WQ0002427_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL A EMENT
GROUNDWATER ATER SECTION
cQu .
r
March 2, 1990
,9go
MEM RAN U t6` r .gyp or ,
U on Safrit
uj
:t
THROUGH: Bob Cheek
FROM: ill Reid
SUBJECT: McGee Business Park
Renewal of Permit No. 13465
Artificial Wetland
Union Co.
Q000 4 ' / t S S3
ark Hawes: I EM SERG Review Engineer
Conditions #8 and f the current permit should be replaced
with the following:
1 The four 4 existing monitor wells shall be sampled
every April, ,august and December for the following
parameters:
NO (10.0) Ammonia Nitrogen
TDB ( TOE
pH ( .5- .5 standard units) Orthophosphate
Total lifcrm 1 1; ml
Chloride (250.0) Iron
Volatile Organic Compounds In December Only by
method 1 or 2 below)
Method 1 Method 6230D (Capillary - Column), "Standard
Methods For The Examination of Grater and
Wastewater", 1 th ed;. , 1989
Method method 502.2 "Methods For The Determination
Of Organic Compounds In Drinking Water", U.S.
The measurement of water level must be made prior t
sampling for the remaining parameters
The numbers in parentheses represent the maximum allowable
concentrationsfor the various analytical
parameters,, as specified in 15 NCAC 2L [Groundwater
Classifications and Standards]: Unless otherwise specified.,`,
units for these concentrations are expressed as milligrams per
liter.

ppppppp-
If TOC concentrations greater than 10 g/l are detected in
any downgradient monitoring well, additional sampling and
analysis rust be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this "HOC concentration. it the 'TO
concentration as measured in: the backqrqpnd monitor well
exceeds 10 mg/l, this concentration will be taken to
represent the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any
exceedances of this naturally occurring TOC concentration in
the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional
sampling and analysis as described above_:
It any volatile organic compounds are detected by method
0 ,` or the equivalent method 502.2, then EPA methods fat►
and Ell Faust also be run to detect other organic compound
which may be present. The results of all analyses specified
in the monitoring requirements, including 604 and 611 if
required, must be submitted simultaneously.
The results of the sampling and analysis shall: be sent t
the N.C. Division of Environmental Management on Form -5
[Compliance Monitoring Report Form] every May, September and
January.
., Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed:
necessary by the Division, shall be provided.
It is recommended that the permit be reissued for a period of two
years. A regional wastewater treatment plant is scheduled to
serve the area within the next 12 to 18 months..
WR/ a
CC.* Barbara: Christian
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

E
S low .Max 13cail
. ?"
VIA-7N1'S:L °ti Tt', L k, A S T9.. ..i': .T:x ._ S..,.a.VIi'7 ::" 1, k ....
Results of6&mple onslysis periarmea an cGee
~ells b
Wivayenua 44inte}[:1s Systems,
_
Y147 SUSPENDED
SOLIDS i 15 G
51
AGIL
kith. 0LVE P
uAW,L+'drl Fjai,` CIO <10 K10
n k„+
L 0.0 12,5 1, . �j
20.E
'A Von
TA ARGANIC
"3
i�J1, L E S 1"sHAA.!Ytfrl r 30 November 1965 to 14 Fi.rcY,B._ uary
:A.992
too
;: t.." L' S-r:PORT 15 ii 0.:n C.r l.i'=• 7" 1990
TIF IE .l. is ,
twos A LVA k; w �v ,� ,i `:. a , LABORATORY MA' RVI S R ,:.. .LrMS
..

I ji .41 V
C 1 10 4 1
ME
kz
PAX U !01 t.
November
10411
AtOpRIS W VOW
f: ""ta"M
't t s,,%, r I
kR KLD
tit()jEic,r. wen
CLIP0 Wien
S i f H w%, it
"Ll
M AN!
Unwit oil
11;7niju u: 0, kv!
n,p, i �Cil
i1wolva Y. T',, ANI
1 S SAMFU MyafdE
R 1, S Pull till LIZ",
W�Owwea Wks 120
17 ! I),
(' �,9
, ",�3
V ,
"w"Widn",
re
too j
IM
Mcy W)RAMI:
14

,A! 111; DC a j WH 10 LN
Oki ft
PACE MCI,
SAMPA'S
;Nis 1,u.

3Hv+7
,8a-1375
October 19,
W
RETI
C
d—
_
water
.
as

Mr. Jesse W. Wells
page Two
October 19, 1989
SING
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
FULL SERVICE LABORATORIES - ENGINEERS & CHEMISTS
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
1881
P.O. Box 34766
Charlotte, NC 28234
[phone]
October 18, 1989
McGee Corporation
Post Office Box 1375
Matthews, North Carolina 28106-1375
Attn: Mr. Morris McGee
Re: Chemical Analysis of Water Samples
McGee Corporation
1.701 East Independence Boulevard
Matthews, Nort,111 Carolina
F&R File No, Q-633-117
Dear Mr. McGee:
On October 3, 1989, engineering personnel from our office
obtained water samples from four monitoring wells located around
the oerimater of a treatraent of located at 'k--he referenced site.
The samples were the t,ransported to the chemical lay for
chemical analvsis. Chemical anal%sis for lily -,-a---, herh)4c4des and
pesticides, 14'ecal coliform, radiation, dissolved soli6s and TOX.
Results -for metals, herbicides and cesticides and fecal --olifo.-M,
are attache6. Results of -zhe radiation, dissolved sclids and, 7110)'
should be ava-ilable not "Later than October 25, 1989 and wi11' be
transm'Ltted to you as soon as possible.
HEADQUARTER S3('L,19DuN1BAHr0N RO AD* BOX 27524
T FAL E- PHONE AREA CODE (804) 9C,4
BRANCHEST ASS IF V1ILE N(.,#F3A1,TMN0RE MDoCHART .07
CROZET, VA # F AYL T'TE_V1(.LE NC # FREOF-RICKSBURG
RAL,EV.;H, NC # ROANOKE, VA * STERL ING, VA # SAUS,
vA#GRFENViL,..-'
URY, MD
v,
v
3"Al
CHARTLRMLWk 'E:l
C, H A Vi R M E M 8 L K NO WWPSJNC� NIA

I
We ap;Dreciate the opportunity to assist you with this work, if
you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
F&R, Inc.
k�c
Dewitt Whitten, E.I.T.
Geotechnical Engineering Staff
Michael G. Clough, P.E.
Branch Manager
i)w m
aft

SINCIF
(9c.
t8at
TEST RESULTS
PA
TAjLS MW#1 MW # 2 MW#3 MW#4 REQUIREMENTS
Arsenic < 05ppm <. 5ppm <. 5ppm < 05ppm 0. 5pp
Barium <.1 pp .l ppm - <,10ppm <.loppm 1.0 ppi
Cadmium <.O1ppm <.0lppm <. 1ppm <. 1ppm 0. 1ppm
Lead. <_.05ppm <,05ppm <. 5ppm < 05ppm 0. 5ppm
Mercury _ <. 01ppm, <.O ,ppm <* 1ppm <. 0lppm 0.002ppm
Selenium < pp <*Olppm <. 1ppr < Olppm O. 1pp
Silver <. 05ppm <.05ppm <. f 5ppm <.05ppm Q. 5ppr
OTHER
Nitrate <.50pp. <.5 ppm <. 0pp <.55ppm Passes
Fluoride < 20ppm<.20ppm'' <. ppm <.5 ppm ?gasses`
Turbidity ��TU) 1 1 1 3.5 Lasses
HERBICIDES & PESTICIDES
n rin < 002ppm <. 02ppm <.002ppm <-.0 2ppm 5.002ppm
Lindane <. 004ppm <. 004pp <,004ppm <.000 ppm Q 0004pprr
Methoxychlcr <.Olppm <tOlppm <.Olpp t <:01ppm 5. 1ppm
ToxaDhene <* 05ppm <.005ppm <. Q5ppm <.001Ippm 0. 05pprr,
2, 4-D <.1 pDm < . 15ppm < . 1 ppr < , l oppm 0. 10ppm
2 4,, 5- T <. 0 1ppm <.01p m <.0 1ppm <_. 01ppm O . Olppt
FECAL COLIFORYI

FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
FULL SERVICE LABORATORIES - ENGINEERS & CHEMISTS
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
al
1881
P.O. Box 34766
Charlotte, NC 28234
( 7 0 4) 3 7 6- 15 9 6
October 27, 1939
McGee Corporation
Post Office Box 1375
Matthews, North Carolina 28106-1375
Attn: Mr. Morris McGee
Re: Chemical Analysis of Water Samples
McGee Corporation
12701 East independence Boulevard
Matthews, North Carolina
F&R File N. Q-63-117
Dear Mr. McGee:
we discussed previously, additional chemical testing of the
water samples obtained from the referenced site on October 3,
1989 were required to conform to the North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources requirements. These test results are presented
Below. Results of the radiation and dissolved solids should be
available not later than November 1, 1989 and will be
transmitted to you as soon as possible.
MW-1 MW-2 Mtn- 3 MW-4
TOX <.001PPM <.001ppm <.001ppm Molpprn
Trihalomethan e <.01PPM <.01PPM MIPPM <.01pprn
eaterN11,
Ar 1,
'DW,,-,BAR70N POAD* BC)X 2,,",24* RICHM()ND VA
HEADQUARTERS:
-ELEPf<)NF AHLA CODE �8C,,A, ',M,-,4 271,­,'!
BRANCHES: ASHEV LL E NC 0 BAL T IM()HE, MD* CHAR[ JTII E, NCO CHESAPEAKE, VA 0
:T1zET.VA*FAYE7TEVHLE NCO FREDERICKSBURG VAeGREENVRO SC
4 _ WK NC a RMNOKE VP� * STERLING, VA o SAL1513LJRY MR,

I
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with this work. if
you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
WR,
Wh
Geotechnical Engineering Staff
Michael G. Clough, P.E.
Branch Manager

FULL SERWCE LABORATORIES ICE HMET
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
1881' . . Box 34766
Charlotte, NC 2E234
(7 ) 376-1596
October 32,.1 YF
McGee Corporation
Post Office Boy 1375
Matthews, North Carolina 28106-1375
Atts: Mr. Morris McGee
Chemical Analysis of Water Samples
McGee Corporation
12701 East Independence Boulevard
Matthews, North Carolina
F&R File No. Q-63-117
Dear Mr. McGee:
Tne additional chemical testing of the water Sa17',::-es Ottaine6,
from the referenced ed , t
and are presented below. rased on these results and the previous
results rePOrted in our corresponience datei October :6,
October 27, 1989, the water Samples meet the req��:,remej-:,rs cf
Environmental Protection Agency and the Tor h Car l ° aDepartment
i Natural Resources.
Beta : <1
Picocuries/liter
HEADOUARTFRS 301U 9 ARTIO . RO I[7
) El E-t)OW AREA CODE
:50ZE1 VA F AY'E`[ rE VALE 'tie:, 0 VREE)E
(8N) "
cr
ti'�i.R,�,.:``EN l4N f; .4":�.C.:
wi4f3'�3 i.4i JeF 44�✓` t R, ;;SA3#. d y?y�„f: +, sk.0

you have any questions please do not hesitate to r-, ` t US.
very gull yours,
.$
s
S
-'-ichae-I G. Cioua'-4'
W b ran , n r

4.,
Or" ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
REW L
MEMORANDUM O
O:
DATE:
FROM:ill Reid
SUBJECT: Application for V1, Renewal Amendment of Permit i
o.
it
Facility 'Name
County
Type of Project J
APplicable Permit Numbers C-W W
EPA AC
We have received a copy of the above referenced application,
which was sent to Your regional office for comment on or about
1989.
You should review the application a ; aa'e for completeness an adequa'elevant information and submityour request for
_additional information to rye is telephone � or memo y
1989 so that all required information can be
r rua d r a applicant at one time., A cOPYOf our formal
request to the applicant for additional information will
be
provided to you
If you do not require additional information from the
applicant.to compl -e your evaluation of the project;_ eau should
re%riew the ap li a-i z-I package and s,ubmit your comments to rare b
1:
if a,cc 1' Off. z1he plicatiol) pa has not been made
available to your office, I'LEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so that
copy can be forty,},ar ed to you as soon as possible.
MDC/APPMEMO

State of North Carolina
DePartment of ErMronment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 No Salisbury Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G Martin, Govemor October 23, 1989 K Paw Wirns
Wiliam W. Cobey, jr,, Secretary Director
Mr. Ronald T. Parker
P.O. Box 509
Monroe, NC 28110
Nm
Dear Mr. Parker: sou'acy8
CON
SUBJECT: McGee Business Park 2
Renewal of Permit No. 13465
Artificial Wetlandss.
Union County Cf t,%
IVIS Cl'KAL affiCE
WQ0002427/GW89383 iiasllat ,
As part of the Division of Environmental Management's comprehen-
sive approach in addressing the impact of waste treatment, storage, or
disposal projects on the environment, your permit application has been
forwarded to us for assessment of the potential impact of the project
on groundwater quality.
Our initial review indicates that the data submitted is not suf-
ficient to make this assessment.
Before your application can be processed therefore, you are re-
quested to submit the following information to the Groundwater Sec-
tion. This information should be submitted in full within 60 days of
the date of this letter. Failure to comply may result in the returning
of this application as incomplete.
1. A site -specific map or sketch, to side, showing the
boundaries of the artificial wetlands, the locations of any
existing monitor wells, and all property boundaries
surrounding the site. This map is necessary for us to
prepare a compliance boundary map for the facility, which
will be attached to the permit when issued.
2. Information as to the presence or absence of any wells
located within 500 feet of the waste treatment/disposal
facility, Any such wells should be accurately located on
the site map, and labeled as to their primary usage lie.
drinking water, monitoring, etc.).
Poff adon Prewnflon Pays
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolinzi 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmadve Action Employer

tea b d 4 11
_urged comprised solely of
re there other sources which will
a t wat r? If so, please provide
type(s) of waste involved, as well a
Y.
mi cal analysis of the typical waste to
h should include the following
"HOC
NO
Chloride
Total Halogenated Cm m pound
Sulfate
Percent. "totalSolids
Iron
that monitor wells were to b
I ilit . A search of mmr zecord
incicates that, as of the: date of this letter, n
groundwater monitoring rin data have been received. Please
submit all results f groundwater sampling and analysis
which have been obtained d to date if no sampling and/or
analyses have been conducted, you are requested to sample
the wells and report the results of the analyses a
specified in the current permit.
Boring logs and well construction details for all existing
monitoring ring wells. Such information should include ground
surface l a ion at each well location and static water
level measurements.
`Please feel free to contact the Groundwater Section, at
( 1 ) 733 1 , if clarification or information is required.
Sincerely,
m
Michael D. Cleary
Hydrogeologist
Permits Gr im
MDC/ja
Jesse Wells
Mike Cleary
Central File
Mark Hawes
Permit Issuance Files

