WQCS00030_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

�ry/L;csa0o3o
col
is
A�,
L Niel $ n,, 7
)f f /•G;T, PM111•10
;Es s vi. .e �/ r "3/i 5.
General Information
l z Ft
psfi2.,... 1
`3.
N,...'—, 1),.
ra=" et•a
• 5.1Y+ I/O.°O7
.1isi 2.:30
Inspection Checklist
Number of Pump stations
SCADA system PS
Telemetry PS ✓ 1..-
4. Audible and Visual only
5. Generators Permanent
a. Frequency tested
Generators Portable
A. Quick -connect plugin
B. Frequency tested
Pump stations served
6.
ORC B-ORC
9 g-3UFi:7
PS
by same generator.
CS-
- 3 r-(- i
Sewer Use Ordinance 'T i" ,_9
iv,,s
Enforcements Last Year
FOG Program / ""r�"`-'' +/
Inspections
/
ow
Public ED How 1 '' X d
Annual Report Date ✓ e h ��
Root Control Program a° l b
Budget $
Documentation of V
1. Line Cleaning (10%)
2. High priority lines (6 mos) 1 s1L
).,o l `3 % g 2'L,,
Lso.°/y a c-, ..s•
3. System observation annual
Years
Gafr1-.")-j-er\1
✓ 1 C Z • A ✓14 .t LL Di a ./Tld
Y` °
4. ROW mowing
v c e o• - .! .A
i-tha L � � N" •��y
rq 3 - F �t
O / 1,I"tcl�rJc r�'c=L.c c4
pel

Review logs PS O&
Reportable Spills
Repeat Location/Cause
/Moe .-e_
Non reportable spills J(
o 41
S E fin,
Customer complaints !
Spare parts inventory
u‘0,1
Cam,
Map of system % complete
0

Pump Station Inspection Checklist
Name. 3 L S, No of Pumps 1
2
Address 0 Operational 12
Capacity of each (gpm)
1
2
Runtime hour meter reading average
1•
2
-e-1
Housekeepin
Secure ,
Accessible
Identification Signage
Inspection Schedule Daily
Weekly 2
Wet Well— Floats
Free of debris
High water float r
Telemetry
Audio -Visual ✓ '�
SCADA
Alarm system tested for communications
!' c1_} r -t Yt l
v.
Emergency power Generator Portable Quick -connect --. t
Fuel tank ! y 4+. G—q s Gallons per hour usage rate
Testing schedule „ _ . k / , Automatic
Bypass pumping configured C et kl ,4 1,v-e „1 y
Overflow piping
Manhole upstream
Inspection Logs
fI - tr— y .1`'

Collection. System Inspection Checklist
Manholes- Lines- Right Of Way- Aerials
1. Manhole location or address
Cover present - vent and cover above grade - vent screened
Visible signs of overflow
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
Invert in good condition Size inches Pipe capacity 1/4 1/2 3/4 diameter.
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessive grease, roots, or sand
2. Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
3. Aerials - High Priority lines
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossings and supports in good condition
Level of debris on or behind line
Free of damage
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
General observation of system (annual)

Name
Address
Y1-e-
Pump Station Inspection Checklist
Housekeeping/'�
Secure t/�
Accessible
Identification Signage
Inspection Schedule Daily Weekly 2,
No of Pumps 1
2
Operational •1 r
2
Capacity of each (gpm)
1
2
Runtime hour meter reading average
1
2
Wet Well — Floats
Free of debris •
High water float d�
Telemetry
Audio -Visual - of (4 d `i b ��- VA_ 1 j A -I
SCADA
Alarm system tested for communications
Emergency power Generator Portable
Fuel tank /V' -I Cra S Gallons per hour usage rate
Testing schedule / 0 d ,ty., Automatic
•
Bypass pumping configured ,-t n oft f °9. of
Overflow piping
Manhole upstream
Inspection Logs

Collection. System Inspection Checklist
Manholes.- Lines- Right Of Way- Aerials
1. Manhole location or address
t / >"
�fc �/i •'A}1
Cover present - vent and cover above grade - ysefeenedt'
Visible signs of overflow �✓
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
Invert in good condition Size �2 O nches Pipe capaci
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessive grease, roots, or sand
2. Right of Way - location or name of'outfall line
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
3. Aerials - High Priority lines — $ , ./V1
A v-
Exposed line of ductile material r� /
Water crossings and supports in good condition
Level of debris on or be ! o d line �i o
Free of damage
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
General observation of system (annual)
1/2
,n -571
3/4 diameter.
s'./1/1: JL /(.L�

Pump Station Inspection Checklist
Name No of Pumps 1
2
Address Operational 1
2
Capacity of each (gpm)
1
2
Runtime hour meter reading average
1.
2
Housekeeping
Secure
Accessible
Identification Signage
Inspection Schedule Daily Weekly
Wet Well — Floats
Free of debris
High water float
Telemetry
Audio -Visual
SCADA
Alarm system tested for communications
Emergency power Generator Portable Quick -connect Onsite
Fuel tank Gallons per hour usage rate
Testing schedule Automatic
Bypass pumping configured
Overflow piping
Manhole upstream
Inspection Logs

Collection System Inspection Checklist
Manholes- Lines-. Right Of Way- Aerials
1 Manhole location or address rot
Cover present - vent and cover above grade - vent screened
Visible signs of overflow V
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
Invert in good condition Size inches Pipe capaci O
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessive grease, roots, or sand
2. Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
%2
3/4 diameter.
3. Aerials - High Priority lines j` . J ‘ j—te, . ss
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossings and supports in good, condition
Level of debris on or behind line
Free of damage
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
General observation of system (annual)

Pump Station Inspection Checklist
Name j,✓;
Address
Housekeeping
Secure v�
Accessible
Identification Signage
Inspection Schedule Daily
Wet Well — Floats
Free of debris
High water float
Telemetry
Audio -Visual
SCADA
Alarm system tested for communications
Weekly z
41,-4
Emergency power
Fuel tank :/Ve,, --
Testing schedule /
Bypass pumping co
Overflow piping
Manhole upstream
Inspection Logs
fo
Generator
O a
nfigured/
No of Pumps 1
2 Ci
Operational 1
2
Capacity of each (gpm)
1
2
Runtime hour meter reading average
1•
2
,
c,cie{ in G(
Portable Quick -connect nsrte
Gallons per hour usage rate
Automatic

Collection System Inspection Checklist
Manholes- Lines- Right Of Way- Aerials
5 ✓l }� 9% o o r
1. Manhole location or address r9 1` eP��JJ
� Vr G O ✓� V ti'G'� e--
Cover present - vent and cover above grade - vent screened
Visible signs of overflow
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
Invert in good condition Size
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessive grease, roots, or sand
1/
ches Pipe capacity 1/4 Y2 3/4 diameter.
2. Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
3. Aerials - High Priority lines
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossings and supports in good condition
Level of debris on or behind line
Free of damage
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
General observation of system (annual)

City of Statesville 06/12/18 State Sewer Inspection Report
Total Footage of all City Sewer Mains
Sewer Gravity Mains = 1,409,353' (266.92 miles)
Sewer Force Mains = 102,541' (19.42 miles)
Totals Mowed for '16-'18
Totals mowed for 2016 = 328,183' (62.15 miles)
Totals mowed for 2017 = 247,691' (46.92 miles)
Totals mowed for 2018 = 95,133' (18.01 miles)
Totals Flushed for '16-'18
Totals flushed for 2016 = 359,589' (68.10 miles)
Totals flushed for 2017 = 198,374' (37.57 miles) Totals flushed for 2018 = 147,239' (27.88 miles) /
Totals CCTV for '16-'18
Totals CCTV for 2016 = 40,828' (7.73 miles)
Totals CCTV for 2017 = 101,761' (19.27 miles)
Totals CCTV for 2018 = 51,319' (9.72 miles)
Creek Crossings Inspected for '16-'18
Totals inspected for 2016 = 607
Totals inspected for 2017 = 189
Totals inspected for 2018 = 30
Total Sewer Mains Repaired
Totals repaired for 2016 = 17
Totals repaired for 2017 = 10
Totals repaired for 2018 = 1
Total Number of Clean -outs Installed
Total installed for 2016 = 15
Total installed for 2017 = 3
Total installed for 2018 = 0
Totals Vapor Rooted for '16-'18
Totals vapor rooted for 2016 = 16,678' (3.15 miles)
Totals vapor rooted for 2017 = 0'
Totals vapor rooted for 2018 = 4,577' (.86 miles)
Total Manholes Inspected for '16-'18
Total inspected for 2016 = 5,207
Total inspected for 2017 = 3,660
Total inspected for 2018 = 1,537
New Sewer Connections from 2016-2018
2018 = 54
2017 = 158
2016 = 145
Creek Crossings
There are 88 Creek Crossings
There are 24 Trestle Crossings
There are 93 Underground Creek Crossing

DEPARTMENT
Sewer Maintenance
Adopted
DESCRIPTION
5 3/4" Boring tool
%
1
City
Water
Capital Improvement
Funding Source
Pay Go
of Statesville
and Sewer
2018
14,000
Fund
Plan 2018-2023
2019
-
2020
-
2021
-
2022
-
2023
' -
Total
14,000
Sewer Maintenance
Backhoe #515
2
Pay Go
-
125,000
-
-
-
-
125,000
Sewer Maintenance
Seeker Camera
7
Pay Go
-
12,000
-
-
-
12,000
Sewer Maintenance
Side Arm Mower
6
Pay Go
-
48,000
-
-
-
-
48,000
Sewer Maintenance
Bush Hog
3
Pay Go
7,000
-
-
-
-
-
7,000
Sewer Maintenance
Pick up Truck ext cab 4 X 4 #502
4
Pay Go
-
31,500
-
-
-
-
31,500
Sewer Maintenance
Sewer Rodding and Hi -pressure Jet Truck
8
, Pay Go
-
250,000
-
-
-
_ -
250,000
Sewer Maintenance_-
_Dump Truck
5
Pay Go
-
85,000
-
-
85,000
q,, , - m._en. .c. ,: 2
LSevYer�(teh'abthtation
-
Pay Go
_
25C1r0
,,�0;000
- 25{j�:a a o ►
,4250; e a o�
': -
1,000,000
Se a ..Maintenance?
Sewer Maintenance & Larkin
-
Pay Go
-
1,600,000
150,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
2,350,000
r i_SewerNMaintenance,
Sewer Rehab - Old CntryClub/Sullivan,Rd:.
' -
Pay Go
-
525,000'
-
-
-
- -
525,000
Water Maintenance
2.5" Boring tool
3
Pay Go
-
7,000
-
-
-
-
7,000
Water Maintenance
Trench Roller '
5 :
Pay Go ,
-
35,000,
-
-
_
35,000
Water Maintenance
LED Light Tower
2
Pay Go
16,000
-
-
-
-
-
16,000
Water Maintenance
Pick-up.Truck4X 4 #510 •.
4
Pay Go.
-
31,500
-
-
-
31,500
Water Maintenance
1 1/2 Ton Diesel est cab Utility Truck
1
Pay Go
85,000
-
-
-
-
-
85,000
Water Maintenance
Water Line Rehabilitation
-
Pay Go
-
200,006
200,000,
200,000
200,000
200,000
1,000,000
Water Maintenance
Major Capital Water Improvements
-
Pay Go
-
600,000
150,000
500,000
-
-
1,250,000
Water Maintenance
Water Line Upsizing
-
, Pay Go,
50,000
50,000,
50,000
$0,000
50,000
50,000
300,000
Water Purification
#2 High Service Pump Motor Controller
1
Pay -Go
119,000
-
-
-
-
-
119,000
Water Purification
Hand Held Valve Actuator and Telescopic
' 4
Pay -Go
-
8,500
-
_
-
-
8,500
Water Purification
Streaming Current Meter
7
Pay -Go
-
13,000
-
-
-
-
13,000
Water Purification
Tube Settlers
1
Pay -Go
-
120,000
-
-
-
-
120000
Water Purification
2-10 Ton Heat Pumps
1
Pay -Go
-
-
36,000
-
-
-
36,000
Water Purification
460v 350 HP Pump Motor
Pay -Go _
-
-_
' 40,562
-
-
=
40,562
Water Purification
Compact Tractor with Loader
-
Pay -Go
-
20,000
-
-
-
-
20,000
Water Purification
1/2 Ton 4x4 Pickup Truck•
.6 •
Pay -Go
-
25,000,
-
-
-
25,000
Water Purification
1/2 Ton 4x4 Pickup Truck
2
Pay -Go
-
28,000
-
-
-
-
28,000.,
Water Purification _
16" Pump Control Valve and Repiping Pro
2
Pay -Go:
_ 50,000.
_ _ _' -
_ -
_ -
-
-
50,000
Water Purification
New Roof on WTP
3
Pay -Go
80,000
-
-
-
-
-
80,000
Water Purification
#1 High Service Pump. Study
5
. Pay=Go
-
-
-
-
_
17,000
Water Purification
Alum Sludge Basin Improvements
2
Pay -Go
-
-
1,240,000
-
-
-
1,240,000
Page 270

WGc 5 coo3D
2./1-3/15
,(l rig 6/ 3% 3
e. 00e, o0, f�j
t'o d n . a- f- h
fro AI
2.k 3: g Yu', General Information
P`Al
l6 Ps
gl, z
0-0 _ elm 19nce C_n-rca. )) v Y `y fr
rl _
PS •
by same generator.
C (O.a.r .�oy m 57.0
65. 3 B-ORC L, Jh,„
,asp .
-S�Y�
J—tr v. P, Pr 5Li"'r l� t.�a5-=r
1 ray 1Sk b (( 1ll1
2 g6g2-111 I
Inspection Checklist
r�1 0 (/
1. Number of Pump stations /
2. SCADA system PS
3. Telemetry PS V... 4 0-4- ;
4. Audible and Visuals i 3° )14 5 fe
5. Generators Permanent c
a. Frequency tested ,i �� h % —n t+v 1
4
14
Generators Portable
A. Quick -connect plugin
B. Frequency tested
Pump stations served
1 e- EI ./t4 „ - o R
7d q-- g-n -- 3 q-17
6..z es
ORC p.Nv11.S C N:,,✓✓.is
7011--Rn2 q
CS- 3
Sewer Use Ordinance
Enforcements Last Year
FOG Program 7LLr--` S� , t4 r, 12 ��/y(Y ; if 0 wL�_
�O � � hA. - )/ /.j�[A .1 f'/c�tN ✓I t4..
Inspections
Public ED How
Annual Report Date- 0 f 1" (2 o (5 , 5 )„ �h
Root Control Program — ��� t,, rO5
CIP Budge( Years
Documentation of
1. Line Cleaning (10°/) V
,- w mJ
)Q b.
2. High priority lines (6 mos) • 2. - ,
0
✓ ✓'Uv.�1 i` wt�
r, 0-7 e "I ,(1 47 G L( WIC n.
3. System observation annual
4. ROW mowing t/
v• 4 r^4.1s 4,-
C-
0w,d5eL4.2_✓'
dv
rvY
c„ -0a; K: j
e.

Review logs for PS O&M f -S %) h9/ ?//DJ �v k - p �c
G I�eCh 'del Ij•.e e'er o✓._
,t`,) c 1.4,tie tr
Reportable Spills
/Qj÷ , dt 2--,o( 5
Repeat Location/Cause
Non reportable spills i c
2 —Sa( 5
Customer complaints
Spare parts inventory sip ,(,_
v
Map of system % complete
of 0�
--- 5
d °cil.��
S r �--�-
yY¢ 1Sd
y rr�+(�Fi ✓^
ogs 0 c1 r2/ �a r✓ tS G'I� S C ov c Cl .
f ly A; t,,.,2 r/ .
I/%�3 , SLt,2t,
11 isG Aq.5 f
Ae� j�e"k +-O — /1/+`1 1'1 % rf1*pif C,�
'r
✓ cl VI'/1r
N c e t et �. n
52 -1'S
alr
,qq Zn v�tt2
l")c(

Name
Address
Pump Station Inspectio
Per
Housekeeping
Secure
Accessible
Identification Signage t/
Inspection Schedule Da Weekly
Wet Well — Floats
Free of debris ✓
High water float -1411.4
Telemetry 1
Audio -Visual
_SGAISA—
Alarm system tested for commtanications
Emergency power Generator
Fuel tank
Testing schedule — u ►+ ��,
Bypass pumping configured
Overflow piping
Manhole upstream
Inspection Logs
"#1;3h
ei f.P
Portable
Gallons per
Automatic
fr
Checklist
No of Pumps 1
2
Operational 1
2
Capacity of each (gpm)
2
Runtime hour meter rd»g average
07
2 37 3
Quick -connect
hour usage rate
/v4-L 4,.(

Collection System Inspect io
Ir
Chec
Manholes- Lines- Right Of Way- Aerials
1. Manhole location or address
irc- VI
Cover present -lentd cover above grade - screened
ist
Visible signs of overflow
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
Invert in good condition Size / S inches Pipe capaci
Line free flowing and unrestricted c/
Excessive grease, roots, or sand
2. Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depression
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
3. Aerials - High Priority lines"
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossings and supports in good condition
Level of debris on or behind line
Free of damage
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
General observation of system (annual)
%2 3/4 diameter.

2
Name
Address
Pump Station Inspectio
••.4./ 4- 0 VI.
Housekeeping
Secure
Accessible
Identification Signage
Inspection Schedule Daily
Weekly/K2
Wet Well — Floats
Free of debris
High water float r cA_ L4
Telemetry
Audio -Visual
SCADA
Alarm system tested for communications
?I:
Checklist
No of Pumps 1
2
• Operational 1
. 2
Capacity of each (gpm)
1
Runtime hour meter reading average
1
2
Emergency power Generator Onsite
Fuel tank Gallons per hour usage rate
Testing schedule Automatic
Bypass pumping configur
Overflow piping
Manhole upstream
• Inspection Logs

Collection System Inspection Checklist
Manholes- Lines -Right Of Way- Aerials
of rJ 0 ,--
1. Manhole location or address
o
Cover present-.yefttan-d-Cover sve-grade -
Visible signs of overflow t�
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present L�
Invert in good condition Size g inches Pipe capacity Y4
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessive grease, roots, or sand
�I ter- s a ti
2. Right of Way - location . name of outfall lme
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
3. Aerials - High Priority lines
lU
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossings and supports in good condition Ab+
Level of debris on or behind line
Free of damage
%2
M crC-
Right of Way mowing records .
Visual inspection of off street lines
General observation of system (annual)
3/4 diameter.
���h C v ossS
cc-
4

Pump Station Ignspectio
Name /c(I f - $1
Address
Housekeeping
Secure
Accessible
Identification Signage
Inspection Schedule Daily
Wet Well — Floats
Free of debris
High water float r u f i
Telemetry
Audio-Vis 1,/1-/
Alarm system tested for communications
Weekly ( 2,
Checklist
No of Pumps 1
2
Operational lv /
2
Capacity of each (gpm)
1
Runtime hour meter reading average
1g')
2 A7 9i �1
Emergency power Generator Pock- conned Onsite
Fuel tank Gallons per hour usage rate
Testing schedule Automatic
Bypass pumping configured
Overflow piping --
Manhole upstream
Tnspection Logs

C aaectio i Syste Inspection Check ! ist
Manholes- Lines- Right Of Way- Aerials
1. Manhole location or address
Cover present
Visible signs of overflow �✓
Sinkholes and depressions /
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present 1/
Invert in good condition Size -inches Pipe capaci
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessive grease, roots, or sand t s- o_ at
2. Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic l r
3. Aerials - High Priority lines .5 ; J ., 1 Il .1)-
'2 li
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossings and supports in good conditioni--
Level of debris on or behind line ,VA
Free of damage
%2
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
General observation of system (annual)
�c9
3/4 diameter.
2. //-62.it4

City of Statesville. Sewer Infrastructure March 2016
6,448: Manholes
12.38 miles.(65392.78 feet) of Pressure Mains
264.79 miles (1398089.54 feet) of Gravity Mains
98.42 miles (519675.49, feet) of 0utfall Line
16 Lift Stations
2 Treatment Plants -.
82055' Sewer CameraTotalfor 2014
78310':Sewer Camera Total for:2015
6415' Sewer Camera Total for 2016
715353' Sewer. Main Cleaned for 2014
492477' Sewer: Main Cleaned for 2015::
36897' Sewer Main Cleaned for 2016
6116 Manholes: Inspected for:2014
5911 Manholes Inspected for 2015
687 Manholes Inspected for 2016
29 Sewer Main Repaired 2014
28 Sewer Main, Repaired 2015
5 Sewer Main Repaired 2016
393500' of Outfalls Mowed 2014
313932'..of Outfalls Mowed 2015.

MAR. 10.2016 10:37AM CITY OF STATESVILLE NO. 4575 P. 12
Attachment A for Condition 1V(4)
City of Statesville
Collection System -Report
Third Creek Crossings
Job Foreman
Completion Rate
Report Information Codes
0 1_gverything is OK
# 6 Clearing work needs to be done
# 2 Lines needs cleaning
# 7 Erosion prevention needs to be done ,
#3 Manholes needs work
# 8 Manholes needs cleaning •
#4 Stricture needs cleaning
# 5 Men holea needs Sealing
# 5 Structure needs painting
# 10 Other (please note problem on reverse side)
Report
Codes
Third Creek Locations
Inspection
Date
Inspection
Rate
Inspection
Date
Inspection
Date
Li.---P
10" 1232 Wilmington Av. .•
P.T. P
12" 138 Foggy Bottom Ln.
12" 1444 Harris St.
a' LP
12" 1921 Wil$pn Lee Blvd.
-,
15" 1105 Winston Av. �
C,
15" 1219 Goldsboro Av.
L`L''
15" 2253 Bristol Rd.
Cc?
15" 324 S. Miller Av,
DIP
15" 762 Buffalo Shoals Rd.
C- i3
16" 118 Raleigh Av.
C;2' P
16" 1444 Harris St.
•
AI'?
16" , 152 Newton Alley
'Z P
16" 208 Corinthian Dr. •
16" 1903 5th St.
18" 1n Bridge Dr.
24" 180 80 Cara Cara Ln. (Hillcrest Trailer Park)
MI
.
='? •
24" 229 Belfast Rd.�
'0.t.
30' 1,37 Pendergrass Dr.
'
80" Under 1-77 —Behind 3rd creek school
C.—IF
30" 175 Club House Dr.
%l V .
30" 201 Hunters Hill Dr. (2 cliff. locations)
t.�Q
8" 1212 Harris St.
8" 237 Cara Ln. (Hlllcrest Trailer Park)
8" 635 Meadowlane Dr. _
•
_
Art"
{r P
8" 1026 Cass St.
8" 108 -C Wall St. & 1-77
8" 115 Megby Trail
2' P
C T''P
el?
er
8" 119 Megby Trail
8" 1201 Walt St.
8" 123 E. Raleigh Av. & Robson Av.
$" 133511th St.
•
}Z '
8" 139 Tenth Green Ct. ,
lax P
MP
8" 175 Club House Dr.
8" _ 197 Hunters Hill Dr.
Dx'P
8" 220 Wedge View Way

MAR. 10.2016 10:37AM CITY OF STATESVILLE NO.4575 P. 13
Attachment A for Condition IV(4)
City of Statesville
Collection System Report
Third Creek Overhead Piers & Trestles
lob Foreman '
Completion Date
Report Information Codes
# 1.yerything is OK
—#
6 Clearing work needs to be dons
# 2 Lines needs cleaning
# 7 Erosion prevention needs to be done
# $ Manholes needs work _
_
# 8 Manholes needs cleaning
4 Structure needs cleaning
# 9 Manholes needs sealing
#5Strueture needs painting
# 10 Other (please note problem on•reverseside) _
Report
Codes
Third Creek Locations
Closest Address
10" 353 Forest Hollow Dr.
12" 313 Bristol Dr.
12" At Hidden Lakes
IP 8" E. of Crowell Av. At W.Garner Bagnal Blvd.
_ g' 130 Lippard St.
j e 8" E. of Cochran St. & Cedar St.
Inspection Inspection Inspection
Date
Date Date
Inspection
Date

MAR. 10.2016 10:37AM CITY OF STATESVILLE NO.4575 P. 14
• Attachment A for Condition IV(4)
City of Statesville
Collection•System Report
Fourth Creek Crossings
Job Foreman
Completion Date
• R
# 1.,gyerything is OK
# 6 Clearing work needs to he done
# 2 Lines needs cleaning
# 7 Erosion prevention needs to be done
# 3 Manholes needs work
# 8 Manholes needs cleaning " ,
#4Structure needs cleaning
#9 Manholes needs sealing
# 5 Structure needs painting _
# 10 Other (please note problem on reverse side)
Report
Codes
Fourth Creek Locations
Closest Address
Inspection
Pate
Inspection
Date
Inspection
Date
inspection
Date
D. X i?
10" 341 W. Hingham St
( P
12" 1335 Museum Rd.
7
12" 2224 Wexford Way
L_ 1 P
12" 474 N. Center St. @ S,H,S.
C- P
12" 1036 Hunter St.
Cep
12" •502 Wilson St.
exp
12" 115 W. BeII St
ex.? 1?
15" 304 Gregory Rd.
54C/
15" Victory Ln. & 1-40
CZ?
15" 1180 Free Nancy Av,
?
16" 545 N. Race St. @ Anderson Park (1)
'IX P
16" , 545 N. Race St. @ Anderson Park (2)_
- 2P
16" 816 Alexander St
i 1
18" 2360 Northside Dr.
1 P
21" 1250 Northside Dr.
,
i'
24" 437 Track] St, @ S.H.S.
CT
24" 406 Oakhurst Rd.
a
0" 1364 Royality Cir.
(IrI
30" 232 Pump Station Rd.
Cyr
30" 140 Turnersburg Hwy.
-
" 1.63a Br®pl�green �4v{� I
.
lit?
30" Bridge on Davie Ave at Walking Trail •
•
6i
30" off 1637 Brookgreen Ave & 1-77
6. .9
42" 450 Sig[rol Hill Dr,
X _
6" 628 E. Front St.
8" 121 Anna Dr.
`i l f
8" 1630 Crown Vue Ct.
8" 232 Pump Station Rd.
.g,
C.-VP:-
S;" 701 Springdale Rd.
F
8" 144 James Farm Rd.
.
'lc`
8" 163 Intercraft Dr.
13(
8" 178 May Dr.
a?
8" 334 N. Oakland Av.
CV
8" 340 Wilson St.
-'
CAP
4
8" 442 Salisbury Rd.
.
8" 453 N. Lackey St.
rP
8" 502 Wilson St.
r C-_ 1P
8" 503 Fall St.

