
41.5 207.26 Bank Height Ratio: 0.8 ,
g •42.4 207.11 Thalweg Elevation: 206.5 ;s
42.7 206.93
43.4 206.56 Stony Fork,XS10,Riffle,T3
44.2 206.53 211
44.6 206.49 -
45.3 206.68
46.1 206.82 210
46.8 206.98 -
47.4 207.01
50.2 206.99 209
54.0 207.12
o,
57.9 207.50 t
63.5 208.03 0 208
69.2 208.15
71.9 208.36
71.9 209.09 W 207
206 ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
--Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area MY00 MYOI -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River - .�` 'P `• '•.° {a .i
Site: Stony Fork •.,!• ta4'• .s'.'
XSID XS11
Drainage Area(sq mi): iii 0.02 , -
Date: 6/18/2020
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez -'� _
�L sue,..; ,, }.
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ` ` v `;1 =?
0.0 199.11 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 198.27 , :.�,' i-
0.2 198.68 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 2.0 ='Kf i r' ��� % ►'f;r
7.7 198.70 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 2.6 r• T i f] ; --., a.:Alf. s4,
14.9 198.72 Bankfull Width: 5.7 4x. ��c i� �3•� '� ;
22.8 198.52 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 198.9 { ' 6 rf k ,i • �Cr'1 1
30.6 198.43 Flood Prone Width: 63.2 '.•,° 1. ,,. ! J ` y
34.8 198.40 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 w , - •' ••r•,'• ;-. r .- 3i aid,`l'i. t. -
36.7 198.21 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 •• ,' i� :;.7 - r x {y . z-. r - ' � _,i
37.6 198.16 W/D Ratio: 16.0 err • _-ram,; A-'-'. •me. � a.
38.2 197.94 Entrenchment Ratio: 11.2 ; �''•:�':•" - - • � =_�-'!
38.6 197.63 Bank Height Ratio: 1.2 '-�� --_ :. l.�v...ti.- -�•. ;
39.9 197.64 Thalweg Elevation: 197.6
40.6 197.72
41.2 198.01
42.1 198.44 Stony Fork,XS11,Riffle,T1
43.9 198.44 201 -
47.1 198.45 201
52.2 198.46
59.1 198.59 200
65.8 199.12
69.6 199.35 200
72.5 199.43
72.6 199.79 t 199
s
° 199
W 0 198
-
198
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MYOI -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River •.F..Ft'. 1 _
Site: Stony Fork ,
XS ID XS12 -
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.02 . s'. • -
Date: 6/18/2020 ,.
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 199.27 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 198.34 ,
0.2 198.88 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 4.8
7.8 198.72 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 5.3 .!.
15.3 198.73 Bankfull Width: 7.4 • ""., <' -•,-`v-j ;= S
24.0 198.35 Flood Prone Area Elevation: _ --- r z ` ri R
33.0 198.57 Flood Prone Width: --- /��, / 'c -1t -
37.3 198.38 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 /+r,�t '(=' .•;. • ;r
41.3 198.35 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 f ' __ - �cp; ',_
42.8 197.93 W/D Ratio: --- / .ae '`� ,'� 0-` r : ; •
43.6 197.82 Entrenchment Ratio:
44.3 197.48 Bank Height Ratio: ---
.,p
45.1 197.26 Thalweg Elevation: 197.2 ./ '` ''R 1 � .=. .w
46.1 197.21
46.9 197.23
47.8 197.89 Stony Fork,XS12,Pool,T1
48.9 198.40 201
50.6 198.50
52.7 198.47 200 ��
-
55.4 198.82n.
58.3 199.50
63.2 199.77 199
67.8 199.68
o,
71.4 199.77 t
75.3 200.03 0 198
W 197 -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station(feet)
--Bankfull -MY00 -MY01 -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River
Site: Stony Fork 4';'``-
XS ID XS13
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.14 -:'
Date: 6/29/2020 , �', .
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez � `"
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 190.20 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 188.20 • }le
_ ''4,;
2.6 189.52 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 9.3 . -•. 7• F .: . .{
5.0 189.12 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 11.0 - } '
8.1 188.79 Bankfull Width: 9.5
19.2 188.42 Flood Prone Area Elevation: --- _ ` `~'• �
26.7 188.18 Flood Prone Width: _ ---
31.1 188.53 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7
33.4 188.48 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0
34.3 188.50 W/D Ratio: ---
35.4 188.21 Entrenchment Ratio: --- _,' ,
37.1 187.73 Bank Height Ratio: ---
38.7 187.15 Thalweg Elevation: 186.5 „ j
39.2 186.75
39.7 186.57
40.7 186.48 Stony Fork,XS13,Pool,T2
41.7 186.60 191
42.5 186.84
43.1 187.23 190
44.3 187.69
45.0 188.37
45.7 188.41 189
47.5 188.59
o,
54.0 189.18 t
59.4 189.70 0 188
62.5 189.90
62.6 190.51
W 187 -
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station(feet)
--Bankfull -MY00 -MY01 -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River
Site: Stony Fork - • .