{
B 13715
October 19, 1989
A,
r
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT Eg iIESTEiI p�r
Mr. Jesse W. Wells
wi
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Wells:
In response to the letter dated October 5, 1989 from Brenda J. Smith,
P.C., Regional Supervisor, we offer the following:
1. We were unaware that test results from our monitoring,
wells were not in compliance. We have retained are
outside testing and compliance ce firm nv r+ ental.
Wastewater, Inc.) since the initial operation of the
treatment facility to maintain the facility in a
manner whichcomplies with prescribed'stanards. We
assumed the facility was operating in compliance.
2. e were unaware of deficiencies in the construction
of the test monitoring wells. We assumed K & S Systems,
Inc. had constructed the wells to comply with all
specifications.
We have taken the fallowing steps to remedy the violations:
1. e have retained DeWitt Whitten,E.I., of the
firm Freehling & Robertson, Inc. to test the ground-
water, using appropriate EPA methods and guidelines.
He will: submit a full written report can the groundwater
quality and any recommendations s necessary. The
report is expected by approximately October 0,'1989.
We expect the groundwater to be in compliance, and
we don't anticipate any future problems with. compliance.
MCGEE

10/19/89 14 51 MC GEE 16001/003
TFLECOPY TRANSMITTAL
DATE: October 19, 1989
PAGE, I OF 3
DELIVER TRY FOLLOWING PAGYS 7'0!
ATTENTION: -Mr. Jesse W. WeI16
at of N. C.
OF: Dept. of Envixonme.nt, Health & Natural Resource�j
MESSAGE: ----
NOTE: Tf this coramuftication is not received In its 6ntirety, PlCa6C Call
(704) 882-1,500.
SIGNED 1jermon, j,.
MCGEE
CORPORATION

October 19, 1989
CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Jesse W. Wells
l
State of North Carolina
Department of Ynvironment, health & Natural iie ource
Division of Environmental l Management
19 North Main Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Wells:
In re6pvnue to the l ttGr ti�ated October 5, 1989 from Brenda J. ;Sara.ith,
r.G. r Regional $upervisor, , we offer- the following;
2 We. were unaware that test results from our trucnitorin .-
wells were not in compliance, We have retained an
outside testing and compliance firm (Environmental
Wastewater,Inc.)sine the initial operation, of the
treatment facility to maintain in the facility in a
manner 'which complies with preqe!ribad Ataandaard . We
assumed the facility was operating in compliance.
We were unaware of aiefici in the consitruction
of the test monitoring wells. We assumed K & S Systems.
Inc. had constructed the wel'IA to conply pith all
specifications.
We have: taken the f0111DWiTIF, Steps to rereKiy the violations:
1. We have retained DeWitt Whitten,F.I.T. of the
firm Froehlin8 & Robertson,Inc. to test the round
waterue ng appropriate EPA methods and guidelines.
lie will submit, as fall written report on the groundwater
quality and any recommendations as necessary. The
report is expected by approximately October 20, 1989.
We expect the groundwater to be in compliance, and
e don't anticipate any future problems with compliance
MCGEE
CORPORATION

10M/89 IN 52 V KY 6EE 41003/003
Mr. Jesne WWellg
Page Two
October 19, 1989
2, All items notetuary to bring the mooltorIng wells Into
compliance have been completed. The wells now have
locking caps, identification plates, and protective
outer coverings. We anticipate no further problems
with the wells.
Q sovu as the te6c rebults as available from Mr. Kitten, we wJlj
forward them to you.
We remain committed to operating the facility as necessary to insure no
groundwater contamination. if you need any additional information,
please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely yours,
McGEE CORPORATION
'ice mmy'k. Harmon J
is President, nance
cc: Ms, Brenda Smith

*w
#x#1
JA N 2.5 1990
4
,C i i d
FROM, pia.ke Cl a r
DATE: �
SUBJECT:
m _
I. attached, is a copy of the additional
inforcabin a have received on the subject
project.
n It is our understanding that a copy off: the
additional information that �a have r i nd -
.__
concerning this r d ha's been sent directl x
Pleases revise this information and provide you
coinments and recommendations by * 1 1
f for any reason you find that t up .:i� d ad-dita onal
information is still insufficient to ma'ke an evaluation
of the project, please let us know immediately, so that
either the needed data can be r u ; tad roiit the ,
applicant, of some
other- appropriate action taken.
f have any' questions concernii ig this r is t.t r
r require additionin ormatio , please advise

12701 East Wependence Blvd.
Matthews, North Carolina 28106-1375

�S I.N C E
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC CORRECTED COPY
FULL SERVICE LABORATOWES - ENGINEERS & CHEMISTS
8�
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
1881 P.O. Box 34766
Charlotte, NC 28234
[phone]
October 18, 1989
McGee Corporation
post Office Box 1375
Matthews, North Carolina 28106-1375
Attn- Mr. Morris McGee
7ater Samples
Re: Chemical Analysis of W
McGee Corporation
12701 East Independence Boulevard
Matthews, North Carolina
F&R File No. Q-63-117
Dear Mr. McGee:
On October 3, 1989, enginee-ring personnel from our office
obtained water samples from four monitoring wells located around
the perimeter of a treatment pond located at the referenced site.
These samples were -the transported to the chemical lab for
chemical analysis. Chemical analysis for metals, herbicides and
oesticides, fecal coliform, radiation, dissolved solids and TOX.
Results for metals, herbicides and cesticides, and fecal colifOrm
a,:e attached. Results of the radiation, dissolved �,,olids and TOX
should be available not later than October 25, 1989 ,n(j will be
transmitted to you as soon as possible.
HEA001JARTERS: 3015 DUMBARTON ROAD* BOX 27524o,RICHMONO,VA�23261
TELEPHONE AREA CODE [phone]
BRANCHES: ASHEVILLE�NC#BAI-TtMORE� MD*CHARLOTTE, NC*CHESAPEAKE�VAO
CROZET, VA * FAYETTEVILLE, RC * FREDERICKSBURG, VA # GREENVILLE SC
RALEIGH, NC # ROANOKE VA * STERLING, VA # SALISBURY, MO
CHARTERmEmUCA Cv"TFFkVCM8fR MEMB("r4 S'W't `W-W

TEST RESULTS
EPA
METALS MW#1 MW#2 MW#3 MW#4 REQUIREMENTS
Arsenic <.05ppm <.05ppm <.05ppm <.05ppm 0.05pprik
Barium <.10ppm <.10ppm <.10ppm <.10ppm 1.0 ppm
Cadmium <.Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm 0.0-1ppm
Chromium <.05ppm <.05ppm <.05ppm <.05ppm 0.05ppm
Lead <.05ppm <.05ppm <,.05ppm <.05ppm O.'05ppm
Mercury <.Oolppm <.Oolppm <.Oolppm <.001pprI 0.002ppm
Selenium <.Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm O.Olppm
lver <.05ppm <.05ppm <.05ppni <.05ppm 0.05ppm
OTHER
Nitrate <.50pp,m <-50ppm <�50ppm Passes
Fluoride <.20ppm <,20ppm <.20ppm <.50ppm Passes
Turbidity(JTU) 1 1 1 3.5 Passes
HERBICIDES & PESTICIDES
Endrin <.002ppm <.002ppm <.002ppm <.002ppm 0.002ppm
in anCa pp <.0004ppm <.0004ppm <.0004pprn 0.0004ppm,
Methoxythlor <.Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm O.Olppm
Toxaphene <.005pprn <.005ppm <.005ppm <.005ppm fit. 005ppm
<.loppm <.10-ppm <.loppm ".10ppm 0.10ppm
2, 4, 5-TP <.Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm < 0 1ppm O.Olppm
FECAL COLIFORY1
colonies/100ml 0 0 0 1/10(mil

oFROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
FULL SERVICE LABORATORIES - ENGINEERS & CHEMISTS
n "OVER ONE 14UNDRED yEARS OF SERVICE'
18,81 p.0. Box 34766
Charlotte, NC 28234
(70 4) 37 6- 159 6
October 27, 1989
McGee Corporation
post of ±:ice Box 1375
Matthews, North Carolina 28106-1375
httn: M. Morris McGee
Re: Chemical Analysis of Water Samples
McGee Corporation
12701 East Independence Boulevard
Matthews, North Carolina
F&R File No. Q-63-117
Dear Mr. mcGee:
e
As m.4e Lonal chemical rL-:-ping of
th
discussed previouslv, addit
water samples obtained from the re:ferenced site on, October 3,
1989 were required to conform to the North Carolina Department of
ments. These test results are presented
,Natural Resources require
'below. Results of the radiation and dissolved solids should be
available not later than November 1, 1989 and will be
transmitted to ycu as soon as possible.
MW-1 MW-2 rAW-3 MW-4
TOE <.U-01PPM <.U01ppm, <.001ppm <.6-01ppm
Trihalomethane <,Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm <.Olppm
A
HEADQUAOTERS: 3015 DUMBARTON ROADBOX 275240 RICHMOND, VA,23261
TELEPHONE AREA CODE (804� 264-2701 q I
BRANCHES-ASHEVILLE NC*BALTtMOSE,MO#CRtARLOTTE,t4C*Ct-iESAPEAKE.VAO X
AC
CROZET� V* FAYETTEVILLE, NO FREDERICKSBURG, VA GREENVILLE, SC* CIAWTERMEMBF44
RALEIGH, NC 4 ROANOKEA * STERLING, VA * SALISBURY, MD

SINCE
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
FULL SERVICE LAsORATORtES - ENGINEEAS & CfiEMISTS
MOVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
P.O. Box 34766
Charlotte, NC 28234
[phone]
October 31, 1989
McGee Corporation
Post 0,1L:fice Box 1375
Matthews, North Carolina 28106-111,75
Attn - ors morris McGee
Re: Chemical Analysis of Water Samples
McGee Corporation
1,2701 East Independence Boulevard
Matthews, North Carolina
F&R File No. Q-63-117
Dear Mr. McGee:
Obt
Tbe additional chemical testing Ow
f the ater samples ained
r om the referenced site on October �, _1989, have been completed
1
and are Dresented below. Based on the these results and previous
results reported in our correspondence dated October 18, 1989 any
October 27, 1989, the water samples meat the requirements of
En-,,irorimental Protection Agency and the North Carolina Department
OIL Na:ural Resources.
MW-1 mW- 2 MW­ 3 MW- 4
ti
0 m 7ppm 6
Dissolved Solids 59ppm _�1pm p P
Radioactivizv*, Alpha <1,<1 <1 <i
Beta <1 <1 <i <1
Dicocuries/liter
HEADOUAATERS. 3015 DUMBARTON ROAD* BOX 27524*RICE- MOND, VA, 2326I
TELEPHONE ARf A CODE [phone]
NC,*CHESAF1E,AKE�Vk*
BRANCHES: ASHEVILLE, NC* BALTIMORE, MD* CHARLOTTE,
CROZET, VA * FAYETTEVILLE, NC * FREDERICKSBURG, VA * GREENVILLE- Sc;
RALEIGH, NC * ROANOKE, VA * STERLING, VA * SALISBURY, N40

%CWAL MANA00AWT -- WA, t., 4 �SIrtal No.
PC-
MinorLHoadoo,
RECORD WELL ' et . °
OW-1 En't.
C>RILLING CONTRACTOR
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER Ri'nT ATl N NUMBER P MI[T NUMOM
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show stretch of the 1100atiOn e10wr)
Ntee(est Town:
Depth DtiLLtrtl LOG
(Road, Oommunity, of Subdivision and Lot No) To Formation t rit)tton
A REST ( reel or K u
tty or Town State Zio cede
. DATE DRILLED `
4, TOTAL DEPTHt CUTTINGS COLLECTEDYG N
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EMSTtNG WELL0Yew Nca
E. STATIC WATER LEVEL: FT. 0 aboyeeTOP OF CASING,
i below
TOP F ASPG t � FT, V LAN SLJFtF E;
N
•t METHODOF TEST
7. YIELD %9�t�°=
ti. WATER ZONES tdeplh7:
S. CHLORINATIOW Tyre Amount
t . t 1NG: 11 additional space i needed use back Of f0rtn.
W t1 Thi lrne
Depth Diameter or Weight/Fl. Mal rial L 4T1 N T H
Frorx+
T :9 Ft. --11Z6_ IL (Show direction and distance from at least two State ROa
or rats, r map rdter t'k w5sfs)
From Tea Ft. �.�
From — To
•r
?oathMaterial, Metti d '�*
," e F!f0 m
Tea �F 1,'
t. ,.
From - �
Ctedtt) Diameter
Slot Size Material
t
F ro rn
To_ Ft
From Tie Ft. in -
GRAVEL PACK�
ott- Size Material t
From T<.
From ---TO— Ft
t 00 H ESY EATtFY THAT THIS WELL WAS NSTRV TE.
E Wlljt -t 1 GAO . °a�a"EL CONSTRUCT
STANDARDS. a THAT i "t HASEEN
S
iTt9tT' FaTE