MAR. 10. 2016 10:38AM
CITY OF STATESVILLE
NO, 4575 P. 15
• Attachment A for Condition IV(4)
City of Statesville
Collection System Rapart
Fourth Creek Crossings
Job Foreman
Completion Date
Report Info matipn Codes
#',EVerything is OK
# 6 Clearing work needs to be done
# 2 Lines needs Cleaning
ft 7 Erosion prevention needs to be done
tt 8 Manholes needs work
ti 8 Manholes' needs cleaning T
#4 Structure needs cleaning
# 8 Manholes needssealing
# 5 Structure needs painting
# 10 Other (please note problem on reverse side)
Report
Codes
Fourth Creek Locations
Closest Address
Inspection
Date
Inspection
Date
Inspection
Date
Inspection
Date
$ 843 Stockton St
r •
8"
857 Wendaver Rd.
('. PP
a" s7O Wendover Rd.
C.ZP
8"
9.04 Hedrick Cir.
Ur?
8"
105 Coddtngton Ln.
aP
8"
119 Coddington Ln.
Di P
:8"
127 Coddington Ln. _
rp
8"
628 E. Front St,
-D1 P
8"
646 Hartness Rd,
EV-7P
8,"
_
behind 520 Signal Hill Ext. Dr.
►1
8"
behind Foxcroft Ter Apt. 606
QI
8" .
south of 35,6 Brad Dr.
'CIF'
8"
south of 715 Sullivan Rd.
.

MAR. 10. 2016 10 ; 38AM
CITY OF STATESVILLE
NO.4575 P. 16
Attachment A for Condition 11r(4)
City of Statesville
Collection System Report
Fourth Creek Overhead Piers & Trestles
Job Foreman
Completion Date
# 1,' rything is OK
# 6 Clearing work needs to be done
"cleaning#'7
' a Manholes needs work
Erosion prevention needs to he dory
# 8 Manholes needs cleaningIt
# 4 Structure needs cleaning
#t 9 Manholes needs sealing
## $ Structure needs painting
# 10 Other (please note Droblem on reverse side)
_ Report
Codes
Fourth Creek Locations
Closest Address
inspection
Date
inspection
Date
inspection
Date
Inspection
Date
L
12" 818 E. Sharpe St.
I R
15" 1,635 Simonton Rd. at Signal dill Dr.
(�
18" 204 Austin Healey Dr. & Simonton Rd.
P
24" 1515 Forest, Park,pr.
24" 434 Oakdale Dr. 84 Bryant St. • .
24" $Imonton Rd. & 1-77 (In the Curve)
r'
24" S'ungntpn Rd. at Signal Hill Dr.
y
2
24" Valley Stream Rd. @ Beechwood Rd
2
24" 1547 Brookgreen Av.
•
24" 222 Knox St.
f '
6" 1203 Valley Stream Rd.
7
6" ,2441 E: Broad St. @ Statesville Manor
p
8" 5315toneybrooke Rd. •
I. f A
8" 123Lincoln St.
- - .
I
8" 1358 Radio Rd.
•
8" 474 N. Center St. @ S. H. S.
r
8" 815 Partridge Dr.
0. I P
8" 920 Brookwood Ct.

Attachment
IV. Collection System Information:
Item 3
City of Statesville
Duplex Pump Stations
The City of Statesville maintains the following lift stations:
Pump
Na. Identification
1. Barkley Rd.
2. Industrial Dr.
3, Interstate Equipment
4. Newton Dr.
5. Park Dr.
6. Airport
7. Kennedy Dr.
8. Marjorie Rd.
9. Valley Stream
10. Davis Hospital
11. Hatfield Rd.
12. Commerce Blvd.
13. Statesville Business Park
14. Pine Forest
15. Wildewood
16. Deer Ridge
Physical Location
116 E. Barkley Road
1302 Industrial Dr.
1610 Salisbury Rd.
2035 Newton Dr.
1018 Park Dr.
262 Hangar Dr.
2415 Kennedy Dr.
241 Marjorie Rd.
301 Valley Stmam
269 Old Mocksvil[e Rd.
152 Hatfield Rd.
186 Commerce Blvd.
341 Business Park Dr.
153 Planters Dr,
196 Skyuka Rd.
144 Deer Ridge Dr.
Pump
Alarm Type Reliability
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Visual, Telemetry Yes
Reliability Source Capacity
Port. Gen. 200 gpm
Port. Gen. 100 gpm
Port. Gen. 225 gpm
Port. Gen. 100 gpm
Port. Gen. 100 gpm
Perm. Gen., Port. Pump 190 gpm
Perm. Geri., Port, Pump 740 gpm
Perm. Gen. 100 gpm
Port. Gen,, Port. Purnp 160 gpm
Perm. Gen. 180 gpm
Perm. Gen. 260 gpm
Port, Gen. 336 gpm
Port. Gen. 210 gpm
Perm. Gen., Pot Pump 250 gpm
Perm. Gen,, Port. Pump 70 gpm
Perrn. Gen., Port. Pump 145 gpm
• e

aim
1
2
3
Department Name
Sewer Maintenance
DESCRIPTION
51/4"Boring'tool
Backhoe#515
4
FUNDING
SOURCE 2017
INPUT
20,000
125000
0
0
0
Department Code
031.5581.473.74.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dept No
0
0
TOTAL BUDGET
IMPACT
$ - 20,000
$ 125,000
4
0
5
6
7
8
9
Vehicles:
1 Pick up Truck ext cab 4 X 4 #502
2
3
4
5
0
0
0
TOTAL EQUIPMENT:i 145,000'
1 j
1-1/2 ton Diesel-4 X 4 Utility Truck 505
Sewer Rodding and Hi -pressure Jet Truck
Dump Truck
3
5
30,000
85,000
0
85,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
250,000
0-,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0.
0
0-
0 . 0 ,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MDR
0
0
0,
145,000
0 $ 30,000
.Oa $ 85,000
$ 250,000
0
0
$ 85,000
TOTAL VEHICLES 200,000 250 000 '.
0` f $ 450 000
Other Capital Projects:
031.5581.473.65.00
1 Sewer Rehabilitation
2 Sewer Maintenance & Larkin
3 Old Country Club Area Sewer Rehab
4 ."Sullivan Road'Sewer Improvements
5
6
250,000
250,000
250,000
0 1,600,000� 200,000;
295,000
150,000
0
TOTAL OTHER CAPITAL PROJECTS 695,000
380,000 1
0
0
0
0
250,000
200,000
0
0
0
250,000
200,000 ?
0
0
yti
2,230,000 450,000 450,000: 450,000"
0 $ 1,250,000
0 $ 2,200,000
0
0
675,000
$ 150,000
0^I -$ 4,275,000
Total Sewer -Maintenat;1,040,000 2,480,000 ? 450,000 - 450,000 450,000 0 $ 4,870,000
345,000 250,000 0 0 0 0

Airport Rd. Liftstation
Y-N-N/A
P #1 HRS
P #2 HRS
Date
Intials
Clean & debris removed
Y-N-N/A
Vaives inspected & operated
Y-N-N/A
Pumps/equip. inspected & lubricated
Y-N-N/A
Alarms, telemetry & aux. equip. checked
Y-N-N/A
Comments-
Y-N-N/A
P #1 HRS
P #2 HRS
Date
Intials
Clean & debris removed
Y-N-N/A
Valves inspected & operated
Y-N-N/A
Pumps/equip. inspected & lubricated
Y-N-N/A
Alarms, telemetry & aux. equip. checked
Y-N-N/A
Comments-
Y-N-N/A
P #1 HRS
P #2 HRS
Date
Intials
Clean & debris removed
Y-N-N/A
Valves inspected & operated
Y-N-N/A
Pumps/equip. inspected & lubricated
Y-N-N/A
Alarms, telemetry & aux. equip. checked
Y-N-N/A
Comments-
Y-N-N/A
P #1 HRS
P #2 HRS
Date
Intials •
Clean & debris removed
Y-N-N/A
Valves inspected & operated
Y-N-N/A
Pumps/equip. inspected & lubricated
Y-N-N/A
Alarms, telemetry & aux. equip. checked
Y-N-N/A
Comments-
Y-N-N/A
P #1 HRS
P #2 HRS
Date
Intials
Clean & debris removed
Y-N-N/A
Valves inspected & operated
Y-N-N/A
Pumps/equip. inspected & lubricated
Y-N-N/A
Alarms, telemetry & aux. equip. checked
Y-N-N/A
Comments-
Y-N-N/A
P #1 HRS
P #2 HRS
Date
Intials
Clean & debris removed
Y-N-N/A
Valves inspected & operated
Y-N-N/A
Pumps/equip. inspected & lubricated
Y-N-N/A
Alarms, telemetry & aux. equip. checked
Y-N-N/A
Comments-
Y-N-N/A
P #1 HRS
P #2 HRS
Date
Intials
Clean & debris removed
Y-N-N/A
Valves inspected & operated
Y-N-N/A
Pumps/equip. inspected & lubricated
Y-N-N/A
Alarms, telemetry & aux. equip. checked
Y-N-N/A
Comments-
Y-N-N/A
P #1 HRS
P #2 HRS
Date
Intials
Clean & debris removed
Y-N-N/A
Valves inspected & operated
Y-N-N/A
Pumps/equip. inspected & lubricated
Y-N-N/A
Alarms, telemetry & aux. equip. checked
Y-N-N/A
Comments-

UTILITIES - WATER
Section 10. Water Connection Fees
Meter Size
3/a" meter
1" meter
1 ' " meter
2" meter
4" meter
Tap Fee
$ 637.00
$ 809.00
$ 1,250.00
$ 1,839.00
$ 7,690.00
Impact Fee
$ 812.00
$ 1,353.00
$ 2,707.00
$ 4,331.00
$13,533.00
Connection Fee
$ 1,449.00 inside town
$ 2,162.00 inside town
$ 3,957.00 inside town
$ 6,170.00 inside town
$21,233.00 inside town
All the above charges and fees are for property located inside the town limits. Out of
town fees are 200% of inside rates.
All tap fees noted above are minimum fees for a standard tap. The customer will be
billed for any and all costs the Town incurs above the minimum fee. If a developer or
property owner extends water and sewer laterals to the property line as defined in
§ 50.031, paragraph (E) of the Town Code, the tap fee may be adjusted to reflect the
actual cost to the town for making the tap. The actual cost will be determined from labor
and equipment charges according to Section 28 of this Fee Schedule.
In the case of a Major Subdivision as defined in the Banner Elk Subdivision Ordinance
the Impact Charges shall be paid within ten (10) days of approval of the preliminary plat
for any phase of development or in the case of a Conditional Use Permit as defined in the
Banner Elk Zoning Ordinance the Impact Charges shall be paid before the issuance of the
permit.
Meter Charge: applicable as initial charge when water service is requested.
3/a" meter
Pin11 .,tom,....
J1GGJ aUU V G
Section 11. Water Rates
$250
Minimum Charges per month:
4J UJl lU J)WU1E1 i.ih. T GV /U
Size of 1 Teter Inside Town
3/" 8.50
1" 14.30
1 =/" 19.80
1 i " 25.30
2" 30.80
3" 36.30

4" 68.00
6" 145.00
0 - 2000 Gallons: Minimum Charge
2001 - 10000 Gallons: $3.50/1000 Gallons
Over 10,000 Gallons: $2.50/1000 Gallons
Outside rates will be 200% of the inside rate. a

ZONING/SUBDIVISION
Section 15. Zoning Permit
The cost of a zoning permit from the Town of Banner Elk shall be determined at a rate of
$1.00 per $1,000.00 of cost of construction with a minimum of $15.00.
Sect: ui 16. Sign Permit
TEMPORARY SIGNS:
Signs including Temporary Agricultural Product Signs,
Temporary Seasonal Business Signs, or other Temporary Signs
used
in the opening activities
:iivi€.e, of
a business, le other sp: >aevents:
PERMANENT SIGNS:
Off -Premise Tire': tional Signs: R :5.00
Building Attached Signs: $2.00 per square foot of signage, plus $5.00
for each separate sign beyond the first
Free -Standing Signs: $2.00 per square foot of signage
Directory Signs for Planned
Commercial Development: $2.00 per square foot of signage
Section 17. Criminal Penalties
in accordance with section 1400(3) of thv Banner Elk Zoning Oi drraaiici'.y the maximum
fine for any violation of the Banner Elk Zoning Ordinance prosecuted pursuant to NCGS
§14-4 shall be $500.00
Section 18. Civil Penalties Schedule
_ _ .. 7 Afil t L.. D _ �. •r —r�___3 Il_..I_.. cL .. %,ii _. __ .-
Bii accoii_tatr4�- .:rtri �vv4� ti i`svi i:ir trr4-.=:airn4t �; r .... --.:�ariati' _ hr :i..-...ng- is a
schedule of civil penalties.
Notice of Violation No Fee
First Citation $50.00
Second Citation.
For the Same Offense $100.00
Third Citation
For the Same Offense $200.00
Penalties paid within ten (10) business days shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%).
10

40, le7-4-fz
Inspection Checklist
General Information
( 3) 1. Number of Pump stations
. 2. SCADA system PS
3. Telemetry PS •
(4, + ftm-kc Nod ikJ-.sue
4. Audible and Visual only
5. Generators Permanent 7
a. Frequency tested c„ y-sbe.
Generators Portable
Z p A' ems— P'" i r�
A. Quick -connect plugin
4-I 1 PS
B. Frequency tested — 1 t-' ` _
• Pump stations served
by same generator.
6.
ORC ` r""� ar�4c.7 B-ORC 6^c-‘S
Sewer Use Ordinance
Enforcements Last Year T4-
FOG Program Jest— i c - -
Inspections yr _ Lb�,c S� �s
Public ED How.
CIP Budget. S iOw Years
Documentation of
"1
1 Line Cleaning (10%) `�
2, -High priority lines (6 mos)
34f7\-70-tc---
3. System observation annual ptirko
4.ROW mowing
Review logs for PS O
Review PS logs information
:►sky.,
Non reportable spills
CS-
C7 u Smoo
b% Cowl cc) (

Customer complaints
Spare parts inventory
Map f system 1l7
of system
nnmr11o+n

Pump Station Inspection Checklist
Name:
Address:
# Pumps -
1
2
90.,S U-sq, '-(,-''
Working
1
Run Time -
YES
NO
Weather: .
Signage: :
" Housekeeping:
Secure:
Wet Well Floats:
Debris:
Working High Water Float:
Telemetry: 0
SCADA:
AudioNisual:
Is alarm system tested, How often:
-----
Inspection Logs:
Emergency Power:
Type: Portable f/nsit Fuel - Oe., ScheduleNender -
Ouick Connect:
Testing Schedule:
Backflow:
Overflow Piping:
Bypass Pumping:
Inspection Schedule:
Comments/ Observations:

Pump Station Inspection Checklist
Name:
Address:
# Pumps -
1
2
idi-1C
1'.e,1 e—
Working -
1
Run Time -
YES
NO
Weather:
Signage:
�-
Housekeeping:
/J
Secure:
Wet Well Floats:
--/
Debris:
Working High Water Float:
Telemetry:
SCADA:
AudioNisual:
--------
Is alarm system tested, How often:
Inspection Logs:
,---
Emergency Power:
C./
�f A1
Type: Portable L" Fuel !v (' ScheduleNendef
Ouick Connect:
.,..-:----
Testing Schedule:
Backflow:
Overflow Piping:
Bypass Pumping:
Inspection Schedule: l ,�,�
Comments/ Observations:

Pump Station Inspection Checklist
Name: •
Address:
# Pumps -
1
2
Working
1
�2
Run Time -
.
.
YES
NO
Weather:
Signage:
o
Housekeeping:
Secure:
Wet Well Floats:
/
Debris:
Working High Water Float:
Telemetry:
SCADA:
x
AudioNisual:
Is alarm system tested, How often:
Inspection Logs:
Eergency Power: m
'
Type: Portable Onsite✓ Fuel - 1\C, ScheduleNendet-
Ouick Connect: •
Testing Schedule: tja,S,21ki
Backflow:
Overflow Piping:
Bypass Pumping: c 6'2- i 5o2-'s o-`1- 4- ' c,
Inspection Schedule: ` ,
Comments/ Observations:

. Pump Station Inspection Checklist
Name:
Address:
# Pumps -
1
2
Working -
1
C
�n e 5
Run Time
[5eJ
YES
NO
Weather: .
Signage:
Housekeeping:
Secure: /
..--
Wet Well Floats:
Debris: 4
Working High Water Float:
—
Telemetry:
.-----
S CADA:
/
Audio/Visual:
Is alarm system tested, How often:
Inspection Logs:
Emergency Power:
Type: Onsite Fuel - ScheduleNendet -
Ouick Connect:
Testing Schedule: 0
Backflow:
Overflow Piping:
Bypass Pumping:
Inspection Schedule: ��i
Comments/ Observations:
P J01}e.-

Collection System Inspection Checklist
Manholes- Lines- Right Of Way- Aerials
Manhole location or address
Cover present - vent and cover above grade - ve
Visible signs of overflow
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
Invert in good condition Size
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessivegrease, roots, or sand
Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
inches Pipe capacity'/4 1/2 3/4 diameter.
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
Aerials - High Priority lines
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossingsand supports in good condition.
Level of debris on or behind line
.Free of damage
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off stet lines
General observation of system (annual)

Collection System Inspection Checklist
Manholes- Lines- Right Of Way- Aerials
Manhole location or address st.,,,„.a..ALL
Cover present - vent and cover above grade - vent screened
Visible signs of overflow
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
Invert in good condition Size
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessive grease, roots, or sand
Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
24 inches Pipe capacity 'A
Accessible
Free of sinkholes ordepressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
Aerials - High Priority lines ALv^ o
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossings .and supports in good condition.
• Level of debris on or behind line
Free of damage
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
General observation of system (annual)
£L 2c(
'A diameter.

Collection System Inspection Checklist
Manholes- Lines_ Right Of Way- Aerials
Manhole location or address .t.) N �/
Cover present - vent and cover above grade - vent sor
Visible signs of overflow/
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
Invert in good condition Size -"LAD inches Pipe capacity'/4 '/ 3/4 diameter.
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessive grease, roots, or sand
Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage'
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
Aerials - High Priority lines
Cry, Daf\L
Exposed line of ductile material
Water crossings .and supports in- good conditi
Level of debris on or behind line
• Free of damage/
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
• General observation of system (annual)
I �r

Manhole location or address
Collection System Inspection Checklist
Manholes- Lines- Right Of Way- Aerials
Cover present - vent and cover above grade - ve Greened
Visible signs of overflow
Sinkholes and depressions
Good condition properly seated
Bypass structures or pipes present
,Invert in good condition Size inches Pipe capacity'/4
Line free flowing and unrestricted
Excessivegrease, roots, or sand
Right of Way - location or name of outfall line
Accessible
Free of sinkholes or depressions
No evidence of leakage
Free of non -utility motorized traffic
Aerials - High Priority lines
Exposed line of ductile material Water crossings .and supports in good condition.
Level of debris on or behind line
. Free of damage
Right of Way mowing records
Visual inspection of off street lines
• General observation of system (annual)
1/2
3/4 diameter.
Akk—

Q11t of
*ttttesuille
11. (!. +dux 1111 • 3tatesuille, Nurtll (irulina 28687
Mr. Lon Snider
Mooresville Regional Office
NCDENR
610 East Center Ave, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: City of Statesville Collection System
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Permit WQCS00030
Date: 1 November, 2010
Dear Mr. Snider,
RECEIVED
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NOV 0 3 2010
SViiP SECTION
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
I am iri receipt of the above referenced Inspection Report dated 11 October, 2010.
As to'the deficiencies noted in the Operation and Maintenance Section we have
standardized our inspection procedure and record keeping making the Third Creek
process the same as Fourth Creek. Since the Fourth Creek records were "complete and
filled out appropriately" this should resolve the deficiency noted in the report. I am
enclosing a sample of the Lifstation Inspection form that is now being used for all our
liftstations.
I can be contacted at 704-878-3438 if you require any additional information,
please let me know.
Sincerely,
W. Byerly
Assistant Director, Water Resources
Cc: Larry Pressley
Joe Hudson- "

Michael F. Easley
Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
April 6, 2001
Mr. Wayne Lambert
Director of Public Works
City of Statesville
Post Office Box 1111
Statesville, North Carolina 28687
Subject: Non -Discharge Facility Inspection
Sewer Collection System
City of Statesville
Iredell County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lambert:
This letter transmits a copy of the inspection report covering the inspection conducted on
March 22, 2001. The inspection was conducted by Mr. Don Price of this office and Marie Doklovic
of the Non -Discharge Permitting Unit in Raleigh, N.C. Mr. Price and Ms. Doklovic were
accompanied by Mr. Andy Smith, Fourth Creek WWTP Supervisor, Mr. Richard Cooper, Water &
Sewer Utilities Superintendent, and Eddie Mitchell, Collection System Supervisor during the
inspection.
The subject inspection was conducted in conjunction with the initial permitting of the City of
Statesville's sewer collection system. Generally the inspection revealed that the sewer collection
system of the City of Statesville is being properly operated and maintained. However, there were
some deficiencies noted that are set forth under "Additional Comments" in the attached inspection
report.
The City needs to take action to correct the noted deficiencies. It is requested that you respond
to this matter in writing by no later than April 27, 2001, indicating actions taken to correct the
deficiencies. Please address your response to Mr. Price. An attached copy of the revelant permit
shell and excerpts from the regulation applicable to collection system permitting are enclosed for
your review.
7
t,ICDENR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Mac: Seet, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Price or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Attachments
cc: Iredell County Department of Environmental Health
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Joe Hudson, City of Statesville Water Resources Director
DP

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
ATA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
GENERAL INFORMATION
City/Town/Owner: Statesville
Permit No. NPDES:NC0031836 & NC0020591
Issuance Date:3/1/2001 for both permits
If applicable, SOC Issuance Date: N/A
Permittee Contact : Wayne Lambert , P.E.
ORC Name:Richard Cooper
24 hr Contact Name:Richard Cooper
County: Iredell
WQ:*
Expiration Date:7/31/2004 for both permits
Expiration Date: N/A
Telephone No.: [phone]
Telephone No.: [phone]
Telephone No.: [phone]
Reason for Inspection
X ROUTINE COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP OTHER
Type of inspection
X Collection System Spray Irrigation
Sludge Other
Inspection Summary: (additional comments may be included on attached mikes)
*Collection System Permit No. is subject to change.
Is a follow-up inspection necessary X yes no
Inspector(s) Name(s)/Title(s) Donald R. Price / Environmental Technician V
Telephone No. : [phone] Fax No.: [phone]
Date of Inspection: March 22.2001

Permittee: City of Statesville
Facility: The City of Statesville currently owns and operates 11 lift stations which serve the City
of Statesville. The following lift stations were inspected on March 22, 2001: lift station #7-Valley
Stream station, lift station #8-Davis Hospital station, lift station #9-Hatfield Road station, and lift
station #10-Commerce Blvd. Station. The Simonton 24" Aerial line was inspected also.
Facility Location: The Valley Stream Station No. 7 is located at 301 Valley Stream Rd., the Davis
Hospital Station No. 8 is located at 269 Old Mocksviile Rd., the Hatfield Road Station No. 9 is
located at 152 hatfield Rd., the Commerce Blvd. Station No. 10 is located at 2748 Bommerce Blvd.
The 24" Aerial line is located off of Simonton Road.
Collection System File Review
1. Does DWQ Database indicate repetitive overflows at any point? Yes No /1 N/A❑
If yes, is there a corrective action plan? Yes No N/A❑
2. Do records include a map of the collection system? Yes /1 No N/A❑
3. Are there records of annual visual inspections of all lines not visible from
normal public access? Yes® No N/A❑
Regular visual inspections of high priority areas? Yes® Non N/A❑
4. Do records indicate that right of ways are maintained to allow access? YesZ No N/A❑
5. Are there areas of regular or scheduled cleaning? Yes /1 No N/A❑
6. Is there a spare parts inventory and list of contractors? YesZ No❑ N/A❑
7. Is the spare parts inventory adequate? Yes® Non N/A❑
8. Are maintenance logs up-to-date and include inspections, tests, maintenance? Yes►4 Non N/A❑
9. Is there a trouble log of all problems that include the following information? Yes No / 1 N/A❑*
Overflows locations, who responded time/date, action taken, cause of
problem/overflow, and how the problem was resolved
10. Does the Town have a Sewer Use Ordinance? Yes Non N/A❑
Does it appear the SUO is enforced? Yes® Non N/A❑
11. Does the system have any known points of bypass? Yes No N/AD
If yes, describe type of bypass and location. Yes❑ No N/A
12. Do records log pumpstation telemetry/SCADA notintions? Yes No /4 N/A❑*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM FILE REVIEW:
*Item No.'s 9 and 10 — A trouble log listing problems/overflows with the system, who responded, action taken,
cause of the problem, how the problem was corrected, along with pump station call -in notification needs to be
developed and maintained for the system.