XSID XS14 Sr {•
: s
• tic
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.14 i: _ 4
Date: 6/29/2020 . i + 's 'c ;..t.+ `i -7
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA
0.0 190.42 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 188.05
•
0.0 189.80 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 5.8 -�- `. r
3.0 189.56 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 4.4 i
4.5 189.21 Bankfull Width: 11.1 - - -; ,r_•
6.3 189.18 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 189.1
8.2 188.80 Flood Prone Width: 47.2
15.2 188.38 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1
17.4 188.42 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5
24.3 188.23 W/D Ratio: 21.4
29.7 188.14 Entrenchment Ratio: 4.2
33.3 188.02 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9
34.6 187.85 Thalweg Elevation: 187.0
35.6 187.66
36.8 187.19 Stony Fork,XS14,Riffle,T2
37.8 186.98 192
38.4 186.99 -
39.0 187.04 -
39.6 187.04 191
39.8 187.28
40.7 187.31 190
41.8 187.61
42.6 187.96
42.7 187.97 t 189
46.0 188.29 s
48.7 188.21 :Sia 188
51.3 188.53 _ --
52.8 188.58 W -_
53.8 189.12 187 -_
55.3 189.19
58.7 189.39
62.4 189.77 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
62.5 190.56
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area MY00 MYOI -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River
Site: Stony Fork '4 _: 1' .,. I I r14.P:- z •^i• '{� -. '.t
XS ID XS15 ^,; i :i " F 7
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.22 oz l i . ( f r lic : I '-.4t 1
Date: 6/29/2020 f*.
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez .
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA ' - -
0.0 183.66 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 180.73 --' y
2.5 182.71 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 11.2 r h•:-
4.0 182.43 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 12.8 i -
744
5.2 182.31 Bankfull Width: 10.9 s--
6.3 182.17 Flood Prone Area Elevation: ---
11.7 181.78 Flood Prone Width: _ --- rl . k. , r l '
16.9 181.55 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.8 s as ° r.
22.7 181.48 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 '�'i - :�,
28.7 181.11 W/D Ratio: --- '" `'
33.2 181.07 Entrenchment Ratio: --- r 4 a -
35.3 180.97 Bank Height Ratio: ---
35.9 180.89 Thalweg Elevation: 178.9
37.1 180.81
38.5 180.62
39.7 180.39 Stony Fork,XS15,Pool,T2
40.6 180.12 185
41.5 179.65
42.1 179.46 184
43.3 179.11
44.6 178.93 183 \,....,,,.....
45.5 178.99
46.2 179.04 182
m
46.8 179.32 t
47.2 179.54 I
-' ''''. ./
53.9 181.33 179
55.4 181.82 =
60.5 182.01 178
66.2 181.91 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
73.1 181.86
76.5 181.91 Station(feet)
76.6 182.51 ----Bankfull -MY00 -MY01 -MY02

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Neuse River
Site: Stony Fork d-' .-; : _,, j W ',',14_i f i'
3 { •
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.22 _ } -
Date: 6/29/2020 1
Field Crew: T.Seelinger,A.Gutierrez I- +_ 4.0 P,ii '..
Station Elevation SUMMARY DATA " '
0.0 183.72 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 180.81 - - . ..
2.5 182.78 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area: 6.0 _ • r r, f
4.0 182.43 Total Cross-Sectional Area: 5.2 ` ^_
6.5 182.12 Bankfull Width: 10.0 .--.- ° - -.
9.8 181.79 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 181.8 •
i ,y1 �-
12.2 181.42 Flood Prone Width: 75.5 =•h +=
14.8 181.41 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 ": '^;~s_`
17.4 181.32 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 ' -x'�` ' -1;w 1 7
22.1 181.23 W/D Ratio: 16.6 f "
27.4 181.05 Entrenchment Ratio: 7.6
•32.0 180.95 Bank Height Ratio: 0.9 :t . • '
32.8 180.84 Thalweg Elevation: 179.8 J
34.2 180.92
35.8 180.56 Stony Fork,XS16,Riffle,T2
36.8 180.15
37.3 180.02 185 --
38.0 179.88 -
38.9 179.95 184
39.9 179.88
40.6 179.80 183
41.3 179.90
41.9 180.02
!;I
180.38 180.62 180.73 180.95 181.40 181.60 181.90 181.65 179 -
90.5 181.48 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
90.5 182.27
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00 -MYOI -MY02

Cross-Section 2 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Stony Fork
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 2 XS 2 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 7
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25- .50 N 4
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% • • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4 ;,
Very Fine 2-4 5 .r, 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G E
M Built
Fine 5.7-8 R 3 �? 60% MY°I
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 -a-MYO2
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 8 E.
Coarse 16-22.6 E 10 5 40%
Coarse 22.6-32 L 9 1,
e
Very Coarse 32-45 S 10 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 13
Small 64-90 C 5 0% -, .----;• • • ! • ,
Small 90- 128 0 11 0.01 0.1 1 l0 100 woo loom
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.71 mean 7.7 silt/clay 2%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 14 dispersion 18.7 sand 19%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 24 skewness -0.34 gravel 59%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 42 cobble 16%
Total 100 D84 84 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 3 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Stony Fork
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 3 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 6
Fine .125-.25 A 3
Medium __ .25- .50 N 4
Coarse .50- 1 D 3 100% ■ r
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 2
Very Fine 2-4 7 a 80%
Fine __ 4-5.7 G 1 i
Fine 5.7-8 R 2 v
0 60% — nse�aa
Medium 8- 11.3 A 9 a T MY01
Medium 11.3- 16 V 6 Ed
C 40% —A,—MY°2
Coarse 16-22.6 E 12 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 8 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 12
Small 64-90 C 6 0%
Small 90- 128 0 6 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 moo moo
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 2
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 1.1 mean 8.6 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 10 dispersion 10.8 sand 18%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 20 skewness -0.27 gravel 65%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 35 cobble 17%
Total 101 D84 67 boulder 0%
Note: D95 130 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 5 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter * Cou Particle Size Distribution
Stony Fork
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 5 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 7
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25- .50 N 3 I
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% — ■ ■ ■ ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 6 Ti