SEP-~1 --19 9 : 0 F I 'i DEHNR I"10 _ ILL
TO 18823263 P .
NATURAL*ATM CAKUNA MPARTMEKT OF Th DCVMOPM2WrFOR U Omy
.off X 21IISY - . 27611. (Olt)
ad. No. Soliat No.
Lat. .� Long. P
Mkw Basin
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Sarin Code � � m
Header Ent. OW-t E:ra
DRILLING CNTRA T R t
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER � �
PERMIT NUMBER;
. WELL LOCATION' (Show sket h Of the toCation below)
Nearest sx t i ta.
Count _
Depth fiTRIO-INN LOG
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lit No,)Fro
To Formation esrridtion ,
tR
j
ADDRESS
Street or Route No.
City Of Town State 71,. Cody
. GATE C r1ILL E — - USE OF WELL
. TOTAL AL DEPTH � _ CUTTINGS COLLECTED Ye o
. DOES WELL REPLACE I TINWELL? Yes
E. STATIC WATER LE "EL'. _._� FT. above TOP OF CASING,-
below
`g P OF CASING IS L FT. ABOVE LANE) SURFACE,
° METHOD OF TEST
. YIELD o m):
WATER ZONES Weothl:
P . CHLORINATION: Type Amount
10. CASING:
�
additional strata i needed use ba k Pt form.
wall Thicknessit
�..
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
i„
LO TIL7I1
*11
Roads
From _ To t.
(Show dirtirk and dis,kaftsd r st CwrtTstate
From Try Ft
r other mad retorenco,.tt intsi .. '�1*�°•� �a
,
k 1tt�
From T _ft,.t
1, ROUT,
I ep;h (Material Method
From�P
From Tt Ft.
°• '
12. SCREEN;
Death ureter Slat Size Material
Pforn T Ft._ ire
ir4.
To Ft.
,u�t
tc .
I rr _
U
�
Fro T - Ft.. , x�
* ;
:
13, GfiAVEL PACK:
' m
0e01h Size Material
From To Ft.
From_ Try Fa..
'r 1
14. REMARKS-
t 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED I
``iR ^S WITH Y N C 2C, WELL ONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY t4A$ BEEN PRO
SrAXTURE OF CONTR OR OR AGENT DATE

F USE ONLY
* T _ GA00NOWAM
No. Itu—
P. 27667 - 7o t 1; C81e,7 7 6 . t tom, t
Let Long-
M Seth i
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD Reath bode
Header Ent.y T Ent
DRILLING CONTRACTOR STATE L,L CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER Rd TRATION NUMBER ref MIT NUMB
t. WELL LOCATION: (Show 061ch of the lrloation below) '
bear St Town' County:
W Depth DRILLING LOG
(Road', Community. or Subdivision end Lot No.)From To rorMation Description
OWNER
A DRF S Str et or o ste t b _LL
City or Ton State Zip Code
3. DATE DRILLED -v USE OF WELL . ' "r
. TOTAL DEPTH 340 CUTTINGS COLLECTED 0 Yea P No
. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yea ttb
Sf STATIC WATER LEVEL; FT, 0 above TOP OF CASING. -
TOP OF CASING Is �. FT. A LAND SURFACE,
VIM
<,
FIELD )° McTHO 0 TESL
. WATER ZONES { eoth1:
. CHLORINATION; Type Ar�. A o _ t
10. CASING: W-ft Thickness -It ad itio l'spa a is needed oae back of form.
Both Diameter of wi by t. Material
From To Ft.. Stti ow dir ottort and distance from at least two State Roam(
From To -- ,�Ft' or`other ntao r6ftrenCe didttt}
Fr011 To __ t.
11, GROUT.
Depth Material { tho
From . To t. /r
From _ To `t.
12�,
Depth Oismoter Slot Ste Material s V10
From _ _ To FL— _ Fn. (to'
from To Ft. in
From _ Tc . Fa. kt4
13, GRAVEL PACK
Depth Size matorial
Zt
From —TO -Ft, b
From To-- Ft.
1, REMARKS:
i 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCT ACCORDANCE AN WITH IS NAC .FELL CONSTRUCTION
STD S. T T OF L Fa�
e0r
SOTrn AGENT DATE
r sir., n e a t traa Submit oftainatt to Division of AvIronmg ial Mena0wMent an,41 Copy to well Ow"

ikHNR
JIOU#4 t t OARTle rf ' t(AIIJAAL C%.,SCCWtCt .f}IaihAJtMf"
Ml 111E-
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR —1246tel—h2l� �/­ $TAj
DRILLER 9 TATf t NUMBER PERK
t_ WELL LOCATION: (Show 0tch of the location btt!tow
Nearest Town, � �County:
Depth DRILLING LOG
�Rnad, ,;orrsrrtunity, or Staddiyi ion ar4 Eat NO.). To F�Onnationooscdptlon
OWNER
ADDRE a
tt t or Rntrta Nd.
pity or Town Stag fits d
. DATE DRILLED USE OF WF11.
. TOTAL DEPTH , � UTTft4 S COLVOTED 0 yea
5DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? C3 Yos [a No
m STATIC WATER LEVEL, FT. C3 above TOP OF CASING,
0 below
TOP OF CASING t:; FT, A EOVC LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (00mMETHOD OF TEST
S, WATER ZONES 0th): .
.CHLORINATION: Type Amouid
10Attu it gadittonal $trace, is needed uss back Of 10rrrt
Tt�a }�ri2
Depth Diameter Of oil;httFt. Material `ATi ft K T tt
From To Fit— (Shaw direction and diStaftCO, trawl at ta4t two State Road
From _To _Ft= or other map retdtanca poittta) VIP
From _ . � To —Ft. - _.
t i GROUTDepthMaterial Method
From To 010�Ft. -' '
Tee FL
Prom __ eoilT a
t 7. SCREEN Get,
Depth Diameter Slot S1aa material
Fran _® o_ Ft, � �.� to ,
o _ Ft./op
Dolour Size Material t
From —TO- Ft.,111
-;
From_ T FL _
14, REMARKS:
M DO HEREBY CERTIFYTHAT HAT THIS WELL WAS CON TR RDAN t' NCAC 20, WELL CONSTPVCTt(
STANDARDS. AW THAT A-OOAD HAS It
Sr,t"TVRE OF TRACTOR AGEW DATE

a* -.
x
Ao
' A
` Y
.".et
r' l
«. �t0,,;;4 111. Sri` r�r. � �° e91 3 "e � � � ii��'�1�xa��* �►, G�i€
�*for the McGee
u
are
a:
} t
w .a. U.ol
U. 13
X0.40
�
ij . a .
bi
s ,a
3.1
.-;. I;..�
0„°
.
Date S�amp
Date Samples f f c:
DATE Salmp.�ps An,
DATE Of Report ­
Certified" fay
.a
VI
w.
�X
.gym ,u

s
t
•+
y
z
Ao
4 "= i.. ^'::h. i
C°xrIAII°r:lua
on j 4uly 1UH ' G
as -follows:
ON
yyll
Well
well
e
yy
»
onto
numple Hecol eo :r
JT.dK `Ls'.as'f
{
Date
p q
.31tl In"7
Date
of Repo
Certified BY
.r
D
b

-
W.
4,
°
,ry
t.
Mix .
December , performed t
,
e eul
x�ci R '
MoGee CO
°lbws 4 e .° L,Id 'I [ vi
WELL
'1
TOTALT LV I I t ` 4 Y
`sOLIDS . �.
w N
Wy i.
0.05
a.,
PER -,Ioo
FzqikL OLIFIA
.
0. •�
ATESI
1
i�
15.7
.'.
1. 1°i.ape..
C) >
IRON.E.
CHLORIDES
x.
s
.1
�L C�1113 11.E a.+
"tt
=its
TOTAL "t
.01
HALOGEN
1987
Date Sampl�6.'Receivedt_
1988
le u
Dates Sal"ple Analyzed
12 j nuaary
Date Of
.tea
NIS
Labor or v
ALVA
y
w

t
.. t$ f "�
:�;
${ � v��� ,'fir•
q„�j5
p �,
I t 1of sanjpieanhLlysia
performed on 15
APri l� l
for, the McGee Wells by Environmental
maintenance Systems
6
Inc,
WELL
WELL #2
a��'LL #3 WELL #4 I°'j p
µ
L
e
Total Suspended
21
V
.. a+• �
135 MG
Solids
Total Residue 18
3
€�
�
x4.
m
Total DiIw
1.61
225
667
371 MG
Solids
. •F
Ng
Iron
1
#
1 ;
Nitrate1,
7
r' key
14.0
,
17, MG/L ,
Tot.- I. Organic12.0
2.4
1 r
t�it�,� L
y*^x
arbon
"
Date samples Recei v 15
April 1
Date Samplesn la 1
Date of Y;eport 19
i*l
Certified BY
.max 4
x.

n He
x a,
a
;�$, army.®ffi3t.
J s y jws of
a..'.sl ��; lr. :3is
performed
on 6 Jul
for tt,e MaG4'Wellsby Lrjvjr
t,wf:rit;u1 vt int n t it Inc.
m
14 E A
i'
w
*dotal tandrl
Solids#T
11
tiG ., *.
To-tal Rtsi4lutw
2GLj
194
/0
ood MGM.
Total Oissol
n
Salida ,.
188
188
('185
301 ` mcIL
Fecal olif rJ:'
<4
<4 P"a low.
5 441.�11-
Tron
1.. 56
, . 'r
5.72
1 iY
y
Nitrate
0.10
U. `il
U. 10
U. IIG/ ,
wD
Chloride
8.G
7
U-0
Total Organic
CarbonC,
.
.Lt
tffi.
16. ti %L
Vote kt{rffi l mReceived-
t: 11 1 ► i-in
�ttal , 1988
tell .J�tl 1d 3I
at rra l Analyzedmails
1 3 sin+
1 l S
Bell Jul 1 1
Da ter of Report
-6
October 1968
C ---r ified BY,
m 4t
ma
¢Y l L. A'dR
y
}. A
, r
or
x
,f
u
y
x
y
ro m
a r a

y :
esuluts oaf sad mple analysis performed cry the t§ic ee
Environmental ent�€al Maintenance Sy
t�Yt6� Inc.
d
WELL WELL jJ2 WELL #3 WELL #4
.,
.. Ammonia nitrogen 0.061 . 6 �.
Total suspended 100 mcil
slid 1'`
Total dissolved
Fecal oolifOrM ,4 -1, 4 PEA_ �
x
Chloride
Iron
Nitrate
Total organic
carbon
t.
n Total organic
tialide; t1 0.01 0.01
0,12
bate Samples Received
Date Samples Analy7ned 30 November IY88 ,.
Date of Report : 1 FebruarY1989
Certified By
ALGA . e l ti UO ATORY PERM 11, I i+i

wow*
` d x
i
a `
' a
k
of sample analynis ourformed on the mccee Wellelf
14NO IA �, TSOGE
C�6 L
TOTAL SUSPENDED
�
31
HG L
SOLIDS
"CAI.. hL31LL
13
TOTAL DISSOLVED
1 3
143.
��
,�� .
SOLIDS�
.
1.
1
1
1
�� �� �}I
FECAL C C1LCIa
a*
1(0
^w'
y
0.160
au 3.
y
C. o�
*° b
0.05
1.69
MG/10
NITRATE
I
• .' TA L ORGANIC
2.3
r .
.1
10.6
CAEBON
DAM SAM L ANAL"
April 1989
CEUTIFIED By ALA"A
G. WIKE
t LABORATORY
;DUI -E "l: UA, Ems
--------------

RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL, PERMIT APPLICATION --REVIEW
-ION? (",)
r
REVIEW BY I& m kW
FACILAM,," NAME
LOCA'Flot'N
TYPE- OF' DISPOSA�_ SYSTEM
DIGN
DESCRIP10N 01:
b
SIZE OF IMPOUNDMENT(FT. . . ..... OF APPIACATION /,,,R[A & OR 911
]PRIMAR\( L�]SECONDARY _-ITER-11ARY
WASIE SOURCE- MUN, 91LUDGE %4`,JN� W, WATER,
[:]IND, SLUDGE [:]IND. W. WATER 0 T H I R S
D0ANCE FROM WASTE SOURCE TO NEAREST: STREAM _ FT, Wl- C° Fl,
FOR WELL: TYPE OF USE DEPTH PUMP RATE ( EST,
WHAT D_ ESIGN CONDITIONS WILL REDUCE INCREASE CHANCE' OF GW CONTAM[NATION
WHAT NATURAL SITE CONDITIONS WRl REDUCE /INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CON-fAMINA'nON:'��,3-U-ll"—/,-
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK ;N-5c) r FT, s SEASONAL HIGH W, T. _-2 -Cl ANNUAL. W, T, FUJX:.��_­ICI FT,
Ia
FBEDRC
GEN. LrTHOLOGYL���.
- f 1:1 MEASURED MEASURED
HYD. COND, 16 __&__FT./DA( g ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
THICKNESS FT,
NO. OF MONITOR WELLS: PROPOSED: UP-- DOWN _; EXISTING: UPL_ DOWN__�.
FROM WORKSHE ET: SITE NUMERICAL DESCRIPTION= _15 4�_& !�E -,e- e P_
T 1 2 3 4 5 6 6A 6B
SITE GRADE (HYDROGEOL) SITUATION GPADE
PROPOSED MPILING SCHEDULE & PARAMETER(s):1--clarterlij NO 3 &1 H,4- f �_(g _�
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONSI,_
GW-48 Revised 8/87 HYD. REGIONAL SUPERVISOR

WA5TF COMM WNW
'kPFUCATION REVIEW WORK
SKY
..
AM °d^
.q
f741
� � tr t ti S
0i
GAP 1
y.,
20 :' 12 29 w
l 5-7 3-1 ice..., ... t3
L"o p� h
a°p� a is Y" al6� Ick>;,l �10fli Gfori G, c
dlc ck-ri
rR
Fps VOL-1+
K u-j9 -I'A c `3 c .; ft ra cinx>d z x"se I txyl
lk u G ib oo&&
pep )
cm, cvnfcrnkt,.. rKv Pll (Jk 0 'I z,Ol,.. CA �,'. ,r<-i 2 p ,&t co rr-4
2 j i'C.a N iP"eorl 2 "i'.mrt :i':.. :
it^Yt lU .. hi.ti
MgiaSihr,
t I'le
c,-d k,It�c ty kxn>y
fia'Af ..i 'Ct#ea"k
0-11k_"6C.i crYdkff-m
l
..
o
}}
,, wC 4N1 c " "& ili 0, no "Yjit `.
rS" M Wr "4 Wd b,�' h Br�"�' vy M
iT
16- Mn cuarlun rm"
f{Y--X1.*dl *�-"7
ttxln l`W
i- X',F ..,-... .. .Nm
....-. -
25 -29 06 IC ID
-
2009
0), bwomkPoo
S1 AN
6004
'
1 - 1 1F AC
AE 58 )ki
9t
At, -6
100A cx 4B 2D M
QI Comok
z to 61 T 71 on
4
"Anwe� 15 is
1 �
5� r '« 71
SY
I0 - 7
0Y
cx
s C 1
# 7K 9f
S�. VP
ow "Mi 8
9Z
9U k e u
C e
CA conkswm kt walwo 0 WAMI A � c
C woo k
G
C
ft.kj
9 crt ra�rxawrr� fta cxc � ; '«4' � t,y !ram
d )
1 d
D-One P "t h04.
....Art
1
kx *p 1
tarmambo ON —NU of 3 a ' k"s r p A)
CSt'r p 3)
tdt°wsr
a twc�a
Y w6suAl by t c 00 wool cx4_A0of*