Gravity Sewers
Manholes:
Are manholes accessible?
YesZ NoD N/AD
2. Are manhole covers above grade? Yes® NoD N/AD
Visible signs of overflow? Yes❑ No N/AD
Sinkholes or depressions? YesD No® N/AD
3. Are manhole covers missing or improperly seated? YesD No / ( N/AD
4. Are manholes in need of repair? Yes® NoD N/AD*
Due to normal wear and tear? YesZ NoD N/AD
Due to vandalism? YesD NoZ N/AD
5. Are inverts in need of repair? Yes❑ No N/AD
6. Is there evidence of collection system deterioration? Yes!: No N/AD
7. Is flow visibly restricted in pipe or manhole? YesD No N/AD
8. Is there an excessive amount of grease? YesD NoZ N/AD
Roots? YesE No N/AD
Sand? YesD No / 1 N/AD
9. Is there evidence of submergence of vents? YesD No N/AD
10. Are bypass structures or pipes visible in manhole? Yes® NoD N/AD*
Lines/Right-of-Ways:
1. Are easement, right-of-ways, in need of mowing or clearing? YesD No N/AD
2. Are sink holes or depressions observed above line? YesD NoZ N/AD
3. Is there evidence of leakage or seepage from the line? YesD No / i N/AD
4. Are there areas of exposed line? 'Yes® NoD N/AD
Are exposed lines constructed of piping other than ductile iron or comparable? YesD NoZ N/AD
5. Are stream/ditch crossings and aerial supports in need of repair? Yes❑ No / 1 N/AD
6. Are right-of-ways being used for roads? Yes❑ No N/AD
7. Do lines show evidence or history of damage? YesD No N/AD

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM GRAVITY SEWERS
- REVIEW :
*Item No. 4(Manholes) — The manhole just upstream from the Hatfield Road lift station #9 revealed signs of
infiltration at the seam between the manhole barrel and cone. This needs to be corrected to prevent surcharging
the lift station.
*Item No. 10 (Manholes) — The manhole just upstream from the Valley Stream lift station #7 revealed signs of
an overflow/by-pass outlet that had been plugged and granted over both in the manhole and at the culvert
for the stream to prevent any overflows. All manholes within the system that have overflow/by-pass outlets
MUST be plugged and grouted to prevent discharges. Please verify this in your response to this report.
Pump Stations/Siphons
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access? YesD NoZ N/AD
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement? YesD No N/A❑
3. Are there any missing pumps? YesE NoZ N/AD
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris thaT. could potentially
affect the operation of the unit? YesZ NoD N/A❑*
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump station or siphon show signs
of backup, overflow, debris originating from the line? YesD No N/AD
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alwrnators that does
not work?
YesZ NoD N/AD*
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested? Yes �. No❑ N/AD
8. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log? YesE No N/AD
9. Is telemetry/SCADA present? Yes® NOD N/A❑
Operable? YesZ No❑ N/AD
10. Are backflow devices in place and operable? Yes 11 No N/A❑
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present and operable? Yes® NoD N/AD
12. Are standby generators present?
Operable?
Is fuel tank full?
13. Is there a 24 hr notification sign?
14. Is public access limited?
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present?
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon?
Yes /1 NoD N/AD*
YesZ NoD N/AD
Yes® NoD N/AD
YesD No►1 N/AD*
Yes/i No N/A❑
Yes!: No/@ N/A❑
YesE No N/AD

17. Is there chemical addition present? Yes❑ No / N/AD
❑ Odor control
❑ pH control
❑ Other, explain
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP STATION/SIPHON
REVIEW :
*Item No. 4 — There appeared to be some accumulation of debris and plastics in the wet -well area of lift station #9,
the Hatfield Road station, that must be removed to prevent lift station failure.
*item No. 6 — The alarm light on Davis Hospital lift station 34 did not work when tested.
No audible alarm was observed on either Hatfield Road lift station #9 or Commerce Blvd. Lift station #10.
Please be advised that the system -wide collection permit section I.10, covering Performance Standards, states:
" Pump stations that do not employ an automatic polling feature (i.e. routine contact with pump stations from
a central location to check operational status of the communication system) shall have both audible and visual
high water alarms." Deficiencies noted in the audible and visual high water alarms needs to be corrected.
*Item No. 12 — Davis Hospital lift station #8 has an on -site generator. A portable generator is utilized for the
remaining Iift stations.
*Item No. 13 — A 24-hr. emergency notification sign was not observed at any of the lift stations. Please be advised
that the system -wide collection permit section 1.8 covering Performance Standards states : " Each pump station
shall be clearly and conspicuously posted with a pump station identifier and an emergency contact telephone
number which an individual who can perform emergency service for the wastewater collection system 24 hours
per day, seven days per week can be contacted. This emergency contact telephone number shall be coupled with
instructions for anyone to call if the visual alarm illuminates, if the audible alarm sounds, or if an emergency
situation is apparent." A 24-hr. emergency notification siggn must be placed on all lift stations.

V NI
Qit of
Sttttesuille
IP. 'Sax 1111 • 'tatesuille, Nurtll (aralina 20687
Mr. Donald R. Price
Environmental Technician V
Mooresville Regional Office
NCDENR
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
tPu6& Works Department
Director/City Engineer
Engineering Division
Programfssistant/Secretary
Garage Division
'u66c grounds eZ Cemeteries Division
Sanitation Division
Street Division
Water/SewerMaintenance Division
F'ax # [phone]
878-3551
878-3552
878-3562
878-3420
878-3428
878-3415
878-3414
878-3417
April 24 2001!TI
- :
( �• .. a 1VI4:M/`.. �
SUBJECT: City of Statesville
Non -Discharge Facility Inspection 3/22/01
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Price:
rAPR 2 5 2001
WATER QUALITY SECTION
In regards to your inspection on March 22, 2001 and you letter on April 6, 2001
requesting our response to items listed, Mr. Joe Hudson and myself have addressed these items
separately.
Under "Collection System File Review"
1. Item Nos. 9 and 12 — A trouble log is kept of all overflow locations, who responded,
time/date, action taken, cause of problem/overflow, and how the problem was
resolved. This is done for both the collection system and pumping stations. A
SCADA system is being evaluated (as are other options) for the pumping stations as
mentioned in Mr. Hudson's Item No. 6 enclosed.
Under "Gravity Sewers"
2. Item No. 4 — The manhole just upstream of the Hatfield Road lift station No. 9 that
had signs of infiltration at the seam between the barrel and cone has been corrected.

Mr. Donald R. Price
April 24, 2001
Page 2
3. Item No. 10 — To the best of our knowledge, no manholes within our system have
overflow/by-pass outlets.
If there is anything we can provide in addition to what you have, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Wayne Lambert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
WL:cm
cc: Joe Hudson
Richard Cooper

(1tit of
�tEttesuille
P. (0. +Nux 1111 • 'tutesuille, Nurtll (craliva 28687
April 11, 2001
Mr. Donald R. Price
Environmental Technician V
Mooresville Regional Office
NCDENR
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
RE: City of Statesville
Non -Discharge Facility Inspection March 22, 2001
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Price:
As required this letter is a response to the above referenced inspection regarding the lift
stations cited in your report.
1. Item No. 4 — Debris and plastics have been removed. We have
an on -going inspection program that removes all items and debris
that may cause pump failure.
2. Item No. 6 — Alarm light at Lift Station #8 is being replaced. We
are currently evaluating our system and obtaining prices to comply
with Section 1.10. We are evaluating options for a SCADA system,
visual and audible alarms or any other means to comply. We will
notify you as soon as we have completed the evaluation and inform as
to how we are going to proceed. We hope to have this evaluation
complete within 30 days.
3. Item No. 12 — From the report it seems this item requires no action
on our part. If we are mistaken please let us know.
4. Item No. 13 — Notification signs. I have directed the supervisors to
have made and install notification signs per your report. This will
be done on all lift stations.

Page 2
D. Price/Env. Technican V
April 11, 2001
Thank you for help in this matter and please call me if you have any questions. My
office number is 704-878-3438.
. F. "Joe" Hudson, Jr., Director
Water Resources Department
LFH/sg
cc: Rob Hites
Wayne Lambert
Richard Cooper

EP R
JAMES B.-HUNT JRi.
'GOVERNOR
'1."BILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
August 17, 2000
Mr. Joe Hudson, Director
Water/Wastewater Department
City of Statesville
Post Office Box 111
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
Subject: Non -Discharge Facility Inspection
Sewer Collection System
City of Statesville
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Hudson:
This letter transmits a copy of the inspection report covering the inspection conducted on
August 16, 2000 of the following pump stations and related sewer collection systems tributary to the
Third Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant: Pump Stations #T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4 and T-5. The inspection
was conducted by Mr. G. T.Chen of this Office. Mr. Chen was accompanied by Messrs. Jeff Carty
(ORC of the Third Creek WWTP), Richard Cooper (Superintendent of Water -Sewer Maintenance) and
Eddy Mitchell (Assistant Superintendent of Water -Sewer Maintenance) during the inspection.
Generally, the inspection revealed that the facilities are being properly operated and
maintained. However, there were some deficiencies noted that are set forth under "Additional
Comments " in the attached inspection report.
The City needs to take action to correct the noted deficiencies. It is also requested that you
respond to this matter in writing by no later than August 31, 2000, indicating actions taken to correct
the deficiencies. Please address your response to Mr. Chen.
If you have any questions regarding to this matter, please contact Mr. Chen or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Attachments
cc: Iredell County Department of Environmental Health
Dennis Ramsey, Non -Discharge Branch
y 1,
(�x ,G.ltERl nA
IIEIEMMM
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
AVA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION _
GENERAL INFORMATION
City/Town/Owner: City of Statesville
NPDES Permit No.: NC0020591
NPDES Issuance Date: 07-25-94
NPDES Expiration Date: 07-31-99
SOC Issuance Date: N/A
Permittee Contact: Joe Hudson
ORC Name: Richard Cooper
24-hr Contact Name: Jeff Carty
County: Iredell
Non -discharge Permit No.: See attached
Non -discharge Issuance Date: See attached
Non -discharge Expiration Date: N/A
SOC Expiration Date: N/A
Telephone No.: [phone]
Telephone No.: [phone]
Telephone No.: [phone]
Reason for Inspection
X ROUTINE COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP OTHER
Type of inspection
X Collection System Spray Irrigation Sludge Other
Inspection Summary: (additional comments may be included on attached pages)
The City of Statesville currently owns and operates two (2) WWT Systems, the Third Creek
WWT System and the Fourth Creek WWT System. Each system has five (5) pump stations via
which collected wastewater from the service areas is conveyed to the wastewater treatment
facility. The following five pump stations and their related sewer manholes and lines, which
are tributary to the Third Creek WWTP, were inspected on August 16, 2000 and found to be
properly operated and maintained: T-1 pump station, T-2 pump station, T-3 pump station, T-4
pump station, and T-5 pump station.
Is a follow-up inspection necessary X yes no
Inspector(s) Name(s)/Title(s): Gong-Tseh Chen/Environmental Specialist II g TC
Telephone No.: [phone] Fax No.: [phone]
Date of Inspection: August 16, 2000

Permittee: City of Statesville
Facility:
Permit:
Facility Location:
The City of Statesville's Third Creek WWT System is made up of the
following five (5) pump stations. All were inspected on August 16,
2000: T-1 pump station, T-2 pump station, T-3 pump station, T-4
pump station, and T-5 pump station.
No permits were found for the five (5) pump stations. According to
Mr. Richard Cooper, Superintendent of Water -Sewer Maintenance
with the City, all five pump stations were built either in the 1970s or
in the late 1960s with subsequent renovations.
T-1 pump station is located at 1152 Barkley Road; T-2 pump station is
located at 1610 Salisbury Road (US 70 East); T-3 pump station is
located at 1302 Industrial Drive; T-4 pump station is located at 2051
Newton Drive at the junction with Scott Street; and T-5 pump station
is located at 1018 Park Drive.
Gravity Sewers
I. Manholes
1. Are manholes accessible? Yes ® No ❑
2. Are manhole covers above grade? Yes ® No ❑ *
Visible signs of overflow? Yes ❑ No El
Sinkholes or depressions? Yes ❑ No
3. Are manhole covers missing or improperly seated? Yes ❑ No
4. Are manholes in need of repair? Yes ❑ No
Due to normal wear and tear? Yes ❑ No 0
Due to vandalism? Yes 0 No 0
5. Are inverts in need of repair? Yes 0 No LEI
6. Is there evidence of collection system deterioration? Yes 0 No
2

City of Statesville
Sewer Collection System
August 16, 2000
7. Is flow visibly restricted in pipe or manhole? Yes ❑ No
8. Is there an excessive amount of grease? Yes ❑ No
Roots? Yes ❑ No
Sand? Yes ❑ No
9. Is there evidence of submergence of vents? Yes ❑ No ❑
10. Are bypass structures or pipes visible in manhole? Yes ❑ No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF MANHOLE INSPECTION:
*I. 2. Not all manhole covers are above grade.
*I. 9. There were no vents for the manholes inspected.
II. Lines/Right-of-Ways
1. Are easement, right-of-ways, etc., in need of mowing or clearing? Yes ❑ No
2. Are sinkholes or depressions observed above line? Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of leakage or seepage from the line? Yes ❑ No
4. Are there areas of exposed line? Yes ® No ❑ *
Are exposed lines constructed of material other
than ductile iron? Yes ® No ❑ *
5. Are stream/ditch crossings and aerial supports in need of repair? Yes ❑ No ❑
6. Are right-of-ways being used for roads? Yes ® No ❑
7. Do lines show evidence or history of damage? Yes ❑ No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF LINES/RIGHT-of-WAYS INSPECTION:
*II. 4. According to Mr. Richard Cooper, Maintenance Superintendent, there are approximately 100 feet
of exposed lines, made of cast iron, in the Third Creek service area.
*II. 5. Not inspected/evaluated
*II. 6. Some sewer lines were installed under streets/roads.
3

City of Statesville
Sewer Collection System
August 16, 2000
Pump Stations/Siphons
1. Are any pump station/siphon sites difficult to access?
2. Does general housekeeping need improvement?
3. Are there any missing pumps?
Yes ❑ No 11
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No El
4. Do wet wells/siphons have accumulations of debris
that could potentially affect the operation of the unit? Yes ® No ❑ *
5. Does the first manhole up line from the pump
station or siphon show signs of backup,
overflow, debris originating from the line?
Yes ❑
6. Are there any floats/controls for pumps, alarms or alternators
that do not work? Yes
7. Did high water alarms fail to work when tested?
8. Did ORC fail to produce maintenance log?
9. Is telemetry, SCADA present?
Operable?
10. Are backflow devices in place and operable?
11. Where necessary are air relief valves present
and operable?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
12. Are standby generators present? Yes
Operable?
Is fuel tank full?
13. Is there a 24-hr notification sign?
14. Is public access limited?
15. Is there any bypass mechanism present?
16. Any signs of overflow at the station/siphon?
4
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No ❑ *
No ® *
No ❑
No ❑
No ❑
No ❑ *
No
No ❑
No ❑
No ►1
*
No ❑ *
No El
No

City of Statesville
Sewer Collection System
August 16, 2000
17. Is there chemical addition capability for:
Odor control Yes ❑ No
_ pH control Yes ❑ No
_ Other, explain? Yes ® No ❑
18. Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counter
or other means to measure flow? Yes ® No ❑
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF PUMP STATIONS/SIPHONS INSPECTION:
*4. The City needs to remove the accumulated solids from the wet wells of pump stations T-3 and T-5.
The City may need to notify the residents in the Park Drive area not to pour grease into kitchen drains
(causing clogging of sewer lines).
*7. High water alarms were not tested since the City had disconnected the alarm systems and replaced
them with telemetry/SCADA systems. The City needs to install or reconnect the high water alarms
for all its pump stations
*8. The City needs to keep a copy of maintenance logs at each pump station.
* 11. No air relief valves were observed at any of the five pump stations .
* 12. The City currently has one portable generator (shared with ten pump stations) which is kept at the
Fourth Creek WWTP. The portable generator was tested and found to be in good working order at
the time of inspection. The City needs to procure other portable generators to adequately provide
standby power for all its pump stations.
*13. There were no signs at any of the pump stations regarding the need to report spills within 24 hours.
The City needs to provide a 24-hr notification sign at each pump station.
*14. T-lpump station was not fenced, however, the pumps are situated in a deep under ground silo and
the wet well and electrical control panel were securely padlocked to prevent vandalism. T-4 pump
station is covered with a fiber glass cover.
*17. No specific chemical addition facilities are at the pump stations. However, chemicals and degreasing
agents can be added to the wet wells from the top of the pump stations.
*18. Flow is measured by recording the run-time of pumps at the T-1 and T-2 pump stations. However,
there are no flow measuring devices at the T-3, T-4, and T-5 pump stations. The City needs to
provide flow measurement devices for all its pump stations.
5

City of Statesville
Sewer Collection System
August 16, 2000
Collection System File Review
1. Does DWQ Database indicate repetitive overflows at any point?
If yes is there a corrective action plan?
2. Do records include a map of the collection system?
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No ❑
Yes ® No ❑
3. Are there records of annual visual inspections of all lines not visible from normal public access?
Yes ❑ No ❑ *
Regular visual inspections of high priority areas? Yes ❑ No ❑ *
4. Do records indicate that right of ways are maintained to allow access? Yes ❑ No ❑
5. Are there areas of regular or scheduled cleaning? Yes ® No ❑
6. Is there a spare parts inventory and List of contractors? Yes ® No ❑
7. Is the spare parts inventory adequate? Yes ® No ❑
8. Are maintenance logs up-to-date and include inspections, tests, maintenance? Yes ® No ❑ *
9. Is there a trouble log of all problems that include the following information? Yes ❑ No ❑
Overflow locations, who responded.
Time/date, action taken, cause of problem/overflow.
Was problem resolved.
10. Does the Town have a Sewer Use Ordinance? Yes ® No ❑
Is the SUO being enforced? Yes /1 No ❑
11. Does the system have any known points of bypass? Yes ❑ No
If yes describe type of bypass and location.
12. Is there records of pump station telemetry/SCADA notifications? Yes ❑ No ® *
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO ITEMS OF COLLECTION SYSTEM FILE REVIEW:
*3. The City conducts line inspections twice a year, however, documentation is not maintained. The City
needs to document all sewer line inspections.

City of Statesville
Sewer Collection System
August 16, 2000
*4. The City needs to document right-of-way maintenance.
*7. Appeared to be adequate at the time of inspection.
*9. The City uses the "Sewage Spill Response Evaluation" records as a trouble log.
*12. The City needs to keep records of pump station telemetry/SCADA notifications.

(rite of
ftitesuille
. (0. Iax 1111 • 'tntesuille. DTnrtll C trulina 28687
Ms. Marie Doklovic
NC Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJECT:
Dear Ms. Doklovic:
,
L
\ -- ----UNR p 4J * tr rG ''i
Larrp VresiOlep, .QE.
VOW Work,r irector/Q1 ttp engineer
Zelepbone 704 878-3551
fax 704 S73-4107
[e-mail].n5
August 4z_2006
AUG % 2OQ6
Wastewater Collection System Permit
City of Statesville
MY 2 f. 2007
Thank you for the recent reminder regarding our Collection System Permit. Enclosed is
the permit application in accordance with permit condition 15A, NCAC 2H.0211 Form CSA
10/05.
Included are the following:
a. 1 original and 1 copy of application form.
b. List of Lift Stations
c. List of High Priority lines.
d. A copy of our spill response plan.
e. A copy of Annual and 5 year capital budgets.
f. A copy dour comprehensive collection system map.
ta
4n nu1/400
aPu'
qSPA- 66e)
eke
Note: We continue to contract with the Town of Troutman as submitted with the
last application. Information is not included per instructions.
If there are any questions, please contact me at 704 878-3551.
Sincerely,
WL:cm �- �°
Larry P. Pressley, P.E.
Director of Public Works

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
SYSTEM -WIDE WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS
FORMKSA40/05
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR,USE ASAN;OR7OINAL)-
Application Number: (to be completed by DWQ)
<THIS ONLINE APPLICATION CAN BE FILLED OUT USING
THE TAB KEY TO MOVE THROUGH THE FIELDS> MAY 2 2007
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Owner (name of the municipality, public utility, homeowners association, etc.): Sta s ` 1 ; fp p A p mg. =vil ,
Authorized signing official's name AND title (15A NCAC 2H .0206(b)): Robert W. Hites, Jr.
Mailing address : P. O. Box 1111
City: Statesville
State: North Carolina
Zip: 28687-1111
Telephone number: [phone]
Facsimile number: (70 878-3438 ei
E-mail: [e-mail]
County where collection system is located: Iredell
Name, affiliation, and contact information of contact person who can answer questions about the application:
L. 'F. Hudson, Jr., City of Statesville, 704 8787d %g"3 4f'3
Is this application new or for a permit renewal? ❑ New
Permit No. WQCS00030 ()Y t%,
1
3
Renewal of
*For Renewals: Only Complete Section I, Section II and Applicant Certification
II. COLLECTION SYSTEM INFORMATION:
1. Owner and name of wastewater treatment facility(ies) (WWTF) receiving wastewater: City of Statesville, 4`h Creek
Plant and 3rd Creek Plant �(
2. WWTF permit number(s): 4`h Creek Plant - NC0031836 and 3rd Creek Plant-NC0020591 U
3. Total miles of sewer (approximate): 7 Force Main 244 Gravity
4. . Population served by this system: 24,900
65-3
X Pressure
5. Wastewater Make -Up: 50 % Domestic/Commercial 50 % Industrial (Process)
6. Pump Station Information: Attach a current list of all major (i.e. not simplex servin
a pressure sewer system) pump stations, names, capacities and their locations. Sums
o Number of simplex pump stations serving a low pressure* sewer: N/A
X- Vaeru�•
G
a single family home as0part
arize below:
DE R QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Indicate the number of simplex type pump stations serving a low pressure sewer system that are owned/maintained such as in a residential
' subdivision. This would not include pump stations that convey larger flows en route to the treatment plant or individual pumps needed to pump to
an adjacent gravity sewer. If simplex stations are listed above, pressure or vacuum mains should be shown in Item II(3 ).
o Number of duplex or greater pump stations: 13
o Number of simplex stations serving multiple buildings: N/A
7. Attach a list of high priority lines according to the Division's definition known to exist in the collection system (See
Instruction E). Head the list with the system name and include "Attachment A for Condition V(4)".
8. Attach a copy of your current spill response plan.
ion
FORM: CSA 10/05
Page 1

9. Attach a copy of your current annual budget and current approved Capital Improvement Plan.
10. Attach a copy of your comprehensive collection system map (a CD is also acceptable, please indicate format).
11. Report any satellite systems over 200,000 gallons per day (see Instruction F). For renewals, only indicate thg4
systems that are newly connected or have exceeded 200,000 :.11.; seor day since the last permit application.
COO
12. Indicate the current designated collection system operators:
Main ORC Name:
Back -Up ORC Name:
Additional Back -Up ORC Name(s) and
Certification Number(s):
Richard Cooper
Certification Number: 14140 Grd 4
Martin Eddy Mitchell Certification Number: 12516 Grd 4
III. COLLECTION SYSTEM PERMIT COMPLIANCE QUESTIONS (NEW APPLICATIONS):
Please reference the attached draft permit in answering these questions. Any compliance dates
needed will be put into the permit. For conditions not listed, compliance dates are not typically
offered.
Permit Condition
Current
Compliance?
If no, Indicate
a Compliance
Date
Typical
Compliance
Schedule
I(3) — Grease ordinance with legal authority to inspect/enforce
❑ Yes ❑ No
12 — 18 mo.
I(4) — Grease inspection and enforcement program
❑ Yes ❑ No
12 — 18 mo.
I(5) — Three to five year Capital Improvement Plan
❑ Yes ❑ No
12 — 18 mo.
I(8) — Pump station identification signs
❑ Yes ❑ No
3 mo.
I(10) — Functional and conspicuous audible and visual alarms
❑ Yes ❑ No
3 — 6 mo.
II(5) — Spare pumps for any station where one pump cannot
handle peak flows alone (in a duplex station, the 2°1 pump is
the spare if pump reliability is met)
❑ Yes ❑ No
6 — 9 mo.
II(7) — Accessible right-of-ways and easements
■ Yes ■ No
6 — 12 mo.
II(9) — Spill response plan with Items 9(a — h)
❑ Yes ❑ No
3 mo.
Other comments:
FORM: CSA 10/05
Page 2

Applicant's Certification:
Note: 15A NCAC 2H . 0206(b) requires an authorized individual to sign this application form. In the case of corporations,
signature is required by a principal executive officer of at least the level of vice president, or his duly authorized
representative. In the case of a municipal, state, or other public entity, a signature is required by either a principal
executive officer, ranking elected official or other duly authorized employee. Duly authorized employee's must provide
proof from the principal executive officer or ranking elected official that they have been authorized to sign this application.
Public Works Director's are not authorized to sign this permit application according to the rule unless delegated
I, Robert W. Rites, Jr., attest that this application for City of Statesville - Wastewater Collection System has been
reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this
application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and
143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application shall
be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000
per violation.
Signature:
**END OF FORM CSA 10/05**
Date: d / 1 / 17

III COLLECTION SYSTEM INFORMATION
ITEM NO. 6
List of City of Statesville Lift Stations
The City of Statesville maintains the following lift stations:
Pump
No. Identification
1. Barkley Rd.
2. Industrial Dr.
3. Interstate Equipment
4. Newton Dr.
5. Park Dr.
6. Airport
7. Kennedy Dr.
8. Marjorie Rd.
9. Valley Stream
10. Davis Hospital
11. Hatfield Rd.
12. Commerce Blvd.
13. Statesville Industrial Park
PCs e
aV'
Physical Location
1152 Barkley Road
1302 Industrial Dr.
1610 Salisbury Rd.
2051 Newton Dr.
1018 Park Dr.
508 Airport Rd.
2415 Kennedy Dr.
241 Marjorie Rd.
301 Valley Stream
269 Old Mocksville Rd.
152 Hatfield Rd.
2748 Commerce Blvd.
341 Business Park Rd.
Pump
Reliability
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Reliability Source
Dual pumps, stand-by power— 3
Dual pumps, stand-by power-,
Dual pumps, stand-by power -3
Dual pumps, stand-by power —
Dual pumps, stand-by power —�
Dual pumps, stand-by power — 3
Dual pumps, stand-by power --
Dual pumps, stand-by power
Dual pumps, stand-by power
Dual pumps, stand-by power
Dual pumps, stand-by power
Dual pumps, stand-by power
Dual pumps, stand-by power
3