Very Fine 2-4 11 as 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1 E
a
Fine 5.7-8 R 4 60%
Medium 8- 11.3 A 3 a T MY01
Medium 11.3- 16 V 4 E. MY°Z
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 0 40%
w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 16 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 11
Small 64-90 C 12 0% 1 •
Small 90- 128 0 7 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B 1 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B _ Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 1.5 mean 10.3 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8.6 dispersion 9.8 sand 19%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 25 skewness -0.30 gravel 62%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 41 cobble 20%
Total 102 D84 71 boulder 0%
Note: D95 100 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 7 Riffle-MY02
Si
Particle Millimeter ii. Cou Particle
Ston Fyorkbution
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 6 XS 7 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 6
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25- .50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% ■ ■ ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 3
Very Fine 2-4 4 80%
Fine __ 4-5.7 G 2 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 3 60% mB°at
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 a T MY01
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 4 N
40% -A-MY02
Coarse 16-22.6 E 6 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 11 e
Very Coarse 32-45 S 14 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 13
Small 64-90 C 19 0%
Small 90- 128 0 15 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B 5 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L 1
Small 256-362 B 2 Size(mm) Size Distribution ffill
Small 362-512 L D16 2.7 mean 16.4 silt/clay 5%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 25 dispersion 8.8 sand 9%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 41 skewness -0.32 gravel 50%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 65 cobble 33%
117 D84 100 boulder 2%
Note: D95 150 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 10 Riffle-MY02
SizParticle Millimeterii. Count Particle
Stony
eD�oscbution
k
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 12 XS 10 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 17
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium _ .25- .50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 8 100% ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 6
Very Fine 2-4 8 ti 80%
Fine __ 4-5.7 G 1 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 2 60% As Buie
a
Medium 8- 11.3 A 2 a T MY01
Medium 11.3- 16 V 5 N
40% —A—n�ro2
Coarse 16-22.6 E 4 w
Coarse 22.6-32 L 5 e
Very Coarse 32-45 S 6 20%
ila
Very Coarse 45-64 9
Small 64-90 C 9 0%
Small 90- 128 0 3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.075 mean 2.0 silt/clay 12%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 0.55 dispersion 27.5 sand 36%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 2.5 skewness -0.06 gravel 41%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 16 cobble 12%
103 D84 54 boulder 0%
Note: D95 83 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 11 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Cou Particle Size Distribution
Stony Fork
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 10 xs 11 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 3
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium .25- .50 N 1
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% ■ ■ ■ ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 3
Very Fine 2-4 3 cl 80% 11
Fine 4-5.7 G _ a
Fine 5.7-8 R
C 60% As Bulk
Medium 8- 11.3 A s ' T AYm
Medium 11.3- 16 V N
40% T a�roz
Coarse 16-22.6 E a
Coarse 22.6-32 L 1 e A AAA AA- /
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 20 r: I A A AAAA AA
Small 64-90 C 15 0% ,
Small 90- 128 0 24 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B 6 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.19 mean 4.6 silt/clay 10%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 42 dispersion 151.0 sand 15%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 57 skewness -0.66 gravel 32%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 78 cobble 44%
Total 103 D84 110 boulder 0%
Note: D95 130 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 14 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter i Count Particle Size Distribution
Stony Fork
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 3 XS 14 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S 5
Fine .125-.25 A 8
Medium __ .25- .50 N 25
Coarse .50- 1 D 8 100% .. ■ ■ ■ • ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4
Very Fine 2-4 4 0 80% i
Fine __ 4-5.7 G 1 i
Fine 5.7-8 R C60% - BotMedium 8- 11.3 A a T aaro1
Medium 11.3- 16 V 1
C 40% —A—a�ro2
Coarse 16-22.6 E 2 .5
Coarse 22.6-32 L 2 e
Very Coarse 32-45 S 6 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 15
Small 64-90 C 6 0% • ,■
Small 90- 128 0 9 0.01 0.1 1 10 too 100o 1oo00
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.25 mean 4.2 silt/clay 3%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 0.43 dispersion 27.8 sand 49%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 1.4 skewness 0.30 gravel 30%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 39 cobble 18%
102 D84 70 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 16 Riffle-MY02
Particle Millimeter Cou Particle Size Distribution
Stony Fork
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C XS 16 Riffle
Very Fine .062- .125 S _ 2
Fine .125-.25 A 5
Medium .25- .50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 2 100% ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 3
Very Fine 2-4 8 80%
Fine __ 4-5.7 G 3 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 3 60% As Bulk
a
Medium 8- 11.3 A 3 a • • • - T MYO,
Medium 11.3- 16 V 1 N
40% —A—a�roz
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 5
Coarse 22.6-32 L 8 e
Very Coarse 32-45 S 14 20%
Very Coarse 45-64 16
Small 64-90 C 18 0%
Small 90- 128 0 9 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.6 mean 14.6 silt/clay 0%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 21 dispersion 8.2 sand 13%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 37 skewness -0.33 gravel 59%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 54 cobble 28%
107 D84 82 boulder 0%
Note: D95 120 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

APPENDIX E
Hydrologic Data
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 73 2020-MY02

Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Stream Gauge SF Main
183 J 5.0
January 1,2020
182 4.0
Gauge malfunction
w
0 181 I I 1 iJ&
3.0
et
7Z
w
II.