"
57,
w
9-
(v
a
m
ri
wIT

110—L"W in -w, —ifunwi, 4r.1 ,A -J,Wu
ftjx i 'W kpoojjtV Afkj')g V"Vjj+dwt-n(Plid—phk, And Apjwi*wjo'j
ffigh—,.'p- m i'r Apw4w, mI -01 RNWrAv save —A-A
At *l,11x:wrM#tit
vW-14. J.0 "I'pt"uh i"tt, Oil- pi,44i'm '11u, il"�mN 'pjllw� l. .11 illxl
.... .. .. .... pnilm Ao tO'h
—dd7x -,—g
--l. a dibtl 0", O"4WO -'-.'o � Al 14 fill Ai,linl tlk'h-11d41UI —k IMENTLA1. NIA'I'RtX
( bum,c of
11, qWo 1"
'-.n.mj"T
-;aftf ­m" fh.h.hV t"l", "'r "v SA 64_4"j
se.AlDECAU OF SOU D -11-411€ fxJ1 4 'IM EGRM 'Of
l,
C4mdkkmw fi)f C*M� inklon
myoww.....
;
--wommml hv I, Tx Rlakktl to 14l, mrc, Ouch i, nwk'i",,w i.N 41wciii.i., nx Nil 14 it N, %'It $WM
—,M"'Ac' V gwfv —% rA'l icilYlhvd' TIk —N t—wwwlu,t
Vh.r—llll -1 it" 4u'Aik1fx' Ok, KeN r'"Iujjwwf" t—' a'-k" tf vi Aq lN, N, 01 pl
Ilw 14-4 1'uOft, ruf1k,ubc '�' lk- ,,t ta -41,�tk(j ol it%,
ng6f q Wwrifl a"
whwbj0. i-iA-k' hn
err hn!'h*affix uinc kv A '114y,
step 8
To* A"d
11w "fuce in Ow. ftwuix (w c*Lh ltriskip is kitand twirmi,"vig pamli*m ol cifounumal
'im"Zl Wnw,411vzod ge - (Munit ipjt I ;T'- I —T—
j, , to witif dk't' "win The )"ter in Otis ujk�
"twxW he addtA (Pmtvdtd tw a + ) to Ow Lw miwelkoriz meter ikfaifitm of the Site
tk'Wnf*iix1 fn" NAt-p 7,
Qxa, (:c•ffk" MIR
jk-.po"kdta+uariin hkd.
in #1*iw- Iati ClAv Mininiz Nkuf A6 , of Momv
do$
1. vkdn.—
Pulp Nfiflt
­km-.d fx'�',vulw —k.u"
110, Ikjm0.
J11 4 k llf,
I't —Wd
if,iwi mw ftg 1"no"I m will, w., imf—f— til"tem, 'A
A -. air . IN
It. p . 4, F'A —'d 4Uk" I*J ..I Uk
..... ..... !" , " " rl"; - Aj,
zi— —fil ii, 11 .11
1 1:21

t
C � ) -44s C>rx' lour
tl+a ? a ) toOOWld*OOY
O Aq p -S' sr~s Aq a P `)O)& ,MOPONOI
are
xt
-
ra
)+
i .),'r" MINO 4 M POvnw?
I
pxKa; P
01>
l71 1 G1 s� �uj ea p rc1 a -(lullt x� uq a{rca
taca,lrl.ssa�� ���c,tryy s�u¢-a��fg p�t��,
r�0'+ &'ik
„
t�r'by'ai.-v.9:aE:..,�Gcsac�ap q69 -rg"� :� v

Date October 27, 1989
S"11AFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATI-�-)No`
County: Unicn
w(,,) 'No. 0002427 (Pen,,iit No. 1,134"IS-",,,)
MR0 No89-26-')
PART
I GENERAL INFORMATION
1'.
Facility and Address. McGee Corp oration -Art iticial.
Wetlands
Post Office Box 1375
Matthews, NC 28106-1375
2.
Date of Investigation: September. 8, 1989
3.
Report Prepared By: Michael L. Parker, Environmental
Engineer II
4.
Person Contacted: Mr. Morris McGee, Operator; telephone
number [phone]
5.
Directions to Site: From the intersection of Highway '74 and
S. R. 1365 south of the Town of Matthews, travel northwest
on Highway 74 approximately 0.3 mile. The site is on the
right (northeast) side of Highway 74.
6.
Discharge Point! N/A
Attach a USES Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site
and discharge point on map.
US Quad No.: G 16 SW
7.
Size (land availablfor expansion and upgrading): The site
is approximately 10_ acres. Area is available for expansion
if necessary.
8.
Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Gently
rolling, 3-8%, slopes. Facility is not located in a flood
plain area.
9.
Location of Nearest Dwelling: None within 500 feet.
10.
Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: N/A
PART
II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1.
Type of wastewater: 100% Domestic
0% Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.004 MGD
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: N/A

Page Two
Pr
?rF 't:� }P` 'i:.E ili:L1 t ..1.:�.,;.. �57,���'�at��`4u�'C.s C5T?.``tmi i 1 kHII d::
N ("
Applicable CFR Part and Subpart: A
. Type of Treatment ( specify whether proposed r existing):
The cxisting faci"Lityconsists of wire basket screening
followed by a. sequential latch type ch omoglass wastewater
treatment plant, disinfection unit and an artificial
wetlands, tan disposal area.
. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: Removed as needed by a
spt.ge hauler.
. Treatment Plant Classification: Class II ,
. SIC a cafe (s) /
Wastewater gods (s )
PART III - OTHER PERTINENTINFORMATION
. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants
Funds (municipals only) ? N
. Special monitoring requests: Additional groundwater
monitoring may be necessary (see Groundwater comments).
3. Additional effluent limits requests: See Part I
. tither: /
PART I - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
The McGee Corporation operates an artificial wetlands
disposal system t treat strictly domestic wastewater from
approximately 1 0 employees (1 shift per day). Victual water
usage figures substantiate the facility's ability to stay within
its hydraulic limits The wetlands area was constructed only
after attempts to acquire an NPDES Permit and/or construct a
conventional septic system had tailed.
t the time of the inspection, the writer Hated evidence of
where a discharge had occurred` from the wetlands disposal area..
The berm adjacent, to a nearby intermittent'stream had breached
and wastewater had at some past. time, entered the stream. No
discharge was occurring at the time of the visit. It appeared
that the deed Canary grass` was growing at the bottom of the
disposal area;, however, its ability to function as a wetlands
treatment system is questionable. The sequenting batch
pretreatment unit is designed to provide secondary treatment

Page Three
pl,-ior to enLering the disposal area. Samples, however,
Ell P" 't -evels of constituen'--s wh,Llch
fram t1ne ret'-Ireatmen,- unt relecd-L f- -L
at times approach 'Che - levels associated with untreated
itJora No. J" of th(:2 subject Permit spec ifles
wastewater. C o n CL
treatment o--"- the applied ef f luent to achieve secondary standards
of BOD- - 30 mg/l, TSS - 30 mg/l and fecal cc liform - 1000,/100
ml. TLs level of treatment is not being attained. High
nutrients entering the disposal area may have attributed to the
proliferation of duckweed noted during the inspection.
Groundwater results from the adjacent wells have documented
exceedances of groundwater standards primarily for fecal
coliform. Remedial action is proposed. It is recommended that
all conditions of the subject Permit remain intact and the Permit
be reissued for a period of two (2) years. A regional wastewater
treatment plant is scheduled to serve this area within the next
12-18 months at which the McGee Corporation will pursue a
connectionrt
Signature of Report Preparer
WateT--Quailtykegionai super,

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
February 13, 1990
MEMORANDUM :; Bill Reid
THROUGH: > Barbara Christian
FROM: Jesse wells
RE: McGee Business Park
Artificial Wetlands
W No. 89383
Union County, N.C.
The Mooresville Regional Groundwater Section has reviewed the
renewal request of McGee Business Rork for the continued operation o
an artificial wetlands facility. On September 8, 1989 1 visited McGee
to inspect their facilities. At this meeting McGee was notified that
groundwater monitoring reports :had not been submitted as 'required*
In addition, an inspection of the monitor well system indicated no
lacking caps, identification plates and protective outer "coverings.
McGee was subsequently issued a N.O.V. dated October 5, 1989. The
N.O. V required correction of the well construction violations and to
perform analysis can the four wells
McGee Corporation notified this office on October 20, 1989 that
the construction violations had been corrected and that. they had
obtained the services of Froehl.ing & Robertson to perform the
groundwater monitoring. McGee had performed prier sampling of the
monitor wells but had failed to submit the results. A reviews of the
previous data indicated several 2L standards violations primarily
fecal and total col,i,f arm. Resamples required, as a part of the N.O.V.
were received in this office, on or about October 20, 1989, indicated
that the quality of the water was within recommended 2L standards.
It is the opinion of the writer that the previous coliform violations
were the results of poor sampling techniques. Additional parameters
required to be monitored were within recommended standards.
It is recommended that the permit be renewed for a period: of two
years. A regional wastewater treatment plant is scheduled to serve
the area within the next 12-18 months and McGee will pursue a
connection. during this period continued monitoring of the well
network is advisable.
If you should have any questions, please advise;.
JWW/pl

F"r
'DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Fobruary 13, 1990
MEMORANDIJM TO: Bill Reid
THROUGH- Barbara Christian
FROM Jesse Wells
RE: McGee Business Park
Artificial Wetlands
GW No. 89383
Union County, N.C.
The Mooresville Regional Groundwater Section has reviewed the
renewal request of McGee Business Park for the continued operation of
an artificial wetlan�dds facility. On September 9, 1999 1 visited McGee
to inspect their facilities. At this meeting McGee was notified that
groundwater monitoring reports had not been sm-itted as required.
in addition, an inspection of the monitor well system indicated no
locking caps, identification plates and protective outer coverings.
McGee was subseguently issued a N.O.V. dated October 5, 1989. The
N.O.V. required correction of the well construction violations and to
perform analysis on the four wells.
McGee Corporation notified this Office on October 20, 1989 that
the construction violations had been corrected and that they had
obtained the services of Froehling & Robertson to perform the
groundwater monitoring. McGee had performed prior sampling of the
monitor wells but had failed to submit the results. A review of the
previous data indicated several 2L standards violations primarily
fecal and total coliform. des amples required as a part of the N.O.V.
were received in this office, on or about October 20, 1989, indicated
that the quality of the water was within recommended 2L standards.
It is the opinion of the writer that the previous coliform violations
were the results of poor sampling techniques. Additional parameters
required to be monitored were within recommended standards.
It is recommended that the permit be renewed for a period of two
years. A regional wastewater treatment plant is scheduled to serve
the area within the next 12-18 months and McGee will pursue a
connection. During >this period continued monitoring of the well
network is advisable.
If you should have any questions, please advise.
Jww/pl

RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT
APPUCATION REVIEW
D
REVIEW Al L P
HILD �VESTIGATION?
FACfI_ffY,',,,'AM
Co:lt'4
V_k"j K-J,
I'YPE Oi' CISPOSAI-SYSTEM (LAGOC)N, FTC. )A,l'
-SIGN (�,AP, (GkK))___
CRIDESPI"iON OF _Lcl
.CI E OF �,,%,',POUNDMENcr (FT, SQ) — -- - --- ----- - & OR" SIZE
OF APPlJC'ATKZNl Al,"EA
WASTEE S01URCE:0MUN. SLUDG[ MUN, W, WATER: PRIM AR"I" []SECONDARY F-1TERIIARY
E]IND,SILUDGE [:]INDW,WATER
Di SEANCE FROM WASTE SOURCE TO NEAREST: STREAM
FT, FT,
FOR WE,',.[-- TYPE OF USE ff),Lmll�__ DEPTH
PUMP RATE ( EST,)
WHAT DEIGN CONDMONS WILL REDUCE INCREASE CHANCE'
OF GW CONTAMINATION:
J
WHAT NATURAL SITE CONDITIONS WILL REDUCE INCREASE CHANCF OCAW CONTAMINATION kk:
Jj
Z" �2 0
HIGH W. F1 , ANNUAL W. T. FEU X _I0 FT
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK -,:15 0 FT, SEASOT.
BED RO,</ARTESIAN AC UIFER'!
GEN. ILM10LOGY,
f MEASURED
OMEASURED
HYD, OND, LQ_ FT, / D AY ESTIMATED
—FT./DAY
[JESTIMATED
THICKNESS__2L,1_Q_ FT.
NO, OF MONITOR WELLS: PROPOSED: UP— DOWN—;
EXISTING: UP _L_ DOWN
FRONA WORKSHEET, SITE NUMERICAL DESCRIPTION
9--
T 1
2 3 4 5 6 6A 66
SITE GRADE (HYDROGEOL,)
SITUATION GRADE
PROPOSED SAMPLING SCHEDULE & F`ARAMETER(S):Af,art*rf(,
tdR-li
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS__
GW-48 Revised -8/87
HYD, REGIONAL SUPERVISOR

pr
..',
U 1
p
_
f
{:.+F `Y,.ti" ., t Doi .4'" . `,d
g}� q .
`
.�'1.JX..: A _
'.. _.. SEA �p+*.� r Wiu"➢ .....
E R •q
..rFa .
,.,�5 y .,...�
C. *l Z.'r4`�i. ? b
...... ... .... a. .,...,..�, _. — _.._..�.,_
u 4 .� Y
",t lr.
..,n:
4 .. ,,. Hull
41 AT
t
�F01t'..: Cs' p+. ^�.. N+i .#E-" .ti u; }�i'r�n"�.:5 k`�ttl Ik�1-+..iF'"a."b a e(. `� .9�.�52.
.«): �. C:^`*'.A'ly
a x L s.�r.%r�.i t"i.:r Ce E '.
1 6 e
Ez#ads'tt cc2lir F.aCt)ri Cad 13-eJ � _,
I o Me �i o f otem
7 dt
C
F'E. M;:
�
510%L on %°tiNorEda �' ;-r[ t't *�a'd#; "`B[
G?CK50" Qc3ck1ri4 err ' wl
^:.
'mrwY F��~n� c�a�ri Me�Ns iu
To ¢?'t(W+hN A'jk6 11 rorl- .scXo
b 9kiwxt 0f "*c ar.
�SPep 3)
fTCol ixrA-- f wctrrc_" &I CAOti %J e S.* tc,mcO
2 ?oeri 13 l2 rhon
ft—' *.' f=_.+nrC.Xd
?cnn='4 oM ' g"'v mkt "orl,
LXJ tho
a
t# v- '>100 - a
16 { ti
5- 9 IC 10 2F
X7k t 1
W 14 48
Cat? 6 i 7 ( 9J'
76
fA#4 G hon 3 16
7K 9F 9� 9p t.*m yon 1
„
OP d)
> ihow -..
NY- •I
a
*p 6)
Vf Y $
6 IW c
Flo sit WOO
D Cw* K dn".40 W I r
- t c
A .k q i
aeft
:. F� i "Ie
az F3 5(* P )
* p
tat 4
0
I- Y&W k vrry tvy k
`tat '..
Y - W 00G.KAR by 1

