The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20120524 Ver 1_401 Application_20120512May 24 2012 U S Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue Room 208 Asheville North Carolina 28801 5006 Attention Mr Steven Kichefski N C Division of Water Quality 401 Wetlands Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1650 Attention Mr Ian McMillan • 2 0 1 2 0 5 2 4 COURTESY( C(C),Py Reference Nationwide Permit No 3 L Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Franklin Water Treatment Plant Raw and Finished Water Line Improvements Project Charlotte North Carolma S &ME Project No 1351 12 004 Dear Mr Kichefski and Mr McMillan E�� MA Y 2 9 2012 S &MF Inc (S &ME) is submitting this courtesy application for proposed waterline improvement activities on behalf of Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU) in accordance with Department of the Army Nationwide Permit (NWP) No 3 (Maintenance Activities) and corresponding North Carolina 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) No 3883 The project will involve replacement of approximately 1 054 linear feet (]f) of existing 36 inch 30 inch and 24 inch diameter raw water and finished water pipeline in Charlotte Mecklenburg County North Carolina In support of this submittal please find enclosed the following • Figures — Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1) USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) USDA Soil Survey/National Wetland Inventory Map (Figure 3) and 2010 Aerial Photograph/Approximate Waters of the U S (Figure 4) • Appendix I Pre Construction Notification (PCN) • Appendix II Overall Site Plan (Drawing C 1) Franklin Stream Crossing (Drawing CIO) LaSalle Stream Crossing (Drawing Cl 1) and • Appendix III Site Photographs Copies of this PCN are being provided to the USACE and DWQ as a courtesy because our client is seeking confirmation that the proposed project conforms to applicable general and specific conditions pursuant to NWP No 3 and WQC 3883 and that further SWE INC / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte NC 28273 5560 / p 704 523 4726 f 704 525 3953 / www smemc corn Nationwide Permit No 3 S &ME Project No 1351 12 004 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Raw and Finished Water Line Project May 24, 2012 written approval to perform the work is not required The proposed project has also been designed and will be constructed in accordance with the applicable conditions of General Water Quality Certification No 3883 Accordingly written concurrence from DWQ is not required The proposed project involves improvements to the raw and finished water lines near the Franklin Water Treatment Plant located at 5200 Brookshire Boulevard in Charlotte North Carolina These improvements include replacement of three existing water lines at a stream crossing known as the Franklin Crossing within the pipeline right of way dust to the southeast of the treatment plant The stream in this project area continues to erode and there is concern about pipe support As such CMU is planning replacement of these three pipes with new sections that will be installed below grade The replacement will be performed with traditional cut and cover methods The improvements also include replacement of an existing section of 24 inch raw water line at a stream crossing near LaSalle Street Erosion in this area has also resulted in concern about support of a previously buried pipe The existing 24 inch aerial crossing is currently not supported consequently CMU is planning to install permanent support of either two 10 inch diameter mini piles or cast in place concrete pipe support The location of the project corridor is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1) the appropriate portion of the Mountain Island Lake and Derita N C (1993) USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) a Soil Survey Map (Figure 3) and a 2010 Aerial Photograph (Figure 4) On February 1 2012 S &ME s Suzanne Knudsen and Darrm Peine of S &ME visited the Franklin and LaSalle Crossing sites and conducted a pedestrian reconnaissance to determine whether there were jurisdictional features present (e g Waters of the United States or isolated waters that could be subject to the jurisdictional authority of the state of North Carolina) The extent of the pedestrian reconnaissance was limited to those areas as described by Hazen & Sawyer P C and as shown in the attached figures as Project Areas S &ME reviewed the sites for wetlands or other jurisdictional waters in accordance with the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and corresponding Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional supplement guide and the Stream Identification Form from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Dominant vegetation observed along the maintained pipeline corridors includes pine (Prnus sp ) red maple (Acer rubrum) sweetgum (Ltquidambar styraciflua) American elm (Ulmus americana) sycamore (Platanus occidentals) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) Soils in the project vicinities are composed of silty and silty clay loams Review of the Mecklenburg County Soil Survey and the USDA Soil Survey 2 Nationwide Permit No 3 S &ME Project No 1351 12 004 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Raw and Finished Water Line Project May 24, 2012 Geographic Data shows a majority