C 180 2.0 E.
ct
I. LALLAIL1411414,j 'ASIAIPt444,...*..0.0„4,.......L. I 1
179 I I I 1.0
[IIII 1� L1 . i i .178 . < < ilL 1I 0.0
, — N w N w 00 N A — N N — N N -1 N A ,-' N w
i v.:, — N Q, — N N ---• N N �l N A — N w sO 67.0 CCN it, — N
Vi A N — O ti J w N w .-. O 0 V ww N — ti 00 J ti Vi A O Oci) 7\ & Jtj (oZo pw , , 444 '-a aa 4440 � › Y .tg OOOo ZZ2 CC
C N � C U4 N n n C 9n ' O N N O N O N N N O N N O N N i t( O N N O N N N N
'OO O - G G' O O N O O N O N OOO O O O O O OO O O O O O O OOO OOO O
Date
Rainfall Stream Bed Elevation Stream Stage Elevation Bankfull Elevation Sensor Depth

Table 10.Verification of Stream Flow
Stony Fork Restoration Site, DMS Project#97085
Gauge Camera
Maximum Maximum
Reach Dates Achieving Consecutive Dates Achieving Consecutive
Days Days
T 1 January 1 —April 5; 152
June 3—November 1
TlA January 1 —April 5; 152 January 1 —July 1 183
June 3—November 1
T2 January 1 —April 5; 152 January 1 —February 22 53
June 3—November 1
T3 January 1 —April 5; 152
June 3—November 1
*Camera obscured or malfunctioned for most of the year
Table 11. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Greater than 30 Days of Flow/Max Consecutive Days
Reach MY-Ol MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05 MY-06 MY-07
2019 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
T1 Yes/60 Yes/152
(Gauge)
T1
(Camera)
TlA Yes/182 Yes/152
(Gauge)
TlA Yes/46 Yes/183
(Camera)
T2 Yes/85 Yes/152
(Gauge)
T2 Yes/84 Yes/53
(Camera)
T3 Yes/55 Yes/152
(Gauge)
T3 Yes/55
(Camera)
*Camera obscured or malfunctioned for most of the year
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCIAssociates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 75 2020-MY02

Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T1 Stream Flow Gauge
205 - - 5.0
January 1,2020
- 4.0
w
©
Gauge malfunction - 3.0
4.
et
E.
/
W 204 - m
a AO hil 4i4144#
96 Days 0. , 152 Days , 1 2.0
E
ca -
c I I
1.0
203 I.1I I,Ii4 � . i i _ Ilr � 1 . kl I. jil1 _. _i I. lit dill III , Ii II
0.0
O\ — N w N W 00 N . — N N — N N -.l N . — N w VD — N O\ — N N — N N -.l N . — N w VD — N O\ — N
cn . N r-- O ,. �l O\ W N — O �D 01 (J W N r-- ,y 00 J ,y th . — O ,,D O\ tr W N r-� Cr �l cn .
o ZZ0 C7C7C7 `" w 0 '71 'II 44 ,-a aa6- 444 `, > Y . OOOo ZZ2 CIC7
,- c n '� O N N O N N O N N N O N N N '1 '1 O N N O N N N 'i '7? UV O N N O N N N N C C N n n
VD V—D O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Date
Rainfall Sensor Elevation Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera) Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation

Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T1-A Stream Flow Gauge
204 5.0
January 1,2020
Gauge malfunction
4.0
II hIIMM AM
203 per .11
c N - 3.0
a 96 Days Camera obscured 152 Days 7:
1 ► 4 ► E.
W Po
.r
an ..
c%
Cir 2.0
E
2 202 -
CID I
1.0
201
lilli. I Li 1 _ 1 1,1 .1 ]
iii III lr _.1 I L
0.0
Q -'- AN LW N— —N OW �0 —I Cr,' ? W— NN N N iN —� c.nN -1'
— N W— \O (7'0 NJ O," —' . N — NO �N CO� N . w N W— `O 0 0 JN T u— AN
o t7C ` 11a , , 41n od ZZd ; c � '7 D444 ' YY 444S YYY nrfOOO ZZ00
CCn nn p CCNPhhN ' " `C ' 'C N h hnNO ,! N t a ' `GG `GN O N N Cr? CT CI? N N N
OOOO OONNNOOOO O CA OOOOOOO
`O O O O O O O IV
O O O O O O OO O O O
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera)

Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T2 Stream Flow Gauge
191 - - 5.0
January 1,2020
4.0
190
w
c Gauge malfunction - 3.0
a Camera malfunction
W E.
189 -
/a
a
A.
�' Nl 1fy 2.0 JLA) 1 :
E
a
IP116.6141,111114 PO°
A.. 41414
C/) IONA". NA, IiI4V4)414"11\144VI
188 r1.111441111. , 96 Days 1 - , I 1152 Days ►
I I 1 1.0
. L 1. iIt . . _.� E I L L t I
187Il'iIli' k I i 0.0
O1 t— N WN N W oo J QN1 .. — N N -- N ,N — 0 NV — N W— '.yO — JN mti — .N N 1— O NO l O\ cNn . — NN W 'D — NJ 9
1 — V.
ti ,
'� n ON � tiO C C C n n
-, O N N N t `< N N N N i . . Nr.) NN N N N
OOO N ON O N N N O NO O OOOOOOOOOO OOOOO OOO OOO !No) OOOO�
Date
Rainfall Sensor Depth Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera)

Stony Fork Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T3 Stream Flow Gauge
210 - 5.0
January 1,2020
209 - 4.0
Camera malfunct on
w
c 208 - 3.0
ea
Gauge malfunction
W
/ / 14%6°01,14,1414„an 77612.
..
ct
c 207 - 2.0 ..