Ta ( 0 ( MOCOW MOP 10)
!cGRKX-
4 tx
P"b-,"yM
a 13,
kO 43
mcy
4-4$047
G
e( ffKvw
fa bo r;
f 7 ood - 7 It
'f n <( oo f h k
..

p ➢ M & �.. e +rrw M.1 ac'+ yµ - sr°s ara €Pr xw„A, yn rap t s { a r rotraG,
emu••; ,gnat ier.'! .xgars.n{�a.asl,#t'a's'4s Igwi-0 mnn,#a rll .o^..y y,a,wnnlwrv. �,r 7sflPaevrld a i
... cu.xega-.axn.�ul 4maat .,,. .a ^ie�W�s<w4. a n,q flgrfvan,nonl -s6 *ate
p i m➢ A g a s �*y §far+ »a d. ! s ba ,ga„r•,wt&w.
..:::- �--..„�---»+.-, �. .ream nr�ragr r. prwrxt{gxagr x.w •r, rrrerreemwA rwax€ rn.au a„<.+<.wa+rw rrtk.p,...
ti,, a+r ii .,va 1'%+ayRz'yq °»fS^i'Al {rYnatC4':. wa .a,ar`a.Mtl tP'#11 rx.{se. 1.1 Mt DID xxgr.x4 pi„te5e.'dx.,2C{
wa3'na�#+�46'i{mBRr aP*yxu.xana.,x.Yvw—pa.-raLhk..wAXqnbi6+ AtI hxfnj 4.DDADIII,�I.
!"xwnyraay ti.wr :yew, rt,a{a. wD-q.,r.afi.,txps tyr.d.Aareu p, at,Ex w.A:Y"-�,
.vq+axawpumxs xasx xay .xs;a, ,a .nn*ry r+.*J p..r gwuearq .,g ,.
:4idl �. nrp. n".&#X'>xYNrti: . qw an �.qsn .,xa'tar, r3r.a�arlK9 4aauc .ux.»m~mu.aarp @....wu+w, arxd ,gwpr~an�..ga.
:. .. ar tree ree.ar>ra�t,>n psr a ,e.atars to ,`i.. .., wteuw,�;,ry p= sux�p +p:frEl „g,is�aYu„-..
c +.s'•is°,sngw.b9 a..s aesu ux rwtsxc'oz¢ {a alruK,wwkl swweccrceeiraan�.ne rc. .4,.a syw. ay.asrat+ti.:h. ta"
nga sx,}.rrcprr ui pttr � r4aJ xiJ.a.s f+x parnzaa za�ycwzresr) fw4'�7+5�" ,vrr
"ir {ep.naa,7 wagrwt aq y>�. ,-.A^kl ux aaq at¢*A',t r'. ! �r P.w3trcae ro- xvrh, wzr a: a.vs. xipsr.a id xxa '{P,xxtda^p rvxw,uxa w Gym y+i*v I;lD Apw
tu,aVV INA'm ty .i 4¢wN Nf 0rM-1 ?rorxav v w alti
. yttir'swk rsa.yaryo-j wM „x+rwmvY'tX Kx+m' u�r .ayk_ vq,
a~,vb& u�p:»u.wm.w�.rra'tk�rrzlsra,ay`�,,-a��g _eu urau.�wx+��d'�aetxtsr�ree uue`t.,. sw vt
�. xnaoxr,y a*ys 'air Bp'ai aaic.Ml'xr{vurrcw rn .tc,"wsq pattruNaswCq :xa to !xu {aaratzg�
::itrawaFti &�rp.Aa, prx.,g*; :fttaisapK .i t S:J `Brno-;, .. rtw2 ,.u#,r Rava ar x'+tra
� #+. pM.'x4ti rn nx .{ap+pm x,.p �sx .iaaxpau re. ew 9&
x IA
� rop. nrs':.w aa>^¢7 azsa pr rv..'a yraeru 1p4+3mtn ury t .xuN
",xa,:tixmv.xy Y) ixv',£agI p +,I c, cxeeagdrs-rx!! p S,>DIJIuMCI
;agta.€u.Pcmq m, 1, Rr ,o '-M uu`nu>,a'"w °d 6N a naj uuDDI
° .atg� .'a'+.it >9pT ,xap�xrtxagra aaai5a� xryawc#ra«`reat n'rg '. erp ¢ � s +;dq *�P-'.a.°a,dci � a>a�ape .� aadxt�.
p.
-.. . .aatrs. waA(a zce :s;�trai �£4't">,e iac,gs paawtt.4(rraaxCuawtatg ,i�yv¢o-atuasa*padtixe g5rrc ajgeaaaxxA Sxu>.�'xt°. ".
AZ-A,Y q te"4a-11'"mr'w) wUaa+i,, p.wn9*'rz: auturwramo, au+o i s+'zF+gUI 4:),1,x{) xpimt .-aqi rar r.K>{rrs ;KU
p Ilq P"+r "pure, :*pw -N i
""' x� apD "e4a a+pi apitP. {'Veiers ww, asa;na.{ .a,rw,a a ati ,{�„ rr;5yar.w..
�atA:! "mr nq a,rgrr:tier aaa;ry raezr.3,y ,. ' aoaatab;aY{asAr,r¢a:a k{;irai .>sr a.rexm*d,xis{PaoA �i4l xp er.vq,v.gnrrrooyxai nw"',]ngaa+ y;in¢r+rgayxyaca,aao 3asy�a,#
f .atyw xR"eli aP a+gs n wY cgr y '»a gxv or3.aa ul#pp ry t, ".xir: aY a a z Y u r d'"qa
."°'�,"•--° � ::•••.""'"�" .s.i4uY a, ! it 1 � a ➢ pgralk t PPlk �, 1'�g tr Bk Y�gipPnax �+ t§ 'dt nk�F6 t i+ eu it eA;'1 1 p h Id 3 hl.'xr
10 18 gelh t v,A*„}Ya.'w _i\t I A°a^.rvN IN r\d h.re44e�*'u'.erva p;\:.u4n .ta[p {%"ua�rd.+.hto.xdM l4ea"[&td1lYSdwr��P.9 a,k-nBLA Bl 'ri a644.%.1R. Gcrrvit4te01.1I
,a4i uas gate eadpgx.enn.u¢p^rtiso ra'a{.xu{vc°.a xe44a>".>k{t ea7ID-w.nr,r xdir.xup uaralrcrae,10 ,tau'opj
`SiE.'F3tiY.#rw Ld-,.'#9 p k -mow
3�kr4s'�`1aar1LF�'µaSFM i%1r'�w'A}' 311t7�,C&'��' SI'i3tXg1('�i1PLY�. A
r
R 4 H x ra ADD s t re! au Do k r ,q T{ I c srw
7 to '5"'ti.. 'Slf"dra 3f7' d29'.iact lx a veu a x ra uy i i i I lo-n : d 3rtl arayi 5 5. r.
u• I i X :R ♦. 36("Y6[ d� i°a N b
� i
�"� s� 'e""�'a.' , i vi43Nr,e x.;.slt e{n'..i tYitFld il}exva'*5&,A NAn2f,52Tp¢is@,y.quttda**''aWa
t} x
r i
t
,, .�-* .. � t� `, ,'AG+`d •"�.7i�sNY _ w t � � a xle� - d d y ayra, qr a rd a�, g { aae.+;
911a WNTSWS .ar':9CAXA`i`XYI irr aav r , oI as a,a pur #rgrn{r.,erw
.. , . ..
... P � „[ rnr:Kan
i .• ... r e ^xia d§4 ��'ly Int ,Fa tt .�ti 46. ��,xPt'a *d C3k
W
6;
� ��Fgi aZ�syr�aagadry� # ..
�aa�'Udx,p
w _
DID
i i
r
.,.�. ..,�.-,na s � r u„ .r ;;. o. u.a:, r ,.. ., ,, j .,,. s �..,. , .a, ... e ,-,. �. Y-•� 4' n zr rF.Ea.s. � ,fe,ao-a,a yap s+..r` Se. i
t o Ja eh as t o (t „ i", -10VIO, a a' e7 s e a ft a.rp It ., p
{ tl q'rrruxakadM gntar iryel , ¢ bwsp G @
SX.d r;x adani o avxrersash saa r 2,r' as ,aLt �p a,als.. sk s a=., '�`"^d4 - 1 a aan r
"fi{, o-' pn.o.

nc* C� L m pw L i t t 4 lX>O :a
tea'
L s-
«
ail � EMM l@." RLr,
qo-w; m-da`s&; '00xv ) 6,dolsYI)Lam o"J.
Iq
PO
p
r �
Rrw

tee.
n
y''� q ry.. rr T P p q `. t
v Y .v .... ..
yy and
�C��.6d .. ,�vi k.���w w�. i�,� .. R..�v3.: 4i��k.�4��.. 'i.. .,a.. �iA�i'"A ..k. l.. .k_f _4
... w.l.:o 4ryF,. xa' pF r� �;r
,L y.,x v,
III
Ma4., d L .... 't`1 s , !..'i l.+ 2v' «w 0 6..1. .1 7...'"..
2.
Dat.e of nvC-igat n . September be , 1989
3.
Report Prepared By, Michael L. Parker, ,Environmental
Engineer
5.
j,)j.rcctioris to Site: From the intersection of Fligm,;ay 14 and
S. R . 1.365 south of , the Town of Matthews, travel northwest
n Highway 74 approximately 0.3 mile. The site is on the
right (northeast) side of Highway 74.
6.
Discharge Point- N/A
Attach _a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site
and discharge point on map.
USES Quad No.-.- 16 SW
-.,Y
ry 6)The site
a
sLV upgrading)-
Size(land dti...Aexpansion
is approximately 10 acres. _Area is available for expansion
^� necessary.
if
.
'topography (relationship to flood plain included); Gently
rolling, . - % slopes. Facility is not located in a flood
lain area.
,.
Location of Nearest Dwelling: None within 500 feet
i
10.
Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: N/
PART
II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORDS
1.
Type of wastewater: 10 % Domestic
Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater. 0.004 MGD
. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater, /

P
Ti 1 W
1C 1-J 1 d,
1 4 t -S v a n
_1� p]:O(,e C
Appllicabl(-� ICT-1-Z P i: t an(l Subpart: N/A
4, Type of TreaT:,ment. (,,�,,pecify ,,hether proposed c.--- e;.- -i s t, i n g
The existing facility consists of wire basket scr& ning
followed by a secil-tential batch -type, chromoglass wastewater
treatment plant, disinfection un1t and an artif-i.c--'1,&,'1
wetlands disposal area.
5. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: Removed as needed by a
septage hauler.
6. Treatment Plant Classification: Class II
7, sic code(s): N/A
Wastewater Code (s): 02
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants
Funds (municipals only)? No.
2. Special monitoring requests: Additional groundwater
monitoring may be necessary (see Groundwater comgents ).
3. Additional. effluent limits requests: See Part IV
4. Other: N/A
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
The McGee Corporation operates an artificial wetlands
disposal system ttreat strictly domestic wastewater from
approximately 150_ employees (1 shift per day). Actual water
usage figures substantiate the facility's ability to stay within
its hydraulic limits. The wetlands area was constructed only
after attempts to acquire an NPDES Permit and/or construct a
conventional septic system had failed.
At the ,time of the inspection, the writer noted evidence of
where a discharge had occurred from the wetlands disposal area.
The berm adjacent to,a nearby intermittent stream had breached
and wastewater had at some past time, entered the stream. No
discharge was occurring at the time of the visit. it appeared
that the Reed Canary grass was growing at the bottom of the
disposal area, however, its ability to function as a wetlands
treatment system is questionable. The sequentin. g batch
pretreatment unit is designed to provide secondary treatment

page Three
prior to entering nhe AisPosal arca. Samples, however,
Lake..
tram the pretruaLmonz VA reflect levels of constiuu=s
whic'n
y Ex s associated with nt.i.,_ .,
i n
wastewater. -1 r � .' 1 w s �. �.,� i F'.^ ¢ 8§( , _! t
C c= a
ef f He= L a achieve secondary
sua1 ld,-,
treatment nt attapplied
-; not. being attained. ned r
;nl. TRis !e�{ el o ttreatment
,n
E
nutrients ering the isposal area may have attributei to the
prcl.tfraw.ion of duckweed notes during they inspection.
Groundwater results .from the adjacent wells have documented
xc edanc s of groundwater standards primarily for fecal
col form. Remedial action is proposed. It is recommiended,
that
all conditions of the subject Permit remain ain intact and
he Permit
be reissued for a period of two () years. A regional
wastewater
treatment plant is scheduled to serge this area within
the next
12-18 months at which the McGee Corporation will pursue a
connection.
--C�" 47,
Signature of Report Preparer
r.
a-u
Water Quality Regional Super
br