CITY OF STATESVILLE
COLLECTION SYSTEM INFORMATION
ATTACHMENT A for Condition V(4)
CREEK CROSSINGS:
1. 36" Behind Mallard Creek Apartments.
2. 6" Off Broad St. at Statesville Manor
3. 8" Greenbriar Rd.
4. 24" Statesville Senior High School
5. 6" Statesville Senior High School
6. 10" Statesville Senior High School
7. 30" Morrison Creek
8. 24" Hillcrest Trailer Park
9. 8" Hillcrest Trailer Park
10. 12" Philips
11. 15" Near Goldsboro Road
12. 12" MoCaro Industries
13. 8" Thornburg Plant
14. 15" Hickory Highway 70E.
15. 18" Behind Gene Davis
16. 24" West of Wallace Springs Road
17. 8" Days Inn
18. 8" Behind Indian Ridge Subdivision
19. 30" Below Queens Crest Subdivision
20. 8" Below Queens Crest Subdivision
21. 12" Museum Road
22. 27" Absher Property
23. 21" Behind Martin Marietta Aggregates
24. 8" Anna Drive
25. 10" Mulberry Park
26. 15" Anderson Park
27. 15" Alexander Street
28. 8" Falls Street
29. 8" St. Andrews Road
30. 8" St. Cloud Drive
31. 8" Broad Street across from Statesville Manor
32. 8" Springfield Road
33. 12" East Elementary Road
34. 24" Free Nancy Avenue
35. 12" Camden Drive
36. 16" Under 1-40
37. 12" Amity Hill Road at Fox Den Subdivision
38. 12" 1-77 at Fox Den Subdivision
39. 8" Lincoln Street
40. 12" to 42" Outfall to Fourth Creek WWTP
41. 12" to 30" Outfall to Third Creek WWTP

City of Statesville
Attachment A for condition V(4)
Collection System Information
Page 2
AERIALS
42. 24" Off Simonton Road
43. 16" Off Simonton Road
44. 24" Off Brookgreen Drive
45. 24" Off Forest Park Drive
46. 24" Off Oakdale Drive
47. 8" Off Lerain Court
48. 8" Off Stoneybrooke Road
49. 8" Off Camden Drive
50. 8" Off Crowell Drive
51. 8" Off Lippard Street
52. 24" Off Norwood Road
53. 24" Off Valley Stream Road
54. 8" Off Cedar Street

City of Statesville
Sanitary Sewer Overflow Response Plan
Applies to All Employees — Water/Sewer Division
July 26, 2006
As required by the State, we have developed a plan to address Sanitary Sewer Overflows caused by
grease, roots, pipe failures, vandalism, or Act of God.
1. Upon discovery of Sanitary Sewer Overflow, the Water/Sewer Division personnel will respond and
make an immediate assessment. If overflow has occurred, the Water/Sewer Division personnel will
contact his supervisor.
2. The Supervisor will determine what course of action is required to stop the overflow and clean up the
site. Remediation Procedures for Sanitary Sewer Overflows are to be used as a guide. Further
guidance may be received through the Water/Sewer Utility Superintendent, his Assistant or State
authorities.
3. The Supervisor will make a record of all events and handle any reporting necessary. The Supervisor
will report all activities to the Water/Sewer Utility Superintendent.
Reporting thresholds as stated in the State's Elimination of Collection System Overflows memo are as
follows:
All spills, regardless of volume that reach surface waters must be reported.
Spills of 1,000 gallons or less that do not reach surface waters and are confined on
site do not have to be reported. However, records must be retained documenting
spill and action taken to address the spill.
Spills greater than 1,000 gallons, regardless of whether or not they reach surface
waters must be reported.
The telephone number for the Mooresville Regional Office is [phone] or the State's
24-hour number, Division of Emergency Management, is 1-800-858-0638. Reportable
spills must be reported immediately but in no case more than 24 hours from the time of
the spill was discovered.
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Overflow Response Plan is to protect the citizens of the City
of Statesville, North Carolina and the environment by establishing written procedures for
responding to Sanitary Sewer Overflows. This procedure applies to all Water/Sewer Division
employees that in the course of their work may deal with sanitary sewer overflows. These
procedures will be reviewed at least semi-annually, or whenever revised guidance from County,
State or Federal authorities dictate a revision is necessary.

PLAN OF ACTION
1. Upon discovery of a Sanitary Sewer Overflow, Water/Sewer Division employees will respond
and make an immediate assessment. If an overflow has occurred the Water/Sewer Division
employees will contact their supervisor.
2. The supervisor will determine what course of action is required to stop the overflow and clean
up the site. Remediation Procedures for Sanitary Sewer Overflows are to be used as a guide.
Further guidance may be received through the Water/Sewer Utility Superintendent, his
assistant or State authorities.
3. The supervisor will make a record of all events and handle any reporting necessary. The
supervisor will report all activities to the Water/Sewer Utility Superintendent.
SPILL REPORTING
Reportable Sanitary Sewer Overflows will be reported in compliance with the State's Elimination
of Collection System Overflows memo. (See Reference Section.) All reportable spills will be
reported to the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] or the State Division of Emergency
Management (24 hours) at 1-800-858-0638 immediately or in no case more than 24 hours after
discovery of a spill.
REQUIRED EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT
Water/Sewer division has the following equipment available at these locations.
Item No.
Equipment
Location
1.
Sreco Flushing Truck
Municipal Warehouse
2.
Vac Con combination Unit
Municipal Warehouse
3.
Sreco Flexible Rodding Machine
Municipal Warehouse
4.
3" Trash Pump
Municipal Warehouse
5.
(3) 3" Mud Hog Pumps
Municipal Warehouse
6.
2 mgd pump 8" discharge & suction
Third Creek WWTP
7.
Camera Van
Municipal Warehouse
8.
4-wheel drive tractor will bushhog
Municipal Warehouse
9.
Backhoes
Municipal Warehouse
10.
John Deere Loader
Municipal Warehouse
11.
Rubber Tire Loader
Municipal Warehouse
12.
Motor Grader
Municipal Warehouse
13.
Boom Truck
Municipal Warehouse
COLLECTION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE RECORDS
The Water/Sewer Division employees keep daily work reports on routine rodding, grease and root
problems, flow monitoring, TV inspection and outfall mowing and inspection.

CITY OE STATESVILE
WATER/SEWER DIV.
STAND-BY EMERGENCY CALL
1ST CALL
CELL PHONE: [phone]
RICHARD COOPER
Home [phone] 1
PAGER 1-881-6991
PAGER 2-881-6992
NAME
FROM
SCOTT WOOTEN
PAUL BROWN
03-Mar-06
10-Mar-06
CHRIS SLOAN
17-Mar-06
JOE MOOSE
24-Mar-06
SCOTT WOOTEN
31-Mar-06
PAUL BROWN
07-Apr-06
CHRIS SLOAN
JOE MOOSE
SCOTT WOOTEN
CELL PHONE: [phone]
EDDY MITCHELL
Home [phone]
TO
10-Mar-05
17-Mar-05
24-Mar-05
31-Mar-05
07-Apr-05
14-Apr-05
14-Apr-06 21-Apr-05
21-Apr-06
28-Apr-06
PAUL BROWN
CHRIS SLOAN
JOE MOOSE
SCOTT WOOTEN
PAUL BROWN
CHRIS SLOAN
JOE MOOSE
SCOTT WOOTEN
PAUL BROWN
CHRIS SLOAN
JOE MOOSE
SCOTT WOOTEN
PAUL BROWN
05-May-06
12-May-06
19-May-06
26-May-06
02-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
16-Jun-06
23-Jun-06
30-Jun-06
07-JuI-06
14-Jul-06
21-Jul-06
28-JuI-06
CHRIS SLOAN
04-Aug-06
JOE MOOSE
11-Aug-06
SCOTT WOOTEN
18-Aug-06
PAUL BROWN
25-Aug-06
CHRIS SLOAN
01-Sep-06
JOE MOOSE
08-Sep-06
SCOTT WOOTEN
15-Sep-06
PAUL BROWN
CHRIS SLOAN
22-Sep-06
29-Sep-06
JOE MOOSE
06-Oct-06
SCOTT WOOTEN
13.Oct-06
PAUL BROWN
20-Oct-06
CHRIS SLOAN
27-Oct-06
28-Apr-05
05-May-05
12-May-05
19-May-05
26-May-05
02-Jun-05
09-Jun-05
16-Jun-05
23-Jun-05
30-Jun-05
07-JuI-05
14-Jul-05
21-Jul-05
28-Jul-05
04-Aug-05
11-Aug-05
18-Aug-05
25-Aug-05
01-Sep-05
08-Sep-05
15-Sep-05
22-Sep-05
29-Sep-05
06-Oct-05
13-Oct-05
20.Oct-05
27-Oct-05
03-Nov-05
PHONE
585-9384
871-0867
876-2561
873-5131
585-9384
871-0867
876-2561
873-5131
585-9384
871-0867
876-2561
873-5131
585-9384
871-0867
876-2561
873-5131
585-9384
871-0867
876-2561
873-5131
585-9384
871-0867
876-2561
873-5131
585-9384
871-0867
876-2561
873-5131
585-9384
871-0867.
876-2561
873-5131
585-9384
871-0867
876-2561

CITY OF STATESVILE
WATER/SEWER DIV.
STAND-BY EMERGENCY CALL
2ND CALL
CELL PHONE: [phone] j j CELL PHONE: [phone]
RICHARD COOPER i PAGER 1-881-6991 ; EDDY MITCHELL
Home [phone] , PAGER 1-881-6992 1 Home [phone]
1
P AME
FROM 1
TO
PHONE
KEVIN WEBER
03-Mar-06 j 10-Mar-06
592-7193
BRADLEY STEELE
10-Mar-06 17-Mar-06
872-1524
CHASE ANDERSON
17-Mar-06
24-Mar-06 902.1024
BRADLEY MILLER
24-Mar-06
31-Mar-06 902-3605
NATE RANKIN
31-Mar-06
07-Apr-06
873-9664
NEWLAND SLOAN
07-Apr-06
14-Apr-06
876-1196
RANDY SLOAN
14-Apr-06
21-Apr-06
876-2130
PATRICK MURPHY
21-Apr-06
28-Apr-06
876-1280
COREY AREHART
28-Apr-06
05-May-06
872-0124
RICK DRAUGHN
05-May-06
12-May-06
871-1044
MARK SLOAN
12-May-06
19-May416
876-6708
EDDIE STEPHENS
19-May-06
26-May-06
528-4688
JUSTIN WILHELM
26-May-06
02-Jun-06
876-0825
TRAVIS CROTTS
02-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
278-3912
KEVIP! WEBER
09-Jun-06
16-Jun-06
592-7193
BRADLEY STEELE
16-Jun-06
23-Jun-06
872-1524
CHASE ANDERSON
23-Jun-06
30-Jun-06
902-1024
BRADLEY MILLER
30-Jun-06
07-Jut-06
902-3605
NATE RANKIN
07-JuI-06
14-Jul-06
873-9664
NEWLAND SLOAN
14-JuI-06
21-JuI-06
876-1196
RANDY SLOAN
21-JuI-06
28-Joel-06
876-2130
PATRICK MURPHY
28-JuI-06
04-Aug-06
876-1280
COREY AREHART
04-Aug-06
11-Aug-06
872-0124
RICK DRAUGHN
11-Aug-06
18-Aug-06
871-1044
MARK SLOAN
18-Aug-06
25-Aug-06
876-6708
EDDIE STEPHENS
25-Aug-06
01-Sep-06
528-4688
JUSTIN WILHELM
01-Sep-06
08-Sep-06
876-0825
TRAVIS CROTTS
08-Sep-06
15-Sep-06
278-3912
KEVIN WEBER
15-Sep-06
22-Sep-06
592-7193
BRADLEY STEELE
22-Sep-06
29-Sep-06
872-1524
CHASE ANDERSON
29-Sep-06
06-Oct-06
902-1024
BRADLEY MILLER
06-Oct-06
13-Oct-06
902-3605
NATE RANKIN
13-Oct-06
20-Oct-06
873-9664
NEWLAND SLOAN
20-Oct-06
27-Oct-06
876-1196
RANDY SLOAN
27-Oct-06
03-Nov-06
876-2130

WATER AND SEWER FUND REVENUES
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 %
Actual Actual Budget Adopted Change
Inside Charges
Water Spec 48,263 66,385 74,150 73,606 -0.73%
Total Inside Charges 48,263 66,385 74,150 73,606 -0.73%
Investment Earnings
Earnings 89,734 243,575 175,000 280,600 60.34%
Total Investment Earnings 89,734 243,575 175,000 280,600 60.34%
Assessments
Interest 26,840 7,600 5,000
Water & Sewer 88,968 2,240 25,000
Total Assessments 115,808 9,840 30,000
5,000
25,000
30,000
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Other Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue - 50,000 3,000 3,000 0.00%
Sale of Fixed Assets 10,810 736 3,000 3,000 0.00%
State Grant 8,400 - - 0.00%
Winter Storm - 13,797 - - 0.00%
Insurance Proceeds 4,802 0.00%
Iredell County Lines - 0.00%
Sewer Permit Violations 3,450 6,700 3,600 3,600 0.00%
Total Other Revenue 27,462 71,233 9,600 9,600 0.00%
Fees
Sewer Fees 3,841,974 4,579,460 4,837,470 4,925,000 1.81 %
Sewer Surcharge 42,300 29,628 50,000 10,000 -80.00%
Utility Availability 24,760 19,638 - 0.00%
Town of Troutman 172,908 214,278 225,000 225,000 0.00%
Penalty & Interest 60,403 81,319 65,500 80,000 22.14%
Excess Water Fees 0.00%
Total Fees 4,142,345 4,924,323 5,177,970 5,240,000 1.20%
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 %
Actual Actual Budget Adopted Change

WATER AND SEWER FUND REVENUES
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Actual Actual Budget Adopted Change
Sales
Sales of Materials and Labor 22 0.00%
NC DOT 8.2821301 B-2579 10 20 - 0.00%
Water -General 2,508,462 3,023,829 3,076,250 3,275,000 6.46%
Iredell 56,955 46,592 51,360 51,360 0.00%
West Iredell 44,444 60,755 53,500 60,000 12.15%
Town of Troutman 58,003 80,234 69,550 75,000 7.84%
Total Sales 2,667,896 3,211,430 3,250,660 3,461,360 6.48%
Services
Water Meters & Connect 75,049 134,494 60,000 60,000 0.00%
Sewer Service & Permits 55,000 71,632 50,000 50,000 0.00%
Water SDF 54,444 75,000 75,000 0.00%
Sewer SDF 168,238 175,000 300,000 71.43%
Total Services 130,049 428,808 360,000 485,000 34.72%
Rent
Site Lease 26,750 30,600 24,000 24,000 0.00%
Civic Center 6,012 - 0.00%
Total Rent 26,750 36,612 24,000 24,000 0.00%
Reimbursements
Electric 31,076 39,574 32,913 12,422 -62.26%
Total Reimbursements 31,076 39,574 32,913 12,422 -62.26%
Transfers
Water/Sewer Capital Reserve
Total Transfers
2,023,519 2,487,493 121,992
2,023,519 2,487,493 121,992
-100.00%
-100.00%
Fund Balance
Fund Balance 457,761 937,835 104.87%
Total Fund Balance 457,761 937,835 104.87%
Total Revenues 9,302,902 11,519,273 9,714,046 10,554,423 8.65%

WATER & SEWER FUND SEWER MAINTENANCE
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Actual Actual Budget Adopted
Salaries -Permanent 215,150 217,026 244,610 239,017
Salaries -Overtime 14,131 12,227 26,456 29,663
Salaries -Longevity 1,125 1,125 1,125 1,125
FICA Expense 17,538 17,605 27,273 20,680
Group Life 610 564 1,174 1,230
Retirement 11,380 11,381 13,671 13,327
Hospitalization 29,534 32,565 35,280 37,044
Christmas Bonus 448 448 525 525
Uniforms 138 210 447 447
Total Personnel 290,054 293,151 350,561 343,058
Professional Services 1,090 98,489 1,090 1,090
Diesel Fuel 4,819 6,476 9,857 16,577
Telephone/ Communications
Gasoline 5,804 6,900 8,869 15,890
Maint & Repair Buildings 600 892 1,500 1,500
Maint & Repair Equipment 25,313 28,447 28,780 28,780
Maint & Repair Auto 6,100 8,485 13,000 13,000
Bldgs/Equip/Land-Rent 631 630 2,500 2,500
Hand Tools 1,426 452 1,500 1,500
Supplies -General 1,265 1,497 1,500 2,000
Supplies -Materials 266 - 1,500 1,500
Contracted Services -General 6,900 -
Dues & Subscriptions 140 140 300 300
Insurance & Bonds 7,590 9,108 12,751 14,026
Inventory Short/Over 276 (289)
OSHA -Safety 1,205 2,231 3,200 3,200
Sewer Maintenance 45,543 27,027 50,000 65,000
Supplies 9,076 10,307 15,209 15,209
Y/E Uncollectible 6,483 10,904
Total Operating 117,627 218,596 151,556 182,072
Capital Improvements -Sewer 93,025 1,048,017
Capital Outlay -Equipment 10,000 10,000
Non -Depreciable Capital 11,912 8,000 4,500
Total Capital Outlay 104,937 1,058,017 18,000 4,500
Total Sewer Maintenance
512,618 1,569,764 520,117 529,630

BUDGET SUMMARY CAPITAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND NON -DEPRECIABLE EQUIPMENT LISTING
Fund/Department
Parks
Parks
Parks
Parks
Parks
Parks
Parks
Parks
Total
Total Cultural & Recreation
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
Description
Artificial Turf Goal Boxes
Soccer Park Gazebo
Soccer Field Lights
Playground Equipment
5 Gang Reel Mower
20' Trailer
Tractor Shed
Front Deck Blower
2006-07 2006-07
Requested Adopted
18,000
20,000
160,000 -
30,000 30,000
18,500 -
3,200 3,200
6,000 6,000
3,000 -
474,700 99,200
1,097,190 212,700
3,844,296 2,012,775
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND NON -DEPRECIABLE EQUIPMENT LISTING
Fund/Department
ELECTRIC FUND
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
Electric Utility
TOTAL ELECTRIC FUND
WATER AND SEWER FUND
Sewer Maintenance
Description
System Improvement & Expansion
Old Farm U/G Distribution Upgrade
2006 Digger Derrick Truck
2006 4 Door Utility Vehicle (602)
2006 4 Door Utility Vehicle (611)
Pickup 1/2 Ton ext. Cab (618)
Mini Excavator
Enclosed 7'x16' Trailer
576kVa voltage Regulators (3)
Protective Relays (12) for Subs 1,2,3
Substation Relay Test Set
Infrared Camera De1,Subs.&Trans
HVAC in SCADA Bldgs Subs 1,2,3,6
Battery Chgr. For Temp DC Pwr
Desk/Work Station
Work Bench & Storage Cabinets
Hydraulic Knockout Cutters
Service Restoration Unit
Personal Computer
2006-07
Requested
2006-07
Adopted
587,000 587,000
600,000 600,000
175,000 175,000
28,000
28,001
25,000
45,000 45,000
5,000 5,000
46,800 46,800
60,000 60,000
15,000 15,000
28,500 28,500
18,000 18,000
1,600 1,600
1,300 1,300
5,250 5„250
1,400 1,400
3,000 3,000
1,700 1,700
1,675,551 1,594,550
260,000
7/27/2006 8:27 AM
4 RCAPITAL SUMMARY

BUDGET SUMMARY CAPITAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND NON -DEPRECIABLE EQUIPMENT LISTING
Fund/Department
Sewer Maintenance
Total
Water Resource
Description
Jet Rodding Machine #554
7" Tripod w/ winches
Alum Sludge Dump Truck
2006-07
Requested
4,500
264,500
52,000
2006-07
Adopted
4,500
CAPITAL OUTLAY AND NON -DEPRECIABLE EQUIPMENT LISTING
Fund/Department
Description
Third Creek Wastewater Portable Generator
Third Creek Wastewater Ice Machine
Total
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Fourth Creek Wastewater
Total
Effluent Composite Sampler
Replace Pickup Truck (1152)
Rebuild 2 Aerators
Replace 2 Metal Rollup Doors
Spare 20 HP Submersible Pump
VFD's for Main Pumps
Heat Pump for Office
Bypass Pumping Flange
Maintenance Office
Personal Computer (3)
Dissolved Oxygen Meter
Specific Ion/Meter
TOTAL WATER AND SEWER FUND
CIVIC CENTER FUND
Civic Center
Civic Center
Civic Center
Civic Center
Total
Partition Walls
Replacement Computer
Hallway Benches
Ballroom Curtains
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES -ALL FUNDS
2006-07
Requested
40,000
3,200
43,200
6,200
17,000
170,000
8,000
7,500
115,000
15,000
60,000
6,500
4,200
1,500
1,500
412,400
772,100
30,000
1,700
3,000
6,000
40,700
6,353,147
4,500
2006-07
Adopted
40,000
3,200
43,200
6,200
85,000
8,000
7,500
15,000
60,000
6,500
4,200
1,500
1,500
195,400
243,100
30,000
3,000
6,000
39,000
3,889,425
7/27/2006 8:27 AM
5 RCAPITAL SUMMARY

CITY OF °"' ATESVILLE
Capital B Projections
Novemoer, 2005
DEPARTMENT: Sewer Maintenance
I
Priority
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09 j
2009-10
2010-11 1
2011-12
Item Description
Ranking
$1000+
$5000+
$5000+ i
$5000+
$5000+
$5000+
Jet Rodding Machine #554
1
260,000
.. 1
i
i
7' Tripod w/ winches
2
4,500
j
I
i
1
Sewer Line Rehab
1
250,000 j
Dump Truck #609
2
45,000
1
Sewer Line Rehab •
1
!
250,000 I
j
Camera Van #557
2
100,000 j
3/4 Ton Truck w/Utility Bed #556
3
25,000 ,
I
Sewer Line Rehab
1
j
250,000
Jet Vac Truck #558
2
260, 000 !
4
Shoring Shields (2)
3
I
-
i
15,000
3
`,
Sewer;Line Rehab
1
J !
250,000
Tractor 4WD #523
2
!
45,000 •
Side Sickle Mower
3
i
10,000
Bush Hog
4
(
i
!
6,000
Pick -Up Truck #502
5
25,000
Flexible Rodding Machine #555
6
1
30,000
Sewer Line Rehab
1
!
250,000
Backhoe #515
2
I
75,000
i
1
!
1
i
1-
i
I
—A
1
L
i
i
I
-
.
r
i
!
i
i
—
!
I
264,500
295,000
375,000 i
525,000 i
366,000 ,
325,000

Capital Outlay Justification
1. YEAR REQUESTED 2006-2007 PRIORITY # 1
2. DEPARTMENT
3. Capital Item Is:
4.
5.
6.
Public Works DIVISION
New
Sewer
Replacement X
Capital Item Requested
(include detailed description)
Combination machine which can be used to rod sewer lines and vac debris out of manholes that
was cut loose during rodding operation.
1Izrchaze
Cost
$260,000
Annual Maintenance
Cost
$3,000
Estimated I]end
Life
10 yrs.
Justification
To keep with current technology and safety features being used in today's market,
7. Complete this section if capital item requested is for replacement of an er sting item..
Current Asset Description:
Model or Age:
Mileage or Machine. Hours:
Maintenance 86 repair costs during previous year:
Explain:
Sreco Jet Truck
1989
93,647
$3,907.82
Recommended for replacement by Garage.

DATE: 12/07/2005
TIME: 11:24 a.m.
CITY OF STATESVILLE
VEHICLE REPAIR HISTORY REPORT
FACILITY: 0001
STARTING VMRS CODE: 000-000-000 FROM VEHICLE : 0554
ENDING VMRS CODE: 999-999-999 TO VEHICLE : 0554
ID: 1-32/RRV
STARTING DATE: 11/01/2004
ENDING DATE: LAST
PAGE: 1
P: 0554
LF MTR: 93465.0 CUR MTR:
93465.0 YR: 90 RAKE: INTERNATIONAL DEPT: 6
SIZE: M CLASS:
FUEL: D
IS CODE DATE WO NUM LF-MILS ODOM
WORK DESCRIPTION
OUT PARTS
TITLE > AIR CONDITION,HEAT
- 023-000 04112005 0006028 90250
TOTAL >AIR CONDITION,HEAT
TITLE > CAB/SHEET METALS
- 063-000 05172005 0006276 90550
TOTAL >CAB/SHEET METALS
TITLE > INSTRUMENTS,GAUGES
- 000-000 03312005 0005944 90130
- 002-000 06162005 0006222 91270
- 002-000 03172005 0005683 89930
TOTAL >INSTRUMENTS,GAUGES
TITLE > BRAKES
- 004-000 02012005 0005579 89240
TOTAL >BRAKES
TITLE > STEERING
-001-000 07212005 0006882 91800
TOTAL >STEERING
TITLE > TIRES,TUBES,LINERS
- 017-000 08242005 0007192 92420
-017-000 03312005 0005979 90130
TOTAL >TIRES,TUBES,LINERS
TITLE > TRANSMISSION AUTOMAT
- 001-000 07282005 0006955 91950
- 001-000 05182005 0006333 90880
TOTAL >TRANSMISSION AUTOMAT
TITLE > CHARGING SYSTEM
- 005-000 07142005 0006820 91720
TOTAL >CHARGING SYSTEM
TITLE > LIGHTING SYSTEM
-006-000 03162005 0005876 89930
-009-000 03162005 0005876 89930
- 022-000 03162005 0005876 89930
- 031-001 101' 105 0007562 93060
- 031-002 051 J05 0006579 91270
-037-000 07012005 0006703 91530
90254 HTR CNTRL
90554 DOOR
90130 INSTRUMENTS, GAUGES
91273 GUAGE ANY •
89931 GUAGE ANY
89244 ADJUST BRAKES.
91797 ADD FLUID, GEAR+PU(MP
92423 TRUCK TIRE CHANGE
90130 TRUCK TIRE CHANGE
91947 ADD FLUID
90883 ADD FLUID
91715 ALT. BELT
89931
89931
89931
'93062
91273
91525
BULB, EXTERIOR
CLEARANCE LIGHT
LENS
TAIL LIGHT LEFT
TAIL LIGHT RIGHT
WIRING 1 TO 8 FT
LABOR
TOTAL
HOURS.MECH. CAU REA WRK
6.22 0.00 6.22 0.30 TERRY 46 8 3
6.22
735.27
735.27
29.90
48.72
38.18
116.80
0.00
0.00
3.84
3.84
123.77
249.31
373.08
4.51
3.00
7.51
25.40
25.40
0.32
7.32
3.52
34.40
34.58
0.00
0.00
6.22
0.00 735.27 13.00 DAVID 44 4 3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
735.27
29.90
48.72
38.18
116.80
0.00
0.00
3.84
3.84
123.77
249.31
373.08
4.51
3.00
7.51
25.40
25.40
0.32
7.32
3.52
34.40
34.58
0.00
0.25 DAVID XX 4
0.70 TERRY XX 12
2.00 DAVID 18 4
3
3
13
0.30 ROGER 21 4 1
0.20 BRAD XX 4 13
0.60 BRAD XX 4 4
1.20 DAVID 44 4 4
0.20 TERRY XX. 4 13
0.00 XX 4 13
2.00 ROGER 12 10 3
0.20 ROGER XX
0.30 ROGER XX
0.20 ROGER XX
0.50 DAVID 12
0.50 TEf 12
0.40 DAB 12
4
`4
4
4
12
3
3
3
3
3
13

Capital Outlay Justification
1. YEAR REQUESTED 2006-2007 PRIORITY #2
2. DEPARTMENT
3. Capital Item Is:
4.
E.
6.
Public Works DIVISION
New
Sewer
Replacement X
Capital Item Requested
(include detailed description)
7' tripod with (2) winches with 50' stainless steel cable
Purchase
Cod t
$4,500
Firmgal Maintenance.
Cost
Eetimated Useful
Life
10 yrs.
-Just fication
To keep, current with technology' that meets all OSHA requirements for use in confined space entry.
L
7. Complete this, sc:ctir a if camp kal item requested is for vepia.cement of an. existing item.
Current Asset Description:
Model or Age:
Mileage or Machine Hours:
Maintenance & repair costs during previous year:
Explain:
Safety Tripod &. Winch
1992
Current unit no longer complies with OSHA regulations.

