WQ0006941_Inspection_20190218

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
February 8, 2019
Mr. Jerry Hatchett, Maintenance Director
Caswell County Schools
P.O. Box 160
Yanceyville, North Carolina 27379
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Stoney Creek Elementary School — Wastewater Irrigation System
Permit No. WQ0006941
Caswell County
Dear Mr. Hatchett:
On January 16, 2019 staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) Winston-Salem Regional
Office completed a compliance inspection of the subject wastewater irrigation system. This inspection was
performed by DWR representative Jim Gonsiewski. The compliance inspection report for this inspection is
enclosed for your review. A separate DWR office file review of self -monitoring data for the period of April
2018 through November 2018 was also conducted. The inspection of the wastewater irrigation system program
reflects compliance with permit WQ0006941.
Our office appreciates your diligence in properly maintaining your wastewater irrigation program. Our office
also appreciates your prompt attention in addressing the violations listed in the Notice of Violation to your
office dated June 18, 2018. Please refer to the enclosed compliance inspection report for additional
observations and comments. If you or your staff have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me
or Jim Gonsiewski at [phone] or via email at jim.gonsiewski@a,ncdenr.gov.
(t Sherri V. Knight, P.E
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ — WSRO
enc.: Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Caswell County Environmental Health
Glen Price — R&A Laboratories
DWR Central Office — Permit File WQ0006941
WSRO Files
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103
336.776.9800

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0006941 Effective: 09/06/16 Expiration: 08/31/21 Owner : Caswell County Board of Education
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Stoney Creek Elementary School
1803 Stoney Creek School Rd
County: Caswell
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Jerry Allen Hatchett
Reidsville NC 27320
Title: Maintenance Director Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
Take Hwy 150 East into Caswell County. Turn right onto Stoney Creek School Road and facility is 1.5 miles ahead on the left.
System Classifications: SI,
Primary ORC: Glenn Fredrick Price Certification: 987931 Phone: [phone]
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 01/16/2019
Primary Inspector: Jim J Gonsiewski
Secondary Inspector(s):
Entry Time: 09:OOAM Exit Time: 11:05AM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Wastewater Irrigation
Facility Status: III Compliant Ei Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions 111 Treatment 11 Record Keeping
III Treatment Lagoons El Treatment Disinfection 1. Storage
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: WQ0006941 Owner - Facility: Caswell County Board of Education
Inspection Date: 01/16/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On January 16, 2019 staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) Winston-Salem Regional Office
completed a compliance inspection of the subject wastewater irrigation system. This inspection was performed by DWR
representative Jim Gonsiewski. A separate DWR office file review of self -monitoring data for the period of April 2018 through
November 2018 was also conducted. The inspection of the wastewater irrigation system program reflects compliance with
permit WQ0006941.
The violations listed in the Notice of Violation dated June 18, 2018 were addressed.
Page: 2

Permit: WQ0006941
Owner - Facility: Caswell County Board of Education
Inspection Date: 01/16/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type
Infiltration System
Lagoon Spray, LR
Single Family Spray, LR
Activated Sludge Spray, LR
Reuse (Quality)
Activated Sludge Drip, LR
Recycle/Reuse
Single Family Drip
Activated Sludge Spray, HR
Treatment
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit?
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.)
Comment: Duckweed was present in the chlorinator and both lagoons. Discussed possbile ways to
reduce/eliminate the problem.
Treatment Disinfection
Is the system working?
Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
Is there adequate detention time (>=30 minutes)?
Is the system properly maintained?
If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe?
Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable?
Is the chlorinator accessible?
If tablets, are tablets present?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth?
If UV, are extra UV bulbs available?
If UV, is the UV intensity adequate?
# Is it a dual feed system?
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
L OUD
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑•❑
DOIND
O 011111
Yes No NA NE
Page: 3

Permit: WQ0006941 Owner • Facility: Caswell County Board of Education
Inspection Date: 01/16/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is a copy of current permit available?
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR?
NDAR?
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
Are application rates adhered to?
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)?
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters?
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW?
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards?
Are annual soil reports available?
# Are PAN records required?
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime?
If so, has it been applied?
Are operational logs present?
Are lab sheets available for review?
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR?
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
Comment:
N OLO
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑❑❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
•❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑•❑
LIMED
❑ ❑•❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑•
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