1PPP
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Albert F Hilton, Regional Manager
.Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION:OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
April 14, 1987
Mr. Ronald T. Parker
Vice President -Operations
McGee Corporation
Monroe, N. C. 28110
Subject: Permit No. 13465
Groundwater Monitoring
McGee Corporation
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Parker:
In reference to groundwater monitoring requirements of the artificial
wetlands wastewater disposal facility at McGee Corporation, located off
U. S. Highway 74 in Union County, the following parameters must be sampled
for prior to disposal operations and thereafter every March, July and November:
Nitrates
Ammonia
Total Organic Carbon
Total Dissoved Solids
Chlorides
Iron
Fecal Coliform,
Total Organic Halogen (initially and thereafter November only)
Water Level (Measured prior to sampling).
I have also enclosed compliance monitoring forms for reporting the
groundwater sampling results to this Office.
In order to obtain representative groundwater samples, it is desirable
to remove approximately six volumes of water from the wells prior to collection
of the samples. Additional sampling information is addressed on the back
of the compliance monitoring form.
919 North Main Somt, PQ Box 95o, Moomsvilke, NC 28115-0950 # Tek-phone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirnuti%w Action Empkyycr

Mr. Ronald T. Parker
April 14, 1987
Page Two
If you should have any questions or desire additional assistance, please
contact this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jesse W. Wells
H rogeolo c Technician
� A p
proved by:
Eric J. Klingel
Hydrogeologic Regional Supervisor
JWW:pb

Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Mooresville Regional Office
latnes G, Martin, Governor Albert F Hilton, Regional Manager
S. Thomas Rhodes, secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
April 14, 1987
Mr. Ronald I. Parker
Vice President -Operations
McGee Corporation
Monroe, N. C. 28110
Subject: Permit No. 13465
Groundwater Monitoring
McGee Corporation
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Parker:
In reference to groundwater monitoring requirements of the artificial
wetlands wastewater disposal facility at McGee Corporation, located off
U. S. Highway 74 in Union County, the following parameters must he sampled
for prior to disposal operations and thereafter every March, July and November:
Nitrates
Ammonia
Total Organic Carbon
Total pissoved Solids
Chlorides
Iron
Fecal Coliform
Total Organic Halogen (initially and thereafter November only)
Water Level (Measured prior to sampling).
I have also enclosed compliance monitoring forms for reporting the
groundwater sampling results to this Office.
In order to obtain representative groundwater samples, it is desirable
to remove approximately six volumes of water from the wells prior to collection
of the samples. Additional sampling information is addressed on the back
of the compliance monitoring form.
919 North Main Street, PQ Box 9,50, Moom-sville, NC,, 28115-0950 0 Tdephone 704,663-169-9
An Equal Oprortunity Affirmative Action EmploycT

Pp
FMr.Ronald PT.' Parker
April 1, 1987
Page Two
If you should have any questions or desire additional assistance, 'please
contact this Office at (663-1699.
Sincerely,
Wells
Hydrogeologic Technician
Approved
Erie J. Klingel
H dru, eolu to Regional Supervisor
p

DEPARTMENT
F ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
NORTHCLIN
.' m _ �.

Farr°Aoy-r-a 6-tf, e-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, 1--lealth, and tur Resources
V illiani W C.:obcn ,,, Jr,r Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONIKENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 5, 1989
CERTIFIED MAIL'
RETURN RECEIPT R C EEKS PED
Mr. Tommy Harmon dice, President:"
McGee Corporation
Matthews, N. C. 2 106-1 I
RE: Notice of Violation 15 NCAC 21, Classifications and
Water r Quality Standards Applicable to the Groundwaters_
Caa Corporation
Artificial Wetlands Wastewater Treatment System
Permit No. 1346
Union County, N. C.
Dear Mr. Harmon;
Chapter lam , North Carolina General Statutes, authorizes and directs
the
Environmental Management Commission of the Department of Natural Resources
and
Community Development ment to protect and preserve the water and air resources
of
the State. The Division of Environmental Management has the delegated
authority to enforce adapted pollution control rules.
Based upon d review of your groundwater compliance monitoring data
submitted on September 29, 1989 as a requirement of Permit No. 13465, the
Division has reason to believe that the permitted activities have resulted
in
noncompliance with 15 NCAC-2L Classifications and Water Quality Standards
Applicable to the Cro ndwaters of North Carolina Condition No. 10 of your
permit states:
"The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of time
responsibility for damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from
the
operation of this facility."
0 Nf,)rth Main Street, Mooresville, N.C. 28Pi , -rdepi one 7 - 3-169 + FA
.*ten EquA Opportunity Affix attvte Acdon Employer

Rr. Tommy Harmon
October 5, 1989
Page Two
Specific violations of 13 NCAC 2L. were as fcl,lc s
Monitoring Well No. 1 21a Standard Date Sampled,
Fecal Coliform <10 per 100 ml, Total. Coliform 1 per 100 mil. 7/1987
Fecal. Coliform < 4 per 100 nil 11 / 1987
Fecal Coliform 8 per 1110 ml. 4/1988
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 tml. 7/1988
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 11/1988
Fecal Co l if orm 10 per 100 ml 4/ 1989
Monitoring Well No. 2 2L Standard Hate Sampled
Fecal Coliform <10 per 100 ml, Total Coliform 1 per 100 ml 7/1987
Fecal Coliform < 4 per: 100 m1 11/1987
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 m4/1988
Fecal Coliform < 4 per; 100 ml 7/1988
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml. 1I/1988
Fecal Coliform, 10 per 190 ml 4/198
Monitoring Well No. 3 21, Standard Date Sampled;
Fecal Coliform <10 per 199 ml. Total. Coliform ` I per 100 ml 7/1987
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 gal~ Total-Digsolved Solids 0 mg/l 11/ 987
Fecal. Coliform 4 per 100 ml /1988
Total. Dissolved Solids 667 g/l 4/1988
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml 7/1988'
Total Dissolved Salida 685mg/1 7/1988 ;
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 11 88
Fecal Coliform 10 per 100 ml 4/1989
Monitoring Well No. 4 21, Standard Date Sampled
Fecal Coliform <10 per 100 ml. Total Coliform I per 100 ml 7/1987
`fatal Dissolved Solids 538 mmg/l, Total Dissolved Solids 500 mg/1 7/1987
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml I1 / 1987'
Fecal Coliform 4 Per 100 ml 4/1988 _
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml 7/1988
Fecal Coliform per 100 ml; 11/1988
'festal Dissolved Solids 550 mg/l 11./1988
Fecal Coliform 10 per 100 m1 4/1989
It was also noted that total l organic halogen TOT) ranged from ,il1 g/ l to
.12 mg/1 1n the monitoring wells. The analytical method used for TOX must be
capable of detecting the total of all halogenated organic compounds present at
a concentration of .005 mg/l. if the concentration of TOX is greater than .005
mg/1 the individual halogenated organic compounds present at a concentration
at or above the mtethod detection limit 1L must be identified and quantified
utilizing EPA methods 601, 602, 604 and 611.

Mr. Tom- y Harmon
October 5, 1989
Page "Three
In addition, an inspection of the monitoring wells on September S, 198
indicated that no locking caps, identification plates and protective tauter
coverings were installed on the wells. The construction specifications of the
monitoring, wells were outlined in Well Construction Permit o. -01 -1, 1-0021
issued to K & S Systems, Inc., on behalf of McGee Corporation dated December
16, 1986.
It is requested a written response be submitted to this Office by no later
than October 19, 1989 explaining reasons for the noncompliance.
In the interim, McGee Corporation mast perform the following:
1. Resample monitoring wells No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 for the following
parameters:
1, Fecal tldllform
2. 'Dotal Dissolved Solid
3. TO
The analytical methods utilized in determining the presence of fecal:
coliform must have a method detection limit of less than 1 colony per 100
MI
The method utilized in determining the concetitrat Lon of '1'OX trust have a
method detection limit of .005 /l. In lieu of determining the TOX
concentration, McGee Corporation may sample each well. utilizing P
methods 601, 602, 604 and 611. Additional. sampling wising the above EPA
Methods will be required if TOX levelsare determined to be greater than
.005m/l
. The monitoring wells must be brought into compliance with conditions
as outlined in Well Construction permit No -01 --tICI31 .
This information east he submitted within thirty 30 days after receipt
of this letter:
If continued groundwater quality standard violations are verified, McGee
Corporation trust undertake to define the horizontal and vertical extent of the
contamination and propose corrective action to prevent groundwater quality
violations at the compliance boundary;. The compliance boundary is established
as one of the following:
1 For disposal systems permitted prior to December 30 1983, , the
compliance boundary is established at a horizontal distance of 500
feet from the caste boundary or at the property boundary, whichever
is closer to the sources

Mr. To Harmon
October 5, 1989
Page Four
2For disposal systems permitted on or after December 30, 1983, a
compliance boundary shal.L be established 250 feet from the waste
boundary, or 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever point is
closer to the source.
Failure to respond within the time specified and to voluntarily achieve
compliance May result in the recommendation of enforcement action, including
the issuance of a special. order against you, under the authority of General
Statute 143-215.2; and/or revocation of your permit.
Your response and/or questions should be first directed to Jesse W. Wells
of the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Brenda J. Smith, P.G.
Regional Supervisor
cc; Office of Legal Affairs
Bob Cheek
D. Rex Gleason
JWW:pb

p,
a:
i
4 V
Qi
C"S`o m�e.I o re
nab
�j JP,t`" 11V 4
for tile McGee
A',.air tcna
ace te'm
n c, are as
A
o
v
u
4
Iron13
Chlorides
1
5
mall
t.3
3.1
odLv
536
Fecallifom
qq
Date 2ampl,R Rece t-,fi :fie
hb'J-N
Date Samples Collectei! 7
Jul,,,
DATE
ta, '
Certified B
•
v
M

I
a, ,
w �k°
Ya +. M
ti
V
m
pytl i
V�
e��u$$op+�.
}�-+�(,q e,�ygyp., Corporation fild�.R ��ht
�ri�'W+\a'Yx 'bgpi Vy
pp�� s aK�a
�s ��4.�A �a�ny i`h
i•.. �ri��. �, kilirl ilr° q� e-j""'te�� Inca.' x� ,�a,,. '
rM� #i6�.{sf.6�m�.kb'��
�VB
ORGANIC
Well
0.011
Date of Report;`
Certified B
y
4
w.

y
Results of rrm 1 r�
.I i ; ga rm
on December
1
o
Systems
Inc
gyml loans yk y�pj �}
WELL #1
WELL rr2
WELL #3
WELL #4
VARAPETL
TOTAL DISSOLVE
I
476
1
;.
SOLIDS t374
FECAL COLD"s
4
4
PE
f L ¢#
S :. . M:ad
to
W
15.7
.3prvr
. i
. Q
. 2
4.
W. ,r
a't
TOTAL ORGANIC
i 3 .
!
24.0
26.0
�t /
TOTAL ORGANIC
Date Sample CollectedtNovember
17
me
9
Date SarAplee e+ eived: 7
December1967
Date Sample Analyzedt wb r 1 /
- 11 JanUary
1 988
Januar-
I)ate of 5 t t
CERTIFIED'. torry
'
,Jp„�,
w

iaResults
of sumple
analysis
performed on 15
Apri
for,the McGee Wells
by Environmental
Maintenance m
Ino,�>
WELL 01
WELL # 2
WELL #3 WELL #4
Pad
METERS
Total Suspended
Solids
19
13
21
135
MG
Total Residue
180
238
6
Total Dissolved
Sol id,
m
. 1
22
1
Fecal Coliform
, eIron
0.046
g g
60
0.060
8118
sm
y p p
Total i
Carbon
27,0
12.
G L
Date Samples Received 1;
"
Date Samples n 1, i 15
t2Eii
Date l' Report
19
ivi F,V
Certified
It
Jt'"t
ta+x"v
a
e
e
a

*.r
.{ h .'�,
r.
a
e
r
riesults 01
per Dane
on (i July
1 &r
for the d coo Wells
a,l int nan , rten'ts. Inc.
METERS]'' ,
:r
E
Total Suspended
Salida
14
15
tw GI
'dotal Rya li
194
700
uU8
Jig
Total bissoly'ed
7- ,
Salida
188
188
085
M
Fecal Coliforin
<4
L;�0°"a
*y
Nitrate
��� )
�J.
�ie.i6
AG L
117, Total. organic.`
Vi;te Strl-,P,l s Received Wells 1.
3 .rnd 4 6
.J21y 1988
W e 11 #2
27,, Ju,ly 1981
Date Samples Analyzed wells 1_.3
and 11 6
lula188
note' of Recant
b October 1
}�, ���v:
�P,� am � �", �,. � i¢a d.t.4✓��9 r. y. K.d# ,r:.a. #,SX
°W,k S.� LnS4}Z � it vP �3 k.�
^y
i,,k i.aA ° F f 1 yI

t, w.
h v
°,a Eli
a
lxt
q.
1
of
sample analysis
performed
on the McGee
Wellab
.Resuluts
Environmental Maintenance Systems Inc.
,
WILL #I
WELL #2
WELL,
Ammonia nitrogen
U. 0i'l
(J. w
O.Oul
bob�t
Total suspended
solids
7
17
5
lou
d,,I
Total dissolveO
solids
161
175
17
..
f r
Fecal coliform
4
4
4
4 PEA
.
Chloride
.1
1U.0
909
14.E
Total organic
carbon13.0
7.2
,
Total organic
j Halide
.ail
U.U1
U101
1;
i�ate samples- Received 3C)
t\ t1kg) ,;j
Date Samples Analyzed 30
November 1988
Date Report
21
Fe
Certified By
L;�

lip,
e
[+} f q d e y^y ^.
Results
%n f Wu Yaed On {.. "mot ,gip
,'p
p cGee Wells
b
Environmental Moiritcr�jnce
i
WL,LL rt 1
WELL #2
WELL #3
WELL #4
PARAKET
AMMONIA "I L a
(1.11
TOTAL SUSPENDED
SOLIDS
1
TOTAL DISSOLVED
SOLIDS
125
183
143
47V
1$s
FECAL COLIFORN
10
10
lu
10
PER
17,
CHLORIDE
10
19
C;
,
1 V P, Tj
• ? -j
U.
0.05
1 .5
x�
NG L.,
TOTAL ORGANIC
LA".Cis SANPLES AN L EU 1k) I1
Iv8o
PTIk IED BY
ALVA
"
G, WIYI,,, 1_sAbt It, TONY
EPet
*
a