TATESTILLE
Cap' et Projections
.ter, 2005
DEPARTMENT. Third Creek
Priority
2006-07__ I
2007-03 a
2003-09
2009-10
I
2010-11 i
2011-12
Item Description
Rankine
$5000+ I
$6000+ I
$6000+
55000+
$50,000+ I
S50,000+
Replacing (9) disconnects
1
13.500 1-
I_
Portable Generator
2
4001)0
!
I----�-
Mixers for rig Basin
3
'639.519 1
1
_
'We recommend these items not be considered for funding
Skimmers
4
'30 930 j
_ (
1
at this time due to the proposed Third Creek Expansion
Grit Removal
1
7
.691.;;.1.
1
Replace Maintenance Truck 1105
2
i
33.000 I
I
� '
non -compliant events, these items may not be required in
Replace Operator Truck 1102
1
F
24.200
r
the expansion project and therefore the expenditure cannot
Screw Auger PI
1
1
"200.200 I
_L
be justified at this time. Should the expansion project not
Plant Expansion
1
---1
I
i
-1
I
19.539.300 t
take place these items will be needed.
Screw Auger in
2
I
L.
"206.260
Dump Truck 1104
3
l
{
56.100 I
Screw Auger#3
1
'21'3,300
I
-
.
_. .-"—Y -
L
- ---i
• 1
-7
i
I
1
I
1
•
I
!
1
I
i
I
1
i
i
I
I
T
I
�
•
1
J
I
I
1
1
r
1_
•
1
1
1
I
I
I
j
i
1
53.500
33.000 i
24,200
•I
19.595.400 1
-
-

Capital Outlay Justification
1. YEAR REQUESTED 2006-07 PRIORITY 2
2. DEPARTMENT Water Resources DIVISION Third Creek WWTP
3. Capital Item Is:
4.
5.
6.
New X
Replacement
Capital Item Requested
(include detailed description)
Portable Generator
Purchase
Cost
$40,000
Annual Maintenance
Cost
Estimated Useful
Life
20 years
Justification
The city has 12 lift stations that do not have a generator on site. We currently have one portable
generator. The state requires us to report the over flows therefore we need to maintain pumping
cycles in all lift stations. With the addition of two new lift stations, we feel one generator will not
be enough during a major outage (ice -storms, hurricans).
7. Complete this section if capital item requested is for replacement of an enlisting item.
Current Asset Description:
Model or Age:
Mileage or Machine Hours:
Maintenance & repair costs during previous year:
Explain:

CITY Ce""TATESVILLE
Capita ,et Projections
De,...nber, 2005
DEPARTMENT: Fourth Creek
j
.
J
Priority
2006-07
2007-08 j
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Item Description
1
Ranking
$5000+ [
$5000+
$5000+
I
$50,000+
$50,000+
f
-I}
j
1.,$5000+
Effluent Composite Sampler
_
I 1 I
6,200 I
VFD's for main pumps
I 2 -1-
115,000 j
I
Replace 1152
�_3 i
17,000
Rebuild (4) aerators
i 4 I
170,000
Heat Pump for office
1 5 1
15,000
Bypass pumping flange
I 6 T
60,000
Replace (2) roll up metal doors
i 7 i
8,000 ,
Spare 20HP Submersible Pump (Davis Hospital lift station)
1 8 I
7,500,1
I
Maintenance office
i •9
6,500 j
Stainless Steal Bar Screens
1 1
1
750,000
kgestor MCC
_�
i 2 -1-
• 89,000
Marjorie Rd. Lift Station control panel
3
i
6,0001
Rebuild (4) aerators
1 4 i
170,000
1
i
Replace (2) roll up metal doors
I 5
8.000
Replace 1107
6 i
17,000
SCADA system
1 1 i
410,0004
Replace 1107
j 2 I
7
13,000
Sta-lime
1 T^
j
6,845,635 j
Plant Expansion
1 I
I
{
22,000,000
Sta-lime
( 1 j—
*3,500j
L
f�
i 1 j
*4,000 ;
I
-1--
1
I
1
I
t
1
!
I
I
r
_4
I
_.
I
r
1
-
r-
I
1—
I
-
t
1-
I
I
405,200 I
1,040,000
428,000 I
6,845,635 i
-
22,000,000
*Studies for future capital improvements

Capital Outlay Justification
1. YEAR REQUESTEE 2006-2007 PRIORITY 8
2. DEPARTMENT Water Resources DIVISION Fourth Creek WWTP
3. Capital Item Is:
4.
5.
6.
New X
Replacement
Capital Item Requested
(include detailed description)
One (1) Fairbanks Morse 4" 5433MV submersible sewage pump with 20 HP, 1770 RPM,
3 phase/60 Hz/230 volt submersible motor with 25' power cable. This pump will be used as a
spare pump for the Davis Hospital lift station.
Purchase
Cost
$7,500
Annual Maintenance
Cost
Estimated Useful
Life
15 years
Justification
The Davis Hospital lift station currently receives the highest flow of all of the Fourth Creek
WWTP lift stations. Due to its location in relation to outfall (1/4 mile away) and its close
proximity to a stream, the maintaining of station's ability to pump wastewter to the treatment
facility is of utmost importance. A spare pump can be utilized to quickly return the lift station
to full pumping capability in the event a failure of one of the two pumps located there.
7. Complete this section if capital item requested is for replacement of an existing item.
Current Asset Description:
Model or Age:
Mileage or Machine Hours:
Maintenance & repair costs during previous year:
Explain: On June 20,. 2005 overflow at Davis Hospital lift station occurred with raw sewage
reaching a waterway within 15' - 20' of the station. The purchase of a spare pump is part of an
overall plan to reduce the risk of having this lift station overflow due to pump failure.

Third Creek
Barkley
1152 Barkley Rd.
400 GPM
Telemetry
Industrial Drive
1302 Industrial Drive
100 GPM
Telemetry
Interstate Equipment
1610 Salisbury Rd.
450 GPM
Telemetry
Newton Drive
2051 Newton Drive
200GPM
Telemetry
Park Drive
1018 Park Drive
200 GPM
Telemetry
Kennedy Drive
2415 Kennedy Drive
Pine Forest (new)
Statesville Pump Stations
Forth Creek
Marjorie Road
241 Marjorie Road
200 GPM
Telemetry
Valley Stream
301 Valley Stream
320 GPM
Telemetry
Davis Hospital
269 Old Mocksville Road
360 GPM
Telemetry
Hatfield Road
152 Hatfield Road
520 GPM
Telemetry
Commerce Blvd.
2748 Commerce Blvd.
732 GPM
Telemetry
Statesville Industrial Park
341 Business Park Rd.
420 GPM
Telemetry

Nov Sent Enforcement Enforcement
NOV Num Dt Case Num Case Initiated
Dt
Totals: 7800 6100

QIit of
�tR<vim
'tatto uille
II. (!. 3ux 1111 • Stutesuille, Nadi! Qlarulinu 28677
August 28, 2000
Mr. Chen
North Carolina Department of
Environmental and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Dear Mr. Chen:
Public ,r urks' lepartment
Director 784-878-355U
Engineering 878-355Z
Garage 878-3428
'anitatinn 878-3415
street 878-3414
ater/'ewer Maintenance 878-3417
We appreciate your response concerning your recent inspection of the Third Creek collection
system. As I tried to explain to you, we have been inspecting the system's overheads, creek
crossings and manholes on a regular basis.
We have changed our daily work report to reflect these inspections. We have an ongoing
maintenance rodding program and TV inspection equipment which rods and inspects the sewer
collection system and record their findings on a daily basis.
If we can be of any help in the future, please contact Eddy Mitchell or me at [phone].
Look forward to working with you in the future.
Respectfully yours,
Richard Coop r
Water/Sewer Maintenance
Superintendent

Qit Of
ftlfPSU11lE
i. a au 1111 • 3tatesuille, l nrtll Carolina 28&87
August 29, 2000
Mr. Chen
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Non -Discharge Facility Inspection
Sewer Collection System
Dear Mr. Chen:
b r>l Fs' 024_
ro rts� ,. .Ylr
,
We have reviewed your report of the August 16, 2000 inspection and offer the following
comments regarding the items noted in the pump station/siphons and file review comment
sections of the report.
Pump Station/Siphons
Item 4. The pump stations cited T-3, Park Drive, and T-5, Industrial Drive, are on a preventative
maintenance schedule for removal of any accumulated solids and are pumped out three to four
times per year based on need. At the time of the inspection, the Park Drive liftstation was due to
be pumped out. We also add a degreasing agent to deter any clogging of lines due to grease.
Further, we have not experienced any clogging of lines in the Park Drive area as your report
implies.
Item 7. The high water alarms are fully functional on each of our liftstations. They are
connected to our telemetry system and alert us if there is a high water alarm or power failure.
Item 8. All records are kept at the Third Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant by the Plant
Maintenance Mechanic. It is his responsibility that any and all maintenance for the liftstations is
properly documented. For proper organization, it is best that these records are compiled and kept
at the plant. The liftstations do not have sufficient storage area to accommodate recordkeeping.
Item 11. Each pump in every liftstation that was inspected has an air relief valve. If Mr. Chen
had asked to see them, we would have been happy to point them out.

Item 12. As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0219 (h) (3) (B), the City maintains one portable
generator and an adequate number of staff to handle power outages. Our standard operating
procedure during a power outage is to determine how many of our stations will require the use of
the generator and schedule each station for interval pumping. Some of our stations only need to
be pumped once every 24 to 48 hours. In addition, the City is an Electricity and supplies power
to all of the liftstations inspected. Therefore, during a power outage, liftstations receive priority
for restoring power. While it would be nice to have more generators, it simply is not the best
allocation of resources for the City to purchase additional generators at this time.
Item 13. It is not clear whether this is a requirement or something that you would like to see.
Please clarify and cite the reference used.
Item 18. As we replace control panels in our capital replacement projects, we install pump
counters or run time meters. However, the control panels at the stations cited, T-3, T-4 and T-5,
work properly and are not due for replacement.
Collection System File Review
Item 12. We have revised our recordkeeping system to include a log of pump station call -ins.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the information presented, please contact
Renee Parkman or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
L.F. "Joe" Hudson, Jr., Director
Water_Resources

• wUCS00083 Owner - Facility: Town of Red Springs - Red Springs Collection System
Inspection Date: 10/29/03
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available?
If no, provide schedule for compliance
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows (2 or more in 12 months) at same location?
If yes, is there a corrective action plan?
is a map of the system available?
Dees the map include:
Pipe sizes
Pipe materials
Pipe location
Flow direction
Approximate pipe age
Number of service taps
Pump stations and capacity .
If no, what percent is complete?
List any modifications and extensions that need to be added to the map
Comment:
Manhplp
Manhole1 -
Is manhole accessible?
Is manhole cover/vent above grade?
Is_ the manhole free of visible signs of overflow?
•
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and depressions?
Is manhole cover present? :.. - •
. Is manhole properly seated?
Is manhole in good condition?
Is invert in good condition? (/
Is line free -flowing and unrestricted in manhole?
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grepse?�
Is manhole free of excessive roots?
Is manhole free of excessive sand?
•
Is manhole's extended vent screened? ,/
Are vents free of submergence?. v
•
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
Comment:
MO_ nrinn ant+ Rannrtjng Ran lira e t
Are copies of required press releases and distribution lists avajjabj ?aAI
Are public notices and proof of publication available?
Comment:
f Lem/Rioht_ntWa srn•
LIne1
Is right-of-way accessible for emergency? L�
Is right-of-way free of sinkholes or depressions?
Is line/right-of-way free feVdence of leakage?
lt' a"7
cfau" ?\5
,�
Y .s Nri Ne nip
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O ❑ ❑ ❑
YesNO NA NF
❑ .❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ..
❑ ❑ .❑ ❑ •••
• ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 0.E10.
0000 ..
❑❑❑❑
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
.0000
O 0.00
O .000.
O 0.00
O 000
Yes Nn Ne- NF
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NF
MODO
O 000
O 000
Page: 5

Permit: WGCS00008 Owner - Facility: City of Burlington
Inspection Date: 09/21/2006
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Do ALL pump stations have an "auto polling" feature/SCADA?
Number of pump stations
Number of pump stations that have SCADA
Number of pump stations that have simple telemetry
Number of pump stations that have only audible and visual alarms
Number of pump stations that do not meet permit requirements
# Does the permittee have a root control program?
# If yes, date implemented?
Describe:
Comment:
/- S
Inspections c4 .Ro (. U (13' / 3 tL Yes• -No' NA NE
Are maintenance records for sewer lines available? � ! . ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records available that document pump station inspections? 0W lT a'A t DOD ❑
Are SCADA or telemetry equipped pump stations inspected at least once a week? . �C) Jam/ ❑ 0 0 0
sAtt;,c)J2-0 Ce 1wtOS
CC- into p
0000
O 0 0 n
Are non-SCADNtelemetry equipped pump stations inspected every day? 0000
Are records available that document citizen complaints?
# Do you have a system to conduct an annual observation of entire system?
# Has there been an observation of remote areas in the last year?
Are records available that document inspections of high -priority lines?
Has there been visual inspections of high -priority lines in last six months?
Comment:
Operation & Maintenance Requirements Yes No NA NE
Are all log books available? 0 0 0 0
Does supervisor review all log books on a regular basis? 0000
Does the supervisor have plans to address documented short-term problem areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
What is the schedule for reviewing inspection, maintenance, & operations logs and problem areas?
Are maintenance records for equipment available?
Is a schedule maintained for testing emergency/standby equipment?
What is the schedule for testing emergency/standby equipment?
❑ ❑❑n
O 000
O 000
(fin❑❑
n nn
O 000
O 000
Page: 4

Job Totals 2006 8/14/2007
JobType#Name
Sum Of Number or Footac
R1-Routine Rodding
302942
R2-Cameraing
88345
Page 1

Job Totals 2006 8/14/2007
JobType#Name
O1-Outfalls Mowed
Sum Of Number or Footac
385215
),'5\0'9
Page 1

Permit: WQCS00008 Owner - Facility: City of Burlington
Inspection Date: 09/21/2006
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Do pump station logs include:
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal?
Inspecting and exercising all valves? c/
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment?
Inspecting alarms, telemetry and auxiliary equipment?
Is there at least one spare pump for each pump station w/o pump reliability?
Are maintenance records for right-of-ways available? --
Are right-of-ways currently accessible in the event of an emergency? t.,/
Are system cleaning records available? tZ
Has at least 10% of system been cleaned annually? ✓
What areas are scheduled for cleaning in the next 12 months?
a
dOso des'
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the plan include:
24-hour contact numbers — 0000
Response time 0000
Equipment list and spare parts inventory / 0000
Access to cleaning equipment 0000
Access to construction crews, contractors, and/or engineers 0000
Source of emergency funds ✓ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Site sanitation and cleanup materials v 0000
Post-overflow/spill assessment 0000
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel? 0000
Is the spare parts inventory adequate? 0000
Comment:
Records Yes No NA NE
Are adequate records of all SSOs, spills and complaints available? 0000
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available? 0000
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows (2 or more in 12 months) at same location? 0000
If yes, is there a corrective action plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a map of the system available? ✓ 0000
Page: 5

Permit: WQCS00083 Owner - Facility: Town of Red Springs - Red Springs Collection System
Inspection Date: 10/29/03
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
}�annrdc
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available?
If no, provide schedule for compliance
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows (2 or more in 12 months) at same location?
If yes, is there a corrective action plan?
is a map of the system available?
Does the map include:
Pipe sizes ,
Pipe materials
Pipe location
Flow direction
Approximate pipe age
Number of service taps
Pump stations and capacity
If no, what percent is complete?
List any modifications and extensions that need to be added to the map
Comment:
Mantala
Manholel
Is manhole accessible?
Is manhole cover/vent above grade?
Is the manhole free of visible signs of overflow?
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and depressions?
Is manhole cover present?
. Is manhole properly seated?
Is manhole in good condition?
Is invert in good condition?
Is line free -flowing and unrestricted in manhole?
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grease?
Is manhole free of excessive roots? •
Is manhole free of excessive sand?
Is manhole's extended vent screened?
Are vents free of submergence? .
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
Comment:
azai nrinr end RPonrtina Ran ire a t
Are copies of required press releases and distribution lists available?
Are public notices and proof of publication available?
Comment:
LbjzaLeir.ht_nf Waas/G ial I
S
Line1
Is right-of-way accessible for emergency?
Is right-of-way free of sinkholes or depressions?
Is line/right-of-way free of evidence of leakage?
Y .s NO m NE
0000
0000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑❑❑.
O 000
❑ ❑❑❑
❑❑ ❑,❑
Yes No NA NF
®❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 000 .
O 000
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O -0 ❑ ❑ ..
❑❑❑❑-
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
❑ ❑❑❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
Yes No NA NF
0000
0000
Yes No NA NF
® ❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
O 000
Page: 5

Permit: WOCS00008 Owner - Facility: City of Burlington
Inspection Date: 09/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Performance Standards
Is Public Education Program for grease established and documented?
What educational tools are used?
Is Sewer Use Ordinance/Legal Authority available?
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance is enforced?
Is Grease Trap Ordinance available?
Is Septic Tank Ordinance available (as applicable, i.e. annexation)
List' enforcement actions by permittee, if any, in the last 12 months
Has an acceptable Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) been.implemented?
Does CIP address short term needs and long term \"master plan\" concepts?
Does CIP cover three five year eriod?
Does CIP include Goal Statement?
Does CIP include description of project area?
Does CIP include description of existing facilities?
Does CIP include known deficiencies? -
Does CIP include forecasted future needs?-
1-6')-efqt7v'j'abt/
Is CIP designated only for wastewater collection and treatment?
Approximate capital improvement budget for collection system?
Total annual revenue for wastewater collection and treatment?
CIP Comments �' _Q
Is system free of known points of bypass?
If no, describe type of bypass and location
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted at ALL pump stations?
# Does the sign include:
Instructions for notification?
Pump station identifier?
24-hour contact numbers
If no, list deficient pump stations
Yes No NA NE
O 000
O 000
O ❑❑❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
Page: 3

WQCS00083
000000000000000000000000000 000000
000000000000000000000000000 000000
00000000000000000000000000 ❑❑❑❑❑❑
0
O
o
c
m
N
c. (N.
•C q ..p •T.
a) co C
N a C O
(T-
o C`• «Nn O N @
•- N > N N N
N x E 2 a
n -. a) N ° N 0 0
N N U N d Q Q
CO ° U U
@ O) (-.. N E CO CO
coo
N C �.' N . N a. -al
N
O) S 4' �- N O D _J
N @
(a N N C L @ @
a C C a)a)a.2. @ N
c. i O .N N C1 o a E 2c o "1 7) _C a s E o c a)
c @n E ai 2 a Q'.3 b 0 TI5 co c) a s
0 U N • _ _ N N @ O O
a °- a @ aj @ @ 3= 7 7
E E `) = m 4) `) 4) N a) @ @
o d Q to V) Q Q Q N rn
0-
Is simple telemetry present?
7 7 N N
E a)@ N c 5 Q @,@ y o, CO CD N Cl.).(J
.CO
(7) CD a)@ a) .. a) r r _ @
N Q N co Q • Q N N N N
\ Ct
G•
a)e•, J
.'O
�' j N
N
a Y c.)E o
J
O
a
cs• a) .5 cs-, \\S \
N
c`' N a '� U ..n O 1 O 2 ',±-, \
To pa O 'O > CO •c• N U a
a m N y) m . a �' a) ° N a o c
.@ rtrt 0 ° C ' ° U @co 'J1 N ,7 (N U m
a) 03 N. N N N a. a) C N .O N C
Oa C G U U c p 0, U C @ . a) O
@ @ N > > T C O N a
N W ° 0 . N U1 0 Ol @ Oa C U
E. 'o D. Ili
•,n c o o .. ro m E a o Y o 0
O C C 71) CO co a .. 0) Y Y N N E @ c in_
G
N 0 O 7. N @ @ N_ 0 N a) a C J
TJ E ..O i- C. . N' N N L
a LL ' C G O) ,.O- Q1 4
Does it include:
c N
O .p
03 C' E
0 a) J
t_. t:. C
o c N
C 0) C
L
'C-5 C a
N O ?.
C U
o @ c
•U in a)
2 ° 2'
N
c J E
a w
Is public access limited?
c
N
E
E
O
U
v.
T_1
c`.
c.-
Cr:
c
0co
a;
0
a)
CO
ro
@
a
O
U
0
co
'n
ui
cn
cn
0
N
U
O
ro
7
U"
a)
v
m
N
a.