of soils in the project areas to be Cecil clay loam Monocan loam and urban land Franklin Crossing Site The Franklin Crossing site was accessed from Worth Place off Lawton Road and surrounding land use is industrial The area of interest for review included approximately 500 feet along the pipeline corridor and approximately 200 feet at the stream crossing perpendicular to the corridor S &ME delineated one jurisdictional water feature within the Franklin Crossing review area This water a stream designated as Stream S 1 is a perennial Relatively Permanent Water (RPW) with year round flow (Photo 1) subject to the regulatory authority of the USACE and the NCDWQ One non jurisdictional drainage feature was observed within the southwest corner of the review area (Photo 2) S &ME utilized the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form to determine the jurisdictional status of identified drainage features No evidence of wetland hydrology or hydrtc soil was observed within the review area during the time of field review However a small (approximately 0 001 — 0 01 acre) emergent wetland was observed outside the review area and adjacent to Mecklenburg County Parcel ID 03918113 (Figure 4) LaSalle Crossing Site The LaSalle Crossing site was accessed from Pennsylvania Avenue off West Brookshire Freeway and surrounding land use is predominately residential The area of interest for review included approximately 930 feet along the pipeline corridor and approximately 200 feet at the stream crossing perpendicular to the corridor S &ME delineated four jurisdictional waters within the LaSalle Crossing review area and included three perennial RPW with year round flow (Photos 3 4 and 6) and one open water pond (Photo 5) subject to the regulatory authority of the USACE and the NCDWQ (Figure 4) No evidence of wetland hydrology or hydric soil was observed within the review area during the time of field review PROTECTED SPECIES AND CULTURAL RESOURCES Protected Species S &ME s consideration of potential protected species habitat began with a review of existing records obtained from federal and state sources The U S Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of federally protected species (updated September 22 2010) was consulted for a listing of protected species documented within Mecklenburg County North Carolina This review identified four protected species three plants and one animal Listed flora and fauna and their federal status are identified in Table 1 Explanations of rankings are included at the end of the table 3 Nationwide Permit No 3 S &ME Project No 1351 12 004 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Raw and Finished Water Line Proiect May 24, 2012 Table 1 Federally Protected Flora and Fauna Summary Species Federal Rank County Status Habitat Present Echrnacea laevigata E Current No Smooth coneflower Hehanthus schweirntzu E Current No Schweinitz s sunflower Lasmigona decorata E Historical No Carolina heelsplitter Rhus michauxn E Historical No M ichaux s sumac E = Endangered S &ME completed a field reconnaissance of the project area on February 1 2012 This effort revealed the project area consists primarily of adjacent residential land and associated building and parking area with woodland boundaries Wooded canopy is not the preferred habitat for the plant species of concern and none of the three listed plant species were observed Based on the level of disturbance the project area was not considered to provide potential habitat for protected terrestrial species with a likelihood of occurring in Mecklenburg County Though the Carolina heelsplitter is listed (historically) for Mecklenburg County the proposed project involves impacts to approximately 601f of the Franklin Stream Crossing an unnamed tributary to Stewart Creek and will not impact streams that drain to known populations of Carolina heelsplitter or its designated critical habitat No documented occurrences of Carolina heelsplitter are known for Stewart Creek or its tributaries Accordingly the proposed project is not anticipated to impact this species or its designated Critical Habitat A copy of this NWP No 3 courtesy application will be provided to the USFWS Asheville Field Office Cultural Resources A copy of this NWP No 3 application will be provided to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) requesting that they review their records regarding cultural archaeological or historical resources in or near the project area and to provide written comments regarding the interests of their agency The proposed project involves permanent impacts to less than 401f of stream at the Franklin Stream Crossing These impacts have been minimized to the extent practicable and have been limited to what is necessary to facilitate maintenance activities CMU proposes to maintain the approximate existing channel dimensions leaving a natural channel bottom To prevent sedimentation of downstream portions of Stream 1 and Stream 2 construction will be conducted in the dry through the use of a temporary berm and pass through pipe 4 Nationwide Permit No 3 S &ME Project No 1351 12 004 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Raw and Finished Water Line Proiect May 24, 2012 Temporary erosion and sediment control measures placed in waters will be removed and the original grade restored upon completion of the project Following construction