State of North Carolina
ent of Environnient, Health. and Natural Resources

Mr. Tommy Harmon
Page Two
September 15, 1989
The Permit for this facility expired on August 1, 1988 and
this Office has no record of receiving a request for Permit
renewal. Failure to make a timely request for renewal is a
violation of Condition No. 14 of the subject Permit and 15 NCAC
2H 0.0211.
It is, therefore, the intention of this Office to recommend
enforcement action for the violations noted above. Civil
penalties of up to $10,000 per violation may be assessed.
A request for renewal of the subject Permit should be
directed to this office as soon as possible along with a
processing fee of $100.00. In addition, action should be taken
immediately to prevent further discharges from the wetlands
disposal system.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact Mr. Parker, Mr. D. Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor, or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
L
Brenda J. Smith, P. G.
Regional Supervisor
CC: Mr., Kent Wiggins
U7,ion County Health Department
7. Dale Overcash
r. Jesse Wells
Mr. Dennis Ramsey
MLP:se

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
M . vill Regional Office
James G,Martin, Governor Albert F Hilton, Re&nal Manager
, 'Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION GP ENVIRONMENTAL TA1 N G NT
December 16, 1986
Mr. Steve Swart
S Systems, Inc;
Post Office Box 1179
Charlotte, N. C. 28220
Subject: Well Construction Permit No.
' C l -- 0 1
McGee Corporation
Union Counter, ` North Carolina
Dear Mr. Swartz:
n accordance with your application received December 1, 198we are
forwarding herewith Well Construction Permit No. 89-0199 -00 1 dated
., December 16, 1986, issued to McGee Corporation for the construction of a
monitor well system."
leis Permitwill be effective from the date of its issuance and shall
be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Sincerely,
Y
Ronald L. McMillan:
Regional Supervisor,.
Enclosure
cc: Permits & Compliance
XoGee Corporation
oresville Regional Office
Central files
JWW:pb
14 North Main 950, vilk-, N.C. 1811s s Te rc704-663-1699
n Equal Opportunity Affirmative ativ Action Empic r.

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WELL OR WELL SYSTEM
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, North Carolina
General Statutes, and other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations,
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
McGee Corporation
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MONITOR WELL SYSTEM located 0.3 mile northwest of SR
1365 on U.S. Highway 74 in Union County in accordance with the application
dated December 9, 1986 and in conformity with specifications and supporting
data, all of which are filed with the Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development and are considered a part of this Permit. The monitor
well system is to be constructed in the residuum of the Charlotte Belt
Hydrogeologic System for the purpose of monitoring an artificial wetlands
disposal system.
This Permit is for well construction only, and does not waive any
provisions or requirements of the Water Use Act of 1967, or any other
applicable laws or regulations.
Construction of a well under this Permit shall be in compliance with the
North Carolina Well Construction Regulations and Standards, and any other laws
and regulations pertaining to well construction.
This Permit will be effective from the date of its issuance until June 16,
1987 and shall be subject to other specified conditions, limitations, or
exceptions as follows:
1. The borehole shall not penetrate to a depth greater than the depth to

Permit No. 89-0199-WM-0021
Page Two
be monitored or the depth from which contaminants are to be
recovered.
2. The well shall not hydraulically connect separate aquifers.
3. Construction materials shall be compatible with the contaminants to
be monitored or recovered. The casing shall equal or exceed Schedule
40.
4. The well shall be constructed in such a manner that water from land
surface cannot migrate into the gravel pack or well screen area.
5. When a sand pack is placed around the screen, a seal shall be
installed above the sand.
6. Grout shall be placed in the annular space between the casing and
the borehole wall from land surface to a depth within two feet
above the top of the well screen or to the bottom of the casing
for open end wells. The top of the well screen should not be above
the mean high seasonal water level.
7. All monitoring wells shall be properly developed by the well driller.
Development shall include removal of formation materials, mud,
drilling fluids and additives.
8. All wells shall be secured to reasonably insure against unauthorized
access and use. The well shall be permanently labeled with a warning
that it is for monitoring purposes and the entrance to the well must
be secured with a lockable cap.
9. All wells shall be afforded reasonable protection against damage
during construction and use.
10. Each well shall have permanently affixed an identification plate.
11. A completed GW-1 and copies of all water quality results must be
submitted for each well to the Division of Environmental Management.
12. When any monitor well is no longer useful for its intended purpose,
it shall be properly abandoned and an abandonment report filed with
the Division of Environmental Management.
Permit issued this the 16th day of December, 1986.
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
. . . ...... ..
. . . . . .....
z 14,
konald L.­­c illan, Regional Supervi#br
Division of Environmental Management`:,
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. 89-0199-WM-0021

PPPPPP­
NORTH CANOE INA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MONITOWECOVERY WELL(
TO: NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Ae.-C".
Gentlemen:
In accordance with the Provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, General Statutues of
North Carolina, and regulations pursuant , application is hereby made by
for a permit to cons iii_
ethereto'' 'app I I cat'
mo me 0 s a ��be
"r or' ' io
Mc c
a w owner
p ni tor/ rec very well s described be Inw a no 1 11 the accc
art of th i s app" ca� ion d in the accompanying data submitted as a
N f pr rty ow
am 0 0 ss P
Re owner: Mc Ge e in Mc(;c
Bus
Park (McGee CcarDoration
(b) Location of property: U. S. H1,Y11wa 7/ 44
L I at Lhe MecklenblIT-�dU �in
t nion lo
'a ry,
(LR2o_-­d2,4Ln_ s , ommunity,
etc.T `'���County
(c) Type of facility or site being monitored: ArLifiCial Wetland
Wastewater treatment S stem
(d) Types of contamination being monitored or re
disi covered- Seconda and
Existing
M Existing monitor wells showing contamination (well no.): none
(9) Estimated water -table depth- 6-8 feet
(h) Estimated date of construction: Begin October 1986 Complete, November
0) Drilling constractor:
0) Location of well: Provide a detailed map showing the location of the proposed well(s),
and Of any wells in an existing monitoring system (if applicable), in relation to the
Pollution source(s) being monitored and to at least two (2) nearby permanent Points such as roads, intersections, and streams. Identify roads with State Highway reference
road identification numbers. (Show all existing water Supply Wells within a radius of
1,000 feet of the proposed well.)
(k) Well constructiOn diagram: Provide a diagram showing proposed tonstruction specifications,
including diameter, estimated depth, screens, sand pack, grout, type of materials, etc.
The Applicant hereby agrees the proposed Box 509
well will be constructed in accordance with Monroe INQ 28110
appBu
dd specifications and conditions of ___TRnai "in —VA, dress �uW�e �er-Re the Well Construction Permit. As regulated K & S Systems Tnc.
under the Well Construction Standards (Title P.O. Bo
15 - North Carolina Administrat
Subchapter 2C)ride(Mailing Address of Agent -if 'Other
"We than above)
0,
gniati
e nor or Agent
FOR OFFICE USEk ONLY
TiceA
A,
r aPPI-IMETe PERMIT NO. ia!L,�-Dlcc issued 19
1W,
GW-22B

NORT14 CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCF8 AND M ITY MVELOPMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
DIVISM OF ENVIRONMEWAL NA' _ GROUNDWATER SECTION C_ �
P,O, BOX 27 ' 7 - RA ,N.0, 27611. PHONE [phone] Quad. No. � � � �Serial No.
Lat. Long. Rc
Mincer Basin
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD Basin Code 3
Header East. W-1Ent.—
DRILLING
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER � f � � PERMIT NUMBER:
1, WELL LOCATION (Show sketch of the Iccatrian below)
Nearest Town:: L1—(1 —, County:
_. Depth DRILLING LOG
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No,) Frrsrn To Formation Description
2. OWNER
ADDRESS _t ILI
�CStreet or Route No,
Carty or Town State 7'- Code
3, DATE DRILLED � v _ USE OF WELL
4, TOTAL DEPTH 3 0 — CUTTINGS COLLECTED El Yes 4o
;DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? D yes o
6; STATIC WATER LEVEL FT 0 above TOP OF CEASING,
0 below
TOP 01` CASING IS-1:­­ FT. A 0VE LAND SURFACE,
7. YELL (gprntj T 6 — _M _ MFTH D OF TEST C .�
WATER ZONES (depth),
9. CHLORINATIONType H, Amount 7 " - ..
10, EAStN : Wall ThicknessIf additional space is needed use back of form,
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
I LL.iATTIN SET
FrAr r � _ To , - L Ft.-(kw1 � � � (Show direction and distance tr ro-�` t fast t ya State Roads,
or rather reap reference points) `
FrOm Try __Ft.
IT RC. UT
Depth Material Method T
From To_— Ft.
12. SCREEN:
Depth Marrtetdr Slot Size Material wit
,
Frt�ns �_.„�._w....m_ fie_ � Ft. rrt, in,
Ff )M, Fr F1. tn. in.
or, Lit
From To-- Ft. in. in.
13 FaRAW'FL PACK
Depth Sipe Materiat L
From To Ft. . '
Frorrr__
14. REMARKE a ._.. 411 3'
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS ONST UCTE I IN RIB WITH t N C� , WELL C i;?NST U i
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY THIS RE ORD HAS BEEN t
If
SIGNATURE OF CONTR OR 014 AGENT DATE
WY-t Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well, owner.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTWENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES TY DEVELOPMENT
DIVO M c
FOR OFFICE USE Y
Lt. Isom Po
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Minor Basin
i
Reader Ent._OW-1 Ent. —
DRILLING CONTRA T ✓"
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER
STATE WELL CONSTRUCnoN
PERMIT NUMBER:
I. WELL LOCATIOK (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town:
county:
tRoad, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.
Depth DRILLING LOG
2. OWNER
From To Forritation Description
ADDRESS
SIree or Route No.
"
City or Town State Zip Code
S. DATE DRILLED USE OF WELL
4, TOTAL DEPTH CUTTINGS COLLECTED C1 Yes ahio
S. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTINGWELL? 0 Yes R No
STATIC WATER LEVEL. FT. 11 above TOP OF CASING,
below
TOP OF CASING iS FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE,
i. YIELD p ):METHOD OF TEST
tl. WATER ZONES (depth):
u ,
0.CHLORINATION: Type — Arnount
10, t: A Ii' GI
Wall Thickness
It additional space is needed use back of form,
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
GA I
From To Ft.
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads,
From —To Ft.
or other wrap reference points)
From —To —Ft—
11. GROUT:
Depth Material Method
To Ft,
Frompvj
djA
From To_ Ft,
lit
12. SCREEN.
t sA
Depth Diameter Mot Size Material
u r Pr .
From To— FL in in.
Frrn To_ Ft. in in.
"
From T'o Ft. in. in
13. GRAVED PACK
Depth Size Material
l "
From To _ Ft,
14. REMARKS:
I IG HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CON TR + RDANG 15 NCAC 2G, WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS
G R. t
SIGNATURE GE ONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
GW-i Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.

NTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND NIT"M DEVELOPMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY'
DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL NA - WA SECTION�
" 4
P.O. BOX 27687 - PALEI . , 27611. f 10) 733-6083
Quad. No. Serial o.'
Lt. Long. Rn
Minor Basin
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Bashi Code
Header Ent, 1ii -1 EraIL
tRILLING CONTRACTOR
GRILLER REGISTRATION I to ill
STATEi ELL. CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER
PERMIT NUMBER:
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Towrti L�
Counter: r ?
�
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No2,
Depth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
OWNER
%DDRESa
o�rLiu
.s "s Li rti
yj CSCree't N.
_
m._...
City or Towra_m. ;Mote Zip Code
1 DATE (DRILLED � USE OF WELL F1� �a '
4. TOTAL DEPTHr a -___ CUTTINGS COLLECTED 0 Yes ErNo
5, DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes £Hca;
.:SiATik WATER LEVEL _��....,.�.­ - FT. 0 above TIP OF CASING,
0 below
TOP OF CASiNG IS FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.:
7 YIELD (gpm)- RIETiRC7tT OF TEST
8, WATER ZONES (depth).. w
. CHLOM ATION: Tyne t4TH Amount #d
Wall Thickness
If additional space is needed use badly of farm.
Depth Diameter or "Weight/Ft. Material
l a From
Tca L F 6
L�SC TICiN Si�ETCH
�m� _ t. ''
(Show: direction and distance' from at Fast two Stag Road,
From To --Ft,--
or other map reference pTvts)
Fg�A'r�P"'iu rye^ {
i GROUT
Depth Material Method
'
From To­2_': Ft
4
From "To._ Ft _
"
12, SCREEN1
S y.
e.
� [�
Depth
le µ,.nth Diameter Ya�I:Vt id..6n' Materiel
a x
4 ryry
FrornTo----_ Ft. �_ in, in.
x-
ii am To- Ft in. in,
From To—,—,,--., Ft, it), in.
y
_ ..��..
.p
13 GRAVEL PACK:
R
yy7,
Depth Size Material
From ---- T° Ft.
From Tta__...- Ft.
14, REMARS.a..
I CC HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTE
NC WITH 1 CAC , WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT COPY THIS RECORD HAS EN %
D
SIGNATURE E CAN
ACT( OR A NT DATE
G W-i Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and Dopy' to well.owner.