E
et
I 96 Days 152 Days
I I I I 1 I
206 — I I 1.0
ispil
a, — N W — N W 00 — N ? '-- N N — N N - '-- N . — N W �p —' N 9, --' N N — N N - --' N A --' N W ,.0 — N a, — N
cn A N '-' O L. J a� W N ' O `O a1 c.n W N — ti 00 J ,'� c.n ? O �O a� cn w N 1 00 J cn A
o Z Z d t7 l7 C7 p " w e cgc czo : 4 4 4 'a Y Y p 4' 4 4' S c c c Y Y Y 2, K rf, c O O O o Z Z d t7 t7
_ G C n n n n N i 'Yits, N C C N �t h h N "a "� `C `G ` `G N Y O N N trQ trQ trQ N 'Y '7 N g g N C C N c2i c2i
`O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O co O O O O O O O O O
O O O
Date
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow(Camera)

APPENDIX F
Additional Information
Stony Fork Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#97085 80 2020-MY02

ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
K C J
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd.,Suite 400•Raleigh,NC 27609 •Phone [phone]•Fax [phone]
February 12, 2021
Jerry Parrish and Lisa Parrish
4141 Elevation Road
Benson, NC 27504
RE: Conservation Easement Encroachment
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Parrish
I am writing to inform you that at a recent visit to the site(February 9,2021),4-wheeler tracks were noted
entering the conservation easement from your property. These tracks entered the easement from the
path along the eastern edge of your property and continued for about 400 feet before exiting the
easement near the end of Sherrill Farm Drive. The Conservation Easement is associated with a stream
restoration project and the purpose of this project was to restore portions of Stony Fork(the stream near
your property) and several feeder streams to mitigate the impacts to streams associated with
development projects in the area. As such, the use of motorized vehicles within the easement is
prohibited. Specifially, Section II, Item B of the recorded conservation easement states:
Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited
except within a Crossing Area(s) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey plat.
I have included a copy of the recorded survey plat for your reference. Additionally, the easement line is
clearly marked with signage along its length, including in the area of 4-wheeler access.We appreciate your
efforts to abide by the terms of the easement and to help resolve this issue. If you would like further
assistance in ensuring there is no unauthorized access to the easement or have any other questions,
please feel free to contact me.
Regards,
Tim Morris
Senior Environmental Scientist
KCI Technologies Inc.
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
[e-mail]
Office 919.278.2511
Cell 919.793.6886
www.kci.com
THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM W W W.KCI.COM

OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #1&6) SPO FILE NO. 51-CD OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #4) SPO FILE NO. 51-CF OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #5) SPO FILE NO. 51-CE NOTES: �JP101'I F�
1. THIS PLAT DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT TRACTS.THE PARENT O
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND TRACT BOUNDARIES ADJACENT TO THIS EASEMENT ARE NOT CHANGED BY THIS PLAT.
DESCRIBED HEREON,WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION DESCRIBED HEREON,WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION DESCRIBED HEREON,WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS DERIVED FROM DEEDS AND MAPS OF �� *SITE*
RECORD IN JOHNSTON COUNTY AND MONUMENTATION FOUND IN THE FIELD.
OF THE COUNTY OF JOHNSTON AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS OF THE COUNTY OF JOHNSTON AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS OF THE COUNTY OF JOHNSTON AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS
SUBDIVISION PLAN WITH MY FREE CONSENT,ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK SUBDIVISION PLAN WITH MY FREE CONSENT,ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK SUBDIVISION PLAN WITH MY FREE CONSENT,ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK 2. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN U.S.SURVEY FEET
LINES,AND DEDICATE ALL STREETS,ALLEYS,PARKS AND OTHER SITES AND LINES,AND DEDICATE ALL STREETS,ALLEYS,PARKS AND OTHER SITES AND LINES,AND DEDICATE ALL STREETS,ALLEYS,PARKS AND OTHER SITES AND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
EASEMENTS TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE USE AS NOTED. EASEMENTS TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE USE AS NOTED. EAS TS TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE USE AS NOTED. -,N o
3. AREA COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD. Q /
4. THE BASIS OF THE MERIDIANS AND COORDINATES FOR THIS PLAT IS THE NORTH CAROLINA 9 s D, 5
�t /w//�S/� /0+` . •I 7 --�' 0 raug� w /e.'�•' STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983(HAD 83),BASED ON �pce P.(ll (� Ea,serifeae -it_ s DIFFERENTIAL GPS OBSERVATIONS PERFORMED IN OCTOBER 2016.ALL DISTANCES ARE a Y(
GARY T'BE ON 1 DATE DAN L MEDLIN JR. DATE SHERRI { RM LLC DATE GROUND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. fill)
US N1
l 5. DEED REFERENCES:AS SHOWN HEREON. ,
{/4 4?t 1a1 DATE17 1011211 1 6. SUBJECT PROPERTIES KNOWN AS TAX NUMBER:AS SHOWN HEREON.
2005.
I DA W.BENSON
CATHRYN Z.MEOILIN DTE 7. SUBJECT PROPERTIES PARTIALLY LIE WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED AS ZONE"X",
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #2)SPO FILE NO. 51-CH BASED ON FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 3720164100J EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 2,
//• ,"7 8. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING PERFORMED DURING THE COURSE OF THIS /
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND ,4Z-5541/141°1 --. /A• SURVEY.