disturbed areas adjacent to the work site will be restored to original grade and elevation Appropriate erosion and sediment control practices will be implemented to meet water quality turbidity standards Best Management Practices employed for the project will be in compliance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual and the local governing authority Impacts have been avoided and minimized and appropriate measures will be taken during construction to allow flow and circulation patterns of waters of the U S to remain unaffected After construction disturbed areas will be appropriately seeded and restored The proposed project will not result in additional impervious surface MITIGATION Based on conversations with the USACE for similar projects we anticipate that appropriate mitigation for the proposed project can be satisfied by the avoidance and minimization procedures implemented during the design phase of the proposed project • ` MI, Thank you for your review of this courtesy PCN Again CMU would like your confirmation that the proposed project as detailed in this submittal conforms to applicable general and specific conditions pursuant to NWP No 3 and WQC 3883 and that further written approval to perform the work is not required If you have questions or need additional information please feel free to contact us at 704 523 4726 Sincerely S &ME 0 PZ�, Darren M Peme QEP Natural Resources Project Professional Attachments Julie Bennett Hudel P G LEED AP Senior Reviewer Cc Nicole Litton Hazen & Sawyer P C U S Fish and Wildlife Service Asheville Field Office SHPO Raleigh 5 pw -1-m—T 1L a. e ' 4%'F4 �04 AMMO skim 6110, ;r & Franklin Water Treatment Plant--� 1615 -1 7 78g' 0 CL X CL 166 1. 0 0/ r Is, S1 ear- c 0 C'e RillL L 01 01 Q 0 0 A -uCkaseegee Rd_— CO % Charlotte A z Z> Wilkinson Blvd Z" 0, d 4 2 s E 0 2 A\ Co C' V: ASAM/ftk oe 2 k 4 Miles Cl) 01% tp REFERENCE: C, 16 GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE ESRI STREETMAP USA DATASET. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER USES. rk THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITSACCURACY. S&ME, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR %' ANY DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPOINTHIS INFORMATION. , Project Areas SCALE. AS SHOWN FIGURE NO DATE. 02-21-12 S&ME SITE VICINITY MAP DRAWN BY PROPOSED WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS DDH WWW.SMEINC.COM PROJECT NO: FRANKLIN WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1351-12-004 ENGINEERING LICENSE NO F-0176 CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA W A r�9�G 20120524 Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version Pre - Construction Notification PC Form A Applicant Information 1 Processing 1a Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ®Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 3 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ❑ No 1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization le Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ® Yes ❑ No For the record only for Corps Permit ® Yes ❑ No 1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu fee program ❑ Yes ® No 1g Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1h below ❑ Yes ® No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2 Project Information 2a Name of project Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Raw and Finished Waterline Improvements 2b County Mecklenburg 2c Nearest municipality / town Charlotte 2d Subdivision name N/A 2e NCDOT only T I P or state project no N/A 3 Owner Information 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed 3b Deed Book and Page No N/A 3c Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable) N/A 3d Street address N/A 3e City state zip N/A 3f Telephone no N/A 3g Fax no N/A 3h Email address N/A Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 4 Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ® Agent ❑ Other specify 4b Name Ms Nicole Litton E I 4c Business name (if applicable) Hazen & Sawyer PC 4d Street address 4944 Parkway Plaza Blvd Suite 375 4e City state zip Charlotte N C 28217 4f Telephone no 704 3573150 4g Fax no 4h Email address nlitton @hazenandsawyer com 5 Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a Name Darren Peine 5b Business name (if applicable) S &ME Inc 5c Street address 9751 Southern Pine Blvd 5d City state zip Charlotte NC 28273 5e Telephone no 704 5234726 5f Fax no 704 525 3953 5g Email address dpeine @smeinc com Page 2 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version B Project Information and Prior Project History 1 Property Identification 1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 06907124 (LaSalle Crossing) 03918107 (Franklin crossing) lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) Latitude 35 2761 Longitude 808838 (DD DDDDDD) (DD DDDDDD) 1c Property size Project review area —6 5 acres 2 Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to Stewart Creek proposed project 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water Class C 2c River basin Catawba /Santee 3 Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application The Franklin Crossing site was accessed from Worth Place off Lawton Road and surrounding land use is industrial The area of interest for review included approximately 500 feet along the pipeline corridor The