NDMR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0006941 FACILITY NAME: Stoney Creel}Elementary
COUNTY: Caswell TYPE: Spray Irrigation REVIEW PERIOD:ij') 2. to
Parameter
Freq.
Limit
or
4S
7g
7%
s%9j
$�g
jv/
t/GJ(
Flow
x
Monthly
3500
C
72r
'�_,67o
9 .
Qs
�t)o�
h±c1i419
7
pH
X
Weekly
G
1-„ (0
7
6
TRC
iA/Qe,k
J
0,
,06
0
0
BOD5
X
3 x Y
G
ag,3
13, a
NH3-N
X
3 x Year
G
ay,b
a)4,
TSS
X
3 x Year
G
-A-1
a,
Fecal
X
3 x Year
G
Qgtiq
3
DO
TDS
Conductivity
Temp.
COD
TOC
Phenols
O&G
NO2&NO3
NO3
X
3 x Year
G
0, i)i.
‹,,,cos
-
TN
X
3 x Year
G
`
q, it
7,Y;
TKN
X
3 x Year
G
D&
-
alb'
TP
X
3 x Year
G
7,
S,07
Residual CI
X
Weekly
G
Sulfide
SAR
As
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Cu
Pb
Mg
Hg
Ni
K
Na
Zn
Comments: Event* = Once per event

NDAR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0006941 FACILITY NAME:Stoney Creek Elementary
COUNTY:Caswell TYPE:Spray Irrigation REVIEW PERIOD: tip to
Storage Freeboard ( 2 feet) Y or N
\`
'1
\
y
' 1
i
Field
Acres
Cover
crop
HourlyYearly�'
Rate
Rate
1l iR
if
! l
n
1%
X -
i) �'
(6
qk
%(
pv
1
3.12
Forest
0.3
18.7"
✓
V
y
Z�>�
Comments:
~ to 0 0.03+k Cu-\!Ie,)'`. t+,k dinC7

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION
General Information
FacilityName'Soy\c Cree County: sWP 1
Permit No.: WQ00 O(,IM I Issuance Date:Ct (e ( I b
p sw e Coy. r- t o F Cr-)ur 4 ir-\ Expiration Date. (11a k
Owner:
ORC Name: €4 1.e Y\ n YD r ;
Backup ORC:cD0v�,, r \ c
Other Contact --
Location (address, gps or directions):
Telephone No.:33C4 -4O8 --le(
Telephone No..36o -
Telephone No.:
e-RX-SG»a 'Rocca > CZ-€\dSU 1)�
eason for Inspection
ROUTINE ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ COMPLAINT ❑ PERMITTING ❑ Other:
Comments (attach additional pages as necessary)
(V\Q51- VC.) N(*ti OR C, S i r N r p lc Q ., C hec_v e_tk ok•I.4', mo o-\
-s Y� , 0 K , A 5 k ca oe b o u -r- p .4 A A d{ G2 slick&
c.\(\:\or'l n a ‘(\.-1Ze-(StA5-c-vv` e'v\-4- s , CV\ c_ c_ 1.c---d-'\'‘ut- c-k1,-;,.,
i`l0 Cr �o-c me__01 c ck\-•%s aC to 1 n2oo-Q
C ►'\~�&C-�- t r� L�,1 1 0 r t � ct�'"o r- '� �'10Gt s °�O t r�ro c,C
�` �' (,� t,v �t � I �c v� �,� � �-p � 4-0 s�'�a� ��� jilt nl rue
ct-
p r 0 b
1 - l e e
RQ-kcr,,,. Irl1(� 11(cyiL1e_ i-0
e© t�a� J l" 1v Ve •r`i t4)e,
T CV (N_r0Ss Cv\tp(`; ,..r^
11 Cl � I o ©i- i3�� c l'UO ��' I yA l
O r k r� � �rUr Is Y\ S. c'e-C+ S P-1-61-‘,1(1 --P.2 (9( . ---C1)54eN.-\\._
e� 6` e� e � � p �
� `� PGDaJ(e Y,,� ,v ,r S1r
bcy,
Is a follow-up inspection necessary ❑ Yes JM No
Primary Inspector:
Date of Inspection: C--)
C` e:p j 9 Secondary Inspector:
j ‘ 1 I crEntry Time. ' 1 �Exit Time: ( ( ; 'OS