DESCRIBED HEREON,WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION WILLIAM R.MEDLIN DATE
mA., ,
OF THE COUNTY OF JOHNSTON AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS 9. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,ITS EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS,SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, VICINITY MAP
SUBDIVISION PLAN WITH MY FREE CONSENT,ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK RECEIVE A PERPETUAL RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE EASEMENT AREA OVER THE PROPERTY AT
////�► REASONABLE TIMES TO UNDERTAKE ANY ACTIVITIES TO RESTORE,CONSTRUCT,MANAGE, \ (NOT TO SCALE)
LINES,AND DEDICATE ALL STREETS,ALLEYS,PARKS AND OTHER SITES AND �� �(�/ MAINTAIN,ENHANCE,AND MONITOR THE STREAM,WETLAND AND ANY OTHER RIPARIAN
EAS MENTS TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE USE AS NOTED. BONNIE MEDLIN DATE RESOURCES IN THE EASEMENT AREA,IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESTORATION ACTIVITIES OR A
/tt/,
LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 111-A OF THE CONSERVATIONotriiNV5,011661 . EASEMENT AGREEMENT LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 467.40 N68'30'11"E
F ISHA BETH BLACKMON DATE G /o/7//? L2 58.52 S43'08'24"W
DEVAN BARBOURII DATE L3 30.01 N72'45'S8'E PT" NORTHING EASTING
1 618047.77 2141051.73
r 2 617918.86 Z140698.76
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #3)SPO FILE NO. 51-CG i` /'�I 1-7 EASEMENT LINE TABLE 3 617980.9835 2140655.93
60
LINE LENGTH BEARING4 _
DEVAN BARBOUR,IV DA E El 375.77 S69'56'15'W 5 618045.11 2140654.99
E2 65.59 N06'51'27"W
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND E3 35.52 S84'07'59"W 6 617943.80 2140523.95
DESCRIBED HEREON,WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION E4 64.76 N00'32'02"W 7 617889.94 2140454.29
OF THE COUNTY OF JOHNSTON AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS E5 165.63 S5217'28"W 8 618081.96 2140410.12
SUBDIVISION PLAN WITH MY FREE CONSENT,ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK E6 88.06 S5217'28"W 9 618166.23 2140835.92
LINES,AND DEDICATE ALL STREETS,ALLEYS,PARKS AND OTHER SITES AND E7 197.03 N12'57'14"W 10 618314.72 2141045.83
EASEMENTS TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE USE AS NOTED. ES 434.06 N78'4817'E
11 617971.92 2140573.54
E9 257.12 N54'43'26'E 12 617954.42 2140575.64
w M/ .y E10 267.02 S01'15'58"E 13 618799.06 2141035.12
Ell 82.49
��•�1+ `, TlivirP4r4L...- 1 D tat 1 .I- .06 2141164.37
E12 17.62 SO6'51'27'E 15 618515.46 2141390.56
JERRY W.PARRI$H DATE 1.
El 52.77 57823'16"W 16 618409.15 2141410.46
r El 751.47 NO115'58"W 17 618378.47 2141673.38
idel; 8.. friF / / E15 129.25 N90'00'00"E 18 618291.95 2141671.72
/ // Et6 362.76 S38'34'31"E 19 618219.05 2141486.62
// / E17 108.15 S10'36'O6"E 20 618185.21 2141713.34
IS PARRISH DATE i /j/ E18 264.70 S83'20'39"E 21 618196.91 2141676.29
El 86.54 S01'05'46"W 22 620140.32 2142411.62
/ /1 E20 666.35 S68'30'11'W 23 619921.50 2142408.96
R�P� //// I 01.0 E22 114.57 S21118'117"E 25 620186.80 2142229.93
fl° .35
,rOB/ E23 38.86 N72'28'27"W 26 620179.48 2142328.94
E�E�3o�1:°�// E25 218.84 500'41'45"W 28 619025.87 2143013.98
G5R E26 218.16 N59'50'04"W 29 618852.71 2142812.35
�/ / E27 155.96 NO3'31'19"E
30 618677.61 2142591.14
4
/...' / 4 E26 99.28 S85'46'28"E 31 618367.78 2142424.75
E29 91.49 S64'39'20"E
/ / 32 618333.62 2142375.63
.7"
// E30 245.32 589'02'47"E
33 618339.64 2142258.03
OA ?...a E31 265.78 S49'20'40"W 34 618372.04 2142182.32
/ % t
milli*
E32 282.13 S51'38'12'W
/ /'' 35 618540.]9 2142339.90
E33 351.68 52814'09"W
// / E34 59.84 S55'11'21"W 618826.0136 2142521.09
/ / E35 117.75 N8T04'13"W 37 618367.94 2142085.59
REBECCA CLIFTON 38 618329.34 2142142.31
/ / PIN 16 4100-39-8527 E36 82.35 N66'49'37"W
.£ED BOOK 3381,iiiiiPAGE 37 E37 230.44 N43'08'24"E
39 618285.21 2142245.41
/ E38 338.41 N32 22'18'E 40 618282.22 2142303.88
\\
E39 320.77 N50'31'26"E 41 618050.94 2142138.52
` "WV E40 112.15 S66'49'37'E 42 618373.72 2141714.16
/ ,A, 43 618248.77 2142066.80
/ GARY r BENSON E41 58.55 SST04'13"E
,Ie
PIN 16,100-29-9157 44 620068.22 2142563.85
xED BOOK„30,PAGE 674 E42 284.31 S35'33'51"W 45 619884.08 2142653.59
E43 445.87 N72'28'27"W
E44 41.06 S83 20'39'E 46 619744.57 2142903.14
I I ., L
E45 374.12 S70'29'22"E
47 619459.80 2143155.07
I I`1 '-- ``111.