Permit: WQCS00083 Inspection Date: 10/29/03 Owner - Facility: Town of Red Springs - Red Springs Collection System
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
R.rlr�c
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available?
If no, provide schedule for compliance
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows (2 or more in 12 months) at same location?
If yes, is there a corrective action plan?
is a map of the system available?
Dees the map include:
Pipe sizes
Pipe materials
Pipe location
Flow direction
Approximate pipe age
Number of service taps
Pump stations and capacity
If no, what percent is complete'?
List any modifications and extensions that need to be added to the map
Comment:
mathoje.
Manholel
Is manhole accessible? �.
Is manhole cover/vent above grade?
is_the manhole free of visible signs of overflow?
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and depressions?
Is manhole cover present?
. Is manhole properly seated?'
Is manhole in good condition?
Is invert in good condition?
Is line free -flowing and unrestricted in manhole?
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grease?
Is manhole free of excessive roots?.�
Is manhole free of excessive sand? L/
Is manhole's extended vent screened? (,
" /,
Are vents free of submergence? .N
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
Comment: �'
Maitnrinn end R Dnrtinn Ra ira a t
Are copies of required press releases and distribution
Are public notices and proof of publication available?
Comment:
j�nec/Rinht-nfLNavalaeriel I fines
Line1
341(
Is right-of-way accessible for emergency?
Is right-of-way free of sinkholes or depressions?
Is line!right-of-wa free of evidence of leakage?
11131151— Lrjj:
941 /✓teuYo
•
lists available?
64(
v 4-M A
Y .s Nn ie nip
0000
O 000
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑❑❑
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
Yes Nn NA iF
P1❑ .❑ ❑
O 000
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
0000
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑❑❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
Yes Nn NA NF
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
®❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
O 000
Page: 5

0
0
a
0
-O
C
CO
(D
(D
U
n
0
D)
(n
(,)
0
N
N
D)
0_
0
0
3
'O
(7
7
CU
(D
i
n
0
0
3
3
(D
Lpel!Wll ssacoe ollgnd sl
3
N 3
-o
N (n_
'O
:S 0.
0 ▪ (D
N 7
C ▪ (D
CT •J
N
Instructions for notification?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 00000
O 00000
O 00000
:apnloul lI saop
1,Ilnl duel Ian.; ay; sl
E
7
ro
(0.
N
0
0
0
CO
n)
CT
•J
Is an emergency generator available?
- 'D
(D.. N
0' m
1 l
•
(D '.
% (0'
< •• <
W N
<: <
(D (D
N 0
O g'
z0
(D ' 'O
N N
o-
.
J
m
7 Cr
D) D)
O •
CD
N
CD
O.
X
0
0_
CD
0'
ro
N
,algellene JoleJaua5 Xo
Lluasaid fulawalal aldwts si
V) (/J
CD of
C C
O 0
U
0 0
7 7
(O CO
N7 FIT
N
O
(D (D
D D
0 -0
a) (D N m
4 N
7
O ,J
J
D
0
cn
O
(0
N
0
C
3
cn
0'
0
ro
v
0-
ro
•J
❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑:k'
❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑o❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑o❑❑•❑❑❑❑oo❑❑❑❑❑
000.000000000000000000000000
adAl uoilels dwnd
uollels dwnd
uont� CJLJ d
:oleo uogoadsuf
3
£ DOOSOOM
0
ro
(
D
n
0
O_
ro.
a
(1)
-o
(0
N
ro
0.
•0
(a
n
0
(D
0
Cn
3

I
r er c[: W 83
Inspection Date: 10/29/03 Owner - Facility: Town of Red Springs - Red Springs Collection System
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available?
If no, provide schedule for compliance
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows (2 or more in 12 months) at same location?
If yes, is there a corrective action plan?
is a map of the systern available?
Does the map include:
Pipe sizes
Pipe materials
Pipe location
Flow direction
Approximate pipe age •
Number of service taps
Pump stations and capacity
If no, what percent is complete?
List any modifications and extensions that need to be added to the map
Comment:
m.2.12hdil
Manhole1
Is manhole accessible?
Is manhole cover/vent above grade? •
Is. the manhole free of visible signs of overflow?
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and•depressions?_
Is manhole cover present?
Is manhole properly seated? •
Is manhole in good condition?
Is invert in good condition?
Is line free -flowing and unrestricted in manhole?
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grease?
Is manhole free of excessive roots? -
Is manhole free of excessive sand? " •
Is manhole's extended vent screened?
Are vents free of submergence?
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes?
Comment:
• Monirnrinn and Reoprting o__
rP P f
Are copies of required press releases and distribution lists available?
Are public notices and proof of publication available?
Comment:
,
Line1
,n
Jliz eta QI NJ _
Is right-of-way free of sinkholes or depressions?V gala,
Is line/right-of-way free of evidence of leakage?� �%_ r at _
d'4,t-c,
Is right-of-way accessible for emergency? ./ (�joi ��i\ (�
Yes Nn N Np
0000
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O ❑❑❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
Yes Nn NA i�
® ❑ .❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑.❑ ❑ ..
❑ ❑❑0
O 000
O -❑ ❑ ❑ ..
O 000❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
YeSNO-- NA NF
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NF
131000
O 000
O 000
Page: 5

0 CD
-G
O m
(D
C 0
(D ,.,
O 7'
< 00
O- (D
(0 N
D
D)
O
O
cn
(D
CS
<
0
<
CDlO
a (3
0 (D (D
"CD7
m•m
N 0 •J
DI
D) O
O
(D N
• N.)• J
❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
ODcow ❑
CD
r D
7 n n > y
\ O (D (D
3 UC O
(D (S
O
m
(D .0
C
7 m
0_ (1
-O
o <n
N
o m
-o
Q. cu
N
n'
0) N
D)
o 7
7 a
(U C].
< (
Cu
Cr CD C:
O
OD
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
3
J
7
A
D
• n > • (n rn
3 (D < 3 • 3
3 3 . < D) . (D
< (L 0 O 7
S 7"7 7
N O O
.. O < (D
(D CD(n
D) < (D (D
R' 0 X (D
CD N < 0
7
o Q a <
o' 3 a 0
.< < < <
N (A (D n
N < <'
N 7 . N <
(n < . Q N
J (D D)
0 (D a
7 •J
• (D
• m a
N
0
•
<
J
00000
00000
00000
00000
U) N (n (n
9 3 �.
S J
0 0 (D
< N (D 7
•
0 ' o
(D (D.• O
c-
o o (a
X• X CD . 7 0
a
o O
n N C O
(/I N 7 7
((DD (D < J
N
[)
Oo 3 g .
(n O <
c a
• N
o 3
(0 •°
D) O
N CD
(D
N i N . N. ( N .N
(D •CD D) (D - (D D)
O O O N N 0
< < (p 7 ' 0 N
S S
j' D O O O 00
O O < (D 6-<
o '0 (D -.. (D
o m 7.'� alm
a• b (D (D N
4 N N N S D) '
E.--• iD. 7. 7 m'..O-.
O a •J .. 7r Q' O
D •J •0 . < <
< • N (0
N co
cn
: a) •• 0 0
a . 0 •J
(D
-0 •<
m
•J
N •
•o
000000000
0000000000
DODOODOODD
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
N
3
0
7
0
(D .
0 .
0
ID
a'
N
•J
N
7
O
(n
J
n n
y
CD f 3 3 .
7 03
a 0) o
O ( CD X
a m n 0,9
N .lD 7 co <
�•
N N 7 O N
O a (D
(ll O O
n. 3 a -0(oD
< N
•
N
(0
(D
.a
O
(J
(0
• a)
a
(1
.
C1
O
• H-
ID
13
0
O.
N
c)
0
7
s!eua;ew adid
0000000
0000000
0000000
0000000
000
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
000
N
0
1
3
0
(D
D)
<
C
a
<
1.3
<
m
0
O
N
O'
(D
5-
D'
O
m
(u
m
Cr
FIT
•.)
J
:e4ea uo:;oadsui
7
0
a
7
(D
(n
<
a
ti
7
(o
0
n
0
FD
cn
o'
3
ERl(1l1C'1nAA

ermit: WQCS00083
Inspection Date: 10/29/03
Owner - Facility: Town of Red Springs - Red Springs Collection System
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
rl7pratinn Pt �4ain�onanrc Ro i!irnTentc
If no, provide schedule for compliance
Comment:
Puma .Station Pump Station 1 Pump station type 4V1AUfli
�
Are pump station locs avaiiable?
Is it accessible in all weather conditions? v
Is general housekeeping acceptable?
P.,P�-
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are wet well/siphons free of excessive debris?
Are upstream manholes free of excessive debris/signs of overflow?
Are floats/controls for pumps/alarms operable?
Is "auto polling" feature/SCADA present?
Is "auto polling" feature/SCADA operational
Is simple telemetry present? .
Is simple telemetry operational?
Are audio and visual alarms present? ' _^
Are audio and visual alarms operable? 8 v-2,20(, -- W
Is the Pump station inspected as required?' ; 44—
..CA�/Is an emergency generator available?
Are backflow•devices in place?.
Are backflow devices operable?
Are air relief valves in place? • .
Are air relief valves operable?".
Is an emergency generator available?
Can the emergency generator run the pumps?
Is the pump station equipped for quick hook-up?
Is the generator operable?
Is the fuel tank full?
Is the generator inspected according to their schedule?
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted?
Does it include: /
Instructions for notification--?//`.
Pump station identifier? V
Emergency phone number
Is public access limited?
Is pump station free of overflow piping?
Is the pump station free of signs of overflow?
Are run times comparable for multiple pumps?
Comment:
R P rzyri s
Are adequate records of all SSOs, spills and complaints available?
Yes No NA NF
Yes Nn NA NF
ri❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑❑❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
0000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000.
O 000
O 000.
0.000
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑❑o
❑ ❑❑❑.
-0000
O 000.
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
0000
0000
YPs Nn NA NF
DODO
Page: 4

Permit: WQCS00008 Owner - Facility: City of Burlington
Inspection Date: 09/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
# Do ALL pump stations have an "auto polling" feature/SCADA?
Number of pump stations
Number of pump stations that have SCADA
Number of pump stations that have simple telemetry
Number of pump stations that have only audible and visual alarms
Number of pump stations that do not meet permit requirements
# Does the permittee have a root control program?
# If yes, date implemented?
Describe:
Comment:
inspections
Are maintenance records for sewer lines available?
Are records available that document pump station inspections?
Are SCADA or telemetry equipped pump stations inspected at least once a week?
Are non-SCADA/telemetry equipped pump stations inspected every day?
Are records available that document citizen complaints?
# Do you have a system to conduct an annual observation of entire system? —
# Has there been an observation of remote areas in the last year?
Are records available that document inspections of high -priority lines?
Has there been visual inspections of high -priority lines in last six months?
,vv 5Md ii
O 000
❑ ❑❑❑
Yes •No' NA NE
0000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
O 000
❑ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑❑❑
Comment:
Operation & Maintenance Requirements Yes No NA NE
Are all log books available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does supervisor review all log books on a regular basis? 0000
Does the supervisor have plans to address documented short-term problem areas? I/ 0000
What is the schedule for reviewing inspection, maintenance, & operations logs and problem areas?
J) Us
Are maintenance records for equipment available?
Is a schedule maintained for testing emergency/standby equipment? X %Arlo
What is the schedule for testing emergency/standby equipment?
O 000
O 000
Page: 4

[LY1 LIl1A° uCl Si �4 N�� c �tes TeoIlIlo u� 1,o{a�� -`pt°
p-zaimti°Spy
‘usinoa am Do tutu .:za ut aft°
a `�utddo;s put pc otis � .zoo tl}.zou uo .zaaojc�a pao3 � 1
3aolaq aou .p .,, LL-I
uoo i`aatl� a�°than ally �utaa aa� Pall' � �u aq
3 iagi aazatmuoS T
aaxd 'pap* aaam 1 °Lunn t� a r •
saaluT uo not
uaoQQg ti�°q aurt� a eoa am auo r i, pia ul. u u t
panne u�Lnn o tig oa put
ally e 2Iu Sfft� s 1
�Ls �tl�ta am �3° tea al ut Uuzonn t[I
.0-gsg.74 Jo WO
ut $u[nnam uaaq pctl A paica ut
LLvsJ1Ui'
a
auo sainftui
su'1P UO%SII.
900Z `0l 1.1:1d1INdr
un down
pipe near
breaking.
point
Dilapidated sewer pipe could flood
Third Creek with hundreds of gallons
of raw sewage if broken
BY ANNA KAPLAN
AKAPLAN @ STATESV ILLE.COM
At the spot where it crosses Third Creek, just off
Amity Hill Road, the city of Statesville's main sewer
outfall line is dangerously curved. The cement piers
that the 30-inch-wide pipe rests on have eroded the
soil around them, and the creek's widening at that
spot leaves the line precariously suspended in the air.
If the city leaves the pipeline to its own devices, it
has thepotential to send all of the raw sewage flow-
ing inside it right into Third Creek.
"The joints are stressed quite a bit more than they
should be. There hasn't been a failure yet, but all
these bolts couldn't take a lot more stress," said Ter-
ry Keever, the city's interim public works director.
At its meeting Monday night, the City Council ap-
proved the allocation of $130,625 from the Sewer Cap-
ital Improvements Account to fix the problem.
See PIPE, Page 3A
REGAN HILL/ [e-mail]
This sewage; drain off Amity Hill Road needs
severe maintenance in order to prevent waste
from seeping into the water that leads to Third
Creek.

I4os'//
PIPE: Heavy rains could cause a Brea/
Continued from Page 1
The item was not a priority
on the city's budget, but the ur-
gency of the project required
immediate attention, Mayor
Costi Kutteh said at the coun-
ci 's pre -agenda meeting Thurs-
day.
Heavy rainfall or the pres-
sure of debris floating down-
stream has the potential to
break the pipeline, Keever said.
The line stretches from a
manhole on one bank of the
creek to another manhole on
the other side, a length of about
120 feet. The creek itself is
'ESV I LLE.COM
about 50 to 60 feet wide at that
spot. This is significantly wider
than it is further upstream be-
cause the pipeline has collected
debris, stopping it from flowing
downstream.
This pipe has been there for
about 30 years. City workers
started noticing the erosion
late last spring. But it wasn't
until the fall that the problem
got especially bad, with the
concrete piers shifting in the
ground, and water washing
away the soil at the creek
banks. In some spots, the piers
are being held by the pipe, in-
stead of the other way around.
Fixing the pipeline will in-
volve pumping the sewage out
and replacing the whole stretch
of pipe, from manhole to man-
hole. The newer construction
will also include replacement
concrete piers, but fewer — two
instead of four — will be used
to minimize erosion and pre-
vent debris from collecting at
the sites of the piers, Keever
said.
The city does not have a '
timeline for the project date.
Ronny Turner Construction
Co. of Hickory won the bid for
the project.
L
Run down
pipe near
breaking.
point
Dilapidated sewer pipe could flood
Third Creek with hundreds of gallons
of raw sewage if broken
BY ANNA KAPLAN
AKAPLAN @ STATESVILLE.COM
At the spot where it crosses Third Creek, just off
Amity Hill Road, the city of Statesville's main sewer
outfall line is dangerously curved. The cement piers
that the 30-inch-wide pipe rests on have eroded the
soil around them, and the creek's widening at that
spot leaves the line precariously suspended in the air.
If the city leaves the pipeline to its own devices, it
has the potential to send all of the raw sewage flow-

Lift Station Information
Sanitary Sewer
Overflow
Action Plan

CITY OF STATESVILLE
Lift Station Information &
Sanitary Sewer Overflow Action Plan
Procedures Page 2
Technical Data Page 3
Maps Page 6
O&M Cost Data Page 12
Sanitary Sewer Overflow Action Plan Page 13
Tab: Liftstation Forms
Tab: Reference
Revised March 10, 1999

1. Andy Smith
2. Ken Houston
3. Renee Parkman
2. Jeff Carty
3. Renee Parkman
Memo
January 6, 1999
To: All Personnel
CITY OF STATESVILLE
From: Renee Parkman, Assistant or
Water/Wastewater Treatment Water/Wastewater Treatme
Re: Lift Stations
Our department maintains (11) lift stations throughout the City. 'These stations are
equipped with callback systems that notify the plants if they have a problem. If you
receive a call from a lift station, call the plant that is responsible for the station and let
them know which station called. If you cannot reach the plant, call the supervisor of the
plant:
Third Creek Stations (872-9261)
Barkley Road
Industrial Drive
Interstate Equipment
Newton Drive
Park Drive
Third Creek On -Call Numbers
1. Deno Williams 528-1548 (home)
910-667-9528 (home)
663-4201 (home)
Fourth Creek On -Call Numbers
872-6244 (home)
[phone] (home)
or 592-2026
663-4201 (home)
Fourth Creek Stations (878-3437)
Statesville Business Park
Valley Stream
Marjorie Road
Hatfield Road
Commerce Blvd. (ASMO)
Davis Hospital
878-4131 (beeper)
881-6993 (beeper)
881-6995 (beeper)
928-4414 (beeper)
8.78-4132 (beeper)
881-6995 (beeper)
When Davis Hospital calls, it identifies itself as Station 1; it will continue to call until it is
reset. Press "9" to acknowledge the signal or call the station back at 873-3540.

PROCEDURES
LIFT STATION CHECKS:
1. When you arrive, look for the RED INDICATOR LIGHT to see if there is a problem.
2. Listen for water running into the wet well or for the pumps, if they are running.
3. Turn pumps to "on" or "hand" position to assure that they are primed and will run. If pumps
will not run or have lost prime, check the breaker. Call for assistance if an electrical problem
is found.
4. Check oil levels if applicable.
5. Check and test the phone system. Reset the phone system if everything is ok.
GENERATOR HOOK-UP:
1. Turn the phone system off.
2. Set up grounding rod.
3. Hook up 230 V cord to appropriate generator outlet.
4. Turn disconnect box to OFF position.
5. Hook up 230 V cord to disconnect plug.
6. Start the generator and bring it up to speed.
7. Switch disconnect to ON position (BOTTOM for generator power).
8. When finished remember to turn disconnect back to City power(TOP).
Davis Hospital lift station has its own emergency back-up generator that automatically switches
to generatorpower during a power outage.
ELECTRICAL OUTAGE:
To report an electrical outage for a station that is on Crescent power, call 873-5241 or 800-283-
8237. To report an outage for a station that is on City power, call 878-3417 during regular
business hours or 878-3406 after hours (Police Department). Davis, Hatfield and Asmo are on
Crescent power. All other stations are on City power.
SEWER PROBLEMS:
To obtain help from Sewer Maintenance during regular business hours call 878-3417 or..878-
3406 (Police Department) after regular business hours.
Page 2

LIFT STATION LOCATIONS AND TECHNICAL DATA
FOURTH CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
MARJORIE ROAD No. 1 Lift Station
Flyght submersible pump station
5 HP Flow 100 gpm @ 43 ft TDH (each pump)
Serial No. C-87-278
Voltage 480 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
30 amp plug for generator hook-up
VALLEY STREAM No. 2 Lift Station
Flyght submersible pump station
2 HP Flow 160 gpm @ 20 ft TDH (each pump) .
Serial No. C-85-112.
Voltage 230 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
50 amp plug for generator hook-up (small black cord)
•
DAVIS HOSPITAL No. 3 Lift Station
Fairbanks Morris
20 HP Flow 180 gpm @ 114 ft TDH (each pump)
Voltage 240 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
50 amp plug for generator hook-up (small black cord)
HATFIELD ROAD No. 4 Lift Station
Flyght below ground
10 HP Flow 260 gpm @ 60 ft TDH (each pump)
Serial No. 35994-A
Voltage 480 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
30 amp plug for generator hook-up (gray cord)
241.Marjorie Road
878-2890
301 Valley Stream
• 872-6963
269 Old Mocksville Road
' 873-3540
152 Hatfield Road
872-2197
COMMERCE BLVD. (ASMO) No. 5 Lift Station 2748 Commerce Blvd.
Flyght below ground 872-2270
60HPFlow 366gpm @ 160ftTDH
Serial No. C88-346
Voltage 460 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
50 amp plug for generator hook-up (Hubble plug, large plug)
Page 3

STATESVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK No. 6 Liftstation
Gorman Rupp Pumps
54 HP Flow 210 gpm @ 163 ftTDH
Voltage 460 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz 68 amps
50 amp plug for generator hook-up
(Hubble plug, Large plug)
341 Business Park Dr.
878-3403
Page 4

LIFT STATION LOCATIONS AND TECHNICAL DATA
THIRD CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
BARKLEY ROAD No. T-1 Lift Station
Ecodyne below ground
5 HP Flow 200 gpm @ 41 ft TDH (each pump)
Serial No. 07-7655-C
Voltage 230 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE No. T-2 Lifts Station
Gorman Rupp above ground
7.5 HP Flow 100 gpm @ 36 ft TDH (each pump)
Serial No. D-105-A
Voltage 230 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
115/ Barkley Road
• 872-2193 .
1302 Industrial Drive
872-2170
INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT No. T-3 Lift Station 1610 Salisbury Road
Ecodyne below ground 872-2191
7.5 HP Flow 225 gpm @ 35 ft TDH (each pump)
Serial No. 07-7654-C
Voltage 230 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
NEWTON DRIVE No. T-4 Lift Station
Gorman Rupp above ground
7.5 HP Flow 100 gpm @ 50 ft TDH (each pump).
Serial No. D-079-A
Voltage 230 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
PARK DRIVE No. T-5 Lift Station
Gorman Rupp above ground
10 HP Flow 100 gpm @ 50 ft TDH (each pump)
Serial No. F-307-A
Voltage 230 Volts 3 phase 60 Hertz
2051 Newton Drive
872-2158
1018 Park Drive.
872-2099
Note: All stations use 50 amp plug (small black cord) for generator hook-up.
Page 5

Map 1: Marjorie Road Lift Station
•
Page 6

Map 2: Valley Stream Lift Station

Map 4: Industrial Park Lift Station
Page 9

Map 3: Davis Hospital Lift Station
Hatfield Lift Station
ASMO Lift Station —L
Ar
cRA
•
Page 8

Map 5: Industrial Drive Lift Station
Interstate Equipment Lift Station
Barkley Road Lift Station
Ge
ce
421
H
IA a-
Hcd
Fo•1--1
rn1.
Page 10

Map 6: Newton Drive Lift Station
Park Drive Lift Station
Page 11

STATION NAME JPLANT
Park Drive
Newton Drive
Third
1997-98 LIFTSTATION MAINTENANCE COSTS
Interstate Equipment
Barkley Road
Industrial Drive
Hatfield
ASMO
Industrial Park
Valley Stream
Davis Hospital
Marjorie Road
Depqr4n
Third
Third
Third
Third
Fourth
Fourth
LABOR
MAINTENANCE CHEMICALS ELECTRICITY
Routine Repairs &
Checks Upkeep* Cost Repairs (oil, grease)
hrs/yr hr/yr $/yr $/yr $/yr
38.5 38.25 $ 943.00 $ 5,672.40 $ 15.00
38.5 54.75 $ 1,106.00 $ 1,525.00 $ 10.00
40.75 34.75 $ 945.00 $ 231.00 $ 10.00
48.75 66 $ 1,323.00 $ 640.00 $ 15.00
49.75 30.75
Fourth
Fourth
Fourth
Fourth
Breakdown PM
Upkeep**
$/yr $/yr $/yr
$ 610.00 $ 2,146.40 $ 487.79
$ 30.00 $
$ 10.00 $
$ 20.00
15.00
..$ ... ... ... .
265.00 . $.
50 11.75 $ 804.90 $ $
50 22.5 $ 945.00 $ 135.00 $
50 2.15 $ 679.80 $ '7.00 $
50 - 3.75
$ 1,021.00 $ 2,907.60 $
.....
50 15 $ 847.30
50
1.5
$ 700.64 $
$ 671.30 $
TOTAL
$/yr
$ 9,874.59
$ 343.74
$ 420.14
$ 482.24
$ 310.00 1,940.80 $ 277.82
....... ... .... , ....
$ 34.00 $ 86.65 1,028.47
$ 1,534.00 $ 981.65 $ 1,526.19
$ 30.00 $ 820.00 $ 1,598.75
$ 4.00 $ 230.00 $ 407.73
$30.00 $ 263.00 $ 2,330.23
$ 34E00 $ 3,763.00 $
...
332.28
$ 2,261.42
$ 3,014.74
$ 1,616.14
$ 2,480.24
$ 6,472.22
... . .. . ... ... . ... . ,
$ 4,846.74
$ 3,528.75
$ 1,328.53
$ 3,323.87
$ 4,800.58
NOTE: *Includes emergencies.
,.•
Upkeep includes gravel, pumping out grease, weed control & painting.
Capital Outlay was not included. P0767 was spent at Davis Hospital Lift Station.

CITY OF STATESVILLE
INTER -OFFICE MEMO
March 4, 1999
TO: All Employees
Water/Wastewater Treatment
FROM: Renee Parkman, Asst.Direc
Water/Wastewater Treatme
Re:
#,,
Sanitary Sewer Overflow Response `.
As required by the State, we have developed a plan to address Sanitary Sewer Overflows caused
by a plant back-up or failure of a liftstation.
1. Upon discovery of a Sanitary Sewer Overflow, the maintenance' mechanic will respond and
make an immediate assessment. If an overflowhas occurred, the maintenance mechanic will
contact his supervisor.
2. The supervisor will determine what course of action is required to stop the overflow and
clean-up the site. [Remediation Procedures for Sanitary Sewer Overflows are to be used as a
guide.] Further guidance may be received through the Assistant Director, Director or State
authorities.
3. The supervisor will make a record of all events and handle -any reporting necessary. The
supervisor will report all activities to the Assistant Director.
Reporting thresholds as stated in the State's "Elimination of Collection System Overflows"
memo are as follows:
• All spills, regardless of volume, that reach surface waters must be reported.
• Spills of 1,000 gallons or less that do not reach surface waters and are contained on -site do
not have to be reported. However, records must be retained documenting spill and action
taken to address the spill. .
• Spills greater than 1,000 gallons, regardless of whether or not they reach surface waters must
be reported.
The telephone number for the Mooresville Regional Office is (704) 663-169.9 or the State's 24
hour number, Division of Emergency Management, is 1-800-858-0638. Reportable spills must
be reported immediately but in no case more than 24 hours from the time that the spill was
discovered.
Page 13

Purpose
The purpose of the Sanitary Sewer Overflow Response Plan is to protect the citizens of the City
of Statesville, North Carolina and the environment by establishing written procedures for
responding to Sanitary Sewer Overflows. This procedure applies to all Water/Wastewater
Treatment employees that in the course of their work may deal with sanitary sewer overflows.
These procedures will be reviewed at least semi-annually, or whenever revised guidance from
county, state or federal authorities dictate a revision is necessary.
Plan of Action
1. Upon discovery of a Sanitary Sewer Overflow, the maintenance mechanic will respond and
make an immediate assessment. If an overflow has occurred, the maintenance mechanic will
contact his supervisor.
2. The supervisor will determine what course of action is required to stop the overflow and
clean-up the site. [Remediation Procedures for Sanitary Sewer Overflows are to be used as a
guide.] Further guidance may be received through the Assistant Director, Director or State
authorities.
3. The supervisor will make a record of all events and handle any reporting necessary. The
supervisor will report all activities to the Assistant Director.
Spill Reporting
Reportable Sanitary Sewer Overflows will be reported in compliance with the State's
"Elimination of Collection System Overflows" memo. [See Reference section.] All reportable
spills will be reported to the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] or the State Division
of Emergency Mangement (24 hours) at 1-800-858-0638 immediately or in no case more than 24
hours after discovery of a spill.
Required Emergency Equipment
The Water/Wastewater Treatment Department has a portable generator that is maintained for
emergency situations involving power outages at department liftstations. The generator is
housed at the Fourth Creek WWTP and is tested monthly by department staff.. Records of testing
are maintained by the Fourth Creek maintenance mechanic.
Liftstation Maintenance Logs
The Third Creek and Fourth Creek maintenance mechanics maintain a maintenance log of all
work, inspections, preventative maintenance, equipment testing and troubles for their liftstations
within their Preventative Maintenance Log. These logs are kept by the mechanic responsible for
the station.
Page 14

Liftstation Inspections/Telemetry
All liftstations are equipped with telemetry that calls its respective plant if there is a loss of
power or an alarm condition.
Liftstations are inspected as to the proper functioning of the station no less that twice per week.
Page 15

LIFTSTATION SPARE PARTS INVENTORY
Station
Vendor
Spare Parts
Davis Hospital
Hugh's Supply
Spare fuses and float switches
ASMO
Hugh's Supply
Spare fuses and float switches
Marjorie Road
Hugh's Supply
Spare fuses and float switches
Statesville Business Park
Emory Wilson
Spare fuses and float switches
Valley Stream
Hugh's Supply
Spare fuses and float switches
Hatfield Road
Hugh's Supply
Spare fuses and float switches
Interstate Equipment
Smith & Loveless
Gaskets, floats, fuses,
mechanical seals, impellers,
bearings
Barkley Road
Smith & Loveless
-
Gaskets, floats, fuses,
mechanical seals, impellers,
bearings
Park Drive
Emory Wilson
'
Belts, shafts, flapper valves,
mechanical seals, o-rings,
impellers, fuses
Newton Drive
Emory Wilson
Belts, shafts,. flapper valves,
mechanical seals, o-rings,
impelleiS;`fuses .
Industrial Drive
Emory Wilson "
-
'.
Blts, shafts, flapper valves,
mechanical seals, o-rings,
impellers, fuses
Page 16