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Record Keeping and Reporting Information
Is current permit available upon request?
Has the facility been free of public complaints for the last 12 months?
Are maintenance and inspection logs present (date & time of inspections, visual observations,
any maintenance (adjustments, cleanings, equip changes) or repairs taken)?
Are weekly freeboard records present?
Are irrigation tracking records present (date, weather, volume, length time, field #,
Hydraulic loading, nutrient loading, other)?
❑ 11
1=1--- I I ❑ ❑
Has irrigation equipment been calibrated (once/permit cycle) & records present? I0AAe.,, ,t.❑
Are records present for residuals removal (date, volume, Residual Hauler tName, y
Name/permit of the receiving party or letter from Municipality)? ,\tr `' �`t',_ ] ❑
- Is an Operation & Maintenance Plan, and Spill Plan present? ❑ ❑
Effluent Monitoring:
Were effluent monitoring reports present? mil NDMR )in NDAR ❑ NDML ©' ❑
Are flow rates less than permitted flow? Permitted Flow: .3.- OC)O ecx i t46,14,12
❑
Are application rates adhered to? Permitted Rate: P K% .1 & i n ,r • "'t0 In'e4s-- ©' ❑
Are lab sheets available for review and support monitoring reports?
Are samples analyzed for the required parameters (See permit)? I] !' ❑Li ❑EY
If required, are PAN records present and complete? ❑ ❑ ❑'
Effluent concentrations do NOT exceed 2L GW standards?
Y N NA NE
Or E
Er ❑ ❑ 0
EY ❑
Groundwater Monitoring:
Is groundwater monitoring required?
Were GW_759's and lab results present?
Were samplesanalyzed for the required parameters (See permit)?
Observed records in4icate no 2L GW quality violations?
Soil Analysis:
Were annual soil analyses results present for each irriga ion fiel ?
If lime was called for on the Agronomist report, was lime applied?
Copper and Zinc indices: ❑ < 2,000 ❑ 2,000 — 3,000
Was Sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm3 ?
Was Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) Less than 15% ?
❑ >3,000
Influent Pump Station(s) Cl Check box if component is listed in permit description.
All pumps present, operational
Floats/Controls operable
Audio & Visual Alarms Operational
Free of bypass lines or structures
General housekeeping good
Back-up power available, routinely tested & fueled?
`"-
Treatment Barscreen ❑ Check box if component is listed in permit description.
Are ba s" aced properly & free of excess debris?
Are scree nllg isisposed of properly?
Is unit in good Z'Zlition (excess corrosion)?
Equalization Basin ❑ Check box if component is listed in petmiiWestrtkion.
Is aeration present?
Are pumps present.and operational?
Is unit in good gene l condition?
r1)"t vva.
Page 1 of 3
❑ n
Ell ❑ ❑
Y
u
N
vl
NA NE
E.
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
NA NE
Y N NA
❑ V' ❑
❑ E E Yam/
II
NE
❑