E46 110.43 N43'08'24'E 48 619495.27 214334i.76
`! 4 i E47 168.44 S64'39'20"E 49 619630.96 2143a93.25
E48 204.84 S25 58'57'E
50 619643.78 2143534.56
E ; 51 619620.64 2143542.21
E49 285.89 S60'4T36'E
E50 380.21 S4129'53"E 52 619545.21 2143642.64
Val,, 34 '€ I ' E51 190.03 N7914'36"E 53 61947639 2143657.58
I: r� E52 203.38 N48'08'53'E 54 619316.56 2143450.05
y E53 43.25 N72'45'58"E 55 619183.57 2143134.42
", \ E54 24.38 S1818'00"E 56 619055.62 2143048.63
' 1 E55 125.76 S53'08'51"E 57 619059.36 2142789.71
E56 70.38 S12'05'25"E 58 619301.46 2142982.28
I ` E57 261.95 S52'23'53"W 59 619580.70 2142808.84
I I tg ,; E58 342.50 567'09' "W 60 619689.43 2142591.99
rear"w PARRISn z E59 154.05 S33 50'4040"W 61 619652.67 2143563.22
I I PIN 164100-19-159B r 1 6
DEED Boar 1147,PAGE 287 ''';a' „,' E60 258.94 N89'10'23"W 62 619684.92 2143667.17
I I �' E61 309.35 N38'29'57"E 63 619521.39 2143720.69
I I !I 4 ;'�`gx E62 328.72 N31 50'39"W 64 619494.46 2143751.85
N T E63 242.58 Nfi3'22'20"W 65 619482.04 2143687.05
I 51� SHERRILL FARM.LW '&�,
N� I,, PM 16acD-28-7593 E64 295.56 N3815'39'W 66 619562.48 2143669.82
I 1 GARY rNOMAs BENsaN , r: a DEED BOOK 4702,PAGE 505 Efi5 1 D8.84 N72'45'58"E 67 619638.99 2143567.74
P/N/6113701 PA e45 I,,04C1i I t, CONSERVATION DEED soar 37or PAGE 909 9'Pg �1 E66 172.06 S18'07'18"E
'
m 1 1 Iz1� ah �¢` �` EASEMENT E67 41.18 S49 09'47"E
O €t1g E68 65.98 S79'09'08"W
g n I 1 A-;` �r1 I I`' E69 82.27 N12 05'25"W
c. y I t INkftelf o • h 1 a SEE SHEET 2 E70 127.58 N53008'51"W
1 I m �" "I I' '"I 1,,I/ r 0 6 t '/I a1 E71 14.40 N1818'00"W
lsl:
1 ,-- - - -- FINAL PLAT
I,JAMES M.GELLENTHIN,HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN -., N/F CONSERVATION EASEMENT
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION, 1 • ecONN R MEDLIN IN&
THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED,AS BONNIE a M7-23
1 PIN r6 2357 FOR
DRAWN FROM INFORMATION AS SHOWN HEREON: THAT THE RATIC),AS 11 I I I I,4E DEED 4834 PAGE 637
PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS GREATER THAN 1:10,000;THAT TMI?MA A R O E47,7 MAxaE x eouN HEIRS 1 �FAnsnA BEN B AcxMaN STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DOES REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY(OF THf�I?ASff�NEN I,,- DEED BOOr1-07P GE 147 1 DEEPRY D B1647OOK 3358,7PAGE 941 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
AREA)AND HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 6''S./.71p S S /•''•., 4/ % V 11
AMENDED.WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,REGIST D,N11 i 0�9 y . DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
AND SEAL THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER,2017 S. PROJECT NAME: STONY FORK RESTORATION PROJECT
SEAL : '' DMS PROJECT#: 97085
!L!-'•A'r L-3860 , 1 z = SPO FILE NO. 51-CD, 51-CE, 51-CF, 51-CG, 51-CH
No AROLINA REGISTRATION NUMBER L-38>SO,:Z ELEVATION TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON COUNTY
' `� ''O NORTH CAROLINA
JAMES M. GELLENTHIN c•:/N
•
�' S ''., S U R J; �` STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
c JOHNSTON COUNTY / ? DATE: SCALE: SHEET:
''''/.....1 EI0` ‘````` STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FILED FOR REGISTRATION AT II 3J •i.2 4 THIS PLAT IS EXEMPT FROM THE DEFINITION OF A AUGUST 16, 2017 N/A 1 OF 2
I,JAMES M.GELLENTHIN,PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR.NO.L-3860 NS ON 9,0 ) SUBDIVISION WITHIN THE ZONING JURISDICTION OF THE
CERTIFY TO THE FOLLOWING AS REQUIRED IN G.S.47-30(F)(11): VIEW OFFICER of!` D 6�r 20 / ? IN THE JOHNSTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT.THAT THE SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY,SUCH AS THE O O NT ,CERTIFY THAT THE MAP REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C.
RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS,A COURT ORDERED SURVEY,OR OR PLAT WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED
OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISIO . MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDED IN BOOK 8 lJ PAGE ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS
ECORDING. O • l ,4 e / /7 6-4-- '/JI�3 I
- ��� E / ! JOHNe ON COUNTY-PLANNER K C 4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, FLOOR 4
w � Y )a)�3�l7 BY ✓IjSa
NO AROLIN REGISTRATION NUMBER L-3860 REVI W OFFICER DATE • / ASSOCIATES OF R83-921 NC 27607
JAMES M. GELLENTHIN f 6 1 REVISED:9/7/17 NOR C 076 CAROLINA PHONE [phone] * FAX [phone]

0
DETAIL NCGS(MO
AH LANG E dr�ON
IT
BEND (AH4769) / ir
N.62706759
E.2,134,119.26
CSF:0.99987437 /
101g1
°.°
s e�€�€€ r ra 11€ €�+ �x$1S pfs1 w{ray €s& �'Ix Yr srgr� rr ,,� 40
IP -p rl �P.�
x S€"`�"c Ps 8 I I �„$6 `F. y'W,€+4 48K 1 $€P t€S r Gca / O 1,
1 �� ��o i' I�IE€ i61=I � r, P ����� r¢��6������`i 3 f l F� � 1�������� � �� I��.. � ) / / / �S �
S f Y+e a 8si,c & q pF€ y .E `11°i� A
.. F 4�P 4'I 7 B. 6 1✓s4 r�8 .g .3,k /
k"J . °�, a ` <g , £, taipt-. 0 � i 0 /' / / P.O.C.
6't . ,,14 r (J CE 5
CE 6
:.ik!.