Smith & Loveless
14040 West Sant Fe Trail
Lenexa KS 66215
Emory Wilson
256 Little Santee Road
Colfax NC 27235
Hugh's Supply
1840 Shelton Avenue
Statesville, NC 28687
Page 17

1.
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE EVALUATION w/wwT
Is staff designated full-time for collection system operation and maintenance? Yes No
2. Do you have a list of 24 hour contacts? x Yes No
3. Do you have an emergency equipment list? x Yes No
4.. Staff distribution/time allocation:
Collection System (incl. part-time)
Pump Stations
1/I Correction
Number
employed
2
(If Yes, please attach)
(If Yes, please attach)
Total staff
hours/week
6
5. Are map(s) of the collection system available? x Yes No
6. Total number of pump stations: 1 1 (Please complete a Pump Station form for each station.)
7. Is a preventive maintenance program in effect? x Yes No (If Yes, please attach)
If yes, does it include:
a. Maintaining logs/records x Yes No
b. Determining equipment/system malfunction rates x Yes No
c. Establishing schedules x Yes No
d. I/1 evaluation Yes No
e. Manhole inspection Yes No
f. Sewer cleaning program Yes No
g. Hydrogen sulfide monitoring and control 0 Yes No
h. Lift station operation x Yes - No
i. Easement/right-of-way maintenance . Yes No
j. °Walking° or visual observation of lines Yes No
k. Spare parts inventory X Yes No
8. Please describe what type of ongoing inspection program for the collection system exists:
9. Please describe the schedule for Tine cleaning:
10. Is there a sewer use ordinance? x Yes
If yes, please identify the responsible party_ for
PrPtrPatmPnt / WRtPr/Wastj
Coordinator,Director wated r"
11. Please describe any sewer use ordi
the Sewer Use Ordinance am
are__required to rspond to D
action to put them back ii 5
m
0
No. Is there a grease ordinance? x Yes _ No
ensuring the ordinance(s) is enforced.
(name of responsible person/agency).
Ienforcement practices that exist: V i n 1 a tnrs nf
Issued fines and /or penalties and
!ex/Wastewater and nutltnP a plan nf
impliance. '

SPILL RESPONSE PLAN EVALUATION
1. Do you have a current 24 hour contact list which includes phone numbers of key personnel and/or
contractors? X Yes No (If Yes, please attach)
2. Do you have an equipment list which includes what functional equipment is available and where it is
located? X Yes No (If Yes, please attach)
3. Do you have the staff resources to make an on -site assessment of a spill with in two hours of notification
of the spill? X Yes No (If No, please explain below)
4. Please list your standard spill response procedures: See Spill RespnnsP Plan
5. Is your spill response plan readily available to all essential personnel? X Yes No
If No, please explain why:
6. Are all essential personnel familiar with the spill response plan and clearly understand its contents?
X Yes No
If No, please explain why:

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 3rd Creek WWTP
Phone Number: 704 - 872-9621
Location of Pump Station:
1018 Park Drive
Contact Person: .TPff cArty
1. How often is pump station inspected? once per day twice per day
(check all that apply) once per week 3 days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 2 0 0 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
Yes. X No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type:
x Portable generator which can be moved to site
Standby generator on site
Alternate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? Mo . (Mo./yr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 3 - 9 9 (Mo./yr.)
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup power exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm system? x Yes No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm High water visual alarm
Other (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level
Dry well high level
High/low current
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
Wet well low level
High/low pH
_x_ AC power status
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump. station)
Name of Facility: 3rd Creek WWTP Contact Person: .Tpff Carty
Phone Number: 7 0 4- 8 7 2- 9621
Location of Pump Station:
1302 Industrial Drive
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week 3 days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 100 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
Yes x No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type:
x Portable generator which can be moved to site
Standby generator on site
Altemate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? MC (MoJyr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 3- 9 9 ' (Mofyr.)•
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backufpower exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have.a working alarm system? x Yes No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm High water visual alarm
Other (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level Wet well low level
Dry well high level High/low pH
High/low current x AC power status
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi.
>1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed. • •
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 3rd Creek WWTP
Phone Number: 7n4-R77-9671
Location of Pump Station:
115? Barkley Road
Contact Person: Jeff Carty
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice perday
once per week days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 4 0 0 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
Yes .. X No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type: •
x Portable generator which can be moved to site
Standby generator on site
Altemate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? Mo . (Mo./yr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 3 - 99 (Mo./yr.) . •
Was the test successful? x Yes' No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backuppower exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have,a working alarm system? x Yes No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm X High water visual alarm
Other (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level
Dry well high level
High/low current
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
_ Wet well low level
_ High/low pH
AC power status
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
X Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
•
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed. -
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 3rd Creek WWTP Contact Person: Jeff Carty
Phone Number: 7 0 4- 8 7 8- 3 4 3 8
Location of Pump Station:
Tntarstata F.cIn1 pmPnt - 1610 Salisbury Road
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week 3 days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 4 90 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
Yes. •• No x
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x • Yes No
If yes, what type: ' Y Portable generator which can be moved to site
• Standby generator on site
Altemate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? Mo . (Mo./yr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 3 - 9 9 ' (Mo./yr.) •
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup power exists, please explain why:
' ' 4. Does the pump station havea working alarm system? x Yes No
On site alarrn system: High water audio alarm x High water visual alarm
Other.. (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level Wet well low level
Dry well high level High/low pH
High/low current x AC power status
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.

Name of Facility:
PUMP. STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
3rd Creek WWTP Contact Person: Jeff Carty
Phone Number: 704-872-9621
Location of Pump Station:
2051 Newton Drive
1. How often is pump station inspected? once per day twice per day
(check all that apply) once per week days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 200 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
Yes • 'X No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type: ' ' : x Portable generator which can be moved to site -
Standby generator on site
Alternate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? MO . (Mo./yr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 3 - 9 9 (Mo./yr.)
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup dower exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm system? x Yes
No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm High water visual alarm
Other- (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level
Dry well high level
High/low current
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
Wet well low level
High/low pH
x AC power status
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
•
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include- exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.
f

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 4 th Creek WWTP Contact Person: Andy Smith
Phone Number: 704-878-3438
Location of Pump Station:
241 Marjorie Road
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week 2 days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 200 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
x Yes No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type: x Portable generator which can be moved to site -
Standby generator on site
Alternate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? Mo . (Mo./yr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 4 - 9 7 (Mo./yr.) .
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backu0power exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm system? x Yes No
On site alarm system: X High water audio alarm x High water visual alarm
Other, (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level Wet well low level
Dry well high level High/low pH
High/low current x AC power status
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
5. Is there a spare pump available or.an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
•
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 4 th Creek wWTP
Phone Number: 704-878-3438
Location of Pump Station:
301 Valley Stream
Contact Person: Anriy Smith
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week 2 , days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 320 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
x Yes No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type: ' x Portable generator which can be moved to site
• Standby generator on site
Alternate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? Mo . (Mo./yr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 4 - 9 7 (Mo./yr.)•
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backuOpower exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm system? x
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm x High water visual alarm
Other, (describe)
Yes No
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level
Dry well high level
High/low current
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
Wet well low level
High/low pH
x AC power status
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 4 th Creek WWTP :: Contact Person: Andy Smith
Phone Number: 704-878-3438
Location of Pump Station:
2748 Commerce Blvd. (Asmo)
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week 2 days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 732 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
x Yes . • • No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type: '
x Portable generator which can be moved to site
Standby generator on site
Alternate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? Mo • (Mo./yr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 4-9 7 (Mo./yr.)
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup'power exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have.a working alarm system? x Yes No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm x High water visual alarm
Other: (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level
Dry well high level
High/low current
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
_ Wet well low level
High/low pH
x AC power status
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.
l

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 4 th Creek WWTP Contact Person:
Phone Number: 7 0 4- 8 7 8- 3 4 3 8
Location of Pump Station:
152 Hatfield Road
Andy Smith
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week 2 days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 520 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
x Yes _• • No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type: • x Portable generator which can be moved to site -
Standby generator on site
Alternate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? Mo . (Mo./yr.)_
When was the generator last load tested? 4 - 9 7 (Mo./yr.)
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup power exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm system? x Yes No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm x High water visual alarm
Other. (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level Wet well low level
Dry well high level High/low pH
High/low current __x__. AC power status
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
S. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 4 th Creek WWTP Contact Person: Andy Smith
Phone Number: 7 0 4- 8 7 8- 3 4 3 8
Location of Pump Station:
269 Old Mocksville Road Davis Hospital
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week 2 days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 3 6 0 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
X Yes . • No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? X Yes No
If yes, what type: '
Portable generator which can be moved to site
x Standby generator on site
Alternate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 1
How often is the generator tested? Mo . (Mo./yr.)
When was the generator last load tested? 1 2 - 98 (Mo./yr.)
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup•power exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm • system?
X Yes No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm x High water visual alarm
Other (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level
Dry well high level
HighAow current
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
Wet well low level
High/low pH
X AC power status
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
X Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: 4th Creek WWTP Contact Person: Andy Smith _
Phone Number:
704-878-3438
Location of Pump Station:
341 Business Park
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week 2 days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? 420 GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
x Yes - No
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? x Yes No
If yes, what type:
x Portable generator which can be moved to site
Standby generator on site
Alternate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve? 9
How often is the generator tested? Mo . (Mo./yr.).
When was the generator last load tested? 4 - 9 7 (Mo./yr.) .
Was the test successful? x Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup power exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm system? x Yes
No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm x High water visual alarm
Other. (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: x Wet well high level Wet well low level
Dry well high level High/low pH
High/low current x AC power status
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
x Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

Collection System Evaluation:
1. Please estimate how many miles of sewer line are in your collection system
<100mi. x 100-500mi. 501-1,000mi. >1,000mi
2. How many pump stations are in your collection system? 11
3. Please list any problem areas within your collection system. Include exact location of problems.
(e.g. Chronically surcharging manholes, pump stations which frequently fail, lines with severe
Infiltration and Inflow, etc..)
4. Please rank the problems listed in No. 3 in order of importance. If possible, include an estimated date
by which the problem will be appropriately addressed.
5. Please describe any ongoing efforts or plans to rehabilitate and/or renovate the collection system.
Include exact location of ongoing or planned work.
(e.g. Infiltration and Inflow studies, pump station upgrades, pipe replacement, etc..)
NOTE: Please attach any additional sheets and/or information if needed.
7-

City of Statesville
Memo
To: Wayne Lambert, Public Works Director
Steve Hampton, Police Chief
Richard Campbell, Fire Chief
From: Joe Hudson
CC: Jack King
Renee Parkman
Date: September 10, 1997
Re: Reporting Overflows and Spills
Per Jack King's request I discussed the state memo regarding sewer overflows and spills with Mr.
Mike Parker of the Mooresville Regional Office. " ,'
According to Mr. Parker, although the memo is addressed to the Permittee any responsible city official
or designated employee can report a spill and the city will be in compliance with the memo. When I
explained to Mr. Parker the organizational relation between Public Works (pertaining to water and
sewer distribution and collection ) and wastewater treatment he suggested Public Works would
probably be the intended office described in the memo. However, he pointed out that the Permittee is
the holder of the NPDES permit and legally is responsible for the collection system. Mr. Parker noted
he would not get Police or Fire involved accept in reporting spills to the proper city department and let
the department ( Public Works or Wastewater Treatment) do the required oral report followed by
required documentation. -
I suggested to him that my department would report and fill out the form for those spills regarding
liftstations and the plants. Public Works would respond in like fashion for those:spills occurring in or
involving the collection system. Mr. Parker said that would be acceptable.
Therefore , my department will handle spills occurring within the sewer plants and liftstations. Public
Works will be responsible for reporting all other wastewater spills (Wayne, please note the attached
form is different from the one previously issued as well as some of the reporting requirements). Police
and Fire will notify the proper department should they see such an event.
If you agree with this arrangement no further action is necessary and will be considered implemented
as of the date of this memo. However, if you do have some concerns or questions please call me. •
• Page 1

r

RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP PROCEDURES
1. Remove all visible debris
2. Remove all visibly ponded wastewater
3. Disinfect the affected area (NO CHEMICAL ADDITION TO SURFACE WATERS)
4. Barriers (i.e. colored tape) should be erected to preclude public access
for at least 24 hours
5. If soil is disturbed in close proximity to stream banks, the area should be
reseeded immediately to prevent erosion

ESTIMATED FLOWS IN SANITARY SEWER LINES BASED ON 2.0 FPS
(IN GALLONS PER HOUR)
ASSUMPTIONS: n=0.013 for VCP and DI, ALL FLOWS AT 2 FPS
FLOW IN
6" @ 0.52%
8" @ 0.40%
10" @ 0.25%
' 12" ®0.19%
15" @ 0.14%
18" ® 0.11%
21" ®0.09%
PIPE
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
2,0 fps
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
'/1 FULL
5,400
9,600
15,000
21,250
33,350
50,000
66,650
1/3 FULL
2,500
4,600
7,100
10,000
15,850
22,900
30,250
1/4 FILL
1,500
2,650
4,150
5,850
9,150
13,350
18,350
1/10 FULL
250
400
1 650
900
1,400
2,000
2,700
1. Look in the line downstream of the blockage prior to clearing and estimate depth of flow (sec figures below) and find the corresponding flow
value. After unstopping, washing the line, and allowing the flow to equalin-, estimate the normal flow depth in the line and find the
couesponding flow value,
2. Subtract your estimated flow values before and after unstopping. Multiply this flow per hour by the cstinmated number of hours the overflow has
been occurring to got an estimated overflow volume.
Example: An 8-inch sanitary sewer lint is overflowing. The line is partially blocked and is flowing 1/10 full in a manhole downstream of a
blockage. After unstopping, cleaning and allowing the flow to equalize, the normal flow in the pipe is about 1/3 full. Subtracting the 1110 flow
volume (400 gph) from the 1/3 flow volume (4,600 gph) yields approximately 4,200 gallon per hour overflowing. If you estimated the overflow
! bad been occurring for 10 hours, your overflow volnrne is appproximately. 42,000 gallons.
112 FULL
1/3 FULL
1/4 FULL
1/10 FULL
City/County Utilities Division, City of Winston-Salem: 07 MAY 9$
866t/0Z/P.
009E-068-6T6
S3IiI7Iin oi-End

.
r

t.
Awpr
NCDE
rcF -' '. ,tea=�.,
'.JAMES B. HUNTJR..r,,,� •
.• GOVERNOR
' AYNE MCDEVITT 4 t✓
• SECRETARY k �9j
"Nd
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Elimination of Collection Systems Overflows
This policy was developed to promote reduction and elimination _of sanitary sewer
overflows (SSO's) from sewer collection systems.
To increase enforcement actions for non-compliance while recognizing and rewarding
systems that demonstrate exceptional Ievels of compliance and environmental
stewardship.
• An Advisory Group, consisting of representatives of municipalities across the state,
consultants, and Division of Water Quality (DWQ) regional and central office staff, was
consulted in development of the policy.
:A. PRESTON HOWARDj �2 •
4:.IR.iP.E.-g "'.�-ti ..
`CDIRECTOR�:'�r •4';r••`-'w
ti• .1; - •
The key to reducing SSO's and minimizing water quality impacts is founded in the
successful implementation of operation and maintenance programs and ensuring
adequate local response to spills and overflows from collection systems.
Initial phase of implementation (July 1, 1998) is to focus on achieving adequate
response to spills from the collection system. New reporting thresholds are as follows:
- All spills, irregardless of volume, that reach surface waters must be reported.
- Spills of 1,000 gallons or less that do not reach surface waters and are contained on -
site do not have to be reported. However, records must be retained documenting spill
and action taken to address spill.
- Spill greater than 1,000 .gallons, regardless of whether or not they reach surface
waters must be reported. ,`.
A "Point System" will be• utilized to determine the amount of penalty to be assessed.
The Collection System Policy will be implemented in two phases. During the first
phase (July 1, 1998 - June 30, 1999), penalty decisions will hinge on whether or not
the owner properly reported the discharge and whether or not proper response and
remedial actions were taken. During the second phase (effective July 1, 1999), penalty
decisions will also include consideration of operation and maintenance factors, as well
as whether or not the owner has substantially evaluated the collection system, identified
problem sewers and/or pump stations, and implemented a DWQ approved plan for
remediation of deficient system components.
Factors for Consideration of Civil Penalty Assessments during Phase I (July 1. 1998 -
June 30, 1999)
Spill Response Evaluation Factors: '.•
- Contact list for municipal staff and contractors on call for clean-ups
- Rapid on -site assessment of spill
- Response / Mobilization after initial assessment_
- Proper DWQ notification
Factors for Consideration of Civil Penalty Assessments During Phase U (beginning
July 1. 1999)
Spill Response Evaluation Factors (see Initial Phase of Implementation above)
O/M Program Evaluation Factors:
Develop and submit to DWQ for approval, a collection system evaluation and
remedial action plan
P.O. Box 20533, RALEIOH, NORTH CAROLINA 27926-0535
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /A►/IRMATIVE ACTION PLOVER • 501E RECYCLED/I 0% POET•CON1UMER

•. ?'..Fs.I.:: �
•��r..:••a y ..
SNcDE•
NR
.•DAMES B. HuNTJR.
„GOVERNOR
,•WAYNE MCDEVITT ?
•SECRETARY, ".+,
'•. � Y�• .1 ci
";.• •'..µ t...:.
,;01.-PRESToN 1-IoWARD,:'
S-r • ''rjC 7. L.•.�F •sue
I:`S
3 y-
•
_
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Elimination of Collection Systems. Overflows - Page 2
B . Conduct the following O&M Practices
- Inventory of collection system
- Annual visual inspection of all lines not visible from normal public access.
- Regular visual inspection of all high priority lines (e.g. aerial lines, aerial crossings,
stream crossings, siphons, streambank lines, etc...)
- Right-of-way maintenance
- Maintenance of a spare parts inventory
- Maintaining maintenance logs documenting all work, inspections, equipment testing,
etc...
- Maintenance of a trouble log documenting each problem, the time, location, who
responded and how the problem was resolved
- Sewer use ordinance adoption and implementation -
- Testing and provision of pump station reliability measures
•
•
•
- Pump station inspections ,
Other Factors that may be considered in decisions regarding penalty assessments
include:
- Compliance histories
- Vandalism or third party causes .
- Extenuating circumstances
- Implementation of Preventative arid/or Educational Programs
Upgrades or renovations in progress
- Repeat offenses
A minimum penalty of $4,000 will be assessed if:
- the spill is not reported as required (see Initial Phase of Implementation above)
Additional compliance and enforcement measures which inay be imposed include:
- Mandated training and education of municipal staff
- Show Cause Hearings
- Special Orders by Consent
- Remediation requirements -
- Injunctive relief
- Moratoriums
- Requiring publication of a notice of the violation in the local newspaper
- Civil or criminal actions
- Referral to the State Bureau of Investigation
Past emphasis by DWQ was on permitting new sewer extensions and classification of
collection system operators. Future emphasis will be placed on development of a
system -wide permit that incorporates existing as well as new sewer extensions. The
new system -wide permit will address reporting requirements as well as operation and
maintenance.
P.O. Box 29533, RALCION, NORTH CAROLINA 276211-05311
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] -
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • 50% RECYCLEO/10% POIT•CONSUMER PAPER

COLLECTION SYSTEM ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE
Regulatory
Response
9
*: Evaluation process will determine if
spill was unavoidable or avoidable

COLLECTION SYSTEM ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE
(Numbers Correspond to Flow Chart)
The reporting threshold shall be 1,000 gallons for spills on the ground which do -
not reach surface waters. The report must occur within 24 hours of knowledge of
the spill.
• The following spills must be reported immediately (or within 24 hours of
first knowledge):
a) spills that reach surface waters (i.e. any spill that reaches any
water already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc...)
b) spills greater than 1,000 gallons on the ground regardless of
whether they are contained.
• The 1,000 gallon threshold applies only to spills on the ground that are
captured, fully contained and removed quickly, ensuring that no
wastewater reaches surface waters: Municipalities must keep records of
all spills for a period of three years and those records must be available for
review by DWQ staff upon request.
• Volume estimations shall be expressed as a range, rather than a specific
amount (e.g. 0-1,000 gallons and 1,001-2,500 gallons,, as opposed to
exactly 25 gallons).
•
This penalty will always be aminimum $4,000 assessment. The'penalty will be
assessed if the spill reaches surface waters, reaches any water present in a
conveyance, ditch or stream; and/or is on the ground and has a volume greater
than 1,000 gallons; and is not reported. This penalty will not be assessed if the
spill is reported.
3) Any spill that reaches surface waters must be reported. A spill that reaches any
water that was already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc. is considered to
have reached surface waters. In addition, spills which reach a conveyance or
ditch and can not be captured and contained are considered to have reached
surface waters.
4) The spill response and operation and maintenance program evaluation criteria
shown in the two attached tables shall be used to evaluate each -spill response and
the ongoing operation and maintenance program. Each item will receive a
numerical rating which will reflect the Regional Office's assessment.
Total Spill Response Score + Total O/M Program Score = (Final Score)*
*Initial implementation (through July 1, 1999) will be based upon spill responses
(Total Spill Response Score). Beginning July 1, 1999, the evaluation will
encompass spill response and operation and maintenance.
Page 1

SPILL RESPONSE EVALUATION FACTORS
Criteria
Requirement
. Evaluation
Total
Points
1
24 hour contact list which includes phone
numbers for
• Personnel / staff to address the situation
• Contractors / staff for mechanical repair•
Complete List = 10 points
No list = 0 points
2
Equipment list which includes:
• Required functional emergency equipment
• Location of functional equipment
Complete List = 10 points
No list = 0 points ..
3
On site assessment of spill as soon as possible
(ASAP), or at least within 120 minutest of
notification of spill. Documentation and
explanation required on length of response
time.
.Initial assessment time ASAP and not
more than120 min. = 10 points
Initial assessment time not ASAP or
more than 120 min. = 0 points
4
Mobilization of necessary response after initial
assessment. .
Adequate mobilization .= 10 points
Inadequate mobilization = 0 points
5
DWQ contacted immediately, or at least within
24 hours of notification of spill.
Contact within 24 hours = 10 points
Contact after 24 hours = 0 points
TOTAL SPILL RESPONSSE SCORE
Notes
120 minute maximum initial assessment time valid until 7/1/99. After 7/1/99, maximum initial assessment time shall
be 60 minutes.
Page 2

O/M PROGRAM EVALUATION FACTORS
Criteria
Requirement
Evaluation for
Gravity Lines
(Points)
Evaluation for
Pump Stations
(Points)
Total
Points
Yes = 5
No = 0
Yes = 4
No = 0
•
1
,Po(may
Inventory sketch o.f
collection system
be a simple line
drawing).
2
r" .
Annual visual inspection
of all lines not visible from
normal public access. Regular
visual inspections of high
priority areas1.
Inspections
conducted = 10 •
•
Inspections not
conducted = 0
Inspections
conducted = 9
Inspections not
conducted = 0
•
3
'}/ V%
Right of way maintenance
to allow system accessibility.
Adequate = 5
Inadequate.= 0
Adequate = 4
Inadequate = 0
4
rls 0
Schedules and conducts line
cleanings. (Has planned
program for cleaning certain
% of lines)
Yes = 5
No = 0. •..
Yes = 4
No = 0
5
Maintains a spare parts
inventory and list of
contractors.
Yes = 5 •
.. .
No = 0
Yes = 4
No = 0
_
6
Keeps up -to date maintenance
logs documenting all work,
inspections, equipment testing,
etc...
Yes = 5
No = 0 -
- .
Yes = 4
No = 0 .• •
• • - -
7
.
Maintains a trouble log
documenting each problem, the
time of the problem, location, .
who responded and how the
problem was resolved.
Yes = 10 . . . .
•
No = 0 `
Yes = 9 . - ..
.
No.= 0
,
8 7
.
Sewer use ordinance
adopted.
• -•
Yes = 2
No=0
Yes = 2
No=0
.
9
Sewer use ordinance
implemented
Yes = 3 . .
No=0 -
Yes = 2 .
No=O
10
_
(Pump stations only) .
Back -.up equipment and/or
reliability systems tested
once per month.
N/A.
-
Yes = 4
If reliability and back-up
power req.'s do not
apply, then score.=-4
No =0
11
telemetry
(Pump stations only) Pump
stations inspected three times
per week2 for systems without
or once per week for
systems with telemetry.
N/A - •
. . .
Yes = 4 •
No = 0
TOTAL O/M PROGRAM SCORE
ote :
Annual inspection requirement valid until 7/1/99. After 7/1/99, minimum quarterly inspection of all
high priority lines (e.g. aerial lines, aerial crossings, stream crossings, siphons and streambank
lines) in addition to the annual inspection of all lines not visible from normal public access.
2 Pump stations shall be inspected once daily beginning 7/1/99 if telemetry is not used.
Page 3

5) The following assessment factors shall be used to modify the Final Score in order
to obtain the adjusted final score
FACTORS
•
SCORE ADJUSTMENT
Act of God
•
Add 10 points
3rd Party / Vandalism
Add 10 points
Compliance History of Collection
System Since January 1, 1998
Add 10 points for good compliance history
Subtract 10 points for poor -compliance history
(Documentation Required)
. Reliability Requirements not in Place
Subtract 10 points
Extenuating Circumstances
Add 10 points
(Documentation Required)
Implementation of Preventative and/or
Educational Programs
.
Add 10 points ,
(Documentation Required) •
•
Major System Upgrades /
Renovations in Progress
-
Add 10 points
(Documentation Required)
Repeat Offense
[Same Location, Same Cause]
•
Subtract 5 points per offense and:
.multiply assessment by 1.2 for 2nd offense
multiply assessment by 1.5 for 3rd offense
. multiply assessment by 2.0 for 4th offense
multiply assessment by 3.0 for 5th offense
ADJUSTED FINAL SCORE
. .
Page 4