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Treatment Activated Sludge ❑ Check box if component is listed in permit description.
Aeration Tnechanism operable & accessible?
Aeration basin t1Loroughly mixed?
Settleometer & dissb1v,ed oxygen results acceptable?
Is sludge an acceptable Cblc
Residual Storage/Treatment
oon ❑ Basin eptic Tank Capacity (gallonsJ�
If Septic Tank, is a sanitary T or filter present? pE' ) L t, ,
How often are residuals pumped?
Tre1atment Filter(s) ❑ Check box if component is listed in permit description.
Is unit'accessible for review (i.e. inspection port or not subsurface)?
Is the filte'N 1edia present, correct size & type?
Is mud well fee of excess solids and filter media?
Is media free of pbnO:Ing, algae or excess vegetation?
Is clear well free of eXtIsss..solids and filter media?
Does backwashing/air scoui''fr,quency appear adequate?
Treatment Clarifiers ❑ Check box if component is listed in permit description.
Weirs level; #' a of excessive solids & algae?
Scum removalsyte operational and accessible?
Sludge blanket at acceptable level?
Clarifier effluent free of excive solids?
Treatment Disinfection
Type: jj T blets ❑ Gas ❑ Liquid ❑ UV
Is the system properly maintained and working? /
Fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection? (10 j
Adequate detention time (> 30 minutes)`', qus t) t .`4 !�
If tablets, proper size & type? ) 11 P
Present in Cylinder(s)? S� ���• �(
If UV bulbs, are replacement bulbs on hand?
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids and growth? nIk' 1 i
y
Flow Measurement �
Flowmeter location: 04iifluent ❑ Effluent
Is flowmeter calibrated annually (design flow >10,000 gpd)?
Is flowmeter operating properly?
Does flowmeter record flow?
If no flowmeter (<10,000 gpd), are water -use records available (water meter)?
Are the daily average values properly calculated?
(f •s
Y N
❑ LI
Y N
NA NE
❑
NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
S6.001
Y
Y
N
N
u
NA NE
NA
Y N NA
Cl ❑ ❑
❑ Et' ❑
117 °E1-1❑ °n
❑ ❑ E
n E" n
II
NE
111
NE
J
II
a a n
E/ • n Er ❑ El
°
❑ Ft'
°
II
Treatment Y i N NA NE
Are treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in permit? [f❑ n ❑
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? If no, note below. ©' In ❑ El
List any items/units):
Page1�of vu
C4,�f+� t�o,�O Ia1/49 �
1 ▪ '
1
(. ouKi

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
uent Storage
agoon(s) ❑ Above ground tank(s) ❑ Underground tank(s) ❑Other:
Amount of Storage (days, months, gallons, etc.): l YES 6,1 n "A-t4e4( P 1 iErrl 5
Effluent Storage Lagoon(s) ❑ Primary ❑ Secondary
Influent structure(s) free of obstructions?
No signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion on embankments?
Proper vegetation type w/ no excessive vegetation present on embankments?
Liner (if visible, is it intact)?
Baffles/curtains in good condition?
Freeboard is >2 feet from overtopping? Measurement at time of inspection: (1, .S
Staff gauge is clearly marked?
No evidence of overflow (vegetation discolored or laying down/broken)?
No unusual color (very black, textile colors)?
No Foam present? Are antifoam agents used? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No floating mats (sludge, plants, inorganics)? ,.1[2:u1/4c_k ,w ,��k
No signs of excessive solids buildup (from bottom)?
Aerators/mixers operational (if present)?
Effluent structure is free of obstructions and easily accessible?
Effluent Pump station
All pumps present, operational
Floats/Controls operable
Audio & Visual Alarms Operational Li \A+ Kc A__ wcnr, k v
Free of bypass lines or structures
If required, is a rain sensor present and operational
General housekeeping good
Back-up power :QQy�-}— E .s C:�c��l
End Use -Irrigation Number of Fields: r
Are buffers adequate?
Are cover crops the type specified in permit and/or in good condition?
No signs of runoff, ponding, or drift?
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
Is the application equipment present, operational, and in good condition?
No limiting slopes present in irrigation fields?
Is site access restricted and/or signs posted in accordance with permit?
No water supply wells within the CB?
No water supply wells within 250' of the CB?
Is permit being followed?
Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Does the permit require monitoring wells? If so, answer the following.
Are the monitoring wells properly installed according to the permit?
Are the monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB & CB?
Are the wells properly identified & free of damage?
Page 1 of 4
N
n
n
II
n
Y
-El El
II
PA
1
N
NA
C
n
n
n
u
u
n
NA
N NA
❑ ❑
II
❑ ❑
NE
n
NE
II
II
II
II
NE
I
Il
u
u
El El
II
❑ LI ❑
Y N
NA NE