LaSalle Crossing site was accessed from Pennsylvania Avenue off West Brookshire Freeway and surrounding land use is predominately residential The area of interest for review included approximately 930 feet along the pipeline corridor 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property No wetlands were identified within the project review areas 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property The Franklin and LaSalle Stream crossings include approximately 200 feet at the stream crossing perpendicular to the pipeline corridor at each location 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The purpose of the project is to replace three existing water lines at the Franklin Stream Crossing The stream in this project area continues to erode and downcut and there is concern about pipe support Also the project is to replace and support an existing water line at the LaSalle Stream Crossing 3e Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used Construction at the Franklin Stream Crossing involves the excavation and replacement of 484 If of existing 36 inch PCCP 304 If of existing 30 inch CIP and 266 If of existing 24 inch CIP Construction involves placement of a minimum of 4 foot cover over the replaced waterline segments and placement of double net coconut blanket on stream banks Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters will be limited to placement of approximately 5 If nprapon each side of the replaced pipe segments within the stream bed at a depth of 1 foot 6 inches pushed into the channel to match existing contrours in order to limit stream downcutting Construction at the LaSalle Stream Crossing involves the temporary placement of berm and pass through pipe to be removed following construction of proposed pipe support installation The pipe support system will either involve two 10 inch mirnpdes or cast in place concrete pipe support system Equipment likely to be used includes industry standard trackhoes dozers trucks and excavators Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 4 Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments Request for verification isnot included with this application ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type of determination was made? ❑ preliminary ❑ Final 4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known) Agency /Consultant Company Other 4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation 5 Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown 5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions 6 Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes explain Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary 1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ❑ Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of Jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps 404 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ —non 404 other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g Total wetland impacts 2h Comments No wetlands impacts are located within the project area 3 Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Jurisdiction Average Impact number (PER) or (Corps 404 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non 404 width (linear Temporary (T) (INT) other) (feet) feet) S1 ®P ®T nprap placement and berm with 31 ® PER INT ® Corps DWQ 15 37 5 LF pass through pipe S2 ❑ P ® T Berm and pass S2 ® PER ® Corps 12 through pipe ❑ INT ® DWQ S3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h Total stream and tributary impacts 37 5 If permanent 31 Comments In compliance with NWP 3 and WQC 3883 less than 40 If of fill is proposed at an existing stream impact location Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 4 Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary T 01 ❑P ❑T 02 ❑P ❑T 03 ❑P ❑T 04 ❑P ❑T 4f Total open water impacts 4g Comments No open waters are anticipated to be impacted by the project 5 Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed then complete the chart below 5a I 5b 1 5c 5d 5e Pond ID I Proposed use or purpose number of pond Wetland Impacts (acres) I Stream Impacts (feet) I Upland Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded I Filled I Excavated I Flooded P1 P2 5f Total 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 51 Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a Project is in which protected basin? 6b 6c 6d Buffer impact number — Reason Permanent (P) or for Temporary (T) impact B1 ❑P ❑T 62 ❑P ❑T 63 ❑P ❑T 61 Comments ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ❑ Other ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6e I 6f I 6g Buffer Stream name mitigation required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 6h Total buffer impacts Zone 1 impact I Zone 2 impact (square feet) (square feet) Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version D Impact Justification and Mitigation 1 Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project To minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters the nprap placement at S1 has been limited to five feet on both sides of the three replaced waterlines The only impacts to the bed of jurisdictional streams proposed are associated with the nprap placement at S1 lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be utilized during construction and in channel work will be done in the dry 