"MATMENT OF NATURAL RESOUROES AND C
DIVISIONFOR
V+lit T WA SECTION
OFFICE ► ONLY
P, , 80X 27687- RALOOKKC, 27411i P1 (040) 7 83
Quads No.� ea g y N
LaL Long. pc
CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Minoro.3111—
Basin
..
Basin Code _
Header Ent* OW-1 Ent. —
DRILLING CONTRACTOR ".
REGISTRATION EFL 4
STADRILLER
ERMIT %LCONSTRUCTION
NUMBER:
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town., ad
County:;
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
Depth DRILLING LOG
, TYPEti.1 p�yyW R :
2.
From To Formation Description
ADDRESSif
t et or Dote Nio.
_
aw
City or Town State Zip Code
`y �
. DATE DRILLED � USE OF WELL
4, TOTAL DEPTH 340 CUTTINGS COLLECTED C3 Yes EjNo
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? C3 'des allo
S. STATIC WATER LEVEL: FT, 0 above TOP OF CASING,
px
below
TOP OF CASING IS FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
T. YIELD (giani): METHOD OF TEST
w
S. WATER ZONES (depth);
a
. CHLORINATION., Type -& Amount
M
10, CASING:
Wall Thickness
it additional space Is needed use back, of forum,
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft, Material
FromTo -2211— Ft.
tCATltf3 SIETC?i
(Show direction and distance from at least two Mate Roads,
From To Ft. _
or other map reference points)
From —To —Ft.—
11. GROUT;
as
Depth Material Method
From Td Ft,
From To Ft.
12. SCREEN:
bal
Depth Diameter Slot Size MaterialOn
FroFt. inm In.
From To— Ft.
From To Ft. 1. in.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
d t
From To FL
Fro m— To . Ft,
14. REMARK&
I"DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTR T`
STANDARDS, THAT A COPY OF HIS RECORD HAS BEEN
ACCORDANCEWITH 1 NiCAC C, WELL. CONSTRUCTION
WE Lw RD 3
JUL 2 1987
SIGNATURE C
iCTOR CAR Am NT D ATE
CVW-1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to welt yawner.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL NAG NT
GROUNDWATER T SECTION
December 2, 1986
MEMORANDUM
Arthur Mouberry
FROM; Bob Cheek ,b
SUBJECT:Artificial Wetland Wastewater Disposal System
McGee Business Park, Union County
. 134 5/e' i w Engineer: er: ii. i
cap review of the project documentation available, we
would make the following comments and recommendations:
ins
l The applicant has supplied no subsurfaceinformation
other that the very generalized data in the'soils
reports and thus we must utilize regional office as-
sessments and conservative ;default values for
h ^dro eclu i.c parameters.
Given the clayey nature of the saprolite and an
existing assumed depth of 15 feet to the water table,
the proposed loading rate would' raise the water table
4.5 and 3.7 feet of the center and edge of the bermed
disposal area, respectively.
(3) The edge of the disposal area appears to he 15-20 from the ' property eundary, well .l within the pe-
rimeter f
(4) GGiven only secondary treatment, ; plus chlorin ti hs,
and the fact that the primary soil sne that would be
counted on for waste attenuation A horizon") has
been removed according to the soils reports, there i
a very high probability that there would he a contra-
vention on of GA standardsboth at and outside the pe-
rimeter of compliance. a �._nce.:
i The hydraulic gradient as a result of disposal, in
conjunction with the proximity of the creek to south
of the treatment area, will result in ovemeht fs me
degree re of contaminated groundwater into that; creek,
of least initially..

The word "initially" is used above due to the
possibilitythat the hydraulic loading rate, in con-
junction with the organic load of waste, and the ap-
parently clayey nature of the saprolite, may result
over time, in a sealing at the subsurface e prc l it
turning the wetland into a lagoon.
While the situation outlined in () above might mitigate
long term violationsf groundwater rnd surface water stan-
dards, the lack of site specific subsurface data: precludes an
reliable prediction of to what degree, and for how long, the
waters 'would be rntaminat d`.
n order to mitigate these potential problems to 'a more
acceptable level we would suggest the following:
(A) The proposed disposal area should be relocated ace
that the edges of the disposal area are - at least 75
feet from the property boundary
() One upgradient and threes downgradient wells (total'
should be installed to monitor changes in groundwater
dwate
quality. The wells should be installed at Yeast two
weeks prior to disposal and should be bard and ,
constructed as approved by the Mooresville Regional
Office, from whom construction permits must :the
ob-
tained.
(C) The wells should be sampled within 48 hours ' f
completion and thereafter every March, July and
No-
vember for the following:
NO 3 Fe
NH Fecal Coliform
c " (initially & thereafter November only)
TDS Water Level (measured prior to sampling)
l
( Because of the remaining potential for groundwater
contamination*, which would lessen but not deleted by
increased buffer, we would suggest that the company
be urged to prepare contingency plans for waste dis-
posal in the event that the disposal operations re-
s nit in contamination of a degree and/or duration
which is environmentally unacceptable.
BC/Is
RonMcMillan/Bill Crawford
Central Files
Groundwater Files

J 4
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community
Division of Environmental Management
512 North lisbur . Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G, Martin, covemor R Nul Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary Ditrctot
e camber 9, 1986
Mr. F. Stephen Swartz
S Systems;, Incorporated
P.O. Box 11792
m.Charlotte, north Carolina 28220
SUBJECT: a business Park
Artificial. Wetlands; Systems
Union County
Dear Mr. Swartz.
This letter is pursuant to our telephone conversation. In
additionto the attached comments from our Groundwater 'Section, the
following items must be addressed:
1. Revised plans should be submitted showing the dual ell
lagoon, with two loading;; pipes at each bell.
2. What will be the loading rate during planting?
3. What are the effects of drastically underloading this
treatment system? N
Please he advised that further technical t�j t be
forthcoming i our Regional Office in Mooresville, a sit s
been inspected. Shouldy have any questions, ease cal st
.`
Gil Vinzani, P.E.
Supervisor, State Review Group
eer nresvil e Regional Supervisor
Gee Corporation
V t
v 91

PPPP'PF
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 2, 1986
MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Cheek
THROUGH: Ron McMillan
FROM: Jesse Wellsv-,
SUBJECT: McGee Corporation-GW 86180
Artifical Wetlands Wastewater System
Union County
I have reviewed the permit application for the above referenced facility.
The following recommendations are submitted:
1. The soil appears to be only marginally suited to provide adequate
treatment of the waste prior to vertical migration.
2. Prior to operation of the system it is recommended that one boring be
done within the proposed area to establish permeability of the site.
This boring should also establish depth to bedrock or auger refusal.
3. Adequate buffer zones should be established for the system in order to
avert any off -site migration.
4. A minimum of threemonitoring wells should be required consisting of
one upgradient and two down gradient wells. Sampling heed le should
establish background quality and then quarterly. Parameters recommended
would be NOV Cl, TOC, Total Coliforms, pH.
5. Hydraulic loading rates should be established which will maximize
treatment. Dr. Reubin reported that 0.5 gpd/sf/day may be excessive.
6. The applicant needs to establish that the natural soils being utilized
as dikes be effective in containing the effluent.
7. The applicant should also establish an evapotranspiration to infiltration
ratio for` the site.
JWW.*se

GROI)NOWATER SECTION
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGE14ENT
RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
REVIEW BY: Jesse w. well's
WILIO K414E.
TOWN
on Vi� 9 gbj��4v 74 Atiw
DATE:
TY:
B horizon soil
S

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 2, 186 ,
MEMORANDUMTO: Bob Cheek
THROUGH: Ron £v illa 1<11 y _,;1_'>"
� a
FROM: Jesse l_ �"
s
..; SUBJECT': Nee Corporation-GW, 8180
Artifital Wetlands Wastewater tewater System
Union Count
1 have reviewed the permit application for the above referenced facility.
F
The following recommendations are submitted:
1.The soil appears to be only marginally suited to provide adequate
treatment of the waste prior to vertical migration.
2 Prior to operation of the system it is recommended that one boring be
done within the proposed area to establish permeability of the site.
This boring should also establish depth to bedrock or auger' refusal.
3. Adequate buffer zones should be established for the system in order t
avert any off -site migration.
r. Aminimum of three monitoring wells should required consisting of
one upgradient and two down gradient wells. Sampling shcedule should
establish background quality and then.. quarterly. Parametersrecommended
would be NU' Cl, TOC, Total Coliforms, pH.
. Hydraulic loading rates should be established which will maximize
treatment. Dr'. R,eu in reported that 0.5 gpd/sf/day may he excessive.
6. The applicant heeds to establish that the natural soils being utilized
as dikes be effective in containing the effluent
. The applicant should also establish an evapotranspiration to infiltration
ratio;; fof the site.
d :se

'AA

Al
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
N-400resvdle Revri naml t f its
al'Tle� tom.:Nbt—tk), Csoverno $bcrt R Hilton, Regional anaget-
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MAl AGFIIE T
October 3, 1989
CERTIFIED L
RETURN' RECEIPT RE211;ST Ii
Mr. Tommy Harmon, , Vice President
McGee Corporation'
P. 0. Box 1375
Matthews, N. C. 28106-1375,
RE: Notice of Violation 15 NCAC 2L Classifications
Water Quality Standards applicable to the Groundwaters
McGee Corporation
Artificial Wetlands Wastewater Trearlment System
Permit No. 13465
Union County, N. C.
Dear Mr. Harmon:
Chapter: 143, North Carolina General Statutes, authorizes and directs the:
Environmental Management Commission of the 'Department of Natural Resources and.
Community Development to protect: and preserve the grater and air resources of
the Staten The Division of Environmental Management has the delegated
authority to enforce adopted pollution control rules»
Based upon a review of; your groundwater compliance monitoring data
submitted on September 29, 1989 as a requirement of hermit No. 13465, the
Division has reason to believe that the permitted activities have resulted in
noncompliance with 15 NCAC 2L Classifications and Water Quality Standards
Applicable to the Groundwaters of North Carolina. Condition No. 10 of your
permit states
"The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Per ittee of time
responsibility for damages to surface or groundwaters resulting from the ;
operation of this facility."
919 North Main Stmet, Mt oresv&E ,, NC. 28115 * Telephone its- -663 699 FAX °ifl 3.60 40

Mr, To PF7�01 my Harmon
October a, 1989
Page Two
Specific violations of 15 NCAC 2L were as follows:
Monitoring Well No. 1, 2L Standard Date Sampled
Fecal Coliform <10 per 100 ml Total Goliform I per 100 ml 7/1987
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml 11/1987
Fecal. Coliform 8 per 100 M1 4/1988
Fecal Coliform < 4 For 1,00 ml 7/1988
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 11/1988
Fecal Coliforin 10 per 100 ml 4/1989
Monitoring Well. No., 2 2L Standard Date Sampled
Fecal Coliform <10 per 100 ml Total Coliform 1 per 100 ml 7/1987
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml 11/198,7
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 4/1988
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml 7/1988
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 11/1988
Fecal Coliform 10 per 100 ml 4/1989
Monitoring Well No. 3 2L Standard Date Sampled
Fecal Coliform <10 per 100 ml Total Coliform I per 100 ml 7/1987
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml Total Dissolved Solids 500mg/1 11/1987
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 4/1988
Total. Dissolved Solids 667 mg/1 4/1988
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml 7/1988
Total, Dissolved Solids 685 as 7/1988
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 11/1988
Fecal Coliform 10 per 100 ml 4/1989
Monitoring Well No. 4 2L Standard Date Sampled
Fecal Coliform <10 per 100 ml Total Coliform I per 100 ml 7/1987
Total Dissolved Solids 538 mg/1 Total Dissolved Solids 500 mg/1 7/1987
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml 11/1987
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 4/1988
Fecal Coliform < 4 per 100 ml 7/1988
Fecal Coliform 4 per 100 ml 11/1988
Total Dissolved Solids 550 mg/l 11/1988
Fecal Coliform 10 per 100 ml 4/1989
It was also noted that total organic halogen. (TOX) ranged from .01 mg to
.12 Mg/1 in the monitoring wells. The analytical method used for TO X must be
capable of detecting the total of all halogenated organic compounds present at
a concentration of .005 mg/1. If the concentration of TO X is greater than .005
mg/l the individual halogenated organic compound(s) present at a concentration
at or above the method detection limit (MDL) must be identified and quantified
utilizing EPA methods 601, 602, 604 and 611.

M Mr. Tommy Harnion
- Tor Octobet 5, 1989
C 0 POPPlac Tt
ge Three
In addition, an inspection of the monitoring wells on September 8, 1989
indicated that no locking caps, identification plates and protective outer
coverings were installed on the wells. The construction specifications of the
monitoring wells were outlined in Well Construction Permit No- 89-0199-WM-0021.
issued to K & S Systems, Inc., on behalf of McGee Corporation dated December
16, 1986.
It is requested a written response he submitted to this Office by no later
than October 19, 1989 explaining reasons for the noncompliance.
In the interim, McGee Corporation must perform the following:
1Rosample monitoring wells No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 for the following
parameters;
1. Fecal Coliform
2. Total Dissolved Solids
3TOX
The analytical methods utilized in determining the presence of fecal
coliform must have a method detection limit of less than 1. colony per 100
I.
The method utilized in determining the concentration of TO X must have a
method detection limit of .005 mg/l. In lieu of determining the TOX
concentration, McGee Corporation may sample each well utilizing EPA
methods 601, 602, 604 and 611. Additional, sampling using the above EPA
Methods will be required if TOX levels are determined to be greater than
.005 mg/l.
2. The monitoring wells must be brought into compliance with conditions
as outlined in Well Construction Permit No: 89-0199-*1-0021.
This information must be submitted within thirty (30) days after receipt
of this letter.
If continued groundwater quality standard violations are verified, McGee
Corporation must undertake to define the horizontal and vertical extent of the
contamination and propose corrective action to prevent groundwater quality
violations at the compliance boundary. The compliance boundary is established
as one of the following:
1a For disposal systems permitted prior to December 30, 1983, the
compliance boundary is established at a horizontal distance of 500
feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary, whichever
is closer to the source.

M Mr. Tommy Harmon
r TC October 5, 1989 Cc o PF7 Page Four
2KK For disposal systems permitted on or after December 30, 1983, a
compliance boundary shall be established 250 feet from the waste
boundary, or 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever point is
closer to the source.
Failure to respond within the time specified and to voluntarily achieve
compliance Eay result in the reconmTen dation of enforcement action, including
the issuance of a special order against you under the authority of General
Statute 143-215.2; and/or revocation of your permit.
Your response and/or questions should be first directed to Jesse W. Wells
of the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
BU49 T,
Brenda J. Smith, P.C.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Office of Legal Affairs
Bob Cheek
D. Rex Gleason
JWW:pb