Viv
lit
i .;j:47,7,:,
.9sC�11:1;
`�..4� 1„'S $'4e,a �tl,;1;ill ill il:joi �. d 1,4 '�'t l!!1:7:10,1, &�� I ',5 , :'i � ,,., ;7i,°'.irx ,i-. .a t1i, „i.b AT G0 P ry l�l�l€4`` ;,;,; m Ell `�� ��`I�;IP� '�;� E O. E: III 3$ 5R /1
IRE40 /
j ,;,�'` CE2 PET `' + /
3,792 SF FIB
LEGEND
#7 0.09AC CEMETERY
Y ./.. / / �o
DISTURB / ,../
"'
• EXISTING PK NAIL
NA-
FA / / QQ EXISTING IRON
T/SNA BE7N BLACKMON /
P/N 164100-07-4699 1110 5/8"*30" REBAR SET W/3.25" ALUMINUM
DEED BOOK 3358, PAGE 941 11111
CAP WITH STATE SEAL
C� FIP Itt1101y O CALCULATED POINT
/ oo O EXISTING MONUMENT
"' NEW CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR
/ / "DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES'
P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING
l N/F P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
/ / REBECCA C CLIFTON
PIN 164100-39-8527
/ DEED BOOK 3381, PAGE 37
P.O.B.
/ FIP FIB CE 5A
\ #25 f E28 #f CE 6A
a I I 111 w I'
/ -....-_,.----. ' ?g
w, 22
6 , 1
/ 44 #44
lam • N/F IIII Mill
i #24` f r"';' GARY T BENSON
1 `: PIN 164100-29-9457
a' DEED BOOK 1430, PAGE 674
CE SA • ,.-
36,783 SF ,#4s
• I CE 68
I I € F�9 12,749 5�
,..
#46 P. .
0.29AC
I CE 6B �, cn
3f1\E1 #62
c 1 r r 6z #s0 /61 E6 "`
f k 1
1 ' ?& I- E r F #49 8,i.I?yeC114. fn
I
o • ili
ui0°m ,i . egg �S ,,,..
371,931 SF K1�` h ��
.. ,-; 'FL:. . -#54
8.54AC
s ,r a 3s a �� . 8
4v�O�,r i, •, •:: ;#55
I ;; P.O.B.
CE 5B\#57 rt - �h
cb
;l a��� fEL ���1111111111
$89 02'47"E #56 S89.02'47"E ���� `� C A 4 0 ���'�,
I 1 370.53' (TIE) #27 .- \
11 3 w #28 i078.87'(TIE) FIB FIP 0��•'F E S S /3 1' �;
1 .7,3.;,:3 p 9
N/F
JERKY W. PARRISH j CESB 4P • ,,!,,;` 1 .;,'1 z
1 I PIN 164100-19-1598 - °Q
P o 148,176SF _ * . ...................................
EA
DEED BOOK 1147, PAGE 287 5 0 3.40AC
rn � I kI #2s L- 6
#13 E15 #�4 #36 77'7
Fi SHERRIL N/F
ARM, LLC �� •1�. 30 .,���''• C E L;``��.
+,' a 6g8;4Yr�# ./11111111\
N/F PIN 164100-28-7593 1 .
` GARY THOMAS BENSON - DEED BOOK 4702, PAGE 505 kit!.tt4.4
fix',
P/N 164100-08-6845 r .E.4. #35
DEED BOOK 3701 PAGE 909 #15
\ C � "+are of North Card=ina,Johnston Co.
m 1 �� I k� g station at //:3.3':211i M.
A #'6. Elf; #, ,, 15 0 + r Cr *bpi.-1 20__LP__in the
4 #42 Po.e. #34 ` ` ` 41 � � #31 ReatrArDttaL FINAL PLAT
III CE SC \
Fos . _ $d.� yl3
1 3a ''4.? 1{Cu�t�d�,. 5 Pane CONSERVATION EASEMENT
La #39 `4'
.
b CE? r1 #43 ' ' MC FOR
C �� 1 r1 rr re;YI " r #40
C \ \ 118,4205f 13£EE 0 f - #19 . ,\1 1! f 19 tll '— STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
C W 2.72 ACf ::0�:It: + . e`>: / E24° a £' E Y ,3
o / Lw ;Ift.!!!!!!.!:10.:".71.,F=...1.,: O •11000p � DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 62 Po.e. DIVISIONOFMITIGATIONSERVICES� \ ,,.,,:::!,,
�jI `' -'� cE 4 CE4 451:5714#1.1. PROJECT NAME: STONY FORK RESTORATION PROJECT•,:;:.1.::
#8 ; ,
t":i
#i 10,696 SF CE SC 44 ' 41
/�IRF 0.25 AC
DMS PROJECT#: 97085
a 6 ; I
�;I\ • ,,' ;,•i.;i•ii4:-,:i5], :::, • �, ° gs 108,065SF SPO FILE NO. 51-CD, 51-CE, 51-CF, 51-CG, 51-CH
.e,
�t P.O.B. N/F 2.48AC ELEVATION TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON COUNTY
-��_ CE 1 WILLIAM R MEDLIN & NORTH CAROLINA
PET , 4
CE 3 BONNIE J MEDLIN DATE: SCALE: SHEET:
CEMETERY CE 2 P.D.C. PIN 164 100-1 7-2357
DO NOT SEE DEED 4834 PAGE 637 AUGUST 16, 2017 1" = 250' 2 OF 2
DISTURB DETAIL IIPPr 3,792 SF
EllEE
N/F 1 ' 0.09AC =��giii KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C.
MAX/NE K. MEDLIN, HEIRS 1 N/F
PIN 164100 07-3890 \ FIP FATISHA BETH BLACKMON GRAPHIC SCALE ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS
DEED BOOK 1025, PAGE 147 �� PIN 164 100-07-4699
% DEED BOOK 3358, PAGE 941 250 l!siew !!!.°
125 250 500 K C I
4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, FLOOR 4
NORTHASSOCIATES
C-07 CAROLINA
RALEIGH, N* 27607
1 INCH = 250 FEET PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
C-0764