2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State ❑ Yes ® No 2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this projects ❑ Mitigation bank ❑Payment to in lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c Comments 4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached ❑ Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet 4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet 4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required Zone 6c Reason for impact 6d Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1 5 6f Total buffer mitigation required 6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Page 8 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1 Diffuse Flow Plan 1a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? lb If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments 2 Stormwater Management Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0% 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why The proposed project will not disturb more than one acre of land as such it does not require a separate Stormwater Management Plan 2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan ❑ Certified Local Government 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3 Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government s jurisdiction is this project? ❑ Phase II 3b Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4 DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW (check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 246 ❑ Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version F Supplementary Information 1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal /state) land? lb If you answered yes to the above does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments 2 Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an after the fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If you answered yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s) 3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description The project is not a growth inducing project 4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility The proposed project will not generate wastewater Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version 5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted ❑ Asheville 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Field review of the project area did not indicate the presence of habitat or endangered species listed for Mecklenburg County The project area and vicinity are not located in a Designated Critical Habitat A copy of this PCN will be provided to USFWS for comment 6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? http / /ocean flondamanne org /efh_coral /ims /viewer htm 7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The North Carolina Historical Preservation Office Online GIS Web Service (HPOWEB) indicated that no properties listed or potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places were located within the vicinity of the project area Additionally a copy of this PCN will be provided to SHPO for comment 8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain? ® Yes ❑ No 8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements Activities proposed are covered under local flood control general permits 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http //polaris mecklenburgcountync gov Darren Peme 5 24 2012 Applicant/Agent s Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent s Signature (Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version z za W pq 00 $ V)a 3 � w�l�'d rr �wyU 3W �o U�AFo N s W C7 fx LL g4�ZZ y ®2� [W -[�wW F OW E- E „ ZWl a' Za o U I � x 5 � l � r a I 4�, L a JQ� 1 2 a 3Ay NOSl3N 9 Z � z SB -1 a LINWOOD AVE y - \NS RDPO No�tN N GVOa SNIASOH ObOb N04 y� F� L_J x�� f m � 1 N \� a y� Y l OAKDA� ROAD F A o z�� g< 00 z Er s WV) -U 9z m Sad w Q � w 6 J LLI gaj Zz zd z is LU rc o C4 a F y m �� IN a C NQP U MON 3NT3dk i 09 # MON 3W13d1d T09 N m N H \/� a ry \ \/ m w N / X W FJ o le s z 14 rc' 3 2 d - d `o `a 3 R R a R R z ° ° N m g W x 8 N g z \jam w °s a \ 1_ Z W R !6 w w O R '� W k, 1 �; Go sip O N / a 8 o jE r $ CL 88GI a W ° a CL # V- V) = W O z x N i W L CL a " 12 I U � o� 1 07 -1 io a I gd a� 3 3 g Z F °> T22 �b \ ��QygS 53F.89: sit go I � J� O S NSizii m =ti a = R a z o z Ob d� I z >� p� R� �o° Q � - < F5 �i1 V- ° 3 0 8 IN iC >S m W { LIJ C z = N Igg Egg ;__ q ; Ali 4 r N.8 # 5i >z�s I a a a C7 d z za W pa 0 O ? $ �d a a� >u 3 ca W xwQx u 4 Q Ud� ? J WFOX z y o �z0 0� > 4 az ` g � °4 � WE- IS ]zEl ° j" L � N S ^ op F= z " yyy$JJJ >d wig of �^ z 5 �rvN a M Jot" I� 1 ` r s � t � y t �+Ye t YM ` < �1 1 alb 1 e� 9 Bit �e REP 1 \ o� \ "c F = t J A 110; 1 T IX *,A t N A o /it a� zamP a� S�'1 ri "0 00 �i< wrc �a � lt� 1 1 sing, Sing, Open Water: Jurisdictional Open Water (Pond) within the LaSalle Crossing field review area Taken by: DMP Checked by: SLK Date: February 2012 Non - Jurisdictional Feature: Located in the southwest corner of the Franklin Crossing review area. Stream S3: Perennial PRW (Stewart Creek) within the LaSalle Crossing field review area Stream S4: Perennial RPW within the LaSalle Crossing field review area SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Proposed Waterline Improvements Franklin Water Treatment Plant Charlotte, North Carolina Project No.: 1351 -12 -004 Photo Page 1 of 1