'4
5) Continued
Use the following table to determine the correct regulatory response:
REGULATORY RESPONSE OPTIONS
Adjusted
Score (Valid
Until 7/1/99)
Adjusted
Score (Valid
After 7/1/99)
' Monetary
Assessment
• Monetary
. Assessment
_ Amount
Additional Penalty
Options
50 or
greater
100 or
greater
No -
None
45 - 49
95 - 99
No -
•
Publish notice in local
newspaper
40 - 44
- 90 - 94
No
_
Publish notice in local
newspaper; mandated
' .training and education
35 - 39'
85 - 89
No
'Mandated training and
education; show cause
hearing
30 - 34
80 - 84 •
Yes
$500
Assessment
.
Show -cause hearing;
SOC agreement; and
remediation requirements
25 - 29
75 - 79
- Yes
$1,000 .
Assessment
SOC agreement;
remediation requirements;
injunctive relief; •
moratorium
24 or less
74 or less
Yes
$4,000
Assessment
•
Civil or criminal action;
moratorium; injunctive
relief; remediation
requirements; SOC
agreement
Intentional Bypass
(Regardless of Point Score)
.
Yes
$10,000 -.
Assessment
Referral to SBI; civil or
criminal action;
moratorium; injunctive
relief; remediation
requirements; SOC
agreement; : ''
Notes
The Director may select one or all of the penalty options corresponding to the
adjusted Final Score. Please note that the monetary assessments associated with
scores of 84 (or 34 until 7/1/99) or Tess are automatic and represent a minimum amount.
Page 5

6) The definition of damage includes when the spill results in:
• A fish kill, based upon an evaluation by WRC.
• A violation of a water quality standard based upon upstream and downstream
sampling data taken at the time of the spill.
• Impact to a surface water such that the water can not be used in accordance with
its classification, based upon sampling data which clearly links the impact with
the sanitary sewer overflow (SSO).
• Other adverse biological impacts (benthic, amphibian, and/or crustacean
mortality), based upon sampling data which clearly links the impact with the
SSO.
7) The penalty imposed shall be a monetary assessment. The amount of the
assessment would be established based upon direct costs of remediation (e.g. fish
replacement, reimbursement for state staff time and expenses, etc...). This
assessment is not punitive; however, an evaluation of the response and operation /
maintenance program is still required (see Number 4). f.
8) = See Number 4 for guidance.
9) : See Number 5 for guidance.
'Page 6

Sewage Spill Kesponse Evaluation:
Permitee Permit Number County
Incident Started: (Date/Time) /
Incident Ended:(Date/Time) /
[lf spill is ongoing, please notify Regional Office on a daily basis until spill can be stopped]
Source of spilVbypass (check one): Sanitary Sewer Pump Station WWTP
Level of treatment (check one): None Primary Treatment
Secondary Treatment Chlorination Only
Estimated volume of spill/ypass(check one): 0-500 gal. 501-1,000 gal. 1,001-2,000 gal
>2,000 gal. - estimate volume in nearest 1,000 gallon increments
Did spilVbypass reach surface waters? Yes No (If Yes, please list the following)
Volume reaching surface waters?(check one):. 0-500 gal. 501-1,000 gal. • 1,001-2,000 gal
>2;000 gal. - estimate volume"in nearest 1,000 gallon increments
Name of surface water
Did spill/bypass result in a fish kill Yes No
If Yes, what is the estimated number of fish killed?
Please provide the following information:
1. Location of spill/bypass:
2. Cause of spill/bypass.:
3. Did you have personnel available to perform initial assessment 24 hours/day (including weekends and
holidays)?
Yes No
4. How long did it take to make an initial assessment of the spilVoverflow after first knowledge?
Minutes
How long did it take to get a repair crew onsite?
Minutes
Please explain the time taken to make initial assessment:

5. Action taken to contain spill, clean up waste, anwor remethate the site:
6. Were the equipment and/or parts needed to make repairs readily available?
Yes No. If no, please explain why:
7. If the spilVoverflow occurred at a pump station or was the result of a pump station failure,
was the alarm system functional at the time of the spill?. Yes No. If the alarm
system did not function, please explain why:
8. Repairs made are: Permanent Temporary
Please describe what repairs were made. If the repairs are temporary, please indicate by
what date a permanent repair will be completed and notify the Regional Office within 7 days of the
permanent repair:
9. Comments:
Other agencies notifed:.
Person reporting spill/bypass: Phone Number:
Signature Date:
For DWQ Use Only:
Oral report taken by: Report taken: Date: Time:
DWQ requested additional written report? Yes No
If yes, what additional information is needed?
NCDENR - DWQ Section: Phone: () -1111' Fax: OW 1=IFILITIT

Sewage Jpui xesponse r,vatuation:
Parmitee Permit Number County
Incident Started: (Date/Time) /
Incident l=nded:(Date/Time) /
(If spill is ongoing, please notify Regional Office on a daily basis until spill can be stopped]
Source of spilVbypass (check one): Sanitary Sewer Pump Station WWTP
Level of treatment (check one): None Primary Treatment
Secondary Treatment Chlorination Only
Estimated volume of spilVypass(check one): 0-500 gal. 501-1,000 gal. 1,001-2,000 gal
>2,000 gal. - estimate volume in nearest 1,000 gallon increments
Did spilVbypass reach surface waters? Yes No (If Yes, please list the following)
Volume reaching; surface waters?(check one)• 0-500 gal. 501-1,000 gal. • 1,001-2,000 gal
>2,000 gal. - estimate volume in nearest 1,000 gallon increments
Name of surface water
Did spill/bypass result in a fish kill .Yes No -
If Yes, what is the estimated number of fish killed?
Please provide the following information: -
1. Location of spill/bypass:
2. Cause of spill/bypass:
3. Did you have personnel available to perform initial assessment 24 hours/day (including weekends and
holidays)?
Yes No
4. How long did it take to make an initial assessment of the spilVoverflow after first knowledge?
Minutes
How long did it take to get a repair crew onsite?
Minutes
Please explain the time taken to make initial assessment:

5. Action taken to contain spill, clean up waste, and/or remediate the site:
6. Were the equipment and/or parts needed to make repairs readily available?
Yes No. If no, please explain why:
7. If the spill/overflow occurred at a pump station or was the result of a pump station failure,
was the alarm system functional at the time of the spill?. Yes No. If the alarm
system did not function, please explain why:
8. Repairs made are: Permanent Temporary -
Please describe what repairs were made. If the repairs are temporary, please indicate by
what date a permanent repair will be completed and notify the Regional Office within 7 days of the
permanent repair:
9. Comments:
Other agencies notifed:
Person reporting spill/bypass: Phone Number:
Signature Date:
For DWQ Use Only:
Oral report taken by: Report taken: Date: Time:
DWQ requested additional written report? Yes No
If yes, what additional information is needed?
NCDENR - DWQ Section: Phone: Ma) 1111. Fax: (RI) - 1'•

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE EVALUATION
1. Is staff designated full-time for collection system operation and maintenance?
Yes No
2. Do you have a list of 24 hour contacts?
Yes No (If Yes, please attach)
3. Do you have an emergency equipment list?
Yes No (If Yes, please attach)
4. Staff distribution/time allocation:
Collection System (incl. part-time)
Pump Stations
I/1 Correction
Number Total staff
employed hours/week
5. Are map(s) of.•the collection system available? Yes No
6. Total number of pump stations: (Please complete a Pump Station form for each station.)
7. Is a preventive maintenance program in effect? Yes No (If Yes, please attach)
If yes, does it include:
a.- Maintaining logs/records . Yes No
b. Determining equipment/system malfunction rates Yes No
c. Establishing schedules Yes No
d. I/1 evaluation Yes No
e. Manhole inspection Yes No
f. Sewer cleaning program Yes No
g. Hydrogen sulfide monitoring and control Yes No
h. Lift station operation . . Yes No
i. Easement/riaht-of-way maintenance Yes No
j. 'Walking" or visual: observation of lines Yes No
k. Spare parts inventory • • Yes No
8. Please describe what type of ongoing inspection program for the collection system exists:
9. Please describe the schedule for line cleaning:
10. Is there a sewer use ordinance? _ Yes — No. Is there a grease ordinance? _ Yes _ No
If yes, please identify the responsible party for ensuring the ordinance(s) is enforced.
/ (name of responsible person/agency).
11. Please describe any sewer use ordinance enforcement practices that exist:
J

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
Name of Facility: Contact Person:
Phone Number:
Location of Pump Station:
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
Yes No
•
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? Yes No
If yes, what type:
_ Portable generator which can be moved to site
Standby generator on site
• Altemate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve?
How often is the generator tested? (MoJyr.)
When was the generator last load tested? (Mo./yr.)
Was the test successful? Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup power exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm system? Yes No
On site alarm system: 'High water audio alarm High water visual alarm
- Other (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: Wet well high level Wet well low level
Dry well high level High/low pH
High/ow current AC power status
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

PUMP STATION
(please complete one form for each pump station)
J
Name of Facility: Contact Person:
Phone Number:
Location of Pump Station:
1. How often is pump station inspected?
(check all that apply)
once per day twice per day
once per week days per week
other(explain)
2. What is the pump station capacity? GPM
Does the pump station have a flow meter, pump counters or other means to measure flow?
Yes No'
3. Does the pump station have a backup power source? Yes No
If yes, what type:
Portable generator which can be moved to site
Standby generator on site
Altemate power feed
If a portable generator is used, how many other pump stations does the generator serve?
How often is the generator tested? (MoJyr.)
When was the generator last load tested? (Mo./yr.)
Was the test successful? Yes No If No, what action was taken to address?
If no backup power exists, please explain why:
4. Does the pump station have a working alarm system? Yes No
On site alarm system: High water audio alarm High water visual alarm
Other (describe)
Telemetry Monitoring System: Wet well high level
Dry well high level
Hiah/low current
Please describe other alarm systems at the pump station.
Wet well low level
High/low pH
AC power status
5. Is there a spare pump available or an adequate spare parts inventory to replace or rebuild pump?
Yes No If No, what actions are being undertaken to address?

ESTIMATED FLOWS IN SANITARY SEWER LINES RASED ON 2.0 FPS
(IN GALLONS PER HOUR)
ASSUMPTIONS: n=0.013 for VCP and DI, ALL FLOWS AT 2 FPS
FLOW IN
6" @ 0.52%
8" ®0.40%
10" 0.25%
12" a® 0.19%
—15" @ 0.14%
18" ®0.11%
21" ®0.09%
PIPE
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
2.0 fps
/A FlJ LL
1 5,400
9,600
15,000
21,250
.33,350
50,000
66,650
1/3 FULL
2,500
4,600
7,100
10,000
15,850
22,900
30,250
1/41TA.,L
1,500
2,650
4,150
5,850
9,150
13,350
18,350
1/10 FULL 250
400
650
900
1,400
_ 2,000 _
2,700
1. Look in the line downstream of the blockage prior to clearing and estimate depth of flaw (see figures below) and find the corresponding flow
value. After unstopping, washing the Line, and allowing the flow to equ lire, estimate the normal flow depth in the line and find the
corresponding flow value,
•
2. Subtract your estimated flow values before and after unstopping. Multiply this flow per hour by the estimated number of hours the overflow has
been occurring to get an estimated overflow 'volume.
Example: An g-inch sanitary sewer lineis overflowing. The line is partially blocked and is flowing 1/10 full in a manhole downstream of a
blockage. After unstopping, cleaning and allowing the flow to equalize. the normal flow in the pipe is about 1/3 full. Subtracting the 1/10 flow
volume (400 gph) from the 1/3 flow volume (4,600 gph) yields approximately 4,200 gallon per hour overflowing. If you estimated the overflow
had beea occurring for 10 hours, your overflow volorne is approximately 42,000 gallons.
•
1/2 FULL
1/3 FULL
1/4 FULL
1/10 FULL
City/County Utilities Division, City of Winston-Sa1ern: 07 MAY 9E
009E-068-616
S3I1I1I111 DI1fld
d
3

NCDENR
•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Elimination of Collection Systems Overflows
This policy was developed to promote reduction
: = overflows (SSO's) from sewer collection systems.
•and elimination of sanitary sewer
JAMES B. HU NTJ R. 51c1.1r•. •
GOVERNOR To increase enforcement actions for non-compliance while recognizing
7.
.A
lz!_l.z
WAYENMCDEVITT 43 V •
SECRETARY( �-.i }4J
IL•PRESTON HOWARD� f -4 •
JRT?E.7, .:a
ID DIRECRS TO."'. '�_-�•.
` / L(
•
systems that demonstrate exceptional levels of compliance and
stewardship.
• An Advisory Group, consisting of representatives of municipalities across the state,
consultants, and Division of Water Quality (DWQ) regional and central office staff, was
consulted in development of the policy.
and rewarding
environmental
The key to reducing SSO's and minimizing water quality impacts is founded in the
successful implementation of operation and maintenance programs and ensuring
adequate local response to spills and overflows from collection systems.
Initial phase of implementation (July 1, 1998) is to focus on achieving adequate
response to spills from the collection system. New reporting thresholds are as follows:
- Alf spills, irregardless of volume, that reach surface waters must be reported.
- Spills of 1,000 gallons or less that do not reach surface waters and are contained on -
site do not have to be reported. However, records must be retained documenting spill
and action taken to address spill.
- Spill greater than 1,000 .gallons, regardless of whether e• not they reach surface
waters must be reported. .
A "Point System" will be utilized to determine the amount of penalty to be assessed.
The Collection System Policy will be implemented in two phases. During the first
phase (July 1, 1998 - June 30, 1999),'penalty decisions will hinge on whether or not
the owner properly reported the discharge and whether or not proper response and
remedial actions were taken. During the second phase (effective July 1, 1999), penalty
decisions will also include consideration of operation and maintenance factors, as well
as whether or not the owner has substantially evaluated the collection system, identified
problem sewers and/or pump. stations, and implemented a DWQ approved plan for
remediation of deficient system components.
Factors for Consideration of Civil Penalty_ Assessments during Phase I (July 1, 1998 -
June 30, 1999)
• Spill Response Evaluation Factors:
•
- Contact list for municipal staff and contractors on call for clean-ups
=-'-' - Rapid on -site assessment of spill
is : PS•r,-' _ �'�±pj.'• V(•
w ; =s:: - Response / Mobilization after initial assessment
— Proper DWQ notification
• Factors for Consideration of Civil Penalty Assessments During Phase II (beginning
•
•
•
July 1, 1999)
Spill Response Evaluation Factors (see Initial Phase of Implementation above)
OM Program Evaluation Factors:
Develop and submit to DWQ for approval, a collection system evaluation and
remedial action plan
P.O. BOX 29535, RALEIOH, NORTH CAROLINA 2742C-OE3B
PHONE Sr D-733.5O03 FAX 91 P-733401 e
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / A/IIRa(ATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • 50% RECYCLE13/1 O% ►OLT•CONIUMER

V` ; T;1,•v.. •.•
•
'ems- : ,•
NODE
• - s
•
JAMESB.HUNT JR.---t•?�
!GOVERNOR
:
•
,_WAYNE MCDEVIrr 4 :
�SECRETARY�
am? '= r. s
�A.;PRES▪ TON•
.. ..� _ :�'.,' .• •-
•
• 7.•
r....- fa
a ^Y 74::•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF `1 '
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Elimination of Collection Systems Overflows - Page 2
B. Conduct the following O&M Practices
•
•r• am-�•```,=�_.
- Inventory of collection system
- Annual visual inspection of all lines not visible from normal public access.
- Regular visual inspection of all high priority lines (e.g. aerial lines, aerial crossings,
stream crossings, siphons, streambank lines, etc...)
- Right-of-way maintenance
- Maintenance of a spare parts inventory
- Maintaining maintenance logs documenting all work, inspections, equipment testing,
etc...
- Maintenance of a trouble log documenting each problem, the time, location, who
responded and how the problem was resolved
- Sewer use ordinance adoption and implementation
- Testing and provision of pump station reliability measures
- Pump station inspections
Other Factors that may be considered in decisions • regarding penalty assessments
include:
- Compliance histories
- Vandalism or third party causes
- Extenuating circumstances • -
- Implementation of Preventative and/or Educational Programs
- Upgrades or renovations in progress
- Repeat offenses
A minimum penalty of $4,000 will be assessed if:
- the spill is not reported as required (see Initial Phase of Implementation above)
Additional compliance and enforcement measures which may be imposed include:
- Mandated training and education of municipal staff
- Show Cause Hearings
- Special Orders by Consent
- Remediation requirements
- Injunctive relief
- Moratoriums
- Requiring publication of a notice of the violation in the local newspaper
- Civil or criminal actions
- Referral to the State Bureau of Investigation
•
• Past emphasis by DWQ was on permitting new sewer extensions and classification of
collection system operators. Future emphasis will be placed on development of a
system -wide permit that incorporates existing as well as new sewer extensions. The
new system -wide permit will address reporting requirements as well as operation and „-
maintenance.
•
P.O. box 29535, RALLION. NORTH CAROUNA 2762S.053E
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION E. MPLOYIR - 50% RECYCLED/1 O%.POST-CONSUMIR

COLLECTION SYSTEM ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE
Response
and 0&M
Program #
Adequate?
8
Regulatory
Response
9
*: Evaluation process will determine if
spill was unavoidable or avoidable

COLLECTION SYSTEM ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE
(Numbers Correspond to Flow Chart)
1) The reporting threshold shall be 1,000 gallons for spills on the ground which do -
not reach surface waters. The report must occur within 24 hours of knowledge of
the spill.
The following spills must be reported immediately (or within 24 hours of
first knowledge):
a) spills that reach surface waters (i.e. any spill that reaches any
water already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc...)
b) spills greater than 1,000 gallons on the ground regardless of
whether they are contained.
• The 1,000 gallon threshold applies only to spills on the ground that are.
captured, fully contained and removed quickly, ensuring that no
wastewater reaches surface waters. Municipalities must keep records of
all spills for a period of three years and those records must be available for
review by DWQ staff upon request..
• Volume estimations shall be expressed as a range, rather than a specific
amount (e.g. 0-1,000 gallons and 1,001-2,500 gallons,, as opposed to
exactly 25 gallons).
-2) ° This penalty will always be a.minimum $4,000 assessment. The'penalty will be:..
assessed if the spill reaches surface waters, reaches any water present in a
conveyance, ditch or stream; and/or is on the ground and has a volume greater
than 1,000 gallons; and is not reported. This penalty will not be assessed if the
spill is reported.
3) Any spill that reaches surface waters must be reported. A spill that reaches any
water that was already present in a conveyance, stream, ditch, etc. is considered to -
have reached surface waters. In addition, spills which reach a conveyance or
ditch and can not be captured and contained are considered to have reached
surface waters.
4) The spill response and operation and maintenance program evaluation criteria
shown in the two attached tables shall be used to evaluate each -spill. response and
the ongoing operation and maintenance program. Each item will -receive a
numerical rating which will reflect the Regional Office's assessment.
Total Spill Response Score + Total O/M Program Score = (Final Score)*
*Initial implementation (through July 1, 1999) will be based upon spill responses
(Total Spill Response Score). Beginning July 1, 1999, the evaluation will
encompass spill response and operation and maintenance.
Page 1

SPILL RESPONSE EVALUATION FACTORS
Criteria
Requirement
. Evaluation
•
Total
Points
1
24 hour contact list which includes phone
numbers for :
• Personnel / staff to address the situation
• Contractors / staff for mechanical repair
Complete List = 10 points
No list = 0 points
•
2
Equipment list which includes:
• Required functional emergency equipment
• Location of functional equipment
Complete List = 10 points
No list = 0 points .
3
On site assessment of spill as soon as possible
(ASAP), or at least within 120 minutest of
notification of spill. Documentation and
explanation required on length of response
time.
.Initial assessment time ASAP and not
more than120 min. = 10 points
Initial assessment time not ASAP or
more than 120 min. = 0 points
4
Mobilization of necessary response after initial
assessment. .'
Adequate mobilization .= 10 points
Inadequate mobilization = 0 points
5 -
DWQ contacted immediately, or at least within
24 hours of notification of spill.
Contact within 24-hours = 10 points
.
_Contact after 24 hours = 0 points
.
•. - TOTAL SPILL RESPONSE` SCORE
Notes
120 minute maximum initial assessment time valid until 7/1/99. After 7/1/99, maximum initial assessment time shall
be 60 minutes.
Page 2

O/M PROGRAM EVALUATION FACTORS
Criteria
Requirement
Evaluation for
Gravity Lines
(Points)
Evaluation for
Pump Stations
(Points)
Total
Points
Yes = 5 •
No = 0
Yes = 4
No = 0
•
1
o(may
Inventory sketch of
collection system
be a simple line
2
,,A,)1
V I" .
Annual visual inspection
of all Tines not visible from
normal public access. Regular
visual inspections of high
priority areasl.
Inspections
conducted = 10 -
Inspections not
conducted = 0
Inspections
conducted = 9
Inspections not
conducted = 0
-
3
-1
}IP
Right of way maintenance
to allow system accessibility.
Adequate = 5
Inadequate.= 0
Adequate = 4
Inadequate = 0
4
-,,ll
r v-
Schedules and conducts line
cleanings. (Has planned
program for cleaning certain
% of lines)
Yes = 5
No = 0.
-
Yes = 4
No = 0
5
Maintains a spare parts
inventory and list of
contractors.
Yes = 5 -
- .. -
No = 0 •
Yes = 4 .
.
No = 0
•
•
6
Keeps up -to date maintenance
logs documenting all work,
inspections, equipment testing,
etc...
Yes = 5
No = 0 •
.
Yes = 4
.
No = 0
. .
7
Maintains a trouble log
documenting each problem, the
time of the problem, location, .
who responded and how the
problem was resolved.
Yes = 10 - . .. .
No = 0 `
Yes = 9 -• •
..
No.= 0
.-
.
,
8 7
.
Sewer use ordinance
adopted.
• --
Yes = 2
No=O
Yes = 2
No=0
.
9
Sewer use ordinance
implemented
Yes = 3
No.=0 -
Yes = 2 . . . -
.
No=0 -
10
.
(Pump stations only) :
Back -.up equipment and/or
reliability systems tested
once per month.
N/A.
-
Yes = 4
If reliability and back-up
power req.'s do not
apply, then score, .4
No =0
11
(Pump stations only) Pump
stations inspected three times
per week2 for systems without
telemetry or once per week for
systems with telemetry.
N/A
•
Yes =4 -
No = 0
TOTAL O/M PROGRAM SCORE
Notes:
Annual inspection requirement valid until 7/1/99. After 7/1/99, minimum quarterly inspection of all
high priority lines (e.g. aerial lines, aerial crossings, stream crossings, siphons and streambank
lines) in addition to the annual inspection of all lines not visible from normal public access.
2 Pump stations shall be inspected once daily beginning 7/1/99 if telemetry is not used.
Page 3

5) The following assessment factors shall be used to modify the Final Score in order
to obtain the adjusted final score
FACTORS
•
SCORE ADJUSTMENT
Act of God
Add 10 points
3rd Party / Vandalism
Add 10 points
Compliance History of Collection
System Since January 1, 1998
Add 10 points for good compliance history
Subtract 10 points for poorcompliance history
(Documentation Required)
'Reliability Requirements not in Place
• Subtract 10 points
. Extenuating Circumstances
Add 10 points
(Documentation Required)
Implementation of Preventative and/or
• .
Educational Programs
, .•• `'
„ . Add 10 points
(Documentation Required) •
•
•
Major System Upgrades /
Renovations in Progress
-
Add 10 points
(Documentation Required)
Repeat Offense
[Same Location, Same Cause] •
.
Subtract 5 points per offense and:
multiply assessment by 1.2 for 2nd offense
multiply assessment by 1.5 for 3rd offense
. multiply assessment by 2.0 for4th offense
multiply assessment by 3.0 for 5th offense
ADJUSTED FINAL SCORE
•.•
Pan 4

5) Continued
Use the following table to determine the correct regulatory response:
REGULATORY RESPONSE OPTIONS
Adjusted
Score (Valid
Until 7/1/99)
Adjusted
Score (Valid
After 7/1/99)
Monetary
Assessment
• Monetary
Assessment
Amount
Additional Penalty
Options
50 or
greater
100 or
greater
No
.
None
45 - 49
95 - 99
No
-
•
Publish notice in local
newspaper
40 - 44
' 90 - 94
No
_
'
Publish notice in local
newspaper; mandated
training and education
35 - 39-
85 - 89
No
.
Mandated training and
education; show cause
hearing
30 - 34
80 - 84 '
Yes
$500
Assessment
.
Show -cause hearing;
SOC agreement; and
remediation requirements
25 - 29
. 75 - 79
Yes
$1,000
Assessment
SOC agreement;
remediation requirements;
injunctive relief; : •
moratorium
24 or less
74 or Tess
Yes
$4,000
Assessment
•
Civil or criminal action;
moratorium; injunctive
relief; remediation
requirements; SOC
agreement
Intentiona
(Regardless of
Bypass
Point Score)
Yes
•
$10,000 -
Assessment
Referral to SBI; civil or
criminal action;
moratorium; injunctive
relief; remediation
requirements; SOC
agreement: '
Notes
The Director may select one or all of the penalty options corresponding to the
adjusted Final Score. Please note that the monetary assessments associated with
scores of 84 (or 34 until 7/1/99) or less are automatic and represent a minimum amount.
Page 5

6) The definition of damage includes when the spill results in:
• A fish kill, based upon an evaluation by WRC.
• A violation of a water quality standard based upon upstream and downstream
sampling data taken at the time of the spill.
• Impact to a surface water such that the water can not be used in accordance with
its classification, based upon sampling data which clearly links the impact with
the sanitary sewer overflow (SSO).
• Other adverse biological impacts (benthic, amphibian, and/or crustacean
mortality), based upon sampling data which clearly links the impact with the
sso.
7) The penalty imposed shall be a monetary assessment. The amount of the
assessment would be established based upon direct costs of remediation (e.g. fish
replacement, reimbursement for state staff time and expenses, etc...). This
assessment is not punitive; however, an evaluation of the response and operation /
maintenance program is still required (see Number 4).
8) See Number 4 for guidance.
9) See Number 5 for guidance.
'Page 6